20160130 Ver 1 _Year 1 Report _20170928

North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC's North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Bank
Monitoring Year 1 Report
September 2017
kt�
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]

MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC's North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Bank
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................2
1.1 Project Description................................................................................................................. 2
1.2 Bank Sponsor.......................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Project History........................................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Project Location...................................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Project Design......................................................................................................................... 3
2 VEGETATION MONITORING....................................................................................................4
2.1 Success Criteria....................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol................................................................... 4
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring.......................................................................................... 5
2.4 Parcel Maintenance................................................................................................................5
2.5 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................6
3 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................6
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Reporting History
Table 2 Tree and Shrub Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Table 3 Character/ Existing Tree and Shrub Species (Piedmont Bottomland Forest)
Table 4 Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting
Table 5 Monitoring Plot Summary—Year 1
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1 Parcel Location
Figure 2 Service Area
Figure 3 Credit Generation Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Locations
Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results
Appendix E: Overview Photos
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1
Monitoring Year 1 Report

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Description
The North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel (Site) is a part of the
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC (Sponsor) North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank
(Bank). The purpose of the Bank is to provide riparian buffer credits to compensate for buffer impacts
within the Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 and to provide nutrient offset payments within the Falls Lake
Watershed. The Site location is depicted on Figure 1.
The Site is located in a rural watershed within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201) and within sub -
basin 02-00-10 depicted on Figure 2. Stormwater runoff drains into eight identified features (A -H): three
unnamed tributaries to the North Fork of the Little River and five ditches. All Site features flow into
unnamed tributary Feature A, which then flows into another unnamed tributary to the North Fork of the
Little River, the Little River, the Little River Reservoir, the Eno River, and ultimately into Falls Lake. All of
the intermittent streams on the Site are classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by DWR. The Little
River Reservoir is a major source of drinking water for the City of Durham; Falls Lake is a major source of
drinking water for the City of Raleigh. To protect these reservoirs, the Little River and its waters are also
classified as Water Supply II (WS -II) and as a High Quality Water (HQW) by DWR. Prior to construction,
the Site consisted primarily of open agricultural fields, used mainly in row crop production for corn.
Streams, ditches, and other stormwater conveyances on the Site had little to no riparian buffer and
were mowed in most locations on an annual basis.
The project included restoring the buffer along North Fork Little River, three unnamed tributaries, as
well as five ditches. Riparian and agricultural ditch buffers were restored on the Site in order to reduce
non -point source contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Falls Lake Watershed. The
project property is 33.43 acres and are protected with a permanent conservation easement. In general,
riparian buffer restoration area widths on streams extend out to 100 feet from top of bank for Neuse
River buffer credits and out to 200 feet for nutrient offset credits.
1.2 Bank Sponsor
The North Fork Little River Parcel is a part of the Bank. The Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) for the
Bank was signed on April 19, 2016.
Wildlands Holdings 11, LLC
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]
1.3 Project History
The MBI was approved in April 2016. The North Fork Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) was
approved and initial credit release obtained in May 2016. Project planting was completed in January
2017, and Year 1 project monitoring was completed in September 2017. Project history is provided in
Table 1.
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
Monitoring Year 1 Report

Table 1. Project Reporting History
Activity
Completion Date
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC Neuse MBI
April 2016
Bank Parcel Development Package Approved
May 2016
Conservation Easement
May 2016
Bare Root Planting
January 2017
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
April 2017
Year 1 Monitoring Completed
September 2017
1.4 Project Location
The Site is located in northwestern Durham County, approximately 14 miles north of the City of Durham
(36° 10' 9.48" N and 78° 55' 49.44" W) in a rural watershed within the Neuse River Basin (HUC
03020201) and within Division of Water Resources (DWR) sub -basin 02-00-10. To get to the Parcel from
downtown Durham, travel north on U.S. Highway 501 North for approximately 12.7 miles. Turn left ontc
S. Lowell Road and continue west for approximately 1.9 miles to the intersection with Johnson Mill
Road. The Parcel will be on the north side of S. Lowell Road at this intersection (Figure 1).
1.5 Project Design
The Site will generate 13.90 acres of Neuse riparian buffer credits and 18.31 acres of nutrient offset
credits. Therefore, based on 2,273 pounds of nitrogen per acre of riparian restoration the Site will
provide 41,619 pounds of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The Site will also provide 2,680.58 pounds of
phosphorus nutrient offset credits based on the 146.4 pounds of phosphorus per acre of riparian
restoration. Site credit generation is shown in Figure 3. The revegetation plan for the Site included
planting of bare root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Bare root trees selected for the Site
were native bottomland hardwood species typical for Piedmont Bottomland Forest communities as
defined by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Tree species selected for planting on the Site as well as size
specifications, planting density, and plant composition are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Tree and Shrub Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Scientific Name
Common Name
Size (feet)
Planting Density
Planting Composition
(Stems/Acre)
N
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
2-3
105
14.3
Liriodendron
2-3
105
14.3
Tulip Poplar
tulipifera
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2-3
105
14.3
Sycamore
Plantus occidentalis
2-3
105
14.3
River Birch
Betula nigra
2-3
105
14.3
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2-3
105
14.3
Fraxinus
2-3
105
14.3
Green Ash
pennsylvanica
Totals
I 735
100
Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shall be counted towards the survival and
success rate of the restored site. "Character Trees" are defined as planted or volunteer species
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
Monitoring Year 1 Report

identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from
reference literature that details native species. A list of Character Tree species (other than the planted
species) is included in Table 3.
Table 3. Character/Existing Tree and Shrub Species
(Piedmont Bottomland Forest*)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Wetland Indicator Status
Carya aquatica
Water Hickory
OBL
Quercus shumardii
Shumard Oak
FACW-
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
FACW
Ilex decidua
Deciduous Holly
FACW-
Nyssa aquatica
Water Tupelo
OBL
Salix nigra
Black Willow
OBL
Fraxinus caroliniana
Water Ash
OBL
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
FAC
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
FAC
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
FAC+
Pinus taeda
Loblolly Pine
FAC
Quercus rubra
Red Oak
FACU
Juniperus virginiana
Eastern Red Cedar
FACU-
Notes: *Source: Schafale & Weakley (1990)
2.0 Vegetation Monitoring
2.1 Success Criteria
Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of Character Tree species as
defined in Tables 2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria is based upon guidelines set forth in the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015), and is defined as a success
rate equivalent to 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5 -year monitoring period.
If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined
monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates
that portions of the Site do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient, supplemental
planting shall be performed with tree species approved by NCDWR. Supplemental planting shall be
performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative measurements of herb
assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria.
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling
Protocol (CVS) Protocol (Levels I & 11) such that at least 2 percent of the Site is encompassed in
monitoring plots. A total of 27 plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were established within the credit
generation area. PVC pipe was used to mark the four corners of the plots. Monitoring plot locations are
shown in Figure 4. GPS points were taken at each of the corners. A reference photo was taken from the
southwest corner of each plot (Appendix D). All planted stems within the plots were marked with
flagging tape and recorded. Total numbers of tree species planted within the monitoring plots as well as
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
Monitoring Year 1 Report

planting density and plant composition are detailed in Table 4. Detailed results of the Monitoring Year 1
stem count are summarized in Appendix C.
Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built)
Scientific Name
Total Stems
Flagged
Calculated Planting Density
(Stems/Acre)
Planting Composition
(%)
Betula nigra
56
84
14
Diospyros virginiana
53
79
13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
61
91
15
Liriodendron tulipifera
60
90
15
Platanus occidentalis
61
91
15
Quercus michauxii
53
79
13
Quercus phellos
60
90
15
Totals
404
606
100
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
The 27 vegetation plots were sampled in September 2017 at the end of the first growing season. A
reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot, which can be found in Appendix D
along with the stem count raw data. Total numbers of tree species identified within the monitoring plots
as well as density and composition are summarized in Table 5. Vegetation result tables with planted
stem density, and stem count by plot and species are summarized in Appendix C.
The monitoring year 1 vegetative survey was completed in September 2017. The 2017 vegetation
monitoring resulted in an average stem density of 501 stems per acre, which is greater than the final
requirement of 260 stems per acre, but less than the as -built density of 606 stems per acre recorded in
January 2017. The Site is on track to meet its final success criteria.
Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary—Year 1
Scientific Name
Total Stems Flagged
Calculated Live Stem
Density (Stems/Acre)
Live Stem Composition (°o)
Betula nigra
37
55
11
Diospyros virginiana
45
67
14
Froxinus pennsylvanica
57
86
17
Liriodendron tulipifera
44
66
13
Platanus occidentalis
43
64
13
Quercus michauxii
50
75
15
Quercus phellos
58
87
17
Totals
334
501
100
2.4 Parcel Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event
that the Site or a specific component of the Site fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the BPDP.
Site maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Site that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree mortality
caused by fire, flooding, drought, or insects. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria.
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
Monitoring Year 1 Report

2.5 Conclusions
The 2017 vegetation monitoring data reflects that the Site has not suffered significant mortality and is
on trajectory to achieve final vegetative success criteria of 260 stems per acre by the end of Monitoring
Year Five. No problems were identified, such as invasive species or excessive tree mortality, during
Monitoring Year One. Therefore, no corrective actions are required at this time.
3.0 References
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation.
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC (2016). North Fork Little River Banking Instrument. NCDWR, Raleigh NC.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks
W North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
Monitoring Year 1 Report

Appendix A: Figures

E
o'
`o
}fo ?d-�
g Lowell Rd
i-
i, r�� i 1•�
tiru
� I -
I
L
i berl A e I
I Il�u•II• f llll
I
I
I
,Prospect Hill
I I
i Rougem ont
;• i
I Stem
Bahama
I
Cedar Grove �, r I
r Rte, •, � � -
North Fork Little River Mitigation Site
� I
1 Butner
r .: ree�il
I '
i
Efland — Eno 1
Hillsborough RiaerState
85� Park ( -
4p
- J / Falls
Lake State
%creation
`Atea
I r
V< /� � t
,.•�'.; UnD�ersity� Durham
--�------Z) � o
p X543 ft
Carrboro r
Figure 1 Parcel Location
North Fork Little River Mitigation Site
WILD LANDS o 2 4 Miles HUC 03020201
t t t
ENGINEERING
Durham County, NC

I I
-I I
- Service Area - Nutrient Offset Credits
Service Area- Riparian Buffer
5a /
J; County Boundaries
- / -
th Fork Little River Mitigation Site
-
/
Creedmoor
�Z. Louisburg l
i
r
--
.
r
Z4.0,
huf,d,i,�,� ndeii
cart' ;

v
200'
T
FeptUre G
0 WILDLANDS o 150 sooFeet
ENGINEERING
FP4t4re B
coo
�4
P
f•'
Conservation Easement Area (33.43 ac)
Zone A (0-50') Buffer Restoration (8.34 ac)
Zone B (51'-100') Buffer Restoration (5.56 ac)
Zone A (0-50') Nutrient Offset (1.08 ac)
Zone B (51'-100') Nutrient Offset (3.18 ac)
Zone C (100'-200') Nutrient Offset (14.05 ac)
No Credit (0.41 ac)
- Jurisdictional Stream
A Ditch
Figure 3 Credit Generation Map
North Fork Little River Mitigation Site
HUC 03020201
Durham County, NC

Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map
North Fork Little River Mitigation Site
0 WI LD LAN D S 0 150 300 Feet HUC 03020201
ENGINEERING
Durham County, NC

Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger

North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset & Buffer Bank (HUC 03020201 Upper Falls Watershed)
Buffer Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 09-05-17 WILD LANDS
DWR Project #: 2016-0130 HOLDINGSO
Sale/
Release Date
Purchaser or % Credit Release
Project Name
Credits
Released/Available to
Bank
Credits Debited/Sold From
Bank
Buffer Credit Balance
Gov't
Requiring
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
5/26/2016
7/12/2016
1st Credit Release (20%)
Shotwell Landfill
Shotwell Landfill
121,096.80
2.78
5,753.68
-
0.13
121,096.80
115,343.12
2.78
2.65
NCDWR
NCDWR
8/10/2016
DWR Approved Transfer to North Fork
Little River Nutrient Offset Ledgers
115,343.12
2.65
0.00
NCDWR
4/11/2017
2nd Credit Release (20%)
121,096.80
2.78
121,096.80
2.78
NCDWR
6/1/2017
3rd Credit Release (10%)
60,548.40
1.39
181,645.20
4.17
NCDWR
Totals
302,742.00
6.95
121,096.80
2.78
181,645.20
4.17

North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset & Buffer Bank (HUC 03020201 Upper Falls Watershed)
Nitrogen Credit Ledger WILD LANDS
Date Last Updated: 09-05-17 HOLDINGS OO
DWR Project #: 2016-0130
Sale/
Credits Released/Available to
Release
Purchaser or %Credit Release
Project Name
Credits Debited/Sold From Bank
Nutrient Credit Balance
Gov't Requiring
Date
Bank
Pounds of
Pounds of
Acres
Pounds of Nitrogen
Acres
Acres
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
05/26/16
1st Credit Release (20%)
8,364.71
3.68
-
8,364.71
3.68
NCDWR
06/29/16
Wexford Chesterfield Parking
West Pettigrew Parking Deck
505.00
0.222
7,859.71
3.46
City of Durham
06/29/16
Wexford Chesterfield Parking
West Pettigrew Parking Deck (Assigned to Durham)
25.25
0.011
7,834.46
3.45
1 City of Durham
08/10/16
DWR Approved Transfer from North Fork Little River Buffer Ledger
6,023.50
2.65
13,857.96
6.10
NCDWR
08/15/16
Croasdaile Farms Apartments
The Lodge at Croasdail Farm
1,179.44
0.519
12,678.52
5.58
City of Durham
08/15/16
Croasdaile Farms Apartments
The Lodge at Croasdail Farm (Assigned to Durham)
58.97
0.026
12,619.55
5.55
City of Durham
08/22/16
Bold Run, LLC
Bold Run Subdivision
163.09
0.072
12,456.46
5.48
Wake County
09/01/16
White Oaks Mangum Flats LP
515 North Mangum
52.73
0.023
12,403.73
5.46
City of Durham
09/01/16
White Oaks Mangum Flats LP
515 North Mangum (Assigneed to Durham)
2.64
0.001
12,401.09
5.46
City of Durham
09/15/16
MREC Brightleaf, LLC
Brightleaf at the Park Tract 12
588.84
0.259
11,812.25
5.20
City of Durham
09/15/16
MREC Brightleaf, LLC
Brightleaf at the Park Tract 12 (Assigned to Durham)
29.44
0.013
11,782.81
5.18
City of Durham
09/21/16
Goodwill Community Foundation
Goodwill - Wake Forest Highway
161.84
0.071
11,620.97
5.11
City of Durham
09/21/16
Goodwill Community Foundation
Goodwill - Wake Forest Highway (Assigned to Durham)
8.09
0.004
11,612.88
5.11
City of Durham
09/26/16
Avalaire Land, LLC
Avalaire
994.96
0.438
10,617.92
4.67
Wake County
09/27/16
Shall Homes, Inc.
The SIKH Gurdwara of North Carolina
194.97
0.086
10,422.95
4.59
City of Durham
09/27/16
Shail Homes, Inc.
The SIKH Gurdwara of North Carolina (Assigned to Durham;
9.75
0.004
10,413.20
4.58
City of Durham
09/28/16
STIHL
STIHL Expansion
12.64
0.006
10,400.56
4.58
Hillsborough
01/06/17
L R Jacobs, LLC
4915 Hillsborough Rd
293.37
0.129
10,107.19
4.45
Orange County
01/24/17
2nd Credit Release - Partial (15%)
6,273.53
2.76
-
16,380.72
7.21
NCDWR
02/08/17
Whiting -Turner Contracting
West Pettigrew Parking Deck -Supplemental
10.66
0.005
16,370.06
7.20
City of Durham
03/23/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar- Old Oxford
119.13
0.052
16,250.93
7.15
City of Durham
04/11/17
2nd Credit Release - Partial (5%)
2,091.18
0.92
18,342.11
8.07
NCDWR
04/18/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage
89.11
0.039
18,253.00
8.03
City of Durham
04/18/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage (assigned to Durham;
4.46
0.002
18,248.54
8.03
City of Durham
04/30/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage - Revised Buydown
39.61
0.017
18,213.39
8.01
City of Durham
04/30/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage - Revised Buydown (assigned to Durham)
1.98
0.001
18,211.41
8.01
City of Durham
05/08/17
Cimland, LLC
Wynngate Subdivision
547.43
0.241
17,663.98
7.77
Town of Butner
05/22/17
McKee Building Group, Inc.
Food Lion Distribution Center
232.99
0.103
17,430.99
7.67
Town of Butner
06/01/17
3rd Credit Release (10%)
4,080.08
1.80
21,511.07
9.46
NCDWR
06/21/17
SHHP East Durham LLC
2102 Angier Avenue Rennovations
42.54
0.019
21,468.53
9.44
City of Durham
06/21/17
SHHP East Durham LLC
2102 Angier Avenue Rennovations (assigned to Durham)
2.13
0.001
21,466.40
9.44
City of Durham
06/26/17
Hubrich Contracting
Falls Lake High School -Academy Additior
276.05
0.121
21,190.35
9.32
Town of Butner
07/11/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar 715698
65.57
0.029
21,124.78
9.32
City of Durham
07/11/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar 715698 (assigned to Durham;
3.28
0.001
21,121.50
9.29
City of Durham
07/18/17
Durack Investments, LLC
Leah Drive Flex Space
96.16
0.042
21,025.34
9.29
Town of Hillsborough
07/19/17
Lennar Carolinas LLC
Sherron Road Tracts 8 & 9
1,596.56
0.702
19,428.78
8.59
City of Durham
07/19/17
Lennar Carolinas LLC (assigned to Durham)
Sherron Road Tracts 8 & 9 (assigned to Durham;
79.83
0.035
19,348.95
8.55
City of Durham
07/31/17
First Continental
The Villages of Applewood Subdivisior
961.50
0.423
18,387.45
8.13
Granville County
08/09/17
Southern Hills Developers, LLC
Southern Hills Estates
178.00
0.078
18,209.45
8.05
Wake County
Totals
26,833.00
11.81
8,628.01
3.80
18,204.99
8.01

North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset & Buffer Bank (HUC 03020201 Upper Falls Watershed)
Phosphorus Credit Ledger WILD LAND S
Date Last Updated: 09-05-17
HOLDINGS O
DWR Project #: 2016-0130
Sale/
Credits Released/Available to
Release
Purchaser or % Credit Release
Project Name
Credits Debited/Sold From Bank
Nutrient Credit Balance
Gov't Requiring
Date
Bank
Pounds of
Pounds of
Pounds of
Phosporus
Acres
Phosporus
Acres
Phosporus
Acres
05/26/16
1st Credit Release (20%)
538.75
3.68
538.75
3.68
NCDWR
06/29/16
Wexford Chesterfield Parking
West Pettigrew Parking Deck
73.11
0.4994
465.64
3.18
City of Durham
06/29/16
Wexford Chesterfield Parking
West Pettigrew Parking Deck (Assigned to Durham)
3.66
0.0250
461.98
3.16
City of Durham
08/08/16
DWR Approved Transfer from North Fork Little River Buffer Ledger
387.96
2.65
849.94
5.81
NCDWR
08/15/16
Croasdaile Farms Apartments
The Lodge at Croasdail Farm
241.94
1.65
608.00
4.15
City of Durham
08/15/16
Croasdaile Farms Apartments
The Lodge at Croasdail Farm (Assigned to Durham)
12.10
0.08
595.90
4.07
City of Durham
08/22/16
Bold Run, LLC
Bold Run Subdivision
46.60
0.32
549.30
3.75
Wake County
09/01/16
White Oaks Mangum Flats LP
515 N. Mangum
13.95
0.10
535.35
3.66
City of Durham
09/01/16
White Oaks Mangum Flats LP
515 N. Mangum (Assigned to Durham)
0.70
0.00
534.65
3.65
City of Durham
09/21/16
Goodwill Community Foundation
Goodwill - Wake Forest Hwy
23.31
0.16
511.34
3.49
City of Durham
09/21/16
Goodwill Community Foundation
Goodwill - Wake Forest Hwy (Assigned to Durham)
1.17
0.01
510.17
3.48
City of Durham
09/26/16
Availaire Land, LLC
Avalaire
211.02
1.44
299.15
2.04
Wake County
09/27/16
Shail Homes, Inc.
The SIKH Gurdwara of NC
16.83
0.11
282.32
1.93
City of Durham
09/27/16
Shall Homes, Incl.
The SIKH Gurdwara of NC (Assigned to Durham)
0.84
0.01
281.48
1.92
City of Durham
01/06/17
L R Jacobs, LLC
4915 Hillsborough Rd
34.65
0.24
246.83
1.69
Orange County
01/24/17
2nd Credit Release - Partial (15%)
404.06
2.76
650.89
4.45
NCDWR
02/08/17
Whiting -Turner Contracting
West Pettigrew Parking Deck - Supplemental
3.05
0.02
647.84
4.43
City of Durham
03/23/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar -Old Oxford
5.51
0.04
642.33
4.39
City of Durham
04/11/17
2nd Credit Release - Partial (5%)
134.69
0.92
777.02
5.31
NCDWR
04/18/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage
44.89
0.31
732.13
5.00
City of Durham
04/18/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage (assigned to Durham)
2.24
0.02
729.89
4.99
City of Durham
04/30/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage - Revised Buydown
(10.57)
(0.07)
740.46
5.06
City of Durham
04/30/17
Sifen, Inc.
Roxboro Mini Price Storage- Revised Buydown (assigned to Durham)
(0.52)
(0.00)
740.98
5.06
City of Durham
05/08/17
Cimland, LLC
Wynngate Subdivision
160.58
1.10
580.40
3.96
Town of Butner
05/10/17
Croasdaile Farms Three, LLC
Crystal Lake Subdivision
2.11
0.01
578.29
3.95
City of Durham
05/10/17
Croasdaile Farms Three, LLC
Crystal Lake Subdivision (assigned to Durham)
0.11
0.00
578.18
3.95
City of Durham
05/22/17
McKee Building Group, Inc.
Food Lion Distribution Center
23.75
0.16
554.43
3.79
Town of Butner
06/01/17
3rd Credit Release (10%)
262.89
1.80
817.32
5.58
NCDWR
06/21/17
SHHP East Durham LLC
2102 Angier Avenue Rennovations
18.81
0.13
798.51
5.45
City of Durham
06/21/17
SHHP East Durham LLC
2102 Angier Avenue Rennovations (assigned to Durham)
0.94
0.01
797.57
5.45
City of Durham
06/26/17
Hubrich Contracting
Falls Lake High School -Academy Addition
69.01
0.47
728.56
4.98
Town of Butner
07/11/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar 715698
9.56
0.07
719.00
4.91
City of Durham
07/11/17
Stronach Properties
Family Dollar 715698 (assigned to Durham)
0.48
0.00
718.52
4.91
City of Durham
07/18/17
Durack Investments, LLC
Leah Drive Flex Space
7.16
0.05
711.36
4.86
Town of Hillsborough
07/19/17
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Sherron Road Tracts 8 & 9
168.66
1.15
542.70
3.71
City of Durham
07/19/17
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Sherron Road Tracts 8 & 9 (assigned to Durham)
8.43
0.06
534.27
3.65
City of Durham
07/31/17
First Continental
The Villages of Applewood
123.80
0.85
410.47
2.80
Granville County
08/09/17
Southern Hills Developers, LLC
Southern Hills Estates
32.00
0.22
378.47
2.59
Wake County
Totals
1,728.35
11.81
1,349.88
6.06
378.47
2.59

Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2017
Plot
Year
Northing
Easting
Planted Living
Stems
Missing
Stems
Volunteer
Stems
Total Living
Stems
Planted
Living Stems
per Acre
Total Living
Stems per
Acre
Number
of Total
Species
Vegetation
Threshold
Met?*
NF1
1
879517.722
2019970.38
9
6
0
9
364
364
5
Yes
NF2
1
879830.491
2019995.925
14
1
0
14
567
567
5
Yes
NF3
1
880253.125
2020336.51
13
1
0
13
526
526
7
Yes
NF4
1
880563.522
2020703.412
10
5
0
10
405
405
7
Yes
NF5
1
880758.584
2020438.685
12
3
0
12
486
486
7
Yes
NF6
1
881068.206
2020590.4
12
3
0
12
486
486
4
Yes
NF7
1
881264.042
2020689.479
12
3
0
12
486
486
4
Yes
NF8
1
881338.352
2020912.408
13
2
0
13
526
526
6
Yes
NF9
1
881229.21
2020973.538
10
5
0
10
405
405
5
Yes
NF10
1
881129.357
2021308.724
11
4
0
11
445
445
5
Yes
NF11
1
881017.118
2021542.489
12
3
0
12
486
486
7
Yes
NF12
1
880830.571
2021608.284
13
2
0
13
526
526
5
Yes
NF13
1
880726.847
2021464.309
12
3
0
12
486
486
6
Yes
NF14
1
880932.746
2021195.712
14
1
0
14
567
567
6
Yes
NF15
1
881075.947
2020823.391
11
4
0
11
445
445
4
Yes
NF16
1
880817.412
2020828.81
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
NF17
1
880854.567
2021070.315
14
1
0
14
567
567
7
Yes
NF18
1
880685.048
2021228.996
13
2
0
13
526
526
5
Yes
NF19
1
880488.341
2021229.735
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
NF20
1
880708.27
2021003.746
12
3
0
12
486
486
5
Yes
NF21
1
880555.781
2020946.466
14
1
0
14
567
567
7
Yes
NF22
1
880594.936
2020646.132
10
5
0
10
405
405
6
Yes
NF23
1
880353.752
2020703.412
12
3
0
12
486
486
6
Yes
NF24
1
880136.243
2020564.082
13
2
0
13
526
526
6
Yes
NF25
1
879828.943
2020405.401
12
3
0
12
486
486
5
Yes
NF26
1
879828.943
2020155.381
12
3
0
12
486
486
5
Yes
NF27
1
879356.768
2020139.9
14
1
0
14
567
567
6
Yes
*Target density is a minimum of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2017
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY1 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
40040-01-0001
Pri P -all T
40040-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Diospyrosvirginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
4
4
4
1 1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
ITree
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
lWillow Oak
ITree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
9
5
364
9
1
0.1
5
364
9
5
364
14
5
5'
14
1
0.1
5
567
14
5
567
13
7
iW,'I
13
1
0.02
7
526
13
7
526
10 10
1
0.02
7 7
405
10
7
405
12
7
12
1
0.1
7
486
12
7
486
12
4
486
12
1
0.1
4
486
12 12
4 1�0�.0�2�j
486
12
1
1
12
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plc
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2017
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYI 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
40040-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyrosvirginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2 2
2
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1 1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
ITree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
lWillow Oak
ITree
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
4 1 4 1
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
6
526
13
1
0.02
6
1 526 1
13
6
526
10
5
JKM
10
1
0.02
5
405
10
5
405
11
5
445
11
1
0.02
5
1 445 1
11
5
445
12 1 12 1
1
0.02
7 7
111'v` 11 486 1
12
7
486
13
5
13
1
0.02
5
13
5
12
6
12
1
0.02
6
1 486 1
12 14
6 6
486 6
14
1
0.02
6
567 1
14
6
567
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plc
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2017
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYI 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
40040-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0016
Pri P -all T
40040-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0018
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0019
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0020
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0021
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
3
3
3
2 2
2
1
1
1
2 2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Diospyrosvirginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
4 4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
3 3
3
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
3 3
3
2
2
2
3 3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
3 3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
ITree
3 3
3
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
lWillow Oak
ITree
3
3
3
1 1
1
2
2
2i
i
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
4
445
11
1
0.02
4
445
11 15 15
1
0.02
4 6 6
445 �'r. N 607 1
15 14
6 7
607:$0 11
14
1
0.02
7
567 1
14 13 1 13 1
1
0.02
7 5 5
567 JIM 11 526 1
13
5
526
15
6
6 1
15
1
0.02
6
607 1
15
6
607
12
5
12
1
0.02
5
486
12
5
486
14
7
1
14
1
0.02
7
567
14
7
567
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plc
North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Monitoring Year 1-2017
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY1 2017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
40040-01-0022
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0023
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0024
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0025
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0026
PnoLS P -all T
40040-01-0027
PnoLS P -all T
MY1(2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO(2017)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1
2 2
2
2
2
2
37
37
37
56
56
56
Diospyrosvirginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
45
45
45
53
53
53
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
3 3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
57
57
57
61
61
61
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2 2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
44
44
44
60
60
60
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2 2
2
4 4
4
2
2
2
43
43
43
61
61
61
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
ITree
1
1
1
2 2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
5050
50
53
53
53
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
4 4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
58
58
58
60
60
60
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
StemsperACRE
10
6
405
10
1
0.02
6
1 405 1
10
6
405
12
6
12
1
0.02
6
486 1
12
6
486
13 13
1
0.02
6 6
% 526 1
13
6
526
12 12
1
0.02
5 5
11 'OA 486 1
12
5
486
12
5
1 4ftj
12
1
0.02
5
486 1
12
5
486
14
6
14
1
0.02
6
1 567 1
14
6
567
334
1 7
11 SK 11
334
27
0.67
7
501
334
7
1 501
404
7
IWOM
404
27
0.67
7
606
404
7
606
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requiremenss, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%,
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 1- Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
1
Betula nigra
0.4
0.8
Missing
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.4
2.6
Missing
3
Platanus occidentalis
0.4
4.5
112
4
Quercus michauxii
0.4
6.7
83
5
Quercus phellos
0.5
9.1
Missing
6
Quercus michauxii
5.0
8.8
15
7
Platanus occidentalis
4.9
6.8
110
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.0
4.4
68
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.9
2.4
21
10
Quercus phellos
5.1
0.8
Missing
11
Platanus occidentalis
9.2
0.8
Missing
12
Quercus michauxii
9.3
2.9
Missing
13
Quercus michauxii
9.2
5.1
67
14
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.2
7.2
27
15
Quercus phellos
9.3
9.4
44
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 2 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.5
0.7
54
17
Quercus phellos
0.4
2.9
25
18
Quercus michauxii
0.3
5.0
69
19
Quercus phellos
0.3
7.2
79
20
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.3
9.0
87
21
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.2
9.2
72
22
Quercus michauxii
4.3
6.9
55
23
Quercus michauxii
4.0
5.3
81
24
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.7
3.3
88
25
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.7
1.0
74
26
Quercus phellos
9.3
1.2
41
27
Diospyros virginiana
9.4
3.1
68
28
Betula nigra
9.4
5.3
Missing
29
Betula nigra
9.2
7.4
26
30
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
9.7
60
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 3 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
31
Quercus michauxii
0.2
0.5
54
32
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.3
3.2
49
33
Betula nigra
0.4
5.0
77
34
Platanus occidentalis
0.6
7.3
62
35
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.5
9.7
48
36
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.0
9.2
82
37
Diospyros virginiana
5.1
7.2
72
38
Platanus occidentalis
5.4
4.9
Missing
39
Quercus phellos
5.2
3.2
50
40
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.9
1.2
54
41
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
1.2
72
42
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.1
3.3
64
43
Betula nigra
9.1
4.9
49
44
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.2
9.4
35
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 4 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
47
Diospyros virginiana
0.4
0.7
52
48
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.4
3.2
Missing
49
Diospyros virginiana
0.5
5.2
47
50
Diospyros virginiana
0.5
7.1
59
51
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.6
9.3
65
52
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.2
8.9
8
53
Diospyros virginiana
5.5
7.0
Missing
54
Platanus occidentalis
5.5
5.5
Missing
55
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.5
3.4
Missing
56
Betula nigra
5.3
1.0
Missing
57
Quercus michauxii
9.1
0.6
68
58
Platanus occidentalis
9.2
2.5
33
59
Platanus occidentalis
9.3
4.9
54
60
Betula nigra
9.3
7.1
103
61
Quercus phellos
9.2
9.6
62
0"
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 5 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
62
Platanus occidentalis
0.1
1.7
74
63
Platanus occidentalis
0.2
4.3
36
64
Diospyros virginiana
0.4
6.0
44
65
Betula nigra
0.6
8.1
116
66
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.7
9.5
45
67
Quercus phellos
4.6
9.0
56
68
Quercus michauxii
4.6
7.3
67
69
Diospyros virginiana
4.7
5.5
46
70
Quercus phellos
4.7
3.6
43
71
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
1.7
14
72
Diospyros virginiana
9.2
1.4
55
73
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.2
3.7
Missing
74
Diospyros virginiana
9.2
5.3
48
75
Betula nigra
9.1
7.4
Missing
76
Platanus occidentalis
9.0
9.5
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 6 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
77
Platanus occidentalis
0.3
1.0
70
78
Quercus phellos
0.3
3.3
47
79
Quercus phellos
0.3
5.4
41
80
Betula nigra
0.2
7.3
62
81
Betula nigra
0.2
8.2
44
82
Betula nigra
4.2
9.3
63
83
Betula nigra
4.4
7.6
32
84
Quercus michauxii
4.5
5.3
Missing
85
Diospyros virginiana
4.5
5.9
58
86
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.5
1.2
Missing
87
Quercus phellos
9.1
0.9
25
88
Diospyros virginiana
9.2
2.8
24
89
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
5.4
Missing
90
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
7.6
34
91
Diospyros virginiana
9.0
9.0
10
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 7 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
94
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.1
0.5
68
95
Quercus michauxii
2.0
0.4
43
96
Diospyros virginiana
4.3
0.5
62
97
Diospyros virginiana
6.7
0.6
38
98
Diospyros virginiana
9.1
0.8
63
99
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
4.8
55
100
Diospyros virginiana
6.8
4.8
53
101
Betula nigra
4.7
4.6
Missing
102
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.5
4.5
57
103
Betula nigra
0.8
4.6
Missing
104
Platanus occidentalis
0.7
9.0
91
105
Platanus occidentalis
2.5
9.1
Missing
106
Quercus michauxii
4.8
9.2
72
107
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.1
9.2
67
108
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.9
9.2
59
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 8 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
109
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.4
1.1
85
110
Diospyros virginiana
2.9
1.1
Missing
111
Diospyros virginiana
4.9
1.2
59
112
Diospyros virginiana
6.6
0.8
62
113
Diospyros virginiana
9.0
0.6
65
114
Quercus phellos
9.0
5.1
65
115
Platanus occidentalis
7.2
5.2
54
116
Quercus phellos
5.1
5.2
66
117
Liriodendron tulipifera
3.3
5.4
72
118
Betula nigra
0.9
5.5
Missing
119
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1.0
9.7
58
120
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.7
9.8
77
121
Quercus michauxii
5.5
9.6
61
122
Quercus phellos
7.4
9.4
47
123
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.5
9.3
73
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 9 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
124
Platanus occidentalis
1.3
0.9
Missing
125
Betula nigra
4.0
0.8
97
126
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.3
0.8
72
127
Liriodendron tulipifera
7.5
0.8
Missing
128
Quercus phellos
9.4
0.8
75
129
Diospyros virginiana
8.0
5.2
Missing
130
Quercus michauxii
7.2
5.1
88
131
Quercus michauxii
5.4
5.1
39
132
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.3
5.0
72
133
Betula nigra
1.1
5.0
34
134
Betula nigra
0.7
9.2
Missing
135
Diospyros virginiana
3.2
9.4
46
136
Quercus phellos
5.2
9.5
35
137
Betula nigra
7.1
9.5
66
138
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.5
9.5
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 10 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
139
Betula nigra
1.2
0.6
69
140
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1.2
2.4
67
141
Liriodendron tulipifera
1.2
4.7
Missing
142
Diospyros virginiana
1.2
7.0
44
143
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1.1
9.4
63
144
Platanus occidentalis
5.5
9.4
Missing
145
Betula nigra
5.7
7.1
52
146
Quercus phellos
5.9
4.8
53
147
Diospyros virginiana
6.2
2.6
65
148
Quercus phellos
6.2
0.7
60
149
Quercus phellos
9.1
0.6
19
150
Quercus michauxii
9.0
2.6
48
151
Platanus occidentalis
9.0
4.8
Missing
152
Quercus michauxii
8.8
7.1
83
153
Quercus michauxii
8.7
9.4
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 11- Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
154
Platanus occidentalis
1.0
4.0
Missing
155
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1.5
2.7
60
156
Quercus phellos
1.6
4.8
40
157
Betula nigra
1.5
6.7
Missing
158
Diospyros virginiana
1.4
9.1
49
159
Diospyros virginiana
5.4
9.2
58
160
Quercus phellos
5.8
6.9
54
161
Quercus phellos
5.9
5.0
25
162
Quercus michauxii
6.0
2.8
83
163
Liriodendron tulipifera
6.0
0.3
20
164
Betula nigra
9.1
0.2
33
165
Betula nigra
9.2
2.6
Missing
166
Quercus phellos
9.0
5.0
59
167
Platanus occidentalis
8.8
7.2
64
168
Quercus michauxii
8.9
9.0
72
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 12 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
169
Quercus phellos
0.5
1.7
73
170
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.8
2.0
77
171
Quercus michauxii
5.0
2.4
79
172
Quercus phellos
7.1
2.6
59
173
Quercus michauxii
9.0
2.9
70
174
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.9
6.7
Missing
175
Quercus phellos
7.0
6.5
65
176
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.6
6.4
90
177
Quercus michauxii
2.6
6.2
75
178
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.4
6.1
79
179
Betula nigra
0.5
9.2
58
180
Quercus phellos
2.4
9.5
56
181
Platanus occidentalis
4.5
9.6
106
182
Platanus occidentalis
6.8
9.7
112
183
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.1
9.7
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 13 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
184
Quercus michauxii
0.8
0.4
70
185
Platanus occidentalis
3.0
0.3
22
186
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.9
0.2
14
187
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6.9
0.3
89
188
Liriodendron tulipifera
8.9
0.3
67
189
Betula nigra
8.7
4.6
Missing
190
Betula nigra
6.9
4.5
60
191
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.9
4.5
64
192
Liriodendron tulipifera
2.8
4.4
Missing
193
Quercus michauxii
0.8
4.3
66
194
Quercus michauxii
0.4
9.1
60
195
Liriodendron tulipifera
2.6
9.2
29
196
Quercus phellos
5.0
9.1
65
197
Betula nigra
7.0
9.0
Missing
198
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.4
8.9
59
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 14 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
199
Platanus occidentalis
0.6
1.0
63
200
Diospyros virginiana
2.7
1.0
63
201
Diospyros virginiana
4.4
1.0
81
202
Quercus phellos
6.4
0.9
75
203
Quercus phellos
8.6
0.9
57
204
Platanus occidentalis
8.6
5.5
97
205
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
6.8
5.3
62
206
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.0
5.4
79
207
Betula nigra
2.8
5.1
Missing
208
Quercus michauxii
0.5
4.8
67
209
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.6
9.5
54
210
Diospyros virginiana
2.8
9.5
58
211
Diospyros virginiana
4.9
9.6
60
212
Platanus occidentalis
6.7
9.5
61
213
Quercus michauxii
8.7
9.4
68
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 15 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
214
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
0.8
23
215
Quercus michauxii
2.4
0.8
Missing
216
Diospyros virginiana
4.8
0.8
51
217
Platanus occidentalis
7.0
0.7
Missing
218
Betula nigra
9.6
0.8
117
219
Quercus phellos
9.5
5.4
57
220
Platanus occidentalis
7.2
5.4
32
221
Platanus occidentalis
5.2
5.3
51
222
Platanus occidentalis
3.0
4.5
36
223
Betula nigra
1.0
5.2
40
224
Betula nigra
0.7
9.5
Missing
225
Betula nigra
2.7
9.5
26
226
Quercus phellos
5.2
9.5
34
227
Liriodendron tulipifera
7.2
9.5
Missing
228
Quercus phellos
9.5
9.5
58
waftKill
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 16 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
229
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.4
0.4
27
230
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
2.8
118
231
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.4
5.1
49
232
Quercus michauxii
0.5
7.3
21
233
Quercus phellos
0.3
9.5
29
234
Platanus occidentalis
4.3
9.3
74
235
Betula nigra
4.3
7.4
27
236
Quercus michauxii
4.5
4.7
66
237
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.8
2.6
67
238
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
0.6
58
239
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
0.7
47
240
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.0
2.7
18
241
Quercus michauxii
9.0
5.0
24
242
Betula nigra
8.9
7.3
45
243
Platanus occidentalis
8.8
9.6
33
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 17 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
244
Quercus phellos
0.4
0.5
29
245
Diospyros virginiana
2.8
0.5
Missing
246
Quercus phellos
5.0
0.5
45
247
Liriodendron tulipifera
7.3
0.5
43
248
Diospyros virginiana
9.5
0.5
72
249
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
5.0
156
250
Platanus occidentalis
6.8
5.0
109
251
Quercus michauxii
4.8
5.0
95
252
Diospyros virginiana
2.5
5.0
94
253
Quercus michauxii
0.4
5.0
73
254
Quercus michauxii
0.4
9.3
72
255
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.2
9.3
81
256
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.6
9.3
19
257
Betula nigra
6.8
9.3
68
258
Diospyros virginiana
8.6
9.3
44
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 18 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
259
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.5
0.8
32
260
Betula nigra
2.9
0.8
62
261
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.0
0.8
74
262
Quercus michauxii
7.3
0.8
53
263
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.4
0.8
68
264
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.0
5.3
Missing
265
Quercus michauxii
7.0
5.2
94
266
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
5.2
59
267
Platanus occidentalis
2.0
5.2
Missing
268
Diospyros virginiana
0.5
5.1
67
269
Betula nigra
0.5
9.3
56
270
Diospyros virginiana
2.6
9.3
68
271
Diospyros virginiana
4.0
9.3
54
273
Diospyros virginiana
6.6
9.3
77
274
Quercus michauxii
8.9
9.3
79
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 19 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
275
Quercus michauxii
1.1
0.7
40
276
Quercus phellos
1.1
2.7
31
277
Quercus phellos
1.1
5.1
42
278
Betula nigra
1.2
7.1
76
279
Quercus michauxii
1.2
9.5
35
280
Diospyros virginiana
5.4
9.7
69
281
Betula nigra
5.4
7.2
72
282
Quercus phellos
5.5
5.0
48
283
Platanus occidentalis
5.5
3.0
87
284
Quercus michauxii
5.6
1.0
55
285
Diospyros virginiana
9.8
1.1
62
286
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.8
3.5
76
302
Diospyros virginiana
9.8
5.2
62
303
Betula nigra
9.8
7.4
51
304
Platanus occidentalis
9.8
9.6
63
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 20 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
287
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.5
1.0
72
288
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2.7
0.7
60
289
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.0
0.6
59
290
Betula nigra
7.2
0.5
Missing
291
Quercus phellos
9.4
0.6
46
292
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.1
4.5
23
293
Quercus michauxii
7.0
4.5
84
294
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.0
4.6
41
295
Quercus phellos
3.0
4.8
48
296
Diospyros virginiana
0.6
4.8
Missing
297
Quercus phellos
0.4
9.6
38
298
Betula nigra
2.7
9.7
Missing
299
Quercus michauxii
5.2
9.4
78
300
Betula nigra
7.3
9.3
59
301
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.2
9.4
12
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 21- Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
305
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.4
0.9
81
306
Diospyros virginiana
1.8
0.7
44
307
Diospyros virginiana
3.6
0.7
59
308
Quercus phellos
6.0
0.7
63
309
Betula nigra
8.3
0.7
38
310
Liriodendron tulipifera
8.6
6.0
33
311
Quercus michauxii
6.6
5.9
70
312
Quercus phellos
4.4
5.9
33
313
Quercus phellos
2.8
5.4
33
314
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
5.4
103
316
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.3
9.6
59
317
Betula nigra
2.4
9.6
64
318
Platanus occidentalis
4.2
9.3
Missing
319
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.8
9.3
65
320
Quercus michauxii
8.6
9.3
29
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 22 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
321
Quercus michauxii
0.5
1.2
92
322
Platanus occidentalis
2.7
1.2
91
323
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.7
1.1
Missing
324
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
7.3
1.0
49
325
Liriodendron tulipifera
9.1
1.2
Missing
326
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.0
5.7
68
327
Diospyros virginiana
7.0
5.5
45
328
Platanus occidentalis
4.3
5.5
Missing
329
Liriodendron tulipifera
2.4
5.7
Missing
330
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
5.2
57
331
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.5
9.9
32
332
Quercus phellos
2.3
9.5
57
333
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.0
9.5
102
334
Platanus occidentalis
7.1
9.5
86
335
Betula nigra
9.7
9.5
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 23 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
336
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.9
1.2
22
337
Betula nigra
0.8
3.1
69
338
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.6
5.3
63
339
Diospyros virginiana
0.5
5.7
8
340
Quercus phellos
0.5
9.6
21
341
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
9.6
27
342
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.7
7.2
54
343
Platanus occidentalis
4.6
5.2
71
344
Quercus phellos
4.9
2.8
52
345
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
0.7
Missing
346
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
0.7
Missing
347
Diospyros virginiana
8.9
2.5
53
348
Quercus phellos
9.0
4.7
55
349
Quercus phellos
8.9
6.9
49
350
Betula nigra
8.9
9.2
Missing
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 24 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
351
Platanus occidentalis
0.4
0.9
Missing
352
Diospyros virginiana
0.4
2.8
Missing
353
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.5
4.8
49
354
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.4
6.7
37
355
Quercus phellos
0.4
8.8
36
356
Quercus phellos
4.5
9.0
33
357
Quercus michauxii
4.5
6.9
35
358
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.5
4.7
60
359
Platanus occidentalis
4.5
2.9
64
360
Quercus michauxii
4.5
1.0
52
361
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.7
0.7
33
362
Quercus phellos
8.7
2.3
22
363
Platanus occidentalis
8.8
4.4
110
364
Betula nigra
8.7
6.8
80
365
Quercus phellos
8.6
9.2
30
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 25 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
366
Betula nigra
0.3
0.7
Missing
367
Platanus occidentalis
0.2
2.4
Missing
368
Diospyros virginiana
0.4
4.4
82
369
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.4
6.5
72
370
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
8.7
112
371
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.8
8.6
35
372
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.7
6.6
32
373
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.7
4.6
54
374
Betula nigra
4.6
2.6
52
375
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.8
0.5
60
376
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
0.9
61
377
Betula nigra
9.0
3.0
47
378
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.0
5.0
Missing
379
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
6.8
93
380
Platanus occidentalis
9.1
8.8
62
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 26 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
381
Quercus michauxii
0.3
0.8
48
382
Quercus phellos
0.2
2.6
32
383
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.2
4.6
80
384
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.2
6.8
48
385
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.3
9.1
Missing
386
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.4
8.7
Missing
387
Diospyros virginiana
4.4
6.8
42
388
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.5
4.9
67
389
Quercus michauxii
4.5
2.7
33
390
Quercus michauxii
4.5
0.9
67
391
Quercus phellos
8.9
0.6
49
392
Liriodendron tulipifera
8.8
2.6
65
393
Liriodendron tulipifera
8.6
4.5
42
394
Quercus michauxii
8.6
6.5
Missing
395
Quercus phellos
8.6
8.6
84
0
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 27 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
396
Liriodendron tulipifera
0.8
0.5
83
397
Platanus occidentalis
0.9
2.3
83
398
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.7
4.3
73
399
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0.5
6.3
60
400
Quercus michauxii
0.2
8.3
62
401
Betula nigra
5.0
8.5
56
402
Liriodendron tulipifera
5.0
6.4
57
403
Liriodendron tulipifera
4.9
4.0
67
404
Quercus phellos
4.9
2.1
32
405
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.9
0.2
72
406
Betula nigra
9.6
0.3
30
407
Platanus occidentalis
9.5
2.7
86
408
Platanus occidentalis
9.4
4.7
Missing
409
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.4
6.8
17
410
Quercus michauxii
9.3
8.7
33
Pip
WNorth Fork Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Appendix E: Overview Photos

North Fork Little River Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

North Fork Little River Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs