20050942 Ver 1_Complete File_20050815

August 12, 2005
John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Massey Preserve (S&L Project #: 2604026)
DWQ Project # 05-0942 Wake County
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorney:
R P= (K5?7'wWR B
AUG ? 5 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STCORMATER BRANCH
Thank you for meeting with us this week (Monday August 8). Skelly and Loy is submitting
the additional information requested from written correspondence on June 10 & July 25, 2005.
We are requesting for NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) written approval under Section
401, Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344. This will assist in compliance with Water Quality
Certification (WQC) 3402 and its accompanying Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39. We have also
revised the PCN application to clarify our requests. These requests are for Massey Preserve
Phase I and II, which includes the stream crossing of the unnamed tributary to Harris Creek.
Proposed impacts associated with these first two phases include: 95 linear feet of an unnamed
tributary to Harris Creek; 6,442 square feet of associated stream buffers; and 0.092 acres of
wetlands.
We have addressed your included written comments in the following paragraphs.
1. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank
stabilization on the site plan. The area of stream impacts related to the utility line
should be shown on the site plan.
Regarding stream impacts, the only permanent stream impact on the proposed
subdivision is the entrance road. As noted in the permit and site plan, we are requesting
95 linear feet of stream impact for the 90 linear feet of culvert and fill slopes. As we
discussed in our meeting and also noted in the PCN application (Section VII), the new
bridge will remediate the current crossing by allowing biological migration. Once the new
crossing is completed, the old one will be restored.
Concerning the new sewer line at the southwest corner of the Jimmie T. Poole tract, we
will not be crossing the unnamed tributary (UT) to Harris Creek. In order to tie in with the
existing sewer manhole that is located in Zone 1 of the UT to Harris Creek, will be
temporarily impacting both riparian zones.

DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Massey Preserve
August 12, 2005
Page 2 of 3
2. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. It appears there are buffer
impacts that are not shown on the site plan these should be clearly shown with
matching as Zone 1 and Zone 2.
Temporary buffer impacts include the two sewer line extensions near the southwest
corner of the Jimmie T. Poole tract. In order to tie in with the existing sewer manhole that
is located in Zone 1 of the UT to Harris Creek, we will be temporarily impacting both
riparian zones.
Permanent buffer impacts include the stream area associated with the entrance road.
These impacts are listed below.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4,155 3 N/A
2 2,287 1.5 N/A
Total 6,442 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
We have indicated the location of the protected buffers and open space on the site plan.
These areas include the stream and downstream pond on the east side of Phase I and the
pond and downstream tributary to Harris Creek in the southeast corner of Phase II. We
have also illustrated the 42.56 acres adjacent to the Neuse River that was dedicated to the
City of Raleigh in Attachment 2(Wake GIS Maps).
4. Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams, ponds and other waters
of the State as overlays on the site plan.
We have clarified the wetlands, streams, ponds, and other waters on the site plan and
labeled them as such.
5. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. The location of the
referenced level spreaders should be shown on the site plan with appropriate
calculations.
We have shown all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. Additionally, we have also
included details for Stormwater Ponds 1 to 6 and stormwater calculations in the 3
subsequent sheets. While under construction, custom sedimentation basins will be
installed to protect buffers against sedimentation along with other appropriate
sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance with the Wake County
Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements. Future Massey Preserve phases will
also have the required level spreaders and stormwater outfalls and will be built according to
0
DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Massey Preserve
August 12, 2005
Page 3 of 3
DWQ standards. We have also included the Nitrogen & Stormwater Calculations
(Attachment 3) that we discussed during our meeting. Included in this document is the
Nitrogen buy down (page 2).
The current project will establish and maintain wetland and upland vegetated buffers to protect
open waters along Harris Creek, Neuse River, and their tributaries. Also, a large greenway
easement was dedicated to the City of Raleigh adjacent to the Neuse River.
This subdivision has been designed around environmental stewardship. It will act as an
environmental education stage for a multitude of visitors and its homeowners for perpetuity. Two
major waterways and their future accompanying Wake County Greenway Trails surround half of
this site. It is also has a large Neuse River riparian wetland inhabited by migratory waterfowl
regularly. Through environmentally-sensitive engineering and planning, we were also able to
preserve two scenic ponds and adjacent open space for this community. Future plans for the
larger pond, near Forestville Road, include adding a natural wood-chip base to the current dirt
pathway that circumvents this pond.
The enclosed PCN Application and attached additional documentation listed below should provide
the necessary information required to secure written concurrence for impacts to Neuse River
Buffers, streams, and wetlands; and meet requirements for GC's 3402 under DWQ 401 Water
Quality Certification for the impacts described above and on the attached PCN Application.
Attachments:
1. Massey Preserve Phase I & II Site Plan, Stormwater Calculations, & Details
2. Wake County GIS Maps (Stream, Greenway, 2002 aerial)
3. Nitrogen & Stormwater Calculations
We appreciate your commitment and recommendations for this project. As we discussed during
our meeting, we do not anticipate any further wetland, stream, or buffer impacts. Future phases
will be designed and constructed when a gravity sewer collection system becomes available to
the western part of this property. If you should have questions or require additional clarification
during the review please feel free to contact me immediately at [phone] or email:
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Skelly and Loy
Jay Keller
Wetland Ecologist

Office Use Only:
Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. DW< # O-uy4Z
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here
IDT,
D
II. Applicant Information 2005
AUG 1 5
1. Owner/Applicant Information
WATER QUALITY F,Rpt CH
Name: McIntyre and Associates
Mailing Address: 4932-B Wind Hill Drive
Ralei h North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919-876-0145 Fax Number: 919-876-0699
E-mail Address: a [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Skelly and Lo
Mailing Address: 6404 Falls of the Neuse Rd Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone Number: 919-878-3535 Fax Number: 919-878-3550
E-mail Address: 'keller a skell to .com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 5 of 12
.
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Massey Preserve
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1747306535, 1747301987, 1747216022
1747102638,1747207216,1747301394
4. Location:
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Massey Preserve
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From US 401N, turn right just
past Neuse River on Mitchell Mill Road & proceed lmile. Turn right (south) on Forestville
Road and proceed 1 mile Site is at the intersection of Forestville and Thorny Bush Lane.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35° 52.0% W 78° 31.0'
6. Property size (acres): 154 acres: Phase I & II: 37 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Harris Creek & Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Mixed forested and agricultural tract. Vacant,
agricultural, and residential area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A Single
family subdivision in the City of Raleigh. The subdivision will include public water
and sanitary sewer mains sidewalks concrete curb and gutter, and a storm water
collection system. Equipment includes trackhoes, bulldozers, and graders.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a new road crossing adjacent
to the current Thorny Bush Drive road crossing. The new crossing will meet
engineering & planning standards and will allow for improved access to
approximately 95% of the remaining land to the west of the unnamed tributary to
Harris Creek The new access point will directly align the new access road with
Forestville Road and the street on the east side of Forestville Road. Thorny Bush
Drive currently enters Forestville Road at a bad angle and not in-line with the trailer
park road on the other side. The culvert will be placed in accordance to best
Page 6 of 12
management practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic passage This will greatly assist in
biological migration since the current culvert does not allow aquatic passage during
low flow conditions.
The installation of an 8" sewer line will be located in the southeast corner near the
back of Jimmie Poole's property (Wake ID 174703301394) There is an existing
sewer line that runs parallel to the north bank of Harris Creek at the rear of the Poole
& Massey lots A 20-foot easement is required and trenches will be excavated
using a trackhoe The easement will be graded to the pre-existing elevation and
seeded for grass The channel excavated for the pipe will be approximately 3-foot
wide In order to tie in with the existing sewer manhole that is located in Zone 1 of
the UT to Harris Creek we will be temporarily impacting both riparian zones.
Construction of a second 8" sewer line will attach to an existing manhole 180 feet
southwest of previously mentioned sewer manhole Impact from this installation will
be temporary excavation inside the unnamed tributary to Harris Creek buffer area.
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ # 05-0942.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. No future
permit requests are anticipated for this project Future plans for the larger pond near
Forestville Road include adding a natural wood-chip base to the current dirt pathway
that circumvents this pond Future phases are anticipated when a gravity sewer
collection system become available to the western part of this proprtv. However, there
are no further impacts to waters of the US or NC anticipated with these phases.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Thorny Bush Drive will impact 95
feet of UT to Harris Cr. A single 72" RCP will convey surface water flows. Impacts
to the tributary include excavation and filling. Impacts to the wetlands include filling
on lots 7 & 8 from the level spreader to the east: and filling adjacent to the dry
detention ponds 1 & 5.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Itnpact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year
Floodplain**
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream (linear
feet)
Type of
Wetland***
Road Crossing Fill 0.043 No 0 forested
Lot 7 Fill 0.021 No 50 forested
Lot 8 Fill 0.020 No 50 forested
Dry Pond 1 Fill 0.006 No 52 forested
Dry Pond 5 Fill 0.002 No 100 forested

TOTAL 0.092
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, rui,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httl2:HNvwNv.femil.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.092 acres
3_ Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Length
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* of
Impact
(linear
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
feet)
Road Crossing Culvert 95 ft. UT to Harris Creek 4 Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.cov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
wwvv.in apJc ticst.coin, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 95 linear feet.
Page 8of12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S. below:
IArea of Name of Waterbody Type of waterbody
Open Water Impact
Site Number Type of Impact*
(indicate on map)
Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(,,, -N bav, ocean, etc.)
N/A
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): F-1 uplands El stream El wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The new crossinq will meet enaineerina & plannina standards for the new subdivision
and directly align the new access road with Forestville Road and the street on the east
side of Forestville Road Thorny Bush Drive currently enters Forestville Road at a bad
angle and not in line with the road on the other side This new road will be necessary to
access the maiority (95%) of the property thus sustaining the development of the
proposed subdivision The culvert will be placed in accordance to best management
practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic passage This will greatly assist in biological
migration since the current culvert does not allow aquatic passage during low flow
conditions The proposed realigned path of Thorny Bush Drive was selected to avoid as
man wetlands as possible and cross the stream at a desired location. The road
crossing was placed upstream of a large pond and below wider riparian wetlands.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors

Page 9 of 12
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
IX.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm?ide.litm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The project will establish and maintain wetland and upland vegetated buffers to
protect open waters along Harris Creek Neuse River. and their tributaries. Also, a
land dedication of 42.56 Ac. was dedicated to the City of Raleigh from this
subdivision along the Neuse River. Within this area, there are areas of uplands
outside of the Neuse River 100-year floodplain and stream buffers.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4,155 3 N/A
2 2,287 1.5 N/A
Total 6,442 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Lone z exienub wi
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Propertq;'Coilservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Buffer Mitigation is not required Uses are allowable without mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Page 11 of 12
The total area of site is 37 acres with 0.25 acres of existing impervious area. Total
proposed impervious area is 8.42 ac or 22.8%. Stormwater on site will be collected and
discharged via level spreaders and preformed scour holes to achieve diffuse flow
through the Neuse River Buffers in compliance with the Riparian Area Protection Rules.
Level spreader and preformed scour hole design is based upon DWQ's Draft Level
Spreader Design Options v.1.0, dated October 10, 2001. While under construction,
custom sedimentation basins will be installed to protect buffers against sedimentation
along with other appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance
with the Wake County Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated from the proposed proiect will travel through a non-
discharge gravity sewer collection system to the City of Raleigh WWTP.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Office Use Only: Fonn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to tlus project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
1[awmV@ 5
MAY 3 12005
Name: McIntyre and Associates . ,P p-p 01 IiN I
Mailing Address: 4932-B Windy Hill Drive °tnsat?DSTOi.'?ti'iATER6Rht?CH
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919-876-0145 Fax Number: 919-876-0699
E-mail Address: a mcinty(2abellsoutli.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jav Keller
Company Affiliation: Skelly and Loy
Mailing Address: 6404 Falls of the Neuse Rd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone Number: 919-878-3535 Fax Number: 919-878-3550
E-mail Address: jkeller a,skellyloy.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 5 of 12
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Massey Preserve
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1747306535. 1747301987, 1747216022
1747102638
4. Location:
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Massey Preserve
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From US 401N, turn right just
past Neuse River on Mitchell Mill Road & proceed 1 mile. Turn right (south) on Forestville
Road and proceed l mile. Site is at the intersection of Forestville and Thorny Bush Lane.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/L.ong): N 35° 52.0'; W 78° 31.0'
6. Property size (acres): 35 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Harris Creek & Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Mixed forested and agricultural tract. Vacant,
agricultural, and residential area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A Single
family subdivision in the City of Raleigh. The subdivision will include public water
and sanitary sewer mains, sidewalks, concrete curb and gutter, and a storm water
collection system. Equipment includes trackhoes, bulldozers, and graders.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a new road crossing adiacent to
the current Thorny Bush Drive road crossing. The new crossing will meet engineering
& planning standards for the new subdivision and directly align the new access road
with Forestville Road and the street on the east side of Forestville Road. Thorny Bush
Drive currently enters Forestville Road at a bad angle and not in-line with the trailer
park road on the other side. This new road will be necessary to access the majority of
the property, thus sustaining the development of the proposed subdivision. The culvert
will be placed in accordance to best management practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic
Page 6 of 12
passage. This will greatly assist in biological migration since the current culvert does
not allow aquatic passage during low flow conditions.
The installation of an 8" sewer line will be located in the southeast corner near the back
of Jimmie Poole's property (Wake ID 174703301394). There is an existing sewer line
,c that runs parallel to the north bank of Harris Creek at the rear of the Poole & Massey
lots. A 20-foot easement is required and trenches will be excavated using a trackhoe.
The easement will be graded to the pre-existing elevation and seeded for grass. Where
` the sewer line crosses the approximately 4-foot stream, the pipe will be placed under
the bed of the stream. The channel excavated for the pipe will be approximately 3-foot
,y wide. A 20-foot temporary easement will be maintained during construction and the
stream will be graded to its former elevation upon completion. Construction of a second
8" sewer line will attach to an existing manhole iust west of previously mentioned sewer
line. The only impact from this installation will be temporary excavation inside the Harris
Creek buffer area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No further impacts to waters of the US or NC are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Thorny Bush Drive will impact 96
feet of UT to Harris Cr. A single 72" RCP will convey surface water flows. Impacts
to the tributary include excavation and filling. One temporary stream impact is
proposed for a sewer line. Impacts to the tributaries include temporary excavation.
2. Individuallv list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year
Floodplain * Nearest
Stream (linear Type of
Wetland k*
(indicate on map) (acres) ( 'es/I10) feet)
1 Fill 0.0532 no 0 forested
' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/dminage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at blip //uww.fema.sov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., fresliNvater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0532 acres
3. Individuall list all intermittent and perennial stream imp acts below:
Length
Stream Impact of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear Before Impact (please specify)
feet)
1 Culvert 96 ft. UT to Hams Creek 4 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement %vall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightming, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named strcarn into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wevw.us s.?oy. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.cont,
\%-\i\v.mahgnest.conl, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 96 linear feet.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name NVatcrbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact )
(If applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Page 8 of 12
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII
VIII
Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The new crossing will meet engineering & planning standards for the new subdivision
and directly align the new access road with Forestville Road and the street on the east
side of Forestville Road. Thorny Bush Drive currently enters Forestville Road at a bad
angle and not in-line with the road on the other side. This new road will be necessary to
access the majority of the property thus sustaining the development of the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed realigned path of Thorny Bush Drive was selected to avoid as many
wetlands as possible and cross the two streams at desired locations. The road crossing
was placed upstream of a large pond and below wider riparian wetlands. As previously
mentioned the culvert will be placed in accordance to best management practices
(BMP's) to allow aquatic passage. This will greatly assist in biological migration since
the current culvert does not allow aquatic passage during low flow conditions.
The new Thorny Bush Drive will allow for maximum land usage since approximately
nine-tenths (9/10) of the property is to the west of this tributary. There is also an
existing sewer line to the south along the north side of Harris Creek that has an integral
part in the location of lots roads and utilities. The proposed line will be an extension of
that existing sewer line and will satisfy the City of Raleigh's criteria for a gravity driven
sanitarv sewer line.
Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ham://li2o.enr.state.nc.iis/ncwetlands/strniQide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreagellinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The project will establish and maintain wetland and upland vegetated buffers to
protect open waters along Harris Creek, Neuse River. and their tributaries. Also, a
land dedication of 42.56 Ac. was dedicated to the City of Raleigh from this
subdivision along the Neuse River.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http:Hli2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litIn. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NO
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 10 of 12
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,400 3 N/A
2 3,600 1.5 N/A
Total 9,000 N/A
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
Buffer Mitigation is not required. Uses are allowable without mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The total area of site is 35 acres with 0.00 acres of existina impervious area. Total
proposed impervious area is 8.42 ac or 24.05%. Stormwater on site will be collected
and discharged via level spreaders and preformed scour holes to achieve diffuse flow
through the Neuse River Buffers in compliance with the Riparian Area Protection Rules.
Level spreader and preformed scour hole design is based upon DWQ's Draft Level
Spreader Design Options v.1.0, dated October 10, 2001. While under construction,
Page 11 of 12
custom sedimentation basins will be installed to protect buffers against sedimentation
along with other appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance
with the Wake County Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated from the proposed project will travel through a non-
discharge gravity sewer collection system to the City of Raleigh WWTP.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
513110-5-
,/'/' Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
,. d
lye '?.-.? '- V - - % l-f .1 - - ," f , .,.i3 t • ? a
v
-ref.
?`
%_`!, • 1,?{/ { -I3 '• .- \+11 1 •. ..?
4 3 '
{
h
1
K
.F•'
- r,`?• is ?.i,? •
N a•
4
Vii'?`?`'?. .a•
. ,? .- - \ ? - ? f ham., , + • z 4. i .
• 1 A -- 'tt ''? '• • ?. - ? d. . to
•'i
J>.
-
_ a
i
t • xet a .. s".? t. >'2i7 ? .' ? S??v. ? -? t9 n •.?
?i t J-... _. - I? rl ' 4t ? I , 4?•r' ?t??yk r 'f. s???l.
e. -. ? - _ 1. ti!? a,i ?+• + 5:
.. (, I', ti ? ?. (? '9`+cy •? 1. • \.•:
? J J
?Ay+
4 ? J•.
T' x re
sr? _
1D Tq*Q` b Cjopvn et 0 I Ddmw Yamrtk ME WN %we Data: uses i roe tt Skgb:1: 240 Dad 13-1 Datmo: wGSM
i _ _
Dc'., csSiCNS ., J0 ^.A �-1..r-.- 4.
9.160 w11. �- q DRAMYC
Cr,L H/C ^c'
o� i RAMP A`, �, n
if o 0 6
^ a o
.o
Fri : a n � n - T _ - ^ �W �� i'• ., , j .� ��./
83
6,339 11
„^ ag
Ir
J r. - RAMP H/C
w�
1• {"\ } 6aq .a 11.. ! 5' S f WALK n RAMP _ q Z�S •✓-+, �„• :' r /�
i1
a �
fir. _ es •.:: ' �- _ -- — - - - — --- - - ------ � %� � � �//�
e .Soo• b.o •4 ,.`.,` -p o. �_ }—I-' .f. _ :` !//� J//,"%//;/�j �. ._soot—•T
Jaov baay. H C
5' S;CEW' K
CEL H C = ` _ c Soar a,a.u.
/ I I •! DCL H/C a.xa -
� RAMP- - bio - - RAMP no i :'f.---------
•
1^p` - a e� - � �..\. r� � �/. ,. s - - - 190i.an el. m Y - m9 e183 • \ ��„ �� i
J 1c�)
Y r
.+ o Y
„Y
o /
'\ •• �. til qb 1. rr. 3.6x3 wn ! iASE I
o d
CCL H/C .woo' lie• �� /
0
RAM ^
p
'
�>,DEwaIK
.a RAMP It. - e. ✓ ' asks R j�
RAMP
f/
s
ETAIL -SEE FIGURE 3
RAMP 4 F i,\\ nnY'�a N `^ �.\J ✓' \ \ \/
\ '
ar L
i
U RAMP
• 6.032 w n. . / L �-'
RAMP _ — _ \ � ..
n � _
u
1. � ✓^ � 'O �^`
O
A p ly
'>• \ 9 L, ..\
%� O
1)) �� 6.)se6w It Fa.00 60W yE• `. )y , \� � � __�..._.._ .-."'
_ ✓' /
H
RAMP
e 161 `� \ 'T\\\ 6' 9. R�• O
-' 6.9)9
OCL H/C nom.. ` A
P? \
RAlA g L. 166.35 _, t» .'- - fti I ,n
1 0.QT qR n \\ 31Ta� r J 27 I
. •• � R.3DD CO -
a3JW
6 /
s�' . , 143
n. C� I
__ a1c3gM1 s�wEa � 1�
i a- S/i 1M 16J
]059 9
L• H /C 01 � 4030 qM1 _ 611• ' C CF'pP h / � I � f - .-,_--.---
+JU.00177
i6.0m nk
c o = \a k O `� '♦�—� 179
TOF51 SA•r17-R, SEWLR EA' -'E \
TO
t. EE COTA'NED FR.OR TO SUEWTTINc
0
©L H/C o o e^ �� _... 1 .� '.IYw. _ •j\.,� 1Jp CC!NS'avCT:i+J C,•?rUucNTi
n os s9R SKELLY and LOY LLP MAY 2005 FIGURE 2
RAMP
qR I �IT 'So ;
\N p/C CEPRE597_ P ! f
__
�!
SITE PLAN
HA IS CREEK INTERCEPTCR
k75
�� \.o x7
DE0ALK „1• RAUP r'�31 5 j ,=` ' M 1992 PG 859 Massey Preserve, Phase
0 / 5 S^
RAMP mo . Y o Y - x e y _ / T "� C U.R. EKI? EAwMENi .yW McIntyreo and Associates
i
6.8e) qR mry " •,( ; \''�� -Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
4.05A
4669
�53 Ea T ' � � --- ��_` Scale: 1" = 150' Project No. 2604026

6
N
U ?
6
N
N ?
r
0
v o
6 N ?'

i \
too
Stream impac?\
Approx.96LF ,>
0000
\
r
\ t ,j
V
0-1. 6 299
t
V t
?i
A-
NON-f?15TURB
?--°' . I NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER EASEMEN
SKELLY and LOY, LLP MAY 2005 FIGURE 3
DETAIL OF
MASSEY PRESERVE STREAM CROSSING
Massey Preserve, Phase I
McIntyre and Associates
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 40' Project No. 2604026

4G
Skell\ & Loy, LIA,
6.10-1 Falls of Ncuse Rd.
Ralei,h, NC 2701>
Atm: Mr. Keller
BASIN:
Ncusc RiNcr
(I5,1 \CAC'13.0?
Complaint NOV
Incident
,larch 7, 200-5
'far-Pimlico
(I 5A NC1C 213 .0259)
N ItRIMltt'05-0033
County: Wake
Butter Determination x
Anneal Call ---
Project frame: Massey Property
Location'Directions: Loc.tted off of Fore,,tsills Rd. SR 20.11)
SubJect Stream: UT to Harris Creek and I lams Creek
F Easley. Go,crnor
?m G_ Ross Jr-, Scuctury
t:cat`; Carc n i Depart•nc•-.t ?` Er v:rcrrtcrt 1 ?? ,h al Resc?,'ces
Al,w CJ n' n?ri P E D,ractc•
Cc' cn ti S. D_puty Ducctcr
Dr„S,:n of V,'atL?r Qual;ty
Date of Determination: 3/7/0
Feature Start Butler End Buffer Stream Appeal Located Located on
GPS Points (if Form Call on Soil USGS
provided) Sur%ey Topographic
SI 1 (?-r POND 22 ? Y ?x
S2 cr'UtiVQ 11.1 E! ? j `t
S3 1 'u, S3 Start Flab t
S4 "W, S-l Start Flag \ 1
Si 1 Not Subject i ?
SG 1 Not subject i - - 1 1 x

fij,;rr f?c_j cncl of' ___ 16-3 t.'a1 Serv _ Ccr!,,
(]_..3,t? R,] ;jt?, tic 'J2
'tCUE
phcne [phone] Custcmcr Service
facsim,'o (919) 571-47 13 1-377-623-6743
Massey PlOrw t"
/2005
P?t()r; 2 of
2
This on-site dchrminution shall expire firr t i) gears from the date of this letter. Landowners or allected panic
that disptrte fi deternniuatioll made hY the DI{ Q or Delegated Local .Iullrarity that a sill./act, water e_Vi%ts (1/111 that
it is suhject to 111c huf er rule may rcqucst a dctcrntinrtion ht- the Director. . I request for a determination hi, the
Director shall he rclerrecl rcr the Director in ?rritin.,' c;'o (:?vldi Karoly , IM '(l Wctlundsl'401 Unit, 2321 Crahtrct,
81vc1., Ralci(llt, A C 2'004-3260. Individuals that dispute a determination ht? the OJVQ or Deler afcd Local
Itrthorit'v that "twentpts" it surface water from the huller rule nurt, ask for rill ad judicatory hearing;. You must
act within 60 dot°.s of the date that rou rcc rive this letter. Applicants are Ircrcht, notified that the 00-dat• ctutulort•
appeal lime dues not start until the allrcted party (including downstream and adjacent lantill lcvlers) is notified o l
this decision. DlVC) recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order ter he certain that third
party appeals art, made in a timely manner. To usk firr a hearing, sent/ a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina Getrcral Statutes to tht, Office of Administrative llearing,s, 6-11 :Hail
Service Center, Ralei,4h, N.C. 2'699-0-1-1. this determination is final and binding unless you cask fi)r it hearing
within 60 clans.
The (ow nerfuntre owners) should notilj• the Division of Water Quality (including urrt other Local, State, and
Federal ; i encies) of this decision concerning cary,fimire correspondences regarding the auhject property (stated
above.). This project mat, require a Section 40-V401 Permit firr the proposed activity. . I l l t, inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Qattlitt' (Central Ojfice) at (919)-'3 3-1'S0, find the 1 %SArmy Cor1r (If Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatort• Field Office) at (919)-S'6-N441.
Respcrtfully,
r 1'Ls -_L' 1 ?r /'l l.
Michael Moran
Ftivirunmerttal Spec. I

CC: File Cop}
Central Files
D\VQ 401 Storm%satcr,\Vct1,mds (fl ice
North Carolina Division of Water Quaiity - Stream Identification Forrn; Version 3.1
Date: Project: r " Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent County: Other
-
e.g. Quad Name:
if? 79 or perennial if a 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= << _) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 ( = > 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 Cg - 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ('6"' 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 C2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches CQ -' 1 2 3
7. Braided channel b J 1 2 _
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 001 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Nc( 0
Yes = 3
- Man-trade ditCtieS are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav Isuhtntai = /, 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 I
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season
0
1
r F.-
r '
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 a
17. Sediment on plants j? J 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) Cb' 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Ye = 1.5
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = / - )_ t
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel (4 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 i 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 ,)
3'**
24. Fish CD,? 0.5 1 -
1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1" 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 9 0.5 _
1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton (j 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. lk. 0.5 1 (----j .5 -'
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Othe (= 0,
items zu and ai focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Sketch:
f
L 1

�, i .. / .� % l .... herw�" i• '7 i. :1 r) }�'., :r�. _. y.r., y.. -., r�v I!. ' �.,'
- .l ems- � w J f ' r , r �u /�w/i f ,( f \1\�� �� ( � � �. r 1 f - � / �t1✓_-,L /.,.� " (\ �1 � 'i �'3.
1!, 5'•5,1 5 - cn._- � ��jj"" `_..mss `n .t—t' --`--='F'-IJf--.t----��— . tn_ �C�-. •••
Y�•a 11``j -l'I i (.r'i�,.� / �`�' 'l.^..1W �`;� "" J �u" 1 \ ill 1�11� 1 !�}�//�� t- '<~�~•
-p` t �� �� , , I �� 1 z�"� � I f�{ I, r f{ !'� �� � , 1 ;1'x..,1 -/ j !I p �•.� �°y �'• ' i
+`�.... .l" t � ._� �r-"r• f _,-',... �t•. `.' y� J^ � �C...7 '!' �-ti./ r '�'`lr i� / C ted'."`• rr
til: ••' P ", �, 1 ��, t '! l �- .� � �i (( r1 1 /!'t (..•---� .!"r'
+i`(C 'L'• `r { �i rv°t r f i I` -
r r l.%'=`� .. / � ,F�•. � l ,". • � , : r f ice.
'�IEIs i' �-..i 11 I� J��.,�.:> ��,J ,,,%//w�`� _ _-s-v...ry v, -- - T, r % _ J� � w, 1 � • , } �f `�� � , , , � ., ,
to 1 R�, ^i �a,.% '-� + •, �•-y •�,%�� % JJ��;.. ,u� ; �" lr f' :2_ •��; �i � -.�� 1.1 R•r ' i� - f�i 1�\`,� � � 1 q,��.
I �'L '• �.. / ,�//'•� ` 1'1 I` J �.{5��,-J�� �J ��Jt/,1 , •� � �' I .�I: r'I�k �',� ' + �'' i\
tt ! "� \ ;4' 1. � �� 11-.3.�; � lV r % � f � r �I �"�. ` / ./%r(.� r1 C � a `� � J• 1
( 1 1
,; I.. �� rl .•,i i I'I i �� / \ ..` ( 1 :I�ji ?{� /f/ ��/t.f-•r Y � -)/ 71 `• \. �� Y ti�(•�
•. 1 /. r�r-1 f��� �f �/ � ,-- .J� � I/ x
�;�,� �, !� � Vii/ ``� �'•: ;. �� ', \\���+� /:- ' � .� \ { � C /.tib+. r` � � .�I7
��• 1 �� , tJl f f ,/r I`/�/.1,\�r •.�1� `... — � .,.` S _ 1 ,•n • I �s 1 1 I � "�_ _ �••.. ('1 _. Y I
a•-` A�l � .ud�,l r"_% /`• / .�' �� • � 7 +i ! / '- � •np� y r! / �1,! . \, f _ � ' '>I �/�' j � = \.�y�y I
•ray ! �_ v 1 _ �� '�. I ,.� � l�
ONLY,
.'�!(f ,j/ ,•�.' "�•.::w_.�. i'`/j!%�
rarer`..^ !i :l(J{I l' 1 1 ` `r _ yr'j • r l //• C,,�- �t /;;/ .J,/ i! 1
Ili ,} .. �.� ��✓ ?� r #.��/ '�`. -� � r/� '.'t,. � � '( 1 t _ i� ` a• �
` � 1
L J /�•' r' , r'"/I�iQj �.I l``` ,��.1_`#`!_ #r J'(t, �'Ll
- � � � 1 i�:\.. I` � J`' I,? 1. i ! � ; � ; i+ � + a (-...�.�, r \- '� J �k> l�` • �� •`'� l t '� .."^�L '4/[` 4 � �" �
,,�.; � . •�� S � � \ h � 1� _ 'i ( ��'� 11 ti, J � , �.,� � 1 � .11.E � , r t/ 'n, ,�.,
�'' i ✓- ,\, ! .cY:.v,--I fh'/ `�� / i �; 1 ( �,��' '`\\�1 { \ �\\ �vf r JI •, - �1 I*6.; y J I P �.i ` J J` %�.
�o:,r. r'i" 1 ti � � �i�� � `�� �a~ S �11+! \! I• ���('`} I ll; (Ne',� ��"I j � , i�•rl
� T` i.zcl:;i>� .P '� 1 a � rr %'( • �t�/' ``5 � / �•�' J � J�1�e J� ,� �� t\ �� � i,J � I
F• •y `. f � y JAI _
z § __// � � t 1 ti � 1 .�^ 1`•ti'` 1 Nr.. ,��'y��-. + �' i �% f `� I� I�S \ r `'_I�..
1 221 (p / / �._, i c) ( �- x _ \ F, �/ \�� r '� { ' �r.\ X
����� 'ate - '� ~-. \'�,.x I � � ( 7 i J.. 1 �-• � :. �-'`, `>\'�ti �, � ,% \ N \ ' , ..1
;: ,!�� •` 4 , 1 ��. I.� /' _ � ; II __ , I Iti•.'•J(%CJ ,� ti^�-`.�-�_ ',\�_�`'ll .1 •�' :`�I ,_I�`t
D TopoQreds Copyd& 01999 De xw Yerm%dk ME MN Solace Data: TJSGS � � 700 ft Scale: 11: 2,4004 Detail ..M l DahmE WQ W

r
s ? k
tom; x»
- F CR ESTVJ
4
i ? I f[
E
f yi " +A yT ? 5 1 A ?df' R j d
J }
±? ,:.?? 3 a H r? Ai 1 t R.?Mt '°'grE3 'tr L ,,t FFFr??{
'7 f) ,`t t L r n P
w ?alyy4i? ., a r k
j?A
# i ar p ?" ? f
! j.. 1 fa
S?xr s
o'
YF Y? ( i' :F
Kx x?
A
k
s c ? d?a ?sP'< ?? ? rR J
r s76 s e1' ?,
5i ,
v
d p , J Wa.
ti Ai A" C ?Af1lM fkt ?
r ' x 7 } a ik i -
or "r Sq
ww,y.giJ y?q } -h ya { t;e 7 ,. ' d ' t,- roA"'wr w xsl t Iar ikry
I ?"" I > f 4
r
r r X ? n 'x . ,

April 15, 2005
TO: Skelly and Loy, LLP
6404 Falls of Neuse Rd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
FROM: Mr. George McIntyre
McIntyre and Associates
4932-B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Forestville Rd. Massey Property
I, George A. McIntyre , as a representative concerning the property on
Forestville Road at Thorny Bush Lane in Raleigh, NC , do hereby authorize and give
permission for Skelly and Loy to represent or act as agent on our behalf and allow the COE or
any other regulatory agency to go on the property with an Skelly and Loy representative for
such purposes as necessary to perform the job tasks.
GeorgeMclntyre
McIntyre and Associates
4932-B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Date
Circular Pipe Flow 11
Project:
Pipe ID:
f Tc
1
r -? J e ? ?ti
claw 'mange
ATRV% J ? 1:
ll
Design Information (input)
Pipe Invert Slope So = 0.0100 ft/ft
Pipe Manning's n-value n = 0.0130
Pipe Diameter D = 72.00 inches
Design discharge Q = 365.2 cfs
Full-flow area Af = 28.27 sq ft
Full-flow wetted perimeter Pf = 18.85 ft
Half Central Angle Theta = 3.14 rad
Full-flow capacity Qf = 424.7 cfs
Calculation of Normal Flow Condition
Half Central angle (0<Theta<3.14) Theta = 2.02 rad
Flow area An = 21.63 sq ft
Wetted perimeter Pn = 12.09 ft
Flow depth Yn = 4.29 ft
Flow velocity Vn = 16.89 fps
Discharge Qn = 365.3 cfs
alculation of Critical Flow Condition
alf Central Angle (0<Theta-c<3.14) Theta-c = 2.37 rad
ritical flow area Ac = 25.85 sq ft
ritical top width Tc = 4.17 ft
ritical flow depth Yc = 5.16 ft
ritical flow velocity VC = 14.13 fps
roude number Fr= 1.00
HARTMAN1, Pipe 5/24/2005, 1:13 AM
Headwater Depth For Circular Culvert
Project:
Pipe ID:
culvertx-section
D
Inlet '
i
----------------------- ?
L
lip e
if
m rawer
loss D
V
d
LSo-------------------------------
Skpe So
Section 1 Scction 2
O utle t
exit Taihvatcr
loss
)esign Discharge
'ipe Diameter
filet Edge Type (choose from pull-down list)
filet Invert Elevation
)utlet Invert Elevation
'ipe Length
fanning's Roughness n-value
end Loss Coefficient
xit Loss Coefficient
ailwater Water Surface Elevation
Pipe Cross Sectional Area
Culvert Slope
Normal Flow Depth
Critical Flow Depth
Headwater Depth b Inlet Control
Headwater Depth by Inlet Control
Headwater Depth by Outlet Control
Q = 265.2 cfs
D = 72.00 inches
Inlet Type = 1.5: 1 Beveled Edge
le = 213.60 ft
Oe = 212.79 ft
L = 80.0 ft
n = 0.013
Kb = 0.00
K. = 0.00
El. Yt = 212.79 ft
Ao = 28.27 sq ft
So = 0.0101 ft/ft
Yn = 3.42 ft
YC; = 4.46 ft
HW-inlet= 6.85 ft
Tailwater Depth for Design d = 5.23 ft
Friction Loss Coefficient over Culvert Length Kt = 0.23
Sum of All Loss Coefficients K = 0.43
Headwater Depth by Outlet Control HW-outlet= 6.37 ft
Design Headwater Depth HW= 6.85 ft
HW/D Ratio = HW1D= 1.14
HARTMANI, HW-Pipe 5/24/2005, 1:13 AM
Vertical Profile for the Culvert
Project =
Box ID = A
Upstream Top
Embankment
T Elavatl'on Dnstream Top
Embankment Elevation
Available
Lkpth - Upstream Crown Elevation
Headwater Dnstream Clown Elevation
Diama€er
Upstream Invert Elevation or Height
Taiiwater T
C117vart Length Dnstream Invert Elevation
Barrel Diameter or Height D or H = 6.00 ft
Barrel Length L = 80.00 ft
Barrel Invert Slope So = 0.0100 ft/ft
Downstream Invert Elevation EDI = 212.79 ft
Downstream Top Embankment Elevation EDT = 225.17 ft
Upstream Top Embankment Elevation EUT = 225.17 ft
Design Headwater Depth Hw = 6.85 ft
Tailwater Depth Yt = 0.00 ft
I Available Headwater Depth HW-a = 11.58 ft
Design Hw/D ratio Hw/D = 1.14
Upstream Invert Elevation EUI = 213.59 ft
Upstream Crown Elevation EUC = 219.59 ft
Upstream Soil Cover Depth Upsoil = 5.58 ft
Downstream Invert Elevation EDI = 212.79 ft
Downstream Crown Elevation EDC = 218.79 ft
Downstream Soil Cover Depth Dnsoil = 6.38 ft
HARTMAN 1, Profile 5/24/2005, 1:13 AM
?IdCUL7+i; (SiiAfE = U .,??i!ii,i.i i,F ",?,iL S, ,_•,it.xlhl,.;, S1"DES, d "r.
`9at1 SPANS No. OF DFFf1ULT DEF. ENTRANCE INLET EQUATION1 HD', 5
COD: (in.) CULVERTS CORRUG. "n" (I',YFE) EDGE (CI) NUMBER-IC CHT4-SCALE
1-RCP 8-144 29,p96ac .012 1-Con, 1-sq. proj. e (no t used)
3-headwall 9 1-1
4-groove 4 1-3
5-9roove,hd 5 1-2
6-1:1 bevel 6 3-A
7-1.5 be v. 7 3-D
2-CSP 12-96 17,p49ai 2.7x.5 .024 1-Cony 1-thin 1 2-3

54-144
16,p50ai 3x1
.028
2-mitered
2
2-2 o.
54-144 16,p50ai 5x1 .026 3-headwall 3 2-1 q
60-312 43,p58ai 6x2 .035 6-1.1 bevel 6 3-A
7-1.5 bevel 7 3-F3 0i
3-CAP 12-84 16,p39ka 2.7x...5 .024 1-Cony (Same as CSP)
30-120 16,p39ka 3x1 .028
o?
48-120 13,p39ka 6x1 .025
60-252 33,p39ka 9x2.5 .035
ALL See Inlet Control Procedures 2-Side 1-thin face, side 56-3 01
For Equations (Cir) 2-square 56-2
3-bevel 56-1
3-Side see box face, side 58-1/2 on

_ I
I

Y
41 1
I
1 j
o.,.e r u.,,.a..
rs sq. ? vu?q 1
(
1

a.v r u.+ar, I
cv..a s o.?.ce?

1
I
I
s... • I
I
4-slope see box face, slope 59-1/2 o m ?1-- D -.. p
ai - AISI, Handbook of Steel Drainage 6 Highway Construction Products, 1983 valueaorKb
ka = Kaiser Aluminum, Hydraulic Design Detail, DP-131, Edition 2, 1984
EQ EDGE KE SR A 611 - DIP EE F
1 thin 0.9 0.5 0.197321 0.56771 -0.156544 0.0447052 -0.00343602 9.97E-05
mitered 0.7 0 0.107137 0.757769 -0.361462 0.1233932 -0.01606422 7.67E-04
3 headwall 0.5 0.5 0.167433 0.538595 -0.149374 0.0391543 -0.00343974 1.16E-04
4 groove 0.2 0.5 0.108786 0.662381 -0.233801 0.0579585 -0.0055789 2.05E-04
5 grv.hdw. 0.2 0.5 0.114099 0.653562 -0.233615 0.0597723 -0.00616338 2.43E-04
6 1.1-bev. 0.2 0.5 0.063343 0.766512 -0.316097 0.0976701 -0.009836951 4.17E-04
7 1.5-bev. 0.2 0.5 0.09173 0.699353 -0.253683 0.065125 -0.0071975 3.12E-04
9 5q.-proj. 0.2 0.5 0.167297 0.553766 -0.159813 0.0420069 -0.00369252 1.25E-04
9 headwall 0.5 0.5 0.087483 0.706578 -0.253295 0.0667001 -0.00661651 2.51E-04
i0 end-sect. 0.4 0.5 0.120659 0.630769 -0.218423 0.0591815 -0.00599169 2.29E-04
EQ 4's: REFERENCE
1-9 : Calculator Design Series (CDS) 3 for Tf-59, FHWA, 1980, page 60
1-10: Hydraulic Computer Program (HY) 1, FIIWA, 1969, page 16
BOX (SHAPE = 2) SLTT5IRY OF SIU?PES, MATERIALS, SIZES, d "a"
Mat! SPAN RISE DEF. E,N'rRANCE INLET EQUATION HD.; 5
CODE RANGE RANGE "n" IITYPF.) EDGE (CI) N,RIBER-IC C11T4-SCALE
I-RC3 4'-15' 4'-20' .012 1-Conv 1-square 1 10-1
2-1.5 bev 2 10-3
3-1.1 bev 3 10-2
4-30-75sq 4 8-1
5-90-15sq I d-2
6-0 sq 5 6-3
7-1.5 bev 6 3-2
8-bevel 6 9-1
All Sec Inlet Control 2-Side I&2-squire face, side 58-1
Procedures For 364-bevel 58-2
Equation3 4-Slope !y2-square face, slope 53-1
3s4-bevel 59-2
ac = ACPA, Concrete Pipe De;i-,n Mamial, February 198',
EQ EDGE FE ,,,, A DS C DI F EE
1 square 0.5 0.5 0.122117 0.505435 -0.10d56 0.0207809 -1.37E-03 3.46E-OS
2 1.5-bev. 0.2 0.5 0.0967589 0.4551575 -0.08129951 0.01215577 -6.78E-04 0.0000148
3 1.1-bev. 0,2 0.5 0.1566056 0.3989353 -0.06403921 0.01120135 -0.0006449 1.46E-05
-1-30/75 j.4 0.5 0,J;-'4''27 O.SO7U07 -0.1114-14 0.0-_1702 -1.49E-03 O.U00038
square 0.7 0.5 0.144133 0.461363 -0.0?21507 0.0200029 -1.36E-03 0.0000358
6 bevel 9.2 0.5 0.0895633 0.4412465 -0.07434981 0.01273183 -0.0007588 1.71E-05
EQ 4's: REFERENCE
1-6: Hydraulic Corputor Program (HY) 6, FH'WA, 1969, subroutin,? PEQUA
1,4,5: Hydraulic Com-puter Program (HY) 3, FHWA, 1969, page 16
1,3,4,6: Calculator Design Series (CBS) 3 for TI-59, FH'WA, 191;0, page jr,
HARTMANI, Design Info
5/24/2005, 1:13 AM
N
LL1
CL
?o
&; J
. N
Lu
0
N
INV OUT
u
z
N
v,
ao
ce
0 u
o?
Lu
J
u
IN
N
34.1 7' 46.1 7'
INV IN
80 LF 72" RCP
1 "=50' H
to
a
0
J
W
C
N
1 11 = 5' V

-0.75%

O
m 00
cD Ln
O m
d' O
00
d'
r4
N ?t
N
N LA
N
N Ln
N
N Sri i
N 1
N 1
?n n m m rn d'
O t? ?t Ln t? 00
N .- r- r- ?--
N N N N N N

lc?

? I

lq??Iv3°JJCS 7
I
Skelly and Loy, LLP
6404 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 103
Raleigh, NC 27615
E-mail: [e-mail]
Internet: www.skellyloy.com
SKELLYArvo LOY
LNGNEER:NG - EM/IF?GNMLNTAL
CONGULTArJTS i=
I Phone: [phone]
0 Fax: [phone]
June 23, 2005
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 O
Re: Massey Preserve (S&L Project #: 2604026) g 1??5
DWQ Project # 05-0942 Wake County
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina o?NSvoSS?t;???6
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Skelly and Loy is submitting the additional information requested from Nritti::, I
correspondence on June 10, 2005. We are requesting for NC Division of Watc2r OL.Iality
(NCDWQ) written approval under Section 401, Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344. This will assist in
compliance with Water Quality Certifications (WQC) 3374 and 3404 and their accompanying
Nationwide Permits (f\IWP) 12 and 14, respectively. We have also revised the PCN application to
clarify our requests. At this current time, we are requesting to realign Thorny Bush Drive for bett,:.
access to the property and to provide sanitary sewer to the homesites. In order to provide this
property access, we are proposing to impact 92 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Harris
Creek and 4,432 square feet of associated stream buffers.
We have addressed your included written comments in the following paragraphs.
1. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank
stabilization on the site plan. The area of stream impacts related to the utility line
should be shown on the site plan.
Regarding stream impacts, the only permanent stream impact on the proposed
subdivision is the entrance road. As noted in the permit and site plan, we are requesting
92 linear feet of stream impact. Also noted in the PCN application (Section VII), the new
bridge will remediate the current crossing by allowing biological migration. Once the new
crossing is completed, the old one will be restored.
Concerning the new sewer line at the southwest corner of the Jimmie T. Poole tract, we
will not be crossing the unnamed tributary (UT) to Harris Creek. In order to tie in with the
existing sewer manhole that is located in Zone 1 of the UT to Harris Creek, will be
temporarily impacting both riparian zones.
Office Locations: Harrisburg, PA Pittsburgh, PA Morgantown, WV State College, PA Hagerstown, MD
Affiliated Company: AMS of Skelly and Loy, Harrisburg, PA
f.
DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Massey Preserve
June 23, 2005
Page 2 of 3
2. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. It appears there are buffer
impacts that are not shown on the site plan these should be clearly shown
with matching as Zone 1 and Zone 2.
Temporary buffer impacts include the two sewer line extensions near the southwest
corner of the Jimmie T. Poole tract. In order to tie in with the existing sewer manhole
that is located in Zone 1 of the UT to Harris Creek, will be temporarily impacting both
riparian zones.
Permanent buffer impacts include the stream area associated with the entrance
road. These impacts are listed below.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 2,555 3 N/A
2 1,787 1.5 N/A
Total 4,432 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site
plan.
We have illustrated the 42.56 acres adjacent to the Neuse River that was dedicated
to the City of Raleigh.
4. Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters
of the State as overlays on the site plan.
The wetlands on the site plan are the solid blue areas. Proposed wetland impact
areas are listed on the attached PCN. The streams are illustrated as solid blue
lines along with the survey mark identification.
5. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. The location of the
referenced level spreaders should be shown on the site plan with appropriate
calculations.
0
DWQ 401 Certification &
Neuse R. Buffer Rules Re-Submittal
Massey Preserve
June 23, 2005
Page 3 of 3
Impervious cover for this project (2.5%) is well below 30%. Please refer to section
XI (stormwater) in the PCN application. The scope of this project and permit is to
realign Thorny Bush Drive for better access to the property and to provide sanitary
sewer to the homesites. While under construction, custom sedimentation basins will
be installed to protect buffers against sedimentation along with other appropriate
sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance with the Wake County
Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements. If future project plans require
level spreaders and other stormwater outfalls, we will install them according to
NCDWQ standards.
We are requesting for NC Division of Water Quality written approval under Section 401, Clean
Water Act, 33 USC 1344. If you should have questions or require additional clarification during
the review please feel free to contact me immediately at [phone] or email:
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Skelly and Loy
Jay Keller
Wetland Ecologist
Office Use Only: Form version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. DWQ # 05-0942
(if any particular item is not appticaDic to uus project, please enter -toot Appticaote or iviti .)
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12,14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details, --I- here,
II. Applicant Information ?5 v t5 D
JUL 1 9 2005
1. Owner/Applicant Information DENR - WATER QUALITY
Name: McIntyre and Associates ?'•?.JpS?di6Dr ,,
Mailing Address: 4932-B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919-876-0145 Fax Number: 919-876-0699
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Skelly and Loy
Mailing Address: 6404 Falls of the Neuse Rd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone Number: 919-878-3535 Fax Number: 919-878-3550
E-mail Address: ikeller a skellyloy.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 5 of 12
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Massey Preserve
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1747306535, 1747301987, 1747216022
1747102638,1747207216,1747301394
4. Location:
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Massey Preserve
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From US 401N turn right. just
past Neuse River on Mitchell Mill Road & proceed lmile. Turn right (south) on Forestville
Road and proceed 1 mile Site is at the intersection of Forestville and Thorny Bush Lane.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35° 52.0': W 78° 31.0'
6. Property size (acres): 154 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Harris Creek & Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Mixed forested and agricultural tract. Vacant,
agricultural, and residential area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: To
construct a new road for access to the interior lots off of Forestville Road. Sewer will
also be provided for them to an existing sewer line in the southeast area. This
existing sewer line runs northerly adjacent to Harris Creek. Equipment includes
trackhoes, bulldozers, and graders.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a new road crossing adjacent to
the current Thorny Bush Drive road crossing. The new crossing will meet engineering
& planning standards and will allow for improved access to approximately 95% of the
remaining land to the west of the unnamed tributary to Harris Creek. The new access
point will directly align the new access road with Forestville Road and the street on the
east side of Forestville Road. Thorny Bush Drive currently enters Forestville Road at
a bad angle and not in-line with the trailer park road on the other side. The culvert will
Pap 6 of 12
be placed in accordance to best management practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic
passage (see profile view attachments). This will greatly assist in biological migration
since the current culvert does not allow aquatic passage during low flow conditions.
The installation of an 8" sewer line will be located in the southeast corner near the back
of Jimmie Poole's property (Wake ID 174703301394). There is an existing sewer line
that runs parallel to the north bank of Harris Creek at the rear of the Poole & Massey
lots A 20-foot easement is required and trenches will be excavated using a trackhoe.
The easement will be graded to the pre-existing elevation and seeded for grass. In
order to tie in with the existing sewer manhole that is located in Zone 1 of the UT to
Harris Creek will be temporarily impacting both riparian zones. Due to the proximity of
the existing manhole to the tributary, any stream impacts will be reclamated and
returned to its former elevation upon completion. Construction of a second 8" sewer
line will attach to an existing manhole 180 feet southwest of previously mentioned sewer
manhole Impact from this installation will be temporary excavation inside the unnamed
tributary to Harris Creek buffer area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
DWQ # 05-0942.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No further impacts to waters of the US or NC are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Thorny Bush Drive will impact 92
feet of UT to Harris Cr. A single 72" RCP will convey surface water flows. Impacts
to the tributary include excavation and filling.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within
100-year Distance to
Nearest
Type of
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Floodplain * Stream (linear Wetland
(indicate on map) (acres) ( es/no) feet)
1 Fill 0.039 no 0 forested
• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clewing, grading, lill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
" 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at 11ttll://nww.fc111a.gov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.039 acres
3. Individuallv list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Length
Stream Impact of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear Before Impact (please specify)
feet)
1 Culvert 92 ft. UT to Hams Creek 4 Perennial
' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
'• Stream names can be found on USGS topogmpllic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
doNvnstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
v?ww.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct doNrnload and printing of USGS maps (e.g., NNN w.tolxlzone.alnl,
NN-%y%y.nlap<111est.Co111, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 92 linear feet.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and anv other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Page 8 of 12
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
To construct a new road crossing adjacent to the current Thomy Bush Drive road
crossing. The new crossing will meet engineering & planning standards and will allow
for improved access to approximately 95% of the remaining land to the west of the
unnamed tributary to Harris Creek. The new access point will directly align the new
access road with Forestville Road and the street on the east side of Forestville Road.
Thorny Bush Drive currently enters Forestville Road at a bad angle and not in-line with
the trailer park road on the other side. The culvert will be placed in accordance to best
management practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic passage (see profile view
attachments). This will greatly assist in biological migration since the current culvert
does not allow aquatic passage during low flow conditions.
The proposed realigned path of Thorny Bush Drive was selected to avoid as many
wetlands as possible and cross the stream at a desired location. The road crossing was
placed upstream of a large pond and below wider riparian wetlands. The new paved
road will also replace the existing dirt road. This will alleviate frequent maintenance and
assist in emergency vehicle flow. As previously mentioned, the culvert will be placed in
accordance to best management practices (BMP's) to allow aquatic passage. This will
greatly assist in biological migration since the current culvert does not allow aquatic
passage during low flow conditions. The new Thorny Bush Drive will allow for maximum
land usage since approximately 95% of the property is to the west of this tributary. The
proposed sewer line will be an extension of the Harris Creek sewer line and will satisfy
the City of Raleigh's criteria for a gravity driven sanitary sewer line.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
Page 9 of 12
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp:Hll2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strm,7ide.litml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The project will establish and maintain wetland and upland vegetated buffers to
protect open waters along Harris Creek, Neuse River. and their tributaries. Also, a
land dedication of 42.56 Ac. was dedicated to the City of Raleigh from this
subdivision along the Neuse River. Within this area, there is approximately 5 acres
of uplands outside of the Neuse River 100-year floodplain and stream buffers.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htIn. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 10 of 12
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 2,555 3 N/A
2 1,787 1.5 N/A
Total 4,432 N/A
' 'Lone 1 extends out 30 fast perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Buffer Mitigation is not required. Uses are allowable without mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The total area of site is 154 acres with approximately 40.000 sq. ft. of existing
impervious area. Proposed new impervious area is approximately 80,000 sq. ft. Total
Page 11 of 12
impervious area (existing plus new) equals 120,000 sq. feet (2.75 ac). Per
recommendations from your agency in the past we have subtracted the 43 acres of
dedicated area which results in a net land area of 111 acres. Therefore, total
impervious area will be 2.50%. While under construction custom sedimentation basins
will be installed to protect buffers against sedimentation along with other appropriate
sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance with the Wake County
Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater generated from the proposed project will travel through a non-
discharge gravity sewer collection system to the City of Raleigh WWTP.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
NITROGEN S STORN1WATER CALCULATIONS
MASSEY PRESERVE SUBDIVISION PHASE,
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
SUBMITTED BY: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
1401 AVERSBORO ROAD, SUITE 206
GARNER, NC 27529
[phone]
FAX [phone]
,00VIrlIrrrrr','
BAR
??o ,. of ?'?'s?1d °?y =.,
Q
SEAL.
023728
A? RO$
??''rrrnlrrH??%?l,ss1' I21 ?D5
vt.?:.:.•.?:a:c,;i: l.lfi:JLic,lIIVl,.)V,"\V I\ i..ti.INi
14V I /%VCISbUR) iMld, 3111LC "VO
Garner, North Carolina 27529
Ph. (919) 625-041 1
July 31. 2005
Reference: Stormwater evaluation
Massey Preserve
The post construction runoff for the above indicated subdivision exceeds the pre-construction runoff by
more than 10%. Therefore, there will be a need for the stonnwater to be evaluated and controlled. The
project consists of three major drainage basins. The area of the basins are approximately 100, 20 and 20
acres. Due to the location of the 100 acres, stonnwater controls will not be needed. The 100 acre basin is
located adjacent to the Neuse River and joins a large FEMA flood plain. However, it will be necessary to
install stormwater control devices for the remaining two 20 acre basins. 'there are existing ponds currently
located within both of the smaller basins. It is our understanding that these ponds are buffered and will not
be considered within the stormwater control calculations. Based on the attached calculations 6 detention
ponds will be installed to control stormwater for the 2-yr and 10-yr storm event. Additionally, due to space
and topographical limitations, I subsurface pipe detention device will be installed.
Additionally, no BMP's for nitrogen removal will be required. The nitrogen runoff requirement will be
met via a buy down of 557,1 19.04.
Development Con tlting Services, Inc.
Keith M. Roberts, P.E.
NC Reg. No. 23728
i?c.:r c,:;t-lett'.I'c t 1. tilYJUL i {I'r:, •.i..4 i( I.??. iiJi
1401 Aversboro koad, June _.ub
Garner. Noith Carolina 27529
1'h. (919) 625-041 1
Jule 31. 2605
Reference: Summary of Stornmater devices
Massey Preserve
POSI construction
2-yr storm 10-yr storm w/ pond
Detention Pond DA(Ac. ) Qpre Qpost re post 2-yr 10-yr
1 2 2.9 9.2 3.6 11.6 2.32 2.57
2 2.32 3.34 11.36 4.19 14.24 2.3 2.57
3 8 11.52 39.2 14.44 49.1 4.51 10.41
4 3 4.32 14.69 5.42 18.41 3.08 3.45
5 3.3 4.75 15.2 5.96 19.1 3.99 5.24
6 4.4 6.3 21.5 7.9 27 2.29 2.76
Pipe stora"e
FES 13 .35 .5 1.71 63 2.15 52 .55
Location
Stormwater Pond Approximate dimensions Riser Structure Outlet Pipe Orifice
- between lots
I 60'x70'x4' 4'x4' 24" 8" 114/115
2 44'x75'x3' 4'x4' 24" 8" 130/131
3 40'x 175'x4' 6'x6' 36" 10" 103/104
4 30'x 145'x3' 4'x4' 24" 10" 111/112
5 30'x70'x3' 4'x4' 24" 10" 139/140
6 88'x88'x3' 4'.x4 24" 10" 183
Location
Pipe Stora-e(ii, Pipe Size Lem"th Orit ice between lots
-
FES 13 48" 100 1f 58!59
Exhibit 3.1 Method 1 for Quantifying TN Export from
Residential Developments when Building and Driveway
Footprints are Not Shown
Step 1: Determine area for each type of land use and enter in
Column (2).
Step 2: Total the areas for each type of land use and enter at the
bottom of Column (2).
Step 3: Determine the TN export coefficient associated with right-
of-way using Figure 3-1.
Step 4: Determine the TN export coefficient associated with lots
using Figure 3-2.
Step 5: Multiply the areas in Column (2) by the TN export
coefficients in Column (3) and enter in Column (4).
Step 6: Total the TN exports for each type of land use and enter at
the bottom of Column (4).
Step 7: Determine the export coefficient for site by dividing the total
TN export from uses at the bottom of Column (4) by the
total area at the bottom of Column (2) and enter it in at the
bottom of Column (5).
(2) (3) - - -(4) (5)
Type of Land Cover Site
Area TN Export
Coeff. TN Export
by Land Use TN Export
From Site
Acres Ibslac/ r Ibsl r Ibslac/ r
Permanently preserved undisturbed
4 0.6
Z
open sace forest, unmown meadow
Permanently preserved managed 1.2
G
o en s ace rass, landscaping, etc.
Right-of-way (read TN export from
5
95
? ,
G DU ,
Figure 1) . _
Lots (read TN export from Figure 2) S ,? ?, , 3 d
Total 144. Z4 6 92,w w
Average for Site
It
y 4?2? uti,is ? 5. 2 o.,,k/1t

_-'?S1,II'I.bZ!

OJay /9[J Shull f7ulll3M4] }o jequint4 Z/
G
Z I: UC F. VI vZ ZZ 0z 111 91 t'l l OL o J b Z 0
--- - 000
ocl
? I
.y x
I-- - - --- --- }-- 009
I
E-F
! d
n
f
I
I
- - - 0001
? I
slo-1 woaj liodx3 U060 IN lalol Z-£ ain6id
luau]aned sl W41 AW-10-a4f3lb;o O5u4uaoJad
%OZL %OOL %09 %09 %017 %OZ
%0
0,0
s -I
Z
m
x
)'OL a
)'SL cr
cv
0
YOZ
)'SZ
i
1 '
I

y
AeM-jo-vj6l?j u,oaj }iodxg uaGoa)!N IL';ol 6-f; aan6tj

e ?0F W A TFRO
co
r
o -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 10, 2005
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0942
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
McIntyre and Associates
4932-B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property: Massey Preserve at the intersection of Forestville and Thorny Bush Lane
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
To Whom It May Concern:
On May 31, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated May 31, 2005 to
impact 0.053 acres of wetlands, 5,400 square feet (ft) of Zone 1 and 3,600 square feet (ft) of Zone 2
protected riparian buffers and 96 feet of streams to construct the proposed residential subdivision. The
DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to
impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Plan Details
a. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on
the site plan. The area of stream impacts related to the utility line should be shown on the site
plan.
b. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. It appears there are buffer impacts that are
not shown on the site plan these should be clearly shown with matching as Zone 1 and Zone 2.
C. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
d. Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as
overlays on the site plan.
e. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. The location of the referenced level
spreaders should be shown on the site plan with appropriate calculations.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz or Mike Horan of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the
project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
None Carolina
Ntumily
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/l0% Post Consumer Paper

McIntyre and Associates
Page 2 of 2
June 10, 2005
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786
if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
i
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBK/bs
cc: Eric Kulz or Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Jay Keller, Skelly and Loy, 6404 Falls of the Neuse Road, Raleigh, NC 27615
Filename: 05-0942 Massey Preserve (wake) On Hold
DNirQ' #05-44942 Massey Preserve (Wake County)
Subject: DWQ #05-0942 Massey Preserve (Wake County)
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:05:22 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded
to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please
do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. All response
correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits
Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
Laurie Dennison
DENR - DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit
05-0942 Massey Preserve (Wake) On Hold.doe Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 6/10/2005 3:05 PM
?O? W ATF9PG Michael F. Easley, Governor
O
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 25, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0942
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
McIntyre and Associates
4932-B Windy Hill Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property: Massey Preserve at the intersection of Forestville and Thorny Bush Lane
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Sir or Madam::
On May 31, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated May 31, 2005 to
impact 0.053 acres of wetlands, 9,000 square feet of buffers and 96 feet of streams to construct the
proposed residential subdivision. Upon review, the DWQ determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ required additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. This information was addressed in our letter dated June 10, 2005. On June 19, 2005,
we received a letter from Jay Keller with Skelly and Loy (dated June 23, 2005) that attempted to address
our June 10 letter. Unfortunately, that response did not address all of the issues in our earlier letter.
Therefore, we are returning your application and will not review the project until the issues in our June
10, 2005 letter are addressed. For your benefit, the remaining questions are repeated below. Once you
have answers to those questions, you will need to reapply with seven copies of a revised PCN and a new
application fee.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Plan Details
a. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. It appears there are buffer impacts that are
not shown on the site plan these should be clearly shown with matching as Zone 1 and Zone 2.
In particular, it appears that there are one or more ponds on the site. If these are subject to the
Neuse River buffer rules, then the pond and buffers will need to be shown on the site plan.
b. Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as
overlays on the site plan. In particular, we cannot tell from the site plan which of the features
are ponds and which are wetlands. Please make certain that the resubmittal makes the
difference clear.
c. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. The location of the referenced level
spreaders should be shown on the site plan with appropriate calculations. Please note that
level spreaders or other stormwater management is required for this (and all other) projects in
the Neuse Basin. Please provide calculations for the level spreaders in any resubmittal.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands
one
N ptftCarolma
atural?j
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Rccycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
McIntyre and Associates
Page 2 of 2
July 25, 2005
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786 if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
hn Dorney
etlands Program Develo nent Unit
CBK/jrd
Enclosures: Applications
cc: Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Jay Keller, Skelly and Loy, 6404 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 103, Raleigh, NC 27615
Filename: 050942MasseyPreserve(W a ke)Return

FORESiVILLE Ra
W--ri- -o-T-

1 ice/
?LLU
?J
Lu

w
gyp ?CIVIOSSOlB:-3 l?78
? '?! t--I-LL I I I I I I I i. I I

h
r s
C
m

l
C
m
CA
[p
Z
m

wry
1
.-

Ma "? ,,t
- ?? Coo
t?d
?+31?+???°.?-oid Fr fe44
::?- C-t e?
V"l
?ree?,?lo? z -?Qc
sm,
9??
Massey Preserve DWQ 05-0942
Subject: Massey Preserve DWQ 05-0942 --? 0-?'2-
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:49:49 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded
to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please
do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. A hard copy letter is
being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to
the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604
unless otherwise noted.
Content-Type: ,-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 7/27/2005 6:35 AM
July 21, 2006
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Massey Preserve
DWQ Project # 05-0942
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
D
JUL "1 4 2006
1"'tTI '05A1'0ST0rJ' TE L'wiCH
On July 21, 2006, Keller Environmental received your comments dated July
18, 2006 for Massey Preserve. McIntyre and Associates has requested my follow-
up with this project since the previous consulting firm and my former employer,
Skelly & Loy, has closed their North Carolina office.
We are informing you that construction has commenced at Massey
Preserve. This includes site grading and the installation of a culvert on the
unnamed tributary to Harris Creek. Permanent and temporary stormwater
management structures have also been constructed in accordance with the
approved plans.
If you should have questions or require additional clarification please feel
free to contact me at [phone] or email: kellerenviro(Dearthlink.net.
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC
Jry KtUrh
Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: George McIntyre, PE
Lia Myott, DWQ
je -
DWQ EXP 20051676
Impacts
Contract 1
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 2
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 3
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 4
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 5
Wetlands
Steams
Contract 6
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 7
Wetlands
Streams
Contract 8
Wetlands
Streams
Buffers
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total
Buffer Mitigation
182,031 sq ft
1 ac temp
454 if
6.148 ac temp
5371f
2.238 ac temp
355 if
4.745 ac temp
541 if
0.895 ac temp
880 if
1.519 ac temp
1261f
1.159 ac temp
1,1071f
5.46 ac temp
6?S4 if
6s4
349,300 sq ft
224,157 sq ft
573,457
0.212 perm
1.496 perm
0.308 ac perm
0.467 ac perm
0.02 ac perm
0 ac perm
0.092 ac perm
1.323 ac perm
i I
Streams
Basin
UT Gum Swamp Cr 030405
UT Falling Cr same
UT Briery Run same
Falling Cr same
Briery Run Cr same
UT Stonyton Cr same
UT Contentnea Cr 030407
Eagle Swamp 030407
UT Neuse River 030405
Neuse River 030405
Allegator Canal 030405
UT Beaverdam Branch 030405
UT Eagle Swamp 030407
UT Swift Creek 030409
UT Lawrence Run ? could not locate
UT Little Contentnea Cr 030407
Indian Well Swamp 030409
UT Indian Well Swamp 030409
UT Fork Swamp 030409
Fork Swamp 030409
Swift Creek 030409
Stonyton Cr 030405
UT Mosley Cr 030405
UT Southwest Cr 030405
UT Strawberry Br 030405
UT Mott Swamp 030405
Pinelog Br 030407
Index Stream Class
27-77-3 C SW NSW
27-77 same (as one above)
27-81-1 same
27-77 same
27-81-1 same
27-81 same
27-86-(7) same
27-86-27 same
27-(75.7) C, NSW
27-(75.7) C, NSW
27-31-1 C SW NSW
27-83 same (as one above)
27-86-27 same
27-97-(0.5) same
27-86-26 same
27-97-5-2 same
27-97-5-2 same
27-97-4 same
27-97-4 same
27-97-(0.5) same
27-81 same
27-84 same
27-80 same
27-80-7 same
27-80-6 same
27-86-26-4 same
0F VATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
p
?

r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
? -1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 19, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 05-1676
Lenoir/Pitt County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Harold Herring
327 N. Queen Street, Suite 121
Kinston, NC 28501
Subject Property: Neuse Regional Water & Sewer Authority
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. Herring:
On September 19, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification to construct
the proposed project. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of the project, you are required to notify this office in
writing by July 28, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation
of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Since ,
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK11em
cc: The Wooten Company, 120 N. Boylan Ave, Raleigh, NC 27603-1423
USACE, Washington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 051676NR WASA(Leno ir/Pitt)EXP+NOT
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nc%tietlands
Nom` Carolina
Ntrrrally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper
n
v,
THE
WOOTEN
COMPANY
July 20, 2006
E N G I N E E R I N G
P A N N I N G Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
A R C H I T E C T U R E 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re:DWQ EXP No. 05-1676
Lenoir/Pitt County
Regional Water Supply System
Neuse Regional Water and Sewer Authority
Kinston, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
All construction contracts have been issued Notice to Proceed and are in
various phases of construction. Please accept this letter as the permit required
notification.
Sincerely,
THE WO TEN COMPANY
?' "" ?1n J ?t ct?\
Ralph . Mobley, Jr.
c: NRWASA-Harold Herring
TWC File (w/encl)
RIN&NOW20
JUL 2 5 2006
120 Noith Bolan k.enue
Raleigh NC 27603-1123
919.828.0531
DENR -WATER QUALITY
VvETLAN S AND TO.R A ATER BRANCH
fax [phone]
??F W AT F9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
-? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 05-0942
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
McIntyre & Associates
4932B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property: Massey Preserve Subdivision
EXPRESS REVIENPROGRAMNOTIFICATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On September 28, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification to construct
the proposed subdivision. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your subdivision, you are required to notify this office in
writing by July 27, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation
of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
6-1--6
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/lem
cc: Mr. Jay Keller, Skelly & Loy Inc., 6404 Falls of the Neuse Road, Raleigh, NC 27604
USACE, Raleigh Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050942Mass eyPreserveS D(W ake)EXP+NOT
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nom` Carolina
Xlura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

7
DWQ# Date (.. ! I /Os- Who Reviewed: h C l??t
Plan Detall Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
1 di aters and bank stabilization on the site plan. `u

El
please show all stre Impacts including all fiLll s o es, ssip
- 111-,N:A Y!I,Q tc, i ti 1?I? ???u `?I1L'??1 ?12 '7???t;?? ?irCv? Sf
Pl ase sh? all wetland impacts including fill slopes.on the site plan.

e
Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. is-C' JLLVQ, <>? t1:'?i l' ?. O r ele?r I
Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. 'i rte 1A ct I r F° r
I i. Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. I
('• S jilt ` L'w v ??..t . Z
Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater. management practices asrequired by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. <rt?. •x
-??ro?:?c? bi 5??,??:.?`\??. ?r..? ???t (U?• wi+h ??frp,-?'ct?2
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on th6 site plan. ?.
?GtIGI-hOt2S
ad b conducted
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts alre y een
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the dr provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the - labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
rovide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
s and
h
l
i
p
e p
an
se t
Please rev
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.

? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. -Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
15 A NCAC 2H
i
.
n
plan must conform to the requirements
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
JAY KELLER
Wetland Ecologist;
Environmental Specialist
S1404 Falls of the Neuse Road Phone: [phone]°
iuite 103 Fax: [phone](
laleigh, NC 27615 E-mail: [e-mail]
MISSION STATEMENT
Skelly and LoY is determined to exceed total
client expectations in the performance of
qualitA. engineering and environmental sen-ices
CORE VALUES
To produce Quality Work On-Time & Within Budget
To Keep Staff Members Gainfully Ernploved
To Earn A Reasonable Profit