NC0033804_Site Visit_20170926

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Charles Weaver
From: Will Hart
Washington Regional Office
Application No.: NCO033804
Facility name: TS Cooper Elementary School WWTP
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge f�ty staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are gpplicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or ® No
a. Date of site visit:
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: and their contact information -
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: 36.25.28 Longitude: 76.36.27
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification: C; NSW
- ext.
RECEIVEDUDEWWR
River Basin and Subbasin No. UT to Raynor's Swamp (Hunter's Millpond) 03-01-01
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses.
H. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
SEP 26 2017
Water Quality
Permitting Section
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #.
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities• The description in the current permit appears to be correct.
Proposed flow. No change
Current permitted flow: 0.004 MGD
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc )
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
FORM. WQROSSR 04-14 Pagel of 3

4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc )? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain
5 Is the residuals management plan adequate9 ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6 Are the existing application rates (e g, hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable'? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain -
7 Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program
8 Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9 Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain -
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain.
11 Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
12 Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review Self-monitonne data do not indicate any compliance
issues.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13 Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain -
14 Check all that apply.
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i e, NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place9
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain -
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16 Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only)
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain -
2. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

Iti
3. Signature of report preparer. I
Signature of regional supervisor -
Date:
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
A site visit was not conducted for this review,• the Regional Office inspector is scheduled to perform routine
compliance inspection October 2017 Currently, there do not appear to be any compliance issues at the facility. I am
not sure of the location of the outfall and therefore I cannot comment on the accuracy of the location coordinates in
BIMS.
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3