20131005 Ver 2_401 Application_20170917

Kimley>»Horn
September 21, 2017
Mr. James Lastinger
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Y6,rr3
ns
RE: Nationwide Permit 29 Permit Application/Reauthorization
Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins:
FS P;G22017
On behalf of our client, Westford WEH LP, Kimley-Horn is submitting the attached permit
application/reauthorization under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 for the above referenced project in
Wake County. The Westford Tract Mixed Use Development was previously permitted under the 2012
Nationwide Permit 29 (Action ID: SAW -2013-01613), verified by the USACE on October 8, 2013 and
NCDWR on November 5, 2013. The project was initially planned to be constructed within the permit
approval window and/or the 12 -month extension following expiration of the 2012 Nationwide Permits,
however the proposed Site Plan was modified slightly since the 2013 permit verification. Since the
original permit verification for the project has expired and the Site Plan has been slightly modified, the
attached permit application/reauthorization has been prepared based on the current Site Plans for
authorization under the 2017 Nationwide Permits.
Three wetlands would be impacted by the proposed Site Plan over four impact sites, totaling 0.458
acre of wetland impact. Site 1 (wetland WC) is a proposed road crossing totaling 0.347 acre, resulting
from the road construction and fill slope. The Site layout was shifted as far north on the property as
practical to minimize impacts to the wetland. Two utilities have been co -located with the road impact
to further minimize impacts to WC, and the fill slope associated with the road will provide the required
cover over the pipes. Site 2 (0.019 acre) will impact wetland WD in the southern tip to construct a
culvert inlet and prevent impoundment issues that could result from the construction of a sewer
easement between wetland WC and WD. Site 3 (0.036 acre) will impact wetland WE, a small
depressional feature located in the central portion of the Site, due to Site regrading to provide borrow
material and construction staging necessary for project construction. Site 4 (0.056 acre) will impact

Kimley>»Horn
Page 2
the upper edge of wetland WD to construct the Wimberly Road Extension and provide access into the
eastern end of the property. Impacts at Site 4 will result from roadway and fill slope construction.
Previously authorized impacts totaled 0.443 acre of wetland impacts, and the proposed site plan
modifications will result in 0.458 acre of wetland impacts. Mitigation has been proposed via payment
into the NC Division of Mitigation Services' ILF program, and approval for mitigation of up to 0.50 acre
of wetland impact is included as part of this application package.
To assist in your review of this NWP application, the following information has been included:
• PCN Application Form • NCDMS ILF Acceptance Letter
• Signed Agent Authorization Form 0 NCDWR 401 Application Fee of $240
Figures
Proposed Impact Figure
Plan Sheets
If you need any additional information to assist in your review of this NWP application, feel free to
contact me at 919-678-4155 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Cc: Eric Rifkin — Westford WEH LP

0/2��0' WAWA rf;q
I IL.J_W`�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
® Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Westford WEH LP
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
n/a
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Eric Rifkin
3d.
Street address:
56 Hunter Street, Suite 230
3e. City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27502
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-387-1885
3g.
Fax no.:
--
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn
5c. Street address:
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
5e. Telephone no.:
919-678-4155
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0722567561, 0722775509, 0722761827, 0722860912
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.7477989 Longitude: -78.9085999
1 c. Property size:
101.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reedy Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear (Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the site is forested. The tract is bordered by the US 64 corridor to the south, and mixed use residential and commercial properties to the
north, east, and west. A new sewer line has recently been installed on the western side of the tract, running from Jenks Road to US 64 as part of the
Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facility - West Reedy Branch Gravity Sewer (SAW -2005-20159).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.07 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 596 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project will construct a multi -family residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The tract will be developed into a mixed-use development with retail, single family, and multi -family dwellings. Associated roads, parking, utilities, and
stormwater infrastructure will be constructed as part of the project. Typical residential and commercial construction equipment will be used including dump
trucks, bulldozers, backhoes, tracked excavators, graders, and pavers.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: IGmley-Horn
Name (if known): Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE Preliminary JD Signed 08/28/2013 (SAW -2013-01613), Town of Apex Buffer Determination Signed April 10, 2017.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
®Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
This project was previously permitted under the 2012 NWP 29 as SAW -2013-01613, verified by the USACE on 10/8/2013. NCDWR issued the 401
approval on 11/5/2013 as DWR# 13-1005. Project was initially planned to be constructed by the end of the 12 -month period following permit
expiration (3/18/2017), however due to a site plan change, an updated permit application is being submitted since the previous NWP expired.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Construction will be completed as one single and complete project.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
© Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
TemDorary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 WC (P)
Fill (Road Crossing)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps/404
0.347
W2 WD (P)
Fill (Utility Installation)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps/404
0.019
W3 WE (P)
Borrow/Staging
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps/404
0.036
W4 WD p
Fill (Road Crossing)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps/404
0.056
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.458 ac
2h. Comments: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will result from construction of two interior connector roads and
associated fill slopes and easements (W1 and W4), installation of a utility crossing and easements (W2),
and construction of a borrow/staging area to facilitate construction of the multi -family residential project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No stream impacts will result from the proposed construction.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No impacts to open waters will result from the proposed construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
No ponds will be constructed as part of the proposed project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
n/a
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
n/a
5k. Method of construction:
n/a
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
Jordan Lake
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ® Other: WaterS pply
Watershed
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: No buffer impacts will result from the proposed construction. See attached buffer determination documentation.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were minimized to the greatest extent practical by careful location and routing of
interior connector roads as close to the historically filled/disturbed areas as possible. The proposed development will be
located close to Jenks Road to avoid the lowland areas at the south end of the tract near US 64.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers in the project vicinity will be avoided and minimized throughout construction by using tree protection
and silt fencing to prevent encroachment into undisturbed wetland areas and to ensure equipment and materials are located within permitted project
corridor at all times. Construction access to wetland impact areas will be routed through uplands or disturbed areas of the Site where practical. Stormwater
Control Measures will be used throughout construction to reduced stormwater impacts to downstream receiving waters and to minimize runoff.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
Q DWQ Q Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
X❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments: Approved banks in the watershed were contacted and no wetland credits are available to meet the
mitigation requirement for the proposed impacts with 3rd party mitigation credits.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: n/a linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: n/a
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): n/a square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 1.0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: n/a acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: n/a acres
4h. Comments: NCDMS ILF Approval for mitigation of up to 0.5 acre of impact is attached.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes © No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments:
No impacts to protected riparian buffers will result from the proposed project.
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The Stormwater Management Plan and diffuse flow plan are under the jurisdiction of
® Yes ❑ No
the Town of Apex and will be reviewed by the Town of Apex prior to construction.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
51%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
n/a
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Apex, but the plan will ensure that
stormwater is not concentrated and discharged through the buffer.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Local Government (Town of Apex)
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Town of Apex, North Carolina
® Phase II
® NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval be:e:nn::]
E] Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
ORW
(check all that apply):
Law 2006-246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project has been planned and designed in accordance with the Town of Apex Western Area Plan, and was designed
to fulfill the need for housing and retail for currently projected growth in this area. This development will not result in
further additional development beyond what is currently proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed development will connect to Town of Apex sewer facilities, which will be treated by the Town of Apex.
Town of Apex sewer facilities are connected to the Western Wake Partnership facilities, serving the area to the year
2030. The sewer system will more than accommodate the sewage disposal requirements of the proposed development.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
n/a
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? A review of NCNHP database records (updated July 2017), USFWS critical habitat descriptions, and onsite
field surveys for suitable habitat areas and community types.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Marine Fisheries Service EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Historic Preservation Office Web GIS Service.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: n/a
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Digital Flood insurance Rate Map (DFIRM)
panels.
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
O"
9/20/2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

SIGNED AGENT AUTHORIZATION

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Eric Rifkin
Address: 56 Hunter Street, Suite 230, Apex, NC 27502
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Date: September 20, 2017
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Mr. James Lastinger
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Westford WEH LP hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in my/our
behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations, Section 404
permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Jordan Lake Water Supply
Watershed Riparian Buffer Authorizations, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process
or revocation by the owner.
In addition, 1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the day ofbe X017
Qes+-P.rd WC -N L—P
Print Property Owner's Name
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Property Owner's Signature
Ef{c-pill, SiS'ra-�.� �%1Ce P, k

FIGURES

Project Study Area
s
0
A a <
0
3
JE Y's RO O
ti
J2
FFk
64
0
D
P- E AYN
Y ENBOR� � DR
DONCRO CT LANSBROOKELN
Z
C""A2-/CL P 0"
a z g
z
p° ~ ti GI
�yPNT
PO
Np LN O m 2 � �9
0 w
Legend � Y a
0 500 1,000 Feet kELLYR�poEO
LU
w D�
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
KimleyoHorn Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
September 2017

` JJ
IS
160 1
00 1
F ' •1
. � ,✓ -�. ,;�,,,�` t ,� Legend
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet ., Project Area
Alp ..a
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Kimley>>>Horn Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
September 2017

CrE
Kimley>>)Horn
w
`= Legend
0 250 500 50 1,000 Feet Project Area
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
September 2017
Cfi6"
Map Symbol
Soil Unit
Hydric
'"
CrB2
Creedmore sand loam, 2 to 6% slopes, eroded
No
CrC2
Creedmore sand loam, 6 to 10% slopes, eroded
No
GrB
Granville sandyloam, 2 to 6% slopes
No
,.
GrC
Granville sandyloam, 6 to 10% slopes
No
r
f
Gu
Gullied Land
No
Wy
Worsham sandy loam
Yes
- V
rB2
2
,.
CrE
Kimley>>)Horn
w
`= Legend
0 250 500 50 1,000 Feet Project Area
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
September 2017

rrc wvOpdrfaon _____—__—_ I 'iizm rrrn
�wnd OK w
me ue nw. a Ivo ,ew rn\xew
TO OfL n01CW i
\ \ wiawiavtxroiesrwnm sr
\ \\ aweu .wn9o.4a
L
Impact Site W3
Borrow/Staging
Bean !�', y.,yl•.., ,., ,��,,r �'�� /�,.
Impact Site W1 „k 0.036 acre
Road Crossing 1 ;,
l
0.347 acre KN
= l;
I /',l ✓/rte �1' !, . ,I i _ l\ •\ � ,l , , I �
�• r a ;! -'' I�\`\ _� 1�, 1 ; Impact Site W4
Road Crossing
I ' li�y ,\� .� / r �� 1 . , j ' ' \� •� ,., - ' I - 0.056 acre
iiQ I �
/Z,V
Impact Site W2
- -- -
Utility Installation
,,:) , \,�� - l;a,d�'`," l; % /�l/ 1 \ °'"`` ; ;,- -,! : , ; '\ 0.019 acre
..� �... - � pwl,�n.-._[�_�►nr� 1 / '
.Y ,1
IV; d / / .ean�w•�m. f / /. I �. I 1 \ — - 'ni7w'Lz�-.earm rx , 5� I 1 1 , l ' I l
I �; Legend
Proposed Wetland Impacts
drnb.lic r'I / /� or row+nwpt •' / / — __ / /, (,,,/ \ w' -_- I 1 � I lr , / !, / �
Jurisdictional Streams
ice^ /v�� sne«°�ro 1r 4 1-
�;?N~ Jurisdictional Wetlands
0 250 500 Feet- Project Area
Figure 5: Proposed Impacts Figure
Krmley>>> Horn Westford Tract Mixed Use Development
J Apex, Wake County, North Carolina
September 2017

NCDMS ILF PROGRAM
ACCEPTANCE LETTER

Mitigation Services
FNV,RnNMFNTpt nU4 TY
Eric Rifkin
Westford WEH LP
56 Hunter Street Suite 230
Apex, NC 27502
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
September 12, 2017
Expiration of Acceptance: March 12, 2018
Project: Westford Tract Mixed Use Development County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/ within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS. the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin I Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
Cape Fear 03030002 Riparian Wetland up to .50
Upon receipt of payment. DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Jason Hartshorn, agent
Sincerely,
A� 349
J me . B Stanfill
As Management Supervisor
St.uc,+1]nnh Carolina Jnr noi_mentel i!ualm >inittap, it lcmc,,
lo�2Vail Sen i.e ('enter R:1121a.%('21OlA- la,;? 21-\l'. Junes Street.;,lpe?000
')Iv 707897o I