20071055 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20081208

J? i55
CUTAWHISKIE CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
2008 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (YEAR-1)
PREPARED FOR:
NCDENR - ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center D (= ? ? p?? no
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16152 (9 NO-
"'Stem
t'R6l4:NA.M
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
AND
O F C 8 2008
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH

ECOSCIENCE: A SUBSIDIARY OF PBS&
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101 let E [" _ ?008
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 tjC ECOSYSTEM
Tel [phone] Fax [phone] ENHANCFPu ENT PROGRAM
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCEEP CONTRACT NO. D06066-A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................ ........................................................... 3
2.1 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ........................................................... 3
2.3 Location and Setting ........................................................................................................... 4
2.4 History and Background .....................................................................................................5
3.0 PROJECT MONITORING AND RESULTS ....................... ........................................................... 7
3.1 Vegetation Assessment .......................................................................................................7
3.2 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................................. 8
3.3 Wetland Assessment .........................................................................................................12
4.0 METHODOLOGY .............................................................. ..........................................................12
5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................... ..........................................................12
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................13
LIST OF TABLES
Table I Project Mitigation Objectives and Structure .........................................................................4
Table II Project Activity and Reporting History ................................. ................................................5
Table III Project Contacts ..................................................................... ................................................6
Table IV Project Background ............................................................... ................................................7
Table V Vegetation Plot Summary ..................................................... ................................................ 8
Table VI Hydrological (Bankfull) Verification .................................... ................................................8
Table VII Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment ......................................................8
Table VIII Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ....................................................................9
Table IX Morphology and Hydrologic Monitoring Summary ............. ............................................. 10
Table X Wetland Criteria Attainment .............................................................................................. 12
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2A, 2B: Integrated Problem Area Plan View ..................................................................... Appendix D
Figure 3: 2008 Precipitation Graph ................................................................................................. Appendix C
Figure 4: N.C. Drought Monitor Data ............................................................................................. Appendix C
EEP Contract No. D06066-A i 2008 Monitoring Report
APPENDIX A: VEGETATION RAW DATA
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Site Vegetation Photo Stations
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX B: GEOMORPHOLOGIC RAW DATA
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Cross-Section Plots: B-1 to B-6 and Stream Photos
Longitudinal Profile Plot
APPENDIX C: WETLAND RAW DATA
Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
APPENDIX D: INTEGRATED PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW
EEP Contract No. D06066-A ii 2008 Monitoring Report
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") was constructed for the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to provide compensatory stream and wetland
mitigation in the Chowan River Basin. This restoration project is located on an unnamed tributary to
Cutawhiskie Creek on a 23.9 acre Site located in Hertford County (Figure 1). The project includes
stream restoration (Priority 1) and preservation, as well as riparian wetland restoration and enhancement.
The following report summarizes the monitoring activities that have occurred in the past year (the first
year of project monitoring) at the Site. Site construction began and was completed in November 2007.
As-built surveys for the Site were performed in February 2008. First year monitoring was conducted
throughout the growing season of 2008. The Site must demonstrate vegetative and hydrologic success
criteria and a stable restored stream channel for a minimum of five years or until the Site is deemed
successful. The following paragraphs summarize the results of the 2008 year monitoring.
Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring for Year 1 was performed based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Levels
1 and 2 (Lee et al. 2006). CVS methodology determines density and survival of planted species, and
individuals resulting from natural regeneration. Plot locations are shown in Figures 2A and 2b (Appendix
D) and are 10m x 10m each. The taxonomic standard for vegetation follows Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas (Weakley, 2007).
Vegetative monitoring success will be achieved by plot data indicating an average number of planted
stems per acre exceeding 320 stems/acre after the third year of monitoring and 260 stems/acre after the
fifth and final year of project monitoring. Based on Year-1 surveys, the average count of the surviving
planted species is 672 stems per acre. If volunteer species are included, the total number of stems
increases to 1246 stems per acre. The Site meets and exceeds the established success criteria for
vegetation based on the survival of the planted species.
Stream Monitoring
Success criteria for the restored stream reach has been established to confirm that no significant changes
have occurred to the dimension, pattern, profile, and bed material over the 5-year monitoring period.
Location surveys of the constructed features were conducted to verify the performance of the stream. A
total station survey was performed to describe the stream longitudinal profile and six permanent stream
cross-sections (3 riffles and 3 pools). Overall, the stream channel bed form and banks are stable. Based
on the cross-sections, longitudinal profile and visual observations, the channel dimensions have not
changed compared to as-built conditions.
Wetland Hydrology Monitoring
The 2008 hydrologic monitoring results indicate moderate hydrologic success within the Site. Two of the
on-Site gauges (Gauges 3 and 4) exhibited saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for at least
12.5 percent (consecutive days) of the growing season (March 28 - November 7 or 225 days). Gauges 1,
2, and 5 exhibited saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 5 to 12.5 percent of the growing
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 1 2008 Monitoring Report
CHOWAN RIVER B/
(0003010204)

ticoScience
A division of _
CUTAWHISKIE CREEK
RESTORATION SITE
MONITORING REPORT
YEAR-1
Hertford County, North Carolina
Date:
NOV 2008
Scale:
AS SHOWN
ESC Project No.:
06-306
pared by: Project: SITE LOCATION Dwn. By: Ckd By: FIGURE
season. Drought conditions throughout the monitoring period likely contributed to the lower than
expected hydrologic saturation periods. Data obtained from the North Carolina Drought Management
Advisory Council indicates that drought conditions have persisted within Hertford County almost
continuously since on-Site construction in November 2007. Figure 3 (Appendix C) shows the monthly
precipitation in Hertford County during 2008 compared to the historic monthly rainfall. Figure 4
(Appendix C) displays drought conditions in North Carolina during Year-1 monitoring and shows the
progression of drought intensity in the Cutawhiskie Creek watershed.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Project Objectives
Site restoration activities included the excavation of a new stream channel, limited floodplain excavation,
removal of stumps and debris, existing channel backfilling, on-Site drainage ditch removal, and final
grading and soil preparation within the adjacent floodplain. These activities were proposed to reintroduce
surface water flood hydrodynamics from a 0.9-square mile watershed along the newly restored length of
stream and floodplain. The new channel was constructed to reflect regional stream characteristics and
accommodate bankfull flows. Characteristic wetland soil features, groundwater wetland hydrology, and
hydrophytic vegetation communities are expected develop in areas adjacent to the constructed channel.
Wetland and adjacent slope soil surfaces were restored and the Site reforested to riparian and upland slope
hardwood communities. Plant community associations were designed to mimic various communities
described by Schafale and Weakley (1990), including Coastal Plain Levee Forest, Cypress-Gum Swamp,
Mesic-Mixed Hardwood Forest, and Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp.
Specific ecological benefits anticipated as a result of on-Site restoration activities are as follows:
o Stream channel restoration will reintroduce stable bankfull dimension, pattern, and profile along
restored stream reaches, which is expected to greatly enhance lotic habitat quality and stream
function.
o Floodplain excavation adjacent to restored streams will restore the characteristic flood regime as
well as provide a lateral hydrologic input to restored wetland areas adjacent to the UT and
within the greater Cutawhiskie Creek floodplain.
o Restored and enhanced wetland areas will help to improve water quality via nutrient removal,
increase local vegetative biodiversity, provide wildlife habitat, and serve as a forested corridor,
linking the Site with adjacent forested areas.
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
The primary restoration features within the Site include the UT to Cutawhiskie Creek and approximately
12.9 acres of drained, hydric soils. The UT has been dredged and straightened, such that it no longer
retained stable dimension, pattern, and profile. Side-cast material (spoil piles) from dredging was
deposited along the west bank of the channel. A moderate headcut (approximately 2 foot drop in
elevation over 20 linear feet of stream channel) was observed near the upstream (north) extent of the Site
boundary, indicating vertical instability. Due to its high level of entrenchment because of
dredging/incision, large flooding events were confined within the channel at its current dimension.
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 3 2008 Monitoring Report
On-Site restoration activities provide the following project mitigation units:
Table I: Project Restoration Components
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Mitigation Units
Linear Footage
Project Segment Mitigation (LF)
or Reach ID e Approach or Acreage (AC) Stationing Comment
UT to Cutawhiskie Creek

(active restoration) R P1 2,540 LF 0+00-25+40
Passive restoration
through floodplain
UT to Cutawhiskie Creek R NA 359 LF NA not stationed.
(passive restoration) Braided reach
measured as straight
line distance
2593 LF actual
Stream Preservation P NA 519 LF NA design units, however
(Cutawhiskie Creek) only 20 percent is
available for SMU
Riparian Wetland

Restoration R NA 11.9 AC NA
1.1 AC actual design
Riparian Wetland WE NA 0
6 AC NA units, however only
Enhancement . 0.6 LF available as
WMU
R = Restoration PI = Priority 1
P = Preservation NA = Not applicable
WE = Wetland Enhancement
2.3 Location and Setting
Land uses in the vicinity of the Site consist primarily of agriculture, forest, pastureland, roadside
shoulders, and residential lots. Row crops including soybeans, cotton, and corn were actively cultivated
on the Site and surrounding areas. The Site is immediately adjacent to a farm and timberland. There is
no livestock or poultry production in the vicinity. Timber is actively harvested from adjacent forested
areas. A large, contiguous bottomland hardwood stand was harvested just west of the Site along the
Cutawhiskie floodplain in the spring of 2006. The Site encompasses approximately 23.9 acres of primary
and secondary floodplain associated with Cutawhiskie Creek. The Site includes a UT that flows into
Cutawhiskie Creek from the north (Figure 1). Portions of the Site had been logged prior to restoration
activities, while other areas within the Site were actively managed for timber or agricultural production.
Prior to restoration, the Site vegetation was generally characterized by bottomland hardwood forests along
un-logged areas on the Cutawhiskie Creek floodplain and low terraces, row crops including soybeans and
corn, and successional communities associated with cut-over timberland.
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 4 2008 Monitoring Report
2.4 History and Background
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A

Activity Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data Collection
Complete Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan N/A* December 2007 January 2007
Final Design (90%) N/A* December 2007 January 2007
Construction N/A* N/A* November 2007
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area November 2007 N/A* November 2007
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments November 2007 N/A* November 2007
Bare Root Seedling Installation February 2008 N/A* February 2008
Mitigation Plan Aril 2008 February 2008 Aril 2008
Minor repairs made filling small washed out areas N/A* N/A* N/A*
Final Report N/A* N/A* N/A*
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring November 2008 August 2008 November 2008
Year 1 Stream Monitoring November 2008 September 2008 November 2008
*N/A- Activities and reporting history for these items are not applicable to this restoration project
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 5 2008 Monitoring Report
Table III. Project Contacts
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Designer EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone]
Construction Contractor Anderson Farms
179 NC 97 East
Tarboro, NC 27886
[phone]
Planting Contractor Carolina Sylvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
[phone]
Seeding Contactor Anderson Farms
179 NC 97 East
Tarboro, NC 27886
[phone]
Erosion Supply Company

Seed Mix Sources 8817 Midway West Rd
Raleigh, NC 27617
[phone]
South Carolina Super Tree Nursery Company
5594 Highway 38 South
Nursery Stock Suppliers Blenheim, SC 29516
[phone]
Monitoring Performers EcoScience: A Division of PBS&J
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
919 828-3433
Stream Monitoring POC Jens Geratz
Vegetation Monitoring POC Elizabeth Scherrer
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 6 2008 Monitoring Report
Table IV. Project Background
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Project County Hertford
Drainage Area 0.9 square miles
Impervious cover estimate (%) <1 percent
Stream Order 1 st order
Physiographic Region Coastal Plain
Ecoregion (Griffith and Omemik) Mid-Atlantic Flatwood
Ros en Classification of As-built E5
Cowardin Classification Stream (R3UB2)
Dominant soil types Craven fine sandy loam (Aquic Hapludults)
Leaf loam (Typic Albaquults)
Wilbanks silty clay loam (Cumulic Humaquepts)
Reference Site ID Black Branch, Bullard Branch, UT to Town Creek
USGS HUC for Project 03010204
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project 03-01-02
NCDWQ classification for Project C-NSW
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment? No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor N/A
Percent of project easement fenced N/A
3.0 PROJECT MONITORING AND RESULTS
3.1 Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation monitoring (10 X l0m) plots have been established to monitor planted vegetation within Site
restoration and enhancement areas. Site vegetation was monitored in accordance with the guidelines and
procedures developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) (CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.0, 2006). Established vegetation monitoring plot
locations are displayed on the Integrated Problem Area Plan View (Appendix D). Vegetative monitoring
success will be achieved by plot data indicating an average number of planted stems per acre exceeding
320 stems/acre after the third year of monitoring and 260 stems/acre after the fifth and final year of
project monitoring. During Year-1 monitoring, the Site met vegetation success criteria with an average of
672 planted stems per acre. The following Table V summarizes vegetation plot density for Year-1
monitoring. Refer to Appendix A for vegetation data collected during Year-1 Monitoring. No vegetation
problem areas were identified during Year-1 monitoring.
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 7 2008 Monitoring Report
Table V. Vegetation Plot Summary
Planted Stems per Acre
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Plot MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
1 728
2 688
3 688
4 688
5 567
MEAN 672
3.2 Stream Assessment
Table VI Hydrological (Bankfull) Verifications
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Date of Photo
Date of Data Collection Occurrence Method Number
No bankfull events recorded
during Year-1 monitoring NA NA NA
Table VII. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
Segment/Reach: 2,540 feet
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 100%
C. Thalwe 100% 100%
D. Meanders 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100%
F. Bank Condition 100% 100%
G. Rock Vanes N/A N/A
H. Root Wads N/A N/A
To ensure stable bankfull dimension, pattern, and profile along the restored channel, annual stream
assessment surveys were undertaken. A longitudinal profile along the entirety of the UT and six stream
channel cross-sections were established and surveyed to monitor any potential instability and adverse
changes in channel geometry (Integrated Problem Area Plan View [Appendix D] for cross-section
locations). Profile and cross-section plots are located in Appendix C. Channel geomorphic data is
summarized on Tables VIII and IX. Success criteria for stream restoration and Level 1 enhancement will
include 1) successful classification of the reach as a functioning system (Rosgen 1996) and 2) channel
stability indicative of a stable stream system. No stream problem areas were identified during Year-1
monitoring.
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 8 2008 Monitoring Report
C N O O q (7,
00 (V V'1 O O O
O O
N z z
+
o "t (2, N O O O ° M ONO D M ¢ a [? \Q'

Q

'? t
n
"'
°
M
V')
V1

M
O,
?
?t
0
N
°
O
N
M
z
z tn

N
O O

p
?O
O
V1
?t
N
?O
O
l?
O
00
O
O
r
N O
Q
--
Q
Q

y O +
0 O M oo
"t O C%
0
0
0
O
O
N
p
O
N
O
O
Q
Q
.. r ^ z O O O N z z
•? O p ? W) r- (7, ¢ .-. N O O O o O WI) O O ¢ d N °v a d W a
Q " a0 M h vl °O N N m z z N 'r z z W z

o p O r- to N O l?
00 O
o l? O g O O
?O l? O 'z O N M 00 z z
.0t 00 ° ° n M W) 06 N
U N N z z Z z t
C
w
C 00 N v? M C7,

06 M Q M Q
00 Q Vl O Q

Z Q

z O O W a

z
A 37 N N z z ,? vi N z z oo O O

O
V1 z O
p~"
rC
N
r
N
p?
•--
n
v?
?`'
°
Q
z
Q
z
O
N
O

N

N

z

z

''
N

b O

U p
O
y

N O z q
M a N ¢ ?r ?r * ?t ?r ?r t

z

z
??"i Q
i b a, z z z z z z z z z z
W U

bq
Q
O
Q
¢
¢
Q *
a ,?
¢
a
¢
d
a
s o
o
C-4 o
O
C'4
O M
Q
v?
Q
z z z z z z z z _
z z z z N N ^' O z z

O V1
E` o '?
?;
N
?}
O
V1
l?
M
Q
d
d
d
¢
d
¢
a
a
¢
¢
a
¢
a O° ° °° z z z z z z z z z z z z
v,
ON
Q
<
d
<
d
z z z z z z z z

[,
<
Q
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
a
¢
Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

F, Q d Q 6 d ¢ d d d

Q ¢ a ¢ ¢
d
3 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
?
D
a a ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a ¢ a ¢ d ¢ d
a
¢
d
'
a
y '
z z z 'z 'z 'z z
' z z
' 'z zz zz z z z z zz
ca

Q
1
¢
¢
Q
¢ <
d Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
d
Q
d

Q
Q

z
z
2
z
z
z
'z
z
z
z
z
'z
z
z
z
z
z z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z

c?
C Q Q Q Q Q Q T Q ? Q Q Q Q ? Q Q Q Q
z z z Z z z z ?? z z z z z z z z z z z
cv ..? '1 '0 '? 4v J'„ ?v q 'y W o a
c O v bA ?bU p N ?"+
N
3 3 ? A Q ? c ? 3 ? b o ? "0 s g o o a
,
,
owG C c '? u a. x W U ? w w d °o o P v w U
0 0
w d o b a o
a .
> c c
o cn
oa
w b
x a b U o b
r N v a x a
3
d w
oa w
40 ;;
y x

a
A V
w
o;
v? V
d
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 9 2008 Monitoring Report

y ?^

?
U

O? p ? N o0 ? ? O O Nr
. d
c

V1 F C
M
O ? ,O

O

U N O

z

N N M N N o v (n
.O+
o U >
+
?
W
F

V1 ,0 j. O

? N
U

U . W)
^;
?O
O
O
VI
In
S
k

c
W t

o
?"
?
0
0
o
Q,
vi

S
v)
?O
V O ? ? N O
O
VI M - ? F-. p
? N
Q.
ti 'r O
y O
U .Ni O O O O 00 O
c, 0 O

M

r S
W
?r O ?' ?O N N N
? O O

r- O? ?O OO a\ q O r, O O O ?D

a b ?" c

A
A
?'
o
kn
a
00
o
so
o
o
i
3 3 E
oq O ? C 7 Co U M N w °' p C a N
p
a
'? ?
o
w
b

?
a
o

.5

i?

c

u

Ca U

G
?' 3 ` a d > Q
? p° w 3 x a b PG U o
w C
o y
o y ? U °
a ? e? ? 04
3
a d
E w
? ? ? ? c ?
a a a a a`
EEP Contract No. D06066-A 10 2008 Monitoring Report

M
r

C
z
?
«
.O y
U

W ?
?, y C
O d
b ? y O

D
? N
D c
0
O '?"

? N U
N
o a
+ o
C

3

ca 0 vi
F U •n

U
N
W
y
O
U N

?., O p l? O oo

a 0
A CU
A .rJ' K b O
"' d
0'
w c c
'•' a,
O
?.
a O

w

'd C
y b
y C
ce

? N w
as a
a
w
?
x

a h
?
A
EEP Contract No. D06066-A I 1 2008 Monitoring Report
3.3 Wetland Assessment
Success criteria for wetland hydrology require that restored areas be inundated or saturated by
groundwater within 12-inches of the ground surface for a period of 12.5% of the growing season. The
growing season in Hertford County begins on March 28 and ends on November 17 (225 days). In order to
achieve hydrologic success, saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface is required for 29
consecutive days. The results of the Year-1 hydrologic monitoring indicate moderate success within the
Site. Two of the on-Site gauges (Gauges 3 and 4) exhibited saturation within 12 inches of the ground
surface for at least 12.5 percent (consecutive days) of the growing season while gauges 1, 2, and 5
exhibited saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 5 to 12.5 percent of the growing season.
Drought conditions throughout the monitoring period likely contributed to the lower than expected
hydrologic saturation periods. Figure 3 shows the monthly precipitation for Hertford County in 2008
with the 30`s and 70`x' percentile rainfall amounts. Monthly rainfall amounts were below the 30`x'
percentile in five out of the nine months in the growing season. Figure 4 displays the nearly continuous
drought conditions in Hertford County in 2008 as recorded by the NC Drought Management Advisory
Council. Table X summarizes wetland hydrology criteria for Year-1 monitoring.
Table X. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A

ract

auge ID Gauge
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?

Tract
Mean

Vegetation
Plot ID

Vegetation Density Met
(320 stems/acre)

Tract
Mean
1 1 No 1 Yes
1 2 No 2 Yes
1 3 Yes 40% 3 Yes 100%
1 4 Yes 4 Yes
1 5 No 5 Yes
4.0 METHODOLOGY
No unavoidable deviations from initially prescribed methodologies were implemented as part of Year-1
monitoring activities.
5.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006 CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Weakley, A.S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas. Working draft of
January 2007. University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden,
University of North Carolina. 1015pp.
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A 12 2008 Monitoring Report
APPENDIX A: VEGETATIVE DATA
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared B Jeffrey Siceloff
Date Prepared 11/19/2008 8:58
database name cvs-ee -ent ool-v2.2.6.mdb
database location C:\Documents and Settin s\23508\M Documents
computer name RAL5ZODXFI
file size 40464384

DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT

Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets,
and a summary of project(s) and project data.

Pro', planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per
acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.

Pro' total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per
acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all
lanted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.

Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary
data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).

Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems
for all lots:

Vigor bS Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by
species.

Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number
of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted
b each.
Damage b S Damage values tallied b type for each species.
Damage b Plot Damage values tallied b type for each lot.

ALL Stems b Plot ands A matrix of the count of total living stems of each
species (planted and natural volunteers combined)
for each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code D04020
project Name Cutawhiskie Stream Restoration
Description restoration monitoring
River Basin Chowan
length(ft) 2,540
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (s m
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 5
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Table 2 Vegetation Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing Unknown
Liquidambar
st raciflua
1
N ssa biflora 1 15 11 2 10
Quercus 1 rata 18 1
Quercus michauxii 3
Quercus pagoda 4
Quercus hellos 7
Taxodium distichum 1 15 4 1 1
TOT: 7 3 62 15 3 12
Table 3.Vegetation Damage by Species

Species All Damage
Categories
(no damage)
Liquidambar
st raciflua
1
1
N ssa biflora 39 39
Quercus 1 rata 19 19
Quercus michauxii 3 3
Quercus pagoda 4 4
Quercus hellos 7 7
Taxodium distichum 22 22
TOT: 7 95 95
Table 4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
lot All Damage Categories (no damage)
D06066a-12345-0001-year: 1 19 19
D06066a-12345-0002- ear:1 22 22
D06066a-12345-0003- ear:1 22 22
06066a-12345-0004-year: 1 17 17
D06066a-12345-0005- earl 15 15
TOT: 5 95 95
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Table 5. Stem Count by Plot and Species

pecies

Total
Planted
Stems

#

lots

vg#
stems plot
D06066a-
12345-
0001-
earl plot
D06066a-
12345-
0002-
earl plot
D06066a-
12345-
0003-
earl plot
D06066a-
12345-
0004-
earl plot
D06066a-
12345-
0005-
earl
Liquidambar
st raciflua
1
1
1
1
N ssa biflora 29 4 7.25 4 10 10 5
Quercus I rata 18 4 4.5 1 3 7 7
Quercus michauxii 3 1 3 3
Quercus a oda 4 2 2 2 2
Quercus hellos 7 1 7 7
Taxodium distichum 21 5 4.2 4 4 4 4 5
Total 83 7 18 17 17 17 14
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Photo Stations
,r f , r
Photo Station 1
Photo Station 2
ul1f aSCPiM'6?: r` l r. 1.. 1' i%,1' a
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Photo Station 3
Vegetation Plots

Vegetation Plot 1
T?k? r ,v,n , At
5 ? 4 b 9
y Y?
?t.LL
..r. ? ?. ?. ,dam ?. ..
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 2
1 ?
?h1 X11 ?a3 a,a 5 '_
DWI 51 y
Vegetation Plot 4
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix A 2008 Monitoring Report
Vegetation Plot 5
APPENDIX B: GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix B 2008 Monitoring Report
Table B2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site - EEPContract No. D06066-A
2,540 linear feet
Feature
Category Metric (per As-built and reference baselines) (# Stable)
Number
Performin
g as
Intended Total
number
per
As-built Total
Number
/ feet in
unstable
state %
Perform
in Stable
Condition Feature
Perform
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles 1. Present? 77 77 N/A 100
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)? 77 77 N/A 100
3. Facet grade appears stable? 77 77 N/A 100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 77 77 N/A 100
5. Length appropriate? 77 77 N/A 100 100%

B. Pools 1. Present? (e.g not subject to severe aggrad. or

migrat.?)
76
76
N/A
100
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean Bkf

>1.6?)
76
76
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate? 76 76 N/A 100 100%

C. Thalweg 1. Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection)

centering?
N/A
N/A
N/A
100
2. Downstream of meander (glide/inflection)
centering? N/A N/A N/A 100 100%

D. Meanders 1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled

erosion?
N/A
N/A
N/A
100
2. Of those eroding, # w/concomitant point bar
formation? N/A N/A N/A 100
3. Apparent Re within spec? N/A N/A N/A 100
4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief? N/A N/A N/A 100 100%

E. Bed 1. General channel bed aggradation areas (bar
formation) N/A N/A 0/2540 100
General 2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing
down-cutting or head cutting? N/A N/A 0/2540 100 100%

F. Bank 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping N/A N/A 0/2540 100 100%

G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour? N/A N/A N/A N/A
2. Height appropriate? N/A N/A N/A N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? N/A N/A N/A N/A
4. Free of piping or other structural failures? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

H. Wads/ 1. Free of scour? N/A N/A N/A N/A
Boulders 2. Footing stable? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix B 2008 Monitoring Report

.
?
s
y R`r ,Y
e kL" r t

L r? ?
a N
V) \ A
c

D ._A
R
r

O
tr1.
R, Fwk
ELEVATION (FEET)
O

Z S
'"' 1X'•
K? t? - y 1 ?
A A A A A A A U? (P N
W A Ili Ol V W t0 O
r
?
.? ?- \ Yx .._ S e
S

1 dYI

Z y
k h Y
t..
o
A 3
? rJ

0

v -Lj
0
?
o
O
z ?
O

•
..
t ` r~
? o
X aP
O
O
o

z
//
y r A A A A A A (s
W a (P O? V Co ?° O N
0 1
(A
-

r
F, 5?1?
ti4
N j?? ?
oo
Z
o a < ? `° ° F FE
o
-? o N F Z
m 0 ?
3
m
°?
3O

?
z >
>
m
A
° O
x N
?

O
J O
O
J
I i t i 1 m
-

F

o
-
0
X0

0m
00
rn
K
p

o 001
Z Z 1.

c

N -4

msm=
X FA
0
-

WA .
a m

U

?.
0 g r0
Z O Z m
m

?

N
N
? D
? m
A
1i A
k

ao
y ji,

-J:

N
ELEVATION (FEET)

? - '?`
? ?.? }' a a P A a A a cn cn cn
w A (P T J OD tp o N

W °
o

0

°

?. X
N
- -- --- s N
0 o
p +
Z No Z1
J
a w

1

X ?:f I + ABM ?«
? o

°
O
7C f c
Z ? ?, f- W A A m J W tD O U. N

S= _
ac. ? .

o ?
o
0 ?
0. c
? c
? 5?
m ? ? ? a
? °
?
N U m
u
O

3
° a
i

o
?
o?
3
gg

- 21 La
am

N F c o°
N OHO

O
d O
J
b
N +
C m m
O ?.
N

N
8
NO
N N
AN
+n rn

i PI Z rI
OOA
c a0 I

0;v
1f
mDm=

® n

IK
3.

u r 0 z 1 y
o 0 Z
Z '? Z m

X

(A i'Fl a - cc 9n'F D
W
C
mA v
-4

x Y 40 ELEVATION (FEET)
y-- [?
_ A A A A V A A (P CP IP
e
9
z
C)

}
m O
X
A .,.Jtt7ro O
_

J?iIN l
k O
U)
ys
0 o
+ __
_
O
Z N
O

+ 0

+
A
X
a, ; +
r
?' n
0
'J? P P P P A A (P (P U'
N
A [P J Qo [O O
Z a# W
_
O m I n w !.t
?tr:i',
`

yr
t
m 4L

Y ?
v

O

C

C

Y
Y
Ynnn n
D

0
O.
?
?
h
h
h
n
ZZZ
O
?

3

O
p
F m
°
93
z z
3
j
ay
no
00 G D
N
W
= c 00
y
D D
G1 O
p
N J
2 1

y
xo

o
W VV)

0m =
A i

0

o mZm
00 °
A
m c

ut

y-i;a
mD _ =

z a m

?

$

p v;0 I
c
z ?
.r
4
??
i
-1
r Z X
Z
Z
? n
yca 4r

y?PeY' ?' VI
"
W esq... "
5 ; m ELEVATION (FEET)
O
•'

Z
?, ? A A A A F h A U U' <P
W A U O? J W tp O N

4-
ao

D
Z V
.. ,. n
°-
o0
7C

Z N
O
? ?
4 wH
2?y
a 4 -? Nay ':.n_.
y E{,,?__ _ O
? O

O r"i? " cn
. W !' [P O? J fb tp O N
J'
'x.
G 40

_ ?o
Z
O
o rt
a c
m 7N
? zD
?
?
?
'?
°
?
?

O
y
`C
`G n
00 I

c
F o
o
Z

3
o ° _ "
S 1 R
m i pyp
v
z
j ?
A
3o
30' 3 A

o
F
o
o- O
30

N
?
n O
J

1
g
a m Ll

i

d
oz- g' o
- 0

g 3 ?
A -
XD
N y
IAA
AN
m
? y x
m
p
o p
° m??
o 00.E
C:
Z? Z J v
o
A
C
'n
=iA
m>mx
1? N ?

u

o

° o
y:
o m 7 ? p ?c

1`
'ir. ... rl N
X
1
N W D I
A m
-
U
- AA
? Ys
t ? <
D :
-5
+ +c ?.,. O
° ELEVATION FE
ET)
O
??," "x..73.1 '{
''
A A A A A A A (P (P N
77
. Li l+ tP O? V Oo lD O N
Z
c> r

r o
,
CD +
D °
Z
x

'hat
o
4 X
(NTH
0 o
p +
n
Z N '?
o .

(D
u
0

I
di?
+
0

X
N

O
x to
°
O
? - A A A A A A A (P
U?
i
Z 'il ?
w A (n m V OJ t0 O N
O

D - -

S? r

i
?
m m 2 Z
o -?

o

a o o

i
F
3 a L a
3

x
N F N O
n

N 222
O
J V
t
? _ n 7 x
a m n°
T XO C
W o • F J (J"V) o in rn y0??
O OOA ?ylm•1V)
A-
N

i
n m l
H r
+
j l
?l
c V)
•
0 0 '
P= O 2s
O Z m
w K Z n

N ?

RI
k >
W C N

r. !<?1
?
?r
1 O
ELEVATION (FEET)
O
Z -
O _ '?, a a a a n r a cn cn cn

G1 _ x ?h` r?
0

tr o
ey
O
O +
Z o ?
O

rn
o
4:.. ?..
y
Z ?•
O

m a'
-

m
A 4 fi ?-' o
J ?p>
Z
m c c T D FL m° p
o
3 F o ?
N i
?
E
r'?
3o m

m

?
no
0,2
C
?
?

` ti O
2
? N
?
O O
V
N
N
III

I a

°

a x0

aNi((A A

0 ;

o ?Z?

?c 0 =A rn =
m

c
40
r"??

-

_ m

Yr I
o
i
° O ? ?
r_ 7
O O
O
Z
z
n Z (n

M
? X t4
X

I
I
I
? y

L
.

? ter-

I .?
N

X

X
i
O
O
M
T Z
7
7 ?
N -N
iO U
w ?
Y I¢`? m 3
1 X
S
8
8
00
8 ..
0
8
8
a
0
0
M
0
0
N
O
O
O
00 r- V 7 r
(I-J) UOIJUAala
§
8
»
} } X
2
:
*
f
f
2
j
�
�
©
�
�
x
�
/
o
CD
2
~
�
}
\
�
Q
-
�
�
k
�
§
9
�
-
�
7
ƒ
�
x
�
a
/
§
w
f
w
§
x
�
/
»
a
» a Q
#
(aaj)®FIV ms

APPENDIX C: WETLAND DATA
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix C 2008 Monitoring Report
(•ui) uoilLlidioaad
Ln o Un o Un o
N N - O O
L aagw;
CO
N
U
Q
om

04 4*
? I Z
L
U I
-
= .
4) •L (D
O cm
Cm
/om
o V
3
?

U o o
4

o
M gZ yady uosees 6
8 Ilady - uoseeS I
83 4oai
(u!) yldaa aalaM
L
O
O
2
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
V- a C07 M N N N w N w IT CD 94- w N w O V- w N w O
r r N N N M CM 1
(•ui) uoijulidpaid
Un O U? O Ln O
N N .- r O O
I aaqulanoN - L

W
CO
M
W
CO
O m
N
d) Z
V N
O
N = cc
0
0
cc C
V ?0
O
2 sz 1iady uoseaS E
g Iiady - uoseaS
gZ yoJew - uoseaS 6ulmo
(ui) yjdaa aalt?M
O
2
CO
O
O
N
06
N
Q.
Q
c
y
C
7
(z
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
O 0 N w 1* O (D N w 1* O? w N ((0 N N N M (0 0O
M M N N N- r
(•ui) uoilulidioaad
Un O u? o Iq O
N N r r O O
L aagwanoN -
LU
LL
m
00 Q
O m
N
O Z
V = ih
O
W =
O
7 i L
U ?
C
M gZ padd - uoseaS f
g Iiady - uoseaS
gZ yoaey4 - uoseas buimc
(u!) uldad aaluM
O

EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
O CO N 00 ? O CO N 00 ? O ? 00 N COO ? 00 N (? O
? M M N N N r r ? r r N N N M M?
(-ui) uoi}t?jidioaad
N
jagW,9AON - L

m

Q
CO
O m
N
O ? Z
V C ?
O

O?
O
O C
V co 0
4) -E
O
2 Sz 1!ady - uoseaS E
8 I!ady - uoseaS
gZ goaeW - uoseaS Bulmo
o Un o (n
N r Q
(ui) ylded j@IL M
0
O
c
0
2
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
O 0 N w? O (O N w't OICT w N w OIt M N (D O
M M N N N T T 7 7 N N N M M l
(•ui) uoilulidioaad
Un o Un o Lq O
N N T T O O
L aagwanoN -
ti
0
m
00
m
O
N
4)
O Z
V = LO
(D 'i
O
N
t = m
O?
cc C

U ca
O
2 sa 1iadd uoseas f
g liady - uoseas
OZ yoaew - uoseas bulmc
(u!) yldad aaleM
0
2
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
0 (D 0 M N N N N cTO T O O op N (O O V w N w O
.- T N N N C? (h 1
L
CL
?L
V
C
Q
az
_A
O =
N :3
4) O
U
U?
O
O
4)
's
3
co
U
M
O
i
7
EL
Cp In It M N O
(ui) uoijalidioaid
0
0
O
Z
0
O
U
O
0
O
Q
N
U)
0
O
O)
O
Q
0
0
0
O
c
o
Cu
0
O
a
Q
0
O
(l?
0
O
a?
U-
00
0
c
c?
O
U
O
O
O
Z
c
O
N
c0 .?
0-00
U) i
02
Zc
0(l)
cc U
02
QE
ZU
0-0
U _ co
O
a) Cz
a=
0 o
(D iZ-
( Z
U) 0
,? U
o?
?Z
• i2
!D U
N
U :3 a iv
O
L O
C C r
C OO
0 2 CO
C U U
CO O
o O CD O
N N 1l- CO
101I-
EEP Contract No. D-06066-A Appendix C Cutawhiskie Creek Restoration Site
Hertford County Drouaht Data
DM Drought Level Broug ht Conditions Percent Area
Date Level Descri ion None DO 01 D2 ,M
11 M 112008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 85.92 14.08 0.00 0.00
111412008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 85.92 14.08 0.00 0.00
1012812008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 85.92 14.08 0.00 0.00
1012112008 D1 Moderate Drought 0.00 0.00 84.97 15.03 0.00 0.00
10)1412008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 84.97 15.03 0.00 0.00
10)712008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 86.35 13.65 0.00 0.00
913012008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 86.35 13.65 0.00 0.00
912312008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
9M 6/2008 D2 Severe Drought 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
919f2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
902008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
8f26f2008 D2 Severe Drought 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
8f1 9f2008 D1 Moderate Drought 0.00 0.00 76.26 23.74 0.00 0.00
8)12/2008 D1 Moderate Drought 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
81512008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
712912008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7f2212008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7/1 5!2008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
702008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
71l 12008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 5.44 94.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
612412008 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 15.40 84.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
6P 7)2008 D1 Moderate Drought 0.00 15.40 84.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
611 012008 DO Abnormal! Dr 2.87 97.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
613)2008 Normal 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5127)2008 Normal 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5/2012008 Normal 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5113)2008 Normal 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
51612008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4129/2008 DO Abnormal! Dr 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4122/2008 D1 Moderate Drought 0.00 28.94 71.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
4M 5)2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 2.20 41.66 56.15 0.00 0.00
418/2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 2.20 41.66 56.15 0.00 0.00
4M 12008 D2 Severe Drought 0.00 0.00 1.96 98.04 0.00 0.00
3125)2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 1.96 98.04 0.00 0.00
3)18/2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 1.96 98.04 0.00 0.00
311112008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 1.96 98.04 0.00 0.00
31412008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
212612008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
211912008 Extreme Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.60 0.00
2112)2008 Extreme Drou M 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.78
2/512008 Extreme Drou M 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.78
1 J29f2008 Extreme Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.78
1 f22f2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.44 0 00
111512008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
1IM008 D2 Severe Drou N 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
1 M f2008 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
12125/2007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
12/1812007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
12M 112007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
12/412007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
11127f2OO7 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
11 f2Of2007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
11 tl 3)2007 D2 Severe Drou ht 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
11 i16f2007 D2 Severe Drought 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
I W30f2007 D1 Moderate Drou ht 0.00 0.00 91.59 8.41 0.00 0.00
M
EcoScience
Client:
i ual Reaxirces
A dim on of PW'J
uon kCoaarvetia
North Carolina
Drought Monitor Data
Cutawhiskie Creek Stream
and Wetland Restoration Site
Hertford County, North Carolina
III: __ICkdlt,: _I FIGURE
DEC 2008
N/A
Project No.
APPENDIX D: INTEGRATED PROBLEM AREA PLAN VIEW
DENR Contract No. D06066-A Appendix D 2008 Monitoring Report
LJJ Z p 3 0 0
Y C7 z LL ? 3: m T
n _ cf) Z F- ? W w
z Q- v o< o w
- jLLI QOO g 9m?Z U cn a Z
C Q U d L.L. 4- Z I..L a O W
(8Z 133HS 33S) 3NIlH3IVh
y
0
0
0
0
0
I, w
Q
U
I'nLll J
U)
0
0
0
W
F
oZZC.D
F0w
?Wo
O
0w?
a W
r J O
?Ow
O Ow-D
z Zao
z
O z
cn O
LO w <
Q
v cn
w
? c)
z c
0
.? D
z -
°3

"
" °
a
w
0
z
0 ° ~
w
Q
~
O
Li z O
~ w
0 (n (n

O
o? Q
'O

t-?

to

O U

Li
Z_
?
Z w N

N

0

0

o
O F- ui n Of
U =
a

U
a O

i
0 ?
> < ? w
aw p o O z z
?U z 0 o Q Q Q
wU
w D Q!? a? :?E
w :?i

w w
Cn of r >- LLI

N ftx
L;
J
xss
En V)
O U
C C C O
O O) rl) O)
LO 6)
?o d
CN LO N N
z z z
z O O w
O 1- F- w
Q
i > Of U
CY- < Of 0 z
i O w w E-- Q
l N of z W W z
w ?- 0 0:: cl? w
V) -
Q
j pC? p p
LLJ Q 0000 37 Q Q Q
Z (f) o< Ch Li LLJ ? Q cn Q ? W
j Ul maf I=- N 3
1

?.? Y o d-- co
p 3 0 0
ui X:
W m ai U) o
?n Ln z?-
=w?w a-j Y u a .. L'i
= w ofoo o ?mw> p Z
a
?I - ?o? w~w (Dowz Q o ?
}Zf]f 2 w?Q¢ o C?
D w_ za a m
i- ;r ¢ U 2 U of o
F 3 o Z N

z
O Z
cn O
_ w
n Q
cn w
w CD cn
L O
S Z
O

..
<
Z 00
O O O Z
0 0 O O

w z O ~
w ~
w z O w Q O
N ~ O cn cn U
Oo Q ZO LO U) O w
Z L
Z Ln CO
O
O lk?
O? N C' T-
o :
?
LLJ LO A O a
p LLJ ~ Q CD z z

cn
>
CD
w
W
Q
0 O
J O
J
Z w
z
F- O z O O Q Q Q
Q' Q' :2 ::5 w

LLJ Cn Of >- >- LLJ Li
>- CD S S a_ a_ (n
r ,
a N ?x

_
L > 1
j xs5

1

U) co
N
w w N
U U ?
p p U
C C C
+I -H p
0) O rn M p) +I
N Ln ? Ln
N N N
Z z z
? O O O :2 Ljj
F-- ~ ~ w
0 Q > ? Z
z of D V) O a ? O Q
0 z V) L/) S
Z Fm V) ?O LLJ ? w
cn -
w >z 0Q 0 w 0 0
C9 0? w wCoe w z 7
W CfLLJ )w < 00 Q Q Q
J LLJ
V) Q? Q cn C w J ~
Ow v~) mo cn ? w
w
I
I

w
Y
cn v
O
O
I I
?i
J
Q
J
0
w
F
C5
pwz
~2o
? W ?