HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160393 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20170915MAPLE VIEW
NURTRIENT OFFSET SITE
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR I REPORT
Provided by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
September 2017
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives............................................................................................................ 3
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary............................................................................ 3
3.0 Bank Site Conditions.............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Restoration Plan............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots............................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Photo Documentation....................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation................................................................. 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area
Figure 2.2: Vegetation Plot Locations
Figure 2.3: As -Built Exhibit
Figure 3: May 2017 Re -Planting Areas
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot, Supplemental Planting, & Encroachment Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
EBX-EM, LLC (an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC) acting as the Bank Sponsor, is
pleased to provide this As -Built Report for the Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank ("Bank").
This Bank is designed to provide nutrient offset mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed in the Cape Fear
River Basin. This project is in accordance with 15A NCAC 0213.0240 and the Cape Fear Riparian Buffer
& Nutrient Mitigation Banking Instrument (LIMBI) made and entered into by EBX-EM, LLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on
October 9, 2009 and modified on February 17, 2014. Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A.
The Maple View Parcel is located in Orange County in Hillsborough, NC (Figure 1). Within the Parcel, a
section of Morgan Creek and two unnamed tributaries traverse the site and exhibit diminished habitat value
as a result of past and on-going agricultural activities and impervious watershed conditions. The Parcel is
located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed USGS 14 -digit HUC
03030002060070 and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Sub -basin Number 03-06-
06.
The site is located near the intersection of Green Rise Road and Dairyland Road (SR 1177). The site is on
the south side of Dairyland Road with the main drainage feature flowing west to east. The coordinates of
the site are 35.973056°N and -79.147778°W.
The conservation easement on the Maple View Parcel totals approximately 7.63 acres and includes two
unnamed tributaries. Stormwater runoff from adjacent land flows directly to Morgan Creek. The Parcel is
located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and residential land use. There is a dairy operation
on the north side of Dairyland Road, but a majority of the Parcel is utilized for row -crop production. Land
use in the project area is hay field, row crops, and existing riparian forest. No livestock are on the Bank
Parcel, therefore livestock access is not a concern.
The Maple View Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank provides water quality benefits through elimination
of nutrient intensive agricultural practices and re -forestation of riparian areas that extend out to 200 feet
from the stream channels. The riparian restoration activities within the Parcel will result in
improved water quality within the downstream watershed. Unnamed Tributary "A" is a perennial channel
which flows in an easterly direction along the southern project boundary. Unnamed Tributary `B" is a
perennial channel which flows in a southerly direction to its confluence with unnamed tributary "A".
Unnamed Tributary "C" is a perennial channel flowing in a southerly direction to its confluence with UT-
A. Stream Determinations were verified by DWR staff onsite on July 7, 2015 and in correspondence
dated July 16, 2015. Site viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset was determined onsite on July
7, 2015 and in correspondence dated August 5, 2015.
The Maple View Parcel is being proposed to provide off-site mitigation for development (both existing
and proposed) requiring nutrient offset credits. The nutrient offset credits proposed on this Bank is
being submitted under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear UMBI modified and signed on
February 2, 2014 between EBX-EM, LLC and the Department of Environmental Quality.
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals associated with the nutrient offset restoration plan include improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through the creation/restoration of forested
riparian areas adjacent to stream channels within the Parcel. The restoration of natural plant communities
within the Parcel will not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within the easement limits,
but also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed.
Goals Objectives
1. Improve water quality • Eliminate nutrient intensive agricultural practices
2. Enhance flood attenuation • Re -forest riparian areas, extending out to 200 feet from
3. Restore wildlife habitat stream channels
• Control non-native invasive species to ensure the
establishment of a diverse native plant community
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary
The Final BPDP (November 2016) describes the pre -construction conditions on the Maple View site. The
site was planted in April 2016 and post -construction conditions are also described in the Final BPDP.
Additional construction activities since the BPDP approval include supplemental re -planting of 0.23 acres
along the easement boundary, installation of easement signage, and amending the conservation easement
to address DWR comments. The easement edge portion of Maple View that was lacking planted stems was
planted with 150 one gallon trees (Figure 3 and Appendix Q. This is an approximate density of 650 trees
per acre over the 0.23 acre area. The final executed and recorded easement documents are provided in
Appendix E.
3.0 Bank Site Conditions
3.1 Restoration Plan
The majority of the site was maintained as a cleared agricultural field for hay and corn production. As such,
these areas required little site preparation other than select herbicide treatment and soil preparation (i.e.
ripped and scarified). The riparian areas were planted with native bare root tree seedlings at a minimum of
8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. The buffered channels will provide
water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Jordan Lake watershed. Some areas adjacent to the
forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species.
Riparian restoration began at the outer limits of the existing tree lines and extend out to 200 feet from the
top of bank from reaches A, B and C (Figure 2.3). Approximately 3 acres of mature forest will be protected
within the conservation easement, but no buffer or nutrient offset credits will be generated.
DWR staff (Katie Merritt) performed a site inspection on April 10, 2017. At that site visit an area
approximately 0.23 acres along the easement boundary was found to be lacking planted stems (Figure 3)
and additional easement marking and signage was requested. RES performed these remedial actions in May
2017 (Figure 3).
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Revegetation of the site includes planting bare root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Piedmont
Alluvial Forest is the target community type for all areas within the project. The community is defined by
Schafale and Weakely (1990). The initial planting of bare root trees occurred during mid-April 2016 and is
described in the BPDP. Initial Plot data is provided in Appendix B. Vegetation plots were installed in
November 2016.
An additional 0.23 acre area was planted in May 2017 (Figure 3) in response to DWR comments. The
easement edge portion of Maple View that was lacking planted stems was planted with 150 one gallon trees
(Figure 3 and Appendix Q. This is an approximate density of 650 trees per acre over the 0.23 acre area.
3.3 Photo Documentation
Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
will provide a photograph of each vegetation plot every monitoring year. Photographs are located in
Appendix B.
4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site will be monitored for an additional four (4) consecutive years or until the required success criteria
have been met as determined by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and is on track to meeting its
success criteria. Overall the site's vegetation has established well in Year 1. An abundant amount of
herbaceous ground cover as well as volunteer tree species were present during Year 1 monitoring activities.
Two problem areas noted during Year 1 monitoring activities on the Maple View Bank Site. The first is a
long strip of encroachment along the edge of the easement where RES replanted in May 2017. The trees
seem to all still be there but the marker poles are missing. The second problem area is another encroachment
area near VP7 where the farmer cut a corner and mowed through the easement about 0.10 acres in size. The
first area will be remarked and the second will be replanted in 2018. Photos of these areas can be found
in Appendix C and Figure 3 shows their approximate locations. If site conditions or tree survival
rates require remediation, supplemental planting and additional site modifications will be
implemented. DWR will be notified if supplemental planting is to occur within Site.
The Maple View Bank Site contains 7 vegetative monitoring plots, all of which are monitored and reported
in general accordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Twenty-
five (10) by ten (10) meter square plots have been permanently established following completion of the
planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and surveyed for future
use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable, have been recorded
within each plot. All vegetation plots are sampled and reported annually. The primary focus of the
vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species encountered
may also be recorded, but will not be counted towards the success criteria.
Success criteria will be based on the survival of a minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of
monitoring. Year 1 vegetation monitoring activities occurred on August 29. As of Monitoring Year 1, the
Maple View Bank Site yields 705 planted stems per acre and 798 total stems per acre counting volunteer
species. A determination will be made regarding the success of the project following the collection and
evaluation of ecological and physical monitoring data, photographs, and site observations.
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
5.0 Jordan Lake Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Maple View Bank generates 4.54 acres of nutrient offset credits and preserves 3.10 acres of riparian
buffer for a contiguous conservation easement. The total nutrient offset credits that the Maple View Bank
generates are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2.3.
Table 1. Maple View Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset Credit Summary
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
Mitigation
Generated
Delivery Factors
Buffer
Type
Credit
Total
Credit Per
Delivered
Zone
Type
Acrea e
Acre
Zone Delivery
Credits
Zone A
Riparian
(0-200')*
restoration
Nitrogen
4.54
2,169.26 lbs
9
89%
8,765 lbs
Zone A
Riparian
(0-200')*
restoration
Phosphorus
4.54
143.81 lbs
7
71%
463 lbs
Jordan
Preservation
Buffer
n/a
3.10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
*areas within existing forest are
Total Delivered Nitrogen Credit
8,765 lbs
included as Preservation Type
Total Delivered Phosphorus Credit
463 lbs
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
6.0 References
Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Schafle, M.P., McNab, W.H., Lenat, D.R., MacPherson,
T.F., Glover, J.B., and Shelburne, V.B., 2002, Ecoregions of North Carolina and south Carolina,
(color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S.
Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,00).
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NCDENR. 2010. "N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1." N.C. Wetland
Functional Assessment Team.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
APPENDIX A
Site Maps
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
gyp.
r k
Maple View
Nutrient Offset Site
ilk
.. Sbti
HD RIB SSB ad
w r
Am
s:
F �
1
ur
�
v
s
v
F y
<
s
=W I
a p.
q
gyp.
r k
Maple View
Nutrient Offset Site
ilk
.. Sbti
HD RIB SSB ad
w r
Am
APPENDIX B
Vegetation Assessment Data
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Note: Discrepancies between planted species presented in the BPDP and plot species presented
in the As -Built Report is due to misidentification at baseline monitoring and planting species not
listed in the original BPDP due to limited availability of plant material.
Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Ste ms/Acre
Volunteers
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Survival
Criteria
Met?
Average Tree
Height* (cm)
1
850
0
850
Yes
76
2
607
0
607
Yes
152
3
S67
0
567
Yes
152
4
486
0
486
Yes
93
5
890
486
1376
Yes
271
6
809
40
850
Yes
192
7
728
121
850
Yes
223
Project Avg
705
92
798
Yes
166
*Tallest 8 trees averaged (number of stems needed to reach 320 stems/acre)
Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 3. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Maple View
Current Plot Data (MY12017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
000003-01-0001
000003-01-0002
000003-01-0003
000003-01-0004
000003-01-0005
000003-01-0006
000003-01-0007
MY1(2017)
MYO (2016)
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
5
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
14
14
14
7
7
7
6
6
6
4 4
4
8
8
11
12
12
13
4
4
7
55
55
62
47
47
47
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
2
6
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
5
5
5
6
6
6
3
3
3
5 5
5
10
10
10
7
7
7
10
10
10
46
46
46
51
51
51
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2 2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
8
8
8
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
1 1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
14
14
14
14
14
14
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
Unknown
IShrub or Tree
1
21
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
21
21
21
15
15
15
14
14
14
12 12
12
22
22
34
20
20
21
18
18
21
122
122 138
1261
126 126
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
7
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17
0.17
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 S 5 6 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6
7 7 7
849.8 849.8 849.8 607 607 607 566.6 566.6 566.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 890.3 890.3 1376 809.4 809.4 849.8 728.4 728.4 849.8 705.3 705.3 797.8
728.41 728.4 728.4
APPENDIX C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot, Supplemental Planting, & Encroachment Photos
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 2 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 3 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 4 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 5 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 6 (8/29/2017)
Vegetation Plot 7 (8/29/2017)
Maple View May 2017 Supplemental Planting Photos
5/4/2017
r
5/4/2017
5/4/2017 5/4/2017
5/4/2017 5/4/2017
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Encroachment Photos
Mowed area (8/29/2017)
Mowed area (8/29/2017)
Missing marker poles (8/29/2017)
Missing marker poles (8/29/2017)
APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
Maple View Monitoring Year 1 Report
Nutrient Offset Site September 2017
10
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0001
Aug 2017 Data
o
X Y
O.lm 0.1m
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: Datum: NAD8YW
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 80
Please 1111 in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 deerees to the richt of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
O.lm 0.1m
Aug 2017 Data
Height DBH
1cm* 1 cm
0
2
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.2
0.2
94.0
❑
3
Platanus occidentalis
R
1.5
0.3
Missing
4
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.7
0.3
77.0
❑
5
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.1
0.5
69.0
❑
6
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.7
0.3
63.0
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.9
0.3
55.0
8
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.6
3.0
56.0
❑
9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
7.1
2.9
55.0
❑
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.4
2.7
74.0
❑
11
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.7
5.7
64.0
❑
12
Quercus rubra
R
1.9
5.8
Missing
❑
13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.3
5.9
69.0
14
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
7.1
5.8
38.0
15
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
U
R
9.9
8.5
51.0
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.2
8.5
80.0
❑
17
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.2
8.6
43.0
❑
18
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.8
8.6
70.0
❑
19
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
3.3
8.5
58.0
❑
20
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.1
8.5
58.0
❑
256
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.0
0.1
58.0
❑
257
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
o
R
7.1
0.2
56.0
❑
258
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.5
0.2
49.0
❑
259
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.8
8.6
71.0
❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm* 1 cm sprout
# stems: 23 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0001
Aug 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplini**:
eiQhtCut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcit-off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
10 3
..
1* *4
••
NS
••
�6
••
7
1:18
)
10 FormWS2,ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0001
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: HO ° N # stems: 23
map size.'
small
0 l
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. t
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 80
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
21
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.1
0.1
120.0
DBH? ❑
22
Quercus michauxii
R
4.1
0.1
MissingF]
23
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.1
0.2
128.0
DBH? F-]
24
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.1
0.3
103.0
DBH? -1
25
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.1
0.3
78.0
❑
26
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.9
0.3
80.0
❑
27
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.3
3.0
85.0
0
28
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.4
3.0
118.0
DBH? ❑
29
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
2.3
3.0
141.0
0.3 ❑
30
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.3
5.6
196.0
0.8
31
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.9
5.7
4.0
u
32
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.6
5.5
44.0
33
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
9.1
6.0
177.0
0.7
34
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
R
5.7
8.6
132.0
DBH? ❑
35
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.8
8.7
72.0
❑
36
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.6
8.4
205.0
0.8 ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
El
El
❑
❑
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*Notes by ID: 27 -rat damage
31 -rat damage/ no leaves
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0002
Aug 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcutoff>I0cmorsubsample?100%. •I
••2
•3
••
••4
••
NS
••
:6
•
::7
::8
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0002
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 80, N #stems: 16
\ map size:
U' small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): n Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 50
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
37
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.9
1.4
208.0
0.5 ❑
38
Platanus occidentalis
J)
R
3.3
0.1
240.0
0.9 ❑
39
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.2
1.2
92.0
40
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
9.9
0.3
80.0
❑
41
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.6
4.0
138.0
0.3 ❑
42
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.9
4.8
45.0
❑
43
Quercus phellos
R
4.2
3.0
Missin g
❑
44
Quercus phellos
$)
R
0.3
4.4
55.0
❑
45
Quercus phellos
Q
R
0.3
10.0
50.0
❑
46
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.2
9.7
149.0
0.3
47
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.6
9.1
80.0
❑
48
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.4
8.4
104.0
DBH? ❑
49
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
9.9
6.5
72.0
❑
50
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.9
9.3
138.0
0.2 ❑
51
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
8.5
9.8
147.0
0.2 ❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. '-
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0003 Aug 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
o
C-
5rr
Tt
b
0
d)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••400
NS
�6
::7
1:8
77
}�9
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0003
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 50 ° #stems: 15
N map size:
0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
k
O
o
C-
5rr
Tt
b
0
d)
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 50 ° #stems: 15
N map size:
0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 75
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
52
Unknown sp.
R
2.0
1.7
Missing
❑
53
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
3.3
1.8
48.0
I]
54
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.8
2.0
73.0
55
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.5
4.5
95.0
56
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.7
4.4
Missing
❑
57
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
4.7
4.5
79.0
58
Platanus occidentalis
$)
R
0.5
7.1
Missin g
❑
59
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
4.3
7.3
75.0
❑
60
Quercus phellos
0
R
5.8
7.3
57.0
61
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
8.7
7.3
142.0
0.3
62
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.9
7.4
99.0
❑
63
Quercus michauxii
R
9.9
9.9
69.0
❑
64
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.6
9.9
100.0
❑
65
Quercus michauxii
®
R
5.4
9.8
Missing
66
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.9
9.7
78.0
❑
67
Quercus michauxii
(
R
0.1
9.9
51.0
❑
❑
El❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. i
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0004
Aug 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcutoff>I0cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••4
NS
:6
::7
::8
}:
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0004
Y:51
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 75 ° N #stems: 16
011
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu–Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0005
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 100
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
68
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.2
0.1
300.0
1.4 E]
69
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.9
0.3
198.0
0.4
70
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
1.9
0.3
320.0
1.7
71
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
3.5
0.4
171.0
0.3
72
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.1
0.3
183.0
0.3
73
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.9
0.2
230.0
0.5
74
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.5
0.5
340.0
2.3 �]
75
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.3
0.4
300.0
1.8
76
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.3
2.6
70.0
J
77
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
6.0
1.8
40.0
Ll
78
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.7
3.0
63.0
1-1
79
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
4.2
2.9
105.0
DBH?
80
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
1.5
2.9
153.0
0.4 n
81
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.4
2.6
84.0
82
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.1
5.6
90.0
83
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.0
5.4
54.0
84
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.3
5.6
60.0
85
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
6.3
5.5
111.0
DBH?
86
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.4
5.5
300.0
2.0
87
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.8
8.4
78.0
88
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.2
8.5
129.0
DBH?
89
Quercus michauxii
R
0.1
8.5
52,0
*SOURCE: Tr- -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 5
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued): 000003-01-0005 Aug 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
T
0
5ff
O
C
O
e h
m'
o
**Required if cit -off >IOcm or subsample ? 100%. •I
•2
•
03
••
••4
••
N56
••
•
�7
�8
}�9
�j
�l0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0005
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 100, N #stems: 22
map size:
/ small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1(
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
0
T
0
5ff
O
C
O
e h
m'
o
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 100, N #stems: 22
map size:
/ small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1(
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
ID Species Name
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 90
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
90
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.2
0.1
88.0
❑
91
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.0
0.1
87.0
77
92
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.5
0.1
57.0
93
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.8
2.7
98.0
94
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
8.0
2.7
330.0
1.9
95
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.0
2.6
220.0
1.0
96
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.0
2.7
235.0
1.1
97
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.7
2.7
155.0
0.4
98
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.5
2.7
107.0
DBH?
99
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.6
2.9
260.0
1.2
100
Platanus occidentalis
$)
R
0.8
2.8
90.0
101
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.2
5.7
79.0
p
102
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
R
4.5
5.7
81.0
103
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.3
5.7
78.0
104
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.3
5.8
108.0
DBH?
105
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
9.0
5.7
119.0
DBH?
106
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.1
8.5
80.0
107
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
7.5
8.6
65.0
108
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.3
8.6
109.0
DBH?
109
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.3
8.7
74.0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
El
El
❑
❑
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0006
Aug 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcutoff>I0cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••4
NS
:6
::7
::8
}:
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0006
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 90, N #stems: 20
map size:
0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000003-01-0007
VMD Year (1-5): F21 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 100
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
l0 Y: I I l ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Aug 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
110
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.9
0.3
85.0
111
Quercus michauxii
R
2.6
0.2
42.0
112
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.4
0.4
320.0
2.5 L]
113
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
5.3
0.3
162.0
0.4
114
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.1
0.3
310.0
1.8
115
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.5
0.2
97.0
116
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.5
0.3
175.0
0.6
117
Quercus phellos
@
R
8.7
2.8
58.0
118
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.9
3.1
123.0
DBH?
119
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.8
3.0
325.0
23E]
120
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.6
3.0
230.0
0.9 E
121
Platanus occidentalis
R
0.6
3.0
120.0
DBH?
122
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.6
5.9
93.0
n
123
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
7.5
5.7
78.0
124
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.4
5.7
79.0
125
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
8.4
8.7
136.0
DBH? ❑
126
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.2
8.8
60.0
❑
127
Quercus phellos
Q
R
0.1
8.7
58.0
❑
❑
❑
El
❑
❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.13
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Plot (continued):
000003-01-0007
Aug 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
Sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcutoff>I0cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••4
NS
:6
::7
::8
}:
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000003-01-0007
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 100, N #stems: 18
map size:
small
/l
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.14
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1