20081473 Ver 4_Year 3 Monitoring Report Phase I_20170915

YEAR 3 MONITORING REPORT
September 2017
Arrington Bridge Phase I and Phase I Expansion
Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
DWQ Project # 2008-1473v.4
Wayne County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
Prepared by:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
September 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT......................................................................
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................
1.2 Project Background.................................................................................................................
1.3 Vegetation Condition...............................................................................................................
2.0 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................
2.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots...................................................................................................
2.2 Photo Stations..........................................................................................................................
3.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Site Maps
Figure 1:
Site Location Map
Figure 2.1:
Recorded Conservation Easement Area Phase I
Figure 2.2:
Recorded Conservation Easement Area Phase I Expansion
Figure 2.3:
Proposed Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — Phase I BPDP
Figure 2.4:
Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas — Phase I
Figure 2.5:
Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas — Phase I Expansion
Figure 3.1:
Monitoring Device Locations — Phase I
Figure 3.2:
Monitoring Device Locations — Phase I Expansion Area
Figure 4:
Monitoring Year 3 Easement Encroachment
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Photos
MY3 — 2017 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photos
MY3 — 2017 Photo Station Photos
Photos
MY3 — 2017 Encroachment Area/Problem Area Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 1: Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 2: CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Table 3A: Stem Count Total and Planted Species be Vegetation Plot Phase I Area
Table 3B: Stem Count Total and Planted Species be Vegetation Plot Phase I Expansion Area
Plot Data CVS Vegetation Plot Sampling Datasheets
Appendix D. Adaptive Management Plan
Memo: 2017 Arrington Bridge I Adaptive Management Plan
Figure 1: 2017 Arrington Bridge I Adaptive Management
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
I
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
Monitoring Report: Year 3
September 2017

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:
Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributary of
the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by
agricultural influences,
Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement, and
Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary to the Neuse River and associated
riparian and upland buffers.
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
• By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site,
• By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical
methods,
• By establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site,
and
• By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program.
1.2 Project Background
Located off of Arrington Bridge Road, at its intersection with John Street in Goldsboro, North
Carolina (Figure 1, Appendix A) is the Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration area previously
referred to as the Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel and currently known as the
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel (hereafter referred to as the Bank Site). The Bank Site was proposed to
be developed in two (2) phases: Phase I and Phase H. According to the Wayne County
Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP, EcoEngineering, April 2012), Phase
I consisted of Parcel Numbers 2598449002 and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection
of Arrington Bridge Road and John Street. Phase H consisted of Parcel Numbers 2598632250 (located
at the northeast corner of the intersection of Arrington Bridge road and John Street) and 2598543857
(located north of Parcel Number 2598449002, along the west side of John Street, and is separated from
Parcel Number 2598449002 by a railroad easement and utility line easement). Since approval of the
BPDP, only a portion of Parcel Number 2598632250 was developed and dedicated to Phase II. The
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Phase H As -
Built Report (McAdams Company, April 27, 2015) describes that portion of land developed for Phase
H. Based on the Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Site Phase II As -Built Report (McAdams Company, April 27, 2015), Parcel Number 2598543857 was
not developed as part of Phase II. Because the approved BPDP allowed development to occur on
Parcel Number 2598543857, it was decided that development on Parcel Number 2598543857 would
be dedicated to Phase I. Figure 2.1 (Appendix A) is the signed and sealed Conservation Easement
(CE) platted for Phase I. Figure 2.3 (Appendix A) is provided to illustrate the Phase I CE as approved
in the BPDP.
Since approval of the BPDP, a portion of Parcel Number 2598427606 has also been added to Phase I;
this portion of Phase I will hereafter be referred to as Phase I Expansion. Parcel Number
2598427606 (Phase I Expansion) is located south of Parcel Number 2598449002, along the south side
of Arrington Bridge Road. On October 15, 2014, staff from the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
authorized approval to this additional area to Phase I, and it is referred to as Phase I Expansion.
Figure 2.2 (Appendix A) is the signed and sealed CE platted for Phase I Expansion.
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

The total signed and sealed Conservation Easement for both Phase I and Phase I Expansion of the
Bank Site consists of +_43.512 acres (Figures 2.1 and 2.2, Appendix A). Figures 2.4 and 2.5
(Appendix A) are provided to illustrate the constructed Phase I and Phase I Expansion
Conservation Easements with aerials.
The purpose of this Bank Site is to improve water quality within the Neuse River watershed by
providing off-site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed) requiring stream buffer
mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
As shown on the easement plat (Figure 2.1, Appendix A), the CE for Phase I of the Bank Site is
38.886 acres (1,693,874.16 sf). Within the Phase I CE, 0.99 acres (43,124.4 sf) is dedicated to 0' to
50' of the Neuse Riparian Buffer and 0.981 acres (42,732.36 sf) is dedicated to 50' to 100' of the
Neuse Riparian Buffer. Therefore, a total of 1.971 acres (85,856.76 sf) is dedicated to Neuse
Riparian Buffer. A total of 31.558 acres (1,374,666.48 sf) is dedicated to Nutrient Offset Credits for
nitrogen. Therefore, there are 5.357 acres (233,350.92 sf) of the Phase I Expansion CE that are not
dedicated to either Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits or Nutrient Offset Credits.
The Bank Site Service Area is contained within 8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201. Stormwater runoff
from the Bank Site drains into an unnamed tributary of the Neuse River (Stream Index #27-(56)).
According to the N.C. Division of Water Resources Basinwide Information Management System
(BIMS), the Neuse River is classified as Class C and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) in this
location. The "C" classification is for "waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation,
fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of
biological integrity, and agriculture" while the NSW designation is for "Nutrient Sensitive Waters".
This Bank Site was established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Neuse Riparian
Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) made and entered into by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), acting
as the Bank Sponsor, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and was entered into by the parties on November 10, 2008. The
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources is now hereby referred to as The
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The Division of Water Quality is now
hereby referred to as Division of Water Resources (DWR).
1.3 Vegetation Condition
Current stem counts (i.e. a stem is defined as a single living tree) were calculated using vegetation
plot monitoring data. Success will be defined as the survival of a minimum density of 320 planted trees
per acre after five (5) years. Monitoring Year 3 field activities were conducted on September 5 and 6,
2017. As of Monitoring Year 3, Phase I of the Bank Site had eight (8) plots encompassing 0.1977 acres,
containing 113 planted stems and 11 different species, which yielded a density of 572 planted stems per
acre. For Phase I Monitoring Year 3, the planted vegetation survival density threshold was met for 8
Vegetation Monitoring Plots. Phase I Expansion had three (3) plots encompassing 0.0741 acres,
containing 50 planted stems, which yielded a density of 675 planted stems per acre. On September 5 and
6, 2017, CVS Level 2 was performed in Year 3 to document any volunteer generation. A total of 250
volunteers were observed across all 11 vegetation plots. Year 3 monitoring recorded an average of 600
planted stems per acre for the entire Arrington Bridge I Site. Arrington Bridge Phase I yielded an average
of 572 planted stems per acre during Year 3 monitoring activities. The Phase I Expansion Area
documented an average of 675 planted stems per acre.
In May 2017 the majority of the Arrington Bridge Phase I was replanted with about 6,500 bare roots and
6,000 sapling/container trees. The area around Vegetation Plot 8 on the Phase I Expansion area was
fenced in, replanted, and the plot was reestablished. No additional areas of encroachment were
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

documented during MY3 in the expansion area. There was, however, a 0.85 acre area of mowing that
occurred in the easement at the southeastern corner of Phase I (Appendix B & Figure 4). It appeared that
there was some work done in the DOT roadside ditches on John Street which leads us to believe that DOT
may have mistakenly mowed this area. Many of the trees that were mowed showed resprouting and the
vegetation plot (VPI) in that area still met success criteria with 12 planted stems. RES will install
additional easement markers in this area and continue to monitor for encroachment.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance with CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a success summary for each vegetation
monitoring plot. Based on the Year 3 vegetation monitoring, all of the eleven (11) monitoring plots were
above the five (5) year monitoring period requirement. Table 2 (Appendix C) provides a stem count total
and planted stem total by each individual vegetation plot.
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix B. Vegetation Monitoring
Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix C. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a respective vegetation monitoring plot.
2.2 Photo Stations
Photographic documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success of the Bank Parcel. Digital
photographs provide a visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. Seven photo stations are located
across the Arrington Bridge I easement and are visited each year during annual monitoring activities.
Each photo station location is mapped on (Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 Appendix A). A photo log of the
photo stations can be located in Appendix B.
3.0 REFERENCES
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. April 27, 2012. Wayne County
Development Alliance Bank Parcel Bank Parcel Development Package.
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. April 27, 2015. Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian
Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation, Phase I and Phase I Expansion — As- Built Report.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration.
Available at intemet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reportsibuffers.pdf.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 2010. Procedural Guidance and
Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation.
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
4

Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department
of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

Appendix A
Site Maps
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
A-1

/ Big 5d+
I
+ uwr
i
W
1 Mina
,� Park PaIT �QOL Weil
Sch North
rk f _
73
Couv �S
5e } N �fiirlY:1— ` r �OWr
ftlk
II'Fy ."`_.Ir*C.,yp raq� •� mIFAA1W10 1 Ai ch
�70 1
en A}}� " �!l� South 70
,tn 7 1;._.Goldsboro • ' :
,J'BANK 'SITE ` ' t
PHASE I �i.` �� 4 - .
-
Sandpit,
amp
BIV 21,
QPr3
T
M 74 —
�`". PHASE I
a
;E. EXPANSION
toney
•- McArthur
V� Luka
�rarCk y t
`, - +* _ �� �4 Pit �` ti 1315 \ � - r r r 3
_
ew,3ge Z2.0
4
LJ {fSewage Vasposaf P
J Ponds
WT
Legend 35°21'0.33"N 'r 4
78' 0'38.64"W
Bank Site Phase I Phase I Expansion
r
7.5 MINUTE USGS "SW GOLDSBORO" QUAD; 1974 (PHOTO INSPECTED 1988)
Fa;r 7.5 MINUTE USGS "SE GOLDSBORO" QUAD; 1982 (PHOTO INSPECTED 1988) _ �- �'•,-
,'
FIGURE 1. USGS QUAD
SW/SE GOLDSBORO
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet

CAVITY MAP
(+nor ro scut'
/1000 =YE.N lR
Aa0 s Loolran snag A ss Eat — —
AIWA a Orff Rl e. — alrf Yv
ova Pvda
arcus lT0>ya-raa-r a ,»mss-xee-,
( D'9410r c PrW)tp( IMF SPa tM S.PERla4
Y3 I14R CPa'1' ]n11T rJNs S1MEY IS 6.NDRER
OIR1M ro NI:; AR MOM APII(Y.
sort a 10"MY daUlPp Wra awry
r
w°w�,
J�NC
!, aNa .D PROFRGx CIXIXV MIT fl45
PLaTMS cls— SIKPImLW PAW .W ACRAL
i
`.-^^j.� rt$! .
TJ, ,S
S[w1lY VIOL LELrR nIV 9.PFA1®a`C (OSLO
S.t I
9MAV YD N YIP 000 AO) /AE � fEi1
OAA,
0 ARr Y CA
MYOPYII,EW RsfFiE'nCm +I1: a`R Rpt q1 R
mo Ylr = ARW CERM UaIC''K mw
T
OF
W 0.S G2GOR" 6 r: 12figtx: RYA Ms Aur
;p�;'
WAS PFAAOV
Nµ9 PAEA.0 e/ -OR4l7 IMM OS R AS
AKM0E0. wrhL9s ri ORIOIW{ ypYR^R[ RfL4A®IRh
!'
^
�•. Q^`
nwlar• AR0 sou nRs ,Tpr1. ar ar .plYm' . Aa.
xtJ
rl�.l«,,...^•`
FIGURE 2.1
'ELD PIAT FOR =
EBX-NEUSE /, LLC.
THE ARRINGTON BRIDGE / SITE
GOIDSBORO TOWNSHIP JAMIaRY 28, 2013
WAYNE COUNTY, NC SCALE: 1" 200'
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
+KAP C SCAT_'
Pf\q! a`rrr 0E
WP OW PUT M
LY1PMIt.1/10R r3 .Y77IID Iti'f5 nfl SbN!OP.1'
Nf01+HE'MPRIs a0R
RT�91M OnrrtOa
am /aI rKasrMr
mu
n c4I 1 - n
lasrae. a OaTss
YnR. (Ta/IM1
grak9-..
0C161+aIL.^.aIJIVWi. .Y: l -I2
i
rG - rKR F(M• SUR!
.. /
,a r
� [49RW PAW Srniat
m . n'snnc 0a,c»rre YOY�xr
,
na . rxsna: Ync YI
rx - Eutna: PR Ipa
r
.
�.
- ,-; ��, / �
-
> w ,c a+0 rpRAawrs .mc a0utr0 Nmw 1rooa
tIE NROR1atY
/
/
a Au 0a -was waE naelORuc mNo auca8aorrs r Ixrr
-\ ♦
,rr
- /
t .iirvs AE/S0� wGT ono�uT Rout
1 Au UtlsS MO aFK0l0[Ms WV YN R SnYw R6 sulEv.
m WOIiA't 71J1Jr, PPLF ?p)
\
1
• (
! RN7t LA41n0arS AIY MPIL#6 a ph M 2SI�AfR11 MO
/J
nwnaPam
Y\
c0wtnxvu/w I:asFnrvr+
(n+,
c»wanr»(
AMA I - ).A9a ACS
A t-. MAl
lout - Xi Ari
�saa� cL a rmL
ar :SOT. ro sx

PMr ro sokc
RAW $7.mwMr .wrm
TK PAOPWY 6 =4110 M E0K -AIL' I. No n oko CIaAAAMS pvO COalEo
ANO 6 Loom .1101 A SPECMG PCOOD IEi[AIIO 1000' w l PMP m
AREA AS DERRMNrS BY INP A11r AV 1 ALL MMNL'Cs AMC MYMa T& aM1RJD t RCMEM *74m Or
NIM DMISM A L 2005 . COIRMOY PMR 'MCA%t=I M M FW R DCCW4$ OkMG: m1mF Co1M4Y. C -Y 10— THE YN OR ANT rO
aKm olwmSC MJ1w mrcx IMS CMAM1 IXW 6 MFMD AKEn Me STAMAW
MAkCR Jlo7l5-lSNN. REaARGIEWS roR MCOAOtW
F-717117
71 F /
\ 7 \ iIDtL C (J00'-1001 - 4G] ACf
DOIML'TS or mix
06 7572. Po W
PC A SL W,
CON$V—W rM0WN1
ACICp a'A
(Br COefORW
1.$10 ACf
OF THE
FIGURE 2.2
-� YIELD PUT
EBX-NEUSE /, LLC.
ARRINGTON BRIDGE I EXPANSION
GOLDSBORO TOWNSHIP JANUARY 2. 2015
WAYNE COUNTY. NC 1' 100'
100' 50' 0 100' e00'
GRAPHIC SCALE
t-
..v OY 4w
Otir
AAED FO* AEOSRMRa —
70t5 _Y
PGI pii! PAa
MHef LOtAiW
STATE Or Agt'm 0000— ame COLMY
R/II _ 10Mf-ar.�tr
C/t CENRIaIR
�\
\
PGt�WE11 W ANYAASIXf f1ADY 724 ACI41L
SURWI Wim' Ll'" W .YpOMAGYO (may RTCIA fRIY
LA . EJ161M. MaV wAr
d - /AE1M0 MCN PPC
ftwR CO M AMP. Df ED E wgL U mE
\\
o- «o rot u!
ft 54AT
. Ant aor
Jyy i'i r .�'
'h- Q
11 I
U•
IDL7 - OOtO wear
v* MUM
\
—F— . EIECAKM CK
. APS PAp^EH1Y tttF
a
—jr--- ro sort
/
K
E_.)09
�. r.SDIMW tx
. am•Nr/RaANDtxr lRa'
F-717117
71 F /
\ 7 \ iIDtL C (J00'-1001 - 4G] ACf
DOIML'TS or mix
06 7572. Po W
PC A SL W,
CON$V—W rM0WN1
ACICp a'A
(Br COefORW
1.$10 ACf
OF THE
FIGURE 2.2
-� YIELD PUT
EBX-NEUSE /, LLC.
ARRINGTON BRIDGE I EXPANSION
GOLDSBORO TOWNSHIP JANUARY 2. 2015
WAYNE COUNTY. NC 1' 100'
100' 50' 0 100' e00'
GRAPHIC SCALE
t-
..v OY 4w
Otir
AAED FO* AEOSRMRa —
70t5 _Y
PGI pii! PAa
MHef LOtAiW
C>o8R1aQ . PADEAM PAorLWIPWC IMO SiMKYa4
AID. 41M.. CVI AMI IH6 OMKY 6 Or ANDYNIM
c4mwt ro W; AN mn~ SU1Kl:
,�l r
• "A,
STATE Or Agt'm 0000— ame COLMY
C Ch 6TOPIKR A MOEIn fY1tIY1' I1Mr IN6
Ci«m
-
PGt�WE11 W ANYAASIXf f1ADY 724 ACI41L
SURWI Wim' Ll'" W .YpOMAGYO (may RTCIA fRIY
ftwR CO M AMP. Df ED E wgL U mE
4
" 7F r�Vir
�
DaMaraa Aw $UttalED ALK afY l 100.10 AS AU-
mov .raaWmv .0mvw= .0t ok r -W term
Jyy i'i r .�'
'h- Q
11 I
ERIM
v* MUM
C>o8R1aQ . PADEAM PAorLWIPWC IMO SiMKYa4
AID. 41M.. CVI AMI IH6 OMKY 6 Or ANDYNIM
c4mwt ro W; AN mn~ SU1Kl:
,�l r
• "A,
STATE Or Agt'm 0000— ame COLMY
C Ch 6TOPIKR A MOEIn fY1tIY1' I1Mr IN6
Ci«m
-
PGt�WE11 W ANYAASIXf f1ADY 724 ACI41L
SURWI Wim' Ll'" W .YpOMAGYO (may RTCIA fRIY
ftwR CO M AMP. Df ED E wgL U mE
4
" 7F r�Vir
�
DaMaraa Aw $UttalED ALK afY l 100.10 AS AU-
mov .raaWmv .0mvw= .0t ok r -W term
Jyy i'i r .�'
'h- Q
Cts PtlL'6M' As C4=1^10 a r Ig( L nMl JI6 ftAI
,•
• cn
•a Pt)rIMATD M ACCOtDNCf O1tl CA .]
q[xKa erKSS .n o6we SOMRAEC Kr61RtlA�r
••• ••
ANWI AAO SGC IJC jQ, a! ff A mAssr D.
]DIS
/
K
E_.)09

FIGURE 2.3. PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER & NUTRIENT
OFFSET RESTORATION AREA - PHASE I BPDP
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet

FIGURE 2.4. NEUSE BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS
250 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet
EB

FIGURE 2.5 - NEUSE BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS -
PHASE I EXPANSION
0 250 500 1,000
Feet h
1 inch = 500 feet 1

"PRELIMINARY PLAT"
NOT FOR SALES, CONVEYANCES,
OR RECORDATION.
GRAPHIC SCALE
RaoI IN FEET )�
Inch = 200 [t
-_VP 4
PS 4 VP 11
\PS 3
//
PSS VPS /
i VP J /
�\ PS 6
�\ VP 10
= 31.558 ACf
= 1.971 ACt \ \
EBX—NEUSE I, LLC.
ARRINGTON BRIDGE 1
YIELD MAP
PS 2 /
YL VP 9
AVIATRIX EAST, PLLC
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE A
TEL: [phone]
FIGURE 3.1
KINSTON, INC 28501
FAX: [phone]
n:rroec s ton ton- Uc , iin-eon renege lank-,rcealAxorm \rnose Av. ,, west creme re—ea riu��w o.aw�, iv r euiD --i- —, roen, n i
PROJECT "° EBX-13020
ARRINGTON BRIDGE
ji
=JOHN P.
COMPANY.IN A>\iS
FILENAME:
n
EBX13020X.DWG
BANK PARCEL
SCALE:
1 r, - 2 0 0 r
t�_�-
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carohna 27713
Ltcenae No.: C-0293
DATE:
v,
MCADAMS
lsoo)7335646•McAdamsCo eom
04-27-15
WAYNE COUNTY, NO= CAROLINA

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE) `.
0
s
LEGEND
R/W = RIGHT-
EQIS
\
INE
CCENTERLINE
EC
EIS= EXISTING IRON STAKE
EIP =EXISTING 11,PIPE
= NO POINT SET
STAKE
\
• =NEW IRON
(() = TIE LINE
(CCTL) CONTROL CORNER
£ = ELECTRICAL NE
= WIRE FENCE
l�
= ADJOINING PROPERTY
22 = NOT TO SCALE
EASEMENT
LINE
�\
-- — = UNE
= EASEMENTFBOUNDORY
UNE
ZONE A (0'-50) = 1.630 ACI
ZONE B (50'-100) - 1.402 —
ZONE C (100'-200) - 0 947 ACI
SOURCES OF NNE
DB 2572, PG 448
PC M. SL 93-1
THIS PROPERTY 15 LOCATED IN ZONE ' AE
AND IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
AREA, AS DE/£RMINED BY NFP RATE MAP
DATED DECEMBER 2 2005 COMMUNITY PANEL
NUMBER 370255-25881.
PS 7
VP 6
VP 7Nl
\\
NOTES:
I. NO NC GRID MONUMENTS WERE LOCATED WITHIN
2000' OF THIS PROPERTY.
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MEASUREMENTS IN FEET & DECIMALS THEREOF.
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
y) %
ry/ /
4 EIS(CC)
\
EIS
° VP 8 \ \P
\ JDA PROPERBES, LLC.
\ \ DB 25]2, PC 448
PC
JBA PROPERTIES, LLC. \� /
OB 982 31
, gG 3\
D 9 SL O -F
1, REVIEW OFFICER OF
WAYNE COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PLAT TO
WH/CH THIS CERTIflGTION
IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUTORY
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING
REVIEW OFFICER
DATE
FILED FOR REGISTRATION
2015. _ M
PLAT CABINET , FACE-
-- OF DEEDS
WAYNE COUNTY
I, CHRISTOPHER K. PADERICK, PROFESSIONAL LANG SURVEYOR
NO, 4189, CERTIFY THAT TH/S SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER
CATEGORY. TO WIT,- AN EASEMENT SURVEY,
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ACREAGE DATA
(BY COMPUTER)
ME
L-4189
°
4.626 AC3
"PRELIM/NARY PLAT"
/
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAYNE COUNTY
D1
1, CHRISTOPHER K PADERICK C CERBFY THAT THIS
v
\ EIS
EIP(CC)
TRUSTEES OF
FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH
OB 853, PG 1541
,
PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER SUPER FROM AN ACTUAL
VEY
SURMADE UNDER MY SUPERUlSION: (DEED DESCRIPTION
OR RECORDATION.
`
` ro
m
RECORDED IN MAP & DEED BOOKS NOTED): THAT THE
BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLv INDICATED AS DRAWN
FROM INFORMATION REFERENCED HEREON, THAT THE RAID
^
OF PRECISION AS CAL11— IS 1: ID 000+; THAT THIS —1
WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS
JRA PROPERTIES. LLC,
0B 2572, PG 948 \
PC M, SL 9 3-7
\
AMENDEQ. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNANRE. REGISTRATION
NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 2ND DAY OF JANUARY . ND.,
m
e
I, CHRISTOPHER K. PADERICK, PROFESSIONAL LANG SURVEYOR
NO, 4189, CERTIFY THAT TH/S SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER
CATEGORY. TO WIT,- AN EASEMENT SURVEY,
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ACREAGE DATA
(BY COMPUTER)
L-4189
°
4.626 AC3
"PRELIM/NARY PLAT"
/
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAYNE COUNTY
D1
1, CHRISTOPHER K PADERICK C CERBFY THAT THIS
NOT FOR SALES, CONVEYANCES,
\ EIS
EIP(CC)
TRUSTEES OF
FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH
OB 853, PG 1541
,
PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER SUPER FROM AN ACTUAL
VEY
SURMADE UNDER MY SUPERUlSION: (DEED DESCRIPTION
OR RECORDATION.
`
` ro
PC 5, PG 128
RECORDED IN MAP & DEED BOOKS NOTED): THAT THE
BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLv INDICATED AS DRAWN
FROM INFORMATION REFERENCED HEREON, THAT THE RAID
^
OF PRECISION AS CAL11— IS 1: ID 000+; THAT THIS —1
WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS
JRA PROPERTIES. LLC,
0B 2572, PG 948 \
PC M, SL 9 3-7
\
AMENDEQ. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNANRE. REGISTRATION
NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 2ND DAY OF JANUARY . ND.,
FIGURE 3.2
e
2015
a
AS -BUILT EXHIBIT - PHASE I EXPANSIONL-489
\
= YIELD PLAT FOR
EBX-NEUSE /, LLC.
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
OF THE ARRINGTON BRIDGE I EXPANSION SITE
\ /
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
908 N*QUEEN Sr.. SUITE A KINSTON. NC 28501
GOLDSBORO TOWNSHIP JANUAR" 2, _, S
\ ��\���//////
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
WAYNE COUNTY, NO 1" _.,
100' 50' 0 100' .,..
GRAPHIC SCALE
���' �\
FIRM LIC. # P-0221
EMAIL: sa rveyor®matrixeast-
DRAWN BY: CKP
SURVEYED BY: CKP
PROJECTNO.: 20130099
DATE: 1/2/2015
SCALE: 1" = 100'
DRAWING NAME: 20130099

= Benton St '
Ws
�� a ,�, �"" ,♦1♦p1+p1♦p♦Ip♦�♦♦,�•
a ®1111111 pc 11111 �.
�. �- ��11♦1111♦♦I♦SVP 41j1♦..,
f ( ♦♦ ♦1111♦�r1 ♦
E� ♦Ig_Ii11 X11♦�♦1� PS 3
M1•�� .3►j; ,St:. +1111♦+. uy
tiC12 Iff
,
17_3++g�9♦♦11♦�
r^ �Ic+♦S♦1♦IIIg11♦♦IIIIg11111g' ®�♦. +`.
CJI PS 4.1♦�.1+♦♦111111♦+gg♦♦1;' ��♦d
►�^ _ A11VP<11�1♦11.11♦♦� w,+� +l. `
F♦ie=♦'2♦♦g111i'♦„®�i+1i+bw
-W 011♦1111•III/Ie.♦11111♦e VP 3_
11 ♦111 p♦ ♦1 ♦11111111111 1111118. L4 11111111 it
♦♦®1♦111♦g♦1♦111♦IIp♦1®♦I ♦41®4� X1/11111♦Id• p,
♦+11111♦♦+11♦11111♦♦♦♦1♦♦♦1111♦11Y's ♦g1♦♦♦1♦+1®11♦1♦11♦1111♦♦♦♦111♦+� •�♦�',
a �' 111♦f1 g 1 S� ♦II �1� ♦�♦.+�1 �14�`♦�1®11*IIII��j�111♦p111�1D11 �112AW
,/aP �♦I�I���f',�� , �.♦���r,��_�♦e�s1�11t,�+1® ......ar�en��.�x�Ar�i
111111 LIQ.♦ g1 /1 ♦1+♦ ®♦ p♦ p1 ♦1 t
. f 1/ 11 1111 111111111 +711 /11 !
1111111111111111 �V,P�5 p♦ p1 p!,
/111111111♦1♦♦111111♦♦11♦♦♦ ♦♦♦1♦+♦1� �.
iY 1111111111p111 01 ♦1 ♦1111111 p
:�i�ligpilpilpil/11p� •��•p� IIo♦.�I��:Ie�g,
� PSI �1��♦II �II.,p. 4yRri IVpi♦� i1pil�il ij +
♦ pi p1 1111' 11♦ 11�11 ♦p 1p °p ♦p
- 111111 ,♦♦� ♦♦1♦11.�1111 ♦11♦11 ♦� �, H.
► ♦ ♦ ♦ t
11♦®�1♦11.18"*ti1+♦1+♦I+O
�♦Ilp�t��Ipr,♦♦1�p� PS 2
X11111®1♦plp�p♦11111p111�1� M,
i �1♦1♦11111♦1g+®1♦111♦1111♦♦p1+
�gplpl♦+♦1♦®♦1.1•®14
�11p♦1111®♦IQIp111�� ♦rg111pia
1111111/1111�VR,t2�111♦♦1111♦jgl.
8111♦111111/1♦1111 111.11♦♦IIIj1+®11111114
�1♦�1®p11p11+♦111.1 111®11♦p�►p11p111p1/p11p♦IpI
a <.
F, Me
ew.44 SO N Nii; S; S;11♦W I.IIF!►�p.
PS 6 - �1♦♦Ijailpe�pilp♦�p11j 11111®+1� 1�p
y1111+♦♦11♦111111111111♦q
,♦♦Ips 1�1�♦1�1♦1�♦1p111y11p111ph�11p� Ips 1� r
i1�i1�i1pj 1! pi1�♦♦211 ♦111®®1♦®11®18
lf
Pr10 �a1p11 01;♦SAW
X11 p♦1♦p+♦p� p1� 1�
�'y�11 p�1141�111p1� 1:p1:p11pp1� 1�
�a r � q ip1i�11i♦1 f�1r1�� I�II�I�y1♦Ips Ip1♦Ip� 11111+
��n9tp �♦�p11� 11� 1�1p11♦11111A1p/1 plss VP 9 �'
Q 6rya 111111♦♦♦♦♦®111111♦♦♦11
♦c•�r,�♦Ig1
LEGEND rl4 T
RoadsP
Photo Station Locations s'
© Vegetation Plot Locations PS 7VP 5
g �j
Conservation Easement Boundary
VP 8
® ZONE A (0'-50') VP 7
® ZONE B (50'-100')
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION AREA
® NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREA
- MY3 Encroachment (--0.85 Ac.)
NC OO neMap, NC Cente5101111 fGeographic Information ar
Board
FIGURE 4. EASEMENT ENCROACHMENTS
ARRINGTON BRIDGE PHASE I
0 175 350 700 res
Feet
1 inch = 350 feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-1

MY3 — 2017 Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 2 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 3 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 4 (9/5/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-2

MY3 — 2017 Vegetation Plot Photos (Cont'd)
Vegetation Plot 5 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 6 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 7 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 8 (9/6/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-3

MY3 — 2017 Vegetation Plot Photos (Cont'd)
Vegetation Plot 9 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 11 (9/5/2017)
Vegetation Plot 10 (9/5/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-4

MY3 — 2017 Photo Station Photos
Photo Station 1 - 260 ❑ W
(9/5/2017)
irk
Photo Station 2 - 234 ❑ SW
(9/5/2017)
Aw--dw
Photo Station 3 - 301 ❑NW
(9/5/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
Photo Station 4 - 288 ❑ W
(9/5/2017)
Monitoring Report: Year 3
September 2017

MY3 — 2017 Photo Station Photos (Cont'd)
Photo Station 5 - 88 ❑ E
(9/5/2017)
Photo Station 7 - 216 ❑ SW
(9/6/2017)
Photo Station 6 - 260 ❑ W
(9/5/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-6

MY3 — 2017 Encroachment/Problem Areas
Easement Mowing/Encroachment Area at
Photo Station 1
(9/5/2017)
Easement Mowing/Encroachment Area at
Vegetation Plot 1
(9/5/2017)
Easement Mowing/Encroachment Area near
intersection of Arrington Bridge Rd. and John St.
(9/5/2017)
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
B-7

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

Table 1. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals (per acre)
Arrington Bridge I, Wayne County
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Stems/Acre
Volunteers
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Survival
Criteria
Met?
Average Stem
Height (cm)*
1
486
0
486
Yes
74
2
445
81
526
Yes
95
3
445
0
445
Yes
66
4
728
8579
9308
Yes
155
5
567
445
1012
Yes
120
6
486
0
486
Yes
108
7
607
0
607
Yes
85
8
931
688
1619
Yes
215
9
769
0
769
Yes
140
10
486
40
526
Yes
61
11
647
283
931
Yes
95
Project Avg
600
920
1519
Yes
110
* Only the tallest eight trees were averaged, as this is the amount that represents 320 stems/acre.
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

Table 2. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Arrington Bridge I, Wayne County
DWO # 2008-1473v.4
Calor Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 109/8 ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 109/8 ®Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10.9
Arrington Bridge I - Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
Current Plot Data (MY3 2017)
Current Plot Data (MY3 2017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
00000401-0001
Species Type Pnol-S P -all T
00000401-0002
Pnol-S P -all T
00000401-0003
Pnol-S P -all T
00000401-0004
PnoLS P -all T
00000401-0005
PnoLS P -all T
00000401-0006
Pnol-S P -all T
00000401-0007
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
MY3 (2015)
PnoLSIP-all T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
111
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
118
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1 1
16
1 1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
1 1
1
6 6
6
8
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
6 6
6
3 3
3
16
16
101
1 1
4
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
109
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1 21 2
2
5
1 1
1
6
6
6
Pinustaeda
loblollypine
Tree
3
3
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1 31 3
31
1 1
1 1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
5
1 51 5
5
2 2
7
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
6 6 6
1
2 2 2
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
1 1 1
2 2
2
1 1
1
26
31
4 4
4
2 2 2
5
5
5
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
Tree
1 1
1
11
11
11
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
Icherrybark oak
ITree
swamp chestnut oak Tree
3 3
3
2 2
2
1 1
1
1 1
1
21
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
Iwillowoak
ITree
5 5 5
3 3
5
7 7
7
6 6
6
71 71
7
81 81 8
4
41
4
axodium distichum
lbald cypress
ITree
i
4
4
2 2
2
Icherrybark oak
ITree
Stem count 121 321 12 11 11 13 ill 181 181
size (ares) 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species countl 31 31 31 5 5F-5 4 T -4--T 4
Stems per ACRE 485.6 485.6 485.6 445.2 445.2 526.1 445.2 445.2 445.2 728.4 728.4
230 14 14
1
0.02
61--T 4
9308 566.fi 566.6
25 12 12 12
1
0.02
6 3 3 3
1012 485.6 485.6 485.6
151
5
607
ic;l
1
0.02
5
607
15
5
607
Calor Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 109/8 ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 109/8 ®Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10.9
Arrington Bridge I - Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017
Current Plot Data (MY3 2017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
00000401-0008
Species Type Pnol-S P -all T
000004-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
00000401-0010
Pnol-S P -all T
00000401-0011
Pnol-S P -all T
MY3 (2017)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY2 (2016)
P.oLS P -all T
MY3 (2015)
PnoLSIP-all T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
2
3
118
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1 1
16
1 1
1
2
2
17
1 1
1
8
8
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
6 6
6
3 3
3
16
16
16
1 1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
4
109
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
5 5
5
1 1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1 31 3
31
1 1
1 1
51
51
5
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
7 7
7
4 4
4
8 8
8
26
26
31
8 8
8
18
18
18
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
11
11
11
5 5
5
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
3 3
3
2 2
2
1 1
1
21
21
21
17 17
17
22
221
22
Quercus nigra
water oak
ITree
1 1
1
1 1
1
4
4
4
2 2
21
4
4
4
Quercus pagoda
Icherrybark oak
ITree
7
7
7
1 1
1
17
17
17
Quercus phellos
1willowoak
ITree
6 61
6
61 61
6
31 3
3
41 41
4
591
591
61
471 47
47
511
51
51
axodium distichum
lbald cypress
ITree
3 3
3
1 1
1
6
6
6
3 3
3
5
5
5
Stem count 23 23
size (ares) 1
size (ACRES)i 0.02
Species counti 61 61
Stems per ACREI 930.81930.81
40 191 19 19 12 12 13 16 16 23 1631 1631 413 85 85 85 131 131 131
1 1 1 11 11 11
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.27 1 0.27
7 61 61 6 51 5 6 4 4 6 11 11 14 9 9 91 10 101 10
1619 768.9 768.9 768.9 485.6 485.6 526.1 647.5 647.5 930.8 599.7 599.71 1519 312.71 312.7 312.71481.91 481.9 1491.9
Calor Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 109/8 ®Exceeds requirements, but by less than 109/8 ®Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10.9
Arrington Bridge I - Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

Table 3A. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot - Phase 1 Area (33.529 Acres)
Scientific Name
Common Name
I Species Type
VP1
Current
VP2
VP3
Plot Data (MY3 2017) 1
VP4 VP5 VP9 VP10 VP11 MY3-2017
Planted Stems
Annual Means
MY2-2016 1 MY1-2015
YO -As -Buil
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
Green Ash
Tree
1
1
1
8
31
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
6
3
16
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
P I ata n u s o cc i d e nta I i s
American Sycamore Tree
1
1
7
3
12
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
White Oak
2
2
3
3
2
2
5
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oal Tree
2
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore Tree
Cherrybark Oak
Tree
5
2
4
8
19
8
18
5
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
6
15
15
29
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Tree
6
3
3
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oal Tree
1
2
1
15 23
1 1
0.02 0.02
5 6
607 930.8
4
2
1
59
1
0.07
5
769
11
10
15
16
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
10
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
Tree
3
1
1
5
1
16
44
Quercus phellos
lWillow0ak
Tree
5
3
7
6
7
6
3
4
41
32
36
40
Taxodium distichum
I Bald Cypress
ITree
2
3
1
6
3
5
8
Stem count 12 11 11 18 14 19 12 16
1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
size (ares) 1 1 1L728.4
Species count 3 5 4 4 6 5 4
Stems per ACRE 485.6 445.2 445.2 566.6M 485.6 647.5
113
3
0.2
11
571.6 1
59
3
0.2
8
299
104
3
0.2
9
526
169
3
0.2
9
855
Table 313. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot - Phase 1 Expansion Area (3.979 Acres)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Current Plot Data
(MY3 2017)
VP6 VP7 VP8
Annual Means
MY3-2017 1 MY2-2016 MY1-2015
Planted Stems
YO -As-Buil
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
Li q u 1 d a m b a r sty ra c i fl u a
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
5
5
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
P I ata n u s o cc i d e nta I i s
American Sycamore Tree
7
7
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
2
3
5
2
2
8
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oal Tree
2
5
3
10
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
10
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
Tree
2
2
1
5
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
8
4
6
18
15
15
29
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Tree
Stem count 12
size (ares) 1
size (ACRES) 0.02
Species count 3
Stems per ACRE 485.6
15 23
1 1
0.02 0.02
5 6
607 930.8
50
1
0.07
8
674.5
26
1
0.07
4
351
27
1
0.07
5
364
59
1
0.07
5
769
Arrington Bridge I - Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0001
Sep 2011 Data
o
1.5
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5): 44 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 583030.106 Datum: NAD8YW
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 2294887.749 UTM Zone: J17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 200
Please 1111 in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 deerees to the richt of X
Sep 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
1
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.5
0.0
73.0
2
Quercus michauxii
®
R
2.4
0.0
49.0
3
Quercus phellos
R
5.0
0.0
89.0
4
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.2
2.4
68.0
5
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.5
2.1
77.0
6
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.0
3.0
123.0
DBH?
7
Quercus alba
O
R
7.7
4.8
Missing
8
Quercus alba
R
8.5
4.0
17.0
9
Quercus alba
O
R
8.9
6.0
29.0
10
Quercus alba
R
7.8
8.0
Missing
I 1
Quercus alba
O
R
5.5
8.2
28.0
596
Quercus alba
$)
R
0.2
1.4
61.0
597
Quercus alba
Q
R
7.0
1.4
19.0
El
598
Quercus alba
O
R
5.0
2.2
48.0
El
El
❑
El IEl❑
ElElEl I❑
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0001
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re quiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••400
NS
�6
::7
1:8
77
}�9
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0001
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 200 ° #stems: 14
map size:
small
N
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. t
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
583715.885
5.123
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 247
U
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: E7710 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
27
Quercus michauxii
O
R
02
2.2
38.0
❑
29
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.2
6.2
22.0
❑
30
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.2
8.2
Missin S
❑
31
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.2
0.2
97.0
❑
33
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.2
4.5
60.0
❑
34
Quercus nigra
R
3.2
6.7
50.0
❑
43
Quercus phellos
R
8.7
3.7
63.0
❑
600
Quercus pagoda
®
P
3.0
1.5
96.0
❑
601
Nyssa biflora
Q
P
3.5
4.0
125.0
DBH? ❑
602
Quercus pagoda
O
P
3.6
6.3
114.0
DBH? ❑
603
Nyssa biflora
Q
P
5.0
7.0
78.0
❑
604
Quercus pagoda
P
4.5
4.2
127.0
DBH? ❑
❑
❑
❑
El
El I
El
# stems: 12 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0002
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re quiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••400
NS
�6
::7
1:8
77
}�9
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0002
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 247 °
# stems: 12
map size:
/ small
N
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584278.466 Datum: NAD83/W
2295502.005 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 345
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
48
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.5
0.3
99.0
49
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.5
0.3
60.0
F]
50
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.5
0.3
50.0
11
55
Quercus phellos
R
5.6
2.8
89.0
1-1
56
Quercus phellos
0
R
7.5
2.8
49.0
11
63
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.7
6.3
50.0
64
Quercus michauxii
R
9.4
8.6
35.0
1-1
606
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.1
7.0
30.0
n
607
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
9.6
5.0
62.0
608
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.5
2.8
46.0
609
Taxodium distichmn
R
0.2
3.0
71.0
El
El I
❑
❑
# stems: 11 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. '-
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0003
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •
•I •2
•3
••
••4
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
�8
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0003
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 345 ° \ #stems: 11
M
ap size:
0 N small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584716.227 Datum: NAD83/W
2295660.175 UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 89
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 El plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
69
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.6
0.4
77.0
71
Quercus phellos
R
4.7
0.4
40.0
77
72
Quercus phellos
R
6.6
0.4
64.0
73
Quercus phellos
R
8.7
0.4
77.0
74
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.4
2.7
150.0
0.6
75
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
3.5
2.7
185.0
0.7
77
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.2
2.7
144.0
0.6
78
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.1
2.7
197.0
1.0 n
80
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.0
5.5
120.0
DBH?
83
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
0.4
5.5
210.0
1.0
84
Quercus phellos
R
8.5
8.4
78.0
86
Quercus pagoda
R
7.0
8.4
47.0
�]
87
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.8
8.4
47.0
611
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.8
0.5
95.0
612
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.5
0.9
128.0
DBH?
613
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.0
3.0
103.0
DBH?
614
Platanus occidentalis
$)
R
0.4
4.9
79.0
615
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
5.0
8.4
94.0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. i
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 000004-01-0004 Sep 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cit -off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. •I
•2
•
03
••
••4
••
N56
••
•
�7
�8
�i0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0004
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 89 ° N #stems: 18
map size:
01 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0005
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584280.181
2294659.477
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 182
U
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
92
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.3
0.3
69.0
❑
93
Quercus michauxii
O
R
2.4
0.3
53.0
77
94
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.4
0.3
97.0
95
Quercus phellos
R
6.3
0.3
63.0
96
Quercus phellos
R
8.5
0.3
100.0
❑
97
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.7
2.0
108.0
DBH? ❑
99
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.4
2.4
213.0
2.0 �]
102
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.5
3.3
176.0
0.7
103
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.3
9.0
96.0
J
104
Quercus pagoda
O
R
1.6
5.9
54.0
❑
109
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.4
2.7
Missing
❑
112
Quercus phellos
R
6.6
7.5
65.0
❑
113
Quercus phellos
R
3.9
8.0
76.0
❑
114
Quercus phellos
(
R
2.9
8.6
91.0
115
Quercus phellos
®
R
1.5
9.0
74.0
❑
❑
❑
El
❑
El I
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. S
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0005
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIina**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •
•I •2
•3
••
••4
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
�8
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0005
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 182 ° #stems: 15
map size:
N - 0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1(
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
582690.926 Datum: NAD83/W
2294612572 UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 258
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
to Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
116
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.4
0.4
81.0
❑
117
Quercus michauxii
$)
R
0.8
3.8
35.0
❑
118
Quercus michauxii
O
R
1.0
6.6
68.0
11
120
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.1
7.5
184.0
0.5 ❑
121
Quercus alba
O
R
2.3
4.9
75.0
❑
122
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.0
1.8
81.0
❑
123
Quercus phellos
(g
R
3.8
2.9
77.0
❑
125
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.0
8.2
100.0
❑
128
Quercus phellos
Q
R
5.6
4.6
134.0
DBH? ❑
129
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.3
0.7
72.0
❑
132
Quercus phellos
Q
R
7.1
7.9
Missin S
❑
133
Quercus phellos
R
9.2
7.0
128.0
DBH? ❑
134
Quercus phellos
Q
R
9.9
4.5
Missin S
❑
135
Quercus alba
0
R
8.5
3.2
39.0
❑
❑
❑
El
❑
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0006
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••400
NS
�6
::7
1:8
77
}�9
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0006
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 258 ° #stems: 14
map size:
' small
\\N
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0007
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
582582.784 Datum: NAD83/W
2294467.404 UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 2
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 El plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
136
Quercus pagoda
(�)
R
0.5
0.6
62.0
❑
138
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.8
0.3
122.0
DBH?
139
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.5
1.3
118.0
DBH?
140
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.1
0.2
67.0
141
Quercus michauxii
O
R
9.6
1.8
53.0
142
Quercus pagoda
R
5.0
2.7
84.0
143
Quercus phellos
R
2.0
2.0
77.0
144
Quercus phellos
R
0.2
3.8
98.0
[�
145
Quercus michauxii
Q
R
2.5
5.5
25.0
146
Quercus michauxii
O
R
6.7
4.9
30.0
147
Quercus michauxii
O
R
9.9
4.6
39.0
149
Quercus alba
O
R
5.5
6.3
46.0
❑
151
Quercus alba
Q
R
0.7
6.8
46.0
❑
153
Quercus nigra
O
R
5.7
9.9
46.0
❑
622
Quercus alba
R
8.1
7.0
55.0
❑
❑
❑
El
❑
❑
El I
EEl
EE]
# stems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.13
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0007
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re quiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•3
••400
NS
�6
::7
1:8
77
}�9
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0007
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 2 ° # stems: 15
C N map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.14
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0008
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
582475.537 Datum: NAD83/W
2294750.040 UTM Zone: 17n
0-5TX-Axis bearing (deg): 70
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y:10 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
624
Platanus occidentalis
®
P
0.6
0.7
202.0
0.7 E]
625
Quercus nigra
O
P
0.9
2.0
170.0
0.6
626
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
P
1.2
3.2
127.0
DBH? n
627
Platanus occidentalis
O
P
0.5
5.7
187.0
0.7
628
Liriodendron tulipifera
P
1.7
7.5
139.0
0.5
629
Platanus occidentalis
®
P
1.0
9.5
211.0
1.1
630
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
P
3.6
9.5
122.0
DBH?
631
Platanus occidentalis
P
2.8
5.5
182.0
0.8
632
Quercus phellos
P
2.6
1.4
189.0
0.6
633
Quercus phellos
O
P
3.8
3.3
203.0
0.9
634
Platanus occidentalis
P
4.9
6.0
185.0
0.7
635
Quercus phellos
P
4.2
7.7
168.0
0.6
636
Quercus michauxii
P
6.7
7.5
161.0
0.3
637
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
P
6.5
5.4
115.0
DBH'? J
638
Quercus michauxii
O
P
6.5
4.0
178.0
0.7
639
Platanus occidentalis
P
5.4
2.1
203.0
1.0 L
640
Betula nigra
@
P
7.4
1.5
280.0
L l
641
Quercus michauxii
Q
P
7.6
3.6
127.0
DBH? n
642
Platanus occidentalis
O
P
8.2
5.4
225.0
1.0
643
Quercus phellos
O
P
8.2
9.2
200.0
0.7
644
Quercus phellos
O
P
9.9
7.2
195.0
0.6
645
Liriodendron tulipifera
P
9.7
4.0
130.0
DBH?
646
Quercus phellos
O
P
9.9
0.2
190.0
0.6
-0m_-
=MMMM
_-M-_-
_-m-_-
_-M-_-
mmmmm
_-M-_-
_-m-_-
=MMMM
_-M-_-
_-m-_-
mmmmm
_-m-_-
_-m-_-
_-M-_-
_-m-_-
=MMMM
_-m-_-
_-M-_-
_-M-_-
_-m-_-
_-M-M-
_-m-_-
• • •
• - --
• -•
-4 •. •• •••
D.
!M7111111111111111
-
=1 -- -
---
*SOURCE: Tr- -Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1 If
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0008
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •
•I •2
•3
••
••4
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
�8
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0008
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 70 ° N #stems: 23
�/, map size:
U small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. if
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0009
VMD Year (1-5): F41 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
583145.667 Datum: NAD83/W
2295099.112 UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): FL 28
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: l0 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
182
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.5
0.6
19.0
183
Taxodium distichum
O
R
4.5
0.5
85.0
F]
184
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.6
0.5
60.0
11
185
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.6
0.4
132.0
DBH?
189
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.6
3.0
51.0
191
Taxodium distichum
R
1.9
6.6
60.0
192
Quercus michauxii
R
3.6
5.5
15.0
197
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.5
9.9
126.0
DBH? E]
198
Platanus occidentalis
(
R
4.3
9.9
29.0
F1
199
Betula nigra
O
R
2.4
9.9
208.0
1.0 E
649
Quercus phellos
O
P
8.6
2.0
105.0
DBH? `I
650
Quercus phellos
P
6.6
2.5
142.0
0.5E]
651
Quercus phellos
P
4.9
3.0
87.0
652
Nyssa biflora
O
P
4.5
6.6
118.0
DBH?
653
Nyssa biflora
@
P
6.6
6.0
152.0
0.3
654
Quercus phellos
O
P
3.5
8.0
93.0
655
Quercus phellos
O
P
2.5
8.5
34.0
656
Nyssa biflora
®
P
0.5
6.3
135.0
DBH? E]
657
Quercus phellos
P
0.1
9.0
87.0
1-1
El
El
El I
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1 i
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 000004-01-0009 Sep 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
Q
0
T
5ff
0
**Required if cit -off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. •I
•2
•
03
••
••4
••
N56
••
•
�7
�8
�t0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0009
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 28' #stems: 19
G N map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1 E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
Of
n
0
Q
0
T
5ff
0
16
0
�
0
16
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 28' #stems: 19
G N map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.1 E
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0010
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
583444.000 Datum: NAD83/W
2294690.066 UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 194
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
201
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.5
0.4
32.0
❑
202
Quercus phellos
R
2.2
0.5
Missing
777
205
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.3
0.6
67.0
❑
206
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
9.1
3.1
58.0
210
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.7
2.6
Missin S
❑
213
Quercus phellos
R
4.9
5.6
24.0
❑
214
Quercus phellos
R
6.7
5.8
71.0
❑
215
Quercus nigra
O
R
8.9
6.1
39.0
❑
218
Quercus michauxii
O
R
6.0
8.1
24.0
J
659
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.0
3.2
58.0
❑
660
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
4.0
3.2
60.0
❑
661
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
1.2
3.2
63.0
❑
662
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.3
7.6
52.0
❑
663
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.0
0.4
62.0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 15
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
000004-01-0010
Sep 2017 Data
o
— HEIGHT
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
#
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Re quiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •
•I •2
•3
••
••4
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
�8
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0010
Y:
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 194 ° #stems: 14
map size:
N ,J
small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 2(
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 000004-01-0011
VMD Year (1-5): Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584474.926
0
Datum: NAD83/W
UTM Zone: 17n
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 1 280
U
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: l0 plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2017 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1111 lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
221
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.6
0.4
8.0
222
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.7
0.2
72.0
77
226
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.4
3.3
162.0
0.6 ❑
227
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.2
3.0
96.0
El
228
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.9
2.7
128.0
DBH?
234
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.1
5.7
19.0
237
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.1
8.7
20.0
238
Quercus phellos
0
R
4.3
8.6
Missing
665
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
9.1
1.9
71.0
J
666
Quercus phellos
R
8.5
3.0
37.0
667
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.0
3.5
73.0
668
Quercus phellos
R
6.0
2.3
68.0
�]
669
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.2
4.0
89.0
670
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.4
6.0
72.0
671
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.2
3.0
62.0
672
Quercus phellos
R
1.6
1.8
65.0
673
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
4.0
7.5
50.0
❑
❑
❑
El
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 21
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 000004-01-0011 Sep 2017 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH # ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyIing**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
Q)
0
5n
0
0
**Required if cit -off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. •I
•2
•
03
••
••4
••
N56
••
•
�7
�8
}�9
�j
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 000004-01-0011
Y:
40
T
Q)
0
5n
0
0
d
IL
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 280 °
# stems: 17
map size:
J\ small
0
N
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 22
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Appendix D
Adaptive Management Plan
Arrington Bridge I — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 3
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 September 2017

res
Memo 10055 Red Run Blvd.
Suite 130
Owings Mills, MD
To: Katie Merritt, DWR 21117
From: Brian Hockett , RES
412 N. 4th St. Suite 300
Based on the Year 2 vegetation monitoring, four (4) of the eleven (11) monitoring
Baton Rouge, LA
cc: File
70802
Date: Februa I5 2017
rY �
1307 Broad Street
Camden, SC
the site requirements are not being met based on the Year 2 vegetation monitoring
29020
Arrington Bridge Phase I — Year 3 Monitoring
Re: Adaptive Management Work Plan
1514 South Church Street
Suite 103
density areas with 3 -year old trees. It is assumed the supplemental replant performed
Charlotte, NC
in May 2016 had low survival rates due to abundant herbaceous cover and sandy soil
28203
During Year 2-2016 monitoring activities, RES documented areas of low planted stem
densities and a small area of easement encroachment located on the Arrington Bridge I
Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site. RES is aware the site is not performing as
5020 Montrose Blvd.
Suite 650
Houston, TX
planned and has prepared an adaptive management plan below to address the onsite problems.
77006
1. Low Planted Stem Densities
1200 Camellia Blvd.
Based on the Year 2 vegetation monitoring, four (4) of the eleven (11) monitoring
Suite 220
plots were above the five (5) Year monitoring Period requirement. RES acknowledges
Lafayette, LA
70508
the site requirements are not being met based on the Year 2 vegetation monitoring
results. RES is planning to perform a supplemental replant across the site in low stem
137 1/2 East Main Street
density areas with 3 -year old trees. It is assumed the supplemental replant performed
Suite 210
in May 2016 had low survival rates due to abundant herbaceous cover and sandy soil
Oak Hill, WV
25901
conditions. RES anticipates that planting larger trees will result in better survival
since they will be above the herbaceous layer. Each tree will be planted with an auger
380 Southpointe Blvd.
drilled oversized hole to assist with soil compaction. The total supplemental replant
Plaza II, Suite 405
Canonsburg, PA
area is approximately 33 acres which includes the area of encroachment in Phase I
15317
Expansion Area.
909 Capability Drive
Suite 3100
2. Easement Encroachment
Raleigh, NC
For Phase I Ex ansion easement encroachment mowin activities were resent
27606
p g p
during MY along the eastern CE boundary. The encroachment damaged Phase I
Expansion CE markers and the markers for Vegetation Plot 8. Additional
conservation easement markers were installed and Vegetation Plot 8 was re-
established. The encroachment area was replanted to a density of 1,575 stems per acre
in early 2016; however, mowing continued within the area. It should be noted that
easement encroachment located in the Phase I Expansion area is not associated with
the project landowner or RES. An adjacent third party landowner is the cause of
encroachment problems. RES has taken action to remedy the encroachment problem
by sending the adjacent landowner a certified letter informing them they have violated
the conservation easement multiple times by mowing and removing easement
signage. RES is planning to install approximately 650 linear feet of woven wire fence
along the outer conservation easement boundary to prevent future easement
encroachment in the Phase I Expansion area. The attached Figure 1 shows the proposed areas of

fence installation and supplemental replanting areas. The proposed fence installation is planned for
early March 2017. Once the easement boundary is re-established and fencing is installed, RES will
plant this area during the 2017 supplemental replanting activities. Vegetation Plot 8 will be re-
established and documented accordingly.
RES plans to perform the above mentioned adaptive management activities by early May 2017. Once work
is completed, RES will provide written notification to NCDWR along with photo documentation to inform
work has been completed.
Thanks,
Brian Hockett, PLS
NC Operations Manager
RES

FIGURE 1. 2017 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN
ARRINGTON BRIDGE PHASE I
175 350 700
Feet
1 inch = 350 feet
fires