The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUS 33 (2)r e ^` STATE ti STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F EASLEY GOVERNOR AGENDA Eastern Concurrence Meeting Thursday, December 11, 2008 Room 101, Parker Lincoln Building Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 LYNDo TIPPETT SECRETARY J -5- 00s.1 - Michele James, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT PDEA TIP No. R-3407, NC 33 from US 64 near Tarboro to US 13/NCI 1-903 in Greenville Edgecombe and Pitt Counties, Divisions 2 and 4 Team Members: William Wescott, USACE Michele James, PDEA Ron Lucas, FHWA Chris Mihtscher, USEPA Gary Jordan, USFWS Ron Sechler, NMFS Rob Ridings and Brian Wrenn, DWQ Sean McKenna, DMF Travis Wilson, WRC Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO Steve Sollod, DCM Daniel Van Lieve, Upper Coastal Plain RPO (non-signatory) Eddy Davis, Mid-East RPO (non-signatory) NCDOT Technical Support Staff and Other Agency Staff: Ricky Green, Division 4 Wendi Williams, Division 4 Neil Lassiter, Division 2 Ed Eatmon, Division 2 Jimmy Goodnight, Roadway Design Tun Goins, Roadway Design Jerry Snead, Hydraulics BenJetta Johnson, Congestion Management Earlene White, TPB Njoroge Wauiama, Geotechnical Shannon Lasater, Highways Admin Office Chris Rivenbark, NEU Mary Pope Furr, HEU Tun Gardiner HEU Charles Cox, PDEA Rob Hanson, PDEA * The purpose of this meeting is to reach concurrence on MA. MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE 919-733-3141 LOCATION NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE WWW DOH DOT STATE NC US RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 Concurrence Point 2A NEPA/404 Merger Team Meeting TIP Project No. R-3407 Federal Project No MASTP-33(3) WBS No 34539 1 1 Widening of NC 33 from US 264 in Greenville to US 64 Southeast of Tarboro Edgecombe and Pitt Counties December 11, 2008 Transportation Building Board Room Purpose of Meeting: The,purpose of this meeting is to submit information to the Merger Team on the, alternatives'that have been studied in detail and to reach concurrence on Point 2A , (Bridging Decisions and Final Alternatives to Carry Forward) for TIP Project No R73407, , Agenda for Meeting: • Project Description and Status • Discussion of Bridging Locations • Discussion of Final Alternatives to Carry Forward • Comments and Questions Project Planning Engineer: Michele L. James (919) 733-7844, Ext. 233 mjames@ncdot.gov R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION TIP Project R-3407 is programmed in the 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the widening of NC 33 to a multilane facility from the US 264 Bypass in Greenville to US 64 southeast of Tarboro The project has been divided into seven sections, with two to three alternatives per section under consideration They include and corridors utilizing existing facilities and corridors located on new location The attached vicinity map shows the location of the project The sections vary from 0 51 to 4 67 miles in length A four-lane median divided facility with partial access control is proposed It is anticipated approximately 200 feet of right of way will be required to accommodate this facility The median width of 46 ft will be reduced in Sections 4 and 6 Studies are underway in accordance with the requirements set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended Right of way acquisition is scheduled for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013 (Section 1 only) and construction is scheduled for Post Year The total estimated cost for the proposed project is $78,100,000, including $6,500,000 for right of way and $71,600,000 for construction cost PURPOSE AND NEED (CP 1) The Purpose and Need Statement (CPI), as approved by the NEPA/404 Merger Team on February 17, 2005 is stated as follows "The purpose of the project is to improve the safety and capacity of NC 33 between Tarboro and Greenville." DETAILED STUDY ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD (CP 2) Concurrence Point 2 (CP 2) was signed on August 24, 2006 At this meeting, the team agreed to consider the following alternatives for each section • Section 1, from US 64 in Tarboro to dust west of NC 42 Two alternatives, northern widening and best fit • Section 2, from dust west of NC 42 to approximately 0 35 mile east of NC 42 Two alternatives, northern widening and best fit • Section 3, from approximately 0 35 mile east of NC 42 to approximately 0 30 mile west of SR 1608 (Thigpen Road) Two alternatives, northern widening and best fit • Section 4, from approximately 0 30 mile west of SR 1608 (Thigpen Road) to 0 40 miles east of SR 1409 (Penny Hill Road) Four alternatives, northern widening, southern widening, best fit and avoidance of the Penny Hill historic doctor's office • Section 5, from approximately 0 40 mile east of SR 1409 (Penny Hill Road) to approximately 0 33 mile west of NC 222 Two alternatives, southern widening and best fit 2 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 • Section 6, from approximately 0 33 mile west of NC 222 to approximately 0 46 mile east of NC 222 Best fit alignments with options in and around Belvoir • Section 7, from approximately 0 46 mile east of NC 222 to US 264 in Greenville Two alternatives, northern widening and best fit CONCURRENCE POINT 2A The proposed alternatives for TIP Project R-3407 are located within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin Jurisdictional streams and wetlands have been identified within the project study corridor Table 1 details the current sections/ alternatives and impacts associated with each alternative Wetland and stream impacts for each project section are provided in Table 2 Wetlands and streams are shown in Figure 2 Wetland and stream impacts were calculated based on the current preliminary design Wetland impacts are calculated from slope stake to slope stake, plus an additional 25 feet outside of each limit as determined from the current functional design plans for each alternative, The totals are rounded to the nearest Y 1 acre for wetlands and the nearest foot for streams Revisions to Current Alternatives: y rt t i 1 Section 4: To, avoid both the Tar River and the Historic Property, NCDOT evaluated one ' , bypass option in addition to the widening alternatives Section 6: In order to minimize impacts to the Belvoir community, NCDOT evaluated 2 bypass options in addition to the widening alternative CP 2A Field MeetinE: A field meeting was held November 3, 2008 The attendees reviewed high quality wetland sites and potential bridge locations Table 3 lists each of the high quality crossings and mayor hydraulic crossings NCDOT's hydraulic structure recommendations are provided in this table At this meeting, the Agencies in attendance agreed with all of NCDOT's recommendations for hydraulic structures 3 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 1: R-3407 Preliminary Impacts ?" '" n _ Section 1 ?Sectiom 1 Section 2 Sect ion-2 Impact Best _ forth Best Fit - _ N rttt C - Widening _ideuiu - W Length (miles) 4 7 47 05 Interchanges 0 0 0 0 Railroad Crossings 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 Recreational Areas and 0 0 0 0 Parks Churches 0 0 0 0 Cemeteries 1 cemetery 2 cemetery 0 0 11 graves 20 graves Potential Residential 9 7 13 8 Relocations Potential Business 0 0 0 0 Relocations Historic Properties (Listed on or eligible for the 0 0 0 0 National Register) Section 4(f)/6(f) Impacts 0 0 0 0 (Park/Historic) Archaeological Sites TBD TBD TBD TBD NRCS - Potential TBD TBD TBD TBD Farmland Conversion Wetlands Impacts (acres) 1 8 2 7 01 3 Stream Impacts (feet) 420 439 0 0 Water Supply Watershed NO NO NO NO Protected Areas Wildlife Refuges and 0 0 0 0 Gamelands Federally Listed Species 1 * 1 * 0 0 within Corridor Known Hazardous Mat'l 0 0 0 0 Sites/ Spill Basins Adverse / Disproportionate Impacts to Minority/Low NO NO NO NO Income Populations Right of Way Cost $2,750,000 $2,845,000 $1,489,000 $855,000 Utility Cost $3,145,232 $3,021,256 $1,021,608 $884,124 Construction Cost $18,500,000 $18,900,000 $2,300,000 $2,250,000 Total Cost $24,395,232 $24,757,256 $4,810,608 $3,991,124 *Section 1 - Documented Bald Eagle nest on south side of NC 33 4 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2*68 Table 2: R-3407 Prelimi pacts (cont _ Section 3 Section 3 Section 1. Section 4 Impact [lest Fit North ( - North fllyp, Forth w 1*Nidening, NVide uin Length (miles) 1 3 1 3 7 17 Interchanges 0 0 0 Railroad Crossings 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 Recreational Areas and 0 0 0 0 Parks Churches 0 0 0 0 Cemeteries 0 0 0 0 Potential Residential 1 1 3 6 Relocations Potential Business 0 0 Q 1 Relocations Historic Properties (Listed on or eligible for the _ 0 0 0 1 , National Register) Section 4(f)/6(f) Impacts 0 0 0 ' 1 (Park/Historic) . Archaeological Sites, + TBD TBD TBD TBD_--, NRCS -Potential TBD TBD TBD TBD" 1 Farmland Conversion : Wetlands Impacts (acres) 12 1 1 10 25 Stream Impacts (feet) 1114 948 297 320 Water Supply Watershed YES YES YES YES Protected Areas Wildlife Refuges and 0 0 0 0 Gamelands Federally Listed Species 0 0 1 * 1 within Corridor Known Hazardous Mat'l 0 0 0 0 Sites / Spill Basins Adverse / Disproportionate Impacts to Minority/Low NO NO NO NO Income Populations Right of Way Cost $401,000 $426,000 $813,000 $1,258,000 Utility Cost $1,248,420 $1,345,848 $655,724 $1,339,422 Construction Cost $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $8,300,000 $6,800,000 Total Cost $6,649,420 $6,771,848 $9,768,724 $9,397,422 * Section 4 - Tar River spmeymussel R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 3: R-3407 Preliminary Impacts (cont.) SectionA Section 5 -Impact ??ith? ? S Section S Smid) NN/din Best Fit i.dcnin _, . Length (miles) 1 7' 11 39 Interchanges 0 0 0 Railroad Crossings 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 Recreational Areas and Parks Churches 0 1 1 Cemeteries 0 0 0 Potential Residential 2 5 8 Relocations y Potential Business 1 j 4 3 Relocations Historic Properties (Listed 1 on or eligible for the (Penny Hill Dr 0 0 National Register) Office) Section 4(f)/6(f) Impacts 0 0 (Park/Historic) l Archaeological Sites TBD TBD TBD NRCS - Potential TBD TBD TBD Farmland Conversion Wetlands Impacts (acres) 68 1 5 1 8 Stream Impacts (feet) 320 1130 2077 Water Supply Watershed YES YES YES Protected Areas Wildlife Refuges and 0 0 0 Gamelands Federally Listed Species 1 0 0 within Corridor Known Hazardous Mat'l 0 0 0 Sites/ Spill Basins Adverse / Disproportionate Impacts to Minority/Low NO NO NO Income Populations Right of Way Cost $759,000 $2,041,000 $2,364,000 Utility Cost $903,888 $3,992,692 $3,861,600 Construction Cost $7,200,000 $14,600,000 $14,500,000 Total Cost $8,862,888 $20,633,692 $20,725,600 * Section 4 - Tar River spmeymussel t r 3' 6 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 4: R-3407 Preliminary Impacts (cont. SE i 6 ?'Sc?ti?ri" 6 Scctibn-6 lrnp pct 13 it \???th ?tss _ South BN "Iss - Length (miles) 0 1 Interchanges 0 0 0 Railroad Crossings 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 Recreational Areas and 0 0 0 Parks Churches 0 0 0 Cemeteries 0 0 0 Potential Residential 18 '? 1 2 Relocations Potential Business 1 0 0 Relocations Historic Properties (Listed _ on or eligible for the 0 0 0 National Register) Section 4(f)/6(f) Impacts 0 0 0 (Park/Historic)' y Archaeological Sites TBD TBD TBD, NRCS - Potential TBD TBD TBD' ' Farmland Conversion Wetland's Impacts acres 0 2 22 •,; Stream Impacts (feet) 288 200 493 Water Supply Watershed YES YES YES Protected Areas Wildlife Refuges and 0 0 0 Gamelands Federally Listed Species 0 0 0 within Corridor Known Hazardous Mat'l 0 0 0 Sites / Spill Basins Adverse / Disproportionate Impacts to Minority/Low NO NO NO Income Populations Right of Way Cost $1,875,000 $561,000 $513,000 Utility Cost $259,220 $223,408 $201,900 Construction Cost $3,600,000 $7,300,000 $6,100,000 Total Cost $5,734,220 $8,084,408 $6,814,900 7 .r rs f . ? e7 ? R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 5: R-3407 Prehminipacts (cont.) - Section 7 Section 7- I?upact Best Fit North VNidenin Length (miles) 0 40 Interchanges 0 0 Railroad Crossings 0 0 Schools 1 t-?s 1 Recreational Areas and 0 0 Parks Churches 0 0 Cemeteries 1 cemetery 1 cemetery (6 graves) ( 6 graves) Potential Residential 18 • 23 Relocations , Potential Business 2 2 Relocations Historic Properties (Listed on or eligible for the- 0 0 National Register) Section 4(f)/6(f) Impacts, 0 0 (Park/Historic) Archaeological Sites TBD, TBD NRCS - Potential TBD TBD Farmland Conversion Wetlands Impacts (acres) 3 3 Stream Impacts (feet) 965 , 750 Water Supply Watershed YES YES Protected Areas Wildlife Refuges and 0 0 Gamelands Federally Listed Species 0 0 within Corridor Known Hazardous Mat'l 0 0 Sites/ Spill Basins Adverse / Disproportionate Impacts to Minority/Low NO NO Income Populations Right of Way Cost $3,084,000 $3,862,000 Utility Cost $3,224,196 $3,345,726 Construction Cost $13,100,000 $13,700,000 Total Cost $19,408,196 $20,907,726 f ? F t Y < ? ? t 8 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 2A: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 1-Northern Widening Riverine ?? elland/ Wetland Length of Non- Riper ine Stream -Wetland Area Stream `1C DWO (N?etlands) ?ldcutification ' Type Impacted - Impacted Ratin4, -Perennial - (Acres) - (ft), n ,Intermittent - (streams) Pond 1 08 Pond 2 19 WA PFO1 C 37 47 Cromwell 207 35 57 P Canal WC PFO 1 C 20 UT1 37 3 50 P WD PFO1 C 03 30 UT2 195 39 75 P UT2 02 39 75 P Wl PFO1C 29 57 WL PFO 1 C 13 70 WN PFO 1 C 18 40 WO PFO 1 C 1 25 48 TOTALS: 2.7 439 Table2B: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 1-Best?Fit Widening ` t - ? R??enne ?, ° ?? etlan?/ NN'etland ' 1 moth of 7= . ' a- - ' NongR?v ei Ife ctland1iEa 1 ' Sftc im _- JNCDN1O _ F - iIdentrtlc?iti??n . T??pc fm??acted - Itiip ietEd? . R?t?n? . ,T ,??crnn??l`/? AC'I eS) ?r (1t) -lntcrnfiftcnt Pond 1 0 0 Pond 2 0 0 WA PFO 1 C 44 47 Cromwell 224 35 57 P Canal WC PFO 1 C 22 UT1 35 3 50 P WD PFO 1 C 03 30 UT2 161 39 75 P WI PFO 1 C 76 57 WL PFO 1 C 14 70 WN PFO 1 C 16 40 WO PFO 1 C 01 48 TOTALS: 1.8 420 9 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 2C: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 2-Northern Widening _ Wetland r - Length of, Riverine Non Riverine Wetland/ Stream ? ? 'Wetland 1 ? - ?Area Stream ate NC DWQ ce, _ wetlands Identification Type -Impacted Impacted Rating Perennial (Acr=es) (ft) - m Intermittent (streams) WP PEM 30 16 TOTALS: .3 Table 21): R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 2-Best Fit W ? { «tctland/ Wetland Letioth.ot i - .Non- Riverine - «' etland Area Stream I nC=D«Q - ,"Oyetlands) Type Iniliacted Impacted_ Rat ligl_ Perennial 4 (fentifica tion ? , Intermittent b = I _ ? (streams) UT3 327 25 5 P UT4 621 28 75 P WQ PFO 1 C 1 14 71 UT5 214 26 75 P TOTALS: 1.1 948 - Riverine i R Mond/ ??'ctland _ Length of Non- Riverine Str am NVetland area Stream NC UN1'Q (wetlands) e Identification T?'pe Impacted Impacted Ratln?; Perenlllaf (Acres) (ft Intermittent (streams) WP PEM 01 16 TOTALS : .O1 ? t Table 2E: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 3-Northern Widening 10 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 N_ a Table 2F: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 3-Best Fit Widening Riverine,/,, ??A ctland/ \N d Wetland ? A Lengib of Non- Riverine, NC D\ S ) aStrea edan rea tream Q1 (NNetlands) - - y n Identification Tvpe -Impacted ? Impacted IZatin Percnnial / (Acres) (ft) Intermittent (streams) UT3 285 255 P UT4 613 28 75 P WQ PFO1 C 1 21 71 UT5 216 26 75 P TOTALS: 1.2 1114 Table 2G: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 4 - Northern Widening Riverine-l - ?1 ctland/ = \N'etland : ? Lenoth of Non- RiNerine ?1 etland area Strean) NC ) (NN'etlands) Stream Type Impacted Iriipactki hating Perennial; Identification (acres) (ft) Intermittent (ctreat>i><s) - WST PFO1 C 89 56 WU PFO 1 C 31 75 PFO 1 C/ WX 1 28 43 PEM Cheeks Mill 320 49 00 P Creek TOTALS: 2.5 320 Table 211: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 4 - Southern Widening _w ro _. Ri?er-inc / NN'etland/ ?? ctland Length of - Non- Riverine Wetland Area Stream NC DNVQ (wetlands) Stream "INI)e Impacted Impacted Rating Rating Perennial / Identification (Acres) (O ? lntermittent` ?? ? stre<<nr<s WST PFO1C 5 35 56 WU PFO 1 C 84 75 PFO1 C/ WX 59 43 PEM Cheeks Mill 320 49 00 P Creek TOTALS: 6.8 320 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 21: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 4 - Northern Bypass ^ W Riverine l ' Wetland/ Wetland Length of Non- Riverine' Stream -Wetland Area ,Stream NC DWQ (wetlands) Identi Identification Type Impacted Impacted Rating Nerellnial / (:acres) (ftj Intermittent (s h-earns) WST PFO1 C 69 56 PFO 1 C/ WX PEM 27 43 Cheeks Mill Creek 297 49 00 P TOTALS: 1.0 297 ia? Table 2J: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 5 - Best Fit Widening i v a Rig erin'e / Wetland/ Wetland Length of Non- Riverine Stream Wetland .area Stream N C DAN Q (wetlands) ldentification yl)e Impacted Impacted Rating -- Perennial / (:Acres) (ft) Intermittent (strea?u?} ,a , PFO 1 C/ WX 19 43 PEM y UT 6 228 42 00 P UT 7 161 32 50 P UT 8 166 24 50 P UT 9 138 30 25 P WAC PFO 1 C 19 82 Conetoe Creek 201 48 00 P WAC PFO 1 C 1 14 82 UT 10 236 29 75 P TOTALS: 1.5 1130 12 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 2K: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 5 - Southern Widening Riverine ?N eI Land/ Wetland Length of n ( Non- Riverine Strcani'? Wetland a, ' - a ..- Area Stream NC DWQ (wetlands) Identitcation Type `Impacted Impacted R-,rtin g Perennial / - (Acres) (ft) Intermittent . streams UT6 169 42 00 P WX PFO 1 C/ 45 43 PEM UT 7 157 32 50 P UT 8 165 24 50 P UT 9 133 30 25 P WAC PFO 1 C 25 82 Conetoe Creek 215 48 00 P WAC PFO 1 C 1 11 82 UT 10 1238 29 75 P TOTALS: 1.8 2077 Table 2L: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 6 - Best Fit w j Riverine N1 etlandl ?1"etland t Length of ? Non- Riverine Wetland .area Stream NC DNVQ (wetlan(I s) Stream TN )e -' Impacted Impacted Rating -- Perennial / Identification (Acres) (ft) Intermittent - (Streams) UT11 165 25 50 P UT12 123 29 25 P TOTALS: 0 288 Table 2M: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 6 - Northern Bypass - Riverine i NN etland/ Wetland _ 4 Length ref Non- RiN erine Wetland Area Stream NC DNVQ '(wetlands) Stream Identification j Type Impacted Impacted Rating; Perennial / (?cres) (ft) Intermittent streams UTO 1/ 200 29 75 P WAR FD 15 58 TOTALS: 0.2 200 13 R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 . rr ? '6 v Table 2N: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 6 - Southern Bypass Riverine / Wetland/ `"Wetland * Length of Non- Riverine Stream Weiland ,,,Area Stream NC DWQ (we_il`ands 111 ? Identifications T e Im acted Im acted 'Rating - Pere`nniall E (Acres) (ft) , , Intermittent` (streams) UT 10 493 29 75 P WAR FD 2 20 58 TOTALS: 2.2 493 Table 20: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 7 - Northern Widening , , _ -` ' - `t - Riverine/- 7 Wetland/ Wetland a Length of Non- Riverine - Wetland ,Wetland Area Stream NC DWQ (wetlands) Identification = Type Impacted Impacted Rating Perennial / . (Acres) A Intermittent r,, n ; streams , UT13 153 34 25 P WAR FD 16 58- WAS FF 16 24 UT 15 59 18 75 P UT 16 153 32 75 P UT 17 46 2025 P UT 18 156 31 75 P UT 19 136 18 00 I j UT 20 47 6 00 I TOTALS: .3 750 1 ? f< 5 i , 14 r caw -1.... R-3407 CP 2A - Bridging Decisions December 11, 2008 Table 2P: R-3407 Wetland and Stream Impacts - Section 7 - Best Fit Widening Rirerinc Wetland/ Wetland Length of Non- Riverine, Stream Wetland Area, Stream NC DNVQ (Wetlands) Identification Type Impacted Impacted Rating perennial (Acres) (ft) Intermittent (streams) UT13 173 34 25 P WAR FD 14 58 WAS FF 16 24 UT 15 134 18 75 P UT 16 155 32 75 P UT 17 116 2025 P UT 18 168 31 75 P UT 19 152 18 00 I UT 20 62 6 00 I TOTALS: .3 965 15 Table 3: R-3407 Hydraulic Structure Recommendations L'tkkI]d/Str-CilIn I xistrll f E ?t ?n?? (lnrlnl'ntK llNdraul?c ? Section 1CDOT lZccomfile nd .ltion SVStein ' Structure froin Meld Visit r-iissiu C Cromwell Canal Yes 1BF 2@7'x7' Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT WA Cromwell Canal WA Yes 1 NS 2@7'x7' Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT UT 2 Cromwell Yes 1 BF 1@9'X 8' Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT Canal UT 2 Cromwell Yes 1 NS 1@9'X 8' Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT Canal UT Tar River WN Yes 1 BF 2@48" RCP Replace w/2 @7'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT Tar River WN Yes 1 NS 2@48" RCP Replace w/2 @7'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 5 Tar River WQ Yes 3 BF 2@48" RCP Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT UT 5 Tar River Yes 3 NS 2@48" RCP Retain and Extend Concurred with NCDOT WQ Suggs (Cheek Yes 4 NS 91' Bridge Replace Existing Location Concurred with NCDOT Mill) Creek WU 120', New NBL 170' x ; Suggs (Cheek ° ' yes 4 SS 91' Bridge Replace Existing Location, Concurred witti NCDOT Mill) Creek WU 120', New SBL 220' Suggs (Cheek' ' Replace Existing Location Mill) Creek WU Yes 4 BYPN Bridge 9 1 to East Dual 220" Concurred with NCDOT UT 6 Tar River Yes 5 BF 48" CMP Replace w/1 @6'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 6 Tar River yes 5 NS 48" CMP Replace w/1 @6'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 9 Tar River Yes 5 SS 60" CMP Replace w/1 @6'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 9 Tar River Yes 5 BF 60" CMP Replace w/1 @6'X5' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT Conetoe Creek Yes 5 SS 120' BRG Retain Existing Bridge, Concurred with NCDOT WAC Add 120' Dual Conetoe Creek Yes 5 BF 120' BRG Retain Existing Bridge, Concurred with NCDOT WAC Add 120' Dual UT 13 Tar River yes 7 NS 84" CMP Replace w/2@7'X7' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 13 Tar River yes 7 BF 84" CMP Replace w/2 @7'X7' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT UT 16 2@112"X75" Tar River yes 7 NS CMPA [Replace w/2 @7'X7' RCBC Concurred with NCDOT Note: "BF" - Best Fit "NS" - North Side Widening "SS" - South Side Widening "BYPN" - North Bypass "BYPS" - South Bypass "W" - Wetland "BRG" - Bridge "CMP" - Corrugated Metal Pipe "CMPA" - Corrugated Metal Pipe Arch "RCP" - Reinforced Concrete Pipe "RCBC" - Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert ? PROjYr I 64 258 k"ll G 264 0 1.5 3 -aw Miles / 1 Air a. NowrN 0q9 WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM Cnty: EDGECOME & PITT NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION US 64 SOUTHEAST OF Div: 284 TIP# R3407 Figure z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS TARBORO TO US 264 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND WBS: 34539 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH 9? EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES "•»°F TRpNg? TIP PROJECT R-3407 Date: JULY 2007 w "C it ®•??,jr. ?' a.Hm,l t r t e.g 4' ?.?,`,'•. -•: >r 4 Y HS a` ?i' •? + *? 'II,Aab 2?+ Q? ? tl•4. ..;,. f: _ ,?..? ,? r - y'r, I"is.... 2'a, ? 14? -, ,?, ?+H?... ? -t? }4T•^ ?• 1 Y. ti.. ? }•??. K ? 4 4 } ??d r ?1?4.._?? Yyy"`r???'? ? ??^ .5{.??? ? `u?? ? - f r o;? ,,kk ? T ,???+aYY h c'Y?• ? " ??s Rw `r" W `" i 4 M ? ;SAL_-?A%,r n +.: 'ONOUd ?. z. Nr, o a - ?C r ... ;. o 0 o 0 o z m 0 CD C =1 N m m • Zo ?m m A P cn o go ` n m c: 0,:5 i WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT ?Tr US 64 SOUTHEAST OF h y OF TRANSPORTATION --I N = co co m TARBORO TO US m 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS In O? X N ?- p 90 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH NSQ v ° o co m N TIP PROJECT R-3407 °Fp CIO 117 m 7 m 9 w" 01 Q° c mK ° p i WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM ppgiH ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION ry 9 N N m co n TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 0 , x rv ?- p 90 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND w, EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH M V C) ° m OF TRPri 'v TIP PROJECT R-3407 N m Zip < ? m (n w W N< Q° ? m= WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NOATN I , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT 4 9 US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION y g m ? - o TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ? C m N ? A co PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND 9QOPY EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ~?'? V C) ° m N N TIP PROJECT R-3407°""p (n _ z o O? < cn O N o WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM N°RTM? m m ? "' w . 90 m - NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF y ?• N K w G) OF TRANSPORTATION TARBO O = co m - R TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS C m No ' ° o PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ' EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ' ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ,,°F,?,,,_ ` c (D o 00 ' V TIP PROJECT R-3407 1 -4 CIO I m = o N 5 WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM of N«nH t <R w • • m NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT m -n m A 90 p'` US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION = m cyl A m - TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS --I w PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND O? N 1 90 EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ?> gQ°p OF Tan? -4 °0 0 co TIP PROJECT R-3407 co ?, m cn m -n Zo < M W .cn 0 N A 0 m WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM H?TH NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION P s TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAY = m _ S V ? j C7 O PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND f C - N W S?° EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES =i ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH M0, TOW °o o W TIP PROJECT R-3407 -1 00 ?, m `a O O X m r (n _ m m ?! z o m 00 w A o Q° 0 m ; o ( ? WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM "ATM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT / US 64 SOUTHEAST OF gy OF TRANSPORTATION N T N 00 W ? , C m p =j m C) TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS O c(D y` ' ; N W ' O K Q° EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND SQC v ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH it ?N °o o co T N TIP PROJECT R-3407 y co v m N _ m 'r! 0 < " M W w `' 0 ` 90 0 c m 0-7 WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM Nop*n NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION °? gy p TARBORO TO US 264 ? c ? m DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - n PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Q i ? 0, 90 EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH pNS°P fT° N CD -P, oo s TIP PROJECT R-3407 v co ° m ? .• ? ? a ? ._, r _ ? ? ? ,-ate p ,'?, ?-? 0 C: m e v C a 54 i ,+ f l ? _ ti y _r sk J L d.. ,?i {L ,, y J ! I j 1 'r I I I cr J -? )t dAre, K a>,,Y 1 '. x 7s i:idt 1z?ix ¦y i4 ti.?:'I q in i r ~^h T _V I t I I is I° I t`. t 11 , IY ;R .Y • 5 r °" , ' 41 4 5 1 Y?I k t l`° °. t l 1 I ,w w x :° ti r, t A '•' - (° hl? r S1 k I` y 1` a •?' ?'' {vr '_ r •.??., J?„" auk., 1 ? 1 I Y ?`y F:, `;h a i'1 , ,?1I:.y; - , ? ? •+i,.. ?: T?td?` ? Ile 1?',??II?'? I?S? 11.11 .,e 5 rr 1 j9 Pt rte, .°s :-+1• - ; 1 7 , ',- aYr }t' _ '?f `?'It i lti k.' '? ? 1 4 V1J CU/ i a r R^` ?`" '4'e'd14.• 0, '4 }:?tj yr5 P 4?? I?'lll? `'w - , ?' aaM i7 i j?_=yam' _ - _.. `?.•?'..? ??) I'r,^?-" ??1- r't.. '?Kr. Ilk 'f 43. Y Y•'j }_ ?fJF -S C / l '? ?• may ?' KS ?y ??cww L 1 •c? '- f- i v 6 04 (m) sk Iv -- `fir •. .: "!.-I`(t _ ? ?' _ -., ' _ ti `? I 5 1 ? 4 , 2f lb? J Y ti -?4t" '? 'YA'M ? r ?P?J? 1 ?.?'r Yf ? 9+- I - '? l'i; 1-_ 1 5. 6 _ S t I .t t? . a , CD C ~ CD 0) C CD D CD CD CD pJ N Q 't 5?1 ?_ ?Jw ei z7 G. N (n (D - - _ Y se N (D (D O r6. 1 J Y?` n-:. ? . T Y ;t (I1 (D `? , s 1 r m m -n m ,^ " N 0 ° m m m K w °; ? w o ? 90 n m = o? T G) WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM Of NORTH Cq9 ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION N 9 T _ m co m - ARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - C 0 N 1 - w PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH (D o E I TIP PROJECT R-3407 ?FT4P' •? co ?, M a ::3 CD CD cn (D r D ,? `. - {,ram a ;, J F?v co m Cf) CD (n M CL 3 m CD o?i cn m ?. < >Z 'r r F ?.. CL N N D co 7 cn ; N 4 ` C fn m m -n Zo < m 5 w O N u° a m WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT °° "a+Tf `` A US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION y N co c'' A m TARBORO TO US 264 c p DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS C 70 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND `' ?, rv w Q° EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH y} "' A -' °o 0 co °srap v TIP PROJECT R-3407 y 00 m fn = z o O? < O N 0 WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NOaTNC ` " m m 11 N =. m m ?,, • • •A 90 m? o m l NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT ° 9g US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION N 9 TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS o <D O C7 0--l PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ? ? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ?, H9Q0 °FTap °o o co TIP PROJECT R-3407 V oo -4 m C13 ? O O m r ~ t• J , ~ yr? n w x < N K 0 O N ,. =3 rL (D :3 lu Er -n V) = m m _T z o < < rn co cn w . A W 0 N 90 -ch, 0 rn 0,:5 m WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM OF NOATH C4 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION S O OF HIGHWAYS TARBORO TO US 264 c DIVI I N (D O rn W C7 0 ?Pv PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND RANCH ?? 41 EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ? K Q. AT??'Ng ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS B °o 0 CD TIP PROJECT R-3407 .? l oo ? m W 0 0 X m r r D K g.. *d y low C .. ,,n?f y f l .Z: 3 , ..d? {?tir?, ??t'?"'?-i? ,xu ?^ ? I .' a',F?t?? ? ??_? ?',? •rs??.",?I , w - t•..i d_ ' _ 17f??° :?. .'c, "i: 1,y}?y?-•`r%a'?'`A F ? ?,' tB ?-r ???'?-,aY7?drti7 '+? ? _ 4t J ? - zr -44 AW t• C % y I ?'t'•`??3 4 1 ?. ? "I 4? 3 4 ". - ¢ :3- ? li yT f y ,, i ??,7-` ??i`dr'4E '•, ''^ :•.4 4 [? ; A:,- 'p?a.1y `?i?' -y,, ?, wr L;, r TT ? r %? ?Jf ? t X s x i < 7 f? '.1z ? ? If'i•? :? '? ? c? i r ? ry. ? r;e "- 1. a ., .f r s O o n o g co e o co Q v (n n D D CD y7? 4 d "? - x (G m m m CD 4x M CD ID a, CD :3 m. ?o y cn L> (D (D N = m m -n = zo O? < m 00 A v N Q° o m o`` WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM ,OATH ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of 4,9 US 64 SOUTHEAST OF r OF TRANSPORTATION 9 TARBORO TO US 264 m m DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS a 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ?. O N EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH NT O P. C) Ao co F TR TIP PROJECT R-3407 .i oo ?, m = Zo ow m 0 N` sO 0 0 m _ o?5 WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM OF NOATH X49 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT w g US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION oo A m TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS N ?7+ m n O PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ; r o N ?,> K 90 EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ?NT OF TRA °o o W TIP PROJECT R-3407 y oo ?, m < ? 0 0 m r 0 cn = m m `TI N to z o < < m co ?, co co 0 N Q° - 0 ? m G) WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NOAtH NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION g TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 9 M n 0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ° ?P 0? Q. EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH", S? O AF °o 0 00 F T TIP PROJECT R-3407 .4 00 m c-C13 < O O m r r D fn m m -n N = z o cu m m C o 90 a ?? m WIDENING OF NC 33 FROM NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT NOAtH C49O`y US 64 SOUTHEAST OF OF TRANSPORTATION y TARBORO TO US 264 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS v '+ O (D % N W C7 0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ° EDGECOMBE & PITT COUNTIES ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH ~?? N ° o o co TIP PROJECT R-3407 •? co -" m