20081461 Ver 1_More Info Received_20081205 (2)

D8- t4Ui
The Clark Group
POST OFFICE BOX 10136
WILMINGTON, NC 28404-0136
REC F?V -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO:
NCDENR- Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
U r ?: ? 2008
DENR WO ER QUALITY
MTLAWN AND STORM!"tATEF? BRAh?H
DATE: 11/21/08 PROJECT #06410
Attn: Chad Coburn
WE ARE SENDING YOU x ATTACHED UNDER SEPARATE COVER OTHER (SPECIFY)
SHIPPED VIA THE FOLLOWING:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
1 11/21/2008 Additional Information (SAW-2008-1715)
THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
- FOR APPROVAL - FOR YOUR USE X AS REQUESTED - FOR REVIEW/COMMENT
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
COPY TO: FILE Received:
THE CLARKGROUP
Geo-Environmental Services
Land/Hydrographic Surveys
VIA HAND DELIVERY
November 21, 2008
Chad Coburn
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Permit Application for Proposed Development Coral Ridge
Clark Project # 06410
USACE Action ID SAW-2008-1715; DWQ Project #08-1461
Dear Mr. Coburn,
This correspondence is in regard to the approximately 41.8 acre tract located adjacent to Bonaire Road, in
the County of New Hanover, State of North Carolina, and as referenced above. In response to your request
for additional information dated November 4, 2008, please accept the following:
1. Please find enclosed a letter of authorization from Mr. Ken Coffer, authorized agent of
Coffer Investment Properties II, LLC.
2. Please reference enclosed revised exhibit for location of sewer lines; all sewer and utility
lines will be confined to right-of-ways and no further impacts will be necessary to waters
or wetlands of the United States.
3. Please find enclosed plan view and cross section of each proposed impact.
4. The "roads to nowhere" are a requirement of New Hanover County; please reference the
enclosed New Hanover County Subdivision Ordinance as provided to the project engineer.
The location of these roads aligns them to stub-outs relative to adjacent developments, not
associated with our client or this project.
Our client is willing to exclude these stub outs from the project design if New Hanover
County changes this requirement.
5. The hydrology onsite will be maintained using the current proposed stormwater
management system. The permanent pool level of the stormwater pond is 16.75' which is
above the base elevation of the adjacent wetland systems and the stormwater pond will
serve to continue to hydrate the wetlands. After stormwater has been treated, it will be
released into these areas which have historically been the interceptors of storm runoff,
Corporate Office: 5000 Blue Clay Rd. Castle Hayne, NC 28429 • P.O. Box 10136 Wilmington, NC
28404
[phone] Office 9 [phone] Facsimile • www.clarkgroup.us
Page 2
November 21, 2008
Coral Ridge
which will continue to nourish the wetland systems to further promote the hydrological
impetus.
6. The proposed impact to onsite RPW has been included in the impact table; all other
impacts have been disclosed (please reference revised PCN).
7. Due to the necessity of potentially having to enter into and retrieve potential storm
damage in the form of dead falls or blow downs within the wetland areas that are directly
adjacent to the stormwater management ponds, we respectfully exclude these areas from
preservation for the succinct purpose as stated. All other un-impacted wetlands will be
placed in preservation which will further preclude any development in these areas; please
reference enclosed draft preservation document.
8. Jamie Metcalf will be responsible for inspecting all site activities and maintaining required
rain gauge and monitoring reports and all sediment and erosion and stormwater devise as
prescribed.
9. It is our belief that the aquatic resources are accurately depicted based upon Kim Garvey's
site visit with Mr. Brent Ashley of The Clark Group. Please reference our response to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "Request for Additional Information." We will provide
your office with a copy of the signed wetland delineation map as soon as we receive it
from Ms. Garvey, who inspected our delineation and our maps, requested that we dedicate
the adjacent roadside ditch as an RPW, which we have done and submitted. She provided
verbal concurrence of this delineation to the division of stormwater management via email
which indicated that she had accepted this delineation with the assurances she provided to
them. It is our belief that the accuracy and verification of this delineation has been
completed with the exception of the signed map, which we are anxiously awaiting from
Ms. Garvey; please feel free to contact her in regard to this matter.
10. As explained in Item 5, the proposed stormwater plan will not remove hydrology from
wetlands, so this office is unclear as to the reason why a revision or modification of the
existing State Stormwater Permit SW8080818 would be necessary based upon our static
pool within our stormwater management ponds will be equal to or greater to the
surrounding wetland topography which would preclude any subsequent subterranean
drainage of those areas..
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us with further
questions or comments.
cerel
-_O W
el' Gary A. Mitchell
Regulatory Wetlands Consultant
Senior Vice President, Wetlands Division
Enclosure
Cc: Kimberly Garvey, USACE, 69 Darlington Ave., Wilmington, NC 28403
File
THE CLARK GROUP
Geo-Environmental Services
Land/Hydrographic Surveys
VIA HAND DELIVERY
November 21, 2008
Kim Garvey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Permit Application for Proposed Development Coral Ridge
Clark Project # 06410
USACE Action ID SAW-2008-1715
DWQ Project #08-1461
Dear Ms. Garvey,
This correspondence is in regard to the approximately 41.8 acre tract located adjacent to Bonaire
Road, in the County of New Hanover, State of North Carolina, and as referenced above. In
response to your request for additional information dated October 16, 2008, please accept the
following:
1. It is our belief that the aquatic resources are accurately depicted based upon your site
visit with Mr. Brent Ashley. These resources are RPWs located primarily along the
southern side of Bonaire Road. Please find enclosed a copy of the wetland survey with
these areas highlighted.
2. The applicant's telephone number is [phone].
3. This project will not exceed the Loss of Waters limit authorized by Nationwide Permit
39; please reference revised impact table and site plan. The hydrology onsite will be
maintained using the current proposed stormwater management system. The permanent
pool level of the stormwater pond is 16.75' which is above the base elevation of the
adjacent wetland systems and the stormwater pond will serve to continue to hydrate the
Corporate Office: 5000 Blue Clay Rd. Castle Hayne, NC 28429 • P.O. Box 10136 Wilmington, NC
28404
[phone] Office • [phone] Facsimile • www.clarkgroup.us
Page 2
November 21, 2008
Coral Ridge
adjacent wetlands. After stormwater has been treated, it will be released into these
areas which have historically been the interceptors of storm runoff, which will
continue to nourish the wetland systems to further promote the hydrological
impetus.
4. All impacts have been disclosed please reference revised impact table and exhibits.
a. The proposed impact to onsite RPW has been included in the impact table.
b. The first culvert will be removed due to the placement of fill in the RPW at
its current location. It will be relocated as demonstrated on the enclosed
exhibit to connect to the wetland across the road at the approximate
location of wetland flag C5 so as not to impede the normal flows and
circulations of the waters of the U.S. as is required. The second culvert is
located towards the "back" (west) of the property and is outside of the
project area and was most likely installed between 1981 and 1996. It
appears that its installation location was in upland at the time of its
placement and only due to Rapanos interpretations dedicating drainage
systems between two wetland systems as a RPW, would it be a concern at
all. We do not feel that it is fair or prudent to include this culvert as an
impact to our current project request.
C. We maintain that the activity onsite between wetlands B and D occurred at
a time when permitting would have allowed minor impacts of this nature
(reference 33 CFR parts 320-330 Final Rule November 13, 1986; 33 CFR
part 330 Final Rule November 22, 1991), however due to the poor quality
of historical aerials, we cannot offer proof of this so we have included this
0.06 acres in the impact table.
5. a. Please find enclosed plan view and cross section of each proposed impact.
b. All utility crossings will be constructed within road right-of-ways and will
be installed without impacts to waters and wetlands of the United States.
All right-of-ways are outside of jurisdictional areas, except those noted as
impacts.
C. The "roads to nowhere" are a requirement of New Hanover County; please
reference the enclosed New Hanover County Subdivision Ordinance as
provided to the project engineer. The location of these roads aligns them to
stub-outs relative to adjacent developments, not associated with our client
or this project. Our client is willing to exclude these stub outs from the
project design if New Hanover County changes this requirement.
6. a. This project has been redesigned so as to reduce wetland impacts as much
as possible. Due to the narrow shape of the property, the existing road and
configuration of wetland systems, roads were designed in a manner to
minimize impacts. Furthermore, the project engineer requested and
received approval from the county to classify Bonaire as a private road so
as to enable us to narrow the road in the areas where wetlands are close. In
Page 3
November 21, 2008
Coral Ridge
these areas, utilizing 2:1 slopes, the pavement width was reduced by 11
feet and the right-of-way reduced by 10 feet.
b. Due to the reconfiguration of the access roads we feel that the minimal
impacts requested should preclude us engaging in retaining walls due to the
minor nature of the project and the undue expense of such activities.
7. a. At the time of this permit submittal, he Corps Final Rule on Compensatory
Mitigation for Aquatic Resources had not been issued.
b. To our knowledge and at the present time, there are no available mitigation
banks within the eight-digit hydrologic unit where the impacts are
proposed to occur.
C. We are willing to accept your recommendation of 2:1 payment d. In regard to your recommendation of upland buffers, itis our belief that our
client has acted in good faith to retain the integrity and preserve the
ecological functions of the adjacent jurisdictional areas to the extent
practicable and that buffers would be a further burden to maintain with the
same integrity as the adjacent wetlands as it is apparent that this parcel has
many challenges to have a viable, economically feasible, esthetically
pleasing, publicly accessible and safe project. We have included a 25'
COD (conservation overlay district) on the majority of the remaining
wetlands which will restrict any development activity within those areas as
indicated by the enclosed exhibits.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Please do not hesitate to
further questions or comments. contact us with
Sinc
Gary A. Mitchell
Regulatory Wetlands Consultant
Senior Vice President, Wetlands Division
Enclosure
Cc: Chad Coburn - NCDENR-DWQ, 127 Cardinal Drive
File , Wilmington, NC 28405
Corporate Office: 5000 Blue Clay Rd. Castle Hayne, NC 28429 • P.O. Box 10136 Wihnin ton
28404 g , NC
[phone] Office • [phone] Facsimile 0 www.clarkgroup.us
?"NNT1,
cL
r
? r
? i
- O
2
? i,...
.?SlthlINIt
New Hanover County
Subdivision Ordinance
L.J
h1ARKET_ST
WST-TREE,RD
M
`P03M?HraHpAks.
'.s ti MON? CH• 4R
F •O 'A t
rRA DR
y RD ?G w
VLQ l1 ?Q NAG LL
.p D
?QQ O??\O? tO QUINN_DR
UPLAND DR z
CQ
NCH ?R
A UARIUS•DR
VAL•E;D.R
BAYSHORE DR
•? v rn
N U r
z =
y-? U G
:? y Z
ePyGO N
?C MAVE1 Nf fT1 ` ` l
Adopted by the New Hanover Board of
County Commissioners on October 18, 1965
Reprinted and Updated March 2008
contract with the city or county to install the street signs and the subdivider
shall pay the cost of such installation. (3103)
(e) Access to Adjacent Properties
The arrangement of streets in proposed subdivisions shall make provisions for
the continuation of existing streets in adjoining areas or their proper projection
where adjoining land is not subdivided and where they may be deemed
necessary for public requirements. For large subdivisions adjacent to large
tracts of unsubdivided property, street projections shall be required into the
adjacent unsubdivided tracts at a maximum distance of every 1000 feet. The
street arrangement shall be such as not to cause a hardship to owners of
adjoining property when developed and when they seek to provide for
convenient access thereto. The use of residential strips of land in order to
prevent the extension of proposed or existing streets or access thereto is
prohibited. (3103)
(f) Street Connectivity Requirements (11/07)
Interconnected street systems promote orderly and safe
development by ensuring that streets function in an
independent manner, to provide adequate access for
emergency and service vehicles and enhance access by
ensuring continuous and connected transportation routes.
All proposed streets shall be continuous and connect to
existing or platted streets without offset with the
exception of cul-de-sacs as permitted and except as
provided below.
The street network for any subdivision shall achieve a connectivity ratio of not
less than 1.40. The connectivity ratio shall be defined as the number of street
links divided by the number of nodes, including cul-de-sac heads or vehicle
turnarounds. A "node refers to the terminus of a street or the intersection of two
(2) or more streets. Any curve or bend of a street that has a minimum centerline
radius of 100 feet or more shall be considered a node. Roundabouts also shall
not be counted as nodes. A divided entrance is one node.
A link shall be any portion of a street, other than an alley, defined by a node at
either end. Street projections to adjacent properties shall be considered links.
For the purpose of determining the number of links in a development,
boulevards, median-divided roadways, and divided entrances shall be treated
the same as conventional two-way roadways. Street links and nodes along a
collector or arterial street providing access to a proposed subdivision shall not
be considered in computing the connectivity ratio.
Residential streets shall be designed so as to minimize the block length of local
streets, to provide safe access to residences with minimal need for steep
driveways and to maintain connectivity between and through residential
neighborhoods for autos and pedestrians.
17
16 InW11 nodes .1.45 ratio
Where necessary to provide access or to permit the reasonable future
subdivision of adjacent land, rights-of-way and improvements shall be
extended to the boundary of the development. A temporary turnaround may be
required where the dead end exceeds 500 feet in length. The platting of partial
width rights-of-way shall be prohibited except where the remainder of the
necessary right-of-way has already been platted, dedicated, or established by
other means.
New subdivisions may be exempt from the connectivity radio standard as set
forth in this section, provided the appropriate reviewing agency determines
there is no option for providing stub streets or connectivity due to existing
documented environmental features such as wetlands or natural water bodies or
existing adjacent developed property (11/07).
(g) Intersections - Street intersections shall be laid out as follows:
1. Streets shall intersect as nearly as possible at right angle and no street
shall intersect at less than seventy-five (75) degrees.
2. Intersections with a major street shall be at least eight hundred (1000)
feet apart measured from centerline to centerline. (3103)
3. Where a public or private street intersects a U.S. or N.C. numbered
highway, or a N.C. secondary road, the intersection design shall be in
accordance with the standards of the N. C. Department of
Transportation, Division of Highways.
4. Street jogs with centerline offsets of less than two hundred (200) feet
shall be prohibited. (3103)
(h) Cul-de-sacs (3103)(7103)
A street designed to be permanently closed at one end shall have a permanent
turnaround at the closed end, the right-of-way and pavement of which shall
meet the requirements specified by NCDOT. Cul-de-sacs shall not be longer
than 500 ft. Longer Cul-de-sacs may be authorized provided the appropriate
reviewing agency determines there is no option for providing stub streets or
connectivity due to existing documented environmental features such as
wetlands, natural water bodies, topographical features, environmental
conditions or physical conditions such as property shape, property
accessibility, or land use relationships. (3103)
(i) Street Projections (3103)
Where there are lots fronting street projections to adjacent properties and
services are required, a temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the end of
the street at the property line, said turnaround to be constructed in accordance
with NCDOT Specifications
1. Where there are no lots fronting street projections to adjacent
properties frontage, the frontage being more or less one side lot length,
the street may be constructed to the property line and dead-ended with
no cul-de-sac required in accordance with NCDOT Specifications
2. The County shall reserve the right to require or not to require the
partial or total initial construction of street projections to adjacent
properties, or to require guarantee of construction of all or part of such
18
lZNov, 13, 2008: 3:26FM1oF,&SECOF CONSTRUCTION T4?CLAWGROU No, 2794 PP, 2 92/82
THE CLARKGRoup
Geo-Environmental Services
Land/Hydrographic Surveys
l' c , hereby autho6ze The Clark Group to act e« tho agent of Coffer
Investment Properties II, LLC in all dealings with :federal and state regulatory agencies on the property
locatod adjacent to the noxti,t and south of Bonaire Road an.d west of Carolina Bcach Road, County of New
Hanover, State of North CaroUna,
Signed;
Date: //- / Y - p F
Corporate Office: 5000 Blue Clay Road Castle Hayne, NC 28429 - Post Office box 10136 Wilmington, NC
28404
[phone] Office • [phone] Facsimile + www.rlarkgroup.us
Received Time Nov, 18. 2008 3:11PM No. 2792
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include
the placement of fill in wetlands in order to provide the toe of slope for roads in accordance
with the minimum standards set by DOT
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodin

Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) g
Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no)
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
I Fill Forested No N/A .047
2 Fill Forested No N/A .028
3 Fill Forested No N/A 001
4 Fill Forested No N/A 001
5 Fill Forested No N/A .029
6 Dirt Path Existing No N/A .06

Total Wetland Impact (acres) .166
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 9.9
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea a multi 1 len b Y dth th A •d

Stream Impact L.7 g w1 , en 1 v1 e by 43,

Number
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Average

Stream Width Impact

Length
(indicate on map) Intermittent? Before Impact (linear feet)
I N/A Fill RPW 4 80
t
Updated 11/1/2005
560.
Area of
Impact
(acres)
.006
Page 8of13
C) 4g - 1,QrL.0 1,
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) .006 I -r 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floodin , drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound ba Im act
(indicate on map) Y, p
ocean, etc.) (acme)
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative
Stream Impa
Wetland Imp
Open Water
Total Impact
Total Stream
pact to all Waters of the U.S.
acres):
aci (acres):
mpact (acres):
to Waters of the U.S. (acres
Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
from the p
.006
.166
N/A
172
N/A
N/A
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond shoul%
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetla,
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installatir
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, tro-
local stormwater requirement, etc.): stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:- undeveloped
Size of watershed draining to pond: see enclosed Expected pond surface areas,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13
WLILAI\JL) ULUIVtH 11v1v iuiHr
WETLAND CERTIFICATION
The wetlands identified on this plot were located I'll", " ''lk"1,,?
?AR
`
using o Trimble Geo XH GPS Receiver which •,
?
?N
delivers differentially corrected C/A positions to
is
d b •
O? ••'' ES S / ••.,,7,?,
F O
'
.
as
sub er o second by secon ,y
p
., y
SEAL
Davi B. loyd P.L.S. L-3640 L-3640 -
?.r
I
CORPS CERTIFICATION SUM
This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately ?J .." •'-l
depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section B.?
404 of the Clean Water Act, pursuant to the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Monuol, as
determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless
there is a change in the low of our published regu -
lations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction
may be relied upon for a period of five years from
this dote. A.O.C.
Rood
E
BeOC .
For Review A.C.O_
h
Corolinc
5 HWv
Ac/(
W
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Official 0
blic n1f
RI
PU
160' Hearne Properties Inc.
DB. 4456, PG. 0976
Dote n1f
o, 1 Lee
DB. 1646, PG. 0416
2 N O? n/f
Uplands on
LEGEND Lots 1-4 & 9-14 3 Lee
^ f-DB. 1277. PG. 0435
? Wetland Flog 6.91 Acres 4
n/f
5 ' N1=
N14 Fisher
$ OB. 1385,PG. 0808
No Wetland
6
n/f
DeterminoBon
Was Mode 7 °
c
Seowell
DB. 1428, PG. 0653
8m
Uplands
9 -' 1 Lots 1-2 5.51 Acres
10 N Carolina Inlet
?- Acres Subdivision
Uplands
MB. 22, PG. 26
1. 71 Acres 11 2
n/f
12
v Hayes
--DDB. 4165, PG. 0082 n1f
13 M - McLomb
?
14 _? QB. 1472, PG. 0643
?
n
Al
@PL 11 • '-----\McLomb
PL - OB. 1282, PC. 0763
Wetlands i--? ' SA 10 nf MS ?•? Gurgonus Total Area
0.61 Acres
A25 w l DR. 2830, PG. 0485 41.81 Acres
PL Total Wetland
A20
T26 C1- ulver? n1f 9,91 Acres (249)
C10 C1J, 6- Coffer Total Upland
A30 Ls10tt7' 7 DB. 1716, PG. 0365 31.81 Acres (76X)
5
45' Private Access B19
& Utility Easement 815 PL - Wetlands
8 1.6f Acres
1
Wetlands L
0.1f Acres a
t11 ?".
Wetlands OJ
0.7t Acres " D30 12 _ Wetlands ,
ulve 1.1± Acres
Uplands 13
7.21 Acres Private Road
J7
j . ~- 45' R/W
J I 14
n1f @PL
Simmons Terue OPL _ Uplands
DB. 9911, PG. 3089 RPW 17 15 1.41 Acres
F1= PL 16
E1 E5 10 11 _
FS PL 17
Wetlands OPL -
0.41 Acres ?' E15
0 E20 25 i 4
E33 E30
n1f
1 Usher
O ~ GS DB. 1342, PG. 1586
o C3 M
DPL Wetlands
'? G 15
Wetlands 4.0± Acres
1.2± Acres
G32
OPL Parcel IDJ
25 R08200-001-063-000
15.94± Acres
Q RPW (8.54 Wetlands)
HI (7.40 Uplands)
H8 PL
Uplands ®PL
7.21 Acres o
Uplands
1.01 Acres
U L 70: n/f
n/f Phillips
Q Bill Clark
DB. 4832, PG. 979 0956, PG. 0823
L
N
4 n1f
n1f
Q Bill Clark Bill Clark
DB. 4832. PC. 977 DB. 5133, PG. 1523
s..=
March 17, 2008 This property7sti,q?
Party Chief. B.A. in a flood-hotcf'
FIRM CID:370168
Project No.: 06410 (Effective dote
Drawn By: M.A.W
SURVEY FOR:
Mott Murphy
1202 N. lake Park Blvd, Suite A
Carolina Beach, NC 28428
Parcel ID: R08200-001-056-00, R08200-001-002-000,
R08200-001-063-000
Federal Point Township
New Hanover County, North Carolina
I I I ?-
E
SITE
WETL AND TIE LINE
LINE LENGTH
T1 1402.08
T2 295.71
T3 1249.94
T4 124.09
T5 279.15
T6 355.38
T7 556.26
T8 197.27
T9
T 10
Ti] M

T12 483.60
T13 361.04
T14 205.52
T15 328.52
T16 1566.83
T17 253.89
T18 1 158.34
T19 327.38
T20 208.54
T21 292.88
T22 528.99
T23
T26 1575.74
268.97
T30 215.77
T31 54.00
T32
- 497.40
- lvnvdawzioE z
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L I I
L12
L13
L14
L15
L 1z
1'17
x 18$
LZUI
L2"'75'
L22
L23
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28

0
,a.
R
14 f -
PO
PH.
116.19
Rd
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S
TABLE "T"
BEARING
N85'30'28 "W
N85'33'2I "W
N85'33'41 "W
N85'33'06 "W
'33'06 "W
'33'06 "W
*40'54"W
'40'54"W
'16'06"E
16'06 "E
16'06' E
;'16'06"E
i' 16'06' E
i' 16'06 °E
i' 16'58 "E
i'00'47"E
i' 10' 13' E
5'08'09' E
5'08'09 "E
5'08'09' E
E
5'07'16'
5'07'51 ' E
1 154.98
850.01
637.51
" 106.94
110.32
127.54
I 1:27_ 1i
S85' 16'U6`
167
431 '08'
96 7'57
g
26
0 54
g
26
128 2'03

20'
19M
d.

21.05 / N

24 RCP
21 0 o
/ N
I e 21

• _ e < e e e 4 v v a Y ? W 4/ W W W
F-
1 ? " ?J/ W W W W
R ! Passive
N \I?, !
_Kec Are2.I
60 61 62 N
/ I „
A WETLAND FILL
2,030.07 S.F.
--
/ ay

/ e e

, ll
V?
W
W
/ 21. 45
i
CONNECTOR STREET - PLAN VIEW
SCALE: I"=30'

30' 15' 0' 30'
60' i
25
23
21
19
1%
61'
LIMITS 0 FILL
3
1.5' ---- 26
ROADWAY
t
5' SIDEWALK
1=- i PROPOSED FILL
3' i 40' R.O.
j
2 2
1? 1
i
EXISTING GRADE
i I (TYPICAL)---,,
CONNECTOR ROAD - CROSS SECTION
SECTION A-A
HORIZONTAL SCALE: I"=10' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"--2'
rwy5m- 777
10' 5' 0' 10' 20' 2' 1' O' 2 4
PROPOSED ACTIVITY.' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WETLAND PERMIT DRAWINGS COUNTY: NEW HANOVER
FOR CORAL RIDGE CLIENT.' COFFER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION MURPHY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
THE CLARK 1202 N. LAKE PARK BLVD
CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
GROUP DATE.' NOVEMBER 18, 2008
EXHIBIT MAP - WETLAND IMPACT #1 SHEET 1 OF 1
':\06410\dwg\X SECLdwg 11/Z11200tl Y:14:JY AM tJl
/ INSTALL RIP R?P
ON SL8(E AROUf?D
?i PIPE WHERE STEEPER WETLAND FILL
THAN 3:1 J 1,201.69j/ S. F. t,j
Fy
97
-, W
41 L? ?
21.04 -- a
? " - ,1.77 ,"J F.E.S.
INV=14.5 -
7/ 7p 7-
X42" RCP
80NAIR ROAD - RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD - PLAN VIEW
? W/F. E. S.
SCALE. 1"--20' I N V--45. 45
INSTALL RIP RAP
20 10' 0" 20' 40' \61N SLOPE\?ROUND
PIPE WHERE STEEPER
9R
2
2.
2L
18
ONAIR ROAD - RESSIL
=CTION A-A
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1'--10'
VERTICAL SCALf.• 1 "=2'
10" 5" 0' 10
20 2' 1, 0
2
O?ERSlDEN17AL DEVELOPMENT
WETLAND PERMIT DRAWINGS COUNTY- NEWTHAN
FOR CORAL RIDGE CLIENT.' COFFER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
/ Ty
k7THHEE CLARK PERFORMANCE SUBDII/ISION MURPHY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
1202 N. LAKE PARK BLVD
GROUP CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
EXHIBIT MAP -WETLAND IMPACT 2 DATE.' NOVEMBER 18, 2008
# SHEET 1 OF 1

SILT FENCE

W1-17.69'
\
/
' ?y
4.29
W2=
2
L=34.0'
\?/T=1.0' ``V WETLAND FILL
WETLAND FILL 59.96 S.F.
\j/ 1,201.691/S.F. \V ?V \V v
o _1

W W W W W

21.77 Y"J F.E.S. _ 18" RCP 21.16
21.
INV=14.5 - _

BONAIR ROAD - RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD - PLAN VIEW ¦? ? ? ?? ?. ?? ?? .? . ?? , ?

SCALE. 1"=20'
RP W ??

20' 10' 0' 20' 40'

25
26

3
2

21 -
2 2

EXISTING GRADE

19
VIA

17
BONAIR ROAD - RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD - CROSS SECTION
SECTION A-A
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=10' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=2'

10' 5' 0' 10' 20' 2' 1' 0' 2' 4'
55'
LIMITS O FILL
ROAD A ?
SIDEWALK

. ?
' R 688.t? CY
3 40
.O.

.
1?
1
i
(
YPIGAL))
i
I

HORIZONTAL SCALE. I"=70'
10' 5' 0' 10' 20'
THE CLAP
GROUP
VERTICAL SCALE. I"=2'
wi i-m?
2' 1' 0' 2 4
WETLAND PERMIT DRAWINGS
FOR CORAL RIDGE
PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION
EXHIBIT MAP - WETLAND IMPACT#4
PROPOSED ACTIVITY: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
COUNTY: NEW HANOVER
CLIENT: COFFER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
MURPHY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
1202 N. LAKE PARK BLVD
CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2008
SHEET 1 OF 1
WETLAND FILL
1,271.62 S.F.
CONNECTOR STREET -PLAN VIEW
SSMH-30
22.1 ?
5' SIDEWALK
18" CP -?
A
SCALE: I "--JO'
30' 15' 0' 30' 60'
26
24
22
20
18
16
CONNECTOR ROAD - CROSS SECTION
SECTION A-A
C i ve I
Rec Ar ca
7-7
- a
a 3: Q5. 2 55a° d
U 0
m S 3
HORIZONTAL SCALE. I"=10' VERTICAL SCALE. 1"=2'
10' 5' 0" 10' 20' 2' 1' 0" 2' 4'
PROPOSED ACTIVITY.• RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WETLAND PERMIT DRAWINGS COUNTY NEW HANOVER
FOR CORAL RIDGE CLIENT.• COFFER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION MURPHY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
THE CLARK 1202 N. LAKE PARK BLVD
CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
GROUP EXHIBIT MAP -WETLAND IMPACT #5 DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2008
IV SHEET 1 OF 1
':\06410\dwy\X SF_CTdw4 1112112008 9.14:59 AM FST
- WLTLA D FILL
21.61 S.F. \1/
SDMH-5
u 60" RCP
7 21.72 _ CB-18 60" RCP
18" RCP -
?mom
--vL??' RPW
? ?
R.P\\ IMPACT,,7
250 S.F.
SILT FEKICE
W WW `I/
W
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD I - PLAN VIEW /
BONAIR ROAD -
SCALE: 1"=20-
20 40'
20 10' 0
28
26
2,

BONAIR ROAD - RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR ROAD -CROSS SECTION
SECTION A-A
VERTICAL SCALE. 1 "=2'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: I"=10'
2' 4
10' 20' 2' 1 0
10 S' o PROPOSED ACTIVITY: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WETLAND PERMIT DRAWINGS COUNTY. NCOFFER EW ANO ETMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
FOR CORAL RIDGE MURPHY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION 1202 N. LAKE PARK BLVD
THE CLARK CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
GROUP DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2008
EXHIBIT MAP - R.P.W IMPACT #1 SHEET 1 OF 1

F?7
50" RCP

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GUIDANCE
August, 2003
Often, developers of residential or commercial subdivisions subject the property on
which the subdivision is built to restrictive covenants, that include provisions such as
setbacks, types of homes/buildings that can be built, etc. If the District has determined
that restrictive covenants are acceptable as a means of preserving mitigation property, the
following language can be added to those restrictive covenants:
"The areas shown on the recorded plat (identify the plat by title, date, and
recording data) as conservation areas shall be maintained in perpetuity in their
natural or mitigated condition. No person or entity shall perform any of the
following activities on such conservation area:
a. fill, grade, excavate or perform any other land disturbing activities
b. cut, mow, burn, remove, or harm any vegetation
c. construct or place any roads, trails, walkways, buildings, mobile
homes, signs, utility poles or towers, or any other permanent or temporary
structures
d. drain or otherwise disrupt or alter the hydrology or drainage ways of
the conservation area
e. dump or store soil, trash, or other waste
f. graze or water animals, or use for any agricultural or horticultural
purpose
This covenant is intended to ensure continued compliance with the mitigation
condition of a Clean Water Act authorization issued by the United States of
America, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Action ID
, and therefore may be enforced by the United States of America. This covenant
is to run with the land, and shall be binding on the Owner, and all parties claiming
under it."
Usually, restrictive covenants have a provision that the property owners (either all of
them or some percentage of them) can amend or modify the restrictive covenants. If that
is the case, that provision needs to provide that our required paragraph (usually identified
by paragraph number) cannot be amended without the express written consent of the U.
S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District.
The permit condition should state that the permittee will record restrictive covenants,
acceptable to the Corps of Engineers, for the purpose of maintaining the mitigation areas
in their natural state in perpetuity, prior to the sale or conveyance of any lots or other
property within the subdivision. It is important that the restrictions be recorded prior to
the sale of any property within the subdivision (or phase, if it is being developed by
phase). If they are not, then any property sold prior to the recording of the restrictive
covenant are not subject to those covenants. Suggest the following:
"Permittee shall execute and cause to be recorded in the County
Register of Deeds restrictive covenants acceptable to the Corps of Engineers for
the purpose of maintaining the conservation areas, as shown on the recorded
plat* (identify by title, date, and recording data), in their natural state in
perpetuity, prior to the sale or conveyance of any lots or other property within the
subdivision. The permittee shall enforce the terms of the restrictive covenants
and, prior to conveyance of the property, shall take no action on the property
described in the covenants inconsistent with the terms thereof. The permittee
shall provide a copy of the recorded restrictive covenants to the Corps of
Engineers within 15 days of recording."
* It is possible and acceptable that the plat may not be recorded at the time of the
issuance of the permit. If that is the case, delete the word "recorded" and be sure you
have a copy of a plat showing the conservation areas in the file, and identify it in the
permit condition by title and date. The plat, however, must be recorded at the time the
restrictive covenants are recorded, and prior to the sale of any lots in the subdivision.
2