HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171188 Ver 1_401 Application_20170918OF W ATF'_
o� oG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
a DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
0
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permi
1 7
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
First Chirstian Church
Forsyth
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Kernersville
2d. Subdivision name:
1
g 2017
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
DE-WAT R RESOD
1 921
3. Owner Information ����MITTING
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
First Christian Church Ministries
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
003233/03373, 003242/01602, 00323/02950, 003231/03291, & 003231/03291
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Mike Wallace
3d. Street address:
1130 North Main Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27284
3f. Telephone no.:
336.996.7388
3g. Fax no.:
336.996.6511
3h. Email address:
mikew@fccministries.com
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kemersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
bluckey@pilotenviro.com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
6864-98-5496, 6864-98-9425, 6874-08-6426, 6874-18-
3668 & 6874-18-3495
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.07623 Longitude: - 80.115530
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
23 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Fiddlers Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land. Structures are not located on the site. The site is located in a
residential/commercial area of Kemersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
-0.26 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams= -620'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide access to a proposed church facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of development of the site with a church facility that will be utilized for community outreach
and ministry. In order to provide safe access to the site and proposed church facility, an access road and stream/wetland
crossing are necessary. To facilitate development of the site and construction of the proposed stream/wetland crossing,
clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during
site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ElNo ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.'
Comments: PJD Request Submitted 7.25.17
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame/Brad Luckey
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PJD not yet received.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this appilication,
are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ®T
Fill
Bottomland
Hardwood
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.07/0.01
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.07/0.01
2h. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 0.07 acres of wetlands by fill and temporarily impact 0.01
acres (400SF) of wetlands for construction purposes. Areas of temporary impact will be re -stored to similar pre -construction
grade and replanted with native tree species and herbaceous seed mix.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Culvert/Rip-
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
80/25/25
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
80/25/25
3i. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 105 linear feet of intermittent stream channel. Of the 105
linear feet of permanent impact, 80 linear feet will be filled with culvert and 25 linear feet will be filled with rip -rap for energy
dissi ator. Additionally, the proposed road crossing will temporarily impact 25 linear feet of intermittent stream channel for
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
assoicated construction footprint pump around. Areas of tempory impact will be restored to similair pre -construction
conditions and matted, seeded and planted.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not being proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: Construction of pondstlakes are not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Yadkin
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the development and use of the site as a church facility, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site
during construction and long term use of the site. Several alternatives were evaluated for the road crossing location. The
road crossing location was selected as far up -gradient as possible to reduce stream impacts due to existing steep topographic
grades further down -gradient of the proposed road crossing. The road crossing location is crossing a portion of stream that is
no more than 3 feet incised. Lower reaches of the stream are incised up to 12 feet and more. The proposed road crossing
location was not moved farther up -gradient of the proposed location in attempts to minimize impacts to wetlands located on
the site, which are predominantly located on the far up -gradient end of the stream/wetland complex. The road crossing
location has been designed to cross the stream in a relatively straight portion of the stream that contains little meanders, thus,
reducing the amount of proposed impact to the stream. Additionally, the crossing in the proposed location is within a weaker
portion of the stream, which has lower quality aquatic habitat and function than if the crossing were located farther down -
gradient.
The use of a proposed approximate 4 foot tall headwall and 2:1 road side slopes have further minimized the proposed impact
to the stream and wetlands located on the site.
There are approximately 0.26 acres of wetlands and 620 linear feet of intermittent stream located on the site. The remaining
approximate 0.19 acres of wetlands and 515 linear feet of intermittent stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The impact and clearing limits will be staked and silt fence or other sediment retention devices will be used. A temporary coffer
dam will be installed up -gradient of the proposed culvert. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction
footprint. Appropriate bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material
will be immediately removed from the crossing area and stockpiled in upland locations. Upon completion of the culvert
installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert. Following
construction, disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: There is no proposed discharge into a regulated buffer.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
12.4%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed project will include a stormwater management plan that uses two stormwater retention devices (dry storage
only, no treatment). The stormwater retention devices will be approximately 15,762 SF and 7,800 SF in surface area and
will be located in upland areas. A stormwater management plan has been submitted to the City of Winston-Salem
separate of this application. The applicant requests a conditional 401 WQC be issued until the stormwater management
plan is approved by the City of Winston-Salem.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Winston-Salem
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water generated by the proposed facility will be treated by municipal services.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Pilot consulted the USFWS Forsyth County list, dated 7.24.17 to identify protected species that could occur within the
proposed project area. The USFWS list of protected species identifes the bog turtle (T S/A), Northern long eared bat (T)
and small-anthered bittercress. Based on our observations, the proposed road crossing location would not contain
suitable habitat for the bog turtle or small-anthered bittercress due to extensive ATV use, excessive sedimentation, lack of
necessary stream characteristics (i.e. substrate, rock crevices and sandbars) and being fully shaded. The proposed
project area contains areas of suitable summer roosting habitat for northem-long eared bat (NLEB). It does not contain or
is not located within 1/4 mile of hibemacula or 150 of a known summer roosting tree. Therefore, the applicant will rely on
the final 4(d) rule for NLEB is tree removal activites are necessary during summer roosting months.
Based on our observations and understanding of the proposed project, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have
no effect to federally protected species that occur in Forsyth County.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
govemments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Pilot reviewed the NC SHPO Historic Properties website to determine impact to historic or archeological resources
(attached). Potentially eligible or listed National Registar properties are not located on or within 1,200 feet of the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRMs 371068400J & 3710687400J
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Bradley S. Luckey
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
iDN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
Environmental, Inc., ou,
email=bluckey@pilotenviro.com, c --US 9.14.17
v
Date: 2017.09.14 20:21:22 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Proposal for Wetland Permitting Services
Pilot Proposal 1453.2
September 12, 2017
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: t' UvR e'
Owner Information:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
.63� ) =fc-x � _ J 3 � �
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
/I k UJt�
Print Name
_ Authorized Agent
Signature
5
hl
eIr
i"
11
z
l'f
C�
y
CD
b
M
F—
Ir-
l oo c u n I •3111VC)s
?-: ► ► y I
dS OS9S£T '3115 9NICI'IVIG 9Z:*9-90-iPL49* Nid
(X'dW o0t) GL4 UH913H 91qICnlnA Samw 99LZ "=ISV WWI
(X'dHW9) (U.LISNW MOT %VZ:l = 9OLZIVG " rM IN37d3d �ZLZ '�N '3T11/�5�12�1
CR-r;,31YM (MUYln93b V NI ION 'CMGMalYM 13MUS NlYW N 0211
MVO (33HSMaLYM 53rdlGINIW H*:)' O NYIISISH'D ISdId
JLwdWl L, I IWdWI I 93121 A W'd OI-KYW
'�I'19nd MRt X09 �
3d
=z
I
Q) SSb'd-lG - U -tr 31VIGN31N1
_mann
! OQ ow DRO
/ \ \� 9NIC1"IIf1A
C36odoM
WV381s 'X3 �)
ED
snOH 'X3
m
LIMITS OF
0
N
Z
---
ME-
----------- E
-- � �'�►.
Li
1 \ SITE19
1 1\ \EX\
000,
000
` O \ \ ` ` 9� _ C7
----- CJ
\\
W a
EX. WETLAND w
\ / 7 (.35 AC) z A
F
STREAM PERMANENT DIST. (I,g20 SF)
\ (.044 AC) a
P ETLAND PERMANENT DIST. (2040 5F)
(.065 AC)
CONCRETE HEADWALL
STREAM TEMPORARY DIST. (1,200 SF)
(FOR TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND)
TOTAL DIST. = 1,200 SF
(.02-I AC)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (PUMP AROUND): 25 LF
�0�54 mi
MINOR.
TOTAL IMPACT: 25 LF
TOTAL IMPACT: 400 SF
60 O 60 120 180 PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT/CULVERT: 60 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT/RIP RAP: 25 LF
SCALE: I" = 60' TOTAL IMPACT: 105 LF
I
M
N
0
0 0 �
STREAM IMPACT
PROFILE
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
AND WETLAND IMPACT
FCC The Crossing
PECAN LANE
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C.
19275
E.
/11111110
tT A ATT\A �i A T1TT
ANUN
We Build Confidence.
Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Wirebn-Salem, NC 27107
p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbtilidem.com
N
Cp
v
70
v
0 0 �
STREAM IMPACT
PROFILE
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
AND WETLAND IMPACT
FCC The Crossing
PECAN LANE
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C.
19275
E.
/11111110
tT A ATT\A �i A T1TT
ANUN
We Build Confidence.
Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Wirebn-Salem, NC 27107
p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbtilidem.com
SITE DETAILS 01
Y i kc. " Y rot to w �1alo/ m mpk/
�p-Q.%"Y bbrrNMlW� t
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
AND WETLAND IMPACT
FCC The Crossing
PECAN LANE
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C.
pwww"Fu
19275
T AAT"TkXA71TT
I ,H l v tnv�tcn
We Build Confidence.
Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court ( Winston-Salem, NC 27107
p.336.784.2000 I wwv.landmarkbuildere.com
O
0, rj) m (P
-T
N
F
DD n
o - � AA
zN �� r 3
D � _
� :
N�� o
Is
S l; ,
S �y
r
19275
= O t i PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING I/11 E II��$P��`vem
m Com..
-11 AND WETLAND IMPACT v 4+LLE T AvT1BA
° FCC The CrosWeBuild
A T1T7
IVPECAN LANE landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Winsdon-Salem, NC 27107
°...: 'pB�ty a"`�1°"°..�.°L.... WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C. p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbuilders.com
ti ticY rM Wt MLM b M r/m sNr .ri/4b1. nNn�
N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Website
Not to Scale
N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Map
First Christian Church
Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Kernersville, North Carolina
PEI No. 1453
•r. �. , `Id Le.,Qr ;;:.. N ��.: 1 ASI -'�e
RRI
01,
~r\
.fwl
%/ •� U . .
'� fk.11p• wr•Jurt ��^'�--
vk
a ,
-
-.
(
Glenn-
�1 •,fir -.y � � �, .. ��. - ' } ... i *'• ��.
f
-_.- I''e•IlryrMip'�°`Qi' � = 'rte /e'}'�5n
/1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map
Kernersville & Winston-Salem East,
NC Quadrangles
Scale: I"= 2,000'
NNC
First Christian Church
Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Kernersville, North Carolina
PEI No. 1453
r i
r
#%
it � � � •� �•� r �
�row
i ❑
-�_ Emla r I
ci
IL m
--rd
T d B
W*
W
�
� a Yup
NWI Map
ti
First Christian Church
Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Kernersville, North Carolina
PEI No. 1453
LEGEND
.-
Site Boundary
NWI Designations
Freshwater Emergent
-
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
-
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
I_
Freshwater Pond
_
Lake
_
Rivenne
Other
W*
W
�
� a Yup
NWI Map
ti
First Christian Church
Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Kernersville, North Carolina
PEI No. 1453
V
LEGEND OTHER AREAS
ZONE x
ZONE 0 Ist,,an1s, areV--d. b,a p..Wft
Site Boundary COASTAL aARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CINIS) AREAS
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHM) SUBJECT TO OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT CRRS and OPAs are nmol, led wen or aMmw to S Flood Ft Areas.he l" annual chawnce food! (100 YmIar flood), also lo—In m the baste flood, m the flood MA
has a I% it— of bem equaW ca meecled m aItry it— vear. The Special Flood Hmard
Area Is the ansa imit"a W foodwo by the 1% annual IN flood. Areas of SWtal Flood 02%aawc rIDapN.nboum. it
Hazard include Zone, A, AE, AN, AD, AP, A", V. and VE The Base Flood EL-.,abdo n Ne =—
wdwe �of jtm use 1% annual flood flo`d� boasm"
—1oK
Z NEA No Use Flood flefabon detenntned
..................... CM *4 CIA b-4" s"t
Z a" ; ........ 1.
ZONE AN Flood depth Fed I W 3 (usually areas of pondM)i bade Food EW,.bdI. ll—,
&ndV SW., I— a.m. n oere,— eau I—
ZONE AO Flood depths of I to 3 fan (usmally s1seelt flow en sod" tentan), a"'ge
dq*M oetm—ed. For areas of allww fan floodinst, veixmes 'Aw
dt— nea.(EL987I ease Flo FI--
ZONEAR Specal Flood ttairaId Aireit W-1, ;xotected ft— the 1%--1 Ibancl, —a,w
flood by a flood cantrol Wgm that was wheIle dwed&wd Zane AR
fria
ckaml,s Wal V. to— flood —UN system , oe" to doadl C---
prowboo ft— the 1% anmsr chance or a -de, ek.4
ZONEA99 Meas M be potected from 1% annual cNiii-e flood by a FWmA flood v---------
P"ecbm Wgm under cmstu ; no Base 1- v ELwabon, det—W rmram.en .AerentM Co me Nin Artertan f)al— d
ZONE YE 1. flood acne eItth -11cO ,,,it 1—e a,T-1, 11— Ilood l", 1-83,
determined .275-1. 2i)od— u—,a, T-- I,
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE 1 .77 500 FEE, s000-Ioot W. — hodl, I'll —` I—"" I,—
(F1P52OtK )2W. Sure Pune NM 87 Nee)
The floodIvay Is the diannel of a sunsaini plus any advent floodpla4n areas that mm be kept Nooh . G..
Nee of so That the 1% --1 lh—e ?..it .. be caned .1~ b�tial SM6510aeaice If. W.—
I-- . flood hmhh, Nwdral C— Survey Mxn man r1c,
BM5510
OTHER FLOOO AREAS 0 ma�4—ng—wI
h%58 GP52 5— iWuc,1 Co" Ka= C,=, Est—
ZONE X Areas of 0 2% annual d,anhe flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood -11, WSW hCF.P Bonen hark, ll.
depths .1 less "m. I foot o, with Ora.W a,eas ies, t1sit., I so-,,
nWe: W a,— —terted N k-- f— 1% dnisitl11— flood. 0 MIS R— mm
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
FEMA FIRM Panel
3710686400J & 3710687400J First Christian Church
Effective Date January 2, 2009 Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Not to Scale Kernersville, North Carolina
4i) PEI No. 1453
mmmigm
4 saw 9W r'a -JLv-Y. - LJ CJS:;
I r1f-rwin
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM/JT/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 31
Pond Flags = 0
Wetland Flags = 20
Total Flags = 51
c
w
-mss �` �,4^3m•�`-ti:}r � :;r. '� `�;.�.'
.,
THE LOCATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE NOT
BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
Drawing 5
2013 Aerial Photograph
Google Earth
PEI Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 300'
Wetland Flag Map
First Christian Church
Pecan Lane and Interstate 40
Kernersville, North Carolina
PEI No. 1453
0
I