Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171188 Ver 1_401 Application_20170918OF W ATF'_ o� oG Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. a DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: 0 ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permi 1 7 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes N No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ® No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In below. ❑ Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: First Chirstian Church Forsyth 2b. County: 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Kernersville 2d. Subdivision name: 1 g 2017 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: DE-WAT R RESOD 1 921 3. Owner Information ����MITTING 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: First Christian Church Ministries 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 003233/03373, 003242/01602, 00323/02950, 003231/03291, & 003231/03291 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Mr. Mike Wallace 3d. Street address: 1130 North Main Street 3e. City, state, zip: Kernersville, NC 27284 3f. Telephone no.: 336.996.7388 3g. Fax no.: 336.996.6511 3h. Email address: mikew@fccministries.com Page 1 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Bradley S. Luckey 5b. Business name (if applicable): Pilot Environmental Inc. 5c. Street address: PO Box 128 5d. City, state, zip: Kemersville, NC 27285 5e. Telephone no.: 336.708.4997 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: bluckey@pilotenviro.com Page 2 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 6864-98-5496, 6864-98-9425, 6874-08-6426, 6874-18- 3668 & 6874-18-3495 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.07623 Longitude: - 80.115530 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 23 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Fiddlers Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C 2c. River basin: Yadkin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site contains undeveloped wooded land. Structures are not located on the site. The site is located in a residential/commercial area of Kemersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: -0.26 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Streams= -620' 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to provide access to a proposed church facility. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The overall project consists of development of the site with a church facility that will be utilized for community outreach and ministry. In order to provide safe access to the site and proposed church facility, an access road and stream/wetland crossing are necessary. To facilitate development of the site and construction of the proposed stream/wetland crossing, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during site construction. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ElNo ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past.' Comments: PJD Request Submitted 7.25.17 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc. Name (if known): Michael Brame/Brad Luckey Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. PJD not yet received. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this appilication, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Page 4 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ®T Fill Bottomland Hardwood ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps ❑ DWQ 0.07/0.01 W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.07/0.01 2h. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 0.07 acres of wetlands by fill and temporarily impact 0.01 acres (400SF) of wetlands for construction purposes. Areas of temporary impact will be re -stored to similar pre -construction grade and replanted with native tree species and herbaceous seed mix. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ®T Culvert/Rip- Rap/Pump Around Unnamed ❑ PER ® INT ® Corps ❑ DWQ 4 80/25/25 S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 80/25/25 3i. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 105 linear feet of intermittent stream channel. Of the 105 linear feet of permanent impact, 80 linear feet will be filled with culvert and 25 linear feet will be filled with rip -rap for energy dissi ator. Additionally, the proposed road crossing will temporarily impact 25 linear feet of intermittent stream channel for Page 5 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version assoicated construction footprint pump around. Areas of tempory impact will be restored to similair pre -construction conditions and matted, seeded and planted. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P 03 ❑P 04 ❑P❑T 4E Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not being proposed. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: Construction of pondstlakes are not proposed. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 6 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Yadkin Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary impact required? B1 ❑P❑T El Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T El Yes ❑ No B3❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Due to the development and use of the site as a church facility, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site during construction and long term use of the site. Several alternatives were evaluated for the road crossing location. The road crossing location was selected as far up -gradient as possible to reduce stream impacts due to existing steep topographic grades further down -gradient of the proposed road crossing. The road crossing location is crossing a portion of stream that is no more than 3 feet incised. Lower reaches of the stream are incised up to 12 feet and more. The proposed road crossing location was not moved farther up -gradient of the proposed location in attempts to minimize impacts to wetlands located on the site, which are predominantly located on the far up -gradient end of the stream/wetland complex. The road crossing location has been designed to cross the stream in a relatively straight portion of the stream that contains little meanders, thus, reducing the amount of proposed impact to the stream. Additionally, the crossing in the proposed location is within a weaker portion of the stream, which has lower quality aquatic habitat and function than if the crossing were located farther down - gradient. The use of a proposed approximate 4 foot tall headwall and 2:1 road side slopes have further minimized the proposed impact to the stream and wetlands located on the site. There are approximately 0.26 acres of wetlands and 620 linear feet of intermittent stream located on the site. The remaining approximate 0.19 acres of wetlands and 515 linear feet of intermittent stream channel are being avoided. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The impact and clearing limits will be staked and silt fence or other sediment retention devices will be used. A temporary coffer dam will be installed up -gradient of the proposed culvert. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be immediately removed from the crossing area and stockpiled in upland locations. Upon completion of the culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert. Following construction, disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked. Page 7 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). Page 8of13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: There is no proposed discharge into a regulated buffer. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 12.4% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The proposed project will include a stormwater management plan that uses two stormwater retention devices (dry storage only, no treatment). The stormwater retention devices will be approximately 15,762 SF and 7,800 SF in surface area and will be located in upland areas. A stormwater management plan has been submitted to the City of Winston-Salem separate of this application. The applicant requests a conditional 401 WQC be issued until the stormwater management plan is approved by the City of Winston-Salem. ® Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Winston-Salem ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 10 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Waste water generated by the proposed facility will be treated by municipal services. Page 11 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? E] Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Pilot consulted the USFWS Forsyth County list, dated 7.24.17 to identify protected species that could occur within the proposed project area. The USFWS list of protected species identifes the bog turtle (T S/A), Northern long eared bat (T) and small-anthered bittercress. Based on our observations, the proposed road crossing location would not contain suitable habitat for the bog turtle or small-anthered bittercress due to extensive ATV use, excessive sedimentation, lack of necessary stream characteristics (i.e. substrate, rock crevices and sandbars) and being fully shaded. The proposed project area contains areas of suitable summer roosting habitat for northem-long eared bat (NLEB). It does not contain or is not located within 1/4 mile of hibemacula or 150 of a known summer roosting tree. Therefore, the applicant will rely on the final 4(d) rule for NLEB is tree removal activites are necessary during summer roosting months. Based on our observations and understanding of the proposed project, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have no effect to federally protected species that occur in Forsyth County. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal govemments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Pilot reviewed the NC SHPO Historic Properties website to determine impact to historic or archeological resources (attached). Potentially eligible or listed National Registar properties are not located on or within 1,200 feet of the site. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRMs 371068400J & 3710687400J Page 12 of 13 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Bradley S. Luckey Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey iDN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot Environmental, Inc., ou, email=bluckey@pilotenviro.com, c --US 9.14.17 v Date: 2017.09.14 20:21:22 -04'00' Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 13 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Proposal for Wetland Permitting Services Pilot Proposal 1453.2 September 12, 2017 AGENT AUTHORIZATION This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permitting. Property Address: t' UvR e' Owner Information: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: .63� ) =fc-x � _ J 3 � � JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on- site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. /I k UJt� Print Name _ Authorized Agent Signature 5 hl eIr i" 11 z l'f C� y CD b M F— Ir- l oo c u n I •3111VC)s ?-: ► ► y I dS OS9S£T '3115 9NICI'IVIG 9Z:*9-90-iPL49* Nid (X'dW o0t) GL4 UH913H 91qICnlnA Samw 99LZ "=ISV WWI (X'dHW9) (U.LISNW MOT %VZ:l = 9OLZIVG " rM IN37d3d �ZLZ '�N '3T11/�5�12�1 CR-r;,31YM (MUYln93b V NI ION 'CMGMalYM 13MUS NlYW N 0211 MVO (33HSMaLYM 53rdlGINIW H*:)' O NYIISISH'D ISdId JLwdWl L, I IWdWI I 93121 A W'd OI-KYW '�I'19nd MRt X09 � 3d =z I Q) SSb'd-lG - U -tr 31VIGN31N1 _mann ! OQ ow DRO / \ \� 9NIC1"IIf1A C36odoM WV381s 'X3 �) ED snOH 'X3 m LIMITS OF 0 N Z --- ME- ----------- E -- � �'�►. Li 1 \ SITE19 1 1\ \EX\ 000, 000 ` O \ \ ` ` 9� _ C7 ----- CJ \\ W a EX. WETLAND w \ / 7 (.35 AC) z A F STREAM PERMANENT DIST. (I,g20 SF) \ (.044 AC) a P ETLAND PERMANENT DIST. (2040 5F) (.065 AC) CONCRETE HEADWALL STREAM TEMPORARY DIST. (1,200 SF) (FOR TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND) TOTAL DIST. = 1,200 SF (.02-I AC) TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (PUMP AROUND): 25 LF �0�54 mi MINOR. TOTAL IMPACT: 25 LF TOTAL IMPACT: 400 SF 60 O 60 120 180 PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT/CULVERT: 60 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT/RIP RAP: 25 LF SCALE: I" = 60' TOTAL IMPACT: 105 LF I M N 0 0 0 � STREAM IMPACT PROFILE PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING AND WETLAND IMPACT FCC The Crossing PECAN LANE WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C. 19275 E. /11111110 tT A ATT\A �i A T1TT ANUN We Build Confidence. Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Wirebn-Salem, NC 27107 p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbtilidem.com N Cp v 70 v 0 0 � STREAM IMPACT PROFILE PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING AND WETLAND IMPACT FCC The Crossing PECAN LANE WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C. 19275 E. /11111110 tT A ATT\A �i A T1TT ANUN We Build Confidence. Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Wirebn-Salem, NC 27107 p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbtilidem.com SITE DETAILS 01 Y i kc. " Y rot to w �1alo/ m mpk/ �p-Q.%"Y bbrrNMlW� t PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING AND WETLAND IMPACT FCC The Crossing PECAN LANE WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C. pwww"Fu 19275 T AAT"TkXA71TT I ,H l v tnv�tcn We Build Confidence. Landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court ( Winston-Salem, NC 27107 p.336.784.2000 I wwv.landmarkbuildere.com O 0, rj) m (P -T N F DD n o - � AA zN �� r 3 D � _ � : N�� o Is S l; , S �y r 19275 = O t i PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING I/11 E II��$P��`vem m Com.. -11 AND WETLAND IMPACT v 4+LLE T AvT1BA ° FCC The CrosWeBuild A T1T7 IVPECAN LANE landmark Builders 1 3520 Triad Court I Winsdon-Salem, NC 27107 °...: 'pB�ty a"`�1°"°..�.°L.... WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C. p.336.784.2000 I www.landmarkbuilders.com ti ticY rM Wt MLM b M r/m sNr .ri/4b1. nNn� N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Website Not to Scale N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Map First Christian Church Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1453 •r. �. , `Id Le.,Qr ;;:.. N ��.: 1 ASI -'�e RRI 01, ~r\ .fwl %/ •� U . . '� fk.11p• wr•Jurt ��^'�-- vk a , - -. ( Glenn- �1 •,fir -.y � � �, .. ��. - ' } ... i *'• ��. f -_.- I''e•IlryrMip'�°`Qi' � = 'rte /e'}'�5n /1 USGS Topographic Map USGS Topographic Map Kernersville & Winston-Salem East, NC Quadrangles Scale: I"= 2,000' NNC First Christian Church Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1453 r i r #% it � � � •� �•� r � �row i ❑ -�_ Emla r I ci IL m --rd T d B W* W � � a Yup NWI Map ti First Christian Church Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1453 LEGEND .- Site Boundary NWI Designations Freshwater Emergent - Freshwater Forested/Shrub - Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine I_ Freshwater Pond _ Lake _ Rivenne Other W* W � � a Yup NWI Map ti First Christian Church Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1453 V LEGEND OTHER AREAS ZONE x ZONE 0 Ist,,an1s, areV--d. b,a p..Wft Site Boundary COASTAL aARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CINIS) AREAS SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHM) SUBJECT TO OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS) INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT CRRS and OPAs are nmol, led wen or aMmw to S Flood Ft Areas.he l" annual chawnce food! (100 YmIar flood), also lo—In m the baste flood, m the flood MA has a I% it— of bem equaW ca meecled m aItry it— vear. The Special Flood Hmard Area Is the ansa imit"a W foodwo by the 1% annual IN flood. Areas of SWtal Flood 02%aawc rIDapN.nboum. it Hazard include Zone, A, AE, AN, AD, AP, A", V. and VE The Base Flood EL-.,abdo n Ne =— wdwe �of jtm use 1% annual flood flo`d� boasm" —1oK Z NEA No Use Flood flefabon detenntned ..................... CM *4 CIA b-4" s"t Z a" ; ........ 1. ZONE AN Flood depth Fed I W 3 (usually areas of pondM)i bade Food EW,.bdI. ll—, &ndV SW., I— ­­a.m. n oere,— eau I— ZONE AO Flood depths of I to 3 fan (usmally s1seelt flow en sod" tentan), a"'ge dq*M oetm—ed. For areas of allww fan floodinst, veixmes 'Aw dt— nea.(EL987I ease Flo FI-- ZONEAR Specal Flood ttairaId Aireit W-1, ;xotected ft— the 1%--1 Ibancl, —a,w flood by a flood cantrol Wgm that was wheIle dwed&wd Zane AR fria ckaml,s Wal V. to— flood —UN system , oe" to doadl C--- prowboo ft— the 1% anmsr chance or a -de, ek.4 ZONEA99 Meas M be potected from 1% annual cNiii-e flood by a FWmA flood v--------- P"ecbm Wgm under cmstu ; no Base 1- v ELwabon, det—W rmram.en .AerentM Co me Nin Artertan f)al— d ZONE YE 1. flood acne eItth -11cO ,,,it 1—e a,T-1, 11— Ilood l", 1-83, determined .275-1. 2i)od— u—,a, T-- I, FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE 1 .77 500 FEE, s000-Ioot W. — hodl, I'll —` I—"" I,— (F1P52OtK )2W. Sure Pune NM 87 Nee) The floodIvay Is the diannel of a sunsaini plus any advent floodpla4n areas that mm be kept Nooh . G.. Nee of so That the 1% --1 lh—e ?..it .. be caned .1~ b�tial SM6510aeaice If. W.— I-- . flood hmhh, Nwdral C— Survey Mxn man r1c, BM5510 OTHER FLOOO AREAS 0 ma�4—ng—wI h%58 GP52 5— iWuc,1 Co" Ka= C,=, Est— ZONE X Areas of 0 2% annual d,anhe flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood -11, WSW hCF.P Bonen hark, ll. depths .1 less "m. I foot o, with Ora.W a,eas ies, t1sit., I so-,, nWe: W a,— —terted N k-- f— 1% dnisitl11— flood. 0 MIS R— mm Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM FEMA FIRM Panel 3710686400J & 3710687400J First Christian Church Effective Date January 2, 2009 Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Not to Scale Kernersville, North Carolina 4i) PEI No. 1453 mmmigm 4 saw 9W r'a -JLv-Y. - LJ CJS:; I r1f-rwin FLAG NUMBERS/INFO WETLAND FLAGS = STREAM/JT/POND FLAGS = Stream Flags = 31 Pond Flags = 0 Wetland Flags = 20 Total Flags = 51 c w -mss �` �,4^3m•�`-ti:}r � :;r. '� `�;.�.' ., THE LOCATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. Drawing 5 2013 Aerial Photograph Google Earth PEI Field Notes Scale: 1" = 300' Wetland Flag Map First Christian Church Pecan Lane and Interstate 40 Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1453 0 I