20020241 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20081021

` Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: 11 1( ioe;- Evaluator's Name(s): :T "d
(
Date of Report: Et b 2? Report for Monitoring Year: 6 )
Date of Field Review: 10 to 1 f4 Evaluator's Name(s):--T-411
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: ?C,h'1 F 1
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: 140E; Exit 373/NC24 E to Jax, S on US17, -12mi, left on NC210, -4mi, left on NC172 into Camp LeJeune,
-7mi past entry gate, rt on TLZ Albatross Rd, veer rt across 1st open field, left at end of field on dirt rd
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20020241 Project History
Project Name: USMC Marsh Wetland Mitigation
County(ies): Onslow
Basin & subbasin: White Oak 03030001
Nearest Stream: Intracoastal Waterway
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: EEP/WRP
DOT Status: DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 3.5 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
j monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: -Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known) received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate
each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20020241-1 3.5 acres Wetland Restoration
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: s ccessf I partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
1,--e c C case=o co--- n+e enc l h? c?
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 3.5 acres Wetland Restoration Component ID: 20020241-1
Description:
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
LLkdi, saturation within 12" of soil surface >12.5% of GS L,,,- Inundated
?tY' CCP CSs c V Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No - Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? es No .? Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? es No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? es No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): C
c?. -Fe i7 S2c?e ? (Fq 2-) 0?1 vI _>d?s -Fhv? C-Ump- __? CSL?
-,'> Jd a-U- - rcZ? 'sn u L"-i , -? ? ?xlC? v? ? ?. AC C ct ?6th c roc t ?? ?, Iil
SOILS - Approved Success Criteri na
Are soils hydric or becoming hydri es No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
i
J VEGETATION -Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
survival of 320s/a after 3 years (though this is year 5 of 5); Species Story TPA/% cover
Shy ave of all plots should have 75°yo veg cover of wet herb sp, `,,
not incl invasives, min 70% plods conatin target sp. ?r cub a'k-QQ"
Monitoring report indicates success& esA C._
Average TPA for entire site (per report):-131
C??S?CI
Observational field data agrees? es No
based on community composition? Ye No (?'K`'i?i ?`??. ?"?(?1 ???cL+?.,? 1
based on TPA and/or % cover? Ksy Yes No c4vi-S (hsz-'?F-rlA-:
Vegetation planted on site? es No
Date of last planting:
CL
Vegetation growing successfully? Ye--s) No
I? "l Q? ? 1 l l n ?- ?
1 -- b-
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: wu-= ?rnas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): +?? crtti-P t? m -Ta 4-e u4" c4_ Lrt , Cv-,) P? ( + 2 ha3;i\c6 ?r,
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant rvival, concerns, etc.): qjs,, (? 54ea'?-s
=?2C ?eCf 4 u?7L?- Z
Ci cm
Q-1
L
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Ln a cy-0-C*_ c?'s '1 o-cl; Page 1 of 2
} 5?rv b yr o?p. -":, w ore_?
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NOW-AM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
a Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis resul o this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCW issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: (uccess ul partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
-- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2