HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171164 Ver 1_Historic/Prehistoric Information_20170911 (2)NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4628 County: Rowan
WBS No: 33803.1.2 Document: MCC
F.A. No: na Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3
Project Description: NCDOT Division 9 intends to replace Bridge No. 6 on SR 1759, Belk Road, over
Back Creek near the Iredell County line. The proposed project length is roughly 1000 feet (304.8 meters)
and proposed right-of-way (ROW) for the project is 90 feet (slightly over 27.43 meters). For the purposes
of the archaeological review, the area of potential effects (APE) is estimated to encompass nearly 2.07
acres (almost .84 hectare).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology was
conducted on July 26, 2016. No previously identified archaeological sites are recorded within the
proposed APE, nor are any archaeological sites recorded within .5 mile of the proposed APE. An
examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB
GIS Service indicates that no historic properties are located within the same radius.
An examination of soils in Rowan County presented on the National Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey indicates that the following soil types fall within the delineated APE:Cecil sandy clay
loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded (CeB2); Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded (ChA); Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (PaD).
No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the new area established as the
current APE. Should the project change to include a larger footprint than covered by the current APE,
further consultation will be necessary. In the unlikely event that archaeological remains are encountered
during the bridge replacement, work should cease in that area and the NCDOT Archaeology Group
should be notified immediately.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
While the proposed APE does represent an expansion of ROW by 15 feet on each side of the highway
facility, this expansion appears to fall almost entirely within areas mapped as frequently flooded, or
excessively sloped. Additionally, adjacent areas have been subject to erosion. None of these conditions
are particularly associated with a high probability for archaeological material, nor are they considered
conditions that are conducive to archaeological sites retaining the ability to convey significance. It is
unlikely that such a small expansion of ROW in such areas will threaten archaeological resources that are
significant to history or prehistory.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
16-06-0032
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Other: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
August 12, 2016
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
16-06-0032
Aerial photograph with 2-foot and 4-foot contours illustrating the location of the proposed APE (in red)
for the replacement of Bridge No. 6 on SR 1759.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
16-06-0032
Soil Map—Rowan County, North Carolina
(Bridge No. 6 on SR 1759)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/11/2016
Page 1 of 3394368039437203943760394380039438403943880394392039439603944000394368039437203943760394380039438403943880394392039439603944000523080523120523160523200523240523280523320
523080 523120 523160 523200 523240 523280 523320
35° 38' 23'' N 80° 44' 43'' W35° 38' 23'' N80° 44' 32'' W35° 38' 11'' N
80° 44' 43'' W35° 38' 11'' N
80° 44' 32'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 25 50 100 150
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,750 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Rowan County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 10, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Rowan County, North Carolina
(Bridge No. 6 on SR 1759)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/11/2016
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Rowan County, North Carolina (NC159)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
0.0 0.0%
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
1.4 65.2%
PaD Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
0.7 34.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 2.1 100.0%
Soil Map—Rowan County, North Carolina Bridge No. 6 on SR 1759
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/11/2016
Page 3 of 3