20171159 Ver 1_MC_PCN_Package_20170811_20170912

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements
2b. County: Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Morrisville
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state U-5618
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Town of Morrisville
3b. Deed Book and Page No. n/a
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Mike Wright, Capital Projects Manager, Administration
applicable):
3d. Street address: 260 Town Hall Drive, Suite B
3e. City, state, zip: Morrisville, NC, 27560
3f. Telephone no.: 919-463-7083
3g. Fax no.: n/a
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if difFerent from owner)
4a. Applicant is: � Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jason Hartshorn, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Kimley-Horn
5c. Street address: 421 Fayetteville St., Suite 600
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC, 27601
5e. Telephone no.: 919-678-4155
5f. Fax no.: n/a
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A (Linear Transportation Report)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.820436 Longitude: - 78.829994
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 61.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Crabtree Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located within the town limits of Morrisville in Wake County. Existing Morrisville-Carpenter Road is a 3-lane
roadway (with a center two-way left-turn lane) between Davis Drive and Old Savannah Drive, and a 2-lane roadway
between Old Savannah Drive and NC-54. The North Carolina Railroad crosses Morrisville-Carpenter Road just west of
the signalized NC-54 intersection.
General land use in the vicinity of the project is composed primarily of high density residential housing and retail centers
that are divided by easements and stream corridors.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.0 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
950 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to decrease congestion, reduce travel times, and improve bicycle and pedestrian
access along Morrisville Carpenter Road within the study area. An additional benefit is to improve bicycle and pedestrian
safety along the corridor.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project would widen an approximately 1.3-mile stretch of Morrisville-Carpenter Road, from Davis Drive to
NC-54 (Chapel Hill Road) to a 4-lane median divided curb and gutter road with wide outside lanes and sidewalks.
Equipment typical of roadway projects would be used, including pavers, skid steers, screeds, and cement trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination is � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
included as part of this application. In addition, a NCDWR
Buffer Determination Letter was issued by Gary Kreiser of
NCDWR on June 8, 2017 (NBRRO #17-159) and is attached
as part of this request.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Jason Hartshorn, PWS Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination is included as part of this application. A field review of the study area was
conducted by Gary Kreiser of NCDWR on June 7, 2017.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
n/a
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1— WB Road widening Headwater Forest � Yes � Corps 0.07
�P❑T ❑No ❑DWQ
Site 1— WB Construction � Yes � Corps
❑ P� T access Headwater Forest � No ❑ DWQ 0.02
Site 2— WA Road Bottomland � Yes � Corps
� P❑ T construction Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ 0.14
Site 2— WA Construction Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.06
❑ P� T access Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4— WD Road widening Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.04
� P❑ T Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4— WD Construction Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.05
❑ P� T access Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.38
2h. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to riparian wetlands within the project corridor will result from the proposed widening of
Morrisville-Carpenter Road. Temporary impacts will result due to construction access for roadway construction equipment and
temporary tree clearing. Tree clearing areas will not be maintained and will be allowed to revegetate with woody vegetation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Site 3— SA Road widening UT to Crabtree Creek � PER � Corps 5' 147
� P❑ T - Stream SA ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3— SA Construction UT to Crabtree Creek � PER � Corps 5, 22
❑ P� T access - Stream SA ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 169
3i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional streams will result from the proposed widening of Morrisville-Carpenter
Road. Permanent impacts to stream SA will result from the extension of culverts and permanent placement of rip-rap in the
channels. Temporary impacts to stream SA will occur as a result of construction access as part of the culvert extension.
Temporary impacts will be restored to pre-construction conditions upon completion of the proposed project.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open waters will be impacted as part of the proposed project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as part of the proposed project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
Site 1 Road Stream SA - UT to Crabtree ❑ Yes
� P❑ T widening Creek � No 8,�52 4,674
6h. Total buffer impacts 8,752 4,674
6i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to the riparian buffers of Stream SA will result from the road widening. The riparian
buffers will be crossed perpendicularly to minimize impacts. According to the NRB Buffer Rules, impacts at Site 1 are
"Allowable" (road crossings that impact greater than 40 LF, but equal to or less than 150 LF or 1/3 acre).
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers have been avoided and minimized to the extent practical. The
road widening will be constructed mostly within existing rights-of-way. Where possible, fill slopes have been tightened to avoid
additional impacts to wetlands, streams, and buffers.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction process by avoiding
stream and wetland features where practical. Equipment staging and construction access will be located in upland areas
throughout the corridor, and silt fencing will be installed around the permitted limits of disturbance to ensure all equipment is
located within the permitted areas. Sediment constrol measures will be used to reduce stormwater impacts to receiving waters
and minimize runoff from the construction sites.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ � Corps
� Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: see attached Statement of Availability for wetland credit information
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Riparian Quantity 0.28 acre riparian wetland
wetland
3c. Comments: Credits have been reserved with RES, LLC per the attached SOA, and are under contract to be purchased
before construction begins.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: n/a
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: n/a
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments: See attached Erosion Control Plans
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 35 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Town of Morrisville will review and approve all stormwater management plans for the proposed project. The project is
a linear transportation project, and all new conveyances will meet diffuse flow prior to discharge into a buffer. See
attached Erosion Control Plan Sheets for stormwater management features.
� Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? Town of Morrisville
� Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes � No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes � No
Comments: A Categorical Exclusion was submitted to the State Clearing House in
April 2017 and is currently pending.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow to and from I-40. The areas surrounding the project are already
developed and no future increase in development is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Yes ❑ No
� Yes � No
� Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS lists four federally protected species for Wake County: northern long-eared bat, Michaux's sumac, rec-
cockaded woodpecker, and dwarf wedgemussel. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
element occurrence database records (updated April 2017) revealed no known occurrences of any federally protected
species in or within 1.0-mile of the project limits.
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The
PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic
determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely AffecY'. The PBO provides incidental
take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Wake County, where the proposed project is
located.
Suitable habitat for red-cockaed woodpecker (RCW) does not exist in the study area. Forests in the study area are
comprised of a closed hardwood dominated canopy and sub-canopy, with several areas of pine-dominated forests. The
pine-dominated forest communities in the project study area have been historically clearcut or managed for timber
production. Understory communities in the pine forests are dense with narrow spacing between planted pines and larger
spacing occupied with dense hardwood sapling growth. Therefore, a half-mile survey was not conducted. Due to the lack
of known occurrences and the lack of suitable habitat, it has been determined that the proposed project will have no
effect on the RCW.
A dwarf wedgemussel survey was conducted in the project vicinity on November 11, 2016 by RK & K. The streams
potentially affected by the project are tributaries to Crabtree Creek. All tributaries for the project flow into Crabtree Creek
above Lake Crabtree. The mussel survey was conducted in Crabtree Creek from a point adjacent to Cedar Fork Park
upstream to highway 54. At the time of the survey the stream had little flow and the substrate was dominated by unstable
shifting sand. A total of 57 live Eastern Elliptios (Elliptio complanata) and a shell fragment of a Paper Pondshell
(Utterbackia imbecillis) were found during the survey. The results of this survey and recent others above Lake Crabtree
suggest rare freshwater mussels are not present upstream of the lake. Given the Lake Crabtree dam acting as a barrier
to recolonization of rare mussels from downstream, the nearest dwarf wedgemussel record being over 20 miles away, the
degraded instream habitat for Crabtree Creek in the project vicinity, and the survey results, completion of this project will
have no effect on this species.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac exists within the study area along the roadsides, utility rights-of-way, and maintained
easements. However, many of the areas of suitable habitat within the project study area are heavily maintained by
mowing or the application of herbicide and present only marginally suitable habitat. Kimley-Horn biologists surveyed
areas of suitable habitat within the study area on October 19, 2015 and no individuals of Michaux's sumac were
observed. Due to a lack of recorded occurrences and lack of observed individuals in the project study area, it has been
determined that the proposed project will have no effect on this species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? �❑ Yes
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
// .
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on June 22, 2017. No essential fish habitat was found within the
project area or within the vicinity of the project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The Pugh House is located at 103 Page Street near the east end of the project corridor. The property is set back
approximately 60 feet south of Morrisville Carpenter Road. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) in June 2014. The Pugh Morrisville Carpenter Road Improvements 7 Categorical Exclusion House was originally
located approximately 400 feet east and was moved to its current location in 2008. The State Historic Preservation Office
(HPO) concurred on November 22, 2016 that this project would have No Adverse Effect on the Pugh House because no
additional right-of-way is proposed in front of the house.
The Williamson Page House was listed on the NRHP in April 2012. It is located at 116 South Page Street near the east
end of the project corridor. The House is approximately 600 feet south of Morrisville Carpenter Road, outside of the Area
of Potential Effect (APE). This project will not impact the Williamson Page House.
No known archaeological resources are in the study area. The Historic Preservation Office determined that it is unlikely
that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the NRHP would be affected by the project. No
further coordination is required.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Wake County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regulatory Program. The stream that crosses Morrisville Carpenter Road near Town Hall Drive is not a FEMA-studied
stream but is located within the FEMA 100-year backwater of Crabtree Creek. Although FEMA coordination is not
required for the stream, a study was conducted for the Town of Morrisville to determine the appropriate proposed grade
for the improvement project. The Town also desired to alleviate flooding in the existing Morrisville Carpenter Road/Town
Hall Drive intersection. The existing dual 72-inch reinforced concrete pipes will be replaced with dual 10-foot x 7-foot
reinforced concrete box culverts and dual 48-inch overflow pipes in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM)
Panel 3720074500J (effective 05/02/2006).
Jason Hartshorn � 8/11/2016
ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
FORM

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: �e •J,�t c�� J�aF��� ��} �� l�.
Address• �C�C� �o,�r,� � � �
Phone: � � �— � �, 3 — �n � O C]
Project Name/Description: Morrisville-Carnenter Roadwav Imnrovements
Date: �� � ! ��� �
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Eric Alsmever
Field Office: Raleieh Regulatorv Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom lt May Concem:
The Town of Morrisville hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, [nc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solelv for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section �404 permits/Section �O1 Water Quality Certifications a}�plications, and Neuse River Basin
Ri�arian Buffer Determinations, and to furnish upon reyuest supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revacation by the owner.
In addition, [, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record aithe propertylproperties identi�ed
herein, do authorize representatives o�the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps}
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act andfor Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of I 899.
Autharized this �
day of � � , �/
�i
Property Ow r's i ature
�
cL '
Print Property Owner's ame
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Divisior� of Water Resources
40l & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

FIGURE S

�arkside_Va/��. � "\
i �'�"1`'ti1 �� �
�a ___, � � ��.�°�e�- � s
�d,.a _ - vo � �
,�Q, � 1� �'.
�` ld�� �
'\�
�� �L
y%� r�,I 1Xj�` ��
� / �.{ �'),�jL
� , ��a f
� \
a� �- � �
`- r , - Leacroft Wa 1 '"
� �
; � r �� � 1 �..M��r�sv/ll� o� �v 54 d_o p( � ��s?;
�- ��' p � �_ � �� e� ` �' � ' � ac
`� �s� `, . m [C � .. cn
. � '.. � � ' � �
N �
L �� � � � � �
—�� C�aret �� ��et Dr I
�� d�-',, � I Kudrow �-� �'�� �
5' �t- N
o.
J _ J ��Q�ndc��aiiNl9h�l�o, -
„�
�; �
_ >, I_ � ' iv(orr'is @., I ;., 1:
_ �_ -J �� �`� �! vill Rkw / _
_ - 1 � � -�si, Q �' �
W�� o . � = / d��ooa �Y ' -- - ,� \
e<itage �iiles Di � _ — -�Q �
D r _ Q � �j c Jalle Vya� : ' ` 'd� ' \/ => � �`
Legend � �f � ,�' � 'a �� ���� _
�°� o �� �; ��
� ; �� [ =,�
Morrisville �" ,� <` 1�" �
� 1 , � ;� ;
� t-' �"� yI �`\/�1� � -�,
Cary �, G'len Abbey� I � � `' \a�y ,�o�;v��r;�;
n��� � i�etr�, v �
� Project Study Area ,.F ---� �-^T� �\ ~ 0 2,500 5,000
c Feet
f �
Kentuck ,` ORANGE GRANVILLE
y � 'V�-- Virginia \�
�;:�
� ��� FRANKLIN
-- DURHAM �\
Tennessee � Project Location
. ... . - ��� 5�-� ���:' �`� ...
�
South
Carolina
Georgia
0 40 80
� Miles
N �SO
!.y
:4 '
� � � OF 11A 4�'Gtr
Wake County ,./ ;
�
--1 �
i;
���- JOHNSTON
AtOa?�fic Ocean LEE � �'�
HARNETT O 6 �2
� Miles
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
Morrisville, Wake County, NC

� � y • ' T� - � I f _ •:. 4 �.3� ' �',
�'I T'�'-�a � � ' - � '�' � I ' � - ��� . N
� '� �,� �� � � •��: � y � e � - - � �. � f .�M s '�
� � ��'+� � �'� �, �� ,,,�--�,,�''�, _ �,� �,, - � .�� -�.� � � ti � � _ A �
� . �``''+�`` - � � ! � 't
� � � ' �.� � `ti '", � �; £ � . , , '�y� I * ` �,+�, � � " , ,, � � ■
1 � � � ' ��, � —_'4 � � L � ��'�."�r� ..T' � � � �� yt� � ,'._ � .
� J � � • � , +�` _ �.s ' � ; ��.'''•
'°- � � � j � � .� �y � �,, _�{' � - �, q� � ' � y4 • -� T•�
'`, " �y s�. � � `� { � � � � ���' � � � � � '� � � i f 4� ' �
s�' � 's�1� ti � t � �---+..+t�-y� � � � � � � ' 4' f '.il �i e i . .
_ , ` • . ri�� fr =-.1��. �� �-. � � � � �y '� , ,
..: � � ` � � ; '
'y ,,.f� �
�
� �"�1� _ 3 j„�� ��t � 'I � � � � .1 ■ ��i �� - .,, � � �h . . � .�'1
�� - - . v- � ��v � � ` 1RF' • �s a i ��� � _�- i� '�'i . �t. � �
c� � -� C � +� +�
, � �T� � r.� � �r�. .�_ - �•��� _ �� 1 I f i * �� .
_ �. i
1� �*_:
�,� .__ � ` _ �� . s_ � � 't._ � � �'
4 - �
1 �. ~
�yv � � � " � 4 _ � s �' ``. - . � '� ' �_ � �' �
•
�.
", � ,, � + �� ��'� i '�. � , - — y T� ��,��•.��-- ' � + a
'' � + � ,. I: � , ', . ,, '�, 'z� �,,�— _ - � ,'
�,, Fj��y i � — � .r'` d � 4 f � �� ,�'.,�1i _�� ''�: �
I� � i� � �
I� 'I , t �� ' �, � � — _ 1� .-a�� �.. �'� � � �` •-` _ _ ' � �
� �`L y i l � Y � =,r *r, �� �`.. � ' .L
7 '� '�' ,, � •�� .,� d � N� I � . _ _ i;•,J ":„y .
. � � �� �{ �� '� � _- � � _ . - -^� i ,. - - -
- � " � �� `. � ' a � �� ' � -� ��-'" _ ,
� . � ' , �, � -- �� . � � -
' ,' ' � � _ , � ' � {� �
���_'�� _ a r.�' i i r _.�� J_ �
�` .e p . •� _ 1 f
) .�~`l, ' � � ` �. � •FL � f
. y �' `O
ro �.,L`„ -._ - �� - _ V._. ,. N ''y � ��'� r�
��'��' I� � ' r� `_��� -�� -�•- � - r� s T' ipF ,• �
�� `_ �
�.�_ _ � __ � a �' ' 4 � z.� �
�' a
' � � I � Ii ymv' � � � ,''. y�,{
j � �� - - ��� i�� •� � 1'
, "1 ' - — _ _ � � ,�,, � ; � e
�* �
' ' � - _��' , � ,� � � � F �►
, "� � � � �. � ��' � _ '`,'
. �,��"'�� �' _- --�� -_ _ _. -_ ,
� � } -- • ' . _
� 4 � }.-�
� � �� - - - � _ _=�-�. -� _�
' p � �
� � �� T
Legend '� � = �. �';► _ - � `
� � �
� � - � ���`� --� _ - � � - 0 700 1,400
� Project Study Area � - _ � � �-`" –�
� _ _ � Feet
� - ' r �
o, tiOF7f{ �,Q .
�� �o; Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map (Cary Quad, 1987)
,�r y
9 Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
m �' Morrisville, Wake County, NC
V
p.�n SP.
T� o(
��FOF TRPT��'Q

.= � � \ �. � ` � � � � Y �. ::�y-j ,'� �� � "� � �. :. a % _�i � e �� . 'i a '�, -. s a,��.v. � � � '��` � g ' �y`'� � ' � �'
\ � �y.14 y� i f � �' ` _ �' � : • ' ` � ! �y,� - '1 ���' nI
=;��"w�..� . ` + �''�'� t� �� �' :.;j �, 7. �;i i .�-.i.,.��j�F*• ',� 4�--R7�� . 'J�' .�t� �:,�,.'`:,'�„�: .�� � , .�.r.' ��� "1 �-w��:t,�.. �/✓��! .� �` ��` � �y�r��� , � .,� � � ! ��.�� 1 fV�
� -!; ", I 7y � �I.�� i'4S1.� . .m � �y . -• � r � ",r, x.� . � �'I d ,\
�. � �a'.... a _N ,.",L'' �' ,�. �}�..^ '71 k � --�-0 �++ i i \ �v' 'a r /i� i . �.: � � � �� . � �r • ,3 k-. N'� � .. .� ' Y , ��' ,'� 1� , .�. w yi � �,\
r �}� � q �c �.�c _ �+ .,,> frz ;.
�> < �i � ��'`�a• i�, ,r1 r�'��� ; � �� ' �'` , , - ��` >d+J J��f ar* ,. ` � �, � '�' ' F;`rtl �,�,; �= J :,'�, � ��, � ; f , � ;� � y��, ( • - � ? �, �. / v �
���` J ' _ _ r r�, r`�!. t : � �� � �M ' � '�ii" . �4� v [ -t. 4� de .. �� . /, ._� '7Y � d� .� . .
� 3 - �� ,,. b r1�� ��� P � r � . .R'R'r : �` -�; �y+. y ^:� �'�.y �} ♦ ��
; � � a� -. � ey� . <r..a♦ ` t�44,��` � ro` .. Za �,� � • � �.�• ��,,..
_ `A'� *.7t" � r U� F . . ;.�"���•_'.� . � +� � � �M � .¢' �� � ' �� '"`•zy , �'---k'� I� '��� �, 1 � '. `�"'"`."'9�' �A " ' � "'.��"` ` �' k'�3 �� � _ ` �.� '
� U�� .•' ia . e9 �� � r �/ 'Te� �n.
� �., i R � t�� '_—I . . �', y � �i �i ,13' h } _ ; � ���.-y '�'� S. K � � . � � �' � ! 7��f =T �' ^ . . �'�,�
� ��'fi �. , . �S} � - �� iI�-y, � � � ,�-�y�4.� " ��� .�`,�j,� ` y .f�y d�Y �4 4� �N � "�� � j �_. �/!7�{���� �� ��,. �',� � �,'�� � �,�'L+�7
''.�� ! - y,X 1 e ,. p . ! V x � .. .� ���� �J � �T� .. � ! � �S � '�i '¢'�' � y, "'� 1V �f X ', f � �.'.f
�e+ '• A . - t - a ' :4� � �
'��A � � `,t��s;'� ;., � � �t �`':��''�^ M„' �f'� -!"9�� �arh -h� , �� .. .�,� -�� _� �w ��. � �'� s�r
L 1 �� }
�✓, -;�„ ��. � j`" � � '1 �, � '#; Y y�"`�i �w+11 � _�� ����, ^ ,� ��'�r r��,� �,'� y� } = ;- �t ��' �,.� �'� � a��` a � � � � ��,�:y
� .. .� �, ; � � �.�� '�s�, a`�'� . '� rY ' '� - ��:x T y",r� �. 54 �•+4�.
, '�'�_ . _ ���- � � j: �� i �`1`i ��,� � � ;:jitlkl::, ,:'�r c-,.,�iM` `��� ty � � `��'4 � 'f/r . ' �'- "�a� `� � " � {3�'g� eF �
` _ ' /�.
.. �.
I'--t .... "� ��.,�0� . 3. Y>-� ..�_ .� ���Q�'` - _ ,. �`i..l� . - n',. � �Q J � �F. , �y =' � ' , �,� . . R'� 1
� „ _ , ''+i �,+"�-.x .t, `" -. _ , � � � � �M r�� � iP t'M''i'1 !I �'i I�A � f� � ' 7\ �Fy ;,q • d, ,� �, �y � s 1 �"�,,�p •! � �y � , �F� !f� :^�
� .? � i � t; . �� . . .,� � .:1� . . �,_� .� i . � f�q7.Y + # "9r.�� r +��Gf�.i«, . ` , �,�'7�. 'ti � �, �� �t �y
� � " •r� r/ �� �1'1�%� �`"• 1T � /�� ' . '�, '� ?4 1�jh`d o� . . �.. Y� � �. �'
_' ��, .,� ..;,rtR.+i....,• .1,#,e�;Y�s .'ia'tl��F =, - _�i����k�'��!�� � � F' i ,��,� ae j � !�'' :� . �y�J' � i � �� y�. �� " - _ - Z` � ',_ +-•' .r:_
�y �. -?� � t�'-��`�rt�'� � ; + �! �.
�, ��' t' �1''�q ::� � '�fa'1'�1�"j'�`tuj�'�I ,_r�..:►"1,��;'�t�+�f*.���-�i st��atisss�s� . � '', r i�.n�t �` : �,..,,� �r �-
t�{. � �� . e!n� � #� � , .. . - $r� � �. � t/#"�`.-�' �,'�" 7 I�. tiX ��-:a' r. . . �1 � �w "• �, �l ji,
.ry �`�.i- 4� e� >�� "�1'?� L�� _�;� �i =' �' � �4'�'Yi'+i'�k �"fe �f',`� � �-. K'�t' � �,�; s(! t �� � '� M1,� `�i
j J � .,� � •rt� -i � 'i ;� ,�4. p-.� ', �'- ���- ����� "f�.�- ��"�i .:`'n ��tj; �"� ,�i_ � ,? .J'�uri�} � -a e �����.
i�: � '.''� .s�iy '�;r,'�k. "�'� `'�� �. ; `�' at i 4;''q � 'aj' " �-'N �.. � f �► ♦ � .p � x` �1 � Y F
��r ��
'� �,_ . - ; '�I„ , r' �, 'i � � `+< v � � v ',`'� al `t+� �: � - � �,�. �` � , � e,e W p -P Y
�` ..,� ,�o� = �� � .� � -� �, °r. � f�- -�� ,��1 �� � 9 � ^�'��'� «'*� �•~�` � �.�� y���;��i: �„r.� d ' � y�� �,
I� 1 � T ' �1 ��I� �, .'d� p. (S�M1 fi. ;. � �.'y�i !i?e"4� ,.W�,y' �s �qj�(';_�,l!J,;a �JF:�C1-1f �If .:..-'.l
[..� `. �1�. &' S._ � y ���� �s�� � o �' t ' ���'4 srs � P�'i }��'l'-�� �� � �� y �,�T^; S'�'� � r
y ��i �� �1 9 �: � � � � �s 'a e' �'''z�'�b� �. � .1�' yr - .�a'i9 Q!ie e� rf '; `j � 3 ��;��V,� � l:�- •T: � y1. Y i �'f �r� ! � -4
+�, V �� � .. � i Y^
�y • � ;� ,.,• '� � �h�' ���,�j� i+,� k �Y .� . 1. 3< � � 5�'� T�el � +�!� �ri°'WB��o ._ - ,Yti`" �6 ����' �r���'�'�v: t ;f
�� r � � ; , . , WE �-� �,t ��.b, t�- ,� �f���Y,. : � 'au'sh�` ,�' e�' F�� �'y �( ��;' �r. . �;�y '� . � � . � ,, �o� ' �, '
r 4 . . � �F��. �,�/ - v� '�,.
�i i . ,.�1, -- �.. i , � ,�'� `iY�.?,,�"���.�Y-�3 �� �} � �r� � ��� � '�� � �t �`� f�� C ��. � n . �i .
� . � �� �� i3`y . 1,�4' *°►��i y.. a� ,cn ���,_� � ' ^ ��. y,�Y« Y� 6 ��.• � i i� S�'i /�' .� , 1 . �A. � � 4t�
e ,. • '� ,���,� � A � , � r + � �
, .
.. � j �
,.
';,._' + • e �..� ' �` �y,' y ' '�' � ;�k �'n �' , r�y: � n '�-�v n _ ry�c`f:.4�1 :,, J� - f� i:-'l a`: a�
�
�.i_. , ._ ' . . . - � r��• ; �� . �' _ .- n_r ^ �. a� �' �� �r' � . ' IC�T i��; `�.
�^ �-- .. �+�.; _ . y�r -,�`�-� i,� %� �ef � � �'-' � - � ''' �. � �iyti ^ f 1 ` � ..v, ' ffi° �:�',
_ _ ` p:. �' � �,�j. !�1 "ri. ��]Rl�� � " � � .'4 `F �' � Mi , � 1� � � _. . / . ,�� .�t . .,�,� �J � fi .;� �� �J� .
._ � _ . ,. , L'� �' � b W g�,
,��� _ ..� a 5- .Y--t - . : ... � _ � �� q .� : 'a�' i/p i, y Ai i 3'�- � !.Y.` � >`4 4'!'- : C '� � ' tv� '
. .�� 3 I j ~�-� � � ��"`-`�z �,3 w. , �I .. � 1� �c' � + ,. � t :: �' 's� t ! � .' .�� '
M f l j s� .� �� `.� ''r' �.�.sh �i's.� ",. �`" �� w�..11 !� °� 2tx � ya ���.� . �_s"{L li`h�.+�' r�+" � *y ' '.Ci ta
�1 r .'.^-) . ',?. ' ? -�. "�i+} -�. ���.,,... � ` . .�,t 'sa. ll :�i '�"� - ��f-,��'r'aS.;^ r i p e';�.,_� ���� +� �����y�\
Y
�' � .
--�'' >
,y� �
. ! - - y
Y
�'�`r� �- ..� : '� � �;� �, _ � ,;� � a,, "'� �r ..,�`: � r �i:� �/ 1„�
.� f�.. ��.�9� ... :'j ; .Y.� .�.e_. �. �Il ' 1 •F�� �� K y. �.A��� � a�iiY ��z� y� �F K �-C '4��_. ' . . 1 L Ri /' /�
�! � 1 �r,g1. -.� .�� ,-,� '�'� �� Y �.'1 �- �1` -- ��w'.� y.��� S`+-'� �c t . ' . � -t�S �}� .� �
.� � �._ ;� ,��� .. _ { � .'� .r-i r�'R�<s- �i' .� [+�� ��'� �6i �t .. . . . r •s► n 1 A.��' �3 �' `'6 �'. 1
.r� .y�� ��` —�r��� J� ..����(� ;��. -y���'� �� ��.lai$ltte w1 tii ��l'� .�y t � . . � e. � �,��j� �- _y
��� 'Ty` Af�_ N+ �e�"�`'�_ T-w,``�.�. ,� '' '���.' e �r ' �� a _ �"j��s,� ��;,�,�/'�,.Y,�ta*".�.':�.'y., l.t' r• � � ,.r"�y'��+• ;��°� t�
.��� F'�.'. . � � - �� . �� +�i �'iiC� �,{!'+}.,�,J i i .C•\� . _' _ - r�Tyr. .�.t_.��" .'y�LL f}�` �r1���f � � . :',Fl- �-'.R�y.� i � . '+r4 : � I'il�4
� � -,-�i���� �.,, � • � .:?'WH ,;. �' k't�'I ,�, _ � - • - T - . . � - � , - . _ . ' .- .. . , .e.,.�.-'..,�...,..,, s,.�
� r"'� %.3� 1' • .r'�r � �� s �2 r�. ,v �g' '►"'S+ct., � ,�,� ��y�.� ��'".�"i'��"'� i. � ' r - - .-a �6 '._, i ' , x xtr°f!�"�y{
i �.`✓:. �'��j;:�-P :,�. � i'. , .'^�.� ',..�;. � "�� �-s^ _. _v - . </� �
�: �i j -�:��Jf'•: ,N,� i ti-`� � 4qi���yi�j��`'f . � _ � - � � �~! iyt*k � � �' i.��� �.1�1
L�- � � . ��,��� , �r �`,�. ` �' �� '.,+�' �. .�.�, ,�-: �� _` , * ' ..+� ;�,.
* :'� � ;'�f - � .. - Y � �• � - "��c;a��,� ,,,�`�. ..:�" �: 1: � ��
' �_�,. '�1�` tl:�t ,��"ia� `�� .- �, � 70� ,�,4��
� Project Study Area ���r..'�''k_#,��P���°,. -� �r� �r��-".����..�����.+�%'' +��i�, � Feet ,
•:,- '�
.�-:.-
oF Har�rk �Q
�
o�
9
a
�
OF
Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
Morrisville, Wake County, NC

� �N r �1 i ' � �,�y. L � .. • l �::` -� � r~����'� yr • ���,� ,�:
a ��
n , - - ;� � �,,,;��� � :� .�, C��� .
/�\ &� y r � � 1 . "`� - ��_�,�. '� ,r
/ V .t -� '� �,}.� �U �, ��", 1�.
` � '.i �, �
I � � ��,(} ' V ��1� � , ,'�4� _
� . JV� . , . _. . r v'z /f 1
� � ' � .� ,CF%°1 � - y � d - �,� ,,�r - ' � i'�
r62 �, r �;r�;� , � �:� - - � �`' }�u
� � ��I - � 5 � �;�� . . � .. , � . ` y � � �
�� �� - � � .ti . �rCz - .t Mv� ` P
�� G',, r, '' �YB2� � - _4 ,�,.� :.y , . �� ,
i_ � �� -; �'''� ' l { - ` � - - � •,� ��, , � : � � . . �
' -- � ,� � �� �' - _ - -
� � y F � � r_�-.� � ^ � jb� y' �_,r � � � , • � � _ � , -' _ � ' � r .
f � ?'` .� � "� � � . • � _ - _ - � , _` �� ry
C a _ >
; � _ � � - � - . , � - " Mly �2 , " {~
.. �,; ,,,r, — - �� _ �,. ____ R8� � '�
I. �[A �- - � � - y C�
� � „ .;�, .
' � _., .r� i . _ � � �� '^���.� �
., Au ,�; / _ ' Ali � , � �
� � = ' ( � Crn � � � i q+� � � � ' �. .
__ �'� � _ ,� '�. �, _
_ � �i.i ' ri ' �'C'p �i ' �,
�lJ ��� �_ ' _ , - .. � - �I _� � � , -- ��^ ,
� ' - �> �`� - ��— � �t"r� rl��"� !�� i. ''��c �- ' _ � , - �
� �� f/ . 1�' �' i _ � s ' �„r �F!"
_ _ s- � � : w: �..
Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements Project ' � � - ,= ' ;_-' •,
NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County (1970) �� �-� �iP17 -�A ` � I, � ''�
Map Unit Soil Unit Name H dric � _ . -.� � �. " � �
AfB Altavista fine sandy loam(0-6% slopes, rarely flooded) Incl. ,-�-� � ��
AuA Augusta fine sandy loam (0-2% slopes, occasionallyflooded) Incl. [1 �1 �' ` � ` ' � .
CaB Carbonton-Brickhavencomplex(2-6%o slopes) No . 1��� �
CaC Carbonton-Brickhaven complex (6-10% slopes) No � t� ,
CaD Carbonton-Brickhaven complex (10-15% slopes) No Ij
CmA Chewacla sandy loam (0-2% slopes, frequentlyflooded) Incl. P� �' J - �� Legend
CpA Congaree silt Ioam (0-2% slopes, frequently flooded) Incl. � � ��'�, �
CrB2 Creedmoor sandy loam (2-6% slopes, moderately eroded) No � � '� � Project Study Area
CrC2 Creedmoor sandy loam (6-10% slopes, moderately eroded) No �1 �y�2 �.'+' �
GrB2 Granville sandy loam (2-6% slopes, moderately eroded) No M ; �-F --
WhA Warne fine sandy loam (0-2%o slopes, occasionally flooded) Incl. '-' �' � 700 1 400
WnA Wehadkee silt loam (0-2% slopes, frequentiyflooded) Yes � �, f%� '
WyA Worsham sandy loam (0-3%o slopes) Yes . �f V� f'�- Feet y
;, — - - � 1r �_ - _ � -�
;. ,� ��°�°����sy Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
y` v`r Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements
� o Morrisville, Wake County, NC
� ��
`F�J:�� T�1pT�� y.

PERMIT DRAWINGS

See Sheet �-A For Index Of Sheets
See Sheet 9-B For Conventlonol Sheet Symbols
UTILITY AND GOVERNING AGENCIES CONTACT LIST:
WATER COMPANY
TOWN OF CARY WATER RESOURCES
316 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27513
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JAMIE BISSONNETTE
SANITARY SEWER COMPANY
TOWN OF CARY WATER RESOURCES
316 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27513
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JAMIE BISSONNETTE
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
PUBLIC SURVICE NATURAL GAS
2451 SCHIEFFELIN ROAD
APEX, NC 7502
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: NAKIMA BOGAN
FIRE CHIEF
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE POICE DEPARTMENT
260-C TOWN HALL DRIVE
P.O. BOX 166
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: TODD WRIGHT
EROSION CONTROL
NCDENR
ENERGY MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
3800 BARETT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JOE DUPREE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
414 AVIATION PARKWAY
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BLAKE MILLS
NETWORK SERVICES
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS
5301 DEPARTURE DRIVE, SUITE 101
RALEIGH, NC 27616
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: ALLEN HAIGH
POWER COMPANY
PROGRESS ENERGY
9920 FAYETTEVILLE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27603
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JB JONES
TELEPHONE COMPANY
AT&T
5715 GLENWOOD AVE
RM 204
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BILLY GRINER
CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY
TIME WARNER CABLE
101 INNOVATION AVE, SUITE 100
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: TOMMY ROBERTS (TELICS)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 DISTRICT 1 OFFICE
4009 DISTRICT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: REID ELMORE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
260-B TOWN HALL DRIVE
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BENJAMIN HOWELL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE POICE DEPARTMENT
260-C TOWN HALL DRIVE
P.O. BOX 166
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CHIEF OF POLICE: PATRICE ANDREWS
TOWN: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR:
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. McKIM & CREED
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, STE. 600 200 MACKENAN COURT
414 AVIATION PARKWAY RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601 CARY, NC 27511
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560 [phone] TEL [phone] TEL
[phone] TEL
S R-3 014 MO RRI SVI LLE CARPE NTE R ROADWAY IMPROVEME NTS
MO RRI SVI LLE N O RTH CARO LI NA
'
TYPE OF WORK: GRAD/NG, DRA/NAGE, PAVING, SIGNING, SIGNALS, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.
LENGTH OF PROJECT:
z
Q
�
a
�
�
OC
BEGIN PROJECT
BEG/N CONSTRUCTION
SR-3014 (MORRISVILLE
CARPENTER RD)
-L- Sta. 10 + 70. 00
SUE:
CH ENGINEERING, PLLC
3220 GLEN ROYAL ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27617
[phone] TEL
TO NC 55
-L- SR-3014 (MORR/SVILLE CARPENTER RD):
-Y10- MORR/SVILLE SQUARE DRIVEWAY:
-Y12- TOWN HALL DR:
-Y16- FRANKL/N UPCHURCH ST;
-Y17-
WETLA1�lD A1�D
Cq ���R���
�<<
R RD
GEOTECHNICAL:
TERRACON
2401 BRENTWOOD ROAD, STE. 107
RALEIGH, NC 27604
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BLAKE MILLS CONTACT: MATT WEST, P.E., AVS CONTACT: TIM VAN GELDER, PLS CONTACT: MAHA A. CHAMBLISS, P.E. CONTACT: MATT ALEXANDER, P.E.
,
�y
�' � S
�,`� W� �
,� �'� v
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
APPROX. 1.32 MILES OF W/DEN/NG AND MED/AN CONSTRUCTION
APPROX. 0.06 MILES OF NEW LOCATION
APPROX, 0.11 MILES OF WIDEN/NG AND MED/AN CONSTRUCTION
APPROX. 0.11 MILES OF NEIN LOCAT/ON
APPROX. 0.02 MILES OF NEW LOCATION AND EX/STING
STREAMS PERMIT PA CI�A GE
END CONSTRUCTION
TOWN HALL DR
-Y92- Sta. 22+33.00
SITE4 TR,B�T,� Ta y��
CRABT REE CREEK , , � -9�` �o�
O�, .L
SI TE 3 � �,
8 �
SI TE 1 �,�� �,,
, R�5 RO D: .
7 � MpR �,�ER �
� �
� � � - �P(tP
� `` �
Z L
6 '
� = o , � �,�1.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
■
�
421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NC License #F-0102
,c�:� �o
'` � `o
� �� m �
,N�
�Z � ,` �� _ /
� I� �
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
-Y17- Sta. 10 + 00. 00
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
MORR/SVILLE SQUARE
DR/VEWAY
-Y10- Sta. 13+47.00
�
��P�� �'� �NCRR CORR/DOR
� y� Q��►J END PROJECT
`� END CONSTRUCT/ON
, y�� SR-3014 (MORR/SVILLE
94a � CARPENTER RD)
�' 2 -L- Sta. 80 + 57.20
END CONSTRUCTION
FRANKL/N UPCHURCH ST
-Y16- Sta. 15+95.45
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
TOINN HALL DR
-Y12- Sta. 9 6+ 00. 00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y11- Sta. 11 + 07. 50
END CONSTRUCT/ON
-Y17- Sta. 11 + 97.00
PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALES
rTE 2 50 �5 0 50 ,00
`-I�-IJ_= � =
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
, , , , ,
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
CLEARING ON TH/S PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD ll.
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDAR/ES
OF THE TOWN OF MORR/SV/LLE.
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,
AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND
CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
I�A i�E FII_'_ NI IMh'� � _ HE�T fvl IMhIJ�' TOTAL ��HE� T'S
5-26-2017 1 X
�_�rrri,,�T;_, _,-,i,
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Kimley>>> Horn
a�iFA�FTT�vii.i F sT. sui-F t>ao
1-'ALEII;H.G,Ii= -srr�,nl
FHON�: i91�1 i �7-�OU4
�/1X: (9191 617-'050
NC LIi-EG1=E "F-Gli ��
�� �'�5W
I�T�OM�LFII'E �`L''A�T
Do oT u�B P'OR R/ N Apvu
PRELI�IVII�TA Y{� P�A�TI
� NOT �4�8 POR G� �N
o ,VI,"
� ��
ou.ic . � _
a � ��
�
� 1 ,vi ^
�
a
U
�
O
a
�
�
°�
W
� U
W Z
a
� � J
M U �
h r �
J �
� �
=�
oo�c
�
�
�
W
_
H
W
�
�
l�;H�I FFi'��JE���I:
012108007
D<;� E:
6-22-2017
R/ W PLANS
a
0
=
W
o�
�
G
C
z
W
�
�
►
�
�
0
�s
�O

C
�
�
�
I
�
�
Q
I
�
Q)
�
I
�
L
Q
I
�
�
I
�
O
O
�
O
N
O
i
E
O
N
L
�
�
I
�
C
O
�
N
�
i
�
�
C
.�
O
L
Q
�
.�
L
N
�
O
�
C
N
�
C
O
L
.j
C
W
/
�
U
�
�
O
L
�
I�
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
C
N
Q
L
O
v
�
,
,
�
�
.�
�
�
�
0
0
�
0
N
O
�,
O
�
�
O
0
�
I
J
Q
�
i
J
Q
�
I
�l
�
i
�
O
U
C
L
�
I
�
�
�

C
O�
�
Z
O
C�
�
�
I
-C
�
Q
I
�
N
�
I
�
L
Q
I
�
�
I
�
�
O
�
O
N
O
�
E
0
a�
�
�
�
i
�
c
0
�
a�
�
�
�
a
c
�3
0
�
O
�
.�
i
a�
�
0
�
c
a�
E
c
0
i
.�
c
W
�
�
U
j
O
L
�
_�,
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
�
C
N
Q
L
O
C�
a�
�
�
�
�
.�
L
�
�
0
�
�
�
N
O
�
0
3
�
0
0
�
i
J
Q
�
�

C
�
�
�
I
�
�
Q
I
�
Q)
�
I
�
L
Q
I
�
�
I
�
O
O
�
O
N
O
i
E
O
N
L
�
�
I
�
C
O
�
N
�
i
�
�
C
.�
O
L
Q
�
.�
L
N
�
O
�
C
N
�
C
O
L
.j
C
W
/
�
U
�
�
O
L
�
I�
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
C
N
Q
L
O
v
�
,
,
�
�
.�
�
�
�
0
0
�
0
N
O
�,
O
�
�
O
0
�
I
J
Q
�
i
J
Q
�
I
�l
�
i
�
O
U
C
L
�
I
�
�
�

G
O�
�
Z
O
v
�
rn
i
�
�
a
i
�
a�
3
i
�
�
a
i
�
-�'
i
�
0
0
�
0
N
O
�
E
0
a�
�
�
�
i
�
c
0
�
a�
�
�
�
a
c
�3
0
�
O
�
.�
i
a�
�
0
�
c
a�
E
c
0
i
.�
c
W
�
�
U
j
O
L
�
_�,
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
�
C
N
Q
L
O
C�
a�
�
�
�
�
.�
L
�
�
0
�
�
�
N
O
�
0
3
�
0
0
�
i
J
Q
�
�

See Sheet �-A For Index Of Sheets
See Sheet 9-B For Conventlonol Sheet Symbols
UTILITY AND GOVERNING AGENCIES CONTACT LIST:
WATER COMPANY
TOWN OF CARY WATER RESOURCES
316 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27513
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JAMIE BISSONNETTE
SANITARY SEWER COMPANY
TOWN OF CARY WATER RESOURCES
316 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27513
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JAMIE BISSONNETTE
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
PUBLIC SURVICE NATURAL GAS
2451 SCHIEFFELIN ROAD
APEX, NC 7502
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: NAKIMA BOGAN
FIRE CHIEF
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE POICE DEPARTMENT
260-C TOWN HALL DRIVE
P.O. BOX 166
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: TODD WRIGHT
EROSION CONTROL
NCDENR
ENERGY MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
3800 BARETT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JOE DUPREE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
414 AVIATION PARKWAY
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BLAKE MILLS
NETWORK SERVICES
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS
5301 DEPARTURE DRIVE, SUITE 101
RALEIGH, NC 27616
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: ALLEN HAIGH
POWER COMPANY
PROGRESS ENERGY
9920 FAYETTEVILLE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27603
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JB JONES
TELEPHONE COMPANY
AT&T
5715 GLENWOOD AVE
RM 204
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BILLY GRINER
CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY
TIME WARNER CABLE
101 INNOVATION AVE, SUITE 100
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: TOMMY ROBERTS (TELICS)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 DISTRICT 1 OFFICE
4009 DISTRICT DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: REID ELMORE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
260-B TOWN HALL DRIVE
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BENJAMIN HOWELL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE POICE DEPARTMENT
260-C TOWN HALL DRIVE
P.O. BOX 166
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
[phone] TEL
CHIEF OF POLICE: PATRICE ANDREWS
TOWN: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR:
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. McKIM & CREED
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, STE. 600 200 MACKENAN COURT
414 AVIATION PARKWAY RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601 CARY, NC 27511
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560 [phone] TEL [phone] TEL
[phone] TEL
S R-3 014 MO RRI SVI LLE CARPE NTE R ROADWAY IMPROVEME NTS
MO RRI SVI LLE N O RTH CARO LI NA
'
TYPE OF WORK: GRAD/NG, DRA/NAGE, PAVING, SIGNING, SIGNALS, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.
LENGTH OF PROJECT:
BEGIN PROJECT
BEG/N CONSTRUCTION
SR-3014 (MORRISVILLE
CARPENTER RD)
-L- Sta. 10 + 70. 00
SUE:
CH ENGINEERING, PLLC
3220 GLEN ROYAL ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27617
[phone] TEL
TO NC 55
Cq ���R���
�<<
R RD
GEOTECHNICAL:
TERRACON
2401 BRENTWOOD ROAD, STE. 107
RALEIGH, NC 27604
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: BLAKE MILLS CONTACT: MATT WEST, P.E., AVS CONTACT: TIM VAN GELDER, PLS CONTACT: MAHA A. CHAMBLISS, P.E. CONTACT: MATT ALEXANDER, P.E.
-L- SR-3014 (MORR/SVILLE CARPENTER RD):
-Y10- MORR/SVILLE SQUARE DRIVEWAY:
-Y12- TOWN HALL DR:
-Y16- FRANKL/N UPCHURCH ST;
-Y17-
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
APPROX. 1.32 MILES OF W/DEN/NG AND MED/AN CONSTRUCTION
APPROX. 0.06 MILES OF NEW LOCATION
APPROX, 0.11 MILES OF WIDEN/NG AND MED/AN CONSTRUCTION
APPROX. 0.11 MILES OF NEIN LOCAT/ON
APPROX. 0.02 MILES OF NEW LOCATION AND EX/STING
B UFFER PERMI T PA CI�A GE
S` ```' C
, �
; �n O
�- i, ,
� Q
� �
, �
�
�'J
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
■
�
421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NC License #F-0102
END CONSTRUCTION
TOWN HALL DR
-Y92- Sta. 22+33.00
TR/BUTARY TO �
CRABT REE CREEK , , � �'-9�` �o
O �.L
SITE 1 �
8 ``�
'. �
v����` �\ `�
N`oR ���R R0 � '.
. GPRQE �'
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
-Y17- Sta. 10 + 00. 00
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
MORR/SVILLE SQUARE
DR/VEWAY
-Y10- Sta. 13+47.00
�
� ��P�� �'� �NCRR CORR/DOR
, y� Q��►J END PROJECT
`� END CONSTRUCT/ON
, y�� SR-3014 (MORR/SVILLE
94a � CARPENTER RD)
�' 2 -L- Sta. 80 + 57.20
END CONSTRUCTION
FRANKL/N UPCHURCH ST
-Y16- Sta. 15+95.45
BEG/N CONSTRUCT/ON
TOINN HALL DR
-Y12- Sta. 9 6+ 00. 00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y11- Sta. 11 + 07. 50
END CONSTRUCT/ON
-Y17- Sta. 11 + 97.00
PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
`-I�-IJ_= � =
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
, , , , ,
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
CLEARING ON TH/S PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD ll.
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDAR/ES
OF THE TOWN OF MORR/SV/LLE.
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,
AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND
CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
I�A i�E FII_'_ NI IMh'� � _ HE�T fvl IMhIJ�' TOTAL ��HE� T'S
5-26-2017 1 X
�_�rrri,,�T;_, _,-,i,
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Kimley>>> Horn
a�iFA�FTT�vii.i F sT. sui-F t>ao
1-'ALEII;H.G,Ii= -srr�,nl
FHON�: i91�1 i �7-�OU4
�/1X: (9191 617-'050
NC LIi-EG1=E "F-Gli ��
�� �'�5W
I�T�OM�LFII'E �`L''A�T
Do oT u�B P'OR R/ N Apvu
PRELI�IVII�TA Y{� P�A�TI
� NOT �4�8 POR G� �N
O � � ,"
M ��
ou.ic . � _
a � ��
�
� 1 ,vi ^
�
a
U
�
O
a
�
�
°�
W
� U
W Z
a
� � J
M U �
h r �
J �
� �
=�
oo�c
�
�
�
W
_
H
W
�
�
l�;H�I FFi'��JE���I:
012108007
D<;� E:
6-22-2017
R/ W PLANS
a
0
=
W
o�
�
G
C
z
W
�
�
►
�
�
0
�s
�O

c
a
�
�
i
r
�
a
i
�
�
,o
i
�
i
Q
i
�
-�
i
ti
0
0
�
0
N
O
i
�
L
a�
�
�
�
m
�
�
o,
c
.�
0
�
a
�
.�
�
a�
�
0
�
c
a�
�
c
0
L
.j
C
W
/
�
U
�
�
O
L
�
I�
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
C
N
Q
L
O
v
�
,
,
�
�
.�
�
�
�
0
0
�
0
N
O
�,
O
�
�
O
0
�
I
J
Q
�
i
J
Q
�
I
�l
�
i
�
O
U
C
L
�
I
�
�
�

C
�
�
Z
O
v
I
�
I
�
�
Q
I
�
J
,O
I
�
L
4
I
�
�
I
�
O
O
�
O
N
O
�
�
L
�
�
�
�
�
i
�
a
c
�3
0
�
O
�
.�
i
a�
�
0
�
c
a�
E
c
0
i
.�
c
W
�
�
U
j
O
L
�
_�,
i
C
O
�
i
L
�
�
C
N
Q
L
O
C�
a�
�
�
�
�
.�
L
�
�
0
�
�
�
N
O
�
0
3
�
0
0
�
i
J
Q
�
�

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
1 DUAL 10'X7' RCBC 66+75/68+60 -L- X 8752 4674 13426
TOTAL: 8752 4674 13426 0 0 0

STREAM AND WETLAND
DATA FORMS

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SA
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.820645
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: R�si�RH County: Wake Longitude: -78.828729
Total Points: 43.5 Stream Determination (cir Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 3
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 2
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SA is a perennial channel that had strong baseflow. The
channel is incised with multiple bank failures observed during field visit. SA
appears to flood the surrounding floodplains periodically. The stream substrate
consisted of mostly sand and silt with some gravel. Mussels were observed
embedded in the sand in several locations.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SB
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.821914
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: R�si�RH County: Wake Longitude: -78.826754
Total Points: 2� Stream Deter ' ' n(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemera Intermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SB is a linear, weak intermittent channel carrying primarily
stormwater and has downcut or been dugout. Baseflow in SB is low and slow,
but the substrate is well sorted and sandv.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SC
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.817992
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: RLS/JRH County: Wake Longitude: -78.83956
Total Points: 24 Stream Deter � 'on (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Cary
Ephemera ntermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. n-c anne structure: ex. ri e-poo ,:
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in
B. Hydrology Subtotal = g.5
9.5
••.
0
0
Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 2 3 3
1 2 3 2
1 2 3 1
1 2 3 2
1 2 3 1
1 2 3 0
1 2 3 0
1 2 3 0
0.5 1 1.5 0
0.5 1 1.5 0.5
Yes=3 0
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SC is a channelized feature that has naturalized. Sweetgums
line the bottom edges of the channel valley, and are located in the stream
channel. Numerous debris piles are located in the channel.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SD
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.819271
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: RLS/JRH County: Wake Longitude: -78.843516
Total Points: 37.5 Stream Determination (cir Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex. ri le-pool, steK
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in ma
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
21
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
Moderate Strong
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes=3
Score
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SD is a perennial channel that flows under Morrisville
Carpenter Road. The stream had strong baseflow and was somewhat incised.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements city�county: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 10�Z7�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWI1 Of M01'rlSVlll2 State: NC Sampling Point: WA-UP
in�estigator�s�: J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIOpe Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): 4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819911 �ong: -78•830248 Datum: NAD 83
so�i Map un�t Name: WnA - Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification: NOfle
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation. Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation.� Soil _� or Hydrolo9Y� naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No ❑
I� Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ _ No within a Wetland? Yes,� No �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
Data point WA-UP was recorded 20' north of and 4' higher in elevation than WA-WET.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired; check all that aqplv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High WaterTable (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): >24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �✓ _ Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators were observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�. Lrguidarrzbarstyraciflzra 25% Y FAC
2, Acer• r-zsbrzrm 20% Y FAC
3 P7f1WS IQL'l,�U 15% Y FAC
4, Ca�y�a glabr•a 5% N FACU
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Acer rt�brum
2. Pinus taeda
3. Juniperzrs viYgi�riaT�a
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
65% = Total Cover
15% Y
15% Y
10% Y
Sampling Point: WA-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 �B�
Percent of Dominant Species ��o�o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multipiv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC FAC species x 3=
FAC FACU species x 4=
FACU UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
40% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�. Rubu,s arugutus 5% Y FACU
2, Quercus phellos 5% Y FAC
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
10% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Lonicera.jc�por�ica 10% Y FACU
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
15% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Probiematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8" 10YR 5/4 100% Loam
8-16" lOYR 6/4 100% Clay loam
16-24" lOYR 6/4 80% lOYR 6/6 20% C M Sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Nydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data point.
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ect�site: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements city�county: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 10�Z7�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWI1 Of M01'rlSVlll2 State: NC Sampling Point: WA-WET
in�estigator�s�: J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, eto.�: Bottomland floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COC1CdVe Slope (%): 1-Z%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819613 �ong: -78•829843 Datum: NAD 83
so�i Map un�t Name: WnA - Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation. Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation.� Soil _� or Hydrolo9Y� naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No ❑
Yes _ ✓ — No �
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes,� No
Wetland WA is a bottomland floodplain wetland that likely receives periodic flooding from a
tributary to Crabtree Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired; check all that aqplv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High WaterTable (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): >24��
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �✓ _ Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland WA likely receives hydrology from overbank flooding of an unnamed tributary to Crabtree
Creek located south of the study area. Portions of WA outside the study area have standing water
visible on aerial imagery. Water-stained leaves are present in the most depressional areas of WA.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�. Acer rubrum 30% Y FAC
2, Liyaridambar� styrncif7ua 20% Y FAC
3. Ca��imrs ccarolii�iarra 15% Y FAC
4.
6.
7.
8.
65% = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Acer rirbrum 15% Y FAC
2. Liquidar��bar stv�°aciflz�a 15% Y FAC
3. Qzrercus p%ellos 10% Y FAC
4, Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10% Y FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
50% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�. Mzc�rostegium vimznez�m 50% Y FAC
2, Carex sp. 15% Y NI
3, Fraxi�us penrrsylvarrica 5% N FACW
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
70% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Ssnilax ��otirndif'olza 10% Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
10% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WA-WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 �B�
Percent of Dominant Species 900�0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multipiv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Probiematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 5/3 100% Loam
3-10" lOYR 5/1 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M Clay loam
10-24" lOYR 6/2 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Nydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Neither the water table or soil saturation was observed within the upper 24" of the soil profile.
Concentrations increase with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: WB-UP
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIOpe Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (°/o): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.820220 �ong: -78•832093 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap un�t Name: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ❑✓
Yes _ _ No ��
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes,� No �
The upland data form is N30' east of and 1' higher in elevation than the wetland data form
location. The upland data form was taken on an adjacent hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): > 24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �_ Depth (inches): > 24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�, Quercus alba 25% Y FACU
2. Carya glabr•a 25% Y FACU
3. Pin�aas taeda 25% Y FAC
4, Qzre��cus rt�br�a 10% N FACU
6.
7.
8.
85% = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�, Carycx Rlabr•a 5% Y FACU
2. Acer rubrzmz 5% Y FAC
3. Qztercus alba 5% Y FACU
4, Vaccinium arboreunz 5% Y FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
� , None
2.
3.
4.
5.
20% = Total Cover
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Sampling Point: WB-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 28 6%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 3� x 3= 90
FACU species 75 x 4= 300
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 105 (A) 390 (B)
Prevalencelndex = B/A = 3.71
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The vegetation at the upland data form was dominated by upland vegetation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB'UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4" 2.5Y 5/4 100% Loam
4-8" lOYR 6/6 100% Clay loam
8-24" lOYR 6/8 100% Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 748)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: WB-W�
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, et�.>: Topographic crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): C011CdVe Slope (°/o): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.820175 �ong: -78•832175 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap un�t Name: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No ❑
Yes _ ✓ — No �
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes,� No
Wetland WB is a headwater wetland within a topographic crenulation. The wetland drains under Morrisville
Carpenter Road through a culvert. According to NOAA/NWS, no rain was reported for the area within 48
hours of the site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
I v I Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes ,a No � Depth (inches): 1��'Z��
Water Table Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): 18��
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑✓ _ No �_ Depth (inches): 18�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation and standing water was observed in depressional pockets within the wetland. Hydrology
appears to be primarily from overland flow during precipitation events, and the wetland likely gets
impounded at the culvert inlet during significant storm events.
Saturation and the water table was observed at N18" at the data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�, Liriodenctron tarlip{fera 25% Y FACU
2. Lzyaridambar stvracifh�a 25% Y FAC
3. Uhna�s arrrer•icana 25% Y FACW
4.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
� , Acer rzrbrum
2. Ilex decidua
3. Vi�urnum dentatum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
75% = Total Cover
5% Y FAC
5% Y FACW
5% Y FAC
15% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Carex spp. 5% Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Toxicodendy�on radicans 5% Y FAC
2.Smilax ��otundif�lia 5% Y FAC
3.Lonicercr japonica 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
15% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: Wg-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1�0%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalencelndex = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB'W�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8" 2.5Y 6/2 80% 7.5YR 5/8 20% C M Clay loam
8-30" 2.5Y 7/2 60% 7.5YR 6/8 40% C M Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 748)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Redox concentrations increase with depth. Both the water table and soil saturation were observed
at N18" in the soil profile.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: WD-UP
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.>: Levee/sewer easement Local relief (concave, convex, none): COCIV2X Slope (°/o): 0-1%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.821314 �ong: -78•829335 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: COCIgdrE'e SIIt IOdlll NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ❑✓
Yes _ _ No ��
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes,� No �
The upland data form is N26' south of and 1' higher in elevation than the wetland data form
location. The upland data form was taken on sewer/stormwater utility easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): >24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �_ Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
1. None
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Sampling Point: WD-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 33.3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
= Total Cover OBL species x 1=
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 35 x 3= 105
FACU species 70 x 4= 280
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 105 (A) 385 (B)
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Elymus hystrix 30% Y FACU
2. Sorg/�um halepense 30% Y FACU
3, Solidago nitissin�a 10% N FACU
4, Rubus a���utus 5% N FAC
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
75% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,LoniceYajcrponica 30% Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
30% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalencelndex = B/A = 3.67
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12" 10YR 5/3 95% 7.5YR 4/6 5% C M Loam
12-24" lOYR 4/2 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 748)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data form location. The substrate became
rocky below 24".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: W�-W�
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, et�.�: Bottomland floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): C011CdVe Slope (°/o): 0-1%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.821377 �ong: -78•82929 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: COCIgdrE'e SIIt IOdlll NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No ❑
Yes _ ✓ — No �
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes,� No
Wetland WD is a bottomland floodplain wetland with a sewer easement running through the
wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): 1��
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑✓ _ No �_ Depth (inches): SUCfdC2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
The wetland receives hydrology from groundwater and flooding from stream SA.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�, Acer rubr�ann 30% Y FAC
2. Fraximrs penJ�svlvanica 20% Y FACW
3. Uhna�s arner•icana 20% Y FACW
4, Lzgziidanzbar stv��aciflara 20% Y FAC
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�, Ca��pinzrs caroliniana
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
90% = Total Cover
10% Y
10% Y
20% = Total Cover
Sampling Point: W�-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1�0%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC FAC species x 3=
FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Sinilax ��otzrndif'olia 5% Y FAC
2.Lonicera iaponica 5% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
10% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalencelndex = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W�-W�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 3/2 100% Loam
2-4" lOYR 5/2 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Clay loam
4-8" lOYR 5/1 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M Loam
8-16" lOYR 6/2 90% lOYR 5/6 10% C M Loam
16-24" 7.5YR 4/6 90% 7.5YR 6/1 10% D M Loam
24-30" 5YR 5/6 95% 5YR 6/1 5% D PL Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
The soil was depleted. The water table and soil saturation were both observed near the soil
surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: WE-UP
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, et�.>: Slight Levee Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (°/o): �1%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.819460 �ong: -78•843464 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CIl2WdCId SdIICIY IOd�71 NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No ❑
I� Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ _ No within a Wetland? Yes,� No �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ✓
Remarks:
The upland data point (WE-UP) is located approximately 50' northeast of and at the same elevation
as the wetland data point. The upland data point was taken on a slight levee adjacent to stream SD.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): >24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �_ Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data point. Neither the water table
or soil saturation was observed within 24" of the soil profile.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�, Acer rubr�i�nn 25% Y FAC
2. Liyaridambas• stvracifh�a 25% Y FAC
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
� , Acer rzrbrum
2. Liyuidarr�bar styraciflz�a
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
50% = Total Cover
30% Y
25% Y
Sampling Point: WE-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 87 50�0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC FAC species x 3=
FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
55% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Aspleniu�n platvnezrrorr 5% Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Sinilax ��otzrndif'olia 20% Y FAC
2.Lonicera iaponica 15% Y FAC
3.Gelsemiarm semperviJ�ens 10% Y FAC
4.
5.
45% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalencelndex = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 6/3 100% Clay loam
3-10" lOYR 5/3 90% lOYR 6/6 10% C M Loamy clay
10-24" lOYR 6/4 80% lOYR 6/6 20% C M Sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data point. From 10"-24", the concentrations
increased with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 3�1�2016
ApplicanUOwner: TOWn Of M01'I'ISvllle State: NC Sampling Point: WE-W�
Investigator(s): R. Sulllvdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.>: Maintained Easement Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (°/o): �1%
Subregion (LRR or MIRA): LRR P �at: 35.819360 �ong: -78•843593 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CIl2WdCId SdIICIY IOd�71 NWI classification: NOCIe
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation .� Soil _B or Hydrolo9Y.�. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No ❑
Yes _ ✓ — No �
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes,� No
Wetland WE is in a maintained sewer/stormwater easement within the floodplain of stream SD. Stream SD
is incised and mostly disconnected from the floodplain. However, a stormwater retention basin seeps and
drains directly (culvert) into the easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) �/ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ✓ Depth (inches): >24��
Saturation Present? Yes ,❑_ No �_ Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
includes capilla frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Neither the water table or soil saturation was observed at the wetland data point. However, the
soils were depleted and oxidized rhizospheres were observed along living roots from 3" to 8" in the
soil profile. An upslope stormwater retention basin provides hydrology into the wetland via a culvert
connection and from hillside seepage. WE is in the disconnected floodplain of stream SD which is
deeply incised.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Species? Status
�, Acer rubr�i�nn 5% Y FAC
2. Pinus taeda 5% Y FAC
3. Lzqziidan�bar stv��aciflara 5% Y FAC
4.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
� , Alnus serr•a�rlata
2. Baccharis l�ali�raifolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
15% = Total Cover
5% Y OBL
5% Y FACW
10% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Juncars ef'fi�sus 45% Y FACW
2. Rubc�,s argunr.s 10% N FACU
3.
4.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
55% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�,Sinilax ��otzrndif'olia 5% Y FAC
2.Lonicera iaponica 5% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
10% = Total Cover
Sampling Point: WE-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1�0%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalencelndex = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The wetland is mostly within a frequently maintained sewer/stormwater utility easement.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvqe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 7.5YR 5/4 95% 7.5YR 6/8 5% C M Clay
3-8" lOYR 6/1 90% 7.5YR 6/8 10% C PL Clay loam
8-24" lOYR 6/2 80% lOYR 5/8 20% C M Sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
BHistosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
� Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
n Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 748)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
The soil could not be removed below 24" for analysis. The soil was disturbed in the early 2000s
during the construction of the sewer/stormwater utility easement. Neither the water table or soil
saturation was observed within 24" of the soil profile. However, the soil was moist to the touch.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

STATEMENT OF
AVAILABILITY

�,
r�s
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability August 7, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Eric Alsineyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite l05
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements (TiP U-5618)
This docuinent confirms that Town of Morrisville (Applicant) for the Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway
Improvements (TIP U-5618) (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.28 RiUarian Wetland
Mitigation Credits from the EBX-Neuse sponsored Neu-Con Wetland & Stream UmUrella Mitigation
Banlc, specifically fr�om the Arrirrgton Bf•idge III Site in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank
Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the banlc acicnowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banlcer shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource rype secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1052.
Best Regards,
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Jurisdictional Determination Request
�, ,;
.
11S Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington 6ishic[
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (7D) from the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
f�»ncl �n-linP at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�,ulatoryPermitPro�ram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
1NSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
Please be aware that a117D
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
Property owner authorization/notification for 7D
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/LJSACE proiocois.
A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Raeroirrae ('nnean�atinn Can�ira r�rinr tn etartincr �z�nrlr
��.���,.,...,.�� .,�,..�.�..�.,.�,.. ti..�....,.�, t,..�,. ,�, �,�..,...b ..�,..�.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
StT'eet AddT'eSS: N/A (Linear Transportation Project)
Clty, State: Morrisville, North Carolina
COUrity: Wake County
Lii���ivi�S: See Figure 1: Vicinity Map
pai'C01 IridOX NUrilbOi'�S� �p��: N/A (Linear Transportation Project)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Kimley-Horn; ATTN: Jason Hartshorn
Malllrig AddT'eSS: 421 Fayetteville St., Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
TelepllOrie NUffibeT': [phone]
Electronic Mail Addressl: �aSon.Hartsnorn@Kim�ey-Horn.�om
Select one:
� I am the current property owner.
❑� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant�
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Town of Morrisville; ATTN: Mike Wright
Malllrig AddT'eSS: 260 Town Hall Drive, Suite C
Morrisville, NC 27560
TelepllOrie NUffibeT': [phone]
Electronic Mail Address3: Mwrignt@townofmorris�i��e.org
� Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarv 7D for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary 7D for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/proj ect area for the presence or
absence of WoUSS and provide an �proved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
� I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/proj ect
area and provide an a�proved 7D (this may or may not include a survey plat).
� I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/proj ect area and provide an approved 7D (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
�
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Proj ect Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Proj ect Area 61.5
n
G.
acres
I verify that the property (or proj ect) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary 7D Requests:
� Completed and signed Preliminarv Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
� Project Coordinates: 35.820034 Latitude -78�831188
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
0
0
�
�
❑
Longitude
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)�:
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheets8
❑�
❑
❑✓
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved 7Ds including Verification of a Delineation:
� Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑
�
❑
�
�
Longitude
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
' 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.armv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re�ulatorvPro�ramandPermits/re� supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
$ Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
� Wetland Data Sheetsy
❑
❑
❑
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
� USACE Assessment Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved 7Ds only)
u
�
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adj acency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps proj ect manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one ori�inal Plat (to scale) that is no lar�er than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
r��ate anr� ratnrn tham via a_mai� tn i1lP YPl111PCil�Y
r.�.�„ �...� ..,��... �...,... ..�. ., ...�... �� �..., ..,.��.,,,��..
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
�❑
�❑
❑
❑
�
❑�
❑�
�
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
� When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using appro�mate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
� all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
� Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reacnes
� Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non-
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved 7D must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
� Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
rran���rt «��TTc
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
� When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (S) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACEAction ID No.:
� When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACEAction ID No.:
Version: December 2013
Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
� be at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
� include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
� include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Appendix 2- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD. Kimley-Horn;ATTN:JasonHartshorn,421 FayettevilleSl.,Suite600,Raleigh,NC27601
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: �/akg COUCIty c�ty: Morrisville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
�at.: 35.820034 Long.: -78.831188
Universal Transverse Mercator: � 7
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH ��MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
See attached table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
� Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data.
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24k, Cary Quad
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County, 1970
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
� State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
�■ Photographs: �■ Aerial (Name & Date): NC Statewide Orthoimagery Project (2015)
or � Other (Name & Date):
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
�
8/3/2017
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Estimated
Site Cowardin amount of Class of
number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic aquatic
resource in resource
review area
SA 35.820645 -78.828729 Riverine 365 linear feet Non-section
10 — non-tidal
SB 35.821914 -78.826754 Riverine 74 linear feet Non-section
10 — non-tidal
SC 35.817992 -78.839560 Riverine 243 linear feet Non-section
10 — non-tidal
SD 35.819271 -78.843516 Riverine 268 linear feet Non-section
10 — non-tidal
WA 35.819613 -78.829843 Palustrine 0.14 acres Non-section
10 — wetland
WB 35.820175 -78.832175 Palustrine 0.21 acres Non-section
10 — wetland
WD 35.821377 -78.829290 Palustrine 0.58 acres Non-section
10 — wetland
WE 35.819360 -78.843593 Palustrine 0.07 acres Non-section
10 — wetland

AGENT AUTHORIZAT�ON �'OYtM
Name: ?own D-� �?'10 rr��rlr ��f�
Address: _ (�� �DG/r1 ��,�� n�'( de
Phone: Qk ��`r " ��0 � ' cS� �� /
Project Name/Description: Marrisville-Carpenter Roadwav Imnrovements
Date: U �� �� �
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Carps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Eric Alsmever
Field Office: Raleigh Resulatorv Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
The Town of Morrisvil[e hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. to act in
mylour 6ehalf as mylour agent solelv for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
5ection 40� permitslSection 40� Water Quality Certifcations applications, and Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Determinations, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day farward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the propertylproperties identi�ed
herein, do autharize representatives of the Wilmingtan District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described far the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated witH Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
4a4 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section l0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this � day of 14�tS°� Sf , e� 7.
7ao�o� �tl�,' fi �
Print Property Qwner's Name
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Clnit
[ 650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699- � 650
�i'I�IB" G/.��
Praperty Owner's Signature

�arkside_Va/��. � "\
i �'�"1`'ti1 �� �
�a ___, � � ��.�°�e�- � s
�d,.a _ - vo � �
,�Q, � 1� �'.
�` ld�� �
'\�
�� �L
y%� r�,I 1Xj�` ��
� / �.{ �'),�jL
� , ��a f
� \
a� �- � �
`- r , - Leacroft Wa 1 '"
� �
; � r �� � 1 �..M��r�sv/ll� o� �v 54 d_o p( � ��s?;
�- ��' p � �_ � �� e� ` �' � ' � ac
`� �s� `, . m [C � .. cn
. � '.. � � ' � �
N �
L �� � � � � �
—�� C�aret �� ��et Dr I
�� d�-',, � I Kudrow �-� �'�� �
5' �t- N
o.
J _ J ��Q�ndc��aiiNl9h�l�o, -
„�
�; �
_ >, I_ � ' iv(orr'is @., I ;., 1:
_ �_ -J �� �`� �! vill Rkw / _
_ - 1 � � -�si, Q �' �
W�� o . � = / d��ooa �Y ' -- - ,� \
e<itage �iiles Di � _ — -�Q �
D r _ Q � �j c Jalle Vya� : ' ` 'd� ' \/ => � �`
Legend � �f � ,�' � 'a �� ���� _
�°� o �� �; ��
� ; �� [ =,�
Morrisville �" ,� <` 1�" �
� 1 , � ;� ;
� t-' �"� yI �`\/�1� � -�,
Cary �, G'len Abbey� I � � `' \a�y ,�o�;v��r;�;
n��� � i�etr�, v �
� Project Study Area ,.F ---� �-^T� �\ ~ 0 2,500 5,000
c Feet
f �
Kentuck ,` ORANGE GRANVILLE
y � 'V�-- Virginia \�
�;:�
� ��� FRANKLIN
-- DURHAM �\
Tennessee � Project Location
. ... . - ��� 5�-� ���:' �`� ...
�
South
Carolina
Georgia
0 40 80
� Miles
N �SO
!.y
:4 '
� � � OF 11A 4�'Gtr
Wake County ,./ ;
�
--1 �
i;
���- JOHNSTON
AtOa?�fic Ocean LEE � �'�
HARNETT O 6 �2
� Miles
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
Morrisville, Wake County, NC

� � y • ' T� - � I f _ •:. 4 �.3� ' �',
�'I T'�'-�a � � ' - � '�' � I ' � - ��� . N
� '� �,� �� � � •��: � y � e � - - � �. � f .�M s '�
� � ��'+� � �'� �, �� ,,,�--�,,�''�, _ �,� �,, - � .�� -�.� � � ti � � _ A �
� . �``''+�`` - � � ! � 't
� � � ' �.� � `ti '", � �; £ � . , , '�y� I * ` �,+�, � � " , ,, � � ■
1 � � � ' ��, � —_'4 � � L � ��'�."�r� ..T' � � � �� yt� � ,'._ � .
� J � � • � , +�` _ �.s ' � ; ��.'''•
'°- � � � j � � .� �y � �,, _�{' � - �, q� � ' � y4 • -� T•�
'`, " �y s�. � � `� { � � � � ���' � � � � � '� � � i f 4� ' �
s�' � 's�1� ti � t � �---+..+t�-y� � � � � � � ' 4' f '.il �i e i . .
_ , ` • . ri�� fr =-.1��. �� �-. � � � � �y '� , ,
..: � � ` � � ; '
'y ,,.f� �
�
� �"�1� _ 3 j„�� ��t � 'I � � � � .1 ■ ��i �� - .,, � � �h . . � .�'1
�� - - . v- � ��v � � ` 1RF' • �s a i ��� � _�- i� '�'i . �t. � �
c� � -� C � +� +�
, � �T� � r.� � �r�. .�_ - �•��� _ �� 1 I f i * �� .
_ �. i
1� �*_:
�,� .__ � ` _ �� . s_ � � 't._ � � �'
4 - �
1 �. ~
�yv � � � " � 4 _ � s �' ``. - . � '� ' �_ � �' �
•
�.
", � ,, � + �� ��'� i '�. � , - — y T� ��,��•.��-- ' � + a
'' � + � ,. I: � , ', . ,, '�, 'z� �,,�— _ - � ,'
�,, Fj��y i � — � .r'` d � 4 f � �� ,�'.,�1i _�� ''�: �
I� � i� � �
I� 'I , t �� ' �, � � — _ 1� .-a�� �.. �'� � � �` •-` _ _ ' � �
� �`L y i l � Y � =,r *r, �� �`.. � ' .L
7 '� '�' ,, � •�� .,� d � N� I � . _ _ i;•,J ":„y .
. � � �� �{ �� '� � _- � � _ . - -^� i ,. - - -
- � " � �� `. � ' a � �� ' � -� ��-'" _ ,
� . � ' , �, � -- �� . � � -
' ,' ' � � _ , � ' � {� �
���_'�� _ a r.�' i i r _.�� J_ �
�` .e p . •� _ 1 f
) .�~`l, ' � � ` �. � •FL � f
. y �' `O
ro �.,L`„ -._ - �� - _ V._. ,. N ''y � ��'� r�
��'��' I� � ' r� `_��� -�� -�•- � - r� s T' ipF ,• �
�� `_ �
�.�_ _ � __ � a �' ' 4 � z.� �
�' a
' � � I � Ii ymv' � � � ,''. y�,{
j � �� - - ��� i�� •� � 1'
, "1 ' - — _ _ � � ,�,, � ; � e
�* �
' ' � - _��' , � ,� � � � F �►
, "� � � � �. � ��' � _ '`,'
. �,��"'�� �' _- --�� -_ _ _. -_ ,
� � } -- • ' . _
� 4 � }.-�
� � �� - - - � _ _=�-�. -� _�
' p � �
� � �� T
Legend '� � = �. �';► _ - � `
� � �
� � - � ���`� --� _ - � � - 0 700 1,400
� Project Study Area � - _ � � �-`" –�
� _ _ � Feet
� - ' r �
o, tiOF7f{ �,Q .
�� �o; Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map (Cary Quad, 1987)
,�r y
9 Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
m �' Morrisville, Wake County, NC
V
p.�n SP.
T� o(
��FOF TRPT��'Q

.= � � \ �. � ` � � � � Y �. ::�y-j ,'� �� � "� � �. :. a % _�i � e �� . 'i a '�, -. s a,��.v. � � � '��` � g ' �y`'� � ' � �'
\ � �y.14 y� i f � �' ` _ �' � : • ' ` � ! �y,� - '1 ���' nI
=;��"w�..� . ` + �''�'� t� �� �' :.;j �, 7. �;i i .�-.i.,.��j�F*• ',� 4�--R7�� . 'J�' .�t� �:,�,.'`:,'�„�: .�� � , .�.r.' ��� "1 �-w��:t,�.. �/✓��! .� �` ��` � �y�r��� , � .,� � � ! ��.�� 1 fV�
� -!; ", I 7y � �I.�� i'4S1.� . .m � �y . -• � r � ",r, x.� . � �'I d ,\
�. � �a'.... a _N ,.",L'' �' ,�. �}�..^ '71 k � --�-0 �++ i i \ �v' 'a r /i� i . �.: � � � �� . � �r • ,3 k-. N'� � .. .� ' Y , ��' ,'� 1� , .�. w yi � �,\
r �}� � q �c �.�c _ �+ .,,> frz ;.
�> < �i � ��'`�a• i�, ,r1 r�'��� ; � �� ' �'` , , - ��` >d+J J��f ar* ,. ` � �, � '�' ' F;`rtl �,�,; �= J :,'�, � ��, � ; f , � ;� � y��, ( • - � ? �, �. / v �
���` J ' _ _ r r�, r`�!. t : � �� � �M ' � '�ii" . �4� v [ -t. 4� de .. �� . /, ._� '7Y � d� .� . .
� 3 - �� ,,. b r1�� ��� P � r � . .R'R'r : �` -�; �y+. y ^:� �'�.y �} ♦ ��
; � � a� -. � ey� . <r..a♦ ` t�44,��` � ro` .. Za �,� � • � �.�• ��,,..
_ `A'� *.7t" � r U� F . . ;.�"���•_'.� . � +� � � �M � .¢' �� � ' �� '"`•zy , �'---k'� I� '��� �, 1 � '. `�"'"`."'9�' �A " ' � "'.��"` ` �' k'�3 �� � _ ` �.� '
� U�� .•' ia . e9 �� � r �/ 'Te� �n.
� �., i R � t�� '_—I . . �', y � �i �i ,13' h } _ ; � ���.-y '�'� S. K � � . � � �' � ! 7��f =T �' ^ . . �'�,�
� ��'fi �. , . �S} � - �� iI�-y, � � � ,�-�y�4.� " ��� .�`,�j,� ` y .f�y d�Y �4 4� �N � "�� � j �_. �/!7�{���� �� ��,. �',� � �,'�� � �,�'L+�7
''.�� ! - y,X 1 e ,. p . ! V x � .. .� ���� �J � �T� .. � ! � �S � '�i '¢'�' � y, "'� 1V �f X ', f � �.'.f
�e+ '• A . - t - a ' :4� � �
'��A � � `,t��s;'� ;., � � �t �`':��''�^ M„' �f'� -!"9�� �arh -h� , �� .. .�,� -�� _� �w ��. � �'� s�r
L 1 �� }
�✓, -;�„ ��. � j`" � � '1 �, � '#; Y y�"`�i �w+11 � _�� ����, ^ ,� ��'�r r��,� �,'� y� } = ;- �t ��' �,.� �'� � a��` a � � � � ��,�:y
� .. .� �, ; � � �.�� '�s�, a`�'� . '� rY ' '� - ��:x T y",r� �. 54 �•+4�.
, '�'�_ . _ ���- � � j: �� i �`1`i ��,� � � ;:jitlkl::, ,:'�r c-,.,�iM` `��� ty � � `��'4 � 'f/r . ' �'- "�a� `� � " � {3�'g� eF �
` _ ' /�.
.. �.
I'--t .... "� ��.,�0� . 3. Y>-� ..�_ .� ���Q�'` - _ ,. �`i..l� . - n',. � �Q J � �F. , �y =' � ' , �,� . . R'� 1
� „ _ , ''+i �,+"�-.x .t, `" -. _ , � � � � �M r�� � iP t'M''i'1 !I �'i I�A � f� � ' 7\ �Fy ;,q • d, ,� �, �y � s 1 �"�,,�p •! � �y � , �F� !f� :^�
� .? � i � t; . �� . . .,� � .:1� . . �,_� .� i . � f�q7.Y + # "9r.�� r +��Gf�.i«, . ` , �,�'7�. 'ti � �, �� �t �y
� � " •r� r/ �� �1'1�%� �`"• 1T � /�� ' . '�, '� ?4 1�jh`d o� . . �.. Y� � �. �'
_' ��, .,� ..;,rtR.+i....,• .1,#,e�;Y�s .'ia'tl��F =, - _�i����k�'��!�� � � F' i ,��,� ae j � !�'' :� . �y�J' � i � �� y�. �� " - _ - Z` � ',_ +-•' .r:_
�y �. -?� � t�'-��`�rt�'� � ; + �! �.
�, ��' t' �1''�q ::� � '�fa'1'�1�"j'�`tuj�'�I ,_r�..:►"1,��;'�t�+�f*.���-�i st��atisss�s� . � '', r i�.n�t �` : �,..,,� �r �-
t�{. � �� . e!n� � #� � , .. . - $r� � �. � t/#"�`.-�' �,'�" 7 I�. tiX ��-:a' r. . . �1 � �w "• �, �l ji,
.ry �`�.i- 4� e� >�� "�1'?� L�� _�;� �i =' �' � �4'�'Yi'+i'�k �"fe �f',`� � �-. K'�t' � �,�; s(! t �� � '� M1,� `�i
j J � .,� � •rt� -i � 'i ;� ,�4. p-.� ', �'- ���- ����� "f�.�- ��"�i .:`'n ��tj; �"� ,�i_ � ,? .J'�uri�} � -a e �����.
i�: � '.''� .s�iy '�;r,'�k. "�'� `'�� �. ; `�' at i 4;''q � 'aj' " �-'N �.. � f �► ♦ � .p � x` �1 � Y F
��r ��
'� �,_ . - ; '�I„ , r' �, 'i � � `+< v � � v ',`'� al `t+� �: � - � �,�. �` � , � e,e W p -P Y
�` ..,� ,�o� = �� � .� � -� �, °r. � f�- -�� ,��1 �� � 9 � ^�'��'� «'*� �•~�` � �.�� y���;��i: �„r.� d ' � y�� �,
I� 1 � T ' �1 ��I� �, .'d� p. (S�M1 fi. ;. � �.'y�i !i?e"4� ,.W�,y' �s �qj�(';_�,l!J,;a �JF:�C1-1f �If .:..-'.l
[..� `. �1�. &' S._ � y ���� �s�� � o �' t ' ���'4 srs � P�'i }��'l'-�� �� � �� y �,�T^; S'�'� � r
y ��i �� �1 9 �: � � � � �s 'a e' �'''z�'�b� �. � .1�' yr - .�a'i9 Q!ie e� rf '; `j � 3 ��;��V,� � l:�- •T: � y1. Y i �'f �r� ! � -4
+�, V �� � .. � i Y^
�y • � ;� ,.,• '� � �h�' ���,�j� i+,� k �Y .� . 1. 3< � � 5�'� T�el � +�!� �ri°'WB��o ._ - ,Yti`" �6 ����' �r���'�'�v: t ;f
�� r � � ; , . , WE �-� �,t ��.b, t�- ,� �f���Y,. : � 'au'sh�` ,�' e�' F�� �'y �( ��;' �r. . �;�y '� . � � . � ,, �o� ' �, '
r 4 . . � �F��. �,�/ - v� '�,.
�i i . ,.�1, -- �.. i , � ,�'� `iY�.?,,�"���.�Y-�3 �� �} � �r� � ��� � '�� � �t �`� f�� C ��. � n . �i .
� . � �� �� i3`y . 1,�4' *°►��i y.. a� ,cn ���,_� � ' ^ ��. y,�Y« Y� 6 ��.• � i i� S�'i /�' .� , 1 . �A. � � 4t�
e ,. • '� ,���,� � A � , � r + � �
, .
.. � j �
,.
';,._' + • e �..� ' �` �y,' y ' '�' � ;�k �'n �' , r�y: � n '�-�v n _ ry�c`f:.4�1 :,, J� - f� i:-'l a`: a�
�
�.i_. , ._ ' . . . - � r��• ; �� . �' _ .- n_r ^ �. a� �' �� �r' � . ' IC�T i��; `�.
�^ �-- .. �+�.; _ . y�r -,�`�-� i,� %� �ef � � �'-' � - � ''' �. � �iyti ^ f 1 ` � ..v, ' ffi° �:�',
_ _ ` p:. �' � �,�j. !�1 "ri. ��]Rl�� � " � � .'4 `F �' � Mi , � 1� � � _. . / . ,�� .�t . .,�,� �J � fi .;� �� �J� .
._ � _ . ,. , L'� �' � b W g�,
,��� _ ..� a 5- .Y--t - . : ... � _ � �� q .� : 'a�' i/p i, y Ai i 3'�- � !.Y.` � >`4 4'!'- : C '� � ' tv� '
. .�� 3 I j ~�-� � � ��"`-`�z �,3 w. , �I .. � 1� �c' � + ,. � t :: �' 's� t ! � .' .�� '
M f l j s� .� �� `.� ''r' �.�.sh �i's.� ",. �`" �� w�..11 !� °� 2tx � ya ���.� . �_s"{L li`h�.+�' r�+" � *y ' '.Ci ta
�1 r .'.^-) . ',?. ' ? -�. "�i+} -�. ���.,,... � ` . .�,t 'sa. ll :�i '�"� - ��f-,��'r'aS.;^ r i p e';�.,_� ���� +� �����y�\
Y
�' � .
--�'' >
,y� �
. ! - - y
Y
�'�`r� �- ..� : '� � �;� �, _ � ,;� � a,, "'� �r ..,�`: � r �i:� �/ 1„�
.� f�.. ��.�9� ... :'j ; .Y.� .�.e_. �. �Il ' 1 •F�� �� K y. �.A��� � a�iiY ��z� y� �F K �-C '4��_. ' . . 1 L Ri /' /�
�! � 1 �r,g1. -.� .�� ,-,� '�'� �� Y �.'1 �- �1` -- ��w'.� y.��� S`+-'� �c t . ' . � -t�S �}� .� �
.� � �._ ;� ,��� .. _ { � .'� .r-i r�'R�<s- �i' .� [+�� ��'� �6i �t .. . . . r •s► n 1 A.��' �3 �' `'6 �'. 1
.r� .y�� ��` —�r��� J� ..����(� ;��. -y���'� �� ��.lai$ltte w1 tii ��l'� .�y t � . . � e. � �,��j� �- _y
��� 'Ty` Af�_ N+ �e�"�`'�_ T-w,``�.�. ,� '' '���.' e �r ' �� a _ �"j��s,� ��;,�,�/'�,.Y,�ta*".�.':�.'y., l.t' r• � � ,.r"�y'��+• ;��°� t�
.��� F'�.'. . � � - �� . �� +�i �'iiC� �,{!'+}.,�,J i i .C•\� . _' _ - r�Tyr. .�.t_.��" .'y�LL f}�` �r1���f � � . :',Fl- �-'.R�y.� i � . '+r4 : � I'il�4
� � -,-�i���� �.,, � • � .:?'WH ,;. �' k't�'I ,�, _ � - • - T - . . � - � , - . _ . ' .- .. . , .e.,.�.-'..,�...,..,, s,.�
� r"'� %.3� 1' • .r'�r � �� s �2 r�. ,v �g' '►"'S+ct., � ,�,� ��y�.� ��'".�"i'��"'� i. � ' r - - .-a �6 '._, i ' , x xtr°f!�"�y{
i �.`✓:. �'��j;:�-P :,�. � i'. , .'^�.� ',..�;. � "�� �-s^ _. _v - . </� �
�: �i j -�:��Jf'•: ,N,� i ti-`� � 4qi���yi�j��`'f . � _ � - � � �~! iyt*k � � �' i.��� �.1�1
L�- � � . ��,��� , �r �`,�. ` �' �� '.,+�' �. .�.�, ,�-: �� _` , * ' ..+� ;�,.
* :'� � ;'�f - � .. - Y � �• � - "��c;a��,� ,,,�`�. ..:�" �: 1: � ��
' �_�,. '�1�` tl:�t ,��"ia� `�� .- �, � 70� ,�,4��
� Project Study Area ���r..'�''k_#,��P���°,. -� �r� �r��-".����..�����.+�%'' +��i�, � Feet ,
•:,- '�
.�-:.-
oF Har�rk �Q
�
o�
9
a
�
OF
Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements
Morrisville, Wake County, NC

� �N r �1 i ' � �,�y. L � .. • l �::` -� � r~����'� yr • ���,� ,�:
a ��
n , - - ;� � �,,,;��� � :� .�, C��� .
/�\ &� y r � � 1 . "`� - ��_�,�. '� ,r
/ V .t -� '� �,}.� �U �, ��", 1�.
` � '.i �, �
I � � ��,(} ' V ��1� � , ,'�4� _
� . JV� . , . _. . r v'z /f 1
� � ' � .� ,CF%°1 � - y � d - �,� ,,�r - ' � i'�
r62 �, r �;r�;� , � �:� - - � �`' }�u
� � ��I - � 5 � �;�� . . � .. , � . ` y � � �
�� �� - � � .ti . �rCz - .t Mv� ` P
�� G',, r, '' �YB2� � - _4 ,�,.� :.y , . �� ,
i_ � �� -; �'''� ' l { - ` � - - � •,� ��, , � : � � . . �
' -- � ,� � �� �' - _ - -
� � y F � � r_�-.� � ^ � jb� y' �_,r � � � , • � � _ � , -' _ � ' � r .
f � ?'` .� � "� � � . • � _ - _ - � , _` �� ry
C a _ >
; � _ � � - � - . , � - " Mly �2 , " {~
.. �,; ,,,r, — - �� _ �,. ____ R8� � '�
I. �[A �- - � � - y C�
� � „ .;�, .
' � _., .r� i . _ � � �� '^���.� �
., Au ,�; / _ ' Ali � , � �
� � = ' ( � Crn � � � i q+� � � � ' �. .
__ �'� � _ ,� '�. �, _
_ � �i.i ' ri ' �'C'p �i ' �,
�lJ ��� �_ ' _ , - .. � - �I _� � � , -- ��^ ,
� ' - �> �`� - ��— � �t"r� rl��"� !�� i. ''��c �- ' _ � , - �
� �� f/ . 1�' �' i _ � s ' �„r �F!"
_ _ s- � � : w: �..
Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements Project ' � � - ,= ' ;_-' •,
NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County (1970) �� �-� �iP17 -�A ` � I, � ''�
Map Unit Soil Unit Name H dric � _ . -.� � �. " � �
AfB Altavista fine sandy loam(0-6% slopes, rarely flooded) Incl. ,-�-� � ��
AuA Augusta fine sandy loam (0-2% slopes, occasionallyflooded) Incl. [1 �1 �' ` � ` ' � .
CaB Carbonton-Brickhavencomplex(2-6%o slopes) No . 1��� �
CaC Carbonton-Brickhaven complex (6-10% slopes) No � t� ,
CaD Carbonton-Brickhaven complex (10-15% slopes) No Ij
CmA Chewacla sandy loam (0-2% slopes, frequentlyflooded) Incl. P� �' J - �� Legend
CpA Congaree silt Ioam (0-2% slopes, frequently flooded) Incl. � � ��'�, �
CrB2 Creedmoor sandy loam (2-6% slopes, moderately eroded) No � � '� � Project Study Area
CrC2 Creedmoor sandy loam (6-10% slopes, moderately eroded) No �1 �y�2 �.'+' �
GrB2 Granville sandy loam (2-6% slopes, moderately eroded) No M ; �-F --
WhA Warne fine sandy loam (0-2%o slopes, occasionally flooded) Incl. '-' �' � 700 1 400
WnA Wehadkee silt loam (0-2% slopes, frequentiyflooded) Yes � �, f%� '
WyA Worsham sandy loam (0-3%o slopes) Yes . �f V� f'�- Feet y
;, — - - � 1r �_ - _ � -�
;. ,� ��°�°����sy Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
y` v`r Morrisville-Carpenter Roadway Improvements
� o Morrisville, Wake County, NC
� ��
`F�J:�� T�1pT�� y.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SA
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.820645
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: R�si�RH County: Wake Longitude: -78.828729
Total Points: 43.5 Stream Determination (cir Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 3
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 2
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SA is a perennial channel that had strong baseflow. The
channel is incised with multiple bank failures observed during field visit. SA
appears to flood the surrounding floodplains periodically. The stream substrate
consisted of mostly sand and silt with some gravel. Mussels were observed
embedded in the sand in several locations.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SB
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.821914
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: R�si�RH County: Wake Longitude: -78.826754
Total Points: 2� Stream Deter ' ' n(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemera Intermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence -
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SB is a linear, weak intermittent channel carrying primarily
stormwater and has downcut or been dugout. Baseflow in SB is low and slow,
but the substrate is well sorted and sandv.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SC
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.817992
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: RLS/JRH County: Wake Longitude: -78.83956
Total Points: 24 Stream Deter � 'on (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Cary
Ephemera ntermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. n-c anne structure: ex. ri e-poo ,:
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in
B. Hydrology Subtotal = g.5
9.5
••.
0
0
Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 2 3 3
1 2 3 2
1 2 3 1
1 2 3 2
1 2 3 1
1 2 3 0
1 2 3 0
1 2 3 0
0.5 1 1.5 0
0.5 1 1.5 0.5
Yes=3 0
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SC is a channelized feature that has naturalized. Sweetgums
line the bottom edges of the channel valley, and are located in the stream
channel. Numerous debris piles are located in the channel.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Stream SD
Date: 1/14/2016 Project/Site: Morrisville Carpenter Latitude: 35.819271
Roadway Improvements
Evaluator: RLS/JRH County: Wake Longitude: -78.843516
Total Points: 37.5 Stream Determination (cir Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name: Cary
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex. ri le-pool, steK
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in ma
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
21
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
Moderate Strong
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes=3
Score
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream SD is a perennial channel that flows under Morrisville
Carpenter Road. The stream had strong baseflow and was somewhat incised.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projecvsite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Imnrovements city�county: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1O�Z7�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWfI Of MOfCISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WA-UP
investigator�s�: J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIOp2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): 4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819911 �ong: -78•830248 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnaP ur,�t rvame: WnA - Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes � No �
Data point WA-UP was recorded 20' north of and 4' higher in elevation than WA-WET.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aaalvl Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (614) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches): >
WaterTable Present. Yes NoII Depth (inches): 24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators were observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�.Liguidambarsryrac�ua 25% Y FAC
2. Acer rubrum 20% Y FAC
3. Pinus taeda 15% Y FAC
4, Carya glabra 5% N FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
65% = Total Cover
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�, Acer rubrum 15% Y FAC
2. Pinus taeda 15% Y FAC
3, Juniperus virginiana 10% Y FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�. Rubus arugutus
2. Quercus phellos
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
40% = Total Cover
5% Y
5% Y
Sampling Point: WA-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species �Oo�o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Veaetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
�.Lonicera japonica 10% Y FACU hei ht.
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5% Y FA
3.
4.
5.
6.
15% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inches) Color (moisU % Color (moisU % Tvpe' Loc2
0-8" 10YR 5/4 100%
8-16" 10YR 6/4 100%
16-24" 10YR 6/4 80% 10YR 6/6 20% C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: WA-UP
the absence
Texture Remarks
Loam
Clay loam
Sandy clay loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) B Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
8 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 722)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 747)
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data point.
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 747)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projecvsite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Imnrovements city�county: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1O�Z7�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWfI Of MOfCISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WA-WET
investigator�s�: J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, eto.�: Bottomland floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COf1CdV2 Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819613 �ong: -�8•829843 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnaP ur,�t rvame: WnA - Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland WA is a bottomland floodplain wetland that likely receives periodic flooding from a
tributary to Crabtree Creek.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applvl Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (614) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (69) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I- Depth (inches): >
WaterTable Present. Yes Non Depth (inches): 24��
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland WA likely receives hydrology from overbank flooding of an unnamed tributary to Crabtree
Creek located south of the study area. Portions of WA outside the study area have standing water
visible on aerial imagery. Water-stained leaves are present in the most depressional areas of WA.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) % Cover Soecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum 30% Y FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 20% Y FAC
3. Carpinus caroliniana 15% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
65% = Total Cover
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�, Acer rubrum 15% Y FAC
2. Liguidambar styrac�ua 15% Y FAC
3. Quercus phellos 10% Y FAC
4, Frczxinus pennsylvanica 10% Y FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
50% = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30� )
�. Microstegium vimineum 50% Y FAC
2, Carex sp. 15% Y NI
3, Frczxinus pennsylvanica 5% N FACW
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: WA-WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 900�0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1.Smilax rotundifolia 10% Y FAC hei ht.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inches) Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 5/3 100% Loam
3-10" 10YR 5/1 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M Clay loam
10-24" 10YR 6/2 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol(A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11;
Thick Dark Surtace (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surtace (F6)
Depleted Dark Surtace (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Neither the water table or soil saturation was observed within the upper 24" of the soil profile.
Concentrations increase with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WB-UP
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdll, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIOp2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.820220 �ong: -78•832093 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes � No �
The upland data form is N30' east of and 1' higher in elevation than the wetland data form
location. The upland data form was taken on an adjacent hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I- Depth (inches): >
Water Table Present. Yes No n Depth (inches): 24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): > 24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
�. Quercus alba 25% Y FACU
2. Carya Qlabra 25% Y FACU
3. Pinus taeda 25% Y FAC
4. Quercus rubra 10% N FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
85% = Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Carya Qlabra 5% Y FACU
2. Acer rubrum 5% Y FAC
3. Quercus alba 5% Y FACU
4, Vaccinium arboreum 5% Y FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
� . None
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� .None
2.
3.
4.
Sampling Point: WB-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 28.6%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 3� x 3= 9�
FACU species 75 x 4= 3��
UPL species x 5 =
Co�umn Tota�s: 105 (,4) 390 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.71
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2�% = Total Cover -
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5 Hydrophytic �
Vegetation
6• Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The vegetation at the upland data form was dominated by upland vegetation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or co
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2
0-4" 2.5Y 5/4 100%
4-8" 10YR 6/6 100%
8-24" 10YR 6/8 100%
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: WB'UP
the absence of ind
Texture Remarks
Loam
Clay loam
Clay
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) B Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
8 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WB-W�
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdll, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, eto.�: Topographic crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): COnCdVe Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.820175 �ong: -78•832175 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Carbonton-Brickhaven complex NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland WB is a headwater wetland within a topographic crenulation. The wetland drains under Morrisville
Carpenter Road through a culvert. According to NOAA/NWS, no rain was reported for the area within 48
hours of the site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
✓ Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
�� ��
Surtace Water Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 1'2
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 18��
Saturation Present? Yes � No n Depth (inches): 18�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation and standing water was observed in depressional pockets within the wetland. Hydrology
appears to be primarily from overland flow during precipitation events, and the wetland likely gets
impounded at the culvert inlet during significant storm events.
Saturation and the water table was observed at N18" at the data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
�. Liriodendron tulipifera 25% Y FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 25% Y FAC
3. Ulmus americana 25% Y FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
75% = Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Acer rubrum 5% Y FAC
Z. Ilex decidua 5% Y FACW
3. Viburnum dentatum 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
� , Carex spp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: WB-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1��%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
15% = Total Cover -
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5% Y FAC _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
�.Toxicodendron radicans 5% Y FAC hei ht.
2.Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FA
3.Lonicera japonica 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
15% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB-W�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8" 2.5Y 6/2 80% 7.5YR 5/8 20% C M Clay loam
8-30" 2.5Y 7/2 60% 7.5YR 6/8 40% C M Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) B Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
8 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
Redox concentrations increase with depth. Both the water table and soil saturation were observed
at N18" in the soil profile.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WD-UP
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdll, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.�: Levee/sewer easement Local relief (concave, convex, none): COIIV2X Slope (%): �-1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.821314 �ong: -78•829335 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Congaree silt loam NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes � No �
The upland data form is N26' south of and 1' higher in elevation than the wetland data form
Iocation. The upland data form was taken on sewer/stormwater utility easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I- Depth (inches): >
Water Table Present. Yes No n Depth (inches): 24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes � Non Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data form location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
� . None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
� , None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Elymus hystrix 30% Y FACU
2, Sorghum halepense 30% Y FACU
3, Solidago altissima 10% N FACU
4, Rubus argutus 5% N FAC
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: WD-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 35 x 3= 1�5
FACU species 7� x 4= 28�
UPL species x 5 =
Co�umn Tota�s: 105 (,4) 385 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.(7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
75% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
�.Lonicera japonica 30% Y FAC hei ht.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
30% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic �
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirn
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2
0-12" 10YR 5/3 95% 7.5YR 4/6 5% C M
12-24" 10YR 4/2 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: WD-UP
the absence of ind
Texture Remarks
Loam
Clay loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) B Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
8 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data form location. The substrate became
rocky below 24".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: W�-W�
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdll, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, eto.�: Bottomland floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COnCdVe Slope (%): �-1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.821377 �ong: -�8•82929 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Congaree silt loam NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland WD is a bottomland floodplain wetland with a sewer easement running through the
wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
✓ High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes � No I v I Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No II Depth (inches): 1��
Saturation Present? Yes ✓� No n Depth (inches): SUI"faCe Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
The wetland receives hydrology from groundwater and flooding from stream SA.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum 30% Y FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20% Y FACW
3. Ulmus americana 20% Y FACW
4. Liguidambar styrac�ua 20% Y FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
90% = Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Carpinus caroliniana 10% Y
2. Acer rubrum 10% Y
3. _
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
� . None
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: W�-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1��%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC FAC species x 3=
FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
�B)
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2�% = Total Cover -
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1.Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC hei ht.
2.Lonicera iaponica 5% Y FA
3.
4.
5.
6.
1�% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of ind
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2
0-2" 10YR 3/2 100%
2-4" 10YR 5/2 75% 7.5YR 4/6 25% C M
4-8" 10YR 5/1 90% 7.5YR 4/6 10% C M
8-16" 10YR 6/2 90% 10YR 5/6 10% C M
16-24" 7.5YR 4/6 90% 7.5YR 6/1 10% D M
24-30" 5YR 5/6 95% 5YR 6/1 5% D PL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11)
Thick Dark Surtace (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: W�-W�
Texture Remarks
Loam
Clay loam
Loam
Loam
Loam
Clay
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
The soil was depleted. The water table and soil saturation were both observed near the soil
surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 1�14�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WE-UP
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdll, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, eto.�: Slight Levee Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): �1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819460 �ong: -78•843464 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Chewacla sandy loam NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
✓ Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes � No �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
The upland data point (WE-UP) is located approximately 50' northeast of and at the same elevation
as the wetland data point. The upland data point was taken on a slight levee adjacent to stream SD.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I- Depth (inches): >
Water Table Present. Yes No n Depth (inches): 24�� �
Saturation Present? Yes � Non Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the upland data point. Neither the water table
or soil saturation was observed within 24" of the soil profile.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum 25% Y FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 25% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% = Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Acer rubrum 30% Y
2. Liguidambar styrac�ua 25% Y
3. _
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
�. Asplenium platyneuron
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: WE-UP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species $�.5a�o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC FAC species x 3=
FAC FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
�B)
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
55% = Total Cover -
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5% Y FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1.Smilax rotundifolia 20% Y FAC hei ht.
2.Lonicera iaponica 15% Y FA
3.Gelsemium sempervirens 10% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
45% = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of ind
Sampling Point: WE-UP
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 6/3 100% Clay loam
3-10" 10YR 5/3 90% 10YR 6/6 10% C M Loamy clay
10-24" 10YR 6/4 80% 10YR 6/6 20% C M Sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) B Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
8 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No �
No hydric soil indicators were observed at the upland data point. From 10"-24", the concentrations
increased with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro�ectisite: Morrisville Carpenter Roadway Improvements cityicounty: Morrisville/Wake Sampling Date: 3�1�ZO16
ApplicanUOwner: TOWII Of MOffISVIII2 State: NC Sampling Point: WE-W�
Investigator(s): R. SulllVdn, J. Hartshorn (Kimley-Horn) section, Township, Range: Cedar Fork
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.�: Maintained Easement Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): � 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P �at: 35.819360 �ong: -78•843593 Datum: NAD 83
so�i nnap ur,�t rvame: Chewacla sandy loam NWI classification: N0112
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation � Soil � or Hydrolo9Y � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland WE is in a maintained sewer/stormwater easement within the floodplain of stream SD. Stream SD
is incised and mostly disconnected from the floodplain. However, a stormwater retention basin seeps and
drains directly (culvert) into the easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) �/ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surtace (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Prese�t? Yes � No I v I- Depth (inches): >
Water Table Present. Yes No n Depth (inches): 24��
Saturation Present? Yes � Non Depth (inches): >24�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Neither the water table or soil saturation was observed at the wetland data point. However, the
soils were depleted and oxidized rhizospheres were observed along living roots from 3" to 8" in the
soil profile. An upslope stormwater retention basin provides hydrology into the wetland via a culvert
connection and from hillside seepage. WE is in the disconnected floodplain of stream SD which is
deeply incised.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) % Cover Saecies? Status
�. Acer rubrum 5% Y FAC
2. Pinus taeda 5% Y FAC
3. Liguidambar styrac�ua 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
15% = Total Cover
Saalina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3�� )
�, Alnus serrulata 5% Y
2. Baccharis halimifolia 5% Y
3. _
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15� )
� , Juncus effusus
2. Rubus argutus
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
Sampling Point: WE-W�
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1��%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
rrevaience inaex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
OBL FAC species x 3=
FACW FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1�% = Total Cover
45% Y FACW
10% N FACU
�B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
55% = Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3�� ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1.Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC hei ht.
2.Lonicera iaponica 5% Y FA
3.
4.
5.
6.
1�% = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The wetland is mostly within a frequently maintained sewer/stormwater utility easement.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of ind
Sampling Point: WE-W�
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3" 7.5YR 5/4 95% 7.5YR 6/8 5% C M Clay
3-8" 10YR 6/1 90% 7.5YR 6/8 10% C PL Clay loam
8-24" 10YR 6/2 80% 10YR 5/8 20% C M Sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11)
Thick Dark Surtace (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
8 Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surtace (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
BPolyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
BUmbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes n No ❑
The soil could not be removed below 24" for analysis. The soil was disturbed in the early 2000s
during the construction of the sewer/stormwater utility easement. Neither the water table or soil
saturation was observed within 24" of the soil profile. However, the soil was moist to the touch.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0