U-5744 (Timber Drive)_JD Package

ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
September 8, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
ATTN: Eric Alsmeyer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
RE: Jurisdictional Determination Package for the following Natural Resources
Technical Report: TIP U-5744: Improvements of US 70/NG50 and Hammond
Road/Timber Drive. The study area extends from just north of the US
70/Mechanical Boulevard intersection south to just south of Buck Branch.
Mr. Alsmeyer,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes converting the
existing at-grade intersection at US 70/NG50/SR 2026 (Hammond Road)/SR 2812
(Timber Drive) to an interchange. The project is located in Garner, Wake County, NC.
Below and attached are a brief description of the project, figures depicting all features,
and appropriate forms.
On March 24 and 30, 2017, Three Oaks Engineering staff inembers, led by primary
investigator Mary Frazer, conducted a site investigation (Figure 1). Eighteen potential
jurisdictional features, twelve streams and four wetlands, were identified (Tables 1-3)
(Figure 3). NC Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification Forms
and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Stream Assessment forms are included for
each potentia] jurisdictional stream. USACE wetland delineation forms and NCDWR
wetland rating forms are included for each potential jurisdictional wetland. A JD meeting
was conducted on August 30, 2017, during which a stormwater retention basin (Pond 6)
was added, stream SL was upgraded to perennial status, wetland WC was designated as
non-jurisdictional, and wetland WF was removed. Ponds 1-6 and wetland WC are
described in the Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form (Appendix A).
Mailing Address: Telephorie: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT[ON Customer Servzce: 1-877-368-4968 1020 BIRCH R[DGE DRNE
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION RALEIGH, NC 27610
1598 MAIL SERV[CE CENTER Website: www.ncdotgov
RALEIGH, NC 27699 1598

Table 1. Water resources in the stud area.
NCDWQ Best Usage
Stream Name Map ID Index
Number Classification
Buck Branch Buck Branch 27-43-6-(1) WS-III; NSW
Unnamed Tributary (UT) 1 to Swift Creek SB 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UT2 to Swift Creek SC 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UT3 to Swift Creek SD 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UT4 to Swift Creek SE 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UTS to Swift Creek SF 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UT6 to Swift Creek SG 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
UT1 to Buck Branch SI 27-43-6-(1) WS-III; NSW
UT2 to Buck Branch SJ 27-43-6-(1) WS-III; NSW
UT3 to Buck Branch SK 27-43-6-(1) WS-III; NSW
UT4 to Buck Branch SL 27-43-6-(1) WS-III; NSW
UT7 to Swift Creek SM 27-43-5-(1.5) WS-III; NS
Table 2. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resource in the stud area.
Map ID Length Classification Compensatory River Basin
(ft.) Miti ation Re uired Buffer
Buck Branch 841 Perennial Yes Subject
SB 399 Perennial Yes Subject
SC 526 Perennial Yes Subject
SD 356 Perennial Yes Subject
SE 192 Intermittent Undetermined Subject
SF 154 Perennial Yes Subject
SG 223 Intermittent Undetermined Subject
SI 47 Intermittent Undetermined Subj ect
SJ 66 Intermittent Undeiermined Subject
SK ll7 Perennial Yes Subject
SL 288 Perennial Yes Subject
SM 178 Intermittent Undetermined Not Subject*
Total 3,387
*Stream SM does not appear on USGS topographic maps or NRCS Soil Survey Maps.
Moreover, it does not occur in a natural topographic crenulation. After a JD meeting on
August 30, 2017, it was determined that SM is not subject to Neuse River Buffer Rules.

Table 3. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the stud area.
Map Hydrologic NCDWQ Area
NCWAM Classification Wetland
ID Classification „_�,__ (ac.)
WA Headwater Forest Palustrine 24 0.08
WB Headwater Forest Palustrine 21 0.03
WD Headwater Forest Palustrine 47 0.2
WE Headwater Forest Palustrine 30 0.05
Total 0.36
*Following an August 30, 2017 JD meeting, wetland WF was removed and wetland WC
was determined to be a non jurisdictional feature.
Please let us know if you have any questions or require additional information. We
appreciate your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
Zahid Baloch, PE
Senior Project Engineer — Project Development
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
[phone]
[e-mail]
cc. Rob Ridings
NCDWR
1617 Mail Service Center, Rm 1219J
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Zahid Baloch, PE
Senior Project Engineer — Project Development
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
[phone]
[e-mail]
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Garner
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.719042°, Long. -78.638459°.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Buck Branch
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 3,387 linear feet
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent and Perennial
Wetlands: 0.36 acres
Cowardin Class: Palustrine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: n/a
Non-Tidal: n/a
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
1

❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
2

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: .
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Corps navigable waters' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, Lake
Wheeler.
0 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Soil Survey of Wake County, NC 1970
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: .
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
OPhotographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date):NC One Map 2015.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date): .
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
❑ Other information (please specify): .
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Cowardin Estimated amount Class of aquatic
Site number Latitude Longitude Class of aquatic resource resource
in review area
Buck Branch 35.713975 -78.629693 Riverine 841 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SB 35.719222 -78.641374 Riverine 3991inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SC 35.719116 -78.64086 Riverine 526 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SD 35.717771 -78.640038 Riverine 3561inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SE 35.716034 -78.640503 Riverine 192 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SF 35.713886 -78.641093 Riverine 154 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SG 35.709615 -78.64086 Riverine 223 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SI 35.713953 -78.62939 Riverine 471inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SJ 35.714083 -78.629665 Riverine 661inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SK 35.714603 -78.628620 Riverine 1171inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SL 35.715937 -78.631163 Riverine 2881inear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
SM 35.718344 -78.635979 Riverine 178 linear feet Non-section 10 -
non-tidal
WA 35.709499 -78.640863 Palustrine 0.08 acres Non-section 10 -
wetland
WB 35.713843 -78.62919 Palustrine 0.03 acres Non-section 10 -
wetland
WD 35.713742 -78.629632 Palustrine 0.2 acres Non-section 10 -
wetland
WE 35.715888 -78.628917 Palustrine 0.05 acres Non-section 10 -
wetland

w/� T � � J � �� ,� y.� � � � rs �__ y: -. - ��.T -�s•�Vt..
�'� �i}� y �' ; %"�,/ � . 3 � _ � � ' "� { r �'1.'��+ l '" � .
y 1 Y � -ti �1. ��4n '6 �! ��� ° �' '� �
^�� �(�D�}��.Sr � ��s r�■'1�,.4'�-.��;�`�' ��+ 'r;!'n� " • � ,�,,` Lr� c .. ..
� �"= y ,� '`' ,:'wR . � �', y � . � ;�,�wa� " G � . , .
- ` - "�"""'� F""�'sa��o���' � _ �'"�'.�' R��' ' `,�'�- � Ral ei h ..
. � '� ,,�, . � '' _ ,••q � 1 � �'�'
^ `-�� �a� ��� �,�`„�- �'1'a. � E. , . .. F; : F` � �
- �� � � � _ � �' _-'�i.���"
� � i� - � � LipY '�l•, a - . �y`
� � � ^$ ..� i � ti� . .. �'��' �' :� � � ' I I �
��x ? . - ' .0 � y . � � a��.; �.*�'', {y � yq�{'['�/j�' - ,�} � . �
1 X, �� L h- 1 ��. A i . . L �� I �" � � �^�.,`,�'' '�� , { 'r'� . � %+' _ ,r�"f
�', �!' � ' �' . �: ` } C,^r F'
�arr+a' ��`�►. �'� -- � � �" . � ,,�, � � ",
� i.
� �> �.'�. � ���` ���: � �� .�k � a
�' `�+,�1 �• �i, � � � . s��, , �r� ryn � � ��rrs-
� ,. �j e_ .-;,.+, �"� ��r ��� lie ' , � t� � � _ t�3 'i+
. ��'�, ��IM ;;�t�°�p�,+ti :' ! �� � -ri � ,�' 'c � � 4
1 �;. �'. •
' �" r�,- r v' ��,�, t p� ?
�"`��; + w ', y � f ."1�.wy, i� �" �,} r. �'� �r 'r�t� � � - � :I � � a � -=;,�! � C �
6Y+�'�" " � .� .=x,� . _" ..�- f�,� M. ����+.... , . � I � �
! "' �`l�'t � _ C;e �s-
T �, y �� .� �. �., � - � �, �'�' i i� � I i r, } �.:� � 49�Ci1Cf ++�c
� ��' �� � �f,,� _ ,'�Sti. e `�. k '� _ U� �,i � � '
� � �'4� �� ? �� `Y� � � l ~ - � �n �t t�; � f � �. , `�$ 1� 6
} , .'t ` x
< �;1�3 ��,\ N '�' t�'-�µ..�� .�yj; 9 ti.: - ,�� . � e ��, �� �., ; �o � � �i -i
�_ G t .� Y }'' ,� ��j. ��; +� �a � TM � .t ¢ +�� �+�
� _, � � �- � � �, y. � � � . y n^'�,�n ' �
� ! ',v 3� _ � : t'� ' ' . t ,:. � • � : .� � k '} ,�.�
� � , e � . • t � `�.�1`' � � �.�y' ���. � : r,+ "ti ��r 4"� �r�.,7� rn
,
-- � ,. �. ,
,� � tio �` ���, �� ��+ r � �^ � ,,�,�!!�� e` s � ,,f =-
� q N � .�.,s P T ^�r+ �' ' � �'� a�4-, '� ,-p `
�a� , � � - � � � 5i +` ���{�� ��', r _ �- • � ' � ?Soarces: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS,
.,
-� r� '� - .G,--� * . '� � Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
` �,r '*{ ; _,�.� �+,. �' � � = f, � � � _ , i+. � Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),
» ':' � s ' � -�,� # � �' r ',� ' ��,,," �' � ` 3� Esri Korea, Esri Thailand Ma m India,
. • .- _ �� �ti , 4 - �- � ), p Y
,, � `� _�. ,� ��,,� ., � �,��.:,, � ,��� '������!� NGCC, O OpenStreetMap contributors,
. .
� i ; ',: �j '' 4 and the GIS- User Community
�, _ •
� ` ;�i � /.� �r
: , ..cx � %Y rr �
?;+i' �r�� ^�� �r F y � �. � _'s �,�I '\ 'M�a� �lP... + ����� �i .`U��,'� "^ ����,�y�j :� �•: Y- '* - ,���;' .
��" � � �� .�' w��j�z -�ti r � � �I. �
+y, . . �� � n/C � �'��.` � � 'i�'ira. ���K I
a:..�/` 1�� .�,( �r d/Ct ... �,�>� � ;� i� - "'' - � ` �fl�i�` =
� � F �,,,�, ,�r, �'",, (�S, ```� � , `, �'kh ��" � '� `.�., �� ,�. . ti '�'� . , " r �` : _
r F' � w� \ �� %�+ * .'/ � i - y ....�'� ` *. ;�:'� .7 . -,.;;:4� � ��•
! : _��� � ,'Y �0�� f' �'�. `"�" i�� �:� - F�x,;�.' ey�g�a �'.. /�y�/ - �+/�lf%1�:� „� - -
�" I' ,1 � 6 i�.� � E � . %' �� ,, � ~ ik• . � j�, f � � � � ' 1�I7 _?t.. ,°�.1 l�";� i P� _ ,� -
� .
' x� r i . �y, � �w"`'� , .�``��, . ��, � e�
� � ���•,,, .F _r;�.�� ,�'.F°a ' "`'�, t'. , ",.�' .,a, `i � ,,� J �� `SR,,� ��,' -f-, ,,�' •�'�+. �-�,� �
� �` .. v �}{yyp�y�
.ia . i �_ yt • -,r�� . 1� � e� � S� '�4% 0 "S ��-+��'
w 4 � � ��G;� ' ", � J !i. ��. � 'q "S2 . � 1 ��' � . , s '.�l i +F� "2, 4I
M ��\ �".� ., `�-1 ! ra * � t�f'.
r ► �_ � ;� ` ;' d;, �r � _. �.. � �,, .,� y ,M� ,` � � � �t � � ; � y '� -� � �qq ,1� ,y�
k � � � �;",,�t�, r. { .. ��.r -__,�. . ,.li +I"�" � ! a . �l� r �`�` +� R r��� ._ 1 . y,,.�r� .1y ^ .� _. .9��w N '�'�.
,� .. a,�� !y k Vesta�« i`�' .��,�. � 'i tiK a . � f� �y _ p VV A '���� + f_ .__7.s�4,x�� �. .
` r � L� � � � �. ..
� � '— r � Q i iS( ' . � ��. � ..
,� y� Gtk yr ��! °� i� .,� � R , p�� ��,�,.A ' �. . � � - . � . �'.' . . r'� � ' �F; : /,� v. ~u�, '�� '.
� e ♦ �. � c�Ut � , �,� 1' � .,� �"':w
�` 1'. 'S,ti §�y}� i4"' - f'Z -Ib�''�` � w � � �� ��• - tr+� / � • - a.. � �r�`�' 7 r .r ��t � � � 4`' �t "'` _ ' s - � t .
�. '4'�\ t`�h t4��.�- ��F 4r+. ,�P_4�. �.. � ��y. ��,. 5 '���.,, s.'�' �� i ,t--} 4,�i.�'� �� �u� .� �� •.J�```�� f �'•`�'� •�
•'� , � + . � � � , ° r � � � � o� iJ`. ,�r� /ye ��
;� . ;�+��' � � � �: . ,�,� ���C�'F� 1'�s r i-, ,,�' + . � o, _ �`'`: � F °ha ��`.� �
.
..� � ��.. � �. • � ; �C I" : � ��I� � __ ni ' V �,.
� �•� 4 d ' �`"',,��',, {�'�:�" "�. ��. �. '��� _-- ,
� �, � � *� � �,. �+ct,. � y`' ` ,
+ � ��r.�'L�� : �`�^., �� Ca�ej R y.
�y �Winteriochen R ^, t��h � � �•'� _ +c w f~..= p ' k i";• �� . � , _ r � - . . ,� . �a
z� �.� � �t Ro � � . . '^� `,, � � � rt �� r. � . - �. � �Henr� a tA �
.. +v . ' � ��� � r�anhe O � , �ti... � � � -Af �. i . � � 1 �yy l . . . r _� X • �, ��i� � ,�* . ,��. � :e: �.� Ir�a ...
] 4 '� � � ,�, .
• ' �r; � .. :.�� . ,��,i s. �.... �� .�fY. .i'*, � ~a.4r . �,�'�i� �. � 1 � '� �� � � '��� . �+,1^.,r.
� �S r ? 11u , ''�,� 1 �. �+ S . 5if ' .�� .� � Y,�. �. . .. , �' `I s a � -• �.
fi > ! . � � ' ,r
� �,�a; 1 " ,�i, .i �`d��i� ���. �i,Y;� ;�s�afb�'',�.,�+�,� ��i('�'d t �. �� � � � � �w j �� . 1�''� + �
. �. c ..:Y ' � r � �,���1 ' �i@ ' � ` C r i . '"s�_'3o-«.° p " �,. . r _ .,
'�� i"� °� > ��Flet Y'' � _ � � � Susa� ,�. } � r I-. : � * - ,.— t � �,.
�r c��*fi ,��• �' �herpr„�' + _,,��:,,� Or�'. �, L•� ��- �• .� �" f � r�
�d `.`.'�p� ,-S �4 e. � �.:r ���_ � }�ya ��� �� �R; , :�V,' �. ,.� r ti�, -�. \� - �a•;'
, e������� ��� � . � aS,� 4�"'� # : �r` y , �,/..� , � L��T,;x�a��^' ,s,�� -. '� � YT�, � ; � i � � ��-"� � }.~ � .
�dw� .�.. �.. �w. � - .�.- ,M. �� ��/ y ��,��F � - �� ��� r � -p. � � . t��
,cY1 r�": �� �'"�r � 4 �� s ��5y,f� e�t't ��; � � �', A' Pr f. ,�;' '� �r*. Y S" � ;:�' pF
�� ,,'-� � ���^ � a- '`�'rt , � � ��f������ r ; Y?? .; n. � � . a pr � , �;y f � _ r "_ . "�r-f �' ` `;� "�'t '±�
'��► ,� �'��` � � �,� 1�'�ek�,�.�k � .I':'�'�;��i r' ,�'!� � ' �*„'• `� ,, ^�ti, ��^ .h �} �,•e �gar�d�',$` ,
� f � r., .� •� Y�`s ,� '� s � �l a r.-:� �.�,.;',.��
���(�.�y e R_, y�!^`��, 7.��rt �� ,�`�r� .!�'a�.� '� = E�",� �^-.w1- ,��'�M�' �:� . ;J�: � , �-� lij�;e. , r ` a . � c� :.;Z,, 4 _ "d'� :�+ ` ro yr s
� r 1��.j q� ., �' � -� : :�� y �,�`�.��, .. �; '� 4w .sy+l�
��nt Pine Ot ..� � �ag'i�ll '" +,��y `�,�+ � `� �� j'` J' � � .�� t °� i , '��� ���
�� � `
� � `F ��y �-k �, + _ /�S � � . , y � r,� ! P
I�' � �' �` � � ��-, t •,
,
, � +� .� T ., � '�,,4 < x�
� ~ ''�S� ^ �_'y,�y� �w'� �� _#�� �� O " ,`y `, � � �` j
� � c jy' k� � - .' ,. �*'"��'�. i'. C��v�.„ � l� � �Q�i .� • �� . i 4 '� �� _
1
� r a ` � � � � •J� �
' :C s. � 'r` .+�'� 'r• ;h, ` � � �
�'._ �. ' . �.'�-�. �e-� g+1� �y�! � '4� +�l .f' � :1 '-�',r y �f'�X . �' 'Q / - . : . c - ,. �"g �`�.,' � ���* 4,;� �j �.s* � ����`Y� ,�,•
.�� ��rs�.. - 'p" ,Z �� - �qn.. ' ii � i�`. y N �..e,�` 4 y _aw F 'r �hn � ro;^ ��� . `-1`�` F* . � 'fA,� �..� .
f +� }�. . ; c � �''y :� ♦ � �
!` d•'! �S� � �"~ , T �y ~ _ � ► �
X�?`v " 'J '� 1 r�,/L Horp a D��''�' �`` � ' =Y , � � !, � � .- �Cr'�� ' ,
�. _ � � k�.' _. �e .yt�."_ _e� �1d _� M1� _r �". ira s. _.y4.
-4� w� ,�, � ��� �y � �.t. �Y��'�'� � '�y�,�o✓� � x`�.r�A ,:� ra _ .. .t... ❑ }a ��.�-' �,,� �y, �� �r.�,.
a� 5 ` ��d � . « � r� �i� �,'e
����• ��v', ��.'"�`�. ��, �',r��� ' ,�i_ � �� - 1i,e _ `� Q%•�'`, r LViI l �/
, , �.��Maxwell Dr .�° :"tit� , ''� ��• �1� �'�.,4 '.` O ti �.,_ a �l f� % 3 � ""`, ^.�. ` r,•�;� � � � f,%
'��� � �, .�y�,����" �� �,:� � a�e���,'�.��i e� � - '�,- _ � a . �_��s����,2� �'���4�' ��`�" .,
� n� � � �� � .k�� f � �i �t �, �'y �ir±A�R ,�t, � ', � � � Cal'OV01710l1i � � �V .. � . �'r �..qS'�'�ri��'l!ti ^`• .^9: � -r ► `j`'1
, � rw�' �` :r � ,'i� � ti ^ � � 'a1� r J�.�""� ��' r • : � � r r. �- � �. �'h
� � �'a t f � + . w■� , ' .. , 4'"r.y, ��s"y. o �►��,. �r+� � �.�"'. ���. A, �, ,
-. �,l'. '4� ii�y. ,'i�i,�:` , E : � " ' - .P " ' � 7E '� � ,R� '� �: ^�"t .P.,' Y �.
` � � � � � �_ �.: . �
y�". t �rY--�� �'�.3� s �F t�� +'ts � � b�+h .:..� � r $. rM . �. ,1 _ � :.e '� �,���..,�� , � . ;* M ����� ��� .! �;
i�, .�� a�, � ir_�� � 4�t i�..� ��`.:�!� '(�I_ �.`iyyr f�`+�t'i _ � e„ @ � �i���� �` � ^ �,�'.. �..3r �'�` � r. `"` � ��;
;t'`•� r
+,� y��+��.'�,�"�' ��,'�! ,�,,, ` _�' Cindy Dr , � �'��'S�`. ! I. _� �� ,r � ,,:..¢ � 3.",�',� � �' ,�' ,� 'Faye Dr�
,,��- ��.�l��r, . �'� - �,i'*'�:.�� "' _ '. _ .� '��'� F: �, �,`� . ,��,�,.,� �r
t �_ �r _ �. �_� � �t� �i i .
.f' �� -+' ,. , 6 '"'Mr '"k,� i � 'sA � Il� •� `�'' �, -. �` ,
,� �s ��`�,, w'
� � S . , i � 1� „� � 'fi ,,
� . `. �� -� ' �� � €� r .�.
'y�� •�...,= ! t � - +�W � 4 � a �' . � 4� Ylti . yb ti: '�'"�M �� i � � -� y >. ,� 7 . 'C � �� � Y �� .
_"R'' # : n�tih��� �'I.�i'.' _:-.�-,�'r°� �� � �:"�� i��t�. 7 �� ' � , ' . . �k� + .r{ �• rk'.#' P ��:�., k pr� ,: o ,� � �, . r
; , [ ,
'� ,. ... �� s,�Grovemont Rd ' •�F � :�,, ,,� ,r: 'IZ � �\�n � ��3"--.',Royal Oa _ �'.as�� - � y ' =�.
.�. ' -, , �,P �' =, d ry a� 7� � I � - ' �� . 'r` �,t _ ,� � a- �`�l:�%k� -, d e Rd' ����r Rd ��
� s ,�, �`,� in,,�" ,� "- , - �. n '� _ � i� ��� �
` '�, " '���' 'y, �:,►• fv` - l-�` r'' r- ' Forest R� g i * ,��`� � `� � �
k �� - � t
�;��. _ ����,���� �+��,��� . , W �. �, �� ,r .',r � h � ; � ,� �� �,�_ � � �- � }-� .�. :�����-
���:��f ., a� `2� "r �:� i, ,' � � � � "��.� '; Q� sA�..I` � r-�1 ��� ; ��� h �'-`_i.
. �� t > ` �,- . ��- '' ��,. t � ' ` ry �w 1 - c�i !- . f� � a ' k � � � +--f
: ' � � �,� i r�. .r°j � ��``' �: ..
� x'�SR#2798 � �i�. , -... d • � T+`'. �'' '1 ."�' �i ` � � " * 1k .�� '�' ' ,� � o.�y �' ^a rr t � ,�°`!% '"w� v '. ,�, �j, F-•�; .
i' � . �r ,n�' . ���Valley St'"�� � � �,-�,\ t'���,'•..�Q :/"= Ik�'�+ ���v'� ,� �� ew,":
— -- � �� tt��i�Ranch Fa'rm�` � � . �^ y�. � ",�'S�� �_� � �L�`��� .�, �� - +' � -
�; �r'r.ft=, Rd � t � Ya+' '+ �� -�.r.. p..t�e �� � ° � . i �'_ •'�w`?'� � ,� `Rr-: t�'�, ' � —� �'�
' {� �.'',],a t }� ' i1 �' s� �� A `� M ' R.' �'1�`, - r ` A { -. ,� �z� �_ � � . � . . i
� • 1 :' Y'' �4,}� ^"W • s}�y �L�� � 1•� .'�.•f ' ,��, .. '_ . � . �
� � aS �, t�., . �`�� � � "� -7''� �� �! r ` ' • ��« � � �� E' �. ,�` e���� �
�!` +f�c.'� �,` ".,,�'�^���r. ' ua.: ��' ; "� � �..,�; ' " `;, ;� �4,_ �,1���, wti ,� Spring�� ��'..
• � ' �- � , y� `` }�' ��1�% . ' _` � �,; � f, 4 ,,, ��� i; ` , �° , , ,, ,'� yA' T� ,:'h� ` ' w ' ;� ���':
� , � Pme Ave�" � � � � �� '��
� t � � �,.
L.� � ��`i�� ��*�5 �•�,�� .+ �f . i� *i.e���T ry-�yy'y,f !- �_ ` � �� i, �'`Sti�#$ 4 p �4 „r� ; °
_ � _ �, � ,� � `" �_'{ '.0 y .` /� .� '�.'t� ' �, `� J � F'^'� ��` 1�i'��%�'" T�`�e ��i"� E` ;� '''`L`�, �� e
f �5 �N, �, r ��� ' 'F . . ��� f
,�`., '�� .f r��'` $ ;, . ��i�ly�r�;��»�'i�'� r _'�- 6�I�'+ �z ��1'Ld �'�� ��w�� �. # _:j' ��Z
� Study Area � �� � ��� , � �':� r , ,' ,� ` r,�?�`y " '�, M ' ��'� � ,:� _,�``-�r�� �'�` � ; y �; ►
� � T �. a �_'�. �� "'` +� � �, . �
„ �,"�F t, r a ;e r- �, r�� �t�'';y��� ��'�;r-f-�', 3- ,�, � � �'� � �,
USGS NHD Streams '`�?'� '�,'` ���,' *` ` � `� � Ford Gates Dr �,., - �``� .:-"�.. :�►�_��;, `,.��� ��- r- � � ��a�
. q ;�. �, �'�"�i�� �f'�s�,���Q'��F � �a `���.��,, " *�'�'.R"�[!R ���,�s,�,�,,r�_' q' , '""rr+r�� I"
er � �, . '
, ���1 [. {,�����%1wrr�� ,� ,ti� 1� �;oVR�d+ 4 � -"�.. -��. 'y ,� �� x "_�'l��2`��� Y r-�
O "� `
Roads .� �- ,Rr ¢ �� �" •` :� :1, � � s � R .`,�'o/ling Ridge,Cir�:�",� '� ��:� �'�µ�.�� �,�
. k '� ' F�" c ' �[ daa'it` .'a /' � `;� ���
»�k �� r � ,{ � t
,� 4 y �sr, ir' � '•T�� +M' f ,. � �� �4t� �' `� ""�,�9C,�������`°�`�' '�}.6 �� • � "' y
� c horn Rd _ •e � ,N�OneMap �NC�Center fo'rnGe�ographic,..Information�ndwA•nalysis,fN,C,91 Board �
_ _ � k ���' �._ �,,qoa.��vR� �
�' y � � � �1
Prepared For:
o� �aoRry ��.,
; �,`� '�'v' ,.
,�� �ti�,
;�� g1
� � k
I�� � �
;�, �r
`��yh� ���;'
�. � � ,.
,,,Fj�rOFTF�F*^i��-4 ,
Improvements of US 70/NC 50,
Hammond Road (SR 2026), and
Timber Drive (SR 2812): TIP: U-5744
Vicinity Map
Wake County, North Carolina
Date:
April 2017
Scale 0 325 650 Feet
I I I
Job No.:
17-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
ETM MEF
Figure

�•,�� ` �� � � '� �5 t �at'• {`y ��. � � �l
_ � � h � # � � II_ � � � � �� t v � `�,� y `��.,a }} 4 � �- -� `� j. '�.� �.. _ M1� . '. � � r..
^� � '•ti � _. — �" � � +� � ',ti �1 � � r� f 't .� ^--.. � .
r � r �, £ � y k f � ��~ ..- ra f � . .
� _ � � £. } �1 `� � } �� � � �
� ' � �' � • �' � = r'� { � � � i ,� �� '��" � I � ` � - �� �', ��._
d � � �� � � r 4 ' 1 � � � � �� `i -- t ��--�_�
' - 'r � ��rr�� j"% '_"i � ? �_� � �J r � T1'jlOr1 Rd �,�� � i j - C�^•yA
..� ��' .r f � � ! � L 5 � � .� f f i � . t�x , . � . .. � �� y t �
� • ' - aF f , p 1 � � +' rr-,� ' � � r�r ' ,-�._ _ ��'�.i ��� y `^ � y, � q.
'i` _ - fr ,I� � �r � y_ 1' ,� .
� .'�L' -� ;�l +� s ��,1'f; � � w � � �` , � �� I{ � ,T �1 � 4� � � `��y� e, �j '���' 4f -'
' � �` �` r � � � ` C� �� � � .. _ 1�
��'-. �,,�-._ -� � �- ,+'r � ��y �,� P ,� j� .� �� l • `�'h �..7F� + � •��,,� '� �1 `` ..� 'r-.�,_ ��
_ i� � lr��� � � ( r'' ' � { 'r� ''` "', j
� ', ,, - € i � `' '" � • I i� �f� rr fi � � � �� �*.� '.°, �
_ �� � � .����`�, r � � �` � � � �..___�•� �r � �� �, �+ ~�, 1d� - --- � - �
' } f� � �'�� `".",.4 � � �r�'' �� � � t _ �� � � tr+ � �jj f+..�. ��.I �Y �� i �r `` ' f..
� { � �{� � �J
T i � ..�;� � � ry'� �� f �� � ` d4 � � r 1 ��
� I �. 1 f ' � �f � � }� � �f,�+ �[ !`e � � � � . �'� `� � J
,. - r ! %r � t � ! • �, ' ! f .+�f F � /'d,�.,. � � � 1! � .� Y 1, �
�D � � S � � I � `� / +� f` � �� - �h '�,� `+-.�+��,."` f } '� __ _ °
� 3�, �. � ��` � { � 4 { �s � �� � - _ t �� � � �
, G�. d ' 3i. y � 1'�� k� �� ,�'' � i,l �r � '' � X f ,r " r �+� _: ���� '�' f� • � ' °'tii ��'' 3� �,,, f ' r � -
� �
� �� �o� ����r �� ! ;! �� '•�' *, .i'�-.�' �� ��.�—�,� - � ,..,4 °-"
� , N, , � � � � � .•—' ,� ..�' '� =
� � � 4�
Q`D� � � �'" # � _ ��` � �,��jy�� �� r M
� r i `'"� 4� .,� �, � ti S � -.fi �+� i, �I `� { ,� s -
� ��� -- � � �� � � � ~ �
. .� � , � r r ,~�`" � .1 ;�
_ - - .� � � ,: � _,.�.-� r.'� j
� � . �_
. .
i f ti � s ,� �
+ ,,'y • ,` 1 � .. ��ql L . `� � i 4 { r - _ r,
tije „r � � ,� A'.� � -.., � } -
��` ,'t � _ � , _� � ri � � r �1 `�. �hah �`' �'' �.1
�+ :±�� y,�,�.. " k+ � � � Ore'/��, # � 'ca�Ct �'+, `�" � �k � ' f`� ' ` n I
GS � � �%l0 I' � I ,s i-. �. . � `',�� � � ■ �:f �} r'�.. nA"1 �''�f R
� j� �� ` ~ ` T `+�"` _ _ 'k � � `h. r � 4. i S � 'f, �� "� � 1
� i .� F��! � � �r ' :a � �' �r # *r '� 'a ,� �� ' �� ��" �T � �
��r � �` / �'�' ,. ` li 7 � 5 } � � '1� �' `S . ._- S ''� . � �� �- �•' � I
� r �`~�. � � �` *#�� ` � i 1 t, - � R,��S? ; i � -,�� ''.
r�''� ,� � � �a . � � �r * � ! �� � � � '� � � - - � -,. �
r * ��f , �' ��1_P # "�.� " � �" f __ "'� �
+ � S � * f'� + rl ! f �� $ ""+ti/r� 4 �' � �
�"� * � ,� * � Vesta pr � � '. { ,, � �j ,� �i �� + � - � i�'
' �� � i �y - �J ■ � ■ 1 i � � � '� - k �v. , ` _ � '#� �YL .� , j
� � } � �� �'�#* �' � �y k �,fl y �� Ut� * "� � L �,a ,� � � �Y.
� ���-- � '� �' �' _ �-� � n � '� � • _ - .
,� 'y �'t ti � '��-� � � �a � � �y � '' �� y - r � ''' ti".-� ' �f° � �' .i � 4 +►� MeOha �r'{ �'�;
,� r � _-� � '`'` __ . � ���,o
Rd , � r � � ,Rir ] ti '� h%c
� # �� � .-'�, w '� +� a�ej�a ,Y ' �''��
,* Winterlochen * , , �y dr�` �' � ��-' ,
i .5 � � � � � `� j' f � Hen►Y Rd*r. � , ���,: �i� "
�+` �` �
��, ' � '4� 7 �"�� �oxdryj�e�r� � ilM � �. i,.-' � �T -' � �� *.� i ''.,� + # •
�+� ��� • ,� � �.-' F y -• � � �lT� � � �
�y s # i? - �'�",r� � �",,'- ��y ; �!' t�' � �`
� #'' � * '` r.r ., � � � ;
. ,.,,+�rt''.- ' _ `•. �+ � �� �' . rf i��� a *S e
�,
l, i� Fletc� ,� �+ SuSary,� �. ��_ - -ti �� �, � �4 � 4
her`pr� � � �r � -r��� y�- ''•�,� � � � +,
�,x ` : ; � t"�. +' :; �''i� � � " s�, �� z,. �
i' � J *� �`+ : � � , ti '� '�� �
4 1 ,r t a�,� Leata �.y,• '� � ; � t„ ;
* # e # . � ��`r � ,_ � r, � � � ••-�. i • + a �La- - !
�ti .�� � ,,�� t � �•' � �- ��� , a�gaa. --
"1Y _.4� J �' '�Id � � �M • �, f f � ' # ;�� � a t � ��e '`� '�`�
� � 'a 1
�e w � �rY � tr"`�1 s �+ � G �� +' '` �i
� ent Pine Ot ,� Aj�'. � 'w � , f � � i � � �. ' �''�ti.,,
f � � � �/ � y � .' �. �4... '! � ' � .� ¢. �f l # � -.. �
�" p � _ , •,�� ��'f" 4 '�---., R ` , a`, �"-� `�--, `1� ' #r ti
�` `"�� �, F �, ! �,� 'y t �i "t' ' � � ,.,'"� t
f * � f rtT� � ,�,. -LH _ � � ,; � � �.� � - .;� 4�
{� � ��,� �,± 4 ,'' � . � F o�neland pr � � �� � � J �� �. s ���c, �`
� -,.,� -^� r c � '--`_
, � 1 � � � �"� '` ` � . �`"�, �� � � � 0 ,�r �j _ } � �t :
f �'�.�s--�- s^+� : �-- - �4 ; '� i �.. e • r �: � �' � � i. + � J4
` t�' -' . � '� '"` � i� ` .�: .�...�,-�-` � � � ,�' _
Maxwell Dr� - O, r" � `Q r' .�--^-'`
+ � � * � y� ' 1c�`e��'d ' � � -•1� �.r. � ,� _� 3 � .�,e. ; • � y� r�--•� �
��. �` _ _ �,�"'f� �� �� - Ga � r Grovemont � � '�• �° �+�, �� � � 04 � � i� � r
� f ' I,�i * � t �.,�� � � _ - - " ° - r+ �'
� . O
�
�] � �� � 1,� � � ' � �.�'�,, L r, � - - - -- - ; r4 i3 « �,� . �
,+ ,�y .
`� ��`�� r� � � � M � � � 'f � ��j���} r + �:, �
�� �1 � f � + �, -•�" � �., ' . e +,� � ,�`, � � -.,�; �
� .'� r-� �f , r - Cindy Dr�, _ - - � � ' *�� � a � � � +� Faye Dr
f S !� �' '�- !- •� �r � +'� . � + Xp� � � �F l'�
1� f� �' �• � { / ��� ' •. ' �' ' �
( 4 f _ -_ +� � r •,,`4 _ r f,� � r �+ M �'� , e � �
4 ' ' '� ..
i���� �_�s �' 4. �; Grovemont Rd' � s� r.r � � � .?� �' Royal Oak �r r�, !'-�` s� , �■ L
f t'r � s� t� i r. �OrRd, ,Y •f ■
� �`�' N __"'� `-!.� � ■ A, �Zr--r. r 1� - � , � ---- ' s ,- s � d e Rd ,• r
- - �'s "�. . � � a � � y � - �ForestR� g _. L .--+
� �~ � P .� a. A�� n� 1! k.
� �f �,. �' ` ' ,;� � � t��-��' Qi '� � � _ ■ _ r
> _ _ �'�-� '',� '�-.- ,� 4 �� I ' ,r ■ `� r s -�i+,
$R#27 8 � 11� Y '�~ �� r' i +� `'� � ! � .c� tr e y` * ''^�� f � � I '�
t �- �`i-- Valley.St �.'� ,r �_,, � �y �'�„�_ � � '�� �+ *
�'� � � �l'4l 9i Y q„� � � � �
�, K' ■ --.# Ranch Farm Rd� � y ��; �-,� � � ''"G _ ' � �,, 1 a �„
�' � �. - �����_ � f, '� �titr r ''�� �` j ��`�t"Ti� `• `�� � � ,-+�t' w a M �►�. � � ,�� � M ■ � �
`��,� r i ` �� O
�``�, - -. t � � : 1e f `4�' � - '+ � _ � "''-� � � Spring��e �`
'��. �� �'ilE . �� r • , Pine Ave � �'- � * - --- . y ; _ _ r_� ,••
., , - ,�,,,,,.� _
. __ ,
�
�� . _ r
_
.
,. ._� , �' Y _� ` . . i'�.;; �p � vc � �_
y '� � �
s -, . �
�y. Wk� F./' _ ��� Y t t : i� � t �.� � � ��.J' $ �. . � R _
1 li- � i= � � '� '�� .r. � r'� '� 4
1 .� r r +� '�+ �'` ,� � . � � i. � v � „µ � f}' �Y _ �—"'� � '' . f
J ' ��� ,� '� �� F ��. � !� � � • il �
� Study Area _ � �; .��` , .{� ' ; r � � � #' , � � s
�:�'
�, , � � `, ,', � � �a � � � � # +�'� „.# � - +► } t,
- � •,�r �, ; y� � ! �� , �„ � . , { r �. �;•' �
USGS NHD Streams " f a -r'' Ford Gates Dr, � w� a � � - �{��«
� ,1 � • +
��•�•r�� O � �'�� '��+ � o �� , * � s a i� �, �r'~r��, +
Roads � � a � ►���,�� � .c ��,� RO/ling Ridge Cir e � � �� �
' ' , � � r� "� -� � c-'�i 9� w�.� r "i`- • i -.` ir-'�'� "� ■ .f � r
`: _ __ �+ �'' �` `- �' �"' � 'r-_ J- - - �•
�. + ■ . �' �,• .r'��khorn Rd- � ~t ;, 5; m �1 ��Meadow Rd. s - �-'� �
rr �
+��q c Prepared For:
�1'��j111�L�'�/� 0� NORry ���* .
'@' � ',� � � �� g,,
� � * � k �".
`V
� r, � I��� � �
,�, �r
�
� � �� �. �h�F ���, �
�• �� ] i'1 k�� �" Np OF T F� A���-4O�
Improvements of US 70/NC 50,
Hammond Road (SR 2026), and
Timber Drive (SR 2812): TIP: U-5744
USGS Topo Map
Wake County, North Carolina
Date:
April 2017
Scale 0 325 650 Feet
I I I
Job No.:
17-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
ETM MEF
Figure

' .._ .�� '� � ' a aa-. � ? -• rk �rry n� . . ' _ ''T..�II
M1
t, ' �4a � „ — � ,wf,,. � _ r' � � �'r,� ���� � �"t . - ` . .
.
,�.. . � - ��--,� , �<>�,' � � � j
� � � ,�r �,— a � T71 -
._ _ 9
1� C� '�.�1 1 ■ � .. t �; - � . � .1 �� Y �y.. � �
�� F ,�+� .. �Fwii;t _,•^N �� �1 «� � 1 i . WE � '�' f
� �_ � - .. ��, �y, �+,� �- ^ � .'�' , -�d� � ,� .. ``� 0 100 200 Feet ,� � `r,;.�
...- _ - "_ �'� � '.`���' _; r - _ �" � � � i' �^ r,� . w ' �,�. ,�
- - `�' n'� L %^" :�.T ' . �i�., - .���� `" �y�
, �S, �
" �` r ,p/� . ��Q � ,y�.}t e �, � . �.� �, 1 � .�
i=:_ �. � '�oi �a� ��' _9 '� -•. �� . . � .
+ '� _ -�
- • .. � ..p , � "� �
�� : � � � ' ' #� " _ i , alS .. ,�. -- �,s } c' ,
� : - � � .., ) ,s� +`�i ,i r
� F , . . , ,
_. f .
� r� Si �'a.,s-�}.1�' -� _$� , • ry�. _ 7 ,.�& `}s� � '� � .Y
r + -' • ' �
�
, . _.. � .. . _ ���
'� r . �'y�.+� +a,.., �.f 7 ia<t�n: ("`� � . . • � '- rr�.. _ � .� � . t �" .
� , - A� i
'T" � p • j� .; . r iN : M�, � "�, �'' ��_., ,
� 4 � ��� :. `t �i � ` r} � . '" w"�+' j , i :i. _ 1 " , ■ ��"� �� �
v , � �' 'tr..��%-� � � :i r, . ;y _ ,.` 'r � . �`„
»�
, -
� �.u,+►,.�� .�.� a..� �' � � t p+ , _
+ `.
r . .
r , i s �
.
.. q, '� r� + R- ..p' ��i � f t+a f ` .t f �,1 � ,'��,. '��� ` � � ` �'
�=a � �LiM ` � � -..���y,. � J�1�t����tV ' � � J� � ,,..y� � ',(' 'd - �r � � � 1 ��� 4 "�' '�•�'1 1 � � ���� �1:y � 14.. -
�p 4� ,.'"i'w ��, � �A^ - - �•r�;. . � y ,r..,�,«."v i � a. "'�ei''�. � z ��� - 1 �
� ��p -n ., 4 ,� �� ; t .� ' „r�' `� � :I ! "' -1,� � i 'e� � � j �r .�± ��n'� -"i���`�" � �'�', e�, -
N`l�� ..v t ��q,�. ��..--.� � '�;i ....��E� 'A v, p..+� 1�'=q.
� . � `�lm,�N ._�-ar-'' ; r 1e4. "",l� � 7'�. . •i,� ' ��at, �� �„ s �" 1 �-� �. X'�., � J,ap _ � ��,,,i'.� �
� m �z { +� * � r - � ,,{ } �'� �� `�► � '� ; � r .r � ti �6�:� � ;�; r' +d �: r � 1
"� ` r,� � .,�: - '�,�" � ��,; ='�,,� a� �`ro �'
, w � �.�. _ � k ,,�. Y .:� !� �I - yn� �
t �.1,2. �O ���'_`. ..���A ��.. - = � �.r ,�' �h � �.��� .:�Tq . < �� - - w'�`N ��� �. � ,�w. � � �,y�'t; ^ih
�j . � � O �,� w � � .t.'� . �. 9T ' �,� �I., m � ,;,X aY � � �T� '1. ..
� R � � �f � � u _� __ Y' . x ..�; . ...: . � . --- �i`•:.. �� �� - � ,� � �:� ;
.
, _
�� � �H; ��� �-� i: 4� i.���.,�if` 1' 'sr+S.+. ^A. ^` �'�* �Y�3 } � . ���`�� � t���
-�� ( f � rL � % �.��� � r � il � � .��� �s�� T� '� �� k_ � '� �� w�� t w�.., � 4 ��'.` � ^,
� `� �' ., � ,v ' � L �,�` ; s �i �`� �
- � � - _ - r � � ► - . �' � � , � � '' �' '`, "' ,.- �:-.. � �,...� ,. � �
. �yyjj�� y,�� 1�y��
,
�;� � �.. � �� '�� r i�, r , , �" ���
. 1 } � �f '�I Y L Y1 r �.,'� �'1� '11.4� � "I � tLl.�1� •
�% � `a�w r �• "; �'r!`-� �' "� L': 1� �.'���'+i ' + `g , * BuCk BrBnCh �� `�� �� � ;SK w� �` F
.r /I �,- �, "' 8 i .,�.�:'��� I ��,?.. s`�_ � ti �� a��� �;� ����� •
y t�. I! �I' ; � t�. u,^ �t1, `�i '�
' g..Y . \ � r�• �� �4-`+ � r. _ � ' 7�l'�.. . +• v j �-•�'�+� �o' � �.I°q.:"*-�'�
.
r \ -
\ t
_.
....- r4�'. a`� \ kwv� � . �. L�" � � _i ' � f�' � , �' �' #,(` �...�_S� . ' i� ,.4 �•
�� . . \� \ � '��• ���+r'�Jr }' �, .� �z� '�;�.� �� �.��h. � � '.Ft r`+ ���'' F
- - � -- _a 3. !Y� tt „ w ��' ,;�1, , , �r i w{4' A���
- . - • �', �
.. .. • • -
� . � �. � ` ty ' . ' ' * ��` � �. ,. ,., x� �,e, "�" ' V�/ g F 'Fr�
._ _ . ,
,
, _
- �II '.. �= Y: � a, A � t r���, �
_, . _ . i
. . �
,' ,
� �,
�+� �R..�i' `�`� j F�� '` O�a/� ,tk � C 1 i
_
' -
,
_ _ � . . "�_ •�� �_ _ ���
,
,
,� - �_ . . .. . . "
t
-. ' .; _ ,, y ,, . , „ � '��y�, -e. � ,� �`'• `'..,e� � c:'�°� ��-�`1 ; G
� � �" ` �,��
� a �, Y • `I , r ' � ° °,.
..r '� . � �~'' Y �i. '"�`'� : �% '� ;e.. h n��d/✓C>; ,,;�t �#� e,� � �: �' 7� S1,' '�� �' i ,
�
- ^ �.: �� r � � tr' t- i T i t h'�. ,
'� O ' -f- '/�, � '� ��jc ( , �W � � +.
`- '�i.y� ` .� �`:�i�<i`���w e�e~e- - r �� ��� �i" (� � x. ��WD!^ Pond6� ,
� � r�t .�% ,� ; � - `�" F'Ond 1 ��' `���, •� � n, . �� � ,S'.��4��� it � � � {� �A.�� . .�`.i1C" �- . :,
:� r �w ,� _ �� � a '. ° , . 7�� '�' ` �� ! ��` R�`q�s ,� �. ,' y1� � �» �, �i� - +,
• y � � � }�, � , + . ti . y ; �� , ' � , �
, j.�. � J
t - �-.. P � • � �Y � ti �. � � '7� _ � `i 1� 'i r4��'��y� 1 � ��� 4 ('� • �
.4. 4 . .i: �l x� " it. � . irs , _ T r � J � 1. � ... . �: ♦
, . �, � � �" `. � .-, . #"'.Pond 5 �� �. � ,� ' . • d`�� '"' ' t3 .
..
„+r � a,� �j , '��j 4 �� *� l �,,f' � �,
, , � • .- �y,+-- , : T �`Ml / �_j �If � : � `� ' � _ ! � `•'� �ys,'�i _.��If-� �!. ��: �+i e`�. X *
j:+b ^�r- ��Lr � '�� � ,�� , . ;irY �''kf..;��.��• ` i''�;.... � � "'.•���`%,''+,` ,� �� ` E� � • d .�'. . ,,_ Y... ._�.,
f; � ' . + � ��� �� *� . �� � � � ",� �.. .�+,;��,�„�`„� a. � . - e .� '�" -
,.,. ` �"�,� '�4°� �� 9�� ''�� . � � B � '�'�`�ti � �';�, � ��� � � ``,�. '"•n ` � � . r.f�y �
'# � �r - , ` •�Ije �� ra . '` � � '�,� (o° t . �4 �; rr
y�� WA Sf rr , , �;,1 r � � �; '+�,,
'� y ;J� l� .�.�� •�. y�_ . aQ�.�� .a ;f;f� r,.�. �� ` _ I �..�•.j�"'�`.r ,, ti�� � J �
,� � y �'� Yk� e't -'j•�. _ * 'yf� � m'1� :. . .,2 ..:Y �,� �- �WJM�'�:�� 4. � ��'.`� r. .t
1 R � .y� 1�„1� � x:;
-� i ' 1 r� � : � . f' 7ig F . , .
a. �` ri, �� ti .� � � '� � !9� ���SC��.�� � ' Pond 4 , _ ` � .:Henr� -- - "' � � .�
. �,
- � . , Aj �� ;��r SD� � �� � � r. �,
.
y1 � • � �. . � �1 1 �. �'1 ' • . ' . I 1% Y�4 �{� � "�D� i � i � . .k` . _ � � ' �'L � y 5 � .. � •
�� } � �f P s � .„ � ,,.� �. �' �`�'•d
3 �"l �'' * 1 ` S ��•?� �' .\ � °�,k}�,. SM �' M1'��'; r , �.,ti"'i�r' I
� ' � `', �'; � � � � #� � �: � �r� ` '�-'"�'" �f:;...Y . �
_ � . ���-' � v.� � �`�`. � � � ,' , � "� � ^ Y,,�R` � f� , �l�., �1
�• � , � ' • ` - , �'`"�., � .
E , 4 .�� 4 _ '�` _� iS�sa �• �' ,. / Pond3 � x� , ��� �� '` f i/
,��r - '� � � � �f>: : '; a - , �; �n' n Dr • ��, � , ,�� � l .. , _ — iF o ��
.. � � �� . _ y � � � �-' ] �
;� ' � , .-r s , .
� � . ` �i r t , ' . i--.�. � � ' � ` W E' F
4 �,," ��� �
a� r� .� �� �,��wy, ` ` l' r i j+ � p.'' =� � '�'■,k ''�rr� �`•M�
� t, � � " ���,� .�� � '�� p�, t i�,�.� �� //; , � r d' ;t. i/S\;,. t y �
� _ y
�� . � ��-t. � �U .„ � ��^ .`""���� �a�.Dr '�����H.; � .,°•, ; �� ,Oa-�s�'*��- r.� �� � ( �R
�• , ; � '!�1t '� . ,� . �, 1+.. , .:E, .ci„� �� a. , ..- . {� �� w.�
; s iiiA
!1 ` r'� � �E �c .. � �� y�,1 � P�.v� `SL ���� : .. .' ► f R
r�� - .
��" r y ya'y 0�
� ����,� �► .� �� �-��{ - 9.�� �r �• � , t ,�.� , � L sK . �>t .r
.'�� ' ' i �
�� ,.dl'. , - �° �"` � a� �, �,� .r, i � � � , � � �-�' 3' ' ' , —a�, �` . , . ` 'L
4 � 0 50 100 Feet "` ;� �' " r�- sF ' y " '+' . * 'a' ��_"Buck Branch, ._ , .
,, `�-,� �-+�' "'}- ' --� ` ti ���°��!„'�FL�� ��� . WB� �
J i�° + , t.�h � 7 r ,,,, - . .. � y. £ .} � , a �
t�_q,�x � � I I r, �,.P.a , . "C, : �' .� � 7��ea<9 ,��� SJ�' f,
. '��j�'
v. . -- ;,, if 1� � � ... »;:' ' .,, ► '� / ' Pond 6 � .'i+, J
.� �� �,,_ � "Horrielanclep .� �•� ,Pond 2 � w �_ .��.\ /�� y t x.
,� �-. a r � � � .� � � Y � �
V ��'� ��'' - _ � . ,�� •. �f F - _ �' . ' �a - j � ���� '
' � � � � ' • : 3 V. Z� �. ". �r _. ' k. � ,' s 4` ' , � ',` L � � . �p. � 4 ,�s f _ ..� /" .
�?`• N �#yL -Q
��" + X�',� iS � � � ��� .� �`•�,,y j �� ,�. ' � d �`} ��;.��r�
i ; i �� ,R'� �� • ��s� :e��0 � ,:1��"� ��,.�� � °' — . ' �� f --.� - -' � +"'�' �' > „ WpWC r"`
t y .� _ , !h. �'��k r,,,� , `'att` �y4, . , y + .: � ,3 �l t r '`�
__ .±4�.t., - .jt.;�..�.�,s.�;'°`�; �' ? ��"�':"'� .r�� � RG - ='� �, . � ' � '�`� � � r �..''-- - ������ " - t?h.. f c,,'�"�"�` y`�
.p � y _
sas,'�` 1� .e ��-` •l �'1 .5: s pt+z . a�il ` ,t.� . �,.. � - y �r�� � � � Grovemont . •-.�r' ;',*" .`'r „$���'�P � r "' f: � C' Y� �.��f�,
�,. .aJ3 . - - ..
�'� �� � C��. "�'�; ,� � '� r . �i . . - ". � 0 200 400 Feet � � �: ,�,��r ,� "�+; �
, ��, j� y �,' 'f�A,� �' r d��"" `..' ��",,� � �-. i'jd ���•�� �'i� �.
� K R • t� • i �� .�r� �;� , , � I � '.'', v
t
y;� x. �� �"L-: '� - - . � : � ' � ' ��i ��
�v i"�+- „��i- , �� � i. F`S.` .n'"t`�
rt �,;� . ;���� :, �t ._..�:—•,'�' Cindy�'Dr � .r�rr. o �' �,�k, ��
,
V �' � .
�, � . : �
�r'� �r�t;��-�.s , _�� .- - t v. } t� � J, _4 " �� � . . � -�"�i� W� �ye-pr;.
yP',1 � '2" P s'L t � L''i ��� �� �..y�`s: na � �� - .. . ��u. ���� � r O � ,�
E. � �s r- , � • 4r .�. �` r - 5 � o �
+`'�' t(�` �� ''v �1..' " *� '; ♦ y� ia�7t` a .�, ` r r i : 4� �' �t .�'i'
k�' , � a„�r t �Q °1,�a, y • �.� [r .w°'�L� �+"'' �t , WA� �' .�� P .n �i�� � , 21��ak��r O b/.k m �i { � ; w_
_'� . +� �.,'s� ,� fY, .� �. �i�"�'�1� � F'° �;� - � ,�� "a , ` i , ! ' oY _ , �4. Rd'�- ' ��
� ��y�.y� . �� GroVemont� qRd =' '�. � ' W�q, t ��F ��1��j'.p+'[�
t6 �* �' Rw` � � f�il '� r S.. V�'I �� �� +Y. � �e A ;; SG 'r, * � - . - ��J� �Y� � �s f � �"��� '�j,{�' R'. �*
r
�+�T ��cn ':•'� ,�. _��'. -,v� •.�" ,�;�'��'��'� ' « � n ge1R ;,..�r *ssy `''-�
,�, _ � y. �, �, r�• stRid - � , .
4 , �,- '' t tit �y�'� � ��:���M ♦�`�",. ��� _ .. �;� "'�� !! . � .s�� "lr
�� . �k i t � .�
.
, ' _, �
� ; `. i /� N �- . .�r ��SM� ,w r: n � IIi�
� `�� �r • ° � � { a �. � Y �� � '-.� . ��, ��� �
�s;: '�:r > _ .��h �4 , 5 / s � � � �= � ,,r ��y '�
' �` � � ,'+�r'r'''A �i !" �P ) .,.a a ` iti.,''�` �#'� � +�� � � �� � '��� _ �y � � �.a±�-i� "$ r„� .
Iley St' �,� • ` ,� � _ „fc�� � �, ," °� .�- +k.;3(�`,
� Study Area � 9 • � �,`�; s �.,_ � .n � r�'; � + � ''_•y�'`
ie�.-� � « �+' ;. � ;�._ 9 es r,./ ��a � ��. . � g �
� Potential Wetland �r ���, �,�` i �, ,�� f :;,, t,, Ka . . �� \ � �a` ����� � �v.� ..� . ,�- �
-,� �f �'� '�'`..
�It �` '1�+�11��`��. ' �� .' '�,f'� � F�'.� .�T 1. /r � .., �` wr3- � {
V2 ' ' � �� . ,U, '7 p�� �� �i,;.� 0 r � � . P -�
Potential Perennial Stream � ��ey,�,� � ��'�' � "_ ; x � �,�r,�-�-��,, � ,�, f ;� � *��; ' '� �.��� �,� M%������,;- � .
j, a� � : p�, � �'': �j` ' ' d ��i '~ ' �''�,� `� H� R�,'�_ ��11 , � 1`_ ; � `` . �' .
Potential Intermittent Stream �� �+� _� �� ' `� � °�':`'��r'� '``��'� S �r ' :AA '"'�� "'�-�"� y w
� y . a +d` �' r- pri �,t X'� �_1
,�. � r �: .
", �o �' ��� ' 9 ���a l`t� � � 4e•; � � "�f `' ^ "Pad� , ` r •'��` n ���� �'i k !' ►•
Potential Intermittent Stream - � ,�`� t R �� 4 � � ;.�`''� � .� � ' � � .'� �-- � ^' ,�
i /� ► � ��d ,� �� ,.� �•' Ford Gates�Dra �-'�'� �'� � F ���y.�-�.,•,, ' � ,++'''_,�^� f `� � ,�" , Na
Not Subject to Buffer Rules : ���'�;`, ����;:�;�. � ��,,:� � . � L �� .��,!� �,+�,,�� ~ �_,��w� � �`--.�,.�.,` �
�+ � �!''� � 'i �. i5�,,.4J �.��` w 6' j�'''-`�# � . ��aY :5 � �<� L... +. ��h('� ��¢��'�Rt�--._.,... U 'GR.�`;-Q� u` � � ,'. j'�p�
� Non-Jurisdictional Waters ,,��; � �,;�� Q� � �'a , � �-'��, a, "' ,r..� ., ; ° � Y s�•��` r �� Rolhng�Ridge�} , o _�',� �
.• H�IItO F �40 �'�� ` " � ♦ + � � �•�c.4 ,�� y. _4� �,('^ -{ r �c 'AI".�r-r;���Q
� " r
L�" p R Ir '.�h � c` � 5'.� Ym dF'�+ 1'��,� � .... . ��g � f`:` e� m
�� t'1l�
d , ;.
Roads . ,� °;�^� � .'` � . � � . �It�,,� ° - ";. �a° b
� , _ . *� , ' �,.,� �st�`' t„ '��' � �", ,��' . -
,
. . � .�
:
, - :
,
• �... '!k' f ;M . ` ' Mead � t��° Ual delGt`�-��`P .;� .
� .�'
• r' „ ��
�- ��m
ow R �
, �_' - F ,
� _ ,. . . � . .... �.
. . .,:- - a . . . _ . . . _ .
Improvements of US 70/NC 50,
Hammond Road (SR 2026), and
Timber Drive (SR 2812): TIP: U-5744
Potential Jurisdictional Features Map
Wake County, North Carolina
Date:
September 2017
sca�e 0 250 500 Feet
i i i
Job No.:
17-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
KMS NH
Figure

NC DWC� Stream Identifscatinn Form Version 4,11
aate: �����d-] Prajectl5ite: lJ` ��'�f �
��aluator: ��.r"4 'f-,.. �fz-I Caunty': �n��,��.G
Tota[ Poiri�S: 5tream Determina#ivn �aircle ane)
5tream r's at leasi i�termitterrt � Ephemeral Intermitt�n r n
if� 19 orner�nrri2l if2 30` �� ,
� � � `-
s �� �., t ,�a� �+ -� o
Latitude: �� t��� rT�
Longit�de: _ � � �,��, �,
Gther �-� ��' �
e.g. QvadN�+ne: �r�J�i�.�.��' �`
A. Geamor holo 5u�tota� _ � Absent wsak Maderate
1a C[rnf�nuity of �hannel hed and banlc 0 1 2
2. Sinwasity of channeP aiang thalweg 0 1 2
3. In-channel strracfure: ex. ri#Fle-povl, 5�2�-j7QC]I, ,,� �_ ' �
ri le- avl se uence � �'
4. Particle size of stream substrate Q 1
5, Acti�elrelict flvadpEain 0 1 2
6. CJepnsi#iona! bars or �e��hes 0 1 ��}
7. Reaent alluvial depQsits � 1 (�
8. Headcuts 1 2
9. Grade cantrol �,. �� �,, # f �; {�, 4 0.5
10. Natural valley Q 0.5 �
•11. S�cond or greater arder channel No = a �.Yes = 3
� artificial ditches are rtot rated; see discussions ln manual
B. H drQla (5u�total = I,�? � 5}
12. Presence of 8aseflow {i 1 �
13. Eron oxidizing bacteria fl 2
'f4. Leaf litter .5 1 0.5
15. SedEment an plants or debris 0 0.5
16. Organic debris li�es vr piles � O.S (.1
17. Sail-t�ased eviden�e af high water table? Na = D , es�3
C. Bivla Subtatal = �1
18. Fibro�s roots in streambed � 2 1
'V9 RaQted uplar,d plants in streambed 2 1
2i}. MacroE�ent�as (nr�ie diversity and abundancej �} 1 2
21. Aquatic Mallusks � 1 2
22. Fish ! 0.5 1
23. Crayfish 0 fl.5 �
24. Amphibiaras ;U O.S 1
25. Afgae 0 1
2�. Vlletland plants in streamhed FACW = 0.75; OBL - 1.5 = o
'perennie� s4reams may alsa be Edentified using �ther mekhods. 5ee p. 35 vf manual,
Nates:
Z� �. 1 �,`°-. �? �r,�.Y,F %' -" .J
.�7kBtCh: f
{�c �� _., r .��} LSA""� � 4', �t-y'-�j ��T jr�r , ,� �� �
p L e)� ,(15 cn f..4 ,i'�"ci7`°7 �"�J^ C�Jt^'�-� `` � :- J"�^-P " r`���
` � � ,
�j _; � c�' � `�s t7.? � .,,�+� � t� �.. �
� y -{- � _.1 .�e�� � .._�'"� � i,�'
3
0
9 .5
1.5
6ank Height (Tt�: �-
Bankfuil width {ftJ: {�,
Water ciepth {iesj. � - � �
Channe! s�hstrate - Cfay,, `�"� , 9�, ue�Cobble,
Bedrock
Welocity-East, moderate
Clarity-elear, ightyturb' ,turbid

NC DWQ Stream Identifcati�an Form Version 4.1I
l3ate: � f �- � -� Pra�ectlSite: � _ }'] `� `�
EvaEuatvr: ,,� � rt �r County; j�,� �, ��
Totai Points: S#ream �etermination (circlE
5tream rs atleast interrrrittent ��� Ephemeral Iniermittent�
if � Y9 or perenr�ial rf 2 3Q'
��
Latit�de: F � � Y + � r� �, ,-+
��< < ���
Lcangitude: r �_ � �� �x
; �� � �
�Other � �''��.r
iaa e.g. Quad Nerrre: �,. j�,;; �'� ��
A. GeQmor hola Suhtotal = 15� Ahserrt Weak Moderat� Strang
1a �ontinuity vf channel bed and bank D 1 2 3
2. Sinuasity �f channel alang thalw�g g 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. rifF�e-povl, step-poal, � � �
ri le- ppI S8 Uence
4. Partiale size of stream subst�ate 0 1 2 3
5. Acti�elrelict flood�plain �j 1 2 3
6. '�epasitional bars vr ben�hes 0 1 3
7. Recent alluvial depvsits 0 1 3
8. He�deuts 0 � � 3
9. Grade control „`�, .v� r. 0 a.5 'H� 1.5
10. Na#ural vall2y 4 a.5 1.5
� 1. Ser.o�d ar greater prder channel ':�No =� � Yes = 3
a artifcial dit�hes are not rated; see discussians in manual
B. H drola (Su�otoial = �i .� 4
12. Presence o# Baseflvw � 1 2 3
13. Iron axidizing hacteria 0 4 2 3
94. Leaf litter ,--'I,��-'' 1 f3.5 0
15. 5ediment on pfants ar debris a 4.5 1. 9.5
1B. CJrgani� dehris lines or piles 0 (J.5 ?_ 1: 1.5
1i. Sai1-based evidence of hi�h w�ter taole? No = 6 'Y'es = 3.
C. Biola {Subtatai =
18. Fibrous roats in streambed 3 2 1 0
�9. Rooted upl8nd plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
2Q. iMaoroben#hos [note diversity and abundanrJe) f} 1 2 3
2'�. Aquatic Molfuslts 0 1 2 3
22. Fish [a Q.5 1 1.5
23. Cra�sh - ;0 a.5 1 �.5
�4. AmPhibians �� 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae (fl 0.5 1 ti.5
2�. Wetfand plants in streamhed FACW =�J,75; O8L � 1.5 er =
"perennial streams may also be identi8ed usfng other methods. 5ee p. 35 of manual.
(1fOt�S;
Bank HEight (ft}; ,� -i �
Sket�h:
C..I�-.� �fRAr••yrf t,s:� S a��wy ���-t:et �yY „ Bankfu9lwidth{Et}: �-IZ f��rc�
� Water depth �in}: � - �-
�� t!,••v� ,r � n'� G�s°' �� �s+-., � s• fC t.,l��r � f Chamiel su6strake- Clay,� nd` ra�el, �
j�4, r. gedroc[c
Velacity- Fast, moderate, slaw V�''�
' � C `. $� �'y I �,� y {' . Lti ; �,� c�- �- ; W Cl�rkty �r, sfightly tur6id, turhid
G�

��
NC DWQ 5trearn Identifieation Form Version 4.11
Date: � Z,� � ProjectfSit�: � • S-� � ,.� Latiiude: �� = I'7 ! � �,
�vafuator: ��,� ���,. Cvunty: �,,f „ � Long�tude: _ �c� �t� � ,��
Total Poirtts; Stream Determination �cirole ane I Other �.:���
Sfream is at leasf irafermitfent
rf �'J9 araerenniaf if Z 30' ���� �phemeral Intermittent er�nnia � e.g. QvadlVama: +��„ t� 1 E"�
A. Ge�mnr }�vlo Subtotal = I�� 5 Ahsent Weak Maderate Sfrang
ia Continuity vf channe] f�ed and bank � 1 2
2. 5inuosity of channel alang thalweg 0 1 3
3. In-channel struc#ure: ex. ri#F!e-pool, step-pool, � � � 3
ri ]e- ov1 se uen�e
4. Particle size of s#ream substrate D 1 3
5. Activelrelict f�vvdplain , �� c�•se,� [d] 1 Z 3
6. �epositional bars or �enches Q 1 3
7. Reosnt alluv�ial deposits 0 1 � 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9. Grade control ,, � Y a � 1_ 1.5
10. Natura[ �+aGley 6 �.5 1 1.5
11 5ecand or grea4er order channel No = D Yes F3'
a_
B. H droio Subtotal =�� 5 )
12. Presence af Haseflow 0
13. Iron axidizing bacteria fl
14. Leaf [itter (�. •�
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
�6. �rganic debris fines ar pifes �
17. Soil-based eviderace of high water table7 No = fl
�. Bialv Subtatal= G��-�
'i8. Fibr�us roois in streambed
19. Raot�d upiand �lants i� s#reamhed
20. Macrobenthos {nate 8iversity and ab�ndar,ce}
2� . Aquatic Mvllusks �` C�
22. Fish 6
23. Cra�sh 6
24. Arraphihians �"0"j
2�. Algae [}
26. Wetland plants in streamhed
'perennial streams may also be identified usEng otri8f inethp[is. See p. 3S of manu2l.
�(?tEB:
Sketch: �^''' �
ti +
�
� ��
2
0.5
0. 5
D.5
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
a.� �
6.5 1
D.5 1
a.5 1
FACW = 4.75; OBL - 1.5
6ank Heig[�t {ftJ: L-�- - f �
Bankfull width (�t�: �- -t C]
Water depth (inj: [j _�,�
Char�nel su6strate � Cla Sii n, ra I, Cobble,
Bedrack
Velocity - fast, modarate,� �'""�
Clarity [ ea slightly turhid, turhid

NC DW[� 5tream Identi�catian �aYm Version 4.i1
[]ate; � �� `�" � PrvxectlSi#e: ',� - S� �l �('
EWatuator; Caunty:
�i t12.��' �I',0.-� t;.�
Totaa Po�nts: Stream �eterminatic�n (circle
Stream is atleastlntermittent '� Ephemeral Intermirtten e
rf z 98 or t�erennla! if � 3�' � �
��
Lat9tude; � �, � ' � �.�� �
I
Lvr�gitude: �� t� �, rr .- .
Other �--�+'��-�
e.g. QuadNarrae: �,�� �w � Y�
A. �eomar taalo 5ut�tfltal = I'� � } Absent 1Neak Mo�erate Strong
1a Continuity a# channel bed and ban'k � 1 3
2. SinUos'rty af channel along thaiweg 4 � � 3
3. �n-channel str�cture� ex, rifFle-povl, step-prsal, 4 � � �
ri �e- ovi se uence
+}. Particle size aF strearn substrate a 1 3
5. Activelrelict floadpfain 0 � 3
6. �eposit�anai bars ar ber�ehes 4 1 t2� 3
l. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2' 3
8. Headcufs �^ 1 2 3
9. Grad� �orrtrol ;-, ,. Q '1 i.5
10, Natural �aRey a 0.5 1 i.5
�'�. 5econd or greater orrfer charanel �fa = Yes = 3
aartificiaf ditches are not rated; see dfscussions ir� menual
B. H dra�a (Subtatal = � � �
12. Presence raf Base�low a � � 2 3
13. Iran axidizing bacteris (} 1 2
14. Leef {itter 1.5 '1 0.5 6
15. 5ediment vr� plants nr �ebris 0 f].5 1 1.5
�6. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 �1' 1.5
17. Sai�-based e�idence of hkgh water table? IVo = 4 es = 3
C. gIo10 Subt�ta� _
18. Fibrous rc�ots in strearr�bed C� 2 1 6
19. Rooted upland pfants in streambed 3 2 1 �
2fl. MBcrvbenkha5 (note diversity and abundan�e) 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mallusks {� � 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 [J.5 1 1.5
23. Cra�sh �.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians { q 0.5 'M 1.5
�5. AIg3e 0.5 � 1.5
26. Wetland plants �n streambed FACW = �.75; QBL = i.5 her =
`perennial streams may also �e identifted using oFher met9�ods. See p. 35 af manual. V
I�OfiES:
S�4EtCf1: . 8ank Height (R}: (�-- l�
� r 1� r S ,�,. �..f �°°� � Ge � c, �u' �' � 1's �- =�,..+rr'� Sankfull wldth (ftj: �{- - �'
�lt_,�,ti � ✓
Water depth [in}, � - (o
�� r�" ��^o-� �'t[ r "" 2 �' �A � � -�-��- • nnf�-.r S s �- � [,= 4tir-r '� Chanrrep substrate - Clay, ilt �In ', rave Cvhble,
� 8edrack
-� f i�e �es� I L�.--� �e t�.. vl ��rr �4 �_ti•..v, � Velo�ity+ - Fast, moderate,�
CI'arity-cl�ar s�ightiytur6i_,furhid

NC D'VVQ Stream Identifi�atinn Form Version �.I1
❑ate: �� � � .� Frajectl5ite: � - r, 7 �+. �j
�
E�aluatar: �� ���� Caunty: lp,��,,�
7otaf PoiRtS: Stream Determination {�ircl� one�
5fream fs at feasf rntermittent Ephemeral ntet e Perennial
if z f 9 or oerennraJ if z 30 ` �� �� ���
C�
Latitude: f; �, �i � � � �
�angitude: -� �', �,�I'G'.�'�
fJther �-��'�"-�..
e.g. QuadlJame: lr)� �C c �4::.�
A. Geomvr holo 5ubfatai = � Absen# Weak Moderate Strong
�a C�antinuity of channel bed and bank a 1 3
2. Sinuosity saf channel afar�g thalweg 0 i 3
3. lr�-channel structure: ex. rifFle-poal, step-pavl, 6 �"1 2 �
ri 12- nol se �ence �-�
4. Parficle size af stream substrate 0 �" � 3
5. Activefreli�t fEoodplain 0 1 3
6. C�epvsitianaP bars or �enohes a 2 3
T. Recent allu�iaf depnsits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade cvntrol �,,� j�-„ k f� a. � 1.5
1f1. Natural walley fl �. � �.5
19. 5econd or greater order �hannel ii = Yes = 3
a
e. HyarQiogy �suetota� _ �� � 11V11M4�
�2. Presence of Baseflaw
13. fran oxidiz€ng hact�ria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sedim�nt on planfs or debris
18. Organic debris i[nes or piEes
�i, Soif-based evider�ce vf high water tahfe?
4 � .� � s
1 2 3
5 1 0,5 Q
{7 fl.5 ; 1.5
a 0.5 1.5
No=� �es=3
C. Bi�lo SubtotaC = �
18, Fihraus rovts in streamhed 3 1 �
19. Rooted upfand plants fn sireambed 3 1 �
2[3. Ma�robenthos Snate diversity and abundan�ej [�i?} 1 � 3
2'i. Aquatic Malfusks ;� 1 2 3
22. �ish , �.5 1 �.5
^�3. Cra�sh [� �.5 1 �.5
24. Amphibians (tT U.5 i 'i.5
25. Afgae a 9 i.5
2fi. Wetland piants in streamEaed FACW = 0_75; �8� = 1.5 � ther =
'perennial streams may alsi.z he ide�tifted using other methvds. 5ee p. 3S of manuaE.
iV ote5:
�'! ' Bank iieight (ftj; 1 ' �
SEcetch: � t � r ,� �J ��.sR s. r-R�= �'3�t`� i,7-�� � �� �n.�.h�..� 6ankfull widih (h�: � - �
Water depth (in]: �j - �
� �,,. ,� rrti � ry.a�c- ��+-- t,-�.r e"., .•..�i..�-�- �1r' � � Channel su6steate - Clay. i , and��raveF?Cnbble,
Bedrv�k
c'� `{'�c';.n�+�,, L„��U.I� �{!r"+kr�•�,���� VeEocity-fast,moderate,slflw <<-
r�„ I+,,�.iy'� J Clarity ear, IEghtly tur6id, tur�id �`

��
i�TC D�'VQ Stream Identif�cation Farm� Version 4,%1
Dat�: � �� . � � ProjectlSite: � - S � `-� �I. Lat9tude: �,r- .s,
?, T � �'7� [
E�aluator: � County: � Lnngitude: ,.
1~l'rr `-r_�. ,.- lr.! �.. Ccf - t � �-/ ,,
Tv't7G Points: Strearn ne#erm'snation [circle one) 4ther �-G !� �
Stream rs at leasi intermittent E hemeral IntermitEent �r nni e. t7vad Name:
if z 19 or psrennial if z 34" � ^� p �� � ti-a�.� E Ml
A. Geoma�r holo Subtotal = �� J Absent Weak Moderate Strang
1a Gantinuity o# channel bed anci Benk D 1 3
2. 5inuvsi#y at channef aiong thafweg 0 1 3
3. In-�hanne6 strueture: ex. riffle-povl, step-pQvl, p 1 � 3
ri le- oo� se uenca
R. Parti�le size of stream substrate 0 1 C2� 3
5. Acti�elrelict floodplain Ll 1 2 3
6. Qepositional hars or �enohes 6 1 3
7. ReGen# alluvdal depasits 6 1 [�] 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9. Grade Gontral a 4.5 i.5
10. Natural valley - Q U.5 4 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel f4a = 0 es = 3
a
. o rn i.i�or�ua�
B. Hy�ralo�y {5ubt�otal = � y �
12. Pres�nce of Baseflor��
13. Irvn vxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. 5ediment vn plants or debris
16. Drganic debris lines or pifes
�7. Sail-hased e�iden�e of high water table?
a.5
3
3
�
1.5
1.5
C. Biolo (Su�tatal = 8-5 )
'f$. Fibrous rovts in streambed 2 i 0
19. Raofed upland pfarats in streamhed 2 1 0
20. Macrabenthas [nofe diversity and abundance) „��'+,�,,.• � Q � 2 3
�1. Aquatic A1�ollusks 1 � 3
22. �i5h �-[� a.5 1 1.5
23. Cra�sh r`0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Am�ahihi�ns rx�.uv-o�..�'.,:_a.=. �'r„•�jp.,,v..+ k� s f} �� 'i 1.5
25. Algae 0 4.5 �] 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; QBL = 1.5 er =
"p�rennial streams may also �e idenfified using oiher methods. 5ee p. S5 vf manual.
IVOtES:
B�nk FCeight {ftJ: `l� -�
SkE[Ch:
BankFull wfdth [k}: � -(Q
j ` �„t.,,,A-.-R k�' �,,�j Waterdepth (inj: �-- �
Channel substrate - C1a Si �$`aY , ra , Cobk�le,
ra
Velvrity - fast, mod�rate, �T�v
C�arity- e� Gghtly tur�id, t�,rbid

NC DWQ Stream Ide�tificatiQn Forrn Version 4.11
Date: 3 �2f'�r � � -�! PrvjeatlSite: {� - j'� `f `-�
E�aluator: �� ��,ti.�,� County: '�,,�,���
To'[af Poifats: Stream Det�ermination circlE
5trear� is at least [r�termrftent � Ep�temerai e mitfent r
If � 19 ar aerennia! if � 3p' � �t��'
��
L�ItUdE: �� � y �
J.>>. T o`# I �
Langitude:r
ane) Other
�nnial e.g. Qa�ad Name
�Q. '�?
� l�� P. �� '�.�
A. Geomor k�o�o Su�kotal = I Absent Weak Modera#e 5trang
1a Cor�#inuity of channef hed and bank U [1"? 7 2 3
2. 5inuvsity af channel along thaaw�g a i �--['�� 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riff[e-pool, step-pool, 6 � � �
ri le- ool se �ence
4. Particle size af stream substrate 0 � 9 2 3
5. Activelreli�t floodplain 4 1 {� 3
6. L�eposiiional bars or be�ches 4 2 3
7. Recent all�viak depos�ts 0 1 t' �7 �
8. Headcuts �''� 1 2 3
9. Grade contral �ro #� 0 �. 1 i.5
10. Naturai walfey 4 � �.�
11. Second or greaterarder channel o= Yes = 3
a
B. H� droloyJ �,{5ubtatal = �_} 1 „�Y,.vu'
12. Presence af Baseflaw Q 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 r'�
14. Leaf litter i.5 1 r
15. Sedirnent vn plan#s vr debris 0 0,5
1E. Organic debris lines ar piles 0 {7.5
1 T. 5o11-based evide�ce of high water tahle'? Na =�
�. QIO��'J SUbtOfa� _
18. Fihro�as roats in streamaeci 3 2
39. Rooted upland plants �n streambed 2
20. MaC�obenthas �nate diversity and abundance}°` ,,,, �,, 5 0 r'`f�
2'�. Aquatic Mollusks �� 1
22, Fish 0.5
23. Cra�sh 10 0.5
24. Amphi6ians 4 4.5
25. Afgae a [1.5 (
�6. Wetland plarrts in streambed FACW = 0.75; O�L = 1
"perennial streams may also he identlfed using other methods. 5ee p. 35 of inenual.
NOtES:
Sketch: ,y�1� °` � • S r'C�..` "�, Y� ��-+' �j r .
1��,��LS 4��''
zn Ua ��� ..,�,�, � ,,. . +�
�'`�C q Y V V1 � 4.4 tJ �
.�,1^'-
a ���`J f�'�-� � � �.Y ��-�2,a, ; ,�y..+�" x .. �Ft7t��., r e .�„ �� '� �� �.e.ee�,a
1 f 6l� } r + , �
t�'�.+Tl) �[ �. { �c�! �� 4 l y+ � 1 �. 1�3f WI�L �'1'.1 (�.� t•+ .'.1
J
2
=3
1
1
2
2
1
1
�
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
4
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.a
Bank Height {ft): � S • � • �
Banklful1 width [F�j: � -�
Waterdepth [in}: �} - �
Channel substrate i� an Gra�el, Cob�le,
Bedrack
Velo[iry-fast, moderate;s� �;ai• ��� �
Cl�nty-cfear, s y urbi turbi

NC DWQ Str•eam Identificatian Form Versior� �.1P
Qate: 'L� rz r�� �`� Projectf5ite: �,,,� . � � � �
Er�aluatar: Caur�ty: �„�,� j�
�'��+�:2��-e�
Total Pvints: S#ream Determinatiun (circle one]
5fream is at least intermrttent I �pfiemeraf I terrt� arennial
if � 19 vr nerennial if z 3Q' l�'� ��
,� l
Latitude: �� �, .., .,
�J � 7 �✓ ���
�.angikude: _ � r �
�' `�. � �-� _ `�i
Other ��� `.
e.g. Quad Nar�re: �1� s P,� -�
A. Geomor holo Subtotal - Ahsent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of ehannaf �ed and bank q 9 3
2. Sinuos�ty of channel aEang thalweg fl 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-paol, � � � �
ri le- aol s� �ence
4. Particle size of strearr� substrate {1 � 3
5. Acfi�elrelict flaodplain 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars vr benches 1 2 3
7. Recenf alEu�ial deposits � 2 3
$. F;eadcuts � 2 3
9. Grade cvntral �o,�.c�rc�t ra -Fn 6-5 1.5
10. Netural �a�ley { 0.5 1 1.5
11. 5ecand ar greafer arder channe! o� Yes = 3
aart�Cclal ditCheS are nvt rated; See diseussions in manua]
8. H dre�fp {sut�total = �-5 )
12. Presence of BaseFlow a 1 2 3
13. Iran oxidizing bacYeria 6 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 �.5 a
15. Sedement on plants or debris 4 1 1.5
i6. Drga�ic debris lines or pilss 0 �.5 i 1.5
17. Sail-based eaidence of high water iable7 IVo = 0 es =
C. Blr�io (Subta#al =
98. Fibrous roots in stream�ed 3 1 �
19. Raated upland plants in streambed 2 � U
2fl. Macrobenthos Snot� cSiversity and aBundance} 1 � 3
21. Aquati� Mollusks �"{�} 1 2 3
22. �ish r� fl.5 � 1.5
23. Cra�sh �`�j U.5 1 1_5
24. AmphibiaRs {'�j fl.5 1 1.5
�5. Afgae 4 0.5 i 1} 1.5
26. Wetland pia�ts in strearnbed FACW = 0.75; C7B� = 1.5 er =
'perennial streams may also be ideratified using flther methads. See p. 35 of mae�ual
N�FeS: -
SkBtGh: `� r c� �^S +t��' -�- �c� v� W�k�- i C.Cs � ve �Ti j �ank Heighc (ft}, O. �• I
8�nkfull width (RJ: � - �
� � � - w� r- Water depth 4fnJ: [j - �
��r:,ar
;�; j -, ChanrteA substrate - Clay,�5�t, S� Grave{;-Eabble,
' ;%�' �edrack
�P v t� �y f,.._.
�, r,.o,;L valacity-fast,moderate��
Clarity-dear, s` t1Y turbi , Yurl�id
,�.�_�,J� (, � r � � w '� , �A i 4h�. . , SY�
� r�;.�

J
I'�TC DWQ Str�am Identificatian Forrn Version 4.11
❑ate: �r � ,� � � Projectl5ite: t� . �-� y ti.f
Er�al u ator: �%1. �.�. E� -�, f. Cou nty: y,.l n. �,�
Total Points: Stream �letermination (c�rcEe ane}
5tream is at reast ir�term+ttent Epherreeral nt�et"F�ii ett Perennial
it � i9 or pererrnia! if � 3Q' �� �
� ,]
Latitud�� �� � � yr� ��
Longi#ude: _ -,
7 �. !z�7�C�
Crther j._.ct �� ��
a.g. QvadlVame: h ���ir.�. e � �' �
A. Geomvr holo Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1� Continuity of ��annel �ed and hank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity vf channel aiong thaEweg 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-poaf, step-paal� ,r„5-�, .� 2 3
ri le- Qol se uence t�-�'
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3
5. Activelrelict tlovdpfair� 0 [, Z 3
5, �epasifional bars ar bench�s 1 2 3
7. Recent aBluvial depasits � 2 3
8. Neadcuts 0 1 3
9. Grade control �- � a. 1 1.5
10. PJatural valley Q 1 1.5
11. Se�and ar greater Qrder c�annel a- 4 Yes = 3
� artiticial dttches are not rated; see ais�uss�ons in manuai
B. Hydrofogy (SubtQtaf = 7• 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iran axidizing hacterfa
i4. Leaf litker
't5. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Drganic debris Gnes vr pi[es
17. Saii-based ev�denc� of high water ta61e?
� £��.� � �
0 2
1.5 1 D.'
D 6. 5 T
6 a. 5
No=U
3
3
�
1.5
1.5
'C. 'aIQ�Q $Ubta#ai = , �
18. Fibraus roots En streambed 3 � �
19. Rovted upland plan#s in streambed r'�'` 2 1 �
�Q. �,+18crpbent�hos (noie divers�ty and abundance} '1 2 3
21. Aquatio Mo�iusks ,�'"a`y 1 � 3
22. Fish ��"� - 0.5 1 1.5
23. Cra�sh 6.5 1 1.�
24. Amphibians '-0{ 0.5 1 i.5
�5. Algae o 4.5� 1 1.5
26. W�tlar�d plants i� steeambed FACW = 4.75; [7BL � 1.5 at�ier =
'perennial streams may alsa 6e identifed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. �
N ofe5:
rr Bar�k Height {ft): � �'�
5ketch: ��,�r � �iy�a�- �., rtE l -�+�••,. �,,.•^,.� �'' �i � ` �� Bankfull width ift1: �, - �
� � � ti+5�a Waterdepth �inj: � -L�
S-a� s'� Channel substrate • CFay, dt_ ara j Gravel, Cobble,
� Bedrack
� n eAI�. `u L�1
4/�-#' .+�.. •.'tR��;'�{ � fr`l L. �.ti/` 1 Velacity-fast, moderate, $��� �`-�iY"�
��� " � Clarity- clear, slight[y tur " ur

�
NC DW'Q 5tream Identificaiion For� Vei-�ion a.11
�� ❑ate: ? � � � -� Pro�ec#1Site: ��w ��� :-S �_.�
J
Eaaluator: �,� � � { Ga�rnty: ,�]r,�; . �
�7 t.' ,, j, r'', Z� � � � • '"-"
7otal Points: 5tream Determinatian {aircle qn
5trearrr is af least i�tem'rirteni � �� �,�h�emeral Intermittent Perenn
if � 99 orp�rennial if � 3D" �� � r-� �•-��
� �
Latit�de; 7�5, `� 1 �( (��J�
�ongitude: ���. {�r �SS'[n7.UU
C�ther L� � 4
e.g. L7uad Name: ,_,� �., l f r
A. Geamc�r Yrolo Suk�tota� = i�� } Absent Weak MQderate Strong
1a ContEnui+y of chan±-!e! bed �nd ban'k 0 1 2 _'3 .�
2 Sinuasity of channeE afong thalweg 4 1 �'��� 3
3. In-channel sir�etura: ex, ri#�Ee-poal, siep-pvvl, � �.';'L�, 2 �
ri le- ool se uence ��� f
4. Partieie sire af stream substrate 0 [] 2 3
5. Activelrefict floodplain a r � 3
6. Qepositfnnaf Bars Qr ber�ches f� � �
7. Recent alluvial depasits 0 1 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Gr�de controi 0.5 i 1.5
14. Natural �alley 4 a.5 ;'1 1.a
11. 5econd or greater arcler chan�el f4o =',��� Yes = 3
a
w�iv �.����u��uu�
B. H drology (Subtota! _ � `-� }
12. Presence af Baseflaw fl 1
13. fron oxidizing bacteria 0 �1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 :.1.-
15. Sediment on plants ar dehris a 4.5
16. �rganic debris lines or piCes 0 � CJ.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? brla = b
C. B�olo Suhtataf = -�� � }�
18. Fi�rous raots in strear^�bed 3 �
19. Raoted upland plants in s#reamhed 2
2D. Macrohenth[�s �nate diversity and abunda�Ga} (} '[
29. Aqua�ic Evlvll�sks ,0� �
22. Fish � �.5
23. Cray#'�sh a i:fl.5
24. Amphihians 4 �0.5
25. Algae 0 � 5
2fi. Wetlar�d plants in stream6ed FAGW �
`pere�rtial streams may alsv he idenfified using other meEhvds. See p. 35 oi m�nual.
�iQ���u: � '� 4 �.Tj ^-`�(� � � 1'.i`�1r+.�? �i'C�riFs �.'i'�C.�-� `-� y•�i'FCr
rr •..:� frr ���1_ �,lT_n1'��nrS.a �r� „� � �le«rnrn�7or ; n i�t it�'�r'.1L
Sketch: �_�� �
I
�,��� �r
�`--�:�� f._ __ . _ . . ..:��...
�
..1..+'_.
� - - - - - _ _
��
2 �
2 �
0.5 0
i 1.5
1 1.5
Yes =!�
t7BL = i.5 Other = fl
n^e '.I: ��r-GGst'.�xa�� t4;s.r,*��L� I
8ank keight {ft}: � ~,,�
r
Bankfull width (ft}: � - � �
Water depth [InJ: � - j�, r�
Channel su6strate - lay, 5ilt, Sand�"aravel, Co6ble,
Bedrqck
Velacity - fast, moderate, ow
Clari#y ear s�ightly lurhid, turbid

NC DW[� Stream Ide�ti�cat�or� Form Version 4,11 C�
aate: "� � �y � � �i PrvjectlSi#e: �- �� `i�� Latitude: �.� ��'��7
!
Evaluator: ��,`•T�r,� 1�OV�. � i Coun#y: �� �f .;. ,� Longitude: --!]�. ,�i�j� I {�
7ota1 Points: 5tream Determination (circle one) Other L�,��
Stream fs at leasr rnterrnr`ttent ^� E heme�al Interrriiftent ^;Perennial � e. , Quad Neme:
if� 19 orAerennialifz 30" L�"� � � ' tif3���.���e.l
A. Geomor hofo Subtatal = } Absent Weak Moderate Strnang
�a Cvntinuity of channel bed ar�d banK 4 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity af channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3, !n-channe[ struotur�: ex, r�ffle-povl, step-pool, � � � 3
ri le- vol se uen�e ���'
4, Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3
5. Acfi�elreipct flopdpl�in U � �
�. []epositianal �iars ar benches � 1 2 3
7. Recsr�t alluvial depasits 0 � �
8. hieadcuts � � �
9. Grade �ontrol Cv l��' �� 0 �. 1 1.5
1�. Natural valley a a.� 1.�
11. 5ecvnd or greaterorder channel ?Va =��} 7 Yes = 3
� � ,
B. H Cfrolc�4u u�(subtotal = y M��� �V11Jj ����4"~M,
i�, �resence crf Base#law
13. �ron oxfdizing bac#eNa
14. Leaf Iit�eT
15. SedPment on plants or debris
16. �rganic debris 4ir�es �r piles
1i. Soil-��sed eviden�e of hign water table?
0 1
4 1
i.5 �'i:�
fl �. 5
0 0.5
No�O
0.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
C. Bivlv (Su�tc�ta2 = Y7 ) --
18. Fibrous roots in strsamhed 2 1 �
�9. Raoted upland plants in sireambed � � �
20. MaerobenYhos (note diversity an� abundance) '1 � 3
21. Aquatic Mv'llusks �'j 1 2 3
2�. Fish s 0} 0.5 1 1.5
23. Cra�sh ;'0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians ?�3"�} C1.5 1 1.5
�5. Algae a- 4,5 `�i 1.5
2fi. Wetland plants in streamhed FACW - 4.75; {?BL = 1.5�Dfher='�f'�
'perenniaE streatns may also be identifed using other methods. 5ee p. 35 of manual. `�" -`" "�
hl[JteS:
�. ��-�s.,a..��r. 'a�n-0"` � RA7'�,s,� ✓c:..A • fC_C Bank Height {ftj: Z - :
Sk£fC�l: ; y, � � 8ankfuH width �it): 3- �
1,i1. � ti �.`,-5_} 1 � ' ' � '/% •
�� �� € � I Vt � � � �' � Water depth (inj: Z - �
f �`"� Channel subsSrate - �lit n Gra�el, Cobble,
^�;�•� -+�C. r.} rj�' fA � f�. �'� (.�^`s� Bedrack L� �
�
�^y _ y�� !,� ��� R�� !� Velotitiy-fast, mode}ate�_�o�s
L.sS] �• �_�l
Ciarity�c�e �-S�ghtly ur kurbid
� r 'j,n'' �^i , ,1�cy r.,� � � '� � , �-' � . '�� �,{ I -_ �
��� , _, � c- � i �- ��,i f'i,`,r.t/-1�'� �hL �'�-fc.slY! �� � .���# Cf rY7 �', �.,�� f ,y l.� � � �.T � i'� f� � �, � �a �.�.. f
A- � f^,� �J �}";� � f e� 1� �`) 1�� f�� � I 1 f+ ! F il ��. R � i� � .
J

NC DV►r'Q Stream Identification Form 'L'ersion 4.11
[]ate: '2��� � �� ProjectJSite: ��_ � �! �,�
E�aluator: ��.� � ! Co�nty:
'�t■ b°.:C. I L.r� �•. i- �
Tot�f 'Pf�ints; 5tream Oeter i ati n circle �neJ
Stream is at feast intermrtterrf � � Ephemeral ntermi�t�nt Pereranial
if ? �8 or raerertrtia� if � 30" �� •�r7
� �
Latiiude: 7�� . �I 2 ��J���
Lvngitude: --��.�'�5�-�'��
���
t3iher ��:,+��.
e.g. Quad Name: ��+ {+��, r._. ;
A. Ca�am�or holfl 5ubioiaf = Abs�nt Weak Mvdera#e Strong
'la .!`.r��tinajlJ n# �h2nnol �iaA anr� �ianl� {� 1 �
2 Sinuasity af channe1 along thalweg fl 1 � �
3. lra-charrnel structure: ex. riffi�-paal, step-pool, � ,-.,-� 2 3
ri le- ❑vl se uence �`
4, Particle size af sfream substrate fl 1 2 3
5. AetG�elrelict floodplain fl � 3
6. �eposi#ional bars ar bencf�es (1 � 2 3
7. Recent alluWial depos�ts � 1 �7 3
8. Headcuts � Z 3
9. Grade cantrvl „I -�., C� �.� ��
10. Natura! valley Q 5 1 �•5
11. Secon� ar g�eater order channef ,� a= 4 Yes = 3
a ___- -
B. H tf�olv (Sudtatal = }
1�. Presence of 8asefEow 0
'f3. Iron caxid�zi�g hacteria �
14. Laaf litt�r 1.5
15. Sediment on plan#s or dehris 0
�6. �rga�[c debris lines vr piles D
17. So�f-based �vide�ce Qf high water table7 hfa =
G. BioE� {Su�totaP = {�.`�
18. Fibraus roots i� streambed 3
19. F2ao#ed upland plants in streamh�d
2�. Macrobenthos [note diuersity and abundance}
21. Aquatic Mallusks 4
22. �f5�1 ,f�
�3. Cra�sh '�'
2�. Amphibians = �
25. Al�ae -a
26. WetEand plants in streamt�ed �i��,�.r•�`� 1
'Asrennial sfreams may alsea be identifed using other methods See p. 35 af manual
P30te5:
2
2
�.�
1
1
=•1.5 C)fher � 0
3
3
a
1.5
i.5
D
�
3
3
1.5
1_5
1.5
1.5
�,�.,r �i ° -_- . _ 6ank Height (ft}: +
Sk�tch: ._....�.���---- I eankfull width (Ftj: - ,�
��, � �
1}�y.'`=., �,� Waterdepth {inj: j • �
�.
( +,�x`���:• , 5 �`{ _ __ �'S�'��µ Channel substratie �S�and, Gra+�el, Cqbble,
_ `'�y+*' � 8edrack
� k,� Veiocity - Fast, mqderate �� o
��
� �f � Cfariiy - clear, figFi' y tur� ,[urhid
�1 F rj{ � � 1 �
,1�"� i,� C�4 i'�'�U v..� A. s ,/"`±�',k,lL �rJ'•'-{ . ,4^.t`-.�Y t; r '. i � s �y �,r.ti ae � 4�+ � '} � A ft C,.,� �:• . r' � �� �-� �
� � i{� 4

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site #
Buck Branch
(indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Nathan Howell
3. Date of evaluation: 03/30/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 0830
5. Name of stream: Buck Branch 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 40aC
�
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.713975
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
[,ongitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.629693
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion): f
From SK confluence to a point 150' upstream towards Yeargan Road
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: Warm; partly cloudy; 0.12" of precipitation in the past 3 days.
16. Site conditions at time of visir. overcast; 67 degrees F; no precipitation
�
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section ]0 �Cidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
❑Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �Water Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond ar lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES �O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 7'S % Residential 20 % Commercial �•5 % Industrial 5 % Agricultural
50 0�o Forested 10 0�o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 6 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 4
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) I�Ioderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
charact�ristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 68 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature �`:� � � - � � � � ���� Date 03/30/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 3
Riparian zone 4
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) '4
,.� Groundwater discharge O
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain 4
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 3
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 4
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 4
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 3
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 4.
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 2
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 2
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 � 00
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 68
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SB (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 10 am
5. Name of stream: SB 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 5aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 400 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.719222
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.641374
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
South of US-70, east of Jessup Drive, north of Vesta Drive
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and clear.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES �O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential 50 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
25 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( �
22. Bankfull width: 6-� 2 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 5-10
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments: heavily eroded culvert at origin
Evaluator's Signature `" � �"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) �
Riparian zone 2
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) �
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 �
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 2
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 3
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 4.
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SC (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 10 15 am
5. Name of stream: SC 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 5aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 525 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.719116
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.64086
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
South of US-70, east of Jessup Drive, north of Vesta Drive. Adjacent to new construction
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and Clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential 50 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
25 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 4-10 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 4-10
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight � ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments: Feeds into SB, adjacent to new construction.
Evaluator's Signature ` " �� ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2
Riparian zone 2
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 �
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 3
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 4.
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 45
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # S� (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 11 am
5. Name of stream: S� 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 30aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 355 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.717771
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.640038
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
west of timber drive, east of vesta drive
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2� 1 aC tOtal
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES �O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: � 5% Residential 70 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
15 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 4-7 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 4-6
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight � ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 54 Comments: 2 stormwater ponds upstream that outlet into SD
Evaluator's Signature ` " � � ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 3
Riparian zone 3
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain 2
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 2
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 q.
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 4
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 4.
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 54
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SE (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: Noon
5. Name of stream: SE 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 3 aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 190 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.716034
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.640503
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
west of Timber drive, east of vesta drive, near leota drive
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 % Residential 50 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
20 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 2-3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 1-3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight � ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments: stream has homemade retaining walls along banks
Evaluator's Signature ` " �a� ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2
Riparian zone 0
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 2
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures ,�
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 2
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 3
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SF (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 1 pm
5. Name of stream: SF 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 20aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 155 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.713886
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.641093
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
west of timber drive, parallel to homeland drive, north of homeland
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: Yes, 1.1 aC
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential 70 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
10 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 3-6 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 4-5
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight � ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments: 1 stormwater pond upstream
Evaluator's Signature ` " � ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2
Riparian zone 3
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain 2
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 2
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SG (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: Zpm
5. Name of stream: SC' 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 4aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 225ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.709615
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.64086
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
along grovemont road, in the turn before timber drive
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: no r'aln
16. Site conditions at time of visit sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES �O
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
30 0�o Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES �O
40 0�o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged 30 % Other ( SChool
22. Bankfull width: 3-4 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 1.5-2.5
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse)• 51 Comments• channelized, appeared excavated in the past in some sections of the reach
Evaluator's Signature ` " �� ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) �
Riparian zone 3
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge 3
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain 3
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 3
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 �j
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 3
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # S� (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 230pm
5. Name of stream: S� 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 3 aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 95 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.713953
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.62939
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
along US-70 near appliance store
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES �O
21. Estimated watershed land use: � 5% Residential
15 0�o Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
70 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: �-2 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 0.5-1
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments; lots of riprap in channel
Evaluator's Signature ` " ���"°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) �
Riparian zone ,�
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) �
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 2
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 2
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 �
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 �
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 35
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # S� (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET =
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Evan Morgan
3. Date of evaluation: 03/24/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 230pm
5. Name of stream: S� 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: •5 aC
9. Length of reach evaluated: 65 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s723t2): 35.714083
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66i ��: -78.629665
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ]ocarion):
south of US-70 near appliance store
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: No ralrl
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and clear
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �fidal Waters f�Essential Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters �Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �ater Supply Watershed I I I (I-I�
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: No
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES Q�
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
% Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES �
100 0�o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 2-5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of banlc); 1-4
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) �oderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ccasional bends requent meander �Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 31 Comments: small drainage into Buck Branch from roadway
Evaluator's Signature ` " � "°` Date 03/24/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 �
(no flow or sahiration = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 2
Riparian zone ,�
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; spriugs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�..� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
a Entrenchment / floodplain access
� (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 �
g Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
�+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
� Presence of major bank failures 2
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
Q 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 2
� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 3
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 �
F (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 �
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 Q
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 2� Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = inax points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 �
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = inax points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 31
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal st�-eams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SK (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Nathan Howell
3. Date of evaluation: 03/30/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 1100
5. Name of stream: SK 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage
9. Length of reach
.5ac
100'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude �eX. 34.a�asiz�: �5.714603
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66 i� �: -� 8• 628620
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
l3. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying siream(s) location):
From SK/Buck Branch confluence to a point about 60 ' upstream of fairly large pool.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: Warm; partly doudy; 0.12" of precipitation in the past 3 days.
16. Site condiaons at time of visir. Overcast; 67 degrees F; no precipitation
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �ji'idal Waters �jEssenrial Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters ❑Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �Water Supply Watershed II I(I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Esrimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
10 0�o Forested 90 % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 2-4 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �'�
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: � Straight � ccasional bends requent meander ery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
coinment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 65 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature /VatiLQ�! �/OWeG� Date 03/30/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 3
3 Riparian zone 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 q.
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 4
a Groundwater discharge 0
� 5 (no discharge — 0; springs, seeps, weflailds, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�, Presence of ad,jacent floodplain 4
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
�
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 4
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of ad,jacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0
(no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points) 4
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 3
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 �
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5
�-+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banlcs = max points) 4
�F''„ Presence of ma,jor bank failures
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 �j
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
� Root depth and density on banks
� 14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 q.
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production �
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2
� (no riffles/ripples ar pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q 1 � Habitat comple�ty 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 3
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) 4'
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 2
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous rypes = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 2
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) �
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 4
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 � �0
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on �rst page) 65
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # 5L (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Nathan Howell
3. Date of evaluation: 03/30/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 1200
5. Name of stream: S� 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage
9. Length of reach
.10ac
300'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude �eX. 34.a�asiz�: �5.715937
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66 i >>: -� 8 • 631163
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
l3. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying siream(s) location):
From SL's confluence with US 70 to a point 300' upstream.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: Warm; partly doudy; 0.12" of precipitation in the past 3 days.
16. Site condiaons at time of visir. Overcast; 67 degrees F; no precipitation
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �ji'idal Waters �jEssenrial Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters ❑Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �Water Supply Watershed II I(I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Esrimated watershed land use: ��% Residential 30 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
30 0�o Forested 30 0�o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3-5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2"3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) � Moderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: � Straight ccasional bends requent meander ery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
coinment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 44 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature /Vat%a7 i/�We�� Date 03/30/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 2
3 Riparian zone 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 �
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 4
a Groundwater discharge 0
� 5 (no discharge — 0; springs, seeps, weflailds, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�, Presence of ad,jacent floodplain 0
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
�
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 �
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of ad,jacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0
(no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 0
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 4
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5
�-+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banlcs = max points) 2
�F''„ Presence of ma,jor bank failures
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 3
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
� Root depth and density on banks
� 14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 2
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 2
� (no riffles/ripples ar pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q 1 � Habitat comple�ty 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 2
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous rypes = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 2
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) �
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 � �0
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on �rst page) 44
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SM (indicate on attached map)
� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: Nathan Howell
3. Date of evaluation: 03/30/2017 4. Time of evaluation: 1400
5. Name of stream: SM 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage
9. Length of reach
.15ac
150'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude �eX. 34.a�aslz�: �5.718344
8. Stream order: �
10. County: Wake
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX. -��.ss66 i >>: -� 8 • 635979
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
l3. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying siream(s) location):
From culvert off of Stone Truck Parts parking lot to a roadside culvert adjacent to US 70.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: Warm; partly doudy; 0.12" of precipitation in the past 3 days.
16. Site condiaons at time of visir. Overcast; 67 degrees F; no precipitation
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 �ji'idal Waters �jEssenrial Fisheries Habitat
�Trout Waters ❑Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �Water Supply Watershed II I(I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Esrimated watershed land use: _% Residential 80 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
20 0�o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: �-2 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) � Moderate (4 to 10% Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: � Straight � ccasional bends requent meander ery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
coinment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 27 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature /�/atita�( �IOwe�� • Date 03/30/2017
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) �
3 Riparian zone 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 �
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) �
a Groundwater discharge 0
� 5 (no discharge — 0; springs, seeps, weflailds, etc. = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�, Presence of ad,jacent floodplain 0
� 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
�
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of ad,jacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0
(no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natura] meander = max points) �
10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 �
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5
�-+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banlcs = max points) 3
�F''„ Presence of ma,jor bank failures
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 q.
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
� Root depth and density on banks
� 14 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 �
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 0
� (no riffles/ripples ar pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q 1 � Habitat comple�ty 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 0
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 3
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) �
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous rypes = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) �
� 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) �
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 �
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 � �0
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on �rst page) 27
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLANQ pETERMIhlATI[}N DATA FC}RM — Eastern Mnuntains and Piedmvnt Regi4n
ProjeeUSite: I� -� i`-��- CitylCounty: � �:-::� ,�'�^`�� �� _ Sampiing Date: � 2'� I
AppricantlUwner: l..j C. � �{�T State: �'�� L 5ampling Paint: ��S ` t ��u��
In�est�gatar{s}; �i , , n ��r ; i� • ���a �r�^�— SectEor�, T�wnship, Range: I� ? rf1 �.r
U �Gv� i�in
Landforcn [hillslope, terrace, et�.]: �� C3� � �n P� ' La�6 reiief {concave, conuex, nane}: fl+ +c��U�— Slope {°Io}: �7
�
5ubregfon (LRR or MLRA}: _���- —� '' Lst: �.�, f "�� �I �� Long: � � C , C� `? =� �f'�, �� fJatum: �`+1 � `:= i -
�'--� �1 .v�r.0 C n'��.� � f=e1tiC. 5�•�,l �+w�GJWI classificaiion:
Sait Map Unit Name: S�'I �---- �;e- SUi45 tr✓�� I��f� _
Are clim�tdc I hydrvlpgoc cqnditians an khe site typirzl for Rhis time of yeaf7 Yes � No {Ef nsa, explain in Remarks.y
Are Vegetation (1D , 5aii 1 i , or Hydr�logy �'d significantly disturbed? Are "�larmal Circumsta�t�es" peesent? Yes '�--� N❑
Are Wegetatian Yili , 5oil f'f❑ , or Hydra�vgy }�� naturaEly pra6lematic? [if needed, explai� any �nswers in RemarEcs.}
SIIMMARY OF FINDIhIGS — Attach sit� rr+a� shvw�ng sampling point faca#ians, transects, im,�r�rtant features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetatian Prespnt7
Hydric Soil present7
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: �
� it'c� �t� ,�-�-r('c, ���•, A�j �'� i
HYQRC3LOGY
��S � �D Is the Sampled Area
Yes X Nv _ within a Wetland7 Yes � No
Yes x No
Wetland Hydroiogy lndlcators: Secvndary Indicators fminimum af fwo reouiredl
Primary IndiGatars �minimurra of an� is required; check all ihat anolvi � 5urtace 5oil Cracks (Bfij
Surface Water (A1j _ Tru� Aquati� Plants 4814} _ 5parsely Vegekaied Conoa�e Surface (B8)
_ Migh Water Table {ACj ! Fiydragen Sulfide C}dQr (Ci) � brainage F'atterns (B14}
:'k. Saturatian (A3] _ Qxicfized Rhizaspheres ❑n Living Roats (C3j _ Moss 7rim Lines R816}
Water Marks {B1] _ Presence of Reduced Iron [C4} _ �ry-Season Water Tabfe [G2)
� S�ediment �epvsits {B2} �, Recerat lran Reducti+an in 7ilfed 5uils (C6} _ Cra�sh 8urrows (�8)
� Drift Oepasits {B3J _ Tnin Muck Surfaee {C7j _ Saturaiion Visible on Aerial Imagery �C9}
! Afgal Mai or Cn�sk {B4} _ Okl�er {Explain in Remarks} _ 5[unted or 5kressed Planls [Q1)
Iron Depasits [65} _ Geomarphic Positian {�2j
� Inunda[ion Visible an ReriaM Imagery (67� _, Shallow Aquitard (D3}
� Water-Stained I�ea�es (69) _ Mi�rotopogra{�hic Relief ��4j
_ Aquatie Fauraa {813} _ FAC-Weutrai "iest {�5)
Fleld Ohservatlans:
Surface Water Present'7 Yes No � aepth (inches):
Water Tatrle Present? Yes �lo �� �e�th [inches}:
Saturati4n Present? Yes :ti �la Dep[h [inches}:� Wetland Nydrvingy Present7 Yes �� No
incEudes ca illa frin �
�escrG�e Recorded Data {s#rearn gauge, monitorir�g well, aerial pholas, previous inspeetionsj, if available:
RarnarEcs:
� � �
�-�.c��- �y�C �c7`3; �,�' ' :• �'"` ` '
in��'� � � �' �'�+`% � +_i�-- �(�'_i � � rl C �� - . �.E, '
US Army Corps of Engineers Easiem hRouniains and Piedmant--Version 2.0

VEG�iAi�Dh� {Faur Straia) — Use scientific names of plants.
Aibsalut� Dominant Indicator
Tree 5iratum {P�ai sixe: 5n''l f'tri�.j °I�� Covsr SaeeEes? Sta[us
1. � .'q + ►, � s ' C , �.� n v+Y r� � � —.L�/_ �,�G1nI
2. �L ,' w� n c�`� `�, Z j f f"�r-
3. _. 7Q� �•,� r_ l� r� n.. 1 , ( t? �l-l/�T— �FrC�
4. i-�l..rr� C v �M �_.+� .i s !v ���
5.
7.
`�0 = Total Cover
5�°% of tvtal car+er. �� 20°fo af total cousr. ��
Sanlinal5hrub Stra[um {Plat size: �+� {'G+d. } '
� . �L41 �4�1l�iU[h/"' �'^�.� �: h r•�'i- �,u rce- �'4 � � �f'rU
2. �1� �iuSj,iAi"� c]t�v, f,`.+.. _ �_ � .��
3. �Lo x o Y�.c.a. � IrV �t
4.
7.
8.
9.
�'� � 7otal Cover �
50°/� of total co�er: Z-�7 26°/a of tatal cover:
Herb �tratum (PIoY siza: �rt f�d. ) /�j
1. u :�n..� �..Y�,,. r�c+r���J•� .� 1 " ,�+14{.
2. C�. �-r x �., �'S . i 5 � �
� �3. l��e.,r^ c�s .ar�i4'=.,� 1 � _�[,�
7.
8.
16.
1T.
�� � YQY�f i�'.9VBC �
5D°Io of total caver: �� 24°Io of total ca�er;
Woody Vine StraCum 4PIot size: �� f�nCl • j
�. �-�o�, _ ,7�4.r , �:�.. ; 5 � �R�
z. ���, I c+ ,� ; r n $ f '
� T
Sampling Point: �+�'�` C �^'"�`
hominanee Test w�rksheet:
Num6er of Dffminant 5pecies �]
ihal Are Q6L, FACW, vr FRC: �Aj
7otaf Num6er af dominant
5pecies Acrass RII 5trata: {8)
Percent of i]ominant Species
Fhat Are C?SL, '�ACW, pr FA�: � (A!B)
Prevalence Index warksheet:
Totai % Gayer of: Mulliolv bv.
aBL species x � _
FACVIi,species x 2 = _
FAC species x 3 =
FACLf species x 4 =
UPL sp�ecies x 5 �
Coiumn Totals: {A} {Bj
Prevalenceindex = 6!A =
Hydrophytic V�gefatian Indlcatars:
J�- Rap�d "�es[ for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2- Dominance Tesl is j50°/a
3- Pravalence index is 53.C1'
� 4 - Nforphofogi�al Adaptations' {Pravide supporting
data in Remarks ar on � separ�te sheetJ
_, Pro6lema[ic Hydraphytio Vegetatian' (�xplainj
'Indicators af hydric sofl and wetland hydrr�logy musk
be presenk, unless disturhed or probl�matic.
aa#in[fions of Faur Vegstativn 5trata:
7ree - Woody plan[s, excludi�g vines, 3 in. {7.6 cm} ar
more in diameter at 6reast hefgl�t {flBN}, regardless nf
heighL
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBN and greaker lhan or equal to 3.28 R[1
m) [all.
Merb - Afl herbacsaus {nan-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and waody plants iess ihan 3.28 ft ta61.
Wvady �ine - All waady vines greater than 3,28 ft En
4.
HydrophytiG
5. Vegetatlon
ZC� = Tvtal Cvver Presenk7 lfes No
50°fo of tatal cover: � t7 20°l� of totai r,aver:,�
Remarks: (lnclude photo numbers here vr on a separate sheef.}
�l�ak 5�z.e c_�-��n
�h�u�r �j�] -�- �c•�; t.k' 4��' 'UV2.f'C�ito� 1 t'ti(-�"'{.�C� `t� [�o+�''"+='cr�fC� �5�" -F S�iu
�:�,`�['c4 C� rw `-� 4�C� �'
�#' S i T:e..
1-+Cl fl'1y (Yr� �h C A- �"'U�S '�'�^ (j+�� + '`,�r.i i s. 1
^� 4sr.�e��,;urn 4 ��.��,�c���a ��� �'�tijG�f[l�7 F�-�{�� G U��'���Gv1
�� �fC7fr��r L�^�`��l {,:r, �trf('_,+l
� 1[9�.,� I"f�u�1ErY(�, G�¢ �,k�`�f�t5 �'ft;�i�t�,,kir
tJS Army Carps of Engineers Eastem Mvuntains and P�edmant - Versfan 2.D

I.�,. — � �''� `�l
SOIL
Sampling Paint: � � - � �•i,�-�
Proflle OsscNpt�pn; [�escrlhe to the depth needed to dncument the indicator or �anfirm tha ahsence of indicatvrs.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�i.nchesl Colar Imoisl °Jo Calar {moisq °/a Tv�e Lr�c iex4ure Remarks
�'� � ��n J°Q . l�G �' _• _ .rn
� 1�.7� `S f � _ �t7 •5 `��`� 2t] � � Gi ���P. -,
, -1__� ► � + � � � c�'f � � �� 3� � � �_
'7 e: C=Cor�Centratian, l]=i]e leiifln, RM=Reduced Frkatrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. �Location: PL=Pare Linin , A�4=Ma[rix.
Hydrlc 5oil Indlcators: Indlcatvrs for Problematic Hydric 5ails':
Histflsvl (A'f J � �erk Surface [�7j _ 2 cm Muck {Ai 0} (MLRA 14ij
Hisiic Epipedon (A2] , Polyvalue 8elow Surface {S8} jM�RA 14T, 148) f Coast Prairie Redox [A16)
Black Mis[ic [A3} _ Thin [}ark Surtar�e (S9] SML.RA '147, 148} jMLRA 14T, 148)
Fiydrog�n 8ulfide �AA) Loamy Gleyed Ivfatrix (F2} � Piedmant Floodplain Sails {F�9}
_ 5iratified Layers {A5} �, �epleked Matrix [F3] jML12A 935, id7)
2 cm Muck (A10} jLRR hfj _ Fiedox Rark Surface (Ffij _ Very Shallow 43arEc Surface (TF12J
Ospleted Selaw �ark Surface [A19 } _ bepleted t)ark Surface {F7} � Other tExplafn in Remarks}
� Thick dark Surface (Al2j _ Redox Depressions (F8j
W Sandy h�9ucky Minerai (S1 }(L�tR I�, f lran-M�nganese Masses (F12J [LRR N,
i4�LRA'E47, 1A8� MLRA 436]
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54} � llmbric Surface {F13} (MLRA �f36, 122j 3lndicatnrs of hydrophytic �egetafEon and
5andy Redax {Sb) _ PiedmonF �loQdplain 5oils (F19} (MLRA 148j wetland hydrfllogy must be present,
Stripped hAatrix (SSj Red Pareni Material {F21 J(N�LRA 927, i47} unless disturf�ed ar pro6lematic.
�testrlctive Layer {i�F ahserved]:
ry��:
�epth {3nphesj: HydrEc Sail Present7 Yes � Nv
Remarks:
L1S Army Gorps af Etrgineers Eastem Maunt�ins and Piedmont - VersEan 2.0

1NETLANa []ETERIVIINAT[(]N DAT� FQRM —��stern Mnuntains and Piedman# R�gion
PrnjeetlSite: i i, '� i`� `-i� CitylCpunty: �`�-&�. r r�-+ ��./+{ a. �+�.- 5ampling f]ate:�
AppticantlC]wner: i,U�t?U� State; �J�- SamplingPornt: k+�k��J���c,,A
y1 �r
Investigatar(s}: M'��<< —traMr . �• M�r� r}cv°-- Seok'ran, Tawnship, Ranga; �� ��"` 'x
�7
Landform {hillslope, terrace, etc.�: �,1� 5����- Local reliaf {cancave, cc�nvex, none}: r1U�f _ __ 51aps {°lmj: �
5uhregEvn [LRR vr MLRA}: ��'. �'' "!` Lat: �� � f��"7� Long: =?���1F"1 Datum: 1�1� Su� 4�'
5oif Map Uni# h#ame; _��' C� '�fiU{7 �r,1'll'.. a�wot��.r ��irr,iY`t h1Wl classification: N a�''� �
Are climatic 1 hydrologic taonditions on the sike typical fQr ihis kime of year? Yes � No (IF na, expEain in Remarks.)
,Are lfegetaiiorr �(�'I U 5ail � il , or Nydrolagy 1�! significanily dfsturhed7 Are "hfarrnal Clrcumstances" present? Yes f Na
Are Vegetatian (7 , SQiI �_, vr Hytirplpgy �p naturaHy prabEemat�c7 ([f needed, exp9ain any answers in Remarks.}
Sl1MMARY QF FINDENGS — Attach site map showing sampling pvint lacatinns, transects, impartant features, eic.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydrio 5oil f�resent? Yes
Wetland Fiydroiogy Present'? Yes
Ftemarks:
HYQR[]LUGY
�° Is the �amplad Area
�O wfthln a Wetland? Yes i�o �--
�iv
Wetlans! Hydralagy Indicators: Secandaev Indicato[s {minimum of two reo�iredl
Primarv Indicatvrs iminimum of one is required= eiaeck all_that anolYl Sur[ace Soil Cracks [66}
SurF�ce �+V'ater {A9 } _ True Aquaiie Plants (B14] � 5parsely Vegetated Conaave 5urfaee {B8j
� High Water Tabie [A2j � �iydrogen Sul�de �dor {G3 } � [�rainage Pattems (B10}
Saturatian (,43) _ dxidized Rhizaspheres on Li�ing �oots {C3j � Mass Trim Lines [81B}
i Water Marks {81} ,__ Presence of Redueed Iran (C4} � qry-Season W�ter Table (GZ}
Sediment fJepasiis {B2) � Reeent fron Redu�tion in Ti�led Soils �Cfi] � Cra�sh Burrouvs 4C8}
_ Ori�t Qeposifs (63] �'! hin Muck 5urfaee (C7) _ Saturation Visibl� an Aerial Imagery {C9j
_ Algaf Ivfat or Crust (B4) � �fher {Explain in Remarks) � Stunted or 5�ressed Plants 4D1 }
� ITon C}eFosits (B5j � Geamorphic Posikfan (02}
Inunaaiian Visible on A�ria! Imagery {BT} _ Shallow Aquitard ��3)
VVater-5tained Leaves �B9} _ iNicrotopographi� Relief {[34j
Aquafic Fauna {B13} � FAC-�leutral Tesi �d5}
Fleld Observatlons:
Su�ce Water Present'? Yes Na 7� Qepih {inchesj:
Water Table Present? Yes h!o SC Depth {inches}:
Satura6on Present? Yes A!a C� �epth {inches): WetEancE Hydralagy Present� Yes Ho :�
includes ca ifla frin e
�escri6e Recarded Data {strearr� gauge, mottitoring well, aerial photos, pravfqus inspeciions}, if a�ailahle:
Remarks:
�
l� ' l ' �
.�41
U5 Army GarFas of Engineers Eastem Mcauntains and Piedmant — Versian 2.0

�-��=�y�
V�G�TATIDh� {Faur Strats) — llse scie�tific names af plants.
Absalute Qaminant Indicatar
T�ree 5tratu (P1ot size: �'"'� fT,�[lunc ) °la Cavar Spscies7 tatus
1. Y �• �, �.� -�,n,. c� �o E� '� f f�C.
2. L � � , ^� .�-si.+"•- r� •. �vz. � s, l i .7 , `��"i�:le. � � t _ FA[ ►.t
3. � C c..,,� 'j , jQ' G w, � .5 11� � f#G
4. 'L'��-.'�.�.D1,W.�.aa-Y a`-�4rG�ti�lvLi 'S '� �r�v_
6.
7.
`�U = iatsl Caver
509/4 t�f total cov�r; � 20°Io aF total cover.° {�
5aplinglShr�b 5tratum (F'lat size: � M rvx�� us y
1. L�' ,.w- 1, ..�E. � � i� � �1 i�C• Uf
2. '4 L �r„ � y�,�., s � �f��-
3.
&.
T.
9.
� � = ivtal Cvver
56°/0 of tolal cover: -7. s 20°/a of tofai caver:�
Heeh 5tra[um {Plvt size: ]
1.
/ = Total Cover
50°Io of ifltal cover: 20°!a of toial cp�ar:
Woodv Vine 5tratum (PIOI SizL': SM r�ck��a j
�. '.-�t� �� s �,,,�, , P k7��,., ,r. 5 � � ��#Luf
2. �,r��'iu.x. �c.[T. It� _� �
3.
4.
�aC7 = Tata! Crsver
50% of total cover� �IC3 2�°/0 of tpta9 co�ar: �Z
Remarks: (Indude phato numbers here ar on a separaEe sheet.)
5ampling Point: �'�►'� ` �
Number of Daminant 5pecies
That Are pBL, FACVir, or fAC: (A}
Tvtal Numbar pf Ddminae�t
Species Aeross All Sirata: (B}
Per�cent af Qominant 5pecies �J /
That Are 48L, FACW, ar FAC: I 1 U (AJ�}
Tntal °Io Cover of`. Multfolv bv:
QSL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
�AC species x 3 =
FNCU species x 4 =
iJPL specfes x 5 =
Cqlumn Totals: {Aj (8J
Prevalence 9ndex = 8IA =
Hydraphytic Vegetatian I�ndicatQrs:
� 1- Rapid Test for HydrophyGc Vegetation
2 - aominance Test is �5�°/0
3- Prev�lenGa Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - futarphoiog�caV Adaptations' {Pravide supparting
data in Remarks ar o� a separate sheet}
_ Prat�lemalie Hydrophy[ic Vegetation' {Explain}
'�ndiGators ot hydric soil and uvetland hydraCagy must
be present, unless distur6ed ar prohlematic.
Definitians a# Faur Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody pfants, excluding vEnes, 3 in. (T.B cmJ ar
mare in diameter ak breast heEght ([36Hj, regardless of
height.
5aplinglShrub - Wvvdy planis, exeluding vines, fess
than 3 in. �BH and greater than or equal #0 3,2$ H(1
m} tall.
Herh - Afl herbaceaus {npn-waody} pfants, regardfess
nf size, and woody plants less lhan 3.28 ft ialf.
1Noody �ine - All waody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
]iydrophytic �
Vegetatlan
�Present7 Yes Nv
� V�}�` 7�� 1.�41�C.� ��1 e7f1 �a � LC� O� .�'U'Hi fG'.�j"c. '��V��� ,:��(U'[�k-�- aro ,,,c�-}�h[,l
iJS Army Carps af �ngineers Eastern Mauntains and Piedmvnt - Version 2.0

� _ � � vir'.�
�0�� Sampling Paint: W � �
Proflle Descript[on; (�escri6e tp the depth needed ta dacument the indicatar ar con#irm the a6sence af indtca�tcrs.}
Qepth M�trix Redox Features
finches] Col4r [moistl °lo -, _ Colar fmvlst) _� Tvoe Loc 7exture Remarks
� �. d "i f S C� [� � � �-- - }. f, r - a r i . � � � �M
_ t�r7 ! � �t� �I�F � (3 c� � � � c�-� L � SC i---
�o—r��r- o�(� '� � `�d Rpvi� 6� � D 'L G ����.4
'T e: C�Conceniration, Q=�e ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, M$=Masked Sand Grains. zLacati�qn: PL=Pore Linin , Ar1=Matrix.
Hydric Svil Indicakcsrs: fndf�cators for Problematic Hydric Solls':
Histasvt {A1 } _ Dark Surface (57} _ 2 cm Ntuck (R1D} (MLRA 147j
� Fiis#ic Epipedor� {A2) _ Polyvafue Balow Surface (S8] {MLRA 747, '14$� f C�ast Prairie Redax {A1B}
Black liistic {A3] , Thin Oark Surface (S9) jMLRA i47, 148j �MLRA 1d7, '1d8}
Hydrogen S�Ifide {A4] _ Laamy Gleyed Matrax ��2] T Piedmar�t Flaodpiain Soils (F19}
' Stratified Layers (A5j � Depletecf {Nalrix (F3} jMLRA 13fi, 147}
! 2 �m Muck {A1i]] [LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surtace (F6} _ Very Shal[aw Dark Surface (TF12]
��epleted Below Oark 5u�face {A11] e Clepleted [3ark Surface (F7j �[?ther �Explain in ftemarks}
Thick �ark 5urface (A'�2} � Redox depressions (F8}
5andy Mucky Mineral (S1 }[LRR N, _ Prqn-Manganese dNasses (F12j jLRR �1,
MLRA 747, 148j 141LRA 136)
$andy Gleyed AAairix {S4] , llmbric 5urface [F13] tARLRA 13fi, 122) 3lndicatars of hydrophytl� r�egetation and
� Sandy Reclox (S5) _ Piedrnont Floodplain Saiis (F19j tMLRA 148} weAand hydralbgy must kr$ present,
Stripped Mafrix {S6} Red Parent Ma#erial (F29 j(MLRA 127, 147y unless disturbed or prablematic.
RestrictivQ Layer (if ohser�e�4j:
Type:
Depih {inches}: Hydric Soil Present� Yes Na �,
Remarks:
U5 Army Corps af �ngineers Eastem Mauntains and piedmant — Version 2.0

WETLANi] pEl'ERMINATIDN QATA FOR�VI — Eas#ern IVlauniains and Pi�drt9ot�t Region
Praje�VSi#e: _ lJ4 ���} '_I � CitylCvunty: C�� i•`�i� v` �'b'ti'� C� Sampling E3ate: ti`� `�
ApplicantfQwner: �'-� � �-' �� St�ie: J� Sarnpling f'oint: � 1�" � WQ �
Invesiigator(sj: �%�r� �Q✓ . � r � �� ��.�"`— 5ection, Tvwnship, Range: ��I'I� P.1'�
�' a
Landform (hillslope, terraG�, etc.): ��p�'� ���r'P Local relief {concsne, convex, I16f1@): C�Q�'1CotvG Slape [°Io�:
Subregian {LRR ar MLRAJ: � a�' i� — I� Lat: `;J , � ;1 � `�� Long: � ~� `�. �a ���f ? �f �atum: �.1 � �C' `�:�.:
5oil Map Unit Name: i"f �'�-Z— (��1�,�,Y I GCnM NWI classificatipn: / W f�/
Are climatic 1 hydrologfc conditipns vn iha site typicai for this kime of yea�? Yes +� Na (if nn, axplain in Remar�cs.]
Are VegeFatian �, Sail �C? , or Nydralogy �U signi�icantly dis#urbed? Are °iVortnal Circumstances° present? Yes lf Na
Ara'Vege4ation r'1i] , 5oil 11G' , or i-lydralogy �1� naturaliy {�rQblernati�? �IP needed, explain any answers in Remarks.j
SIJMMARY UF R�VaINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point 1oc�tior�s, transects, impor#ant features, et+c.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Presenl?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Fiydrol4gy Present?
Remarks:
HYDRQLQGY
Yes �'� �fo Is the 5amplec{ Area ,/
Yes X No wlthln a Wetland7 Yes %. N�a
Yes T IVa
Wetland Nydraf�gy Indlcatars: 5ecflndary Indieatars fminimum of lwo required�
Primary Indi�stvrs {minimum of on� is re4uir�d• check all that apply) J 5urface 5oil Cracks {B6)
� 5urtace Water [A1 j _ True Aquatic Plants 4B14} _ 5parsely Vegetated Concaue Surface [B8}
� High W�ter Table (A2} ! Fiydrogen SuC�ide Odor {C1j � bra9nage Pakterns {81D}
� 5aturation (A3j _ �xicfized Rhizaspneres on Living Ra�ts (C3] _ Mass T`rim'Lines (B16}
Water Marks (Bt} : Presence of Reduced Iran (C4j � C]ry-Season Water 7able (C2}
� 5ediment OeposEts (B2] T Recent Imn Red�ciion in Tilled Soils (Cfi� _ Cra�sh Burraws �C8}
❑rofk �eposits 443} i Thin Muck 5urtace [G7} , Saluratiqn V"ssi6le o�n Aerial lmagery {CS}
� Algal Mat or Crust {B4} � C}fher {Explain ir� Remarks} _ Siunted or Stressed Plants ([}7 j
_ Iron Depasiks {B5] _ GeQmorphic P4sition (D2j
Inundati❑n VisihlQ an Aerial Irnagery �B7} ! Shallow Aquikaed (D3 j
' Wafer-5tained Leaves (B9} icrratopagraphic Relie� ([?4j
_ Aqualic Fauna (613} �AC-Ne�tral Test (D5]
Fieid [7bservatians:
Surface Water Presenk? Yes 7C Nn �apkh (inGh�sJ: t�-- �
Water Table Prasenk7 Yes � No �epth (inchesj: -�v a� ���_.�
r' � Nv
5aturation Present7 Yes ^� No Qepth {inehes]� '�' `� _;;: ��",� Wetland Hydro�ogy Pressnt? Yes
inciudes r,a illa frin e
{Jescribe Recorded p2ka {stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photfls, pre�ious inspeclionsj, if avaFlahle:
Remarks:
�r� 4n� ��n.� ��
US Army Gorps [�f �ngineers Eastem Movntains and PierJmont — Versian 2 q

��,} _, J :1 L� ,.,.+
I
VEG�TA�'�C]hJ {Faur Strataj — llse scientific names of plants. Sampiing Point: (,�J �`� In/��
Absafute Qarr�inant Indicakor pominance Test worksheet:
"free 5[ratum (Plot siza: «{"'" � Z^� J % Cover Soecies? 5katus
r� Number o� Qaminant Species
1. �` r ^�- r�`? 1 t�. 3� �' � That Are C]BL, FACW, or FAC: � {Aj
2. � �e,� r.brL,,,.. I. � I�1 �
�' �� �y� a�-� � 5'L�, � q� � ��� Total Num6er oi Dominant
.�_ Species Across AMI Strata: �f �8)
4._ �- , + . � �+�-- d � u+� ���'. �' "-1^f'-- .5 /.1' i�c+�
Percent vf �omir�ant Species + 4'
5. ihat Are D�L, FACW, ar FAC. f �� �Ll {A!g]
7.
%'� = TotaP Co�er � �
50°� o# tfltal ca�er: � 24% of total co�er:
SaplinqfShrub 5tratum (Plot size: ;i��+ k�-r�, j
1. L � „ � l�n.�.1a,� �r- �#- -�.. r , l l �� 5 �`i� �►�C..
2. +�s C e �,- ,(b1n � ,lf„L �,� —� �,�L
4.
7
5Q°/a of tokal ro�sr:
Herq Strat�m {Plot size: � �f"t u �► )
i. �-1' J�..�.�! i �n �rti�A -�t��^-
7. L f .n [ .. . ir-T�.. � �
a.
6.
7.
9.
� �7 = Total Cover
� ZD��v Of COiB� CQ4Ef: �
�, � �
,,�� � 1- V
11.
( Z- = Total Cover
5i]'/o of total co�er: � 20°/0 ot tota! caver: �'�
Wvod Vine 5tratum {Plot size: ��rs 5C �+� j
�. r7--� I �_ �.�., �,�... _,}7 r-: �-W °� r �,•. � }=-I�C.
2 u
3.
Z - Tntal CO�er
5p°/o vf tvtal Ga�er; I 2Q°� oi total cover: •�
Remarks: {Include phof4 nurnbers here or on a separata shaet.j
Tatal % Cover a1: iNultiniv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FAGW sp�cles x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU speci�s x 4 �
UPL species x a =
Column Totals: (A} (BJ
Prevalenceindex = SIA =
HydroAhytic Vsgetatian Indlcatars:
�R�pid Test far Hydraphyiie Vegefatian
- �]ominanae iesi is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - �Aorphological Adaptations' {Provide supparting
dat� in F2emarks or on a separare sheet}
_ Probfemakic Nydraphytic Vegekativn' (Explair�}
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrolagy must
be present, unless disturhed or prahfematic.
❑eflnitlons af Faur Vegetaiivn 5trata:
Trae - Woody pfants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cmj vr
mare irr diameter �t breast heighi (�BH}, regardless caF
height.
Sap3ingfShrwb - Wflody plants, exeluding venes, less
than 3 in. QBH and greater ihan� or equal tv 3.28 ft{�
m} talE.
Herh - All her�aceous �non-woodyj plan4s, regardlass
of size, and woady plants less than 3.28 ft tafl.
Woody vine -� All woody vines greater than 3.28 ht in
Hydraphytic �
Vegetation
Fresent? Yes _ �fo
C' l� 5' t-t=- C{��r5�1 ��n '� -� v � ori� S it� nr,� I�`�,, ec � �`I.��
11S Army Cqrps af �ngineers Eastern Mounfains and Piedmvni -'Versfan 2.f}

1��� ����
S�IL
Sampkirsg Foint: vJ �- [ w�t�
Proffie Qescrlptinn: {Describe tv the depth needed to document the irtdtcalor ar �onflrm the absence of indica#ors.)
Qepih Matr€x Redax Faaiures
tinchesl CaGor {moist) °% Ca1or imoist] °Io Tvpe Lac Texture Remarks
�� [ � "iV� i� � � � �� � � f � S .�.:- P� ��- _ - ..� .�� -� � 1 � R .
�� �_�?�I� _Si� � (o'�� �!B -"' �� C- r�� 5�� ��+���`-� C.�.�-� , �a cr,
'T a: C=Concentratian, �='De [etion, RM=Reduced Pt+latrix, MS=Maslted Sand Grains, �Lvcaiion: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Svi� ]nd'ecators: �r�dicators fdr Pro6lematic Hydric SalJs':
a-listvsfll [A1 } � Dark SurfaCe [57) _� cm Muck {A1Q] tMLRA 147y
J Histic Epipedon (A2} _ Polyva�ue Belaw Surtace [58} (MLRA �147, 148] � Coast Prairie Redax (A'f 6)
Black Histic {A3� _ Thin Qark Surface (S8) (Ii+ILRA i47, 148j (MLRA 1d7, 148}
^, Hydrogen Sulfide (A4} i Loamy Gleyed Mairix {F2) J Riedmonl Floodp[ain 5oils {F19]
5tratifed Layers (A5j '��G. Oepleted Matrix (F3} (NfLRA 13fi, 14T�
� 2 cm Muak (A10j {I.RR Nj _ Redox l7ark Surface (Ffij _ Very Sha!!ow Dark SurFace (TF12}
Depteted Belaw dark Surface {A11] _ �epleted �ark SurFace [F7} _ Olher {Explain in Rerrtarksj
� Thick Dark SurFa�e (Al2} _ Red4x Qepressians (FSj
� Sandy Niucky Minera2 (S13 (LRR N, _ Iran-Manggn�se Masses [F12] tLRR N,
ML�RA 747, 148j fNLRA 1�fij
8andy Gieyed Ivfatrix {S4) � Llmbric Suriace (F13j {MLRA 136, i22] 'lndicators o� hydrophytic vegetation and
� Sandy Redax {S5) _ Piedmont Fdoodplain Svils (�7 9) (14'I�RA 148J wetland hydrqlogy must be pr�sent,
Strrpped Matrix (SB} Red Parent Materia! (F21j (iNCRA 127, 147J unless disturbed vr prohlematic.
Restric#i�e Layer (i# ohseruedy:
Type:
C3epth (in�hes): Hyc{rlc 5011 Aresenk? Yes '� No
Remarks:
t18 Army Corps of Engineers Eastem h+lountains and Pierlmont — Versaon 2.0

WET�AND D�T�I�MINATI�N [}ATA FORIVI -- Eastern Mcsuntains and Piedmvnt Region
ProjectlSite: 1,1+ - � �+ � `"d 1 1 �1'�,� 1J r1 �1� City1C[�unty: ,,,, �r.-� ws � Sampfing Date: 3 �� � � � �
Applicantl�uvner: „ h.� � 1�'7 (a� „� St2ke: �` 5arrrpling Point; WP��____�_____� i{,�
Investiga#ar(s}: � �'l .�� �+ ��f . � • �'l-r��`�� Se�tian, township, Range: � C'�'� '+..sC�
Landfarm {hillslope, terrace, etc.}: hi�l�'��ti���,� Local reliei {concave, �onvex, na�zaj: 5iope [°Ia}:�
S�breg�on [LRR or MLRA}: �-�,��- - 1� Lat: �.� � � � �a "F` Lang: , ' f P�'� . �.`I !� C�aiurn: PJ .. 1� `t���
Svil Map Unit Name: I� � C.Z- f-1 f�R� �nr. ��y luo��-, NWI classifieaticrn: I� r�`�-
Are c�imatfc 1 hydro#ogin conditions on the site typical far this time of year? Yes � IVo {Ct no, explain in Remarks.y
Are Vegeta#inn � f3 , 5oil �1C? , pr Hydralogy i�Y�� signifrznily disturbed? Are "�lorrnal Circumstances" present7 Yes ^-� No
Are Vegetatian ,,C1 , Sall �(]�, s�r i�ydrology �� natural�y prop[ematic? {If needed, expEain any ans�ers in Fiemarks.}
SUMMAR`�'' �F FI�DIIVCS — A#tach site map shc�uvir�g sampling po�nt locations, transects, tm,portant features, etc.
Hydrophytic l/egetation Pnesent?
Hydric 5oil Present?
Wetland Hydralagy Present?
Remarlcs:
HYDRO�OCY
Yes � No
Yes No ��
Yes No ��
is the Sam�Ced Area �
within a Wetland7 Yas �Vo
Wetland Hydrqlpgy Indlcatars� Seeondarv Indieators (minimum af iwo reouEred]
Primarv IndiGators fminimaam a� one is reauired: checit ail lhat as�p{v] _ SurFace Soi1 CracEcs {8fij
_ Surtace Waker {A1} ! True Aquatio Plants (8'iR} _ 5pars�ly Vegetaked Cancave SurEece {�8]
High Waler iabfe [A2} u Hydrvgen Sul�ide Qdor {C1 } � brainage Paktems (B10}
5aturakion [A3} _ Cixidized Rhizosphe►es an Living Raats (G3} _ Nfoss 7rim Lines (6a6j
Water Marks [B1 } ��resen�ce a� Reeiuced Iran [C4} ^ C7ry-Season Water iable (C2}
Sed�ment Deposits (�2) � Recent Irr�n Reduction in Tiiled Soils [C6} � Cra�sh Burraws {C$]
_ Orik D�ppsits {63} _ Thfn Nfu�k 5uriaca {C7j � 5aturation 'Visible an Aerial Imagery (G9J
_ Algal iulat or Crust {84} _ Other {Explain in Remarksj _ 5tunted or 5tressed Plants {d1 ]
_ Irc�n �eposits {65} _ Ceamorphic Pasitfan (D2)
Inundation Visible an Aeria! Imagery t�37} _ 5�hal�aw Aquitard (�3}
Water-5tained Leaves [69} _ Mi�rotvpagraphic Relief (D�}
� Aq�atic Fauna {813j _ FAC-�leutral '�est {�5j
Flelcf d6servatians:
5r�rface Water Present? Yes NQ �� �epth {inches): �
Water �abde Present? Yes fVo X Qepth {inchesJ:
5aturatiorr Present? Yes No �- Qepth tinches}: �' Watland F[ydrology Present? Yes No �
inc�udes ca illa frin e
Oescribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial pfi�otas, previous inspectians}, ifi av�ila6Ee:
Remarks.
U5 Army Corps of EngEne�rs Eastem INountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

u - `� �- `-� `�
VEGETAiION [Four Strataj — Use scientific names nf pfants�
Absolute Domir�ant Indicator
Tree Sfratum {Plot size: ��1�"' X�[��h j 96 Cover Soecies? 5fafus
1. D �.e -r � v�— �_ �_ �Ac�
2 P � v,�� i-���.- _� �3 �' �
3. .. . • J.u, �... 1�,.,.,� ,'� c. �� �� �f#�C.J
4. � , �,:��I+.�.�,_-. ��•_... }ti,�, �� �e-v�r,1 � �a � '��iLL(
���
7,
�C� = �otia! Caver ,,r
50°!e of [otai caver: �3_ �" S• 20°fo of toCal cover: �]
5aplinqfShru6 Sfraium (Plot sVze: i4m x lU,,rr j
1. V� tir � _,, � s, r''j� a r t�. n. S � f f"�C. �-[
2. � t r •f v �,; b � ... ..- _ .5 � f-f�L
.7. �.'� �Y'lC�''�:. �.JPx,�' �'1�F.C*i��a'(?� �O � �
7
5D°I'o o� tatal cc}ver: S f7
Herb Siratum (Pfv! size: ���^� � �U, j
1. � i, , f1�,a� G {� .� �+� M�w Cr, �a.. _ -
2.
3,
4.
7
� = Total Cover ' }
209'0 of tvta! cover: �
� ��
9.
1�.
1'i.
� = Tatatl Caver I
5a°fo of tota! �oWer: 2. � 20% of totai eover
Waodv Vine 5tra[um {Plot size: ���x1U }
�. Cg-c 1 �'P M_ ..,... �.2 � - rir-'� w'� ��-� � .� `� �.
3
�� Tqial Cq�er
5b°Io oi tatal co�er: �-�4 20°l0 of tofal cover: �
{Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.j
5arn�ling Point: 'h.r ` �
Daminance Test wrorksheet:
Number af �aminant 5pe�ies
That Are L?BL, FACW, or FAC; {A)
Tfltai �Vumper QF bominant
5pecies Across All 5lrata: (Bj
Parcenl of dominant SpeeEes �'
shai Are OBL, FACW, r�r FAC: �� �� (Al'Bj
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total'/o Co�er of: Muftiplv �v:
dBL specfes x 1 =
FACW speGes x 2 =
FAC speeies x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
L1P4. spaci�s x 5 =
Column Totals: {Aj (B)
Prev�lenCelndex = BfA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indi�atars:
/1- Rapid Test far Hydrophytic Vegelatinn
+✓2 - Qomir�snce �est is �5Q%
� 3- Frevalenee Index is s3.Q'
_ A- Morpholagical AdaptaCions' jProvide suppor#ing
data in Remarks ar on a separafe sheet}
_ Pro6lem�tic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain}
'Indicatprs of hydric soi! and v+fetland hydrology mus[
6e presenl, �nless disturhed or pi�hlematic.
Refinitions vf Fvur Vegetatian Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 8 in. (7.6 em} or
more in diameter at hreast height (OBH), regardless of
height.
5aplinglShrub - Woody plants, exciuding vines, less
lhan 3 in. �BH and greater than or equal ffl 3.2$ ff {1
m} tall.
Herb - Afl herbaceous {nan-4vaady) Rlants, regardl�ss
of size, and woody {alanfs less ihan 3.28 ff tall.
Waady +�Ine - All woody vines greaker than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
�resent? Yes No
��'f'�x.f aI,': �' ��1'� ��:, rwJt.=r',�.L.,-t?�'` t� j�s�r..',r t,nC';_"' f, 7 J, `_ _ + -
�r'�' .; ..�r� yt'1-�r�r?.�.,.� _�µ=��;
f- �r '.T [..{�...lrrr�+�1G�� N",. �, _. ,. ,ti�G �'�i�. �-Cr_i��i .. 'c.��,1 '�I`y�J f_�-�1� .
J
U5 Arrny Carps nt Engineers Eastern Mourstaii�s and Piedmont - Version 2.a

��r �����
SOlL
Sampling Pqint: ln� �JJw - �-�
Profile �escrlptlon: (Descrihe to the depth needed to dacument the Indicatvr or confirm the ahsence df indlcators.j
f?epth Matfik Redox Features
(inchesl Color[moist} °ro Colorfmoistl °/a Tvpe Lvc F xture Remar'ks
a`� f� y V� `�i I� `� 1 l�o t r, 4 S''
� -�,�1' 2 � S � f a ,�b '� � "Z . � `� � `i ,3 c� � � - - � !� :. f �-. ; , `, ' ir`,
�] -! Z� 5`� �v b E o� S t—
'T e: C�Concentraiion, D=De fetion, RM-Reduced Matrix, iNB=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocatifln: PL-Pare Linin , M=Nlairixu
Hydric 5al! Incflcatars: Indicatvrs for ProhRematic liydrtc Soils':
Histosoi (A1 } _ Dark 5urface (87j _ 2 cm Muck �AiDJ (MLRA 1A7j
' Histic Epipedvn (A2� � Pvlyva�ue Eelow Surface [S8} {MLRA 147, 1d8j � Coast Prairie R�dox (R,i6j
Black Histic (A3j , Thin Qar& 5urfa�e (59} {M�RA 447, 1A8} jMLRA 147, 148)
� Hydragen S�rlfide {A4} _ Laamy Gleyed M2trix {F2] _ Piedmqnt Flaodplain 5ails (F19)
Stratified Layers {A5} _ Qepleted Matrix (F3] (iNLRA 138, 14T]
� 2 cm Niu�k {A1D} (LR93 N} _ Redox aar4c Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow �ark SurFace (T�12)
De�leted Belaw park Surface (A9 9} ^ dspl�ted Dark Surface (F7j J fliher {ExpleEn in Remarks}
Thick Oark 8urface (Al2} f Redox Depressions (F8}
� S�ndy Mucfcy Mineral (51 j{LRR �!, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
NlLRA 147, 148J MLRA 736j
5andy Gleyed Mairix {S4� , Umbric SurFace {F'E3} [MLRA 136, 122j 'andicators af hydrophytiG v�getalian aad
5andy Redox {55} _ Piedrnant �laodpla€n SoiEs {F19} tiNLFiA 148) wei[and hydrology must be presenk,
Stripped Matrix (S6j Red Parent helakerial (F27 )(MLRA 127, S47) unless disfur6ed or problemalic.
Restrictl�ve Layer �if nhservedk:
Type:
Depih {inches}: liydric Sa�l Present7 Yes N❑ �
Remarks:
{JS Army Corps vf �ngineers Eastem Mauntains and Piedmant - V�rsion 2.0

W�T�P4NQ DETERIIAINATIDN i�ATA FORM — Eastern Mc�untains and Piedmant Reginn
Proje�tlSite; i.�. -, 5 Y`t'� fi� rn 1���C` L'� `� s� CitylCoun[y: 1� �'� e. 5ampling �ate: _C'�3 }��"� ! 1'�-#
Appli�ar�tlDwner: r�JG1}Cr1� _ State: 1��. Sampling Point: WL�- �. +'� "-�- 1
In�estigator(sj: 1`� � I-i� +r1� �i-_ �._ �f`� �� _ Section, Township, Rar�ge: rd rt, P r
Landiorm �hillslc�pe, terrace, etc.]: �1 _^� �� i f�+ �� Il LQcal re9ief �concave, eonvex, r�nne]: ,����+�Y''�" 51ope {�,}; p�-� '�
�ubregion {LRR ar MLRA}; ?-(� ��-. r � Lat: :S� � l� ��� Lang: F "� �. ��:� i � r��: ❑�tum: N A � �=C �
Soi1 [Nap Unit hJame: 4� o� 1- S�, ��ti �- `` o ;!v �� NWI ciassificatian: �r`��
Are elimati� 1 Y� drplv ic conditions orr the site typieal for [his trme af year? Yes No (If nv, explain in Remacks.J �y
Are 4+eg�:ta[ian 50+1 I °� I, rrr Hydrolvgy ��s�i�r ificanUy distur6ed? N� Ar� "NormaV Circumstanees" present? 1"es I"� � No �
Are V�getaCion 5oil �, ctr Hydrerlogy � naturally Qrotalematic? +r''� �(If needed, explain any answers in Re+narks,}
SUMMARY OF FINCII�[G5 -� Attach site map showing samp{ing point lacations, transe+�ts, impartant features, etc.
HydrophyBc Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Saii Presen47 Yes
Wetland FSydrnlagy Presern? Yes
Remarks:
HY�R�LDGY
inn
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes iVo 0
W�Uand Hydrolagy fndicators: conda Indicat[rrs minioreum oF two re uired
Primary Indicatars (minimum of one is required: check all fhat a�olyl �[ 5urta�e Soil Cracks (B6j
❑ Su ace Wa[er {A1) ❑ True Aquatic Pl�nts {814j ❑ 5 arsely Vegeta[ed Concave Surface (B8}
#iigh Water Table (A2] ❑ Hydragen 5ul�ide (Jdor (C1] nrainage Pattems [B70}
'�SaturatiQn {A3J Q �xidized Rhizvspheres an Living Raots [C3} �lloss T�im Lines (816}
❑ Water Marks {B1) � presence of Reduced iron (C4} [] Dry-Seasan Water Ta61e (C2�
❑ Sediment [7eposits (8z] ❑ Re�ent Irtsn Reduc[ion in Tilled Spils [CfiJ ❑ Cra�si Burrnws [C8}
�ift Depasi[s {B3j � Thin Muck 5urtace (C7) [� Saturatian Visible on Aerial Imagery {C9}
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4} ❑ �ther {�xplain in Remarksj ❑ 5tunted or Stressed Plants {p1]
� Irvn depcas�fs (85j Q Geomorphic Posili4rr [02J
�] I ndatian Visi�le on Asrial lmagery {B7] � 5hallouu Aquitard (p3}
Water-Stained Leaves [B9} ❑ Microtapographic Relief tp4)
� Aquatic Fauna (813} �FRC-Neutra4 Test t�5)
Fie[d Observations:
Surface Water PresenC? Yes Q, No �b�pth {inches): �
uvater Table Present? Yes ��No � bepth {inches}: `�
Saturation Present� ves� 1Va � Depth {inchesj: ��•f I' F. t F•_. Wetland F�ydralogy Presenk? Yes � No �
includes ca ilfa frin e
Deseribe Recc�rdeci Data (stream gauge, monitoring weU, aerial phr�tas, peevio�s inspectionsJ, if available:
Remarks:
't, � - Ir.l �J i � .�`�— �2-� � N'-.. t'��-f�a..{� rf l.�"J � �'r i !;T i,'. £__«f (^ 'v � � 1�'... I I
Ll-J�l F ! ��. � i
L1 � �,+�:.� C[ �-��, �F_ I� .15,a: �� . iJV' 3 ���i� .
US Army Cqrps of Engineers E�s[ern Mour�[ains �nd Piedmant - Version 2-a

��� J���
VEG£TR,T�C?N [Fi�e Strata] — Llse scientifi� names of �lants. 5ampling Point:_r��j - 2 l��S��! ,.
, Absalute �ominan[ indica[ar aaminance Test worEcsheet:
Tree Stratum [Plot siae: _�,�J '� Gd ') °k Cpver Soecigs? Stat�ts �W���r �� p,�minant 5pe�ies
7. �, ti fk r ra arh �S�yr `�,�,'� Ca t_, �•�t�t � i�� �I'�� Thal Ar� OBL. FACW, oi FAC: � IAi
2._ —i_C�.a�ti � P..t?C, ' 2� �`� �R5 �,
Tatal Num6ee p% pomin�nt
�' Species Acfoss AII Svata: � (gj
_ �� � Tofal Caver
5a% of [otal t.�ver. �'� 2b% of [oCal ca�er: /i �
Sapling Stra[um (Plot size: � v l 1�e. ��� .
1. �
t.
3. - -
4. �� ..
5,
= Tatal Cover
5f1� of [ata! caver: 20°% of toial cover:
5hrub Stra[um {P!a[ size; ? ��� i�c� ��, �
�. � r �f`.U_if� P ��C.-'�L{ ('('j • ��� lO� ,�.�
z._ �;{+��'rs�€r�'rs�r ,,,;. ,�.rr',�luc, 1 Q �� �r .
pereent of Dominant 5pecies
That ArQ QBL, FACW, ar FAC: �� d
Pa�evalence Index wprkshe�t:
TQtal 95 Co�er of, Multiolv bv:
DSL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FAC U species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Co9umn Totals: (A}
Prevaience lndex = BIA =
LwB1
��
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indiea�tars:
❑� �1- Rapid Test for Hydrophy[ic Vege[ation
+-LT� - �ominance �est is n56p/4
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is e3.0'
❑ 4 • Morphofagieal Adaptations' (Prouide suppoe[ing
da[a in Remarks ar pn a separate shee[j
� Problematie Hydrophy[ic Vegetation' {ExplainJ
� 'Pndi�ators oF hydric soil and wetland hydrology mu5[
he ,present, unless disturbed or prablematic.
'�� '� = Tatal Cover p��nitions af Five Vegetatian Strata:
5U% of tota� caver: %��-' 209G flf to�al cover: � r�
Her6 5va�um (Flat size: � C7 i�c, c� � Tree - Woody plants, excludfng woody vines,
approximately 2q F[ {6 m} or more in height an� 3 in.
1. C R-°,�� r� ; t� c,f � c� �� r•�-Gti L?� w p j F�,( +�� (7.fi �mj pr larger in diame[er at 6reast heigh[ ((]BHj.
2.
Sapiing - Waady plan[s, �xcluding wovdy vines,
3• appraximate�y 2fi ft{6 m) or more in height and f�ss
q, th�n 3 in. (7.& cmj DBH.
''� _ 5hru6 - Woody pfants, excfuding wppdy vines,
�, approxima[ely 3 to ZD ft {1 to fi m} in heigh[.
�' F#erb - RI! herbaceous (nvn-woody) plants, including
8. her6ac�Qus vines, regardless of siae, and woody
pl�nts, except woody vines, less than �pproximately 3
�' f[ [7 m} irt height.
7 i}.
11
�r � = Tqtal Caver
54°% aF [otal caWer: r�.'' f-�' 2Q% of ro[al cvver:�
Wocsdy Vine Stratum {Plat si ;�r� I�c;� . ]
1. �ia7 i l �i ,'L C o� � n r� '� �a I � :� _ �D �C'.> ��
�. r,rr. i`F.�4j a_, of� �Lar i� �} �`'�
Remarks:
Woody �in�e - Afl wqody vines, regardfess oF height.
�- Fydrophytic
�� �' = Td'tef COVQr Vegetation
5{}% of total caver: �r'�' 2(]3�, pF [atal cvver: /� presenf? Yes � No�
photo numt�ers �ere ar on a separa[e she�[ )
US Arrriy Corps r�f Engineers Easiem Mountains and �iedmont -• Versifln 2.0

�1-5�yz�
SOIL
�
Sampli�g P�int: f 17 -� � �.�-s�a,c�
ProFle Oescriptian: (D�saribe to ti�e depth needed tv document the indicatc�r or confifm the ahsence vf indicators.j
Depth Matrix Redax Feature�
ir�ches ,Colar [moistl % Col�r fmoist] 9'a Tvne�" ac� Texture Remarks
.� �_^ �! � ? / i � p �l r`'� t� �;(� .� i f, �, t��,
�' 1z I�`If�S'/z. '�� Ia y� �f� �� �_ 4�1 ��
J-z-1' «��l►� �In � I�`�1t �1 r �,� �� � '� �1'' �
'T e; C=Gancen[�a[ion, C]=de letipn, RiN=F2edu�ed Ma[rix, M5=Masked 5and Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Linin , fN=�+IaVix.
Hydric SoiE Indicators: Indicators �ar Problematic H�rdric SaFls':
0 Histosol (A1� ❑ Dark Surf�ce {S7J ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10] {MLRA 347}
❑ Hsstic Egipedon (R2} �] Pofyvalue Belaw 5urface (58} {MLRA'147, �48j ❑ Gaast Prairie Redox {A1fi}
❑�lacls Histic (A3] ❑ Thin Oark Sueface (S9j (�UILRA 143, 748] 4MLI�A 74T, 148j
�[ Fiydrogen Sulfide {A4) ��.aamy Gleyed Matrix (�2j � Piedmvnt FI[�otfplain S�ils [F19}
0 5tratifed Layers {A5} �aepleted M�trix {F3) {MLRA 73fi, 747J
❑ 2 Cm MuCk (A10} (LRR N) f] Redox park SurFace (FBj �] Very Shallaw Dark Surtace (TF12}
��ep�eted Bel�w Dar& Surtaee {Ai "1] � Oepleted �arK 5urface [F7} � 4ther {Exp}ain in Remarks)
❑ Thick bark Surtace (Al2} � Redox Depressians [F8}
� Sandy Mucky Mineraf (51) (LRR iV, ❑ Iran-iNanganese Masses {F32J [LRR N,
MtRA �47. 148} MLaA 13fi]
❑ Sandy Gleyed Mat�ix {54} ❑ Umhric 5urface �F13) (MLRA 'i3fi, 122} 'fndicatars oF hydrophytic vegetatian and
� Sandy R�dox [S5} [� piedmqnC '�Inadplsin Soils {F19) �14�LRA 748) we[land hydrology r�aust 6e presQnt,
❑ Stripped MaVix {56J � Red Parent Allaterial [F2"l} (M�RR 727, '[47) unless dis[urbed or problematic,
Restrictive Layer (if obser+uedJ:
7ype:
❑epth {inches}: Hydric Svil Pr�esent? Yes �f No �
Remarks:
S,a !, jJtv Y Y!�-�'- ..7 �' ��.`y D
U5 Army Cr�rps of Engineers €astern Maunlair�s and Piedmant - V�rsiar� 2.�J

WET�ANO QETERMINATIQN DATA FC]RM -�astern Mountains and Piedmant Regian
Pr�jec�ISice: 9.� ����`�� �, r�� 1�Fx �iir, J� _, CitylCounry: Il�l�- f� 5arnpiing �ate; �,�
AppficanUC3wner: P� f,s 1%' �'� �ta[e: �� Sampling Poin[: #r-�b -.�'� ��-l�L-�
investigator{s]; r..S, 1''. �v]Pl.,�_�}- [�1 '�rc+ �l.J�' sectian,'�ownsMip. �tange; �-�'+�l�P�
Landform [hiilslape, terrace, etc.j: �1,i]_� i� �� ___ Locs! relief {conc�ve, convex, nflneJ: t�Cn +��.i� 51ope [°.6y: f�
7 �''
Subregion (LF2F2 or MLF2A); �-CZ � - � Lat; ..��: , 't � � � l�ong; : ` '� � . ��='=� � Datum: I�AC� �"�
5ail Map Unit Name: V� s��.��rn �r-•-r. l.� r, r-'�''`an �f.-�F NWI classification; iJ!�� ,�
Are climat�c ! h drolo ic_conditions an,Yhe site typ�cal far khis.;irn� of year? Yes �No {!f nv, explain irr Remarks.J �
Are Vegetatian Soil Q or Hydraiogy � significar�tly di�turhed? �1 G7 Are "dVormal Cireums[ances" presen[? Yes I �� Na �
Are Vegetatiqn �� 5vil �, vr Mydrpipgy ��naturally �roblematic? !�J p{if needed explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINOINGS - Attach s�te r�°iap $hawing sampting paint lacatians, transects, important features, etc.
Hydraphytsc Vegetation Present7 Yes � Na,
HydriC S4il PEesent7 Yes � No,
Wetland Hydrolagy �resent7 Yes �, No
Remarks:
HvaRo�.vcv
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No �
Wetla�d Hydrplagy Indicators: Secondary Indica[ors [rqtinimurn oF twa requiredl
Primary Indicator� iminirswm vf one is required: check all tha[ aoofvl ❑ 5urtace SoiR Cracks {B6}
❑ Surface Water {A1j ❑ Tr�e Aquafic Plants {B1A) ❑ 5parsely Vege[ated Ctancave 5urface {68j
Q High Wa;er Tabte [A2) �] Hydrogen 5ulfide C]dor [C7 ) ❑ I]rainage Patterns (�10j
❑ 5aturation {A3} � Oxidized Rhiaospheres pn I�iving Roats (G3) � Moss Trim Lines (B15}
❑ Water Marks {B1] � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4J Q Dry-Season WakerTa6le {C�}
0 S�diment Qeposits (B2} ❑ Recent Ison Reduetian in Tilled Soils �C6} ❑ Cra�sh Burraws (C8)
❑ Dri� Oeposits (B3j ❑ 7hin Muck Surface (C7J ❑ Saturation Visi6le on Aerial Imagery (C9J
Q Algal Mat ar Crust (84) ❑ Ottrer {Explain in Remarks} ❑ SCun[ed ar SVessed Plan[s (D1]
❑ Iron aepasics (65j ❑ Geomarphic PasiTion {�2j
� inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (67j D 5hallow Aquitard {p3)
� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Micrvtvpographic F2elief [p4}
� Aqua[ie Faa�na (813} � FAC-Neuval Test [D5)
Fie[d �bservations:
SurFace Vlrater Present7 Yes � Na dDep[h (in�hesi: �
Water Table Prese�t? Yes � No � eptr {inches}. �
5aturation Present? Yes � No �e�th (inches}, f'7 wetland Fkydroiogy Present? Yes II Ho
includes ca �Ila frin e
ClescKibe R�corded Data {stream gauge, monitaring well, aeri�l photos, previvus inspections}, if available:.
Remarks�
L15 Arrtty Corps flf Engineers Eas[ern Mauntains artd Piedmont - Versivn 2 4

�.�, - � � Ll t.�
VEGETATIQN (Five Strata) — U�e s�ieniifrc �a�rnes nf plants. Sampling Point: W� - 3;r���=-`��
1 A�saGute Dominan[ I�dicatar �ominance iest workshee[:
Tcee Strafum {Plof sfae; �� '�` � c� , j 3'o Cover eCi� ? a[us �utilber vF O�minani SpeCies r
1._ � tia e.0 r:,-; �+ �. r;�:� ��_ �� ��l.J� ihat Are O�L, FACW, ar FAC: �[A}
2. C�:r ��: �,'�a,r�, �D Ye:
, � � Tata1 Numher of dominant
3._ � , � � p tl �i Jh � s e� !� '�+� '� ', � � !.C` t� � !� � i ��. 5peci�s Across All 5irata: � {�1
�� = T4[al Cauer
sa�a aF tvta� caver: ��� 2a� or tata� �over: 1�
Sa lin 5tratum (Plqt size: =� ^• �`'�u+s }
�. � P { 1�} {` 4+�'i�� d. D f�� T�r�^
�L..- �,_ � f ' � � ..f '� Yi'1 f'. [ =. � ` � �; � r- y 4 4 ',�. G'1 � � I � J' t'•"'�.��
�= Total Ca�ver
Per�en[ aF Dominant Species
That Are 4BL, FACW, or FAC: �'ri (Alg)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Tatal 40 �over aF; Mu1[i � 6:
OgL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC s,pecies x 3 =
FACU speeies x 4 =
I�PL species x 5 =
Ga�urtan Tp[815: {q} [g]
Preva�ence �ndex = SIA =
f50°k flf [ataf cpuer: 1-+ �� 2pg'o t�f total cpver: �'f' ��-��p�d Test fpr Hydrophytie Vegeta[ifln
Shru6 SVatum (Pfo[ size: __ �!� W� A�' ) �[7aminance Test is �50°to
1. 1-f+ � i` �� r,�� �_ � r� 1 t� _�`f'� �i��. ❑ 3- PrevaPence Index is 53.0'
2. '�. •� ° r !" �,: ; •;i- , ! q � �3 F�T 0 4 • Morphologi�al Adaptakions' (Provide supporting
3. i'� r� k -� �+� ei G _'.] j a G �� �..
4. Imt,tS �7, �7 ��} �T
5. �)t P� n� u� u b e..�11G� �� �� � f`.]D _�i�
�. '�.�� c� r r , �� � � �, � . �-- t`� r ' ��
� C = Tatal Cover
, 5p°,6 of total caver: c- �� 24% of total cpver. �
Her6 Stratum (Pla[si�e. `�G r,:;�1 }
1. � ti? Ln tr3 +J ; t• @,e. l j t'� `� � 3 �'�--�,
2. V: � � f-'� '4 � L�, � T
7
11.
/� = 70Ea1 Cover
509"a of tptal cnver� � 2Q% af toFal ca�er. �
Wa�dy Vine Sir�[um (Plo[ siz�; :i j�.=r�. }
1. `_�€n ,' fr `t i`.;.l. � r} ; �U�,' �>, �� �'f �� �dY'f�
tc�
2. :�--^��:r rPa �t�l�r,'t'a �� � P_� �.`,r -
r �/�
3. 1�-�'- � � �' .�� �A r(`I � �°.Yr'+ � P � •J ," [ r ,d� -} _ J � 1 � � �� L�
4.
5.
��` `� = Total Caver
509`o af toiai caver: �� 2p96 af [v[a1 cover:. 1` �7
�emarks: {Include phata numhers here or on a separate shePt.)
r � 1�
� J.a,f•, _1"�''. M �f'��'f'�.. s :� ,� �' , o : Py .� r� f`rji�i\ � :� C-•� �^, i ] 1 C. �� b �`°� .
data in Rem�rks or on a separate sheet]
� problematic HydropY�yti� Vegeta[ian' {Explain}
'Indicarors oF hydric saif and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturhed ar prablematic. �
Qafini[ivns of Fi+ue Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, exe(uding woody vines,
apprpximate�y 20 Ft {fi m} pr more in height and 3 in.
(7.8 cm} pr larger in diarnete� at hreas[ height {bBHj.
5apling - Waady plan[s, excluding woady vir�es,
approximately 2Q �[ (Fr m) or erTore in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 errkj E76Fi.
Shrub - Waady plants, exeluding �nroody vines,
approximateiy 3[0 20 Et {1 t4 f m} in height.
Herb - A!I herbaceous [non-woady} plants, inciuding
herbaceaus uir+es, regardless of size, and woody
plan[s, except wvody vines, less than approxi�mately 3
h t1 m} in height.
Woody vine - AI! wflody r�ines, regardless pf heigh[.
Hydraphytic
Vegetatinn
Present? Yes '•/` ! iVa�
U5 Army Corps nf En�ineers �astern NEourotains and Pietimont - Versian 2.6

o,� — �= -`�' I
�
SaIL
Sampling Paint: '�.�`��_ '� � �--�
Profile Descriptian: (Describe ta the depth needed to document the indicaWr ar canfirm the a6sence oi indicators.}
€7epth Matrix Redox Features
{incMesl Calor moist) % Color [moist3 � Tvoe L[x � 7ex ure Remarks
(r'- � !d `��- � �Z � �C7 SGC� �+�'� = �a��� �.��.., {.ryarr,
� - �� G �� I ��'� f �� �� �
fa�l� �-��d �f� r� �c�
'T e: C=ConCentr3fiDn, �=Cle letion, RM=Reduce� Matrix, MS=Nfasked 5and Grains. �Laca[ion; PL=Pore �inin , M=CNatrix.
i�H dri� 5oil lndicatars: Indicators for Problematic Wydric Soils'r
Histosal tA1J � Dark 5urface {57} � 2 �m Muck �A�O] (MLRA 1A7j
� His[ic Epipedon (A2} n Pvlyvalue SeEaw 5urface [S8j {MLRA 147, 748} ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (Alfij
❑ 6iack Histic (A3j �] Thin O�rk Surface {59} (MLRA a47, g48) {MLRA 147, 'i48J
0 Hydrpgen Sulfde (A4J ❑ M�oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2} � Piedmvnt Flpadplain Soi�s [F19)
0 Stratifed Layers (A5} ��epleted Mat�ix {F3j {MLRA 136, 147j
❑ 2 em Mu�k {A10} (LRR PJj �] Redax ❑aFk 5urface (F6j � Very 5hallow [�ark Surta�e (TF12}
❑ C3ep9e[ed Selow bark Surface {A11 j �] E]epfe[ed DarEc Suriaee (F7j � �[her (Expfain in Fiemarks}
Q Thick Dark Surtace (Ri2} � Redax Depressivns (F8}
� 5andy �Mucky Mfn�eral (S1 j{LRR IV, ❑ Iron-�Vlar�ganese n+lasses (F12} (LR�2 N,
MLRA 747, T4$) MLRA 13Bj
� 5arrdy Gleyed INaVkx (54) ❑ t�mbric Surface {F73j (MLRA'f3S, 122] 'Indicat[rrs of hydrvphy[ic vegeta[�on aad
❑ Sandy Redox (S5j ❑�iedmont Floodpiain Sp�ls (F19} (MLRA 148] wetland hydrology must 6e presan[,
Q SVip�ed Matrix (S6j � Red Paren[ MaYerial {F21 j(MLRA 127, 147} unless dis[�rbed or pra�blemalic.
Restracti�e Layer {if obser�ed]:
T�,p�.
Dep[h (inches): Hydric 5vil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of �ngineers Eastem Moun[ai�s and Piedrnorn - Version 2 fl

WETLANQ DET�RMiNATI�N pATA F�RM —�as#ern Mountains and Piedmant Region
ProjecUSike: +�� -:� �7�`- � t f�=�"�:� `; 1+�� CitylCounty: G�� � 5ampling date:
Appficantlf3wner: ��. t� �� State: �� Sampling Point: � uJ��-
In�estigaCar(sj: ��� f"�� L''� .1.�f '"� /� �� -' °� Sectian, Township, Rar�ge: f�'��I f�
Landform {hillslape, terrace, etc.}: 5�-+r[�t�V�. S �� Lvca! refief [concave, canvax, none}: �" �, � Sfiope [°Iq}: 'i�
Subregivn {LR� t�r Ml�Ra4}: �-�+'� ' I� Lat: ..�i� � �,� �'�`t� Lvng: �� �� � `7 �71 7 Datum: +��-��`� - a �
54i1 Map l}nit Narne: �*'� �; r�� Sun � �-r M �h rr'+, , ,� - l�, �'r, ` '. _, , : G �: . ir'od �su-'. e.M -r �°.rr+�r�� .�i_ NW] classification; , I��GI'r;°
_, ,
Are clim�tic f hydrologic cvnditi�ns an the site lypi�cal for Lhis time of year? Yes Na (IF nv, explain in Remarks.}
Are V atatio' , 5ail i�, or Hydrvlogy N� significantly distur6ed7 Are "Normal ClrcumsLSnees" present? Yes �'� Mo
Are Vegetatiorr �, 5oil f� , or Hydrolvgy _t�1b naturally problematic? {ff needed, expl�in any answers in RarrzaEks.j
SUMNlARY �'� FINDINGS — Attach site map shawing sarrrpling point lncatinns, transects, im,portant feat�ares, etc.
Fiydraphytic Veget�kian �'reseni7 Yes L� �!o
Hydric Sail Present? Yes ��o Is the Sampled Area �
+xlthin a Wetlanci? Yas hla
Wetland Fiydroiagy Present? Yes � �Po
Remarks: J -
L� W °' ,
HYDRDLO�GY
Wetland tfydralagy Indieators: SeGandarv Indicatnrs fminimum of twa reauired]
Primarv Indicators [mmimum of one is requlred; check all ihal appfy} _ Surface Sail Cracks [BB]
Surhace Water �A1j _ True Aquatic PEants (814y _ 5parsefy Vegetated Co�ca�e SurFace [69j
� High Wate� Table {A2} � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor tC1 j _ Qrainage Pattems {B14}
'�aaturation (A3} � dxidized Rhizaspheres on Living Roals (C3} _ Mass Trim Lines (616J
_ Water Marks [B1 J ,�, Presence pf aeduced Iron (C4} ��ry-Season Waier Table SC2}
5edir�ent peposiks (�2) ,,,_,_ Recent Iron ReductEan in Tilled 5ails {Cfi} � Gra�sh 8urrows {C8]
' ariTf baposits (B3} i Thin iNu�k 5ur#ace (Cij _ Salurai6an Visihle on Aerial Imagery {C9)
AEgal Mat or Crust (B4j T C3ther {Explain in Remarks) �, Stunted or 5kressed Planis (d1]
Iro� �eposits (�5j _ Geamorphic Pvsition {p2}
Iroundation VisibEe on Aerial Imagery (B7j ! Shallaw Aquitard {�3J
.�Water-Stained teaves (68j �-�' �otopographic Retie# {D4)
_ Aquatfc Fauna {613j ✓ FRC-Neutral isst {�5)
Fleld dhservations:
5urface Water �'resent7 Yes No c� Ospth {inehes}: C7
Water 7able Present7 Yes No � Depth {inchesj: �
Satueatipn Present? Yes �N4 Oepth {inchesj:,R:' �.�sku-cQ� Wetland liydrology Rresent? Yas ��No
includes ca illa irin e
Qescribs R�corded �a[a {s[ream gauge, moni[oring well, aeria! phatos, previaus inspect�onsJ, if available:
R�emarks: �1 r (
�i, � � p. � t -, t -�.�, �-;,rc,r. u,.- `..�. }"� �- �i � � 4*-� v�� �� + � , � t�� r
j.lr�i �� �-� I v' �I�L�E C,
r
U5 Army Carps of Engineers Eastem Mvuntains and PiedmQnt - Version 2,4

�� !
i.l; - "� +". f".
VEG�ETATI�N {Fou�r 5tra#a) - Use scien#ifi� names af piants, SamplEng Paint: '�+.h��- ���
� ! Absolute Oarninant Indicator Oominance Test worksheet:
7ree Stratum [Plot size: �� > � J °% Cover S�ecies? Status ��mber vf C7ominant Species �
1. �,' �' N��r� A f� ���� i�"l t q t� { u r.� �� t� �. Fhat Are 08L, FACW, ar FAC: � {A}
2,
Total Number of Qominant
3• Species Acrpss All 8trata: �(BJ
7,
� � = Total Ca�er
50°la of iotal co�er: `i r f 2fl°�o oF tolal cover: i;%
SaQlinalShrub Stratum (Plat size: �13 �t 1�� j
- S�
1. �,1�v_T i`� 4-� ft� c?� r".t��rt.�r 4.iC� �� �i�C':r� r
2. "T�r as. ,J' � �,'�h: rM � ° �, :� �G� �.
3. ffi, �[ i�;..� ` 1 t�+. :� i. tr''. "� i� �J ���
4^'�i E.�' C ca 1-� r`�.. tf�._ — �, ��� ���=
5.
s.
7.
8.
9.
� = Tatal Cover
r� �-
5a°Ia of jotal co�er. t- -�' 20°Ia af kotal cv��r; ,� _
Her6 5tratum (Plot sixe: �� X 1�s }
�-k`f: �l '�� rr, IYI �-.�.�U P6,°�-U,, (Y^I � � i�F'� �u'�-
2. r.�r.�:1. �sry1 ��F �� ;I`.t � r�L� ��G�
3., _�G � n �"�. i L^ 'Z �� L�l'=t L'1. '� _ �__�L_ v_� r_�� � fL-�,iJ
4. �r -. �- �� r r. 1 L� T�.} C f�i.�--
�,
�, r-.�-.-. .,r ,�_, ti' �- 1, t�i 1 a � N �'� !� ��
7.
14.
19.
�'--� = Total Cover
5�°/a af lotal r�aver: �"�. � 20°Jo of #vtal cv�er: �,� ---
Woodv Vine 5iratum (Plot size� '3a`1� 1`� j
1. ��Yl ; � G 'd �c� �t-�{'� ;l �, �ai i �', �� }��'': ��'!-.
� ,
2. �r�� r� C �.A � , h 'S"" �'� fi �:� '�C� '1�P `J. .�
3.
� c'�� = Total Ca�er
54°/o af total caver: �'� 2�Q°!o of totat cover: f�
Ftemarks: {Include phoko numhgrs here ar on a s�p�rate sheet.)
i
Percent 4f Cl�minent Species �. -r-
Thai Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �-� {AiBj
Prerralence Index worksheet:
Tolaf °Io CoWer o#. Multiply by:
flBL species x i =
FACW speeies x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU spscies x 4 =
L1PL spe�ies x 5 =
Column Fotals: (Aj (Bj
Prevalence [r�dax = BIA =
Hydrpphytic Ve�etatlon Indicatars;
_ �t-_Rapid Test for Hydrophykic Vegetadan
t!2 - C]qminance Test Es �5D%
T 3- Prevalence Index is 53.�'
� 4 - �Vtarphological AdaptatPans' (Provide suppoRing
data in Remarks or vn a separate sheet]
_ Prab�emaiic Ftydmphytfc Uege[ation" {Explain}
'Indicators vf hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
�e present, unless disfurl�ed ar �rn6lernatic.
Definitions af Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in ddameter at 6reast height (DBH], regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub — Waody plants, excluding vines, fess
Ihan 3 in. �BH and greater than ar equak to 3.28 ft(1
m) i�ll.
Her6 —All herbaceaus {non-woadyJ plants, regardless
of sixe, and woady piants less lhar� 3.�$ k tall.
Wootfy ►rine — All woody �ines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydro�hytic
Vegetation
Present7 Yes N
•���7 � B'�` �'� y"� Cl..�i �t r+""�� �l�'�Gj � ...1� y��' � ,'al {� t��r: �}'+,J�?.'�'� �:. (.;::1 � � ri �1 CP�a L.�.J G.�nf� r �:i I::i -"�,�1� ,r�_! ��'j ,�::��A
� �'' Ef ('�.:L .�..�., J �. � �-� �i i�1�° �, :,C � , 1 r'� � ^� i' �� r � ❑,ry 1 �, 7
� �'r�, r.•r�� _I7�e-11 f�� �,. Il � d� r�r�Lyr,. � kli.. �-� � � r'1 r� � �irf+`��r
�"�., �. �.'� Q:�' f�f`�en �� Q SiIG'�f },-},,', r 3;;r ��! UJ +� ,� �,ni.-�:'..Ow� rr( �.�' '�'���.0 ,��.� nk r�
j � ` t ' �'��r , �arr�;�� GMah1+,���
Ltif' [. �.•.'� r�a � �, �: [ �i � � ¢! �`� � C. ��,�`` � G f� J +� � ' ' `''� � 'r "�°? ' j'� {` =°:.. ir'V ,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mouniains and Pledmoni — Version 2.a

�� � � � y�-�^'
SC?IL
5ampling Point: � �� '' G I �,
Proflle �escrlption: {Describe tv the d�pth needed 3o dacument the indicatar ar canfirm the abaence af indicators.)
D�{�th Mairix _ Redox �ealures
[inchesl _ Cdlor fmaist'1 °Ia Ca1or 'moist °Io Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
�� �'� `� � �'� � '� � � _� � l".� � G��,�, �,-� _
� i� ! � i} "`{� � �7 � 3 —� � �' `.�...-. �r_ j' � � `=,ar,� r 1��. Lrac.rh
'"f e: C=Caneentration, D=De !e[ion, FtM=Fteduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grai�s. zLocatfon: PL=Pare L�nin , hA=Matrix.
Hysiri� Soil Ind[cators: Indieatars for Rro6[ematic Fiydr9c Soils':
Histasol (A1 } _ dark 5urface {S7J � 2 cm Muck [A14j (iNLRA 147]
' Nistio �pipadon (A2j _ Pa4yva6ue 8elow SurFace (58} {MI.RA 147, 14$} _ Coast Prairie Redox {A16]
Bfa�k Histic fA3j �„ Th��a DaFk Surface {59} (MLRA 147, 448j (i41LRA 747, 148}
�lydragen Sul�de {AAj _ Loamy Gleyed Matr'rx {F2} _ Rfedmant Floadplain Soils �f39}
Sir�iifiad Layers (A5} �]apC�teri Ma[rix {F3j tH1LRA 136, 147j
' 2 cm Muck (A1Dj {LRR M} , Redox �ark Sur�ace (F5) � Very Sha9low Dark 5urtaae (TF12}
~❑epleked Belaw flark SurFace (A11 j _ deg�eted Dark Sueface (F7} _ Dlher j�xplain in f2amarks)
Thick �arlc Surface (A1 Z] _ Redax Depressians {F8}
5andy Nfu�ky Mineral {S� )[LRR IY, _ Irvn-iNar�ganese Masses (F12j 4LRR N,
MLRI� 14i, 148J ML�A 136}
S�r�riy Gleyed Matrix {S4) _ Um6ric 5ur#ace {F13j ti4�LFtA 136, 122] 3lndicators vf hydrophytic Vegekation and
� Sandy Redox (55} ^, F'iedmont Floodplain 5oils (F19j (MLF3A 148) wekland hydralogy must be present,
� Stripped Matrix {SB) Red Parent fVlaterial [F2i j(INLRA 1i7, 14Tj unfess disturbed or groi�lemalic.
Restrictiye Layer (if ohserved]:
Type:
Depih [inches}: Hydric 5011 Present7 Y�s �� No
Remarks:
U5 Rrmy Carps c�t ��ngin�ers Eastem Mauntains and Piedrnant -'Versian 2.0

WETLAMQ L7ET�RMINATIQN DATA FQRN6 —�astern Mountains and Pfedmnnt �Region
ProjecUSite: I.� - � � `i �"� �:. C_t1'k1°Q.� - �+ �� vi �- CiiylCounty: 1h�Gt `r"-P Sampling Date: � � � � �1
Applic�ntJQwner: � e-� �� State: ��` Sampiing Point: r 1�- ��''
hn�estigator(s}: N�<' s�,1+�.L1 � f'�y� �1•G,'� t'� Sec#ivn, �vwnship, Range: �n, �+ ��•, F� e_
Landform [hillslope, terrac�, etc.}: l�-i'�1 ��'� 1'� Laea! relief [corrcave, cor�Vex, none}: �n�M �`� 51ape (°Iq}: ��
Su�regian [LRR ar Iv1f.RA}: �� 'r�- �T'T Lat: 1��, � f5 �J.:� 17 �ong: T T�� C���' �� rt�to �]atum: hJ'�i� �`.-'
Sofl M�sp Unit Name: �'r'��, r,.; �,nd x���m , - f.,�„ =. lr_ , r'�' l�1a���'��r rlr.,d•�c� NWI Gassification: �� �` �.°.�
F1re Glimakic ! hydrologic conditivns a� 3he sike typicai fvr this tirrse af year? Yes No (If nv, explain in Recnarks.)
Are U�geta ia ��. 3ail � D, or FEydralvgy �� l7 signifiGanlly disturl�ed? Are "Normal Cireumstanc�s° preserr[? Yes � I�o
Are Vegeta4ivs� r� o, Sail ��� , qr Hydrology �`�'J naturally pro6lematic? (If needed, explain any answers rn Rernarks.)
SiJMMARY [7� FlNDINGS — Aftach site map shvwing sampling point locat@ons, frans�cts, impartant featur�s, e#e.
N�+rfrqphytiG Vegetat�on Present? Yes
9iydric Sail Present2 Yes
Wetland F4ydrology Presenk? Yes
Ramarks:
(�. w � ,
HXE]ROL�GY
�O Is the 5ampled Area
�° 'r withln a Welland7 Yes Ho �
i�q ��
Wetland Hydralagy fndicatars: 5ecandant Indicators {minimum of two reauiredi
i?rim�ry Indicators {minimura of one is required; check all th_a_[ applyl _ Surface 5oil Cracks (Bfij
SurFace Water {A9 j � True Aquatic Plants (B14} _ 5paeseiy Vegetated Cvncave SurFace (68)
High Water Table �Ac} ,, FCydrpgan Sulfide Qdor {C1) _ IJrainage Pattems (81 pj
Sa[ura[ion (A3y _ Oxidized Rhizospheres an Living Raats (C3} _ Moss Trim Lines (�1F}
Water Marks (Q1) � Rresence of Redu�ed Iron {C4} ! dry-Season Water T�b1e [C2j
SedEment hepos�ts {82) _ Reeent �rorr Reductian in Tiiled 5vi6s (C6) � Gray�ish Burr�ws {CS}
` C?rift deposifs �B3] _ Thir� Muck SurFace {CZ) _ Saluratian Visi�le on Aerial Imagery (C9j
AIg21 Mat vr Crust (64j �{7ther {Explain in Reraarksj � Sfunted or Siressed Plants [D1]
' Pron Deposits (85) � Geamarphic Positivn jQ2]
� fnundatfon Visible on Aerial imagery �E3T} ! Shal�ow Aquitard {Q3}
Wa#er-Slained Leaves (B9} �, Microtopographic Relief (D4}
J Aquatic Fauna (B13] � FAC-�feutral 7es# ��5}
Fleld Observatfons:
5�arface Wafer Present7 Yes I+lo � �epth (in�hes): �
Water Table Present? Yes 140 �DepSh {inchesj: �
Saturatir�n Present? Yes Afo �epth {inches) � Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes �!o ��
includes c8 ilia frin e
�escri6e Recorded Data [stream gauge, manifori�g well, aerfal photos, preWious inspecifons), if availa6le:
Fiemarks;
US A,rmy Corps of Engineers Eas4em Mau�tains and Pi�dmort4 - Version 2.4

�l- � 7 `-1�'
VEGETATIDN �Fvur Strata) -� Use scientific names nf {�lants. 5am�ling Pvint: �� ���. �
,; Ahsalute pomina�t Indicatvr amminance Test worksheet:
Tree 5kratum (Pl�t size: ��f ��t� e ] f ° Cover Snecies? Staius Nuria6er of Dominant Species
7 , �+ . � -n .� S�- "4j �' � � '� -t 1, �. � �.,�'� 7hat Are QBL, FACW, ar FAC: � {Al
�' '� Total M1lumper of �ominant
3• Speefes A�rass Ali 5irata: � [B}
5.
7
5�°/a af #vtal es�wer:
SanlinalShrtil� Stratum {Ptfft
1
8.
9_
= Total Cover
2[]°lo af tataf cover:
= Toial Co�er
56% �# fotal couer: 20°/0 of tatal cover:
Herb Stratum (Plaf size: ra� ��F r�- }
1. I�n-lr.r,��.��da� �,.cn !:ri o r�+-� c� L��' � '�� � Fti�C �.
2. 1 r.�l: h ws�. r.7. r lL7C7 �
3. `�', � kie.s•,r� -;�� . . �7C� 1Vy
A �i •<, r'r,: c.+n'1 r�� � G,`�r� f� � �f r`� -r'' r, i
6.
7.
9.
10,
11.
�!� = Total Caver
5o°Io 4� tatal caver: y�-, � 20°� of tatal cover;�
Wvadv Vine Stratum {�'lot �ize: }
1.
2.
3,
4.
5.
= TOtr3� '�dVEF
50°/0 oF iatal eover: 2Q°/u r�f total c��er:
Remarks: {Include photo num6ers here ar an a separate sheei.}
Percent of daminant 5pecies
That Are []6�, FACW, or FAC: � (A16j
Pfevalence Index wvrkshee#;
i'atal °/� Cover of: Multfply hy:
�38L spe�ies x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC spscies x 3 =
�ACU species x 4 =
UAL speaies x 5 =
Cqlumn Tatals: {Aj �8)
Preva�ence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicatvrs:
� 1- Rspid Ysst far Hydrophytic Vege[ation
2 - Qominanr�e Test is �5�°/a
3- Pre�alance Index is s3.0"
� � - f�prphofogical Adaptaiians' (Provide supporling
data in Remarks or an a separate sh��tj
� Problemat�c Hydrophytic Wegetation' (Explain)
'Indicatars aF hydric sail and �vetland hydrology rnust
be presen[, unless disturbed nr problematic.
Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Wopdy plants, excl�ding vines, 3 in. {7.6 �m} ar
more in diameter ai hreast hei�ht {QBH}, regardless vf
heighl.
Saplir�glShrud - Woady plants, exaluding �ines, �ass
lhan 3 fn. �BH and greater than or equal ta 3.28 ft(1
m} 4a11.
Fierb - Afl herhaceous {nvn-waody} plants, rsg�rdless
raf size, and waody plants less than 3.28 k fall.
Wavdy �€ne - All woody vines greater than 3.28 fl in
Hydrophytic
Vegetatlan i� :
Present7 Yes �!o
US Arrny Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmflni - Version 2,0

!�{ — � � G]C,:�
sai�.
Sampling Poir�t: l�E 3 • �-�
Praflle Descrlption: {Qescrlbe to the depth needed to dvcurnent the indicatar or canflrm the absence v'F indlcalars.}
i7epth Nlatrix RBd4x Features
inct�es Colar trnaist] % Colar tmoistl °Ja �T �e � Loc Texture Remarks
��31 4 � � � � t� I �Y i7 4f . . � ��F � ! CJ- 'ie I _ � � %� n `-7 S.� �^.� M�
'T e: �=Cone�ntration, d=�e letian, RiN=Reduced Matrix, iNS=Masked 5and Gr�Ens. 2Lacation: PL=para Linin , M=Mekrix.
Hydric So[I Indlcainrs: ind€catars for Problemallc Hydrie Salfs':
Histosal {A�] J. Clark SurfaCe (S7} � 2 cm Mucic {A10} {MLRA 9a7y
' Hislic �pipedrsn {A2j _ Polyvafue Below Su�Face (5$) [MLRA 147, 148} _ Cvast Prairie Ftedox {A1fi}
Black Histi� (A3} , Thin �ark 5urface (S9j {MLRA 147, 148j (�ALRA i47, 148j
_ Hydrogen 5�alfide {A4j � Loamy Gleyed iNatrix (F2} _ Piedmant FSaadpiain 5oils [F13}
Stratified Layars (A5} _ C]epleted Matrix (F3} (MLRA 136, 747]
2 �nn INuck (A10] jLRR Nj _ 1�edvx qark SurfaGe (F6} � Very 5hellow Dark Su�face {TF12j
� E7epleted 8elow C}ark SurFace (A11) _ C]epleted Dark Su�ace (F7] _�ther (ExplaEn in �temarks)
7hick E7�rk SurFace (Ai2) _ Red�x Oepressions {F8}
! 5arrdy Mucky Mineral(51 }(LFtR N, u Iron-Manganese I+Aasses ('Fi2} �LRR N,
MLaA 147, 148] iMlRA 13B}
Saady Gleyed Matrix [S4} � Umbric 8urfaca (F93j jMLRA 136, 122j 3lndicakors af hydrophylic vegeiat�an and
Sandy Redox {55} _ Piedmon[ Fdaodplafn 5oils (F19j �MLRA 1d8j wstland hydrQlogy must 6e present,
^ Skripped Malrix (S6} Red Parent Material (F21 }[MLRA S21, 147y unless distur6ed ar problematic.
Restrictiwe Layer {ff ohserved}:
Ty�e:
Depih (inches]:
Hydrlc Snil Presen#? Yes No j
FtemarEcs:
�� f !�` U�'� rt�`� '.�k '�
US Army Corps of �ngineers Eastem Nl�unt�ins and Piedm�3nt - Versian 2.0

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
pPOjeCi Nari1e U-5744 (Timber Drive Improvements)
County Wake Wetland area o.oa
Name of evaluator Evan Morgan
Wetland location
on pond or lake
_ on perennial stream
X on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series' Mantachie Soils
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
X predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
X ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
_ Bottomland hardwood forest
X Headwater forest
Swamp forest
_ Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
WA
Nearest Road us �o
acres Wetland width 25 feet
Date 03/24/2017
Adjacent land use
(within �/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 35 %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 50 %
X impervious surface � 5 %
Dominant vegetation
�1� Fraxinus pennslyvanica
�2� Liquidambar styraciflua
�3� Viburnum prunifolia
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
X intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
_ Other:
� The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
= R Water storage 2 x 4.00 = s�
; A Bank/Shareline stabilization z x 4.00 = s� wetland
� T Pollutant removal z rating
**x5.00= 10
I Wildlife habitat 3 x 2.00 = 0 n�
; N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 0 �t
; G Recreation/Education z x 1.00 = 0
�** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
pPOjeCi Nari1e U-5744 (Timber Drive Improvements)
County Wake Wetland area o.oa
Name of evaluator Evan Morgan
Wetland location
on pond or lake
_ on perennial stream
X on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series: Appling sandy loam
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
X predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
X steep topography
X ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
_ Bottomland hardwood forest
X Headwater forest
Swamp forest
_ Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
�
Nearest Road us �o
acres Wetland width �� feet
Date 03/24/2017
Adjacent land use
(within �/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 20 %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 30 %
X impervious surface so %
Dominant vegetation
�1� Liquidambar sytraciflua
�2� Arundinaria tecta
�3� Acer rubrum
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
X seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
_ Other:
� The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
= R Water storage � x 4.00 =�
; A Bank/Shareline stabilization o x 4.00 = o� wetland
� T Pollutant removal � rating
** x 5.00 = 5�
I Wildlife habitat 2 x 2.00 = 0 ��
; N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 0
; G Recreation/Education o x 1.00 =°0
�** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

WD
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
i�T'OjeCt NaTTIe U-5744 (Timber Drive Improvements)
County Wake Wetland area � 2
N2111e Of eValUatOP Nathan Howell
Wetland location
on pond or lake
X on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
_ within interstream divide
other:
Soil series' Worsham sandy loam, 0-3% slopes
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
X predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
ditched or channelized
X total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
_ Bottomland hardwood forest
X Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
Nearest Road us �o
acres Wetland width 60
Date 03/30/2017
Adjacent land use
(within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation �� %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 20 %
X impervious surface � o %
Dominant vegetation
�1� Arundinaria tecta
�2� Juncus effusus
�3� Viburnum dentatum
feet
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
X intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
Other:
� The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage 2 x 4.00 = a�
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 = s� wetland
T Pollutant removal 4 rating
** x 5.00 = 20
I Wildlife habitat 3 x 2.00 = 0 4 7
N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = 0
G Recreation/Education � x 1.00 = 0
** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10°/o nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
pPOjeCi Nari1e U-5744 (Timber Drive Improvements)
County Wake Wetland area o.05
Name of evaluator Nathan Howell
Wetland location
on pond or lake
X on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series' Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
X predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
_ Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
_ Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
WE
Nearest Road us �o
acres Wetland width 30 feet
Date 03/30/2017
Adjacent land use
(within �/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 40 %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 40 %
X impervious surface 20 %
Dominant vegetation
�1� Liquidambar styraciflua
�2� Viburnum dentatum
�3� Anihoxanthum odorarum
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
X intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
_ �t]Zer: wet residential yard
� The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
= R Water storage � x 4.00 =�
; A Bank/Shareline stabilization i x 4.00 =� wetland
� T Pollutant removal z rating
**x5.00= 10
I Wildlife habitat � x 2.00 = 0 � 0
; N Aquatic life value o x 4.00 = 0
; G Recreation/Education o x 1.00 =°0
�** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

Appendix A
Rapanos Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/barough: Wake City: Gainer
Center coordinaYes of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.719042° N, Long. -78.638459° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Buck Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) lnto which the aquatic resource flows: Swift Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Swift Creek (10-digit HUC: 0302020110)
� Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsiYe mitigation sites, disposal sites, eYc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDWGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
I`here Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [ReguiNecl]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate ar fareign co�nmerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are and are not "waters of the U.S." within Ciean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): i
❑ TNWs, including territarial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters� (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly ar indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
� Potentially jurisdictional waters and/ar wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: Waters/Wetlands (Ponds 1-6 and Wetland WC) are isolated and have no significant nexus to WOTUS.
� Boxes cl�ecked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III be]ow.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a'INW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section IILD.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNV1� AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and iYs adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-rouud
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody' is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identi�ed in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IILB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a signiticant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed sizc: square miles
Drainage area: square miles
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through 10 (or more) tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(or less) river miles froro RPW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from "INW.
Project waters are 1(or less) acrial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook wntains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in tl�e arid
West.
' Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows througl� Yhe review area, Yo flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that app�
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain: .
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: .
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for. Intermittent but not seasonal flow
EsYimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: .
Other information on duration and volume: .
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑
❑ shelving ❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑
❑ sediment deposition ❑
❑ water staining ❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.� Explain: .
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to detennine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along share objects ❑ survey to availablc datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
�A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjurisdiction (e.g., where the sYream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Wl�ere there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outerop or through a culvert), the agencies willlook for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): .
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
❑ Habitat far:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
ProjecY weYlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined
Characteristics: .
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Expiain iindings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecologica] connection. Explain: .
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .
(d) Proximity�Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Projcct waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is froin: Wetland to/from navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wctland as within thc 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oi] film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: .
❑ Habitat far:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other enviromnentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 30 (or more)
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumularive analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the Yributary to determine if they significantly affecY the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capaciry to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the Yributary, in combination wiYh its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and ]ifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and arganic carbon that
suppart downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combinarion with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: .
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on thc tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: .
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: .
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: .
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three inonths each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .

Provide estimates forjurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
3. Non-RPWsx that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW ar an RPW, but flows directly ar indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supparting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that Yributary is perennial in Section IIID.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that weYland is
directly abutting an RPW: .
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where h-ibutaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicaring that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .
Provide acreage estimates far jurisdictiona] wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the h-ibutary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetiands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conciusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates far jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," ar
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are ar could be used by interstate or fareign travelers for recreational ar other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used far industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
❑ Other factors. Explain: .
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
"See Footnote # 3.
y To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CR'A jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Follawing Rapanos.

Provide estimates far jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
❑ Wetiands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
� If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
� Review area included isolated waters with no stiibstantial nexus to interstate (ar foreign) commerce.
❑ Priar to the Jan 2001 Supreine Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solelv on the
"MigraYory Bird Rule" (MBR).
� Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required forjurisdiction. Explain: Ponds 1-6 and
Wetland WC were considered to be non-jurisdictional during a JD Meeting held on August 30, 2017. Ponds 1-6 do not have
a significant nexus to streams or other WOTUS. They are stormwater basins constructed alongside developed areas in
uplands. Wetland WC is a roadside ditch that was cut into upland.
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above): .
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factars (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wefland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: Ponds 1-6: 2.25 acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: Wetland C: 0.004 acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTWG DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: .
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by ar on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation repart.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Coips navigable waters' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, Lake Wheeler.
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Soil Survey of Wake County, NC 1970.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: .
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): .
ar ❑ Other (Name & Date): .
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
❑ Applicable/snpporting case law: .
❑ Applicable/supparting scientific literature: .
❑ Other information (please specify): .
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: