The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20010006 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080206A Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Date of Office Review: - ?- C Evaluator's Name(s): Date of Report: _ o' ] Report for Monitoring Year: C U I Date of Field Review: =11 - 2CX ? Evaluator's Name(sV- Hi'd Other Individuals/Agencies Present: t M LL)i l1 i W YLS . A3?Cryk VYLCt_ry-u (L_G Weather.Conditions (today & recent): Cbl? L -i c i A n c?? - I t-1 ' Directions to Site:C? . tC% 1. Office Review Information: Project Number: 20010006 Project Name: Duplin County Airport County(ies): Duplin C' U D3C? ?c??, Basin & subbasin: Oftf)e Nearest Stream: Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: 61L w- Mitigator Type: Private 1 iLi?1 DOT Status: non-DOT Project History Event Event Date Report Review - Wetlands 1/24/2007 Wetland: 1 aces M CL (1a -? S m: U k- C am, . Buffer: (c? ,2 VVv, ?5 06 A roved mitigation plan available? Yes No nitoring reports available? es No roblem areas identified in reports? Yes roblem areas addressed on site? Yes No L? itigation required on site: "Add significant project-related events: reports, Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc. During office review, note success cn e h d evaluate each component based on monitoring report results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III. On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit. II. Summary of Results: 'oty Monitoring Success Success Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved 20010006-2 4.7 acres Wetland Restoration IA,1, A2, 2(s 6 - I 20010006-3 1.6 acres Wetland Enhancement 20010006-4 3.4 acres Wetland Preservation i; Z? 6 I t 20010006-1 2.3 acres Wetland Creation 3 6 Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)?,,k k Page 1 of 2 f Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: s cessf partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this project: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): ?.1: t eta C;? " c? _._ L?%?'l? ?_ v? 1 , ? C? C , ,?Yt?` lCtr?C_?. tY-??' ? ? ?ti??-'?? ??? lr.'? ???1??? 1>` %iC? J ?.lc ref ??1 1??:???CCk L; - u? °"x ???+ c). Etc=; `>?`sl\? .?`16 1Gc? ?'•T.-t?'1t? , i\?,it? ?itiC- 1.? 'X l?kli ?) 111i`t i C 1 fit.-t cA O-A i?1C?? 11 Y Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) 1 Page 2 of 2 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 4.7 acres Wetland Restoration Component ID: 20010006-2 Description: aC?1.k"1'4;? Location within project: III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HY ROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: l l 1 12` _ >? `7 Cc ?S (ll Ce c . AAA Inundated ? Saturated in upper 12 inches 1 -? 1 J Act ? JS Monitoring report indicates success Ye No Drift lines J Observational field data agrees? a No ? Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? a No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? e No Water marks List any remaining h drolog 1: Cfituhsg, excessi L? wti ?a C?h ?? ci?C e vru t tk ?t?u? ( y?,?-i?? F c c r?clr` - SOILS - Approved Success Criteria': Olt Are soils hydric or becoming h 60 List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: jcir, cts Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No As,v rake TPAfqr a ire site Obse ( ej re / 1UI oonal iel `alk`f1\11dda?fda- 2)act?' c•/? rvati ta a rees? 11VS?1d? No based on community composition? a No based on TPA and/or % cover? es No Vegetation planted on site? No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? fe No Dominant Plant Species Species Storv TPA/"/ cover r- -114 bl LGl kWL-7 Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): n-a Cc V2 l/a'J L? Lc) dCn-- t. " vu)? > ak-9' wA-D\/UnC, I ?1 . L'LA ?(?e.tn r-j r Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) C? Ac) c' ?6?) C) w i I he f?{c V\-c JY'CL y' V - l V- CL I e t "/lfi? ?b v'C Page 1 of 8 ,,4C:)C C -,Tn VkO1O' Ck- ? J Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site: Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success7_ 1 lt? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM,,iog'sues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.) MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: cces ful partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: ?.; \l(A C?1 C?J<: , 1L' ??1V(Cr L 1(Cr?iC??-. y J 1 ????1(?r1?7i ?:?.,u_(` i ?•t lac; , ???_.I f st v1?? l C-?L'A? s Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 8 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 1.6 acres Wetland Enhancement Component ID: 20010006-3 Description: Location within project: e O III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12 inches Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): I SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species Species Story TPA/4/ cover Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Average TPA for entire site (per report): Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 3 of 8 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques NCWAM Type on Site: Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 4 of 8 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 3.4 acres Wetland Preservation Component ID: 20010006-4 Description: Location within project: 111. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated Saturated in upper 12 inches J(e Monitoring report indicates success Y ) No Drift lines Observational field data agrees? No Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? ei No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): .-I G d6LT SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? ?Ilyes No e u (7 12" e 1 I C' ryl 7 ?-C'? T' List indicators of hydric soils: vj(tV l u-" List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species Species Storv TPAP/ cover 4 J( \/"t L? r-CA C?fD ' ?-cam . .?o j Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Average TPA for entire site (per report): ll --),` C?e Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No , Vegetation planted on site? Yes No -4-lckk Date of last planting: >> 1,... // Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No I' l:-?c + } t% t(. (?_ )t. GLc (< <z?z ?,? Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 5 of 8 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success C iteria or Evaluative Tech s: NCWAM Type on Site: Monitoring report indic? Observational field data Attach NCWAM analyses Coastal Riverine su Yes No Riparian S. Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) alts to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remain issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.) MITIGATION SUCCESS: j Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: su cess I partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 6 of 8 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 2.3 acres Wetland Creation Description: SCCCt_rro -(iw ?C:C C Location within project: III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: -v?Lh (2" ..?Y i ` % CS C l1 C csr zc . ? Monitoring report indicates success No Observational field data agrees? No Component ID: 20010006-1 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Inundated ?Saturated in upper 12 inches Q A-CX-L Drift lines Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yeses No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yep No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remainiqg ditches, excessive water, etc.): VIYT-P _ C ?``(V 11Y? ? Cif) J? r 1 SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: na i Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? yes No List indicators of hydric soils: 4 X61. N GA Cr List any remaining soil issues to address (e g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): ode ?S c?C-r + IrLA ?- Le lt'r C?-'D C;UAJ) Z-v\ CcI-Q-C ?rVEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species -15Lo '7tkCV--v,(V(dC Species Story TPA/`lo cover I?, ti?c?l s. JC Monitoring report indicates success? es No ?c Average TPA for entire site (per re port): 15 _ C' Observational field data agrees? Yes No ^,-- based on community composition? e No 'l L1 jt.t, based on TPA and/or % cover? es, No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: ?'4 0-?? Vegetation growing successfully? - es) No C-k 0 C t S r1v? Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: ?I VL6? Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: j Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): I? ?- 0-)C? C) List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): r{„5kvY ?? ohs (A v A 00 -dlcrk - cam - ye -- «-- -a ? _kA Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) `? A ? C51,4- C'D/ ?Si S?? C Page7of8 ?0-x"4d vices C-? Cyo ? use- V?)a "I,, , l0??C) ?" Y? UUL I CCI LL-- Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniqu na NCWAM Type on Site: Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analvsis results to this rt. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: su ess I partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 8 of 8