20171070 Ver 1_401 Application_20170828

SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Land Planning Permitting Environmental Consulting Construction Management Expert Testimony
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: 23 -Aug -17
Name: Brook Meadow
Company Name: First Capital Investments
From: Dalton Cook RE:
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Attached
X Shop Drawings
X Letters
X Reports
SEI #:
Under Separate Cover via
X Specifications
Change Order
Computer Disk
p CCSA 1-16 H17
l�JI
Invoices
Reproducibles
Samples
COPIES
DATE DESCRIPTION
4
Four copies of a PCN application with supporting documents.
8/23/2017
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
X For Approval Approved as Submitted
X For Your Use Approved as Noted
As Requested Return for Corrections
For Review & Comment FOR BIDS DUE
Resubmit Copies for Approval
Submit Copies for Distribution
Return Corrected Prints
Other
1
SIGNED:r -
C,ce_t�A CC..
ry
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 tel [phone] fax [phone]
1-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com

a� pG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Brook Meadow
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Lisa K. Scruggs & Donald S. Scruggs
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB. 8602 PG. 643
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
11s
` 0 V U 1
44018 BUFFER PERM01-1JG
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name:
Mr. Larry Witek
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
First Capital Investments, LLC
4d. Street address:
110 Lions Gate Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
4f. Telephone no.:
919-337-5558
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
I [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
James A. Spangler
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental Inc.
5c. Street address:
4338 Bland Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC
5e. Telephone no.:
919-875-4288
5f. Fax no.:
919-875-4287
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0770817900
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degreesy7
Latitude: 35.678612 Longitude: -78.735797
1c. Property size:
16.76 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Swift Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the site is undeveloped and wooded with one residential home and two barn type structures. The general land use in the nearby
vicinity is mainly residential and old agriculture fields with one gas station across the street.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.039
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,023
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct a public road crossing a stream for a residential subdivision on the subject property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is a residential subdivision that will involve grading/earth moving and utility work using grading and excavating equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dalton Cook
Agency/Consultant Company: Spangler Environmental Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A jurisdictional determination for this property has been requested but it is unknown at this time if it has been completed.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributariesX❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Swift Creek
PER
DWQ
3
148
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
-
S4
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
148
3i. Comments:
This culvert installation is for the purpose of constructing a public road to access the residential single family homes.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 P
Road Crossing
UT to Swift Creek
No
7,432
2,992
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7,432
2,992
6i. Comments: These impacts are associated with the construction of the public road to access the single family residential homes.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The stream crossing was designed to intersect the stream at a 90 degree angle to minimize impacts. It was deemed impossible to avoid these
impacts because the stream bisects the property completely.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control BMPs will be implemented during the construction process to control runoff and other discharges from these activities
into jurisdictional waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
E] Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑x Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
wake County
❑ Phase II
❑X NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached.
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The property will be serviced by municipal sanitary sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The Natural Heritage Program element occurrence data set
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Office of State Archaeology
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Plan Maps
James A. Spangler
A994r-ant/ 4�nt Printed Name
Date
Signature
(Agen s signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

elmtoAwstreet
7/18/2017
To Whom It May Concern:
The letter serves to inform you that Elm Street Builders., LLC located at 6354 Six Forks Rd,
Raleigh, NC 27615 hereby authorizes Spangler Environmental, Inc. to act as our technical agent
for the purposes of environmental issues, including wetland and stream identification, permitting,
mitigation planning and regulatory agency coordination at the property known as 6209 Ten Ten
Rd, Apex NC27539 , and as shown in Wake records as Pin # 0770817900. All site visits by
regulatory personnel must be coordinated in advance with our agent, Spangler Environmental,
Inc. This letter supercedes all previous Agent -related correspondence.
The following contact persons should be copied on all correspondence:
Property Owner (or Legal Agent/Representative):
Christopher R Weir
Elm Street Builders, LLC
6354 Six Forks Rd #201, Raleigh, NC 27615
919-810-9163
Technical Agent:
James A. Spangler, CEI, A.M.ASCE
Spangler Environmental, Inc
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
u4t_41�1_
Christopher R Weir
Elm Street Builders, LLC
Member -Manger

_USDA United States
Department of
_ Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
July 13, 2017

35° 40' 51' N
35° 40' 34' N
Custom Soil Resource Report
3 Soil Map
Z; �
704800 704WD 709920 7D4990 705040 705100 705160
3 3
Map Scale: 1:2,620 if printed on A porbait (8.5" x 11") sheet. �
Meters
N
N 0 36 70 140 210
/V
0 100 200 400 800
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: VVGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WG584
9
2+5
35° V 51" N
35° 40' 34' N

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAPLEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Arca of Interest (AOI)
iq
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI)
Q
Stony spot
1:15,800.
Soils
�
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map unit Polygons
Wet Spot
.,.
soil Map unit Lines
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can rause
other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
(�
Blowout
Water Features
scale.
Streams and Canals
®
Borrow Pit
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
�(
clay spot
�-r-r
Rails
measurements.
!,+
Closed Depression
ti
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
X
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
O
Landfill
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A.distance
Lava Flow
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh or swamp
.
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Mine or Quarry
O
Miscellaneous Water
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
®
Perennial Water
of the version date(s) listed below.
V
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
+
Saline spot
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016
Sandy spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
4W
Severely Eroded Spot
1:50,000 or larger.
C
Sinkhole
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 27, 2014—May
Slide or Slip
6, 2014
g
Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Wake County, North Carolina (NC183)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ag132
Appling gravelly sanay loam, z
4.2
to 6 percent slopes,
3.1
moderately eroded
AgC
J Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6
to 10 percent slopes
AgC2
jAppling gravelly sandy loam, 6
to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Apl)
CgB2
'r -
WyA
Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15
percent slopes
Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to
6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Worsham sandy loam, 0 to 3
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Map Unit Descriptions
3.0
c 1.0 10
4.2
25.0%
3.1
18.5%
1.71
10.2%
3.0 18.2%
--- -16.7 ---- - -- 100.0%'
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
11

U.S. DEPARTMENTOINTERIOR GLE
2USGSU.S. GEOLOGICAL LAKE WHEELER WLINAUADRAN.
NORTH
QUARE N
.00STopo --..UTE __
.'�%n
SCALE 1:2600D woa.am r
�,�'
�M
........ .............. 1..
w��"w.ww�-•`...w�.��. ....w.,. �.. nn.n,.
w.m.w.K...e.su,.,w>,... ....
,»,......,dv. u..�.., �a u. ....
LAKE WHEELER, NC
�'9
w...�.........m we.� w.u.�a n..�,.r nn
......*�.e..
2016
s
�3

NDisclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
A 220 440 880 ft the most current and accurate information possible.
t t t I t I t I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch = 400 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

Brook Meadow I 9 I Wetland Delineation Map
6209 Ten Ten Road
Apex, NC
July 2017
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
map source:
NC OneMap

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
July 13, 2017
Dalton Cook
Spangler Environmental
4338 Bland Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Brook Meadow
Dear Dalton Cook:
Secretary Susi H. Hampton
NCNHDE-3887
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler ncdcr.aov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone: [phone] LOCATION:
1661 Map SeMce Center www.ncrh.org 121 West Joan Street
Raklph, NC 27699.1651 Raleo, NC 27803

No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at haps://ncnhde.natureserve.ory/content/helo. Data query generated on July 13, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Brook Meadow
July 13, 2017
NCNHDE-3887
Element Occurrences
Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name Common Name Last Element
Accuracy Federal
State Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status Rank
Rank
Date Rank
Animal
19860
Waterbird Colony --- 2001-03 D
3 -Medium ---
--- GNR
S3
Assemblage
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004 -Pre H?
5 -Very —
Significantly G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Reptile
35532
Ophisaurus attenuatus Slender Glass Lizard 1980-05-18 H?
4 -Low —
Significantly G5
S2
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Wake County Open Space Wake County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at haps://ncnhde.natureserve.ory/content/helo. Data query generated on July 13, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

46/
NCNHDE-3887: Brook Meadow
July 13, 2017
❑ Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
[� Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:23,342
0 0.2 0A Oaft
0 0.3 OA 1.2 km
cows.. su,, 4ft Oew , Imr— Inarwwn P cw� 01M), usas.
FAO, N%, NgLAN. OaeB... ION Mb.W NL 0.— E " R. ~
MET,. E. Cnuu (Motp Kony). Yntaroy0. M. W— a ODud:MW.
m.xnuw..�e m. as uu� camNnxy

/2017 11:03:26 AM PLOT BY:1tl R:*2016*1615l - Me333w Creek - 1010 SOICITILge CCnetrwfimw006 - 16151-C/.I.Egn
Lw w w w w w a a _a _a a a I
N v OD 03 1D LD O O N N -
O Ln O v O LJI O Ln O UI O tf1
a,
N O ..
3
VPI ELI 414�➢0 ,
YI tlV=.:4S4S6 ,
-------------------
- -----
O
On
z - r
^ I
g o
o
,
.r' T' —
gCD
n }
5
o
• J
i /
.r
NN '
o
O
0
,
,
C
() `� \ VPC El �99.E9 N '�' // .• ( ,_ .�,
0
1 m,
ct
w
\ \
\
F '
o
z � _
888 0. <�
z a«==
m C zo
o
(�
1111,:111 oO ?! mC :i
amN
9 p s zno
FiFiNZS .m O �,n •,ii
O
a� �,•,.rwF
a$rn
n Soni'
- - -- - — — -OOZE
F s orm m
w w w w w w a a a a a a �$ F
�I O O 10
LO O
O V1 O to O LII, 10 Ln O LFI O LFI
SHEET J,TYL,s
JOB NO. DATE o.r WBASS, NIXON 8s KENNEDY, INC.
BROOK MEADOW
C4.1 CLUSTER SUBDIVISION STREET , i -v- WAn COUNTY COMMENTS JCT CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PLAN AND PROFILE � T.V-n wAKE courrrr COMMENTS JCT 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SURE 250, RALEIGH, NC 27607
PIN: 0770-81-7900No. DATE DESCRIPTION By
TELEPHONE:[phone] OR [phone] FAX: [phone] [2 Ul 13
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: T• = s0• REVISIONS CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS (C-0110); NCBOLA (C-0267)
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BID SOLICITATION

ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT AND WAKE COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
m E
i
_ _ _ _ RLL CUT �,..
` TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION — 50RMI 20' PVM'T+�
'\FORESTRY.
t--_-_ PECAYGNGGM9 NO SCALE GIGGING. R4ON
PW.OT0613674
oaza>aR�p I
NOTES
NO LOT 314LLH, oSAC®9 TO —MROADO
MTM FXLOTT . m
ALL PROPOSED ROADS TO BE FUSING
NCDOT DM/EY/AY M31AR REOURED P11IOP TO WIK1AlICTgN
PLW APnrovAL
HOMEO—E. ASSOOATgN TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OXEN
IMPEFMWSmmAFACE UMTS NOTED ON EACH LOT MLL M
E
1FOWED NO
EXCEPTIONS INTO PEPPETKTY.
EXISOTIIN III— TE BE RDING MOVED ON LOT V SMALL BE
D PMOL TO A COFINAL PUT.
246 !s OF IMPERVIOUS MEA ON LOTS E B 6 IS INTENDED FOR
THE GRAVEL ACCUS ROAD LEADING TO THE WELL LOT.
NOTES
WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED BUFFER CRO$51NG I ONVEWAY
CMOS&NGS THAT ACCESS SINGLE-FAMILY OWELLSNGS
O ALTERNATIVE TO THEW LOCATION IN THE BUFFER ONCLUDING
OPPERTUMTY FOR SHARED DRIVEWAYS) EXISTS;
BUFFER DISTURBANCE ISNO BARE N 60 THAFEET RADE 111;
BUFFER INSTURBANCE IS NO MORE THAN 6,000 SQUARE FEET
IN AREA:
TME DRIVEWAY CROSSES THE BUFFER AT AN ANGLE AS CLOSE TO
90 DEGREES AS POSSIBLE (AND NOT LEGS THAN W DEGREES);
91DE SLOPES DO NOT EXCEED All (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
MT10 (BRIDGING AND I OU RETAINING WALLS MAYBE USED TO
MEET AND THE d9TU__C. MDT. STANDARD): AMD
ALL CULVERTS ARE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR THE
25 -YEAR STORM EVENT OR AS OTHERWISE REQUW M BY WANE
COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES.
NOTEa
WAlEll911PPLY WATERSHED CROSSING I ROA
CR06a1MGa 1PVM
L3BC OR A6VATE TE RO D
RO
AD91. PROVIDED:
NO ALTERNATNE TO THEW LOCATION W THE BUFFER EXISTS;
OFFER DLSTURBANCE DOES NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE REWIRED
PoGHT-0FAVAY OR EASEMENT MDTH, OR IN NO CASE IS MORE THAN
. FEET MOE;
BUFFER DISTURBANCE IS HO MORE THAN 9,000 SQUARE FEET
IN AREA;
THE ROAD CROSSES THE BUFFER AT AN ANGLE AS CLOSE TO
MI DEGREES AS POSSIBLE (AND NCO`EXCEED A 2: LESS THAN. DEGREES);
RATIO )BPIEOGItIG ANNOTD I OR RETAINING WALLS MAY BE USEDTO TO
MEET AND THE OBTURBANCE VADTH STANOAADI; AND
ALL CULVERTS ARE DESKiNED AND LdISTRUCTED FOR THE
CW NTYR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVILE REWIRED BY WAKE
\
D,7Dri-)900
1677 Ap IT.,501 SO
TD. ROAD
RdOW
SWIFTCREER RURAL
PROPOSED USE:
rmuLo7s:
MIM lm RAZE PROPOSED:
MAIL Lm SIZE PROPOSED:
CLusTFR SUBUMSION
Ix
0.64 AC (27,1176 SF)
—AC. (46,1)4 SR
AVERAGE LOT SIZE MOPORD:
MIX. LOT WIOTX:
0.76 AC (33,106 SR
103 IF
OPEN SPPCE REWIRED:
lA) AG 171,745 SFj
PFRMANFM OPEN PACE MOW OFD:
4.Po AC. (M3,S60SF)
IMRFRVIOUSSURFACEF PRCPOSEDRWDS:
0.63 AC. (17..S SF)
MAX. IMPERMUS SURFACE AMOUNT PFR LOT:
15,405 SF
v W�i tYNG[
FIGURE 1
CCB PLACEMENT FOR SHWLOER SE02N- REW--NML LOLL ANO..
COLLECTOR_SUBD)YISIDN STREETS
ENGINEERS:
BASS, NIXON AND KENNEDY, INC.
6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX. -(919)9514M
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCUTATIONS:
TOTAL MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED: 3M 16 -ACRES 5.03 AC (219.10, SF)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA- ROADS (INCLUDING MAIL KIOSK): 0.63 AC (27,SBS SF)
MOFOSEDIMPERVIOUSAREA-WELLLOT 0.15 AC 16,6%6 j
MO SED IMPERVIOUS AREA -LOTS -4 AC (3.A. 51)
PROPOSED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA PER LOT: 4.24 AC/12 LOTS: 0.35 AC OR
15,405 SF/LOT
-1 QATA
NN:
AREA:
.DDRESS:
ZONING:
WAT0.5XED;
D,7Dri-)900
1677 Ap IT.,501 SO
TD. ROAD
RdOW
SWIFTCREER RURAL
PROPOSED USE:
rmuLo7s:
MIM lm RAZE PROPOSED:
MAIL Lm SIZE PROPOSED:
CLusTFR SUBUMSION
Ix
0.64 AC (27,1176 SF)
—AC. (46,1)4 SR
AVERAGE LOT SIZE MOPORD:
MIX. LOT WIOTX:
0.76 AC (33,106 SR
103 IF
OPEN SPPCE REWIRED:
lA) AG 171,745 SFj
PFRMANFM OPEN PACE MOW OFD:
4.Po AC. (M3,S60SF)
IMRFRVIOUSSURFACEF PRCPOSEDRWDS:
0.63 AC. (17..S SF)
MAX. IMPERMUS SURFACE AMOUNT PFR LOT:
15,405 SF
DENUDED AREA =..1.72 AC
NOTE:
ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN
ON THIS PLAN TAKEN FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS
AND SUBJECT TO SITE SURVEY VERIFICATION.
PR �LI L��d7II RY
DO NOf}7 [, � �6, UCTION
S-25-16
XME IN FEET
pq
E3
>W Z 90
G W gg
W Z -_
Za- eg
Y Lu
Zz RV2
GJ:1
Km w=
Z�/9 Z —R`
vI O o ti
61Q� E�WWIy�
W F t.3
r_'
0°
QN O
WAC=
0
C m
GN^
f`
Yc
wZ_
0
0� O
U
M 3
W
H r
W
W �
N U
Z
O
Q
H
U
0
0
m
2
0
Z
0
U
Q
r
to
Z
0
U
0
LU0
co
Q
W
Li
0
z

ON -4
4441
*44*
op
*tow a a anollin
41 40
44�
77 U
N PROP 48 RCP
INV 382. 00
uj
Z
XT,
z
A41
Lu
CL
in.
0
RCP
PROP 48'
INV 381 10
00000
a Now
am W
'Ar
cn
t.
LIJ CC Ln 0
uj
ujuj N —
Z!= cm
z..00
z -i NJ
0 ui 0
6 0 Cc
U LO
Go
z 0)
J Lu ui
< 36 0
zu � CL
00 UJ UJ
ui
Ilk.
It
si It
4p
immlIA-Mas Tj
AM
SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80 120 160
7/lG2017 10:21:30 ArTi PL T BY: john R:\2016\16151 - Meadow Creek - 1010 SD\CIVIL\04 Construction\06 Impact Map\lmpact Map.dgn