20030570 Ver 9_401 Application_20170810

CALYX"'
ENGINEERS + CONSULTANTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27699
From: Jennifer Harrod
Re: PCN, Reynolds Mill — Phase 2
Grace Church St. Extension
Wake Forest, NC
I am sPndinn vnu the follnwinn item(s)-
L5
6750 Tryon Road
CA Cary, NC 27518
P: 919.836.4800
F: 919.851.1918
CALYXengineerscorns.com
AtIG
0 ?d
sr ��Rc 1 1,�
bR44q &h POU141�Y
Date: JL 1�7* 2017
"Mail"'
Job No.: 2011076.02
COPIES
DATE
DESCRIPTION
1
07/28/17
Cover Letter — Overview of PCN
4
07/28/17
Pre -Construction Notification Form
4
07/28/17
Project maps and proposed impacts.
1
07/28/17
Check in the amount of $570.00
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ As requested ® For your use
® For approval ❑ For Signatures
❑ For review and comment ❑
Remarks:
Ms. Higgins,
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at [phone].
Signature
Jennifer Harrod
Project Manager

CALYX"
ENGINEERS + CONSULTANTS
July 31, 2017
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27699
1FC
4001 �,�°�
�
o
grF�,pQUA
�J�-
'NG
Subject: PCN for Reynolds Mill Subdivision (Phase II), Wake Forest, NC
Dear Ms. Higgins,
This letter is in reference to the attached PCN for your review. The PCN describes the
proposed work to be done during Phase II on a parcel located within the Reynolds Mill
Subdivision, between Ligon Mill Road and Grace Church Street in Wake Forest, NC. The work
will include the construction of residential lots requiring permanent impacts due to piping an
intermittent stream (128 ft) under a road; there are no wetland impacts associated with the
project.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (919)
858-1847 or by email to [e-mail].
Sincerely,
It,.V+ 4trma,
Jennifer Harrod
Environmental Services Project Manager
Attachments:
Map of site
Impact drawings
Pre -Construction notification
CC: James Lastinger, USACE, w/ attachments
6750 Tryon Road, Cary, NC 27518 P:919.836 4800 F919.851.1918 t

O��pFyWjATF�9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
11%
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ® Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program. Calyx proposes 1:1 mitigation for impacts to an Intermittent
stream; pending agreement from the Corps.
® Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 In.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Reynolds Mill Phase 2
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Wake Forest
2d. Subdivision name:
Reynolds Mill
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A I 0
0p,2©
3.
Owner Information TOh'AND
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Taylor Morrison of Carolinas Inc pry ,�_
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
016094 PG 00627
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
211 James Jackson Avenue
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27513-3166
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
11%
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Taylor Morrison
4b. Name:
Tommy Reisland
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Taylor Morrison of Carolinas Inc
4d. Street address:
211 James Jackson Ave
4e. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27513
4f. Telephone no.:
919- 265-4045
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer Harrod
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Calyx Engineers and Consultants
5c. Street address:
6750 Tryon Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
5e. Telephone no.:
919-858-1847
5f. Fax no.:
919-851-1918
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
3
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.576648 Longitude: -78.781936
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
19.68 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site topography is moderate with slopes from 5% to 15%. The existing tree coverage ranges from young
pines (< 10 years old) to mature hardwoods adjacent to the creek that traverses the site. Surrounding area consists of
residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres (Phase 2)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
693 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the Grace Church Street road extension is to allow access to a residential subdivision (Reynolds Mill).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The extension of Grace Church street will be approximately 438 LF. The road requirements are identified in the Town of
Wake Forest Transportation Plan. Traditional construction equipment will be utilized including, backhoes, excavators and
bulldozers.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
was signed on July 24, 2012 (SAW -2005-21377) Wetland WA
and stream SA were extended approximately 226 ft. to the
west after the final JD notice was issued. Features included
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
In the JD were for Phase 3. A Notification of Jurisdictional
Determination (Action ID: 200521377) was issued
September 26, 2005 and determined the stream crossing in
Phase 2 to be jurisdictional; see attached copy. See NCSAM
Assessment Form also attached, completed by Calyx July
24, 2017 and DWO Stream ID form for the stream crossing
associated with Phase 2.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Calyx Engineers and
Consultants
Name (if known): Brian Dustin (Phase 3)
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW -2005-21377: Field visit was on 6/22/12 with James Lastinger of the USACE.
200521377: Unknown
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A NW 29 was issued November 9, 2015 for Phase 3. No impacts for Phase 1.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain. Phase 1 was completed with no impacts. Phase 3 was completed prior to phase 2, proposed impacts to
phase two are shown on impact maps.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 [-]PMT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
RCP
UT Richlands
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWO
12"-5'
128.00
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
128.00
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑ PEI T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
-Temporary
131 ® P ❑ T
Liner road
crossing
UT to Richland Creek
❑ Yes ® No
8,139
4,972
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑P❑T
El Yes [-I No
B5 ❑P❑T
El Yes El No
B6 ❑P❑T
El Yes El No
6h. Total buffer impacts
8,139
4,972
Total buffer impacts = 0.30 acres. Intermittent system.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road crossing has been designed to cross the stream and buffer as near to perpendicular as possible. Retaining
walls have been incorporated into the road design to reduce the overall impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All temporary and finished slopes will be seeded to prevent erosion and the discharge of sediment into the streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of
the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: No bank credits found prior to submission to DMS.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
128 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
NW square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4h. Comments: No bank credits found prior to submission to DMS.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
® Yes ❑ No
mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact (square feet)
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for
Catawba)
Zone 2
1
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0.00
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Buffer mitigation is NOT required on Intermittent streams. Please see the attached NCSAM and
Stream Identification form attached.
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWO)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
The Diffuse flow plan is currently under review by the Town of Wake Forest.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Structural Stormwater BMP's in the form of two (2) bioretention areas are being proposed to provide treatment for water
quality and quantity. .
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Wake Forest
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other: Phase II
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ®No
Stormwater plans are currently under review by the Town of Wake Forest.
5. DWO 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There will be no sewage from the Grace Church Street extension.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
1:1 Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
Impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Calyx Biologist noted that there was no habitat present for Rhus Michauxii.
National Heritage Program data was reviewed, on July 27, 2017, within 1 mile of the study area and no Federally or State
listed species were found in the area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
hftp://www.habitatnoaa.gov/protecbonlefh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC National Register of Historic Places
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodmaps GIS Data, NC Floodplain Mapping
Program.
NC Floodmaps: Firm map 3720183000) , Zone X (effective date May 2nd, 2006).
Jennifer Harrod
July 31, 2017
r
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
App I an Agent's Signa ure
(Jure
Date
(Agent's sigis val only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Aocompanns user mama vemlon 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #
nvsTRucrruns: AU= a sKaum ar me assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USES 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches Will be evaluated on the awns property,
Identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and Include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested Information. Record in the 'Notes' section If supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assesenent area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMA
1. Project rams Of any): Mvil il_ 2 ) 2. Date of evaluation: 91
3. Applicent/owner name: ax Ma Ck (`d, jjW. Assessor name/organizeft
5. County S. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: /ye- Lae on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at and of assessment reach): 36. q(,aW i I.. -M
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be appraedmatkme) r - - y8�
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet):
11. Channel depth from bad On riffle, If present) to top of bank (feet): 1211.51 ❑Unable to assess charnel dep
12. Channel width at top of bank (fest): t2 N 0.5j 13. is assessment reach a swamp stream? ❑Yes Po
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow 14Irterrnilterd flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) ❑Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for ❑a l J Xb
Tidal Nash Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less alnutws stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed alze: (skip Wtze 1 (< 0.1 ml) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi:) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 ml) ❑Size 4 (i 5 ml')
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
18. Were regulatory consklemilloons evaluated? ❑Yes Ohio If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Clasel led Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑1 ❑II 11111 01V ❑1n
❑Essential Fish Hab td ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑High Quality Waters/Outetanding Resource Waters
❑Publ* owned property ❑NCDWR riparian buffer rule In effect ❑Nutrient SwWM Waters
❑Arrad1rOmous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence d a federal andlor state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Deaigneled Critical Hebkm (list species)
19. Are additional stream Warmatlon/suppiemr
section or aiteched?
1. Charmll Water - assessment reach ma do (skip for Sbe11 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water fihroughotd assessment reach.
jo No fkxw, water In pods only.
❑C No water In assessmwrt reach.
Z Evjdmm of Flow Restriction - assassrrwnt reach nmMc
*A At bast 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or di le -pool a quance Is severely affected by a flow restriction g_r fill to the
point of obstructing flow g a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes Q ponded water 2E Impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (ewes: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature pattern - assessment reach metric
A mejority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. t turaat Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
�A McWty of asseesment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradatiori, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
8. Signs of Active Instability - ommmernent reach metric
Consider only current Instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of Instability Include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of chamal unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
vli

Streamslde Area Interaction - eVeamside area metric
Consider for the Lett Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
MA [3A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely ailed reference k to *calm
pp Ma Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, a mkition, dredging) OW adversely eRed
reference Interaction (examples: limited streamslde area access. disnrptlon of flood flowers through streamalde area,
leaky or hrtenNtient bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction. minor dltr hong pnolualng mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Exbenaive evider►ce d conditions tlhet edvefsey aired rsfarerhoe Interactlorh (iWe to no Aaodplainliniertldal zone evxess
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel oonstrfctlon; bulkheads, retaining walla, till, stream Inaislon,
disruption of flood flows through sftsWNke area] g too much AoodplaWntarOdal zone access [examPies:
Impoundments, Intensive mosquito dkctdnCfl) g floodpWnlintertidal zone unnaturally absent g assessment reach Is a
man-made feature on on IMerstromem divide
ir. Waisr Quality Stressors - assessment reacidhrteredal zone movie
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water In stream or lotevtidel zona (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloralton, ON sheen, stream foam)
❑B EXVMWM sedimentation (burying or stream features or Inwitidal zona)
8C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment Pesch A using a water quality Problem
Including sulfide odors)
D Odor (not natural
❑E Current published or collected date Indicating degraded water quality In the assessment reach. Cite scums In 'Notes" section.
❑F Livestock with somas to Stream or Intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae In stream or Intertidal zone nowIng. destruction, etc.)
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the In(removal, zone removal, burning, reguler
01 Other. (explain In'Notes/Sketch'section)
Little to no stressors
S. Recent Weather - watershed metric (sMp for Tidal Marsh Str em s)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher Is considered a drought for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher Is considered a
droug[3Ah Drought conditions " no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 Inch within the last 48 hours
[38 Drought conditions god rainfall eding 1 Inch within the lest 48 hours
'W No drought conditions
S. Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment roach metric
❑Yes XNo Is stream too large or dangerous to sown? K Yee, skip to Metric 13 (Streemelde Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural InItroam Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes Degraded In-etreem habilet over me(ority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors Include excessive
,*o
9"mantation, mining, excavation, onstream hardening [for swunple, dp4V], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Sits 4 Coastal Plain shams any, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs If),- 5% cam a of assessment reach) (amf r Slae%4 Plain or dinar natural herd huottoms
[3A WNpls aquatic mecrq*0N and aquatic mosses
pnduding Ilverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ❑d Submerged aquatic vegetation
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent (pools)
'
AB OH Sand bottom
veg Station
Multiple Brags and logs (Including lap trees) I � 13J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
p 5% undercut banks and/or root meta and/or rods � ❑K Little or no habitat
In banks e)dend to the nominal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
ANING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAM
11. Bedform and Substrate - assessment reach metric (slip for Size 4 Coastal Plain ebmuns and Tidal Marsh Streams)
'
lie. ❑Yes 0o Is assessment reach In a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. lg!evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
Riffle -run section (evaluate 110)
'
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate lid)
❑C Natural bedfomn absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
lie. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wafted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged•
Check at least one box In each row. Not Present (NP) - absent, Rare (R) - prsssM but:S 10%. Common (C) - > 10.40%.
100% for each assessment read►.
'
Abundant (A) =:o 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages should not exceed
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrodklsaprotlte
Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
[$�
0 Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
p ❑ p Siwaiay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ Debttus
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rIP-raP, concrete. etc.)
11d. *es []No Are pools filled with sediment?
ell

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
128. )*as []Nom
No Was an In-streem aquatic life aasesseint performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and slop to Metric 13. ❑No Water []Other.
12b. ,WYes ❑No Are equetio organisms present in the assessment reach (look In riffles, pods, than snags)? If Yes, check all that
appy. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 strearns and'twm' for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑Adult frogs
❑Aquatic reptiles
[:]Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic masses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑Beetles (including water pennies)
❑Caddidy larvae (Trlchopiere (T))
❑Asian dam (Carblcrda)
00nrstaceen(isopodlamphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑mmeelfly and dragonfly larvae
❑Dipterans (true flies)
[Mayfly larvas (Epherneroptere [Ell
(a o larv. flsMly, dobsordly larvae)
quito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusfa) or mud minnows ((Jmbrs pygmeea)
1>Mussels/Clame (rot Ccd *uta)
larvae (Plecoptem In)
13. gtreamslds Area Ground Surface Condition — streamslds area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for tars Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Conelder storage capacity with regard to both ovcrbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
� ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a mgjority of the stresnislde area
LJB A Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a mglm ty of the streamaide area
13C ITC Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the sbwmstde area (w amples: ditches, fill, soli
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, men -made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Strsanrslde Area Water Storage — strsramslde area metric (skip for Size 1 streams. Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area,
ILS RB
Majority of streaaids area with depressions e to pond water x 6 Inches deep
❑B ❑B mablMajority of streamside eros with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
Majority of &Mrr*lde area with depressions able to pond water 3 Indies deep
1b. Wetland Presence — stream -ids arae metric (aklp for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
mAre wetlands present In the streamelde area?
16. Ban~ Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Stream)
Chick all oonbiburoes within the assessment reach or within view of gM draining to the sesesament reach.
❑A Streams andfor springs (Jurisdictional disdwges)
gB Ponds (include wet detention beelns; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction that passes sane flow during kmr flow periods affecting asseesment reach (ex beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (Iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
pE Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment If present)
,per None of the above
17. Bassflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump Installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex watertight dam, sediment deposit)
Urban stream 01 24% Impervious surface for watershed)
YW Evidence that the streamslde area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
1111. Siadhp — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
CgDsIder aspect. Consider leaf -on' condition.
J%k Stream shading Is appropriate for the stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered tress)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — atreamside arae metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Straams)
to Consider vegetated buffer' and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A❑A gA ❑A 2 100 feet wide gr extends to the edge of the watershed
E38B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ©C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑13 FD ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 host wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide of no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
RB
Mature forest
❑D
❑E
0C,
❑D
❑E
Non-maturewoody vegetation 2EmodMied vegetation structure[3c Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of tow c 10 feet wide
Maintained shrubs
Liffe or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — sUmnsids arae metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indkate If listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
Is within 30 feet of abeam (c 30 feet). or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30.50 fat).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts c 30 fast 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑ Row orope
❑B [313❑B E313 Maintained turf
13C13C❑❑BC ❑C C C Pasture (no Ilvestockyoommercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D OD ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stam Density — stnramside was metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
Medium to high stem density
OB Low sham density
OC ❑C No wooded riparian buffer lE predominantly herbaceous species g bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — str eamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vagetated buffer Is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas locking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
The total length of buffer brooks Is c 25 percent.
B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent
24. Vegetative Composition — FIrst 100 feet of streamside area metric (sldp for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) ss it contributes to
assessment reach habitet.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is dose to undisturbed In spades present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native spades,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
tcw Vegetation indicates disturbance In terms of spades diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of nett
species. This may include communities of weedy native spades that develop after dear-arttfng or clearing g
communitiies with non-native Invaelve species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the axpeded Amis gt
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in tonna of spades diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is aboard g communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata g_r communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species gl communities inappropriately composed of a single spades gr no vegetation.
25. Conductivity agessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
259. Oyes �IoWas conductivity measurement recorded?
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of micrcaiemens per oandmeter).
OA < 46 ❑B 46 to c 67 ❑C 67 to c 79 LID 79 to c 230 ❑E k230
Notes/Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
2b l
Prolect/site: a
Latitude: 35. 9(#ow
Evaluator. L. W,County:WaKL
Longitude: -78.52q3"
Total Points:
Stream is at least f nt7.14
Stream Dote circle one)
Other
a 30ft
M2 f9 a rarndallla 90"
l
Ephemeral ntenn erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Nanic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool uence
0
Yes = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
Q
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
S. Depositional bars. or benches
0
1.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
8. Headc uts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11
UD
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
araaciai sac hes are not rawa; see ascumms n maruai
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 3 I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1. 1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .5)
1 1.5
16. Nanic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
CD 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
cwo =
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed CT5
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22, Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfth
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
1
1.5
25. Algae CP
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
August 1, 2017
Tommy Reisland
Taylor Morrison of Carolinas, Inc.
211 James Jackson Ave.
Cary, NC 27513
Project: Reynolds Mill Phase 2
ROY COOPER
MTCHAEL S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: February 1, 2018
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
River CU Location Stream (feet)
Basin (8 -digit HUC)
Cold Cool Warm
Wetlands (acres)
i Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Riparian
I Non -Ripa -Han
Coastal Marsh
Impact Neuse 03020201 0 0 128
0
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Jennifer Harrod, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Caroline I Environatental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS'
� 1
\ ` d
REYNOLDS MILL PHASE III
0 `d6J
�gg�_o I a.
EXISTING POND \ \ /
I `
G O \ \` // I CL HOU
AME
O eT C-) I REYNOLD'S MILL PHASE IB
I
--- --- -- ;`.`�� .M ` �'''h EXISTING _
RECEIVED
AUG 10 2017
DENR-LAND
STORMWATER PERMITTING
AREA TO BE
ci DEVELOPED O
� O O
PERMANEM
IMPACT
_
NIIIFRS NORXAYE �� / \�^�,�•����\ \ I I � \\\ \ \
\
i_---- ----
I OPEN SPACE
g REYNOLDS MILL PHASE III \ \ p
I O BM 2007, PG 1066
1 PEMBE SUBDMSIO} I r \\\ \\\
/
IF
-Ti ilk -lee 1 '-/ \
€a €.€$ 13
I I I
EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL PERMANENT IMPACTS:
INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT -128 LF
INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT - 30.5 SO FT
BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1 - 8139 SO FT- 0.19 ACRES
ZONE 2.0072 SO FT -0.11 ACRES
TOTAL •0.30 ACRES
LEGEND:
NRR.ZONE1
® NRRBZONE2
_ STREAM IMPACT
SITE DATA
AREA IN PHASE 2: 20.13 AC,
LESS AREA IN RAN: 2.85 AC.
LEW AREA IN OPEN SPACE:1186 AC.
NET AREA (LOTS): 1188 AC,
NUMBER OF LOTS: 55
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 9,331 SO, FT.
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 0.210.1 AC,
AVERAGE LOT MOTH: W LF
HOME TARGET PRICE: 3205,000
AVERAGE HW E SIZE:2.600 SQUARE FEET
LENGTH OF PUBLIC ROAD EXTENSION: 2.191 LF
LENGTH OF PUBLIC WATERLINE EXTENSION: 2.,28 LF
LENGTH OF PUBLIC SEWER EXTENSION: 2,2 LF
PRELIMINARY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 35%
ISA OPTION: HIGH DENSITY (70% IMPERVIOUS ALLOLAED)
.ISA ALLOWED PER LOT:2.WOSQUARE FEET
REQUIRED MIN SETBACKS: 20- FRONT
19 SIDES
25 -REAR
2a STREET SIDE
MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS: 50 - LOT WIDTH
7,SOOSOUAREFEET-LOT AREA
ZONING (TQLAN OF WARE FOREST): CU GRS (CASE NO. RZ#11)
'NOTE: ISA ALLOWED PER LOT (2,600 SF) WILL NOT BE
CHANGED ONCE PLAT RECORDATION.
80' 0' 40' 80' 160'
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 h10h . BD It.
t
it
�S
°
0 V
n m r
V = .09,18 -ZI
V
H
Lj
z
^^N
HCWl��
M
"z
swU,z
qx c
� � U
N
vJ
W
oIli
K
II
PROJECT NO: 201 1076.02
DRAWN BY: CJR
DWG. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: SEE PLAN
DATE: march 25, 2016
O\'T.R U,L
B-100

RETAINING WALL
1NITIJ CCKirC
N
REYNOLDS MILL PH
A\lox/
RETAINING WALL
GI3 42DBL
EXISTING \
DEVELOPMENT \ \\
FES,40
0 1v � VAVA\\����
\� = RETAINING WALL \ \
WITH FENCE
Ro -77
\ �\ �1VE� \\ \
FLOW
30
_ TOCP OF BANK
-zo-
_ OPEN SPACE
- REYNOLDS MILL PH III —
77
RETAINING WALL i
WITH FENCE
PEMBERLEY SUBDIVISION
1
.y
r
TOTAL PERMANENT IMPACTS:
INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT = 128 LF
INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT = 345 SQ FT
BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1 = 8139 SQ FT = 0.19 ACRES
ZONE 2 = 4972 SQ FT = 0.11 ACRES
TOTAL = 0.30 ACRES
LEGEND:
NRRB ZONE 1
®
NRRB ZONE 2
STREAM IMPACT
PROPERTY LINE
��—
LOT NUMBER
1
1
1
1
1
V
50' 0' 25' 50' 100'
min
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 inch = 50 ft.
mo ��
Ju 'm �
z
aw Ft
NU
W
P.
W H
�Z
z
I �L
^�
�Or
woW�
a�
o
wl
w
O
w
CG
�
PROJECT No: 201 1076.0
DRAWN BY: CJR
DWG, CHECKED BY: MDA
SCA E: SEE PLAN
DATE: MARCH 25 2016
IMPACTS
B-200

VICINITY MAP
- The Engineer does not guarantee that all existing facilities such
as pipelines, electrical lines, conduit, telephone cable, service
c.n or other facilities are shown on the Plans. It shall
be the Contractor's responsibility to have all utilities located by
their respective avners, field mark the utility locations, and
protect all such existing facilities prior to beginning construction.
The Contractor Is fully responsible for notifying all utility owners
in accordance with NC General Statute - Chapter 87, Article 8,
The Underground Damage Prevention Act.
- No portion of the subject property is in a special flood hazard area
per map number 3720183000 J, Zone X (Effective Date May 2nd, 2006).
Said map was downloaded on 06-30-2012 from the following website.
'WAW NCFLOODMAPS.COM"
- Existing vegetation and natural areas shall be protected to the
greatest extent possible and minimum clearing of land shall be
undertaken during development.
- All construction shall be in accordance with Town of Wake Forest,
City of Raleigh and/or NCDOT Standards 8 Specifications.
- Wetlands/buffers shown per location map by MWkey Engineers &
Consultants. Presently under review by DWO S USACOE.
- All Neuse River Riparian Buffers are measured from top of stream bank.
- No observable evidence of a cemetery has been found.
- No existing structures were observed on subject property.
- Stream banks are shown and stream buffers have been measured
from the stream banks.
- The site does not contain any known contaminated soil or hazardous
materials.
- Soil Types: ApB2, AIPCZ ApD, WwE, WwF
'ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS'
/��� '� _/ —moi �\ _ \\ \\ �\� i•�\ v\ % �\ _ _ a _ &41
Z,
REYNOID'S MILL PHASE IN
/ \\
EXIT
---\\
DIP WATER
a+
it
ll
Pc 1889 \ \ ! \a \-out,
—
� r
-- — �/ EX SPUTTER BOX
EXISTING POND
v v v .................. .
a,aa... roam,
EXFH
/
.J
-' EXCB
= I DIPWATER \ \ — \ \ — — — — _ \ \ \ \ \ \ REYNOtD'S MILL PHgSE III aeo ply �Ve /, sOe
I �� �v .-�\ �' _ AREA TO BE DEVELOPED _ v v�, ( \A v v ro +�� o;!
Am 1 — i vv v�v
20.13 AC
__,-- --- l vv I v vv� v atawt A /
\ .w IXC\ IX\n
Is
EXDI
A�—
/ EXTDIPWATER 1 t,
--------------
/ ' EX& wF MBL
i' EXI WATER
\—
/OPEN SPACE
1 \ \ ^ \ \ \ \ i _ _ — —�+_ _ — REYNOLDS MILL PHASE
\w EXFH ' BM 2007, PG 1086
PEMBEALEY SUBDNI ION — 1 7r-
l
JRE$Qgy� p Rte„ REF S REF
/�\i=R I��IB�I 8'I REf.jl
'IR 6 8�I �SFy
80' 0' 40' 80' 160'
GRAPHIC SCALE
I Inch - 80 K
X a
o
J= °m„s
Z
Q Z z a
Vwsa z
z
�a
�I
U
�I
z:2
N
�D�a
arzdN���
V J
rW
W
Z
O
N
u]
K
i
PROJECT NO: 201 1076.02
DRAWN BY: CJR
DING. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: SEE PLAN
DATE: march 25, 2016
EMSI'ING CONDITIONS
B-300

Pvi
PV
GRADE4 LT_.. _ IL
Grace Church St
25' B -B / 50 ' RW
. - i-
'ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS'
. PERMANENT IMPACTS:
TENT STREAM IMPACT • ME 80 FT
MPACT
4E21.8139S0 FT•0.19ACRES
2.497] SO FT • 0.11 ACRES
TOTAL •0.80ACRES
ID:
I.M.-I4.1
INRRB ZONE 2
' STREAM IMPACT
0 40' 80'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1'=W
VERTICAL SCALE: V = 4'
t
Grace Church Storm Outfall
20' Easement
365
380
355
350
345
340
335
130
i
—0.75%
` /
IXB' VE
I
II
AN
�
•
E
_
E lE
\ H N
9 m
PVl my=3N.I5
20784
X•1800
PROP OWE
183%
�
/
24 RT
__
/ _
355
350
345
340
335
325
320
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
355
350
345
-
ffAOCECNORCHS
335
330
325
320
TSRT
OP0RA0E
1
121 NLN III
RI 38013' \ I/
1 w 7MP WATf
\ 1\-
\ 41.1 IIACP@52816
IXB VANE
z
1Rvq
waw
W90
!A 1402 LF 18-RCP@428%
• 1308E
STAIO 00GGRACE CI{U HST OUTFALL= @5
111.
1 M 347W
-CE DHURCH ST —
\ ANO ENEWT
INV. 331Nf !
-I 411(�)111 / 4 IXf
\ 1
jMll-42
INV. j/Ji 33]50 C842082/
STA1 O ECHURCH ST WTFA11=
FAM353.83' \ 1 11 84208E _-
GRPC C BT STA IM917 F
MIMI,
EXGRAMIIPVt�
1330
1 1 INV. N: NEMI
-
L
EUX, E I X11 .' /i EXGIRME 'LT
/ AT Ill '
IX 24 RT \11
v J
/
- !
TW .70' / 1
/
a *33 _.. -
0 L _ _ /
w
Z
0
N
aTaxvERT
M
L.T.
IN OU 78.
I
DRAWN BY: CJR
DWG. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: SEE PLAN
DATE: mrch 25. 2016
10+03
11+00 12+00
13+00
14+00
9+00 10+00
11+00 12+00
X
0
u
�.d���8
Qi F Z o
:L
VW -sad U.
1 '
U
I4
U
z
N
r
waw
W90
aC/)
z
oar
C)
Q h v
N
v J
W
w
w
Z
0
N
K
PROJECT NG: 201 1076.02
DRAWN BY: CJR
DWG. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: SEE PLAN
DATE: mrch 25. 2016
GRACE CHURCH STREET
PIAN & PROFILE
B-400

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO..____________ __ PLAN NO
STREET ADDRESS: Grace Church Street
(Reynolds Mill Subdivision - Phase 2)
PARCELID: 1830847718
Please print:
Property Owner Tommy Reis land, Taylor Morrison of Carolina's Inc
Property Owner:.-.=
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jennifer Harrod
(Contractor / Agent)
of CALYX Engineers and Consultants
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certlflcation and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
211 James Jackson Ave. Cary, INC 27513
Telephone: (,919) 2654045
We hereby certify the above Information submitted in this application Is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
...__.... ...
._. _._..._ _-___
Authorized Signature
Authorized Signature
Date: August 11, 2017 Date: