20051576 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report 2006_20081117

Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Contract #:
County:
Cataloging Unit:
Monitoring Firm POC:
Prepared For:
D05013-1
Cumberland
Cape Fear 03030004
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
Rich Mogensen [phone]
Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc.
Will Wilhelm [phone]
EEP Project Manager, Guy Pearce
Year 1(2006) Monitoring Report
P
PPPP'
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
M i d- A t l a n t i c
JI i t i g a t i o n L L C
A N E A R T 11 11 A R K C 0 :11 P A N Y
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT ABSTRACT 1
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING 2
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES 3
3.0 PROJECT CONDITON AND MONITORING RESULTS 7
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT 7
3.1.1 Soil Data 7
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas 7
3.1.3 Stem Counts 7
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary 8
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 9
3.2.1 Cross Sections 9
3.2.2 Bank Full Events 9
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles 9
3.2.4 Wetland Assessment 10
3.2.5 Site Stability Assessment Summary 10
Figure 1: Project Location and Drainage Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Plan View
TABLES
Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives 5
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History 5
Table III. Project Contacts 6
Table IV. Project Background 6
Table V. Preliminary Soil Data 7
Table VI. Stems Counts g
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project i Monitoring Year lof 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. Vegetation Raw Data
APPENDIX B. Cross Sections
APPENDIX C. Profile Survey and Pebble Count Data
Survey Sheets
Pebble Count Graphs
APPENDIX D. Photo Log
APPENDIX E. Ground and Surface Water Data
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project ii Monitoring Year I of 5
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
On behalf of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), Mid-
Atlantic Mitigation, LLC (MAM) with technical assistance from Kimley-Horn and
Associates (KHA) restored, enhanced and preserved 4,402 linear feet of stream, restored
6.6 acres of riverine wetlands and enhanced 2.7 acres of riverine wetlands. Construction
of the project began in November 2005 with beaver dam removal and grade-control
structure installation, continued into March 2006 with final planting completed in June
2006. The Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project (Project) will provide
NCEEP with 3,930 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 8.0 Wetland Mitigation Units
(WMUs).
The objective of the restoration approach is to plan, design, and construct a dynamically
stable stream/riparian floodplain and bottomland hardwood riverine wetland community
providing an ecological improvement for the entire site and watershed. This project is
designed to provide a stream channel that neither aggrades nor degrades while
maintaining its dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the surface
water and sediment load. Also, the Project aims to reestablish the primary stream and
wetland functions associated with nutrient removal and transport, sediment retention,
wildlife (both aquatic and terrestrial) habitat, and to provide restoration of riparian zones
that have been historically an impounded lakebed. The restoration approach, due to the
existing condition (fluctuating open water levels caused by Beaver activity) and varied
historical conditions of the site (lake, dry lake bed, beaver impoundments, etc.), involved
an "adaptive" management phased process.
The project was constructed in two phases. The restoration approach established a stable
grade control stream section, which maintains the elevation of the entire stream thalweg
and the floodplain by controlling the downstream end of the project area. The floodplain
elevation below the dam was set by installing several rock-cross vanes and a constructed
riffle to hold the grade of the existing lake bottom area which is now the floodplain area
above the dam. This design provides both secondary water quality and primary flood
storage benefits. The Project (both streams and wetlands) underwent a natural adjustment
to a more stable aquatic ecosystem. The streams continued to re-establish natural channel
function. This adaptive management approach allowed the streams to naturally seek
equilibrium and appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile as the Project stabilizes. The
primary restoration approach is to determine whether the stream adjustments trend
towards the design criteria and restoration goals based on up-stream reference
morphology and vegetation communities.
The riverine wetland and buffer vegetation community will transition as the system seeks
hydrologic and biologic equilibrium. The sediments were unconsolidated and mucky
with saturation. It was anticipated that settling and subsidence would occur throughout
the initial growing season, first through evaporation and then through transpiration as the
herbaceous cover (seeded and natural propagation) established. This did occur and
continues to progress. Areas that were not saturated/ponded (i.e. fringe areas and/or
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project I Monitoring Year l of 5
headwater wetlands) were intially planted with bare root seedlings and containerized
plants to establish a bottomland hardwood riparian wetland community. Later as the site
dewatered, thousands of containerized, bottomland hardwood trees & shrubs were
planted throughout the stream and wetland areas.
The stream(s) will be monitored for stability of dimension, pattern, and profile using
standard practices including permanent cross sections, riffle-run-pool analysis, and
pebble counts. Wetland hydrology and vegetation success will be monitored using self-
reading ground water monitoring gages and standardized, randomly placed permanent
vegetation plots which will be monitored for species diversity and survival. Monitoring
data will be analyzed to determine what remedial actions if any are required and any
remedial actions proposed will be detailed in the annual monitoring reports.
The first year monitoring was completed on October 19th, 2006. There is some active
channel evolution and adjustment occurring in the mid to upper reaches on both stream
channels. This will be monitored closely and MAM may want to do some low-intrusive
hand channel work this winter. Any minor channel work will be documented in the 2"d
Annual monitoring report. The vegetation in all of the plots currently meets and/or
exceeds the requirements.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Project is located in the City of Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina on
the corner of Clearwater Drive and US 401 Bypass (Country Club Drive). A location
map is included in Figure 1. The project site is located in the Upper Cape Fear River
Watershed (USGS 8-digit Hydrologic Unit 03030004, and NCDWQ River Basin 03-06-
15), and is within the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Cross Creek Targeted
Local Watershed (00050). The project site was historically impounded by a dam built in
the 1970s, creating Country Club Lake by impounding about 4,500 feet of two perennial
prongs of a tributary to Cross Creek. The project drainage area is approximately 2.6 sq.
mi. flowing into Cross Creek, a 303(d)-listed stream for impaired biological activity. The
eastern prong of the project which is named UT to Cross Creek East has a drainage area
of 1.0 square miles. The western prong named UT to Cross Creek West has a drainage
area of 1.6 square miles. The project area conservation easement consists of 17.8 acres.
The restoration project is being managed and monitored by Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
but the property is owned by the Greg and Patricia Tarlton and the conservation easement
is held by the State of North Carolina.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 2 Monitoring Year lof 5
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of the Project are to restore a naturally stable stream and
riparian wetland community; to restore a bottomland hardwood wetland community; and
to provide stormwater management for downstream development. In addition, water
quality will be improved, flood storage will be increased, wildlife and aquatic habitat will
be restored and the threat of flooding of downstream areas will be significantly reduced.
Phase I (completed Fall 2005): A beaver management plan was implemented to remove
all the beavers from the project site. The removal of the old dam debris and spillway was
completed in November and December 2005 making it more difficult for the beavers to
re-establish a dam at its existing location. A beaver control program which includes
regular site visits to the former dam area has been implemented and will continue
throughout the monitoring period. In mid-November 2005, the lake water level was
lowered over a 3-5 day period slowly releasing the water downstream to prevent flooding
and erosion. In conjunction with removing the beaver dams, the stream section through
the area of the historical dam and beaver dams was restored. The channel in this section
(approximately 175 feet) was restored using a Priority I (Rosgen) restoration approach.
The stream restoration included establishing a bankfull channel and active floodway
through the relic spillway/dam and providing a variety of in-stream structures (rock
vanes, constructed riffle, and step pool structures) to provide grade control, stability, and
improve aquatic habitat diversity. The natural channel design was based on the upstream
reference reach. The restoration project was transitioned through and under an existing
aerial sanitary sewer crossing that is just beyond the easement limit. In addition to the
stream restoration, a BMP (level spreader / pre-formed scour hole) was constructed in
this area at the outlet of a stormwater drainage pipe. This restoration establishes a stable
grade control, which maintains the elevation of the entire stream thalweg and the
floodplain by controlling downstream end of the project area. The floodplain elevation
below the dam was set to hold the grade of the existing lake bottom which is now the
floodplain area above the dam. This also prevented any sediment that was in the old lake
from being washed downstream and to provide a natural "pinch-point" corresponding
with existing topography. This pinch-point will help re-establish and control natural
hydrology in the proposed riparian wetland during events above bankfull and act as a
large detention area.
Phase II (completed in July 2006): Once the beavers, beaver dams, and impounded water
were removed, and the downstream grade control established, the Project (both streams
and wetlands) underwent a natural adjustment to a more stable aquatic ecosystem. The
stream segments found their hydrologic equilibrium and re-established bed and bank
features. In addition, the site soils gradually dewatered allowing the deposited sediments
to consolidate and subside. During the first growing season the Project soils stabilized
through evapotranspiration and subsidence processes. The streams continued to re-
establish natural channel function, and were evaluated for necessary adjustments. This
adaptive management approach allowed the streams to naturally seek equilibrium and
appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile as compared to the upstream reference reach.
The primary restoration approach is to determine whether the stream adjustments trend
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 3 Monitoring Year lof 5
towards the design criteria and restoration goals based on reference morphology and
vegetation communities. The eastern and western prongs are designed as Rosgen C5->E5
channels. During each monitoring year, where the channel slope and/or dimension are
found to be unstable, structures such as rock cross vanes, log cross vanes, log vanes, log
sills, and constructed riffles may be utilized to help maintain the channel compared to the
reference morphology.
The riparian wetland and buffer vegetation community will transition and stabilize as the
system seeks hydrologic equilibrium. The initial planting/seeding of the site was
completed in March-April 2006 to establish herbaceous cover of exposed bare soils with
the expectation that the initial growing season would allow for evapotranspiration to
dewater lake bottom sediments. These sediments were initially unconsolidated and
mucky with saturation. It was anticipated that settling and subsidence would occur
throughout the initial growing season, first through evaporation and then through
transpiration as the herbaceous cover (seeded and natural propagation) established. This
has occurred as proposed. Areas that are not saturated/ponded (i.e. fringe areas and/or
headwater wetlands) were planted with bare root seedlings and containerized plants to
establish a bottomland hardwood riparian wetland community. Additional plantings may
occur as needed, as the site continues to consolidate and settle.
In order to stabilize the newly constructed stream channel and flood plain areas both
temporary and permanent grass seed as well as wetland herbaceous seed were applied to
all restored areas. The types of seeds used were: Leersia oryzoides (Rice Cut grass);
Panicum clandestinum (Deertongue grass); Panicum virgatum (Switchgrass): Trisacum
dactyloides (Gams grass), and Secale cereale (Annual rye). Also, a Southeast Wildflower
mix was applied throughout the project. Five hardwood planting zones were established
as follows: Zone 1 - Stream Channel, Zone 2- Stream Bank, Zone 3 - Bottomland
Hardwood wetland, Zone 4 - Swamp Wetland, and Zone 5- Upland fringe. Livestakes
were installed along the newly constructed channel (approx. 175') within Zone 2. They
were planted randomly spaced approximately 3 feet apart and differed in sizes ranging
from .25" to 2" in diameter and 2' to 3' in length. Further livestaking may be necessary
as the new stream channels stabilize. Zone 3 -5 consists of bareroot seedlings and 1
gallon containerized plants, which were planted randomly 3' to 12' apart throughout the
proj ect.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 4 Monitoring Year I of 5
Table I. Proiect Mitigation Structure and Obiectives Table

Linear
Footage
Project Mitigation or
Segment Type Approach Acera a Stationing Comment
Stream 10+00-14+ Western Prong as it
W Prong P - 341 00 enters the site
Western Prong between
Stream 14+00-19+ Preservation Area and
W Prong E1 596 00 Restoration Area
Remainder of Site is
Stream R P1 3465 Restoration 88%)
Wetland R - 6.6 Project is 83% restoration
Stream Enhancement
Area is bordered by
Wetland Enhancement,
Several other
Wetland E - 2.7 enhancement areas exist
Table II. Proiect Activity and Renortine Historv

Activity or Report Calendar Year of Completion or Planned
Completion Actual
Completion
Date
Restoration Plan October 2005 March 2006
Construction October 2006 March 2006
Temporary /Permanent
seeding October 2006 March 2006
Bareroot Plantings November 2006 March 2006
Containerized Plantings November 2006 June 2006
Mitigation Plan December 2006 Aug ist2006
Year 1 Monitoring December 2007 October 2006
Year 2 Monitoring December 2008 October 2007
Year 3 Monitoring December 2009 October 2008
Year 4 Monitoring December 2010 October 2009
Year 5 Monitoring December 2011 October 2010
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 5 Monitorin- Year lof 5
Table III. Project Contacts
Project Manager
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC 9301 Aviation Blvd., Suite CE1
Concord, NC 28027
Rich Mo ensen [phone]
Designer
Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. 4651 Charlotte Park Dr
Suite 300
Charlotte, NC 28217
Will Wilhelm [phone]
Construction Contractor
Earthwork Inc. 343 Chapman Drive
Sanford, NC 27330
Dan Wood [phone]
Planting & Seeding Contractor
Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwight McKinney [phone]
Seed mixes provided by IKEX
Nursery Stock provided by Native
Roots Nursery (Formerly Southern
Shade)
Monitoring Performers
Mid-Atlantic Mitigation, LLC 9301 Aviation Blvd., Suite CE1
Concord, North Carolina 28027
Christine Cook [phone]
Table IV. Project Background
Project Background Table
Project County Cumberland
Drainage Area 2.6 square miles
Drainage Cover Estimate (%) 10%
Physiographic Region Coastal Plain
Ecoregion 45a Southern Inner Piedmont
Wetland Type Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved
Deciduous
Cowardin Classification PFO1Fh
Dominant soil types Johnston Loam
Reference site ID UT to Cross Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference 03030004
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-06-15
I of project easement fenced 0 - Urban site surrounded by private
residence
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 6 Monitoring Year lof 5
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
Table V. Preliminarv Soil Data
Series Max Depth % Clay on K T OM
in Surface %
Johnston 80 25 - 49 .20-.17 5 3 -8
Loam
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
At this time, no vegetative problem areas have been noted or invasive species problems.
The site has been stabilized and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species
3.1.3 Stem Counts
Zones 1 - 3 of the five planting zones were sampled in three 75 ft by 75 ft plots. The
prevalent vegetation should consist of macrophytes that typically are adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions. These species should have the ability to grow, compete,
reproduce, and persist in anaerobic soil conditions. A reduction in the percentage of
nuisance vegetation in wetlands areas with existing vegetation to less than 15% will
indicate enhancement of wetland vegetation. For the restoration areas, study plots
showing that the composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas that
compares closely to the reference areas will indicate restoration success for vegetation.
The initial success of riparian and wetland vegetation planting will be evaluated based on
herbaceous cover as the site is stabilized in the initial growing season. After the year-two
growing season, success will be gauged by stem counts of planted species and desirable
volunteer species. Stem counts of over 320 trees per acre after 3 years, 288 trees per acre
after 4 years, and 260 trees per acre after 5 year will be considered successful. Photos
taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation
community.
On October 19, 2006, the first year-vegetative monitoring was performed on the
established vegetative plots.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 7 Monitoring Year lof 5
Exhibit Table VI: Stem Counts for Each Species Arran ed b Plot
Plots Initial Year 1 Survival
Species 1 2 3 Totals Totals %
Shrubs
Alnus serrulata 3 5 3 8 > 100
Ce halanthus occidentalis 1 2 3 3 100
Cornus ammomum 4 1 4 10 9 90
Totals 8 3 9 16 20 > 100
Trees
Betula ni ra 5 12 1 18 18 100
Chamae aris th oides 1 1 8 2 25
Fraxinus ennsylvanica 20 1 14 35 35 100
Liriodendron tuff i era 1 0 0
Nyssa a uatica 5 1 6 6 100
N ssa Mora 6 2 8 8 100
N ssa sl antica 5 4 1 10 10 100
uercus falcata var. a oda olia 0 0 0
uercus michauxii 0 0 0
uercus ni ra 2 0 0
uercus hellos 1 1 1 100
uercus shumardii 1 1 1 100
Salix ni ra 1 0 1 >100
Taxodium distichium 7 8 6 25 21 84
Totals
J.« 49 27 27 115 103 90
r ear i i otals include planted material and native volunteers
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
Vegetation success will be defined as tree survival to meet 320 stems per acre alter 3
years and 260 stems per acre after 5 years inside the permanent vegetative plots and
herbaceous cover evaluated with photos showing 75% coverage, after 5 years.
All three plots showed excellent survival percentages. The site as a whole shows an
average of 317 stems per acre and demonstrates 94 percent survival. The community is
diverse and rich with healthy volunteers. Volunteer numbers ofAlnus serrulata and Salix
nigra have increased since the plots were installed and initial counts done in June of 2006.
It is expected that desirable species such as these will continue to colonize the site and
that planted species will continue to have a low mortality rate, therefore stem counts
should maintain or continue to rise slightly over the next few years as the site progresses.
In Appendix A, the vegetative survey data tables show the actual counts of each species
found per plot, severely stressed but not dead plants were noted. The herbaceous cover
plant community was monitored in a 1 in by 1 in square at one corner of each plot. Each
herbaceous quadrant showed at least 75% cover and all were or at close to 100%.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 8 Monitoring Year lof 5
3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Cross Sections
The site has shown no significant change since as-built documents were submitted. The
Cross Section plots are located in Appendix B. Cross Sections 1 and 2 show the only
constructed pool and riffle, respectively, on the site at this time. There appears to be
some minor settling occurring on the left bank of the run between Cross Sections 1 and 2.
Much of this area was constructed with usable debris from the dam removal and this bank
is composed mostly of stone. The vegetation is slow in taking hold on this section of
bank because of the stone composition. The stream channels at Cross Sections 3 through
10 are less defined then Cross Sections 1 and 2. MAM and KHA tried to select deep still
areas for pools and chose shallower areas of swift running water for the riffle cross
sections.
3.2.2 Bank Full Events
The upstream reference gage has only registered minor peaks exceeding bank full
elevation. There is no evidence on site that there have been any significant bank full
events. A crest stage gage was proposed to be installed at the end of the site in the
location of the old dam. MAM and KHA have decided to install both an automated
stream gage with data logger and a crest stage gage as planned. However, neither device
has yet to be installed at this time. Going into year-two monitoring KHA will install the
data logger near the top of the Western Prong at the top of the beginning of the project
and MAM will install the crest stage gage as planned. Both installations should be done
within the next two months.
3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles
There is currently only one constructed riffle on the project, which is located at the site of
the original dam and corresponds with Cross Section 2. This riffle was constructed with
large cobbles and small boulders found on site. A pebble count was done which
demonstrates the substantial size of the bed material. There is currently no smaller bed
material present and only a small representative sample was taken. The peeble count data
is presented in Appendix C. The site has shown no significant change since as-built
documents were submitted. Currently, the site is in a very early stage of development and
MAM will be watching and remediating the stream work as needed through out the next
year. At least one significant bank full event will need to be observed in order to identify
sections of the stream that may need additional work. While several obvious pools
(shown on the profile graphs in Appendix C) have formed, very little definition in the
riffle areas has been observed. Although in low-gradient coastal plain systems the
current stream morphology is common and stable.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 9 Monitorin, Year lof 5
3.2.4 Wetland Assessment
Seven ground water gages are distributed around the project along with one reference
gage off site, but not far upstream on the Western Prong. Detailed descriptions of each
gage along with graphs showing the 2006 data have been prepared. These graphs along
with the rain gage data graphs are presented in Appendix E. Each gage on site indicates
jurisdictional hydrology. At this stage of development demonstrating jurisdictional
hydrology is not a problem. Some areas of the site, as evidenced by Gage 6 still remain
somewhat over saturated and standing water is observed. As the site progresses towards
hydrologic equilibrium, some areas may develop small open water features, but for the
most part is predicted that the site will continue to dry out over the coming years.
3.2.5 Site Stability Assessment Summary
Overall, the stream channel has developed and stabilized well. The herbaceous vegetative
cover has also developed a healthy and diverse community. The planted trees and shrubs
have also done very well and are supplemented by a robust existing buffer community
which provides seed source for volunteers well suited to the current site conditions.
Ground water wells demonstrate favorable trends and jurisdictional wetland hydrology.
Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration Project 10 Monitoring Year lof 5
FIGURES
<` f a'. Wis. •? R.
Title Project Site Watershed Map (Cumberland County 2001 Aerial)
Project Tarlton Stream and Wetland Restoration
Mid-Atlantic Prepared Foy Cumberland Count North Carolina
Mitigation, LLC Date Project Number Figure
11/14/06 012857003 1
O
O
O
Cl)
O
CO
0
U

o l! pO
UD
Q Z
O
z z F
C) cl
CO ? a W?
z z z o ? z z W
w _O z z p w O E J p W
Q w O w w U ° ? Z
q° ~ w w Q Z
W Z:) Z Q p z M LL Op O Q O OJ $ w
m z w a = LLI
d z C7 w = CJ1 O J N
pz w ? Q
W 0 wi z a z z O z Q¢ w c°Q
W w a Q Q Q Q Q Q° o° ? 3 rs
w
H p a w p z I C?
Cf) CL
N a <
0

O
N
V z
z
w
2w z
Li
LL- 1 O
O -Z
\ W_ 3 C%l
Z Lj
` WQ?
????" ? 'zg00
zblir
LIJ / Ww? p
z3
t?

r
d
a
z
0
m
z
w
m
w
a
W

D

r ,.
CJ zoo
0Q°ca

E;,
I
i

U
U?
M
IC
i o is
O C) n °
(n N n
cf:Z:,
"
O 07
E 7C:3 Qe
= U
cz F < -
LL
Z
JO
KLV
Ir,
00,D
O?
W M?
= O`
mz
cio
g
a
s
I3
z
9.
APPENDIX A: Vegetation Raw Data
Tarlton- Vegeta tion plot #1

Trees/ Shrubs um er o Species
planted um er o
Volunteers
Alnus serrulata 3
Betula nigra 5
Cephalanthus occidentalis 1
Chamaecyparis thyoides 1
Cornus amomum 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20
Driodendron tulipifera
Nyssa aquatica 5
Nyssa bflora 6
Nyssa slyvantica 5
Quercus falcata var. pagodafolia
Quercus michauxii
Quercus nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus shumardii
Taxodium distichium 7
53 4

Herbacous Vegetation
Juncus spp. Dominant
Polygonum spp. (tearthumb) Sub dominant
Eupatorium capillifolium Common

Plot Size: 5625 ft2
Stems/plot = Stems/acre
Sq ft/plot Sq ft/acre
57
5625
441
43560
Tarlton- Vegetation plot # 2

Trees/ Shrubs Number o
Species
planted
Number of
Volunteers
Alnus serrulata
Betula nigra 12
Cephalanthus occidentalis 2
Chamaecyparis thyoides 1
Cornus amomum 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica I
Liriodendron tulipifera
Nyssa aquatica 1
Nyssa biflora
Nyssa slyvantica 4
Quercus falcata var. pagodafolia
Quercus michauxii
Quercus nigra
Quercus phellos
Quercus shumardii
Taxodium distichium 8
28 2

Herbacous Vegetation
Eu atorium ca illifolium Sparse
Juncus spp. Dominant
anicum clandestinum Common
polygonum pensylvanicum Dominant
polygonum spp. (smartweed) Common
Polygonum spp. (tearthumb) Common
sedge sp. Sparse
Plot Size: 5625 ft2
Stems/plot = Stems/acre
Sq ft/plot Sq ft/acre
30 232
5625 43560
Tarlton- Vegeta tion plot # 3

Trees/ Shrubs Number o Species
planted Number o
Volunteers
Alnus serrulata 5
Betula nigra 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Cornus amomum 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 14- (2 Stressed)
Liriodendron tulipifera
Nyssa aquatica
Nyssa biflora 2
Nyssa slyvantica 1
Quercus falcata var. pagodafolia
Quercus michauxii
Quercus nigra
Quercus phellos 1
Quercus shumardii 1
Salix nigra 1
Taxodium distichium 6
30 6

Herbacous Vegetation
Eupatorium capilli olium Dominant
Juncus spp. Dominant
Lycopus virginicus Sparse
Mikania scandens Sparse
Polygon um spp. (tearthumb) Dominant
unidentified Sparse

Plot Size: 5625 ft'
Stems/plot
Sq ft/plot
36
5625
Stems/acre
Sq ft/acre
279
43560
APPENDIX B: Cross Sections
m m n m N a M( PI O
M M M M M M M M M M O rn m m n ?O N a M N 0
a t2 M M M M n2 M M M M M O rn m m n m m a M N O
a M M M M M M M M M M M O m m m
a M, M M

O C

J W
J
W
LL O J
O .
LL- O W
LL
- -

I? 0 m
z
z
O 0 p
_

W U W U
(n W
?
n
V
O V) V)
V N
O p
? 0
n

O
m m n? O N a n N 0 d ?.rnj M h Mn] M M M M M M M M r 7 M M Ym1 h M M M M M d M M h M M M M M h h H h m M M
M M M M
h
M M m M a M M h M m m t2 m M M M? M M m M M M M M 0 N1 M m M M M M M m M m M a M M

_., m ., m
o

W
J
Ll-
J W W W

O
al
_
Of a-
LL-
LC)
'o Of
N
O

(D
O O p w
?

w
v U 1= ?

"
ill LLJ

w

Ln

U)
O
U)
o

V

?
n

Q

V/ O
cn
cn n
?
(A O
O/ y O

O O O

.
m n m m a M N o
t2 M M M M M M M M
?' •- •- r .- p
m m n m m a M N o
M M M M M M M M M M

m m n ?p a M N O
M M M M M M M M M M
_- p
m m n .o m a M N O

..
m m

...... :O
??
^ M I2 ^ M M M
n m m a M N O
t2 ?2 V t2 t2 '2 t2
J
O
O
a-
O
z
_O
F-
-C)
W
V)
V)!
GO
NO
LL
U
?Z
O
r
O
m _/ V
LLI
J
0 $
Z
-J J
aW
H?
11
`O
r
i
L_U
r
Z
J W
i
U
C
uS'
N
C _CZ
C) U
O
? Q
Y c
d
f
S
i
APPENDIX C: Profile Survey and Pebble Count Data
I
04 N N
9NnHOiVh
1
I
I
I
I
I

N
N
c°g
N
N
N
N
a
3Y
u
y
V
J
V
C? C14 N N
,! L-----
3NnHJldw
0
I
I
I
c`X
N
V
O
ct
F -
C0
w

OZ
Q
QQ I
W?
Q
H
II .
t-i
li!
Z
CO)
T?T
ILL
Q
U
Cf)
_CD
i CCf
C>
N Q Cl)
.9-mit
Y c
I
R OP ¢ N

? o
N
W9
N
b
t
?QQ
+pN
N
Z
? o
cr-
cr
w
a+
V
Q

9*9a
1
S'9£l 1
FL

Z
gM o

} g? m ?

SW Z
?
m w

cm

9vu w

I B 8E%
? ?
gea

N VOM
e?
I
I
I
I
I
O
M
F
O
N
O
0
W
Oz
cr.
11
9
V
N
O V
O
Cl)
? Q
Y c
6
Z ?8
d

Site Name: Tarlton Steam and Wetland Restoration Pebble Count Data Sheet
Poject No: D05013-1 X Sec: 2
Date: 10/19/2006 Sta No.: 35+00

Particle e mm T otal o in Range % Cumulative
Sand and Silt <2 0 0% 0%
2 -4 0 0% 0%
4 -6 0 0% 0%
6 -8 0 0% 0%
8-12 0 0% 0%
Gravels 12 -16 0 0% 0%
16 -24 0 0% 0%
24 -32 0 0% 0%
32 -48 0 0% 0%
48 -64 0 0% 0%
64 -96 0 0% 0%
96 -128 0 0% 0%
Cobbles 128 -192 0 0% 0%
192 -256 8 31% 31%
256 -384 4 15% 46%
384 -512 7 27% 73%
Boulders 512 -1024 7 27% 100%
1024-2048 0 0% 100%
2048 -4096 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals: 26 100%

Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% - 32%
90% 28%
80% m 24%-
_
E 70% 0
? 20%-
20%
E i; 16%-
60%-
12%
N 50% 0 8%
u 40% 4% .
a 30% 0%
20%
?0
00
e0
?0
10% 66/
G/a?
`,/,
e
ILI,
Cobble Boulder Boulders Boulders
S
192 - 256 256 - 384 384 - 512 512 -1024

I Cumulative % Fine Particle Size (mm)

APPENDIX D: Photo Log
' Wx

k.L. .° .. rw..J:
ikf
k -a tit.
Photo Point 1 - Storm Water BMP

Photo Point 3 - Structures 1 & 2
141,

Problem Area 1 - Rocks and bank under matting have settled. Vegetation hasn't taken
root due to rock under matting, area will be live staked this winter.

d , ( ._'4
Photo Point 8 - Site overview from Monument
Photo Point 9 - Eastern Prong from top of dam
Photo Point 12 - VP2
i
VP 2 Herbaceous Plot
Photo Point 14 - VP 1
~ (pp(er?
? f
4,
3
VP 1 Herbaceous Plot
Photo Point 20 - VP3

a
a
+,.

r
L
Photo Point 13 - Western Prong from Utility Line, downstream
VP 3 Herbaceous Plot
V'a* wrs Eb s s4f `
-mac .3 ter '` ?, a :s + > :.
,4Wws
g arc 9 t'rr ?<
F Mf"
Photo Point 31 - Enhancement Area

Photo Point 15 - Western Prong from Utility Line, upstream
APPENDIX E: Ground and Surface Water Data
U
C
ui
d
C ?
° o
2 N
ate) Q
E a
Y m
a)
co
, L
cG T
o m
rn ?
o c
(say3ul) IItiuILId 0
L C
O L
U
O N M t[7 0)
- - r
• • -- 90/8 L /O L 0)
90/Z L/0 L a) FA
- 90/90/OL cCo 0
• • 90/8Z/60 cn
0
? • • j 90/ZZ/60 L
• % 90/S L /60
•• • 90/80/60 L m
# '' • • 9020/60 T .a
r'Z"." •? 3 U O 90/9Z/80 E
{ N a) o Q E> 90/6 L /80 °-) E
•ar,,y'' W o
'xs ..
Cf) Y' ti o •• ' U) z m 90/£ L /80 0 0
(D Co >
?` 3 u W x m • z o o -90/90/80 c
a) o
cfl o > •
°M - 9010£/LO
-t6 0)
o .. po • • 0 c 90/17Z/LO 3 U)
N fi k°: k N a) W u (o
rn * „ C7 901L L /LO L
' yg o o • 90/0 L /LO co coo
o • 9011701LO o
.,,.. to a • - 90/LZ/90 0
90/oi?/90 a)
•• • • 90/17 L /90 N o
• • • • 90/LO/90 - CO
90/L£/90 a c 0
90/SZ/90 o 0
m ; U) E
U) cu
w - 90/8L/SO
' 3 3 0 , • - 90/LL/SO
; U • ' ; 90/90/90 _0
.. .
s
?, ?? • • - 90/8Z/170
3 r ?' c • 904Z/170 io
t
O • - 90/9 L /170 -0 ?
CD : o • - 90/80/170 oa U)
N "
N ? 90/LO/170 c E
T 4g ' oQ z
C14 !?-l
v U • 90/9Z/£0
W 90/ZL/£0 Y a-
90/90/co o is
¢ r i 90/LZ20
:tf L +
N
w - 90/Oz/M .3
U ,
" a " , y • 90/17 L/ZO 0 N
? ? ?; • • - 901L020
904MO 1 Z3 (D
' 3 ';;r' 3 •i • ; - 90/9Z40
of "i >w r - - . -- - 90/8L/LO N
r 0 - U,,' cn 0 ° ° o u> c
r4, 3 A co N O (V cM V O
?O
44, w ?K coo `+ oo (4) lanai Ja;eM o
./A o o L
N +, ` N 0) c
>
LLI
°: co m
Om E
O U 2 cn
E o c
0) co co 3:
Q -0 co N V O U i a+ -iz
=3 c a) n3 0
0 U ?ki
E c -a o m a)
co a co o c E Zo -c- 00
O o L i? Q)
Z o a) o 0 o? o a oC6 a??i co ? v ?•?? ? ? :? K a 0 76 a) -a ?; L E n of ci o a ai U) co z 0)
o U c (o C « 1?+r ++?, a =.;
+. O O H co U p Y o Lo
cn ° a> 3
m c w o o a? O
0 '4
%
(tea LLI aD - o c m N o ca'?
N > H O C (o U a) Cb Q) e
(0 0 Y t"' : fT W+ r. t rl ,; ?' •?rt , !"` (`r . a 4F CD
V c. co 0 L0 5.
O. Q a) L 2 E p u` ) rn a) ?? ? o
»0+ C T a) _d c O O L 0 L C O co -
\ a gip" r a:? '?( is r Ar $i 0-0 m co w L a) a) 0 a) J >Z T Q o In rCry_ "k } \ t m7 e r 'Y;• r +lw
70
3 3 .? +. ,? Q a) E N x •,-. ;'''+, t,a •x % w '+`' * 1 R, t' .......
."'tY ?,'Na "•,'
U C O O m a) co O
cn 0 a) 0 OJ>- U O 0 w* at<° w 0 M -0 F-
m m
c0 U O 7 r W O- a) N cu 0 O •0 (o
C) CO P: En C
0 U) N d a) N (D p (n L- 0 a)- W N Q. N a; •(U < i 8 " i K
W ct Z (n CO V C O -0 o , vl U p to _ k? a4'a + r ' v w « x q a t ' ' , yll
V 3 Z 0 0 _T T L_ L Q Q Q Q 00 _ . r 4-.,° t L.'cy+`-x't •. s s..? 'IP". "'
U cn N 3 0 w (o 0
W V
a) Q _ m w
aD W 0
J m as E o c oo as cn o +'. r +.,?w•
ti U J E E m 70 6.
R {? , ?' a
a -FU
y r W Q o co O > CL > j VN
(? (o () U O a)
0
p -0 E a h Y d aD
>, Q Q o 0 Z 2 Q a 0- Q 0 Q E O O o u 0
d m L9 J - (n (o co (u L .? .? J U) Q) O Q 0 U «rr'!f ' . e-._ f ",s •M'?' (? .<
N
W
U
I
X
N
Q)
-rz
m?
m
a
ail
m
m
C
O
m
O
Z5
a?
O
LL
Q)l
c
0
Fm
?I
O
0
co
co
N
O
c
Q

O O
0 I
r - •
q? ?pY
i r
t o.
(S??UI) Ile??le2!
O O O
N Cl) V
o
a)
L
U (o
C a)
a) L
a) U
U
a)
O U
O Q)
LO L •?
a) -0
M
90/8 6 /O L
9026/06 M
90/90/06 3
90/8Z/60 0
902Z/60 o
90/96/60 U)
90/80/60
9020/60 Q)
90/9Z/80
90/66/80 0
70
90/£ 6 /80 a) L
c .'?
90/90/80
90/0£/LO CU t
90117Z/LO
90/L ULO U) a)
90/O6/LO L?
901b0/LO cn 0)
N
90/LZ/90 (n (n
90/OZ/90 co D
90/b6/90 a) •
U ?
90/LO/90 m
904£/90 o a) 90/9Z/90 0 =
90/86/90 c
90/66/90 " rn E
90/90/90 m r o u0)
90/8Z/b0 c
90/6Z/t70 co
90/9 6 /b0 co E
90/80/b0 3 E
O
90/60/t70 0
90/9Z/£0 o m ai
CY.
90/66/£0 co
9026/£0 U)
m
90/90/£0 Y .?
901LZ20 0 coo 0
90/OZ/ZO_ a L
90/b620 3 p
90/L020 a)
904£40 2 U) -0
Z3 L Q)
90/9Z/60 io ?5 "
- 90/86/60 0
o = co O
0
O 0) C
lA a) U)
0 ? 0
O
m
co
L E
2
Z a)
W m
C13
c
cu
rn
c
m
_ U
3 0
N E
> o
o -
CO
C.0 w
0
N
CD rn •
co
U I
a)

3 ?- --6 1
N O o
> O C.)
N

co
a)
CO I
0
0
N
r-

•

C0
O N (M
(4) lanai ao}eM
dCDO
O
O
O
i�
G
N
co
a)
t
O
C
O
O
N
0)
O
(SNOUT) IlebuleU
0 0 0
N M
O
O
It
0
90/96/M
9026/06
90/40/0 L
90/8Z/60
90/ZZ/60
90/SMO
/60
90/80/60
90/ZO/60
90/9Z/80
90/66/80
90/£ L /80
90/90/80
90/OE/LO
901VZ/LO
90/L L /LO
90/0 L /LO
90/b0/LO
90/LZ/90
90/OZ/90
90/ti6/90
90/LO/90
90/6£/40
90/4Z/40
90/Wso
/40
90/6 6/40
90/40/40
90/8ZA70
90/LZ/t70
90/4 L A70
90/80/W
90/60/tb0
90/9Z/£0
90/6 L /CO
902 L /£0
90/90/EO
90/LZ20
90/OZ/ZO
90/bL/ZO
90/LO/ZO
90/6£/60
90/4Z/ W
90/86/60
O
O
O O O O O O
N O cV c')
(4) IOAG-1 JOWM
a) ( m
a) �
•�L E E O wt
Z E R O O cc -0>' : aa) Co
W O 0 N U) O C -O m U p
(A C E cL (0 U (n m a) Vi
O O Q Op C >, O N (D co y a
L O`_ I a) co O > 7 0
O O a)
j m O a) O` O>_ O O C �+
N _O N O co .� C O— cn
a) a) c a) a cn N O O co
O coo a) �>le — T V O CO p y ) C
-0 co O U cu M E Q « N= O
0) CY)U a) E 0 >+ ao .� u S
L O L 4)
~ ) a) O o N o � z i a) co
N s E 0 N OL 0 `16 - �
Z O 3 O .0 a) co i p - a) U a) O LL
cp U (0 a ) (o O C:) -0 C Q U i Q- N O
coCO L C co a) 0- (n Q i� N
3 ch3 a) >,yN> a)�.k co
C
00 W U) 00' N O .� Up O Z) C') Q C'4 CT3 O
D 7 m +' C V O c O d O a) V CO N 1 w
OJ cO .O a) E -_ m Q .O p a `� a r
L M Z O 76 -a _ CL 0N O w a� U j Q O a+
O y° w m`
Q � p O c m
n a) Q .`� a co 3 c a ui p 0 O
iJ W
_j —1 0a) E .� .0 N O a) O O C y r i
uCL
2 a o rn a) coq a) a co w o a a m m
U a L O 7 N N Q
0 >, 0 0 Z p r N O N cEo d O m .� '�
� I r
�. Ae L �,.
'Now.
t'lnmrw
pry,
C:
O
M
a
C:
D
_c
c
co
0)
c
0
O
O
C:
m
U
Q)
O
m
U
C
a)
a)
(D a)
O "O
'ywuJ ��♦7��f♦♦♦777 yi���"�
04 k
y s
A.CD

M
0
3
a)
3
aD
z
ti
I
0
0
(SNOUT) Ile3uled
0 0
N M
0
0
V
0 0 0 0 0 0
N O N M
(3!) lanai Ja;eM
c
0
U
O
Q)
L
L
m
>
0
o =
o N
Y
co
90/8L/OL U)
m
90RVOL
90/90/0 L m
c
1 90/8Z/60
90/ZZ/60
90/9L/60 ca
R
90/80/60 rn
9020/60 0
90/92V80 r
90/6L/20 a)
90/CL/90
90/90/80 0
a)
90/0£/LO m
90/bZ/LO
90/LL/LO
c
90/0L/LO m
C:
90/b0/LO F-
90/LZ/90 0
a
90/OZ/90 m
L
0
90/bL/go E
90/L0/90
m —
90/L£/90
90/9Z/SO c
(D
w
90/2USO
/90
904 L/90
90/SO/SO 0
L
90/8Z/b0 u>
c •-
90/LZ/b0 O _
a) .N
90/9L/b0 n
m
90/80/b0 m
90/LO/b0 L m
m
90/9Z/£0
C �-
90/6L/£0
90/ZL/£0 3
90/90/£0 >
901LZ20 C
— c
90/OZ20 0 c
0) O
90/bL/ZO >
'L T
90/LO/ZO
904£/LO 3
0
90/9Z4O D
1 90/8L/LO
0 -0
V Q)
0)
� (a
o m
m
N
d' O)
c
Fes- ca
z
W
O
U E
a)
m E a) O co
C rn -0 cn .> J 0
m m
° 3 i:z oc 0 m co
= m °p E a> O C)fc>3
c C (D U)
U
o
_ L Q) > O a)T)
O
m M° M a 'o
n-0 c L)
.+
C
CN
O
.—
U
O O O N a) a) T
O- -r-_ > p N V)
0
O
N . E O :F
a� o E
_
T
O U Co 'E c6 Q) •N O
a T
w
m 0 E' E
-C :3co cOa 'x E
Z: m
U
U
OX Q) p O
O U a N O J
c
E
w
m
0-
Z U 0- a) O
O
O�
N
E
(�
Q)
6
N 0 0 M 70 m U
cL m
E ° °' m t
.i
vii
>,
a�
a a�_ c=a m
Iy�
v,
U 0 L J O L
(6 ~
N
E0
c
fn c0 -0 > \ Q)
Lu@ c .: co
Y
w ° m m c
L
H
co
U
O
E}
F- V c0 @ E O Q
❑
N
m
~
a
N
'p a) a) `) U O E c c0
LLI
FRE
3
Z
z L ca -� E m co o- 1-
0 a 0) o ff c� o
U
Cl)
O
U
L L� � O
m=LL
Q Q)
O>
v
LU
.2
N
Q)
U
(B
J o U
Q a) L
O O7 d
O= U j N-0 U)
a_
m
O
J
-
CO
- 0. 0- r 0 M m U) >- cn r
I
0
0
(SNOUT) Ile3uled
0 0
N M
0
0
V
0 0 0 0 0 0
N O N M
(3!) lanai Ja;eM
c
0
U
O
Q)
L
L
m
>
0
o =
o N
Y
co
90/8L/OL U)
m
90RVOL
90/90/0 L m
c
1 90/8Z/60
90/ZZ/60
90/9L/60 ca
R
90/80/60 rn
9020/60 0
90/92V80 r
90/6L/20 a)
90/CL/90
90/90/80 0
a)
90/0£/LO m
90/bZ/LO
90/LL/LO
c
90/0L/LO m
C:
90/b0/LO F-
90/LZ/90 0
a
90/OZ/90 m
L
0
90/bL/go E
90/L0/90
m —
90/L£/90
90/9Z/SO c
(D
w
90/2USO
/90
904 L/90
90/SO/SO 0
L
90/8Z/b0 u>
c •-
90/LZ/b0 O _
a) .N
90/9L/b0 n
m
90/80/b0 m
90/LO/b0 L m
m
90/9Z/£0
C �-
90/6L/£0
90/ZL/£0 3
90/90/£0 >
901LZ20 C
— c
90/OZ20 0 c
0) O
90/bL/ZO >
'L T
90/LO/ZO
904£/LO 3
0
90/9Z4O D
1 90/8L/LO
0 -0
V Q)
0)
� (a
o m
m
N
d' O)
c
Fes- ca
z
W
O
U E

ci
c
0
2
a?
E?
]C
(sa143ui) lle;uiea
00 00 00 00 °o
O • N M V
lZO, „p+3? %;k-,
6r

>
C?l* 3 zP? E
O ,

a , ?r
c
L
•
Cc
m
? U
a? o
> E
I_- o
V
0 o
CO
c
a)
O Ltl
O
N
col
,I
m
N
L
0
O
O
O
N
r-
c?
r
m
U
(0
7
U
N
L
F--
o
0
L6
0)
90/91/01 c
9021/01 a
90/90/O L
m
90/9Z/60 U)
90/ZZ/60 i
90/91/60
90/90/60 a
9020/60
90/9Z/90 0_ m
90/61/90 C
90/CI/90 Co
c
90/90/90
90/0£/LO
90117Z/LO a) 00
90/LL/LO a
90/O1/LO a0i
90/b0/LO a)
90/LZ/90 Q o
90/OZ/90 2 3
90/K/90 /90 co 0
90/LO/90 2
90/1£/90 G
90/SZ/90
90/91/90 3
90/11/90 0
90/90/90 " 0
90/9Z/VO (n CL
90/1Z/VO
90/9 UVO N c
90/80/VO 7
90/10/VO L N
90/9Z/£0 N N
c
90/61/£0 c a
90/Z /£0 3 0
90/90/£0 0
0
901LZ/ZO
90/OZ/ZO
90/V1/ZO °-
90/1020 m o
90/1£/10
N .?
90/SZ/10 -0 p
90/91 / 10
00 (1) o
y m E
co E
0 0
N
70
CD
Z -0
W
c
2
M?
O
O
P?l
LO
00
N
0
c

O o O o 0 0
0 0 0 o O O
N r O N M
(4) lana-1 Ja;eM
c
m
3 I ="

P
}
ti
y
co
0
C O a)
0
co
_
L O r >_
-0 E -0 O 0 3
'
CU
0) a) (D Crj
?
0
0 '
p .
7 N
? -
p O 0 70
a) C: C to
LL

Q L
to .? m2 N U) O O CQ Q3 a)
a) EL a)
CO co
_

Z C.D
O 0 M cc)
0) 0 0 0 E a
c' °
?

N r
m _
cu
cu a) E 4i 0)
m a.
O
'
.?+
= 67
r 0 -
0 L
a
- f' O C C
D L O)

3
O O

r N
- m co
O != 0 0
O U) V
c m
m 0'o.E aa- a?a ?-0
U cm = E E 3-: a N cu It

i a' CL •C •? 3 in Q N •o _0 can
u (D
L 0 m y co N> O . "0 L
m
M
a >
U 0 L 0 1 O U) >%.-
)-0 0 0 O
0 rn
c
>
m
E °r 0
a o c
Z a) 0 Z 0
i in :a
a
L L o
m y
0 cu o

CD " L. C
H ?. E
0 .a 0 ?-
0
Co

°0 (D
_ 1
mQ US
c - m
3 O o in E 0 O c-
m N- `
° M c
+-' 0 m
J
C >
m 0
]C co L O LL Co
i
Im 0 7 0
L 0 0 0 o c
lL
L
`
E
I- CO U O 7 N U -0
? co E O 'C m
0) M
? O
N CO
~ _
d
0 ?
, Cn .0 K CD -0 Of c?0 U O 0
0 j
75
O M E`n
a=
D ui v 3 ,j
(
Z ,
-
is
?- v
L Quo a) 0 0 (5
0 C
11

r

U

N ?

0

(n
a
CD m a) a)
~ o o c o v Q E c
.. L7 W `
W W
U ?- 0 E m 0 w c"a c4 a i 0 c
0
M
)
u W

O O O 5 0
X m 0
c 70
Q C
0 0) (D
?
o v
2
51
b
a) CO - am m E m
N?`C
CL Q -
J
d m
CD
J
U)
- a O m 0 tp
Q 3 C
•
y. h m
t )
z 3 0
E
U m
W, fi 0 >
O W
O
y r , k N
y rn
?• r
CD o)
r O
00
0
• I
•
A
•
•
•

O° 00
N .-
U)
L
7
O
L
00
m
C
c
co
LL
a ..
LO
r
w
m
v
i
0
a+
U c= §
(sayOul) pe;uleb
0 0 0
0 0 0
N M 7
a
0
L
0
m
U)
0 0
o -
LO 0
90/86/0[ cn
902[/0[ o
90/90/0[
9O/8Z/60
90/ZZ/60 0
90/9[ /60 cn
90/90/60 0
0
9020/60
90/9Z/80
=
--90/61/90
90/c[/90
0
90/90/80 rn
90/0£/LO p
90/t7Z/LO
90/L[/LO
90/0[/LO
90/b0/LO
90/LZ/90
O
90/OZ/90 0
d>
90/t4/90
901LO190 :: c`o
90/[£/90 o L
0
90/9Z/90 -0
90/9[/90 Q
90/[[0 L
90/90/90 0
90/8Z/t70 0)
Cl)
90/[Z/t70 0
O
90/9[/b0 U
m
90/80/t70
90/[0/W s
90/9Z/£0
90/6[/£0 c
90/Z[/CO
90/90/£0 >
90/LZ/ZO
rn
90/OZ/Z0 U)
90/b[/ZO 0)
c
90/LO/ZO m
90/[£/[0 m
90/9Z/[0 0
a
90/8[/[0 T
o m
0 0
1
CD
r
N cB
cn
M
z
O o
U CL
0
l
M
i N

MI
0
0
LO
N
O
c
Q

00 00 00 00
O N M
(4) lana-1 Ja;eM
oi5Y

a -?
ui
M a U
C E a?+
c'
v I1
E.3 m (n
2 = m
co
N C
if 0
Y?
H co U
o M
N ~
" ch U
V ?
a` m
(o
a)
P
.d?
3
N
3
0
a)
0
O
O
N
co
M
a)
U) a)
) N C, T u
O
U
O
a)
Q)
(
O
m O O .? •0
Co
t"n c ONN 2' U O
L >
-'
a)
'
. k `
C L N
Y ? O ^ C
C
-
Co
O a)
O
70
C/) 0 E
c 0 .? MO O (o O 0
E -C5 C: co
.
Co o o -0 6 N
o c a o c Q i >, c
(D
X
a) CL (D
.c c c N
_
o)oa)co --EOZcN
N
L
>
O O NF= co Co o Z Q) 6
co a)
3o??N._co?ooE
o 0 a? E U Q 0x
L
a) O co co c>v -0
Y M co c0 a) Q
co
:t-- cu o m E m a E N D' _c
U'
L

co a) a) co ,U G aa) to
a
U L ?- L O L a)
O fn c N Q
.
?. 3
O
.-
c

m L
o co c
c >,
O
co
B m L
w 0 a) E

Z N
't Q
co c k c
??? co m c -0 M O .Q cUp om
W c m ?- E ch `? =3
7 u7 H o 3 0 •X a? ?'' co M
i L Q cn E m cm fl -0 v Q? 0
a) E
? Z co co c a ?' Q.aY c
co J
3 ° Z co m
a)
?
n m
(D )
Lu Q a w ai °-
' o f E c co
o
C U- U J o) 'c 0 O? -0
-
L
m
) U O c ++ > L L
0 c)
Q fo 0
U Q C U) c 0 .o co w E C Q? D?
? H cn ? H a 3 co Q u0i 3

.
z
6
.y
3 ,E
":
r co
te..
)Vol O

N

F ' ,
w4 0
o

m
c
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
O
'cY
cn
co
c
C
.0
O LL { '1ft•
r- -0
O LO
r
c o ,?
0
(sayOui) [Pluiea
° °
o 0 0
N M V
tt ? wU
•??,g? •N f?1 ? fit.' ,
k- . r
*t` re
4rF ?`

.w
.'A`•.
N
D
0
m
U
a3
L
Q]
2
co
O
o
0
L
O
r
MUM
.?
c
90/90/01
90/0£/60
L
90/CZ/60 co
w
90/91/60 E
co
90/01/60
90/£0/60 m
90/LZ/80 U)
90/1Z/80 c
90/171/80
90/LO/90
m
90/10/80
90192/LO co
90191/LO
O
9012 1 /LO
c
901901LO
90/8Z/90 N
ry
90/ZZ/90
L
90/S 1 /90 co
90/80/90 3
0
90/ZO/90
U
90/9Z/SO a)
•o
L
90/61/90
a)
90/E 1/90
c
90/90/90 s
90/6Z/170 3
90/EZ/170
90/91/170 c
- co
90/60/170 -0 Q)
co
90/EO/170 -0
a) C)
90/LZ/EO cu 0)
90/OZ/EO -a05 CL
90/171/£0 () a
0 0) 0
o co ?c
0 'U)
O
Cl) a)
M a)
N
0
o
o v
• LL
-0 o
Y
0
0
J
m
m
v`
a
V ? o
J •
o° 00 00 °o 00 °o
N O N M
(:l) lana-1 JQgUM
0
0
V
i
Ia!
0
0 vti?vh
N
0 d
0
m
a?
N
U
c
0
a
c
m
a?
?j
I
0
U
U
vl
U
W
t I
L
7
O
Cn
E
(4) y;daa algel -jejeM
00 00 00 0 0
0 0
Cl) N O
I + i
0 0 C) 0 O 0 0 0 0 00
co N O
(4) lanai JajeM Wear;S
0
0
N
0
O
N
0
0
C6
0
O
M
O
O
V
i
9026/06 iA
O
90/90/06 cu
90/6Z/60 E
m
90/ZZ/60 0
90/96/60 a)
90/60/60
O
9020/60 c
0
90/LZ/80 L)
90/OZ/80
0
90/UM ? a)
90/LO/80 Q
0
90/6E/LO a
90/1Z/LO o
L 7
90/86/LO
to
90/66/LO 0
90110/LO c; coo
90/8Z/90 oo m
c
90/6Z/90 0
90/16/90 Q
" o
90/80/90 E 9
0 0
90/60/90 c
m O
90/4Z/40 M
90/66/40
0 m
9026/40 c`no
o
90/40/40 o E
90/6Z/10 U))
U)
90/ZZ/10 c M
•co rn
90/46/10 Q m
0 ?
90/60/10 3
9020/10 Q)) :3
O) U)
90/9Z/EO m -0
90/OZ/EO o
?+ 0
90/E6/EO a
cc m
0 O o)
O m
N 0)
T- -0
N C
.I -
? N
H ?
Z N
W
?i
?I
0
cv)I
0
0
LO
co
N
O
G
Q

• •
90/ZL/OL
90/90/O L
• 90/6Z/60
90/ZZ/60
•* 90/9L/60
90/60/60
s
90/ZO/60
•
90/LZ/80
• 90/OZ/90
U) 0 90/£ L/90
•
CD z ~ 90/LO/90
90/L£/LO
-- % 90/17Z/LO
90/9 L/LO
90/L L/LO
•
•_ 901VO/LO
m
90/8Z/90
90/LZ/90
90/ti L /90
• •'
?- • 4 90/80/90
90/L0/90
90/9Z/90
90/6 L /90
902 L /90
90/90/90
90/6Z/VO
• 90/ZZ/b0

90/%/170
/b0
• ` 90/60/b0
90/Zo/VO
90/9Z/£0
90/OZ/£0
90/£L/£0
0 0
o
0 0
04
H
Z
W

O
U
0
r
Co
-0 M
=
E
ilr{9? ?'!. Mid i r
co
Cu
S -0

00
''TA, Ak
CD Co Co D
of
C\j
CD
E U)
CD CU -0
co

O d
f Om
LL
CU C

e
` J
0) k
ftpwfi.;?
, Fe
Pw.
r :::
••

(2
C:) LL:

?
jr
<
0 in
o
w E -o

W,.
" ^
?' '" '
"
CL -r- CU
CL
-

T
f
a#
4
I
t
4
0 D
CD
t
s.

1 4
F
m a)
y
P •
4
!
0 Co !=
w°t yy •
m

Ld C:
Fa L)
.0

u

F
t o
P 0 C) 7a)
q
\""? v m
- ?
0 0
?. ,. .
c

0 CL
>1 CO CL 0 E

rn
Z r- _E
c
0
cnI
O
O
co
N
O
c
Q