20070259 Ver 1_Complete File_20040404

aJ Ji ?
® North Carolina Wildlife Resource s Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
TO: John Thomas, USACOE
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
¢r?
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator /
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: February 19, 2007
SUBJECT: Lewisville-Clemmons Road, TIP U-3119A, DWQ # 20070259, Forsyth County
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen an existing highway
near West Forsyth High School. Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission are familiar with habitat values in the area. These comments are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1
through 113A-10; NCAC 25).
The NCDOT project will impact 32.8 linear feet of intermittent channel and 0.08 acres of
wetlands. Impacts are indicated to be needed to improve safety and traffic flow. Muddy Creek
(Class C) supports a warm water fishery. Bog turtles, Glyptemys muhlenbergii (NCT/FT-SA)
have been documented for the Muddy Creek basin; however, it is unlikely they are present at this
location.
Based on our review of the submittal and our knowledge of area habitats, we will not object to
the project as proposed. NCDOT should follow applicable 404 Permit and 401 Certification
requirements as well as provide appropriate sediment and erosion control measures.
Autochthonous plants should be used for re-vegetating slopes along the highway.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project during the early planning
stages. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
E-copy: Sue Homewood, DWQ-WSRO
Diane Hampton, NCDOT
Kathy Matthews, USEPA
Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Marella Buncick, USFWS
Sonya Gregory, DWQ-Raleigh
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 © o
Division of Water Quality I!
Y
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary ED A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director If-d
November 17, 1997
M11MORANDUM
To: Michelle Suvcrkrubbe
Through: John Dorne
From:' Cyndi ' Bell C
Subject: Environmental Assessment for SR 1103 (Lewis ville-Clemmons
Road) Widening from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 and
Revisions of Interchange at. US 421
Forsyth County
State Project No. 8.2623601, T.I.P. No. U-3119; EIINR 198-0313
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including
wetlands. The project will involve no fill in wetlands. Extension of an existing
crossing of one unnamed perennial stream will be required. DWQ offers the
following comments based on the document review:
A) NCDOT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidance and minimization of
wetland and stream impacts. The project, as currently planned, would
not require wetland or stream mitigation.
Based upon the wetland impacts described in the EA, General Certification 3103
will be applicable to this project. Final permit authorization will require
formal application by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be
aware that this approval will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance and
minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the }A. DOT is
reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water quality standards
arc met and no wetland or stream uses arc lost. Questions regarding the 401
Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in DWQ's Water
Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Eric Alsmcyer, COE, Raleigh
Howard Hall, FWS
David Cox, WRC
U3119EA.DOC
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5M recycled/10% post consumer paper

Environmental Review Tracking Sheet
DWO - Water Oualitv Section
MEMORANDUM
TO: Env. Sciences Branch (WQ Lab)
O Trish MacPherson (encl. sps)
O Kathy Herring (forest/ORW/HQW)
O Larry Ausley (ecosystems)
O Matt Mathews (toxicology)
O Jay Sauber (intensive survey)
Non-Discharge Branch (Archdale 9th)
O Kim Colson (Permitting)
* Wetlands (WQ Lab)
O John Domey (Corps, 401)
Cyndi Bell (DOT)
ric Galamb
1165q
?EC'Eivt1j
fdU'v - j
? ?yy?
A/l 8o?l '+ZNrAc8V.-,- es
Reg./ Prg. Mgmt Coordination Branch
O Farrell Keough (Archdale 9th)
O Brent McDonald (Archdale 12th)
* Regional Water Quality Supervisors
O Asheville ' O Mooresville O Washington
O Fayetteville O Raleigh O Wilmington
O Winston - Salem
Planning Branch (Archdale 6th)
O Alan Clark (basinwide planning)
O Boyd DeVane (classifications & standards)
O Beth McGee (management planning)
O Ruth Swanek (modeling) (Archdale 9th)
Point Source Branch (Archdale 9th)
0 Dave Goodrich (NPDES) O
0 Bradley Bennett (Stormwater) O
0 Tom Poe (Pretreatment) (Archdale 7th) O
FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Regional/ Proggra Management Coordination Branch
RE: C? DJ 2 k 1_14 0? IS Ji?Q, h _
VZGC
Attached is a copy of the above document. Subject to the requirements of the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant impacts
to the environment, especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority. Please
check the appropriate box below and return this form to me along with your written comments, if any, by
the date indicated.
RESPONSE DEADLINE:
NO COMMENT F-] COMMENTS ATTACHED
Name:
Date:
Thank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining this process are greatly appreciated!
Notes:
I can be reached at:
phone: [phone], ext. 567
fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
mis:\circmemo - mac version
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
8-2s-9? ? ?/?
Date H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
# 78" F7
Date Ni h L. Graf, P.E.
?ivision Administrator, FHWA

SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
Ronald G. Lucas, Jr.
Project Planning Engineer
.k GARoz.
/0 0.1
•Z?'?J7 = 4 SEAL
- 022632 .
"-,0 'L,9 FHG1N, 0
co %
Robert P. Hanson, P.E.
Project Planning Unit Head
V, /?' ??
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................1
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................ 1
A. General ......................................................................................................... 1
B. Transportation Plan ...................................................................................... 1
C. Accident Record ........................................................................................... 1
D. Traffic/Truck Volumes ................................................................................ 2
E. Level of Service ............................................................................................ 2
III. EXISTING FACILITY INVENTORY .................................................................... 3
A. Length of Section Studied ............................................................................ 3
B. Existing Typical Section .............................................................................. 3
C. Right of Way ............................................................................................... 3
D. Structures ..................................................................................................... 3
E. Speed Limits ................................................................................................ 3
F. Sidewalks ..................................................................................................... 3
G. Access Control ............................................................................................. 3
H. Intersecting Streets and Type of Control ..................................................... 3
1. Functional Classification .............................................................................. 4
IV. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .........................................................................4
A. Build Alternatives ........................................................................................4
1. Widening Alternatives .....................................................................4
2. Interchange Alternatives ..................................................................5
B. Transportation Systems Management Alternatives .....................................6
C. "No-Build" Alternative ................................................................................6
V. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................ 6
A. Design Speed /Speed Limit .......................................................................... 6
B. Typical Section ............................................................................................ 6
C. Alignment .................................................................................................... 7
D. Right of Way ............................................................................................... 7
E. Access Control ............................................................................................. 7
F. Structures ..................................................................................................... 7
' G. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 7
H. Cost Estimates .............................................................................................. 7
1. Utility Conflicts .......................................................................................... 7
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION ..................................8
A. Natural Systems ...........................................................................................8
1. Methodology .................................................................................. ..8
2. Physical Resources ......................................................................... ..8
3. Biotic Resources ............................................................................ 11
4. Jurisdictional Topics ...................................................................... 15
B. Cultural Resources ..................................................................................... 18
1. Historic Properties ......................................................................... 18
2. Archaeological Resources .............................................................. 18
C. Relocation Impacts .....................................................................................18
D. Environmental Justice ................................................................................19
E. Land Use ....................................................................................................20
1. Status of Local Planning Activities ................................................20
2. Farmland ........................................................................................21
F. Air Quality Analysis .................................................................................. 21
1. CO Analysis ................................................................................... 22
2. Other Pollutants ............................................................................. 23
G. Noise Impacts ............................................................................................. 24
1. Characteristics of Noise ................................................................. 25
2. Noise Abatement Criteria ..............................................................25
3. Ambient Noise Levels ....................................................................28
4. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels ...............................28
5. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours ....................................29
6. Traffic Noise Abatement Measures ...............................................31
7. "Do Nothing Alternative" ............................................................. .32
8. Construction Noise ........................................................................ .33
9. Summary ....................................................................................... .33
H. Hydraulic Concerns .................................................................................. .33
1. Hazardous Materials Involvement ............................................................ .34
1. Underground Storage Tank Facilities ........................................... .34
2. Landfills and Other Contaminated Properties ............................... .35

VII. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................36
Figure 1 - Project Location Map
Figure 2 - USGS Quad Map
Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph of Project
Figure 4 - 1997/2020 Traffic Projections
Figure 5a, 5b - Proposed Typical Sections
Figure 6 - Interchange Alternatives
Figure 7 - Thoroughfare Map
Figure 8 - Other Interchange Alternatives Studied
Table 1 - Soils in the Project Area ................................................................. 9
Table 2 - Potential Forest Productivity of Soils in the Project Area ................ 9
Table 3 - Water Resources Characteristics ..................................................... 10
Table 4 - Estimated Impacts to Biotic Communities ....................................... 14
Table 5 - Federally-Protected Species for Forsyth County ............................. 16
Table 6 - Hearing: Comparative Noise Generators ........................................ 26
Table 7 - FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria .................................................. 27
Table 8 - Definition of Substantial Increase ................................................... 27
Table 9 - Ambient Noise Levels .................................................................... 28
Table 10 -Noise Abatement Criteria Summary .............................................. 30
Table 11 - Traffic Noise Level Increase Summary ......................................... 31

SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
Prepared by the Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
SUMMARY
Description of Action - The North Carolina Department of Transportation
proposes to widen SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road) in Forsyth County,
North Carolina. The 4.0 km (2.5 mi.) project will widen the existing facility to a
multi-lane facility from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421, and revise the
interchange at US 421. This project is included in the 1998-2004 Transportation
Improvement Program (T.I.P.) with right of way acquisition scheduled to begin in
Federal Fiscal Year 1998, and construction scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal
Year 2000. The total cost estimated in the 1998-2004 T.I.P. is $ 9,100,000,
including a right of way cost 2,500,000 and a construction cost of $ 6,600,000.
The current estimated cost is $ 23,297,000, including a current right of way cost
$ 9,247,000 and a current construction cost of $ 14,050,000.
2. Project Benefits - The project will have a positive impact by improving the safety
and handling capacity of Lewisville-Clemmons Road and the US 421 interchange.
The project will relieve traffic congestion between Lewisville and Clemmons.
3. Environmental Effects - Approximately three businesses and 4 residences will be
relocated. The project will have only a limited effect on natural systems
consisting of impacts to 0.8 acres of mixed mesic hardwood and pine forest and
0.2 acres of ripparian fringe community. There will be no effect to architectural
and historical resources listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. Noise impacts are expected at 95 locations; however, noise abatement
measures are not considered feasible for this project. There will be no substantial
impact to air quality.
4. Environmental Commitments - It is anticipated that a Nationwide 404 permit will
apply to the stream crossings of this project. A 401 water quality certification will
also be required. To minimize environmental effects, Best Management Practices
will be implemented as part of this project.
5. Coordination - Several federal, state and local agencies were consulted during
preparation of this document. Citizen workshops were conducted to involve the
public in the planning process. Written comments were received from the
following agencies.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
N.C. Department of Health and Natural Resources
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Northwest Piedmont Council of Governments
City/County Planning Board of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County
Transportation Advisory Committee (Winston Salem)
City of Winston-Salem
Town of Lewisville
Village of Clemmons
6. Additional Information - Additional information concerning the proposal can be
obtained by contacting the following:
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Ave.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1442
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
1. GENERAL. DESCRIPTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen SR 1103
(Lewisville-Clemmons Road) to a multi-lane facility from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road)
to US 421. The interchange at US 421 will be revised as a part of this project. The
recommended improvements consist of a four-lane roadway divided with a 4.8 m (16
foot) median; this will transition into a five-lane roadway. The project is included in the
1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program (T.I.P.) with right of way acquisition
scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1998 and construction scheduled to begin in fiscal year
2000. The project will use federal and state funds. The total estimated cost of the project
included in the T.I.P. is $9,100,000. This estimate includes $ 2,500,000 for right of way
acquisition and 6,600,000 for construction. The project has a current estimated cost of
$23,297,000, including current right of way cost 9,247,000 and a current construction
cost of 14,050,000.
II. NEED FOR PROJECT
A. General
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and handling
capacity of this section of SR 1103. Traffic volumes are currently beyond the facility's
current handling capacity. The revised interchange at US 421 will be particularly
important for improving safety and traffic flow of roadways in the project area.
B. Thoroughfare Plan
SR 1103 is designated as a major thoroughfare on the Winston-Salem / Forsyth
County Thoroughfare Plan (see Figure 7). The proposed multi-lane facility is in
conformance with the thoroughfare plan.
C. Accident Record
The accident rate for this section of Lewisville-Clemmons road was 242.5
accidents/ per million vehicle miles (acc/100mvm) from July 1992 to June 1995. This is
above the statewide average of 199.2 acc/I00mvm.
The most prevalent type of accident along the project corridor involved vehicles
making left turns opposing oncoming traffic. The proposed project will provide a safer
facility and lower the accident rate.
D. Traffic/Truck Volumes
Approximately 21,600 vehicles per day (vpd) travel this facility in 1997. Traffic
volumes are expected to increase to 41,400 vpd by 2020. Truck traffic is expected to be
6% of the total average daily traffic. See Figure 4 for more information regarding traffic
projections.
To evaluate benefits of this project, design year traffic projections for Lewisville-
Clemmons Road were determined assuming the construction of two other roadway
improvements: the Winston-Salem Outer Loop and the Styers Ferry connector. Figure 7
shows these facilities.
E. Level of Service
The concept of level of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing
operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists and
passengers. Operating conditions are based on such factors as speed, travel time ,
freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Six levels
are defined and designated with letters from A to F. Level A represents the best
operating conditions with free flow and virtually no delay. Level F represents the worst
operating conditions when traffic volumes exceed the capacity of the facility. At level of
service F, long queues of traffic tend to form.
A capacity analysis of the subject project yielded the following results:
1. Lewisville-Clemmons Road is currently operating at level of service (LOS) D.
The SR 1103/ US 421 interchange is currently operating at (LOS) F
2. If no improvements are made to the subject section of Lewisville-Clemmons
Road, the level of service is expected to deteriorate to LOS F by the year 2005.
3. Widening Lewisville-Clemmons Road improves operating conditions to LOS
C initially and maintains operating conditions at LOS C through the design year
(2020). Proposed revision to the SR 1103/ US 421 interchange will improve
operating conditions to LOS C initially and remain at LOS D or better through
the design year.
2
III. EXISTING FACILITY INVENTORY
A. Length of Section Studied
The length of this project is 4.0 km (2.5 mi.).
B. Existing Typical Section
Currently, Lewisville Clemmons Road is primarily a two-lane undivided facility.
Travel lanes are 3.6 m (12 ft.) wide plus 0.6 m (2 ft.) paved shoulders. South of SR 1891,
(Peace Haven Road), Lewisville-Clemmons Road is a five-lane facility. The proposed
project will provide a continuous multi-lane route from I-40 to US 421.
C. Right of Way
Lewisville-Clemmons Road has an existing right of way width of 15 m (50 ft.).
D. Structures
Bridge No. 213 carrying Lewisville-Clemmons Road over US 421 is 66 m
(216 ft.) in length and 9 m (31 ft.) wide. The current sufficiency rating is 67 out of a
possible 100.
E. Speed Limits
The existing speed limit is 70 km/h (45 mph) throughout the entire project.
F. Sidewalks
There are no existing sidewalks along the project corridor.
G. Access Control
There is no control of access along the project except for the US 421 interchange
which has full control of access.
H. Intersecting Streets and Type of Control
Currently, traffic signals are located at the following intersections:
Lewisville-Clemmons Road and SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road)
Lewisville-Clemmons Road and SR 1225 (Styers Ferry Road)/ SR 1261
(Marty Ln.)
Lewisville-Clemmons Road and US 421 eastbound on/off ramps
Lewisville-Clemmons Road and US 421 westbound on/off ramps
3
The remaining intersections are stop sign controlled.
Lewisville-Clemmons Road is classified as a major collector on the statewide
functional classification system.
IV. ALTERNATIVES
A. Build Alternatives
Several alternatives were considered for the widening of Lewisville-Clemmons
Road, as outlined below:
The first alternative would widen the entire 4.0 km (2.5 mi.) project length to a
five-lane facility. This would provide two 3.6 in (12 foot) travel lanes in each direction
and one 3.6 in (12 foot) center turn lane. This alternative would allow left turns from the
facility throughout the project corridor. Figure 5a shows a five-lane typical section.
Four-Lane Facility with Grassed Median (Recommended)
This alternative would widen the facility to provide two 3.6 in (12 foot) lanes in
each direction separated by a 4.8 in (16 foot) grassed median. Figure 5b shows this
typical section. Median crossovers would be provided at certain locations. This
alternative would direct left turns to discrete openings in the median and would allow
landscape plantings in the median. Because of the intensity of development in the
northern end of the project, the grassed median would transition into a center turn lane at
the north end of Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
On January 8, 1997 the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory
Council passed a resolution requesting a four-lane facility divided with a 4.8 in (16 foot)
landscaped median, (see Appendix, page A-17).
Widening Lewisville-Clemmons Road to a three-lane facility was considered.
This would increase the capacity of Lewisville-Clemmons Road by removing conflicting
left turning vehicles. However, due to the high volumes of through-traffic, a three-lane
facility is not sufficient to handle projected traffic volumes. Therefore, the three-lane
alternative was rejected.
4
2. Interchange Alternatives
The interchange alternative consists of a recommended alternative and two other
alternatives. The description of these alternatives are as follows (See Figure 6 for Alt. 1,
2, 3 interchange configurations).
Alternative # 1- Realign Lewisville-Clemmons Road to the north,
cul-de-sac existing Lewisville-Clemmons Road, and
widen bridge over US 421 to six lanes.
Alternative # 2 - Realign Styers Ferry Road to the west, cul-de-sac
existing Styers Ferry Road, and widen bridge
over US 421 to six lanes.
Alternative # 3 - Lewisville-Clemmons Road and Styers Ferry Road remain
(Recommended) near their existing alignment and a loop is added in the
northeast quadrant onto westbound US 421. The ramp in
the northwest quadrant onto US 421 west is removed.
The cost estimates and relocatees for each alternative are as follows;
Alternative # 1 Alternative # 2 Alternative # 3
Relocatees 3 3 1
Construction Cost 5,500,000 5,900,000 7,000,000
Right of Way Cost 5,500,000 5,000,000 5,400,000
Total Cost 11,000,000 10,900,000 12,400,000
Alternative # 1 was presented to the public at an informational workshop in
December, 1994. Alternative # 2 was presented to the public at a public hearing on
September 5, 1996. Alternative 3 was then developed in response to public comments
and comments from local officials. Alternative 3, along with Alternates 2 and 3, were
again discussed at a Citizens Informational Workshop on May 19, 1997. Based on the
favorable response to the design of Alternate 3 from local officials and the public, it is the
recommended design.
Other interchange alternatives were studied but eliminated from consideration.
These alternates are shown on Figure 8. The description of the alternatives studied are as
follows:
Alt. 4 - Construct Rotary Interchange
Alt. 5 - Widen bridge over US 421 and widen Styers Ferry Road north of the
interchange, with no major ramp revisions.
5
Alt. 6 - Diamond interchange with a loop in the southwest quadrant onto US 421
east, and relocate Lewisville-Clemmons road north of the interchange.
Alt. 7 - Diamond interchange with a loop in the southwest quadrant onto US 421
east, and relocate Styers Ferry Road north of the interchange.
Alt. 8 and 9 - Relocation of US 421 eastbound off-ramp and add loop in
southwest quadrant onto US 421 east.
These alternatives were analyzed for operational performance. Due to
unfavorable delays calculated for motorists, alternatives 4, 5, and 8 were eliminated.
Alternatives 6 and 7 were eliminated due to the increased construction costs. Alternatives
6 and 7 did not significantly improve the LOS from Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 to justify
their added costs.
B. Transportation System Management Alternative
Transportation system management involves improvements designed to optimize
use of the existing facility with minimal additional construction. The traffic volumes are
projected for this facility require additional through-lanes. In addition, traffic volumes
exceed the capacity of the existing interchange geometry. Transportation system
management will not provide an acceptable level of service for this section of Lewisville-
Clemmons Road, or the US 421 interchange.
C. "No-Build" Alternative"
If the "no-build" alternative were chosen, it would have a considerable negative
impact on traffic operations in the area. Lewisville-Clemmons Road is a highly
congested facility at the present, especially during peak periods. Projected increases in
traffic would deteriorate the level of service to an undesirable level. As discussed in
Section II-G, the no-build alternative would result in LOS F on the existing roadway by
the year 2005. Operations at the interchange are currently operating at LOS F. Increased
congestion would lead to higher operating costs, increased travel times and higher
accident potential. Therefore, the "no-build" alternative has been rejected.
V. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Design Speed/Sp d Limit
The recommended design speed is 80 km/h (50 mph). The posted speed will be
70 km/h (45 mph).
B. Typical Section
The recommended typical cross section is a four-lane facility separated by a
grassed median. This will transition to a five lane facility north of SR 3580 (Forest Oak
6
Road). The four-lane cross section will consist of two 3.6 m (12 foot) lanes in each
direction separated by a 4.8 m (16 foot) grassed median.
C. Alignment
The alignment of Lewisville-Clemmons Road will be designed to minimize
impacts to adjoining properties.
D. Right of Way
30 m (100 feet) of right of way will be acquired to accommodate the proposed
widening. Some temporary easements may be required where slopes extend beyond the
proposed right of way.
E. Access Control
Control of access will be provided at the SR 1103/ US 421 interchange. No
control of access will be maintained along the project along SR 1103 south of the
interchange.
F. Structures
Bridge No 213 over US 421 will be replaced with a bridge 70 m (230 ft) in length
and 32 m (104 ft.) in width.
G. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
No special bicycle provisions are proposed for this project.
The Village of Clemmons requested the construction of a sidewalk on Lewisville-
Clemmons Road on the eastern side of the roadway within their city limits. This request
is currently being evaluated. It is anticipated that the new sidewalk on Lewisville-
Clemmons Road would cost approximately $137,500. Funding will be determined
according to NCDOT Pedestrian Policy.
H. Cost Estimate
The total project cost is estimated at $23,297,000. Construction is estimated at
$14,050,000. Right of way acquisition is estimated at $9,237,000.
The overall degree of utility conflicts of this project is expected to be medium.
Water lines, fiber optic cable, and sewer lines are located along the proposed project.
7
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. Natural Systems
1. Methodoloev
General field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by NCDOT
biologist on January 19,1996. Plant communities and their associated wildlife were
identified and recorded. Wildlife identification involved using a variety of observation
techniques: active searching and capture, visual observations (binoculars), identifying
characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat, tracks and burrows). Organisms captured
during these searches were identified and then released. Jurisdictional wetland
determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria prescribed in the "Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual" (Environmental Laboratory, 1987).
Information sources used in pre-field investigation of the study area include: US
Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle map (Clemmons), NCDOT aerial photographs of
the project area (1:2400), and Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soil maps
of Forsyth County. Water resource information was obtained from publications of the
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR,1993) and from the
Environmental Sensitivity Base map of Forsyth County (NC Center for Geographic
Information and Analysis). Information concerning the occurrence of federal and state
protected species in the study area was obtained from the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) list of protected and candidate species and the NC Natural Heritage Program
(NHP) database of rare species and unique habitats.
2. Physical Resources
Soil and water resources which occur in the study area are discussed below. Soils
type and availability of water directly influence the composition and distribution of flora
and fauna in any biotic community.
Forsyth County occurs in the middle piedmont plateau in the north-central part of
North Carolina, in the felsic crystalline soil system. The topography of the county is
gently sloping to rolling and has fairly broad ridges. The elevation throughout the project
area is 250 m (800 ft) above mean sea level.
2.1 52QlE
There are three soil map units in the immediate project area. Table 1 provides an
inventory of these soils.
Table 1. Soils in the Project Area
Mapping Unit Percent Slope Hydric Classification
Cu - -
CcB 2-6
PaC 6-10 -
NOTE:"-" denotes nonhydric soils
Cut and fill land (Cu) is land that has been altered by human activities such that the
original soil profile and topography are not recognizable. The soils are usually sandy
clay loam to clay. Slopes are usually less than four percent with one side being
steeper than the other. This soil type is usually found on uplands along four lane
roads, industrial centers and railroad tracks where the original soils have been cut or
filled.
Cecil sandy loam (CcB) is a well drained soil found on uplands. These soils occur on
long ridges in broad, irregularly shaped areas that range from 5 to 85 acres.
• Pacolet fine sandy loam (Pac) is a well drained soil found on uplands. This soil is
found on long, fairly narrow, upper side slopes in areas that range from 3 to 50 acres
in size. Surface runoff is rapid on these soils and infiltration is moderate.
Forested areas within the project area are associated with Pacolet and Cecil soils.
Table 2 compares ranges of Potential Productivity for Pacolet and Cecil soils.
Information in Table 2 suggests that these two soils tend to rank average in woodland
productivity.
Table 2. Potential Forest Productivity of Soils in the Project Area
Soil Series Site index
red oak white oak
CcB 70-80 70-80
PaC
Cu
70-80 70-80
Note: Site Index is defined as the expected average height in feet of dominant trees in an
even aged stand at 50 years of age.
2.2 Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to be
impacted by the project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of the
resource, its relationship to major water systems, Best Usage Standards and water quality
9
of the resources. Probable impacts to these water bodies are also discussed, as are means
to minimize impacts.
2.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics
The principle water resources in the project area are located in the Yadkin-Pee
Dee drainage basin. Tributary 1 is a small perennial stream that originates in the project
vicinity and flows approximately 1.6 km (1.0 mi.) to its confluence with Muddy Creek.
Tributary 2 is an intermittent stream which flows into tributary 1. Tributary 3 and 4 are
intermittent tributaries that flow approximately 0.8 km (0.5 mi.) to Blanket Creek.
Specific information on the water resources in the project area is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Water Resources Characteristics
Stream Width Depth Substrate Flow
Tributary 1 0.9(3.0) 0.3(1.0) sa,co mod
Tributary 2 0.3(1.0) 0.3(1.0) sa,co slow
Tributary 3 0.3(1.0) 0.15(0.5) sa slow
Tributary 4 0.3(1.0) 0.15(0.5) sa slow
NOTES:
• Values are given in meters (feet).
The abbreviations sa and co denote sand and cobble.
2.2.2 Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM). Any unnamed stream which is not named in the
schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned to the
stream segment to which it is tributary. The streams in the project vicinity are tributaries
to Muddy Creek and Blanket Creek. The DEM classification of Muddy Creek (index no.
12-94-(12.5)) is WS-IV from the Forsyth-Davidson County line to the Yadkin River.
Blanket Creek (index no. 12-90) is also classified as Class WS-IV from its source to the
Yadkin River. Class WS-IV waters are protected as water supplies which are generally in
moderately to highly developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated
wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211; local programs to control
nonpoint source and storm water discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class
C uses. Class C uses include aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife,
secondary recreation and agriculture. Neither High Quality Waters, Water Supplies (WS-1
or WS-11), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi.) of the
project study area.
2.2.3 Water Quality
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by the
DEM and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which
10
addresses long term trends in water quality. The BMAN classification for the project
area is unavailable.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Service (NPDES) program. Any discharger
is required to register for a permit. There are no point source dischargers registered in the
project vicinity.
2.2.4 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Project construction may result in a number of impacts to water resources, such
as:
• Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion.
• Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and
vegetation removal.
• Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and\additions to surface and
ground water flow from construction.
• Changes in water temperature due to vegetation removal.
• Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction and
toxic spills.
The following measures will be implemented to minimize effects to water
resources:
Best Management Practices will be implemented prior to construction and maintained
throughout the life of the project.
Non-point sediment sources will be identified and efforts will be made to control
sediment runoff.
3. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section describes
those ecosystems encountered in the study area as well as the relationships between fauna
and flora within these ecosystems. Composition and distribution between biotic
communities throughout the project area are reflective of topography, hydrologic
influences and past and present land uses in the study area. Descriptions of the terrestrial
systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications. Dominant flora
and fauna observed, or likely to occur, in each community are described and discussed.
Fauna observed during the site visit are denoted with an asterisk (*).
3.1 Terrestrial Communities
Community descriptions are based on observations of the general vegetation in or
near the project ROW. Three distinct terrestrial communities were identified in the
project study area: maintained\disturbed, mesic oak-hickory forest, and riparian fringe.
Many species are highly adaptive and may populate the entire range of terrestrial
communities discussed and may not be mentioned for each community located.
3.1.1 Maintained\Disturbed Community
Maintained\disturbed lands are intensively managed where humans structures or
activities preclude natural plant succession. Fallow fields, powerline easements,
residential, and commercial developments comprise this community.
Roadside shoulders, maintained by mowing, give rise to a rich assemblage of
herbaceous plants. Lawn grass, is prevalent with some encroachment of ragweed, Queen
Anne's lace and dandelion. Various cultivars of holly, are common around residential and
commercial developments. In addition, euonymous and white pine are planted as
landscape plants. Goldenrod, thoroughwort and frost aster are abundant in powerline
easements and the edges of yards and fields. In some areas, blackberry, red cedar, scrub
pine and privet form dense thickets in disturbed areas adjacent to residential areas.
Maintained\disturbed communities adjacent to forested tracts provide rich
ecotones for foraging, while the forests provide forage and cover. Common mammals
associated with ecotones are woodchuck, least shrew, southern short-tailed shrew, hispid
cottonrat and eastern cottontail.
Fallow fields and other open areas adjacent to forested communities support an
abundance of bird life. Northern mockingbird, robin, northern cardinal, common grackle,
and turkey vulture were observed in the project study area. In addition, meadowlark and
eastern bluebird may utilize this community by perching on telephone wires or fences
overlooking the maintained community where they forage for insects. The red-tailed
hawk and Cooper's hawk are important predators known to forage in this community
preying on rats, mice, other rodents and song birds.
The eastern fence lizard inhabits open, sunny situations such as building sites and
fence rows usually in close proximity to trees. American toad and box turtle are very
common amphibians and reptiles that inhabit disturbed areas and lawn edges.
3.1.2 Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest
Small tracts of mesic oak-hickory forest are found in the study area. Tulip tree,
black oak, white oak, southern red oak, mockernut hickory and sweetgum are the
dominant canopy trees. The understory consists of redbud, dogwood, black cherry, and
red maple. Pipsissewa, ebony spleenwort and poison ivy comprise the ground layer.
Upland forests of the area are fragmented and are adjacent to disturbed areas, thus
the faunal composition is similar to that which occurs in the maintained\disturbed
community. Species more commonly associated with upland forest include white-footed
mouse, raccoon, white-tailed deer and gray squirrel.
12
3.1.3 Riparian Fringe
Narrow strips of riparian forest border the banks of the small creeks in the study
area. Dominant canopy species found here include sweetgum and tulip tree. The shrub
layer is comprised mainly of sapling species from the canopy and thickets of privet and
giant cane. Climbing bittersweet and lead plant are also present.
The riparian edge provides habitat for an assortment of birds and mammals. Birds
often associated with streamside communities include red-winged blackbird, white-
throated sparrow, song sparrow and northern cardinal. Yellow-rumped warblers,
common yellowthroat, are found in this community. Yellow warbler, red-eyed vireo,
Carolina wren and mourning dove also utilize the riparian fringe for forage and/or
nesting.
Mammals which may be found in the riparian edge include white-footed mouse
and raccoon. In addition, white-tailed deer and gray squirrel may also forage in or near
this community.
Amphibians and reptiles are likely to be locally abundant in the riparian edge.
Spring peeper and upland chorus frog breed in semipermanent pools during the spring.
Rat snake, worm snake, ring-necked snake and queen snake may be found near streams.
The box turtle is likely to utilize this community. Copperheads, which are important
predators of small mammals, may occur in the project vicinity.
3.2 Aquatic Community
No fish were observed during the site visit. Fish that should be expected in the
tributaries to both Muddy Creek and Blanket Creek are rosyside dace and bluehead chub.
These fish feed on detritus, algae and zooplankton and serve as prey for bluegill,
pumpkinseed and greensunfish.
Amphibians are highly water dependent for completion of larval stages in their
life cycle. Some species are totally aquatic. Some water dependent salamanders likely to
occur in the project, are two-lined salamander, three-lined salamander and northern dusky
salamander. Green frog and pickerel frog could also inhabit some of the grassy areas
along the streams in the project area.
Queen snake and northern water snake are the snakes most likely to be
encountered. No turtles were observed during the site visit.
3.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic
resources described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have
the potential to impact biological functions. This section qualifies and quantifies impacts
13
to the natural resources in terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary
and permanent impacts are considered here as well.
Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each
community present in the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and
degradation of portions of these communities. Table 4 summarizes potential quantitative
losses to these biotic communities, resulting from project construction. Estimated
impacts are derived using the entire proposed right-of-way of 31 m (100 ft).
TABLE 4. Estimated Impacts to Biotic Communities
Community Impacts
Maintained\Disturbed 3.6(9.0)
Mesic Mixed Hardwood/Pine 0.3(0.8)
Ripparian Fringe 0.1(0.2)
Totals 4.0(10.0)
Values cited are in hectares (acres)
Impacts to terrestrial communities will occur in the form of habitat reduction in
the process of clearing, grading and surfacing during construction. Portions of the
maintained/disturbed roadside community will be completely destroyed during
construction, but will eventually re-establish after construction has ended. This will result
in a temporary loss of habitat for small animals and predators that utilize open areas. The
edges of other communities will be taken, thus reducing the total natural habitat in the
project area.
The data in Table 4 predict only the direct taking of land and community types
during highway construction. There may be a number of indirect effects which could
occur. This damage could potentially include:
- soil compaction and root exposure and injury
- placing fill dirt over tree root systems
- spillage of harmful substances
- skinning of trees by machinery.
Any possible indirect effects will be minimized to the extent possible.
Extension of culverts and other in-stream activities are potential sources of
stream impacts. It is anticipated permanent and temporary impacts to aquatic
communities will occur from increased sedimentation and loss of habitat. Sedimentation
covers benthic organisms inhibiting their abilities to feed and obtain oxygen. Filter
feeders may be covered by the sedimentation, thus preventing their ability to feed.
Increased sediment loads and suspended particulates can lead to the smothering of fish
eggs, reduced depth of light penetration in the water column, reduction of dissolved
oxygen and alterations in water temperature. Increased light penetration from removal of
streamside vegetation may also increase water temperatures. Warmer water contains less
14
oxygen and results in a reduction of aquatic life dependent on high oxygen
concentrations.
Increased sediment and pollution from highway construction activity and
pollution after construction are widely recognized as factors that can reduce water quality
Aquatic organisms are generally extremely sensitive to these inputs. Stringent
employment of Best Management Practices will be utilized during the construction phase
of this project to lessen impacts to aquatic organisms.
4. Jurisdictional Topics
This section provides descriptions, inventories and impact analysis pertinent to
two important issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected species.
4.1 Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the
United States", as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part
328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in
saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls under the
jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
4. 1.1 Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Potential wetland communities were evaluated using the criteria specified in the
1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual". For an area to be considered a
"wetland", the following three specifications must be met; 1) presence of hydric soils
(low soil chroma values), 2) presence of hydrophytic vegetation, and 3) evidence of
hydrology, including; saturated soils, stained leaf litter, oxidized rhizospheres, matted
vegetation, high water marks on trees, buttressed tree bases and surface roots. No
jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted by the proposed project. Impacts to surface
waters are expected in the project study area.
4.1.2 Permits
Impacts to surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with provisions of section
404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for
the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States."
A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 is likely to be applicable at all stream
crossings found in the project study area. A Section 401 General Water Quality
Certification is required for any activity which may result in a discharge and for which a
15
federal permit is required. State permits are administered through the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR).
s
4.2 Rare and Protected Specie
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in the process of decline either due
to natural forces or their inability to coexist with humans. Federal law (under the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action,
likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review
by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Other species may receive additional protection
under separate state laws.
4.2.1 Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of section 7 and section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of
May 2, 1997, the FWS lists 2 federally-protected species for Forsyth County. Table 5
lists the protected species and their status.
Table 5. Federally-Protected Species for Forsyth County
Scientific Name Common Name Status
Picoides borealis red-cockaded E
woodpecker
Cardamine micranthera small-anthered E*
bittercress
C'lemmvs Muhlenbereii Bog Turtle PT(S/A)
NOTES:
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range).
"P" denotes Proposed (a species proposed for an official listing of threatened or
endangered)
"*" denotes no specimen from Forsyth County found in past twenty years.
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker E
The RCW uses open old growth stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine
(P palustri s), for foraging and nesting habitat. A forested stand must contain at least
50% pine, lack a thick understory, and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate
habitat for the RCW. These birds nest exclusively in trees that are > 60 years old and are
contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range of the RCW is up
16
to 200.0 hectares (500.0 acres). This acreage must be contiguous with suitable nesting
sites.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No suitable nesting habitat in the form of 60 years old pines are contiguous with
pine stands at least 30 years of age occur within the project study area. Therefore suitable
habitat for RCW is not present. A review of the Natural Heritage Program data base of
rare species and unique habitats does not contain records of this species in the project study
area. Therefore, it can be concluded that project construction will not impact this species.
Small-Anthered Bittercress E
Small-anthered Bittercress is a slender, erect, perennial herb with fibrous roots.
This herb has single (rarely more) simple or branched stems. The stem leaves are
alternate, mostly unlobed, crenate, and cuneate. The flowers which are borne in April and
May have four white petals, six stamens, and small, round anthers.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat for small anthered bittercress does not exist along the disturbed unnamed
tributaries within the project area. A review of the Natural Heritage Program data base of
rare species and unique habitats does not contain records of this species in the project
study area.
Bog Turtle PT
The bog turtle is North Carolina's smallest turtle, measuring 7 to 10 cm (3 to 4 in)
in length. It has a dark brown carapace and a black plastron. The bright orange or yellow
blotch on each side of the head and neck is a readily identifiable characteristic. The bog
turtle inhabits damp grassy fields, bogs and marshes in the mountains and western
Piedmont.
Habitat for the bog turtle does not exist in the project study area. A review of the
data base of the N.C. Natural Heritage Program Rare Species and Unique Habitats reveals
no records for the species listed above in the project vicinity.
The bog turtle is listed as Proposed Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
(T S/A). This is due to its similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed
for protection. T S/A species are not subject to Section 7 consultation and a biological
conclusion for this species is not required.
17
B. Cultural Resources
1. Historic Properties
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed the project and is
aware of no properties of historic or architectural importance within the proposed project
area (See Appendix, page A-17).
2. Archaeological Resources
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed the project and is
aware of no archaeological sites within the proposed project area. No archaeological
survey was recommended (See Appendix, page A-17).
C. Relocation Impacts
It is estimated four residences and three businesses will be relocated by this
project. This relocation is not expected to cause a breakup of a community nor the
disruption of services. It is anticipated that adequate replacement properties will be
available. This relocation action will be in accordance with the revised North Carolina
General Statutes , Chapter 133. A relocation report discussing potential relocatees is
found in the Appendix, page A-27.
It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement housing will
be available prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore,
the North Carolina Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize
the inconvenience of relocation:
* Relocation Assistance
* Relocation Moving Payments, and
* Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement
With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes,
apartments, or business for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs. The
Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual
moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or
tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing
arrangement (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or
Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $ 22,500 to owners who are eligible
and qualify and up to $ 5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance
with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and/or the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act
(GS 133-5 through 133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
18
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one
relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families, individuals,
businesses, and non-profit organizations for relocation assistance advisory services without
regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will schedule its work
to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for negotiations, and possession of replacement
housing which meets decent, safe, and sanitary standards. The displacees are given at least
a 90-day written notice after NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displaced
persons will be offered in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and
commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will be within the
financial means of the families and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible
to their places of employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced
businesses, and non-profit organizations in searching for and moving to replacement
property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an
explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing,
(2) rental of replacement housing, either private of public, or (3) moving existing owner-
occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply
information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced
persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships
to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee
for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit
organizations, and farm operations acquired for a highway project. Under the Replacement
Program for Owners, NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase payments
for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals, and other closing
costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest expenses for
replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement housing
payments, increase interest payments, and incidental purchase expenses may not exceed
$22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort Housing provision.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to
rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses, on
the purchase of a replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the State
determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250.
It is a policy of the State that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state or
federally-assisted construction projects unless or until comparable replacement housing has
been offered or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to
displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as income for the
purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining
eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the Social Security
Act or any other federal law.
19
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is
not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the
replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the
program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the State so that
decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided.
D. Environmental Justice
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Action to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations), a review
was conducted to determine whether minority or low-income populations will receive
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental impacts as a result of
this project. It is estimated the project will relocate four residences; none of these are
considered low-income. In addition, relocation impacts are not expected to have a
disproportinate effect on minority residences or businesses.
Two informational workshops discussing the roadway widening and four public
meetings discussing the revised interchange were held for all residents and business
owners along the proposed project. The affected property owners have notified of these
meetings by the local media and mail. No issues related to environmental justice
concerns have been discovered through the public involvement process.
Based on project studies and coordination taken with regard to involve any
minority or low-income communities, this project has been implemented in accordance
with Executive Order 12898.
E. Land Use
The proposed improvement is located within the planning and zoning jurisdiction of the
Village of Clemmons, the Town of Lewisville, and Forsyth County. The project begins
inside the Village of Clemmons jurisdiction and ends just inside the Town of Lewisville's
jurisdiction. In Summer, 1997, The Village of Clemmons annexed land northward from
their previous northern limits to SR 1293 (Kenbridge Drive). The project is also inside
Winston-Salem's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Clemmons, Lewisville, Winston-Salem and
Forsyth County operate a joint City-County Planning Board, which oversees an active
planning program. The Planning Board's Vision ZQQU comprehensive plan serves as the
county's policy guidance document for land use and development. The Planning Board
also enforces a zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations.
The area of the proposed improvement is located within a relatively rural area
undergoing a period of transition to suburban development. Several high-density,
multi-family and single-family residential developments have recently been constructed
along the project corridor. There are churches, a mobile home park and scattered
20
commercial uses in the project area. The West Forsyth High School is located in the
project area.
Coordination with local govenment regarding school access has been undertaken
prior to the initiation of this project study and will continue during design and after
construction to ensure the safest possible school access is maintained.
The Growth Management Plan contained within Vision 2 A15 divides the county
into six areas: Central Business District, Central Area, Urban Area, Growth Area, Rural
Area, and Conservation Area. Each area has distinctive characteristics, and are treated as
individual planning units within the Growth Management Plan. The Growth Area has
been subdivided into Short-range and Long-range areas. The County's effort at growth
management is designed ensure efficient growth patterns rather than control the rate of
growth.
The project area is described as a portion of the Growth Area: short-range, which
is defined as "currently or can easily be served by public utilities, and growth is expected
in the near future."
According to local planning officials, the project area is anticipated to experience
continued residential development with highway commercial use growth at the
intersection of the project corridor and US 421.
2. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on
prime and important farmland soils. Land which has been previously converted to non-
agricultural uses is exempt from the requirements of the Act. The proposed improvement
will occur within an area that is experiencing urban growth and where urban growth has
been planned. Therefore, no further consideration of farmland impacts is required.
F. Air Quality Impacts
Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from industry and
internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources. The impact resulting from
highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air pollution problems to
improving the ambient air quality. The traffic is the center of concern when determining
the impact of a new highway facility or the improvement of an existing highway facility.
Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), hydrocarbons (HC),
particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead (Pb) (listed in order of decreasing
emission rate).. Automobiles are considered to be the major source of CO in the project
area. For this reason, most of the analysis presented is concerned with determining
expected carbon monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic flow.
21
1. CO Analysis
In order to determine the ambient CO concentration at a receptor near a highway,
two concentration components must be used: local and background. The local
concentration is defined as the CO emissions from cars operating on highways in the near
vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters) of the receptor location. The background
concentration is defined by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources as "the concentration of a pollutant at a point that is the result of
emissions outside the local vicinity; that is, the concentration at the upwind edge of the
local sources."
In this study, the local concentration was determined by the NCDOT Traffic
Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer modeling and the background
component was obtained from the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources(NCDEHNR). Once the two concentration components were
resolved, they were added together to determine the ambient CO concentration for the
area in question and to compare to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)•
A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future CO
concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements. "CAL3QHC - A
Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadway
Intersections" was used to predict the CO concentration near sensitive receptors.
Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO concentrations
consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with predicted traffic volumes,
vehicle emission factors, and worst- case meteorological parameters. The traffic volumes
are based on the annual average daily traffic projections. Carbon monoxide vehicle
emission factors were calculated for the year of 1997, five years after (2002) and the
Design Year of 2020 using the EPA publication "Mobile Source Emission Factors", the
MOBILESA mobile source emissions computer model for idle emissions and for free
flow conditions.
The background CO concentrations for the project area was estimated to be 1.8
parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air Quality Section, Division of
Environmental Management (DEM), North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient CO concentration of 1.8 ppm is suitable
for most suburban and rural areas.
The worst-case air quality scenario was determined to be located at Receptor 12
which was 13 meters from the centerline of the roadway. The predicted I -hour average
CO concentrations for the evaluation build and no-build years of 1997, 2002 and 2020 for
the worst-case air quality scenario are as follows:
22

1-Hour CO Build
Concentration (ppm) 1-Hour CO No Build
Concentration (ppm)
Receptor 1997 2002 2020 1997 2002 2020
Rec 12 (SE CORNER) 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.6 4.5
Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS (maximum
permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging period = 9 ppm)
indicates no violation of these standards. Since the results of the worst-case 1-hour CO
analysis is less than 9 ppm, it can be concluded that the 8-hour CO level does not exceed
the standard.
2. Other Pollutants
Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides.
Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried into the atmosphere
where they react with sunlight to form ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Automotive
emissions of HC and NO are expected to decrease in the future due to the continued
installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new cars. However,
regarding area-wide emissions, these technological improvements maybe offset by the
increasing number of cars on the transportation facilities of the area.
The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide require
several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone generally occur 10 to 20
kilometers downwind of the source of hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas as a whole
are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons, not individual streets and highways. The
emissions of all sources in an urban area mix together in the atmosphere, and in the
presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to form ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and other
photochemical oxidants. The best example of this type of air pollution is the smog which
forms in Los Angeles, California.
Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of particulate matter and
sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less than seven percent of
particulate matter emissions and less than two percent of sulfur dioxide emissions.
Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the result of non-
highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural).
Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from automobiles are very
low, there is no reason to suspect that traffic on the project will cause air quality
standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded.
Automobiles without catalytic converters can bum regular gasoline . The
burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline containing tetraethyl
lead which is added by refineries to increase the octane rating of the fuel. Newer cars
23
with catalytic converters burn unleaded gasoline eliminating lead emissions. Also, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the reduction in the
lead content of leaded gasolines. The overall average lead content of gasoline in 1974
was approximately 0.53 gram per liter. By 1989, this composite average had dropped to
0.003 gram per liter. In the future, lead emissions are expected to decrease as more cars
use unleaded fuels and as the lead content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990 make the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead
additives unlawful after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is not expected
that traffic on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for lead to be exceeded.
The project is located in Forsyth County, which is within the Greensboro-
Winston-Salem-High Point nonattainment area for ozone (03) and the Winston-Salem
nonattainment area for Carbon Monoxide (CO) as defined by the EPA. The 1990 Clean
Air Act Amendments (CAAA) designated these areas as "moderate" nonattainment areas
for 03 and CO. However, due to improved monitoring data, these areas were
redesignated as "maintenance" for 03 on November 7, 1993, and "maintenance" for CO
on November 8, 1994. Section 176(c) of the CAAA requires that transportation plans,
programs, and projects conform to the intent of the state air quality implementation plan
(SIP). The current SIP does not contain any transportation control measures for Forsyth
County. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Urban Area 1997 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) has been determined to conform to the intent of the SIP.
The MPO approval date for the TIP is June 6, 1996. The USDOT approval. date of the
TIP is April 4, 1997. The current conformity determination is consistent with the final
conformity rule found in 40 CFR Part 51. There has been no significant changes in the
project's design concept or scope, as used in the conformity analyses.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing
and grubbing, demolition or other operations will be removed from the project, burned or
otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Any burning done will be done in accordance
with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for
air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Care will be taken to insure burning
will be done at the greatest distance practical from dwellings and not when atmospheric
conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will be performed under
constant surveillance. Also during construction, measures will be taken to reduce the
dust generated by construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection
and comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation completes the assessment
requirements for air quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the NEPA
process, and no additional reports are necessary.
G. Noise Impacts
An analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed widening of
Lewisville-Clemmons Road on noise levels in the immediate project area. This
investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land uses and a field survey
of ambient (existing) noise levels in the study area. It also includes a comparison of the
24
predicted noise levels and the ambient noise levels to determine if traffic noise impacts
can be expected resulting from the proposed project. Traffic noise impacts are
determined from the current procedures for the abatement of highway traffic noise and
construction noise, appearing as Part 772 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise
abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered.

The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure. Since the
range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is used to relate sound
pressures to some common reference level, usually the decibel (dB). Sound pressures
described in decibels are called sound pressure levels and are often defined in terms of
frequency weighted scales (A, B, C, or D).
The weighted-A decibel scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle noise
measurements because it places the most emphasis on the frequency range to which the
human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound levels measured using a
weighted-A decibel scale are often expressed as dBA. Throughout this report, all noise
levels will be expressed in dBA's. Several examples of noise pressure levels in dBA are
listed in Table 6.
Review of Table 6 indicates that most individuals in urbanized areas are exposed
to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go about their daily activities. The
degree of disturbance or annoyance of unwanted sound depends essentially on three
things:
1) The amount and nature of the intruding noise.
2) The relationship between the background noise and the intruding noise.
3) The type of activity occurring when the noise is heard.
2. Noise Abatement Criteria
In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are not compatible with
various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed noise
abatement criteria (NAC) and procedures to be used in the planning and design of
highways. These abatement criteria and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned
Federal reference (Title 23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for
various land uses is presented in Table 7. The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is the level
of constant sound which in a given situation and time period has the same energy as does
time varying sound. In other words, the fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are
represented in terms of a steady noise level with the same energy content.
25
Table 6
Hearing: Comparative Noise Generators
OVERALL EFFECT DBA DESCRIPTION
PAIN 140 Shotgun blast, Jet 30 in away at takeoff
Motor test chamber '
THRESHOLD OF PAIN
130
Firecrackers
120 Severe thunder, Pneumatic jackhammer
Hockey crowd
UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD Amplified rock music
110
Textile loom
LOUD
100 Subway train, Elevated train, Farm tractor
Power lawn mower, Newspaper press
Heavy city traffic, Noisy factory
90
Diesel truck 65 kph @ 15 m
80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal
Average factory, vacuum cleaner
MODERATELY LOUD Passenger car 80 kph @ 15-m
70
Quiet typewriter
60 Singing birds, window air conditioner
Quiet automobile
QUIET Normal conversation, Average office
50
Household refrigerator
VERY QUIET Quiet office
40
Average home
30 Dripping faucet
Whisper @ 1.5 in
AVG. PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING 20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves
JUST AUDIBLE Whisper
10
26
Table 7
Federal Highway Administration
Noise Abatement Criteria
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - Decibels (dBA)
Activity
Category Leg(h) Description of Activity Category
A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of
extraordinary (Exterior) significance and serve an
important public need, and where the preservation of
those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to
serve its intended purpose.
B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active
sports (Exterior) areas, parks, residences, motels,
hotels, schools, churches, libraries and hospitals.
C 72 Developed lands, properties or, activities not
included in (Exterior) Categories A or B above.
D -- Undeveloped lands.
E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public, meeting rooms,
schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.
Source: 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772; December 1991.
Table 8
Definition of Substantial Increase
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibel (dBA)
Existing Noise
Level in Leq(h) Increase In dBA From Existing Noise
Levels To Future Noise Levels
<_ 50 15
> 50 10
I
Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines.
27
3. Ambient Noise Levels
Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the project to
determine the existing background noise levels. The purpose of this noise level
information was to quantify the existing acoustic environment and to provide a base for
assessing the impact of noise level increases. The existing Leq noise levels were
measured at a distance of 15 meters from the roadway. The ambient measurement sites
and exterior Leq noise levels are prensented in Table 9.
Table 9
Ambient Noise Levels
Site Location Description Noise Level
(dBA)
1 SR 1103, across from Sedaila Grassy 67.7
Drive
2 US 421, Just east of SR 1103 Grassy 73.2
interchange
3 SR 11561 Grassy 61.9
0.2 mi.NW of interchange
4 Styers Ferry Road, just north Grassy 62.1
of SR 1153

The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the most current
traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing noise levels for comparison
with noise levels actually measured. The calculated existing noise levels averaged
approximately 2 dBA higher than the measured noise levels for the locations where noise
measurements were obtained. Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching"
of vehicles, low traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds versus the computer's "evenly-
spaced" vehicles and single vehicular speed.
4. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels
The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study was the Noise
Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA (revised March, 1983).
The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic
Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model
uses the number and type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds, the physical
28
characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed, elevated, etc.), receptor location and
height, and, if applicable, barrier type, barrier ground elevation, and barrier top elevation.
Only preliminary alignment was available for use in this noise analysis. Only
those existing natural or man-made barriers were included in setting up the model. The
roadway sections and proposed intersections were assumed to be flat and at-grade. Thus,
this analysis represents the "worst-case" topographical conditions. The noise predictions
made in this report are highway-related noise predictions for the traffic conditions during
the year being analyzed.
Peak hour design and level-of-service (LOS) C volumes were compared, and the
volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were used with the proposed posted speed
limits. Hence, during all other time periods, the noise levels will be no greater than those
indicated in this report.
The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized in order to determine the
number of land uses (by type) which would be impacted during the peak hour of the
design year 2020. A land use is considered to be impacted when exposed to noise levels
approaching or exceeding the FHWA noise abatement criteria and/or predicted to sustain
a substantial noise increase.
The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are listed in Appendix
3. Information included in these tables consist of listings of all receptors in close
proximity to the project, their ambient and predicted noise levels, and the estimated noise
level increase for each.
Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels either: [a]
approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria (with "approach" meaning within
1 dBA of the Table 8 value), or [b] substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The
NCDOT definition of substantial increase is shown in Table 8. Consideration for noise
abatement measures must be given to receptors which fall in either category.
The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that are predicted to
become impacted by future traffic noise is shown in the appendix. These are noted in
terms of those receptors expected to experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or
exceeding the FHWA NAC or by a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. Under
Title 23 CFR Part 772, there are 95 impacted receptors due to highway traffic noise in
the project area. The maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours from
SR 1103 are 27 and 48 meters, respectively, and 53 and 85 meters, respectively from US
421. This information should assist local authorities in exercising land use control over
the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local jurisdiction. For
example, with the proper information on noise, the local authorities can prevent further
development of incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels of an
adjacent highway.
29
Table II indicates the exterior traffic noise level increases for the identified
receptors in each roadway section. Ninety-four receptors are predicted to be impacted by
a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. The predicted noise level increases for this
project range from +4 to +8 dBA. When real-life noises are heard, it is possible barely to
detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more readily noticeable. A 10
dBA change is judged by most people as a doubling or a halving of the loudness of the
sound.
Table 10
FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria Summary
Maximum
Predicted Leq Noise Approximate Number of
Description Levels, dBA Contour Distance Receptors Impacted According
(maximum)(Z) To Title 23 CFR Part 772
15m 30m 60m 72 dBA 67 dBA A B C D E
From SR 1891 (Peace 73.5 69.4 63.9 27 m 48 m 0 44 3 0 0
Haven Road) to SR 3580
(Forest Oak Road)
From SR 3580 73.5 69.4 63.9 27 m 48 m 0 23 1 0 0
to SR 1145 (Holder
Road)
From SR 1145 73.5 69.4 63.9 27 m 48 m 0 18 5 0 0
to US 421
US 421 78.5 74.4 68.9 53 m 85 m 0 0 1 0 0
Styers Ferry Road 68.2 64.1 58.6 <15 m 26 m 0 0 0 0 0
Lewisville-Clemmons 65.5 61.4 55.8 <15 m 17 m 0 0 0 0 0
Road
Totals: 0 85 10 0 0
NOTES: (1) 15m, 30m, and 60m distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane.
(2) 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of nearest ravel
lane
30
Table 11
Traffic Noise Level Increase Summary
Impacts
Substantial Due To
Noise Both
Exterior Increase In Noise Level At Sensitive Receptors Level Criteria
Increase (1) (2)
Description <=0 14 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >=25
From SR 1891 (Peace 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0
Haven Road) to SR 3580
(Forest Oak Road)
From SR 3580 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0
to SR 1145 (Holder Road)
From SR 1145 1 5 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
to US 421
US 421 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Styers Ferry Road 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewisville-Clemmons 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Road
Totals 0 1 127 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES: (1) As defined by only a substantial increase (See Table 9).
(2) As defined by both criteria in Table 9.
6. Traffic Noise Abatement Measures
If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative
noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be
considered. Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to all impacted
receptors. There are 95 impacted receptors due to highway traffic noise in the project
area.
6.1 Highway Alignment
Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or vertical orientation of the
proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of
alternative alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance between
noise impacts and other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise abatement,
horizontal alignment selection is primarily a matter of sitting the roadway at a sufficient
31
distance from noise sensitive areas. Changing the highway alignment is not a viable
alternative for noise abatement on this project.
6.2 Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic management measures which limit vehicle type, speed, volume and time
of operations are often effective noise abatement measures. For this project, traffic
management measures are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due to their
effect on the capacity and level-of-service on the proposed roadway.
6.3 Noise Barriers
Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can often be applied
with a measurable degree of success by the application of solid mass, attenuable measures
to effectively diffract, absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise emissions. Solid mass,
attenuable measures may include earth berms or artificial abatement walls.
The project will maintain only limited control of access, meaning most
commercial establishments and residences will have direct access connections to the
proposed roadway, and all intersections will adjoin the project at grade.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it must be high enough
and long enough to shield the receptor from significant sections of the highway. Access
openings in the barrier severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It
then becomes economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise
reduction. Safety at access openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted
sight distance is also a concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a barrier's
length would normally be 8 times the distance from the barrier to the receptor. For
example, a receptor located 15 meters from the barrier would normally require a barrier
120 meters long. An access opening of 12 meters (10 percent of the area) would limit its
noise reduction to approximately 4 dBA.
In addition, businesses, churches, and other related establishments located along a
particular highway normally require accessibility and high visibility. Solid mass,
attenuable measures for traffic noise abatement would tend to disallow these two
qualities, and thus, would not be acceptable abatement measures in this case.
7. "Do Nothing" Alternative
The traffic noise impacts for the "do nothing" or "no-build" alternative were also
considered. If the proposed widening did not occur, 69 receptors would experience traffic
noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC. Also, the receptors could
anticipate experiencing an increase in exterior noise levels in the range of +3 to +7 dBA.
As previously noted, it is barely possible to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5
dBA change in noise levels is more readily noticed.
32
The major construction elements of this project are expected to be earth
hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise impacts, such as teml
speech interference for passers-by and those individuals living or working near
project, can be expected particularly from paving operations and from the earth u,L;
'b
equipment during grading operations. However, considering the relatively short-term
nature of construction noise and the limitation of construction to daytime hours, these
impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss characteristics of
nearby natural elements and man-made structures are believed to be sufficient to
moderate the effects of intrusive construction noise.
9. ?
Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not recommended,
and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This evaluation completes the highway
traffic noise requirements of Title 23 CFR Part 772, and unless a major project change
develops, no additional noise reports are required for this project.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the Federal/State
governments are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new
development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a
proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of
the location of this proposed highway project will be the approval date of CE's FONSI's,
ROD's or the Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For development occurring
after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are responsible to insure that noise
compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility. -
H. Hydraulic Concerns
Forsyth County is currently a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular
Program. This project does not cross any identified flood hazard areas. The project is
almost entirely on a ridge. There are no major streams crossed by the project. The terrain
in the project vicinity is rolling with natural draws such that the project may be drained
without difficulty. The project drains into a water supply watershed west of the project,
but not into high quality waters nor into the watershed critical area. Therefore, erosion
and sedimentation will be controlled through the appropriate specification, installation
and maintenance of standard erosion and sedimentation control measures. Existing
drainage patterns will be maintained to the best extent practicable. Groundwater
resources will be evaluated in final design to ensure measures are taken if necessary, to
avoid groundwater contamination.
33
Following review was conducted concerning potential hazardous materials.
Based on field reconnaissance survey, four operational and two non-operational
facilities were identified for the possibility for USTs with the proposed corridor.
Information about these sites are as follows:
1. Grocery Barn
1545 Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Clemmons, NC 27012
Owner: Pace Oil Co. Inc.
P.O. Box 15047
Winston-Salem, NC 27113
This operational facility is located in the northeastern quadrant of the SR
1103/SRI 145 (Holder Road) intersection. Currently three USTs are in place. The tanks
have storage capacities ranging from 4,000-6,000 gallons and contain gasoline. The
tanks are located approximately 26 m (85 feet) from the centerline of SR 1103 and
13.2 m (45 feet) from the centerline of SR 1145.
2. Jarvis Estate Owner: Duke Power
Styers Ferry Road 422 S. Church St.
Clemmons, NC 27012 Charlotte, NC 28242
This non-operational facility is located along the west side of existing SR 1103
just south of the US 421 interchange. The field reconnaissance suggests that this site is
involved with extensive groundwater remediation. A file search of the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) shows this site to be listed as Groundwater Incident
# 6266 and clean up requirements are currently under the direction of the Winston-Salem
regional office. As of the date of reconnaissance, there are several groundwater
monitoring wells, recovery wells, and an operational pump and treat system on the
property. According to DEM, remediation will continue at this site.
3. Etna Snack Mart
1421 Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Clemmons, NC 27012
Owner: Taylor Oil Co.
P.O. Box 5195
Winston-Salem, NC 27113
This operational facility is located in the southeastern quadrant of the
SR I I03/US 421 interchange. According to field survey and DEM file search, there are
currently five USTs in use at this site. These tanks have holding capacities of 12,000
gallons and are constructed of Buffhide and contain gasoline, kerosene and diesel fuel.
These USTs were installed in 1986 to comply with 1998 requirements. The tank bed is
situated approximately 18 m (60 feet) from the centerline of existing SR 1103.
34
4. Lewisville Texaco
1410 Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Clemmons, NC 27012
2037 Vargrave St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
This operational facility is located in the southwestern quadrant of the
SR I I03/US 421 interchange. Field reconnaissance and DEM records show that this site
has four USTs in use. The storage capacities for these tanks range in size from 4,000 to
8,000 gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel. Three of the USTs are situated in a tank bed
just to the south of the office and one tank is located approximately 18 m (60 feet) from
the centerline of SR 1103. An above ground storage tank is located behind the building.
It is anticipated this property will be acquired as part of this project. A preliminary site
assessment will be performed on this site during the acquisition of right of way to check
for any possible contamination from these UST's.
5. Citgo Fast Track # 132 Owner: Fast Track Inc.
5076 Styers Ferry Road P.O. Box 410
Lewisville, NC 27023 Wilkesboro, NC 28697
This operational facility is located in the northeastern quadrant of the
SR I I03/US 421 interchange. Field reconnaissance and DEM records show that this site
has three USTs in use. The storage capacities for these tanks range in size from 8,000 to
10,000 gallons of gasoline. The gas pumps are located approximately 31m (100 feet)
from the centerline of the road. The tank bed is located 40 m (130 feet) from the
centerline.
6. A Cleaner World
2600 Lewisville-Clemmons Rd
Clemmons, NC 27012
Owner: Howard Helper
2600 Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.
Clemmons, NC 27012
This non-operational facility is located in the northwestern quadrant of the
SR I I03/US 421 interchange. Field reconnaissance and DEM records show no USTs
associated with this business and there is no evidence of non-compliance. This site
should pose no environmental concerns.
2. Landfills and Other Contaminated Properties
The Geographical Information Service (GIS) was consulted for the project
corridor. the research shows that no regulated or unregulated landfills or dumpsites occur
within the project corridor. Based on field reconnaissance and records search, there
should be no further hazardous materials conflicts.
Owner: Leonard Oil Co.
35
VI. COMMENTS COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
On October 3, 1994, a letter was mailed to the following state, and local agencies
to solicit suggestions and receive environmental input concerning the proposed project
(Note: an asterisk indicates those agencies which responded to this letter):
Army Corps of Engineers
* N. C. State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
* N. C. Department of Health and Natural Resources
* N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
* Village of Clemmons
* Town of Lewisville
* City of Winston-Salem
* Northwest Piedmont Council of Governments
Copies of this correspondence are found in the Appendix.
Several public meetings have been held to discuss the revision of the SR
I I03/US 421 interchange. In 1993, an early design for the revised interchange was
shown to the public at a corridor workshop covering the Winston-Salem Northern
Beltway (T.I.P. project R-2247). On December 6, 1994, Alternate 1 for the revised
interchange was shown to the public at an informal citizens workshop for the Winston-
Salem Northern Beltway. On September 5, 1996, Alternate 2 for the revised interchange
was shown to the public at the public hearing for the Winston-Salem Northern Beltway.
Following the September 5, 1996 public hearing, Alternate 3 was developed. Concerns
had been raised by the public and local officials regarding Alternates 1 and 2 because of
the required cul-de-sacs and relocation of intersecting roads. Alternate 3 was designed to
minimize relocation of the intersecting roadways. On May 19, 1997 a citizens
information workshop was held to discuss Alternates 1, 2, and 3. Alternate 3 adds a loop
in the northeast quadrant onto westbound US 421. In addition, the ramp in the northwest
quadrant onto US 421 is removed. Citizens attending this workshop favored Alternate 3.
Written comments by citizens following the workshop also showed support for
Alternate 3.
Two public meetings have been held to discuss the widening alternatives for
Lewisville-Clemmons Road. A citizens informational workshop was held on June 4,
1996 covering only the widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road. A five-lane facility was
the only alternative under consideration at the time. At the workshop, local officials
requested that a three-lane facility be considered. Local officials also requested that a
roadway with a grassed median be considered. Following the workshop a three-lane
facility was analyzed. The analysis indicated that a three-lane facility would not have the
handling capacity for future traffic on Lewisville-Clemmons Road. The local
Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) passed a resolution supporting a four-lane
36
facility with a grassed median on January 8, 1997. As discussed previously, another
citizens workshop was held on May 19, 1997. In addition to the interchange alternatives,
two widening options were discussed - a five-lane, curb and gutter alternative, and a four-
lane alternative with a 4.8 m (16 foot) grassed median. At this workshop, citizens voiced
concerns regarding the loss of property. Citizens also had concerns about the median -
divided alternative, because of inconvenience in accessing adjoining properties.
A future public hearing will discuss the recommended design discussed in this
document.
37
FIGURES
1cra.... 2 .?Rffr?l Nall -4000,
17 Gen
n ? 7 1 5
6i SUn1?1^nlle
kBetnlnfl 5 66 ?wlueflonn IR
Y F
-P on-1 ern SY
BLewisville,/ t ('
?A_ 11f ? n f •^•?
i lemmons
7a 11?. .u to
°?? - 711? .1 ; ]LI
- 70 ?? i:i! Lt:+ 1 f1
1111 iiil 3
` Lewisville
Town Limits ---
am Interchange to be Revised 'Al 21
17
1! ' _ n
IUL
Ga ..f c>
e ? '7
JILL 79
:n
UAL
- 09 iL 13
.
- / < J;
17 ??•
i
)L .O1 .f• i . ..
< UU 71li ?«
1 - y
1
Village ofClemmons »•^ °
. ply ? 77 Lll
1 I ,? .rl
.a
' Clemmons
r , Village Limits
fi
>u I:u2
'.7 3614
\ . - j n
-71 7.ff
i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
.15 1.:i ov TRANSPORTATION
?• -h " PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
1111
o _ BRANCH
o, .lob I, . 1,
2.33 ? ? f
WIDENING OF SR 1103 FROM
SR 1891 TO US 421 AND REVISE
INTERCHANGE AT US 421
FORSYiH COUNTY
T.I.P. NO. U-3119
I km FIG1
o? ? ? •,??
? Y
{ T
._31 a 1 ' y y-?
4 Am.
0.1
Map,,. \n,\?'1 11.r1\l\ _a.' A;a
WIT'-
1
I
O +IRI?.

m
U
u?
F
ce
E z
o w
p ?k U
'- o Co
r-
1- N
l '
~ E
w
f? M
V
N (s"'
?-
? Q
M N
5w ?,

? w
w
° Q
3
o w

c p
W Z
4 `
N
-?
M

w
rT
r M
p
ii'

17 Pp TFT
a-
cS
l4l ?, ?lS rar r 4"'
;90J?' `? 1. I'r if;' ° ?"' ` ' ?? ? -- ?rr.- -_ er-- 4"•V
V) V)
lif,(?
i 41 +'
.? r
/? ,/ ----(?Ltn QU. ?_ rrF ? :. ? •. 4 ?i d f ? I I iC4t]
51
! ir
) t p,r 1
cJ
o J i` ; rJ. I?°, ? ? l I
Vt,
t r I r/,,n /? `i1 / I
, f
I I 1 rre,frd
1•U Pr
{
i' ( (1
r
yy 11 ?11? ? 1-
ff7
l 'f',r /?'r?/y?;?1?"?,1?(i ?Y ? ". I: !'r I.I ..C:? ? I i,• 'r' ?
I1 1 '
i:4
b`eon
1T
.. a
--
t ¢zz w Mz
z O Q
< (D 7, w
2C) ?
a / tU)Z Z
0 crr ? Er ° U
zl-ato -w
1-
? , ? z
J w°rr
.r aee
r
o
?ll '? a JN ?? ,•??fi? We
r `? y
o , r S. S /)J
Ins, -
ar ?
as LU
?' ?? (j(?'eee (` lJ t ! ?!' I
=?. Piatro ?? .b Y+ .?I II '(
?rrrrr e 1
?: rrerrr ? 1
1? ••eseee ?;• \•, I
+? \ ,;
f ! =? ! ,, I ly Aso
Ci I I. II , I I'
I
oa ,
Jll\ o
4 U I /r t
`C?`??, J 1 r?Jr
r 1
,f
t
1r. Arb_
! I
1
( Y
I 'I dR N
1 1
I
11'11 '? ? I i
11 J _ i Lj
Ldl
(r
?` to,; I
?'r a . v 4'r
( `III
I
V 4;r. I j
0 0 ? ?r O q I'
ujVCq>v"N•Y
zW? ?
REgr ? r', f
X e""
r
I 1
O
.I
El)
a z
p?rrt w ¢ a, W
ler? °ZZ .-¢
tees ), Z0 W Mm
J F ° W
(rF4-a U¢
000 oW
xuai U ¢z
Z a
U R g aa[ a cxi
zl-am I-Ill
I- ?
'L
' I i
t
s

.z
con
i

to ? L7 L'.7 '
C\
zi
O c,,?=p
-S7 ER. /r
\I
Y F
Q- c • ERRY ? =oNN' ???? ? ? ?
z v O I cr
w
a
~ CL ,
w c_
McGREGOR
C% 3 \ L
d --° BEGIN PROJE4 0
1 ='
1
LE LEWISVILLE
:'T I
13
END PROJECT ' US 421
O
0 j
0
i
' I ? \ r
G \
Y X\
CLEMMONS? ?'\ A
\ 9yi
WINSTON-SALEM /FORSYTH COUNTY
THOROUGHFARE MAP
FIG 7
> NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
s PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
.....f BRANCH
r
14J (1' Vl
yLL?
4J IiJ It?r
tl ,
VI '1' ''U V,
n
1- C (? AWrn3J,J.7I.
Li CI G ? ? ts..n37
Iz ' r• _
O C1 R I, ` ,/
cJ N tC Vi
J n ? L Ifl
I\IV ? /??, ?V
1j_ICJ 1Jy
?_7 U SING
G J

U
V)
o I,_I
u V 1
c)_ P
V,
Y
O ?`
rl'
I ?J V, syy
fj? ?•
f!
AWL
LLJ
uG
O 11 ,`
tiJ l? 0
O I I I ??
Q) Ln
(71
?
-
o N U ?i
J
L4jU
I.z
O }
J

0

kn
l? .

o
u: n'-

o
u-
f
n l lid

tL q,
Q) U
I U s
-
J
} V) s
w
z .
Lcl
O N It 1?\ ` 'r4'Fli13JJ 3)]

uj
Lj ,
i,lS/l(?7
_
Z IL u,,,,us w
? N
V) Ill V
U ,ji11 i?NLtlt
k I-?
L
v)
IJ
W
I
zz

A

N-I

Z c
)
?L V) riz
1 j
Eb

Z J
cl:

v)
y

Jd-
tU ti
uj
L Q) ?' ?l l
-
U (
Iv ILL. J? GYIY
SaYLIi137J

- Ii
v,
, )Jli
) ts.ri37

Q) 10
V) 104)
of
I LI 111sp
w ,n
w

u
i?
L?li.li,)
I, J V,
11"
I_ U tL
LC
1l)l.?
LJ L.1
_ J
l) 1 ?; I U
_t
i
G*%
? LLJ
J Cl
o V)
'1- tt
Ili V)
a LL? I
tL I_ I"
i,1 I
?;UG
ljiy
??L-o
ul_v
?i V tj?
Ln v U
t' (n lzz
tU o
it: U
li ti_I
V.
J
1100
ILL]
r? U
O j
J
I t1
G --, V)
Q cl
r?IIJV)
?? ch tv
rl 'I 1j
I,J tU J
v ?
?L?
1 is
trj ri= o
C)
V, C)
q t\f v
- V, W O
Q1
U
LL LLj
J
VV ,'
7
i
,
i L'
r;
IU
V)
1? R
v "4 1f+?
lu ....? 1 1`.
l
V LL
LEV? 15 O l 11 5 jZ0A0
CIJ:IaM
1
?i
v
j i
U
v
P
v j
V)
5V l I.LL 1 1
LLV? ! 1?0pU
Cl_LIII?UIJS
1 J•?

1/Il r•,1 .11/
'? [IE?LUAS
w
J
41

w
0
?Ir
to

?0014 U
lu
v
r?
t
5 ?VU/1
7I?ISI,I I_?7

LL
O J
I- Q
z F-
w W (5
LL

Q o
w
0 > worn
O w -
zo z ZQ
J 1-? SI--_
U U

Q¢O
U I-w'
a z ¢ O
_
?yzz rrza
cc < = w n:
OCC Jcc
F J_
z1-am Oal

e
3 a
•?yF

APPENDIX I
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
?L CCU ?'
C?'aS? N F y?'yT
United States Department of the Interior
y a
? a
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
M,RCH 9 Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
January 24, 1996
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E.. Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Subject: Scoping for the proposed widening of SR 1103
(Lewisville-Clemmons Road) from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to
US 421 in Forsyth County, North Carolina, T.I.P. No. U-3119
In your letter of January 11, 1996, you requested information regarding
potential environmental impacts that could result from the subject
project for your use in the preparation of an environmental document.
The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e),
and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to information provided in your letter, this project will
involve the widening of a section of SR 1103 from two to five lanes from
SR 1891 to US 421. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is
particularly concerned with potential adverse impacts to federally listed
species and stream and wetland systems. As with any road improvement
project, the Service generally prefers an alternative that utilizes the
existing alignment.
The enclosed page identifies federally protected endangered and
threatened species known from Forsyth County that may occur within the
area of influence of this proposed action. The legal responsibilities of
a Federal agency or their designated non-Federal representative under
Section 7 of the Act are on file with the Federal Highway Administration.
The enclosed page also contains a list of other species of Federal
concern that are currently under status review by the Service and which
may occur in the project impact area. These species are not legally
protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions,
including Section 7, unless they are formally proposed or listed as
endangered or threatened. We are including these species in our response
to give you advance notification. The presence or absence of these
species in the project impact area should be addressed in any
environmental document prepared for this project.
A-1
The Service's review of the environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if the document contained the following information:
(1) A complete analysis and comparison of the available
alternatives (the build and no-build alternatives).
(2) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within
existing and required additional rights-of-way and any areas,
such as borrow areas, that may be affected directly or
indirectly by the proposed road improvements.
(3) Acreage and description of wetlands that will be filled as a
result of the proposed road improvements. Wetlands affected by
the proposed project should be mapped in accordance with the
(4) Linear feet of any water courses that will be relocated as a
result of the proposed project.
(5) Acreage of upland habitat, by cover type, that will be
eliminated because of the proposed project.
(6) Description of all expected secondary and cumulative
environmental impacts associated with this proposed work.
(7) An analysis of the crossing structures considered (i.e.,
spanning structure, culverts, etc.) and the rationale for
choosing the preferred structure(s).
(8) A discussion as to the extent to which the project will result
in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat from
direct construction impacts and from secondary development
impacts.
(9) Mitigation measures that will be employed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated with
any of the proposed project.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these scoping comments and
request that you continue to keep us informed as to the progress of this
project. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please
reference our Log No. 4-2-96-027.
Si rely,
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor
Enclosure
A-2
cc:
Ms. Linda Pearsall, Director, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
320 S. Garden Street, Marion, NC 28752
A-3
IN REPLY REFER TO
LOG NO. 4-2-96-027
FORSYTH COUNTY
FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES
BIRDS
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - Endangered
PLANTS
Small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera) - Endangered
White irisette (Sisyrinchium dichotomum) - Endangered
OTHER SPECIES OF FEDERAL CONCERN
REPTILES
Bog turtle (Clemmvs muhlenbergii)
A-4
FM208
03-19-96
• NUKIm LAMULI"A JINIC %'Z;pq .anvwva?
?CC? S OEPARTMEN T OF ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
MAILED TO: FPOM:
N.C. ^EPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS BAGGETT
FRANK VICK DIRECTOR
PLANK. E ENV. BRANCH N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
TRANSPORTATION BLDG./INTER-OFF
PROJ=CT DESC?IPTIr)N:
SCOPING - PROPOSE? WIDENING OF SR 1103 (LEWISVILLE-CLEMMONS RD.)
FROM SR 1891 (PEAVE HAVEN ROAD) TO US 421; TIP OU-3119
SAT NO 96E422^^471 PROGRAM TITLE - SCOPING
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SI)3MITTED: ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
( X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHDULD YOU HAVE ANY QI)ESTIONSv PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone].
C.C. REGION I
Q
??'I V O
MAR 2 1 1995
A-5
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Henry M. Lancaster II, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee \
Environmental Review Coordinator
RE: 96-0471 Scoping for Proposed Improvements to SR 1103, Yadkin River
Subbasin
DATE: February 26, 1996
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed
the proposed information. The attached comments are for your consideration.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
attachments
RECEIVED
FEB 2 't' 1995
N.C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
A-6
p.0. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50110 recycled/ 10110 post-coruumef-paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources /Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E `----' N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 23, 1996
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Monica Swihart?;?Water Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Project Review #96-0471; Scoping Comments - NC DOT
Proposed Improvements to SR 1103, TIP#U-3119,
Yadkin River Subbasin 03-07-04
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project.
The stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated,
it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks
be revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary)
to be employed. DEM recommends that no weep holes be
installed in bridges that drain directly into surface
waters.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Summarize the total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General certification numbers requested
from DEM.
A-7
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-c onsumer;2aper
Melba McGee
February 23, 1996
Page 2
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas
should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the
contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques
alleviate the traffic problems in the study area?
K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the
environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the
following:
1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after
wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible.
2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of
mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same
watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation.
3. Mitigation should be in the following order:
restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking.
Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be
issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on
Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents
DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of
Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the
document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for
review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended
that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until
the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed
by the Department.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may
be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage
under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will
require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401
Certification may be denied if wetland or water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
11167.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
A-8
?aww ur r?ur ur vaiwuw
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
ct Number: Due Date:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS P F-031,71
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be/obtai4d in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, Information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Process
Regional Office.
l?
C
C
C
C
LLe
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
rmil to construct d operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions. d sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters technical conference usual (90 days)
N ES - permit to discharge into surface water andlor Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection 90.120 days
ermit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPOES Reply (N'A)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPOES
permit-whichever is later.
Water Use Permit
Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(N Ai
1
Well Construction Permit
Complete application must be received and permit issue
7 days
prior to the installation of a well. (15 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
edge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department or 190 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.06 NIA (90 days)
A open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
ssb s material must be in compliance with 15A 60 days
-NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NiA
prior to demolition Contact Asbestos Control Group
919.733.0820

Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 20.0800 190 days)
e Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity An erosion & sedimentatio
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect I at least 30 20 days
davs before be inning activity A fee of $30 for the first acre and $20 00 for each additional acre or part must acCOmDanv the olan (30 davsi
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance (30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount
Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permiled. The appropriate bond 160 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued
North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days (NIA)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22
i On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day
counties
n coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned."

Oil Relining Facilities
NIA 90.120 days
(NIA)
If permit required. application 60 days before begin construction

Dam Safety Permit Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans 30 days
inspect construction. certify construction is according to EHNR approv
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program And (60 days)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces.
sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of 5200.00 must ac.
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion
A_9 Continued on reve,se
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natu
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS
ECGCs- Q
JAN 25 1996
o esc •
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Project Number: f6 -DL/
7 ;V County: FUhc SYT H
Charles H. Gardner
Director
Project Name:
Geodetic,Survev
411 This project will impact 1 Z geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be.contacted prior'to construction at P.O. Box' 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
Reviewer Date
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
• No comment
This projeclt will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at [phone].
Reviewer Date
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh. N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunlry Affirmative Acdon Employer
A-10
01 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
FROM: Stephanie E. Goudreau, Mt. Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program A ea DATE: February 15, 1996
SUBJECT: State Clearinghouse Project No. 96-0471, Scoping comments for SR 1103
(Lewisville-Clemmons Road), Forsyth County, TIP #U-3119.
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our preliminary review and
comments regarding a proposal by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
to widen SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road) from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 in
Forsyth County. I conducted a site visit on 12 February 1996.
Land use is the area is primarily residential, and wildlife habitat is limited to maintained
yards and a few small areas of mixed hardwood and pine stands. An intermittent stream and small
wetland area were observed near the Agape Faith Church. No special concerns were noted
during the site visit; however, we will provide additional comments when the Environmental
Assessment (EA) is complete.
In order for biological staff of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission to
provide a meaningful review, the EA prepared for this project should include the following
information:
1) Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern animal and plant
species. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (919/733-7701) should be
contacted for information on listed species.
2) Description of waters and/or wetlands affected by the project.
3) Project map identifying wetland areas. Identification of wetlands may be accomplished
through coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. If the Corps is not
consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria listed.
A-11
96-0471 Page 2 February 15, 1996
4) Description of project activities that will occur within wetlands, such as fill or channel
alteration. Acreages of wetlands impacted by alternative project designs should be listed.
Project sponsors should indicate whether the Corps has been contacted to determine the
need for a 404 Permit under the Clean Water Act. Contact is Mr. John Thomas at
919/876-8441, extension 25.
5) Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities.
6) The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of
wildlife habitat.
7) Any measures proposed to avoid or reduce impacts of the project or to mitigate for
unavoidable habitat losses.
I appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to the NCDOT in the early
planning stages of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please
contact me at 704/652-4257.
cc: Ms. Janice Nicholls, USFWS, Asheville
A-12
Northwest Piedmont
lT?C?LII?GW L. LUI?'?
Executive Director
Council of Governments
Intergovernmental Review Process
280 South Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-5288
REVIEW & COMMENT FORM
[phone]
FAX [phone]
The State Clearinghouse sent us the enclosed information about a proposal which
could affect your jurisdiction. Please circulate it to the people you believe need to be
informed.
If you need more information about the proposal, please contact the applicant
directly. You may also contact Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director of State Clearinghouse,
[phone].
If you wish to comment on the proposed action, complete this form and return it to
the NWPCOG office by March 11, 1996. Please use the enclosed window envelope
and make sure the return address shows.
We will send your comments to the State Clearinghouse to be included in a
recommendation to the proposed funding agency.
State Application Number 96-E-4220-0471 Widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Commenter's Name & Title Mr. John Whitson. Town Manager
Representing Lewisville Phone _ (9101945-5558
Mailing Address Post Office Box 547. Lewisville. NC 27023
Date signed ? ;
J Signature
N I support this application.
COMMENTS: (You may attach additional sheets)
280 South Liberty Street - Winston-Salem. NC 27101-5288
TDD [phone]
A-13
Northwest Piedmont
MdUnew L. uoige.
Executive Director
Council of Governments
Intergovernmental Review Process
280 South Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-5288
REVIEW & COMMENT FORM
[phone]
FAX [phone]
The State Clearinghouse sent us the enclosed information about a proposal which
could affect your jurisdiction. Please circulate it to the people you believe need to be
informed.
If you need more information about the proposal, please contact the applicant
directly. You may also contact Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director of State Clearinghouse,
[phone].
If you wish to comment on the proposed action, complete this form and return it to
the NWPCOG office by March 11, 1996. Please use the enclosed window envelope
and make sure the return address shows.
We will send your comments to the State Clearinghouse to be included in a
recommendation to the proposed funding agency.
State Application Number
Commenter's Name & Title
Representing Clemmons Phone [phone]
Mailing Address Post Office Box 1710. Clemmons- NC 27012
?C7
Date signed 4'.
aT9 ?
Signature
1 support this application.
COMMENTS: (You may attach additional sheets)
280 South Liberty Street - \Vinston-Salem. NC 27101-5288 - TDD (910) 761-21 10
A-14
? a? t Z
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
February 13, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook G'?GIiV°J
Deputy State Hlstorlc Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Widen SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons
Road) from SR 1891 to US 421, Forsyth
County, U-31 19, Federal Aid Project STP-
1 103(6), State Project 8.2623601, 96-E-
4220-0471
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of
historical or architectural importance located within the planning area. However,
since the survey of historic architectural resources in Forsyth County is fifteen
years old, there may be structures of which we are unaware within the project's
area of potential effect. Therefore, we recommend that an architectural historian
with the North Carolina Department of Transportation survey the area of potential
effect and report the findings to us.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 Cast Junes Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2507
A-15
H. F. Vick
February 13, 1996, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
N. Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett
Forsyth County Joint Historic Properties Commission
A-16
r,-0e-1997 13:21 FROM HPO "
Federal Aid # -1 Ib , TIP # 1 County
and Project
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE'FOR -
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

On C J mpresentatim of the
_leNoah Carolina Department of Tr;xnsport?tion (NCDOT)
??cdcrsl Hig}n ay Administration (FH%YA)
1Vorth Carolina Statc Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
rcvim--d the subject project at
scoping mating
Histcric architectural resourc= photograph mvicNv session/consultation
Other
All parties present agreed %
. t(tcrc arc no properties over fik- Fears old within the project's area of potential effects.
-z--*,;crc arc no•propcrties less than M- 3,trs old which arc considered to meet Criterion
Considcmdon G within the proj,-Tt's arcs of potcntial effcets.
11
there am properties over fifty gars old (list attached) within die project's area of potential cfocts,
but based on tho historical information aNailabie and the photographs of each property, properties
identified as arc considered not eligible
fo National Register and no further evaluation of them is rrcccssarv.
there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's ate of potential effects.
Rcorescntntive. NCDOT Datc
Stgncd•

Administrator, or other Fcd=l Agency Date
ReprMcatadvc,
a
A-17
TOTAL P.02
ira stiany mat is P?qmnxt, a Rital wpb or this form and the attache] 0..i %ill be hydudod. .
C,
i
??5uT1-?'
Federal Aid # f7TPf 11031[Q) TIP # U-3 l County
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FO 6? q*
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 'tit
g? -?-
Brief Project Description W tQeN 14L S? (03? -?wt 5R A
,rvP ? n
On 1 MAD? representatives of the
/North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
dcral Highway Administration (FH%N'A)
? North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
A scoping meeting
? Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
Other
All parties present agreed
there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
here are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criterion
Consideration G within the projects area of potential effects.
/there arc properties over fifty years old (list attached) within the projects area of potential effects.
but based on the historical information available and the photographs of each property, properties
identified as ?? 1 - arc considered not eligible
for National Register and no further evaluation of them is necessary.
there arc no National Register-listed properties within the projects area of potential effects.
Signed:

M
vc, NCDOT
the Division A inistrator, or other Federal Agcnc,,.-
Representative, SHPO
Date
Date
'Date
State Historic Preservation Officer
Date
If a survey rLpart is prepan•d, a Htial copy or this ronn mid tlic altaciicd list will be included.
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 2511, NVINSTON-SALEM. NOR"fH CAROLINA 27102 C n
• 910-727-2707 fax [phone] G Lr
March 3, 19974190 ?
X99,
Mr. Frank Vick, P.E. a
c,
Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
SUBJECT: Lewisville-Clemmons Road Widening (TIP Project U-3119)
Dear Frank:
On January 8, 1997, the Winston--calem/Forsyth County Urban Area
Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) discussed the proposed
widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road, from US 421 to Peace Haven
Road in Forsyth County.
The TAC agreed that if a widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road to
multiple lanes was necessary, then the road should be widened to a
four-lane facility with a sixteen (16) foot landscaped median and
sidewalks. The TAC also expressed their concern for the safe
movement of motorists and pedestrians/students accessing West
Forsyth High School when the road is widened. Enclosed is a
resolution approved by the TAC at its February 26, 1997 meeting
which summarizes their concerns for the proposed widening project.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information as this project moves forward.
Sincerely,
Brent McKinney, P.E.
Director of Transportation
Enclosure
pc: Lewisville -Clemmons Road Widening Files
David Smith, Village of Clemmons
John Whitson, Town of Lewisville
Graham Pervier, Forsyth County Manager
A-19
r'
t.'
A RESOLUTION
IN SUPPORT OF WIDENING LEWISVILLE-CLEMMONS ROAD (SR'1103)
FROM PEACE HAVEN ROAD (SR 1891) TO US 421 TO A
FOUR-LANE THOROUGHFARE WITH A LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND SIDEWALKS
WHEREAS, Lewisville -Clemmons Road is the primary north-south
thoroughfare which provides traffic service for the Town
of Lewisville and the Village of Clemmons and the
numerous neighborhoods in between; and
WHEREAS, Lewisville-Clemmons Road is classified as a major
thoroughfare between Interstate 40 and US 421; and
WHEREAS, Lewisville -Clemmons Road, a two-lane road carrying a
high volume of traffic is experiencing congestion and
safety problems, particularly at West Forsyth High
School; and
WHEREAS, western Forsyth County is growing at a rapid pace with
numerous residential developments under construction; and
WHEREAS, the countywide Thoroughfare Plan indicates that
Lewisville - Clemmons Road will need to be widened to a
five-lane road by the year 2005; and
WHEREAS, a project to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road to a
four/five-lane road is already programmed in the State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for
construction beginning in the year 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Lewisville and the Village of Clemmons
support the widening of Lewisville -Clemmons Road to a
four-lane road with a 16-foot landscaped median and
sidewalks;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Winston-Salem/Forsyth
County Urban Area Transportation Advisory Committee
(TAC) requests the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road
from Peace Haven Road to US 421 to a four-lane road with
a 16-foot landscaped median and sidewalks; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that access to West Forsyth High School from
Lewisville-Clemmons Road be provided in the safest manner
possible.
Adopted this the 8th day of January, 1997.
17
.? //42 Robert S. Northing n, J ., Chairman
Winston-Salem/Forsyth.County Urban Area
Transportation Advisory Committee
A-20
11
CITY-10UHTY PLRHHIHG Bow
OF FORSYTH COUNTY A,,rD%TNSTONSALEK NORM CAROLINA
101 N. MAIN ST • P.O. BOX 2511 • WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. 27102
910-727-2087 • FAX [phone] • TDD# 910-727$319
E-MAIL planningCci•winstomsalem.nc us AG
July 3, 1996
JUt 1 51996
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager ` • kslcN01
Planning and Environmental Branch '_ V?r?;?YS p,;
Division of Highways - NCDOT
EHuN
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
RE: TIP #U-3119 - Lewisville-Clemmons Road (SR 1103) Widening
From Peace Haven Road (SR 1891) to US 421
Dear Mr. Vick:
Planning staff has reviewed the above referenced project as it
relates to vision 2005, A Comprehensive Plan For Forsyth County,
North Carolina, the existing transportation system and
accompanying land uses, and the anticipated travel and
development patterns of Forsyth County residents.
Lewisville-Clemmons Road connects the Village of Clemmons with
the Town of Lewisville. Both towns are currently developing
plans to maintain a "Village" character. The five-lane widening
of Lewisville-Clemmons Road, within the Village of Clemmons is
what citizens in both Lewisville and Clemmons are trying
desperately to prevent in other areas of their respective
communities. Planning staff is not encouraging unnecessary and
unwanted commercial development along this portion of Lewisville-
Clemmons Road. Currently, Lewisville-Clemmons Road is overburden
by traffic bound for I-40 westbound. Lewisville-Clemmons Road
provides the most direct route between US 421 and I-40. For this
reason this portion of Lewisville-Clemmons experiences frequent
accidents or near misses accompanying the increased traffic flow.
Please keep the following points in mind as you continue planning
improvements to Lewisville-Clemmons Road:
A three lane section is supported by the Transportation
Advisory Committee (TAC), Village of Clemmons, Town
Lewisville and the City-County Planning Board in the adopted
1996 Transportation Needs Report. We are aware.that the two
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools generate a-lot of
traffic, but it is the interference of through traffic with
no connection to abutting land uses that tends to cause more
problems in this area. From discussions between the NCDOT
A-21
Mr. Franklin Vick
Page 2
July 3, 1996
Division Engineer and the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
School System a signal is not a recommended alternative to
safety problems in front of the schools. A five-lane cross-
section will significantly increase the need for a signal at
the entrance to the schools. Right-of-way should be
purchased for future widening, but until this area exhibits
some change in land use patterns, other alternatives should
be explored that will help improve safety and traffic flow,
while maintaining a lower scale suburban environment.
It is our position that when built, the Northern Beltway
will eliminate a large portion of the I-40 cut through
traffic from Lewisville-Clemmons Road. Since this area
seems to warrant immediate improvement to handle traffic
problems, maybe advancing the schedule on the Northern
Beltway between I-40 and US 421 is appropriate. If the
schedule for the Northern Beltway were advanced not only
would traffic along Lewisville-Clemmons Road be improved,
but also traffic within the Village of Clemmons.
We also strongly recommend a future connection between
Lewisville-Clemmons Road and Peace Haven Road with a local
service interchange (the Styers Ferry Connector), to provide
an alternate travel pattern for area residents. These two
alternatives combined with a three-lane cross-section should
be implemented first, and then the area reevaluated to
determine what other measures,if any, should be evaluated.
A five lane road will attract and even encourage new kinds
of development. We believe this area should develop with
careful consideration and comprehensive planning. For
example, widening Lewisville-Clemmons Road to four-lanes
with a landscaped median would help attract quality
development to this area and allow control of marginal
friction and congestion. On the other hand, if Lewisville-
Clemmons Road is widened to five-lanes it will be difficult
to prevent "strip" commercial development with multiple
driveway cuts. When commercial developers learn of a five
lane roadway, they perceive that driveway cuts will be
granted. Land is sold and piecemeal development occurs,
making it difficult to encourage well planned and
coordinated development. Traffic problems associated with
turning movements already exist on Lewisville Clemmons Road.
A five-lane roadway will increase traffic and congestion in
the area as the future land use pattern changes.
A-22
Mr. Franklin Vick
Page 3
July 3, 1996
The City-County Planning Board has agreements to provide planning
services with both the Town of Lewisville and the Village of
Clemmons. I have shared my thoughts about this project with the
Mavor and manager of both Clemmons and Lewisville. Their
signatures below indicate their concurrence with this letter.
If you need additional information about ongoing plans in the
area, please let me know.
Sincerely,
James E.,Ya rough, Jr.
Director of Planning
14 L 1k-- - -, - 9? z?/ q ?\-?
ha k Chilton, Mayor William C. McGee, Jr., Mayor
Town of Lewisville Village of Clemmons
pc: John Whitson
David Smith
A-23
VILLAGE OF
CLEMMONS
„oio ,I ,hcorro ?,,,ro
100 Irr1
July 29, 1997
Mr. Douglas B. Waters
Division Engineer
Division of Highways
2125 Cloverdale Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Dear Mr. Waters:
The Village Council discussed your proposal concerning the Lewisville-Clemmons Road
improvements at their meeting on July 28, 1997. They expressed their appreciation for your
concern and assistance in receiving approval for a four-lane road with a median and sidewalk.
With regards to the sidewalk, we wish to express keen interest in proceeding with the
construction of a sidewalk in conjunction with the highway improvement.
The Village would be interested in seeing such a sidewalk on the East side of Lewisville-
Clemmons Road from Peacehaven Road North to the Village limits. It is our understanding that
the State would procure the right-of-way, build the sidewalk under a participation agreement with
Clemmons. The cost of materials as we understand it would be 30% from Clemmons and 70%
from the State. It would be helpful if we could be provided with an estimate of the cost of
materials for this project and what Clemmons dollar cost would be. We also understand that
should this sidewalk be constructed, Clemmons would assume responsibility for its maintenance.
Should you need additional information, feel free to contact me at (910) 766-751 L
Thanking you in advance for your concern and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
e . PSI on
erim Manager
AMD%svp
A-24
3715 CLEMMONS ROAD • POST OFFICE BOX 1710 • CLEMMONS, NC 27012 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
LEWISVILLE?!
I U fl F U T 1 0 C
6550 SHALLOWFORD ROAD - POST OFFICE BOX 547 • LEWISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27023
[phone] / 5530 - FAX [phone]
July 15, 1997
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Dr. Larry R. Goode
State Highway Administrator
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Su 1,;?ct: US Hial:wad J'1 :ntercltan;e )vith Lewisville-Clenzinons Road
Dear Dr. Goode:
We wish to express to you our thanks for the engineering creativity in the latest design of the
proposed intefchange improvements at US Highway 421 and LeVvisvi1le-Clemmons Road. That
a plan might be developed that would keep open both Lewisville-Clemmons and Styers Ferry
Roads (similar to the most current design) has always been one of our primary concerns
regarding any highway redesign at this very important Lewisville intersection and entry point.
While this most recent design (alternative III) adversely impacts some businesses in the area,
we feel it still represents the most desirable plan to date. We hope your stafr's continued revie:v
and subsequent refinements might minimize any negative impact on these business properties.
additionally the growth and development of this area calls attention to the necessity of another
refinement in the design. Specifically the section of Lewisville-Clemmons Road norhwestward
from the interchange to beyond the entrance to Sunrise Methodist Church and Preschool must
be improved to a three-lane, curb and gutter, with bicycle accommodations, to handle the traffic
volumes being generated in the immediate area.
Finally we request the project be moved forward as much as possible to accommodate the
situation that exists today. The many problems require action now and is vitally important to
the safe and efficient flow of traffic.
A-25
Dr. Goode
Page 2
July 15, 1997
Thank you for your continued cooperation and coordination. We look forward to the approval
of this project and its anxiously awaited construction.
Sincerely,
Jane Welch H. Grad y Bull
nk Chilton
Mayor Mayor Pro Te Council Member
?? fly
Fred Frarildin Mike orn KenlSad er Bob Stebbins
Council Member Cou cil Member Council Member Council Member
cf..
Mr. Dalton Ruffin, Member, North Carolina Board of Transportation
Mr. Doug Waters, NCDOT Division 9 Ensineer
Winston-Salem Area Transportation Advisory Committee

A-26
APPENDIX 2
RELOCATION REPORT
RELOCATION REPORT
North CaroHna Department of Transportation
71 E.I.S. F-] CORRIDOR F_? DESIGN AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: 8.262_3_6_01 COUNTY FORSYTH I Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
I.D. NO.: U-3119 F.A. PROJECT I STP-11036) - -
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: WIDEN SR 1103 TO A FIVE LANE CURB AND GUTTER FROM SR 1891 TO
r< US 421
Type of
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Dtsolacees Owners Tenants Total I Minorities 0-15M I 15-25M I 25-35M I 35-50M I 50 UP
Residential j 21 2 4 01 21 21 0j 0
Businesses 1 1 1
Farms j 0 1 0 2 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE

Non-Profit j 0 1 0 0
0 Owners
o
2o Tenants
- -- For Sale
For Rent
•
M 0 5
S O-1_0 0 0-20M 1 0 SO-1501
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Y 20-9m 0 150-250 1 20-IOM - 150-250
I 5
es j No Explain all "YES" answers. 4o-70M L 2 250-!00 1 1 40-70M I g 250-to0
I 10
X 1. Win special relocation services be necessary's 70-100m 0 400-800 1 0 7o-1ooM 9 400-600 6
X 2. Will schocGs or churches be affec! by 00 uP 0 uP 1 0 100 uP 1 100 600 uP 1 6
displacements k
OTAL 2 33 27
X 3. Will business services still be available after

project? RE?NlARKS (Respond b Number

X 1
4. Will any business be displaced? If so SIMILAR BUSINESS SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE IN GENER-
, AL AREA OF PROJECT NOT BEING AFFECTED

Indicate size, type, estimated number of .
A) RONNIE'S RESTAUPAAIT - GENERAL RESTAURANT 4 FULL

I employes, minorities, etc.
5
l TIME & 6 PART TIME. NOT THOUGHT TO EE A MINORITY
X . Wi
l re!ecatcn cause a housing shortage? BUSINESS.
6. Source for available housing (list). E) UNNAMED BUSINESS - NO SIGN OUT FRONT OF ANY KIND
I X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? APPEARS TO BE A SMALL BUSINESS

X
8. Should Lest Resort Housing be considered? .
6. NEWSPAPER AND VISUAL SURVEY
X 1 9. Are there large, disabled, e!derly, etc. 8. WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS NEGESSARY

families? ..
9. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE MAY BE SOME LARGE FAM-
I X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? IL!ES; SOME ELDERLY AND POSSIBLY A FF/V DISABLED
X 1
X 11. Is public housing available?
1 AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT. HOWEVER, NO LARGE NUM-
2. Is It felt there win be adequate DSS housing EERS EXPECTED

housing available during relocation period? .
11.N/INSTON-SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY

I X
13. Will there be a problem of housing within .
12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE AVAILABLE HOUSING LIST
financial means? 14. SEE ITEM 6.
X I 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source). C0MMEA1 - (A) AVAILABLE HOUSINS LIST WAS CCMP!l F^
15. Number months estimated to complete FROM A PARTIAL LISTING AND DOES NOT INDICATE THE TO

IS A PROB
RELOCAnoH? F
ABILITY, DUE TO THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE -
TAL AVAILABLE HOUSING IN FORSYTH COUNTY. (E) THERE
AREA
THAT THER

' ,
E ARE SOME MINORITY RESIDENTS AND
BUSINESS OWNERS. HOWEVER, A FAIR ESTIMATE FROM THE LIMITED CONTACTS AND PRESENT INFORMATION
CANNOT BE DETERMINED UNTIL INITIAL CONTACTS WITH THO
SE AFFECTED ARE MADE.
Rei'ocation Agent Date
ADOroved by Date
Farm 151 Revised 02195 d
;rgmal 3 1 C:;y State Relocation Agent
A-27 2 Copy Area Retocatlon cmce
RELOCATION REPORT '
EDE.I.S. ? CORRIDOR F-1 DESIGN
tV.;" Vir,27F :tf
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA "'C". 91 OFFICE
PROJECT: 8.2623601 COUNTY FORSYTH Alternate 1b?
I.D. NO. U-3119 F.A. PROJECT STP-1103(6)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: REVISED SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)/US 421 INTERCHANGE

ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Businesses 0 1 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20m 0 $ 0-160 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-i so p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20.40M 0 150-260 0 20-40M 0 160-260 0
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70M 0 250-400 0 40-70M 0 250-400 0
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70.100M 0 400400 0 70.100M 0 400.600 0
X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 10o up 0 800 UP 0 100 UP 0 goo uP 0
displacement? TOTAL 0 0 0 0
X 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS Res and b Number
project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so, NEGATIVE RESIDENTIAL STUDY
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc. 3. SIMILAR BUSINESS SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE.
N/A 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list). 4. (A) TEXACO SERVICE STATION - GASOLINE SALES, AUTO
N/A 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? SERVICE AND U-HAUL RENTAL. 4 FULL AND 3 PART TIME
N/A 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? EMPLOYEES. NOT A MINORITY BUSINESS.
N/A 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. AREA.
families?
N/A 10 . Will public housing be needed for project? 14. LOCAL REALTORS, WESTERN PIEDMONT MLS,
N/A 11 . Is public housing available? NEWSPAPERS AND VISUAL SURVEY.
N/A 12 . Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
N/A 13 . Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION?

:xi
. %
H. ALAN ROTHROCK 08-14-97 s _. _•;, _
_ 1?2I ?-? - c
Relocation Agent Date - Approved b Date
Forrn 15.4 Revised 02/95 d
Original d 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy Area Relocation Office
APPENDIX 3
TRAFFIC NOISE EXPOSURES
Traffic Noise Exposures
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.)
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to US 421
Forsyth County
TIP # U-3119 State Project # 8.2623601
AMBIENT NEAREST NOI SE
RE CEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROAD WAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEV EL
ID#
z=x LAND USE CATEGORY
:tzz=xzzxxxax:axzxx= NAME
zzz.z DISTANCE
.zz.-z= (m)
z=. LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) L- -Y- MAXIMUM
zx==z ==x=x=xz========z x=xxx==z======x==xz===v= INCR
_=== EASE
==x=
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to Forest O ak Drive
1 Residence B SR 1103 38.0 L 61 SR 1103 38.0 L * 69 8
2 Business C 21.0 R 66 21.0 R * 73 + 7
3 Business C 25.0 R 64 25.0 R * 72 + 8
4 Residence B " 25.0 L 64 25.0 L * 72 + 8
5 Residence 8 " 45.0 L 60 " 45.0 L * 67 + 7
6 Residence B " 39.0 L 61 " 39.0 L * 68 + 7
7 Residence B 16.0 R 67 " 16.0 R * 75 + 8
8 Residence B 45.0 R 60 " 45.0 R * 67 + 7
9 Residence a 45.0 R 60 it 45.0 R ' 67 + 7
10 Residence B 24.0 L 65 " 24.0 L * 72 + 7
11 Residence 8 42.0 R 60 42.0 R - ' 68 + 8
12 Residence B " 13.0 L 68 " 13.0 L 76 + 8
13 Business C 13.0 R 68 13.0 R * 76 + 8
14 Church E " 200.0 R 43/<40 " 200.0 R 50/<40 + 7/0
15 Church E " 20.0 L 66/41 " 20.0 L 74/49 + 8/8
16 Apts. B 34.0 R 62 34.0 R ' 70 + 8
17 Apts. B 30.0 R 63 30.0 R 71 + 8
18 Apts. a 60.0 R 57 " 60.0 R 64 + 7
19 Apts. 8 62.0 R 57 62.0 R 64 + 7
20 Apts. B 32.0 R 63 32.0 R 70 + 7
21 Apts. 8 33.0 R 63 33.0 R 70 + 7
22 Apts. B 31.0 R 63 31.0 R * 70 + 7
23 Apts. B " 31.0 R 63 " 31.0 R 70 + 7
24 Residence B 30.0 R 63 30.0 R * 71 + 8
25 Residence B " 26.0 R 64 26.0 R 72 + 8
26 Apts. B 52.0 L 59 52.0 L 66 + 7
27 Apts. B 30.0 L 63 30.0 L 71 + 8
28 Apts. B " 30.0 L 63 " 30.0 L 71 + 8
29 Apts. B 30.0 L 63 it 30.0 L * 71 + 8
30 Apt. Office C 70.0 L 56 70.0 L 63 + 7
31 Apts. B It 30.0 L 63 30.0 L * 71 + 8
32 Residence B 25.0 L 64 25.0 L * 72 + 8
33 Residence B 25.0 L 64 25.0 L ' 72 + 8

NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y--> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). * => Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
A-28
Traffic Noise Exposures
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.)
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to US 421
Forsyth County
TIP # U-3119 State Project # 8.2623601
AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE
RECE PTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVEL
ID;* LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE( m) L -Y- MAXIMUM INCREASE

From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to Forest Oak Drive (cont.d)
34 Residence 8 SR 1103 25.0 L 64 SR 1103 25.0 L * 72 + 8
35 Residence B 41.0 R 61 be 41.0 R * 68 + 7

36
Residence
a
25.0 R
64 Be
25.0
R *
72 + 8

37
Apts.
B
"
24.0 L
65 to
24.0
L
* 72
+
7
38 Apts. 8 " 24.0 L 65 is 24.0 L * 72 + 7
39 Residence B " 21.0 R 66 21.0 R * 73 + 7
40 Residence 8 " 25.0 R 64 if 25.0 R * 72 + 8
41 Residence 8 " 21.0 R 66 " 21.0 R * 73 + 7
42 Residence 6 " 29.0 R 63 29.0 R * 71 + 8
43 Residence 8 16.0 L 67 " 16.0 L * 75 + 8
44 Residence 8 " 25.0 L 64 of 25.0 L * 72 + 8
45 Residence 8 " 45.0 L 60 45.0 L * 67 + 7
46 Residence 8 " 29.0 L 63 it 29.0 L * 71 + 8
47 Residence B " 37.0 L 62 It 37.0 L * 69 + 7
48 Residence 8 29.0 L 63 " 29.0 L * 71 + 8
49 Residence B It 21.0 R 66 " 21.0 R * 73 + 7
50 Church E " 102.0 L 52/<40 102.0 L 59/<40 + 7/0
51 Residence B 32.0 L 63 32.0 L * 70 + 7
52 Residence a 22.0 R 65 22.0 R * 73 + 8
53 Residence 8 34.0 R 62 " 34.0 R * 70 + 8
From Forest Oak Drive t o Holder Road
54 Residence 8 SR 1103 22.0 R 65 SR 1103 22.0 R * 73 + 8
55 Residence 8 55.0 R 58 It 55.0 R 65
* + 7
+ 7
56 Residence B 35.0 L 62 35.0 L 69
* + 7
57 Residence a 44.0 L 60 44.0 L 67 + 7
58 Residence 8 45.0 L 60 45.0 L 67
*
+ 8
59 Residence 8 " 29.0 L 63 " 29.0 L 71
65/40 + 7/0
60 School E " 55.0 R 58/<40 55.0 R 41 + 7/1
61 School E 50.0 R 59/<40 50.0 R 66/
62 Residence a " 55.0 L 58 " 55.0 L 65
* + 7
+ 7
63 Residence 8 " 33.0 R 63 33.0 R 70
* + 8
64 Residence a at 26.0 R 64 a 26.0 R 72
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existi ng or proposed roadwa ys. -L -=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y -=> Noise level from other contributing roadways. `
n as exteri
h
l
l or/interior (58/48). IF _> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
Category E noise ow
eve
s s
A-29

Traffic Noise Exposures
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.)
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to us 421
Forsyth County
TIP # U-3119 State Project # 8.2623601
AMBIENT NEAREST
2.zaaa s
From Forest Oak Drive to Holder Road (cont.d)
RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED
ID# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) -L-
s zasszzzzsz. s a.zas:.2..2222:z_ 2.222 z z_2z..szz._.zz.m -...===
65 Church E SR 1103 45.0 L
66 Residence B 16 58.0 L
67 Residence B 00 20.0 L
68 Residence a is 47.0 L
69 Residence B " 19.0 L
70 Residence 8 40.0 L
71 Residence 8 32.0 L
72 Residence 8 " 17.0 R
73 Residence 8 29.0 R
74 Residence a 23.0 R
75 Residence B 31.0 R
76 Residence B " 25.0 R
77 Residence 8 " 49.0 R
78 Residence B " 54.0 R
79 Business C " 21.0 L
80 Residence a " 30.0 L
81 Residence 8 " 24.0 L
82 Residence 8 " 16.0 R
83 Residence 8 " 24.0 R
84 Residence 8 " 26.0 R
From Holder Road to US 421
85 Residence B SR 1103 28.0 L
86 Residence 8 11 31.0 L
87 Residence 8 so 28.0 L
88 Business C 18.0 R
89 Business C if 40.0 R
90 Church E " 32.0 R
90A Church E " 47.0 R
91 Business C " 27.0 L
92 Residence 8 " 44.0 L
93 Residence 8 " 20.0 L
NOISE LEVELS
-Y- MAXIMUM
_______===:.x222
NOISE
LEVEL
INCREASE
60/<40 SR 1103 45.0 L - 67/42 + 7/2
58 It 58.0 L 65 + 7
66 20.0 L - - * 74 + 8
60 47.0 L - - * 67 + 7
66 " 19.0 L - - * 74 + 8
61 40.0 L - - * 68 + 7
63 32.0 L - - * 70 + 7
67 It 17.0 R - - * 75 + 8
63 " 29.0 R - - * 71 + 8
65 " 23.0 R - - * 73 + 8
63 31.0 R - - * 70 + 7
64 25.0 R - - * 72 + 8
59 49.0 R - - * 66 + 7
58 54.0 R - - 65 + 7
66 " 21.0 L - - * 73 + 7
63 30.0 L - - to 71 + 8
65 24.0 L - - * 72 + 7
67 " 16.0 R - - * 75 + 8
65 it 24.0 R * 72 + 7
64 It 26.0 R * 72 + 8
64 SR 1103 28.0 L * 71 + 7
63 " 31.0 L * 70 + 7
64 " 28.0 L * 71 + 7
67 11 18.0 R - * 74 + 7
61 is 40.0 R - 68 + 7
63/<40 61 32.0 R - 70/45 + 7/5
60/<40 47.0 R - 67/42 + 7/2
64 " 27.0 L - * 71 + 7
60 " 44.0 L - * 67 + 7
66 " 20.0 L - * 74 + 8
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y-2> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). to => Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
A-30
Traffic Noise Exposures
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.)
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to US 421
Forsyth County
TIP # U-3119 State Project # 8.2623601
AMBIENT NEAREST
RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED
I0# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) -L-
xxxaaxxs:s:axxxaasaaax aasaxaa?xxxaxxxxx aoaxx xxoxxxxxaxxxxxx== xxxxxxxex
From Holder Road to US 421 (cont.d)
94 Residence a SR 1103 14.0 R
95 Residence 8 " 25.0 R
96 Residence a " 37.0 R
97 Residence a " 51.0 R
98 Residence 8 " 69.0 R
99 Residence a " 55.0 R
100 Residence a " 43.0 R
101 Residence B " 30.0 R
102 Residence 8 " 16.0 R
103 Residence a " 15.0 R
104 Residence 8 " 27.0 R
105 Residence 6 " 40.0 R
106 Residence a it 49.0 R
107 Residence 6 if 55.0 R
108 Residence 8 " 40.0 R
109 Business C " 29.0 R
110 Residence 6 " 15.0 R
111 Business C 35.0 R
112 Business C 15.0 R
113 Business C " 30.0 L
US 4 21 Interchange Impr ovements - US 421
114 Business C US 421 110.0 R
115 Residence B " 120.0 R
116 Business C " 185.0 R .
117 Business C It 169.0 R
122 Business C It 50.0 R
123 Business C to 87.0 R
124 Business C " 89.0 R
NOISE LEVELS
-Y- MAXIMUM
NOISE
LEVEL
INCREASE
axxxxaaa
68 SR 1103 14.0 R * 76 + 8
64 25.0 R - * 72 + 8
62 it 37.0 R - * 69 + 7
59 51.0 R - * 66 + 7
56 " 69.0 R - 63 + 7
58 55.0 R - 65 + 7
60 " 43.0 R ' 67 + 7
63 30.0 R * 71 + 8
67 16.0 R - * 75 + 8
68 15.0 R - - * 75 + 7
64 " 27.0 R - - * 71 + 7
61 It 40.0 R - * 68 + 7
59 49.0 R - - * 66 + 7
58 " 55.0 R - - 65 + 7
61 40.0 R - - * 68 + 7
63 29.0 R - - ' 71 + 8
68 " 15.0 R - - * 75 + 7
62 35.0 R - - 69 + 7
68 " 15.0 R - - * 75 + 7
63 30.0 L - * 71 + 8
58 US 421 110.0 R 63 + 5
57 120.0 R - - 62 + 5
58 185.0 R 57.3 64.5 65 + 7
56 " 169.0 R 58.5 60.1 62 + 6
67 50.0 R - - 72 + 5
61 " 87.0 R - - 66 + 5
61 it 89.0 R 66.4 55.0 66 + 5
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-x> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y-x> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). * a> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
i
A-31

Traffic Noise Exposures
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.)
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to US 421
Forsyth County
TIP 0 U-3119 State Project 8.2623601
AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE
RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVEL
ID# LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) -L- -Y- MAXIMUM INCREASE
aaaxaasssassassssasasa sxssassssaaaasass xevnc saaxssasaaassaxss axsxavvscscssv==xxsxxsax xxxsass=
US 421 Interchange Improvements - Styers Ferry Road
118 School E SR 1103 34.0 R 57/40 SR 1103 34.0 R 64/<40 + 7/0
119 School E 95.0 R 47/<40 " 95.0 R - 54/<40 + 7/0
120 Church E 32.0 L 57/<40 " 32.0 L - 65/40 + 8/0
120A Church classrm.E " 83.0 L 49/<40 " 83.0 L - 56/<40 + 7/0
121 Business C " 31.0 L 58 31.0 L - 65 + 7
US 421 Interchange Improvements - Lewisville-C lemnons Road
125 Church E Lewisville 37.0 L 56/<40 Lewisv. 37.0 L - 61/<40 + 5/0
126 Business C " 24.0 R 60 " 24.0 R - 64 + 4
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y-=> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). ' => Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
A-32
i
gam',
N C. DEPARTMENT OF TRA149PORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
Tbl REF. NO. OR ROOM, BBJLDDGG.
FR 1
._.? L REF. NO. OR ROOM. BLDG.
ACTI ON ( .*
_? NOTE. AND FILE I? 081 OUR CONVERSATION
?NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS :D POR YOUR APPROVAL
?. NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? ROR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEAOE ANSWER ? Pon YOUR COMMENTS
?. PREPARE REPLY FOR MY BIGNATURB ? OIGNATURE
- D TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? 10VIRSTIGAT9 AND REPORT ,
COMM ALTS:
RkEIVM
Ut 2 81975
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
. QfjA AII!N
i
i_ ,
-I
STATC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TkANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
July 25, 1995
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Section
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager ?j/ /
Planning and Environmental Branch""
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for reconstruction of Bridge
Number 213 on SR 1103 over US 421 and the widening of
SR 1103 to a five-lane facility from SR 3580 to
SR 1153, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, State Project
No. 8.2623601, Federal Aid No. STP-1103(6),
TIP No. U-3119
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for August 24, 1995 at 9:00 A. M. in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 434). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Ron Lucas, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842, Ext. 253.
??` ??? ?? ?-?^ c w? .
RL/p1 r CGS 3h5
Attachment I? CCt»1i(/V"I
fv
G

PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date: July 20, 1995
Revision Date
Project Development Stage
Programming
Planning
Design
TIP #: U-3119
Project #: 8.2623601
F.A. Project #: STP-1103(6)
Divsion: 9
County: Forsyth
Route: SR 1103
Function Classification: minor arterial
Length: 1.4 miles
Description of project: Reconstruction of Bridge Number 213
over US 421 and the widening of 1103 to a five-lane facility
from SR 3580 to SR 1153.
Purpose of Project: Improve the handling capacity and ease
traffic congestion on SR 1103.
Type of environmental document to be prepared: Categorical
Exclusion
Environmental Study Schedule: Categorical Exclusion is to
be completed by November 1996. Right of way acquisition is
to begin in fiscal year 1998. The project is to be let in
fiscal year 2000.
Type of funding: Federal and State
Will there be special funding participation by municipality,
developers, or other? Yes No X
If yes, by whom and amount: ($) , or o
How and when will this be paid?

PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
{
Type of facility: Five-lane curb and gutter and seven-lane
bridge
Type of Access Control: Full Partial None
Number of: Interchanges 1 Grade Separations 1
Stream Crossings 0
Typical Section of Roadway: see attached figure
Traffic Projections:
Construction Year (2000): 22,800 vpd
Design Year (2020): 33,100 vpd
% TTST 2
Design Speed:
00- DUAL 1 % DHV 10
50 mph
Preliminary Surface Design:
Preliminary Pavement Design:
Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost $ 4,514,000
(including engineering and contingencies)
Right of Way Cost .............................. $ 1,850,000
(including reloc., utilities, and acquisition)
Force Account Items ............................ $
Preliminary Engineering ......................... $
TOTAL COST $ 6,364,000
TIP Cost Estimate:
Construction: ................................... $ 4,600,000
Right of Way: ................................... $ 1,850,000
TOTAL COST $ 6,450,000
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
List any special features, such as railroad involvement,
which could affect the cost or schedule of the project:

ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS
Item Comments Cost
x Pavement
Surface ................................. $ 562,915
Base .................................... $
Milling and Re cycling ................... $
Turnouts ......... $
Shoulders: Paved .................... $
Earth .................... $
x Earthwork ................................. $ 325,516
Subsurface Items .......................... $
X Subgrade and Stabilization ................ $ 125,118
X Drainage(List any special items) .......... $ 316,000
Subdrainage ............................... $
Structures Width X Length
Bridge Rehab. X $
xx New Bridge 98' X 230' $ 1,270,080
Widen Bridge X $
xx Remove Bridge 28' X 216' $ 30,240
New Culverts
Size: Length $
Fill Ht.
Culvert Extension .................... $
Retaining Walls:
Type: Avg. Ht. Skew $
Noise Walls .......................... $
Any other misc. structures ........... $
x Concrete Curb and Gutter .................. $ 132,264
Concrete Sidewalk ......................... $
Guardrail ................................. $
Fencing ................................... $
x Erosion Control ........................... $ 21,000
Landscape ................................. $
Lighting .................................. $
x Traffic Control ........................... $ 80,000
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS
Item
Comments
Cost
Signing: New ......................... $
Upgrading ................... $
x Traffic Signals xx New ................. $
Revised ............. $
RR Signals New ................. $
Revised ............. $
With or without Arms ................ $
If 3R: Drainage Safety Enhancement .... $
Roadside Safety Enhancement ............... $
Realignment for Safety Upgrade ............ $
x Pavement Markings :
Paint Thermo x
i rn nnn
Markers xx $ 30,600
Delineators ............................... $
Other (clearing, grubbing, mobilization)..$ 881,267
CONTRACT COST (SUBTOTAL)..$ 3,925,000
Contingencies and Engineering ................... $ 589,000
PE Costs ........................................ $
Force Account ................................... $
CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL..$ 4,514,000
Right of Way:
Will contain within existing Right of
Existing Right of way Width 60'
New Right of way needed: Width 100'
Easements: Type Width
Utilities ..........................
*RIGHT OF WAY
Way?
Est
Est
..Est
SUET
Yes No X
Cost $ 1,850,000
Cost $
Cost $
OTAL: $ 1,850,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 6,364,000
(Includes R/W)
i *TIP Right of Way estimate
U-3119
The above scoping information has been reviewed and approved
by:
INIT. DATE
Highway Design
Roadway
Structure
Design Services
Geotechnical
Hydraulics
Loc. & Surveys
Photogrammetry
Prel. Est. Engr.
P & E.
Right of Way
R/W Utilities
Traffic Eng.
Proj. Management _
County Manager
City/Municipality _
Others
Others
INIT. DATE
Board of Tran. Member
Board of Tran. Member
Mgr. Program & Policy
Chief Engineer-Precon
Chief Engineer-Oper.
Secondary Roads Off.
Construction Branch
Roadside Environmental
Maintenance Branch
Bridge Maintenance
Statewide Planning
Division Engineer
Bicycle Coordinator
_ Program Dev.
FHWA
_ Dept. of Cult. Res.
Dept. of EH & NR
Others
Scoping Sheet for local officials will be sent to
Division Engineer for handling.
If you are not in agreement with proposed project or
scoping, note your proposed revisions in below and initial
and date after comments.
Praparad By:
Data:

.Lr ? L_L__LLL?l?L
6? I
~I
?JL
4
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
?c.. BRANCH
SR 1103, WIDEN BRIDGE NO. 213
OVER US 421 TO MULTI - LANES
FORSYTH COUNTY
T. I. P. NO. U-3119
I FIG. 1
tt
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 ® Q
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ® IF= F ? (7 !J n
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 23, 1996 A 1FC'FG
MEMORANDUM
F,yG Cc0
?.9
T0: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
???, •. q?so 6
FROM: Monica SwiharC Water Quality Planning Fs
SUBJECT: Project Review #96-0471; Scoping Comments - NC DOT
Proposed Improvements to SR 1103, TIP#U-3119,
Yadkin River Subbasin 03-07-04
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project.
The stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated,
it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks
be revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary)
to be employed. DEM recommends that no weep holes be
installed in bridges that drain directly into surface
waters.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Imoacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Summarize the total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested
from DEM.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer M% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
N
Melba McGee
February 23, 1996
Page 2
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas
should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the
contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
J.' To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques
alleviate the traffic problems in the study area?
K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the
environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the
following:
1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after
wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible.
2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of
mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same
watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation.
3. Mitigation should be in the following order:
restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking.
Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be
issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on
Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents
DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of
Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the
document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for
review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended
that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until
the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed
by the Department.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may
be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage
under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will
require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401
Certification may be denied if wetland or water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
11167.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
a a SfATt
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 11, 1996
MEMORANDUM TO: Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Dept. of Administration /
FROM:
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Widening of SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road) from SR
1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 in Forsyth County,
State Project 8.2623601, Federal Aid Project No.
STP-1103(6), T.I.P. No. U-3119
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed improvements to SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons
Road) from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 in Forsyth County. The
project is included in the 1996-2002 North Carolina Transportation
Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 1998 and
construction in fiscal year 2000.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful
in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your
agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a federally funded
Categorical Exclusion. This document will be prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by March 21, 1996 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of
this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Ron
Lucas, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone].
HFV/plr
Attachment
DECEIVED
JAN 1 P1 1990'
N.C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
NZ/
rim
• 1
/r
I
,?1

N 1
F•

uUL"i

4 ••
ALL
Diu
lull''ll a w
„11r
.alL
?a
i?
I,Q

IU1.. \ ,! 1
.1?
i y
u i
• ? I
/
t. ?
UE.y ?sl
LIL 1 U.l
• pl 11.! ?
1!M U .° Y
I e I.L
»m? t. 11
IW? .i tW
A
. I... ` U, ,? •.
... J ••
1" Aa
t
..-,.,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
SR 1 103, WIDEN TO 5-LANES
FROM SR 1891
TO US 421
FORSYTH COUNTY
TIP NO. U - 3 1 19
FIGURE
RECEIVED
QpR 2 2 1991
NOTICE OF A CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP 'AviRoNvA
FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING OF LEWISVILLE-CLEMMONS ROAD- ?tSgi,,es
(TO INCLUDE US 421 INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES)
FROM PEACE HAVEN ROAD TO US 421
Project 8.2623601 U-3119 Forsyth County
A citizens informational workshop will be held on Monday, May 19, 1997 in the
Southwest Elementary School Cafeteria located at 1631 Southwest School Drive in
Clemmons. This will be an informal open-house workshop conducted between the
hours of 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Those wishing to attend may do so at their
convenience during these hours.
The purpose of this informational workshop is to present information, answer
questions; and receive comments during the planning and early design stages of the
proposed widening/improving of Lewisville-Clemmons Road (SR 1103) from Peace
Haven Road (SR 1891) to US 421. The project proposes to widen the roadway to a
multi-lane facility. A primary focus of the meeting will be revision alternatives for the
Lewisville-Clemmons Road/US 421 Interchange.
Representatives of the Department of Transportation will be available to discuss
the proposed project with those attending. Anyone desiring additional information
about the workshop may contact Mr. Ron Lucas, North Carolina Department of
Transportation, Planning and Environmental Branch, P. 0. Box 25201,
Raleigh, NC 27611 or by telephone at [phone] - Extension 253.
NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to
participate in the workshop. To receive special services, please call Mr. Lucas at the
above number to give adequate notice prior to the date of the workshop.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 29, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorney
From: Cyndi Bell
Subject: Finding of No Significant Impact for SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)
Widening from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 and Revision of
Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
State Project No. 8.2623601, T.I.P. No. U-3119;
DENR #99-F0368; DWQ #12310
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands. The project will involve no fill in
wetlands. Extension of an existing crossing of one unnamed perennial stream will be required.
NCDOT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream
impacts. The project, as currently planned, would not require wetland or stream mitigation.
Based upon the project description provided in the FONSI, a General 401 Water Quality
Certification will be applicable to this project. Final permit authorization will require formal
application by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be aware that this approval
will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts
to the extent practical, and provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the FONSI. DOT is
reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality
concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification Program should be directed to Cyndi Bell at (919) 733-
1786 in DWQ's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, COE, Raleigh
Tom McCartney, FWS
David Cox, WRC
Gloria Putman, DENR
U3119EA.DOC
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Environmental Review Tracking Sheet
DWQ - Water Quality Section
Date: l ?l aa?9$
MEMORANDUM
TO: Env. SSciences Branch (WO Lab_
O Trish MacPherson (end. sps)
O Kathy Herring (forest/ORW/HQW)
O Larry Ausley (ecosystems)
O Matt Mathews (toxicology)
O Jay Sauber (intensive survey)
DEC Z 3 IC?'g
1F?E7
DENR# 99 t=os6%
DWQ # /a3/o
L,t,DS GKnir,
Non-Discharge Branch (Archdale 9th)
O Kim Colson (Permitting)
Wetlands (WQ Lab)
O John Dorney (Corps, 401, construction)
Cyndi Bell (DOT)
b Eric Reek (dredging)
O
Ret=_ional Water Ounlity Supervisors
O Asheville O Mooresville O Washington
O Fayetteville O Raleigh O Wilmington
O Winston - Salem
Plnnninu Branch (Archdale 6th)
O Alan Clark (basinwide planning)
O Boyd DeVane (classifications & standards) .
O Annette Lucas (management planning)
O Jeff Coutu (water supply)
O Ruth Swanek (modeling) (Archdale 9th)
Point Source Branch (Archdale 91h)
O Dave Goodrich (NPDES) O
O Bradley Bennett (Stormwater) O
O Tom Poe (Pretreatment) (Archdale 7th) O
FROM: Gloria Putnam, Local Government Assistance Unit, Planning Branch, 6th Floor, Archdale
PROJECT:
Attached is a copy of the above document. Subject to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant impacts to the environment,
especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority. Please check the appropriate
box below and return this form to me along with your written comments, if any, by the date indicated.
I can be reached at:
phone: [phone], ext. 567 fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
misAcircmemo - mac version
Thank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining this process are greatly appreciated!
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmerta! Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: County: Date Received: Date Response Due (firm deadline):
U
This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? Air ? Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville ? Water ? Coastal Management
? Mooresville ? Groundwater life ater Resources

? Raleigh El Land Quality Engineer ?-EttVi-ronmental Health
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant ? Forest Resources ? Solid Waste Mgmt
? Wilmington P Land Resources ? Radiation Protection
d Winston-Salem o-Panes & Recreations ? Other

v
at1.W ter Quality
? Groundwater
? Air Quality
btanagcr Sig-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
? No objection to project as proposed.
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Other (specify or attach comments)
IMIUWN tV:
Melba McGee
Environmental Coordinator
Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
•
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
' Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED: Q
Date William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Date is as L. Graf, P.E.,
Division Administrator, FHWA
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
,???uuurrr///?
CA Rot
SS %
6,s /0
?
?G'Cg
9
G IO -Ise = Q SEAL
.
.
Ronald G. Lucas, Jr., P.E. 022632
p f :
0
Project Planning Engineer =,
4L FHGINE??•5;

////61lQitYn?k!?

R ert P. Hanson, P.E.
Project Planning Unit Head
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

r
PAGE
1. TYPE OF ACTION ................................................................................................. 1
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................ 1
III. SUMMARY OF SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS ..................................... 1
IV. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE ................................................................. 2
V. SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................... 2
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................... 3
A. Alternative Selection .................................................................................... 3
1. Widening Alternatives ..................................................................... 3
2. Intersection Improvements ............................................................... 3
3. Interchange Alternatives .................................................................. 4
4. Landscaping ..................................................................................... 4
VII. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS .................................................................. 4
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment ............................................. 4
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment ............................. 5
1. Comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ....................... 5
2. Comments from DENR, Division of Water Quality ........................ 5
3. Comments from N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission .................. 5
C. Public Hearing ............................................................................................. 6
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ...................................... 8
FIGURES
APPENDIX I Agency Review of Environmental Assessment
APPENDIX II Local Government Correspondence
APPENDIX III Public Hearing Notices
SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)Widening
From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421
and Revision of Interchange at US 421
Forsyth County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6)
State Project 8.2623601
T.I.P. No. U-3119
TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human environment. The FONSI is based on the Environmental Assessment, which
has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and
accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. The
Environmental Assessment provides sufficient evidence and analyses for determining that
an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The FHWA takes full responsibility
for the accuracy, scope, and content of the Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen SR 1103
(Lewisville-Clemmons Road) to a four-lane roadway divided with a 4.8 m (16 foot)
median from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421. The interchange at US 421 will
be revised as a part of this project (see figure 2).
III. SUMMARY OF SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS
All standard procedures and measures, including NCDOT Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, will be implemented to avoid and
minimize environmental impacts.
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be applicable at ditch and
stream crossings found in the project study area.
The Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers has requested an opportunity to
review the final plans for a project-specific determination of Department of the Army
permit requirements. NCDOT will forward the final plans for the proposed project to the
Regulatory Branch of the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers for their review.
A North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) Section 401
General Water Quality Certification is also required.
A sidewalk will be constructed on the east side of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
within the Village of Clemmons municipal boundaries.
In accordance with the NCDOT landscaping policy, NCDOT will fund up to
0.75%. of the total project construction cost for landscaping. A municipal agreement for
maintenance of landscaping plantings will be coordinated between NCDOT and the local
municipalities.
IV. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE
The project is included in the 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program
(T.I.P.). It has been divided into two sections for scheduling and funding: U-3119A and
U-3119B. U-3119A will widen SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road) from SR 1891
(Peace Haven Road) to SR 3580 (Forest Oak Road), a distance 2.1 km (1.4 mi.). U-
3119B will widen SR 1103 from SR 3580 to the US 421/SR 1103 interchange, a distance
of 1.4 km (1.1 mi.). Right of way acquisition and construction for U-3119A are
scheduled to begin in fiscal years 2002 and 2004, respectively. Right of way acquisition
and construction for U-3119B are scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1999 and 2001,
respectively. The project will use federal and state funds. The total estimated cost of the
project included in the T.I.P. is $9,100,000. This estimate includes $ 2,500,000 for right
of way acquisition and 6,600,000 for construction. The project has a current estimated
cost of $23,297,000, including current right of way cost 9,247,000 and a current
construction cost of 14,050,000.
V. SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and handling
capacity of this section of SR 1103. Traffic volumes are currently beyond the facility's
current handling capacity. The revised interchange at US 421 will be particularly
important for improving safety and traffic flow of roadways in the project area.
Approximately three businesses and four residences will be relocated. There will
be no effect to architectural and historical resources listed in or eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places. The project will have only a limited effect on natural systems
consisting of impacts to 0.8 acres of mixed mesic hardwood and pine forest and 0.2 acres
of ripparian fringe community.
Strict enforcement of sedimentation control Best Management Practices (BMP's)
for the protection of surface waters will be implemented to reduce sedimentation and
protect aquatic resources. No major stream channel relocations are anticipated for the
stream crossings along project. During final design, appropriate coordination with the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and the Division of Water Quality will
be initiated to address stream and wetland impacts.
Noise impacts are expected at 95 locations; however, noise abatement measures
are not recommended because of the access allowed to the facility. Openings in the noise
barriers for roadway access severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier.
Most commercial establishments and residences have direct access to the roadway, and
all intersections are at-grade with the exception of the interchange with US 421. Since
2
the proposed project does not have full access control, it is economically unreasonable to
construct a barrier for small noise reductions. Safety at access openings due to restricted
sight distances are also a concern. For these reasons a noise barrier is not recommended.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the Federal/State
governments are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new
development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a
proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of
the location of this proposed highway project will be the approval date of this FONSI. For
development occurring after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are
responsible to insure that noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility.
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Alternative Selection
Wideniny, Alternatives
The environmental assessment for the proposed project designated the four-lane
facility with a 16-foot grassed median as the recommended widening alternative. The
design would transition to a five-lane curb and gutter near the north end of the project.
The final selection was made following a review of comments received at two public
hearings, and a review of comments received concerning the environmental assessment.
The comments received were used to reevaluate impacts of each widening alternative. A
four-lane facility with a 16-foot grassed median has been selected for the entire project
length. Although the four-lane widening alternative is more expensive than the five-lane
curb and gutter alternative, this alternative was selected based on its operational
advantages. The median will serve to control traffic movements and enhance safety and
traffic operations along the facility. The Environmental Assessment recommended that
the median alternative transition to a five-lane facility at the north end of the project.
However, based on the high traffic volumes at the north end and the likelihood of high
volumes of turning vehicles, a median is proposed for the entire project length.
2. Intersection Improvements
A new traffic signal is proposed at the West Forsyth High School student parking
lot. The student parking lot will be reconfigured by the school system. The traffic signal
and revision of the student parking lot will improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety
entering and exiting the school.
August Drive will be realigned as part of this project. August Drive will be
aligned with the proposed West Forsyth High School bus exit which is also to be
realigned by the school system. This realignment will improve traffic operations over the
current offset condition.
Linwood Drive will be realigned as part of this project. Linwood Drive will be
aligned with the Western Villa apartment complex.
A right turn lane will be provided on Lewisville-Clemmons Road southbound at
SR 1261 (Marty Ln.).
Interchange Alternatives
The environmental assessment for the proposed project designated interchange
alternate # 3 as the recommended alternative. Under Alternate # 3, Lewisville-Clemmons
Road and Styers Ferry Road remains a continuous thoroughfare near their existing
alignment, a loop is added in the northeast quadrant onto westbound US 421, and the
ramp in the northwest quadrant onto US 421 westbound is removed. Alternate #3 has
been selected based on the favorable response from local officials and the public.
4. Landscaping
NCDOT will prepare landscaping plans for Lewisville-Clemmons Road within
the project limits. In accordance with the NCDOT landscaping policy, NCDOT will fund
up to 0.75%. of the total project construction cost for landscaping. A municipal
agreement between NCDOT and appropriate local authorities will be prepared prior to
construction documenting landscaping maintenance.
VII. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment
The environmental assessment was circulated for review and comments to the
federal, state, and local agencies below. An asterisk (*) indicates that a written response
was received from the agency or municipality. Copies of the correspondence received are
included in the appendix of this document. Specific comments included in this
correspondence are addressed in Section VII.B. of this report.
* Army Corps of Engineers
US Fish and Wildlife Service
* N. C. State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
* N. C. Department of Health and Natural Resources
* N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
* Village of Clemmons
* Town of Lewisville
* City of Winston-Salem
4
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
Comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Comment
"Review of the subject project indicates that the proposed work is located on the
ridge line between Blanket Creek and Muddy Creek and is not likely to impact
jurisdictional waters in either creek. All work restricted to existing high ground areas
will not require prior Federal permit authorization. However, Department of the Army
permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, as
amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material within the
crossing of jurisdictional waters and wetlands. Specific permit requirements will depend
on the design of the project, extent of work within streams and wetland areas
(dimensions, fill amounts, etc.), construction methods and other factors".
"When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of
development within any waters and wetlands, the applicant should contact Mr. Thomas
for a final determination of the Federal permit requirements".
Response
When final plans for the proposed project are completed, NCDOT will contact
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Raleigh Field Office to discuss the extent of
development within waters and wetlands and Federal permit requirements. Applicable
404 permits will be obtained during this project phase.
2. Comments from the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR), Division of Water Quality
Comment
"NCDOT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidance and minimization of wetland
and stream impacts. The project as currently planned, would not require wetland or
stream mitigation."
3. Comments from N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment
"Based on the review of the EA, this project should have minimal impacts on
fisheries and wildlife resources. Therefore, we concur with the EA and could agree to a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for this project."
C. Public Hearing
Following completion of the environmental assessment, a public hearing was held
on December 8, 1997. Following the hearing, the typical cross-section was revised to a
four-lane roadway with a grassed median throughout the entire project. A public hearing
was held April 21, 1998 at Southwest Elementary School to address these changes.
Copies of the news releases for both hearings are included in the Appendix. Citizens
were encouraged to comment either at the hearing or by mailing in comment sheets which
were distributed as a part of the project handout. A summary of the comments received
through public hearing process and responses to those comments is included below.
Correspondence received from local governments through the public hearing
process along with responding NCDOT correspondence is found in the Appendix.
Comment # 1
Several adjoining property owner (especially businesses) requested median
crossovers to allow left turns into and out of their properties.
Response
Final decisions regarding median crossovers will be made during preparation of
final construction plans. NCDOT will attempt to balance the need for access to
properties with the need to minimize left-turn conflicts along Lewisville-Clemmons
Road. Median crossovers will be placed in accordance with NCDOT's "Median
Crossover Policy for North Carolina Streets and Highways".
Comment # 2
We the property owners and businesses in the commercial district of Lewisville-
Clemmons Road, adjacent to the intersection of US Highway 421 , are strongly against a
median being placed through this existing commercial area. We feel it would have a
substantial negative economic impact to our business and potential businesses. We feel
that the five-lane road with a center turn lane would be far more efficient and safer to our
customers and neighbors in the area.
We do not object to a median with the proper curb cuts through the residential and
school areas to the south of this commercial district. This would make logical sense for
safety, aesthetics, and traffic flow. We support it.
Response
The four-lane section was extended northward to US 421 due to safety and
operational concerns. One hundred eighty-eight accidents occurred within the project
corridor over a three year period (1993-1996). Seventy-four (40 %) of these accidents
occurred within the commercial section of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from Marty Ln. to
6
US 421. Twenty-eight of those accidents involved vehicles attempting to make left turns,
and forty-three of those accidents were rear-end type accidents. Widening Lewisville-
Clemmons Road to a four-lane grassed median facility with limited left-turn access will
help reduce these types of accidents, though providing additional access for businesses on
Lewisville-Clemmons Road in the commercial district is being studied.
Comment # 3
I am in favor of a median for safety and for the environment. A median will be
prettier and add to a smaller "village" look. Look closely at a stop light at Holder Road
versus Marty Ln.
Response
The four-lane median section was selected over the five-lane cross section for
operational and safety reasons.
The Lewisville-Clemmons Road/Holder Road intersection will be analyzed
following construction of the project. A decision on a traffic signal at this intersection
will be made following this study.
Comment # 4
The proposed median will require too many U-turns leading to unsafe conditions.
Response
Aditional widening will be provided at intersections to help vehicles make U-
turns.
Comment # 5
Provision for the future Peace Haven Road/Styers Ferry Road connector should be
planned.
Response
This future connector is not funded in the 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement
Program. Additionally, planning and environmental studies are not currently scheduled for
this future connector. The connector's location, design, and intersection with Lewisville-
Clemmons Road will be determined after funding is established and planning/environmental
studies are conducted.
7
Comment # 6
Development along Lewisville-Clemmons Road should be limited and tightly
controlled.
Response
Because the Lewisville-Clemmons Road corridor is already highly developed, no
control of access is proposed. The proposed median will reduce interference caused by
unrestricted left turns into adjoining development. Controls on development are largely
the responsibility of local governments.
Comment # 7
Construct traffic circles rather than stoplights.
Response
Due to the high traffic volumes projected for Lewisville-Clemmons Road, traffic
circles (roundabouts) are not considered appropriate. A roundabout was considered for
the US 421 interchange, but eliminated due to delays calculated for motorists and impacts
to adjoining development (see Environmental Assessment).
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project as documented in the
Environmental Assessment and upon comments received from federal, state, and local
agencies, and from citizens, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the quality of the human or natural environment. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
FIGURES
;A. "Ail 10 2 Bere.S??
Slantendle I°3
` _?n Felnanta 65
66 T?? a1?erH n M
Y,enna
ttl?. r s ?5,s effte SYI
c,6 4
(On 16M
''Clemmons r'wvI
70 l,lt .I]? 'rd 10 1", ,? 1? 73s'I 'o,)L r
0 70 0 un 1 7 7.] 11 ,J•7 •
LW t? 7111 L'.::. •! t7
1
tr
'lu Lewisville
' Town Limits ---
t?
am Inte; chan-ge to be Revised
?`ul aM '0 72
,7
3 t7f7 ? ?? \ ` ?:.5 79
36
i 1 , . _
7 1 ~.
17 ,ee0
au7.or 77 'i%0 7
t.1i / t
7L la t .1• , ?
1
UULw
Villas: of Clemmons
v
y? 7 to
-Iuu
SO?ti ? ° 1
Clemmons
I 'f 1 ' Villaee Limits o
UL t
UL u!. t Lill
.;2 I
lw i >z
1
u.. -
„ ] 1•;7 ov y `? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
?? halo 17 TRANSPORTATION
1ui au a y o PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
w IOZ ° ?1' - ` d' BRANCH
1611 1 362 .I l
WIDENING OF SR 1103 FROM
SR 1891 TO US 421 AND REVISE
INTERCHANGE AT US 421
FORSYTH COUNTY
T.I.P. NO. U-3119
FiG 1
' 1 i
f ? ii
?i ? ? i i ?i i
??
1
? I
. ; I
i ? ? ;f
I
' Ii 1

1
' ,
f ? Ii
111
? } i
'I
t
1 ?
1 I
?
I
i
I ??? ?.

c tilt ii s0,IN\I % IM.) r E
?: ?? r .c ? .:" ? •LL' ?` ' ? ? to ? w ? ?.
W? S O i h i N i p
o. o
r ?
v 0.
SV.NSION Sl,l,A'. ('O
z
O
U
o? W
M
? U
L?
l
l
H?
U
w
z
Q
W
r
W
z
rTO
r
U
u?
F
c,u
a
E 2 o
o ?o
r N
E
?

W
w
?
°
o d -
3
co w
x

M w
Q

4
? I N I
M
N
? C

a E N -?
M
E I N I
M
E v ? ?
w
o U
m
F
ua
U
z
?o
?u
o ?o
v, .
? rv
?H
APPENDIX I
AGENCY REVIEW OF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
?- IN REPLY REFER TO February 20, 1998
Planning Services Section
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
??GEI Vc0
v FEa 2 1998
?- DIVISION OF
2^? HIONN/AYS arc
?FNVtROt
This is in response to your letter of October 21, 1997, requesting our comments
on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)
Widening From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 and Revision of Interchange
at US 421, Forsyth County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6), State Project
8.2623601, T. I. P. No. U-3119" (Regulatory Division Action I. D. No. 199820137).

Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources, which
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
E. Shuford, Jr., P.E.
Chief, Technical Services Division
Enclosure
February 20, 1998
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road)
Widening From SR 1891 (Peace Haven Road) to US 421 and Revision of Interchange
at US 421, Forsyth County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1103(6), State Project
8.2623601, T.I.P. No. U-3119" (Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199820137)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Mr. Bobby-L. Willis Plannin Services Section at
[phone]
The proposed project is located in Forsyth County, which is a participant in the
National Flood Insurance Program. From a review of Panels 234 and 242 of the
February 29, 1996, Preliminary Forsyth County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Flood Insurance Rate Map, the portion of roadway considered for improvement is not
located in an identified flood hazard area. This is confirmed by a review of the
pertinent United States Geological topographic maps of the area ("Clemmons. N.C.").
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mr. John Thomas Ralei h Field Office
Regulatory Branch at [phone] Extension 25
Review of the subject project indicates that the proposed work is located on the
ridge line between Blanket Creek and Muddy Creek and is not likely to impact
jurisdictional waters in either creek. All work restricted to existing high ground areas
will not require prior Federal permit authorization. However, Department of the Army
permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, as
amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material within the
crossing of jurisdictional waters and wetlands. Specific permit requirements will
depend on design of the project, extent of fill work within streams and wetland areas
(dimensions, fill amounts, etc.), construction methods, and other factors.
At this time, construction plans are not available for review. When final plans are
completed, including the extent and location of development within any waters and
wetlands, the applicant should contact Mr. Thomas for a final determination of the
Federal permit requirements.

S I v E ( I

North Carolina 1--- -'
Progran; Devefopm?16; i3ran-"
Department of Administrafion - _.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Mr. Whit Webb
N.C. Department of Transportation
Program Development Branch
Transportation Building
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Webb:
December 1, 1997
oEC - a isst
Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary
t
PROJECT M,qN- A T .
Re: SCH File # 98-E-4220-0313; Environmental Assessment ro
(Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.) from SR 1891 (Peace Haven Rd.) to US 421 and Rof SR 110'
evision of
Interchange at US 421; Forsyth County; TIP #U-3119
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
C 02V
Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
N: C:-State Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region I
Melba McGee, DEHNR
VE0
191
/y ,/
116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity / A(Firmativc Action Employer
.xJ
JAMES B. HUNT
? GOVERNOR
W YNi McomviTry`rti.'
L a
CRETARY
%

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee Y"
Environmental Review Coordinator
RE: 98-0313 EA Lewisville-Clemmons Road Widening,
Forsyth County
DATE: November 14, 1997
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has
reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are
for the applicant's information.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
attachments
Vk-
NOV 2 1 1997
N.C.'STATE CLEARI?1!GNr( q1,
P.O. BOX 27667, RALEIGH NC 2761 1 -7667 / 512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET, RALEIGH NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.EHNR.STATE.Nc.US/EHNR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST-CC`45UMER PAPER
Department of Environment,
I VA
Health and Natural Resources :?
Division of Water Quality
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary k,Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director N
Nuvc:rr?hur 17, 1997
To: Michelle Suyerkrubbt
Through: John Dorn c'T-
yndr''Dell
:Subject: EnViro'nmctital Assessnic;rnl. Grt SR 1103 (Lewisville•Clel"1141ons
Road) Widening from SiR 1891 ! (Puacu Haych Road) ter US 421 and
Rcwlstows or Ttaer'change at U5 421
Forsyth . t^ounty
State -Project No. 8.26213601, T.I.P. No. U-3119; F.HNR #98-0313
The' i6fcituced docui'nent leas becti reviewed by this of.ice. The Division of
Water Quality -(DWQ) is responsible for the issuyne of Oic Scetion 401 Water
Quality CertifiCati.on for activities. which impact. waters of the state including
wetlands. The projecE- will Involve no fill In wetlands. Extcnsion of an uxisting
.crossing of one unnamed perennial stream will be required. DWQ offers . chr;
following comments based on the documGrll review.;
A) NCDOT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidance and minimization of
wetland and st.ruam impacts. Tttc project, as currently planned, would
not require wel.lund or stream mitigation.
Based upon the ?wcdand lmpacr5 described in the EA, General Certification 3103
will applicable to this project. Final permit authorization will require
formal application by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ, Please be
aware that this approval will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance and
minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland : and stream mitigation where ncces.,mry.
DWQ appreciates. the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. DOT is
reminded that issu,lnce of. a, 401 `Water Qdality Certification requires
satisfaction of water quality con,c.erns, to t,nsurr:, Iltal w.iwr qualil.y standards
are met and no wetland or stream uses arc Most. QurWons regarding the 401
Certification should 'be directed to Cyndi Bell' at [phone] in DWQ's `Wier
Quality Environmental Sciences Dranch.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, CUE, Raleigh
Howard Hall, FWS
David Cox, WRC
U3119EA.DOC
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal OpportunRy Aftlrrtrattve Allan Employer 50% recyded/10% poet coneumer paper
• d rte . 11 nrri rTr' -,Ll
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative and Tntergovernmental Affairs
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
FROM: Joe H. Mickey, Jr., Western Piedmo t Region Coordina or
Habitat Conservation Program }?. n
DATE: November 10, 1997
SUBJECT: State Clearinghouse Project No. 98-E-0313, Review of the Environmental
Assessment for the NCDOT SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Road) Widening
Project, Forsyth County, TIP No. U-3119
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our review and comments cn the
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
SR 1103 widening project. These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.) -and the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25).
The NCDOT proposes to widen SR 1103 to multi-lane facility from SR 1891 to US 421.
The road will consist of a 4 km four-lane divided highway with a 4.8 m median; this will
transition into a five-lane roadway. Unnamed tributaries to Muddy Creek and Blanket Creek will
be impacted by the project (1 perennial and 3 intermittent streams). No jurisdictional wetlands
will be impacted by the project. A total of 4.0 hectares of biotic communities
(maintained/disturbed-3.6 ha, Mesic mixed hardwood/pine-0.3 ha, and riparian fringe-0.1 ha)
will be impacted by the project.
Based on the review of the EA, this project should have minimal impacts on fisheries and
wildlife resources. Therefore, we concur with the EA and could agree to a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for this project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 910/366-2982.
cc: Mark Cantrell, USFWS
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
lu S 12 b
• INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
Projoec:Nem :b;: Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) andlor approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications. information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same (---
Regional Office.
PERMITS
Permit to construct d operate wastewater treatment
facilities, sewer system extensions. 8, sewer
systems not discharging into state surface waters.
----------------
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
Application 90 days before begin construction or award of
construction contracts On-site inspection. PoSt•application
technical conference usual
Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
limit)
30 days
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water andror (90 (lays)
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Application 180 days before begin activity On-site
dischargmg into state surface waters Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. t in permit t 90.120 days
construct wastewater treatment facilitygranted afterNPDES (Reply
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES (N AI
permit•whiChever is later.
Water Use Permit
Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days

Well Construction Permit (NrA)
Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well. Bays
dredge and Fill Permit Application copy muss be served on each adjacent r (15 days)
iparian
roe
owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conf
r
p
n
y
5? Cays
e
ence usual
Fil
ng
may require Easement to Fill Irom N.C. Departm
n
f

Permit to construct b o e
t o
Administration and Feceral Dredge and Fill Permit. 190 daY`-t
perate Air Pollution Abatement
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H
0
.

Any open burning associated with subject proposal 6
NIA
60 days
(90 days)
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 20.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containin
g
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A
NCAC 20.0525 which requires notification and removal
prior to demolition
C
.
ontact Asbestos Control Group
919.733-0820. NIA 60 Cays
Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 20
0800
.
.
The $edimentation Pollution Control Ac; of
1973 ust c
n
l
r
b
(90 days;
o
tro
plan will be required if one or more acres
y addressed for any land disturbin activit An erosion d semmentatio
to be
disturbed. Plan filed with pro
davs before becinnind activity A f
R
per
egional Office (L and Oualit
Set 1 at least 30
ee of 330 for the first acre and S20.00 for each additional acre or part must accom
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 197
20 Cays
oanv the plan
3 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 days:

Mining Permit
On-site inspection usual
S
r (30 days)
.
u
ety bond filed with EHNR.
Bond amount
varies with type mine and number til acres of
ff
a
ected lan
d Any area
mined greater than one acre must be ermiled
Th 3
0 days

North Carolina Burning permit .
e a
appropriate bond
must be received before the permit can be issued
160 days)
.
On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Res
ources if permit
exceeds 4 days
t Cay
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit • 22 (NIA)
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils On-site inspection by N.O. Division Forest R
esources required -if more
than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections
should be requested at l
1 day
east ten days before actual burn is planned.'' (NrA)
Gil Refining Facilities
NIA 90.120 days
(NIA)

Dam Safety Permit It permit required. application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N
C
.
. qualified engineer to: prepare plans.
inspect construction. certify constructi
i 20
Cays
on
s according to EHN;; approv.
ed plans. May also require permit under m
osquito control program. And
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspe
ti
f
(60 days)
c
on o
site is neces•
sary to verily Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of $200.00 must ac-
company the applicati

1.4 on. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be r
e0uiretl u0on Completion
Continuec on reverse
1NQ,m1h CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Clearinghouse Coordinator
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Archives-History Bldg.
Raleigh NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Dept. of Agriculture
Dept. of Crime Cont./ Public Safety
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Dept. of Env. Health, & Natural Res
Northwest Piedmont COG
J
V
PROJECT INFORMATION ??J\DCC ?CI3I(Cl?
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
ERD: Environmental Assessment
DESC: Proposed Widening of SR 1103 (Lewisville-Clemmons Rd.) fz`om 1891 (Peace raven
Rd.) to US 421 and Revision of Interchange at US 421; Fg?rsy/County; TIP -3119
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 96-E-4220-0471 l
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse f-r
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the a=.ove
indicated date. If additional review time is. needed, please-
lease contact this office
at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
NO COMMENT
a COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY:
DATE:
7 ti?y9 !
STATE NUMBER: 98-E-4_220-0313 F02
DATE RECEIVED: 10/29/1997
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/24/1997{
REVIEW CLOSED: 11/29/1997
O (?vl?ua ? I.?.,?r
NOV 12 1991
N.C. STATE G?EAF,`:GHGUS:r
NOV 0 t 1
APPENDIX II
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CORRESPONDENCE
SH?PI '
1?
r {' ROADWAY DESIGN UNIT
RECEIVED FILE
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM JUN
1 7 1998
DEPARTW,,N'f OF TRANSPORTYflON ,
110, 110N 2511 • WINSrOiN-S ALENI, NORTH CAROLINA 27102-2311
rr
^ - (7tjt)???I?CI? -- r
330-727-2707 fax [phone] ?

June 15, 1998

Mr. Jay A. Bennett, P.E.
Project Design Engineer
North Carolina Department ofTransportation
RoadNvay Design Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
SUBJECT: Proposed Lewisville-Clemmons Road Widening ("TIP U-3119)
Dear Mr. Bennett:
I regret that I will be unable to attend (lie North Carolina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT)
"post design public hearing" review meeting today on the proposed widening of Lewisville-
Clemmons Road, from Peace Haven Road to US 421, and the redesign of the US 421 interchange.
I want to restate our position on the need for a median on this facility and would request that you
share it with the project design committee there this afternoon.
On January 8, 1997, the Winston-SalenVForsvth County Transportation Advisory Committee JAC)
passed a resolution which supports the widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road to four (4) lanes
with a landscaped median and sidewalks on botli sides of the read. We believe that for the projected
volume of traffic on this facility (between 29,400 and 40,800 vehicles per day in the design year),
that a median is needed for the entire project length to enhance the safe and efficient movement of
through traffic and turning traffic. We stated this position in our December 11, 1997 letter to you,
and, also in attendance at your initial post-design public hearing review meeting on March 3, 1998.
We also believe it is particularly important to have a median for the north end of the project near the
US 421 interchange where the heaviest concentration of turning movements will occur because of
the commercial development located there. We strongly support maintaining a consistent median-
divided design and not to provide a common center left turn lane for small portions of the project.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Also, please let
me know what the results are of today's review meeting. Thank you.
Sincerely,
G-f?t?r
Greg Errett, AICP
Principal Planner
PC: Lewisville-Clemmons Road Widening File
Brent McKinney
Jolni Whitson, Town of Lewisville
Al Dillon, Village of Clemmons
11
LE„WISVILLE01 1
6550 SHALLOWFORD ROAD • POST OFFICE BOX 547 - LEWISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27023
[phone] / 5530 - FAX [phone]
June 11, 1998
Mr. L. L. Hendricks
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
We have reviewed the updated plans for the widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from
Peace Haven Road northward to US Highway 421. This revised plan certainly appears to better
fit our ideas and recommendations. We appreciate the added safety features which are shown
for West Forsyth High School.
After further review of the median from Styers Ferry Road/Marty Lane northward to US
Highway 421 it would appear logical to end the median at Styers Ferry/Marty Lane. Current and
future commercial development of this area may best be served with a middle turn lane versus
the proposed raised median.
We wi11 appreciate your consideration of our recommendation to remove the median from the
plan for this short section of Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
Sincerely,
?,, V. Ya L :::: ?
Robert (Bob) G. Stebbutis
Mayor
JUN 12 1995
VILLAGE OF
CLOMMONS
April 21, 1998
Mr. L. L. Hendricks
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
We have reviewed the updated plans for the widening of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from
Peace Haven Road North to US 421. This revised plan certainly appears to better fit the ideas and
recommendations of this municipality. We greatly appreciate the added safety concerns which are
shown for West Forsyth High School, in particular the traffic signal should prove to be a great
addition for better safety.
In this regards the school system is anxious to discuss the possibility of them relocating
their bus exit further to the South and have August Drive shifted so that these two roads would be
better aligned. This would then allow for another traffic signal which could be synchronized with
the one on the North side of the school. This would greatly enhance the safety of students,
teachers and staff.
There are two other concerns, the first being the median in front of Welborn Associates
Apartment complex known as "Morgan Place". Because of the large number of apartments in this
complex, it would appear desirable to provide an opportunity when exiting the complex for them
to be able to make either a left or right turn onto Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
The last comment has to do with the median from Styers Ferry Road/Marty Lane North to
US 421. Your new plans indicate a full median at this location. Because of proposed plans for
development of commercial properties on the West side of this road it would appear to be more
logical to stop the median at Styers Ferry/Marty Lane. The current design would appear to be
more dangerous as it does not provide viable alternatives for timing movement along this portion
of the road.
15 CLEMMONS ROAD • POST OFFICE BOX 1710 - CLEMMONS, NC 27012 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
The Village of Clemmons is grateful for the proposed improvements to Lewisville-
Clemmons Road and feel that these improvements will make for a safer and more attractive road.
The addition of the sidewalk alone will improve the appearance of this road immensely.
Sincerely,
i
Village Manager
L'
AMD/svp

CITY OF MNSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
December 11, 1997P•0•BOXZSII. INST N-SALEaz9 0.7On HCAROLINA27102
Mr. L. L. Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Citizens participation Unit
P • 'O . Box 25201
Raleigh North
.'PU$LIC ; ? ;? ?.
oEC 12 1997
Carolina 2:7611-5201
SUBJECT: Proposed?Lewisville-Clemmons Road. Widenin r
Dear Mr. Hendricks• 9.(TIp v-3119)
ou ve
widening of Lewimuch o sviller the °pPorttulir;y to comment on t
heace' Haven he Proposed
421, and the redesign of 6M"Ons 4zld,;*rom Peace'
fro •P:in
n Road to Us
Clemmons and the Town of Lew
he u isville: the Village of
of the proposed design plans and have he °pleted our review
Pz'oject: following comments on the
I1 on January g .
Transportation Advisor 1997, the 'W#Gton_galem/For th
supports the widenizig Lewisville E,Clemmons :R'ad'to four (4) County -
Passed a; reso (4) which
.with a landscaped m?ia'n a 1 a..1e3
o
rtd sidewalks .on both aides o
We are disappointed
for the southern . ;hat .t.he proposer) median has only been tdesigned
,.
porti" of the r d, We :;believe
projected volume of traffic on tlzi;9l facilit that for the
40,600 vehicle y (between 29,400 and
s per day), that a me"?'
project length to ;enhance an.ie needed for the
through traffic and the safe And efficient entire
Important to have a median forathe parch end of th movement of -.W6 b
Environmental + elieve it is particularly
n on Assessment indicates on page 4 e project, as the
Y of development- .", ? "Because of the
2) we are pleased that the project ?s:includin9 a sid
east side .of the road, from Peace He:ven Road to side Meribridge Drive.
However, we believe that sidewalks are
both s walk on the
road for the entire length
Pr°Pooed sidewalk on;thethe side of neGheerdedad on ghoul sides the
north to the Town of;Lewis.viXle to theive?, least' the
to the neighborhoods.ar?d bus' provide a d be extended
bridge over US 421 must be desinecoes gned w-ith in to ae?co munit . connection
the bridge to provide a ? alne vn both $idestaF
bridge in the future, needed pedestrian connection across the
pedestrian movements .toTh abridge must notbecome a
High School and other degtinationa nearby, n impediment for
ry School, West Forsyth
3) The Proposed Peace Haven
project is an important R°ad/skyeis Ferry Road a direct connection from east-west thoroughfare whi h Will
Lewisville-Clemmons Road to Connector
interchange for the Northern the Prov
Per day will use vide
projections for this connector indicates that abou proposed
Beltway. Your 20 0 traffic
significant volume this proposed road in the t 16,500 vehicles
Gi how or where this traffic, yet we did not sGeture. This
Road and road would be is s
how this m ht tied into I,ewi sY, indication
Clemmons
Road. We have condo tedaname tinihtialsinvesti a
g of Lewisville-Clemmons Peace the proposed
and would bevha
Road/Styers Ferr 9 dons as where located believe th® ppy to share th se Road connector might be
time fob planning this with your staff.
Part of the road has been constructed Propose We
d connection is now.
4) We want to em 'h '
hundreds of studen s asize.the need'to;provide
pa
work or visit at West F.S cul safe access for the
rents, fa?ty:end staff . who
widening ,
the road Yth Kigh:School.. ?.ttend school
means of access conrl alai'sf Coed pie .do not believe
(?) Diane cross-$A ' that
particularly for students who are not e a s ction without any
we would recommend ;that .a afe driving'environment, the movements in median b ' ' I t - t- cedI drivers . Again,
bui It to comtral the turning
between Interstate area US This?
the Interstate roadway serves
r ' id, this 40/US 421 inter?hariTtu s mov as the co
ement is not nnecto_
road. We must g,; therefore ' Provided
part of t do all we can to ;.enhance ,;heavy trucks use
he community. Also the safet
work closely with the appropriate we would recommend• that y in this
and local North. Caro For ?h of y school board $4a o
• Division g i Count
closin staff 'in identify i nt Tr.'ansportation.
providing driveways, insalgin9 traffipossiblec (NCDOT)
g other means;of a. ternatiires for
to provide assistance access to the Achool control devices or
,
problem, in developing solutions oe would be happy
his important
please let me know if you have an
information. Y questions .?r
need any additional
Sincerely,
C
Brent McKinney, P
Director of •E. ,
Transportation
Pc: Lewisville-Clemmons Road W .
John Whitson, Town of Ld Wid ni g pile
sville
Al Dillon, Village of Clemm
ons
VILAG^ OF
??vla?NS
Irrrrrr'Irrr ?ttorrrr??rs.
;y - urr
December 8, 1997
Mr. L. L. Hendricks
Citizen Participation Unit
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, IBC 27611
Re: Proposed Widening/improvements of Lewisville Clemmons Road. Project 8 26 23601 U-
3119 Forsyth County.
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
We are in receipt of. the plans for the widening of Lewisville-Ciemmgns Road from Peace Haven
Road to US 421. We greatly,appreciate the effort and concerd,which jhas. gone into this project
and see it as a great improvement over the existin"i cond. However, there are some concerns
which we feel need to be addressed and considered. These concerns are as follows:
1. The first Major concern is for the safety of the students and faculty at West Forsyth
High School: Currently there is.a safety, problem with the large number of students
who drive;to; school. Because of the high volume of traffic on the road, students
take chancesi getting: out of the parking. lot onto Lewisville-Clenunans Road. There
has already been several accidentswith permanent crippling injuries which have
devastated several families. In order to prevent this we are strongly recommending
that two synchronized traffic.signafs be installed. One traffic signal should be at
August Drive and the other at the student parking lot entrance. These signals
should be automated controls scheduled.to opeSate at the time students are
arriving.and departing from schools additionallyithese signals should be capable of
manual controls. They could remain off during the remainder of the day. These
lights.are not just desirable but in our.. opinion absolutely necessary to insure the
future safety of students and other personnel at West Forsyth High School.
2. The Ylllage Council is on record supporiing.a.sidewA. along the East side of
Lewisville-CIemmons Road. The Council has already set aside a reserve fund as
required by the State DOT to assume. a portion of the cost of construction of this
sidewalk.
3. The Village Council.is also on record supporting a median dividing this highway.
3716 CLE W40NS ROAD - POST OFFICE BOX 1710 - CLEMMONS, NC 27012 • [phone], FAX [phone]
Your plan shows a median on a portion of this road. It is understood that due to
other entrances to Lewisville-Clemmons Road, that it may not be practical to have
a median for the entire project, however we are on record as desiring a median
wherever possible.
We appreciate your attention to these matters.
Sincerely,
l . Dillon
ger
AMD[svp

r

MEMORANDUM
WS/FCS Facilities Department
336-727-2533 or 2616
TO: Dept of Transportation Att: Robert Hanson Fax-919-733-9794
FROM: Bill Powell
DATE: January 12, 1997
RE: Lewisville-Clemmons Road Widening (U-3119)
Southwest Elementary and West High School Traffic
We rcccived and reviewed drawings for the area around West High School. Permanent
eas menu and general alignment look like they are close to being ready to present to
the board of Education for comment with the exception
lights requested at the hearing. ( At Holder Road, at School h/Student Main Entry and
at the Bus Exit) Attached are pencil revisions for the area around the Bus Exit which
coutd make the light requested for that location more functional for the community.
By copy we're asking The Village of Clemmons to comment.
WS/FCS would be willing to move the Bus Exit Road on our site to make the traffic
signal work if it benefits the neighbors on August Drive. Meanwhile, Southern Bell
has asked for a R.O.W. extension at the bus exit, but we will not grant it until possible
August Drive / Bus Exit alignment is agreed upon. Please review and call to finalize
bus }exit and traffic lights.
We also note no trees within the permanent R.O.W. therefore we expect no trees to be
cut, ? Also, overhead utility company tree trimming appears minimal, but that needs to
be oonflrmed.
cc: Project file
Village of Clemmons Att: Larry Kirby
Dept. of Transportation Att: Douglas Waters
WS/FCS Att: R Teague
01.1:.1448 lti'09
MQKIIIS L•
kiAlky P. KKO08 ?
IM •N:
R ? ! s Y. 1
y
.c i
r ti ii ?. r r W _ Z$ W.
J 1'?.. !N• moot
y L r!
ttNAf{OIb
...,r t .. Y.A,'nW
INIFE
YVosges S.'01
FORD 64
AND F p ?' r Y' TfY4p11A LL
i' cr 1 r;. r• •t FRAWLNE m"GAN •v
WIFE
j ! r.? _ v;' KN014? VANCY 6MAN
? I ? ?rp?11CG ?? t1 Sri'
ILI?
T""70- t
?u raw, a1/A Q y
G?o509?//?4?w t*ti
(i ?- r'. Sri wR' , L ?. _ • ..,? ?, . . ?
RdETTA IF YV-
, ,LEACtI - :r
let?.
Y ; ; , a t ! r; Tp, p
mcm
t•. 0 LUgA 10NrOf1 ? A .. ?X, ??• S
QtlO?a , { r o ,
LCO

JDNA A;.
AAD K ?+y trf 5 e
Q ,.? r
' 1 r icy U }?„ ?? r n r
??' . . ?"?!?, ?. .. ?:'??' ? ?:3?il?:fa'.?.? tau,,:,•?:.,.k.;:,.:?..',r;?:.?;...
, „ ., . f, ?. :r,,?^r _ w .:r?,l ?R;i'7a^•'i'ar?rTr-r. R'a. r,, 74•V!fr?n?,', -
??•••! .CAM JY.
. , ., .. ,... ? ?,;. ,. i...?• . it . ',
:r.wEWD+?.'.
itm
7??w
VILLAGE OF
CLEM
MON?
Public Works
TO. Dept. Of Transportation
ATTN: Mr. Robert Hanson
FROM: Larry Kirby ?
Assistant Manager, Vttlage of Clecnmons
DATE: January 14, 1998
RE: Letter From Bill Powell
Winston-Salem Forsyth County Schools
The Village of Clenunons has received the suggestion that August Drive and the school
bus exit driveway be aligned. This suggestion is a very good one, in that this would give a
clean intersection for a traffic signal. Anything that can be done to keep a clean
intersection for the traffic signal would have to enhance the safety situation for our kids.
Please give this idea your thought and hopefully you will promote it to the design
engineers.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
cc: Doug Waters - Department of Transportation
Bill Powell
3715 CLEMMONS ROAD* POST OFFICE BOX 1710 - CLEMMONS, NC 27012 • 1510) 766-7.511- FAX [phone]
`?'. ? STNS
N r r?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
March 10, 1998
City of Winston-Salem
Department of Transportation
Attn: Mr. Brent McKinney, P.E., Director
P.O. Box 2511
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
Subject: Proposed Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Dear Mr. McKinney:
SECRETARY
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on March 3, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. A major agenda item was the
widening design planned for Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
This meeting was attended by the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Traffic
Engineering Branch - the group that maintains safety records for the various highway designs used
within the State. Based on their best judgment regarding future traffic volumes and patterns along
Lewisville-Clemmons Road, this group strongly endorses the four-lane median divided roadway for
the entire length of the project primarily for safety reasons. This same recommendation has been
received from the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Village
of Clemmons, the Town of Lewisville, and many users who travel this route on a daily basis.
Based on this input, a decision was made to modify the original design presented to the
public at the December 8, 1997 hearing at Southwest Elementary School by constructing a four-
lane median divided roadway from Peace Haven Road to the US 421 Interchange. Efforts will be
made to make this highway convenient to use by providing several median crossovers along the
route with appropriate left-turn lanes at each opening. Although efforts will be made to minimize
impacts to property owners adjacent to the project, it is unfortunate that some private property
must be acquired. A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD REGARDING THIS
MATTER - PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT SIX WEEKS.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. A sidewalk is planned along the
east side of the road from Peace Haven Road to Kenbridge Road. A decision regarding traffic
signal placement will be made during the final design. If I can be of further assistance to you
regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
L. L. Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
? STATi
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
March 10, 1998
Town of Lewisville
Attn: Mr. John Whitson, Manager
P.O. Box 547
Lewisville, NC 27023-0547
Subject: Proposed Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Dear Mr. Whitson:
SECRETARY
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on March 3, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. A major agenda item was the
widening design planned for Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
This meeting was attended by the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Traffic
Engineering Branch - the group that maintains safety records for the various highway designs used
within the State. Based on their best judgment regarding future traffic volumes and patterns along
Lewisville-Clemmons Road, this group strongly endorses the four-lane median divided roadway for
the entire length of the project primarily for safety reasons. This same recommendation has been
received from the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Village
of Clemmons, the Town of Lewisville, and many users who travel this route on a daily basis.
Based on this input, a decision was made to modify the original design presented to the
public at the December 8, 1997 hearing at Southwest Elementary School by constructing a four-
lane median divided roadway from Peace Haven Road to the US 421 Interchange. Efforts will be
made to make this highway convenient to use by providing several median crossovers along the
route with appropriate left-turn lanes at each opening. Although efforts will be made to minimize
impacts to property owners adjacent to the project, it is unfortunate that some private property
must be acquired. A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD REGARDING THIS
MATTER - PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT SIX WEEKS.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. The new proposal does not alter
the US 421 Interchange design; however, we are still investigating alternatives to minimize impacts
to the shopping center. If I can be of further assistance to you regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincerely,
? T.
L. L. Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
y r-y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N,C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 10, 1998
Village of Clemmons
Attn: Mr. Alfred M. Dillon, Manager
P.O. Boa 1710
Clemmons, NC 27012
Subject: Proposed Wideningamprovements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
Dear Mr. Dillon:
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on March 3, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. A major agenda item was the
widening design planned for Lewisville-Clemmons Road.
This meeting was attended by the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Traffic
Engineering Branch - the group that maintains safety records for the various highway designs used
within the State. Based on their best judgment regarding future traffic volumes and patterns along
Lewisville-Clemmons Road, this group strongly endorses the four-lane median divided roadway for
the entire length of the project primarily for safety reasons. This same recommendation has been
received from the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Village
of Clemmons, the Town of Lewisville, and many users who travel this route on a daily basis.
Based on this input, a decision was made to modify the original design presented to the
public at the December 8, 1997 hearing at Southwest Elementary School by constructing a four-
lane median divided roadway from Peace Haven Road to the US 421 Interchange. Efforts will be
made to make this highway convenient to use by providing several median crossovers along the
route with appropriate left-turn lanes at each opening. Although efforts will be made to minimize
impacts to property owners adjacent to the project, it is unfortunate that some private property
must be acquired. A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD REGARDING THIS
MATTER - PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT SIX WEEKS.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. The requested sidewalk along
the east side of the new road will be included in the final design. If I can be of further assistance to
you regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
L. L. Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
s.. SIA1t .
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
October 20, 1998
SECRETARY
TOWN OF LEWISVILLE
Attn: The Honorable Robert G. Stebbins, Mayor
P. 0. Box 547
Lewisville, NC 27023
Subject: Proposed Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
From Peace Haven Road to US 421 - Forsyth County
Dear Mayor Stebbins:
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on June 15, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. Several of the items
discussed required further review and investigation before decisions could be made, thereby
delaying a written response to you. The Department of Transportation appreciates the time
you have taken to share your comments, concerns, and recommendations with us. The
following design summary represents the current status of this project:
DESIGN
A decision was made to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road to four lanes with a raised
median sixteen feet wide to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and reduce traffic
congestion. The grass median will begin north of Peace Haven Road and continue to the
US 421 interchange. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory
Committee, the Village of Clemmons, and the Town of Lewisville are on record
supporting the four lane median divided roadway.
MEDIAN OPENINGS
• Median crossovers are currently planned at Sedalia Drive, the new driveway for Willow
Trace Apartments, Morgan Place Apartments, Linwood Drive, August Drive, West
Forsyth High School student parking lot, Kenbridge Road, Holder Road, and Styers
Ferry Road/Marty Lane. A future median opening is planned for the Peace Haven-Styers
Ferry Connector intersection with Lewisville-Clemmons Road. Left turn lanes will be
provided at each crossover to separate turning movements from through traffic.
TOWN OF LEWISVILLE
The Honorable Robert G. Stebbins, Mayor
October 20, 1998
Page 2
DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER
• A directional crossover is planned approximately halfway between the Styers Ferry
Road/Marty Lane intersection and the US 421 interchange to provide left turns for
entering area businesses; however, only right turns will be allowed when exiting.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Traffic signals will remain at the Lewisville-Clemmons Road intersections with Peace
Haven Road; Styers Ferry Road/Marty Lane; US 421 eastbound on/off ramps; and US
421 westbound on/off ramps. A new signal will be considered at the West Forsyth High
School student parking lot after internal improvements to the parking area have been
completed by the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County School System. Signalization at
Holder Road will be reevaluated upon completion of the project. Remaining
intersections will be stop sign controlled.
INTERSECTION REALIGNMENTS
Linwood Drive will be realigned across from the Western Villa Apartment entrance and
August Drive will be realigned across from the proposed bus entrance for West Forsyth
High School. The alignment shifts will improve the safety of these intersections and
provide better utilization of the proposed median openings.
SIDEWALKS
• A sidewalk will be provided on the east side of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from Peace
Haven Road to Kenbridge Road.
US 421 INTERCHANGE
• The US 421 interchange design will remain as presented at the public hearing; however,
the length of the concrete barrier north of the US 421 interchange has been reduced.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. If I can be of further
assistance to you regarding this project, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Len Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
Swr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
October 20, 1998
VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS
Attn: Mr. Alfred M. Dillon, Village Manager
P. O. Box 1710
Clemmons, NC 27012
SECRETARY
Subject: Proposed Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
From Peace Haven Road to US 421 - Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Dillon:
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on June 15, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. Several of the items
discussed required further review and investigation before decisions could be made, thereby
delaying a written response to you. The Department of Transportation appreciates the time
you have taken to share your comments, concerns, and recommendations with us. The
following design summary represents the current status of this project:
DESIGN
• A decision was made to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road to four lanes with a raised
median sixteen feet wide to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and reduce traffic
congestion. The grass median will begin north of Peace Haven Road and continue to the
-US 421 interchange. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory
Committee, the Village of Clemmons, and the Town of Lewisville are on record
supporting the four lane median divided roadway.
MEDIAN OPENINGS
• Median crossovers are currently planned at Sedalia Drive, the new driveway for Willow
Trace Apartments, Morgan Place Apartments, Linwood Drive, August Drive, West
Forsyth High School student parking lot, Kenbridge Road, Holder Road, and Styers
Ferry Road/Marty Lane. A future median opening is planned for the Peace Haven-Styers
Ferry Connector intersection with Lewisville-Clemmons Road. Left turn lanes will be
provided at each crossover to separate turning movements from through traffic.
VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS
Mr. Alfred M. Dillon, Village Manager
October 20, 1998
Page 2
DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER
• A directional crossover is planned approximately halfway between the Styers Ferry
Road/Marty Lane intersection and the US 421 interchange to provide left turns for
entering area businesses; however, only right turns will be allowed when exiting.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
• Traffic signals will remain at the Lewisville-Clemmons Road intersections with Peace
Haven Road; Styers Ferry Road/Marty Lane; US 421 eastbound on/off ramps; and US
421 westbound on/off ramps. A new signal will be considered at the West Forsyth High
School student parking lot after internal improvements to the parking area have been
completed by the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County School System. Signalization at
Holder Road will be reevaluated upon completion of the project. Remaining
intersections will be stop sign controlled.
INTERSECTION REALIGNMENTS
• Linwood Drive will be realigned across from the Western Villa Apartment entrance and
August Drive will be realigned across from the proposed bus entrance for West Forsyth
High School. The alignment shifts will improve the safety of these intersections and
provide better utilization of the proposed median openings.
SIDEWALKS
• A sidewalk will be provided on the east side of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from Peace
Haven Road to Kenbridge Road.
US 421 INTERCHANGE
• The US 421 interchange design will remain as presented at the public hearing; however,
the length of the concrete barrier north of the US 421 interchange has been reduced.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. If I can be of further
assistance to you regarding this project, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Len Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
October 20, 1998
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
Department of Transportation
Attn: Mr. Greg Errett, AICP
P. O. Box 2511
Winston-Salem, NC 27102-2511
SECRETARY
Subject: Proposed Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road
From Peace Haven Road to US 421 - Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Errett:
A post-hearing meeting was conducted on June 15, 1998 in Raleigh to discuss the
concerns and comments received from the public hearing process. Several of the items
discussed required further review and investigation before decisions could be made, thereby
delaying a written response to you. The Department of Transportation appreciates the time
you have taken to share your comments, concerns, and recommendations with us. The
following design summary represents the current status of this project:
DESIGN
A decision was made to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road to four lanes with a raised
median sixteen feet wide to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and reduce traffic
congestion. The grass median will begin north of Peace Haven Road and continue to the
1JS 421 interchange. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Transportation Advisory
Committee, the Village of Clemmons, and the Town of Lewisville are on record
supporting the four lane median divided roadway.
MEDIAN OPENINGS
Median crossovers are currently planned at Sedalia Drive, the new driveway for Willow
Trace Apartments, Morgan Place Apartments, Linwood Drive, August Drive, West
Forsyth High School student parking lot, Kenbridge Road, Holder Road, and Styers
Ferry Road/Marty Lane. A future median opening is planned for the Peace Haven-Styers
Ferry Connector intersection with Lewisville-Clemmons Road. Left turn lanes will be
provided at each crossover to separate turning movements from through traffic.
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
Department of Transportation
Mr. Greg Errett, AICP
October 20, 1998
Page 2
DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER
• A directional crossover is planned approximately halfway between the Styers Ferry
Road/Marty Lane intersection and the US 421 interchange to provide left turns for
entering area businesses; however, only right turns will be allowed when exiting.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
• Traffic signals will remain at the Lewisville-Clemmons Road intersections with Peace
Haven Road; Styers Ferry Road/Marty Lane; US 421 eastbound on/off ramps; and US
421 westbound on/off ramps. A new signal will be considered at the West Forsyth High
School student parking lot after internal improvements to the parking area have been
completed by the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County School System. Signalization at
Holder Road will be reevaluated upon completion of the project. Remaining
intersections will be stop sign controlled.
INTERSECTION REALIGNMENTS
Linwood Drive will be realigned across from the Western Villa Apartment entrance and
August Drive will be realigned across from the proposed bus entrance for West Forsyth
High School. The alignment shifts will improve the safety of these intersections and
provide better utilization of the proposed median openings.
SIDEWALKS
• A sidewalk will be provided on the east side of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from Peace
Haven Road to Kenbridge Road.
US 421 INTERCHANGE
• The US 421 interchange design will remain as presented at the public hearing; however,
the length of the concrete barrier north of the US 421 interchange has been reduced.
Thank you for participating in the public hearing process. If I can be of further
assistance to you regarding this project, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Len Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
APPENDIX III
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES
?? • ?rans.?n' h??a? ri. r. Vick, P. E.
Transportation Bldg.
y ? AA1t
N J ?V?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR November 5, 1997 SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Secretary Garland Garrett, Jr.
FROM: L. L. Hendricks a • I -
Public Hearing Officer
Citizens Participation Unit
RE: Notice of a Public Hearing on the Proposed Widening/Improvement of
Lewisville-Clemmons Road from Peace Haven Road to US 421 to Include
US 421 Interchange Revision
The following Notice is furnished for your information:
U-3119 The project proposes to widen/improve existing Lewisville-Clemmons
Road to a multi lane facility from Peace Haven Road (SR 1891) to US
421 - a distance of approximately 2.8 miles.
LLH:dnh
Attachment
cc: Mr. Dalton Ruffin, Board of Transportation Member
Ms. Margaret Kluttz, At Large Board of Transportation Member
Mr. Larry R. Goode, P.E., Ph.D.
Mr. J. D. Goins, P.E.
Mr. D. R. Morton, P.E.
Mr. J. B. Williamson, Jr.
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E.
Mr. C. W. Leggett, P.E.
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E. ?, G EE 11 V
Mr. D. E. Burwell, Jr., P.E. X10
Mr. H. F. Vick, P.E.
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P.E. _
Mr. W. R. Brown, P.E. 6 19,07
_
Mr. J. M. Lynch, P.E. r
Mr. C. H. Casey, P. -
Mr. Robert Mathes
Mr. Danny Rogers ? _ ••- ?;.... r.,..
Ms. Rosy Goode
Mr. Everett Ward
Mr. Ron Poole, P. E.
Mr. Wayne Patterson, Right of Way Agent
FHWA
(9
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED WIDENING/IMPROVEMENTS
OF LEWISVILLE-CLEMMONS ROAD
FROM PEACE HAVEN ROAD TO US 421
TO INCLUDE US 421 INTERCHANGE REVISION
Project 8.2623601 U-3119 Forsyth County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the above Public
Hearing on Monday, December 8, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the Southwest Elementary
School Cafeteria located at 1631 Southwest School Drive in Clemmons.
The hearing will consist of an explanation of the proposed location and design,
right of way requirements and procedures, and relocation advisory assistance. The
hearing will be open to those present for statements, questions, comments, and/or
submittal of material pertaining to the proposed project. Additional material may be
submitted for a period of 10 days from the date of the hearing to: NCDOT,
L. L. Hendricks, Citizens Participation Unit, P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611.
This project proposes to widen/improve existing Lewisville-Clemmons Road from
Peace Haven Road (SR 1891) to US 421 - a distance of approximately 2.8 miles. The
recommended widening consists of a four-lane roadway separated by a raised grass
median with curb and gutter from Peace Haven Road to south of Forest Oak Drive
transitioning into a five-lane facility with curb and gutter to the US 421 Interchange.
The bridge over US 421 will be replaced. The interchange at US 421 will be revised as
part of this project.
Plans setting forth the location and design and a copy of the environmental
document - Environmental Assessment - are available for public review in the
Lewisville Town Government Complex located at 6550 Shallowford Road in Lewisville
and in the Clemmons Town Government Complex located at 3715 Clemmons Road in
Clemmons.
Representatives of the Department of Transportation will be available to discuss
the proposed project with those attending the Public Hearing. Anyone desiring
additional information may write to Mr. L. L. Hendricks, Citizens Participation Unit,
P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611 or telephone [phone].
NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to
participate in the hearing. To receive special services, please call Mr. Hendricks at the
above number to give adequate notice prior to the date of the hearing.
? ??? ?Z?" Y\I V-LLC0_;D
s'r rAz?3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR April 1, 1998 F N SECRE TOLSON
MEMORANDUM ECRErnRti'
TO: Secretary Norris Tolson
FROM:
L. L. Hendricks ?. •,1. ? - ?
Public Hearing Officer ?`?;•'
Citizens Participation Unit ell
1998
RE: Notice of an Open-House Public Hearing on the Proposed _
Widening/Improvements of Lewisville-Clemmons Road from VVL
Peace Haven Road to US 421 to Include
US 421 Interchange ?;'? F"'-'" • ? `'` ? r?
Revision
The following Notice is furnished for your information:
U-3119 The project proposes to widen Lewisville-Clemmons Road to a four-lane,
median divided roadway with curb and gutter - a distance of approximately
2.8 miles.
LLH:dnh
Attachment
cc: Mr. Dalton D. Ruffin, Board of Transportation Member
Mr. Len Sanderson, P. E.
Mr. J. D. Goins, P. E.
Mr. D. R. Morton, P. E.
Mr. J7 B. Williamson, Jr.
Mr. R. L. Hill, P. E.
Mr. C. W. Leggett, P. E.
Mr. Whit Webb, P. E.
Mr. D. E. Burwell, Jr., P. E.
Planning & Environmental Branch Unit Head
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E.
Mr. W. R. Brown, P. E.
Mr. J. M. Lynch, P. E.
Mr. C. H. Casey, P. E.
Mr. Robert Mathes
Mr. Danny Rogers
Ms. Rosy Goode
Mr. Everett Ward
Mr. Ron Poole, P. E.
Mr. Wayne Patterson, Right of Way Agent
FHWA
Ch
NOTICE OF AN OPEN-HOUSE PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED WIDENING/IMPROVEMENTS
OF LEWISVILLE-CLEMMONS ROAD
FROM PEACE HAVEN ROAD TO US 421
TO INCLUDE US 421 INTERCHANGE REVISION
Project 8.2623601 U-3119 Forsyth County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the above open-
house public hearing on Tuesday, April 21, 1998 from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the
Southwest Elementary School Cafeteria located at 1631 Southwest School Drive in
Clemmons. Interested individuals may attend this hearing at their convenience
between the above stated hours. Division of Highways personnel will be available to
provide information, answer questions, and take comments regarding this project.
A formal public hearing regarding this project was conducted on December 8,
1997 in the Southwest Elementary School Auditorium. Changes to the original design
have been made based on updated traffic projections and verbal/written comments
received from the public hearing process.
This project proposes to widen/improve existing Lewisville-Clemmons Road from
Peace Haven Road (SR 1891) to US 421 - a distance of approximately 2.8 miles. The
recommended widening consists of a four-lane roadway separated by a raised grass
median with curb and gutter from Peace Haven Road to the US 421 Interchange. In
addition, safety improvements have been proposed at West Forsyth High School. The
bridge over US 421 will be replaced. The interchange at US 421 will be revised as part
of this project.
Plans setting forth the location and design and a copy of the environmental
document - Environmental Assessment - are available for public review in the
Lewisville Town Government Complex located at 6550 Shallowford Road in Lewisville;
in the Clemmons Town Government Complex located at 3715 Clemmons Road in
Clemmons; and in the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Division Office
located at 2125 Cloverdale Avenue in Winston-Salem.
Representatives of the Department of Transportation will be available to discuss
the proposed project with those attending the Public Hearing. Anyone desiring
additional information may write to Mr. L. L. Hendricks, Citizens Participation Unit,
P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611; telephone [phone]; FAX [phone];
or email Hendricks @ doh. dot. state. nc.us.
NCDOT - in compliance with the American's With Disabilities Act - will provide
auxiliary aids and services for disabled persons who wish to participate in the hearing.
To receive special services, please call Mr. Hendricks at the above number to give
adequate notice prior to the date of the hearing.