20140762 Ver 3_RE R-2915C Site 6_20170828

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Wanucha, Dave
Sent:Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:47 AM
To:Cheely, Erin K; Kichefski, Steven L SAW
Cc:Slaughter, Johnathan H
Subject:RE: R-2915C, Site 6
Erin,
DWR does not believe a 401 modification is warranted in this case, but since it is a
change in the original plans, we do appreciate the notification so that we can make a
determination. If surface water or BS impacts were increased, or other significant
changes as in the April, 2017 R-2915B modification, then yes a formal modification
would be necessary.

If the Corps requires a permit modification in this case, DWR will follow suit and review
the information as well.

Thanks.

Dave W.

Dave Wanucha
Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
NC Department of Environmental Quality

336-776-9703 office
336-403-5655 mobile
[e-mail]

NC DEQ Winston Salem Regional Office
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Cheely, Erin K
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 7:08 PM
To: Kichefski, Steven L SAW <[e-mail]>
Cc: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: R-2915C, Site 6

Steve,

1

I wanted to run a change by you for R-2915C in Ashe County. At Permit Site 6, a pipe
that was previously going to be extended is in bad shape, so they need to bore and jack
a new pipe instead. The new pipe will be adjacent to the old one and the tie-in should
occur close to the originally proposed outlet in the area permitted as bank stabilization
with riprap. See below info from the Division as well as the attached photo and
drawings (both proposed and what was originally permitted).

Do you believe this warrants a permit modification? I should be in the office all week if
you’d like to discuss.

In addition, I wanted to follow up on the permit modification for R-2915B that was
requested on April 7, 2017. We received the 401 mod back in May but have not yet
seen the 404. Were you ever able to issue that?

Thanks for your guidance,
erin

Erin Cheely
Environmental Senior Specialist
Environmental Analysis Unit
N.C. Department of Transportation

919 707 6108 office
919 323 5192 mobile
[e-mail]

1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Slaughter, Johnathan H
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Cheely, Erin K <[e-mail]>; Dagnino, Carla S <[e-mail]>
Cc: Beaver, G Trent <[e-mail]>; Hiatt, Todd M <[e-mail]>;
Poindexter, David A <[e-mail]>; Dancy, Jason D <[e-mail]>;
Elmore, Bethany <[e-mail]>; winkler, jeffrey d <[e-mail]>
Subject: R-2915C, Site 6

Erin,

See attached drawing of the proposed bore and jack pipe that is needed. As I
mentioned on the phone, the existing pipe is rotten and already separated at the outlet
end. EC measures are being installed now. The bored pipe will essentially follow the
2

C/A line on the plans (not sure what that is supposed to be since we aren’t running
controlled access fencing across the road). The inlet of the new pipe will tie into a larger
box about 30 deep.

Permanent impacts should remain about the same. There will be a very short channel
tie in constructed through the proposed riprap shown on the plans at the outlet. I don’t
think this warrants a permit modification but the regulators should make that
call. Please coordinate and let us know.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
3