The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20011206 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_200809050 Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Date of Office Review: q/5 f [A Evaluator's Name(s):"-7a I I Date of Report: {aps Report for Monitoring Year: Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s): Other Individuals/Agencies Present: Weather Conditions (today & recent): Directions to Site: Ag land (grazing) north of SR 1134, adjacent to UT to Tick Creek, 4.5 mi S of Siler City. n0J?J. n, Lxt, ,:)Lwo r' (t1 Wilk b e Subrn e?;l w 1. Office Review Info on: +W5 lCbiQI'u-11W& rP ISLE b?brrlclkt?l) - - - --- - - - `T Project Number: 20011206 Project History Project Name: Mount Vernon Springs County(ies) Chatham Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear 03030003 Nearest Stream: Tick Creek Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C Mitigator Type: Private DOT Status: non-DOT Total Mitigation on Site Wetland: 14.88 acres Stream: 4985 linear feet Buffer: Event Event Date Report Receipt: Prospectus 7/7/2000 Report Review - Wetlands 1/30/2001 Report Review - Streams 1/30/2001 Report Receipt: Application 8/8/2001 Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan 9/28/2001 Report Receipt: Response to Letter 10/3/2001 401 Issued 11/6/2001 Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan 12/20/2001 Report Receipt: As-Built 6/21/2002 Report Receipt: Monitoring 7/14/2003 Report Receipt: As-Built 9/8/2004 Report Receipt: Monitoring 3/2/2006 Report Review - Wetlands 6/19/2006 Approved mitigation plan available? Y No Report Review - Streams 6/19/2006 Monitoring reports available? es No Site Visit - Wetlands 1/31/2007 Problem areas identified in reports? Yes o Site Visit - Streams 1/31/2007 Report Review -Streams 2/5/2008 Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports Associated impacts (if known): , i received, construction, planting, repairs, etc. During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III. On back of sheet, note other information found durin g office review and/or to be obtained during site visit II. Summary of Results: Mitigation Component Monitoring Success Success Year (report) (field) Resolved 20011206-1 7.52 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration 4 20011206-2 7.01 acres Wetland (Riparian) Creation 4 20011206-3 4985 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 4 20011206-4 - ---- - - - - 0.35 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Creation 4 ------ Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this project: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): I Q? 05 ? ?S?nve. •sv? .?acrh c? ? 3 r?e?s-4-cared /c?ta.r?k? c,omrn?.ru-Ey ?{p-?--- ?c ornpor?c?- 1, 2- I FT.) 05) node arx t v-xxLeo u.-Yf (? obi co_? auCund U'VJl/ plo+ :4--4 C(0w \[? C:ax* ch 2oo-t sin-ou- Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 7.52 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration Description: bottomland hardwood WL Location within project: III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: saturation within 12" for at least 16 consecutive days of GS Monitoring report indicates success Ye No Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drift lines Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): - Acts : zccl '-" C?Lptit'l L'Q- CLrVk-q{1t ?-- `jl8 ?a?,?.c? `7 ?d -'" I I con.?.c-u-+? tte.. d-? ? ?? $ rn-c?l?cti.or?e? ?' ?'?1 "ePlr?? SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: NA Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Ye o List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): i VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species ear 3; 260 = 320 stems/acre at end of it d Species Story TPA/'1o cover y mean ens y stems/acre at end of year 5 ?I Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No ?t?Q OYL ?tt¢, . ??- Average TPA for entire site (per report): LA-1 Aq LEI G.??LlX1UtS OCc Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No No i Y ucrL bU\LY1- C Vegetation planted on site? Yes No 31L) • CXl.Q'AT-\j ' cak, fYl? i Date of last planting: flttlQ., 6o1-usilltiw ( ??c ? ?I Vegetation growing successfully. Yes No . u 1T1 ,J Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): rlV LL- m b `+ . romi- 011- to List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): p l A 4 ou a nD?- mee+ su c c. ??s c t? ( ?ls? x?4ed s1 s + 2 von . n aLh ) Component ID: 20011206-1 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ?Inundated ?Saturated in upper 12 inches Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 6 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Eval tive Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site: NA Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates succ s Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results this report. Non-riparian (drier) i List any remaining NCWAM i ues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): i During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 6 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 7.01 acres Wetland (Riparian) Creation Component ID: 20011206-2 Description: oxbow shrub marsh bog - S? cornpo c 4- Location within project: , ?Vr III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: saturation within 12" for at least 16 consecutive days of GS Inundated Saturated in upper 12 inches Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: NA Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: mean density = 320 stems/acre at end of year 3; 260 stems/acre at end of year 5 Dominant Plant Species Species Story TPAP'1o cover Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Average TPA for entire site (per report): Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 3 of 6 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality F NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site: NA Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful' List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): i During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 4 of 6 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality Component: 0.35 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Creation Component ID: 20011206-4 Description: vernal pools ?J- Location within project: ` a_JQ r III. Success Criteria Evaluation: HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: saturation within 12" for at least 16 consecutive days of GS Inundated Saturated in upper 12 inches Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g . remaining di tches, excessive water, etc.): SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: NA Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No List indicators of hydric soils: List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g_ erosion, upland areas, etc.): VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species mean density = 320 stems/acre at end of year 3; 260 Species Story TPAP/ cover stems/acre at end of year 5 Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Average TPA for entire site (per report): Observational field data agrees? Yes No based on community composition? Yes No based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No Vegetation planted on site? Yes No Date of last planting: Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.): Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 5 of 6 Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table NC Division of Water Quality NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site. NA i Coastal Riverine Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter) Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier) List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g, functionality, developing wetland type, etc.): I? MITIGATION SUCCESS: Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful i List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.): i I During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report. Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations. Additional notes related to evaluation of this component: Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 6 of 6