Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0005363_Permit Rating Work Sheet_20000401zoo `q ��' 1,16 � lCQ U� NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet (/ ❑ Regular Addition ❑ Discretionary Addition r/ / ❑ Score change, but no status change NPDES No JM621_01_q�21.01 ❑ Deletion a Code Number Checked. �Q�► Total Pbmts'Factor 1. U v;1701_69 0 1011 Reach Number A- Wastewater Flow Only Considered Section B- Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered Wastewater Type f 1 Is this facility a steam electric power pl nt (SIC=4911) Is this permit for a municipal separate storm Wastewater Type Percent of Instream Code with one or more of the following characte sewer serving a population greater than 100,0009 (See Instructions) 1 Power output 500 MW or greater (not using a cooling pond/lake) 2 A nuclear power plant rl.O ❑Yes, score is 700 (stop here) 3 Cooling water discharge greater than 25% of the receiving stream's 7Q10 flow rate ❑No (continue) �ItiF� /L�3 % Q 10 l/dl"40 b /w J` / O 21/o 11 i + ❑Yes, score is 600 (stop here) XNo (continue) �f FACTOR 1: Toxic Pollutant Potential Flow 5 to 10 MGD Flow >I 0 to 50 MGD ❑ ❑ 12 13 10 20 Stream Low Flow PCS SIC Code Primary Primary SIC Code--�—�—� I ( Other SIC Codes--------------�—�—� ❑ 14 Industrial Subcategory Code 0101 a (Code 000 if no subcategory) Type 1/1II <10% ❑ 41 >_10% [1 42 0 10 Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one ( Type II Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points 21 ❑ No process ❑ 3 3 15 ❑ 7 7 35 20 waste streams 0 0 ❑ 4 4 20 ❑ 8 8 40 Flow I to 5 MGD ❑ 1 1 5 ❑ 5 5 25 ❑ 9 9 45 20 ❑ 2 2 101 C 6 30 1-110 10 50 a Code Number Checked. �Q�► Total Pbmts'Factor 1. FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream Flow Volume (Complete either Section A or Section B, check only one) Section A- Wastewater Flow Only Considered Section B- Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered Wastewater Type Code Points Wastewater Type Percent of Instream Code Points (See Instructions) (See Instructions) Wastewater Concen- Type I Flow < 5 MGD 11 0 tration at Receiving �f l Flow 5 to 10 MGD Flow >I 0 to 50 MGD ❑ ❑ 12 13 10 20 Stream Low Flow I ( Flow > 50 MGD ❑ 14 30 Type 1/1II <10% ❑ 41 >_10% [1 42 0 10 U ( Type II Flow <1 MGD ❑ 21 10 to <50% > 50% ❑ 43 20 Qj (91N✓ Flow I to 5 MGD ❑ 22 20 r� �(f Flow >5 to 10 MGD ❑ 23 30 Type 11 < 10% ❑ 51 0 1 V V50% Flow >10 MGD E]24 50 >_ l0% to < 50% El 20 LxA F131 >_ ❑ 53 30 Type Ill �4j Flow <1 MGD Flow I to 5 MGD ❑ 32 0 10 Flow >5 to 10 MGD ❑ 33 20 COHIO Flow >10 MGD F134 30 �� � Code Checked from Section A or B. I-LILI Total Points Factor 2 1-10-1 NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet `3 FACTOR 3: Conventional `Pollutants NPRES X10, trjj—J—j-I (only ah(.n IInllttd by'the Permit) A Oxygen t)cmanding Pollutant (zhecf oncj ❑ 1301) ❑ (SOD ❑ Other-- C ther_ _ _ Cada. Prn,nts cJ PUmlt t.imnv (,Chu.k one) _ ❑ <I00 Ibsldety I o ❑ 100 to 1000 Ihs/day 5 �F1>I 000 to 1000 Ibs/day i 115 ❑ >3000 1h'/day 4 20 Code Checked 1-1 Points Scored- (_J<E� 13, Total Suspcncicd,Sobds(ITS) Cod(, Points Pcmit)_imua' (chccL(Jn(.) ❑ <1QO1bslday 1 0 El 100 to 1000 lbs/Cay 2 5 ❑ > 1000 to 5000 t 15 ❑ >i000 11 5 day 4 20 Code Checked 1-1 Points Scored 1-14 C6 Nitiog'cn pollutant tthcul. one) ❑ Ammonia ❑(Ohio Ivwoeui Lqunalutt COCc Plaint~ I'unut Limit" (ohccl. one) ❑ <100 Ibs/day I 0 ❑ 300 to 1000 Ibs/dav ❑ > 1000 to '000 Ihshha a 15 ❑ 7"()00 Ibs/dad4 20 Code Checked Points Scored- --101 Total Points Factor`3 1-101 FAC'T'OR 4: ,Public Health Impact �4 � l„t is theic a public dnnl.in,-, \%,I (L, supply located within 51) nulcfi dor�nuicaIII ofthe Gttlncnt dnchai°c (this uulud,s stny body 6f ��atct to lunch the tLctiun; ��atci n a tnhutaty) I A public diinktnL WatQi suppk m it include infiltration e11tllunUti of Ofhu' mU.thods of comuu. ancGthat uIt! matcI get %szttcr Irom thoabovci teiLiIce 1 '711pI h ❑ Ycs (If VLchccl: to\itity Potutti it nuntbcrh;lot�Ai �E No (11'no. «t3 to factor :) Oct cunuu the human health tmicm potunti it Irom NI)I)Lndd\ A Ud , the tiantz SI( eodG�stnd subcatLLOIy icleicncQ11a� a Factor I (13c sure tQ Uu the human hUulth to.\ictty group column = JIUJ 011c he lost 'lomuty (,1oup (4udG Points `(o ifit�'Citaup (aoA, Point" ro\i(,ity Group Q"),]& Points ❑ NO PIoccs, ❑ a a O ❑ 7 7 15 v\astebUcam" 0 0 ❑! d 0 ❑ K S 20 ❑ I I 6 ❑Sao 5 5 El ? 25 ❑ 2 ❑ 6 6 19 ❑lo 10 �(l Code Numbei Checked I—I—I Total Points Factor 4 1-10 NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet FACTOR 5: Water Quality Factors NPDES No \, k (or kull) one or more of the of fluent discharge, limits baud on ti.ttci quality tactors of the receiving stre.tm (tAIM than tc,ehnolovy — based federal effluent gmdelmcs or tcchnolo � — based state t f fluent awdehnes) or has a %s,mc load allocation been assroncd to the discharge Code Points (� Yes 1 10 ❑ No 2 0 I3 1, the rcu,ivrnL water in comphance with apphLable s�atu quahtystancLucls for pollutants that arc water quality funned in OIL permit' Code Points Yes 1 0 ❑ No 2 5 C Does the effluent discharocd from this facdrty cxhihrt the ieasonahle potential to crolate water qu,thty standards due to whole cftluent toxicity' (;ode Points ❑ Yes 1 10 XNo 2 0 Code Number Checked A J1 B 111 C 1-1 Points Factor 5. A 141-0I + B 1-01 + C 01 = I LD1 TOTAL Base SeOIC (I113R1 Score) _ x (Nluftiphcation Factor) — (TO FAL POINTS) R Additional Points — NEI' Proeram C, Additional Points — Great Lal.cs Arca of Concern For a tauht�'that has an HPRI code of 3 docs the tauhty For a lacingy that has an HPRI code of 5, docs the Li rhty drschaige to one of the estuaries enrolled in the National di'Lliaroe am of the pollutants of conwn into one of the Estuaiy Protection (NEP) pio,ram (sec ImUu(.uons) of (aruat Lakcs ) I areas of concern (see Instructions) the (,hesa1)ea4,e Bay 1 Code Points ❑ Ycs 1 10 ❑ No 2 0 Codc Pomts ❑ Yes 1 10 ❑ No 2 U Code Number Checked A �—j B �_� C 1-1 Points Factor 6 A l-1-1 + B I-1-1 + C 1-1-1 = TOTAL FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters 8 j r A Base Score Fntu flow code hc,n. (from Factor 2) �_ �� Entcr the multiphcation factor that concsponds to the flow code _ Check, appnipnate fauhty HPRI Code (from PCS) HPRI # Code 1lPltl Score Flovs ('odU MulUpheation Factor ❑ 1 1 20 11 ,_ l or 41 000 ❑ A ' 2 0 12, 32, of 42 005 ❑ I 3 3 30 13 33 or 41 0.10 ❑ 4 4 0 14 or 34 0 15 ❑ 5 5 '_0 21 or 51 0 10 22 or 52 0110 23 or 53 0.60 �IIPRI code checked, 1_1 21 1 00 Base SeOIC (I113R1 Score) _ x (Nluftiphcation Factor) — (TO FAL POINTS) R Additional Points — NEI' Proeram C, Additional Points — Great Lal.cs Arca of Concern For a tauht�'that has an HPRI code of 3 docs the tauhty For a lacingy that has an HPRI code of 5, docs the Li rhty drschaige to one of the estuaries enrolled in the National di'Lliaroe am of the pollutants of conwn into one of the Estuaiy Protection (NEP) pio,ram (sec ImUu(.uons) of (aruat Lakcs ) I areas of concern (see Instructions) the (,hesa1)ea4,e Bay 1 Code Points ❑ Ycs 1 10 ❑ No 2 0 Codc Pomts ❑ Yes 1 10 ❑ No 2 U Code Number Checked A �—j B �_� C 1-1 Points Factor 6 A l-1-1 + B I-1-1 + C 1-1-1 = TOTAL Toxic Pollutant Potential Flow / Streamflow Volume Conventional Pollutants Public Health Impacts Water Quality Factors _� to Proximity to Near Coastal Waters 0 TOTAL (Factors 1 through 6) 51 Is the total score equal to or greater than 809 ❑ Yes (Facility is a mayor) [�No 52 If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major9 0 ❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below) Reason NEW SCORE OLDSCORE Permit Reviewer's Name Phone number bate