NC0038822_Wasteload Allocation_19921229

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO038822
PERMITTEE NAME.
FACILITY NAME:
Central Care, Inc.
Central Care, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.010 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
STREAM INDEX: 12-72-948)
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tnbutary to Stewarts Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-07-03
Reference USGS Quad: B 16NW, Dobson (please attach)
County: SAY
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/93 Treatment Plant Class: I
Classification changes within three miles:
>3mi. ;.
Requested by: Jule Shanklin'_T L —, Date: 10/30/92
Prepared by:
Reviewed by: C _ 0&
v-? U�t/
Date: k t
Y) Date:
fz
Modeler
Date Rec.
I #
_
z z
Irl
2 % I
Drainage Area (rm Avg. Streamflow (cfs): D.07S
7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 30Q2 (cfs) 0
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parametersil;ue -P.O. } POEM_ COWFORM C01JDk rJVtTY
Upstream N Location AT t,egsr loo' g5-mc -m
Downstream Location AT Lasr 3o0' wasr9_F_4m
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
3o
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
30
3
F. Col. (/100 ml)
000
Zoo
pH (SU)
ift.
The facility discharges into a stream with 7Q10/30Q2=0 cfs. Removal of the
discharge will be required if a more environmentally sound alternative is
available. An engineering report evaluating alternatives to discharge is due
180 days prior to permit expiration along with the permit renewal
application. As part of the report, the cost of constructing a treatment facility
to meet limits of 5 mg/1 BOD5, 2 mg/1 NH3, 6 mg/1 dissolved oxygen, and
17 ug/1 chlorine must also be included if there are no alternatives to a surface
discharge. Upon review of the results of the engineering report, the Division
may reopen and modify this NPDES permit to require removal of the
discharge, modified treatment designs, and/or revised effluent limitations
within a specified time schedule.

1
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7199
Facility Name:
Central Care, Inc.
NPDES No.:
NC0038822
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
UT Stewarts Creek
=
Stream Classification:
C
e
Subbasin:
030703
County:
Surry
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
WSRO
USGS #
Requestor:
J. Shanklin
Date:
Date of Request:
10/30/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.04 r .�
Topo Quad:
B16NW
Summer7Q10 (cfs):
0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.0
Average Flow (cfs):
0.075
30Q2 (cfs):
0.0
IWC (%):
100.0
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
The facility discharges into a stream with 7Q10/30Q2=0 cfs. Removal of the discharge will be
required if a more environmentally sound alternative is available. An engineering report evaluating
alternatives to discharge is due 180 days prior to permit expiration along with the permit renewal
application. As part of the report, the cost of constructing a treatment facility to meet limits of 5
mg/l BODS, 2 mg/1 NH3-N, 6 mg/1 DO, and 17 µg/1 chlorine must also be included if there are no
alternatives to a surface discharge. Upon review of the results of the engineering report, the
Division may reopen and modify this NPDES permit to require removal of the discharge, modified
treatment designs, and/or revised effluent limitations within a specified time specified time
schedule.
Central Care has had 1 BODS and 2 Fecal coliform violations in the past year.
The facility has had no instances of "no flow" up or downstream. D.O.'s are greater than 5 mg/l.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:` Date. z-15 11 Z
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: Date: i a l 7 0
Regional Supervisor: _ Date: 3
Permits & Engineering: Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: JAN 16 1993

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mgft
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Toxicity testing:
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Toxicity testing:
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.010 0.010
30 30
30 30
1000 1000
6-9 6-9
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.010 0.010
30 30
30 30
200 200
6-9 6-9
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
Parameter(s) Affected
new zero flow policy, Fecal
coliform
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the
immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent
limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

4 � '
QF = ©, o r
/ COJ G Caen 1Ne,
Q = O.41 -U4 0
7Q��y=o
• �voQs
p1075 �5 .
�►c = low
Bo�.-� _
IvDa
�vs . V!o� • 2_c�L
83
-7 �9
5e(Ai
03o 7o3
f NS?-A + r ArN l7eiq W5;

3
9
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream Location: at least 300 ft downstream
Parameters: temperature, DO, Fecal coliform, conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility dem9 trated the ability to meet the proposed ne limits with existing tre tment
facilities? Yes 1/ No �sSu�f'®r'�'.�
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No ,
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

N.C. Dop'f'. Of
DEC 9 j
OSL
g 0
.1 Office

PERMIT NO.:
NCOO 3082Z
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: cd�
tS"1IIdG PROPOSED
(circle one)
Permit Status: iiF1gE1A►wl.) 1101WICAMON
(circle one) �
Major Minot
Pipe No: ©O
Design Capacity (MGD): �� )
Domestic M of Flow): D O
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
UNPERbff1 TED NEW
RECEIVING STREAM: L)_r_15 -fWA 0t"_ff_L
Class: C
Sub -Basin:
0 3 -0 - 03
Reference USGS Quad: 0 M (please attach)
County: t!5 u Yr
Regional Office: As Fa Mo Ra Wa Wi OWS
(circle one)
Requested By:
J -J e G_ �f`-1 L' Date: � �
l6
Prepared By:
Reviewed By
�-Zlc1JO-CDate: a t C
Date:
f
Modeler
Date Rec.
# r r
IZ ill8�
3'17i
Drainage Area (mi2 ) QED
Avg.
Streamflow (cfs):
�D�5
7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10
(cfs)
O 30Q2 (cfs)
[7
Toxicity Limits: IWC % (circle one) Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters �,���-P M.P
3
Upstream Location Q e- s e- Lar "°
Downstream Location
C�iSe�-1 rrC�e� •
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BODE (mg/1)
�p
NHS N (mg/1)
—
D.O. (mg/0
—
TSS (mg/1)
3 �,
F. Col. (/100ml)
( Goo
pH (SU)
-�
Comments: `1FCd/rJ/%%P%I/1yeemoded W he d(Sc�r7ryF �S
�,5CvJ-? c?S l%/1 __.1,e0z,nps- -

1
.A
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics Monthly Daily
Average Maximum Comments
Type of Product Produced I Lbs/Day Produced I Effluent Guideline Reference

^s IRequest Nc. :4372
thlA-ITEML'.'AD ALLC. --`,TIC-N APPROVAL r'v'Fih"i----_____ _.-_-______ _ __ _. - _
F c l I .i t y I d; a rri e
Type of Waste
t �t t U 'w
wtr - rn C I ass
,- ount,Y
R ,, 1'Jrl_i�1 01 l ice
Rwque-: for
l'atw of Raquel �t
n i,,P—_0 V.3 ..ARUG.S22 A tt'-
CENTRAL E 5 INIC.
DC) h•4
EY,x'WTIN ,
UT 5 T E W A,RTS3 CREEK
T
0 � 0 7 0 3
SI_IRRV
WINS T W'N-SALEM
SHANKLIN
1 2/h1 ;)/0 7
2, i I I Shl
D[,a r age Ai,s-a ( �:,cl mi ) . .04
Avgr•,agr Flow (cts) . .075
Elummer• 7Q10 {cfs) . 0.
W1^^ n ter 7'u' 10 ct'W ! .0
30'L2 (c l .M ) t 0
RE'wOPiMErIDED EFFLUENT LTMITE---_.,________._...______._____
5-Day BCD (mw/1;. 30
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l
F,r caT 1 Col I i o1'm { #/ '1 OOm 1) . 1 000
pH { ,li r . 6-9
RECEIVED
MC, Dept. NROO
Div)sion .�f
� �tl'(1/il`dFlri��fit&1 IVla�la��^;�+�4
Windari-Salem RZ,g Y'f q
.______ _ ___ ___ _____ _ I'ONIITJRIN
iUp31,1 rn lY/N) : ,' I_ocat"Ion: i_iFD T RE4_Prl OF THE DISCHARGE
Do�,vn tr earn (y/N) . 'r Location: llI-I MEDI^,TELy D"'C,bVNSTREAv9 'D'F THE DIS'CHAIR,'GE
REC'.:JIs'fMEOD R} i't1C''VA,L OF THE DISCHIAR'SE AS SO,--,N AS AN ALTERNATIVE BE'CCtMES
AV !, T L A EMS L E ,
LI!vII T REMAIN U��t. HAr1-3ECl .
6jf . Ao &:: ) i � a i t dA A. k5 I4 Gu-tj c4EcA-ca AS --� PE6;'zA 1 N 1 u w:r- .
RWcoimnen j',_d lu,y
i e v i v 'eV w^ d b 'y' .
T�z_ch . Support 33uper ,+i sor•
GI-I.Fj Lire v1 ,wr
L
Permits Engineering
D
Date _�i�/_99
Date
RETUF:r+ TO TE'C1-1NI'Si'',L S E R v TC'ES D,`( FEB 2 5 1386

W
INSTREAM SELF -MONITORING DATA
MONTHLY AVERAGES
3 �
Discharger: ( . Permit Number: NC00 .3$jS,=?c2
Stream Name: Ur �5�L/r�Y�c�, oo� Sub -basin: 030703
Upstream Location: o�,� Downstream Location:
Month Year Up�streaifl
Downstream
TEMP D.O. BOD5 COND. TEMP D.O. BOD5 COND_
DEC-87
NOV- 87
OCT- 87
SEP-87
AUG-87
JUL-87
JUN-87
MAY-87
APR-87
MAR-87
FEB-87
JAN-87
DEC-86
NOV- 86
OCT-86
SEP-86
AUG-86
JUL-86
JUN-86
MAY-86
APR-86
MAR-86
FEB-86
JAN-86
DEC-85
NOV- 85
OCT-85
SEP-85
AUG- 85
JUL-85
JUN-85
MAY-85
APR-85
MAR-85
FEB-85
JAN-85
A&
�_
/ o
I
I �
/�
I;2
/O
Olt
lCOlt
,� � � O=LYE r , � �� 10 a- P�

0
c-0
0
v
L�
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
A(
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed Q
Q XX 51.81,
J
Date: Jz-
•
Permit No.: ALC,003812-L Pipe No. QO 1 County: cL
Design Capacity (MGD) : Q.0 l b Industrial (% of Flow) :
Domestic (% of Flow) : /p0 qa
Receiving Stream: kT STaLjyxs o eezk. Class: _ -- Sub -Basin: 3'" - 03 �Q
Reference USGS Quad: (Please attach) Requestor: &LC A k,�S Regal Office ` ¢
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: a3°C Drainage Area: G. a'1, 72, Avg. Streamflow: 0 •
7Q10: b.05n6 Winter 7Q10: 0.02914� 30Q2: G.1
W
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): a.o Slope: 5 3.3
6 Velocity (fps): •5 Kl (base e, per day, 200C): t. 7 K2 (base e, per day, 200C): O
0
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
f)s
Mil
s
U.
Effluent Monthly
Characteristics Average Comments
i i __T
Original Allocation a
Revised Allocation Date(s) of Revision(s)
Co (�rr (Please attach previous allocation)
�� Prepared By: RCS zu► % Reviewed By: t lL)4t r ,t l Date:

For Appropriate Dischargers, List Complete Guideline limitations Below
Effluent Monthly Maximum Daily
Characteristics Average Average Comments
Type of Product Produced Lbs/Day Produced Effluent Guideline Reference

c)�' �saer3 d r Q��
` ,: •• GUEST Nv I 518
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 « 0.05 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
CENTRAL CAREY INC.
« DOMESTIC
SURRY
« WINSTON—SALEM
UT STEWARTS CREEK.
W7010 0.09
« 0+20 SQ+MI.
REQUESTOR « DAVE ADKINS
SURDASIN « YAD03
GFS 3002 « 0.1 CFS
STREAM GLASS «C
*** * * * ** RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
WASTEFLOW(S) (MGD) « 0.01 THIS DISCHARGER WAS FORMERL't
BOD-5 (MG/L) « 30 EVILLY PAYNE'S COLONIAL REST
NH3—N (MG/L) « HOME 42.
D.O. (MG/L)
PH (SU) « 6-9
FECAL COLIFORM (/100ML)« 1000
TSS (MG/L) « 30
FACILITY IS « PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING ( ZNEWx( }
LIMITS ARE « REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION C �0 OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY**
MODELER
SUPERVISORYMODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY «
DIVISION DIRECTOR
_E'�Le-w_DATE « S'
7
_ �'`�il
ATE
___ _____DATE «_ ) '7�

Vf p►" FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY:
t FACILITY NO.
r WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST �(
/77" Actual Facility
/_/ Proposed Facility Date of Request
TO: Mike McGhee, Technical Services Date Needed / / AJO
FROM:
1
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit No.(001 ) Pipe No.(003 )
1
Permit Application Received (802 ) Nod SufiMr� ram' 1/�j Draft to Public Notice (805 )
Discharger Name (103 )
County (104 )
Type (40�
3rLL� P�yjvF's Go6pTluYr. ('r5rr t�aM�
SU�Pl2
%j
Mu /%-7Id
lebv19 Sax 63 G , MT. 4) Rl 16,
2
0 3 0
Equiv. Population Served (202 )
Latitude (115 )
Lat/-
Longitude (116 )
J&o a��`
//
0)"
goo 3ql 3�
201 Area (263 )
208 Area (264 )
Subbasin(112 )
Stream Classification (269 )
C
O 3 o'7 b
Receiving Stream (109 )
Drain. Area(267
) 7/10 Flow(270)
Ratio Waste 7/10
(303 )
awl Ta
®, ) ,,,,,,; a
0. O
S �P
Design Capacity (207 )
Design Temperature (NKP)
Elevation (NKP)
D, n I
1 3�(-
1160
Location Discharger (NKP)
Principal Product (NKP)
Sample No.
BODB(mg/Z)
ecaZ CaZiform
a ure
?�
DO (mg/Z)
310
100mZ 31616
F7
300
41
I - Mo. Average Concentration
01
- Wk. Average Concentration
02
ti
J - Minimum Concentration
03
K - Maxinan Concentration
04
M - MonthZy Average Loading
05
- WeekZy Avera e Loadin
06
P - Minimum Loadin
07
Q - Maximum Loading
08
T - Frequency of AnaZ sis
09
W -S Ze Zype
10
NH3-N
p;7 (units)
75
(m Z) 600
400
I - Mo. Avera e Concentration
21
—
-
- Wk. Average Concentration
22
J - Minimum Concentration
23
K - Maximum Concentration
24
M - MonthZy Average Loadin
25
- WeekZy Avera e Loadin
26
P - Minimum Loading
27
Q - Maximwn Loading
28
T - Frequency of Ana2 sis
29
W -S Ze Zype
30
UOD (NKP) 1/ d

I -
Mo. Avera e Concentration
31
-
Wk. Average Concentration
32
J -
Minimum Concentration
33
K -
Maximum Concentration
34
M -
MonthZy Average Loading
35
-
WeekLy Average Loading
36
F -
Minimum Loading
37
Q -
T -
W -
Maximum Loading
Frequency o Anal sis
S le Type
38
39
40