20081407 Ver 1_More Info Received_20081110

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
November 5, 2008
TO: Mr. Chad Coburn
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
ode o
o ? 0 ,?ppB
Nov 1
p5 ?0
RE: 401 WQC/Nationwide Permit 39 Application; Additional Information
BPG Properties, Commerce Drive; Leland Industrial Park; Brunswick County, NC
DWQ Project#: 08-1407
Dear Chad:
Thank you for your letter dated October 31, 2008 in which you request additional
information about the 401 Water Quality Certification application we submitted for the BPG
Properties, Commerce Drive Project located in Leland Industrial Park. Below is a response to
each of your comments.
1. Please re-submit your site plans on full plan sheets at a scale of no smaller than I" =50'
with topographic contours shown.
RESPONSE: Enclosed are site plan maps at a scale of 1" = 100'. We found that printing the
site plan at a scale of 1" = 50' would require two large match sheets and did not improve the
visibility of the impact area. The impact area is printed at a scale of 1" = 50'. Contours of the
impact area are provided. Please note that in response to comments from the ACOE, the
applicant was able to reduce permanent impacts to 0.062 acre of wetlands and temporary
impacts to 0.017 acre of wetlands. Enclosed is a revised PCN form.
2. As mentioned in Part N of the PCN, this project will require some form of a Stormwater
Management Plan. A State Stormwater Permit would satisfy this requirement. Please
note that until a Stormwater Management Plan or Permit is approved by the DWQ,
impacts to waters of the State should not occur.
RESPONSE: The project engineer is currently preparing the stormwater plan for this site.
The applicant agrees that no impacts to waters of the State will occur until this plan is
approved by DWQ.
3. Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
RESPONSE: All sewer lines will be located within the proposed development footprint as
shown on the site plan. Please note that LMG incorrectly listed the need for temporary
wetland impacts as utility installation. However, the temporary impacts are needed as a road
construction corridor, not for utilities. Utilities will be installed within the roadway
shoulders.
4. Please provide cross sectional drawings of the proposed impact areas.
RESPONSE: A revised site plan and cross section are enclosed.
I hope this response adequately addresses your concerns. Please contact me if you have
any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. John Knott III, BPG Properties Ltd.
Mr. Phil Norris, Norris, Kuske, and Tunstall
Ms. Kim Garvey, ACOE
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
2
?tLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
I?Ew Environmental Consultants
November 5, 2008
TO: Ms. Kim Garvey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
RE: Nationwide Permit 39 Application; Additional Information
BPG Properties, Commerce Drive; Leland Industrial Park; Brunswick County, NC
Action ID# SAW-2007-2958
Dear Kim:
Thank you for your letter dated October 1, 2008 in which you request additional
information about the NWP 39 application we submitted for the BPG Properties, Commerce
Drive Project located in Leland Industrial Park. Below is a response to each of your comments.
Based on your Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and site plan, it appears that you
will exceed the Loss of Waters limit authorized by Nationwide Permit (NWT) 39. Please
explain how hydrology will be maintained to on-site wetlands post construction. This
office recommends revising your storm-water management system to ensure that all
wetlands on-site retain hydrologic input.
Response: According to the project engineer, Mr. Phil Norris, the permanent pool elevation
of the stormwater retention ponds shall be higher than the water level of adjacent wetlands.
Therefore, these ponds are not anticipated to drain wetlands located nearby. The stormwater
management plan for this project is currently being developed.
2. The site plan you submitted is unclear, please address the following issues:
a. Please provide a detailed plan view and cross section of the proposed impact
area. The information you submitted is insufficient.
Response: A revised site plan and cross section are enclosed.
b. Your PCN does not include any impacts to wetlands associated with the removal
of the existing culvert. Please explain how you propose to avoid impacts to
wetlands at that location while still being able to widen the road.
Response: The temporary impact listed under the Stream section (pg. 8) accounts for
impacts associated with the culvert replacement. As we discussed over the phone, the
existing culvert has collapsed and is not functioning (see attached pictures). A new
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
culvert will be installed that is located approximately 40' to the north. The new
position was selected based on topographic information collected from the area. This
position will improve flow to the stream and improve the overall health of the system.
We have classified this impact as temporary because the culvert will be replaced by a
new and better functioning culvert.
3. Based on your application, it does not appear that you avoided and minimized impacts to
waters and wetlands of the US to the maximum extent practicable (NWP General
Condition 20 (a)).
a. It appears based on the typical cross section you submitted that you have not
minimized this crossing to the maximum extent practicable. This office
recommends looking at 2:1 slopes and minimizing the road width to further
minimize impacts.
Response: The proposed road will have a 30'-wide pavement and six foot shoulders.
This cannot be reduced because the road will be providing access to large trucks and
narrowing the road or shoulders would create potential safety issues. However, the
applicant was able to reduce the slope of the road from 3:1 to 2:1. This has reduced
permanent impacts to 0.062 acre of wetlands and temporary impacts to 0.017 acre of
wetlands. Enclosed is a revised PCN form.
b. Please explain the purpose and need for the proposed temporary impacts. Based
on the plans submitted, it appears this impact could be avoided by putting utilities
closer to the roadway.
i. Please be aware that permanently maintained rights-of-way may require
compensatory mitigation (NWP General Condition 20 (h)).
Response: LMG incorrectly listed the need for this temporary wetland impact as
utility installation. However, the temporary impacts are needed as a road construction
corridor, not for utilities. Utilities will be installed within the roadway shoulders.
A 5'-wide work corridor is needed to allow heavy earth-moving equipment to
construct the road. This temporary impact will be restored to grade and seeded with a
wetland seed mix as soon as road construction is complete. Please see the enclosed
restoration plan.
4. Your mitigation plan is not accepted. Compensatory mitigation will be required for this
project.
a. Please explain why Mitigation Batiks were not considered.
Response: According to information obtained from the NC EEP website, there are no
private mitigation banks located within the Cape Fear River Basin.
2
b. Please explain why you believe 2.7 payment to NC EEP for riparian wetlands is
appropriate for 0.09 acre of impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 86 linear feet
of impact to Rowel Branch, a natural stream.
Response: As mentioned above and in the PCN form, the impacts to the stream
should be considered temporary because this is a replacement of an existing, damaged
culvert. The new culvert will improve water flow and aquatic function in this stream.
Because it is a temporary impact and the new culvert will improve stream quality, we
believe no stream mitigation should be required.
Permanent wetland impacts have been reduced to 0.062 acre. The applicant plans to
buy into the NC EEP for the restoration of 0.25 acre of riparian wetlands, which is a
4:1 ratio. We believe this is sufficient mitigation.
i. This office recommends 2:1 payment for impacts to riparian wetlands and 2:1
payment for impacts to Rowel Branch. Further, this office recommends
preservation of the remaining waters and wetlands of the US in the project
area as well as upland buffers to provide further protection to Rowel Branch
and its riparian wetlands as well as to enhance their functions.
Response: Because the applicant has reduced permanent wetland impacts to 0.062
acre and has proposed buying into the NC EEP for the restoration of 0.25 acre of
riparian wetlands, we do not believe any further mitigation, including preservation,
should be required.
I hope this response adequately addresses your concerns. Please contact me if you have
any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely, 1 L
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. John Knott III, BPG Properties Ltd.
Mr. Phil Norris, Norris, Kuske, and Tunstall
Mr. Chad Coburn, DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
3
Office Use Only: Fonn Vcrsion March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
LC?C?ML p
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
NOV 1 0 2008
Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. c/o Mr. John Knott III DEW-WATER QUAUTY
Mailing Address: 3200 Centre Square West WEILANDSANDSIORMMI RBRMCH
1500 Market Street
Philadelphia PA 19102
Telephone Number:_ [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kim Williams
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 2522
Wilmington NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address: kwilliamsklmuoup.net
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: BPG Properties; Leland Industrial Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Portion of 02800008 and 02200009
4. Location
County: Brunswick County Nearest Town: Leland
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Leland Industrial Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Wilmington take
US 17 South into Brunswick County. Merge onto US 74/76. Stay on US 74/76. Take the
Leland exit and turn ri14ht onto Mount Misery Road. Turn left onto Industrial Boulevard
(enter Leland Industrial Park). Turn right onto Commerce Drive. Property will be on the left
between the railroad and powerline easement.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.2774 ON 78.0603 °W
6. Property size (acres): approximately 71 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Rowel Branch
8. River Basin: Cape Fear 03030005
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The tract is currently undeveloped and forested. Adjacent
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6of12
land use consists of commercial development light industrial development and undeveloped
land (to the west).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of the development of the site for the construction of an approx. 992,000-sf
warehouse with two adjacent concrete loading areas. Three retention ponds will be
y
constructed. The project will extend Commerce Drive to run adjacent to the propert
boundary. Standard sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented during
construction. The existing culverts at the current road crossing will be removed because they
have collapsed and are not functional. They will be removed and the new RCP's will be
placed at a location that more closely reflects the current movement of the water.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the wetland impact is tog ant
access and utilities to the proposed warehouse site. The newly constructed roadway will be
an expansion of Commerce Drive.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. The project area has been delineated by both Tom Gulley of Needham
Environmental and Paul Farley of Land Management Group, Inc. The impact areas were flagged
by Paul Farley. Ms. Kim Garvey of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved the wetland
line in the field. The surveyor is currently preparing the final wetland survey.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed wetland impacts are limited to
.062 acre of permanent impact and .017 acre of temporary impact. The permanent impact is
necessary for the road crossing while the temporary impact is for a road construction corridor.
In addition, 86 LF of temporary stream impact is needed to replace existing culverts.
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact 1 Permanent wetland fill Forested No adjacent .062
Impact 2 Temporary wetland fill Forested No adjacent .017

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.079
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: - 15 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage- multiply length X width- then divide by 43 560
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Impact 3 Rowel Branch Replace existing
Perennial
5
86
0.01
culvert (temporary)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 86 0.01
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredging_ flooding- drainnoe_ hulkhendc_ etn
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
?
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma
p)
ocean, etc.) )
(acres)
N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the broiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.01
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.079
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.089
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 86
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Land is currently undeveloped and forested.
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant has attempted to
minimize wetland and stream impacts to the greatest extent possible However, a wetland/stream
system runs the entire width of the property and some impact was needed in order to gain access
to the site. The proposed road has been located in the footprint of the existing road to reduce
impacts. Some temporary impacts are needed during the construction of the road as a work
corridor. These wetlands will be restored to grade and allowed to revegetate No wetland or
stream impact is needed for the construction of the building itself. Please note that the existing
culverts at this road crossing have collapsed and are not functional They will be removed and
the new RCP's will be placed at a location that more closely reflects the current movement of the
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands/strmQide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
To mitigate for the proposed permanent wetland impacts (0.062 ac) the applicant proposes to
buy into the NC EEP for the restoration of 0.25 acre of riparian wetlands. This is a 4:1 ratio.
Because stream impacts are temporary, no mitigation is proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone i -.-ro 47 t? Multiplier A
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is no existing impervious cover within the
site. The proposed project plans to create 38.49 acres of impervious cover, which is - 51% of the
site. The project engineer is currently preparing a stormwater plan for this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project will tie into the Town of Leland's wastewater system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Project
will not provide connections or utilities to surrounding tracts.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
i a
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12

i U C), Cn
J cy
O Z - Q G
O S =
O?? v?O o
C
=zL?
z w=

wWZ? o
IT j ? U
J t- I = C]
Ocy- ~? Li r O
z O O
o

-C z
O S
Z
L?
S ¢C
L-J
Q~ i
z
?C?f LLJ
Jz ro
c N
Fci
z Om0 ?S E Ua ai
-

W cf
)
H cn
G S- Q) a.
O
_ w S w

LJ
= U N p
a
A
a LL
U>
= vm 2; d z d -Q
U)
a
c
m
CD
0
U
ro
N
co
O
O
v
(6
Q
E
c
ro
m
c
ro
E
`m
U
ro
O
O
U
ro
a
E
70
M
ro
m
T
ro
0
a
E
F-
E C>
l 0 m
O
O
`,D
N
V
O
O
M
I I
O
0
(`)
W
_J O
Q
U
0
_I
I
i,
I
I
I
I
I
I.

AV i
I
-Jo-i HOla

SONY I
3M 30 3003
I
o?

I
i
? n f
I
0
h ? I
N I

I U?
I
O I
b?
I

LL =g
I
00 ® m
a
U a
of m
z?
s ?
I
i
I
I
w rcw i
oN
s
}
I
I
I
N
I ?
I zI

O
0
-
z
I H
X
I W
I
I

_

AY I
I
-3o-iHOla ?
SONY 3M 30 3003
I
I
I

I
i I
I
I
I
C
O
U
C
O
U
O
O
z
a
m
c
O
O
(n
J
W
U
0
z
0
U
w
(n
(n
0
CY
C)
Width of avement
r 3;01
S
WETLAND IMPACT #1:
2,709 S.F. (0.062 AC)
Permanent
WETLAND IMPACT #2:
752 S.F. (0.017 AC)
Temporary
w
WETLANDS
Proposed Rip Rap
N
OF
4 -` PROPOSED 60 LF TWIN 60" RCP CULVERTS
- 80 28aoC 10'x10'x6" RIPRAP EACH END
TO BE INSTALLED
?Ls X15 \ ? "1 \\
CMPI d a 5
60
6 0` 2s? e?,)ove
Be 6 S STREAM IMPACT #3:
WETLANDS 86 LF
S
?E Temporary
e
Preliminary: Not for Construction
SCALE 1" = 50'
0 25 50 100
0 0 0 404 Wetlands
® Permanent Wetland Impacts (0.062 ac)
Temporary Wetland Impacts (0.017 ac)
BPG Properties Land Management Group, Inc.
Leland Industrial Park; Commerce Dr. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. Pictures of existing( culvert
Brunswick County, NC
October 2008 ?
Looking north along eastern side of existing culvert.
From road, looking west along existing culvert. Flag denotes culvert location.
Land Management Group, Inc.
BPG Properties
Leland Industrial Park; Commerce Dr. Environmental Consultants Pictures of existing
Brunswick County, NC Wilmington, N.C. road and culvert
October 2008
Looking northeast along existing road.
Trash located within existing roadway.