20000846 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20070503

Draft Wetland Mitigation Site Evaluations: Information Tabll i
r?1.1 1 j-f ; rte' ?? NC Division of Water Quality ?? .
r
February 2, 2007: Draft Version 4.0
Evaluator's name(s): 1 a mt4 I---? I I Evaluator's Agenc,
Date of Office Review: c - 2 - 2DJ Date of Field Review: 5 - ?- 200?-
Other individuals/agencies present:
Weather conditions (today & recent):
1. Office Review Information:
Project Name:
DWQ Project Number: 000 A 4LP
Mitigation Project Type (Circle One)
EEP rivate , Mit. Bank
Project mitigation was constructed for (if
applicable): ?1e(?? ?Dr Tr i QC? ' U A . A r park
Location of project (narrative):
Nearest n ed stream (WQ classification):
County: ,u1 16-d
Monitoring reports available? Y No
Problem areas identified in reports? es No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
re rts: 0
Date(s) o Monitorin S Al (rty)W?,e
Year(s) of monitoring:
tjr?,.-?
River basin and subbasin:
Approved Mitigation plan available? Yes No
Goal of Mitigation (wetland type(s) & details):
Mitigation Acreage required by 401:
Mitigation Acreage present on site:
Type of Mitigation: restore, create, enhance, preserve
(circle all applicable and show locations on site map)
Dates of Activities(month/year):
Start of Construction:
Construction Completed:
Corrective Measures Taken:
Tyne Date
¦ When more than one type exists on site, evaluate each separately. Locate the approximate
boundaries of each on the site map, and prepare separate site evaluation forms.
¦ Note success criteria & dominant species information in the appropriate areas in section II.
¦ Below, provide any additional important information found during the office review,
and/or list1 any additional information that needs to be obtained during the site visit:
-D CDnn ?G -) t} N ?_'2 for, 1-}pC1 H 1 PIC
_3?? C)
U1 ?}1 1 c,r? 1? 2015 tc L.cf CCoc ?. -t? / rL CF ?.
®?l X { ? 1 C' ,?c? Z OUP 1-3. fl_ rante Vtsitt w ` i1Lt ?C rk , n r. r1

Hydrology: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Approved Success criteria: Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches

Monitoring report indicates success: Yes No Drift Lines
Observational field data agrees: _ Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
based on mitigation plan Yes No Sediment deposits
based on type (per WAM) Yes No Water Marks
Met for entire site Yes No
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive )ateir, etc.):
PC.- 3
PC - 2 L l ?
C - 3 2 - ._.e a
Draft page 1 oft Dt ?c a ec 9

St)

x,41;
23

l
_r

" m rw
J f
J
a
N ^n
U
Draft Wetland Mitigation Site Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Soils: -' "' 1
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Ye No
List indicators of hydric soils: C ( 1 ti 17, 1-1 Cc ri C t? v, ?.D ;c rv
AV remaining soil issues to address (e.' .erosion, upland areas, etc.): C) ? f^V ? C c, ,
Vegetation: Per monitoring report:
Approved Success Criteria: Dominant plant species TPA/% cover
1.
Monitoring report indicates success: Yes e 2.
Observational field data agrees: 3.
Community composition Yes No 4.
TPA and/or % cover Yes No 5.
Vegetation planted on site Yes No Average Trees per Acre forzntire
Vegetation growing successfully Yes No Date of Latest plantin
r--.. oto or 0-0 c j -3 . H C-L ,I j ,- 1, a H C--2 I
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
List of invasive species on site and percent cover:
Any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc):

vv?

)
117
?. k
l
Wetland Functional Assessment with NC WAM:
Wetland Type: coastal riverine riparian non-riparian (wetter) non-riparian (drier)
Attach NC WAM analysis results to this report.
Mitigation Success:
Compared to the mitigation plan, the site is: successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for any lack of success for this site:
1.
3.
4.
5.
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
c`\-?k .(? Lc????LtiLus 1???j?(Lu}U5,,,n?i rec_uti7
¦ Attach site maps showing problem areas and/or different wetland types.
¦ Attach digital photographs of representative sites with photo locations shown on site map.
-D IX"
1-4 t '7 l?ratt page 2 of 2
pvw4os h ruou t !? i ei C'