20081596 Ver 1_401 Application_20081008

5&ME
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
Fa Phone: 80
?:tf'3 9 y r.-A i
[phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL l .
Date: 10/16/08 Or Zile
J`NR. - V?'A7ER, ilUP.L;1Y
Project Number 1588-07-047 WEELA'NDSAr:o
From: Melanie McKinne
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly Copy to: File
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
Subject: Application for Regional General Permit No. 198200030
Transmitted via
First Class Overnight X Hand Other
Mail Express ? Delivery ?
Remarks:
Ms. Karoly,
Please find attached the following:
• 5 copies of an application for Regional Permit No. 198200030
• Check in the Amount of $240.00
Please feel free to contact me at 336.288.7180 or mmckinneygsmeinc.com if you have
questions or require additional information.
Thanks you,, 1
Melanie V *J
SWE, Inc.
3718 Cld Battleground Rd,
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
011420
+ PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS i
INVOICE D. VOUCHER NO. AMOUNT
10-15-08 1588-07-049-Ph 1 1588-5040 $ 240.00
.l S ?s c° 4 I,
y

DEW - WATER, UUAL! f y
WrTj 6 vno Aun crn... r..,;.. .__ .. _
- -- - ' ? • ......r r. a.n UI YN b V17
S ME Bank of America
Greensboro, NC 27410
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410 October 15, 2008
[phone]
PAY Two-Hundred-Forty- DOLLARS AND 00/100 CENTS
TO THE NC Division of Water Quality
DER
OF 410 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
66-55
531
$ **240.00**
011420
NOT VALID FOR AMOUNTS INEQSS OF $1,000.00
010
11.0114200 i:053LOOS 591: 02138237911'
USACE SECTION 404/DWQ SECTION 401
REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT NO.198200030
Crane Point at High Rock Lake
Rowan County, NC
S&ME Project No. 1588-07-047
Prepared for:
Molasses, LLC
P.O. Box 1234
Lexington, NC 27293
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
October 16, 2008

#S&ME
Gelehrating 35 Years
' 1973.2008

October 16, 2008
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
' 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Attention: Mr. Steve Chapin
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
' 401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
'
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karol y
' Reference: Regional General Permit No. 198200030 Application
Crane Point at High Rock Lake
' Rowan County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No
1588-07-047
.
Dear Mr. Chapin and Ms. Karoly:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit this application for impacts to waters of the U.S.,
including wetlands in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Regional
General Permit (RGP) No. 198200030. S&ME is working on behalf of Molasses, LLC who
will be considered the applicant for this pen-nit. Please find enclosed the following:
' Fi
Si
Vi
i
gures:
te
c
nity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), Soils
Map (Figure 3), Aerial Map with Photo Locations (Figure 4), Approximate
Wetlands Map (Figure 5), Proposed Pier Location Map (Figure 6),
Proposed Launch Ramp for Permitting Drawings (Sheets 1-5)
Appendix 1: Completed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and signed Agent
' Authorization Form
Appendix 11: Site Photographs
Appendix III: Upland and Wetland Data Forms, USACE Approved Jurisdictional Fonn
A
i
' ppend
x IV: Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. (APGI) Subdivision Access Approval Letter
dated March 6, 2008
Appendix V: Copies of agency correspondence
1 SWE, INC. / 3718 Old Battleground Road / Greensboro, INC 27410 / p 336.288.7180 f 336.288.8980 / www.smeinc.com

1

General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
PROJECT BACKGROUND
For purposes of this pen-nit application, the subject property is referred to as the Crane
Point at High Rock Lake and is an approximately 23-acre tract located along the shoreline
of High Rock Lake, on Crane Point Road in Rowan County, North Carolina (35.3949°N,
80.1957°W).
Provided below is a list of pertinent information relating to the site and the permit
applicant:
Table 1: Project Information Summary
Applicant: Molasses, LLC
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1234
Lexington, NC 27293
Attention: Mr. Tim Ragan
Telephone Number: 336.240.0672
Address of Project: Crane Point Road
Size of Project Area: Approximately 23 Acres
Closest Waterway: High Rock Lake, Class C
River Basin: Yadkin
Count : Rowan
Coordinate Location of Boat Ramp: . 35.39490N, 80.1957°W
USGS Quadrangle: Southmont, NC 1987
In December 2007, S&ME completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Crane
Point at High Rock Lake, which was submitted to APGI for approval. The EA document
was prepared in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-
Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures-Yadkin Project FERC No.
2197 dated July 1, 1999 (Revised July 1, 2002). A portion of this document included a
Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Detennination within the study area (land
along the approximately 2,600 linear feet [If] of shoreline of High Rock Lake, or land
within 100 feet of the nonnal full-pool elevation of 655 feet [Yadkin Datum]). This
effort determined the presence of two jurisdictional forested wetlands, Wetland A,
located in Lots 4 and 5, and Wetland B, located in Lots 7 and 8, as depicted in Figure 5.
The EA was submitted to various regulatory and state agencies including the USACE,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and N.C.
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).

J

General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The study area within the subject property is limited to land along approximately 2,600 if
of shoreline as measured from the normal full-pool reservoir elevation of High Rock
Lake, extending 100 feet inland. The existing land use within this area is largely
undeveloped, hardwood forest (Photo 3). Generally, canopy vegetation within the study
area was dominated by deciduous hardwoods including willow oak (Quercus phellos),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and northern red oak (Q. rubra). In addition to the
deciduous species, shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) was interspersed within the canopy of
upland areas. Subcanopy trees included blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), white oak (Q. alba),
red maple (Ater rubrum), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), American holly (Ilex
opaca), and possumhaw (I. decidua). The shrub layer in upland areas included
strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia).
Herbaceous vegetation observed within the study area included spotted wintergreen
(Chimaphila maculata), gamma grass (Tripsacum dactyloides), Solomon's seal
(Polygonatum biflorum), partridgeberry (Mitchella repens), and Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica).
An existing, maintained powerline easement bisected Lot 10 in the northeastern portion
of the study area, exiting the study area upon crossing a cove. Vegetation observed in the
maintained powerline easement included plume grass (Erianthus contortus), small-head
sunflower (Helianthus microcephalus), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), sericea lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), five-fingers (Potentilla canadensis), Indian hemp (Apocynum
cannabinum), mullein (Verbascum thapsis), and maypops (Passiflora incarnata).
Additionally, saplings of shortleaf pine, willow oak, and sweetgum were observed within
the powerline easement.
Two small wetlands, identified as Wetland A, located in Lots 4 and 5, and Wetland B,
located in Lots 7 and 8 are depicted in Figure 5. Wetlands A and B exhibited wetland
pockets that appear to retain water after the lake recedes from high water levels.
Vegetation observed in these areas included river birch (Betula nigra), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsyNanica), black willow (Salix nigra), button bush (Cephalanthus
occidentalis), silky dogwood (Corpus amomum), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana),
smartweed (Polygonum sp.), and bugleweed (Lycopus virginicus).
Debris including bottles, shoes, and tires within the coves adjacent to Lots 4, 5 (Photo 5),
Lot 6 (Photo 7), and Lots 7, 8 (Photo 8) was observed. An existing concrete boat ramp
was observed between an off-site property and the southwestern portion of Lot 4.

1

An area has been cleared within Lot 1 (Photos 1, 2) approximately 50 feet from the high
water elevation inland. We understand that the previous property owner cleared this area,
under a grandfather clause of Alcoa's Shoreline Stewardship Policy, prior to Molasses,
LLC's acquisition of the property.

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC
SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
October 16, 2008
The topography of the shoreline within the property is generally gradual with sandy
beaches located in many of the coves. Lots 3, 4, 10, and 11 have steeper topographic
areas adjacent to their shorelines.
ON-SITE JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
Wetlands
S&ME's Jurisdictional Determination found two small wetlands, identified as Wetland A,
located in Lots 4 and 5, and Wetland B, located in Lots 7 and 8 which are depicted in
Figure 5. Wetland A is approximately less than 0.05 acre in size and Wetland B is
approximately less than 0.10 acre.
Streams
No on-site jurisdictional streams were identified during S&ME's Jurisdictional
Detei7nination.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
APGI manages and operates High Rock Lake as a principal storage and water regulation
facility for the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. APGI pen-nits residential development
along the shoreline of High Rock Lake in accordance with the requirements outlined in
APGI's Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting and Industrial
Approval Procedures. Crane Point at High Rock Lake is proposed as a residential
community comprised of 22 lots. Lots 1 through 11 are shoreline lots with 10 eligible
boat piers. Additionally, the proposed project entails the construction of a boat ramp,
boarding dock, and a lake access road for use by residents, along an approximate 0.15-
acre lot, located west of Lot 1. Construction of the boat ramp will require authorization
through RGP 198200030 and associated Water Quality Certification No. 3693. An on-
site road is proposed which will extend from a cul-de-sac to the community boat launch
and dock area. Construction activities will be performed "in the dry" (during periods of
draw-down) between the months of October through April when fish are not spawning.
The boat launch will be 16 feet wide constructed of concrete and extend 85 feet outward.
The boat pier and dock will be constructed of galvanized steel and all deck materials will
consist of Trex Decking. The floating devices of the pier and dock will be encased so
that the structures will not rest on the reservoir bottom. The dock will accommodate
watercraft for access during boarding. Industry-standard construction equipment will be
used to construct the project. Construction will not take place in wetlands.
Of the 11 residential shoreline lots, Lots 1-5 and Lots 7-11 will have private boat piers
offering private access to the reservoir. Lot 6 does not meet the minimum shoreline
width requirement for a private pier and therefore, Molasses, LLC has proposed for Lots
6 and 7 to share a pier. Lots 1-4 and Lots 8-11 do not require notification through
submittal of a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN). Lots 5-7 do not satisfy the water
depth requirements to accommodate private piers and private property owners may
excavate the reservoir bottom to accommodate adequate water depth. APGI will not

i

General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
pennit excavation activities until the property owner has received the appropriate permits
from the USACE and DWQ. It will be the responsibility of individual property owners to
obtain USACE, DWQ, and APGI permits for any excavation activities for private piers.
The purpose of this application is to obtain a RGP 198200030 and associated Water
Quality Certification No. 3693 for construction of the boat ramp within waters of the U.S.
PROPOSED JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
The proposed project will entail constructing a concrete boat ramp west of Lot 1 that
extends from a cul-de-sac area into High Rock Lake. The impact to the reservoir bottom
associated with the boat ramp is expected to be 0.04 acre (1,615 square feet).
Construction of this facility will require authorization through RGP 198200030 and
associated Water Quality Certification No. 3693. The floating sections of the associated
boat pier and dock will be encased so that impact to the reservoir bottom will not occur.
The stationary portions of the dock will be secured by pilings driven into the lake bottom
and will not involve dredging or filling. Construction of the facility will occur while
High Rock Lake is drawn down (during the months of October through April) using
industry-standard equipment and approved construction materials. This pen-nit
application submittal has been triggered by the proposed construction of a concrete boat
ramp. Any future excavation proposed by individual lot owners for private piers will be
the responsibility of the owners to obtain.
PROTECTED SPECIES AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES
Federally-Protected Species
S&ME conducted a protected species assessment within the study area (land along the
approximately 2,600 if of shoreline of High Rock Lake, or land within 100 feet of the
normal full-pool elevation) consisting of a literature review and a site reconnaissance.
Results of these efforts did not reveal the presence of federally protected terrestrial
species (plants or animals that occur on land) within the study area. These results were
incorporated into the EA document. As mentioned previously, a copy of the EA
document was submitted to the USFWS on October 15, 2007. The USFWS did not
comment on the proposed project. An additional letter was provided to both the USFWS
' and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on September 3, 2008. The
NCNHP responded in a letter dated September 5, 2008 stating that they have no record or
rare species, significant natural communities, significant natural heritage areas, or
' conservation/managed areas at the site, nor within one-half mile of the project area. To
date the USFWS has not responded to our latest letter.
Historic Properties
APGI has conducted a cultural resources assessment on some properties adjacent to High
' Rock Lake. The subject property was included in this assessment and was determined to
have low cultural resources risk. As mentioned previously, S&ME also provided a copy
of the EA to SHPO on October 15, 2007. SHPO responded with a December 20, 2007

G
l R
i
enera
eg
onal Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
l
etter, attached, stating their office was not aware of historic resources that would be
affected by the proposed project.

AVOIDANCE AND
MINIMIZATION
APGI enforces strict guidelines that adjacent landowners must comply with to gain access
to the reservoir from their lot. These guidelines aid in avoiding and minimizing impacts
' to the reservoir, associated shoreline and waters of the U.S. and are discussed below:
To comply with APGI's Shoreline Management Plan, Shoreline Stewardship Policy and
' Specifications for Private Recreation Facilities, adjacent landowners to High Rock Lake
must obtain an APGI-administered pen-nit prior to constructing a private pier. Before
APGI will approve such permits, certain criteria, such as water depth, must be met.
However, High Rock Lake is regularly subjected to a high sedimentation load which
decreases the water depth of the reservoir. As a result, APGI will consider excavation of
the reservoir bottom to achieve the required water depth for a private pier through the
' landowner submitting an "Application for Activity Permit for Reservoir and Shoreline
Alteration (Excavation, Dredge and Fill)" along with appropriate regulatory agency
pen-nits. APGI does not permit activities that will impact aquatic vegetation or that will
' occur within waters of the U.S. Excavation may be considered by the future private
owners of Lot 5 and for a shared pier between Lots 6 and 7 since the water depth was
insufficient for piers. APGI will consider Lots 5-7 eligible for excavation of the reservoir
' bottom to reach the minimum water depth requirement, because aquatic vegetation and
waters of the U.S. are not located along the central portion of the shoreline. Permitting
and approvals associated with excavation adjacent to Lots 5-7 will be the responsibility of
' the future private property owners.
' Furthermore, APGI requires that piers be specifically designed to avoid impacts to the
reservoir bottom and shoreline environment without mitigation. Specifically, piers
cannot extend into the reservoir farther than 75 feet from the nonnal full-pool elevation.
Ramps cannot extend further than it is deemed necessary for the intended use. APGI will
not permit activities on individual lots that will impact aquatic vegetation or impacts to
waters of the U.S. including Wetlands A and B. No impacts to Wetlands A and B are
' proposed for this project.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
'
No wastes spoils or fills be placed within waters or riparian areas beyond the limits of
those depicted in this PCN application. Appropriate sediment and erosion control
' practices equaling those outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" will be required as part of
' the project specifications that govern the proper design and meet appropriate turbidity
water quality standards.

1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
' The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has provided a list of
"Standard Recommendations for Marina Activities on Lakes" for this project.
' Construction moratoriums established by NCWRC will be adhered to by Molasses, LLC.
Deed notifications for Wetlands A and B are not proposed for this project since the
' wetlands are located within 100-feet of the normal pool elevation of High Rock Lake,
regulated by APGI. No impacts to these wetlands would be allowed by APGI and any
activities including tree removal, or construction of pathways or trails would require
approval by APGI.
MITIGATION
The proposed project entails permanent impacts to 0.04 acre of waters of the U.S. We do
1 not anticipate that mitigation will be required for this project based on the total amount of
impacts.

FJ

CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your acceptance of
this permit application. Your timely response to this PCN is appreciated, and if we can
provide additional infonnation or answer questions you may have, please feel free to contact
us.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Melanie L. McKinney, L.S.S.
Natural Resources Project Man er
P14
Rob Willcox, L.S.S.
Natural Resources Department Manager
Senior Review by Lisa J. Beckstrom, C.E., C.W.B.
Attachments
cc: Mr. Tim Ragan, Molasses, LLC
1

i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC
FIGURES
SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
October 16, 2008
l
V \
0
z
°
0
o?
?o
(T
?o
m T
° Z
Opp`'
a
'Poi sO,> c
O
m< ?
G?
T _
<2 _Q \
z
J
C) w z Lif
'QO
N

0
0
ir
0
X
i,

Z
C
?m
N
y
569904A
0
w
U
a
FILE RD
pSAIL RD
HIGH ROCK LAKE
off, °oo
Scale: 1 inch equals 2,000 feet Site Vicinity Map FIGURE
Drawn by: MLM Crane Point Subdivision
Reviewed b : Rowan County, NC
fS&ME
,Igp Date: August, 2007 S&ME Project #1588-07-047
1 4 - t lam'^?_. . ?? -.
61 0
9Fe - i? •
Roan
21
f
?r? 4 I rT r
1'k N\ 0-
¦ r? r
r
?f ? .?r -.- ?ry r it
r .'
-USGS topographic map was obtained from www.libremap.org
-? -
Scale: 1 inch equals 1,000 feet USGS Topographic Map FIGURE
Drawn by: MLM Crane Point Subdivision
Rowan County, NC 2
Reviewed b : JBP
S&M I
Date: August, 2007 S&ME Project #1588-07-047
V
1
VaB
n..n ?

McB2
i% McC2
EnB
:B2

McB2
PaB
VaB

L;ettz \ CcC
EnB
Soil information was obtained from http://soildatamart.nres.usda.gov!{
Scale: 1 inch equals 600 feet Soils Map FIGURE
Drawn by: MLM Crane Point Subdivision
Reviewed b Rowan County, NC 3 ME- Date: August, 2007 S&ME Project #1588-07-047

1

11

J 1 01
w » <-.el N
.r
0 INN
Lot 22
,Lot 21 ° � �� *�. ,T �, �, � k�a > L`lot ;l11 `
"! I
y -
7S 0A Rf r ' Lot 10A
Lot 209S 4J
I O . , I
O 'Ao 1 `I r. Lot,7 -.
Lot -49 8S 11 S �°'01- i., Lot 8 Lot 9
fy Lot 6 �;p-� '4 ,.
Lot 18/ Lot 5
`/ t12 -
O i
Lot 13 �/ Lot 4
1
O
Lot 14 i Wetland B
ft. Is It�r
y1r15 /� "Lot 3 V�
-4 -_
In , Lot 2
Lot�1, I
Scale: 1 inch equals 292 feet
Drawn by: MLM
Reviewed by: JBP
Date: A„m„c+ ?nm
0
Approximate Wetlands Map FIGURE
Crane Point Subdivision
M E Rowan County, NC 5
S&ME Project #1588-07-047

.)
A
nd
ing Dock
Lot lines were obtained froi
Scale: 1 inch equals 292 feet
Drawn by: MLM
Reviewed by: JBP
Date: August. 2007
r
a

Legend
1 Proposed Boat Piers
Surveying Mapping, PC
Proposed Pier Location Map FIGURE
Crane Point Subdivision - 6
Rowan County, NC
S&ME Project #1588-07-047

F

1
1

wa < oawo ..........:a s9a.

%VJ 96LS-C99 (HOC) $3/NV 1

31VJ5 Y °

C O C d L J ?
:2
Lo O
9LSC-f 99 (COL)

..
Llt 9L ON 'all!a .0)
._
01L
O160
0 :
JO
0 p
pl
?-
-
cn
C;) v+
Q
v
.
. .
111% 999
sag .(aaa - b-" oaiapsuo3 91V
93
0180160 V 103fOdd

V03
d p U p

u °
(' O

-C

It
M

--

a 6 p as a ?g 31va
010160 03AOHd
VV
SnJ
x L
C o Q U
C) c Q
W O
Z
?aoQ looqA? 1o8
IIJJ 31V0 -"o =z O L
J a Z ?/?
00
O =
U L>
o

H Q
L'i cu
O
d

J J
J
06 O
N
W

U)
11 _ LU
m
W J O
mU), 7? cna UmQQ
O
w
<
?Q<a
O cr ?:
Q =
?JW
LL
~?
J E
Q
LLZ
w
Q
Q
U
Z
= J
flOz?zQ
i
Z C)
Q N O
O
? c
X O Z 0 c Z
< W Q Z
CD = U) ? C
U) < z )
LL
U U) J
N U
<

? m

u
LL
X W
U) Z
-

F7 < T
x
F-
0 w
? ? W
W
JW
2?
-
U
Z ~ w
? w
?U W
z
F ?wF-
mUjm?
U w ? Cf w
cl?
O ?wQJOQ
QOw00W?
,JW
QU
? UU
?
z< -
} z
z CD
Z w -
w
'?
a=Q

W Z oLL

Z mC

m
? ww
?w
Y a
Z
w
0 O
J Q w U O
Q O= ZT-
O
ZZF- O
Q -(qU U W
Q = JJ
Q Q X J?U)
W
W W C) W =F-z W
J JQ
Jz
w ZF-
> =F-
U) W O=ULL01
w
~WO?F-
o?
Q .
? Z :
0
?
Z
F- z
(AO=O w?
mw OW
P: cc 2-jw
co Jw
=JOQX

?W Z ?.Q ~
Q
U
J
F J O
J m
v? J U-? W Z_
oU
N
z°°'
m wd Q-
O? ?Jw w F-?

?F-z
? OL?< ?
?
>c°flOQ U)D
Q C/) L-Lj ZO ¢ UdTZ??
QC??6
z mm 2F- w wQF-U) Q wW
O?
wO J3:
0
Q Qza:Lu
06
mU w _j
LL z CD w C/) C6
Q
F
t
??F-
J U) 2 F-
J?
? O_Z
-=
=W
a:
?WN? Z= u
WQZ
=(D?ZCD
mZLLQ=) w?
z3: (1 W
a? J

Q co> W ZOUr Q
V wJ J z
W Z

wQaQW
az
0U)
(!1 U .J W
W
? ? W wU)Z?

Z F poOm
?
?- W ?O
OUP za
W J F- D
?z0w
UW

O LLj
J
U) W ->
Y
Q
? W
z?a
O?
W ?
a
Qa? Qm
<W W
F
< m-J J
Z
co w Z? F W_j
?
a!
w

U
LL
QW U)
Z0
2i :E
w
P W Q 2i

Y
W LL.L.w??f
-2
2

U -
w o
0? ?E
m p Q>a
O J 5
W aw
U)
>~ O v 0
a o
0 < J
j
O
=
(
n ?
mm ?? ?a ? ¢E
-Q
?m
f

t
i
1

C
1

S]IIYVA Y °
C a
E w Ln o
KV3 96Z9-t99 (a01)
uzoc-m (a06
ez ON 'a ,.-,aa„
Rolf 0160 31aJ5
SB C O
O J 0 p
- (n

n N L,
oooy woy?M ase ?3ira :a 3JVrv»v ,J3roaa O p ( cy) O
oe u,n as 6..- Ga,aG,.soap 0180160 VJ3 v O
O d N M

a 6 paa a)? IM 03noaae8
o E E O U
a r Q M w
010160
3110 SnJ
M
a o 0 :3 co w z
1j300 4DOqMOd w =z O
J z
O
N o
0 C, U O
to
- ?
o
o0
.-
0? p O .m

D
~ N
o r C
Q 0 O
O O O
_
?d add Q o cn
O p w _
X
O ?Li
-
Q)
no L- -
o
?
a

lL 0?Z M „00-,? -o0 S > '00,01
.
- :
m

Z ?D
/ m

v ?Ln (6
'n o o
/

,? Ln
o in n in in in

o o,0 mm(o(o
in in ?nN

O T.1 1 1 1 1
cDF, NOOn?n
r7 ? i!7 ?n in 0 0
N U
cn zzzzzzz
W
n
O
v (
j o?corn
u/ U J J J J J J J
o Q
/ w
I N
-

Y
-------------

°w
? 1
f a
? w
CO a
?

N I Q
as

I j ?a
E
1 L
0

co o}
°^

I m
N
??? V ?
tt1
i Q>22
D cn D O
,-
??p0 O
mp3Z o
z LL,
cr
o

r 1?
1

0
1

1

1

1

1
1

wo'Rodwolwp+oi....:al!s9a.
n3 e6ZS-C99 (sOL)
$3/C+d/? :3WDS Y p
O
C Q_ U-) (yJ C) M
O

9L1C-C99 (90L)
LIIBL 7N 'all!swooy? O/
fO/6O Sn
(] .
p J p
U
_
(n
?
I)
V 1

O T
V'
„y
9ooa uocwo!II!M 999
Isa9 •Oan aVl 6.- w.aG!suo0 :31V0 :WDWt 133fOdd

0/80/60 *3 O ' O
0 U U
0
Q -0
U
L
V
1'Q
M

co
a 6 p as Q ? :31v0 03n08dd
o/f'O/sO sw? o ~
i a U Q w

?oOQ IDOgMOd B
3,ro NMWO
Sz
O O
Z
-
O z
d J o

rn Q ?

rd, dd

?
k j?\ o c3 `
I c?
-?- m
z
OL
\
i?\
\ w

Lti

U O \`/a\i/
O
\ LL N
O
T
O a
o
w

0 0
F-

w o o
W 11 J W
O m Z p a Y K //\ \?//?/\\ 7=
F
F?
,
,
M m
w
Z?c
Oz
LL ¢

i
0
N
ONE W 1
\?
aIOLw
W LL
o
o0
a
:,i
0'r M 0>w
on-

C) \\\ \
LLj
?2
?y?\?//\\??
\
/\ a
J
\
\
??/j?/
\??/
\
j` o
°
,
,
\ ? Z a
/`\/\y\\i\`/`??\ W l a m
U
J U w In W
J
a a 0
¢ O F O Z ..
om
¢ . f- (D
n
(n
Q

'
W °
z 1) ° o
W
QO
w°wQ
LLI 0 -j m w
X
(
Q?
L(n
F...
-j
O W Q Q m p

it z ? ? ? a A

-AO d-,.a9..,... a?!s9a+
zv3 96ZS-C99 (OOC)
8LK-09 (Y01 )
a
o
'o
S318dn 3NJ5
D/f0/6.0 so

?

w °' °
- p C
p J p 0- U?
? .?
y
C, w

(n ?
C L
N
Ln
L
O
,
ON
ll!nf
(I lBL JN
POOH -02-091W 999
11.9 b., ., 600- ".p!s00J O

;31tl0 :83`N- 1J3f d

0/80/60 dj3
:
?
pl
p , p
O ()

-, ?
Q) L

cr) U

Q

O
't

o
a 6 p as o 3110 03AOdd
0/so/6o sno

3110 NMtltlO Q
0 CL
c
-
O
1

M ?
00

w

=
"?1 J O a , o O g m O`
nl TI 4 T1-11 = z 6
-
J z
O C?
o

?? h a

MMEN,
\

/

W
O ?O \\\ \\
c, z

I
/ co
\\?
/\\ W

W
Li3 >-
Z O
p
N

/??//\?//\\

O
a

U
REN \??\\?\\??\
'

LIJ 2 '
U
Z
LU
O
JC Om
L
k?j UQ

aU :-)w
--j LU
CL
Q

-,'A.oeu.03100owpi wx.. :s??s9PM
03 8 6ZS-C99 (}OL) S31?ldii
:31YOS Y°
C a 0)
E c w QC L
°
9LtC-C99 (VOL)
LI l9Z ON '?II.,a... Rolf 0160 Sg u C
° O
J O O L L

pooy uoswO!ipM
9S9
:31V0 :830.. MrOW
p
p _
'D C-
cn
?
O
lsag 4'A ayl 6uawy P",P!suoO
0180160
V03 u
u
° Q) L .--F
V 1' /

a 6 paa Q

??
:31VO B
03AO8:
E

r u3
O U
a J
Q
I-
w pp

°

. o/Fo/6o sryo .9
31V0 NMtlNO o
"
JOa }Doy?MOa
/I N =Z J O z O
0

?h

m;

LLI -j

L
° ?:
E w .
:
m
zQ
=W

t

Umy
?? Fym Cp

mU
O
n
O
/
U
K \

/?\
/ Q o O=
? OW L] Q
i? ?\ m ? ti _ Il
/? Z \ O

/? ? m OWZ
°
o
7 Q
a
2
`O

U
S ? N N

O? ?

1
1
1
A
1
1
1
1
f
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
APPENDIX 1
Completed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and signed Agent Authorization Form
f
Office Use Only: Form Version March
05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
' I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: RGP No. 198200030
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401
Certification is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is
proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete
section VIII, and check here: ? N/A
¦ 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
? N/A
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Molasses, LLC
P.O. Box 1234
Lexington, North Carolina 27293
Attention: Mr. Tim Ragan
Telephone Number: 336.240.0672 Fax Number: 336.219.3311
Email Address: [e-mail]
I 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization
letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Melanie McKinney
Company Affiliation: S&ME, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
Telephone Number: 336.288.7180 Fax Number: 336.288.8980
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
I Page 6 of 17

' III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing
property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the
vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of
all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the
snaps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS
Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be
included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted
on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of
any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet
version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the
final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on
hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Crane Point at High Rock Lake
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 612-002 & 612-238
3. Location
County: Rowan Nearest Town: Spencer
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Crane Point at High Rock Lake
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
' From Asheville: I-40 East towards Statesville, Take the US 64/NC 90 Exit towards
W Statesville, Turn Right onto US 64/NC 90, US 64/ NC 90 becomes US
70/Industrial Blvd, Take 70 to Jake Alexander Blvd., Take I-85 North to Exit 81 -
Spencer. Right on Long Ferry Road, Right on Lake Farm, Left on Crane Point
Road
From Mooresville: Take Hwy. 150 East towards Salisbury, Take Jake Alexander
Blvd. and merge onto I-85 North to Exit 81- Spencer. Right on Long Ferry Road,
Right on Lake Farm, Left on Crane Point Road
4. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.39.49 ON, 80.19.57 °W
(For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Property size (acres): The project area is approximately 23 Acres
5. Name of nearest receiving body of water: High Rock Lake, C
Index #: 12-(115-2)
Page 7 of 17
1

1
1
0

1
1
1
1

?1
1
I
1
6. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins.
The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
7. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the
project at the time of this application:
The existing land use within the project area is largely undeveloped, hardwood
forest (Photo 3). Generally, canopy vegetation within the study area was
dominated by deciduous hardwoods including willow oak (Quercus phellos),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and northern red oak (Q. rubra). In addition
to the deciduous species, shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) was interspersed within the
canopy of upland areas. Subcanopy trees included blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica),
white oak (Q. alba), red maple (Ater rubrum), eastern red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), American holly (Ilex opaca), and possumhaw (I. decidua). The shrub
layer in upland areas included strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus) and
Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Herbaceous vegetation observed within the
study area included spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila niaculata), gamma grass
(Tripsacum dactyloides), Solomon's seal (Polygonatum biflorum), partridgeberry
(Mitchella repens), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
An existing, maintained powerline easement bisected Lot 10 in the northeastern
portion of the study area, exiting the study area upon crossing a cove. Vegetation
observed in the maintained powerline easement included plume grass (Erianthus
contortus), small-head sunflower (Helianthus microcephalus), goldenrod (Solidago
sp.), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), five-fingers (Potentilla canadensis),
Indian hemp (Apocynum cannabinum), mullein (Verbascum thapsis), and maypops
(Passiflora incarnata). Additionally, saplings of shortleaf pine, willow oak, and
sweetgum were observed within the powerline easement.
Two small wetlands, identified as Wetland A, located in Lots 4 and 5, and Wetland
B, located in Lots 7 and 8 are depicted in Figure 5. Wetlands A and B were
characteristic of wetland pockets that appear to retain water after the lake recedes
from high water levels. Vegetation observed in these areas included river birch
(Betula nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black willow (Salix nigra),
button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), silky dogwood (Corms amomum),
persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), smartweed (Polygonacm sp.), and bugleweed
(Lycopus virginicus).
The portion of the reservoir adjoining the proposed project consists primarily of
sandy silt substrate with some large boulders. Aquatic vegetation was not observed
within this portion of the shoreline. Lap trees (trees growing along the reservoir
shoreline) observed within the study area included river birch, sweet gum,
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), black willow, and green ash. Shrubs observed
along the shoreline included button bush and silky dogwood. Additional shoreline
Page 8 of 17

1??

1
t
F

1
71
J

1

h

1

vegetation observed just outside of the lap area included ironwood (Carpinus
earoliniana) and river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium).
The project area is bordered to the north and east by undeveloped land and
several residences, bordered to the south by High Rock Land, and bordered to the
west by a proposed subdivision.
General land use in the vicinity of the project area is a mixture of residential
subdivisions, single-family residences, and undeveloped land.
8. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
APGI manages and operates High Rock Lake as a principal storage and water
regulation facility for the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. APGI permits residential
development along the shoreline of High Rock Lake in accordance with the
requirements outlined in APGI's Subdivision Access Approval, Multi-Use Facility
Permitting and Industrial Approval Procedures. The subdivision consists of 22
residential homes and associated outbuildings with 11 shoreline lots and 10 eligible
boat piers. Additionally, the proposed project entails the construction of a boat
ramp, a boarding dock, and a lake access road along an approximate 0.15-acre lot,
located west of Lot 1, for use by residents. Construction of the boat ramp will
require authorization through RGP 198200030 and associated Water Quality
Certification No. 3492. Construction activities will be performed "in the dry"
(during periods of draw-down) between the months of October through April
when fish are not spawning. The boat launch will be 16 feet wide constructed of
concrete and extend 85 feet outward. The boat pier and dock will be constructed
of galvanized steel and all deck materials will consist of Trex Decking. The
floating devices of the pier and dock will be encased so that the structures will not
rest on the reservoir bottom. The dock will accommodate watercraft for access
during boarding. Industry-standard construction equipment will be used to
construct the project. Construction will not take place in wetlands.
Of the 11 residential shoreline lots, Lots 1-5 and Lots 7-11 will have private boat
piers offering private access to the reservoir. Lot 6 does not meet the minimum
shoreline width requirement for a private pier and therefore, Molasses, LLC has
proposed for Lots 6 and 7 to share a pier. Lots 1-4 and Lots 8-11 do not require
notification through submittal of a PCN. Lots 5-7 do not satisfy the water depth
requirements to accommodate private piers and private property owners may
excavate the reservoir bottom to accommodate adequate water depth. APGI will
not permit excavation activities until the property owner has received the
appropriate permits from the USACE and DWQ. It will be the responsibility of
individual property owners to obtain USACE, DWQ, and APGI permits for any
excavation activities for private piers. The purpose of this application is to obtain
a RGP 198200030 and associated Water Quality Certification No. 3693 for
construction of the boat ramp within waters of the U.S.
Page 9 of 17

9. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Market analysis and presales of the proposed project substantiate the
community's need for a lakeside residential neighborhood where its members can
appreciate the natural setting of the environment. The purpose of this application
is to obtain a RGP 198200030 and associated Water Quality Certification No. 3693
for construction of the boat ramp within waters of the U.S.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
' project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain.
Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date
permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously
issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved
wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If
this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same
T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules
In October 2007, S&ME completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Crane
Point at High Rock Lake, which was submitted to APGI for approval. The EA
document was prepared in accordance with Section V of the Subdivision Access
' Approval, Multi-Use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Approval Procedures-Yadkin
Project FERC No. 2197 dated July 1, 1999 (Revised July 1, 2002). A portion of this
document included a Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Determination
within the study area (land along the approximately 3,600 linear feet [If] of shoreline
of High Rock Lake, or land within 100 feet of the normal full-pool elevation of 655
feet [Yadkin Datum]). This effort determined the presence of two jurisdictional
forested wetlands, Wetland A, located in Lots 4 and 5, and Wetland B, located in Lots
7 and 8, as depicted in Figure 5. The EA was submitted to various regulatory and
state agencies including the USACE, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), DWQ,
and N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
1 V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated
work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
It is not anticipated that Crane Point at High Rock Lake project will require future
404/401 permits from the USACE nor DWQ. The project will require future permits
from APGI such as any applicable reservoir excavation and private pier construction
permits. It will be the responsibility of individuals to obtain 404/401 permits for any
excavation required in association with private pier construction.
1
I Page 10 of 17

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must
be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately
from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed
impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly
identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams
' (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms
should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's
discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and
describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or
description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the impacts:
proposed The proposed project will entail constructing a concrete boat ramp west of Lot 1

that extends from a cul-de-sac area into High Rock Lake. The impact to the
reservoir bottom associated with the boat ramp is expected to be 0.04 acre (1,615
square feet). The floating sections of the associated boat pier and dock will be
encased so that impact to the reservoir bottom will not occur. The stationary
portions of the dock will be secured by pilings driven into the lake bottom and will
not involve dredging or filling. Construction of the facility will occur while High
Rock Lake is drawn down (during the months of October through April) using
industry-standard equipment and approved construction materials.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.

1
1

Located
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) within
100-year
Floodplain Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact (acres)
(yes/no)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Wetland Impact (acre) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.15 Acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement
Page I 1 of 17

1

1

t

1

[7

1
1
walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If
stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both
the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply
length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Average
Number
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or Stream
Width Impact
Length Area of Impact
(indicate on Intermittent?
Before
(linear feet) (acres)
map)
Impact

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are
not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name
Wate Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number plicablle) e)
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, Impact
(indicate on ma
p)
bay, ocean, etc.) )
(acres)

Dredging due to 0
04
N/A High Rock Lake construction of a Reservoir .
concrete boat launch
6. List the cumulative impact to all Water-, of the I I C recnltino frnm t1,P nrniPnt•
Stream Impact (acres): None
Wetland Impact (acres): None
Open Water Impact (acres): None
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.04 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): None
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or
stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this
section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by
the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond
should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Page 12 of 17

n
No ponds are proposed for the project.
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout
pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
V. Impact Justification Avoidance and Minimization)
,! Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to
provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances,
accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of
alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not
feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was
developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
1 construction to reduce impacts.
APGI enforces strict guidelines that adjacent landowners must comply with to gain
access to the reservoir from their lot. These guidelines aid in avoiding and
minimizing impacts to the reservoir, associated shoreline and waters of the U.S.
(streams), including wetlands and are discussed below:
To comply with APGI's Shoreline Management Plan, Shoreline Stewardship Policy
and Specifications for Private Recreation Facilities, adjacent landowners to High
' Rock Lake must obtain an APGI-administered permit prior to constructing a private
pier. Before APGI will approve such permits, certain criteria, such as water depth,
must be met. However, High Rock Lake is regularly subjected to a high
sedimentation load which decreases the water depth of the reservoir. As a result,
APGI will consider excavation of the reservoir bottom to achieve the required water
1 depth for a private pier through the landowner submitting an "Application for
Activity Permit for Reservoir and Shoreline Alteration (Excavation, Dredge and Fill)"
along with appropriate regulatory agency permits. APGI does not permit activities
that will impact aquatic vegetation or that will occur within waters of the U.S.
Excavation may be considered for Lots 5-7 since the water depth was insufficient for
private or shared piers. APGI will consider Lots 5-7 eligible for excavation of the
reservoir bottom to reach the minimum water depth requirement, because aquatic
vegetation and waters of the U.S. are not located along the shoreline in the vicinity of
the proposed piers. Permitting and approvals associated with excavation adjacent to
Lots 5-7 will be the responsibility of the future private property owners.
Furthermore, APGI requires that piers be specifically designed to avoid impacts to
the reservoir bottom and shoreline environment without mitigation. Specifically,
1 Page 13 of 17
f
piers cannot extend into the reservoir farther than 75 feet from the normal full-pool
elevation. Ramps cannot extend further than it is deemed necessary for the intended
' use. APGI will not permit activities on individual lots that will impact aquatic
vegetation or impacts to waters of the U.S. including Wetlands A and B. No impacts
to Wetlands A and B are proposed for this project.
VI. Mitigation
1 DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of
impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to
perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Pennits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required
when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal.
Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the
impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate
and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate
' and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing
and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as
streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating,
' restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same
watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in
order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any
application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on
' hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for
stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina,
available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
r 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should
provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location
(attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and
amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement,
creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions,
1 conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and
proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is
needed.
It is anticipated that the proposed project will not require mitigation. Therefore,
no mitigation plan has been developed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to
Page 14 of 17
1
contact the NCEEP at [phone] to determine availability, and written approval
from the NCEEP indicating that they are willing to accept payment for the mitigation
' must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland miti
ation re
uested (acres): None
None
g
q
VII. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use
of public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to
' the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is
required, call the SEPA coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for
environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? N/A
' 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so,
please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No
? N/A
VIII. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also
' provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be
listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers
must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers.
Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate.
Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
No Riparian or Watershed Buffers
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213
' .0233 (Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba)
15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or
other (please identify )? Yes ? No
I Page 15 of 17

r
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian
buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by
applying the buffer multipliers.
1

1
IX
1
1
L?
?
t

XI.
I
I
1
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Gone l extends out .9U teet perpendicular trom the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide
calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The total impervious area of the project is dependent upon construction details on
each individual lot. The project is not expected to exceed 24 percent impervious
surface, since a 100-foot buffer in each lot must be maintained due to the APGI
guidelines.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject
facility.
On-site wastewater disposal systems and wells
Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer
Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact pen-nit application? Yes ?
No
I Page 16 of 17

I XII. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes ? No
' If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative
description:
The proposed project outlined in this PCN will follow strict guidelines as set forth by
APGI. It is in the intent of these guidelines to avoid degradation of water quality.
Crane Point at High Rock Lake residential community will not create secondary and
cumulative impacts affecting downstream portions of High Rock Lake.
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of
desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an
applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that
may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates
associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues
outside of the applicant's control).
Activities associated with the impacts outlined in this PCN are anticipated to be
completed before April 2009 when the reservoir is drawn down and fish are not
spawning.
' Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an auth rization letter from the applicant is provided.)
1
1
1
i
Page 17of17
011021 2063 13:48 3362411311 rWut e?
Proposal for Section 404/Section 401 Permitting Services SWE Proposal No. 1588-08-P063
' Crane Point at High Rock Lake Rowan County NC April 3 2008
' AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM *-S&ME
Date: _ 29 -()
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: Crane Point at Nigh Rock Take
Type of Project: Permitting under Regional Permit No. 198200030
-_
............
- ,--.NC.. -.-_ _
Location: Nigh Rock Lake, Rowan County.
i
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name: mJ us-. UiC
Mailing Address: eF O N? L?I ,1-
City, State, Zip Code: T `
' Telephone No.
Contact: #i'?
? *`RA T,&
Agent Information
' Business Na ne:
Street Address:
' City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
' Contact:
t Authorization:
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
[phone]
Ms. Melanie McKinney
27293
I on behalf of
(Coniac?nature)
?0 LaCSf- L g=am hereby authorize
(Name of Landowner or Representative)
S&ME to act as agent with the USAGE in connection with the
above-mentioned project.
5

1

1
1

1

1
D
t
General Regional Permit No. 198200030
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC
APPENDIX 11
Site Photographs
SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
October 16. 2008

7-7
Photo 1: Lot 1, facing northwest from shoreline area
Photo 2: Lot 1, facing southwest within buffer zone
I Photo 3: Lot 3, facing southwest within mature hardwood forest Photo 4: Facing northeast toward beach area in cove of Lot 4
Photo 5: Facing southwest toward Wetland A between Lots 4 Photo 6: Lot 6 facing the point at shoreline
and 5
7/30/07 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Taken by: CAM Sheet No.
Crane Point at High Rock Lake
Checked by: MLM
ME
Project No. 1588-07-047 Rowan County, NC

Photo 11: Lot 11, facing northwest within mature hardwood forest
7/30/07 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Taken by: CAM
Checked by: MLM _ &ME Crane Point at High Rock Lake
Project No. 1588-07-047 Rowan County, NC
Sheet No.
2
Photo T Debris near Lot 6
Photo 8: Debris along beach between Lots 7 and 8
Photo 9: Facing northwest toward Wetland B between Lots 7
and 8
Photo 10: Facing southwest from Lot 10 along powerline
easement

L
1

1
t

u

H
1

General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
APPENDIX III
Upland and Wetland Data Forms, USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination For n

1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Project Site: Crane Point Subdivision Date: 7-25-07
Applicant/Owner: Molasses, LLC County: Rowan
Investigators: Melanie McKinney - S&ME, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes® No? Community
ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes? No® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes? No®
(if needed, explain on reverse) Plot ID: Wetland B

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
VEGETATION (In Order of Str

I. Dominant Plant Species
Betula nigra
2. Salix nigra
3. Cornus amomum
4. Cephalanthus occidentalis
5. Diospyros virginiana
6. Lycopus virginicus
7.
8.
t) Note those species observed to nave morphological adaptatl
Stratum
canopy Indicator
FACW Dominant Plant Species
9.
canopy FACW 10.
canopy OBL 11.
shrub FACW 12.
shrub FAC 13.
here FAC 14.
15.
16.
to weuands with an F
Stratum Indicator
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands.
Describe Morphological Adaptations: N/A
Remarks: Wetland B
HVDROLOGV
RECORDED DATA PRIMARY (1 or more required)
(Describe in Remarks) INDICATORS
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gage ? Inundated
? Aerial Photograph ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Other ® Water Marks
® No Recorded Data Available ? Drift Lines
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ? Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: none SECONDARY (2 or more required)
INDICATORS
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: surface ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland B
1
1
A
1
1
1
1
1
q"11.";
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations ?
Taxonomy Loamy, kaolinitic, thermic, arenic, kan hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
(Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concreations,
[aches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc.
0-6 " A 10 YR 3/2 None None Silt loam
6-18" Btg 10 YR 5/2 None None Silt clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfide Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
H dric Soil Present? Yes ® No El
Remarks: Wetland B
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No?
Is this Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes® No?
Remarks: Wetland B

1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project Site: Crane Point Subdivision Date: 7-25-07
Applicant/Owner: Molasses, LLC County: Rowan
Investigators: Melanie McKinney - S&ME, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes® No? Community
ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes? No® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes? No®
(if needed, explain on reverse) Plot ID: Wetland A

1
1
1
1
1
1
I) ivote those species observes to nave morpnologlcal aaaptau
Stratum
canopy Indicator
FACW Dominant Plant Species
9.
canopy FACW 10.
canopy OBL 11.
shrub FACW 12.
herb FAC 13.
herb FAC 14.
15.
16.
s to wetlanas wan an °
Stratum Indicator
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100%
Include species noted (*) as showing morphological adaptations to wetlands.
Describe Morphological Adaptations: N/A
Remarks: Wetland A

' HYDROLOGY
RECORDED DATA PRIMARY (1 or more required)
(Describe in Remarks) INDICATORS
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gage ? Inundated
? Aerial Photograph ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Other ® Water Marks
® No Recorded Data Available ? Drift Lines
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: ? Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: none SECONDARY (2 or more required)
INDICATORS
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: surface ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland A

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15% s lopes Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations ?
Taxonomy Loamy, kaolinitic, thermic, are nic, kan hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
(Subgroup):
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concreations,
Niches Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc.
0-12 " A 10 YR 4/2 None None Sand loam
12-20" Btg 10 YR 5/1 None None Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfide Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
H dric Soil Present? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Wetland A
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No[]
Is this Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes® No?
Remarks: Wetland A

u
0

1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030 SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Crane Point at Hiqh Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC October 16, 2008
APPENDIX IV
APGI Subdivision Access Approval Letter dated March 6, 2008

Alcoa Power Generating Inc.
Yadkin Division
© PO Box 576
ALCOA Badin, North Carolina 28009-0576
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.alcoa.com/\/adkin
March 6, 2008
Mr. Tim Ragan
Mr. Dan Smith
Molasses, LLC
P.O. Box 1234
Lexington, NC 27293
RE: APGI Yadkin Project (FERC No. 2197)
' Crane Point at High Rock Reservoir Lots 1- 11 and Multi-use Facility
Dear Messieurs Ragan and Smith,
Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI), through its Yadkin Division (Yadkin), has
reviewed the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Agency Consultation documents
' as prepared and submitted by S&ME, Inc. for Lots 1-11 with 10 private piers (one
shared pier and nine individual piers) and the proposed multi-use facility that
includes a boat ramp, a dock, and a reservoir access road on the community "Lake
' Access Lot" intended to serve the Crane Point residential development in Rowan
County, North Carolina and has determined that Yadkin's applicable EA and/or
Agency Consultation Process requirements for Subdivision Access Approval as set
forth in the Yadkin Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) have been satisfied.
As a reminder, High Rock Reservoir, because of its size, functions as a storage
' reservoir and serves as the principal storage and water regulation facility for nearly
the entire Yadkin/Pee Dee River including Yadkin's and other's downstream
hydroelectric operations. The operation of High Rock powerhouse, and
' consequently releases of water through the turbines, depends primarily on current
water level, streamflow into the Reservoir, and time of year. Because High Rock
' Reservoir is a storage reservoir, there are seasonal fluctuations in reservoir water
levels. Also, because of Yadkin's minimum water discharge requirements,
extensive drawdowns of the Reservoir can occur during drought conditions.
' Yadkin manages the FERC-licensed Yadkin Project (Project) in an environmentally
responsible manner, generally consistent with the recommendations of State and
Federal resource agencies. Accordingly, Yadkin has reviewed the EA along with
agency comments from the NC Division of Parks and Recreation (NCDPR), NC
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), and the NC Department of Natural
' Resources (NCDENR) and has made the following determinations about eligibility
for private residential access to the reservoir and the proposed community boat
ramp and dock.

7
In order for Lots 1-11 to be determined eligible for a pier, the lots must meet the
following relevant eligibility requirements as described in the SMP:
A. Lots must meet the minimum lot width, water depth, and cove width
specifications outlined in the Private Recreation Facility Specifications.
B. In new subdivisions platted and recorded on or after July 1, 1999, lots must
maintain a 100-foot forested setback. Additionally, all structures (including
t but not limited to buildings, houses, driveways, roof overhangs, decks,
porches, patios, cantilevered decks, stairs, posts, columns, fences, retaining
walls, landscaping walls, and gazebos) must be set back at least 100-ft from
' the reservoir shoreline.
' C. In order for a lot in a new subdivision to be eligible for a private pier, the
subdivision developer must have satisfied Yadkin's applicable Environmental
Assessment or Agency Consultation Process requirements and obtained
' subdivision access approval as set forth in Yadkin's Subdivision Access,
Multi-use Facility Permitting, and Industrial Use Procedures of the SMP
(Procedures).
' Eligibility Determination
The EA along with additional information provided by S&ME, Inc. provides sufficient
information to determine whether Lots 1-11 meet these eligibility requirements (see
table below). Yadkin may verify this information with actual field measurements
0

R

Lot No. Lot Width ft Cove Width (ft) Water Depth ft
1 200.0 N/A 8
2 219.1 N/A 8
3 288.2 N/A 8
4 275.8 N/A 8
5 327.6 175.0 6
6 shared with Lot 7 116.3 N/A 6
7 shared with Lot 6 210.6 168.0 6
8 255.5 168.0 8
9 253.2 189.0 8
10 215.6 179.0 8
11 290.0 179.0 8
As measured by Molasses, LLC during onsite meeting with Robbie Cole, Alcoa.
Minimum Requirements
Lots 1 - 5 and Lots 8-11 meet the requirement that adjacent landowners each have
200 feet minimum shoreline width for an individual pier. While Lot 7 meets the
minimum shoreline width requirement for an individual pier, Lot 6 does not;
therefore, Molasses, LLC has proposed that Lots 6 and 7 share a pier. As such, Lot
7 will not be eligible for an individual pier.

1

1
1
1

1

u
Lots 1-4 and Lots 8-11 meet Yadkin's minimum water depth eligibility requirement of
eight feet within 75-ft of the shoreline or'/4 of the cove width, whichever is less.
Lots 5-7 do not meet Yadkin's minimum water depth eligibility requirement.
Excavation may be an option to increase the water depth adjacent to these lots. As
a reminder, Lots 5 and 7 are located in coves with a width of 175 feet and 168 feet,
respectively, therefore, the water depth eligibility requirement of eight feet must be
met within'/4 of the cove width (or 43.75 feet and 42 feet, respectively). Please
keep in mind that any excavation must be conducted and completed in accordance
with the specifications for Shoreline and Reservoir Alteration (Section VII) of the
Shoreline Stewardship Policy. Additionally, excavation will not be permitted in
wetland areas or areas where aquatic vegetation is present.
In order to receive approval for excavation, the applicant must first satisfy the
application requirements described in the SMP. Included in these requirements (but
not limited to) is the approval of the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) by way of a Section 404
permit and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. No excavation will be
permitted in a Conservation Zone without NCWRC concurrence. Only once the
necessary permits and approvals are obtained may excavation occur.
The water depth at the proposed boat ramp and associated dock was not described
in the EA. As a reminder, all proposed slips or all portions of the multi-use facilities
intended for docking watercraft must meet the minimum water depth of 8-feet.
100-Foot Forested Setback
In order to be eligible for a private pier, vegetation within 100-foot forested setback
MUST be maintained as it existed prior to development. This approval of eligibility
is given on the condition that, at a minimum, the existing buffer is maintained in
accordance with the vegetation management guidelines outlined in Yadkin's
Shoreline Stewardship Policy.
Multi-Use Facility Approval
Molasses, LLC has proposed a boat ramp, a dock, and a reservoir access road on
the community "Lake Access Lot". The proposed boat ramp will be approximately
15 feet wide and will consist of reinforced concrete six inches thick. The proposed
dock will be constructed in accordance with the plan view in the EA adjacent to the
proposed boat ramp. The proposed dock will accommodate two boats and will be
utilized for short-term docking while boats are boarded.
Before Yadkin can issue a Construction Permit for the multi-use facilities (dock and
boat ramp), you must first satisfy the application requirements described in the
Procedures (III. Multi-use Facility Permitting Process). To date, Yadkin has not
received a complete Multi-use Facility Permit Application and a Pre-Application
1

P

Meeting Worksheet (enclosed). A complete application and worksheet must also
include the following:
• construction plans or detailed drawings of the proposed facilities at a scale of
1:2,400 (1 inch = 200 feet) or larger,
• certification by a registered Professional Engineer that the proposed facilities
and any modifications planned for existing facilities are safe and structurally
sound,
• copies of all necessary county, state, and federal permits required for the
planned facility(ies) or proof that such permits have been applied for, and
• a non-refundable application fee in accordance with Yadkin's fee schedule
with checks made out to Alcoa Power Generating Inc., Yadkin Division.
Yadkin will determine whether to issue a multi-use facility Construction Permit
based on its review of a complete Multi-Use Facility Application and Worksheet.
Agency Recommendations
Agency comments from the NCDPR, NCWRC, and the NCDENR have been
received and reviewed. In addition to the requirements of eligibility discussed
above, the following agency recommendations will be applicable, as appropriate, to
both private recreation facilities and multi-use facilities:
• The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed
for any land disturbing activity. An erosion and sedimentation control plan
will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed. Plan must be filed
with proper Local Program at least 30 days before beginning activity.
• Any out-of-use water supply wells must be abandoned in accordance with 15
A NCAC 2C.0113.
• Any open burning associated with land clearing debris must be in compliance
with 15 A NCAC 2D. 1900.
• An in-water work moratorium must take place during April 1 to June 1 to
minimize impacts to spawning fish and to the survivability of young fish.
• Suitable trees and brush or other "Fish-Friendly" structures should be placed
under fixed piers to provide complex aquatic life habitat. These should be
constructed and maintained for the life of the pier.
• The use of pesticides, fertilizers, and cleaners must be avoided near or over
water.
• Where practicable, jurisdictional waters (including wetlands) and buffers
should be set aside as common areas instead of being subdivided into
portions of individual lots. Reservoir access easements through buffer zones
are recommended. Maximum available buffers will ensure aquatic habitat
benefits and protect shoreline habitat values. Buffers should be forested
areas that run contiguously with the shoreline.
• The NCWRC Standard Recommendations for Marina Activities on Lakes
should also be considered.
4

Next Steps
' Yadkin's applicable EA and/or Agency Consultation Process requirements for
Subdivision Access Approval as set forth in the SMP have been satisfied.
Yadkin will accept and begin processing private pier applications from homeowners
'
with a house under roof on Lots 1-4 and Lots 8-11.
Permit for the multi-use facilities boat ram
Before Yadkin can issue a Construction ( p
and dock), you must first satisfy the application requirements described in the
Procedures (III. Multi-use Facility Permitting Process). To date, Yadkin has not
received a complete Multi-use Facility Permit Application and a Pre-Application
Meeting Worksheet (enclosed).
This letter in no way constitutes pre-approval or conditional approval of any private
pier or other activities to occur on the Yadkin-Managed Buffer, along the shoreline,
or in the reservoirs (including installation of private individual or shared piers, or
multi-use facilities; shoreline stabilization measures; pathways; vegetation clearing,
or excavation). Permission to install structures, construct piers, or clear or plant
vegetation will be considered with the individual property owners and will be granted
in accordance with Yadkin's policies and practices at such time as permission is
applied for.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] or marshall.olson(C-)-alcoa.com if
' you have questions or need additional information.

Marshall Olson
Environmental and Natural Resources Manager
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Melanie L. McKinney, S&ME

1
1 '

L

1

1
1
General Regional Permit No. 198200030
Crane Point at High Rock Lake, Rowan County, NC
APPENDIX V
Copies of Agency correspondence
SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
October 16, 2008

d STAl f °
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
December 20, 2007
Melanie McKinney
S&ME
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
' Re: Crane Point Subdivision, S&ME No. 1588-07-047, High Rock Lake, Rowan County, ER 07-2241
Dear Ms. McKinney:
Thank you for your letter of October 15, 2007, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources that would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
' Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Peter Sandbeck
1
1
1
Location: 109 East Joncs Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC: 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599
Ll

P_J

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission P
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
1 Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: November 7, 2007
SUBJECT: Crane Point at High Rock Residential Development, Environmental Assessment,
High Rock Lake, DENR Project No. 08-0127, Rowan County
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed
the subject document and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are
provided in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 791a-
825r) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et
seq.).
' Crane Point at High Rock is a residential subdivision located on the shoreline of High Rock Lake
which is an Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. (Yadkin) impoundment. Proposed facilities for the 22
residential homes include 10 boat piers and a boat ramp (lot 11) with a boarding dock and access
road. The project impacts do not appear to be located within a designated Conservation Zone.
No areas of Significant Aquatic Endangered Species habitat are located in or adjacent to the
project area; however, four (4) small forested riparian wetlands are indicated for lots 4, 5, 7 and
8. The Bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus (NCT, FT) is known from High Rock Lake.
' Should Yadkin decide to allow the proposed project, we will not object to the proposed project
provided the applicant adheres to the Yadkin Shoreline Management Plan including the 100-foot
forested setback requirement for each of the lots. We offer the following additional suggestions
to reduce future impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife and their habitats.
1. An in-water work moratorium of 1 April to 1 June should be provided to minimize
impacts to spawning fish and to increase the survivability of young fish.
2. Suitable trees and brush or other "Fish-Friendly" structures should be placed under fixed
piers to provide complex aquatic life habitat. These should be constructed and
maintained for the life of the pier.
3. Use of pesticides, fertilizers, and cleaners near or over water should be avoided.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
1 Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
j

Page 2
November 7. 2007
Crane Point at
High Rock Lake

1
t
1
1

4. Strict erosion and sedimentation controls measures should be installed and used before
beginning any land clearing or construction. These measures should be routinely
inspected and properly maintained.
5. Where practicable, jurisdictional waters (including wetlands) and buffers should be set
aside as common areas instead of being subdivided into portions of individual lots. Lake
access easements through buffer zones are recommended. Maximum available buffers
will ensure aquatic habitat benefits and protect shoreline habitat values. Buffers should
be forested areas that run contiguously with the shoreline. An access/walking trail may
be placed in the buffer zone providing it is kept away from waters to the extent
practicable, it is pervious, and its width does not exceed minimum width requirements
specified in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
6. Although the project is not likely to directly affect Bald eagles, the US Fish and Wildlife
Service should be contacted for their concurrence that the project will not negatively
affect the Bald eagle or any plant or animal species within their purview. Habitat
protection should be implemented to provide long term protection for any perching,
nesting and foraging trees that may be used by Bald eagles.
Although not specific to this site, the attached general recommendations for marinas are provided
as information for Yadkin and project proponent's review and consideration as they plan and
develop the project. Please be advised that this office does not evaluate for plants. The NC
Natural Heritage Program and the US Fish and Wildlife Service should be contacted for site
review and evaluation concerning plant and animal species within their respective jurisdictions.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. If we can provide further assistance
please contact our office at 336-769-9453.
Attachment: Standard Recommendations for Marina Activities on Lakes
Cc: Melanie McKinney, S&ME
E-copy: Todd Ewing, WRC
John Ellis, USFWS

I
Page 3
' November 7, 2007
Crane Point at
High Rock Lake

1

1

r-I

1
Standard Recommendations for Marina Activities on Lakes
1. Boat slips should not be placed so as to impede or block navigation or create a navigational hazard for
recreational vessels. Reflectors or night lights may be needed for recreational safety.
2. Boat slips should not extend into the lake further than necessary. Shoreline management guidance should
be followed to minimize impacts to open waters. Dock facilities should not extend more than a third (1/3),
preferably less than a quarter (1/4) of the total water body width.
3. If any dredging is necessary, it should be done in the dry (if possible) when the lake level is low. This will
minimize sedimentation into the lake. NCWRC discourages dredging shallow water areas with productive
bottom, wetlands, or submerged aquatic vegetation. We are less concerned with dredging shallow areas
having a mud or sand substrate.
4. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted to determine if a 404 Permit is required. The NC
Division of Water Quality should be contacted to determine if certifications and stonnwater permits are
necessary.
5. Any existing Environmental Areas, Natural Areas and shoreline buffers in the area should be surveyed or
photographed to create a permanent record of current habitat conditions. Copies of this documentation
should be permanently maintained. These habitat areas and any newly established habitats should be
protected through common area conservation easements, individual lot deed restrictions or other
enforceable methods to prevent future direct and/or indirect habitat impacts. Should impacts occur, project
proponents should guarantee restoration of any affected habitats to original pre-disturbance conditions.
6. Boating restrictions and lake access restrictions may be appropriate that prevent and minimize secondary
impacts from boat wakes and shoreline activities to Environmental Areas and shoreline buffers.
7. Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is disturbed and maintained until project
completion. Excavated materials should not be stockpiled where sediment will erode to surface waters.
8. Concrete is toxic to aquatic organisms so procedures which prevent wet concrete from contacting surface
waters should be used.
9. Beneficial undisturbed forested shoreline buffers should be provided and promoted. We recommend
shoreline reforestation using autochthonous (native) plants. These should include large woody shrubs and
trees. Disturbed buffers should be restored to naturally forested conditions. Depending on local
conditions, buffers can be replanted with silky dogwood, river birch, red maple, silky willow, tag alder,
black willow, sycamore, or other native woody species to provide improved habitat, stability and shade.
Note that silky dogwood, silky willow and black willow can be planted as live stakes collected during the
dormant growing season. Cuttings should be randomly planted on four (4) foot centers from the waters
edge to the top of the bank. Trees should be planted on ten (10) to twelve (12) foot centers. Disturbed
banks should be temporarily replanted with a temporary crop of annual wheat or oats. Once established,
native woody plants should improve habitats along the edge of the lake and provide water quality benefits
as well as improve aesthetics.
10. Fencing is recommended to protect buffers and direct users to provided access points.
11. Although not recommended, a walking trail may be placed in the buffer zone providing it is kept away
from waters to the maximum extent practicable, it is pervious, and its width does not exceed minimum
width requirements specified in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). NCWRC recommends "Fish-
Friendly" structures for ADA piers and docks as these devices provide attractive fish habitat.
12. If fueling stations or maintenance areas will be provided, emergency spill containment and stormwater
management activities should be provided that meet Division of Water Quality and Emergency
Management requirements. Emergency spill containment equipment should be readily available on site.
13. All activities must follow established shoreline management plans and any conditions specified by the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, including buffer requirements.
14. If any water and sewer connections will be provided for piers and manila facilities, Department of
Environmental Health and Division of Water Quality requirements must be followed to avoid any noxious
conditions or health concerns.
1

t
North Carolina
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Natural Resources
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
September 5, 2008
Ms. Melanie McKinney
' S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
Subject: Proposed Crane Point Subdivision - Crane Point Road; High Rock Lake, Rowan County
S&ME Project No. 1588-07-047
Dear Ms. McKinney:
' The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, significant
natural heritage areas, or conservation/managed areas at the site nor within 1/2-mile of the project area.
(An identified natural area lies within a mile to the south, but across an arm of the lake.) We presume
that the State Threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) does occur/forage at High Rock Lake
' during parts of the year; however, we have no record of a nest within several miles of the project site.
' You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.ncnhp.org for a listing of
rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our
Program also has a new website that allows users to obtain information on element occurrences and
significant natural heritage areas within two miles of a given location:
<http://nhpweb.enr.state.nc.us/nhis/public/gmap75_main.phtml>. The user name is "public" and the
password is "heritage". You may want to click "Help" for more information.
NC OneMap now provides digital Natural Heritage data online for free. This service provides site
specific information on GIS layers with Natural Heritage Program rare species occurrences and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas. The NC OneMap website provides Element Occurrence (EO) ID
' numbers (instead of species name), and the data user is then encouraged to contact the Natural Heritage
Program for detailed information. This service allows the user to quickly and efficiently get site specific
NHP data without visiting the NHP workroom or waiting for the Information Request to be answered by
NHP staff. For more information about data formats and access, visit <www.nconemap.com>, then click
on "FTP Data Download", and then "nheo.zip" [to the right of "Natural Heritage Element Occurrences"]
You may also e-mail NC OneMap at <datag0ancmail.net> for more information.
' Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry-.,. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
1 Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 NOOne
Phone: [phone] FAX. [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ Carolina
;Viatunally
' An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper

r-
LIB

1

*- S&ME
September 3, 2008
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Attention: Mr. Brian Cole
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
Raleigh Office
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Attention: Mr. Harry LeGrand
Reference: Regional General Permit No. 198200030
Proposed Crane Point Subdivision
Crane Point Road
High Rock Lake, Rowan County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1588-07-047
Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. LeGrand:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) conducted a protected species assessment on July 30, 2007, for an
area defined as 100 feet from the normal pool elevation of High Rock Lake on the above
referenced tract. The purpose of the assessment was to develop an opinion of the
presence of suitable habitat for federal and state protected threatened and endangered
species for inclusion in an Environmental Assessment (EA) Report. Although potentially
suitable habitat was identified for Schweinitz's sunflower along a power line right-of-
way, no individuals of this species were identified.
S&ME is requesting comments from both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program for inclusion in our permit application for a
Regional General Permit No. 198200030. The permit is being submitted for construction
of a boat ramp that will service the proposed subdivision.
The subject site totals approximately 23 acres adjacent to High Rock Lake in Rowan
County, North Carolina. The subdivision consists of 22 residential homes and associated
outbuildings with 11 shoreline lots and 10 eligible boat piers. Additionally the project
entails the construction of a boat ramp, a boarding dock, and a lake access road for use by
SWE, INC. / 3718 Old Battleground Road / Greensboro, INC 27410 / p 336.288.7180 f 336.288.8980 / www.smeinc.com

P
t
t
d S
i
R
i
ro
ec
e
pec
es
ev
ew SWE Project No. 1588-07-047
Regional General Permit No. 198200030 September 3 2008
' its resident
Fi
d
i
ti
h
s.
gures
ep
c
ng t
e project area are attached for your reference. Thank
you for your review of this project.
'
Federally Protected Species
' According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service online database accessed September 2,
2008, the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was listed as protected under the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
was listed with a current record status as endangered (E) for Rowan County, North
Carolina. The Carolina darter (Etheostoma collis collis), Robust redhorse
(Moxostoma robustum), Yellow lampmussel (Lampsilis cariosa), Prairie birdsfoot-
trefoil (Lotus unifoliolatus var. helleri), and Virginia quillwort (Isoetes virginica)
were listed as federal species of concern (FSC) for Rowan County, North Carolina.
' Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum) was listed as a candidate species (C).
State Protected Species
'
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program online database was
conducted
on September 2, 2008 for the Southmont, NC topographic quadrangle. The Bald Eagle
H
li
(
a
aeetus leucocephalus) was listed as state threatened (T) and the Eastern Small-
footed Myotis (Myotis leibii) was listed as a state species of concern (SC) for the

' Southmont, NC quadrangle.
Closing
' We respectfully request official correspondence from your office for inclusion in our
permit application regarding your input related to the threatened and/or endangered

' species that may be affected by the proposed project.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
/ 1 1L1 6't )
Melanie McKinney, L.S.S.
Natural R
P
M
a
esources
roject
an
ger
i Attachments: Figures

' 2
tw
X7" 1

?i
tf i ? - {? Efp 6
n
,f ? Dt f
1, ; R- - ? t f t , °' r

Ot:ained from Jibrerrra f 1 gt'f{?
k p°.,?
Scale: 1 inch equals 1,000 feet. 11 USGS Topographic Map I FIGURE
Drawn bye ML
Reviewed by dBP
Date,: August, 2007
Crane Point Subdivision EA
Rowan County, NC
S&ME
SWE Project #1588-07-047
2

PaC
PaD -/
\ Pac
r

VaB
by
Y ' PaB

i i

VaB
_ r

Soil information was obtained
CH I k! ZS{ E'Li LP ?'k`a t F.,, l_I lE.: k
r -42
'i V Fit'
!? 1
PaC
CeB2: Cecil sandy loam 2-8% slopes, eroded
PaC: Pacolet sandy loam 8-15% slopes
PaD: Pacolet sandy loam 15-25% slopes
PcC2: Pacolet sandy clay loam 8-15% slopes, eroded
a
j
COB2 \COC\
ttp:UsoiIdatarnart.nres.usda..ga? ', .. ,
Soils Map
Crane Point Subdivision EA
Rowan County, NC
S&ME-
S&MProject #1588-07-047
¦
Drawn by: MLM
4 Reviewed by:.lgp
Date: August, 2007
NTtieB2
FIGURE
3
?f9L - S9
R

1 ¦

Legend
1 Proposed Boat Piers
' Scale: 1 inch equals 292 feet
Drawn b : MLM
Reviewed by: JBP ME?-
Date: A a „ni ic+ Onn7
Aerial Photograph FIGURE
Crane Point Subdivision EA
Rowan County, NC
S&ME Project #1588-07-047