The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20011231 All Versions_Mitigation Information_20010906�� UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) Stream: U7 to Dixon Brench County: Mecklenburg 401 Issued: 9/6/2001 TIP: R-2248D 400 tee[ Total Length of Project 400 fee[ Credits Used for Project 0 fee[ Credits Remaining Stream Setting: Rurel Status: Active q00 fee[ Total Length of Project feet Restoration / Relocation Monitoriny Plan Sheets ves Plan SF�eets/Aerials Lepible7 _ Yes Plans Ovedald on Aerial7 Yes �� ^� dear7 Yesl MO� �� photo polr�7 WetlarW MidpetlOn type5 NA�. dearlydelinea6ed7 -NA Vep plots dear and In all . . mitlpatlon/ecosys0em types7 Stream Setting: Rurol qp0 feet Credits Used for Project feet Enhancement General Monitoring Plan Comments Clear aerial with photo pointr and buffer delineated. Problem areas should be indicated on azrial. Rd xirg sheuld not be part of easrrient. otherveyeeaeoo Monlboriny Revlew Items Yes I^°aslves reportad in the moni6oriny report. Yes �� Invasives obaerved duNnq slte Wslt Yes .. I^vasives treatad durinp arrent i monitorinp year or past7 ves ��aemeMal PlaMlnq duriny current � or past monitariny year7 Invasives treated 2013, supplemental planting 2011, 2012, and 2014. Buffer was sparse, see site visit notes. Ofeet CreditsRemaining fee[ Preservation Conservatlon EasemeM � No Conservation Easement ... EncroachmeM ReportedT None noted. Ck signage during site visit. STREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Stream Monitoring Success Requirements -a �� V e � � �i' w �,..,�s -Visual Vegetation Monitoring only required � h r � r�� ,J `;,,� rv -Visual Stream Stability Monitoring only Required y� 1l•Lr l�' Si i-t Photo Documen[ation Required -Level 1 � lti� �,�,�1J r�� 9��-j Level of Stream Monitorina Reauired 5 / M �eM- SU ��'' '�-� t�� f i .�-� 1'��5� (��Sf- POn e� Level of Stream Monitorin¢ Required � Two Bankful Events are required ,�),U � S r� Bankful event observed in past year 1� Other Monkoring rtequirements , Serious bank scour at sharp bends. See Site visit notes for 2014 monitoring plan notes. � VEGETATION MONITORING SUMMARY Stems/ Supple. Year Year Plant. Comments 2009 N/inter NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings in 2Q10 2009 Summer NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings in 2030 2010 Winter NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings after remedial work takes place on the stream. 2010 Summer NCDOT plans to replantType I and II plantings by March 2011 now that the stream remediation work is complete. 2011 Winter NCDOT replanted Type I and II plantings on March 2, 2011. 2011 Summer Lespedeza is very thick throughout this site but some of the planted seedlings are surviving within the buffer area. 2012 Winter Lespedeza is very thick throughout this site but some of the planted seedlings are surviving within the buffer area. 2012 Summer . Regulatory agencies stated that additional planted species were needed within the buffer. NCDOT plans to complete multiple herbicide applications on the lespedeza in the summer of 2013 and replant the buffer in the 2013/2014 planting window. 2013 Winter Regulatory agencies stated that additional planted species were needed within the buffer. NCDOT plans to complete multiple herbicide applications on the lespedeza in the summer of 2013 and replant the buffer in the 2013/2014 planting window. 2013 Summer NCDOT completed two herbicide applications on the, lespedeza and plan to replant the left buffer and the left streambank between January to March 2014. OTHER GENERAL COMMENTS Site review and recommendation for remedial action received 1/6/15, to fix meander bends that are highly scoured and unstable: See laserfishe. Is credit given to legth of stream that has heavy rip rap shown in winter monitoring photo point 4 upstream? UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) Stream: UT to Dixon Branch County: Mecklenburg 4011ssued: 9/6/2001 TIP: R-2248D 400 feec Total Length of Project 400 feec Credits Used for Project 0 feec Credits Remaining Stream Setting: Rurel Status: Active 40p feec 7otal Length of Project feec Restoretion / Reloca[ion Monkoring Man Sheets Yes Plan Sheets/Aerials Legible7 Yes Plans Overlaid on Aerial7 � PhMo points clear7 Yes M�s wlth photo points7 Watland Mitlgatlon types NA ��early dellneatedi NA �� Plots dear and in all mltlgatlon/awrystam qpes7 Stream Setting: Rurel 400 feec Credits Used for Project fee� Enhancement General Monitoring Plan Comments OtherVeyefatlon Monitoring Review Itams Yes I^vaslves reported in the monitoring report Yes Invasives observed during site vlslt. Yes Invaslves treated during current monitorinq year or past7 Supplementsl Planting during current r Yes . . -- or past monitoring year2 Ofeet CreditsRemaining feec Preservation Conservatlon Easement i No Conservation Easement Eneroachment Reported? None noted. Ck signage during site visit. U� dL?�" Invasives treated 2013�supplemental planting / 2011, 2012, and 2014. Buffer was sparse, see / site visit notes. � Clear aerial with photo points and buffer delineated. � r Problem areas should be indicated on aerial. Rd xing � should not be part of easment. ' �� STREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Stream Monitoring Success Requirements - uired \ / v ,�(- -Visual Stream S[ability Monitoring only Required Photo Documentation Required Level of Stream MonitorinR Required -Level 1 Level of Stream Monitorina Required Two Bankful Events are required Bankful event observed in past year �e�p�,� Z � et� S Other Monitoring Requlrements Serious bank scour at sharp bends. See Site visit notes for 2014 monitoring plan notes. Stems/ Supple. Year Year Plant. 2009 Winter 2009 Summer 2010 Winter 2010 Summer 2011 Winter 2011 Summer z012 Winter VEGETATION MONITORIIVG SUMMA►RY Comments NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings in 2010 NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings in 2010 NCDOT proposes to replant Type I and II plantings after remedial work takes place on the stream. NCDOT plans to replant Type I and II plantings by March 2011 now that the stream remediation work is complete. NCDOT replanted Type I and II plantings on March 2, 2011. Lespedeza is very thick throughout this site but some of the planted seedlings are surviving within the buffer area. Lespedeza is very thick throughout this site but some of the planted seedlings are surviving within the buffer area. 2012 Summer Regulatory agencies stated that additional planted species were needed within the buffer. NCDOT plans to complete multiple herbicide applications on the lespedeza in the summer of 2013 and replant the buffer in the 2013/2014 planting window. 2013 Winter Regulatory agencies stated that additional planted species were needed within the buffer. NCDOT plans to complete multiple herbicide applications on the lespedeza in the summer of 2013 and replant the buffer in the 2013/2014 planting window. 2013 Summer NCDOT completed two herbicide applications on the lespedeza and plan to replant the left buffer and the left streambank between January to March 2014. OTHER GENERAL COMMENTS Site review and recommendation for remedial action received 1/6/15, to fix meander bends that are highly scoured and unstable. See laserfishe. Is credit given to legth of stream that has heavy rip rap shown in winter monitoring photo point 4 upstream? 5` SITE VISIT HISTORY � y�'�Cti��,J TIP: R-22486 Mitigation Site: UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) i- �� DATE COMMENTS S/6/2014 visit with Alan. There are two blow out areas with scour and sluffing bank that need repair, Alan requested in Apr 2014. Blowouts located at sharp corners, expanding pools can be seen in the aerials. Blowouts covered in veg, ard to see sluffingbank. Ke.�S S� �X:F,uCCtSa�'l� J n>..l':+•e�ws F�' 8/6/2014 Would rip-rep bank 5. of xing cause reduced credit�� .b. �' G �`h �."� ' F,�Eh� h��'�� u � 8/6/2014 Poor tree vigor and sparse growth on both banks. More evident on E. bank that was mowed, some trees planted in. Agencies did not talk about veg problems with DOT at Apr site visit. Containerized or ball and burlap saplings would have better survival rete. 8/6/2014 Areas with dense Lezpedeza on site (S. side especially) that could be impacting sapling growth. 9/9/2014 v, •' ��/.v 10 UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) Stream: UT to Dixon Brench County: Mecklenburg 401 Issued: 9/6/2001 'IP: VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY 2009 Winter 2009 Summer Station 9+90-Y7- 9+S0-V7- 9+90.V7- 9+80-Y7- Structure Type Crossvane Crossvane Piping through/ around structure? Is headcut or downcut present? Bank or scour eroslon present? Bank erosion on Bank erosion on right bank right bank Other problems noted? Right arm of Rlght arm of crossvane has crossvane has fallen into s[ream been displaced in � to channel 2010 Winter 2010 Summer Station 9+90 Y-7 9+80 V-7 . 10+40 Y-7 & 10+80 Y-7 10+40 Y-7 10+20 V-7 10+80 V-7 Structure Type Piping through/ around structure? Is headcut or downcut present? eank or scour erosion present? Bank erosion Bank erosion Bank Ba�k Bank on right bank on lek bank swuring on scouring on scouring on left bank lek bank left bank Other problems notedt Right arm of crossvane has been displaced into channel. 2011 Winter 2011 Summer Station 30+80 Y-7 30+40 V-7 10+20 V-7 10+80 Y-7 10+40 Y-7 Structure Type Piping through/ around structure? Is headcut or downcut present? •, .• UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) Stream:UT to Dixon Brench County: Mecklenburg 401 Issued: 9/6/2001 'IP: VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARY Bank or scour erosion present? Bank xouring Bank scouring Bank stouring Bank scouring Bank swuring on IeR bank on left bank on leh bank on left bank on left bank behind 1-hook behind 1-hook behind 1-hook behind 1-hook Other problems noted? Bank SCouring on left bank behind 1-hook UT to Dixon Branch Mitigation Site (Site 19) Stream:UT to Dixon Brench County: Mecklenburg 401 Issued: 9/6/2001 IP: VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMARV Station 10+80Y-7 Structure Type Pipingthrough/ around structure? Is headcut or downcut present? Bank or scour erosion present? Bank scouring on left bank behind 1-hook Other prohlems noted? Bank scouring on lek bank behind J-hook Station iW80Y-7 Structure 7ype Pipingthrough/ around structure? Is headcut or downcut present? Bank or scour erosion present? Bank scouring onleft bank behind 1-hook Other problems noted? Bank s[ouring on lek bank behind J-hook 2012 Winter 10+40 Y-7 Bank xouring on left bank behind 1-hook 2013 Winter 10+40 Y-7 Bank scouring on lek bank behind 1-hook 2012 Summer 30+80 Y-7 10+40 Y-7 Bank scouring Bank scouring on lek bank on left bank behind 1-hook behind 1-hook 2013 Summer 1M80 Y-7 lOMO Y-7 Bank scouring Bank scouring on lek bank on lek bank behindl-hook behindJ-hook '� � �„�� I �k� �w�""� DOT Mki� �s.o ��r b �,u� �� Yr mitigation 5�S of required years, Review Notes- Division � I u A�G✓' �akw5c^ � � c� y� v ww,ea� . DWR # �� , TIP No. r J Z�-1 � lJ fz,n,ny- � 2oor�z3! ,.,�- 3 I Z o � �( �ty M�c�elci.�lo��4 ,DateReview ,�_ Insert a"check" for needed, "X" for given, or N/A1 for non applicable and circle Yes or No where applicable. List Mitigation: N�Q � l ��`��`� � / 0-t E ,- • -c� �R.an 5?� 5 iiv P 5*� S� t �< <^'t�"' � f'"` '- r� s� �L. a.` �� V Illegible Plan Sheet � Overlay of plan sheet on Aeriai needed `l��y �� r1, �y°'� �Numbered plots on Plansheet / aerial needed `'�� A - � �� /l� �� O �Photo points on plan sheet / aerial with direction arrow and number needed X � ko �Clear designation of wetland mitigation type (restoretion, enhancement, creation, preservation) needed on plansheet / aerial N� Designate what type of wetland is mitigated (Riverine, Non-riverine, coastal). �� If there are multiple types of wetlands (Riverine, non-riverine, coastal, marsh) designation on aerial / plan sheet is needed. U"� veg plot size needs to be indicated � /" �veg plot missing from mitigation type (enhancement, restoretion, creation, buffer) /='' size of plots, # plots, % surveyed restoration, _% surveyed enhancement, % surveyed creation, _% surveyed buffer, _not able to determine %(GIS used to determine Y or N?) 7 Invasives note�or NO - If yes what �3� ��_ Was treatment giver�r NO and years . 2X (bt-w�oe aor'f Visual monitoring of Plants only �or NO, if Yes add answer to comments, if No neM question Hydrology monitoring required YES o�l if yes what pertent # gauges_ are wetland units represented yes or no, comments Request to stop monitoring early Y25 oC�; if Yes how early _ �� 13�f(�rSl�e�� Supplemental planti�or NO, if yes what years: �� zo �� Mowing encroachment Ye5 NO; 'f yes what ye rb s�� f�� n ve ��•K; Frrr� �� Issues with stream stability reporte�or NO, if yes, what? How many riffles _ and pools_monitored7 L➢.� Q, I V�� Q � E � Other Comments (Areas wher hydrology, veg, eam structure failed etc): 45 �d-� S�s��n A41) i� r✓d/� �i� f�-� � - C+�w�V� �'' S �`-�- Z i�� Zc�oj - S� .� v v . S/h G ( G r YO J� � (�li � 1, �� {(,� ��.,/ pK J P %(,t6 Vl. 1/Tli ( NL q/ 7 V` v s l h'1 [J( bW L� .S ��G�lrr "� (/�}! f"� 1 I� S ` if-' �,/ � j� n 1('P /il� i r-e ff ZG7 0 Y V _`� pt � - - I V3�� s,r,�c t Z c r 3 ' n� �e - s: �e. 1,� Sw-r 5 s k--1� I-� Channel Mi[igation Monitoring SheMs 1, II, 111, AND IV Monitoring Data Record Project Title: R-2248D — Charlotte Outer L000 COE Action ID: 200131321 Stream Name: Trib. to Dixon Branch (Site 19) DWQ Number: 011231 City, County and other Location Information: Mecklenbure County. Charlotte Outer L000. R-2248D Left of Proiect Station 10+00 Y-7 Date Construction Completed: Mav 2008 Monitoring Year: ( 6) of 5 Ecoregion: 8 digit HUC unit 03050103 USGS Quad Name and Coordinates: Rosgen Classification: Proaosed C4 stream tvce classification Length of Project: 400 ft. Urban or RuraL• Urban Watershed Size: Monitoring DATA collected by: M. Green and J. Youne Date: 3/11/14 Applicant Information: Name: NCDOT — Roadside Environmental Unit Address: 1425 Rock Ouarrv Rd, Raleigh, NC 27610 Telephone Number: �919) 861-3772 Email address: mlereen(cr�ncdot.eov Consultant Information: Name: Address: Telephone Number: Email address: Project Status: Monitoring Level required by COE and DWQ (404 permiU 401 Cert.): Level 1 The permittee shall perform the following components of Level 1 monitoring each year for the 5-year monitoring period or through two documented bankfull flow events: Reference photos; plant survival (i.e. identify specific problem areas (missing, stressed, damaged or dead plantings), estimated causes, and proposed/required remedial action);visual inspection of channel stability. Physical measurements of channel stability/morphology will not be required. The permittee shall submit the monitoring reports to the USACE, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Project Manager, within sixty days after completing the monitoring. [f less than two bankfull events occur during the first 5 years, the permittee shall continue monitoring until the second bankfull event is documented. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring years. In the event that the required bankfull events do not occur during the five-year monitoring period, the USACE, in consultation with the resource agencies, may determine that further monitoring is not required. It is suggested that all bankfull occurrences be monitored and reported through the required monitoring period. The permittee shall perform and submit photo documentation twice each year (summer and winter) for the 5-year monitoring period, and for any subsequently required monitoring period. Section l. PHOTO REFERENCE SITES (Monrloring ar a!/ /eve/s must complele this seclion) Total number of reference photo locations at this site: 8 n6otos were taken from 4 photo pO1�tIOC8�10O3 Dates reference photos have been taken at this site: 2/23/09. 9/1/09. 3/16/10. 9/28/10, 3�2/11. 9/12/11. 1/25/12. 9/20/12, 1/23/13. 9/17/13, 3/11/14 , Individual from whom additional photos can be obtained (name, address, phone): Other Information relative to site photo reference: A site map with photo noint locations is attached to rh;� rP„�,�r . ! If required to complete Level 3 monitoring only stop here; otherwise, complete section 2. Section 2. PLANT SURVIVAL Attach plan sheet indicating reference photos. Identify specific problem areas (missing, stressed, damaged or dead plantings): The left buffer is lackin�planted ve�etation due to dense areas of lespedeza noted in 2012. Estimated causes, and proposed/required remedial action: An onsite meetin� was held on June 5. 2012, between re ulatory agencies and NCDOT. Re ug latorv aeencies stated that additional planted species were needed within the buffer. NCDOT completed two herbicide applications on the lespedeza. The left buffer and left streambank was replanted on 3/11/14 with silkv dogwood and black willow live stakes and willow oak, svcamore, river birch, and �een ash bareroot seedlings. The left streambank was live staked only where missing or dead stakes were noted. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: If required to complete Level 1 and Level 2 monitoring onlv stop here; otherwise, complete section 3. ' Section 3. CHANNEL STABILITY Visual Inspection: The entire stream project as well as each in-stream structure and bank stabilization/revetment structure must be evaluated and problems addressed. Report on the visual inspection of channel stability. Phvsical measurements of channel stability/morphologv will not be required. Include a discussion of any deviations from as=built and an evaluation of the significance of these deviations and whether they are indicative of a stabilizing or destabilizing situation. � UT to Dixon Branch �Site 191 stream relocation is stable for the Year 6 Winter evaluation. Some areas of bank scourine still exist upstream of the pipe crossin� at Sta. 10+80 Y-7 and Sta. 10+40 Y-7. The areas of bank scourin� behind the two j-hooks have filled in with sediment deposition due to bankfull events since the last monitorin� visit• NCDOT live staked these areas on 3/11/14 to helppromote woodv plant growth. The area downstream of the nipe that had extensive erosion was repaired durin� Mav 2010 and is hi�y stable. A bankfull event had occurred since the last monitoring evaluation. NCDOT will continue to monitor channel stabilitv at Site 19. • Date Station Station Station Station Station, 3/11/14 10+80 Y-7 10+40 Y-7 Number Number (additional hoto (additional hoto) Structure Type Is water piping through or around structure? Head cut or down cut present? Bank or scour Bank scouring Bank scouring erosion on left bank on left bank present? behind J-hook behind J-hook Other problems noted? � Section 4. DEBIT LEDGER The entire UT to Dixon Branch (Site 19) stream mitigation site was used for the R-2248D project to compensate for unavoidable stream impacts. UT to Dixon Branch sire I �) �; ;a � .:.'�ir� . � ia '" - - �r j'} .#AFH' � yr• � .� M 4� -, � 1^qr.• �..� f� f �'{s� �{�i ' k�u . - �� _ i \ � � �.�' � I il�`a '_ � F : _ . 's,�ti �.� ,' �f ..� � ' , .... �,�� ; ��, � �,' �,., i, ' � ., � `'� +� ' � a _+r: t r "r�,�'�: , t , ' < �, `' - �- ,+ ` ' :� - _ � 5�' '- t :... x-. . .f�� a� -.� .. F�,�^ ' • �,`i�.rfi r, y e ..f �: t. ! Y �a.� 5 � y'�. N: f'`'� ga'f � � ",�' �� " `�Jr.�, ��`- � ,��.� �.�,Er � .. � � � I �i�t � � ��. � �; I ��L��1'i�llli-� I� �i�ll'c.Alll) � + � - i i -`: �.�., ,;r syraH : � . w * #i y �� A' � � J1 � L �:�.� .. �'� y k �f Y,`� l �:� ��.5 a�"�+ � ` � e�"' n �,,++ , ; �, . �z, �� , �;��, rr�. -/n; r � �* ' — ; � .,,lj °. �.�- - � e � �� / 1 1 �e� �C�, t �� yY'� .. �� e:�<t. i �'� j��.�,�' K yy� � ,y.,�' ! ` f e .{ ' , \'�x! � � � ' �,f/1..�� ! � `` ' �d�',�-'. I'h,�t„ ('nint � � il �,,trc_in�i Ycar6 Alintcr—,Ai:irch �l�l-! Phutn I'�-�ii�t �� il>��n,tr�un�) --�'� , � ' :9�, - � I��, , I` i,,,,n.tre:u») � �.�n.irc;lm� � UT to Dixon Branch site 19 � h�- �-r ;<�� ,:�� , v" ` �` ' f#R � ,�s,i� �� L,, � , � W �i%�=, �� , '. r J aK��,•,;!"�.. ' wy p ' � 1 �S`Sbr� � - ,� '�q�� (..^� eii� ', f. r , � 1. p � '+ � � �.. . ' � t .:� r' � �. � 4 .h �: � :� � �' � . � . ,{ JV-�f,�•� � ♦ � � Ra x _'� '�-. �:$, _ �4��a -. : G �;- : , r ° iG .�p��\ l� . _ . . "A"' �j _.rF�r. . . , . (� 4l)�.�� .� . . �'�li li� �'i�Inl'--� (� �»II'C.tilll � i � . ,� � � F � .�, q IJ '� { y , � , , ��.. '� �\ ��o�'III�/��V��/�' ��.�ka��}'�.�,li��a�.� %r Lcft h:inl� ,iuurin_:ii en�i ,�� 1-I I��I� �i til;i. I I) � 811 1�-7 , fi'6- �,.�?` -.�- _ I' , l� �- 'aY�� 1�.,, � , � , _ _- rYg �' " �� J y t d..M1�'.-�jy� .5,� . ' � � . ; , _. ( l�.i � i,�� I'D�9i� i�� :,�� I�I l��urn\\ini�i ,�lur�h'ul-4 � , � ,� � �� R �� k t � T . � `. � �, ��.`� ,rs��ko�± ��+�.-:.. 7 rCY ].rJ23+ �•;, A i�. �;, ` � �' �y.��x' � � ,l�'4'.,.`�E ,�r M�[� "t`.t� : U� "1 '1'4 �, �^ 4�A' � L •4 �1 ,* ,� �.{''� �'.i .. { � 9'�P�� r �` / + ) 4,.ml�M ��5.� 2. � �e jj� ♦ < a " s ' �`, a �-�11�7 ^1.� ..::% k . Jr " `� -".�.. i�: • � l F �..� �`a4 ��i ; 1� 3*'� �c x �f'; ri'1 °l - � � � ` . t?�,:.�,� �.CC{ .'f `v, ..\ �� I'h��ir I'��int -..1 (I)u��n,uv.inil yi � , � !=>w;. �r y. ..` � ��. > .t s 1 � TK ��6��- :F � •d.W�e S � :J/�� ,a�;�"l ��.:�.na• �S�ra�'1{. I ct1 banl. ya�urine ai cnJ "I�.I-I I�,��k u Si��. I I1 lU 1�-7 R-�2°248D TRIB T'Q Q�TC Ad CREEK � -r ..� r�� - r � �'1`i�r� ■�C:+�- _^.'�' ;�-- '`� �' J'� .� .�;e,> �' �..;''"k!►� `' -� ,,a'.,,.� =, �.._ - `, `+ YJ � t� I f �T '�?'1 '=' .�; r �y' -� �_' �� =+G } i � 1 � � .� i. �.a; ..�� .�� } . . _ ,aJ��'� � � +� . .. -.. � .�...nn� � ' r_ `' r � L .,y79u"i�b-�+�7�..-1.�J'�''��- �r• , w " r _.�r ../ _!':� _r2"�1.4 � J.(J'u't5 ��j I I 1 � �. . " .�'�A�. � ; ��._.;� �'' - f � � �_ .;�,�, ;�r � � '� + ��' ry" e,,� it►"� � '` �`=' � D�� '�� R''' .'�� yfy, ,-.� . �7 B o ',�Fii,� 6Y.�... �'._ � � � �, � � ��y ; `.lASJ �.°J �_ . -... - � ,,, . �.� � �� x-'a .. . \ � . � �i� �� - � '�,- _ ��, , Y ,�.�. � �� - � �" � _ � . I �„- v -i�' ��,_� ;� • o � .. - ' � ;!;�311 :,��- ' � ' _ i �'�r�flC:yr" , y r ,Y' �' - �..�.�'�� ; q- --- '��. •, �� D • ��;�I� � - — c i, �r - _ i a ��`�" t � �' L .�,... � �.: � . . ��j { �i'yt� 3� �k ♦ JpJ , � L �F ��] i .. „�,d.� � � -� q:ry.,.Ca:v� �� , : � :: r � "•� _�i _, � � � �� .r � .` , Go:��le earth feet 3000 km 1 ,< a ,��. .� �� ; ;�� ._.� ./'Z.J,� 1 �o :.�. . .. __« ...._ . .�_ .�._� �.. 2�._.. __..... C�.S�Z�..�S ,�._1�\.-t-._Ic�/. , .__..._ ._._.__.___. ._.�.�._....-------,_._. ----._ ._.......�.._ ._.____ _..� ______ __...... . _ _� . _v_.. ;1`ta�'i -------..�._.__ _._.-- --- --__ ._ _ .�. � ___. . __ _... ... e � __ .. �,�rn _ _ n .. _ _ a .. _ _. ._._.. �� r.L, - l_ __.�._ .___. ._..- -..._ ._. . . _ . .. _ : . �.�n�v�. la�ylo�:� __.-- --- _ -___.-- -- -_ _�t_�tj�� R�U-5 23� ��o ,�«�a l�r _t�, __ -�_ -_�o:✓ . _ _.._ 0 � �c�v.. ;` '�C, � �� ----� �--___��a� ____----.._-----___--- ._._ .� _ .__ �� _ --.-- - -- -- ----_.__�� _�.. __. � .. ��___:_. _ �$ 3�_ _��,�,�.c� _._ _ � . �_,_. �. ._ .. s/� i��,..._S'l�`-'- ---�`�-'�''-4�K-3�_--- n.._C_ _(J--a _i .___�'�. `-`-`._._._.j a_�l_:._`_� a'3 _'.. �� va �_.,.._...�c�St� ��s[(-�A..�� -e.� c(1 _ 2`_ Go� __ �rv� l�iL1� _.. --_ �Nc�o_?-_ !%w__._.. _._.._%�__��_`9!d"'l.. _ __�.�i, /l@ sz�-.la z�.____ .� .v_..__.. �� /�FND`./._..�'/12/F�!�%___._.._.._._.._��.�bT-.P1��._.___ .._9/� �0'7 6/2�___,._r �*'� � _�l _ _ . ..__. __._�_.__ . .� . � _�_� __.---____...�._ _ �- __ _TT_� � __C�__ _n_cc%a � _�.a_.V_. � ?�v� B`,�_ __.�-`-__�.. .. -- --.�: /_V c�Dcs�_....�D�, __ _._ .. __ _._ � _ � � � -- -.. � ��v�t z��/ �-- L z o �, - �! �l .� __._;�. __,___ : -� _.__.___ -_--------__ _.��--_-__�_._� ________ y__�_,__ ..��o��__�?�� ._.___ __��-�`r-.._��J _��._._.. �. ...�d�. .��f'�.' `�`-!a 3 ._._.�`t�.�a�za� i��+a-F�-�,v_ t% �( Y: 1h � k j'� w.�� Y 1" ��G"' lX � IJ I�N� � L�� % i.7 � C' �� x � J' i � ��-,,, y � l/ � <5 u � �l�A < < �� eti � v ' +"IC' c{�Ci'ir � —.._.__. __� 11; . i__ .a_.._.___.�__._.___.�_.---,_._______.._._. ___._..__ _..__�... _�__.�..._,._�.___.__—_..._�_.._.__ .._.____ _._,.,_�`_'�..._,__...__�_.�__._____._.�,=_`j_.. �._._/ J f< • �/ _Lo��n___S-� e�l__--- --_1�,]�v_�d_ ..- -- _.'.es . _�_..-7D_�k.�z �oa . _�nGmdnv��1Q��;�r, c�m ; �'e`�'-- i �' f� L 9 � � .._...�P'V'C ��__�_r.___�D..v_i'V1,Q�S9___ ov_►ti,�e.��.r��F_______7_a`�`3..��__30,0� ......--��e��6�_��.s�_co�w��t��.co� i: . . . ,. �r_C _S,_ �rec�rv►an ___._ ____ _. M � �, a��c�__�Pm��r��s _-- -- - Zo_��_3�.z_. _a_y�a ----_ _ �ta�ce.r�v: d�,�:�s. �� ; ; � � ' ';� �_Zz��;� Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenh�a�-g County, North Carolina � , � � I- , -. �,� - , � � � _ � - � - , �,� �� . ;s�. Date Prmted� 9/2°/2015 9�38�25 AM � ,w:--.�-. , y _ .. ,7 �. . � I ._ . w, 4 �, �� '� �� . ' .� .�, /' .�u . ., .� � j . , �, . . ' .''��Y7�M. ' ., y�,/n�,r'� : A� . . . - .4 'I � .�„�p- i C'{ ��sa r�,'� ' : ��P � , 5±�. s l � � ' , ii� � � . . � �rj "Tt*�� . ��t'K'' � .. +.s� y; -;- . �� ,.�. � ` 1 t. � d. "� '7 ,^ �L t � .� ,:1 � . r �+' `� � �+:� ` ii� ya-r�. .�1", � 1 $iT �- . `'� �. � : .: � ��,, @ 1 w � o`"'v� . ' . !,7„ � � L py A�' � h . -, . � '�;a � ,f� �-:� • � " � /I i :�. Ip ��'�F ��e �� aY'�� :_..�„ '�¢.�„-�I i...� � ,�'�'!� l�, ti.. yt�t f 4� � J e . �1 . . � . �' Y . R, � r i Q" ± .i+.'�C .1" .� ii e� � Y .f I � g �,7 � '.�'� � � � .r,�'S'!"i[ �� . � ?!��.}, ti^; ��' f ` '�,� .�_�R.4^�i'�.." �i i.,. � ��..�' d�!'� ��. . � _ . ��'�j��y� '� -,� � - j��' ,�,��' ' „ � p' � � � � ` �'� �.r,i'�' `i � ' � ' � +"1 , � fy+J ,��t ,� % r � b � ° �'I � i� j e.S. � : . � " � '� . � �i:/. � � �'•• ,��,� ' . -� � y� ir � .. . � . � . t: � . � � f a ` ^J �'. i �. 'It. ► .- P y�IJ ` ,r t�'� .� � .�. � ` � �� . � j ' !. � 1 �y � M' . ��C ' A 'F rl � l � i I f 1 �� - � . .� � ��F r � • � �,� .�d K-, � � l � S ! " - • � ,. � ! y. �� . .� �+ �` k� �� , � �. � � y, � !. , ;.� � I I ��' �� ,�� , � � °,� "Y1 i�` r„ y' � � � � ��.�: 'f 4° ' �� '� r'��RT� .� � �� Jf> i.� .f� -.. ��,'M:��.. �1 • I � � �i. � e S � �� r, r . ,v�. � I I � 'iA�'M�j�yN/�' F �� i• � � . r .. �� '.1x r� � 1 .! `i t ��1 .i'��' �i�i'. � r �' .� , ' � y�.A �., _ i '� b''�"�b 1. �� .i I y,,��y� r �.� f� ,��4 , � �� t, . . �. j ,•� ,!� s: , i aR"n?k'_` ��, 4 �.!� x� 1f ' � a �_ ��`' . � �. � �° �.F i � !'� ? � �% ��7p: T 4 . r�H � : . � � ,� Yy� f�+'..'.. �� _ . , < . _' � �'� . '.� li . -fv., � �v « ti r: '� . r . '. 1 � ' r �y, 1 � , {1�.' � � � i ' ��..i 'ii �-.- • � � nt 1'�,.; 2y{�[ � � � ..:1a - +" � � �`�J!� I �. �oS i,. �. : � � 1� �f'i' � �PMG �� 7[�; . y,� � .. • ( . �� ' w� , Y. 1� � �,, r r. �' r� � 1 t ". A F ' f�� . y� �. '4� `f ��:.i �e�+. : :�� * .+ � �" r�,_;1K �..�; M ��N �,��`�7� w I �j. . � . f .�, � �^� :��r, . � o ;� T , �tiF �.�,r�� s; �. � , , , ; ., f t �yyy�p� f - "_ A �y —1� i 1 ,�\ ' �'h�� /� � di Y '. . � � / I� � �C 7!i' W{� .' 9-..r � � �, , � ` �t { 1 a ,- � .4 f ' . iC��' . - j� , �jk 1!+ r 'f ,rF � .. ' . . V: � v �t "` ...: ` �� f� � � ) � � Y_ . t f,a • �• - �• l . � �, ' _ �o � { 1 �i�i C+ i�'t �':1 �.4i' �'. ��r� , ' '�`,� K '� �+I� E � �� { I t . � r�, � tr y p i � 1' S� �9. ♦ � . 7�� .--�• � ' tr .� . . �. \ : �4'� � i. ��J.. �� 3, ,. � Id �� f i*,.':,�� y�s«3, .. =" �-'� . . �� C 'r, }�..:Tj�: - � '-�='c-.�.� f:�� y" E � ..j. �� r� � e'�� ,�;..; _ "�} �. , - �; � . i� . i�t. 1 � . '�;:_� �i M' � I� �4Y�.,. �� . - . � R �_� � . Y�, � -_:..��.� � � �� . -" ;: .. y F � i:�." � _ _ nl, � � ti r�• r ,:7,,}� � � .. .�M ,* � __ ' .�., �,� +. �' ;L��4^ ��'t-' .Vt` f' �.*+� J�: ... � .1 , �1� 2-. .i1 � �� _ ., ' . p'001'503�r i�.J% M,es'� ' T R �� "`~' s�� {�/\�� M' / � 4u�h.. . �:��v.,�� '�`� ,�. i� ,�`i-�� ,_ . —1— / '�'� ,�`�`:l_1 ,./ � �' _.q�+P�L:..` - r':._ ..r \— This map oi �cport is preparetl for�the inven�ory of real property within Mecklenburg County antl is compil>d f:om recortle tleeAs. �la�s. tax maps. surveys. plamme�nc maps. and olher pi,Dlic�rerortls antl tlaia. Users ot ths mapor report are hereby notitied that the dforementioned public primary i�ormation sources §hould 6e con�ltetl for venficalion. Mecklenburg County antl As mapping conuacro�s assume no lepal 25ponslU;tiry for 1he informa�i0n containetl herem. �� .� a Iv.�_�.ib.-�-,�'� 1'.y � �,�, ,:• a�, c!��' ,� �� _� t-e A`'t - fi'.-C: •� �, �, , �' ��,, � , , �.o � . � � � �� I ~ 2 � a _ O �_ _- `_. _ - � . I � ��.` 1 ,.t.Qo _ -` _ \ CENTERLINE OF STREAM 35'STREAM BUFFER � 4+� � L �h � + j 766.45 o I 766.450 N I 755.28 + p 755.280 N I 747.86 + p 747.865 + I 743.98 p 743.976 �' I 742.26 + p 742.261 � /' � 738.66 r /�°�� 0 738.655 �� / � . /xo�� / . x�' � / � / � + 748.84 /�,�� i � p 748.844 i / Cn + O O � w � � � 0 Baker, Virginia From: Sent: To: Subjed: Ginny, Wainwright, David Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:44 AM Homewood, Sue; Baker, Virginia RE: impact to existing mitigation site I have known this to happen on rare occasion; however, it is usually DOT wanted to impact their own site and they are more than willing to make up the credits (since they want the project). This case, however, is different in that it is not DOT. Personally, if I was DOT I think I'd tell the land owner he'd have to cover the credits. Anyway, even though the site is not closed out, the site was predicated on a certain number of credits being available once the site has closed out. I agree with Sue, you will need to work with the USACE to come to an agreement. I would push for 2:1 since this is a protected site and we will have the same issues we are normally would be concemed with — the site not performing as expected. If you go with 1:1 and you have issues with that site, then that much more mitigation is lost. This may not help, but is one of those strange situations that arise. David From: Homewood, Sue Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:21 AM To: Baker, Virginia <virginia.baker@ncdenr.gov>; Wainwright, David <david.wainwright@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: impact to existing mitigation site I've only had this come up once or twice over the years and in each case the USACE project manager made the decision on whether the impacts could be allowed/were justified and what the replacement mitigation ratio would be. DWR just followed suit (I may have provided my opinions to them during their review but nothing formal) Thanks, SueHomewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue Homewood(a�ncdenr.qov 45D W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 �'Nothing Compares - . Ematl couespondence tc and trom this address is subiecf to the North CaroDna Pubbc Records Law and may he disdosed fo third par' From: Baker, Virginia Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 5:14 PM To: Wainwright, David <david.wainwriQht@ncdenr.�ov>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewoodC�ncdenr.Qov> Subjed: impact to existing mitigation site Hey Sue and David, I was just trying to get a little institutional history from those with much longer memory banks then myself. There is a DOT on-site mitigation site that may end up having impacts. The site is still active due to various instability issues causing closeout delays (it is in year 7 of 5) plus there were former delays in getting the site into monitoring to begin with. The site was permitted in 2001. The land owner wants to put a driveway in which DOT is very much against and we would also be against. The land-owner DOT dispute will have to get worked out and ultimately the credits will need to be replaced elsewhere by DOT if this driveway is actually allowed. From what I understand with IRT sites it has been case by case according to Todd and Eric as to whether a 2:1 OR 1:1 replacement of the lost stream footage is requiredrAnthony told me he dealt with impacts to one mitigation site that was not closed out yet so the site just lost the credits it would have generated. This site I am dealing with has already been credited by DOT. Any recollection of similar circumstances? Ginny Baker Trdnsportation Permifting Unit NCDEQ-Division oFWdter Rewuires 1650 MdilService Center Raleigh, NC2 76 99-16 50 Phone-(919I707-8788, Fax-(9f9I733-1290 r Baker, Virginia From: Sent: To: Hood, Donna Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:33 AM Baker, Virginia Cc Chapman, Amy; 'Crystal Amschler (crysiai.c.amschler@usace.army.mil)' (crystal.c.a mschler@ usace.a rmy. mi I) Subject: RE: 10725 Statesville Road Driveway Access Ginny, I got some insight to this issue yesterday. It seems that during the I-485 project this land owner's parcel was going to be cutoff, so he was compensated over one million dollars at the time for his loss of use. The landowner talked Steve Lund, ACOE (now retired), into allowing him to put in a driveway crossing so he could at least access the property for signage/billboard type use. (pipe is >48", though not sure of the exact size) This crossing has been the source of some of the on going issues with the mitigation site because of the erosive area it created. And he has access to the property. More recently this man has been approached by a realtor saying he had NOT been compensated for his land----and now we have this—possible detriment to an active mitigation site. There is a business park directly across the street from his site. One which he has apparently wanted to add to with his land. Anyway, DOT does not seem to be amena6le with letting him impact an active mitigation site. I would be inclined to agree. Any thoughts on this side of the story? Thanks, Donna Donna Hood - Donna.Hood@ncdenr.gov North Carolina Dept. of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Transportation Permitting Unit 610 E. Center Ave. Mooresville, NC 28115 Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax:704.663.6040 �'Nothing Compares - . Einau w; � ��,N��.i�•nce to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records la and may be disdosad to thiid partie� unless the content is exempt by stalutF or other iegidation From: Baker, Virginia Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:49 PM To: Hood, Donna <donna.hood@ncdenr.gov> q Cc: Chapman, Amy <amy.chapman@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: 10725 Statesville Road Driveway Access ,� Hi Donna, I am back in the office today so could look this site up, it is one of the four UT to Dixon mitigation sites, project # 200111231, this is site 19, the last active site due to the site needing bank repairs. The repair area, I believe, is north of where the driveway impacts are proposed. These UT to Dixon sites for R-2248 were an older design with sharp cornered bends that had issues with erosion. Plus from what I understood from Jason Elliot and Byron Moore last June is that these sites were designed and built at the Division level and then sat there for 4-5 years before lason and Byron in Raleigh found out about their existence and put them into monitoring for 5 years. Sites 23 and 24 closed in 2014, site 16 closed in 2015 (it is located at the north western side of the green polygon, you can just make out the stream), and site 19 now in iYs 7`^ year. If you take a look at this link, the DOT mitigation sites, go to year 2014, Division 10, Site 19 (summer report�, see the aerial of the site and the vicinity map. It appears from comparing the stream configuration on the mitigation aerial and plansheets C3 and C3 there will be impacts from the driveway up to about photo point 3 in the mit. Plan, �100-150'. Lat lon is 35.358416, -80.8401740 in case you want to see it on google maps. httos://connect.ncdot.aov/resources/Environmenta I/Pases/Perm its-a nd-M itization.asox Also attached is info from the mitigation database I up keep on Site 19. I had a site visit with DOT (and Crystal too I think) on 6/16/15 to discuss repairs and some treatment for lespedeza. Additionally an aerial I made of this site a few years ago is attached (zig zag be�ds). All of this along with some additional photos of the site are on the O drive under Transportation Permitting/Mitigation/Division 10. We will need a current plan sheet that shows the proposed work, like the ones that were sent (Ci and C3) along with the stream configuretion that would have genereted credit at closeout and the conservation easement boundaries denoted along with the exact stream footage that will be impacted inside the conservation easement as well as outside. I don't think the stream crossing area of Site 19 was credit genereting, but 1 would probably want to double check on that at the meeting. I don't know if you wa�t to mention to DOT before the Jan 20tb meeting that this information would be helpful to have in order to move things along. Ginny from: Hood, Donna Sent: Monday, January il, 2016 4:58 PM To: Baker, Virginia <vi�nia.baker@ncdenr.Qov> Subject: RE: 10725 Statesville Road Driveway Access Hi Ginny, So�nds good—and no worries on if you can't come. I completely understand the parent thing. My parents, my kids and I are all together in one house—and my father has dementia. Whatever works for you is fine with me. I am not sure that it has been closed and credited. I think there is still monitoring going on—can't swear to it. Just let me know if you figure anything out. O Thanks, . Donna From: Baker, Virginia Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 938 AM To: Hood, Donna <donna.hood@ncdenr.aov> Subject: RE: 10725 Statesville Road Driveway Access Hi Donna, On the 20th I think I can attend. My elderly father is staying with me and has had some medical challenges which is why I am working a home this week. My sister and I aze trying to get him placed in assisted living, on the 20th he should be staying at my sister's unless some medical challenge comes up. I can't look this project up in the mitigation database since I am home, but will next week with the TIP #. Did you say this project was already closed out and credited? You know after two plus years I am still not cleaz on DOTs exact organization when it comes to natural resource impacts and mitigation. Some of the mitigation sites start at the division level and move to PDEA (or what ever the central group in Raleigh is), some start here in Raleigh. Jason Elliot and Byron Moore seem to have varying levels of knowledge when I ask them questions about the mitigation sites depending on when their involvement with the site started. Randy Griffin's group seems to be the ones in chazge of monitoring. Leilani has been involved with some of the projects, the ones that are more complex (like Bonner Bridge), and is sometimes at the closeout site visits, but usually not. Since this is a more unusual situation I am not surprised she is involved. I will do some more follow up on what we have done in the past for mitigation site impacts. I just asked Eric and he thought it was generally case by case and the ACOE and State had the same requirement. The easement will have to be revised of course. Ginny Sent from Outlook Mobile On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:12 AM -0800, "Hood, Donna" <donna.hood�a�,ncdenr.�> wrote: So, how does Lelani figure into all this? And if you can't attend, I know Crystal Amschler, ACOE rep for Division 10 is calling in—so maybe you could do that if you can't come in person? Donna Hood - Donna.Hood@ncdenr.Qov North Carolina Dept. of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Transportation Permitting Unit 630 E. Center Ave. Mooresville, NC 28115 Ph:704.663.1699 Fax:704.663.6040 � �'"Nothing Compares -- � '�' - Email co�re>pUndi n[e to and i .-�.�-� n,. . n. -�,-. , �_..., ��. ��. �i From: Baker, Virginia Sent: Friday, January O8, 2016 9:05 AM To: Hood, Donna <donna.hood@ncdenr.�ov> Subject: Re: 10725 Statesville Road Driveway Access Hey Donna, Thanl:s, 1 will attend if I am able to. f need to check on this one. li is not often an existing mitigation site will be impacted. T�his came up once beYore at an IR"C meeting. I believe the replacement ratio of a mitigation site is 2x that of a normal wetland or stream resource. Although 1 am not sure if ihat was a ACOE requirement or ours. So actually Mac Haupt is the "Mitigation bank and DMS coordinator". Since I am payed on DOT $[ may help wiYh banks and had been doing more of that until Eric Kulz's position was replaced in Oct. I am the DOT mitigation coordinator and also deal with DMS pr�jects since those are funded by DOT. Byron and Leilani know me A while back DOT had asked forjtist one project contact for eadl project so they will n�t always contact me directly when something mitigation related comes up. 1 havc asked reeionaf stafl'to always let me know when a meeting will be dealing with mitigation issues. Or if yuestions or concerns come up about mitigation at a meeting that I may not be at. Please ask me. Not trying to be pushy, but DO"r has asked a regional staff to make decisions on requirements for mitigation sites when they should have asked me. My position is 2 years old no�v, prior to that regional staff did make the decisions. Dave Wanucha, when he was new, was asked if some of the monitoring requirements coidd be reduced on an on-site mitigation site. Historieally there have oeen a lot of inconsistency between dii'ferent DOT on-site mitigation site requirements and crediting with each other and especiallp with bank and D�'�1S site; so 1 a;n trying to get things more consistent. The ACOE has also had issues with inconsistency too. I hope you are setNing into your new position. I have likeh not been in regulation as long as you have so 1 am still learnin� the ins outs and all grey areas. Thanks Donna, Ginny Sent from vutlook Mobile On Thu, Ja�� 7, 2016 at 6:27 PM -0800. "Hood, Donna° <dunna.hoo� �i ncdenr.t�ov> wrote: Hi Wendv. Ginny, our miti�ation bank coordinator, would like to �ttend as well.She is copied on this email. Thank you, Donna SenC from Outlo��k Mobile ;�, �� , Mee,� �1 �� k I 9 c� `T^ -h� I�2��lb � . I o �zs Sl�,��1�� ' a ��r � rV �� L�.�- �� C� r l � StiQ2 M,c+ktr w , N,II Gc — ` V� 6� %� � ° �a � G�,FF,� G�, � �u �r i�ivnrt £�%10� 1 i�rwkr� ✓� - — N l�� W b W ��Fii f � j} r� 5 � — � �. ►'Pi (J 1 h, c.e k.�o...8 � "� � Ow r,M� c�L i3 �I'�„ -1 G►- HS I�e � s� s �f��huX ih'1`,�'7r1N "% fi «f, , �j�,,, � W o-U-f. �\ lX r c� �Si 3►� � � ��-�P�a-� _ po r +� s,� � �-. r - I ..._.�+,..�w an. w r.�as- ,'r �— �' . sr`�` — __ L (/Q � �"(� e Nn Jr�'" � � • � K ��• ,y�c � , �� Y9 � , � �� j1 . _ ' � - ��iS��l�� s � � _ � � . . � . 4� � ., �I : " �. � �. � � � . � .. ti.. � � � . �Char10 Outer Lacu O�it� ZS� ,i: � ,4. �� _ :�,� � _ �. ,,�"' .�� ; �. ' k ' � = ._., . � _ - � �,.'' y� F� � �' , ' �l - :' ` � i. �}�a� .:� _ - - � '�_,��` � _ ;c::ria1 � �' ��F ' 1 ' ' . ' - � .. ., 1� ,,�. [ r �. .. y� �'� �1�� '�` .� �. ��""�;€ � �..f--,..�� , a` 1 � � ' � - � �r � �� L�' - - _ - � _ �a �� +1. 'l'J i h�� .. _ —�. � i ' _' . � �. � � � ^ . r.. �x � -"a �l �� i � '' � __ .� H',i�z__�4_� .� ��- � �. . , - � 1 _. _ _ - - . _.7 �� -•: �- _ �-' y�•�'-�' � �� ' ..�;" . � _— - ,. ._ � f��` � _ •'�_�s^. � �y . if � �•� ��, �' �. sA�� ...— .. . � � '_ ' r . - r ` , `( . - �- � . ...i� '�'�o �_ / ��_ "' .:IW'��.��.` "�— �st='Y - �!� k�%l.i. :. �.�. �/i� - -- � � � � _. , �� . � d ,� y �' �,:. �, r . �` - . �. � �� r:-��,. . - � � : I �r(! ' � �^� ' ..F YR� � � r � •�j�'�i�`x� f"' '�£�`,, � � i,�Y. � `��rJ ,�_, ��,iA' ..u. ��S �.i��:.'l I. 1�� `� � 1 N yFF'� i .�- Y � � �• �Y ,( r e O� R.:,'t � _ j��: 0 - A^ a ..-'` .S .Y.,'-� �u=. � . t "i ' �i � p � IW -._��1_ . i � . •�@^g � � . � i FY{;;=%.T�'f l� F�� -'� 155 ',c � "rM " � � �, �r ' F !_ ' I i��. T � �. r�� • r - � �;.',,�:, ,:.>:._ � 1 i 1\� � " � � ,.'' - �w `KW c� r ...,, � ,,� >� � t,�.. . :� �, .� f� �-. y I N � � I � 4 /n� f�i�ts' I.JJ� '�-,�,� . :f� i _� �� 0 ��,�� I��,.�� DOT Mitigation_polys_2G I �1 «5 DOT Mitigation_pts_20131220 EEP Project Site Location DOTDivisionBoundary