Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0028827_LV20170201_201708161 Ai^!1r� :►,��; .rte+ �, . RECEIVED/NCDENWR AUG 22 2017 Water Quality Permitting Section 16 August 2017 Wastewater Branch Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Re: Letter of 07 July 2017 Subject: Notice of Violation & Intent to Assess Civil Penalty Case No. LV -2017-0201 Permit No. NCO028827 Snug Harbor on Nelson Bay WWTP Carteret County Gentlemen: Pursuant to Mr. Gregson's above referenced letter, it is requested that remission of this civil penalty be considered. The "Justification For Remission Request" (att 1) and "Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts " (att 2) forms are attached as requested. The "Justification For Remission Request" (att 1) lists five factors and I believe two of those factors, (b) and (c), applies to this case and they are checked. The detailed explanation as to how both factors apply was provided by the letter to Mr. Gregson dated 10 May 2017. (att 3) The cost to Snug Harbor for rebuilding the Tertiary Filters, the cause of the violation at issue, was $6,622.54 and breaks down as follows: Material: $1,530.60 Contract Labor $3,019.80 Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Travel $1,072.14 As soon as I had knowledge of a problem, action was taken to reduce the pollutants to acceptable levels. Test results the following week and since have confirmed our efforts resulted in the desired outcome. I hope you will have regard for the cost and resulting outcome when the determination is pondered for the penalty assessed against us. I thank you for your time and efforts. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Paul Tully, Director of Engineering Snug Harbor on Nelson Bay 272 Hwy. 70 E Sea Level, NC 28577 1P 0'1 ox 150 dea Pevel, WC 26577 252-225-4411 JUSTIFICATION FOR REIVHSSION REQUEST Case Number: LV -2017-0201 Assessed Party: Snug Harbor Management LLC Permit No.: NC0028827 County: Carteret Amount Assessed: 5567.25 Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty You must also complete the "Request For Remission Waiver of Right to an Adinanzstratrve Hearing, and Stipulation o,Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty You should attach any documents that you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document Pursuant to N.C.G S § 143B -282.1(c), remission of a cavil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors apply. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed). (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 14313-282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed an the civil penalty assessment document), _ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation (a e, explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future occurrences); AZ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (a e, explain why the violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare fon), (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions (a e., explain how payment of the cavil penalty wall prevent you frons performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance) EXPLANATION: S8 e- A f/ _3, /- ffe-,- 0/,z f�c� /o r" ,v -7, o / Z AH 1 k STATE OF NORTH CAROLrNA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY OF CARTERET IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND STIPULATION OF FACTS Snug Harbor Management LLC ) Snug Harbor on Nelson Bay WWTP ) PERMIT NO NCO028827 ) CASE NO. LV -2017-0201 Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S567 25 for violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated July 07, 2017; the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within thirty (3 0) days of receipt of the notice of assessment No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment This the /6 day of A u 5 u s f SIGNATURE ADDRESS 20 / 7 -i-Al Gi� 4 Y LSO!/'y t✓ A & 4' -AJ Sj 1.i/ L ,Sea Le„e,/ 616 2 77 TELEPHONE .2.5�2- zzs - 4 411/ X J-7-3 /2 tf' �2- WaI `e-c�, N\Gq 11 t aO t 7 01� 10 May 2017 James H. Gregson, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Re: Your Letter of 02 May 2017 Subject: Notice of Violation & Intent to Assess Civil Penalty Tracking No. NOV-2017-LV-0307 Permit No. NC0028827 Snug Harbor on Nelson Bay WWTP Carteret County Mr. Gregson: Your above referenced letter addresses Limit Exceedance Violations reported on the January 2017 Discharge Monitoring Report. The specific violations are BOD and TSS. As you know, the TSS was 43 on 19 January 2017, and although not above the Daily Maximum, did cause concern and I investigated the potential cause as soon as I received notification from the Lab, Environment 1, on 24 January. When looking for the culprit, everything appeared normal and the cause was not identified. On 26 January, I received notification from the Lab that BOD, from the sample taken on 19 January, was >84.00. I investigated the potential source of the malfunction again on 26 January and could not locate the source. In the evening hours of the 26U' and morning hours of the 27a' I continued to investigate the cause of the high values. Knowing the problem was most likely tertiary filter related, I started digging deeper into the filter media and discovered debris in the filter media was causing a short circuit. Numerous hours were spent on the 27th removing portions of the media, removal of the debris, washing, and replacing. At the same time on the 27th I was locating sources for the media, P&A, and contacting outside contractors to line up the labor force needed to rebuild the filters. Over the next several days, we spent numerous manhours removing portions of the media, cleaning and replacing to attempt to stay in compliance while the media and labor force was getting lined up and on site. The results of the effluent analysis from 02 February samples proved that our time spent on cleaning the filters was not in vein. On 31 January, the order, with prepaid freight to Snug Harbor, was placed for the anthracite and the anticipated delivery was scheduled NLT 06 February, but did not arrive. On 06 February the sand for the filters was picked up in SC by Snug Harbor, and ready to begin work, however without the anthracite, we had to reschedule the crew. We ended up having to pick up the anthracite in Greenville on 08 February due to a transfer of freight from the original carrier to a subcontracted carrier. A -r f 3 /� 112- The crew began work on the East Filter on 08 February, however we discovered the specifications had been altered sometime in the past and on 09 February, I contacted Dean Hunkele and Tom Tharrington for advice which was very helpful and most appreciated. We continued our daily media cleaning process on the West Filter, prepped the East Filter under drain and tank interior, and began the search for the balance of media gravel needed to rebuild the filters in accordance with the advice of your staff. On 14 February, the gravel media was picked up in Hoffman, NC by Snug Harbor and delivered to the site. The crew began immediately placing the media in the East Filter. The newly placed media was saturated and the West Filter media cleaned while still on line. After almost 40 hours of total saturation, the East filter was placed on line, observed through several backwash cycles and after confirmation of proper operation, the West Filter was taken off line and rebuilt in kind. The debris which caused the filters was not visible on the surface and was only discovered after hours of looking and then only by digging down to the sand layer under the anthracite. In summary, I began investigating the situation as soon as I received knowledge of the problem and spent numerous hours cleaning the old media with the filters in service to curtail the Parameter Values of BOD and TSS exceeding our NPDES Permit. It is requested that consideration be given for the enormous expense and effort by Snug Harbor in resolution of the matter giving rise to your NOTICE OF VIOLATION & INTENT TO ASSESS CIVIL PENALTY when you evaluate the civil penalty associated with the Limit Exceedance Violations. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Paul Tully, Director of Engineering Snug Harbor on Nelson Bay 272 Hwy. 70 E Sea Level, NC 28577 o: 252-225-4411 x223 c: 910-389-1295 e: ptully@bizec.rr.com cc: F Patrick Ausband Penny Sproul Joe Behan /I &'T p'y 7--lz