20171054 Ver 1_401 Application_20170821

MARKS ENTERPRISES of NC, PLLC
One Palatka Street - Arden, NC 28704
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
August 8, 2017
NC DEQ Water Resources
1611 Mail Service Center 2 0 1 T 1 0 5 4
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1611
Reference: WATER QUALITY PERMIT APPLICATION
Creekwood Village Stream Remediation
Jonathan's Creek @ 3340 Soco Road
Maggie Valley, North Carolina 28751
Project No. ME -17-003
To Whom It May Concern:
Submitted herewith are five (5) sets of documents for your review necessary for issuance
of a Water Quality Permit for the referenced project. Each set of the'submitted documents
includes a completed Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form and one set of
Construction Plans and Specifications for restoration of the creek and stabilization of the
north (left facing downstream) bank. The Construction Plans present both current stream
and stream bank erosion conditions associated with a meander in Jonathan's Creek that
has accelerated and is likely to produce slope failures that will impact residences as well
as the design plans proposed for stabilization of the left bank throughout the property of
Ms. Sonja Michels, owner of the Creekwood Village Resort. A check in the amount of
$570.00 for the Water Quality Permit is attached to the top copy of the PCN.
We appreciate your assistance with this project. If there are questions that arise during
your review please contact the author of this transmittal letter at telephone number (828)
231-0598 or email address: drbdangbellsouth.net.
Respectfully,
B. Dan Marks, Ph.D., P.E., Principal
NC Registration No. 09631
BDM/dm

`t W A TEy
Mi,&i(5)
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:X❑
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ,� Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
becausewritten approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes 0 No
For the record only for Corps Permit.-
ermit:because
❑ Yes No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes 0 No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Creekwood Village Resort Jonathan's Creek Stream Restoration
2b.
County:
Haywood
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Maggie Valley, NC (Inside Town Limits)
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Sonja Michels and Rita Hartline (Trust)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
PIN No. 7686-58-5053 & 5520 PIN No. 7686-58-3239 & 7326
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
210 Wade -Reese Way & 293 Wade -Reese Way
3e.
City, state, zip:
Maggie Valley, NC 28751
3f.
Telephone no.:
(828) 926 - 3321 UU1 AuG 9 1
3g.
Fax no.:
(877) 926 - 3341gGi S
3h.
Email address:
www.CreekwoodVillageResort.com DEQAN
r14 9BUFFER PERMITTIN
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
N/A
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
B. Dan Marks, Ph.D., P.E., Principal
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Marks Enterprises of NC, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
1 Palatka Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Arden, NC 28704
5e.
Telephone no.:
(828) 231 - 0598
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
I. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 7686-58-5053 & 5520; PIN 7686-58-3239 & 7326
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.5152 Longitude: -83.0839
1c. Property size:
5.18 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Jonathan's Creek (Stream Restoration Work)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C: Jr)
2c. River basin:
Pigeon River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Jonathan's Creek meandering northward eroding near vertical slopes on northern bank. House on adjacent northern property in jeopardy of
undermining. North side of creek is grassland/hay fields. South side of creek is Creekwood Village Resort having nine (9) cabins and two (2) Trout
Ponds. South Bank stable with some dead trees, Briars, & Underbrush to be removed and grass cover nurtured with admixtures. North Bank Sloped.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 475
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Stabilize North Bank by benching and sloping; and constructing J -Hooks and Lateral Vanes to move Thalweg (main channel) to center of stream.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
First sequence - Construct gravel haul road to Install structures in stream before earthwork using crawler mounted backhoe to move Thalweg to center.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all priorphases) in thepast?
Yes ❑X No El Unknown
Comments: No Jurisdictional Land or Water
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No ❑ Unknown
❑x❑
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Permit Applications and Reviews: Trout Buffer Variance: PCN (here), Erosion and Sediment Control (Haywood County); NCWRC (review); & NCOWQ.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers Z Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
I Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
Jonathan's Creek
PER
DWQ
45
400
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
400
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Jonathan's Creek
Other
Other
0.46
02
Choose one
Choose
03
1 Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total: open water impacts
0.46
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Slope Excavation
Jonathan's Creek
Yes
5,000
5,000
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
5,000
5,000
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimize width of bench to overflow during 2 -year return frequency storm event and Maximized use of boulder vanes and J -Hook vanes to realign and
configure the Thalweg in the central portion of the stream. Use excavated materials from Thalweg to stabilize vanes with no increase in volume in the
100 -year flood. Spoils from slope excavation will be stored permanently above the 100 -year floodplain elevation so there is no reduction in the volume
of the floodplain.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Excavation of the north bank slope will be accomplished be excavating material from the back of the cut slope to the front so that there is always a
buffer between the excavation and the stream channel. Later backfilled boulder vanes will have already been installed before excavation reaches the
stream shoreline.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b.Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity.-
uantity:3b.
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
D
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
[Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
E3 Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
8%
2b. Does this pr2ject require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Storm water runoff is being managed through proper Erosion & Sedimentation Practice where runoff is primarily low volume sheet runoff.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
Haywood
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes E] No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑SRW
❑
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes QX No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
El Yes No
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," a short
provide narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
$Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
[,flit. w 14AMST*Z
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impactEndangered Species or Designated Critical
s�
Habitat? ��Q�iM�Mt CpMMW►1\CE4'�iO�dS �% � H+�MSti� � �� ��+5
F i -0 d Off-oci (8t8) Zj0- 3 V3F
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact E`s-sential Fish Habitats?!
MM13wLf V- Me-- 414 'n -a Teo
7jq�0AjAi G 4.
.A+1ojS%
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or arche logical resources?
.i_. V w US
CA�o ti �c �n+w.t��
•
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Yes E] No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
q„er I}✓�.�,K'�� ii�5�1� J',�'o...1 �NJo
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determinate ? �.�, w� n r --•y —�M S
PJ�
Applicantbc Printed Name
Date
Applicant/1 ignature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Construction Plans Specifications
Stream Restoration Project
Jonathan's Creek @ Creekwood Village
Maggie Valley, NC
Prosect No. ME -17-003
Prepared for
Southwestern North Carolina Resource Conservation & Development Council
In Cooperation with
Contents
Sheets 1 & 2
Site Plans
Sheets 3 & 4
Topographic Site Plans
Sheets 5 thru 8
Restoration Plans
Sheets 9 & 10
Structure Placement Plans
Sheets 11 thru 13
Plans & Construction Details
Sheets 14 thru 17
Trout Buffer Variance
Erosion Control Plan
Trout Buffer Revegetation
Haywood County Soil & Water District
Prepared by
Marks Enterprises of NC, PLLC.
1 Palatka Street
Arden, NC 28704
B. Dan Marks, Ph.D., P.E Principal
NC Registration No. 009631
[phone]
[e-mail]
`���►'CAROL�,�
ey'�•�t3.��g

Place Min. TO Boulder
EI. 2939.8'
Massive Rootball--
Remove Multiple Trees
And Leave Rootball
Deteriorating Boulder
Single Vane Structure
—STA o+o
To Be Stabilized
Concrete Intake fo
Trout Ponds
Water Line
Concrete
T•
Intake
Top of Bank
1.2933.52
E'
Parking Area
Nail in 8" lei Maple Tree
Steps
EI. 2940.20'
'
/El. 2940.10' TOB TOB
El. 2932.1'
SEI. 2932.3'
Flow
STA 1+00
�
STA 0+50
•
EI. 2932.7'
EI. 2932.9'
or 00' 00"83.35'
TOB TOS
EI. 2939.1'
EI. 2939.4'
Gravel Drive 8"
ER Gravel Drive
EI. 2934.20'
E1.2937.9'
EI. 2942.8'
EL 2932.1'
STA 1+50
•••
Remove
Trees
EI. 2943.3'
19S48'25"
� ---PMT E1.2938.1' 57.6' 10'x10'
@ Top of Bank (TOB) — EI 2938 2' Storage Bldg
A. IRP #1 ICBM EI. 2938.50'
Nail in Root of 18" 0 Maple Tree E1.2834.4'
South of Concrete Intake Stucture Trout Pond #1
EI. 2939.17'
8'
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
JONATHAN'S CREEK @ CREEKWOOD VILLAGE IRP#2
Nail in Top of Hollow 36" 0 le Tre
MAGG I E VALLEY, NC Between Storage Bldg and Grave rive
EI. 2936.11
Scale: 1"= 20'
/El. 2944.4'
\EI. 2932.0'
STA 2+00
%%J1111111,
CAR
DAN 1A
F,,1011811111 00
Match
Line
EI. 2943.9'
EI. 2933.8r •
STA 2+SO
•
EI. 2937.6'
TOB •
Large Evergreen Tree
(DO NOT REMOVE)
213.62' \\
EI. 2941.37'
Cabin #9 2 BR / `E1.2834.2'
Screened in Porch
Gravel Drive 8
Match
Line
SHEET 1 of 17

Match
Line
EI. 2940,4'
Top of Bank (TOB)
Water Line: �
EI. 2935.8'
EI. 2935.8'
Water Line—
Top of Bank (TOB)
TOB
Match
Line
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
JONATHAN'S CREEK (@- CREEKWOOD VILLAGE
EI. 2942.9'
EI. 2935.9'
STA 3+50
TrEI.
re
To
Be Removed
TOB_
MAGGIE VALLEY, NC
PROJECT No. ME -17-003
Scale: 1"= 20'
EI. 2934.3'
EI. 2933.8'
Traveler #1," �� \
E1.2932.85' EI. 2990.0' TOB\\
R
Gravel Drive
EI. 2939.2'
Property Corner
STA 4+0,
EI. 2933.9'
EI. 2937.5'
,%%%"C'- AR
F
Z.-E-017!
EI. 2937.8' EI. 2931.7
SHEET 2 of 17

NOTE: _
Remove all Trees, Tops, Laps,
Stumps, Rootballs, and Roots
From the Site
Place Min. TO Boulder
EI. 2939.8'ANIL
_
Massive Rootball—
Remove Multiple Trees
And Leave Rootball
Deteriorating Boulder
STA
Single Vane Structure
To Be Stabilized
Z94U.5- qP5U
(
2943.7'1 50'
1
Wooded Area - I
To Be Cleared and Graded 1 2942 I
(Trout Buffer Variance) I I II
2940.3' 25' 2942.9' 30'
TO BE REPLACED 1
O-bncrete Intake for
Trout Ponds /
Water Line Concrete • IntakePr Steps
Top of Bank---
E1.2933.52'
ankE1.2933.52'
Nail in 8" 0 Maple Tree
@ Top of Bank (TOB)
I � �
2940.2'# 15' I
2940.3' T 10' I ,
EI. 2939.8' 2942.6 -* 15 --_2940-
25'
2940
2'94 �7' 110'
EL 2942.
LEI. _2940.10' _>
2932
2 r
� 2942
• • •
� --E1.2932.1' EI. 2932.1'
'-EI. 2932.3' �I
i
Flow STA 1+00
STA 1+50
STA 0+50
EI. 2932.7' EI. 2934.20'
�El. 2932.9' • • • • •
'0 • - - - - 83 35'
EI. 2939.4'
Parking Area
PMT
EI. 2938.2'
IRP #1
Nail in Root of 18" 0 Maple Tree
South of Concrete Intake Stucture
EI. 2939.17'
\\IN
2945.7' * 50'
f 294
2947.5' 50' 2948
�-2944-- � �\
I
� 2944.5\ 30' 2944 I
2944_ \ \
2943.8'*20' 2945;5' I `\
20
93 --,Match,,.,- �\
2932 �
—'i'— EI. 2944.4`2932 0944.4LIn O�,\\\ \\\
0• jEl. 2943.
—ii
-2942•_ 932
EI. 2932.0' • • • _
STA 2+00 JI SEI. 2933.81
STA 2+50
•••
— TOB TOB Remove
EI. 2939.1' Trees
E1.2937.9' •
Gravel Drive 8" Lawn Area EI. 2937.6'
EI. 2943.3'
193r48' 25" • •
ER Gravel Drive 57.6' 10'x10' TOB • ��
E1.2938.1' Storage Bldg Large Evergreen Tree
(DO NOT REMOVE)
ICBM El. 2938.50' 00,001,
213.62'
E1.2834.4' EI. 2941.37'
Trout Pond #1
8'
Cabin #9 2 BR E1.2834.2'
GAR o'%�TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN
•"'o••�''81"�• STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
IRP #2
41, JONATHAN'S CREEK @ CREEKWOOD VILLAGE Nail inTop ofH0 w36"0 IE
MAGG I E VALLEY NC Behind Storage Bldg and Grave
SANµPP•F°�`•` , El. 2936.11'
0 PROJECT No. ME -17-003
Scale: 1"= 20'
rive
Screened in Porch
Gravel Drive
SHEET 3 of 17

\ 2947.6' 50'\ \ \
\ \ 2950 �
\ 2952-- Wooded Area
Mane 2948 � TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN
\ \ 2953.0150' To Be Cleared and Graded
� 2944.6' 30' \ \ I '\ ( Buffer �
Trout BuffVariance STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
R
\ 2946 \ 111 2952 TO BE REPLACED JONATHAN'S CREEK @ CREEKWOOD VILLAGE
2942.9' 20'2940 Z-11\ �
T f Bank k T B \ 2944
2929\' 30' 2950 \ MAGGIE VALLEY, NC
Top a (0) 2942.0, 10'\ 2935 � \ \ PROJECT No. ME -17-003
Water Line \ \ \ 2948 � \
293 2942 2944.6' zo' 1-1 - \ \ 2952
Scale: 1"= 20'
EI. 2940.4' 2946 \
EI. 205.8' - 2940 10'4
X294 \ '2950
\294 `
-2935 N2946•1' 3Q;2948 R
2942
2932 `
E1. 2942.9' \2946
2942.9' 20' Property Corner
STA 3+00 El. 2935.9' 2940 \ 2940— 2944 `
2935,
EI. 2935.8'
Water Line— -2940_
STA 3+50 EI. 2939.2' qw
Top of Bank (TOB) EI. 2934.8' EI. 2934.3' /
TOB Trees To
Be Removed
TOB _ STA 4+00
Match
Line
EI. 240_8
� EI. 2933.8'\
Traveler #1
E1.2932.85' EI. 2990.0'/
TOB
EI. 2933.9'
Gravel Drive
EI. 2939.2'
GAR C
�M
EI. 2937.5'
EI. 2937.8'
EI. 2931.7
SHEET 4 of 17

2932
2928
12.4
Begin Slope Excavation
Grade to Natural Slope @ STA 0+50
2932.2' ♦ 2932.2'r
♦ 2930.5' 2931.0'
:2930.
Width of Creek
Creek = 40'
Gravel Drive
Grassed lawn Area _
remove Underbrush, Briars & Vines
;evegetate with Grass if necessary
24 20 16 12 8 4 0 24 20 16 12 8 4 0
Distance, Feet Distance, Feet
0%
'%J
Section STA 1+00 (Begin LT. Bank Excavation)
'" ow
Scale: 1" = 4"
6v��g
�.: OA !I►P.���
2944
2940
2936
2932
2928
W
SHEET 5 of 17
2940.2'
2944
Diversion Ditch
Walking Trail
a 2940-2940.0'
2939.8'
a
c
0
2' 3'
cO
>
1 Excavation
a
W
2936
1.5 End Area
2932
2928
12.4
Begin Slope Excavation
Grade to Natural Slope @ STA 0+50
2932.2' ♦ 2932.2'r
♦ 2930.5' 2931.0'
:2930.
Width of Creek
Creek = 40'
Gravel Drive
Grassed lawn Area _
remove Underbrush, Briars & Vines
;evegetate with Grass if necessary
24 20 16 12 8 4 0 24 20 16 12 8 4 0
Distance, Feet Distance, Feet
0%
'%J
Section STA 1+00 (Begin LT. Bank Excavation)
'" ow
Scale: 1" = 4"
6v��g
�.: OA !I►P.���
2944
2940
2936
2932
2928
W
SHEET 5 of 17

W
2950
2945
2940
2935
2930
2925
— 2945.0'
i
i
Excavation
End Area
I
1
1
24.4 SYD
1
10'�
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance, Feet
t%%IIIIIII,�
ca CARO ���� LT. Bank Section @ STA 2+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
r,; OAN
2932.0'
2930.5'
Remove Marked Dead
Trees, Underbrush & Briars
/ 1
/ 1
//
_2930_51��'
25 20 15 10 5 0
Distance, Feet
RT. Bank Section @ STA 2+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
2950
2945
2943
a�
2940 UT
Ci0
2936
2935
2930
2925
SHEET 6 of 17

a
a
LL
0
ca
a�
W
2950
2945
2944 '
5
2940
Diversion Ditch
3'
Walking Trail
2942.5'
Excavation End
Area = 8.25 }
0
2935 2936.0'- I 10'
2930
2925
2940.5'
/-2939.5'
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CARO
Distance, Feet
) � — Lt. B�kS ection � STA3+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
►e_aAN 0PP�6`�,```
2934.0'
2950
2945
,��^----------------- 2940.8' a
a
i C
o
a,
--_ J 2935 W
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Distance, Feet
Rt. Bk Section @ STA 3+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
2930
2925
SHEET 7 of 17

v 2940 NOTE: 2939.0'
Partially Weat d~1
7.5' Rock may be Encountered
in Excavation
Field Changes will be made \
�� 2935.0'
2935 .. 10
J I 2934.3'
2930
2925
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
►���1CAR
Distance, Feet
Lt. Bk Section L'w*--"& STA 4+00
0SC
ale: 1" = 5'
14 0PQ�%I'
'111111111101
TOB 2939.0 "--,t2940 tv
LL
2934.0' � 2935 °'
W
dth of Creek = 40 Feet
25 20 15 10 5 0
Distance, Feet
Rt. Bk Section @ STA 4+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
2930
2925
SHEET 8 of 17
Estimated Volume of Excavation
2955
Diversion Ditch
Average End Area Method:
Walking Trail
End Areas Average Incremental Total
Volume Volume
2950
2949.5'
-__
STA 1+00
2950
12.4
' 2948.0'
18.4 1840 CYDS
STA 2+00
24.4
2948
X2946.0'
16.3 1630 CYDS 4,500 CYDS
2' 2'
STA 3+00
8.2
11.1 1110 CYDS
2945
1-1
���,
STA 4+00
13.9 2945
2943.0'
Excavation �' 2942.5'
1.2 End Area 13.9 SYD X2941.0'
v 2940 NOTE: 2939.0'
Partially Weat d~1
7.5' Rock may be Encountered
in Excavation
Field Changes will be made \
�� 2935.0'
2935 .. 10
J I 2934.3'
2930
2925
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
►���1CAR
Distance, Feet
Lt. Bk Section L'w*--"& STA 4+00
0SC
ale: 1" = 5'
14 0PQ�%I'
'111111111101
TOB 2939.0 "--,t2940 tv
LL
2934.0' � 2935 °'
W
dth of Creek = 40 Feet
25 20 15 10 5 0
Distance, Feet
Rt. Bk Section @ STA 4+00
Scale: 1" = 5'
2930
2925
SHEET 8 of 17

Stabilize Existing Vane
with 25 2.5' to 3'0
Boulders.
50,000 t = 3 Trucks
Place Min. TO Boulder
SEI. 2939.8'
Place iZ Boulders here
Massive Rootball
Remove Multiple Trees
And Leave Rootball
Deteriorating Boulder
Single Vane Structure
To Be Stabilized
Place 7 Boulders Here, --
Water Line -
To p
ineTop of Bank
E1.2933.52' --
Nail in 8" 0 Maple Tree
@ Top of Bank (TOB)
CARI
A 0+00,
Concrete Intake for
Trout Ponds
Concrete
• Intake
P Parking Area
(1�
TF41101157�g
►.; QaN CPQ..
•
EL 2932.3'
STA 0+50
jEl. 2932.9'
• • fi 00' 0
EI. 2939.4'
Steps
Backfill with Thalweg
Exavated Material
13°
• • •
Flow A,
Backfill with Thalweg
Exavated Material
�-�7 * - -
'-EL 2932.1'
STA +1.00
EI. 2932.7' EI. 2934.20'
83.35'
- TOB TOB
EI. 2939.1'
E1.2937.9"
Gravel Drive 8" Lawn Area
ER Gravel Drive
Backfill with Thalweg
Exavated Material
/ E1. 2942.8' Match
_ EI. 2944.4' line
f •
1111EI.2932.1' •'-� EI. 2943.9'
#6
El. 293. '
STA 1+50
STA 2+00 \ \E1. 2933
Remove
Trees 4'0 Boulder,
•
Q EI. 2937.6'
125"
EI. 2943.3' � • •
57.6' 10'x10' TOB • \
A ---PMT E1.2938.1' Storage Bldg Large Evergreen Tree
El. 2938.2'
IRP #1 ICBM EI. 2938.50'
Nail in Root of 18" 0 Maple Tree E
South of Concrete Intake Stucture Trout Pond #1
E1. 2939.17' 81
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
JONATHAN'S CREEK @ CREEKWOOD RESORT IRP#2
Nail in Top of Hollow 36" 0 le Tre
MAGG I E VALLEY, NC Between Storage Bldg and Grave rive
E1. 2936.11'
Scale: 1"= 20'
(DO NOT REMOVE)
000,001,
213.62'
4' EI. 2941.37'
Cabin #9 2 BR E1.2834.2'
Screened in Porch
Gravel Drive
Match
Line
SHEET 9 of 17

Match Lin
Top of Bank (TOB;
Water Line
Water Line--�\
011
Top of Bank (TOB)—%,,,.,
TO
Match Line
Stream Restoration Project
Jonathan's Creek @ Creekwood Resort
Backfill with Thalweg Maggie Valley, NC
Exavated Material PROJECT No. ME -17-003
El. 2940.4' Scale: 1"= 20'
EI. 2942.9'
SEI. 2935.8' ,'
j Property Corner
STA 3+00 El. 2935.9' EI. 2939.9'
El. 2934.8'
Be Remo
TOB
EI. 2934.3'/
EI. 2933.8'
Traveler #1,'
E1.2932.85' EI. 2990.0' TOB
8' Gravel Drive
EI. 2939.2'/ /
,�t,,GAR 111
►i; DAN N►PQ ��
4+00
EI. 2933.9'
EI. 2937.5'
Spillway @ Thalweg
Extend Thalweg to
Property Line (R)
STA 4+75
El. 2937.8' \\ /El. 2931.7 SHEET 10 of 17

SHEET 11 of 17
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
1.
REFERENCE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING
BOULDER VANE AT STA 0+00.
7. STA 3+10 TO STA 3+35: DOUBLE ROW LATERAL VANE OF TWO (2) -
FOOT 0 BOULDERS AT 30° ANGLE W/ ERODING NORTH BANK -
2.
STA 0+62.5 TO STA 1+00: GENTLE MOVEMENT OF CURRENT; USE
BACKFILL THE SLOPING LATERAL VANE WITH EXCAVATED THALWEG
A SLOPING "J -HOOK" BOULDER VANE - 37.5 FEET AT 13'W/ NORTH
SPOILS - USE OVERLAPPING 2 1/2 - FOOT 0 BOULDERS FOR THE
BANK - USE TWO (2) FOOT 0 OVERLAPPING BOULDERS. ESTIMATE
PRIMARY VANE AND AT LEAST THREE (3) - THREE (3) - FOOT 0
THIRTY (30) TWO (2) FOOT 0 AND SIX (6) THREE (3) FOOT 0
BOULDERS AT EACH END OF THE VANE FOR LONG-TERM STABILITY.
BOULDERS TOTALLING ABOUT FIFTEEN (15) TONS. BACKFILL THE
ESTIMATE TWENTY (20) - 2 1/2'0 BOULDERS AND SIX (6) - 3'0
TOTAL LENGTH OF "J -HOOK" WITH SPOILS FROM THE THALWEG
BOULDERS.
EXCAVATION.
8. STA 3+50 TO STA 3+75: SAME AS No. 7 - PLACE THREE (3) - THREE (3)
3.
STA 1+25 TO STA 1+50• MODERATELY STRONG MOVEMENT OF
- FOOT 0 BOULDERS BETWEEN STRUCTURE No. 7 AND STRUCTURE
CURRENT; USE A SLOPING SINGLE VANE "J -HOOK" AT 28° W/
No, 8 TO CREATE A TROUT CUBBY BETWEEN THE TWO (2)
NORTH BANK - EXTEND TO 1/3 WIDTH OF STREAM CHANNEL AND
STRUCTUTES.
BACKFILL COMPLETELY W/ THALWEG EXCAVATION SPOILS. PLACE
THREE (3) 3 -FOOT 0 DIAMETER BOULDERS AT END OF THE VANE
9. STA 4+25: CONSTRUCT A DOUBLE THREE (3) - FOOT BOULDER CROSS
TO CREATE THE "HOOK". ESTIMATE TWENTY (20) - 210 BOULDERS
VANE WITH ANGLING DOUBLE 2 1/2 ' 0 BOULDER LATERAL VANES
AND THREE (3) - 3'0 BOULDERS.
EXTENDING FROM STA 4+00 TO 4+25.
4.
STA 1+75 TO STA 2+25: RESISTANCE TO STRONG NORTHWARD
NOTES: a. DO NOT LEAVE SPACES BETWEEN BOULDERS AT
MOVEMENT OF THE CURRENT AND STREAM BED; USE A LATERAL
ANY LOCATIONS IN THE STRUCTURE.
SINGLE VANE CONSISTING OF OVERLAPPING TWO (2) - FOOT 0
BOULDERS TO PROTECT THE BACKFILLED THALWEG EXCAVATION
`��ttttCAROl% b. CREATE A SPILLWAY SECTION AT THE THALWEG
SPOIL MATERIAL.•.,ssi-•
��� LOCATION BY ALLOWING THE BOULDERS TO
SINK TO THE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THALWEG
5.
STA 2+00 TO STA 2+40: PROVIDE LONG-TERM PROTECTION AND
CHANNEL THUS NOT ALLOWING BOULDERS TO
GRADUAL DEPOSITION ON THE RIGHT BANK TO DIRECT THE
r "BRIDGE" THEMSELVES ACROSS THE THALWEG
PRIMARY CURRENT TO THE THALWEG AND CREATE GENTLE EDDY
a� g .��
•....,..-r'P•E.• CHANNEL.
CURRENTS TO BACKFILL THE RIGHT BANK - USE A MINIMUM OF
DAN /��tt
�tttt��
FIFTEEN (15) TWO (2) - FOOT 0 BOULDERS IN THE "J -HOOK" AND
c. EXTEND THE THALWEG CHANNEL TO THE
AT LEAST ONE (1) FOUR (4) - FOOT 0 BOULDER TO CREATE THE J-
PROPERTY LINE (END OF THE PROJECT).
HOOK FOR LONG-TERM STABILITY.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
6.
STA 2+50 TO STA 2+75: MODERATELY STRONG MOVEMENT OF
CURRENT; USE A SLOPING SINGLE VANE "J -HOOK" AT 28° W/
STABILIZATION OF THE EXISTING CROSS VANE AT THE BEGINNING
NORTH BANK - EXTEND TO 1/3 WIDTH OF STREAM CHANNEL AND
OF THE PROJECT (STA 0+00) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE AND
PARTIALLY BACKFILL TO WITHIN ONE (1) FOOT OF TOP W/
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE FLOW VELOCITY AND
THALWEG EXCAVATION SPOILS. PLACE THREE (3) 3 -FOOT 0
CHARACTERISTICS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
DIAMETER BOULDERS AT EACH END OF THE VANE. ESTIMATE
PROJECT. AS SUCH, IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WORK BEGINS AT STA
TWENTY (20) - 2'0 BOULDERS AND SIX (6j - 3'0 BOULDERS
0+00, FOLLOWED BY WORK AT THE END OF THE PROJECT, AND
CONTINUING TO WORK UPSTREAM.
SHEET 11 of 17

Structure spans 1/2 to 2/3 of stream width.
I
PLAN
Notes:
-Rocks in vane are not
spaced.
-Rocks in "J" section are
spaced 1/2 rock width.
Flow
CARO���i
Sub -Pavement
PROFILE
e �g���' and
Vegtate Banks
Slo
I)AN 101-0
Bankfull
Bench
Inner Berm
a�,=_W/ e � o �_= -
Legend Bed '\ >—//,�///— — —//!-/14 Ela
Header Rods p Tree /
Footer Rods '``I,,
vim- Vegetation
CROSS-SECTION
NC J -Hook Vane Detail
Stream .0
Restoration Institute
(Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
Date: 6/12/03
Note:
-There should be no gaps
between the rocks in the cross
vane_
Bankfull Stage
415%
FLOW
—9cour
Hoe
Channel
Subpavement
PROFILE
FLOW
Slope and
Vegetate Banks
Bankfull
Bench --
Legend
Hew« Rod* vegetation
CROSS-SECTION
NC Cross Vane Detail
Stream 0
Restoration Institute
Date: 6/12!03 (Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
SHEET 12 of 17

Bank =10'
—10'-
2,d Bank Level (Extreme Flood)\\
wave 135' \
1,, Bank Level \
,/Design Flood
Middle'/,
=12'wz- W '-12'
Center line Middle third
Low Flow Low Flow
,r' t
Width of Thalweg = 4'- 8'
Depths of Thalweg = 24" -12"
DesiredLocation
of the Thalweg
Thalweg Design Section
Scale: NTS See Dimensions
►i, OA 0P'P
Channel Bottom or Sream Bed
TABLE I
APPROXIMATE VOLUMES AND WEIGHTS OF VARIOUS SIZE
BOULDERS CONSISTING OF COMMON ROCK TYPES
Diameter, feet
1.0
1.5
2.0
- - 2.5--- -
3.0
Volume, cubic feet
0.525
1.767
4.187
8.176
14.133
TABLE II
Weight, pounds
70 to 75
240 to 250
560 to 590
1100 to 1150
1900 to 2000
PERMISSIBLE EROSION FORCE RESISTANCE
d5o Boulder -Size, Inches
6.0
Permissible Shear Stress, Psf
2.0
9.0
3.0
12.0
4.0
15.0
,.0
18.0
21.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
X24.0
SHEET 13 of 17

Wade -Reese Way
15' Buffer
Drainage Ditch
NOTE: Red Area
is to be Cleared
NOTE:
Max Disturbance
IDistance = 30' I
1=10
TOB
Field Access Road
(Grassed Lane)
rty line (Approx) 225' (Approx)
Existing Buffer (DO NOT DISTURB)
50' (Appox)
15'
Spoil Area
(Revegetated)
200' (Appox)
\2'X 20' CMP 200' (Approx)
-Haul Road (See Detail) Surface Drainage
(DO NOT DISTURB
Slope Cut Line
—TOB 15'
TOB Trout Buffer
TOB —
TOB
1+50 2+00
TOB
TOB
NOTE: Minimum 25' Trout Buffer Will be Re -Established
Following the Excavation of Stream North Slope.
0
#1 Strip & Stockpile Grass Rootmat and Topsoil.
#2 Density Subgrade By Proof Rolling with 1/2 loaded Tandem Axle Truck.
#3 Place One Layer of Woven Geotextile with Grab Strength = 200 LBS.
#4 Place & Compact Minimum 8" of CABC Stone Base. Compact with
Loaded Tandem Axle Dump Truck.
50' is'�
(Approx) 10' 1
Property Line
225' (Approx)
Spoil Area
(Revegetated) 50'
A / (Approx)
150' (Approx)
TOB 27'5' Disturbance line
30'
2+50 Slope Cut Line 160' (Approx)
TOB
3+
TOEt 30' «
TOB
Erosion &Sedimentation/Trout Buffer
Creekwood Village
Site Plan
Trout Buffer Variance
Scale: 1"= 40'
Haul Road Detail
NOT -TO -SCALE
TOB __ 41 --Property Corner
3+50
FLOW
TOB 4+00
TOB 4+5 4 75
k` FLOW
1% 0 CAR i1
ouvi�
446
we
►rj,d ,N %APR,
TOB
SHEET 14 of 17

Existing Drainage
`.� Feature
STA 0+75
Haul Road
(See Detail Page #14)
—15'
20'—
illing Basin
Drainage Feature of the
Spoil Storage Areas
Scale: 1"= 10'
Total Area = 0.41 Acre<0.5 Acre
24 CMP Q Peak = 1.7 CFS
Bedded on #3 Ballast Stone & 10 Year Storm
Tc=5min
Filtered With #57 Filter Stone 4 Slope
Existing Surface Drainage Ditch 0 Spoil Storage Area
q' 3'X 10' Wide
—Sediment Basin
Vm.. = 20OFT 3
Req'd Discharge @ Peak = 1.13 CFS
Wade Reese (� Existing Buffer
Way (DO NOT DISTURB)
1-10 5' I
30'
Existing Grass Rootmat
(To Be Removed & Stockpiled)
8"-12" Haul Road Embankment o-
3'
o-
( Slope Excavation Material )
n4"
S/W Control Elev. 104.0'
Basin Filter System
#3 Ballast Stone
W/#57 Stone Cover 1 4'
30 CYD Stone 2
Bottom of Basin Elev. 100'
8' ��-2'�� - 8'
Sediment Basin Spillway Detail
Scale: 1"= 4'
Erosion Geotextile
Excavation Cover Over Reused
Stockpile Grass Rootmat & Topsoil
25' 1
Pasture/Hay Field
(DO NOT DISTURB)
150' (Approx)
To Trout Buffer
(To be Restored)
CABC Base Stone 4 2 a Existing Grass -Lined
Woven Geotextile Drainage Ditch
(DO NOT DISTURB)
Erosion & Sediment Control Section ,%%cAR
Slope Excavation Stockpile
Scale: 1"= 10'
PAN MP�.���
SHEET 15 of 17

NOTE:
Plant Live Stakes in 1/8"0
Bored or Driven Holes
in a 4X4 Pattern
Walking Path & Diversion
Ditch (See Detail)
_.._ ____I
Erosion Protection Geotextile
Stake Per Manufacturer Directions
atural Slope
1
5r
LL
CL
C
Q �
� N
Use Silky Dogwood, Gray Dogwood,
or Red Osier Dogwood.
Alternate
X
ru
0
X
Eroded Bank
Min. VOX 3' Live Stalks
Containing Min. 6 Buds.
Use Native Willow, Silky Willow,
Black Willow & Pussy Willow
Alternate
Use ALL Willows
on 1st Bench
10' Min.
•
•
•
•
2'♦14 4-
1st Flood
Level Bench
Slope Failure
Lateral Vane
I 1
I
I
I
€ Excavated
Thalweg
4' Minimum
I
tl
O
I
U. I
Live Stake Planting Plan
Scale: 1"= 4'
2 Min. �^
1 1 Thalweg Fill J -Hook Boulders
4'\
y
1' Thalweg Excavation
2- 12'1
2'
10'
14'
Min. 10' 1st Level Bench Diverted Creek
with Upstream Lateral Vane
1st Flood Level Bench 14' and/or J -Hook Vane
Trout Buffer Revegetation Detail
Scale: 1"= 4'
►���,�CAR
'NVY01lIE� �6j
PAN
SHEET 16 of 17
0
4
Stagger—
2'
0
0
Stagger
— 2
i 0
4'
0
0
- 0
CL
O
°o
CJ
0 C
to Q
1
hk0
�
O
O V1
•
N
_
0
c°
L
o
O
Y O
cc
Use Silky Dogwood, Gray Dogwood,
or Red Osier Dogwood.
Alternate
X
ru
0
X
Eroded Bank
Min. VOX 3' Live Stalks
Containing Min. 6 Buds.
Use Native Willow, Silky Willow,
Black Willow & Pussy Willow
Alternate
Use ALL Willows
on 1st Bench
10' Min.
•
•
•
•
2'♦14 4-
1st Flood
Level Bench
Slope Failure
Lateral Vane
I 1
I
I
I
€ Excavated
Thalweg
4' Minimum
I
tl
O
I
U. I
Live Stake Planting Plan
Scale: 1"= 4'
2 Min. �^
1 1 Thalweg Fill J -Hook Boulders
4'\
y
1' Thalweg Excavation
2- 12'1
2'
10'
14'
Min. 10' 1st Level Bench Diverted Creek
with Upstream Lateral Vane
1st Flood Level Bench 14' and/or J -Hook Vane
Trout Buffer Revegetation Detail
Scale: 1"= 4'
►���,�CAR
'NVY01lIE� �6j
PAN
SHEET 16 of 17

USDA o N RCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Helping People Help the Lanai
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
Tree and Shrub Planting with Live Stakes
Definition:
A "Live Stake" is a dormant cutting of red -osier
dogwood (Cornus serecia), gray dogwood
(Cornus racemosa), silky dogwood (Cornus
arnoinurn) or native willow (Salix sp.). The
cutting is 3 feet long and is pushed into the soil or
inserted into a predrilled hole 2 feet into the
ground in April.
Benefits:
• Much cheaper than container stock.
• Easy to plant and handle.
• Dogwood provides wildlife food.
• Pussy Willow (Salix Discolor) provides
early season nectar for bees.
• Great for stabilizing stream banks
• Provides a substitute for invasive plants
• Can easily be cut from power lines and
other plants
Planting Instructions:
• Plant dormant in April or November
• Plant a three foot stake 2 feet into the
ground
• Cut branches with several buds and nodes
as these will form roots and new branches
• Live stakes are more vigorous if planted
in the spring.
• Plant them as soon as possible after
cutting them or receiving them in the mail
• Keep stakes moist and cool while storing
them
• Larger diameter stakes have more store
energy and often sprout more vigorously
• Best if planted in soils with high water
tables (hydric soils) or moderately drained
soils with heavy loamy, silty or clayey
textures.
• Select non -stoney soils such as flood
plains for installation.
• Cut one end of the stake to a sharp point
to help push it into the ground.
• Pre -drill a planting hole by hammering a
piece of rebar into the ground or use an
auger
Above: A red -osier dogwood, live stake which has
produced leaves from nodes.
Live Stake and Joint fftrrp
`cc!y+tctn Jiututgw1wit
Planting for S t re a m b a n k atut ,r�,toY�,tuln
`� ;/it 1�fl.YCli J�YUIIYaf)t
Erosion Control -1
by Robbin B. Sotir and J. Craig Fischenich November 2007
Complexity Environmental Value Cost
Low Moderate Hi eh Lo« Moderate Hiuli Low Moderate High
OVERVIEW
The live stake (LS) and joint planting (JP)
soil bioengineering systems are units
fabricated from live, woody plant material
branches. Over time, the LS's are effective
for erosion control and the JP system
provides reinforcement to slopes upon
which rock has been placed. The LS and JP
live cut branches are expected to grow roots
and top growth, with the roots providing
additional soil reinforcement and surface
cover providing protection from runoff and
streamflow. The LS and JP units are used
from the baseflow elevation up the face of
the streambank, acting principally to protect
the bank toe and face. In the case of the
JP's, the root soil reinforcement serves to
augment bank protection. The LS's and JP's
are also useful to improve erosion control
and infiltration and support the riparian
zone. Once top growth has developed, both
systems have the potential to accumulate
sediment (Figures 1-7).
L...A
Figure 1. Fabricating a live stake or joint
planting unit
Job Sheet—Tree and Shrub Planting- 612 1 ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-35
Figure 2. Installing a live stake
Figure 3. Installing a joint planting
►,,; DAN �MP';;�`
SHEET 17 of 17