Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080889 Ver 1_Staff Comments_20080911Re: Steeles Mill Dam Removal - Minutes of Sept. 4, 2008 On-site Me... 2doSC? Subject: Re: Steeles Mill Dam Removal - Minutes of Sept. 4, 2008 On-site Meeting From: "Kevin Tweedy" <ktweedy@mbakercorp.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:09:42 -0400 To: <Eric.Kulz@ncmail.net>, <ian.mcmillan@ncmail.net>, <Emily.R.Burton@saw02.usace.army.mil> CC: "Jessica rohrbach" <jrohrbach@mbakercorp.com> Emily, Eric, and Ian- There was discussion at our meeting last week that NWP 27 was not the appropriate permit for the dam removal work. I have looked through the list of NWP's and am having trouble finding one that works better. I've found information on the Web indicating that a NWP 27 has been used before for dam removal. If not a NWP 27, do you all have suggestions of which NWP and WQC this should be filed under? -Kevin Kevin Tweedy, PE Senior Engineer Office Manager - Cary NC Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, NC 27518 Ph: (919) 459-9004 Cell: (919) 810-6331 Fax: (919) 463-5490 I I I Kevin Tweedy 9/8/2008 1:30 PM »> III Project - Steeles Mill Dam Removal Project Subject - Summary of Meeting Held On-site on Sept. 4, 2008 at 10:00AM Participants - Emily Burton - USACE; Ian McMillan - NCDWQ; Eric Kulz - NCDWQ; Shari Bryant - NCWRC; Jeff Bruton - NCDWR; Mike Wicker - USFWS; Monty Crump - City of Rockingham; John Massey - City of Rockingham; Kevin Tweedy - Baker Engineering The meeting began with a brief history of the project provided by Kevin Tweedy and Jeff Bruton. Everyone then walked up to the dam and stood along the right abutment to view the dam and the creek upstream and downstream. Discussed the plans for the removal, that include for the dam structure to be completely removed, but the abutment walls on either side of the dam will remain after demolition. Rock material removed from the dam will be used to provide additional toe protection along the abutments. Discussed the fact that the sluice gate of the dam has been open for at least 7 years, so there is no current backwater from the dam. The group walked approximately 150 feet upstream of the dam to gain a better. Upstream of the dam, the creek is free-flowing and appears to be mostly stable with dense herbaceous vegetation on the stream banks. Therefore, the group agreed that sediment release is not expected to be a concern for the removal of the dam. The group walked down the proposed construction access to the point where construction equipment will cross the creek channel to access the dam. Kevin Tweedy described the proposed access plans. Construction equipment will cross the channel at a perpendicular angle to access a mid-channel bar on the opposite side of the creek. The equipment will then move upstream on the bar material to get to the dam - this approach should minimize disturbance to the stream bed. In areas where the stream bed may be disturbed through construction, Mike Wicker agreed that USFWS would do a survey for mussels prior to equipment being brough in, and if species 1 of2 9/12/2008 12:57 PM Re: Steeles Mill Dam Removal - Minutes of Sept. 4, 2008 On-site Me... were found, they would be relocated to another stream reach away from disturbance. Shari Bryant indicated that she and/or members of her staff may be interested in participating in this work. Shari Bryant and Mike Wicker also indicated that NCWRC and USFWS would like to see the demolition work occur during the period from October 15 through March 15. Kevin Tweedy said that this time period would be fine, pending approval of all necessary permits. Kevin also indicated that the USACE 404 permit for the work may take the most time, due to coordination that is required with SHPO. Emily Burton said that she would contact SHPO and determine the necessary steps that would be required to get SHPO concurrence, and attempt to move this process through in time to meet the Oct-March demolition time frame. Emily asked about past public involvement regarding the proposed dam removal, and Monty Crump indicated that the plan had been discussed numerous times with the community over the past few years, and that public opinion of the project had always been favorable. Action Items: - Baker Engineering to notify USFWS (Mike Wicker) and NCWRC (Shari Bryant) at least one month prior to the planned start of demolition activities, so that mussel relocations can occur prior to disturbance. - Baker Engineering to resubmit permit forms for 401 Certification with NCDWQ. Submittal will only be for dam removal portion of the project, and remove mention of stream restoration. - USACE (Emily Burton) to contact SHPO and discuss items necessary to move the project forward. - Baker Engineering to notify this group periodically of project status. Please let me know if anyone has any corrections/additions that should be included with this project update and minutes. Sincerely, Kevin Tweedy Kevin Tweedy, PE Senior Engineer Office Manager - Cary NC Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, NC 27518 Ph: (919) 459-9004 Cell: (919) 810-6331 Fax: (919) 463-5490 Kevin Tweedy.vcf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Encoding: quoted-printable 2 of2 9/12/2008 12:57 PM