20170993 Ver 1_401 Application_20170809

CLearWaLer
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
August 4, 2017
Mr. David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR 401 Permitting & Buffer Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 91' Floor
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
k�
0 ,c
RE: Brittany Place (+/- 7 Acres)
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Henderson County, North Carolina
Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins:
2 0 1 70 993
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of Sidney E.
Kirkley represented by Properties at UNO, LLC. The project site is located at 2810 Chimney Rock
Road, Hendersonville, in Henderson County, North Carolina. The applicant is seeking a
Nationwide Permit 29 to construct a new multi -family apartment complex for residential use.
A copy of this package has been sent to Mr. Zan Price of NC DWR, Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Should you have any questions regarding the attached PCN please do not hesitate to contact us at
828-698-9800.
Respectfully,
4ieA�
Britten W. Yant
Biologist
cc:
A
ent Rid ]e, P.W.S
Principal
NC Wildlife Resources Commission — Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Resources Commission — Bvron Hamstead
NC DWR — Zan Price
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2017 - 1193 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder F] Assign Action ID Number in ORM F1
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Brittany Place
2. Work Type: Private a Institutional F1 Government F1 Commercial F]
3. Project Description/ Purpose [PCN Form B3d and 133e]:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a new multi -family apartment complex. The
complex will include 6 residential buildings, 3 garage buildings, and associated infrastructure.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Properties at UNO, LLC/ Sidney E. Kirkley
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: ClearWater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 65b): N/A
7. Project Location -Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb):
35.358374, -82.420339. The proposed project is located at 2810 Chimney Rock Road,
Hendersonville, in Henderson County, North Carolina.
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 9680-02-4871 and 9680-02-6973
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Henderson
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c): Hendersonville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Wolfpen Creek HUC:060101050302
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c): French Broad HUC:06010105
Authorization: Section 10 F Section 404 W1 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
8 Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
FINo Permit Required
Revised 20150602

&par Ler
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby
authorize C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Water of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.
CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for permit processing at
the request of the USACE or DWR.
Property Owner of Record: Properties at UNO. LLC
Property Owner Address: 695 Ransier Drive
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Phone Number: 828-702-3147
Property Location: 2810 Chimney Rock Road - Hendersonville, NC
Owner/Managing partner Signature: l
Date:
32 Clayton Strect
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
www.cwcnv.com

o`��� wn rf 9�G
Uj 9
I 1 >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes © No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
® Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes © No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project: Brittany Place
2b. County: Henderson
2c.
Nearest municipality / town: Hendersonville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Properties at UNC, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
1449/384
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Sidney E. Kirkley
3d.
Street address:
695 Ransier Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Hendersonville, NC 28739
3f.
Telephone no.:
828-702-3147
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
5c. Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828-698-9800
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9680-02-4871 and 9680-02-6973
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.358374 Longitude: -82.420339
1c. Property size:
7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Wolfpen Creek HUC:060101050302
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
Class C
2c. River basin:
French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed project site is currently undeveloped with the exception of one residential home. The surrounding land is primarily residential with
limited commercial use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.18
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 9
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a new multi -family apartment complex. The complex will Include 6 residential buildings, 3 garage
buildings, and associated infrastructure (stonnwater pond, parking lot, playground, ect.).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project Includes 0.18 AC Impact to W1 and 9 LF of stream impact to S1 for the construction of property entrance road. Typical
construction and earth -moving equipment would be utilized on site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Q Yes No Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Ex Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Clearwater Environmental Consultants
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW -2017-01193 Preliminary JD 6-12-17 (attached)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes x❑ No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area Impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWO (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.18
VV2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.18
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c. 3d. 3e.
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction
3f. 3g•
Average Impact
stream length
width (linear
(feet) feet)
81 P
Fill
UT to Wolfpen Creek INT Corps
2 9
S2 -
Choose one
'
S3 -
Choose one
- -
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 9
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary T
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 _
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
Pi Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary T
feel
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
134 -
Yes/No
135
Yes/No
66
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project.
Stream and wetland impacts are the minimum necessary to develop the site. The jurisdictional Impacts are necessary to provide an entrance road to
the property.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures would be utilized on site to avoid/ minimize Impacts during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Q Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQX❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
0 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.18 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X❑ No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A storm -water management plan will be reviewed and approved by The City of Hendersonville. The City of Hendersonville Is a delegated local
authority for the review and approval of storm -water management plans.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Hendersonville
0 Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented Stormwater management programs
a I check all that apply):
apply (
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ORW
[]Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. -Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes Q No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes © No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is in a previously developed residential and commercial area Hendersonville. NC. The proposed project would not result in
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will connect to the existing sewer system and wastewater would be treated at the local existing municipal facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
EJ Yes X❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑x No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
'
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and the Natural Heritage Program GIS data. CEC consulted the FWS's "Northern Long -Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for
Henderson Co. This County has not been identified as having known occurrences of hibemacula or matemity sites. It is the opinion of CEC that the
project would have "no effect" on the northern long-eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS. Impact will not occur In a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes Zx No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS
Service. House (HN1355) is located approximately 2,000 ft from the proposed project site. It is the opinion of CEC, that the proposed activity is not
to threaten the integrity of this site.
—likely
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yesx❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Program. FEMA Map Number 3700968000J Panel 9680 Effective 10!2/2010
R. Clement Riddle
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agents Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

In -Lieu Fee Acceptance Letter

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
August 1, 2017
Sidney Kirkley
Properties at LINO, LLC
695 Ransier Drive
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Project: Brittany Place
RI.)), ( W)PER
MICHAE1 S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: February 1, 2018
County: Henderson
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEO Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certiflcation/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation In that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
Impact
River
Basin
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri alien
Non -Riparian Coastal Marsh
French
06010105
0
0
0
0.18
0 0 0
0
Broad
1
(
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest In the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Since ,
FOR Jrt��5. B Stanfill
-set Management Supervisor
cc: Clement Riddle, agent
Stale of North Carolina I Envitoninmal Quality, Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Centcr I Raleigh. NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Parcel Information

Henderson Countv. NC Tax Parcel Report Thursday, May 11, 2017
Parcel Information
REID:
1013700
Pin:
9680024871
Listed to:
PROPERTIES AT LINO LLC A NC
Neighborhood:
HENDERSONVILLE CITY
As inlormation or data provided (whelher subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) Is provided as is, without any
LLCOMPANY
war atdias, h*m* g the warranties or merchontability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson County and Ms
Mailing Address:
695 RANSIER DR
Township:
Clear Creek
Mailing City, State, Zip:
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
Municipality:
HENDERSONVILLE
Physical Address:
2810 CHIMNEY ROCK RD
Tax District:
HENDERSONVILLE CITY
Deed:
1449/384
Plot:
Not Available
Data Recorded:
12-30-2010
Elementary School District:
SUGARLOAF
Revenue Stamps:
0
Middle School District:
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
County Zoning:
Cities
High School Distad:
NORTH HIGH
Property Description:
US64 EAST ON
Soil:
Hayesvilie loam, 7 to 15 percent
slopes
Map Sheet:
9680.00
Voting Precinct:
Clear Creek
Assessed Acreage:
5.91000000
Commissioner District
4
Building Value:
$0.00
Agrlcuttural District
None Found
Land Value:
$177,800.00
North Carolina House District
117
Value To Be Blllod:
$177,800.00
U.S. House District
11
North Carolina Senate District
46
Flood Zone:
Zone X, Not Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
f HandemoriCounty
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY,
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
200 North Grove Street
As inlormation or data provided (whelher subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) Is provided as is, without any
Hendersonville. NC 26702
war atdias, h*m* g the warranties or merchontability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson County and Ms
P- (626) 6984124
ampbyeas make no warrmtias or guarantees. either express or implied. Use of the information or data subscribed.
F: [phone]
ptaehased or otherwise dislribuled whether In hard copy or digital media, shall be at rte usafs own risk.

Henderson Countv. NC Tax Parcel Report Thursday, May 11, 2017
Parcel Intorrnstfon
REID:
301416
Pin:
9680026973
Listed to:
TRUSTEES OF HVILLE CH OF GOD
Neighborhood:
DANA
Mailing Address:
2822 CHIMNEY ROCK RD
Township:
Clear Creek
Mailing City, State, Zip:
HENDERSONVILLE. NC 28792
Municipality:
Physical Address:
2822 CHIMNEY ROCK RD
Tax District:
DANA FIRE
Doed:
586/235
Plat:
Not Available
Date Recorded:
01-22-1980
Elementary School District:
SUGARLOAF
Revenue Stamps:
15
Middle School District:
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
County Zoning:
LC
High School District:
NORTH HIGH
Property Description:
US64E ON
Soil:
Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 percent
slopes
Map Shoot:
9680.00
Voting Precinct:
Clear Creek
Assessed Acreage:
2.69000000
Commissioner District
4
Building Value:
5311,200.00
Agricultural District
None Found
Land Value:
$46,900.00
North Carolina House District
117
Value To Be Blllod:
$358,100.00
U.S. House District
11
North Carolina Senate District
48
Flood Zone:
Zone X, Not Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
1yl�Y,� Henderson Canty
46
Geographic Henderson
C Systems (GIS)
200 Nath Grove Street
Hendersonville, NC 26792
F. (826) 6984-124
F [phone]
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
AN intornwtion or dela provided (whatner subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed) is provided as is, without any
warranties, Including the warranties at merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Henderson County end Its
employees make no warran8es or guarantees, ether express or implied. Use of the information or date subscribed.
purWsed or otherwise distributed, whether In hard copy or digital media, shall be at the user's own risk.

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)
.• i
o
b
�r
0
O\dz
Project Boundary
/^4 .
�ytix Rd
f
v
zed �
Might,�a
s Sgtare
Up rank. �r
J'
CJroUt�y ,�� Waddell pr
L
t64
\�'
iignai Full Fid ��''� Sugarloaf Rd
r
y ,
a s
Blue V,
Ridge a
mail �
L
Legend
o
Project Boundary ana Rd
Drawn by. B 9 17, CEC Project# 917
Henderson County.
North Carolina
00
qtr
Ill
4
nZn
U
1d Sb lset Fill! Rd
Sug3rJ0,II Ra
ti
w
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
`•' f, ana Rd
CLearWater I Site Vicinity
32 Clayton StreetI Figure 1
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)
w _NO
- ~^ (a det
Mile
Iz
0. ... •
-.. Project Boundary
Al
to
.r -
Legend
I------ ,/ • 0 500 1,000 2,000
Project Boundary------ • Feet
-. L ..
2 C P o e`ct#xJ'YF� `, R -• ,
rearWater USGS Topographic Map
Henderson County, Hendersonville Quad
North Carolina
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 2

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)
my ftoalk�
r Jurisdictional wetlands and waters idernified on this
Potentially Jurisdictional Water ,� map have been located within sub -meter accuracy
h utilizing a Trimble mapping grade Global Positioning
t System (GPS) and the subsequent differential
Wetland (AC) Stream (LF) correction of that data. GPS points may demonstrate
uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
W1 0.18 S1 9 cover, and/or multipath signal error.
'.. Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
approximate.
e dr howetver, they have not been been
Although
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is
p T (� confident in our assessment, the US Army Corps of
Total 0.18 Mal 9 Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make
final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and
waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
-�! I preliminary determinations are subject to change until
written verification is obtained. CEC strongly
j 1 recommends that written verification be obtained from
R , /' I the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning
1 any site work, or making any legal reliance on this
determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best
information available to CEC at the time of production.
i 1 - This map is for informational purposes only and should
not be used to determine precise boundaries,
roadways, property boundary Imes, nor legal
/ 1 descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an
/ t official survey of any data depicted.
P.,Source Data: ary is ifr from Henderson County
� _ t Project Boundary is from McAbee 8 Associates P.A.
or
6
I I
1 I
t W1
(` 1
1
'Amp
lit
�\ I
r `� 1
.S 1 _�r4r �
�IR
Legend
•� \/
x� Data Form
Wetland N
Stream
Contours
------"'"4 ' 0 100 200 400 t
I Project Boundary c
� J FeetDl 9
CLearWater Stream & Wetland
Henderson County, Delineation Map
North Carolina 32 Clayson Street Delineated May 2, 2017
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 5

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC)
,
All
I �s
'A' AIN,
�
16-
N.
F f: +w'
f3
K
Its
dw
'
i
IfN
Legend
it
RR.
® 100 Year Flood Plain
- 0 100 200 400
Project Boundary Feet
CLear\/ater FEMA Flood Plain Map
Henderson County, FEMA Map Service Center
North Carolina 32 Clayton Street Map# 3700968000J Panel -9680
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 6

Preliminary Site Plan

127'
79
LEGENn
I WOLFPEN AMENITRS ASSOC INC
i
1 PM 9660-02-9009
DB. 1003 PG. 643
EXISTING DRIVEWA7J
, EXISTING
TO BE REMOVE7)
STRUCTURE
6 Car Garage
TO BE REMOVED
—�--�� PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
\
\
I 1
�
PROPOSED
I I
I
WATER SERVICE
I 1
he'. ht = 12'-2'
`
PROPOSED WATER MAI
PROPOSED WATER SERVICE
JEFFREY A RHONDA PRUITT
\
• I
I
PROPOSED
PLAYGROUND
IYPICAI 6 CAR GARAGE BUILDING
y PROPOSED FIRE UNE
^ fpC PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
PIN 9680-03-3362
DB. 1282 PG. 17
)
=(2it.)
NTS
}� PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
ZONING: LOCAL COMMERCIAL (LC),
/
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPING
• PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
(HENDERSON COUNTY)
179'
/
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
TYPICAL 1 BEDROOM BUILDING
APPROXIMATE WALL HEIGHT
N.T.S.
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING
TYPICAL 2 BEDROOM BUILDING
N.T.S.
TYPICAL 3 BEDROOM BUILDING
NTS
FRUITLAND RD
$.R. 1574 (PUBLIC)
R/W VARIES
two/three bedroom
(24 units) PROPOSED COMMON OPEN SPACE /
height = 3E'-5"
EXISTING WETLAND AREA
EXISTING / PIN CIPOW 1. ///,,1
DRIVEWAY / /Sam l�AllatI�,'
TYPICAL 2 / 3 BEDROOM BUILDING
N.T.S.
COUNTY OF HENDERSON PROPOSED �- / RIGHT -IN
PN 9670-93-3731 / RIGHT -OUT d' '
D8. 1431 PG. 253 -. -y/� DRIVEWAY i sk
ZONING: RESEDENTIAL 1 (R1) - -'�
(HENDERSON COUNTY./ EXISTING
P STORM DRAINAGE
(THP) �I. p �i �i /,��' ./�•
d6° 6A
�< EXISTING
DITCH , PROPOSED ,
m / .J rE1P /i' ��- Ir
SIGN
WATEAN
APPROXIMATE
/
LOCATION of
,'DM05TWG741G 16• WATER MAIN ,W� -
(CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE)
, ! 2 t ll <
, ,/ moi• � �WW �PROPOSED j 13
WALL (TYP)'u
DRIVEWAY \
EXISTING ,
DRIVEWAY /' ,
,
EXISTING PARKING
TO BE REMOVED
1. TRIANGLE REAL ESTATE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF COMMON OPEN SPACE. RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES. SIDEWALKS (OTHER THAN ALONG US 64),
PARKING, AND DRIVES SERVICING THE PROJECT.
2. PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE
OF THE CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE CITY LRAITS (1 ACRE
PORTION OF PARCEL 9650-02-6973 TO BE ACOUIRED AND
ANNEXED).
3. ALL LIGHTING WILL BE SHIELDED FROM PUBLIC R/W
AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
4. SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
McABEE h ASSOCIATES, P.A.
3 MCABEE TRAIL , FAIRVIEW, NO 28730
[phone]
5. THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ONE PHASE
STANDARD CONCRETE CURB
h GUTTER
15
�26• FACE TO FACE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER
EXISTING UTILITY
POLE (TYP)
EKISTING OVERHEAD
%uTtnY (TYP)
}PROPOSED
LIGHTING (TYP)
1
LOCATION MAP
1 •= 2000'
PROPOSED SIGN DIMENSIONS
PROPOSED
PROPERTY p p
BOUNDARY� � TtIE ESTATESAT
BRITTANY PLACE
p O
TRUSTEES OF HVILLE CHURCH OF GOD
PN 9680-02-6973
D8. 566 PG. 235
ZONING: LOCAL COMMERCIAL (LC)
(HENDERSON COUNTY)
1_­_11-
II�IIr11�11�1 X11
PROPOSED
§�N
� lII4E (THP) •'
1
PROPOSED
FINE DEPT.
/1 \ 4� •\ <' CONNECTION (TYP)
C PI EXISTING V
WETLAND
Proposed
p7act ��
I \ �' PROPOSED i /
FIRE HYDRANT (TSI) / f
EXISTING SANITARY
•` SEWER MANHOLE ,
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
TYPICAL DRIVE CROSS-SECTION
NT.S.
C I 4
EXISTING
STORM DRAINAGE\\"`
() /6 PROPOSED
EEM r /4
PROPOSED 6• DIPJ \ •P�,' MAMIOII - .�
SANITARY SEWER MAIN
If
�4P *,, / \ PROPOSI
TRIANGLE REAL ESTATE OF GASTONIA. INC If 7h .�A
PIN 9680-02-2266
DB. 1040 PG. 94
ZONING: PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) p
(CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE)
EXISTING UNOERGOUND ,!/
GRAPHIC SCALE GAS LINES 4
re
III.DG /3 33'
SIDE YARD SElBAC(
30' SETBACK (TYP)
1
1 BLDG 1»
31.3' 510[ YARD SETBACK
1
PROPOSED 1 ACRE
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY FROM
PIN 9680-02-6973
1
I
I
I / PROPOSED 40'3
1/ WOODED BUFFER
I 1
I WOLFPEN AMENITRS ASSOC INC
i
1 PM 9660-02-9009
DB. 1003 PG. 643
EXISTING DRIVEWA7J
, EXISTING
TO BE REMOVE7)
STRUCTURE
r — k
TO BE REMOVED
}PROPOSED
LIGHTING (TYP)
1
LOCATION MAP
1 •= 2000'
PROPOSED SIGN DIMENSIONS
PROPOSED
PROPERTY p p
BOUNDARY� � TtIE ESTATESAT
BRITTANY PLACE
p O
TRUSTEES OF HVILLE CHURCH OF GOD
PN 9680-02-6973
D8. 566 PG. 235
ZONING: LOCAL COMMERCIAL (LC)
(HENDERSON COUNTY)
1_­_11-
II�IIr11�11�1 X11
PROPOSED
§�N
� lII4E (THP) •'
1
PROPOSED
FINE DEPT.
/1 \ 4� •\ <' CONNECTION (TYP)
C PI EXISTING V
WETLAND
Proposed
p7act ��
I \ �' PROPOSED i /
FIRE HYDRANT (TSI) / f
EXISTING SANITARY
•` SEWER MANHOLE ,
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
TYPICAL DRIVE CROSS-SECTION
NT.S.
C I 4
EXISTING
STORM DRAINAGE\\"`
() /6 PROPOSED
EEM r /4
PROPOSED 6• DIPJ \ •P�,' MAMIOII - .�
SANITARY SEWER MAIN
If
�4P *,, / \ PROPOSI
TRIANGLE REAL ESTATE OF GASTONIA. INC If 7h .�A
PIN 9680-02-2266
DB. 1040 PG. 94
ZONING: PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) p
(CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE)
EXISTING UNOERGOUND ,!/
GRAPHIC SCALE GAS LINES 4
re
III.DG /3 33'
SIDE YARD SElBAC(
30' SETBACK (TYP)
1
1 BLDG 1»
31.3' 510[ YARD SETBACK
1
PROPOSED 1 ACRE
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY FROM
PIN 9680-02-6973
1
I
I
I / PROPOSED 40'3
1/ WOODED BUFFER
PROPOSED COMMON
\ / OPEN SPACE (TYP)
/ PROPOSED
DOG PARK
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
214 N. KING STREET
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28792
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
The Estates
at Brittany Place
Hendersonville
Henderson County
North Carolina
,
C o n
REV11101t
DAT( DOQ1'1'IIOII
b-19-17 DoH twrun«,t.
/
f
K— whet'. befO W.
Call before you dig.
PROJECT NUMBER. 17107
DATE: 5/8/17
DRAWN BY: MJF
CHECKED BY: GTJ
Preliminary Site Plan
C-200
SCALE: 1-=40'
I 1
I WOLFPEN AMENITRS ASSOC INC
1 PM 9660-02-9009
DB. 1003 PG. 643
ZONING: PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
(PRD)
I (CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE)
ai
M
I
J
I 1
�
PROPOSED
I I
I
WATER SERVICE
I 1
AND METERS
(TYP)
i 1
I I
• I
I
PROPOSED
PLAYGROUND
PROPOSED COMMON
\ / OPEN SPACE (TYP)
/ PROPOSED
DOG PARK
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
214 N. KING STREET
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28792
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
The Estates
at Brittany Place
Hendersonville
Henderson County
North Carolina
,
C o n
REV11101t
DAT( DOQ1'1'IIOII
b-19-17 DoH twrun«,t.
/
f
K— whet'. befO W.
Call before you dig.
PROJECT NUMBER. 17107
DATE: 5/8/17
DRAWN BY: MJF
CHECKED BY: GTJ
Preliminary Site Plan
C-200
SCALE: 1-=40'

NC WAM Field Assessment Form

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
USACE AID #
Accom aures user manual version ux
NCDWR#
Project Name
917/Brittany Place
Date of Evaluation
7/31/2017
Applicant/Owner Name
Wetland Site Name
Wetland 1 W1
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
KAY, BWY/CEC
Level III Ecoregion
Blue Ridge Mountains
_ Nearest Named Water Body
Wolf en Creek
River Basin
French Broad
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
French Broad/06010105
County
Henderson
NCDWR Region
Asheville
n Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latltude/Longitude deci-d rees
35.357928,-82.421102
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate. In
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadmmous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream Is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
ni area
normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rale the assessment
area based on evidence an effect
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soll compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity (if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch 5 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soll compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feel
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the lop 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon z 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑A
®A
®A
®A
> 10% impervious surfaces
❑B
❑B
❑B
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C
❑C
❑C
2 20% coverage of pasture
❑D
❑D
®D
a 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E
❑E
❑E
2 20% coverage of maintained gross/herb
OF
OF
OF
2:20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G
❑G
❑G
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment areatwetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feel of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Welland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank Is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A 2 50 feet
®B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. lthe tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
05 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributarylopen water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width 2 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area —wetland typelwetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT
WC
❑A
❑A
a 100 feel
❑B
❑B
From 80 to < 100 feet
Sc
®C
From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D
❑D
From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E
❑E
From 30 to < 40 feet
OF
OF
From 15 to < 30 feel
❑G
❑G
From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H
❑H
< 5 feel

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition— assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Welland Size —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is dear -cut, select'K' for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (If applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
Z 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
❑F
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
191
01
Of
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (Z 90°%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90°% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
Z 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
®E
< 10 acres
OF
OF
Weiland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Welland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect —wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas Z 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option 'C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is dose to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10°% cover of exotics).
08 Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment arealwetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A i' 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
>.AA WT
c ®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
C
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mld-story/sapling layer
v El ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ❑C Mid-storylsapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
= ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
N ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ®B ®B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches In diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland typelopen water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water In the growing season. Patterned
areas Indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C D
1 �
r ,
r
.j
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and SaltlBrackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channetization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Welland drainage channelized at maintained ROW into riprap lined channel; Wetland/overland continuity altered by presence of ROW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland 1 (W1) Date of Assessment
7/31/2017
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization
KAY, BWY/CEC
Function
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (YIN)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating
Summary
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (YIN)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (YIN)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (YIN)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

Notification of
Jurisdictional Determination

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2017-01193 County: Henderson U.S.G.S. Quad: Hendersonville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Properties at UNO LLC / Attn.: Sidney Kirklev
Address: 695 Ransier Drive
Hendersonville. NC 28739
Telephone Number: 828-702-3147
Size (acres): 8.49 Nearest Town: Hendersonville
Nearest Waterway: UT Wolfpen Creek Coordinates: 35.35837 N. 82.42033 W
River Basin/ HUC: Upper French Broad (06010105)
Location description: The site is located on a tract of land (PINS 9680-02-4871 and 9680-02-6973) at 2810 Chimney
Rock Road in Hendersonville. Henderson County North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, -and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a•consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Novi -able Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a clianee in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the %voters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project arca leave been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA

jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the lav or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the lav or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). if
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Brown at
828-271-7980, ext. 4232 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on September 15, 2015 and are as
approximately depicted on the attached Stream and Wetland Delineation Map (dated May 2, 2017) submitted by
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This deIineation/determInation has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The del ineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. if you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Atm: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsvth Street SW, Room IOM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Preliminary -JD).

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Otlice if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence." �D�nvidBr!wn Corps Regulatory Official -
Issue Date of JD: June 1-2. 2017 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue
to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
httrr//comsma;ace.-.1 mil/cm aae�/i?aa136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc., Britten Yant, 32 Clayton Street, Asheville, NC 28801

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND 94FORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: June 12, 2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Properties at UNO, LLC / Attn.: Sidney Kirkley
695 Ransier Drive
Hendersonville, NC 28739
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -3017-01193, Brittany Place
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The site is located on a tract of land (PINs 9680-024871 and 9680-02-6973) at 2810 Chimney Rock Road in
Hendersonville, Henderson County North Carolina.
State: NC County/parislt/berough: Henderson City: Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (Int/long in degree decimal format): 35.35837 N, 82.42033 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Name of nearest waterbody: UT Wolfpen Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
0 Office (Desk) Determination. Date: June 12, 2017
ED Field Determination. Date(s): September 15, 2015
Use file table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
I. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when (hey may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or outer general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
Centered Coordinates
Estimated A mount of
Geographic
(decimal degrees)
Aquatic Resource in
Type of Aquatic
Authority to Which i
Site Number
Review Area
Resources
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
S l®
Wetland
N Section 404
(UT Wolfpen Creek)
35.358094
-83.431039
91f
Non -wetland
� ld W
Section
® Sti10/404�
Wetland
0 Section 404
W I
35.357878
-83.42 1151
0. 18 ac
® Non -wetland Waters
0 Section 10/404 ,
I. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when (hey may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or outer general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that

basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the N WP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) .whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terns
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there 'Shay be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "nray be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic Features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
N Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester. ClearWater Environmental
Consultants. Inc.
N Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester. ClearWater Environmental Consultants.
Inc.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rational:
® Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
® Corps navigable waters' study: '
® U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)1-lydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
USGS map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Hendersonville.
® Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Henderson County, NC
National wetlands inventory (NWI) mnp(s). Cite name:
® State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
91 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) / Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) maps:
91 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW -2015-00457 Pre -JD issued November 19, 2015
WE Applicable/supportingscientifiic literature:
® Other information (please specify): UT Wolfpen Creek exhibits indicators of ordinary high water marks (OHWM)
including developed bed and bank, scour, presence of litter and debris, destruction of lerrestrial vegetation, sediment sorting
and deposition, and leaf litter washed away. Perennial flow has been observed by Corps representatives during visits to the
I•lendersonville, North Carolina vicinity.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region (version 2.0).

These wetlands are adjacent to a stream channel located on the site that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The
stream channels at the site is a UT of Wolfpen Creek which flows into Wolfpen Creek, then into Clear Creek, which flows
into Mud Creek. Mud Creek flows into the French Broad River, traditionally navigable water and designated Section 10
water. The French Broad River merges with the Holston River to form the Tennessee River. The Tennessee River flows into
the Ohio River then to the Mississippi River before entering the Gulf of Mexico.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be retied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
David Brown, Jutie 12, 2017
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing
preliminary JD
Properties at UNO, LLC / Sidney Kirltley
OR
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Britten Yant or Clement Riddle
per Agent Authorization
Signature and date of person requesting
preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)
Two copies of this Preliininary JD Forut have been provided. Please sign bout copies. Beep one signer! coop for your record
and return a signed copy to the Asheville Regulatory Field Offi%e by grail or a-nnaiL
US Army Corps of Engineers-Wihnington District
Asheville Regulatoq, Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Roont 208
.-fsheville, NC 28801-5006
I Districts muy establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD form. ifthc requester does not respond within the established time
frame, the district may presume concurrence and no udditional follow up is nettssary prior to finalizing an action.

Brittany Place (+/- 7 AC�)��t' //��
rfr �.JW-'1�(•./!-'.i41..,�,,,, ,�y f717
Potentially Jurisdictional Water
Wetland (AC) Stream (U)
W I
0.18 S1
9
Total
0.18 Total
9
t / a �, . ,hrp hove
nal been
located
wetlands and waters -meleed cc Ifft
acy
\ 3 map hove been lohaled vnhhh srA•mNer sowrary t •-
j'>� 'dicing s Tfimble mapping grade Global Positioning
System (GPb) oro she subsequsni dEWIntW
4 \� }• correction of IMI dale- GPS points may demonstale
hncorreclable errors due to topography, vegelalive
� L Cover, sndlor mul"palh signal error.
f Nole: The lluslraled we land and sbeem locations are
opptwurrole. These seas have been flopped In she
\ lal0, however, they have nol been survsyad. All ho gh
ClearMler Environmental Conshllents, Inc (CEC) Y
confidant In our assessment, ra US Amar Corps of
+ t Engineers (Corps) Is the any agency dad can make
•�, � — do � 1nid decisions regretting Jhrl�onel wesaad well
:. " •+ .� t �' "lers of the US detneadons. Therefore, tl
/ prelmhory determinations m "Jed b dherge UFA
wdren vednccation ts obUlned. CEC Nrongly
recommends gal wdteo wtlolion be obiahed kom
i the Corps prior to dosing on rho propeft beginning
{ o % any she w:rk m matting any legal slants on ria
determination.
�. This map was prepared by CEC using Do beat
lydormabon avalable to CEC ee she Wne of production,
j This mop Is for i iarrnslonel phspoess oniy asci show 7
!•� �i
not be used Is deft it praolse berehaddes,
roadways, property brteldery irs. sof opal
descriptions. This map Wulf not be matruM to be M
o16dW surveyof any dea depissed.
Sours Dale: Topp is ettm N es, L rr CarMMy
Project BohrWary Y teem bAdtbas fl Aaaedelrs PA.
Legend j `f r -A
_
�t Data Form �; ,y07 -A `'I' +
WeilandJL �, s,�'+} ; 3 -.,Ur • N
r}- nil
Stream"� '
Contours 6� �t}' l'!PT
: H► �!f m h T -'1`
0 100 200 400
Project Boundary �' ; Feet
r 1—
bra :B�Y 1t� li itlgih�' d���Ff'nd \ ,''• 1 �f - '
Lear Ler Stream & Wetland
Henderson County, !' '' `" Delineation Map
North Carolina Delineated May 2, 2017
32 Clayton Street
Asheville. North Carolina 28901 Figure 5