20051061 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20080414

A A 5106
UT to Rocky River (Smith Tract) Stream and
Buffer Restoration, Enhancement, and
Preservation
Chatham County, North Carolina
CU: 03030003 SCO# 402
Final Monitoring Report
(Year 1 of 5)
February 15, 2008
Submitted to:
1??.?????telll
111101 t11 l it H
<.a. -1
EIN@1ROW01
APR 1 4 2008
DENR • WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Project Manager: Melonie Allen
Parker Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Boulevard, Suite 1 H-103,0
Raleigh, NC 27604
R i 4 Zooa
Ap 1 Q%JWO 'V P'l ppS ANA TOR?A??B
ASIA
I
UT to Rocky River (Smith Tract) Stream
and Buffer Restoration, Enhancement,
and Preservation
Chatham County, North Carolina
1't Year Monitoring Report prepared by:
C?
c
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
8386 Six Forks Road, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-5088
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
?1A MIT/
1- "1
R Ar
.
d'
1,3344
L 7*N*
Catena
Group
The Catena Group, Inc.
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
2 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
Table of Contents
1. Title Page ........................................................................................................................ 1
II. Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... . 3
III. Executive Summary / Project Abstract ....................................................................... . 5
IV. Project Background .................................................................................................... . 6
1. Location and Setting ................................................................................................. . 6
2. Project Structure, Mitigation Type, Approach and Objectives .................................. 7
3. Project History and Background ................................................................................ 8
4. Monitoring Plan View .............................................................................................. 11
V. Project Condition and Monitoring Results .................................................................. 11
A. Vegetation Assessment ........................................................................................... 11
1. Soil Data ............................................................................................................... 12
2. Vegetative Problem Areas ................................................................................... 12
3. Vegetative Current Conditions Plan View (Vegetation) ..................................... 13
4. Stem Counts ......................................................................................................... 14
5. Vegetation Plot Photos ......................................................................................... 14
B. Stream Assessment .................................................................................................. 14
1. Procedural Items .................................................................................................. 14
2. Current Conditions Plan View (Stream) - Appendix B 1 .................................... 16
3. Problem areas table summary .............................................................................. 17
4. Numbered issues photo section ............................................................................ 19
5. Fixed photo station photos ................................................................................... 19
6. Stability assessment ............................................................................................. 19
7. Quantitative Measures Tables (Morph and Hydr) .............................................. 25
VI. Methodology Section ................................................................................................. 25
TABLES
Table I. Project Structure Table ........................................................................................ 7
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History .............................................................. 9
Table III. Project Contact Table ...................................................................................... 10
Table IV. Project Background Table .............................................................................. 11
Table V. Preliminary Soil Data ....................................................................................... 12
Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas .......................................:...................................... 12
Table VII. Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot .......................................... 14
Table VIII b. Reach 2 Hydrological (Bankfull) Verifications ........................................ 15
Table X a. Reach 1 Stream Problem Areas ..................................................................... 17
Table X b. Reach 2 Stream Problem Areas .................................................................... 18
Table XI a. Reach 1 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .............. 19
Table XI b. Reach 2 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .............. 19
Table XII a. Reach 1 Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ............................ 20
Ward Consultin- Fnyineers, P.C. 3 UT to Rocky River Strearn Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SC 0 + 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 4, 2008
Table of Contents (cont)
TABLES (cont)
Table XII b. Reach 2 Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary ............................ 21
Table XIII a. Reach 1 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ..................... 22
Table XIII b. Reach 2 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary ..................... 23
Appendix A Vegetation Raw Data
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
a. Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
b. Table 2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
e. Table 3. Vegetation Damage by Species
d. Table 4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
e. Table 5. Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species
f. Table 6: All Stems (planted and natural) by Plot and Species
2. Vegetation Problem Area Photos
3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix B Geomorphologic Raw Data -
1. Current Conditions Plan View (Stream) with Stream Problem Area Photos
Figure 2: Reach 1
Figure 3: Reach 2
2. Additional Stream Photos
3. Table B.1. a: Reach 1 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Table B.1. b: Reach 2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
4. Cross section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Figure 4: Reach 1 Cross Section 1
Figures 5-9: Reach 2 Cross Sections 1-5
5. Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
6. Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 4 UT to Rocky River Strearn Restoration,
EmIlancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO9 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 3, 2008
III. Executive Summary
In October of 2006 NCEEP completed 1111 linear feet of stream restoration and 1095
linear feet of stream enhancement on two unnamed tributaries to Rocky River on the
Smith property in Chatham County. The streams on both Reach 1 and 2 classify as C4
stream types. The priority one restoration of Reach 2 has constructed riffles that establish
grade control with single wing rock vanes to provide additional stability. The
enhancement of Reach 1 was accomplished with bank stabilization along with a short
segment of stream realignment that accommodates a new livestock crossing.
The UT Rocky River (Smith Tract) restoration project is functioning well. The reach one
bank repairs and channel restoration are stable. There are a few areas in reach one that
were identified as potential problems due to minor toe erosion and sparse bank vegetation
that require further monitoring during year two. Reach 2's pattern, profile, and sections
have not changed significantly as compared to the as-built conditions. There are some
areas in Reach 2 experiencing toe erosion at riffles and bare banks due to the loss of the
erosion control fabric along with the seed placed underneath. Two significant stream
problem areas exist on Reach 2. These two areas are both located below the tributary that
enters Reach 2 from the west and occurred shortly after construction when the adjacent
wooded property was cleared. Incision of the channel has occurred at two locations.
This incision is currently isolated to these two segments, no incision is progressing
upstream. The second area is at the end of the stream where aggradation has occurred. A
farm road crossing just below the project with a small pipe caused a backup of storm
water and deposition of sediment washed off the newly graded floodplain. The EEP
project manager is currently pursuing replacement of the existing pipe with a larger size.
At the time of this pipe replacement the incised areas will also be repaired.
Overall, planted vegetation of both Reach I and 2 is in excellent condition. However,
there are some areas of minor invasive/exotic vegetation encroachment. The vegetation
plots themselves appear to be in excellent condition, and sampling results indicate low
planted stem mortality rates and limited invasive/exotic encroachment. It is not
recommended that invasive/exotic vegetation eradication activities take place at this time,
but that abundance and densities be monitored annually and eradication initiated when a
significant threat, if at all, develops. The most significant problem area on the site is in
Reach 2 where the loss of erosion control fabric and support vegetation prior to plant
establishment and growth led to exposed and eroding banks.
Ward Consultin- Engineers, P.C. 5 UT to rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO4 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 3. 2008
IV. Proiect Background
1. Location and Setting
From U.S. Highway 64 just east of Siler City, head north on Silk Hope Road, then
turn left onto Rufus Brewer Road, and take the next left onto Smith Hudson Road.
The property is in Chatham County (Figure 1). The construction entrance is off of
Smith Hudson Road, just east of the house, and provides access to Reach 1 (Latitude
35°45'56" and Longitude 79°24'57") and Reach 2 (Latitude 35°45'57" and
Longitude 79°25'9"). The site is in the Cape Fear River Basin in Cataloging Unit
03030003. See the vicinity map below:

,:,. f°

A4V

Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
t

6 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
sco# 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
The drainage area for Reach 1 is approximately 1.28 square miles and Reach 2 is
approximately 0.21 square miles. The watershed contributing to Reach I is currently
developed with rural agricultural usage. The watershed for Reach 2 has less
agriculturally developed land. The property falls under the planning and zoning
restrictions of Chatham County.
2. Meet Structure, Mitigation Tyne, Approach and Objective
The project involves the improvement of water quality and the control of sediment
transport with stream restoration and enhancement, and riparian buffer restoration,
enhancement, and preservation. Reach 1 has a total stream length of 1095 linear feet.
Stream Enhancement I was performed on 208 linear feet of stream. The stream
pattern and profile was restored throughout this stream segment to improve the
channel stability and provide for a permanent livestock crossing. The remaining
length of Reach I includes 887 linear feet of Enhancement Il, stream bank
stabilization, to reduce sediment export from prior cattle access to the stream. On
Reach 2 a priority-one stream restoration was preformed for the entire reach length of
1111 linear feet. The channel long-term stability was returned with the restoration of
channel pattern, profile, and dimension.
Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives Table
Smith Tract / Number 046107
Project o
segment c. o Linear
or p I a Footage
Reach a or
ID Acrea a Stationing Comment
Reach 1 Ell SS 887 00+00 - 08+87 Bank stabilization, fence out cattle
",
' Relocation, improve cattle/equipment crossing,
Reach 1 EI 208 08+87 - 10+95 reestablish stream pattern and dimension
Reconnect to floodplain, adjust stream pattern, profile
Reach 2 R P1 1111 -00+03 - 11+08 and dimension, install structures and vegetation
/R= Restoration P1= Priority I
El= Enhancement P2= Priority II
Ell= Enhancement 11 P3= Priority III
S= Stabilization SS = Stream bank stabilizations
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 7
UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO4 402
titonitorinQ Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
3. Proiect History and Backeround
In 2001, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) identified two
unnamed tributaries to Nick Creek in Chatham County, North Carolina, as stream
mitigation sites. The tributaries are on a tract that was referred to as the Smith Tract
Mitigation Site. The two unnamed tributaries have been designated Reach 1 and
Reach 2. Reach 1 is located in the approximate middle of the property and flows
from the property's eastern boundary line with Mr. John R. Fox to the western
property line with Mr. George Edward Pike. Reach 2 is located in the western most
portion of the property and flows from the northern property boundary line with Ms.
Julia B. Howard to the southern property boundary line with Mr. George Edward
Pike. These two streams join just south of the Smith property boundary line on Mr.
Pike's property, and then discharge into Nick Creek approximately 6,000 linear feet
west of the Smith Property, just above the confluence of Nick Creek and the Rocky
River.
The goals of the enhancement on Reach 1 were to remove cattle access to the stream,
restore damaged banks to prevent further sediment input, and to restore a section of
the stream with a realignment and incorporation of a stable livestock crossing. Reach
2 goals consisted of reconnecting the incised channel to the floodplain and permanent
stabilization with a corrected pattern, profile, and dimension.
The construction of the stream restoration and enhancement for the project was
completed in October of 2007. The planting of the woody species was delayed until
late November and was completed in Early December.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. $ UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402)
Ytonitoring Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107

Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion Data
Collection
Complete Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan 1/31/2005 8/20/2003 4/26/2005
Final Design - 90% 2/28/2005 NA 8/4/2005
Construction 9/25/2006 NA 10/13/2006
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area - Reach 1 9/9/2006 NA 7/27/2006
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area - Reach 2 8/5/2006 NA 9/29/2006
Permanent seed mix applied to reach segments - Reach 1 9/9/2006 NA 7/27/2006
Permanent seed mix applied to reach segments - Reach 2 8/5/2006 NA 9/29/2006
Containerized and B&B plantings for reach/se ments - Reach 1 12/31/2006 NA 12/12/2006
Containerized and B&B plantings for reach/se ments - Reach 2 12/31/2006 NA 12/12/2006
Mitigation Plan/ As-built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline 12/1/2006 1/15/2007 3/20/2007
Year 1 Monitoring 12/1/2007 11/1412007 1213/2007
Year 2 Monitoring
Structural maintenance bench expansion, vane adjustment
Year 3 Monitoring
Supplemental planting of containerized material
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Years 5+ monitoring
Bolded items represent those events or deliverables that are variable. Non-bolded items represent events that are standard
components over the course of a typical project.
NOTE: Temporary and permanent seed placed at same time as construction progressed from upstream to downstream for
each reach
yard Consulting Engineers, P.C. 9 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
sCO; 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
Table III. Project Contact Table
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107
Designer Firm information/Address
Becky Ward [phone]
Ward Consulting Engineers 8386 Six Forks Road, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27615-5088
Construction Contractor Firm information/Address
Harvey McQueen [phone]
McQueen Construction 619 Patrick Road, Bahama, NC 27503
Planting Contractor Firm information/Address
P.O. Box 808, Apex, NC 27502
Southern Garden Inc. [phone]
Seed Contractor Company information/Address
Harvey McQueen [phone]
McQueen Construction 619 Patrick Road, Bahama, NC 27503
Seed Mix Sources Company and Contact Phone
Evergreen Seed 919 567-1333
Nursery Stock Suppliers Company and Contact Phone
Coastal Plain Conservation Nursery, Inc. (Edenton, NC) Ellen Colodney [phone]
Cure Nursery (Pittsboro, NC) Bill and Jennifer Cure [phone]
Brook Run Nurse Blackstone, VA Howard Malinski 919 422-8727
Firm information/Address
Ward Consulting Engineers:
8386 Six Forks Road, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27615-5088
Monitoring Performers The Catena Group:
Ward Consulting Engineers & The Catena Group 410-B Millstone Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
Stream Monitoring POC - Ward Consulting Engineers Beck Ward 919 870-0526
Vegetation Monitoring POC - The Catena Group Kate Montieth 919 732-1300
Wetland Monitoring POC - NA NA
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 10 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
S('O# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 8, 2009
Table IV. Project Background Table
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107
Project Count Chatham
Drainage Area - Reach 1 1.28 mil
Draina a Area - Reach 2 0.21 mil
Reach 1 2%
Drainage impervious cover estimate (%) Reach 2 1%
Stream Order - Reach 1 2
Stream Order - Reach 2 2
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont
Ecor ion 45c Carolina Slate Belt
Ros en Classification of As-built - Reach 1 C4 / E4
Ros en Classification of As-built - Reach 2 C4
Cowardin Classification NA
Dominant soil types - Reach 1 Cid-Li num Complex, Nanford-Baden Complex
Dominant soil types - Reach 2 Riverview Silt Loam
USGS HUC for Project and reference 03030003
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and reference Cape Fear River Subbasin 03-06-12
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference - Reach 1 C
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference - Reach 2 C
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
% Of project easement fenced - Reach 1 13%
% Of project easement fenced - Reach 2 41%
Note: The cattle are currently fenced out of the stream. Mr. Smith has set a pasture fence closer to the
house.
4. Monitoring Plan View
The plan view for the site is shown in Appendix 13, Section 1, Figures 2 & 3. This plan
view is at a P to 30' scale that shows the as-built topographic information, stream, and
vegetation locations. No current photographic information was available to reflect a clear
image of the repaired channel and therefore the as-built drawings were utilized as the
base plan for the figures submitted with this report. Reach 1 in shown on Figure 2 and
Reach 2 is shown on Figure 3.
V. Proieet Condition and Monitoring Results
A. Vegetation Assessment
Reach 1: Overall, planted vegetation is in excellent condition. However, there are
some areas of minor invasive/exotic vegetation encroachment. There is minor
development of privet (Ligustrum sinense) along entire reach, mostly along stream
banks. Japanese grass (Microstegium vimineum) is dense in some areas of the
Ward Consulting Encineers, P.C. 11 UT to Rocky River Strearn Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring, Report Year I
February 8, 2008
floodplain. The vegetation plots themselves appear to be in excellent condition, and
sampling results indicate low planted stem mortality rates and limited invasive/exotic
encroachment.
Reach 2: Overall, planted vegetation is in excellent condition. Invasive/exotic
vegetation encroachment is minimal for the entire reach, although forested slope areas
that were not planted have some mature growth of privet and autumn olive
(Elaeagnus umbellata), which increases the risk of exotic plant invasion into the
floodplain. The vegetation plots themselves appear to be in excellent condition, and
sampling results indicate low planted stem mortality rates and limited invasive/exotic
encroachment.
1. Soil Data
Table V. Preliminary Soil Data
Series Max. Depth (in) % Clay on Surface KW Kf T %OM
Cid-Lignum complex (CmB)
Cid 40 10-25 0.4 0.49 2 0.5-2
Lignum 40-60 10-25 0.3 0.43 4 0.5-2
Nanford-Badin complex (NaC)
Nanford >60 10-27 0.2 0.37 5 1-3
Badin >40 10-27 0.2 0.37 3 1-3
Riverview silt loam (RvA) >60 10-27 0.3 0.37 5 0.5-2
2. Vegetative Problem Areas
Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas
Feature/Issue Station
#/Ran e Probable Cause Photo
#
Bare Bank Site 4 Existing bank not in original repair area, bank stable 8
Site
10a-d Loss of fabric & seed, soils not conducive to plant growth 18-20
Bare Flood Site 2 Unknown 3-4
Plain Site 11 Unknown 21
Invasive/Exotic Site 1 Privet: encroachment from outside; volunteer 1-2
Populations
Site 3
Microstegium: upstream seed source
5-7
Site 4 Multiflora rose: encroachment from outside; volunteer 8
Site 5 Privet: encroachment from outside; volunteer; Microstegium: upstream seed source 9-11
Site 6 Privet and blackberry: encroachment from outside; volunteer 12
Site 7 Privet: encroachment from outside; volunteer 13
Site 8 Privet: encroachment from outside; volunteer 14
Site 9 Privet: encroachment from outside; volunteer; Microstegium: upstream seed source;
Japanese honeysuckle: encroachment from outside; volunteer 15-17
Site 12 Privet and blackberry: encroachment from outside; volunteer; Autumn olive:
encroachment from outside; volunteer, upstream seed source 22-23
Stream
Station
4+00
Fescue in channel from upstream seed source
444
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
12 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 4, 2003
3. Vegetative Current Conditions Plan View
The most significant needs for vegetation repair are on the exposed and eroding
banks of Reach 2 (Sites 10a -10d), most likely caused by loss of erosion control
fabric and support vegetation prior to plant establishment and growth in early
2007. Of less concern, but as a potential erosion risk, Site 11 is a fairly large area
of exposed soil that should be reseeded to prevent: 1) soil loss during flooding
events and 2) development of exotics and weedy vegetation. The abundance of
autumn olive and Chinese privet is relatively low and does not yet present a threat
to planted, volunteer, or pre-existing native vegetation. It may be expected,
however, that these species will increase in abundance over time from on and off
site seed and vegetative sources. There is a small amount of Fescue growing in
the channel of Reach 2. This originated from an upstream seed source.
See Appendix B, Section 1, Figures 2 & 3: Problem Areas Plan View for Reach 1
and Reach 2.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 13 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 8, 2008
4. Stem Counts
Table VII. Stem counts for each species arranged by plot.
Initial Year-1 Survival
Plots Totals Totals %
Species 1 2 3 4 5 6
Shrubs
Alnus serrulata 1 2 2 5 10 7 70b
Ilex verticillata 2 4 6 5 83
Lindera benzoin 1 2 5 8 6 75b
Sambucus canadensis 2 6 8 5 63b
Viburnum nudum 2 2 2 100
Trees
Betula nigra 1 4 5 10 11 a 110
Carpinus caroliniana 1 1 0 0
Carya cordiformis 8 3 2 5 3 6 27 23 85
Celtis laevigata 1 4 5 10 9 90
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2 4 5 5 1 17 17 100
Liriodendron tulipifera 3 2 4 4 3 16 8 50`
Nyssa sylvatica 6 6 6 100
Platanus occidentalis 3 2 1 6 6 100
Quercus alba 7 7 7 100
Quercus pagoda 2 2 2 2 8 8 100
Quercus phellos 3 1 5 1 10 9 90
Quercus rubra 4 4 4 100
Ulmus Americana 4 1 2 7 6 86
a: Includes one stem that was missed during Year-0 monitoring
b: Alnus serrulata, Lindera benzoin, and Sambucus canadensis are all shrubs that were planted at
the top-of-bank which is eroding in some places. This has caused the less than 8 0% survival rate
for these three species as they have washed away.
c: A variety of grassy, herbaceous species were growing in the plots. Their dead s tems created a
mat of vegetation that surrounded the planted stems. It is possible that this mat captured water and
led to the rotting of some stems of Liriodendron tulipifera. Addition ally, a few stems were
knocked over during flood events and died.
5. Vegetation Plot Photos
See Appendix 1 Section 3: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
B. Stream Assessment
1. Procedural Items
a. Morphometric Criteria
Dimension: One (1) established permanent cross section was monitored on
Reach 1 within the 208 linear foot stream Enhancement I segment of the
stream. Five (5) established cross sections were monitored on Reach 2 three
of which are in riffles and two are in pool locations.
Ward Consulting Engineer;, P.C. 14 UT to Rocky River Strearn Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
S('04 4()?
Nlonitoring Report Year I
Februarv 3, 2008
Profile: Profile data was collected on 1111 linear feet of Reach 1 and 208
linear feet of stream profile on Reach 2 throughout the Enhancement I stream
segment.
b. Hydrologic Criteria
One verified stream bankfull event occurred in October of 2007 on Reach 2.
A stream flow level recorder is located on Reach 2 at stream station 2+90,
which shows the highest level of water flow through the channel. Table VIII
shows this bankfull event and Figure 1 illustrates the recorded rain gauge data
that substantiates the date.
Table VIII b. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Collection Date of
Occurrence
Method Photo #
if available
11/15/2007 October 26, 2007 Stream Gauge / Rain Gauge Haw River None

ZUSGS
USGS 02098197 B. EVERETT JORDAN LAKE AT DAM NR MONCURE, NC
2.5
N
t
c 2.0
4
.1
+°+ 1.5
c
0
.Pq
61
1.8
a

u
d
?, 8.5
J
H
Q
O
0.8

Jun 81 Jul at Rug 81 Sep at Oct at Nov at
2087 2087 2887 2007 2807 2887
---- Provisional Data Subject to Revision ----
Figure 1. USGS rain gauge in Moncure, NC.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 15 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 8, 2008
2. Current Conditions Plan View (Stream)
Reach 1: The overall stream conditions of the bank repairs and re-alignment are
holding up very well. There are only a few areas along the stream that have
minor toe erosion however the upper banks in these areas are well vegetated. At
stream station 7+50 to 7+75 (photo 381) the bank is very vertical with large tree
roots. This area was not part of the original repairs to the stream bank and the
extensive tree roots in this area have stabilized the bank. All areas noted in Reach
one have been identified as trouble areas that warrant future monitoring.
Reach 2: The overall channel pattern, profile and dimensions of Reach 2 have
remained stable during this first year of monitoring. Most of the fabric placed on
the channel broke down within the first 3 months of installation. However the
vegetation has established well along the stream banks and floodplain. Because
of the drought the stream was not subject to large storm events during the initial
establishment of vegetation. The left stream bank from station 8+90 to 9+40 has
no fabric or vegetation and the soils in this area are not conducive to vegetation
establishment. Toe erosion has occurred at some constructed riffle locations due
to vegetation establishment within the channel that has forced the water to the
edge of the rocks.
Shortly after construction was completed the adjacent property owner to the west
cleared his entire property. A tributary from this property enters Reach 2 at
stream station 3+70. Two locations downstream have experienced channel
incision as illustrated in photographs 447 and 449. The channel has become
narrower and deeper. At the end of Reach 2 the land owner below the project
constructed a road and installed an 18" pipe in the channel. This restriction has
caused aggregation of the channel for a distance of approximately 23 feet. The
rock cross vane structure is currently buried in sediment. Ms. Melonie Allen the
EEP project manager is currently in the process of obtaining an easement from
Mr. Pike to allow the replacement of the current 18" pipe with a 36"pipe. This
36-inch pipe will have sufficient capacity to pass the bankfull storm event. As a
part of the pipe retrofit the channel incision at stations 1+60 - 1+80 and station
2+35 to 3+45 will also be addressed for repairs.
See Appendix B, Section 1, Figures 2 & 3: Current Conditions Plan View for
Reach 1 and Reach 2.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 16 UT to Rocky River Strearn Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 8, 2008
3. Problem Areas Table
Table X a. Stream Problem Areas Reach 1
LIT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107

Feature Issue Station
Numbers Suspected Cause Photo
Number
Debris Forming
D
t
f C
l
t 1+20 Culverts Larger Velocity Causing Scour maybe a
l
h if
h d
b
i
b
ild
owns
ream o
u
ver
s
(watch)
1+28 p
ace to watc
enoug
e
r
s
u
s up may go
around either side 374
L
ft B
k 1+32 Left Bank erosion over roots - due to debris overflow
e
an
1+35
upstream Still a lot of roots and rock 375

B
k t
i
l
ft 1+73
Ch
l
hifti
f
ft
an
oe eros
on
e
1+83 anne
s
ng
rom center to le
side 376

B
k
d
t t
i
ht 3+26 Channel has shifted to the right toe undercut - 1'
d
i
b
li
h
3
an
un
ercu
oe r
g
3+38 goo
vegetat
on on top - may
e water
ne w
en
water in channel 77
Steep Bank Vegetation 3+44 steep bank - still has vegetation and large tree roots
t
t
f
il
i
t
6
ll
378
has not established well 3+51 o preven
mass
a
ure - (p
c
ure
) - overa
upstream
Left Bank not much
ti
h
t
l 4+54 tree roots & steep bank left side hard for add
i
t
b
k i
tl
t
bl
379
vege
a
on -
owever
arge
tree roots 4+58 vegetat
on
o grow -
an
s curren
y s
a
e
w/remaining fabric
Left Bank toe no 5+74 no vegetation on bank, toe still holding slope maybe
l i
ll
fl
tl
i
h
d
t
380
vegetation - not undercut 6+00 y un
er wa
er no
ow curren
y
n
w
ere poo
s usua
channel inside bend of pool
Left Bank Steep major
t
t
h
th 7+54 Bank looks stable not repaired originally in project,
ldi
k
l
t
t
& t
b
k h
b
381
roo
s no
muc
o
er
vegetation 7+77 ng
an
- no
arge
ree roo
s
rees on
an
o
signs of erosion upstream
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 17 UT' to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO4 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 4, 2008
Table X b. Stream Problem Areas Reach 2
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107

Feature Issue Station
Numbers Suspected Cause Photo
Number
Bed on Left Side Riffle 10+70 Bypassing Rock - Vegetation very dominant on Right
id
ti
l
ft
d Sid
h
t
H
t
383
Eroding Bypass
" 10+76 on on
e
s
e -
e, no
as muc
vege
a
an
move rip rap over
Bed on Left Ripple 10+00 Riffle Downstream of tree - water bypassing on left 384
Erosion - Bypass 10+08 side
Left Outer Bank No 9+55 Stable bank - No vegetation some degradation - vane 432
Vegetation 9+68 helping, sta. -13.5'
Bank widening both sides 9+39 Riffle #5 - vegetation not established on bar - fabric 433
of riffle 9+52 gone 9'
k
d 9+20 19'
f
ti
f
b
i
i
i
L
t 434
not protecte
Ban 9+39 vege
on,
a
r
c m
ss
ng
oss o
a
Riffle not stable no 9+15 8.5'- gravel starting to form, no vegetation - sediment 435
vegetation or rocks 9+23.5 causing shift in channel
Outside bank of pool & 8+85
i
il
17'
N
f
b
b
d
436
riffle no vegetation 9+15 r
o
a
c -
a
so
s -
Bank Erosion Sediment 7+69 6' Water eroding left bank going around rip rap - lack 438
Loss 7+75 of vegetation bank eroded
B
k b 5+10 L
f b
k
ti
i
t 442
an
are 5+17 an
vege
on, some eros
on
oss o
a
Pool at Station 4+10, pool length has grass seed
Fescue In Channel washing from upstream property this continues in
channel downstream 444
E
i
t t
f
iffl 3+76.5 Lack of vegetation on right bank toe, length = 13.5', - 445
ros
on a
oe o
r
e 3+90 6" deep at toe
E
l
k
d
d t
ft b 3+05 too much vegetation growing on top of rip rap in 446
ro
an
e
oe
e 3+13 channel forcing water to left toe L=8'
Riffl
t
bl
d 2+54 d b
hi
h
l
iti
f 4
0
e un-s
a
e gra
e 2+60 cause
y
g
ve
oc
es
rom upstream 5
Channel Incised bank 2+35 channel destabilized after adjacent field was cleared, 447
erosion vertical 2+45 LF 10'
Vertical bank erosion 1+60 Vertical erosion caused by rip rap forcing water to

inside bend
1+70
inside of bend, channel narrow at this location 448

d
t
f
h
l 1+60 large rip rap & destabilizing from off side adjacent
own cu
o
c
anne 1+85 clearing 449

di
S
t Fill
d Ch
l 0+00 Deposition from floodplain due to pipe restriction
d
men
e
e
anne
0+23 ownstream, buried cross vane, silt check still in
channel 452
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. j$ UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
scw 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 8, 2008
4. Numbered Issue Photo Section
See Appendix B, Section 1, Figures 2 & 3: Current Conditions Plan View
for Reach 1 and Reach 2. Also, See Appendix B, Section 2: Additional Stream
Photos
5. Fixed station photos
See Appendix B, Section 4: Cross Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
6. Stability Assessment Table
Table XI a. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment based on Enhancement I
length of 195 LF Station 9+00 to 10+95
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107
Reach 1:1095 feet total len th Enhancement I& III
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 80%
B. Pools 100% 100%
C. Thalweg 100% 100%
D. Meanders 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100%
F. Vanes/J Hooks etc. 100% 100%
G. Wads and Boulders 100% NA
Table XI b. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
UT Rocky River Smith Tract / Number 046107
Reach 2: 1108 feet
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 92%
B. Pools 100% 91%
C. Thalweg 100% 95%
D. Meanders 100% 96%
E. Bed General 100% 99.98%
F. Vanes/J Hooks etc. 100% 100%
G. Wads and Boulders 100% NA
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 19 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February 4, 2008
M Lo
-0 6) p It 'IT O 0 LO L co N

M O N Lo

O r M CO CR -i

co
c2
00
N
O
O

U
N M N N CO nj N C) M I , N O O

O O O
m
x Lc)
LO (D 00 04
O
Lo N
O
Lo
O
O
M
i
i
i
i .
N r N co
O

to
Q

Lo
N

cn

Cl)
N

C)

I

CD

LO

CD
0

r-

r
N

0

N [
nj L6 IT LO O

O

O

(O

co

r
M
O)

LO

p

p

p

O

> 5 O

M

C)

co 1

CO

?

LO
00

O M
O_ LO
O_

V'
N
M
N LO LO CO O N M 0 st N
LO M r N ?-: O O U

O N CD O O
? LO LO (O i N i i 0 0 a?
O
0
i
i

C6
`-
r
N (
p to co
N
co
C:
N
M
i
M•
i
O
i C3 LO
O
0
p
O
N
C V to
O
m U M M O
Lo 00 -'T LO O
co r V) 00 M N
O LO O M
r N r r r- ?
N
M
M co
O M
r m
N r
C)
N
N CO N rn co
M
co O)
M N

r O
O O
O
U
r 0 .? 0 0
O
4+ C
N
A
A } E
N
N
M V)
O)
C LO
M
N
00

i

a0

N
'o

V

? 0)

r

O)

'IT
E co of
? r O r o c- r O M M I-
LO CV v .' N O r co i
En O U
O
3 0 w, . M 3 .
V CO
O 0 C 1-
N
o
CO Co
N to
? co
r
CO O1
f?
: i' to
M M
r
LO LO
LO CO
w
a. d N O r .
r N 0 O r N
` N w O
CO '

E
= 3
N

LO

Cn v

1*' m

co

M
M Z L a m
O) co ^ m 04 r
(O N LO O O p LO
O M r
M r O)
0 N N O O
p W
C. r+
m ?. O)
- M
r
N
r : ., CO
t
'
M
N
O N M f? x ii N r p U

A d

co
OO .

j O O
O) ?, C
r
co

O
N
O)
co
O
C'7
00
r
M
000
Or
to
O
Iq L
r
N
CL W? C%4 CN Cl)
C) LO
N
?u
O d a
c
{?
C L
C

r
v
`O
r
co
C7
`

V

?
'n
M

co
MO
O

r

co
W M N 0 CO N
Y

m o
A w 0 O 'a
N N

X? ? r

La m x OO Q O ? aaaa¢a <<<< aaaa aa aa¢¢QQ
H CD r p `ma `y N Z LO N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z z

Im
N
M
O
a
l
d

CD N
(6 2
N
tM
m
a¢ a a a a a a a a
a a a a
Q a a a
Q Q
a¢ Q Q Q Q
c7 g Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z Z Z Z z z z z z z z z z

(n C_

$ ?- .0 .O •O L •? L E E C 1- Y O
L L N L rL•+ L_ N L L L E E r L L O n7
"O "O O N N C L N
E U U 7 C .?-.
- C O C U 0
co C C C N N
O C D N .?
C: L Z N O N O N a J J U) O O y
LL
m O ¢ x
N Q V m j O N IL N U li
L C N U -
W • O U >m r`C O
Q. O L f co

o
o

m U N C T

c O >
L '(]
c •
-
a 6

> C
m N
4? C
a?

o
m
w m
a)
L rn m
y '°
d r
U
CD
e LL cn = U m m
d to

E C i O
m
E U m
O y
a c m a a` cnn a
C .A
r
IJJ V! t?t
O
N
U
N
.a
co
a3
b
N
C
N 4j
r
b
U uli
N
U i
N
G
b C.l
O ?
U
c
Q

v

N N
O(OD
0^O U) (O
O co
r M
OD
O
?
00
-
00
"T Cl)
M
O
co
CV
O

0)
O
N
M
O
N M
M
CA
o
U)
(4 CD
0) '
\ U
i
O
O
O
- O

Q fx6 p 0rl-
0 0 to 00
N to
c,4 N 00
CD U) O U) n M O U) M
N N U) M N CO C'4
N
O
N
CO

C O)
00
p t?
O f?
1.- '-T
M O
`- Co O OV M
r- M
O M
M N
p 00
00 M
V
O) co O r 0 0 N r C
O
y N CO U) M O 00 Ln 00 (MO U') M U) O O O M N N
OO C) M M O O O N N ? N _
O O U
O O
C
0)
X

O

4

t
00

l)

0

c)

N

C

?

N
M

N

_
to
(O
N O
O CO O
N (
O
N O O O
Q O O O
C
•r
- 00 N V
r U)
O W
00 to

N
O M

`- N
C)
M
I,.- 0^O M
0
i
2 O O N O .-- 0
O O

0 cM

M cM

LO LO 000 .t

Cl `- CO NO co ? ? 00 ? N N 0) Cl)

M
N
^
O)
?
N
0n0
O
Cl
?
E n G ccn O N ° N N ° 6
?
M

M M
O
U
3 0 c O 0 0

OD

•7
E

a) ca
X
N
0)

O)
T
Cl
v
N
w

00

N
0)
L9
0)

O)

T
i d O (vj O O M i O M U)
CO f?
U) N N O (O
a ?
(D
.
6 ce) to

C Z
C
N
N
0?0
to C-1
r
0?0 0)
-
r
CO
.M-
U) to
LO
N

?Vr
r O q s
O L r
~ a-
'
M CIO to
M

w N O
N cn M
f? N
00 (O
N
O to
U) N
co
° M
r U)
'qr
n
M
O U)
rl.
O
m CO
p LO _
t
Q •? t 2 ° O O O N N to N N O Oj v N O O O O C9
E v
O N a O
C c N 0 0 0

(D jce
C N
x '0 X
N
r-
(V
O
C
O
O (O
U) M
00
i
O
M N
LO
M
r- N
r
M O)
M
•? W e

U ? O O N 00 C)

°
?--
m
N u (L

m O
C Cl)
O U)
f-
CV N to
N to
IT U)
f?
M
(D
(D LO
?

F- ^
(O
O
00
O M
Cl O
x
d

a)
'0
Q)

(9
CN
H 7
m
[ ,`i a a Q Q Q
Z z z Z Z Z z z Z Z z Z z Z z z Z z z Z Z z z

h v LO
M M C::i
c

0 a)
0)
m
mx
Q Q Q Q¢ a a¢ Q Q
a Q a a
Q Q Q Q
Q a
a a a a a a
g z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

0

U c

ca O O O •? p
t L Q V7 L_ L
_ 7 L_ N L_ L_ L E E j
(p
'D U C N N w C L 'O c L c O C C
V C C C O
a O
C)

3

0
"O

Q

N
N

-
E

'
m

Z
N
"O
N
O
N
O
U7

U
00

U

L

0)
J

N
J

(n

O .

O

N

LL
a)

? X

°
E
L
a
)
= C

a O

m QJ

' N N

° y
m o a
i ( c
i U (
o FE 4) o m
m U-
m U

c
'a
LL a a?i 'o
0) :3 o ? c E Q. s m e

m c

a)
o 0
to m m c m ° N a) m c t: L

U
Lll
_
` U
c
r 4f
U
fn to
d m M
L U- Q L
co
10
o a
a`
r
'n to
Q
N
1..
U
O c
G ?
O ?
0. ?
o ? y
N ? is
O
O 1
7 W V t
N
T
U
tU.
b
b
C '-J
s
F. U
w .?
U w
4: ?Q
O .?
N
j1 s
.+ C
"G
O r
U
Q

CO

3 ?
O
LT
t0
C
_
C

E
`.
Z
of

V i O
= H r

C E }
t
N
C LO
.C

00
C
O

U
F N
}

_

} LO
co
Cl)

u?
cc
!
?

CIO

v
It

N

j

Co

O

M
00 N N
00 Q
M
•O O O E E
L L_ O L L 7 E E
o o `L 4) L E LO 00

LL
CO
C0
C
Q
C
M
X
C6
N
0
E
L
•N
2
'c
a

U LO 00
O f0
o N .L-. U Y
M
O f3 LL LL
co f m 'O
O
LL (D
U) m w a?
_
2 cn
4i .
N O0 (l1
? ? U H
U-

04 x
? Ca
L
C]
}
C
L .C
L

r

O
N
X
LO m
c?

}
C_

N
O

O
N
x
? (0
?
O

}
.C

a
N
O

O
N
X
M
O N

}
C_

N
00
O
O
N X
m
N
O

C_

N O O 00

Cl) (CIO,
N
MO
N
t`
M M 00 e- O N
C)
O
O
N
Lo
O
00
O
co
O
M
r
CA
.
(D N C
O
O ?

} o
C r- M N p M r-
04 N (O O
•? ? i Z p
y
-
'"-' d
L N L L L L L O
'O O E a c CL CL
Z N N _O N w
w
N
O
O
N
m > (D > N N to ?. (/) F (6
U F o
Q- o (o a) w
co U
y > C V > m N
c
CC
:3 N C6
L
U

(n

o
U N ca
L
m
`
O
O
c M
`
CL a a a
? .j
?L
!1!
C? ,1)
sU w G
il Qd
>
? 1)
H c1
N
N
.Y s
y
d ,?f,
3 ?:u
cd M,
Q M,
0
z

N_
O
N
>- m
O

M ?

a) ?

cn }
O
? r
U
} o
N
x
O

} .Lo-- O - 'M
, o
M r ? ? N } C_
O N I? O cV 0 Cl O
} N

LO
N x
a7
E }
O cc
E
N
N Co } c
U
O
L
O O
a
M
a
C p c } a)
O r O O
0 U
O y
' } N co
-
GI 2 M 2
!6 O

2 Z } 0) CNO ar0 M
-1 n! N
l
0 ONO
"D
CD c
a- N 2 O Oo O O O O 2
CU a+ t .
A V
d
F- } m
OMM g rp 2
O

t
E O
CLU)
L_ L
} N x
m
o ?

? c

X o
? g
v o
a, a> ?

cc co E
to M
} a
O
co
00
co M
cp
co M

p co

'i co
N M O p N s
2
U
N

2 N X
M Lo

N O

M M

N M

N GO
C?
O O

N O
(0

LO O

N

N O

O

O \
O U

}
v
10
M
M
M
p
M
p
M
O
p
C_
LO
O
O)
M
(co
O
M
M O
O
2 O N D M I_ N In O N o 2 N N c?j p r N

L cy
y
L
L cc
V7
E
E
t
N
L
L
L
ad+
L
L
o
ca

O

a

o

)

)

w

C

L _

o >

a
of

o

0 _

a
:3 ..
a

C

w «.

C

) ...

C C

U
c0

£ ...

C ..

C
) O

C
fn

N
O

N
o

U
w
D
a> o
E E
af a s a? v a? o
y a? a) a
N N
LL

m a>

e Q c

as x

m

0 m

=
N
n

`-' a)

co

U a?

m

? o

b

o o

o 0

75

CL

0

o

? v)

LL m

U
d c 2 U N C a N p U d' a s V a7 m m m C
c LL m ?•" co a C V1 14 L > a)
m W j = t -0 C 2 U U) O
LL ' U cc
r p O d Y Of
2 io
O
E co a E c CD O

d U m
a
a c 00 ?n a s a` a
? U
?? 4J
c

U -u

N
Cd
N
W
O
C
O
O
CL
N
3
O
N
U
c0
w
W M
O N
O
O
O
LL
a
N
ti
W
O
y
U
G
M
3 cFj
a?
s
v? o
Q
0
z
U
O ti
}
c
G
LO
}
C
G
LO
C
O }

U N
N
M

C O
U
}
Z+
A ?
E
E
} v
(D O
O M
M ^
O (,)
CD (D
M C-4
N
(fl M
CD O
co M
N O
O
N O M O O - O N O O O
cm 1 1
++
L o
l"'

E we G
O C d
C
G
? r

3 £ ;:
(p 7 7
?Z N O
2Ut
v
V vo
N
n
C y }
p
p U
E
_
GN 04
sa

O
O
LO
0
O
O
r
f-
LO
M
LO
LI)
co
V
cM
co
M
in
O
O
o 0 ? O ?

X
m .o O o E E
L L y L L 7 E E
>
> p p "

N

L

E
O

U")

co
co
co c Q c x
p E Z r
N
co o (a a) (6 U = a ,U
o 2 LL v m (D
p
o LL.
m m m :r-
? a

L
C
LL
(n w >
> _
ad+ O N a4)
d y O
U
a o m
m
s ?
1J ii
i U
n
f-^ 7 `u
N

c
op
w
cq
J
c
c
J
5
'l. Quantitative Measures Summary Tables Tables XII and X1II)
See Tables XII and XIII on the previous five pages for morphological data
comparisons of pre existing conditions, reference stream, stream design, as-built
and year one monitoring cross sections. (Tables XIIa and XIIIa are for Reach 1,
and Tables XIIb and XIIIb are for Reach 2) The morphological data for the two
reaches indicate that the stream has changed in only a few places during the last
year. A pool has begun to form in the restoration portion of Reach 1 just
downstream of the cattle crossing, but the rest of the restoration is performing as
expected. The profile of Reach 2 has shifted in a few locations mainly due to the
deepening of some pools. One particular pool on Reach 2 at station 2+40 has
shifted approximately twelve feet downstream and the riffle at the top of it has been
elongated, most likely due to the clearing of land above the tributary that enters the
stream at station 3+60. Another reason that the profile may have shifted some
could be due to the method of data collection. The stream was surveyed after
construction using a tape and level and the year was survey was completed using a
total station device. The total station data would remain fixed while the tape data
could vary in places due to the tape layout or sliding when it was in the field.
The comparisons between the as-build and year one cross sections can be seen in
Appendix B, Section 4. The overlays of the cross sections show that there has been
very little erosion, aggradation or degradation in the permanent channel cross
>ections that represent each reach.
VI. Methodoloey Section
The data was collected for the year one monitoring report with a Nikon TDM 332
Total Station. The cross sections were surveyed between the permanent markers
and compared on the cross sections to the base data collected for the Mitigation
plan. The longitudinal profile was collected at every head of riffle, end of riffle and
center of pool location. The thalweg elevation and top of bank (bankfull) were
collected. No water was in the channel due to the drought therefore water surface
elevations were unable to be obtained for the year one data. The total station data
also allowed for the stream alignment to be established in plan view for the
comparison of pattern data. The bank repair conditions for Reach 1 were located by
station as marked by a tape measure located within the center of the channel.
]Each of the vegetation plots were located by four preset metal conduits in the
ground set according to the CVS protocol. Vegetation plots were monitored
:Following the NCEEP/CVS protocols (Lee, M.T. et. al. 2007). This methodology
]provides a standardized method for gathering vegetation data. All data were
subsequently entered into the NCEEP/CVS database and submitted electronically to
NCEEP/CVS. All GPS data were collected using a Trimble GeoXT with sub-meter
accuracy.
Ward Consulting Fngineers, P.C. 25 UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year l
Februarv 4, 2008
References:
Becky L. Ward Consulting and The Catena Group. 2005. UT to Rocky River
(Smith Tract), Chatham County, North Carolina, Report and Restoration Plan.
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Lee, Michael T., Peek, Robert K, Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2007.
CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation. Version 4.1.
NCEEP, 2006. Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring
Reports. Version 1.2 (11/16/06). NCDENR, NCEEP. 17pp.
Radford, A.E., Ahles, H.E., and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of
the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Rosgen, D,L. (1996) Applied River Morphology, Wildland Hydrology Books,
Pagosa Springs, CO.
USACE, Wilmington District, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife
Resources Commission, and NC Division of Water Quality, 2003. Stream
Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, 26 pp.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. and The Catena Group March 20, 2007 Mitigation
Report, UT to Rocky River (Smith Tract) Stream and Buffer Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation, Chatham County, North Carolina.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 26 IFI'to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCU# 402
Monitoring Report Year 1
February 4, 2008
APPENDIX A
Vegetation Raw Data
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
a. Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
b. Table 2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
C. Table 3. Vegetation Damage by Species
d. Table 4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
e. Table 5. Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species
L Table 6: All Stems (planted and natural) by Plot and Species
2. Vegetation Problem Area Photos
3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 27 U F to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report Year I
February g, 2008
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Table 1. (Appendix A) Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared By Kate Montieth
Date Prepared 11/2/2007 10:50
database name TheCatenaGroup-2006-A.mdb
database location \\Gateway\catena\Mitigation Monitoring\cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.2.0
computer name KATE
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata This worksheet, which is a summary of the project and the project data.
Proj, planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems, for each year. This excludes live
stakes and lists stems per acre.
Proj, total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems, for each year. This includes live
stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems. Listed in stems per
acre.
Plots List of plots surveyed.
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp Count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers
combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code 402
project Name UT Rocky River Smith Tract
Description 1. Reconnect Reach 2 to its floodplain through the restoration of 1,011 linear feet
of stream.
2. Relocate 150 feet and stabilize 955 feet of stream bank in Reach 1.
3. Provide a stable stream channel that neither degrades nor aggrades while
maintaining
River Basin
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
Table 2. (Appendix A) Vegetation Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing
Alnus serrulata 4 3 3
Betula ni ra 5 6 1
Ca rya cordiformis 6 12 5 4
Celtis laevi ata 8 1
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 8 9
Ilex verticillata 4 1 1
N ssa s Ivatica 1 4 1
Quercus alba 3 3 1
Quercus pagoda 4 3 1
Quercus hellos 2 6 1 1
Sambucus canadensis 4 1 2 1
Viburnum nudum 1 1
Car inus caroliniana 1
Quercus rubra 3 1
Lindera benzoin 2 1 2 1 2
Liriodendron tuli ifera 3 5 5 3
Platanus occidentalis 4 1 1
Ulmus americana 2 3 1 1
TOT: 18 52 71 14 2 16 9
War(] Consulting Engineers, P.C. U F to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO4 402
Monitoring Report (year l of 5)
February 4, 2008
Table 3. (Appendix A) Vegetation Damage by Species
All Other/
Damage (no Human Unknown Vine
Species Cate ories damage) Flood Trampled Insects Animal Unknown Strangulation
Alnus 10 5 3 1 1
serrulata
Betula ni ra 12 3 5 3 1
Carpinus 1 1
caroliniana
Carya 27 10 7 5 5
cordiformis
Celtis 9 5 2 1 1
laevi ata
Fraxinus 17 13 4
enns lvanica
flex verticillata 6 4 2
Lindera 8 5 2 1
benzoin
Liriodendron 16 9 2 1 4
tuli ifera
Nyssa 6 3 1 1 1
s lvatica
Platanus 6 6
occidentalis
Quercus alba 7 3 1 1 2
Quercus 8 5 1 2
pagoda
Quercus

hellos 10 7 1 2
Quercus rubra 4 3 1
Sambucus 8 5 1 2
canadensis
Ulmus 7 2 4 1
americana
Viburnum 2 1 1
nudum
TOT: 18 164 89 31 4 4 17 18 1
Table 4. (Appendix A) Vegetation Damage by Plot

lot All
Damage
Categories
(no
damage)

Flood
Human
Trampled

Insects Other/
Unknown
Animal

Unknown
Vine
Strangulation
402-01-0001-year: 1 22 12 1 9
402-01-0002-year: 1 21 17 1 2 1
402-01-0003-year: 1 23 12 3 1 4 2 1
402-01-0004- ear:1 38 22 12 1 1 2
402-01-0005-year: 1 26 9 11 6
402-01-0006- ear:1 34 17 8 1 4 4
TOT: 6 164 89 31 4 4 17 18 1
Ward Consrilting Engineers, P.C. t_1T to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
5C0# 402
Monitoring Report (year l of 5)
F ebrnary 8. 2008
Table 5. (Appendix A) Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species
plot plot plot plot plot plot
402- 402- 402- 402- 402- 402-
Total 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- 01-
Planted # avg# 0001- 0002- 0003- 0004- 0005- 0006-
Species Stems lots stems ear:1 ear:1 ear:1 ear:1 ear:1 ear:1
Alnus 7 4 1
75 1 2 1 3
serrulata .
Betula ni ra 11 4 2.75 1 4 5 1
Carya 23 6 3
83 7 3 2 4 1 6
cordiformis .
Celtis 9 3 3 1 3 5
laevi ata
Fraxinus 17 5 3
4 2 4 5 5 1
enns Ivanica .
flex verticillata 5 2 2.5 1 4
Lindera 6 3 2 1 1 4
benzoin
Liriodendron 8 5 1
6 1 2 3 1 1
tuli ifera .
Nyssa 6 1 6 6
s ilvatica
Platanus 6 3 2 3 2 1
occidentalis
Quercus alba 7 1 7 7
Quercus 8 4 2 2 2 2 2
_pagoda
Quercus 9 3 3 3 5 1
hellos
Quercus 4 1 4 4
rubra
Sambucus 5 2 2.5 1 4
canadensis
U'Imus 6 3 2 4 1 1
americana
Viburnum 2 1 2 2
nudum
TOT: 17 139 17 18 20 22 29 22 28
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 4, 2008
Table 6: (Appendix A) All Stems (planted and natural) by Plot and Species
402-01- 402-01- 402-01- 402-01- 402-01- 402-01-
Total # avg# 0001- 0002- 0003- 0004- 0005- 0006-
Species Stems lots stems earl earl earl earl earl earl
AIN.zia
' 2 1 2 2
ulibrissin
Alnus 10 4 2
5 1 2 2 5
serrulata .
Betula ni ra 110 6 18.33 32 7 58 4 7 2
Ca rya alba 2 1 2 2
Carya 28 6 4
67 8 3 2 5 4 6
cordiformis .
Celtis

laevi ata 10 3 3.33 2 3 5
Fraxinus 18 5 3
6 2 4 5 5 2
enns lvanica .
flex verticillata 5 2 2.5 1 4
Ju lans ni ra 4 1 4 4
Ligustrum 8 2 4 4 4
sinense
Liquidambar 58 4 14
5 3 18 18 19
s raciflua .
Nyssa 6 1 6 6
s lvatica
Pinus taeda 13 3 4.33 3 8 2
Quercus alba 7 1 7 7
Quercus 8 4 2 2 2 2 2
- _pagoda
Quercus 10 4 2.5 3 1 5 1
hellos
Sambucus

canadensis 7 2 3.5 1 6
Viburnum 2 1 2 2
nudum
Ilex o aca 2 1 2 2
Carpinus

caroliniana 1 1 1 1
Cercis

canadensis 8 2 4 7 1
Quercus

rubra 5 1 5 5
Ca rya labra 4 3 1.33 2 1 1
Lindera 6 3 2 1 1 4
benzoin
Liriodendron 35 6 5.83 3 2 9 12 4 5
tuli ifera
Morus 2 1 2 2
Platanus 6 3 2 3 2 1
occidentalis
Acer rubrum 74 5 14.8 2 14 35 18 5
Ulmus
44 3 14.67 26 17 1
americana
TOT: 29 495 29 57 39 119 126 85 69
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year l of )
February 8, 2008
2. Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Reach 1
Photo I
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 2
Photos 1 and 2: Site 1 - Small population of privet in floodplain, bank, and bench (about
20 stems). All appear to be less than 2 years old.
Photo 3
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 4
Photos 3 and 4: Site 2 - Bare floodplain, 30-80% soil exposure in 3 x 10 meter area
Photo 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 6
Photo 7
Photo 5-7: Site 3 - Microstegium invasion (50-90% coverage) in floodplain depression
along side slope and in adjacent floodplain
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 8
Photo 8: Site 4 - Bare bank and outbreak of Rosa multiflora on bank.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 9
Photo 10
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo II
Photo 9-11: Site 5 - Privet outbreak on top of bank (about 15 stems). All appear to be 2
to 3 years old. Microstegium sp. (70-100% coverage) on entire left descending
floodplain. Bare bench on left descending side.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 12
Photo 12: Site 6 - Small outbreak of privet (5-10 stems) and a few blackberry stems on
banks and top of banks
Photo 13
Photo 13: Site 7 - Privet outbreak (about 30stems) on banks and large bench. All appear
to be between one and two years old.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 14
Photo 14: Site 8 - Privet outbreak (around 20 stems) on bench and banks. All appear to
be between one and two years old.
Reach 2:
Photo 15
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 16
Photo 17
Photos 15-17: Site 9 - Significant outbreak of blackberry (about 15 stems) and privet (about 20
stems) in floodplain. All appear to be less than one year old. Japanese honeysuckle is the
dominant herbaceous plant. Microstegium is dominant as well. One Japanese lantern as well.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 18
Photo 19
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 20
Photos 18-20: Sites l0a-f - Bare bank and bench at several sites along reach.
Photo 21
Photo 2
)sure.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year l of 5)
February 8, 2008

Photo 23
?•4f+ s>?.yp?7? as'' ;:'?4{'? ? n '" ? ,<+' .. ?a' ? `,."?J?Y?i; `4!!` ????,?j.;.`d
'f.Photos 22-23: Site 12 - Floodplain area (3 meter by 1 metr) that was not planted but has
dense Microstegium cover (approx. 80%). Also, Blackberry and privet are present (about
30 stems). Additionally, there are three stems of autumn olive (1-3 years old) present.
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 22
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008

c
i +.? ,
6 P+? ?{1 4

Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 3: 402-01
Photo 5: Plot 402-01
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 7: Plot 402-01-0004-year: 1 from
Photo 8: Plot 402-01-0004-year: 1 from
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year 1 of 5)
February 8, 2008
Photo 9: Plot 402-01-0005-year: 1 from
Photo 10: Plot 402-01-0005-year: 1 from

'! ? G I. } ? S t i r ? n t '
?
1 e

1,1
G
"k AI
q

Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. UT to Rocky River Stream Restoration,
Enhancement, and Preservation Project,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year I of 5)
February 8, 2008
APPENDIX B
1. Current Conditions Plan View (Stream) with Stream Problem Area Photos
Figure 2: Reach 1
Figure 3: Reach 2
2. Additional Stream Photos
3. Table B.1. a: Reach 1 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Table B.1. b: Reach 2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
4. Cross section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Figure 4: Reach 1 Cross Section 1
Figures 5-9: Reach 2 Cross Sections 1-5
5. Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
6. Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.(_. Rocky River Stri,i,,
(',ent,and Pre,,:,_c ior eject,
SCO# 402
Monitoring Report (year I of 5)
February 3, 2008
oull0Jo3 y}+oN 'Alunoo woy;oyO I u003
uo!;MasaJd 3g ;uawaouoyu3 ja;;ng V ;uawaouoyu3 wa
s?soo
;
3
/uogoJo}saa woau;S 7aou1 y7!wS uaniy xiooa in
„ ••„""",
`dNI-108VO Hi80N `Jl1Nf100 V4VHiVH0

woJ6oJd }uawaouo4u3 walsAs003 - ou!louo? y}uoN
g'?a `•3NI o
N
} N
6909-049 (6T6) Xd3 9T9LZ ON Vlal'2ZI
' = 64FE1 m `
iv35
D
: ?NI?101JNOW I S`d?Jl
z
0 ° 0 0
PH S31-10A xcS 99£9
9290-OL9 (6T6) TOT altng ??
,
a 3
° F o
H MBU NVIJ SNOWON00 iwmuno N N

•Yd 'saaaui2u3 2ui;insu03 p.zUM

L HOV31d I3VUI HAAS U

a

3
/ It,t ` IJ II Z J U
>2tiWS ?O
77
t'y / N vi Z ?i 0.? k ,?,. •t?? ' o E Z Z to r
? 6 d ?/ uof m 1'?a r" d ry A aO:22W ?W
u?D Q W S L ? 0^ MU> X W
Z
/ "o ypUe\1br^$ { Yy ,? ,,F m 'X'ai z µ y? ~pxoa? i ww
099 ??HOO w y?y,.. "? °' 1??17- wrp o ,,,r '{ r I a w w w oc I W
?a a ICo
q, 0 OJO ZOQW?w Z,
x.p k.. t FIJQ?.~.. 0;aWQQ OZ.~.
G`? y s ewp? '+I 4? yJ.,aa cf?y r>Q?ww ago
woa J oJW r
aw w?
K N auKxr-?.K>a
X
?
N I of
x
m a ?? :F
`S
m
n
m
0
r U ^
c c N co a a
U ?
?w
eo
N
Z
Z
co
?
Q
c
0
a) a) N
Q Q -
Z - m
o m

a
c
la c c

c o
_ E
E
am
c
c
c
a)
U E N N
m E E ? ar
o
Q o w a
c
w co cm m
o w w m
- co
m m m m
o
m N N N N
U) U) in
U
N
O
a O
U

W
? m
Qm
N
H
?a
a
W W
H QJ
Z
Q "
J 0
uw
wp
>r
w tY
oQ
a
Y
U H
J ?
Z
1? { I

X
SS
S

YL?^. .

I ?
z fj n
I 1 ! i^
I I 1 4?,
I $ ? 1 1
j ? trS II ?---
I W !
I
L
N
U
w
? i
r
vim. y
I
a:? r
m
ti
l
0
°a
z - ?
Y y I r.
O yx
a
ry
Y
Z
Q
£S6£T'Z:T 'Wd Tb:£Z:b LOOZ/£/ZT '6N?p•suoi}ipuo:) juaaan:)\T aeaA\Iaeal q;!wS\s6uimead peaolnd\:D
owj0Jo0 y}.ioN ',(}unoo wo41oy0 I uo4u3
u04}on QS@Jd V }uawaouoyu3 ja;ing V }uawaouo4u3 wa}s s003
/uoi}oJo}eaa woaJ}S }ooul y}iWS ?an!a A100a In „•,•AINI. , VNl-IOUVO KWON uNnoo NVHlVH3
• •3NN?
wou6oJd }uawaouoyu3 w0}s(so33 - ouiIoJo? HPON `3Ni o ° o N
69P9-049 (616) Xd3 2i'PH 'uB ONIHOANOI \ I H V 3 ° o
9290-O49 LB 616 i0i aging 'PH s31 Kao3 x12 t5 9 BEB ` `•?o ?3?aD:' z R w
:., ;;........: ?
.: MBVA NVld SNOWON00 iNaudfl0 ° . = .. v a
•3•d lsaaaui2lu:j 2uijinsuo3 p vAA,
ro3s Z HOV3810` U HAAS
Y m "4 q '7' wf' Z H J D Z RI Q?
?'.a o S ae ,y!^? ° w z w ? w
o z o W> Zo v w J J
Z N J
to '"i`4 r.. r1•« i ,5 oa°uQ?
v ., 9F ,. ? o P v gerye' A -` 1}. N . 1? 9T y?.. J ... 2 W ¢ U Y
Y tl ?0 4"'emu '?14 ?- t vM? Ya. 2WZwN I WQ WUq?Q
¢ AY S} ?'A W',. ,? yt F.i ••?UOQ ViN KZ P9?OdW
W '( ? .n O w fi ?[gy?, R x'<? ??. Z .Y( N ..p {= W d, i K Q J O ? W?
r
W yin nwJ
w =-M1 h :o,J ? TM' h ?a Q r'+#?- WQ? woy oz
Z
1 3 f ?vWi 'y ` :.ta, oWOz
pa W??Q¢ ?z^u
` ij W ti x _ i?r.+l zaae?a _ rW `Q?zwwwQ?w
ry;k a..: ata uo°aw w'zwa,oojNtt
o r a a
°Imi I'm
a
N w ? ((rr ..
a o
4kr %` x
I ??y
A
zo \J.\
AKI
?4 4?+
m OW
4 Y Z
i ?• ?a
00
- - ----------
4 Q W r
J jffj
N `. +'y, S
Y ?' u l
?1•.A ? it A Y p?E
+er u ?
bt ? ?
04
, 74
Y HH y
4- -Alt
8.
u 41
` ay14f o ait r AJ.?
P
R 11
ov
! K W y t___ e' qq,,
e vv tr sw °'° fw.4?. c °? f .Y?? •.
+„+ s `rP 4 D Wg L
y 1
Q
?_ kv r_ l {rA ?n p "° l7
N
? N
? • 3
O Z
W Q
H q ME"
K
l7
h
u? m ? eo m o m ?n rn
a
M h
y ?
0 N O
N ?
O t0
a a
? r
N r
f?
N h 0 0 0 0 N V O M
`
0 W 0 N N oN0 N r N r O? V
m• W a0 I? r c0 f` O O t0
°
O r
O2 f`
02 ?
W ?
N r
OJ r
¢? r
N ?
N t`
C2 r
O2

C
'g ?n a m m
N m oo rn a o
d
- W
O ?
O a
M
O W M ?
N W O M
p
c
W

Z

?

(

?

I N

n O W

0 m

C
f? D
r N
O
(0 O
N N
M _ OD
O ?
O
Q V
M V
M V
M V
M V
M 7
M ?
M V
M V
M V
M
V r r r n r r r r t` r
m
U)
C

N
O V ,C
p
v ?o_ ¢
? m ? m
N Q
M m
M Q
? m
a ¢
lf m
?
N -? )
C
2 W

?
F
? ?,dh Y

'?
• dd
z 1
? z b..
o ,yr
t,
p 4
}. o . J

%
p*
w

Z
z ?
ro }}
.? 1r?yyTK S 2 ? -^!.1

u
H
£S6£T'Z:T 'Wd ST:LT:b LOOZ/£/ZT '6mp'suoiTipuo:) luaaanD\T aeaA\:peal q;!wS\sbuiMeaa peaoTny\:D
Appendix B, Section 2: Additional Stream Photos
Reach 1:
Photo 382 -
Reach 2:
Photo 459 - Structure #1
Photo 437 - Structure #2
Photo 439 - Structure #3
Photo 440 - Structure #4

Photo 443 - Structure #6
1ti
???s ?`frb9

a1 a

Photo 441 - Structure #5
Photo 451 - Structure #7
" i°

=N
o \°
\
\°
\°
oCo
W t
o
`a
°o
°o
o
°o
°o a
z
a
)
ii n
g co
r
r
r
r
r
a?
a o m .°
o C)
o ,j, 0
C) 0
' 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 C
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 a a o
o 0
C 0
a o
CD a s
r r- U
) Z Z Z Z

0

-0
.0
coE
E a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a s a a a a a s
N z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Z ? 3

07 w.
0
d f?6 a 7
fl
o
rf
M
CM
CM
M
M
co
co
M
m
z
z
r
z
z
C j
U) 4+ c a
N ti
m co
N +
N
Q rn
N N d
N E O
(n 'a
M
M
N
CM
M
M
co
M
M
M
M
M
Z
z
r
z
z

N? C ? Z a c

d ?
?
V
V
,
? 7 d v
+, L
C N C., ' c
L
L
CI.
O O
O L y
C LL C C
L }' (0
C
G r O
C) C
L ? L Cl E
L
L

E
U
p ?O 2 Cn
C
?,
N
N d N A C U C.. CI.

CO
( Y
m O
U C
,0
a +.
.c (D
Cl. (n
Co a)

L N

m In

?
LA
r 01 N 0
? ? C a) U Q a) ? C •?- ?
O

m r Cu

C C` N N

°

C a) O _ co
_
Q
O
d r a) C
a) a)
> c O c
M -p C
O p
N Q (U
y =
m E
a) C_
' L
v -? \ C_ N CV N Z3
C?

O

V
U
C`

a)
p

'O
O

+.

O

70
-
CM
a
w
O

U

n

m
L

N

I.
L

Co

U

:3

CU
C=
Cv
Q

O
-0
U
CL
L
a)
C
CO
(0
U
?
C)
CA
C?
O L
7
p
Q
?L
rn
rn
LE to E a) X "0
C: -
0 4
Q U
ca C
N r
0
cn
m
N

is
C
(0
°
0 :3 Co CI. 70
C M
a)
C -0 :3
(D
O
c CT O
Q m
U +
m O
C Q T
` m
a) E N
N CA !E
t N

OL

a) rn

a) m-

L N

•C O L

O

I.

_
a)
CZ
c L
CL
N
a)
C2
E w
p C
"a
c a)
-0
O
C1
0

0)
L CI.
a)
a) M
a) (D OL

N a LO

O
E C O

L U O cv

(D O Y

U OL 0(D
) c

O

l6

N

l p
M
N >
W p
CL
v >,
.r Q
a m
a) p
C
4) 0?
-
-
U n
0)
co C2
C2
c
_0 Q
U
n
a
L C
.
c N L
t0 (u
L cl•
C C
a) N
L
N
rn a) a)
rn C
a) c
.p c
C
.
?
O N Cc Q
O
O CA
c
° N ?.
° a) E 0) cn ° °' Q c .
.
N
0 a)
' a, (D a? o
U " - N a) N ? N O 7 C1 D (D L C_ (D N c - " O
CL s L -i a U) -j D O O m U) CD U u. 2 a IL U- LL
r N co tI) N M N N CM 4 N 0
o N M N
N
L

cn

N

3 ^
`
W

C

U)

(n U)

L
0 p N ? L C ?p d

Q) /
LL ^1
LL
H cc
C co
\\
/
O
'
Li U a m U w C7 li U
CO
N 0o
0
, CD <
C
u
N O O FO O) O U)
O co
O) O Z
LL Q ? O)
N
C a) C
L
? O
co
OD
C)
CV)
LO
to
co
(D
C)
CY) C)
OD
co r
CN
CN - - - - a z
6) O) O) O) m co m 00 m 0) 0) 07 O) O) O O ' Z Z
a) C:
CL C O
o
C5

?
•- U
H Z 2 j y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z Z Z Z Z
6 E N.0
H: Q
?t r
ct N N N
V
?t N
d M N N Q
Z Q
Z w w w w Q
Z Q
Z
N O Q
N
d
N
N
Q
O)
O 'C N
O ) j E a
C: O
co co
c) 07
M L
c) CO
m co
m co
co O
co
M c) Q
Z Q
Z
M
00
w
M Q
Z Q
Z

C

c
Z
CO)
L d

r
•? r
c r V

N
t - C?-
Q m C?• - C O
O Ca 0
` d ?-
cm C: c`
a O
m
C
N g C`.

3 = `
O
? a)
c C
O
2
N
E CC! i
a
U _ 4 N
() U O N
Y O C N
_ co U O O N
m CO U 0
O c
' CI. a) U c0
cu _ p
CL
m
a)
(D
0
CL
a) a) \

) j O C

C C
C
O
C

o
M
C
O
O
Q
to
N E D
C cn v O U o O
C ( u)
m
F.-
ro
N
C}
O
N
O 0 m N
U ?
a
U CO) m m C.. N
C

Q ) U O

a C

a) L

E C C'. CO)
O)
C ?.

0)
L

D
1
y
7
L

N
_ C
C N _a a)

-a 0 UA`? U

U c

m O c

'-
O
Q
cn

N O

O
a)

I i

N X

c0

l L

? 4-

O \

? W
CL
N

a
Co
7
- U

U

O L

C
ca
O C
W C
a)
C
O
O
C
) O
N U
E
C L
C
O O N [6 O
C v
C (0 (9
a) C
C 76
C -

CL

O L 2

cu N O
O
v Q C
O `
O

a)
O `
C
E
O

U)

c
' 3:
O
C

a)
-0
L

-
O
CL 0

0 CI.
3 O N L j C D
O U O N 4- Y O C
a Q Q >, Q c0 d a) U O N `
Q .
a O m
a +; N N c cc O N c C C Q U
m U
a O - N .U y p) ) U C+ O = O O
cn
E
Crn
N rn
C 3 a?
?- s
•?- ca a)
C C
N U
a)
6) O
o
()
a)
.O
U
. a)
L L co C (V (D
L (V Q O D 4- Q
C) a) C a)
N ,
C
O
` CL Q LL J CL U) J 0 O O co (n U LL 2 Q LL LL LL
N M .4 In ? N M ?- N r- N M d ? N d r N M V ? C
cn
a)
n
(
O
fn
c
a)
U) Cl)
O
0) O
0 N M a C a CU
:2
(6 2 CC CL m C > m
U- U Q Co U 6 LLi C7 ti C7 m

f
SEW
[ .8

14-
'o A

-
r
Y O
>s

0 ;T
fn
Q J Y '
4 \ w
, V (B
Q)
.
? z a d y<? ." y,..
.r Y,' yr? 1 ?+"W +N•^
?+ • a ^ ']?` 'fi` 7ay..`.'!-? t ?' ?
4'n s'
'?
O
?
l.
d63
a ,.
i4K-. ' i \ i yF .t? L i .. A y@I •r .,.+*3 7?r, ?? lY,,,?? ?*.YI
s
t '
0 s.Y i+Ui ' e`S -., y
a+ { 3..1.
t

e, A .u .asZ $
s'r
' L
?e
i.

t aS
i ?j W
t
? I
eyrtr µ?s ? 1 i
a? t

?s
It,
§
+
{
t
r
,AVM .4+
p-.,.
Y;
fi
'T,t .i 'K
•' .
e
?
?
AXM1 ?? .? msg. 1 'w'kCVt..s'
` `?„
i ?'
,`
?`'A%`11•n/e."_ . yLr,.. ,sr.. ?.? yid ? 1?
O
wVw,
O
yych
v, O I L

O O
N
U C)
o

Y d
?
C

E
m O ,C
N
1 O cu co
L T ?_
y O
L
O
°
O ,n
r-

C _
Q/
? O
Z
.Y
O } 00
O

J
X °
v C
t) o
U
r O E
cu
C
7
::
$ M cu
O fE

v 's
U
m
N ole
0
fA O N O
O
L ?
? L
a
U X O c
O
o
? ca
I O
O
o (D 4) NO

O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
o O
O O U
(?
0
O
O O U O U t O U O O L n O
O
In

LO 0

t 0

7
o W

7
?
c
0 f

1
V
0

0,
)
LO
7

U
te
>
-0
a
-..
(}?) uo i;en013 E m E
o

o: E z
L J J
W ?
W ?'
m J

:D LO
(0 O
0
?
d
?
G1 >
a_ O
U >
~
U L.L
a
M
N
?- 00
N
O0
U
U 5,

LL
F- z
z
CU
a
?
m

eo

=
0

0

O

O

O

O

0

O

M

O

)

?

O

O

O

O

M

?

M

-

o

M

M

O

O

O

?

N

o

N

M

O

O

O

N e?
*'

p
ca

Q
c

Z
N
N
O
r,-
N
I?
M
LO
M
`?
M
CO
I?
O
T--
I`
O
W
M
O
r-
M
00
N
M
M
LO
I?

O
?
L

O
O j
N

t .

O

3

L
00

LO
00

Lf)
00

LO
00

LO
00

Lo
00

LO
W

LO
I?

LO
I?

d
LO
(O

LO
CO

LO
6

LO
L6

LO
6

0

6

LO

6

LO

6

6

LO

6

tO

(0

LO

(0

0

r--

LO

n

ti
?t
LO

00

Lf)

00

LO

00

0

00

LO

O

LO

O

LO

O

LO

O

LO

O

0
"'

O
"T
LO

O
I
0

O
?
LO p

.

?

'O

!Z
O

+
m

o

,
cf

ar

c
O

N

?
7 N ? X - O
O O

?
? _ O
E U
U
m 2 (D
cn
o c ,? c c c
0 0 r-- I? q-
N m
? o
00 m
LO M
N 0
f? Nr
00 T--
?
M
M
O
O
f? O
N ?
? O
LO M
LO O
Ln f?
N I?
N M
M l?
`d LO
00 N
(0 V
00 LO
0 N
0 O
- M
v r
I O
? d
O U
- ca
co ?
C Y
?
? O U LL
+ O
O f?
?- O
M (fl
I` M 00 O N LO CO I? 00 0 N N co V (O (O r? O N 0 00 N v 0o N r? M
m co
Uj

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
LO
LO
Ln
O
(O
I-
ti
Y ?f
cu
C Q? Q
m ?, N
H ?
>???" ?i

_
a 4S '
'1 Y x+14 ? AN`, ? 4
4,t 7
4 C)
_
04
r a O

r r t r
j '? `. (0
Q. "
F t 3f a)

O ,
rR y.c ,

x t. lj

1
Y,, r
d f i tu<
?••
1, S
s d
,
-
.
?
O ? r
,
a
?
t
ti ? L

Cl) ?e1 P 1
.:H t 1T .,,6.8.•? ?' a?Ts!m- Y _y ? .! y Ili "'!i

Y.r? d, MY ?ctl,
?O

a

L

:
+..
•
' FJr•
? ^'
,.?„ :,a..,? ,.?u'is «,f M^ .,eYC-`r3'
j r
x
.
,
w
s
w
N K.; a x rud s
j? .. 4

+ N
rail r t
f

O
V
d
O
N
cn ° a

a, E
V v,-
o CU
N
o
co
d
Y
C iz
f6
m o Y
c co m
L ?
0
o U
O
Q
N

C
- O
z
O T- o

J
X :•
N r c
0
co o
U

a cu
c +.
o
v U
d
co
O o
o
U
N
} o a)
tl?
° O
-
L) U) a-
o
o c
O
LO cu

' 0
o
v ° ? O
o

0 C
D O ton
o ton o
o ton U
c
C Cc
0

`n 0) 00
O 0
` 0 tl-
`n
n r l- CD
`n
LO
U ` >1
W L-
(1)

t
n L
U
t
n t
n
t
n CU -0
(:U) U0 14eAG13 _ E E
U N o

a 1 z

U
m
Lu J
m
U
Lo
CA
00 co
N
i p O~ O LL O a N co o ? ? r U a
t ? Z ~
m ?
c
?
_
O
0

+

O

0

M

0

f-

0

O

0

I-

IT

?

0

LO

IT

M

00

O

r-

ti

00

0

LO

M

O

?

d1

0

In

0

0

0

Cc)

fl-

r-

(O

?

I-

0

N

0

CO

O

O

N

0

(O

0

00

?
cc co
N
L-

C c
O

J

?
o ?
O O N I

d
> rn
0
Ln ao
0
Ln a
0
Ln ao
0
LC) ao
0
LC) ao
Ln
LC) ao

Ln aD
0
l!) n
LO
(!) ?
Ln
(1) ?
Ln
In ?
Ln
Ln ?
0
Ln ti
0
Ln ?
0
Ln M
0
L() M
In
Lf) (O
LO
l() (O
LO
In ti
LO
Ln ?
0
Ln ti
0
Lf) ao
0
Ln ao
0
In ao
0
LC) CA
0
lf) ev
O
2
L
-
O
Q
0)
Q ?

p (q
W
)
?
x
? +-a
a
%;z
0
U

-

0)
CO
-
a) U +
- 2 ? p t cn
N
L O O ._ L C ca O
O O M M M CO
I CA M O
' N 00 ? 00 (0 00 '• I-- N O) CO M ? CO 00 I- LO V m
m ? Y
O ? a)
U LL
O (O co O O T LO LO : M 00 LO Ln
- ? Co Ln CO 00 N - Cl) O 00 (O
" f OD - C }' a)
M O CA M 0 (0
•- 00 m m O
N ?
N M
N M
N v-
N 0
N Co
N ?
N 00
N O
N O
M O
M Ir
M co
M 4
co
m
?C
O
d
?, O
Q..
N
m ? a
Y 7i ]y1l ;tly .T 4 ,{ ? ?n rt6 .. "'k INC'-

?_w ?
` rt Ft? ?L-
M" '
'S"I
"^
?
h
ME-
8r_ , r, ?' 's J, t
a ?
rY
4 ` ???
Y
W
-
T,
° L'1 547,.4^';C R ?A
5^ f

d y?
4 w ,M a it ° ?i (fl O N

w+ ?
/4 4 `' Y 9rs "`lff
ft 'f fie.'yYt~ 'e ?
O
(O

mo

U
/ V, I
` (D

0 (D
IL LL

?A r;.. pY:A>•., .
.
G T?
hr
b
P
'
f
e
s..
t ,
y
...
4

44) 3 fir-- dd ff .. r

O
wV`
0
-
W
co
LO
U
0 CD
o
N
U >- v ~ -t3

Y
0
d L
>
O
U. >
m O
?
U

m
p (6
c a)
m

N LO
co 0
=
° U
p o
p ° o
C

5
Z
Y } O ? ?

p w-

X -
O
N
J
' N

U
O o
00 E
d N L
C
0
° m
U
c
? 0 U
N
N ? o O
O U)
o
a
U ?
I o
1
OoA

°o
LO O
U
a)
r`
0
0

0
U O
0 0
Ln C 0
? Ln 0 0
o LI 0
? o 0
V 0
? o
L 0 0
Q C 0
? U?
ca N
of o

Ln LL f c

B tr o 0

) V 0 r

) L - r

n LS - (0

') LO c

L o u

O L ) L

n L O It

O LO
p
Ln L A LS 7 L O L A I n In L O L O L O Lo
"J L
a)
(:4) uOI JeA813 v E ? -0
m
L- E
a)
J ~ co >
O
co Z

?O
? O
J
(
0
000
cc LO
e) r` (n
(
C
a O ? O O
00
rn
o
?
?-
? N O
a
LL
c
co
m
?
?
r O N

p
C
p c
o
O N
O gT
M m
'q w
r r-
00 (o
LO c)
N c)
00
rl- w
LO M
(0 M
(O ao
LO ti
LO r-
? N N
ti N
M 0
N N M
•- 0
M N
IqT r-
LO M
r- C)
O
IT I
LO W
LO c)
Co o
L) N
'IT Lt
CO
LO
(O o
r- }'
- - 03 O

> O 00 00 00 r-- r-- r- O (O (O (D (O (O
- (D (O (O LO U
) Lo L) U
) LO LO LO LO (O (O (0 (0 (.0 (O (O O (O CO
- Cfl
L
41
?"
" (q

''
In
Ln V)
Ln Lo
Ln Lo
to L()
Ln Lo
In Lo
Ln Lo
In Lo
Ln Lo
Ln Lo
In Lo
In U
)
Ln L()
Ln Lo
LC) Lo
LC) Lo
L() Lo
In Lo
Ln Lo
In Lo
Ln Lo
In 0
Ln Lo
In Lo
L(? Lo
Ln Lo
Ln 0
Ln Lo
Ln Ln
Ln Lo
In V)
In V)
In 0
In U
)
In Ln Cc c: cn
L
CO)
W Q O
CO) a) C
M x L c O .?
(n a)
m
?
OL
U
U
? cn
° C: :3 4-- -r- C CO 0
O O N co m o M M M
O Ln
LO M
IT 00
V M
CO O
0 B
W P--
M N
M
M 0
0 It
0 I-
M M
ti W
O LO
N
00 0
- 0
O 0
W 0
r- 0
;T 00
LO 0
O M
M M
B 0 0
ti 0
(O U
- O
m .
C C -0 N
C U U-
D
r+ O
O M
?- M d N
O (fl
ti O N It (0 M O O N N CO LO O ti ao 0 CA O O N CO lq- (!J CO O
' N M L1)
' m m W
CO) ? ? ? ? ? N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M ? ? '? ?7 ,C c6
C O Q
m
m w,
F- a)
a
_ -CE.?G'? H ?yyGtf c"'1p ? 1 ?'P''~ .. 'sy` ,y„i,fi4 ."yf'?."?

All- .:AR`s{ ,2.,•..,;R''
T ip ," t" d
lwaf
1 c J ?
i ? '? r+eAy ,p/3 + ti
i
i. Yl?4
/• ??
I
.
r K
??? .'
w Y .. w ''s?< t ?, k ? s?' {l ,'
by
'S? i t`
?'°} ????-•
,
}
yt.
-
N
O r-
w!

f
`..
?JdK. .piY,_ Y1" '?'?.f' - w,? IMF Z 'j4' +"
`+*9
fix.
`
i ?
"
1.
sL
v ?

.a

a „?_ Are...., zNNN 4 N
A Y 'r ?A s ti f L
4 V W
1

t?
?A:
.
y
,,{?

? of t .•„' + !R

M ? ?•i L

O
0

O cn
d
rn O
(0

0 N m
N
V }
i H
O
Y
i7-

E cu

m
Y
m
L T o
tl)
c O O

o cc

Q ?
?

_ O
z
O }
? o c
o O y
J U)

X
M
C
U) O
U
m
CL
o m
o N L
p U
")
U
} 0)
fA
N
TL ff
O
X O
L-
U C; a
I o
1
o
0)
O
o r O 04

o
in
o ?
0
° o
io
n o
°o o
n

m

Q
LO LO L LO LO LO U
(U) UOI IBA013 ? E ? E
C0 o

J z

?
>
m J
LLI
W
m J
U
r
r
r-
M
ti
? ?
N
d
r o O O Y a U
a
i a Y
z O
H
F- r? ai o ? r N o
U-
m z a
m

=
cu c

ca
0
00
r-
Lo
M
00
N
O
O
w
(O
r-
O
O
v-
v-
v"
o
)
a)
w
w
00
M
?
N
m
w
w
N
a7
w
m
Q

Q O

:
q M 'T 'IT IT IcT d7 r- M 'IT M c- 0 0 ? M M M 0 M M (0 O (0 (0 0 M L C O a) )r

d M N
to N N r ?-
to
0 ?-
0
0 0
0 0
, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T-- I r Q- O CO

3 D
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
V)
U) U
)
U) LO
V) LO
V) 0
V) 0
LO m
U-) 0
LO 0
to LO
? 0
0 LO
LO In
? ?
? LO
? LO
UC) LO
? 0
V) 0
V) In LO
E

'U

D

0)
Q

O'
co

? C

O

c
n

C
W U o
m L) U
U) U) a) OL

° c M o
O O ti (D I-
'I M 14-
I a) 00 a) w a) d1 r- M O 01 00 00 a) O M a) N (O T-- T--- T--- O e- 00 O U
m Y Y 70 ".
w O O , C-4 t N t r In N a) O O It 00 N r? O U) O N
, 00 ti IT N N - 00 O r- - - - C w _0
O N LO 00
•- 'IT I,- N
N 14-
N r-
N M
N O
(M O
(M O
CO
M
M N
(y) N
CO M
M M
M Ir'
M U
)
CO (O
M (O
M r-
M 00
M a)
M a)
M O
? -
V M
qT (O
q- O
0 IT
0
Y
co
co
W
m
C d Q.
m
co

a

A-

*
9t;
T
z
4
NW?Ai?
s

rr,. ' .r L' n1 {, ^ s
l?ytt F?.C'?
x+r:
A
A;
r'fi:F TPF Y
?ww-- ^r Y .1 i° Aid'

¢ 3 bn ra * ` u,

?.;4?s, 'f \
iVi yil? "lP 4
, O

CD

0

N
sue. y'Jk'12. 1 `F` 4 w 'fY'?``r4' 'b.
' z r
L O W }I
0 U

^
inf. _
i p
..._ *-u R r Yyv a
iTtiwwr. Y Y •: C ?? e. V1 ; r (0

44 '!

x=a.
g p
?,
?
a)
O H a ??
?3 `
,
y
'
-
? a ii
cn ?. s
W i
r

y

}- -mow "S K` ' " Y - .tbl iJ ! r s7W`dtr ;
N y ?. titJll r"0.
x Y
' {'i
Sy
n
L
V
le .
:.M
.
f?r4n l`r'? ,
'iryy -1453
\
?
w
F
\i -w' r wS. :Yr'mi.'QY 1r ' { -4Y?
»
/f.'.
"
r
O
p
!n
CD ^^_

O tts
N
V } ? ?
o 'a3
Y
C ? O
I

(U .L
m a
1
? T m
L
N
o p
o ?
O
3 co
o
o ?

o
--- o C
° °
p X co +r
? c
J
1

O
' U
E
a ca
= o
O
N (0
?
V C) U
O
cn
M }
(n N
O
O
L
V X
I o
0 a

? 0

I ca
L
O
O
O 4; N

0 1
°O o
U°
C? o
U? +? M
0
LO m 0
LD I ) 0
t 0 00
U)
LO L) 4)
( 4) U0' 14BA013 1- E

(n
N m
o

E z
J
J
co
i
U J
co w
0
w
m
U VO
o O
0
o
? UO
(Y) UO
LO
N v
m
n_
0
O LL
Z
O
<L
r
O v:
U 0-
lL > a
co
?

r+ ca C

C
O
1-

00
O
CO
I-
O
M
O
?
M
?
O
o
N
M
P`
?^l?
V/
O

ti?,/?

w

N

M

M

OM

OM

A w

O
L

w
Q
N

Q
O

U _
r

M
O
O
O
M
I-
M
M
M
r-
1_
M
M
1_
1_
O
O i
m m m m m m rn rn
O
CL
r,
Cc (q
?O ?O ?O ?O ?O IO ?O IO IO tO ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O IO IO ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O ?O O ?
-0 0 N p Of ? C
O C

r? W CU
a +- u?
U

Cl) CU
U

? L lA
L:
0 co
O
O O O O O
O O
N O
O O
M O
- N
q It
co O
r-
I- CO
U-) O M
Co (0
q r
CO r--
- N
E
N O
O LO
LO V.
CO N
VT N
'T 0
CO O V)
P- LO
M to
d' U O
m Y
c Y
c ?_ w
?'
U w
p
a+
r O
O m
N v-
(6 0
- q- W M
N 6
N (D
N o
N i`
N w
N O)
N O
M O
M -
M N
M M
M M
M lt
PM V
co V)
co Cfl
M I?
M I`
M 00
M 0 M LO
d 00 -
Z) c4
m m ? W N
6
Y
C (
Q
00 L
•'.-++...s_'°.?y'? wRa°.T :-4",P ,? X19.: ?.Rl. yj`
_ +r rf 3'
°er.??aryA?{uY4 7? V
Air-

i:1 lwie4 -wtr ? '. ?3? +PS. sI?ie?1 r N?

(D N

O
-j r ?sa4?i ry a
J

,,?.7 ?.eayq .tag Xi,.},. •?
•? ?? F r
u -? ° a ii
N *
iy ? ? .y 7. l M 7M i

I? sr ??,

aY .

LID
,, s d Ada .,.b a.
yy, ?9! 1 Ji'
O
V

?' co

c
n a
M
o
O M
N
V F
-
.F
Y 0 ,a
d
co
LL

m 000
N - ov o
= a
3
O U
_.. -C
_ } $ O
z
Y

O

U) M O
.?
J X ego =3
O
cA U
O 5 E
a m
O N m
O , U
N
} U

N 0)

O
M
O ()
X O a.
C.) 1 o

T
ca
L
O
.N
CO)
Q)

o O
0
° U 9
co OD C
L )
q o Un O° ? L)

L (D
N

IT It
LO LO

L (.0
v co
v Lr)
It
O In
(11) u01 LO
;ena13 LO LO
v E i
E
m
J y >
m L O
O z

16- 3
U
j

W

UJ

M

U
M
IT

0)
M
0(0
)j
C14

N E
?

d
y a _

O

W
0 0 a o C ) C ,
C) N

o
.- r- 0 a
a)
m
LID

ca
?
=
O
F+

I-
00

M
I?

CO

(D
In

O

-

f-
r-

(0
O

O
O

O

m

M
r-

In
O

V-
O

LO
N

N
O

(D
00

N
00

O
O

In
M

0
'T

(O
O

M
M

M
r-

N
r,-

M
r,-

r?
? c?

Q
c
^

3 03
2
LlLo
V)
V)
V) r--
LlLo r--
? r-
Lo oo
? r--
LIL r,-
? ti
Lo ti
L r,
LLLo (o
Lo (O
In 0
LLLo Lo
V) In
V) U)
? co
In 0
V)L (O
Lo r-
U) r,
Lo r,-
00 r,- 00
0
0 Q + O
m
W
O

N
W E
cl)

m a U

cn C L cn
U)
0 C
La : -C C (0 O
L
0 0 OD O I- ?
N LO
r- LO
0 ?
LO OD
M `-
Ig M M
- 00 0 M 0 M IN O O 00 ? ? 0 M W M U
Co Y _C
C ? a) L
+
(9 O In ? O
- T r M 0 M N O (o (0 0 M N 0 W M V-- In - C
? c p
O N LO 00 N V M O N Ln 00 O M LO In O O H 00 O O ? M ? (0 O ? m m ?
N . . . N N N N M m co co co co M M ? ? , IT Nr ? ? LO Y m
I 1 1 H C
«S y Q
N
co ~ a

co
ca

J rn

'

U

U
o O N d 0 C
F- H H J m m
a)
a)
o)•0
N
a O
F O
H LL LL c
cLo >
N
7
ca 7
co 7
13 7 v-
10 3
CO -Y- r N N C_ O N
In
U
UI O N ?
(n .? ?
0 m rn m aL IL LL Ln m m a) N L N
Q Q J Q E Q co Q co } } } X U U co 01- U LL
1 0 x X I + 1 I
T
L
?L
O
._
O
2
06
i.?
.M?
W
1
N
Q
1
d
O
L.
a
C
?a
C
O
J
T
V
N?
?
Ln
Ln

C
O
cu
r
X

--...

...
1 +1

.. +
+
+
t
1

t

+
+

1

i

t + 1
x `4 0
+
+ 1

+ 1

t
N ? O
LO M LO
LO LO LO
O co fl- O
IT Iq IT
LO LO LO LO
(4) UOIILIna13
LO Iq co
Iq d' IT
LO LO LO
O
O
r
O
LO
O
F
O
O
(D
T-

0 C
- LO O
O) =
m
4.0
cn
O
O
O
O
- LO
00
O
O
00
N
IT
LO
Project Name Smith Tract (UT to Rocky River)
Task Longitudinal Profile
Reach Reach 1
Date 11/14/2007
Crew Beck Ward, Zach Pitts
Year 1 (2007) Survev
TW TW TOB Left TOB Left TOB Right TOB Right
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Station Elevation
837.52 546.56 ER 837 845.58 549.65 842.85 549.25
846.57 545.95 ERUN 846 867.09 549.9 851.55 548.88
862.96 545.34 CP 863 880.38 549.3 864.12 549.2
874.76 545.64 HG 874 914.15 548.65 889.52 549.6
887.06 546.43 HR 886 917.56 549.55 912.68 548.15
895.05 546.23 ER 893 945.71 547.89 948.84 547.66
904.84 545.76 CID 903 968.73 547.81 961.93 548.11
914.37 546.21 HR 910 980.44 547.31 987.61 548.64
922.14 545.97 CATTLE XING 995.04 548 998.34 548.15
932.96 545.84 CATTLE XING 1016.93 548.9 1055.11 548.18
940.94 545.84 CATTLE XING 1055.71 547.54 1076.92 547.72
943.75 545.7 ER 939 1063.06 547.48 1089.76 547.85
960.75 544.93 CP 956 1079.1 547.85
964.98 545.24 EP 961 1088.17 547.85
970.69 545.4 HR 966
973.27 545.27 ER 969
985.13 544.61 CP 981
998.45 544.97 HG 994
1014.64 545.41 HR 1010
1021.69 545.18 ER 1018
1033.83 544.63 CP 1029
1045.54 544.76
1054.28 544.74
1064.95 545.46 ROCKVANE 1061
1075.25 544.75
1078.89 544.75
1091.71 544 CP 1088
1094.81 544.17 FENCE
Project Smith Tract
Name UT Rocky River
Task Pattern Measurements
Reach 1
Date 11/14/2007
Crew Beck Ward, Zach Pitts
Radius of Meander Channel
Curvature Wavelength Beltwidth
180 198 40
86 163 48
46 172 53
Min 46 163 40
Max 180 198 63
Med 104 177.7 47
Reach 1
Pool length p-p spacing
895.05
914.37 19.32
943.75
964.98 21.23 49.655
973.27
998.45 25.18 31.495
1021.69
1045.54 23.85 47.755
I-
? N
of co
x
r
L
.i
O
O
2
o!f
m
N
Q
a?
O
L.
a
C
C
O
J
N
L
V
R
d
7C
ii
LL
Y
m
m
O
H
m 'o
m
Q X X
J t
9
Y of
M LL
co Y
O CO
co
O
C9
Q X
J
LL
Y
m
F- m
O
Z H
M r- M
Q X
I + 1 1
t¦?
¦
'

-

t

J ¦
o ¦+
?MF

r?

t

C+

,h
+ I

W a
v C
4 N
Cl) 1-
+
i
00 +
C C
O O

? N
X X '

co C O O Ln LO LO LN Ln 19T 00
LO LO to to LO LO LO LO
(g) U014BA013
IT CN
IT IT
0 LO LO
0
0
0
0
N
T_
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
T-
0 O
O
rn .?
CO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
r-
O
O
O
O O
It (O
LO
N
?Xf
II
w
t
LL
Y
co
co
O
co I-
Lo
C? U) U)
Q x x

J t
_rn
Y
m LL
M Y
O CO
m
O
co
N of U)
Q >- x
¦
N
J
LL
Y
co
F- m
O
CO r M
c U)
a x
I + I
..1
¦

?I

¦
ti

C

,l
X11
{1
.1
?I
C

?I

¦

n N
o n n
M C)
n N a0 ;i
+ t
+ M
C C C
C
O O O +-1
8 c0 5
6) cl? +
&; 6 +
U) U) U)
X X X

(0 (0 LO LO LO LO U)
LO Ln LO LO LO LO LO
(U) U01jena13
co (0 ICT C\j
IT IT IT Iq
LO LO LO LO
O
0
0
O
c0
O
O
0
O
LO
O
O
O
O
IT
O ?
O 0
O
ch
N
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
T
O
O
O O
Project Name Smith Tract (UT to Rocky River)
Task Longitudinal Profile
Reach Reach 2
Date 11/14/2007
Crew Beck Ward, Zach Pitts
Year 1 (2007) Survev
TW TW TOB Left TOB Left TOB Right TOB Right
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Station Elevation
-2.84 542.46 10.32 543.84 4.65 543.33
-0.74 542.36 22.88 543.72 43.63 545.2
2.34 542.53 35.63 544.21 58.39 545.26
7.27 542.41 46.06 545.13 75.19 545.82
9.13 542.85 77.24 545.75 104.01 546.47
12.39 542.97 93.49 546.22 113.95 546.55
16.33 542.61 110.86 546.56 132.71 546.75
19.82 543 127.48 546.75 172.93-
22.6 542.81 141.25 547.01 187.78 548.03
26.62 542.24 CP 161.56 547.55 196.54 547.73
36.62 542.75 CP 173.37 547.64 226.89 548.21
44.95 543.75 ER 190.25 548.04 237.46
53.09 544.08 HR 196.52 547.98 255.07 548.82
60.64 543.46 CP 211.13 548.09 315.89 549.78
67.55 544.03 ER 224.49 548.44 331.63 549.84
74.96 544.47 HR 254.4 548.9 352.85 549.92
85.5 544 CP 262.9 549 375.07 550.42
89.8 544.43 ER 274.14 549.22 393.8 550.91
94.29 544.51 HR 291.12 549.19 405.87 550.82
97.79 544.25 CP 297.68 549.27 421.13 551.24
102.17 544.99 ER 313.54 549.49 442.26 551.31
106.59 545.21 HR 334.37 549.87 456.4 551.44
114.72 545.01 CP 343.99 550.09 463.7 551.39
121.41 545.34 ER 356.4 550.14 474.93 551.65
128.01 545.68 HR 362.7 550.3 491.37 551.76
135.99 545.05 CP 379.06 550.49 506.61 552.19
140.54 545.36 ER 395.78 550.91 512.36 552.08
144.81 545.32 HR 408.04 550.89 518.72 552.33
160.32 544.96 CP 424.33 551.34 525.87 552.44
173.81 545.79 ER 439.05 551.35 564.95 552.53
188.94 546.55 HR 454.47 551.34 591.95 553.08
194.89 546.29 CP 461.8 551.41 602.82 553.31
203.21 546.56 ER 505.44 552.25 619.69 553.29
208.5 546.71 HR 511.57 552.18 625.28 553.62
218.61 546.45 CP 519.33 552.28 635.35 553.65
225.83 546.64 ER 540.04 552.32 668.85 554.25
231.83 546.96 HR 546.87 552.38 686.89 554.28
238.17 546.26 CP 556.4 702.18 554.55
243.83 546.79 ERUN 558.83 552.31 718.73 554.54
254.11 547.35 ER 559.69 728.22 554.85
260.79 547.7 HR 565.05 552.5 737.53 554.67
267.25 547.12 CP 602.38 553.3 748.82 555.08
271.81 547.59 ER 608.27 553.38 762.77 555.28
279.19 547.74 HR 620.01 553.59 766.08 555.21
284.21 547.3 CP 637.46 553.66 777.39 555.63
Year 1 (2007) Survev (cont.)
TW TW TOB Left TOB Left TOB Right TOB Rig ht
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Station Elevation
293.3 547.99 ER 654.66 553.98 782.42
297.34 548.13 HR 661.42 553.83 794.82 555.61
300.97 547.65 CP 699.78 554.58 819.62 556.55
308.92 548.22 ER 710.83 554.6 826.31 556.51
314.27 548.44 HR 720.46 554.87 836.84 556.3
319.53 548.32 HG 738.89 554.98 843.58 556.43
332.48 548.23 ER 752.23 555.19 855.4 556.65
345.66 548.73 HR 759.73 555.33 875.72
351.77 548.47 CID 767.13 555.36 887.71 556.85
355.59 548.9 ER 783.51 555.49 893.4 556.77
364.39 549.12 HR 796.49 556 915.79 557.59
372.61 548.31 CID 821.14 556.67 920.27 557.55
380.85 548.97 ER 826.45 556.53 930.56 557.28
394.56 549.58 HR 837.95 556.59 943.79 557.78
405.17 549.4 HG 864.09 556.86 951.43 557.82
407.57 548.97 CID 875.3 954.87 557.7
412.55 549.55 ER 881.49 556.75 966.09 557.88
424.58 549.89 HR 892.29 556.98 968.82 558.09
434.8 549.41 CP 898.46 556.9 999.62 557.98
440.63 549.83 ER 907.25 557.07 1012.55 558.03
457.26 550.2 HR 913.39 557.17 1017.85 557.89
463.97 549.51 CP 918.46 557.3 1048.49 558.85
469.68 550.06 ER 932.47 557.36 1067.5 558.74
478.11 550.18 HR 945.87 557.76 1084.59 559.16
488.14 549.14 CP 953.13 557.7 1098.92 558.98
492.24 550.42 ER 957.23 557.53 1105.98 559.32
506.72 550.78 HR 969.66 557.2
513.12 550.06 CID 983.23 557.77
519 550.79 ER 997.74 557.79
522.81 550.84 HR 1015.64 558.24
528.82 550.69 CID 1029.52 558.43
539.11 550.91 ER 1038.14 558.36
545.71 550.95 HR 1049.01
555.79 550.32 CP 1056.88
563.84 551.13 ER 1072.83 558.67
575.83 551.11 1107.32 559.83
588.05 551.68 HR
594.18 550.98 CID
599.55 551.63 ER
602.21 551.71 HR
610.05 551.37 CID
616.56 552.2 ER
619.69 552.21 HR
629.7 551.67 CID
637.09 552.26 ER
652.99 552.8 HR
656.8 552.53 HG
660.05 552.2 CP
666.45 552.76 HP
671.28 552.68 HR
681.45 552.52 CP
688.11 553 ER
Year 1 (2007) Survev (cont.)
TW TW TOB Left TOB Left TOB Right TOB Right
Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Station Elevation
700.31 553.37 HR
707.6 553.1 CID
712.93 553.51 ER
720.69 553.37 HR
730.61 553.3 CID
738.84 553.62 ER
749.81 553.96 HR
761.47 553.2 CID
766.77 553.82 ER
778.55 554.13 HR
783.51 553.37 CID
793.63 554.17 ER
808.24 554.83
819.92 555.05 HR
827.61 554.81 CID
833.85 554.87 ER
838.25 555.15 HR
846.39 555.06 CID
854.1 555.11 HR
862.25 554.72 CP
875.32 554.99 ER
880.71 555.12 HR
886.52 554.84 CP
892.11 555.35 ER
899.59 555.44 HR
904.95 555.49 CP
913.31 555.73 ER
919.7 555.81 HR
925.99 555.69 HG
930.75 555.52 CP
937.99 555.64 HP
943.99 556.17 ER
952.06 556.27 HR
957.16 556.05 HG
963.51 555.81 CP
971.14 556.2 ER
982.24 556.5 HR
991.59 556.14 CP
1000.1 556.36 ER
1014.99 556.79 HR
1021.84 556.8 CID
1027.47 556.91 ER
1041.16 556.97 HR
1049.04 556.41 HG
1054.99 556.26 CID
1061.87 556.44 HP
1070.65 557.14 ER
1085.59 557.81 HR
1101.84 557.83 CP
1107.72 557.89 FENCE
Project Smith Tract
Name UT Rocky River
Task Pattern Measurements
Reach 2
Date 11/14/2007
Crew Beck Ward, Zach Pitts
Radius of
Curvature Meander
Wavelength Channel
Beltwidth
17.6 63.8 30.8
14.3 55 26.4
24.2 39.6 16.5
22 30.8 14.3
15.4 41.8 17.6
24.2 50.6 22
27.5 57.2 19.8
35.2 61.6 19.8
27.5 55 19.8
33 46.2 17.6
19.8 39.6 17.6
14.3 37.4 16.5
24.2 44 18.7
11 52.8 25.3
23.1 48.4 22
52.8 55 19.8
15.4 59.4 24.2
17.6 57.2 28.6
15.4 52.8 22
19.8 50.6 22
17.6 44 17.6
26.4 35.2 16.5
13.2 48.4 35.2
19.8 70.4 28.6
17.6 61.6 26.4
11 46.2 26.4
15.4 50.6 19.8
24.2 55 22
23.1 48.4 19.8
24.2 57.2 24.2
22 70.4 28.6
61.6 57.2 15.4
15.4 39.6 22
11 41.8 17.6
24.2 37.4 16.5
13.2 41.8 22
18.7 55 24.2
14.3 55 26.4
81.4 50.6 15.4
44 55 20.9
19.8 50.6 24.2
Min 11 30.8 14.3
Max 81.4 70.4 35.2
Mod 23.7 50.5 21.7
Reach 2
Pool length p-p spacing
22.6
44.95 22.35
53.09
67.55 14.46 26.545
74.96
89.8 14.84 22.06
94.29
102.17 7.88 15.85
106.59
121.41 14.82 15.77
128.01
140.54 12.53 20.275
144.81
173.81 29 25.035
188.94
203.21 14.27 36.765
208.5
225.83 17.33 21.09
231.83
243.83 12 20.665
260.79
271.81 11.02 28.47
279.19
293.3 14.11 19.945
297.34
308.92 11.58 16.885
319.53
332.48 12.95 22.875
345.66
355.59 9.93 24.62
364.39
380.85 16.46 21.995
405.17
412.55 7.38 36.24
424.58
440.63 16.05 23.745
457.26
469.68 12.42 30.865
478.11
492.24 14.13 21.705
506.72
519 12.28 27.685
522.81
539.11 16.3 18.1
545.71
563.84 18.13 23.815
588.05
599.55 11.5 39.025
602.21
Reach 2 (cont.)
Pool length p-p spacing
616.56 14.35 15.585
619.69
637.09 17.4 19.005
656.8
666.45 9.65 33.235
671.28
688.11 16.83 18.07
700.31
712.93 12.62 26.925
720.69
738.84 18.15 23.145
749.81
766.77 16.96 28.525
778.55
793.63 15.08 27.8
819.92
833.85 13.93 40.795
838.25
854.1 15.85 19.29
854.2
875.32 21.12 18.585
880.71
892.11 11.4 21.65
899.59
913.31 13.72 20.04
925.99
937.99 12 25.54
957.16
971.14 13.98 32.16
982.24
1000.1 17.86 27.02
1014.99
1027.47 12.48 30.06
1049.04
1061.87 12.83 34.225
1085.59
1107.72 22.13 41.2
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 1, Cross Section 1
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 9+55.6 1
Particle Size mm Total # % In Range % Cumulative
Silt/Clay < 0.062 1 1% 1%
Very Fine .062-.125 0 0% 1%
Fine .125-.25 21 21% 22%
Medium .25-.50 4 4% 26%
Coarse .50-1.0 2 2% 28%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 5 5% 33%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 7 7% 40%
Fine 4.0-5.7 2 2% 42%
Fine 5.7-8.0 6 6% 48%
Medium 8.0-11.3 3 3% 51%
Medium 11.3-16.0 11 11% 62%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 7 7% 69%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 14 14% 83%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 5 5% 88%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 6 6% 94%
Small 64 - 90 1 1 % 95%
Small 90 - 128 3 3% 98%
Large 128 -180 1 1 % 99%
Large 180 - 256 0 0% 99%
Small 256 - 362 1 1 % 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 100 100% 100%
D50 = 10 mm, D75 = 24 mm, D84 = 33 mm, D80 = 50 mm
Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% 25%
90%
80% 20%
m
LL 70%
15% - -- - -- -
e 60%
>
50% ?

3 40% 10%
o

3
30%
V 5%
20%
10% 0%
0% p0
?O
?p
pp
1b*
p? pp ?O ?O ?O
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 ^
?
6
??
??
Particle Size (mm) Particle Size (mm)
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 2, Cross Section 1
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 10+34.82
Particle Size mm Total # % In Range % Cumulative
Silt/Clay < 0.062 0 0% 0%
Very Fine .062-.125 0 0% 0%
Fine .125-.25 54 53% 53%
Medium .25-.50 0 0% 53%
Coarse .50-1.0 0 0% 53%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 5 5% 58%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 0 0% 58%
Fine 4.0-5.7 0 0% 58%
Fine 5.7-8.0 1 1% 59%
Medium 8.0-11.3 4 4% 63%
Medium 11.3-16.0 8 8% 71%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 3 3% 74%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 3 3% 77%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 0 0% 77%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 1 1% 78%
Small 64-go 6 6% 84%
Small 90 -128 8 8% 92%
Large 128 - 180 7 7% 99%
Large 180 - 256 0 0% 99%
Small 256 - 362 1 1% 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 101 100% 100%
D50 = 0.23 mm, D75 = 24 mm, D84 = 90 mm, D90 = 101 mm
Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% 60%
90%
50% - - -
80%
as
E 70% 40%

60% A
y IX 30% -
> 50% c
40% 0 20% ---

30%
U 10%
20%
10% 0%
0°/, '? h O O O O O O O O O
D
1 roe
O?
0. 1 10 100 1000 10000 ?
Particle Size (mm) Particle Size (mm)
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 2, Cross Section 2
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 8+47.24
Particle Size mm Total # % In Range % Cumulative
Silt/Clay < 0.062 0 0% 0%
Very Fine .062-.125 13 13% 13%
Fine .125-.25 50 50% 62%
Medium .25-.50 4 4% 66%
Coarse .50-1.0 1 1% 67%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 9 9% 76%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 0 0% 76%
Fine 4.0-5.7 3 3% 79%
Fine 5.7-8.0 1 1% 80%
Medium 8.0-11.3 1 1% 81%
Medium 11.3-16.0 3 3% 84%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 6 6% 90%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 3 3% 93%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 3 3% 96%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 2 2% 98%
Small 64 - 90 1 1 % 99%
Small 90 -128 1 1 % 100%
Large 128 - 180 0 0% 100%
Lar a 180 - 256 0 0% 100%
Small 256 - 362 0 0% 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 101 100% 100%
D50 = 0.203 mm, D75 =1.6 mm, DS4 = 16 mm, D90 = 22 mm
Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% 60%
90%
50%
80%
d
70% 40%

60%
y 12 30%
>
w 50% c
j 40% 0 20%
3
30%
V 10%
20%
10% 0% k 1. A-1-1
0% O? O. ?? ? ? O? O? rv R?
1 0l'
+
0. 1 10 100 1000 10000 ,1
Particle Size (mm) Particle Size (mm)
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 2, Cross Section 3
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 4+79.07
Particle Size mm Total # % In Range % Cumulative
SilUCla < 0.062 0 0% 0%
Very Fine .062-.125 0 0% 0%
Fine .125-.25 51 51% 51%
Medium .25-.50 2 2% 53%
Coarse .50-1.0 2 2% 55%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 12 12% 67%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 0 0% 67%
Fine 4.0-5.7 3 3% 70%
Fine 5.7-8.0 7 7% 77%
Medium 8.0-11.3 5 5% 82%
Medium 11.3-16.0 10 10% 92%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 6 6% 98%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 2 2% 100%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 0 0% 100%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 0 0% 100%
Small 64 - 90 0 0% 100%
Small 90 - 128 0 0% 100%
Large 128 - 180 0 0% 100%
Lar a 180 - 256 0 0% 100%
Small 256 - 362 0 0% 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 100 100% 100%
D50 = 0.25 mm, D75 = 7.1 mm, D84 = 11 mm, D90 = 12.5 mm
Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% 60%
90%
50%
80%
m
E 70% 40%

e 60% R
us W 30% -
50% c
40% a 20%

30%
() 10%
20%
10% 0%
0% '? O O O O O O O O O
b
0'
0
`L
0
1 1 1 06
0
X0
O?,
. 0 100 1000 10000 ?
Particle Size (mm) Particle Size (mm)
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 2, Cross Section 4
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 3+24.72
Particle Size mm Total # % In Range % Cumulative
Silt/Clay < 0.062 0 0% 0%
Very Fine .062-.125 32 32% 32%
Fine .125-.25 36 36% 67%
Medium .25-.50 1 1% 68%
Coarse .50-1.0 3 3% 71%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 3 3% 74%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 1 1% 75%
Fine 4.0-5.7 1 1 % 76%
Fine 5.7-8.0 6 6% 82%
Medium 8.0-11.3 2 2% 84%
Medium 11.3-16.0 3 3% 87%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 7 7% 94%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 4 4% 98%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 0 0% 98%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 1 1 % 99%
Small 64 - 90 1 1 % 100%
Small 90 - 128 0 0% 100%
Large 128 - 180 0 0% 100%
Lame 180 - 256 0 0% 100%
Small 256 - 362 0 0% 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 101 100% 100%
D50=0.18 mm,D75=3mm,D84=11 mm,1390=18mm
Particle Size Distribution Histogram
100% 40%-
90%-
35%
-

y 80%
30%
C 70% N
ii CI 25%
e 60% A
us W 20% -- -- -
>_ 50% C
7
40%
a 15%

3
30% 0
10 /o
V
20% 5%
10% 0%
0% O? ?O
Off? ?O 00^O
?O
00
00
?0 O
0
1 1 10 ?
?
0
?
6
'
. 100 1000 10000 ? 3 O
Particle Size (mm) Particle Size (mm)
YEAR 1 MONITORING, PEBBLE COUNT
Site Name: Smith Tract Pebble Count Data Sheet
Project No: 046107 Reach 2, Cross Section 5
Date: 11/24/2007 Station Number 1+80.7
Particle Size mm Total # % in Range % Cumulative
Silt/Cla < 0.062 0 0% 0%
Very Fine .062-.125 1 1 % 1%
Fine .125-.25 23 23% 24%
Medium .25-.50 7 7% 31%
Coarse .50-1.0 2 2% 33%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 2 2% 35%
Very Fine 2.0-4.0 0 0% 35%
Fine 4.0-5.7 1 1% 36%
Fine 5.7-8.0 4 4% 40%
Medium 8.0-11.3 0 0% 40%
Medium 11.3-16.0 6 6% 46%
Coarse 16.0-22.6 3 3% 49%
Coarse 22.6-32.0 10 10% 59%
Very Coarse 32.0-45.0 2 2% 61%
Very Coarse 45.0-64.0 7 7% 68%
Small 64 - 90 6 6% 74%
Small 90 - 128 14 14% 88%
Large 128 - 180 7 7% 95%
Lar a 180 - 256 2 2% 97%
Small 256 - 362 3 3% 100%
Small 362 - 512 0 0% 100%
Medium 512 - 1024 0 0% 100%
Lr - Very Lr 1024 - 2048 0 0% 100%
Bedrock 0 0% 100%
Totals 100 100% 100%
D50 = 22 mm, D75 = 92 mm, D84 = 110 mm, D90 = 135 mm

100% Pa r ti cl e Size Distri b u t i on Histogram
25%

90%

20%
80%

C 70%

15%
e 60%

% ]
50

+. 10%
-
- -
40%

30% 5%
U
L
20% ? A
I
I 0%
10% '

O
N
p O O O
OO
O
0%
0 .1 1
P
a
r 10
ticle
S 100
ize (
m
m 1 0
) 00 1 0000 ??
4
?D
?
+r
1
Particle Size (mm)