20170956 Ver 1_401 Application_20170802

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2013 - 1583 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder F-1 Assign Action ID Number in ORM FI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
2. Work Type: Private F_1 Institutional F-1 Government Fv—(] Commercial 1-1
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is to repair failed spillways and dam embankments and also to alleviate
flooding and to increase the stormwater capacity of Waverly Pond and Marlwood Pond.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41:
CMSWS; POC: Ms. Erin Shanaberger
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS Inc. POC: Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2013-01583
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
Waverly and Marlwood neighborhoods of Charlotte, North Carolina
35.2060420, -80.7037030
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: multiple
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: McAlpine Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba (HUC 03050103)
Authorization: Section 10 F-1 Section 404 Fv_/1 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
eStandard Permit 8 Pre -Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
0 Regional General Permit # 163(GC # 4100) 0 Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request 7 No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
July 31, 2017
Ms. Crystal Amschler
Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Regional General Permit # 163
and Pursuant to General Water Quality Certification No. 4100
Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project (SAW -2013-01583)
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins,
The Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project is approximately 124 acres in extent
and is located in the Waverly and Marlwood neighborhoods of Charlotte, North Carolina (Figures 1-2,
attached). The purpose of this project is to prevent flooding and maintain the water quality benefit of the
Waverly and Marlwood Ponds. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) has contracted
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
Applicant Name: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services; POC: Ms. Erin Shanaberger
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-336-3927
Street Address of Project: Albemarle Road and Nathanael Greene Lane, Charlotte, NC
Waterway: McAlpine Creek
Basin: Catawba (HUC' 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Tax Parcel ID numbers: Multiple (Please see the attached list)
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.206042°, -80.703703°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Charlotte East, NC (199 1)
Current Land Use
The site consists of residential subdivisions and Marlwood and Waverly Ponds with adjacent wooded
bottomlands (Figure 3, attached). Typical on-site vegetation includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), box
' "HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
elder (Acer negundo), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and red maple (Acer rubrum).
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
On April 5 and 10, and May 13 and 14, 2013, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, Professional Wetland
Scientist (PWS), Gregg Antemann, PWS, and Kelly Thames, PWS delineated jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. within the project area (Figure 4, attached). On -Site jurisdictional features were field -verified by Mr.
Steve Kichefski of the USACE in 2014, and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was issued on
September 29, 2016 (SAW -2013-01583, attached). However, during a site visit in April 2017, CMSWS
noted potential jurisdictional wetlands in Pond B and contacted Ms. Chrystal Amschler of the USAGE.
Ms. Amschler visited site on June 20, 2017 and requested a re -delineation of the area previously labeled
as Pond B.
On July 20, 2017, CWS scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT) and Sean
Martin, Senior Scientist, re -delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the feature labelled as Pond
B in the previous delineation dated May 2013. Based on the re -delineation and reviewing the aerial
imagery, approximately two thirds of the Pond B was reclassified as a wetland (extension to the Wetland
BB).
This General Permit application document has been revised according to the re -delineation of the
aforementioned features and the amendment to the previous Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request is attached. This amendment includes a revised Jurisdictional Boundary
Map with updated pictures and data forms of the revised feature and a revised Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination form (note: only the revised documents are included in this
amendment). The on-site jurisdictional features are also depicted on Figure 4 (attached) and in Table 1
(next page).
Page 2 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Table 1. Summary of on-site .jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Stream
Jurisdiction
USACE/EPA Ra anos Classification'
Approximate
Linear Feet (If)
Approximate
Acreage (ac.)
Stream A
Seasonal RPW
229
0.01
Stream B
Seasonal RPW
914
0.06
Stream C
Seasonal RPW
147
0.01
Stream D
RPW
3,691
1.14
Stream E
RPW
297
0.06
Stream F
RPW
236
0.02
Stream G
RPW
151
0.02
Stream H
RPW
336
0.03
Stream I
RPW
310
0.03
Stream J
RPW
294
0.03
Stream K
RPW
214
0.02
Stream Total
6,8191f
1.43 ac.
Jurisdictional
Wetland
Jurisdiction
USACE/EPA Ra anos Classification
Approximate
Linear Feet (if)
Approximate
Acreage (ac.)
Wetland AA
Directly abutting RPW
N/A
0.30
Wetland BB
Directly abutting RPW
N/A
3.64
Wetland CC
Directly abutting RPW
N/A
2.62
Wetland DD
Directly abutting RPW
N/A
0.10
Wetland EE
Adjacent to RPW
N/A
0.09
Wetland Total
N/A
6.45 ac.
Jurisdictional
Pond
Jurisdiction
USACE/EPA Ra anos Classification
Approximate
Linear Feet (l
Approximate
Acreage (ac.)
Pond A
(Waverly Pond
Impoundment of RPW
N/A
18.03
Pond B
Impoundment of RPW
N/A
0.28
Pond C
(Malwood Pond)
Impoundment of RPW
N/A
5.92
Pond Total
N/A
24.23 ac.
Total Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
6,8191f
32.11 ac.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on October 5,
2016 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. In the response letter dated October 20, 2016, the SHPO states that they
"are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project." A copy of the SHPO
response letter is attached. CWS also consulted the North Carolina SHPO online GIS service' and
Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non -Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non-RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year-round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.
' North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office. http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed October 5, 2016.
Page 3 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission4 database and found no historical structures,
buildings, or historic districts within the project limits.
Protected Species
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data
Explorers on October 5, 2016 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate species,
endangered species, threatened species, or critical habitat within the project area. Based on the NCNHP
review, there are no records of federally -protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the
project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the white -nose
syndrome disease. Habitat for the NLEB includes forested areas of any age, rocky areas with boulders,
and culverts greater than four feet wide. Due to recent population declines of almost 89% caused by
white -nose syndrome (WNS) and continued spread of the disease, the NLEB now receives protection as a
Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. A Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely
to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.b
This project takes place within the Northern long-eared bat habitat range. However, there are no known
mature roosting trees or hibernacula recorded in Mecklenburg County per The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) published GIS data.' Therefore, per the Final 4(d) Rule the project is exempt. The
USACE project manager will make the final determination if consultation is necessary under Section 7.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The current conditions of Waverly Pond (Pond A) and Marlwood Pond (Pond B) do not meet the current
City of Charlotte design standards (Figure 4 and Photographs 1-3, attached). Waverly Pond and
Marlwood Pond are impoundments of McAlpine Creek. Both ponds exhibit failing dams, failing outlet
structures, undermined weirs and spillways, and voids are forming underneath the dams. These failures
have resulted in the flooding of Albemarle Road and south Marlwood Circle due to structure failure and
overtopping of the pond embankments. This has resulted in damage to the spillway areas, weakening of
the pond embankments, and weakening of road integrity. Moreover, the flooding of Albemarle Road and
south Marlwood Circle results in hazardous road conditions that pose safety concerns for neighborhood
citizens.
Therefore, the purpose of this project is to prevent flooding and maintain the water quality benefit of the
Waverly and Marlwood Ponds. Additionally, improvements must be made in such a way that the
downstream Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) floodplain of McAlpine Creek will not be
impacted.
The project proposes to replace the weirs of both ponds in the footprints of the original structures. The
upgraded, proposed weirs will be keyed down to the dam in order to better secure the structures in place.
The voids in the dam embankments will be filled and stabilized. The rip rap spillways associated with the
4 Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, http://www.cmhpforg/homehistoricproperties.htm. Accessed September 8, 2015
s North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer. https:Hncnhde.natureserve.org/. Accessed October 5, 2016.
a The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1973. Endangered Species Act. http://www.fws.gov/cndangered/laws-policies/.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat. http://fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_
WNC.html.
Page 4 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
weirs will be upgraded and maintained. The spillways are required to dissipate flow velocities and
prevent erosional forces from undermining the dams during large storm events when the weirs are
utilized.
Additionally, the removal of accumulated sediments in both ponds is necessary in order to increase the the
capacity of the ponds. This will allow for the necessary water storage and constant release of flow from
the pond, thereby helping to eliminate `flashy' flows during high-flow events. The proposed dam
improvements and the associated sediment removal will not change the surface water area of either pond.
Marlwood Circle is a circular road that crosses Marlwood Pond twice. Therefore, for the purposes of this
permit, north Marlwood Circle and south Marlwood Circle are utilized to distinguish between the two
crossings.
Avoidance and Minimization
The project was originally designed to avoid all impacts to wetlands; however, over the long life of the
project in the design phase, some area of previously delineated open water is now wetlands. At this point
in time, it is not feasible to abandon the project (safety hazards, easement acquisitions, costs, etc.) and as
such, impacts to the newly delineated wetland areas are unavoidable.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with
all conditions of RGP 163/GC4100. All work will be constructed in the dry. Permanent impacts have
been limited to 129 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel.
No Action Alternative
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a
"No Build" alternative was considered. The goal of this project is to prevent flooding and maintain the
water quality benefit of these ponds.. A "No Action" option would not meet the project goals to meet the
the current design standards for the City of Charlotte and would continue to pose threats to the current
pond embankments, roads, and citizens as the embankments and spillways are currently in a state of
failure. Therefore, the No Action Alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
Page 5 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Alternative Designs
Alternative Design I
Alternative Design 1 proposed piping the entire stream reach between Waverly Pond and the existing
culvert beneath Albemarle Road (Figure 5, attached). This would result in 138 linear feet of impact to
jurisdictional stream. This design also proposed eliminating the weir and spillway at Marlwood Pond and
piping the pond outlet to the existing culvert beneath south Marlwood Circle (Figure 5, attached). This
would result in 184 linear feet of impact to jurisdictional stream, totaling 322 linear feet for Alternative
Design 1 (Table 2, below). It was determined that there were other options with fewer impacts to
WOTUS and therefore, this alternative design was rejected.
Alternative Design 2
Alternative Design 2 proposed elevating the dam embankment of Waverly Pond to allow for an additional
foot of freeboard during storm events and to pipe the outlet of Marlwood Pond to the existing culvert
beneath south Marlwood Circle (Figure 6, attached). The elevated dam at Waverly Pond allows for
additional impoundment of waters during normal flow events that could potentially flood approximately
two acres of wetlands upstream of Waverly Pond (Figure 6, attached). This design would also cause
potential flooding impacts to adjacent residences and roads during large flood events. The proposed pipe
at Marlwood Pond would impact 184 linear feet of impact to jurisdictional stream (Figure 6, attached).
The proposed impacts associated with Alternative Design 2 totals approximately two acres of wetland
impacts and 184 linear feet of stream impacts (Table 2, below). As a result of the potential to flood roads
and residences, and the number of impacts to wetlands, this option was eliminated from further
consideration.
Proposed Design
The proposed plan has been thoughtfully designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
wherever practicable while still meeting the goals of the project to reduce flooding and maintain the
existing water quality benefits of the ponds. The proposed dam improvements proposed are depicted in
Figure 7 (attached). Dam, weir, and spillway improvements at Waverly Pond consist of replacing the
failing weir and upgrading the existing rip rap spillway, resulting in 94 linear feet of impacts to
jurisdictional stream (Figure 8, attached). Dam, weir, and spillway improvements at Marlwood Pond at
south Marlwood Circle consist of replacing the failed weir and adding additional rip rap to the existing
spillway, resulting in 35 linear feet of impact to jurisdictional stream. The spillway improvements at
Marlwood Pond will avoid impacts below the ordinary high water mark for the majority of the existing
spillway (Figure 9, attached).
An existing culvert at north Marlwood Circle will be replaced linear foot for linear foot between the north
and south parts of Marlwood Pond (Figure 10, attached). The replaced culvert will be buried one foot
below the existing stream bed to maintain aquatic life passage and low flows. This culvert replacement
will not result in any impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. Table 2 (below) summarizes the impacts
associated with the alternatives analysis.
Table 2. Summary of alternative site plans and associated impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Proposed Design Plans for
Magnolia Walk
Figure
No.
Total Stream
Impacts (If)
Total Wetland
Impacts (ac.)
Alternative Design 1
5
3221f
0
Alternative Design 2
6
1841f
— 2 ac.
Proposed Design Plan
7-10
1291f
0.62 ac.
Page 6 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
The maintenance of the proper weirs and spillways will better regulate storm flows and will result in less
flashiness of the flow in the system. These improvements will also help reduce erosion, and therefore,
reduce sediment input to downstream waters.
Both ponds will be temporarily dewatered as needed in order to perform the dam repair, weir
replacements, and minor sediment removal. The temporary dewatering will occur at a slow rate that will
not cause erosive degradation of downstream waters. All removed sediment will be disposed of in an
appropriate upland location off-site and will comply with all conditions of GC 4100.
The purpose of this project is to conduct maintenance and repair of existing ponds in order to meet the
project objectives with minimal impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. As the channels where the
proposed repair and maintenance impacts will occur are currently rip rapped, this project will have
minimal, temporary negative impacts to the on-site jurisdictional waters. Additionally, this project is
designed to prevent and avoid impacts to the downstream FEMA floodplain of McAlpine Creek to the
greatest extent practicable. Proposed wetland impacts consists of removing the accumulated sediment
from the portion of the Wetland BB that was previously classified as a pond. We believe that the current
proposed plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while minimizing impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under RGP163 unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with this project are
limited to a total of 129 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel as needed to perform repairs on
currently failing spillways and dam embankments and 0.62 acre of wetland due removal of accumulated
sediment. Impacts to RPW Stream (McAlpine Creek) are the result of the replacement and addition of rip
rip for spillways at both Waverly and Marlwood Ponds. These spillways are necessary in order to
dissipate flow velocities exiting the ponds in large storm events, protect the weirs, and to stabilize pond
embankments. Figures 8-10 (attached) depicts the proposed plan views and the proposed impacts are
summarized in Table 3 (below).
The ponds will be partially dewatered temporarily to reconstruct the dams and replace the weirs. During
this process, some minor accumulation of sediment will be removed from the pond beds to restore the
original capacity of the ponds. The removal of sediments within the ponds will not result in any impact to
the surface water acreage of either pond.
Table 3. Proposed impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Feature
Impact
No.
Temporary/
Type of Impact Permanent
Impact (If)
Impact (ac.)
McAlpine Creek
Waverly Dam: S 1
Rip Rap Permanent
94
0.02
Marlwood Dam: S2 Rip Rap Permanent Loss 35
0.01
Wetland BB
W1
Excavation Permanent Loss
-
0.62
Total Stream Impacts:1 Impacts:
1291f
1 0.65 ac.
Page 7 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Permanent Impacts to McAlpine Creek: S 1 - Waverly Dam at Albemarle Road
The proposed weir at Waverly Pond will be installed in the existing footprint of the original weir,
resulting in no impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The proposed weir replacement will
necessitate upgrades to the spillway in order to prevent a failure. The proposed rip rap apron replacement
for the spillway associated with the weir replacement at Waverly Pond will result in 94 linear feet of
permanent impact to McAlpine Creek (Figure 8, attached). The existing rip rap spillway is in disrepair
and requires removal and regrading and will be re -rip rapped. This rip rap spillway replacement,
associated with the weir replacement, at Waverly Pond dam is necessary to dissipate the flow velocities
and prevent erosional forces from undermining the weir and downstream channel. Additional rip rap will
be added beneath the spillway in non jurisdictional areas as well. The weir and channel improvements
are necessary to repair the existing infrastructure currently failing and prevent catastrophic dam
embankment failure resulting in loss of life and property and significant environmental impacts and
damages.
Permanent Impacts to McAlpine Creek: S2 - Marlwood Dam at south Marlwood Circle
The proposed weir at Marlwood Pond will be installed in the existing footprint of the original weir,
resulting in no impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The proposed weir replacement will
necessitate upgrades to the spillway in order to prevent failure. Rip rap will be added to the existing
spillway at Marlwood Pond and will result in 35 linear feet of permanent impact to the jurisdictional
stream channel (McAlpine Creek; Figure 9, attached). This rip rap apron addition associated with the
weir replacement at Marlwood Pond darn is necessary to tie in the weir replacement to the existing
spillway, to dissipate the flow velocities and prevent erosional forces from undermining the weir, and
prevent compromising the integrity of the embankment. The weir and channel improvements are
necessary to repair the existing infrastructure currently failing and prevent catastrophic dam embankment
failure resulting in loss of life and property and significant environmental impacts and damages. The
existing channel will be preserved to the extent possible including maintaining the existing large pool area
near the downstream culverts.
Additionally, an existing submerged culvert between the north and south parts of Marlwood Pond at north
Marlwood Circle will be replaced utilizing the footprint of the existing culvert (Figure 10, attached). The
existing 40 -foot long, double barrel 36 -inch corrugated plastic pipe (CPP) will be replaced linear foot for
linear foot with a 40 -foot long, 12 -foot wide and 5 -foot high reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC).
The replaced culvert will be buried one -foot below the existing bed to maintain aquatic life passage and
flow between the north and south parts of Marlwood Pond (Figure 10, attached). This culvert is being
replaced to provide additional culvert capacity and prevent overtopping of the road in frequent storm
events and causing a dangerous condition.
Permanent Impacts to Wetland BB: W 1
The proposed sediment removal via excavation within Wetland BB will result in approximately 0.62 acre
of permanent wetland impact. This area was previously classified as a pond in the original delineation
dated 2013 (Pond B), but due to sediment accumulation, this portion of Pond B now exhibits wetland
characteristics. The removal of the sediment would convert the wetland back to its original open waters
state. Due to the sediment accumulation, flooding, and edge effect to the adjoining open maintained area,
this portion of Wetland BB scored LOW as assessed with North Carolina Wetland Assessment
Methodology (NC WAM, attached).
Page 8 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Regional General Permit # 163 CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Compensatory Mitigation
Permanent impacts to the jurisdictional stream channels have been reduced to less than 150 linear feet.
Therefore no mitigation for the proposed stream impacts is not required.
As permanent impacts to jurisdictional Wetland BB total 0.62 acre, compensatory mitigation is required.
The City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank (Umbrella Bank) is a municipal
mitigation bank in which the City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County municipalities can purchase
credits from in order to offset unavoidable impacts associated with infrastructure projects. This project is
located within the Lower Catawba watershed (HUC 03050103). Proposed impacts requiring mitigation
total 0.62 acre of permanent wetland impacts, which CMSWS proposes to mitigate for at a 1:1 ratio. The
proposed ratio is based on the fact that the portion of Wetland BB proposed to be excavated is a
low -quality feature as assessed with NC WAM due to extensive sedimentation, edge effect, and flooding
(NC WAM Form, attached). CMSWS proposes to purchase credits from the Umbrella Bank in order to
offset the impacts associated with this project. Please see the attached Mitigation Credit Reservation
Letter.
On behalf of CMSWS, CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification Application with attachments
in accordance with all Regional General Permit Conditions, and Pursuant to Regional General Permit #
163 and to General Water Quality Certification No. 4100
Page 9 of 10

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
Regional General Permit # 163
July 31, 2017
CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not hesitate
to contact me at 704-408-1683, or through e-mail at [e-mail] should you have any questions or
comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Cha�lotte�Mecklenhur.
STORM
WATER
services
Digitally signed by
Erin Shanaberger
Date: 2017.07.31
11:42:13 -04'00'
Erin Shanaberger
Water Quality Program Specialist
CMSWS
Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map
ZT-a- C
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
Carolina Wetlands Services, Inc.
Figure 2. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 3. Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 4. Jurisdictional Boundaries Map (Photographs 1-3)
Figure 5. Alternative Design 1
Figure 6. Alternative Design 2
Figure 7. Proposed Impacts: Overview
Figure 8. Proposed Impacts: Waverly Dam
Figure 9. Proposed Impacts: Marlwood Dam
Figure 10. Proposed Impacts: Culvert Replacement
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Regional General Permit # 163
Tax Parcels List
NCNHP Data Review Report
SHPO Response Letter
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Verification (SAW -2013-01583)
Amendment to the Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. Jurisdictional Boundary Map (Photographs A and B)
B. Jurisdictional Determination Request (Amendment)
C. Preliminary Jurisdictional determination Form (Amendment)
D. USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP 1 - extended Wetland BB)
Mitigation Credit Reservation Letter
NC SAM Forms 1-2
NC WAM Form
Page 10 of 10

} 1 N I
r,o�y
:l9` JI Ir L1 trV
[
ql
r.
Jr _ � k • �� r.9 � Y
,_ k'J' vy+.. 6r iq 1:4'.; Bei'j I ],� -•1 '!r 'r r 1 --'-�
G6
-�! + l .:'P�, r t *. - j r /r J''�•} - /r� ill
y -f' 7+ sl t fid' b'S: S " '' Y rf �• x
, y ! ff a� .
4 .� F1 �.I Y Prtf
Fti.a•c'"` { .. Ijly "`i • �'+ { r ':,s ! -^`+,� ) !. r t C ;- r r .`\ ° - riIl� y .r. i Ird' f
It �
a y t P '` s. nmhrsykE +r� • �, '� I� � _ • ..
o f f{ .. r i iS�•L.,' i i `' i - L 1 Eit� i q i�. u'�h� •y
E y0. `��..��V � � �J •, ,i G« � `~i`'���.. I r .1 1 I++r � '� t h�?84:
k J, • x r i. -- s l it �1
,
ftl 11
2'^Al
L.^ +!} `< f. ''sj-J t ' *y` �2•.:� um 4Wet
Irk i ..•i �'.}- If1 F�•r� E `� ° _i i• �' ',j` f a
rL _— L ` `' �' ,a -•-s^...2 % ,islt' IL. �r �r'Gr rn F
• Albemarle Road
9 + Is
�l q It r. .tom:y �r 11 _ ,4 w rf�.ss+� .•.
y�f ffy \V 1 •l �y {I ti f r l + 1..
t
,}1 4j ,i .moi• JT i 11 rr�'.11 ;: 'ro`"'�?;-may`' _ "'r,
w
1.
I
T
We_ �•'� l � {� '� '�4 � 1 ;�, if � I '•,, r s --
iiMarlwood Circle
- e t
t a � � a1�+1'+i:+_r`� t • . I �� C� s rY .,a � •< ` 1� y, -n s'^'A°. i kc H'-'�
ov
'!t y: ••. �`a l . l • �f r� i. ; 3r'j--•J
'._ ll � f r�,ti 33?;$; ' . . � : � Sl E �� r • + � r ,�"i{ , i.l
� y'r.. -'�
if
...+ _ 1 f l4µ li �!<'� l� ..~°i ' I-."`_'�1" � ' • I 'i�`��'•;
47,s$, south Marlwood Circle
Fefi g f T: n rs'i-'7 v IT'ryic'l�'et��c'ite
v Suh #
>' � • i - ! r l 1 � � •'. � _ .i t S } . A +1 °+� >�/ Y F .: t' r� � (I J : I y � � J � 1 ,�
� - • <. ri �.- +�4. ,�. �''S[y � r; ? �'1..' I� 4 ,� •?moi v�✓///� � �,`� / `� �� yy !j�^,^ f � �,�' i/`l.
rf '+ G. r �F< 11 :a; vl
'-ter • � L. � - 1 - r $ '� h �k`C. ir'.' ._'• ly rj ! ,v t 1 rf 1 ' 'C i
Lawyers Road
� i r • ? r a'+ c-' 1 y ... I 1 `-�• j ,,� s s � w � <,� • Int Ili ��.11.
;e' ` s r ��" ~ \� S'•.Y x M a :`•i+'r `•+� r ' 7 r ,y(
IS
t �� 6 rr.`a _ $:�.;.��i`k- •E 4 a '' '. �.3 e \ 1 ��::f • .v � � I � � " R+l. Or`��'a �9ht � I �'+ , , L
v-
flepe l I�- `� ' "y 9 3 � .:r 1{S r LJi�'r '`.G.. ••rr`,
X r 1J�' s.^jq 's{,� ls+��.�' ,''may h Jll`-t J 4J •fr 1 :.~J Legend
/ - 1 •,.-"� l li �rr�,e11:.� �. gy <...ff rf/� `_•,. Project Limits (124 ac.)
1- Sl �'l , . ,•�•�l 1 +Ir _ I"7� I a ^'•�. 1. �!
f 3z
I".a, 2,000 1,000 0 ~2,000 Feet
REFERENCE:
7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPI IIC USGS QUADRANGLE CHARLOTTE EAST NC (1991)
l 1y�.7. 1rf r<... -SIJ f 5 Ir•t - - ff.'r y�l. '.\� .Va .1\wti�Y
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 10/31/2016 USGS Site Location Map
CWS PROTECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2016-4094 AVH Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Charlotte, North Carolina
KMT WETLAND SERVICES, CWS Project No. 2016-4094
U:\2016\CW S\2016 Projects\2016-4094 Waverly Marlwood Pond and Dam Improvement\Ar GIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

C:\UsersWliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Marlwood Waverly\Revised JD and Permit 2017\ArcCi IS 2017\Figure4 NEW.mxd

C:\UsersWliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Mulwood Waverly\Revised JD and Permit 2017\ArcGIS 2017\Figure5 Altemative Design l.mxd

C:\UsersWliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Mulwood Waverly\Revised JD and Permit 2017\AmGIS 2017\Fig-6 Alternative Design 2A.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Marlwood Waverly\Revised JD and Permit 2017\ArcGIS 2017\Figwe7 NEW Overview.mxdl.mxd

WAVERLY DAM w
PLAN AND PROFILE
, g,
O
715
710
705
700
RIP
NCDO
695
690
685
715
710 k
M
N
a�N wQ'
GRAPHIC SCALE
w
zoz�ww
20 0 10 20 40
80
705
w
( IN FEET)
I inch = 20 ft.
9:6o
A o U 0.
U
k z
kn
i
z
700�Lu
W
! �Z
J. _1
N
695
EX
HW -1008 rn
a
w
ra
690
-CL
0a
a
HW E1
07 CID
00
r� z
W
685
W
FL:
O
ch
m
CTLn
(n
;a
-WEIR ELEVATION=699.60
WEIR ELE
+ o
z
0
ATION=699.28
.61
_^
I
w(f)
Q x
c�
o
I
N z
N
\
WEIRELEVATION=69
x
N
x
PROP GRADE
°
-� -
s
ALBEMARLE
RD.
\
I
I
LACE 104 TONS
AP
TYPE 2 GEOTE
OF CLASS B
TILE FABRIC.FX
°
\
\ \
;,
14;3
\
\
1
I
I
RCB
(TO RE
12 X 12'
AIN
PLACE 185 TONS OF CLASS 1
RIPRAP 1.5' THICK OVER 203
NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
SY
EX. 24"
ES
EX. 48" RCP
FES
\
715
710 k
M
N
a�N wQ'
GRAPHIC SCALE
w
zoz�ww
20 0 10 20 40
80
705
w
( IN FEET)
I inch = 20 ft.
9:6o
A o U 0.
U
k z
kn
i
z
700�Lu
W
! �Z
J. _1
3 []
695
z
0
a
w
ra
690
685
0
0
z
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 3+75 r m
log
NOTE:
\ 5 \
1. DAM EMBANKMENT FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE USED c y
OVER EXCAVATE VOIDS UNDER EXISTING FOR ANY FILL MATERIAL USED ON DAM AND I \ I
WEIR AND FILL WITH DAM EMBANKMENT SHALL BE PLACED PER THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
109-111-01 I 1
FILL MATERIAL PER SPECIAL WAVER Y SWIMMING CLUB INC.
PROVISIONS. 2520 PG 369
SEE SHEET 31-34 FOR
820 LBEMARL
SECTION VIEWS (TYP)
� / / � - - � � 11 1111 I ➢I I � Pep \
PROP DAM EMBANKMENT WAVE 11 1 I I 9 \
PROTECTION. 111 TONS OF CLASS B II I Ist
RIPRAP 1.5' THICK OVER 122 SY OF APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. POND � I II II �
KEYED IN NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE / DRAIN FROM AS -BUILT DATED / I II $1 I I I I
FABRIC. SEE DETAIL SHEET 7 4/22/1981. DEPTH AND SIZE i I II 1 I I I`o _ co
\1� UNKNOWN TO REMAIN / I II 1 1 �1 e
I al N
i [ffAS
13 LF OF ELECTRIC GATE �0j'4 III 11 I@ 1 cn a Q N w
WELL AS ELECTRIC MOTOR II $ 1� II cn m N F-
°qK°z, a. �� m�
6s 0
-- REPLACE 325 LF OF 6 HIGH BARBED 1 1 1 1 1 o
702-50]\ WIRE TOPPED WIRE MESH FENCE Pos / I Pp 1 \ cYP
PM REQ
or
°q
\ K \ \ PROPOSED 33 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP _ - x I 1
F/GR • , - , o - 1.5 THICK OVER 37 SY OF KEYED IN
k �0 702.50 ' • < ' • ° - - - NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC '02. k �x� c -Q ! `�1 I < 00 v mw �w
4. y _ • • a a - . • a 7 /� - - - ��x�x�x_x�x� K ATe� s II CY O Z 0 7
s- I 7t .9• .a •. 6,99 a .• . 1.4 r \ 03.27 - x�x x��x x�: x�x fypg0 / j 1 Z 04
O N 0. V
uM 30
/5»
.. 6 - J - EX. CHANNEL IS NOT TO BE
• ' • a 9g' - - - - - DISTURBED BEYOND GRADING LIMITS\ - - RM "-los
REPLACE 40 LF OF 6' HIGH BARBED 0+00 1 o = . • - _ - - _ _ - - - - _ - \� 0 46"8. "V //v �P
WIRE TOPPED WIRE MESH FENCE o ~-\\ \ \ "V 69.64 /
p � p �+00 � o o � - - - - - � ' � � - � � � m 0�r, � SDE t
\ o c / �` i \ SD�� �• �SDE SUE - SDE. - z M 66g.,8 S
p
SDE S SDE �r
PROP 101' WAVERLY POND WEIR ` \ p p o - . / �' i \\\\\ I - - r �0�.�
- i r / / / 0� / V�8 1 5\ x 20'rPERMANENT EASEMENT O
/ / / Cp
I r l
11
FIRST WEIR INV ELEV = 698.61 \\ p / , / / �/ �/ / �0 FOR STORM DRAINAGE EXIST 48 RCP
SECOND WEIR INV ELEV = 699.28 - - -1 o / / / / (�� I DB 18940 PG 459 21
THIRD WEIR INV ELEV = 699.60 IE - - - / / / / / / i ��o I wpp x�o 1 \ \ w
o
2+00 / s g /- /L
- SDE-- IST 24 RCP / r OVE E D ELECTRIC l
XX CY OF CONC. - - - - - orHE1T vrtl _ - �/� - - - - _ -SR �- S - w ' W
C.MYRTLE 3'� C YRTLE 4" o d68 J - I TIPLE \
ALL EXPOSED CONC. SHALL HAVE UT uT UT -° TLE 4„ C.MYRTLE 6» - coNe L _ - - t
STAMPED CONC. FIELDSTONE FACADE - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - uT - Ex-Hw- - MYRr�f OTHF TIUTI s
l _o _ - - - -rte - , -�" �ONC--u. - T_ / UT UT UT UT s., T� TE A Q
SEE STRUCTURAL - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ oR�Ro - - W*+ E - -u - - uT c.MYRTLE " > Exisr N
C - -�--G------- _ S/CN C.MYRTLE 5° / / _24" \ \
- - _ _ _ _ _
DETAIL SHEETS SX AND SX �U - - / -- C/RETE SIDEWALK G G G G------- ------- -__---- f RC =\ j j a
-e \CUTTER -- --- _ „ --- ----- / \
- - -� X -CB -108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AAS w�
\ � GRATE ®FL 703.43 � ----- ---- - ___-------- - - ---- ----- - ------ _ -- W i W
15" INV OUT 701.07 \ 2'-6" CURB & GUTTER EX -CB -1089 - - - - - - - - - O
\ PROPOSED 203 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP \ GRATE 0 FL=700.27 Ex-cB-loso EX -MH -1092 �J
PROPOSED 102 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP ' \ 15' INV IN=697.39 GRATE ® FL=700.25 / RIM -701-95
O
1.5 THICK OVER 222 SY OF KEYED IN \ 15" INV OUT=697.09 / ASLB E MARL IE D ® 24•' INV IN=692.11
1.5' THICK OVER 112 SY OF KEYED IN �Q � - \ 15' INV OUT=697.57
NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC \ \ U0.6 / 24" INV our=692.08
NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC _A _ \ x /
C14 U-)\ 110 PUBLIC R � a
_ _ \ (PAVED) c�
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT POWER _
POLE DURING CONSTRUCTION � / -EXIST _M H--
_ _ -- -
-� ----- RIM=700.80-
- i - - 8° INV. IN=690.79 - - - - - - --
-ExrsT 8" PVC SS - STREAM CHANNEL s � /' - - - - - - o EX -DI -1088 _
i 5S 8' V. OUT=690. ZZ x X09- - - - - - -GRATE=699.49 _
�- S �- n �
U AS -BUILT PLANS \ - 699.4 15 INV IN=695 z� -
c0 0
CIOd'

MARLWOOD DAM
PLAN &PROFILE `
695
cne • I �r
690
685
680
675
670
665
695 9
690 E N
ON
UaU,
Ntm W t�
W �D U
zoz�ww
685 GRAPHIC SCALE c o r 3 u
20 0 10 20 40 80 W W Z V1
aj
s� AcU u
U
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 20 ft. a i
680 W
Z
�S Z
W
W J
J. 1
3 []
675
z
0
a
n
670
665
0
0
z
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+75 c
log
oE�
NOTE: y
1. DAM EMBANKMENT FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE USED
Y�,
FOR ANY FILLMATERIAL USED ON DAM AND
Ai' ogD. Goy) N M � co SEE SHEETS 15-18 FOR I cn SHALL BE PLACED PER THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
P 109-251-17 PROPOSED DAM EMBANKMENT WAVE SECTION VIEWS (TYP)°GENE L. WYKE PROTECTION. 28 TONS OF CLASS 2 i- 2 1-1 o "and wf. JOHNNYE 0 WYI E RIPRAP 1.5' THICK OVER 31 SY OF I I
I
C ARD 0 SER
MB 7 PO 223 KEYED IN NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE % d w B -RAH R SEK w
MB 1698 PG 635 B 1 P 63 n u,
DB 3942 PO 963 FABRIC. SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 I o' I N r� I I tet' \
1305 MARLWOOD CIR. M I I 1 126 6 Gw �i Qm N 1 1 PD (t 1 I/ \ \/ o I
GUS, �U 333 RL 00 R. i��D Q " 1 /\
/ PK 2A I I
ao I 1
T/WEIR T'oo� o�,
W°o0 6,• ° / \ ` 677.50 w o 681.50 f I NU m
/I -b �� - f I I / \ \ 1 co
PROPOSED 19' MARLWOOD POND WEIR I - - -- J677 N
G� WEIR INV ELEV = 677.50 ' \ 678 _ r�o _ _ - - - - - _ I I / \ I 11 I I m
4' XX CY OF CONC w \ � o \ i — — 6� _ _ x 6 _ g x 5 R 2�„ / - - r11 \ tX s�9 / oN\ /I 1 ° N a ILL. �w N
\ 6so F GR 6 ER e oW I
�l 10 u
ALL EXPOSED CONC. SHALL HAVE 0 • . \ r /
v1 \ / —680 - sst - - - \ �a �� 681.50 6�0 \\ 1 \ / /4 �5" I / m
STAMPED CONC. FIELDSTONE FACADE SEE
STRUCTURAL DETAIL SHEETS SX AND SX ��` \ \ �,G� o
�„ Mpr_ I ° \�. • . 681 / A - — — r —E80 co I O
° `�; J6 P� P• o \ 1 _---- —_ / — — — '� ' I \ `U�
6SN F/GR w I o 4 0 _ _- �P — _-- LOD L I 1
j/ / 681.50 oPK 12 11 /— — I w I \I /II N I /RIC ARD/P169- 6.2ROSSER / I
�M a o 2� °� o _ \ PROPOSED 17 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP Pk 4„ I ��' a
1.5' THICK OVER 18 SY OF KEYED IN Cn P 8 �d wt/ B 7 PO � L. Ro SER
PROPOSED 33 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP oo - - \\ �, G I _/ MB 7 Po 223
1.5' THICK OVER 36 SY OF KEYED IN o - - _ _� NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - `� �{ ( / / DB 10126 Pc 635 I m Co
h NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC _ - - 6
/ 1(20 TIMIBER LAKE �R. 00 Q Ca
% 675— �t I / / / I O Z U 04 M
2�, o ° - o PROPOSED 59 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP �\ 1 I I % / I I ,9 �sv p� 04 o N a c- o
NW000 z Nc oR N\GK00 5' _ - 1.5 THICK OVER 65 SY OF KEYED IN I
1 N GKo 00 \ o I I I I Bye -'0p I °I
PROPOSED GABION WALL NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC Wo II x68o 5 I o I I a I o\ �XNSPR 9�, P
w l to I 1 )p OF CN
SEE DETAIL SHEET 7 2' I _ 10 5 I� 1 I I ;4 oaE I
0° �� R PR pSV0 � ll� v
• _ gZR CSS
5_ 2 "6� v o`' 6�3 r_,r�� I 11 1 ¢cGR `o�z-BOR, I
-6� ae �,!� I IBNRI
) -p \N Z-
\ cAeioN wAL� o`1/ -� 67_ 2� �N REPLACE 25 LF OF ���
/ cn o o �6� 5 a
o �2 -6 CURB AND GUTTER,__ CLDS 10.17A I -O> 7 Gq�o
= S„ 'Cl cd 6v o S SDE QO7 # / N 0Pk I o I cKoRl 15„
I R ,18 P)\vE 2 G M 6 X MANEN MPP _ 40l
7\v S' o o ERp
POPDP / NORM DRAIN EASEMENT �- ANENT
MoSP GUM�P. M o_�� ���Q DE_ / I o
Og 8000 PG 570 �860M S 6 I I I \ \ m
� STp
UDGEMENT) P\N 10 — �S 2 \ — — — —�_Zz��L
S� S6RAIN aE CP E
I EXISTING RIPRAP TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED \ / NE a' ° PN ° 5, o W - - _ _ _ - _ - \ / `7 �I a/
4' ANDRML EX W-10 i
W 68D? (70 X
S' UM N' \ INV=
�68N ,66 — — — 7 8 I R\ v 6U 6�� _ EX/STcL�� S� / y I I I I 1 Q�VpO \ o A a Q O
D E�5 6� 7 �9 P ,E „ — —S — — — —— STORM VAULT Ny- S' i rT1 P /�
U ROM �N I . 5 _ _ N — 2� E
5 P MPPDE 'l NOGG 0" \N� OUj 66 EXIST 1 "VCP ioa „�BOf�C- ©— — RC — — — S % sl
�/
Dce_70 - - - -�€w OEN Q� W O
NM UM \ GUM 6 — a GRA ®FL --679.71 — — -�_— — — pe 7T 01'-gp�Y / r'1 I I
12 PDDR \ 1' \ 12 OPS _ \'` 5 I A -i
(o c17 r X=LoOR==- FL=677971 > — — — — — — PG 637 — I I
I I v✓ 24" INT 8 E — — \ W �II I \ \ = W r-
/ ° GU N\CK — — ui p x EX -DCB -1003 673.05 P — \ \ — - / / / 0 O 4
GEDP 2 8 D / �m GKATE OOR ®FL=679.88 L UL11P E IC — — — — G — / I \\ O O
EXISTING GABION RATE 0FL=679.90 w Exsj6go3 6 2 o�ERNEA° E E o Es
-
/ WALL TO REMAIN - - - - - - - - ( ow UMPSUr L 1 -669.07 Ro; N�. o° ,666 ANo M i���- - - - - - LAPP \ i o
GUM VM A°„ P N p i — — _ — — TO CULVERT N OE OTS 2'-6" _ ��� P ROX M 55
U; E - — _------- --_-- --) o cu ER �E� GR a
CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST GABION - - - - _ - - - - — W, D 5 - - - - - - _ A �% & currER �� NScl F CMAR�q� t
° _
BASKETS AS NEEDED TO CONNECT N°, sME� 4' HA R iL 1� RIM, RIECr A s
a - TMP ON3 TrE
_ —_— — — \ 6Q' �� I (BUO� #6�� E1.ISI
PERMPN EPSE�g4Z-fP�EFAL " C C HW — — _ ELIC 1g" NV IN=) 7°3 00 _ RC
GSM GUM INTO EXISTING GABION WALL EXISTING CULVERT RP R s- _ - PU 1s" I ED s _ 18"
` Qg �g1 — -- _ pMgNENrX e �� — — R/W IN,
oo TO REMAIN o eas Sr M ��o - - - - = P ED car, fD) SB
AIN o— AV INV (URI _
PGM846�SF 1D, — \ — — 2'-6'
(D\ \\\ - — _ o � c — �_— —CURB' n -5 I
W M o \O
Cn
rn
i EX-
HW -1002
00
2
to
O
LC)
EX -
-1004 O�
co
HW
a
Z 0
W
z
Z
ON000Z
PROPOSED
CONCRETE WEIR
O oo C"
I
+ r -
TOP OF
WEIR = 677.
+uo -00=
....
x
PROPOSED
PROPOSED CLASS 2 RIPRAP KEYED
I
a Q _
MARLWOOD
CIR
w
C/)
GRADE
Cn I --
IN
IN PER CLDS DETAIL 20.23
EXISTINGr
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
/-EXISTING
RIPRAP
PROPOSED
SPILLWAY
1.
GRADE
4G SPILLWAY FIRST.
RIPRAP
FROM EXISTI
695 9
690 E N
ON
UaU,
Ntm W t�
W �D U
zoz�ww
685 GRAPHIC SCALE c o r 3 u
20 0 10 20 40 80 W W Z V1
aj
s� AcU u
U
( IN FEET)
1 inch = 20 ft. a i
680 W
Z
�S Z
W
W J
J. 1
3 []
675
z
0
a
n
670
665
0
0
z
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 2+75 c
log
oE�
NOTE: y
1. DAM EMBANKMENT FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE USED
Y�,
FOR ANY FILLMATERIAL USED ON DAM AND
Ai' ogD. Goy) N M � co SEE SHEETS 15-18 FOR I cn SHALL BE PLACED PER THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
P 109-251-17 PROPOSED DAM EMBANKMENT WAVE SECTION VIEWS (TYP)°GENE L. WYKE PROTECTION. 28 TONS OF CLASS 2 i- 2 1-1 o "and wf. JOHNNYE 0 WYI E RIPRAP 1.5' THICK OVER 31 SY OF I I
I
C ARD 0 SER
MB 7 PO 223 KEYED IN NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE % d w B -RAH R SEK w
MB 1698 PG 635 B 1 P 63 n u,
DB 3942 PO 963 FABRIC. SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 I o' I N r� I I tet' \
1305 MARLWOOD CIR. M I I 1 126 6 Gw �i Qm N 1 1 PD (t 1 I/ \ \/ o I
GUS, �U 333 RL 00 R. i��D Q " 1 /\
/ PK 2A I I
ao I 1
T/WEIR T'oo� o�,
W°o0 6,• ° / \ ` 677.50 w o 681.50 f I NU m
/I -b �� - f I I / \ \ 1 co
PROPOSED 19' MARLWOOD POND WEIR I - - -- J677 N
G� WEIR INV ELEV = 677.50 ' \ 678 _ r�o _ _ - - - - - _ I I / \ I 11 I I m
4' XX CY OF CONC w \ � o \ i — — 6� _ _ x 6 _ g x 5 R 2�„ / - - r11 \ tX s�9 / oN\ /I 1 ° N a ILL. �w N
\ 6so F GR 6 ER e oW I
�l 10 u
ALL EXPOSED CONC. SHALL HAVE 0 • . \ r /
v1 \ / —680 - sst - - - \ �a �� 681.50 6�0 \\ 1 \ / /4 �5" I / m
STAMPED CONC. FIELDSTONE FACADE SEE
STRUCTURAL DETAIL SHEETS SX AND SX ��` \ \ �,G� o
�„ Mpr_ I ° \�. • . 681 / A - — — r —E80 co I O
° `�; J6 P� P• o \ 1 _---- —_ / — — — '� ' I \ `U�
6SN F/GR w I o 4 0 _ _- �P — _-- LOD L I 1
j/ / 681.50 oPK 12 11 /— — I w I \I /II N I /RIC ARD/P169- 6.2ROSSER / I
�M a o 2� °� o _ \ PROPOSED 17 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP Pk 4„ I ��' a
1.5' THICK OVER 18 SY OF KEYED IN Cn P 8 �d wt/ B 7 PO � L. Ro SER
PROPOSED 33 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP oo - - \\ �, G I _/ MB 7 Po 223
1.5' THICK OVER 36 SY OF KEYED IN o - - _ _� NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - `� �{ ( / / DB 10126 Pc 635 I m Co
h NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC _ - - 6
/ 1(20 TIMIBER LAKE �R. 00 Q Ca
% 675— �t I / / / I O Z U 04 M
2�, o ° - o PROPOSED 59 TONS OF CLASS 2 RIPRAP �\ 1 I I % / I I ,9 �sv p� 04 o N a c- o
NW000 z Nc oR N\GK00 5' _ - 1.5 THICK OVER 65 SY OF KEYED IN I
1 N GKo 00 \ o I I I I Bye -'0p I °I
PROPOSED GABION WALL NCDOT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC Wo II x68o 5 I o I I a I o\ �XNSPR 9�, P
w l to I 1 )p OF CN
SEE DETAIL SHEET 7 2' I _ 10 5 I� 1 I I ;4 oaE I
0° �� R PR pSV0 � ll� v
• _ gZR CSS
5_ 2 "6� v o`' 6�3 r_,r�� I 11 1 ¢cGR `o�z-BOR, I
-6� ae �,!� I IBNRI
) -p \N Z-
\ cAeioN wAL� o`1/ -� 67_ 2� �N REPLACE 25 LF OF ���
/ cn o o �6� 5 a
o �2 -6 CURB AND GUTTER,__ CLDS 10.17A I -O> 7 Gq�o
= S„ 'Cl cd 6v o S SDE QO7 # / N 0Pk I o I cKoRl 15„
I R ,18 P)\vE 2 G M 6 X MANEN MPP _ 40l
7\v S' o o ERp
POPDP / NORM DRAIN EASEMENT �- ANENT
MoSP GUM�P. M o_�� ���Q DE_ / I o
Og 8000 PG 570 �860M S 6 I I I \ \ m
� STp
UDGEMENT) P\N 10 — �S 2 \ — — — —�_Zz��L
S� S6RAIN aE CP E
I EXISTING RIPRAP TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED \ / NE a' ° PN ° 5, o W - - _ _ _ - _ - \ / `7 �I a/
4' ANDRML EX W-10 i
W 68D? (70 X
S' UM N' \ INV=
�68N ,66 — — — 7 8 I R\ v 6U 6�� _ EX/STcL�� S� / y I I I I 1 Q�VpO \ o A a Q O
D E�5 6� 7 �9 P ,E „ — —S — — — —— STORM VAULT Ny- S' i rT1 P /�
U ROM �N I . 5 _ _ N — 2� E
5 P MPPDE 'l NOGG 0" \N� OUj 66 EXIST 1 "VCP ioa „�BOf�C- ©— — RC — — — S % sl
�/
Dce_70 - - - -�€w OEN Q� W O
NM UM \ GUM 6 — a GRA ®FL --679.71 — — -�_— — — pe 7T 01'-gp�Y / r'1 I I
12 PDDR \ 1' \ 12 OPS _ \'` 5 I A -i
(o c17 r X=LoOR==- FL=677971 > — — — — — — PG 637 — I I
I I v✓ 24" INT 8 E — — \ W �II I \ \ = W r-
/ ° GU N\CK — — ui p x EX -DCB -1003 673.05 P — \ \ — - / / / 0 O 4
GEDP 2 8 D / �m GKATE OOR ®FL=679.88 L UL11P E IC — — — — G — / I \\ O O
EXISTING GABION RATE 0FL=679.90 w Exsj6go3 6 2 o�ERNEA° E E o Es
-
/ WALL TO REMAIN - - - - - - - - ( ow UMPSUr L 1 -669.07 Ro; N�. o° ,666 ANo M i���- - - - - - LAPP \ i o
GUM VM A°„ P N p i — — _ — — TO CULVERT N OE OTS 2'-6" _ ��� P ROX M 55
U; E - — _------- --_-- --) o cu ER �E� GR a
CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST GABION - - - - _ - - - - — W, D 5 - - - - - - _ A �% & currER �� NScl F CMAR�q� t
° _
BASKETS AS NEEDED TO CONNECT N°, sME� 4' HA R iL 1� RIM, RIECr A s
a - TMP ON3 TrE
_ —_— — — \ 6Q' �� I (BUO� #6�� E1.ISI
PERMPN EPSE�g4Z-fP�EFAL " C C HW — — _ ELIC 1g" NV IN=) 7°3 00 _ RC
GSM GUM INTO EXISTING GABION WALL EXISTING CULVERT RP R s- _ - PU 1s" I ED s _ 18"
` Qg �g1 — -- _ pMgNENrX e �� — — R/W IN,
oo TO REMAIN o eas Sr M ��o - - - - = P ED car, fD) SB
AIN o— AV INV (URI _
PGM846�SF 1D, — \ — — 2'-6'
(D\ \\\ - — _ o � c — �_— —CURB' n -5 I
W M o \O

MARLWOOD CIR. CULVERT
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
goo
695 cnc
690
685
680
675
18'
695
HW N
695
690
�
690
685
2000 0.
O
to
N
685
680
HW
680
675
2001
675
000 "AW
J
—
=0
IrZ J
U
N
>
H
U
D
00—
O
O
QQ
O�
N'
O XNO
Lu
O
O
Np
�—
NO
H H
N2
�O
Le
00
N3
„
=N
co�
FILL PIPE 1'
PE
TO PROPOSED
�: •- 1 .�
3 Q 3„
w W
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Han
A,
oos�No
mw7
= N
N =
r
-
-� -NONE
l I -
PROP GRADE
NO:
I
---------T\
PLACE 1 Ir TONS OF CLAS 3
-RACK OVER
,>rr-
VER
NCDOT TYPE 2
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
a
_
NC
OT TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC.
-•
• • •6"
/PRS -6
F OF
-
I 01.0319
------
a
APPROX. LOCATION
CHARLOTTE W
--
OF 6" WAIER
TER AS -BUILT
EX. GRADE
MAIN PER
64-007.
RELATE EX. SANIRY SEWER
T
PROPOSEE
8" DIP SANITA
Y SEWER WITH
_•.
•-
PROPOSED LOC
T10N OF 6" WATER
MAIN.
STEEL ENCASEM
NT PIPE (0.4'
F CLEARANCE)
DI -2004. PROVSEAL
MAINTAIN 2' C
ARANCE BETWEEN
WATER MAIN
695
695
690
690
685
685
680
680
675
675
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 1+75
700 9
N
695 o�
A"'�c00.i�z
W�DU'J? C
zoz�ww
.. �=w4K
W
c�or3u
W �
s� AoU u
U
z
r� Z
a
685
SED ENDWALL� Lu
ONCRETE DITCH W
J
J. 1
3 []
680
z
0
0.
E
ON n
675
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+25
d
z
log
9B9 L E �
y
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" VALVE AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE
EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. SEE
BOTTOM OF 12' X 5' RCBC = 674.16 CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
TOP OF PROP. 6" WATER LINE = 672.15 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 6" TAPPING SLEEVE. CUT IN SLEEVE WITH REMOVE 51 LF - EX. 6 WATER LINE REPLACE WITH
CLEARANCE = 2' MIN ` REMOVE 50 LF - EX. 6" WATER LINE REPLACE WITH 50 LF - PROP. 6 DIP (2) 6" VALVES AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE EX. WATER LINE WITH 51 LF - PROP. 6" DIP WATER LINE (PRESSURE„ CLASS
Vi 1 I WATER LINE (PRESSURE CLASS 350 WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS) UNDER PROP RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. 350 WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS) UNDER PROP 15 RCP.
1 I I TO ESTABLISH 1' OF SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE
SEE SHEET 19 FOR ROAD DETAIL 1 o.N i 9 X 5 RCBC. TO ESTABLISH 2 OF SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND , I If AND WATER LINE. SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON
AND ELEVATIONS 1_ zy WATER LINE. SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6 FOR CROSSING1 / SHEET 6 FOR CROSSING DETAIL. RECONNECT ANY DETAIL. RECONNECT ANY IRRIGATION OR METER SERVICES ENCOUNTERED. IRRIGATION OR METER SERVICES ENCOUNTERED.
I D
109-261-02 /
I HUBERT STYLES AND /
`O cn wf. MILDRED H. STYLES /
HW -2000 (STA. 0+50) r �^ I - HW -2001 STA. 0+90 BOTTOM OF 15 RCP = 679.13 0 / oN / CD
m DB 2793 PG 202 c
STAMPED CONCRETE FIELDSTONE STYLE o I 1 ° I STAMPED CONCRETE FIELDSTONE STYLE TOP OF PROP. 6" WATER LINE = 678.13 1808 MARLWOOD CIR. I / I °" / >., N
HEADWALL WITH HANDRAIL (CLDS 50.04A) I o I HEADWALL WITH HANDRAIL (CLDS 50.04A CLEARANCE = 1' / fl c °a
+ I N w w a w
SEE DETAIL SHEETS SX AND SX I NI p SEE DETAIL SHEET SX AND SX I / N
T�WALL = 681.75 _
T WALL = 682.25 o Lo LO LOD —�— LOD _�� U u Q
12' X 5' N INV = 674.82 ac I Ewsr 1s" PVC
a/
-� 12 X 5 N INV = 675.23 ---�-►----------- m
s ' - J wU a a SS -- o
v OD Wj OE ---- - / O
-- OE — �L S� of — 55 - N P S — ,OE -
0 0
co �' g W — po po � po P° o o Po / / / M /
` � W M /
109-251-17 = _ _ _
109-261-01 M=683.60
GENE WYKE, TRUSTEE OF THE \ I _ _ _ EXIST. 3.6H
x I KIM T. KOVACH ` `� MARLWOOD C s" iNv. = /
8" INV. 1 671.34
GENE WYKE REVOCABLE TRUST '6' ', r;,
DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2013 \ - 0 and wf. CONSTANCE S. KOVACH sp 4+00 so' PUBLIC x/w IR s11 " I our=67066 _ PL /
MB 7 PG 223
MB 7 PG 223 Mp � 5+00—
MB 1698 PG 635 1os2 m m
DB 28303 PG 316 I 1 5 DB 11014 PG 275 RADE—s817g
1305 MARLWOOD CIR. 0+00 0 1+00 1+40 1904 MARLWOOD CIR. — 15" INV IN=679,57 I z U w LL.
w
/ 0_ d Q Ca
—�I- - _ — - - -- - -- — — — 15" INV OUT=678.99 / O O 04
- - -- --_ 3 ,—_ r-----�\ — �° 04 p (n a U
-- DI-2004\� e 8 s----=--_ w a
\ = I 0+ 00 �_ �'" 5 +00 -=oma QUIT a� ¢
9L9 ld 15 � CP0 15" RC H —2006
o I �� CONNECT EX. 15" RCP sioN
�m s INTO DI -2004. /
/ PROVIDE OUT BETWEEN
�
P4
_0I \ 25' ' ,c��5� PROPOSED AND EXISTING
I �� o� / / CONCRETE DITCH F
PLACE 15 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP v i 00�° _ �0D PLACE 15 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP o r,; / oo� °
-4 ]PROPOSED DI -2004 NCDOT / / oe I PROP HW -20061.5 THICK OVER 17 SY OF NCDOT# 840.17 �0 AR I NCDOT 81, 1.5 THICK OVER 17 SY OF NCDOT � I ��IH A NCDOT 840.22 GRATE � � / E0 �4•' # �
TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. #
TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. \ I I b � I �� � C / Q � W
o \7u m aR / / a PROP DI -2005 NCDOT # 840.17
o ° �� �' / WITH A NCDOT # 840.22 GRATE I AAE-+ Q W
t7=7uX X 109-251-16 I '� <e
A 6.HANE A SULLIVAN O� �N / 09—?/62-01 A O
PROP 40 LF 12' X 5' ~ �) 3�� o z z 109-261-02 and wf. JESSICA E. SUL AN / // °� / �� and S ANE A ASUE LIV ,N (.z�
Qo u HUBERT STYLES AND MB 1698 PG 63 // a / / Z A/
11 RCBC BURIED 1' C� 1.03% I M / oo J J N wf. MILDRED H. STYLES DB 28203 PG 3 Nq o �° �/I �� / / C. / D 2` 698 P 9
109-251-15
B 2793 PG 202 1901 MARLWO CIRC oa / allos A w
JOHN H. STARNES I 180 ARLWOOD CIR. Ao) / / gpE1�
and wf. JANE S. STARNES I 40 IMBER LAK Q
MB 1698 PG 635 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6 VALVE AND CONNECT PROPOSED DIP TO / ROFp C) Q ~
/ �� I � \ Q [�
DB 6941 PG 135 I I I - 3Ss �� THE EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. g
1033 TIMBER LAKE DR. 109-251-16 I Lo 3Ad „s SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
SHANE A SULLIVAN�s1 3
and wf. JESSICA E. SULLIVAN I ) I z �� �S5
MB 1698 PG 635 :2<
DB 28203 PG 193 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6 VALVE AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE ~
_ EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. SEE GRAPHIC SCALE U
1901 MARLWOOD CIR. I � I '
CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
20 0 10 20 40 80
SEE SHEET U2 FOR
SANITARY SEWER w o
RELOCATION ( IN FEET) N
I inch = 20 ft.
000 "AW
J
—
1 1
r
•
■
E-330.
„
TO PROPOSED
�: •- 1 .�
r
-
-� -NONE
l I -
poll
NO:
I
a
_
c� • ••
-•
• • •6"
WATER MAIN
���mr•.
i
_•.
•-
•
•
- •
DI -2004. PROVSEAL
—•
700 9
N
695 o�
A"'�c00.i�z
W�DU'J? C
zoz�ww
.. �=w4K
W
c�or3u
W �
s� AoU u
U
z
r� Z
a
685
SED ENDWALL� Lu
ONCRETE DITCH W
J
J. 1
3 []
680
z
0
0.
E
ON n
675
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+25
d
z
log
9B9 L E �
y
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" VALVE AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE
EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. SEE
BOTTOM OF 12' X 5' RCBC = 674.16 CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
TOP OF PROP. 6" WATER LINE = 672.15 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 6" TAPPING SLEEVE. CUT IN SLEEVE WITH REMOVE 51 LF - EX. 6 WATER LINE REPLACE WITH
CLEARANCE = 2' MIN ` REMOVE 50 LF - EX. 6" WATER LINE REPLACE WITH 50 LF - PROP. 6 DIP (2) 6" VALVES AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE EX. WATER LINE WITH 51 LF - PROP. 6" DIP WATER LINE (PRESSURE„ CLASS
Vi 1 I WATER LINE (PRESSURE CLASS 350 WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS) UNDER PROP RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. 350 WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS) UNDER PROP 15 RCP.
1 I I TO ESTABLISH 1' OF SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE
SEE SHEET 19 FOR ROAD DETAIL 1 o.N i 9 X 5 RCBC. TO ESTABLISH 2 OF SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND , I If AND WATER LINE. SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON
AND ELEVATIONS 1_ zy WATER LINE. SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6 FOR CROSSING1 / SHEET 6 FOR CROSSING DETAIL. RECONNECT ANY DETAIL. RECONNECT ANY IRRIGATION OR METER SERVICES ENCOUNTERED. IRRIGATION OR METER SERVICES ENCOUNTERED.
I D
109-261-02 /
I HUBERT STYLES AND /
`O cn wf. MILDRED H. STYLES /
HW -2000 (STA. 0+50) r �^ I - HW -2001 STA. 0+90 BOTTOM OF 15 RCP = 679.13 0 / oN / CD
m DB 2793 PG 202 c
STAMPED CONCRETE FIELDSTONE STYLE o I 1 ° I STAMPED CONCRETE FIELDSTONE STYLE TOP OF PROP. 6" WATER LINE = 678.13 1808 MARLWOOD CIR. I / I °" / >., N
HEADWALL WITH HANDRAIL (CLDS 50.04A) I o I HEADWALL WITH HANDRAIL (CLDS 50.04A CLEARANCE = 1' / fl c °a
+ I N w w a w
SEE DETAIL SHEETS SX AND SX I NI p SEE DETAIL SHEET SX AND SX I / N
T�WALL = 681.75 _
T WALL = 682.25 o Lo LO LOD —�— LOD _�� U u Q
12' X 5' N INV = 674.82 ac I Ewsr 1s" PVC
a/
-� 12 X 5 N INV = 675.23 ---�-►----------- m
s ' - J wU a a SS -- o
v OD Wj OE ---- - / O
-- OE — �L S� of — 55 - N P S — ,OE -
0 0
co �' g W — po po � po P° o o Po / / / M /
` � W M /
109-251-17 = _ _ _
109-261-01 M=683.60
GENE WYKE, TRUSTEE OF THE \ I _ _ _ EXIST. 3.6H
x I KIM T. KOVACH ` `� MARLWOOD C s" iNv. = /
8" INV. 1 671.34
GENE WYKE REVOCABLE TRUST '6' ', r;,
DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2013 \ - 0 and wf. CONSTANCE S. KOVACH sp 4+00 so' PUBLIC x/w IR s11 " I our=67066 _ PL /
MB 7 PG 223
MB 7 PG 223 Mp � 5+00—
MB 1698 PG 635 1os2 m m
DB 28303 PG 316 I 1 5 DB 11014 PG 275 RADE—s817g
1305 MARLWOOD CIR. 0+00 0 1+00 1+40 1904 MARLWOOD CIR. — 15" INV IN=679,57 I z U w LL.
w
/ 0_ d Q Ca
—�I- - _ — - - -- - -- — — — 15" INV OUT=678.99 / O O 04
- - -- --_ 3 ,—_ r-----�\ — �° 04 p (n a U
-- DI-2004\� e 8 s----=--_ w a
\ = I 0+ 00 �_ �'" 5 +00 -=oma QUIT a� ¢
9L9 ld 15 � CP0 15" RC H —2006
o I �� CONNECT EX. 15" RCP sioN
�m s INTO DI -2004. /
/ PROVIDE OUT BETWEEN
�
P4
_0I \ 25' ' ,c��5� PROPOSED AND EXISTING
I �� o� / / CONCRETE DITCH F
PLACE 15 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP v i 00�° _ �0D PLACE 15 TONS OF CLASS B RIPRAP o r,; / oo� °
-4 ]PROPOSED DI -2004 NCDOT / / oe I PROP HW -20061.5 THICK OVER 17 SY OF NCDOT# 840.17 �0 AR I NCDOT 81, 1.5 THICK OVER 17 SY OF NCDOT � I ��IH A NCDOT 840.22 GRATE � � / E0 �4•' # �
TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. #
TYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. \ I I b � I �� � C / Q � W
o \7u m aR / / a PROP DI -2005 NCDOT # 840.17
o ° �� �' / WITH A NCDOT # 840.22 GRATE I AAE-+ Q W
t7=7uX X 109-251-16 I '� <e
A 6.HANE A SULLIVAN O� �N / 09—?/62-01 A O
PROP 40 LF 12' X 5' ~ �) 3�� o z z 109-261-02 and wf. JESSICA E. SUL AN / // °� / �� and S ANE A ASUE LIV ,N (.z�
Qo u HUBERT STYLES AND MB 1698 PG 63 // a / / Z A/
11 RCBC BURIED 1' C� 1.03% I M / oo J J N wf. MILDRED H. STYLES DB 28203 PG 3 Nq o �° �/I �� / / C. / D 2` 698 P 9
109-251-15
B 2793 PG 202 1901 MARLWO CIRC oa / allos A w
JOHN H. STARNES I 180 ARLWOOD CIR. Ao) / / gpE1�
and wf. JANE S. STARNES I 40 IMBER LAK Q
MB 1698 PG 635 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6 VALVE AND CONNECT PROPOSED DIP TO / ROFp C) Q ~
/ �� I � \ Q [�
DB 6941 PG 135 I I I - 3Ss �� THE EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. g
1033 TIMBER LAKE DR. 109-251-16 I Lo 3Ad „s SEE CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
SHANE A SULLIVAN�s1 3
and wf. JESSICA E. SULLIVAN I ) I z �� �S5
MB 1698 PG 635 :2<
DB 28203 PG 193 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6 VALVE AND CONNECT PROP DIP TO THE ~
_ EX. WATER LINE WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKING. SEE GRAPHIC SCALE U
1901 MARLWOOD CIR. I � I '
CHARLOTTE WATER DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 6
20 0 10 20 40 80
SEE SHEET U2 FOR
SANITARY SEWER w o
RELOCATION ( IN FEET) N
I inch = 20 ft.

E3 0� VJA �<G
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 163
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
multiple
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Charlotte Storm Water Services (Storm drainage easements, temporary construction
easements)
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Local Government
4b.
Name:
Ms. Erin Shanaberger
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d. Street address:
600 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f.
Fax no.:
704-527-1133
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Please see the attached Tax Parcels List
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.206042 Longitude: - 80.703703
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
124 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
McAlpine Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Catawba (HUC 03050103)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of residential subdivisions and Marlwood and Waverly Ponds with adjacent wooded bottomlands (Figure
3, attached). Typical on-site vegetation includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), box elder (Acernegundo), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), and red maple (Acer rubrum).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
6.45 ac.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
6,819 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Please see "Purpose and Need for the Project' section of the attached cover letter (pages 4 and 5).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see "Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters" section of the attached cover letter (pages 7 and 8).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes F1 No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: CWS
Name (if known): CWS
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
September 29, 2016 (SAW -2013-01583, attached)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Excavation
Emergent
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.62
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.62
2h. Comments: Permanent impacts to Wetland BB total 0.62 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Rip Rap Spillway
McAlpine Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4-5'
94'
S2 ® P ❑ T
Rip Rap Spillway
McAlpine Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4-5'
35'
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
129 If
3i. Comments: Permanent impacts to McAlpine Creek total 129 linear feet (0.03 ac.).
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Some minor, temporary impacts to open water as a result of partial de -watering.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse F1 Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See "Avoidance and Minimization" section of attached cover letter (pages 5-7).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See "Avoidance and Minimization" section of attached cover letter (pages 5-7).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
® Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: City of Charlotte Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Riparian
Wetland
Quantity 0.62 ac.
3c. Comments: Proposed impacts requiring mitigation total 0.62 acre of permanent wetland impacts, which CMSWS proposes
to mitigate for at a 1:1 ratio. The proposed ratio is based on the fact that the portion of Wetland BB proposed to be excavated
is a low -quality feature as assessed with NC WAM due to extensive sedimentation, edge effect, and flooding (NC WAM Form,
attached).
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No significant change to impervious area.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not result in future development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on October 5,
2016 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate species, endangered species, threatened species, or
critical habitat within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally -protected species
within the project limits or within a mile of the project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the white -nose syndrome disease.
Habitat for the NLEB includes forested areas of any age, rocky areas with boulders, and culverts greater than four feet
wide. Due to recent population declines of almost 89% caused by white -nose syndrome (WNS) and continued spread of
the disease, the NLEB now receives protection as a Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. A
Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
This project takes place within the Northern long-eared bat habitat range. However, there are no known mature roosting
trees or hibernacula recorded in Mecklenburg County per The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) published GIS
data. Therefore, per the Final 4(d) Rule the project is exempt. The USACE project manager will make the final
determination if consultation is necessary under Section 7.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on October 5, 2016 to determine
the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. In
the response letter dated October 20, 2016, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached. CWS also consulted the North Carolina
SHPO online GIS service and Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission database and found no historical
structures, buildings, or historic districts within the project limits.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710459300K
tt Digitally signed by
STORM Erin Shanaberger
Ms. Erin Shanaberger
WATER Date: 2017.07.31
Services
11:43:19 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Plat # Tax PID Owner
Address
1109-111-04 Richardson, Patricia A.
6000 Almond Road
2 109-111-05 Cancel, Eddie And Colleen Maloney
5936 Almond Road
3 109-111-06 Donato, Mark A. And Wife, Hope Shaner Donato
5930 Almond Road
4 109-111-07 Mitchell, Ivy D.
5924 Almond Road
5 109-111-01 Waverly Swimming Club, Inc. (N/K/A Waverly Swim & Tennis Club, Inc.)
8205 Albemarle Road
6 109-235-14 Lynton Place Homeowners Association, Inc.
7941 Quail Field Drive
7 109-261-02 Styles, Hubert And Wife, Mildred H. Styles
1808 Marlwood Circle
8 109-261-01 Kovach, Kim T. And Wife, Constance S. Kovach
1904 Marlwood Circle
9 109-251-17 Wyke: The Gene Wyke Revocable Trust
1305 Marlwood Circle
10 109-251-16 Sullivan, Shane A. And Wife, Jessica E. Sullivan
1901 Marlwood Circle
11109-251-15 Starnes, Jane S., Widow
1033 Timber Lake Drive
12 109-251-14 Souliere, Paul And Wife, Donna Souliere
1027 Timber Lake Drive
13 109-251-13 Brunson, Catherine Marie
1025 Timber Lake Drive
14 109-251-12 Dirks, Tyler And Wife, Caroline Dirks
1017 Timber Lake Drive
15 109-251-11 Harry Ernest Brown (Trustee) under the Family Trust of Harry Ernest Brown
1011 Timber Lake Drive
16 109-251-10 Rosser, Richard P. And Wife, Deborah L. Rosser
1333 Marlwood Circle

Nraflf-al (in J
October 5, 2016
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project; 2016-4094
Dear Aliisa Harjuniemi:
PAT McCRCIRY
ryoswmr
S USAN IKLT,7rT Z
..ie',C*1 erarti
NCNHDE-2322
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Suzanne Mason at suzanne.mason&ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
--"-'Nothing Compares
State o1FNorck C=Ll a I Depa Eml cfl,==Bal and 09� Rmauras
109 Fast am_- Street I Rale46NC27601
919407-730D

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
Project No. 2016-4094
October 5, 2016
NCNHDE-2322
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database
does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on October 5, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q2 June 2016. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
Project No. 2016-4094
October 5, 2016
NCNHDE-2322
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group 9 1 Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Hi? 5 -Very Species of Endangered
Low Concern
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
G3 S2
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at hftps:Hncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on October 5, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q2 June 2016. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-2322: Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project
October 5, 2016
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:36,014
0 0.3 0.6 1,2 mi
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Oelarrne, Int.—p, increment R Cary., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, MVS, NRCAN, GeoBase, ION, Kadastm NL, Ordnance Survey, Ewi Japan,
MEYI, EssiChina (Hong Kang), swisstopo, Mapmylndia. $i Open$Ueelmap
canlnbutora, and the GIS User Conxnunay
•rc.
HK kDF
�r rs. -� io•:iy. �.
'
Rd klarlwr
a
... w
i, rt1J '�11
4A 4�OYtli
app
%
NL
s
©
�
f r
�yrrr
7�
-
17
z
Ak[�rrmarla
p�V
rilern�annof' D'
.,
JAliaamaf{.rRd
JY•
.^.i
/7Ea31C
y
h.i tte
Eaetlantl Mall _
Sh ppcy
t�
Cenlar
N
_
�yti
g -
r
Four
Seawns
- -
�,
plt1
Fond
m
t
ry =
Allhrmarb
Ftl MMdb
w 5rrrmons d'K
�+
'c;•:,,
eairnan
f(nl-.
u711cd ,,,�' Narthras
ti
yam'
rrulrunlq �� -
fyei
Middk
�-"
., r.
41dN1
P.Hq
4V
J�` u
rl-1
r
a• r'y p•, r114�
If
MI n1 IMM
C i,7tanW
G -
L.+r C� HA
h1u Irw
S
ti
ti
,.40't's'
wE:r
+.s
October 5, 2016
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:36,014
0 0.3 0.6 1,2 mi
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Oelarrne, Int.—p, increment R Cary., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, MVS, NRCAN, GeoBase, ION, Kadastm NL, Ordnance Survey, Ewi Japan,
MEYI, EssiChina (Hong Kang), swisstopo, Mapmylndia. $i Open$Ueelmap
canlnbutora, and the GIS User Conxnunay

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
October 20, 2016
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvements, Charlotte, CWS 2016-4094,
Mecklenburg County, ER 16-1849
Dear Ms. Harjuniemi:
Thank you for your letter of October 5, 2016, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6011, Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

U.I. ARM -M C C IRP S C IF ENG INEIIRLl
W]ILN WGION DISI RICH
Action ILII: Sk'W-21]3-0:1983 County: MaakTonbuiig L.S.CI.S, Clued: CIl a rlatla 11k;1t, Wldddington, Mint Hl ill
NOTI1H1C AMON OB JURISDIC7lIONAL DETHRMINATION
Pnoperty Uminen: Clhatutotte Stonm Mlatei Sa nviaes ,I A Itbi : la aai Hinson
Alddrass: (100 F as -I I ourt] 9ti ec t
Clhaulotte, INC 3 8213
Tole1lhone 1, umt or: 704-33 f1-4419
Siae (acnes): ]130 acral Ncanast Tlawn: [It a rietta
1,earestWatenvvay: Mr Alpine [heck Cleonditlates: 39.2011042 TS, 3CA3703 WI
River Baa in HU C: Lamian [lalawl a Watcrshod; Sanloe Basin; HUCI: 03 0 5011C 3
p p p. a m south a 11 tuindla Lake 11rNe
Location dolma lion: 77 t ee uo osnd pna r� c1 st_le_t< located along Mc �llntne Clraela 1n„
to as utl of Marhvoa d Cinch and a nothen mt etio n both up and downstnda m of tlaY vet ;i Ra ad in Ohatula I k, Me(kb t burg
Clouu ty, No nth ( la ra lit a.
Indicail e)Mlieb of Me Ha llovmin 2 Apply:
A. Ilrelim inary Deil a rtrin ail is n
N Basecl onpaeliminanyinformation, theta ma31be watetis oitt e U.S. itialucling wetlands on the abaue des cid ad 11raj cot arca.
We sttarigly suggest you have this pi operty inspactad to detarmiti c the extent of I aparta exit of the A.rn y (DAI)
jurisdietioi . 'lo 1 a sansidorad fina 1, a jutriadictAnal detentnination must be vorifiad 131 the Carps. 'this ptaliminauy
cictarmination i, nal ati alpeilal to actionundertha RagulatarnPnegram Administiaiiva Alppia] nnacass (Referonco 33
❑Fla Part 331;. 1111)Iou miish, you may ni gluast an appnoved Hl (whish niay to appealed), b3I contacting the Catgls clisttiat
lar flrtt ei instruction. Also, you may pnovidc new irifotnnation alar fdrtt eti a owWeraiion by tic Corps to rce`ialuate the
.117.
B. Al p rovtedl Dell a rn in ailia n
TI enc ai e l` auigal ie Witana oil the United 9lotas muthui the al a ve (leictil c d gropert; I subject tithe 1 eimit racluiraments of
9 aatian I0 oil tha Rivers and Harl ars Act and I action zI04 afithe CIc an Wateii Alct. Lnless tl ene is a change in the lama on
aua published :i agulations, this datcrminailion ma31 ba raliacl ullon ibn a pirio d not to axcaecl five }lea its flatri the data aildlis
notifi+i 0 ioti .
Tl ene aie Antetu of the U.4. inaludiig wetlands an tl a abol ic deiciibecl pneHerty sul.icitto tl c pea mit iii quinements afl
8 aatian d C 4 a tl e Clian Wlateii Alcl (CWIAI)(33 USC � 1344). Unle is tl ene is a of ang c iii the lama on our published
regulations, tt i;i cletarmination mall be raHed upan fan a pe ria d nal io axcaed five 31ears Ecom the date Atl is notification.
_ We stt oti gly s ug € est yo u ha ve the AN tlanc Is a n ya un pnol a i tyl dc Lina ate d. Due to the s iza oil ; Ia un P n erty a nd/e :u our
pimetitwarlload, thf Calpsmay nit teWetoacaamlllishthiswatlaiiddelineationinatimalymannar. Fara marcIincly
deluiea lion, }lou n ay 49h to obtain a ea tisullant. 7o 1 e a(inside rad fina 1, any (IcIinc atian must t e nerifiecl by the Corl Is.
_ T he vii a to rs a 1 t1 e L. S. it i chiding AN tland s on your pnoja c 1 ara a hal ie l e en da linea ted and the da linea tion t as I a eii
vetifiacl b`1 the Carps. Vic stlongly suggast you 1 aiis this delineation survayod. U1 on aon pletian, this survcy sheuld I a
reviewed and n(nifiedbyttle Clorps. Clnae vcnified, this aurv431 will pnovicle an aacunte del ictian oil all anaas ;subject to
C)MI? jui Adiatian of your pi oparty whiel ,.provided thine is no ahango in tl a law ar a to pnbliihecl ragylatian i, ma;l ba
raliacl upan ibn a pariadnaIto axaead five years.
_ The viato:isofthe L.S.inch ding wetlands havf been delineated and surneyedand a:ieacounatalydcpicteclontllelllat
sig ned by the Cot 11 s P a g ula tony C IB01c ial identilia d l a Iovsi on . U nlc 19 the i e i; a cl ang e in the h mi of oun p ublishe d
uegulations, this datermiaatioti ma 31 be icliid ul anilona paaiednetto axicad five years fdom the date aAthis notification.
Theno ani no Aiate:i i a f the U.9., to u i(iluda mietlands, pne,i a ni an tha at ova dasarit ed prie ji at arc a "hiah a uc s ubic ct to the
pi rn it requi:uemc nts oil Sc ctia n 414 oil the Clea n Villata a Act (33 L SC I I zI4). U nla ss the iic is a change in tl a la w e .0 our
put lishcd ragulations, th's cletaiunination may i e no lied upon fon a penial not to ixce ed flue ;lea s fioni the date o1 tl is
noti0la a1 is n.

JAN :1Q.3 -a 153.1
7ha piopertyis loaaacl in an( (if tha 20 Coastal Coturlies subioatto wgylation unclenthe Caa„ital Aria ManagamantAlet
(CAIMA). You stoukl contaottho Diiiisian ol CoistaIManagementto (leiirmino thairnaquirements.
Pia cement oil dnadgad of fill n atenial w ithin waWn of the US and/au watlancls without a Dapartn rant of the Armil penn it ma71
4awi-1itute a viola tic naA91cation 3CI altlaClaan'fttenAct(13 UICIj 1311). if you have anyquestionsragarclingtIis
datim inatian and/on tl a Cloags negglate:iy pnagl am, please aeniaat Stave l ichafski at lL 1!-271-798(1, east. 23,1 e:i
sleven.l.lciaheisldCaa waca.ai my.mil.
C. Basliil for L flermlitifliionl:
Ile side contains imetlaucls as do lenmined 131 the 1987 Canpii oil finginaeiis Wet Ila aid Delineation N anual and ilhe
Re gie n s I Supple men 1 to tl a Curls ail Enitin ea ns We tla nds Ile line a tion Manua I: Rastenn Mountain and
Piedmc ni Ragion(vensiaa 2.0). These wetlands ane adjacent to stneam cl sin Dells local ed on the pro Icrit, I d a
ealhibiil indicators al ardia at 1 igh islaten manki. Tl e s tiara el anneI on the lnolarty "hi knoNln as” on "is an
unnamcd Ijiit u1ar,I ") te" McAlpine Cneekwl iah f7omm into 11lie llowen Catawba Waternshed; Santee lasin;
RUC: 43051103 Miver. U'A's to MOIII ine (lraetc flaw io tl a AltlanIia Ocean via MlaAllline Uraek, Sugar ❑i eek,
Ihe Oalawba Mivar and the I a nieii-(looler River. 'Cho Cataivi a River is a Sea Iion 1U navigable -ii -hail riven
beginning a it a Mt. Lland Lako Da in.
D. Ramarld :
E. Atlention USBA Program Flarilie ipants
This delineation/doteru (nation f as been conducted to identify the limits a f Carps' Clla an WIaten Aot juni:idic tion Bar tl e
pa lioular site idantifled in d is naquest. The clelinaitic nAdetein iratian DIE ynat ba validfoi tha watlind aonserwtion
provisions a f the Food 9leaurity Alet of 1919. if you or your tenant ani USHA Program I ariieipm ts, an aiiticil ate partiaipatian
in U SDAI programs, you ahoulcl iiegluest a car ifad vuetland determination fdanu the local oifiae a the i` atura 1 Pesouroes
(lonsenvation 9lenvioe, Urian to startir g wark.
F. Appeals Infamallic n ('Dhia information alllies only to approved jurisdieti[ nal de lenaninallions as indicated it
1. above:
Ihis casra;iilondenaeaonstituta.i an aplravecljuri,iiclictiana dew-minationfam the abatieclescnibodsiti. Ifyouobjactta this
de terrain alio n, you may ra qua st an a dmin'stna tive a pl cal un dan Cc ipai :uegu ation s at 13 CAR l ar 311. Enclosed you lAill find a
Ii otifcation a f Al peal Pnoaess (NAP) haat sheet and naquost Ilan apll eal (RFAI; form. I111c u nagluast to al peal this
determination ya a must sul mit a con pletod RFA farm to the fallowing a dchess:
USAIrmyCorlis al Enginaens
9loutl Atlaniia Diiiisian
Attu :.1 la ac n Sta c1a,13cvic vo OilficQ:l
60 1 arsytf Stlea l SAII, Poorn IOMI3
Atlanta, Georgia :1430:1-1801
In order Aon an RfP tc ba accepted b`1 the Carps, the Car11s niunt determine d a itis eamplate, that it maets the cnitaria for
a ppa a 1 under 33 C IFr part3 31.3, and t1 Et it t as ba en re ca iva d by tha Divisia n Oilfia c within (K day3 of tha date of The I\ Pfl .
Sl ould you decide to subn it are RAA Jorm, it must] a neaeived a1 the above addres i by
I It isnot neaamaq to sul mit an RFA 1 ikrm to tl eDiviAi Office if you do uof a 1 jeat to tl e deteimir ation bi this
a ora capon det ca.
/A
Coigl914q ulatory C18Fzaial. K '
S c ve chefski
lin uc f7ata a11Jfl: Sept ambia 29, 20;1(1 ExI irotian I ate: rya

I AW -f C 13-C 158:1
11he VOlining on Diiinii t i9 committed to providing tbi 1 igheit level oil suppor la the public . Ta 1 alp um emira we
i anlinue to da so, phase complata ouiu Cus]omer Salij-ac lion Survey, loaalled online al
htlp:i�hie u� lata ry.0<ac eniiivay.comi/l.
Copy furniihad:
Chiegg Azrlenionn, Carolina Wetland Rrvises, Inc, SM E Westing] aurae Blvd, Charlotta, lV C X T11

1 AW -701:1-C 158]
Apl lioant: Charlotte Ile aim Wa 14 r S( rvih (: i / A -I In: File Numl a:i : SAVII-SAIW-2013-01583 Date: September I S, 2011 (1
ba ac Blinson
Attached is: 1 See Section below
LJ
IT ITIAII PI40FFE F EII PHRNHI (Standard Permit or Letter a f permission)
A
❑
PR CII FERIID PHRNII71(Standard Permit a n Ile tte ii of permission)
13
❑
PERMIT I]ENIAII
CI
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL EIETHRMINAI7ICIN
11
MI
PRELIMINAim JURISDICTIONAL DETHRMIIVA'IDOr
E
���U.s�O-s- 1.. .�ry ^`;v' �"�� x�x�r ^:-, "`5 �':Y ,� �r ��" N �✓ '� - ecus 3r� r F��c*w a„^.0 t.�.�. ��,. �:.
N ello�gdenrltsotiltaiidttftc�hsegadittgnadustra er�pfieal�eboedecllgn�
s-
���;dc�i�i�t=tat ln�orn�atlp� ma�"1�,e�brind �t��ttl, ££wry us��� arrr��llMrss�c��lsf��va]�o�/Re;g�latc���'�o raun�ndPer�tts �s�� �i�
A: INITIAII HR[IRRIMEE I EAMIT: 'lou may, ac( pt it r of j( (11 to the p( rtmi I.
ACIC IHI'M Ifyou naceincd a c tandard Permit, }lou may ai8 n the hermit daeumonl and raturn ii to tl a distdol ertgincu:i far final
autl orhiatior . If you reaeived a Letter of Petr; i43ion (110P), you nay accept the LCIP and your vsio:ik im authaniaed, dour
mill nature an the &andat d Petmit at acaeptau ca of the IICIH n ears that you ac( ept tl e parmil in ilm entheb , and miiaiiie all
rights to al peal the llurmit, inahtding its tern said conditions, and apllrailed jurisdictianal (latenmina lions assaeialad wish tl e
porn it.
OBJECI7: If }lou e 1 juct to the ll a:i mil d&anda d o LOP) because a f c erlain teams and conditions ihet ein, you may rieglues t
lhal the hermit be modified aceordingl;l. You mu,it eoml late Section F of this form and relurn tl a form 1lo the district
engineer. Your e b'eeiions must benecei+ied bi the district anginea.i wilhir (10 da}ls e fthe (late ai ihis notice, an}lou Neill
iloi feit your right to appeal the I ermit in the future. Upon raceil t of yourn letter, the dish ret engineer will evaluale }lour
oliactions and may: ija; modifj the llarmii 10 address all of your aancams, (I ) niadify rho permit to ,ddtesm same of your
of jactions, or do) no'l modi 1 the I ermit hailing determined That the parniil should be issued as previously Writlen. Alf ler
ovalua ling ya ui objeations, the distriiat enginaer will send you a pt ollfene(I hermit ibn your nocom We ration, as indicated in
Soation H belcw.
B: PF OFFSRED PHRMIT: Nou niay a ccapt oti al peal the permit
AICCIHIH Tl: I1I _lau iueaeived a Star dard Permit, you niay sign the permit docun ent and nett rn it io tho distriet anginuen foci fmal
aulhoriza lion. Irl you :ueceived a Letter c f H ormimsion QLOP), you ma}l aaaellt the LCIP and Ila u:u work is autl onized. Your
signature on tte Standard Permit or aacalltanee oillhe LOP moans that ,lc u accept the fletmil in its anlimly, and waive all
nigl is lo appeal the permit, ineludin> its terms and conditions, and al prove(I jui isdialional detarrainalions associated viiilh the
Herinb.
• AlPPEAIL: If you ahoose to dcolin e the p:iof(i lad 11arznit i ItandarcI od LOP) because e faertain terms and (Ionditiana theteir,
}lou may all Ileal the daclinad permit undo tl a Clc ips of Engineers Alda inistnative AIppoal Puocass by aomplating Section II oil
tl is Jorm acid aend irig the fans to the divimien enginear. 11 is Jot court t e reoaivod by tl e division angineen within 60 days
af'Ihe da I oltl is notiue.
(1: PERMIl IIEI\ IAL: )1 o u ma}1 apll a at tl la do n ial of a permit ur den the Corps of Engineers Adn inistrative A 111 pea I Pro cess by
co n pleting I a ctia r lI a f tl is loam a nd sending the fa nn to the d ivn is n eng mea r. Thio form n1 ust I e rea eivo d by tl Ie division
enginearwithin 6( da, is olIhe data of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURINIDIC IT 101` All DE]MRNIfNA ITIC IN: )I a u mal l ae c ell t a r a ppo al the approved JII c r provide n ew
informatio n.
• A(ICHPI. You do no l need ilo no lify the Clorps to as co11tan appiovod JD. Failure to notit)l the Clorps within CIO days of the
data of ibis notice, means that }lou aacapl the appnovad JD in its entirety, and waive all tights lo all peal the appnovocl M.
a APPEAL: If you disagree with the apHra�ied JD, }lou may al l cal the allproved JD undo a the Clorps of Engineers
Administrative AlHpeal Process by acmpleting Section Il ofiIth lata and sending the form to the district engineer. Tl is Morin
must be received t )l the clivi ion engineers viithin 60 clays oiltho (lata ofihis notice.

9 AW -7 0 11-0 1581
E: I RE LIMINAIRY JURISDIC ITICINAL IIETBRNUNAIIICIN: N au da r of nead to respond to the Carl rl s meg ai ding tt e
pralitninagi JD. The Pnelin it aryJD i9 not appealable. If you viish, you niay requemt an appnovecl JD (whiah ma31 be appealed),
by contaoting Vhe Clorpm dimtriat for furlhej instruction. Alma you niay l ravide new itila mn alion tbn fumthen aom idenatian by the
Ooips to neavaluate tha JL1.
xsty F
+.. '_ g �.
.*P
E�L�
Sn��l1ATT�CREDE
RHAICINS F(R All PEA IL OR OHJUCTIIOI` 9: (Describe youri reasa ns :b r appealing the dea isia n or your a t jeo do nm to an initial
puafijauad 1 a iimil in clear concise statement . Nou ma31 atlaah addillional information 1011hi: fermi to alariBI where you€ tea at s or
objeations are addressed in tl u administrative me co( d
AEILIIIICINAL INFORMAIIICIN: The appeal is limited to a i evie w of the administrative record, the Ca mlls memomandum for 1lhe
recom(I c flhe appeal conlarenaa or maeling, and any supplamer tal intbrimation that the leiiiew alliaan has dalarmined is needed to
clarify tl e admini:lrative neaond. I, either tl e appellant non the C la rlls n ay acid now inlbnmatia r of analyses to the racord.
Hovieva , you may pnovide additional information to clarify tl e loaation a f info umalion tt at is aheady in the administrative
rieaa rd.
4. O1>\IT' QE Cb TAC T FC)R UES O
If you haveglues1ion! regandiligthis deaisiat and/or the If you only ha ve questions regarditgthe appoalpro aess31oumay
alIeat pioceamyou may eanlaal: also contact:
Dig Iriet Dnginear, Mlilminglan Regulalor31 Divieiicn, M. Jlason Steale, Aldministaaiive Apt aaI Peviaw Clf1aer
Atdn: Steve Kiahetlshi CIESAD-PIICI
878-27:1-1981 ax11.114 U.S. Army Carps oillinginecim, Joulh Altlant]a Division
f fl Form31th Street, PJoa n l OM 15
Altlanta, Gac gia 30301-83al
PI a ne: [phone]
RIMA CIF ET TRY: Noun s ignatura belcw gran 1s the iiighl oil entlyto Clonp;a of En€ inears personnel, and any gwiernmiont
aonaultanis, to aanduetinveatigationm of the l ra joct site (luring the course altha aligeal pne cess. You will] a pnovidud a 15 da31
notice a f any site investigation, nd will have the opportunit to participate in all site investigations.
Nala :
' la to pha n e nun ben:
Signature al appellant or agent.
Hor appcalm on ]Initial Piioffered Hermits Mand 11 is iloiin to:
Di'illrint Engineer, Mlilmington Ragulallot- Divisic n, Attn.: Steve Islieh4%ki, (19 Datilingllon Avenue, NNlilmingllon,
No tnlh Ca nohna 23 X10 3
HorPanmill denials, Ireflleced PetimiIs and oppnovad JurbidietionaIDeis liminai4on,m sei d this ilorni to:
Division Dnginear, Clommandeti, U.8l. A1ini31 Rnginael Division, South A1Iasilie, Attn: Mr. Jamon S le4h,
A Idni iti is11 ra tiva Appea I Off c es i, CE SAII-IMCI, 60 Forsyth SU ie et, Hoorn 1OM15, AI la n I a, Goo tigia 30303-3801
Hhoue: (414) 5162-51;11

A711ACHMRN T
PROL IMINARY JUS ILIDICTIONAL DRIIBRMIN AVON RORM
BACKGROL N v INRORMA710N
A. RORORT COMRL EIIIOH DA119ROR RREL IMINARY JL RI�cIL1IC11IIOP AIL
DBTORMINA710N (JD): 71-15-' 3
B. N AIME AND ADDREiILI OR RERSON REQUE11-11N CI RR13LIMIN AR) JD:
Charly tte-N ( cl fen k ur913 tc rm Wa ter Sennii e s
PC C: N r. Is aaa Hina on
600 Eait RonrtP Street
Charlotte, N4 28702 _
C. UISTRIC7 ORRICE, RILE N AIME, AND NUMBEIR: Wilmiingtan Divtiucil
D. RROJ9C111 LOCAIION(S) AN 13 BACKGROL N D IN F ORMA710N:
ilL SE TH 9 AI11TAICIF 813111ABLH 110 111OCIUMEN7 M UL111RLS WATERBODIBS
AT 11IRRER9N T SITHS)
Silate:NC . Clouni)llpanish,bonough: MEicklenbung Ci -1y: Chanlotle
CEinlEin coondinalEis 01 siilEi 11lat/long in deguee decirrial lormat): I al.33.'e011042° N,
Lang. 80.74170;8° W.
L nivEinsal Tian sveiisa Mencalor:
NamE1 of neanesl watenbody: McAlpine Cli lek
Idenlify Ilestimate,' amounil o1walens in 1hEi uEiview tinea:
Non-wErlland waters: E1,819 linean-leel: Z-20' widilh (Ifil and)or 2EIA7 acnEis.
Clowau(lin Criss: R4SB4, F 5L E, F L E 3
Blneam Rlow: REinannial, InlerrrTHEini
Wetlands: 61.13 acres.
Clowandin Class: PF0'IA
NamE1 of any wa-len bodies on thEi site lhal have beEln identified as SEICIion 10
wateiis:
Tidal:
N on -Tidal:
R. REVIEW ROWORMRO ROR 1111E E% AIL UA710N - CIF RCk AL L 7F AT
ARRLY):
❑ CIHicEi (DEisk] DeilEinmination. Date:
® Rield 110Einminalion, Da-le(js): Api it 5 and 10, and May 13 and 1z , 2013
-1. The Corps of 9ngineeiis bEiliEives -Ihal -It eiie may bEi juiiisdiational wallens of 1hEi
L niilEid Slales on 1hEi subjEict si11Ei, and the pEinmii applicanil on othEin affeclEid party
who nEiquEis'led 'II is preliminary) JCl is hEineb)l advised of his on het option to

requo3t and of lain an appnovEid jurisdicticinal delerminatian (JD) foil that 9018.
NEiverl heless, thEi peuimit applicant on oil ar peri on wha reigL eisllEid chis
preliminary J❑ has declined 'lo exencisEi thEi op -lion 11ci ablain an approved JO in
this instance and at This tirriEi.
2. In any circurristance whone a pEmmit applicanll ob-lains an individual penmil, cin
a Nationwide GEinEiral Permit (N WR) or crlhen general pEirmii venilication r8quiring
"pne-conslnuclion nalilicaition" (PCN), an nequasts vanifiaalion lar a nan-nEipanting
NWFI on alhen genEinal penmil, and 'Il a penmit applicant has nal nEiquEisled an
appncived Al flon thEi aclivilly, the permit applicanl is l areby made aware of the
1<dlciwing: (1) thEi penmil applicant has EllEicted to soak a pEnrrriill authanizatian
based cin ai pnEdiminary JD, wl ieh does nai makEi an of ficial dErlenrniinallion cif
junisdictianal wa'IEns; (2) that 1hEi applicanl I as the opilion to nEiquEisl an appravEid
JD baloim accepting the 1Emms and canditions al-Iha penmit authariaaiion, and
That basing a pEinrriill aullhanization on an approved JD caL Id possibly rasul-1 in IEISS
compEinsalciny miligallion being 118quined an difiEment special conditions; (3) tha-1
the applicant 1 as t1 a righ-1 la request an individual permit rather Ihan accepting
the teiims and condi-lions cit 1hEi N WF an alhEn genEna l penmit aL thoriza,lion; (4)
that the appliaan-I aan accept a permit aL thoniza-lion and -II ereby aignEia 110 comply
with all the 'lenms and conditions cif that pEirrriii, including wl alevan miligatian
naquinemenls the Conps I as determined i(i be nEice9sar) ; (5)11 a1 underlay ing
any activity in naliaince upcin the subject penmit aulhonizaiicin withoull neques1lingl
an appnavEid JD constitutes 11 a applicant's acceptance a1 t1 a use cif 1hEi
preliminairYl JD, bull Iha-I eilhEin -lonrni oil J❑ will be pncicessed as stun as is
pmaticablEr (5) aacepling a pEirmill aullhanization ((3.g., signing a prafened
individual penmit) or undEirtakingl any aciivil)I in iieliance on any flcuim of Clonps
penmit aulhuniza-lion based on a pneliminany .ICI conslilu-les agneemEinl that all
wetlands and tither wa1En badiEis on the site affeciod in any wary by tha-1 activity
ane judsdiational walens of the L niled %'EIta-lo3, and precludes any c1 allenge to
s uch jL nisdiclion in any administiialivEi on judicial compliance on Einlcincernarrl
action, ar in any adminislnarlive appeal an in any Rederal court; and (1) whEithEir
the aipplicani elects i(i use eiihen an approved JCI ar a pneliminar) JD, -II all J❑
will be pnocEissed as soan as is pracilicabla. RurihEin, an appraved JCI, a pncifiered
individual pEnmii (and all tenms and condillions canlained II enein), or individual
penmil denial can be adminis'Inaiively appealed punsLiant to 33 C.F.R. Part 33'1,
and Iha-I in ain)l adminisinative appeal, junisdiclianal issuEis aan I e raised (see 33
G.R.R. 3.1I1.5(a)(2)). 111, during Thai administrative appeal, ii becomes necessany'
-la make an cifficial clatarminatian w1 Edhen CIWA junisdiction Exists cIVE111 ai s ite, on
-Io pravide an afiicial delineaiicin crl junisdiclianal watEins an the site, thEi Clanps will
pnovide an appnoved Al to accarnplish -II all nasult, as soon as is pnaaticablEi.
This pnelimina iy JD ilinds that 11hene "n ay, fle" waters o-1 the L n itad 9layles on II e
sE bjacl pnojeci sitEi, and idenfflies all aquarlia isatuiies on the site t1 all aauld be
aflecled by the propassed activity, based an the follawingl irrlonrriation:
4

SIL RRORTING DATA. Data iiaviawec ficin preliminary J❑ (check all thail apply
chEicl,ed VEims shauld bei included in caisE1 iilel and, wf ene chEickeid and
nequeslEid, appimpdately nekirence souncEis bEilcnrv):
® Maps, plans, plots an plal submillEid by an on behalf all -I he
applicantkcins ulleint:
FK Data sheens pnepareWs ubmitleid by cm an b0hal-1 ail ilhe
applicant/cons ullanl.
❑ Offia a cancurs wilh da -la shEiels,ldeliwalian 110par. .
❑ Office daeis nail cancun wilh da'la shfleilsldeliwalian nEipar
❑ Data sheets pnEipared i y the Carps:
❑ Conps r avigablEi waleirs' sludy:
❑ U.S. Geolagical SurME1y F ydncilogic All las:
❑ USGS NHD daia.
❑ USGS 8 and '12 digil HUC maps.
® U.S. Clecdagical SurME1y map(s). ClitEi scale & quad name:1:24 ,000,
ChanlcilI la E asil, N Cl, Dal ed 1991.
® USDA N ailunal ResauncEls ClansEmva'lian SEirVice Sail SunVEry. Clilaiion:
Mocklenbung Caunly Sail Surueiy.
❑ Natianal wellands inveniloryl map(s). Clile narna:
❑ S1a'leull_acal wEitland inVEmtaiy rriaplls):
❑ FIEIMAIRIRM rniaps:
❑ 100 -yeah Rlaadplain Elevalion is: iIN atianal GEi(ideicliC \ er ical Dail um
all '1929)
® Phatagraphs : ❑ Aeuiial (INamei & Dale):
ar ® Olhen jP ame 81 DailE1):SilE1 photognap[ s ail welland aneas
IjApril and May, 20'13).
❑ PiiEiviaus delEinminaiicm(Is). FlilEi na. and dalEi of wipanse IEfltell:
[10-11 en it iarmatian (plEN3a specityJ):
IMPORTAN 11 NOW: The inicnimatian recardad cin this form ham nail
neiceissaiiily becin Ni eniiicid b V thea Clar Ei and shoo Id nat b e nelicid u Pon icm
lailcm jurisic ictianal daterminaticins.
061'15,1'13
Sig tune and dailo of Signalure and dalEi all
Regulalan�l F najEiat Managen pensan nequfisling pnelimiinaN J❑
(REICQL IREID) dFIBQL IRS[], unless obtaining
the signalure is impiaclicable)
3

Site
ltumkall
La1liltide
longilude
Clowardia n
Cllass
Estimated
E ntounll of
Aquallic
Resotlnce in
Review Aeea
C le ss of Aqua-lic
Resounae
Stream A
N35.200488°
W80.705357'
R4SB4
229 linear feet
non -section 10 - non -tidal
Stream B
N35.203838'
W80.703123°
R4SB4
914 linear feet
non -section 14 -- non -tidal
Stream C
N35.206947°
W80.703883°
R4SB4
141 line a r feet
non -section 10 - non -tidal
Stream D
N35.207400'
W80.70,I311 °
R5UB
3,691 linear feet
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Stream E
N35.213456'
W80.709385°
R_',U B
297 linear feet
i as -se ction 10 -- non -tidal
Stream F
N35.213195'
W80.709589'
R5UB
339 linearfeet
non -section 10--nen-tidal
Stream G
N35.19 3:1111'
W80.704691°
R5UB
151 line arfeal
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Stream H
N35.212548'
W80.704589°
R5UB
336 linear feet
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Stream I
N35.208579°
W80.703846'
RfUB
310 fine arfeet
non -section 1C --non-tidal
Stream .l
N35.206096`
W80.703378°
R5UB
2! 4 linearfeet
non -section 10 nan-tidal
Stream K
N35.203958'
W80.704800'
R5UB
214 linear feet
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Wetland AA
N35.203731°
V 1811.794911'
PF01A
0.3 acre
nun-sqatiau iD -wetland
Wetland BB
N35.204228'
W80.703893°
R FOIA
3.02 a cre a
i an -se ation 10 -- wetland
Wetland CC
N35.213519'
W80.708933°
PFOIA
2.62 acre;
non -section 10 - wetland
Wetland DD
N35.212142°
W80.704964'
PFOIA
11.1 acre
non -section 10wetland
Wetland EE
N35.212698'
W80.104850°
PFO1A
0.09 as re
nca-section 10 -wetland
Pand A
N35.211269'
W80.706745`
PUBJ
18.03 acre:
non -section 10 -- 11 a -tidal
Pa nd B
N35.203055°
W80.704534°
PUB3
11.79 aara
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Pond C
N35.201T E'
W80.704561°
PUB3
5k;1 acre,,
non -section 10--non4idal

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Amendment the the Jurisdictional Determination Request CWS Project No. 2016-4094
Amendment to the Jurisdictional Determination Request

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Amendment the the Jurisdictional Determination Request CWS Project No. 2016-4094
A. Jurisdictional Boundary Map (Photographs A and B)

C:\Users\AliisaHmjuniemi\Desktop\Marlwood Waverly\Revised JD and Permit 2017\ArcGIS 2017\Figure A_ Revised JD1.mxd

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Amendment the the Jurisdictional Determination Request CWS Project No. 2016-4094
B. Jurisdictional Determination Request (Amendment)

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (7D) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug lato!yPermitPro rg am.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
Albemarle Road and Nathanael Greene Lane, Charlotte, NC
City, State:
Charlotte, North Carolina
County:
Mecklenburg
Directions:
Albemarle Road and Nathanael Greene Lane, Charlotte, NC
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple (Please see the attached list)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Chadotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services.; POC: Ms. Erin Shanaberger
Mailing Address:
600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number:
704-336-3927
Electronic Mail Address I :
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
W1Other, please explain.
Charlotte Storm Water Services (Storm drainage easements, temporary
construction easements)
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: ChadoXe Storm Water Services (Storm drainage easements, lempmary mnavuc�ion easements)
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-336-3027
Electronic Mail Address3; [e-mail]
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
' If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print) Date
STORM
Digitally signed by Erin
"CharlaffnMwklenburg
WATER
Shanaberger
Date: 2017.07.3113:43:12
Services
-04'00'
Property Owner Signature
E. .IUR[SDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
W1I ant requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoU,S (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 124 acres
IlI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form 6.
� 35.206042 -80.703703
I V I Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay
VLarge and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
VAerial Photography of the project area
W1 USGS Topographic Map
FZI Soil Survey Map
5-71 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
e See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
❑✓
❑✓
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http'//www usace armv mil/Missions/Civilworks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http'//Portalncdenrorg/c/document library/ et file7uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http�//www saw usace armv mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/r)ublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
a Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters..
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I I "x] 7", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
ElMust clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the lmown surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary'
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
FWhen the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACEAction ID No.:
ElWhen uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
'This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual.'
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACEAction ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
1-1 include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Amendment the the Jurisdictional Determination Request CWS Project No. 2016-4094
C. Preliminary Jurisdictional determination Form (Amendment)

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 7.24.17
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services; POC: Ms.
Erin Shanaberger, 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Asheville Office - Charlotte Satellite Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Albemarle Road and Nathanael Greene Lane,
Charlotte, NC
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.35.2060420 Long.: -80.703703°
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: McAlpine Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
appli.cable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
Stream A
N35.200488°
W80.705357°
229 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream B
N35.203838°
W80.703123°
914 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream C
N35.206947°
W80.703883°
147 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream D
N35.207400°
W80.704311 °
3,691 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream E
N35.213456°
W80.709385°
297 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream F
N35.213195°
W80.709589°
236 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream G
N35.193370°
W80.704691 °
151 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream H
N35.212548°
W80.704589°
336 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream I
N35.208579°
W80.703846°
310 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream J
N35.206096°
W80.703378°
294 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream K
N35.203958°
W80.704800°
214 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Wetland AA
N35.203731 °
W80.704690°
0.3 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland BB
N35.204228°
W80.703893°
3.64 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland CC
N35.213519°
W80.708933°
2.62 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland DD
N35.212142°
W80.704964°
0.1 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland EE
N35.212698°
W80.704850°
0.09 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Pond A
N35.211269°
W80.706745°
18.03 acres
Non -wetland
Section 404
Pond B
N35.203055°
W80.704534°
0.28 acre
Non -wetland
Section 404
Pond C
N35.201376°
W80.704561 °
5.92 acres
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000, Charlotte East, NC (199 1)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County Soil Survey, dated 1976
and 2016
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC Onemap, dated 2015
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site photographs of wetland, dated
July 20, 2017
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Charlotte -Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
Services
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Digitally signed by
Erin Shanaberger
Date: 2017.07.31
13:57:56 -04'00'
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement Project July 31, 2017
Amendment the the Jurisdictional Determination Request CWS Project No. 2016-4094
D. USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP 1 - extended
Wetland BB)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Marlwood and Waverly Pond and Dam Improvement City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 7/20/17
Applicant/Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): AVH Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): : concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.203097 Long: -80.704320 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: PUBH
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of jurisdictional wetland area BB
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al) X
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (64) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
—Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 24
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100 % of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
HDsoiuie
vominam
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Salix nigra
20
Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Ulmus rubra
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Cephalanthus occidentalis
30
Yes
OBL
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Salix nigra
10
Yes
OBL
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Cornus amomum
5
No
FACW
UPL species X5=
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
45
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Persicaria sagittata
30
Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Ludwigia palustris
10
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100 % of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPI
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 5/8 25 C M Loamy/Clayey-
4-20 7.5YR 5/1 60 7.5YR 5/8 40 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators for hydric soils are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

,=Cirarlatte•Meckfertburg
STORM
��.,-,WATER
Services
September 24, 2015
Mr. Ben Lanzillota
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject Project: Marlwood-Waverly Pond & Dam Improvement Project
HUC#: 03050103 (Santee/Lower Catawba)
600 E. Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Fax [phone]
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the City of Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
("Umbrella Bank") is willing to accept the mitigation responsibility associated with the subject project. Please note that the
decision by the Umbrella Bank to accept this responsibility does not ensure acceptance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. It is the responsibility of the applicant to coordinate with these agencies
to determine if payment to the Umbrella Bank for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. The following documents must be submitted to the
Umbrella Bank within this time frame for this acceptance to remain valid:
1. 404 Permit Verification
2. 401 Water Quality Certification
3. Executed Departmental Transfer Invoice (DTI) between the Design Management (Maintenance) account and
the Mitigation Bank account detailing the use of and payment for the credits described in the table below.
Based on the information supplied by your office, the stream and wetland credits that are necessary to satisfy the
compensatory mitigation requirements and the total mitigation credits available for this for this project are detailed in the
table below.
Project Name
Wetland Credits
Available
Wetland Credits
Requested
Wetland Credits
Remaining
Edwards Branch Phase III
0.20
0.20
0.00
Muddy Creek
0.95
0.42
0.53
Total
1.15
0.62
0.53
The stream and wetland mitigation will be provided as specified in the Section 404 Permit or corresponding 401 Water
Quality Certification for impacts associated with the subject project in Hydrologic Unit 03050103 of the Santee (formerly
Lower Catawba) River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Agreement to Establish the City of
Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, dated June, 16, 2004.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone] or ihinson(a_charlottenc.aov.
cc: Crystal Amschler, USACE
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ
Gregg Antemann, CWS
Kyle Hall, CMSWS
File
obTo report pollution or drainage problems, call: 311;
http://stormwater.charmeck.org '{-{
(NAMHYTF.. ��s�-
Sincerely,
Digitally signed Isaac Hinson
s a a e
DN: cn=Isaac Hinson, o=City of
Charlotte, ou=Storm Water
Services Division,
email=[e-mail],
Isaac Hinson
HinsonDate:2017.07.31
`=us
12:02:16-04'00'
Mitigation Administrator
cc: Crystal Amschler, USACE
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ
Gregg Antemann, CWS
Kyle Hall, CMSWS
File
obTo report pollution or drainage problems, call: 311;
http://stormwater.charmeck.org '{-{
(NAMHYTF.. ��s�-

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Marlwood-Waverly Ponds
3. Applicant/owner name: Charlotte Storm Water
5. County: Mecklenburg
7. River basin: Cat -03
Date of evaluation: 8/8/14
Assessor name/organization:
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
IJH
McAlpine Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.209577, -80.704346
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 120
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑AB
valley shape (skip for ®
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ®Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses -7,N ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) @ ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent g ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N ❑1 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R)
= present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C A P
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes
❑No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ®Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
❑A ❑A ❑A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
R From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
®D ❑D ®D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ®E ❑E
®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure —
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Mature forest
®B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ®C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ®C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 FIB 46 to < 67 FIC 67 to < 79 FID 79 to < 230 FIE >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
1.13" of rain on 8/6/14 at nearest gauge. Waverly Pond is immediately upstream of reach (17 Ac in extent), total DA=1.4 sq mi

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Marlwood-Waverly Ponds Date of Assessment
8/8/14
Stream Category Pb3 Assessor Name/Organization
IJH
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Marlwood/Wave
3. Applicant/owner name: Storm Water
5. County: Mecklenburg
7. River basin: Catawba
Date of evaluation: 4/26/17
Assessor name/organization: ETS
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: McAlpine Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 (pond outlet) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A �..��
valley shape (skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ®Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
®E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses -7,N ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) @ ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent g ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N ❑1 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R)
= present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C A P
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes
❑No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
® ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
® ❑Tipulid larvae
® ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
®C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
❑A ❑A ❑A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
R From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
®D ®D ®D
®D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure —
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Mature forest
®B ®B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 FIB 46 to < 67 FIC 67 to < 79 FID 79 to < 230 FIE >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Marlwood/Waverly Date of Assessment
4/26/17
Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization
ETS
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accom
s User Manual version 5.0
I USACE AID # NCDWR# I
Project Name
Applicant/Owner Name
Wetland Type
Level III Ecoregion
River Basin
Marlwood/Waverly
City of Charlotte Storm Water
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Piedmont
Catawba
County Mecklenburg
Yes I-1 No Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Date of Evaluation 7.20.17
Wetland Site Name Wetland BB
Assessor Name/Organization CWS
Nearest Named Water Body McAlpine Creek
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03050103
NCDWR Region Asheville
Latitude/Lonaitude
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
35.203007. -80.704373
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms,(pand V etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations -Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1.
q
3.
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B §eve altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, xcessiv
sedimentation fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alters ion examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], rolo is alterati
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity duration are substantially altered ration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, odi , soil compaction, filling, cessive sedimentatio nderground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4.
5.
6.
7.
Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B F1 Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
®C ®C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentiall overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetatio excessiv
edimentatio odor)
Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
®A
®A
®A
> 10% impervious surfaces
❑B
❑B
❑B
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
El
El
El
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑D
❑D
❑D
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
®E
®E
®E
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F
❑F
❑F
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G
❑G
❑G
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_ 50 feet
❑ B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑ D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<_ 15 -feet wide ®> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑ D ❑ D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑ E ❑ E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F n From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G n From 5 to < 15 feet
❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
®C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
F1
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑ D
❑ D
❑ D
From 25 to < 50 acres
El
❑E
R
From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F
❑F
R
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
®G
®G
From 1 to < 5 acres
®H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
El
El
R
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
R
R
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
R
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑ B
❑ B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
®C
From 50 to < 100 acres
® D
❑ D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑ E
❑ E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
®Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure - assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
®A >- 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
�
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C El Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density shrub layer
U) El
El
Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
_ ❑B
❑B
Moderate density herb layer
El
El
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
El Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
®A ❑B ❑C ❑D
1; W�A'� I
e
22. Hydrologic Connectivity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Eccessive sedimentation, wetland influenced by beaver

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland BB Date of Assessment 7.19.17
Wetland Type Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization CWS
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) YES
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Overall Wetland Rating LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW