Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081394 Ver 1_Stormwater Info_20081014v?IVtCIQM£dCREED TO: NCDWQ 401 Oversight Unit 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 I ATTENUON: Annette Lucas LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 13, 2008 PROJECT NO: 1517_0178 TASK NO: RE: SECU-Madison 08- 3q'k TRANSMITTAL NO: PAGE 1 OF 1 WE ARE SENDING: ? Originals ® Prints ? Shop Drawings ? Samples ? Specifications ® Calculations ® Other Quantity Drawing No. Rev Description Status 2 Original & 1 Copy of SMP Application Form 2 Original Supplement forms for BMP's 2 Original O&M Agreements for BMP's 1 Copy of Stormwater Narrative & Calculations 1 Copy of the Soils Report REMARKS: Please find the enclosed Stormwater Management Plan Submittal for the proposed State Employees' Credit Union in Madison. Two sets of Construction Plans will be forwarded to you by Cory Larsen in the Stormwater Permitting Unit. Let me know of you do not receive the drawings. Please feel free to call me with any questions or comments. Thanks, 1730 Varsity Dr., Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27606 919/233-8091 Fax 919/233-8031 Cc: iJ McKIM & CREED, PA O C i 1 4 2008 DENR - t.NArER QUALF[Y WETLANDS AND STCRMIMATER MA,NC 1 Signed DWQ USE ONLY Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number 0S - 139{ State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION This form may be photocopied for use as an original 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 7-3 1? ?C W 1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project): 1 4 20n$ State Employees' Credit Union 1)Er4g _+NATER. (1UALITY VJETLAyDS 010 STORM?!ATER 3RbA "A 2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance): Robert S. Hall Sr., Senior Executive Vice President 3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above: P.O. Box 26055 City:Raleigh State:NC Zip:27611 Phone: (919 ) 839-5000 Fax: ( ) Email: 4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.): State Employees Credit Union Madison Office 5. Location of Project (street address): 654 Chief Martin Street City:Madison County:Rockingham Zip:27025 6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection): From Intersection of US 311 and US 220 Business, head north on US 220 Business. Follow US 220 Business through town and take a left on Chief Martin St. The site is on the right past an existing shopping center. 7. Latitude:36° 23' 38" N Longitude:79° 58' 18" W of project 8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project: Namejason C. Allen, PE Telephone Number: (919 ) 233-8091 Email: jallen@mckimcreed.com II. PERMIT INFORMATION: 1. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ?Renewal ?Modification Form SWU-101 Version 03.27.08 Pagel of4 RECEIVED N.C. Dept. of ENR OCT 0 32008 )RM Winston-Salem Regional office 2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit number and its issue date (if known) 3. Specify the type of project (check one): []Low Density []High Density []Redevelop ®General Permit []Universal SMP []Other 4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748): ?CAMA Major ®Sedimentation/Erosion Control ®404/401 Permit ?NPDES Stormwater III. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project. Stormwater will be collected and distributed into two grassed bioretention areas. The bioretention areas have been designed to control the first 1" of runoff and bypass larger storms Bypass pipes will tie into the proposed site storm drainage system 2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Roanoke River basin. 3. Total Property Area: 6.99 acres 4. Total Wetlands Area: acres 5. 100' Wide Strip of Wetland Area: acres (not applicable if no wetlands exist on site) 6. Total Project Area**:2.96 acres 7. Project Built Upon Area:17.6 % 8. How many drainage areas does the project have?2 9 'Basin' Information Drainage Area 1 Drainage Area 2 Receiving Stream Name Big Beaver Island Creek Big Beaver Island Creek Stream Class & Index No. C (22-29) C (22-29) Total Drainage Area (so 57,064 40,946 On-site Drainage Area (so 57,064 40,946 Off-site Drainage Area (so 0 0 Existing Impervious* Area (so 0 0 Proposed Impervious*Area (so 31,799 21,780 Impervious* Area (total) 55.7 53.2 Impervious* Surface Area Drainage Area 1 Drainage Area 2 On-site Buildings (so 3,762 4,888 On-site Streets (so 0 0 On-site Parking (so 26,175 15,082 On-site Sidewalks (so 1,879 1,810 Other on-site (so 0 0 Off-site (so 0 0 Total (so: 31,799 21,780 Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc. **Total project area shall be calculated based on the current policy regarding inclusion of wetlands in the built upon area percentage calculation. This is the area used to calculate percent project built upon area (B LIA). Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below. For high density projects, com lete the table with one drainage area for each engineered stormwater device. Form SWU-101 Version 03.27.08 Page 2 of 4 10. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?N/A. All offsite drainage was bypassed around the site via piping or swales. IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS One of the following deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment. Forms can be downloaded from http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm - deed restrictions. Form DRPC-1 High Density Commercial Subdivisions Form DRPC-2 High Density Developments with Outparcels Form DRPC-3 High Density Residential Subdivisions Form DRPC-4 Low Density Commercial Subdivisions Form DRPC-5 Low Density Residential Subdivisions Form DRPC-6 Low Density Residential Subdivisions with Curb Outlets By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project shall include all the applicable items required in the above form, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at (919) 733-5083 for the status and availability of these forms. Forms can be downloaded from http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/suj2ml2 forms.htm. Form SW401-Low Density Form SW401-Curb Outlet System Form SW401-Off-Site System Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin Form SW401-Infiltration Basin Form SW401-Infiltration Trench Form SW401-Bioretention Cell Form SW401-Level Spreader Form SW401-Wetland Form SW401-Grassed Swale Form SW401-Sand Filter Form SW401-Permeable Pavement Form SWU-101 Version 03.27.08 Low Density Supplement Curb Outlet System Supplement Off-Site System Supplement Wet Detention Basin Supplement Infiltration Basin Supplement Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement Bioretention Cell Supplement Level Spreader/Filter Strip/Restored Riparian Buffer Supplement Constructed Wetland Supplement Grassed Swale Supplement Sand Filter Supplement Permeable Pavement Supplement Page 3 of 4 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (Appropriate office may be found by locating project on the interactive online map at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/msi mans.htm) 1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided next to each item. Initials • Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form TCA • Original and one copy of the Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form (if &.1A required as per Part IV above) • Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) and O&M agreement(s) for each BMP TL _ • Permit application processing fee of $505 (Express: $4,000 for HD, $2,000 for LD) payable to NCDENR C • Calculations & detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/ management J • Copy of any applicable soils report r 76A • Two copies of plans and specifications (sealed, signed & dated), including: GA - Development/ Project name - Engineer and firm -Legend - North arrow - Scale - Revision number & date - Mean high water line - Dimensioned property/ project boundary - Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers - Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations - Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures - Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist - Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations - Drainage areas delineated - Vegetated buffers (where required) VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your behalf, please complete this section. (ex. designing engineer or firm) Designated agent (individual or firm):McKim & Creed Mailing Address:1730 Varsity Dr., Suite 500 City:Raleigh State:NC Zip:27606 Phone: (919 ) 233-8091 Fax: (919 ) 233-8031 Emaii:jallen@mckimcreed.com VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) Robert S. Hall, Sr. certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions and protective covenants will be reco ded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000. Z Q Signature: Date: j Form SWU-101 Version 03.27.08 Page 4 of 4 r . 1% Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) Drainage Area Number: Bioretention Operation and Maintenance Agreement I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP. Important operation and maintenance procedures: - Immediately after the bioretention cell is established, the plants will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (commonly six weeks). - Snow, mulch or any other material will NEVER be piled on the surface of the bioretention cell. - Heavy equipment will NEVER be driven over the bioretention cell. - Special care will be taken to prevent sediment from entering the bioretention cell. - Once a year, a soil test of the soil media will be conducted. After the bioretention cell is established, I will inspect it once a month and within 24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately. BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The entire BMP Trash/debris is resent. Remove the trash/debris. The perimeter of the Areas of bare soil and/or Regrade the soil if necessary to bioretention cell erosive gullies have formed. remove the gully, and then plant a ground cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer application. The inlet device: pipe, The pipe is clogged (if Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the stone verge or swale applicable). sediment off-site. The pipe is cracked or Replace the pipe. otherwise damaged (if applicable). Erosion is occurring in the Regrade the swale if necessary to swale (if applicable). smooth it over and provide erosion control devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future problems with erosion. Stone verge is clogged or Remove sediment and clogged covered in sediment (if stone and replace with clean stone. applicable). Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page 1 of 4 BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The pretreatment area Flow is bypassing Regrade if necessary to route all pretreatment area and/or flow to the pretreatment area. gullies have formed. Restabilize the area after grading. Sediment has accumulated to Search for the source of the a depth greater than three sediment and remedy the problem if inches. possible. Remove the sediment and restabilize the pretreatment area. Erosion has occurred. Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or riprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems. Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. The bioretention cell: Best professional practices Prune according to best professional vegetation show that pruning is needed practices. to maintain optimal plant health. Plants are dead, diseased or Determine the source of the dying. problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc. Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one-time fertilizer application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is necessary. Tree stakes/wires are present Remove tree stake/ wires (which six months after planting. can kill the tree if not removed). The bioretention cell: Mulch is breaking down or Spot mulch if there are only random soils and mulch has floated away. void areas. Replace whole mulch layer if necessary. Remove the remaining much and replace with triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Soils and/or mulch are Determine the extent of the clogging clogged with sediment. - remove and replace either just the top layers or the entire media as needed. Dispose of the spoil in an appropriate off-site location. Use triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if possible. An annual soil test shows that Dolomitic lime shall be applied as pH has dropped or heavy recommended per the soil test and metals have accumulated in toxic soils shall be removed, the soil media. disposed of properly and replaced with new planting media. Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page 2 of 4 t . BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The underdrain system Clogging has occurred. Wash out the underdrain system. (if applicable) The drop inlet Clogging has occurred. Clean out the drop inlet. Dispose of the sediment off-site. The drop inlet is damaged Repair or replace the drop inlet. The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the NC Division of Water damage have occurred at the Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919- outlet. 733-1786. Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page 3 of 4 e Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party. Project name: SECU - Madison BMP drainage area number: Print name: Robert S. Hall, Sr. Title: Senior Executive Vice President Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president. I, ?uA??A We- C?, i/ -e f- , a Notary Public for the State of r-? C.- , County of W O? K 2, , do hereby certify that 4. S ?A 0'- 1 1 personally appeared before me this 05 day o6e- to\D c olG? , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing bioretention maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal, JMN w4 v)eauelr IJ B SEAL My commission expires ?JU J ? i l Form SW401-Bioretention I&M-Rev. 2 av l a Page 4 of 4 Address: _ 1000 Wade Ave., Raleigh, NC 27605 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) Drainage Area Number: Bioretention Operation and Maintenance Agreement I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP. Important operation and maintenance procedures: - Immediately after the bioretention cell is established, the plants will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (commonly six weeks). - Snow, mulch or any other material will NEVER be piled on the surface of the bioretention cell. - Heavy equipment will NEVER be driven over the bioretention cell. - Special care will be taken to prevent sediment from entering the bioretention cell. - Once a year, a soil test of the soil media will be conducted. After the bioretention cell is established, I will inspect it once a month and within 24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately. BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The entire BMP Trash/debris is resent. Remove the trash/debris. The perimeter of the Areas of bare soil and/or Regrade the soil if necessary to bioretention cell erosive gullies have formed. remove the gully, and then plant a ground cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer application. The inlet device: pipe, The pipe is clogged (if Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the stone verge or swale applicable). sediment off-site. The pipe is cracked or Replace the pipe. otherwise damaged (if applicable). Erosion is occurring in the Regrade the swale if necessary to swale (if applicable). smooth it over and provide erosion control devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future problems with erosion. Stone verge is clogged or Remove sediment and clogged covered in sediment (if stone and replace with clean stone. __applicable). Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page I of 4 BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The pretreatment area Flow is bypassing Regrade if necessary to route all pretreatment area and/or flow to the pretreatment area. gullies have formed. Restabilize the area after grading. Sediment has accumulated to Search for the source of the a depth greater than three sediment and remedy the problem if inches. possible. Remove the sediment and restabilize the pretreatment area. Erosion has occurred. Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or riprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems. Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. The bioretention cell: Best professional practices Prune according to best professional vegetation show that pruning is needed practices. to maintain optimal plant health. Plants are dead, diseased or Determine the source of the dying. problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc. Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one-time fertilizer application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is necessary. Tree stakes/wires are present Remove tree stake/wires (which six months after planting. can kill the tree if not removed). The bioretention cell: Mulch is breaking down or Spot mulch if there are only random soils and mulch has floated away. void areas. Replace whole mulch layer if necessary. Remove the remaining much and replace with triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Soils and/or mulch are Determine the extent of the clogging clogged with sediment. - remove and replace either just the top layers or the entire media as needed. Dispose of the spoil in an appropriate off-site location. Use triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if possible. An annual soil test shows that Dolomitic lime shall be applied as pH has dropped or heavy recommended per the soil test and metals have accumulated in toxic soils shall be removed, the soil media. disposed of properly and replaced with new planting media. Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page 2 of 4 BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the problem: The underdrain system Clogging has occurred. Wash out the underdrain system. (if applicable) The drop inlet Clogging has occurred. Clean out the drop inlet. Dispose of the sediment off-site. The drop inlet is damaged Repair or replace the drop inlet. The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the NC Division of Water damage have occurred at the Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919- outlet. 733-1786. Form SW401-Bioretention O&M-Rev.3 Page 3 of 4 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party. Project name: SECU - Madison BMP drainage area number: 2 Print name: Robert S. Hall, Sr. Title: Senior Executive Vice President Address: 1000 Wade Ave., Raleigh, NC 27605 Phone: Signati Date: Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president. I, 1-k. \A A V1 Y\ Ct i1 e t- , a Notary Public for the State of C_ , County of W aA? Q , do hereby certify that 7 . S . } (;L ` personally appeared before me this a 5 day of Sep{-r-vv ?o,? , ;Dtpp , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing bioretention maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal, ,. 4 N OTA v C06 SEAL My commission expires MO-\J.. 1% 1 a o k a W 0-a \1 e-f Form SW401-Bioretention I&M-Rev. 2 Page 4 of 4 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) OF W A rF9 0 QG =NR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM BIORETENTION CELL SUPPLEMENT This form must be filled out, printed and submitted. The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information. SECT INFORMATION name SECU - Madison name Jason C. Allen, PE lumber (919) 233-8091 October 1, 2008 e area number 1 ;IGN INFORMATION aracteristics e area -)us area impervious rainfall depth ow Calculations -hr runoff depth -hr intensity elopment 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow velopment 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow t 1-yr, 24-hr peak control Volume: Non-SR Waters volume : Volume: SR Waters elopment 1-yr, 24-hr runoff velopment 1-yr, 24-hr runoff n volume required provided tiensions depth of water depth of water area of the top of the bioretention cell radius eport Summary wn time, ponded volume rvn time, to 24 inches below surface wn time, total: oil: ermeability media soil: ermeability omposition Sand (by weight) Fines (by weight) Organic (by weight) 57,064.00 ft2 31,799.00 ft 2 55.7% % 1.00 inch in in/hr ft 3/sec ft 3/sec ft 3/sec 2,623.00 ft3 ft3 ft3 0.00 ft3 ft3 10.00 inches OK 0.83 ft 3174.00 ft2 OK 80.00 ft OK 45.00 ft OK 10.00 ft OK 5.00 hr OK 5.00 hr OK 10.00 hr 0.52 in/hr OK ?"'^ V S Ga? rv? i h '?? ?ESiSn 0.52 in/hr OK 86% OK 10% OK 4% OK Total: 100% Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.3 Parts I and II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2 't J a yea Uoyd 'ejuOD 3afad Ald 'I r Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) 3 Index (P-Index) Cations pool elevation ,evation (top of the mulch) ,the cell epth uepth of mulch SHWT elevation Are underdrains being installed? How many clean out pipes are being installed? What factor of safety is used for sizing the underdrains? (See BMP Manual Section 12.3.6) Additional distance between the bottom of the planting media and the bottom of the cell to account for underdrains Bottom of the cell required Distance from bottom to SHWT Type of bioretention cell (answer "Y" to only one of the two following questions): Is this a grassed cell? Is this a cell with trees/shrubs? Planting Plan Number of tree species Number of shrub species Number of herbaceous groundcover species Additional Information Does volume in excess of the design volume bypass the bioretention cell? Does volume in excess of the design volume flow evenly distributed through a vegetated filter? What is the length of the vegetated filter? Does the design use a level spreader to evenly distribute flow? Is the BMP located at least 30 feet from surface waters (50 feet if SA waters)? Is the BMP localed at least 100 feet from water supply wells? Are the vegetated side slopes equal to or less than 3:1? Is the BMP located in a recorded drainage easement with a recorded access easement to a public Right of Way (ROW)? Inlet velocity (from treatment system) Is the area surrounding the cell likely to undergo development in the future? Are the slopes draining to the bioretention cell greater than 20%? Is the drainage area permanently stabilized? Pretreatment Used (Indicate Type Used with an "X" in the shaded cell) Gravel and grass (8'inches gravel followed by 3-5 ft of grass) Grassed swale Forebay 20 (unitless) OK 622.83 fmsl 622.00 fmsl Insufficient temporary pool elevation. 619.75 fmsl 2.25 ft 3.00 inches OK fmsl <' ho 5ro.>nd Wo..-1 C-e ire Y (Y or N) 4 OK 10.00 OK 1ft 618.75 fmsl 618.75 ft OK Y (Y or N) OK (Y or N) Y (Y or N) OK N (Y or N) Excess volume must pass through filter. ft plpe sfs N (Y or N) Show how flow is evenly distributed. Y (Y or N) OK Y (Y or N) OK Y (Y or N) OK Y (Y or N) OK 5.82 fUsec Insufficient inlet velocity unless energy dissipating devices are being used. N (Y or N) OK N (Y or N) OK Y (Y or N) OK 'R 'r rc%i- gvevForm SW401-Bioretention-Rev.3 Parts I and II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2 Permit No: (to be assigned by DWQ) III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a requirement has not been met, attach justification. Page/ Plan Initials Sheet No. C1203 1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing: Design at ultimate build-out, Off-site drainage (if applicable), Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin), Cell dimensions, Pretreatment system, High flow bypass system, Maintenance access, Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), Clean out pipe locations, Overflow device, and Boundaries of drainage easement. ?- C5104 2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the bioretention cell showing: Cell dimensions Pretreatment system, High flow bypass system, Maintenance access, Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), Design at ultimate build-out, Off-site drainage (if applicable), Clean out pipe locations, Overflow device, and Boundaries of drainage easement. T6 4 " ' C5104 1 3. Section view of the bioretention cell (1 = 20 or larger) showing: Side slopes, 3:1 or lower Underdrain system (if applicable), and Bioretention cell layers [ground level and slope, pre-treatment, ponding depth, mulch depth, fill media depth, washed sand, filter fabric (or choking stone if applicable), #57 stone, underdrains (if applicable), SHWT level(s), and overflow structure] I'CA Enclosed 4. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information. All elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (fmsl). Results of soils tests of both the planting soil and the in situ soil must include: Soil permeability, Soil composition (% sand, % fines, % organic), and ,T A P-index. ?_ C5104 C 5. A detailed planting plan (1" = 20' or larger) prepared by a qualified individual showing: A variety of suitable species, Sizes, spacing and locations of plantings, Total quantity of each type of plant specified, A planting detail, The source nursery for the plants, and Fertilizer and watering requirements to establish vegetation. TLA- C1203 6. A construction sequence that shows how the bioretention cell will be protected from sediment until the entire drainage area is stabilized. /? T& A Enclosed 7. The supporting calculations (including underdrain calculations, if applicable). :Y4A Enclosed 8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement. '=-F L N/A 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required). Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.3 Part III, Page 1 of 1 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) ,A NCDENR O? ? W A T ?R H?G t ??+rv?Ci o < STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM BIORETENTION CELL SUPPLEMENT This form must be filled out, printed and submitted. The Required Items Checklist (Part 1/1) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project name SECU - Madison Contact name Jason C. Allen, PE Phone number (919) 233-8091 Date October 1, 2008 Drainage area number 2 II. DESIGN INFORMATION Site Characteristics Drainage area 40,946.00 ft2 Impervious area 21,780.00 ft2 Percent impervious 53.2% % Design rainfall depth 1.00 inch Peak Flow Calculations 1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth in 1-yr, 24-hr intensity in/hr Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow ft3/sec Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow ft 3/sec Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak control ft3/sec Storage Volume: Non-SR Waters Design volume 1,804.00 ft3 Storage Volume: SR Waters Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff ft 3 Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff ft3 Minimum volume required 0.00 ft3 Volume provided ft 3 Cell Dimensions Ponding depth of water 10.00 inches OK Pgnding depth of water 0.83 ft Surface area of the top of the bioretention cell 2298.00 ft2 OK Length: 65.00 ft OK Width: 45.00 ft OK -or- Radius 10.00 ft OK Soils Report Summary Drawdown time, ponded volume 5.00 hr OK Drawdown time, to 24 inches below surface 5.00 hr OK Drawdown time, total: 10.00 hr In-situ soil: Soil permeability 0.52 in/hr OK t " A55,irne-al rhtn • T-e Planting media soil: - `0? cl Soil permeability 0.52 in/hr OK L Soil composition % Sand (by weight) 86% OK % Fines (by weight) 10% OK % Organic (by weight) 4% OK Total: 100% Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.3 Parts I and II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) Kosphon 5 Index (P-Index) 20 (unitless) OK Basin Elevations Temporary pool elevation 621.83 fmsl Planting elevation (top of the mulch) 621.00 fmsl Insufficient temporary pool elevation. Bottom of the cell 618.75 fmsl Planting depth 2.25 ft Depth of mulch 3.00 inches OK SHWT elevation fmsl 4Z, no 5 ro v'd'3 G?.4-er er+co ?.+-?-?rec? i r., b o r i v, 5 Are underdrains being installed? Y (Y or N) 5 How many clean out pipes are being installed? 4 OK What factor of safety is used for sizing the underdrains? (See 10.00 OK BMP Manual Section 12.3.6) Additional distance between the bottom of the planting media and 1 ft the bottom of the cell to account for underdrains Bottom of the cell required 617.75 fmsl Distance from bottom to SHWT 617.75 ft OK Type of bioretention cell (answer "Y" to only one of the two following questions): Is this a grassed cell? Y (Y or N) OK Is this a cell with trees/shrubs? (Y or N) Planting Plan Number of tree species Number of shrub species Number of herbaceous groundcover species Additional Information Does volume in excess of the design volume bypass the Y (Y or N) OK bioretention cell? Does volume in excess of the design volume flow evenly distributed N (Y or N) Excess volume must pass through filter. through a vegetated filter? What is the len th of the ve etated filter? ft LL ro poSG J CD ?'>F?.?IS T?? i .?'?'D g g D s th i n d l l d t l di t ib t fl ? N f S-ho r ^?, 5 sdC?. g oe e es use a eve sprea er o even y r s u e ow (Y or N) Show how flow is eve6lly distributed. Is the BMP located at least 30 feet from surface waters (50 feet if Y Y or N) ( ) OK SA waters)? Is the BMP located at least 100 feet from water supply wells? Y (Y or N) OK Are the vegetated side slopes equal to or less than 3:1? Y (Y or N) OK Is the BMP located in a recorded drainage easement with a Y (Y or N) OK recorded access easement to a public Right of Way (ROW)? Inlet velocity (from treatment system) 5.74 ft/sec Insufficient inlet velocity unless energy dissipating devices are being used. Is the area surrounding the cell likely to undergo development in N (Y or N) OK the future? Are the slopes draining to the bioretention cell greater than 20%? N (Y or N) OK Is the drainage area permanently stabilized? Y (Y or N) OK Pretreatment Used (Indicate Type Used with an "X" in the shaded cell) Gravel and grass (8'inches gravel followed by 3-5 It of grass) c? Grassed Swale Forebay Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.3 Parts I and II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2 Permit No: (to be assigned by DWQ) ` III, REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a requirement has not been met, attach justification. Pagel Plan Initials Sheet No. 16A C1203 1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing: Design at ultimate build-out, Off-site drainage (if applicable), Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin), Cell dimensions, Pretreatment system, High flow bypass system, Maintenance access, Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), Clean out pipe locations, Overflow device, and Boundaries of drainage easement. TGg C5104 2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the bioretention cell showing: Cell dimensions Pretreatment system, High flow bypass system, Maintenance access, Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), Design at ultimate build-out, Off-site drainage (if applicable), Clean out pipe locations, Overflow device, and Boundaries of drainage easement. ?i_ J ? C " ' 5104 3. Section view of the bioretention cell 0 = 20 or larger) showing: Side slopes, 3:1 or lower Underdrain system (if applicable), and Bioretention cell layers [ground level and slope, pre-treatment, ponding depth, mulch depth, fill media depth, washed sand, filter fabric (or choking stone if applicable), #57 stone, underdrains (if applicable), SHWT level(s), and overflow structure] TCEnclosed 4. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information. All elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (fmsl). Results of soils tests of both the planting soil and the in situ soil must include: Soil permeability, Soil composition (% sand, % fines, % organic), and ?-? A C5104 ( P-index. A " ' _ - 5. detailed planting plan (1 = 20 or larger) prepared by a qualified individual showing: A variety of suitable species, Sizes, spacing and locations of plantings, Total quantity of each type of plant specified, A planting detail, The source nursery for the plants, and Fertilizer and watering requirements to establish vegetation. ?^ J Lpt C1203 6. A construction sequence that shows how the bioretention cell will be protected from sediment until the entire drainage area is stabilized. TLA Enclosed 7. The supporting calculations (including underdrain calculations, if applicable). 51-A Enclosed 8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement. N/A 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required). Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev. 3 Part 111, Page 1 of 1 ?.??tt+it}?: September 12, 2007 Julie McLaurin O'BRIEN ATKINS & ASSOCIATES P.O Box 12037 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Re: Report of Subsurface Investigation Proposed SECU Bank - Chief Martin Street Madison, North Carolina GeoTechnologies Project No. 1-07-1112-EA Dear Ms. McLaurin: 3200 Wellington Court, Suite 108 Rdoigh, North Carolina 27615 919.954-1514 Fax 919••954-14213 GeoTechnologies, Inc. has completed the authorized investigation to evaluate subsurface soil conditions for a SECU bank proposed for construction off Chief Martin Street in Madison, North Carolina. Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by completing 13 soil test borings at the approximate locations shown on the attached Figure I. The boring locations were established in the field by measuring distances from existing site landmarks, and therefore the indicated locations should be considered approximate. The soil test borings were extended to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 25 feet below site grade utilizing standard penetration test procedures at selected intervals to evaluate the consistency and density of the subsurface soils. This report presents the findings of our investigation and our recommendations concerning site grading and foundation support considerations for the proposed new bank facility. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION It is our understanding that a new SECU bank will be constructed on the north side of Chief Martin Street, west of the Rockingham Square shopping center in Madison, North Carolina. At the time of our investigation, a majority of the site was wooded. An overhead power easement was observed on the south side of the property along Chief Martin Street, and a sanitary sewer easement was observed near the western border of the property. Additionally, the discharge point for a 36 inch CMP from the Rockingham Square shopping center was observed near what is currently planned to be about the middle of the east side wall for the new bank building. The pipe presently carries storm water from the shopping center to the referenced discharge spot where the water then flows west in an open channel through about the middle of the proposed building. The pipe is not exposed (below grade) until about the last 10 feet before discharging, and therefore, the channel in the building is the only place that is deep and where water was observed. The channel width ranges from a few feet up to 15 to 20 feet, and bottom depths relative to the side banks appear to be on the order of about 8 to 12 feet. The water in the channel is deepest below the discharge point of the pipe. Based on observations of site topography, we anticipate that some cuts and fills will be necessary during site grading to achieve grade; however, proposed finished grades were not provided. GeoTechnologies was not provided with any information regarding structural loading details; however, we anticipate the structure will be supported on relatively light columns and load bearing walls. Column Ge,otechnicol and Consfruction Molorials h;Wing Se;ivices O'Brien Atkins & Associates SBCU - Chief Martin Street September 12, 2007 Page: 2 loads are not expected to exceed 100 kips with wall loads in the range of 3 to 4 klf or less. In addition to the proposed bank building, drive-thru teller lanes and parking and driveway areas will be constructed. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Generalized subsurface profiles prepared from the test boring data are attached to this report as Figures 2A and 2B to graphically illustrate subsurface conditions encountered at this site. More detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered at the individual boring locations are then presented on the attached test boring records. Below a surface layer of topsoil which did not exceed more than about 8 inches in thickness, the near surface profile on this site was found to generally consist of 3 to 12.5 feet of fill or possible fall soils whose penetration resistances were in the range of 3 to 25 blows per foot (bpf). The fall generally consisted of low to moderate plasticity silts and clays with occasional minor organics along with some zones of more concentrated organics (B-1 and B-12). Below the fall, the borings typically encountered silty and clayey residual soils, except in boring B-1 where some alluvial silts were underlain by more granular soils. Penetration resistances within these soils were in the range of 5 to 52 bpf. Partially weathered rock (PWR) was encountered in borings B-3 and B-10 at depths of 20 and 10 feet. PWR is defined as material which could be penetrated with the soil drilling augers but which exhibited penetration resistances in excess of 100 bpf. All of the borings were terminated at the plan boring depths which ranged from about 10 to 25 feet. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings at the time of boring completion. However, it should be noted that the near surface soils at the site are conducive to the temporary development of perched groundwater conditions during periods of wet weather, and that groundwater levels will fluctuate during different periods of the year. Additionally, water was observed running in the drainage channel in the center of the proposed building at the time of our site visit. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the attached test boring data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and past experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. Should site grading or structural plans change significantly from those now under consideration, we would appreciate being provided with that information so that these recommendations may be confirmed, extended, or modified as necessary. Additionally, should subsurface conditions adverse to those indicated by this report be encountered during construction, those differences should be reported to us for review and comment. Suitability of Site. The results of our test borings indicate that this site has previously been graded with the placement of up to 12.5 feet of fill in some areas. Figure 3 shows the depth of old fill or possible fall encountered in our borings. Although most of the fill was firm and free of significant organics, some lower penetration resistances were recorded in borings B-1 and B-6, and some zones of heavy organics were encountered in borings B-1 and B-12. Based on these conditions, and our past experience with similar profiles, it is our opinion that the in-place fall is not consistently adequate for support of the footings or the vault pad, However, the fill appears suitable for support of a lightly loaded slab-on-grade and for pavements. e o-e O'Brien Atkins & Associates SPCU - Chief Martin Street September 12, 2007 Page: 3 In addition to the in-place fill, a deep drainage channel with water is located near the center of the proposed building. The channel is associated with a 36 inch CMP from the Rockingham Square shopping center to the east. The channel width ranges from a few feet up to 15 to 20 feet, and bottom depths relative to the side banks appear to be on the order of about 8 to 12 feet. Probing of the channel bottom typically indicated the presence of soft soils to depths in the range of 3 to 4 feet. Based on the described conditions, it should be expected that repairs associated with the existing subsurface conditions at this site will be more extensive than normal, most notably within the limits of the proposed building footprint. Site Grading Considerations. The support method used for the footings (including the canopy) and vault pad will have an impact on the type of subsurface repair recommended within the limits of the building pad. The first option would be to undercut all of the existing fill soils as well as the soft soils along the base of the drainage channel from within the limits of the building pad. However, this would involve removing up to 12.5 feet (or more) of soil in some areas. Additionally, even after flow into the drainage channel is diverted, we anticipate that the contractor would have to be prepared to handle water with sumps/pumps. Several feet of clean stone would also be needed along the lowest elevations to help handle the water and to facilitate compaction of newly placed fill soils. If this option is considered, we estimate that about 4,500 cubic yards of soil would need to be removed for the building, with most (but not all) of that soil being suitable for reuse as fill in other areas following moisture conditioning. If the future expansion to the east is repaired at the same time (recommended), we estimate that another 1,000 cubic yards of soil would need to be removed, Additionally, we estimate that about 160 cubic yards of clean (#57 or 467) stone would have to be placed in the lowest elevations before soil fill could be used, with an additional 50 cubic yards of stone needed to cover the future expansion. The volume of stone needed will in part be a function of the contractors ability to control water levels. It is noted that the indicated volumes are only rough estimates, and we suggest that a fair unit price be established in the contract for dealing with the undercut. Due to the potential for variability, we do not recommend that the repair be bid as an "unclassified" item. Alternatively, a stone replaced footing could be used in conjunction with limited repairs for the slab-on-grade. This repair involves performing neatline over excavation to firm approved soils, and then placing #57 or #67 stone to grade. If we can be provided with grading and foundation plans, GeoTechnolgies will be happy to estimate the quantity of undercut needed for the stone replaced footings. The stone should be compacted in 3 to 4 foot lifts with the backhoe bucket, except at the top where a wacker packer should be used. If this repair is utilized (and grade is not raised), we expect that over excavation repairs will generally be in the range of 3 to 12,5 feet; however, this will have to be confirmed in the field by a geotechnical engineer at the time of excavation. Once approved soils are encountered, we recommend that the excavations quickly be backfilled. Due to the potential for encountering groundwater and for sidewail caving, the excavations must proceed in short segments. To facilitate the repair, we suggest that separate equipment be used for excavation and for backfill. This is a common repair technique, but it does require some operator skill and experience where over excavation depths become significant, With this approach, the vault pad could either be fully undercut, or a structural (reinforced) slab could be used. This would need to be designed by the structural engineer. If a stone replaced footing is used, consideration should be given to how footings for the future expansion will be installed, because the stone will cave without confinement. Possible alternatives include O'Brien Atkins & Associates SECU - Chief Martin Street September 12, 2007 Page: 4 using full-depth concrete at the future tie-ins, carrying over excavation repairs somewhat outside the initial walls, using spanning grade beams, or planning on using helical piers adjacnet to the building. With a stone replaced footing, repairs for the slab could then likely be limited to only near surface repairs (assuming summertime grading), except where the drainage channel is present. In this area, we expect that the repair discussed previously would still be needed. Therefore, we estimate the need for about 300 cubic yards of undercut, with about 210 cubic yards of clean stone needed to floor-in the channel bottom. Both of these numbers include repairing the fixture expansion areas, and would be about 25% less without the expansion. We also suggest including about 150 cubic yards of undercut repair for near surface repairs outside of the channel in the building pad, again assuming a summertime grading operation where shallow repairs can be completed with moisture conditioning and recompaction rather than undercut. One alternative to using stone replaced footings would be to use helical piers. Most specialty contractors who install the piers will provide a cost estimate if provided with a foundation plan and loading information. We suggest comparing the cost of stone replacement with installing helical piers as both would be adequate for this site. Because the near surface soils in the borings are firm, we do not expect that significant undercut type repairs will be needed in pavement areas. We recommend that all parking and driveway areas at grade or designated to receive fill be proofrolled with a loaded dump truck in the presence of a geotechnical engineer once site grading begins. Areas found to be unstable during the proofroll should be repaired as directed by the on-site engineer. We suggest including about 250 cubic yards or undercut for random pavement repairs; however, conducting site grading during the typically cooler and wetter winter months may result in the need for more significant repairs. The on site soils, excluding organics and unsuitable undercut soils, should be suitable for reuse as structural fill provided compaction moisture is maintained near optimum during placement. If off site borrow is required, a low plasticity clay, silt, or sand with Unified Soil Classifications of CL, ML, SM, and SC may be imported for use as structural fill. All new fill should be compacted to not less than 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density except in the final foot where this requirement should be increased to 98% of the standard Proctor maximum. If any areas of the building pad will receive more than 8 feet of fill, a minimum waiting period of 30 days should be observed between the time of completion of backfilling and the beginning of building construction to allow fill induced settlements to subside. An alternative to this would be to establish settlement points in the fill section to monitor the fill induced settlement for a period of time until the settlement has subsided, or reduced to an acceptable level. Difficult Excavation Considerations. Two of our test borings encountered PWR at 10 feet or greater. Therefore, our borings suggest that difficult excavation type materials could be encountered in isolated areas, notably in deeper cuts or excavations. Foundation Support Considerations. With stone replaced footings, or with removal and replacement of the existing fill, the proposed building may be supported on shallow spread footing foundations designed for a bearing pressure of 3,000 psf subject to the restriction that column and wall footings have least dimensions of not less than 24 and 16 inches, respectively. These foundations may bear at nominal depth below finished exterior grade except that a minimum embedment depth of not less ::m.,r O'Brien Atkins & Associates SECU - Chief Mai-tin Street September 12, 2007 Page: 5 than I8 inches is recommended for frost protection. All footings should be inspected by a geotechnical engineer. In order to assist the project structural engineer with an estimate of settlement potential, we have prepared the attached Figures 4A and 4B to graphically illustrate the magnitude of settlement anticipated for a range of column and wall loadings assuming subgrade repair. Typically, differential settlements are equal to approximately one-half of the total settlement for a project of this nature. These values assume that the bearing materials will be repaired as discussed previously. Pavement Design Considerations. Neither field nor laboratory CBR tests have been performed on representative samples from this site; however, we anticipate that properly prepared subgrades will exhibit a design subgrade CBR value on the order of 4% or greater. A typical pavement structure for these conditions would consist of 2 inches of asphalt over 8 inches of stone in areas subject only to light car traffic such as the car parking stalls and a section consisting of 3 inches of asphalt over 8 inches of stone in areas subject to channelized car traffic and occasional truck traffic. It is recommended that a minimum 5 inch thick concrete pad be constructed in front of the dumpster pad in order to better distribute the heavy front wheel loadings from that vehicle during dumping operations. We further suggest placing a minimum of 4 inches of CABC base course stone under the concrete slab to provide more uniform support. The most important parameters affecting pavement life on a site of this nature are the condition of the subgrade at the time of base course stone placement and post construction drainage. It is recommended that pavement subgrades be reworked and compacted to not less than 98% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density immediately prior to base course stone placement. Additionally, site grades should be detailed to promote drainage away from the pavement areas. Miscellaneous Considerations. If low concrete retaining walls are constructed as a part of the new construction, we suggest that they be designed for an equivalent triangular lateral earth pressure based on the assumption that the soils behave as an equivalent fluid weighing 50 pounds per cubic foot assuming level backfill behind the wall. For this value to be applicable, the material placed within 3 feet of the retaining walls should be compacted with hand held rather than with heavy mechanized equipment. If segmental unit retaining walls such as Keystone or Rockwood will be used, we suggest importing a select granular fill for use in the reinforced zone and placing a drainage composite against cut slopes if the walls will be used in front of cut slopes. Seismic Design. This site is a seismic site class "D" under the building code based on the test boring data. GeoTechno logics, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to have provided you with our services on this project. Please contact us if you should have questions regarding this report or if we may be of any further assistance. '1111irti,, ° p sE L Z Y 0 255:; ?. y ?F nr,e d <t,+ t4 1v Sincerely, ebT :cpnologies, Inc. Ernest L. Stitzinger, P.E. NC Registration No. 25534 eta ?r;:r:fi2? w ? W w q U 4 W 1 N N 0 d z u a FID W ° ,CI u H 0 d u ° E ? ° a ro ro y O Qn 7 102 ?W A ? ro q U N ? p t ,A 0 k .d A O ? ? a?+ W, O o E M 00 N co O w vi ro O O G co 00 00 u ° y O ro O O O' u Q C13 d) 0 9 C U N O q 3 V) q ro ¢? O ° fy..• • Q O ro N ? Q h ? a + .? •0 W 0 3 -0 cd u cd .. w a. U T b 0 0 ? aui N N O O En y w Ei U S? O 4 E w 4) C cd N 0 p o • N N ro i-+ C% oA ti cd v ;a? J co p U a. ?; ' w ? O O ?•+ (n a b .C d ? o c ° (/) U - W N ro w .w n ? v o ?. ? y U ro 'H O y O ?C, O a O o rro o o M UAW P. r?-i Q, Ems'. in L a ? _ 'p ? p O w r Ln .27 c U ? •o :n ? U ? C a U A • ? ? c u A p u o ?' > a ? a i -sd i I { I I I r n M CD f_ 'o PLLLL Loon m+ H I i=n c? co u, a w o V1 W V 1 ? 1 ? _ co Q f p ' J O ? 1 i OD _J 6•/.1V- d- N? 6-? O c^- uj di V' 2 4V LL f W U? a a? w ? N ?- V CO o r h o ° o Z Z W Z ? a m ? CO o LL cu c 0 I - m U O Z G O ? N U `o d v ro N m 0 ro O U b m ? ? ro 0 y Uy ?3 U m N Z O ro N a.. U ? ?d (D .2 u ro E2 m d P 40 c a 3 i6 Z C 3 m W V) 0 0. -1 CL co ¦®E®[?]®®B®Q El ? N r n m W J LL O CD T ?y T ? M cr ELL W co U a U - w n a to T T L T OD W 00 M lD N r- r- T n OD W Z W in T M T n 00 ?. M Ln Q .4. 4 T N M N N Ch ? r N M u) ti r a O N ?' w co O N 't w co O N cr w i- T r r r N N N N 3 0 cn N Q W J U cn U W a Q W r, N 4 0 V- Z O W Z m ? O W to C 0 L U Ut W 0 N Z c r_ 0 0 N z 0 W J W J_ LL 0 a a LLI U LL N t3E1 0 W N J W z tll (9 Y ^(D W LL t Q d 0 U C U N C u e u T 0 ro O a U b U U) m v N m R ro _ L ' ro w ro ? ro x d v 0 4 a o m E c 0 0 0 c r- j -1 a u a co ?00Rl 0 r N t? M r m ;• LO f? M m O e- ?^ N r r m <r CO M O r r LO O r Q m (O tV r 00 It r m O N d' w co O N lD r r r r a w = N r O r L ? cn P. N O O N a z W z W m ? O U. C 0 L U U W o z Y O O 0 N tQ RS i T- .qtr ? co I LLL ao ; { LL 00 cu N" ?`- (I I Ilfl- (L 0 a w (? 7a O ' co CO ' ?" i----? s . N I a W a '? M o f s? ? I p r ?t--q, tV aas ,oE a ?o 1 s 1 ti` lu N a a? w o S ti 0 ° o z w z° U m 0 v) O LL Vi 2 N? d? Z1 r LL i W iii ca c .o ?a U 0 z c 0 ? N U 'a N ? c a? E i? 0- is ? CL Cf) O N r I i O -- ( O ` 0 E V i d J co > ? d I i f E I a. ? Y v I ? 0 '^ CD _j w C E U E N I W - d 0 `t N i O N ?- CO CD ?!' N d r"' C7 O d O (sayaul);uauaalpaS 11210l Q v a? rn it a? E _ U - N a CL C; ? U) co I i f i f r ? I I ro in f I N i I i ' A r I I I ? I t ? Q r W 00 >` (D to d M N r O O O O 0 O O O O O (sayoui);uauaamag Is;ol co v a? rn LL TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 6.5 12.5 17.0 20.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES n in 20 an 60 inn Topsoil ML Fill - Stiff Red Fine Sandy SILT 4-5-8 5-6-6 Fill - Soft Black-Brown Slightly Organic Clayey SILT OL 2-2-1 Alluvium - Firm Gray Clayey SILT ML 1-2-3 Possible Alluvium - Medium Dense Tan Slightly Pine SAND SM 10 10 16 Boring terminated at 20.5' - - Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B- I DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF I Maw!, t CeoTechnologies, Inc. rn 0 F L7 a' 0 N O z a 0 TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 0.0 0.3 3.0 12.5 15.5 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 Topsoil ML Possible Fill - Stiff Orange Fine Sandy Clayey SILT 6-7-8 Very Stiff to Hard Red Brown Clayey SILT ML 9-12-12 i 8-12-24 Hard Tan Fine Sandy SILT ML 13-25-27 Boring tenninated at 15.5' Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B- 2 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 IM ME, eoTe(hnologies, Inc. 0 a c? (v f` O 2 Q L) TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0,4 7.C 12.5 20.0 22.0 25.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 10 20 40 60 100 Fill -Topsoil ML Fill - Stiff to Very Stiff Red Orange SILT 5-7-9 6-6-7 Possible Fill - Firm Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT MI. 2-3-4 Stiff to Hard Brown Slightly Micaceous SILT ML 3-4-7 Partially Weathered Rock - Silty d .D 6-24-50/5" Hard Purple Fine Sandy SILT ML Boring terminated at 25.5' 40-18-30 Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER BORING NUMBER DATE PAGE 1 OF 1 1-07-1112-EA B- 3 9-10-07 3 0 fV O Z Q TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.4 3.0 6.0 12.0 15.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 0 10 20 46 60 100 Fill - Topsoil ML Fill - Very Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy SILT a-s-lo Possible Pill -Stiff Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT ML 5-6-7 Very Stiff Brown Pine Sandy SILT ML 5-7-9 Very Moist Cirm Brown Slightly Micaceous Fine Sandy SILT ML 4 3 3 Boring terminated at 15.5' - - Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-BA BORING NUMBER B- 4 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE I OF 1 a d a U' N n O Z Q TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.4 3.0 7.5 12.0 15.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 0 10 20 40 60 100 Fill - Topsoil ML Fill - Very Stiff Red Fine Sandy SILT 9-$-9 Fill - Stiff Brown Silty CLAY w/Some Organics CL CH 5-5-5 Fill - Firm Brown Silty CLAY CL 2-3-2 Very Stiff Red Slightly Micaceous Fine Sandy SILT MI.. 3-7-9 Boring ternabiated at 15.5' Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B- 5 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 0 N H a (V r 0 z_ c? TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 0.0 0.3 8.0 12.0 15.5 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 Fill - Topsoil Fill - Stiff to Very Stiff Iced Fine Sandy SILT 9-8-$ 5-4-5 Fill - Soft Brown Silty CLAY w/Some Organics CL T 3-1-2 Stiff Tarr Fine Sandy SILT ML - ' I 5-6 3 Boring terminated at 15,5' - Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B- 6 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 I • 1 11 0 a M 0 n U' rv A O z 'a TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 3.0 10.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES n in In en Kn inn Fill -Topsoil Fill - Stiff Tan Brown Clayey SILT 4-G-8 Possible Fill - Very Stiff Red Fine Sandy SILT ML 10-11-14 Boring terminated at 10.5' 6-6-8 vcvunuwdter not encounterea at time of boring. JOB NUMBER BORING NUMBER DATE PAGE 1 OF 1 1-07-1112-EA B-7 9-10-07 V1111110, Gw _ S a Q C7 F^ U' 4 U N n O 4 H TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) U 0.3 3.0 8.0 10.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES n 1 n 2n An An 1 AA Fill -Topsoil CL Fill - Very Stiff Brown Fine Sandy Silty CLAY 4-8-8 Very Stiff Brown Clayey SILT ML 6-9-15 Stiff Red Brown Clayey SILT ML Boring terminated at 10.5' 6-7-8 Uroundwater not encountered at time of boring. JOB NUMBER BORING NUMBER DATE PAGE 1 OF 1 1-07-1112-1?A \ B-8 9-10-07 ? e f 1 1 0 a w 0 a L! N n O z a 1 A TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 3.0 6.5 10.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) (A in nn AA - BLOWS PER SIX INCHES ynn Fill -Topsoil ? Fill - Very Stiff Tan SILT 5-7-9 Fill - Firm Purple Fine Sandy Clayey SILT ML 3-3-5 Possible Fill - Stiff Micaceous Fine Sandy SILT ML Boring letminated at 10.5' 5-5-7 vruunuwuter not encounterea at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B- 9 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 • 1 11 0 0 0 a C9 N n Q _Z U 4 TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 3.0 8.0 9.5 10.0 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES u 10 20 40 60 1 00 Possible Fill -Topsoil ? Possible Fill - Very Stiff Red Brown SILT 5-8-10 Stiff Purple Clayey SILT ML 5-5-8 Bard Tan Fine Sandy SILT MI Partially Weathered Rock - Silty " Boring terminated at 10' 30-50/4 %jwu,ruwater not encounterea at Me of boring. JOB NUMBER BORING NUMBER DATE PAGE 1 OF 1 1-07-1112-EA \ B-10 9-10-07 • - 1 1g 0 3 ti 0 C7 C7 CL fV n O Z Q J TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.4 7.5 10.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES U 1 0 2 0 40 60 100 Fil] - Topsoil ML Fill - Stiff to Very Stiff Tan Fine Sandy SILT 5-8-9 4-5-6 Very Stiff Brown Silty CLAY CL CI'l Boring terminated at 10.5 12-8-12 uivunuwater not encounierea at time of boring. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B-l I DATE 9-10-07;: <.. a a gi e s, I n c. PAGE 1 OF I m 0 c? w V 'a N O Z Q S ?1 TEST BORING RECORD DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 7.5 12.0 15.5 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES 0 1 0 20 40 60 100 Fill - Stiff Brown Clayey SILT 4-8-7 3-5-5 Possible Fill - Wood 3-3-4 Bard Tan SILT Boring terminated at 15.5' 6-15-22 I kirounawater not encountered at time ol'boring;. JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-EA BORING NUMBER B-12 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF i ?...... 4mc--oTe(hnologies, Inc ti a 0 c? a c? r 0 z a DEPTH (FT.) 0.0 0.3 6.0 10.5 Groundwater not encountered at time of boring. TEST BORING RECORD DESCRIPTION ELEVATION PENETRATION BLOWS PER (FT.) (BLOWS/FT.) SIX INCHES n IA 1n AA /n Fill - Topsoil ML 7V V V 1 VV Fill - Finn to Very Stiff Red Fine Sandy SILT 6-9-11 3-3-4 Possible Fill - Stiff Red Silty CLAY CL Boring terminated at 10.5' 4-5-8 JOB NUMBER 1-07-1112-BA BORING NUMBER B-13 DATE 9-10-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 RECEIVED N.C. Deot. of ENR ' 013 - 3 q 4 OCT 0 3 2008 Wlnston•Salem Regional Office CONTROL STORMWATER AND EROSION NARRATIVE AND CALCULATIONS RD 0 % 1 1 4 2008 DENR - `DATER CuAUlY NC State Employees' Credit Union WETU1yDS 00 S??`Rt`?'.^!?^?TER 1 ' Madison Rockingham County, North Carolina Prepared for: ' State Employees' Credit Union c/o O'Brien Atkins Architects PO BOX 12037 ' RTP, NC 27709 (919) 941-9000 ' Date: 4/9/2008 Revised: 9/19/2008 , yN CAR 0 ? Prepared by: r AL 033748 McKim & Creed, PA ??;GINe'? 1730 Varsity Drive C.?P?? Suite 500 Raleigh, NC 27606 ? v?MCMM&crzEED ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' NARRATIVE FIGURES ' SITE AERIAL PHOTO ' USDA SOIL SURVEY MAP PRE-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP ' POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP WATER QUALITY BIORETENTION AREA DESIGN SUMMARY SHEETS ' WATER QUANTITY PRE- vs. POST-DEVELOPMENT WATER QUANTITY SUMMARY ' EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS SEDIMENT TRAP CALCULATIONS SWALE & DIVERSION DITCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS ' RIP RAP APRON SIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER CALCULATIONS ' POST-DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER CALCULATIONS ' STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS L DESIGN NARRATIVE ' 1. GENERAL The project site is located on Chief Martin Street approximately 1115 feet from the intersection ' of Highway Street and Chief Martin Street in Rockingham County, North Carolina. The total area of the parcel is 6.99 acres. The total disturbed area for site construction is 2.96 acres. The intent of this project is to construct a new State Employees Credit Union and all associated ' parking required to serve the facility. The bank will incorporate a four lane drive-up teller bay area that will be serviced from the interior parking drives. The site will be served by public water and public sewer systems. ' Stormwater and erosion control devices will be designed and constructed in accordance with the NCDENR Division of Land Quality and Division of Water Quality requirements. 2. EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION ' The existing topography of the site is slight to moderate slopes (4% - 6%) with a high point generally in the northeast property corner around elevation 637. The site drains east to west to an existing stream. ' The point of interest used for stormwater calculations is the existing creek immediately downstream of the site. Pre-construction runoff at the point of interest is 4.51 cfs for the 1-yr, t 24-hour storm. The water body downstream from the site is Big Beaver Island Creek, which is considered class C water. Existing vegetation consists primarily of trees, and existing soils on the site are, per USGS soils survey, SvB (Stoneville Loam, 2-8% slopes) and SwC (Stoneville- urban land complex, 2-10% slopes). The soils are classified as hydrologic soil type B. 3. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ' An existing 36" corrugated metal pipe currently enters the site from the east and outlets stormwater from the adjacent site into the existing stream mentioned above. The corrugated metal pipe will be shortened and rerouted around the site to bypass offsite runoff. The offsite drainage area to this pipe was estimated using aerial photographs to have 10.02 acres of impervious surface and 2.90 acres of pervious surface. There is also a 12" CMP at the southeast corner of the site that discharges stormwater from the same adjacent property. The ' offsite drainage area to this pipe was estimated to be 1.42 acres of impervious surface and 2.57 acres of pervious surface. This drainage will also bypass the proposed site. ' Onsite stormwater controls were designed for 85% TSS removal and control of the first 1 " of runoff per NCDWQ requirements. Two grassed bioretention areas are proposed to meet these requirements. Pre-development runoff for the 1-yr, 24-hour storm is 4.51 cfs while post- development runoff is 3.68 cfs. Offsite areas where there was no change in runoff between pre- and post-development were not included in these calculations. Stormwater runoff will be conveyed to the proposed bioretention areas through a system of ' reinforced concrete pipes, catch basins, drop inlets, flared end sections and manholes. Rip-rap aprons will serve to reduce exit velocities at proposed flared end sections. J 4. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTOL ' Erosion control measures have been designed per NCDENR Division of Land Quality requirements. Temporary diversion ditches, silt fence, inlet protection and sediment traps have all been implemented to reduce sediment laden runoff from the site. A temporary construction ' entrance will be constructed on Chief Martin Rd. D 11 FIGURES 3 14 4 z .mwnv? IOIY? ro ?oorurw wM+uw?+i Mwrmm'w umaoe .w•morurw wws?r?en°o sui duai? p 1coB-mz( 6l6) xre joN ?uo5jpB Uujjol?D u? ..... "- 5'= = y?- QQ$$ e M-M '3131 616 M, MOM WMN 'IY 1PU oos Wins '3nwa usarn ocu ! . lawjS u!u.W 3a!4J 4s9 aay30 uos!pey? ` ° $ 5? s S a o a w r w uoiun jjpwD,sooKojdwg olviS 0 W? ?°?F I a .nor i 5 ? I i R H ? I III - s I 1 /? ? ?\ ?9\?I?III II WN ? I 1 ? I c ? ce?`u 1 ?o ? \ `a° III... ,Sys p" ems' 1 `7"? Wig N95 z / I a p, Q ?IIII \ /? ? \? ?9\ I? I " I II I n c? ?? 'N L n \ I I I I 31 l . i 4/, ID - - -- - -- - -- - -- i 1 I m r m m = m • .°c•aa9rurw wy+s?nwrr° UIAIV uaia p ButjoJL'D uIzoN `uosi L'W . = a x „1 1608-992 filfi 3131 Q ?r7!9OK YmMIOWJNlla1N 'Ik)131Ytl ,yy'e? aa Qa? l_L711?J? usarY ?Lt/J..v q laaalS U1W JO UOS PUN i J o a a uoiun iipojD ,so;)XojdLuR owIS 09 1 z Elm MIN MIR i o Q e? 3?SS q I rrF ° e+ I I I AIOI>b?0? ? ?'q '`I Q ? III -- ----- I sfl II I ° I ? I I I J3 jig ?o I W^ X-i 11 Cayho?Z00F I i l - UU I I'4i r0s "?? UU \ I 0 p -'z ge ?j illOO r .N 00, ? I I I I I I I , Ir .0 f \I ?° ?1I ? N ?I III/ I ^I ?Lj L ' 1 I?° I I XZ'CIOMOI!'0 71 _io_ z Z MOllVll$ Jl Zbl?O _, °° O I I f =m 1 ° I I I e 1 I / I I / ? ?I I I ---- l` i WATER QUALITY 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTH BIORETENTION AREA Project Information: Project Name: SECU - Madison McKim & Creed Project #: 01517-0178 Designed by: JCA Date: 9/23/2008 Revised by: Date: Revised by: Date: Checked by: Date: Site Information: Sub Area Location: Post-1 Drainage Area (DA) = 1.31 Acres Impervious Area (IA) = 0.73 Acres Percent Impervious (1) = 55.7 % Required Storage Volume: Design Storm = 1.0 inch Determine Rv Value = 0.05 +.009 (1) = 0.55 Storage Volume Required = 2,623 cf Surface Area: Ponding Depth = 10 in. Surface Area = 3,147 sf Elevations: Top Elevation = 624.00 ft Temporary Pool Elevation = 622.83 ft (Riser Elev.) Bottom Elevation = 622.00 ft Areas/Volumes: Area @ Top of Temporary Pool = 3,756 sf (Elev = 622.83) Bottom Surface Area = 3,174 sf (Elev = 622.00) Volume of Temporary Storage = 2,923 cf Bottom Elev. (622') to Riser Elev. (622.83')) Bioretention Area Side Slopes = 3 : 1 Volume of Storage for 1" Storm = 2,923 Yes ( 2923 > 2623 ) cf 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTH BIORETENTION AREA Find Time Drawdown of Water Through Bio-Retention Soil Laver A. Rate of Drawdown Qd = (2.3e-5) * k * SA * H / L H / L Approximatley = 1 Qd= 0.1448 cf B. Find Time to Drawdown Water from Inundation to Saturation at Surface: Volume to Drawdown: Vi-s = SA *Depth Vi-s = 2,623 Time to Remove Volume of Water at Flowrate Qd: Ti-s = Vi-s / Qd = 18,116 sec. 5 hr. C. Find Time to Drawdown Water from Saturation at Surface to 2 feet Below Surface: Porosity (n) = 0.45 Volume to Drawdown: Vi-s = 2 feet * SA * n Vs-2 = 2,832 Time to Remove Volume of Water at Flowrate Qd: Ts-2 = Vs-2 / Qd = 19,565 sec. = 5 hrs D. Total Time to Draw Water Through Soil: T= 10 hrs I NORTH BIORETENTION AREA Underdrain Pipe Sizing Note: Underdrain pipes are to be used when existing soil is clay. NxD=16*( 10*Qd*n/s^0.5)^(3/8) N (Numbr of Underdrain Pipes ) D (Pipe Diameter) = 6 in s (Internal Slope of Pipe) = 0.50% n (Mannings Roughness Coefficient) = 0.011 N x D = 9.15 N = 1.52 = 2 Pipes Pipe Type and Diameter Manning Roughness Coeff. 4" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.014 - 0.015 4" Smooth Wall Plastic 0.010 - 0.011 6" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.014 - 0.015 6" Smooth Wall Plastic 0.010 - 0.011 8" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.015 - 0.016 Gravel Envelope: Underdrain pipe should have 2 inches gravel cover. The minimum depth for the gravel envelope should be 6 inches. Depth = 8 in 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SOUTH BIORETENTION AREA Project Information: Project Name: McKim & Creed Project #: Designed by: Revised by: Revised by: Checked by: Site Information: Sub Area Location: Drainage Area (DA) _ Impervious Area (IA) _ Percent Impervious (1) _ Required Storage Volume: Design Storm = Determine Rv Value = Storage Volume Required = SEW - Madison 01517-0178 JCA Date: 9/23/2008 Date: Date: Date: Post-2 0.94 Acres 0.50 Acres 53.2 % 1.0 inch 0.05 +.009 (1) = 0.53 1,804 cf Surface Area: Ponding Depth = 10 in. Surface Area = 2,165 sf Elevations: Top Elevation = 623.00 ft Temporary Pool Elevation = 621.83 ft (Riser Elev.) Bottom Elevation = 621.00 ft Areas/Volumes: Area @ Top of Temporary Pool = 2,763 sf (Elev = 621.83) Bottom Surface Area = 2,298 sf (Elev = 621.00) Volume of Temporary Storage = 2,137 cf Bottom Elev. (621') to Riser Elev. (621.83')) Bioretention Area Side Slopes = 3 : 1 Volume of Storage for 1" Storm = 2,137 Yes ( 2137 > 1804 ) cf 1 1 1 1 1 SOUTH BIORETENTION AREA Find Time Drawdown of Water Through Bio-Retention Soil Laver A. Rate of Drawdown Qd = (2.3e-5) * k * SA * H / L H / L Approximatley = 1 Qd= 0.0996 cf B. Find Time to Drawdown Water from Inundation to Saturation at Surface: Volume to Drawdown: Vi-s = SA *Depth Vi-s = 1,804 Time to Remove Volume of Water at Flowrate Qd: Ti-s = Vi-s / Qd = 18,116 sec. 5 hr. C. Find Time to Drawdown Water from Saturation at Surface to 2 feet Below Surface: Porosity (n) = 0.45 Volume to Drawdown: Vi-s = 2 feet * SA * n Vs-2 = 1,948 Time to Remove Volume of Water at Flowrate Qd: Ts-2 = Vs-2 / Qd = 19,565 sec. = 5 hrs D. Total Time to Draw Water Through Soil: T= 10 hrs SOUTH BIORETENTION AREA Underdrain Pipe Sizing Note: Underdrain pipes are to be used when existing soil is clay. NxD=16*( 10*Qd*n/s^0.5)^(3/8) N (Numbr of Underdrain Pipes ) D (Pipe Diameter) = 6 in s (Internal Slope of Pipe) = 0.50% n (Mannings Roughness Coefficient) = 0.011 N x D = 7.95 N = 1.33 2 Pipes Pipe Type and Diameter Manning Roughness Coeff. 4" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.014 - 0.015 4" Smooth Wall Plastic 0.010 - 0.011 6" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.014 - 0.015 6" Smooth Wall Plastic 0.010 - 0.011 8" Single Wall Corrugated Plastic 0.015 - 0.016 Gravel Envelope: Underdrain pipe should have 2 inches gravel cover. The minimum depth for the gravel envelope should be 6 inches. Depth = 8 in 7 WATER QUANTITY 1 11 I 1 11 N N co N Q J r 'O U Co co cu U N L Y a U U ?a 0 R U o= E Z 2 E O U (n MO) -a O C Z CU c C1 N L m E E 7 co C U L r N +? O a M > co o ? 5? U O CO M Q ? . O I0 N O U fB (B a° Q CY) U c LL. (0 Q O O a? D ? cu a W Q m 01 ? -1 +?I O r' N C O N ? N U 7 (p U U C a c m o L N U L O O c N (D N > cu -a I-- 0 C a) E L O Q N N > 0) _0 O N O 2 Q C C U ?- ? ? a)_O a L o rnT c :, cn -O = 40-- =3 0 C Q 2 O .C Y O a) (6 C ? N C N U O 0 0 o -0 3 cu cu -0 w c co o m o ?. M a) Co maDM=3 U N N (0 U L "0 N L N ? N 000.5 , N M a) O Z EROSION CONTROL ' CALCULATIONS 11 II L' C SEDIMENT TRAP #1 Project Information Project Name: SECU - Madison McKim & Creed Project #: 01517-0178 Designed by: JCA Date: 9116/2008 Revised by: Date: Checked by: GML Date: 9/18/2008 Drainage Area Total, AT= 1.56 Ac Disturbed, AD= 1.11 Ac 10-year Runoff (Q10) C = 0.60 Tc = 5.00 min 110 = 7.22 in/hr Q10 = 6.76 cfs Surface Area Required SA = 435 sf X Q10 SA = 2,940 sf (At Spillway Elevation) Non-Rectangular Areas Surface = 3,520 sf (At Spillway Elevation) Bottom = 1,388 sf Volume Required VR = 3600 cf/Ac x AD VR = 3,996 cf (At Spillway Elevation) Side Slopes = 3 :1 Depth = 3.5 ft Elevations Description Elevation Top of Berm 624.00 (Allow 1ft freeboard above spillway flow height) Emergency Spillway 622.50 Cleanout Mark 620.75 (Half of storage height) Bottom 619.00 Provided SAP= 3,520 sf > 2,940 VP = 8,589 cf > 3,996 Emergency Spillway - Q10 110 = 7.22 in/hr Q10 = 6.76 cfs h = 1.5 ft CW = 3.0 Minimum Lw= 6 ft (Minumum set by NCDENR) Actual Lw= 10 ft (Based on Q10 Flows) Depth at Spillway = 0.37 SEDIMENT TRAP #2 i Project Information Project Name: SECU - Madison McKim & Creed Project #: 01517-0178 Designed by: JCA Date: 9/16/2008 Revised by: Date: Checked by: GML Date: 9/18/2008 Drainage Area Total, AT= 1.55 Ac Disturbed, AD= 1.29 Ac 10-year Runoff (Q10) C = 0.50 Tc = 5.00 min 110 = 7.22 in/hr Q10 = 5.60 cfs Surface Area Required SA = 435 sf X Q10 SA = 2,434 sf (At Spillway Elevation) Non-Rectangular Areas Surface = 2,573 sf (At Spillway Elevation) Bottom = 945 sf Volume Required VR = 3600 cf/Ac x AD VR = 4,644 cf (At Spillway Elevation) Side Slopes = 3 :1 Depth = 3.5 ft Elevations Description Elevation Top of Berm 623.00 (Allow 1ft freeboard above spillway flow height) Emergency Spillway 621.50 Cleanout Mark 619.75 (Half of storage height) Bottom 618.00 Provided SAP= 2,573 sf > 2,434 VP = 6,157 cf > 4,644 Emergency Spillway - Q10 110 = 7.22 in/hr Q10 = 5.60 cfs h = 1.5 ft Cw = 3.0 Minimum Lw= 6 ft (Minumum set by NCDENR) Actual Lw= 10 ft (Based on Q10 Flows) Depth at Spillway = 0.32 ' SEDCAD 4.0 f -,Hri hf 1QQR P-I. I Ghuiah 1 Swale #1 Permanent Lining Material: Grass mixture Trapezoidal Channel Left Ri ht Bottom 9 Retardance Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Limitin 9 Width (ft) Sideslope Sideslope Slope (%) Classes R ti R ti Depth (ft) % of Depth Mult. x Velocity (fps) a o a o (VxD) 3.50 3.0:1 3.0:1 3.9 D, B 0.50 5.0 Stability Stability Capacity Capacity Class D w/o Class D w/ Class B w/o Class B w/ Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Design Discharge: 1.67 cfs 1.67 cfs Depth: 0.28 ft 0.78 ft j 0.61 ft 1.11 ft Top Width: 5.21 ft 8.21 ft -- r - 7.15 ft ------------ 10.15 ft Velocity: 1.35 fps 0.52 fps X-Section Area: 1.24 sq ft 3.24 sq ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.234 0.441 Froude Number: 0.49 0.14 Roughness Coefficient: 0.0830 0.3296 SEDCAD Utility Run Printed 09-17-2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SEDCAD 4.0 1QOa ate. 1. 1 Diversion Ditch #1 Temporary Linina Material: Straw w/ Net Triangular Channel Left Right Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Sideslope Sideslope Slope (%) Manning's n Mult. x Ratio Ratio Depth (ft) % of Depth (VxD) 3.0:1 3.0:1 3.9 0.0330 0.30 w/o Freeboard w/ Freeboard Design Discharge: 1.67 cfs Depth: 0.43 ft 0.73 ft Top Width: 2.55 ft 4.35 ft Velocity: 3.07 fps X-Section Area: 0.54 sq ft Hydraulic Radius: Froude Number: 0.202 1.17 Check that T < Tmax for Straw w/ Net For Straw w/ Net, Tmax =1.45 T=7xdxs Where: 7 = 62.4 d = 0.43 s =0.039 62.4 x 0.43 x 0.039 = 1.05 T < Tmax 1.05 < 1.45 Straw w/ Net is acceptable 1 SEDCAD Utility Run Printed 09-17-2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SEDCAD 4.0 r- ... ;m,* 1008 P-1. I Crh?eroh 1 Diversion Ditch #2 Temporary Lining Material: Straw w/ Net Triangular Channel Left Right Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Sideslope Sideslope Slope (%) Manning's n Mult. x Ratio Ratio Depth (ft) % of Depth (VxD) . 3.0:1 3.0:1 5.0 0.0330 0.50 w/o Freeboard w/ Freeboard Design Discharge: 1.15 cfs Depth: 0.35 ft 0.85 ft Top Width: Velocity: 2.12 ft 5.12 ft 3.07 fps X-Section Area: 0.37 sq ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.168 Froude Number: 1.29 Check that T < Tmax for Straw w/ Net For Straw w/ Net, Tmax =1.45 T= Yxdxs Where: 'Y = 62.4 d = 0.35 s =0.050 62.4x0.35 x0.050=1.09 T < Tmax 1.09 < 1.45 .•. Straw w/ Net is acceptable SEDCAD Utility Run Printed 09-17-2008 SEDCAD 4.0 r-,Hnht 1 QQR P-1. I Rrh-.K 1 Diversion Ditch #3 Temporary Lining Material: Straw w/ Mat Triangular Channel Left Right Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Sideslope Sideslope Slope (%) Manning's n Mult. x Ratio Ratio Depth (ft) °/Q of Depth (VxD) 3.0:1 3.0:1 3.4 0.0330 0.50 w/o Freeboard w/ Freeboard Design Discharge: 3.58 cfs Depth: 0.58 ft 1.08 ft Top Width: 3.49 ft 6.49 ft Velocity: 3.53 fps X-Section Area: 1.01 sq ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.276 Froude Number: 1.15 Check that T < Tmax for Straw w/ Net For Straw w/ Net, Tmax =1.45 T-7x dxs Where: 7 = 62.4 d = 0.58 s =0.034 62.4 x 0.58 x 0.034 = 1.23 T < Tmax 1.23 < 1.45 .•. Straw w/ Net is acceptable SEDCAD Utility Run Printed 09-17-2008 SEDCAD 4.0 f'--;r h} 10QA 0-1. I Crhuroh Diversion Ditch #4 Temporary Lim Material: Straw w/ Net Triangular Channel Left Right Freeboard Freeboard Freeboard Sideslope Sideslope Slope (%) Manning's n Mult. x Ratio Ratio Depth (ft) % of Depth (VxD) 3.0:1 3.0:1 4.3 0.0330 0.50 w/o Freeboard w/ Freeboard Design Discharge: 2.96 cfs Depth: 0.52 ft 1.02 ft Top Width: 3.11 ft 6.11 ft Velocity: 3.66 fps X-Section Area: 0.81 sq ft Hydraulic Radius: 0.246 Froude Number: 1.27 Check that T < Tmax for Straw w/ Net For Straw w/ Net, Tmax =1.45 T=yxdxs Where: 7 = 62.4 d = 0.52 s =0.043 62.4 x 0.52 x 0.043 = 1.40 T < Tmax 1.40 < 1.45 .•. Straw w/ Net is acceptable 1 SEDCAD Utility Run Printed 09-17-2008 fl 11 1 1 • • • PROJECT NAME: SECU - Madison PROJECT LOCATION: Madison, NC DATE: 9/16/08 PROJECT NO: 1517-0178 DESIGNED BY: JCA CHECKED BY GML Storm Outlet Structure Structure= FES-5 Q10/Qfull = 1.58 Size= 48 in V/Vfull = 1.10 Q10= 74.19 cfs V = 7.3 fps Qfull = 47.08 cfs Vfull = 6.66 fps From Fig. 8.06.b.1: Zone = 2 From Fig. 8.06.b.2: D5o = 8 in DMAx = 12 in {; Riprap Class = B Apron Thickness Apron Length - - = 22 24.0 in ft Length Apron Width = 3 x Dia 12.0 ft Storm Outlet Structure Structure= FES-20 Q10/Qfull = 0.57 Size= 18 in V/Vfull = 1.024 Q10 = 8.00 cfs V = 8.2 fps Qfull = 14.07 cfs Vfull = 7.96 fps From Fig. 8.06.b.1: Zone = 2 From Fig. 8.06.b.2: D50 = 8 in DMAx = 12 in y Riprap Class Apron Thickness = = B 22 in ' ; { t t r Apron Length = 9.0 ft Apron Width = 3 x Dia = 5.0 ft 1 L 1 1 0 • • • • PROJECT NAME: SECU - Madison PROJECT LOCATION: Madison, NC DATE: 9/16/08 PROJECT NO: 1517-0178 DESIGNED BY: JCA CHECKED BY GML Storm Outlet Structure Structure= FES-13 Q10/Qful1 = 0.53 Size= 15 in V/Vfull = 1.012 Q10 = 5.93 cfs V = 9.2 fps Qfull = 11.17 cfs Vfull = 9.10 fps From Fig. 8.06.b.1: Zone = 2 From Fig. 8.06.b.2: D50 = 8 in DmAx = 12 in -I Riprap Class = B Apron Thickness = 22 in 3 Apron Length = 7.5 ft Length Apron Width = 3 x Dia = 4.0 ft Storm Outlet Structure Structure= FES-18 Q10/Qfull = 0.26 Size= 15 in V/Vfull = 0.831 Q10 = 3.68 cfs V = 9.8 fps Qfull = 14.42 cfs Vfull = 11.75 fps From Fig. 8.06.b.1: Zone = 2 From Fig. 8.06.b.2: D50 = 8 in DMAx = 12 in -7 Riprap Class = B sl Apron Thickness = 22 in MR. Apron Length = 7.5 ft Length Apron Width = 3 x Dia = 4.0 ft PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 1 I Pre-1 OLD Off s ite-1 pre,, n POA #1 Type.... Master Network Summary Page 2.01 Name.... Watershed File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Raleigh, NC Total Depth Rainfall Return Event in Type RNF ID ---- ------- Pre ----- 1 ------ 3.0000 ---------------- Synthetic Curve ------------ TypeII 24hr Pre 2 3.6000 Synthetic Curve TypeII 24hr Pre 10 5.3800 Synthetic Curve TypeII 24hr MASTER NETWORK SUMMARY SCS Unit Hydrograph Method (*Node=Outfall; +Node=Diversion;) (Trun= HYG Truncation: Blank=None; L=Left; R=Rt; LR=Left&Rt) Max Return HYG Vol Qpeak Qpeak Max WSEL Pond Storage Node ID Type - Event ------ cu.ft Trun ---------- -- hrs --------- cfs -------- ft -------- cu.ft ------------ -------------- OFFSITE-1 --- --- AREA 1 9647 11.9000 3.64 OFFSITE-1 AREA 2 11730 11.9000 4.39 OFFSITE-1 AREA 10 17921 11.9000 6.59 *POA #1 JCT 1 23062 11 . 9500 4.51 - ?' r s'?{ nn *POA #1 JCT 2 30584 11.9500 5.83 *POA #1 JCT 10 54796 12.0000 10.17 PRE-1 AREA 1 13415 12.2000 2.78 PRE-1 AREA 2 18853 12.2000 4.03 PRE-1 AREA 10 36875 12.2000 8.11 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:27 AM 9/22/2008 11, DESIGN STORMS SUMMARY ' Storm Tag Name =- ----- --- ---- Pre--1---------- Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 1 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 3.0000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs ' m St T N = Pre 2 orm ag a e ------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------- Data Type, File, ID = ---- Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr ' Storm Frequency = 2 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 3.6000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Storm Tag Name = ----- --- ---- Pre-10---- Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 10 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 5.3800 in ' Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs L Type.... Design Storms Name.... Raleigh, NC File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede Title... Project Date: 7/9/2008 Project Engineer: Nick Lutzweiler Project Title: SECU-Madison Project Comments: Design Storm File,ID = Raleigh, NC Storm Tag Name = Pre100 Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 100 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 8.0000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Page 4.01 11 1 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:27 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... OFFSITE-1 Page 6.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment #1: Tc: TR-55 Sheet Mannings n .0110 Hydraulic Length 100.00 ft 2yr, 24hr P 3.6000 in Slope .040000 ft/ft Avg.Velocity 1.93 ft/sec Segment #1 Time: .0144 hrs Segment #2: Tc: TR-55 Shallow Hydraulic Length 251.00 ft Slope .051000 ft/ft Unpaved Avg.Velocity 3.64 ft/sec Segment #2 Time: .0191 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #3: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 2.5000 Wetted Perimeter 5.91 Hydraulic Radius .42 Slope .048000 Mannings n .0500 Hydraulic Length 272.00 sq.ft ft ft ft/ft ft Avg.Velocity 3.68 ft/sec --------------------------------------------------- Segment #3 Time 0205 hrs Total Tc: .0541 hrs Calculated Tc < Min.Tc: Use Minimum Tc... -Use-Tc-=------_0833-hrs- S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:28 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... PRE-1 Page 6.04 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede t 1 1 1 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment #1: Tc: TR-55 Sheet Mannings n .8000 Hydraulic Length 100.00 ft 2yr, 24hr P 3.6000 in Slope .027000 ft/ft Avg.Velocity .05 ft/sec Segment #1 Time: .5210 hrs Segment #2: Tc: TR-55 Shallow Hydraulic Length 440.00 ft Slope .063000 ft/ft Unpaved Avg.Velocity 4.05 ft/sec Segment #2 Time: .0302 hrs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Tc: .5512 hrs ------------------------- ------------------------- S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:28 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... OFFSITE-1 Page 7.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Impervious 98 .960 98.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> .960 98.00 (98) SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:28 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... PRE-1 Page 7.02 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Prede RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA ------------------------------------ ---- ---------- ------------------------ Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- - Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Goo --- 61 --------- .220 ----- ----- ------ 61.00 Impervious Areas - Paved; open ditc 89 .090 89.00 Newly graded area (pervious only - 86 2.270 86.00 Woods - good 55 .870 55.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> 3.450 76.67 (77) SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:28 AM 9/22/2008 i C' F u POST-DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 1 Offs ite-1 Untreated-2 Untreated-1 :; . O a2 Untre ated ' A North Pond Routing North Post-1 North Bio POA #1 South pond Post-2 South Bio 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Master Network Summary Page 2.01 Name.... Watershed File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Raleigh, NC Total Depth Rainfall Return Event in Type RN F ID ------- Dev ----- 1 ------ 3.0000 --------- Synthetic ------- Curve ------- TypeII --------- 24hr Dev 2 3.6000 Synthetic Curve TypeII 24hr Dev 10 5.3800 Synthetic Curve TypeII 24hr Dev100 8.0000 Synthetic Curve TypeII 24hr MASTER NETWORK SUMMARY SCS Unit Hydrograph Method (*Node=Outfall; +Node=Diversion;) (Trun= HYG Truncation: Blank=None; L=Left; R=Rt; LR=Left&Rt) Max Return HYG Vol Qpeak Qpeak Max WSEL Pond Storage ' Node ID Type Event cu.ft Trun hrs cfs ft cu.ft ----- ------- NORTH BIO - ---- IN ---- POND ------ 1 --- ----- -- -- 6556 --------- 11.9500 - - - 2.72 - - --- ------------ NORTH BIO IN POND 2 8870 11.9000 3.68 ' NORTH BIO IN POND 10 16267 11.9000 6.77 NORTH BIO IN POND 100 27863 11.9000 11.43 NORTH BIO OUT POND 1 3683 12.1500 .51 622.88 3067 ' NORTH BIO OUT POND 2 5997 12.0500 2.09 623.02 3602 NORTH BIO OUT POND 10 13394 12.0000 6.04 623.22 4411 NORTH BIO OUT POND 100 24990 11.9500 10.57 623.40 5141 ' OFFSITE-1 AREA 1 9647 11.9000 3.64 OFFSITE-1 AREA 2 11730 11.9000 4.39 OFFSITE-1 AREA 10 17921 11.9000 6.59 OFFSITE-1 AREA 100 27043 11.9000 9.83 ' SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:29 AM 9/24/2008 1 Type.... Master Network Summary Page 2.01 Name.... Watershed File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd MASTER NETWORK SUMMARY SCS Unit Hydrograph Method (*Node=Outfall; +Node=Diversion;) (Trun= HYG Truncation: Blank=None; L=Left; R=Rt; LR=Left&Rt) Return HYG Vol Node ID Type Event cu.ft Trun ------ ------------- *POA #1 ---- ---- JCT ------ 1 ---- 16948 *POA #1 JCT 2 23988 *POA #1 JCT 10 46982 *POA #1 JCT 100 84120 POST-1 AREA 1 6556 POST-1 AREA 2 8870 POST-1 AREA 10 16267 POST-1 AREA 100 27863 POST-2 AREA 1 4481 POST-2 AREA 2 6106 POST-2 AREA 10 11339 POST-2 AREA 100 19592 SOUTH BIO IN POND 1 4481 SOUTH BIO IN POND 2 6106 SOUTH BIO IN POND 10 11339 SOUTH BIO IN POND 100 19592 SOUTH BIO OUT POND 1 2383 SOUTH BIO OUT POND 2 4009 SOUTH BIO OUT POND 10 9241 SOUTH BIO OUT POND 100 17495 UNTREATED-1 AREA 1 1063 UNTREATED-1 AREA 2 1960 UNTREATED-1 AREA 10 5670 UNTREATED-1 AREA 100 12967 UNTREATED-2 AREA 1 172 UNTREATED-2 AREA 2 292 UNTREATED-2 AREA 10 756 UNTREATED-2 AREA 100 1625 Max Qpeak Qpeak Max WSEL Pond Storage hrs cfs ft cu.ft --------- 11.9000 -------- -------- 3.67 <- ~ I` ------------ 12.0500 5.97 y? Srr? 11.9500 16.93 11.9500 29.13 11.9500 2.72 11.9000 3.68 11.9000 6.77 11.9000 11.43 11.9500 1.86 11.9500 2.53 11.9000 4.72 11.9000 8.06 11.9500 1.86 11.9500 2.53 11.9000 4.72 11.9000 8.06 12.3000 .27 621.86 2173 12.0500 1.35 621.97 2480 11.9500 4.33 622.14 2971 11.9500 7.61 622.30 3449 12.3500 .10 12.3000 .26 12.2500 1.06 12.2500 2.71 12.0000 .06 12.0000 .11 11.9500 .31 11.9500 .67 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:29 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 DESIGN STORMS SUMMARY ' Design Storm File,ID = Raleigh, NC Storm Tag Name = Dev 1 ' ----- --- ---- Data Type, File, ID = -- ---------- Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 1 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 3.0000 in ' Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs u L 1 Type.... Design Storms Name.... Raleigh, NC File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd Title... Project Date: 7/9/2008 Project Engineer: Nick Lutzweiler Project Title: SECU-Madison Project Comments: Storm Tag Name = Dev 2 Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 2 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 3.6000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Storm Tag Name = Dev 10 Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 10 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 5.3800 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Storm Tag Name = Dev100 Data Type, File, ID = Synthetic Storm TypeII 24hr Storm Frequency = 100 yr Total Rainfall Depth= 8.0000 in Duration Multiplier = 1 Resulting Duration = 24.0000 hrs Resulting Start Time= .0000 hrs Step= .1000 hrs End= 24.0000 hrs Page 4.01 1 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:33 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... OFFSITE-1 Page 6.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd ........................................................................ ........................................................................ TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR ........................................................................ ........................................................................ Segment #1: Tc: TR-55 Sheet Mannings n .0110 Hydraulic Length 100.00 ft 2yr, 24hr P 3.6000 in Slope .040000 ft/ft Avg.Velocity 1.93 ft/sec Segment #1 Time: .0144 hrs Segment #2: Tc: TR-55 Shallow Hydraulic Length 130.00 ft Slope .035000 ft/ft Paved Avg.Velocity 3.80 ft/sec Segment #2 Time: .0095 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #3: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area .6200 sq.ft Wetted Perimeter 1.97 ft Hydraulic Radius .31 ft Slope .018000 ft/ft Mannings n .0130 Hydraulic Length 28.00 ft Avg.Velocity 7.11 ft/sec Segment #3 Time: .0011 hrs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:33 AM 9/22/2008 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... OFFSITE-1 Page 6.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd Segment #4: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 3.5300 sq.ft Wetted Perimeter 4.71 ft Hydraulic Radius .75 ft Slope .020000 ft/ft Mannings n .0130 Hydraulic Length 349.00 ft Avg.Velocity 13.37 ft/sec Segment #4 Time: .0072 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #5: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 6.2800 Wetted Perimeter 6.28 Hydraulic Radius 1.00 Slope .005000 Mannings n .0130 Hydraulic Length 36.00 sq.ft ft ft ft/ft ft Avg.Velocity 8.10 ft/sec Segment #5 Time: .0012 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #6: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 2.5000 sq.ft Wetted Perimeter 5.91 ft Hydraulic Radius .42 ft Slope .042000 ft/ft Mannings n .0500 Hydraulic Length 111.00 ft Avg.Velocity 3.44 ft/sec Segment 46 Time: .0090 hrs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Tc: .0425 hrs Calculated Tc < Min.Tc: Use Minimum Tc... Use Tc = .0833 hrs SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:33 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... POST-1 Page 6.05 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment #1: Tc: User Defined Segment #1 Time 0833 hrs -----------------------------------------------_--- ------------------------- ------------------------- -Total-Tc:-----.0833-hrs- S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:33 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 ii Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... POST-2 Page 6.07 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment #1: Tc: User Defined ------ ----------------------------------- -----_0833 - hrs Segment #1 Time ------------------------- ------------------------- -Total-Tc_-----.0833-hrs- S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:33 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... UNTREATED-1 Page 6.09 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd ........................................................................ ........................................................................ TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment #1: Tc: TR-55 Sheet Mannings n .8000 Hydraulic Length 100.00 ft 2yr, 24hr P 3.6000 in Slope .027000 ft/ft Avg.Velocity .05 ft/sec Segment #1 Time: .5210 hrs Segment #2: Tc: TR-55 Shallow Hydraulic Length 142.00 ft Slope .050000 ft/ft Unpaved Avg.Velocity 3.61 ft/sec segment #2 Time: .0109 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #3: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 3.7500 Wetted Perimeter 9.16 Hydraulic Radius .41 Slope .038000 Mannings n .0300 Hydraulic Length 236.00 sq.ft ft ft ft/ft ft Avg.Velocity 5.34 ft/sec Segment #3 Time: 0123 hrs ------------- --------------------------- ------------------------ S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... UNTREATED-1 Page 6.09 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd Segment #4: Tc: TR-55 Shallow Hydraulic Length 142.00 ft Slope .132000 ft/ft Unpaved Avg.Velocity 5.86 ft/sec Segment #4 Time: .0067 hrs ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment #5: Tc: TR-55 Channel Flow Area 2.5000 Wetted Perimeter 5.91 Hydraulic Radius .42 Slope .036000 Mannings n .0500 Hydraulic Length 59.00 sq.ft ft ft ft/ft ft Avg.Velocity 3.19 ft/sec Segment #5 Time: - hrs -Total-Tc_-----.5561-hrs_ SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 t Type.... Tc Calcs Name.... UNTREATED-2 Page 6.13 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATOR Segment 41: Tc: User Defined 1 1 ------ - ------------------------------------_-----_0833 - hrs Segment 41 Time ------------------------- ------------------------- -Total-Tc:-----.0833-hrs- S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Page 7.01 Name.... OFFSITE-1 1 1 1 1 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Impervious 98 .960 98.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> .960 98.00 (98) SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 ' Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Impervious Areas - Paved parking to 98 .730 98.00 Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Goo 61 .580 61.00 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... POST-1 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> 1.310 81.62 (82) Page 7.02 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... POST-2 Page 7.03 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Goo 61 .440 61.00 Impervious Areas - Paved parking to 98 .500 98.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> .940 80.68 (81) ........................................................................... S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:34 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 s t 1 1 1 1 1 1 L I 1 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... UNTREATED-1 Page 7.04 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA .......................................................................... .......................................................................... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Woods - good 55 .760 55.00 Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Goo 61 .430 61.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> 1.190 57.17 (57) ........................................................................... SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:35 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Runoff CN-Area Name.... UNTREATED-2 Page 7.05 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA .......................................................................... .......................................................................... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impervious Area Adjustment Adjusted Soil/Surface Description CN acres %C %UC CN -------------------------------- ---- --------- ----- ----- ------ Open space (Lawns,parks etc.) - Goo 61 .130 61.00 COMPOSITE AREA & WEIGHTED CN ---> .130 61.00 (61) SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:35 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/22/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Vol: Elev-Area Name.... NORTH BIO Page 12.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd Elevation Planimeter Area Al+A2+sgr(Al*A2) Volume Volume Sum (ft) (sq?in) (sq?ft) (sq.ft) --- - (cu.ft)-- -- -(cu?ft) ---- ---- 622.00 ----- -- ----- 3174 ----- 0 0 0 623.00 ----- 3880 10563 3521 3521 624.00 ----- 4642 12766 4255 7776 POND VOLUME EQUATIONS * Incremental volume computed by the Conic Method for Reservoir Volumes. Volume = (1/3) * (EL2-EL1) * (Areal + Areal + sq.rt.(Areal*Area2)) where: EL1, EL2 = Lower and upper elevations of the increment Areal,Area2 = Areas computed for EL1, EL2, respectively Volume = Incremental volume between ELl and EL2 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:30 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Vol: Elev-Area Name.... SOUTH BIO Page 12.02 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd Elevation Planimeter Area Al+A2+sgr(Al*A2) Volume Volume Sum (ft) - --- (sq.in) (sq.ft) ---------------------- (sq.ft) ----------------- (cu.ft) --------- (cu.ft) ------------- ------ - 621.00 ----- 2298 0 0 0 622.00 ----- 2862 7725 2575 2575 623.00 ----- 3483 9502 3167 5742 POND VOLUME EQUATIONS * Incremental volume computed by the Conic Method for Reservoir Volumes. Volume = (1/3) * (EL2-EL1) * (Areal + Area2 + sq.rt.(Area1*Area2)) where: EL1, EL2 = Lower and upper elevations of the increment Areal,Area2 = Areas computed for EL1, EL2, respectively Volume = Incremental volume between EL1 and EL2 SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:31 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 1 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... North Outfall Page 13.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd REQUESTED POND WS ELEVATIONS: Min. Elev.= 622.00 ft Increment = .25 ft Max. Elev.= 624.00 ft OUTLET CONNECTIVITY ---> Forward Flow Only (Upstream to DnStream) <--- Reverse Flow Only (DnStream to UpStream) <---> Forward and Reverse Both Allowed Structure No. Outfall E1, ft E2, ft ----------------- ---- ------- --------- --------- Inlet Box R ---> C 622.830 624.000 Culvert-Circular C ---> TW 617.250 624.000 TW SETUP, DS Channel SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:31 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... North Outfall Page 13.01 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd OUTLET STRUCTURE INPUT DATA Structure ID = R Structure Type = Inlet Box - # of Openings = - 1 Invert Elev. = 622.83 ft Orifice Area = 4.0000 sq.ft Orifice Coeff. _ .600 Weir Length = 8.00 ft Weir Coeff. = 3.000 K, Reverse = 1.000 Mannings n = .0000 Kev,Charged Riser = .000 Weir Submergence = No SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:31 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... North Outfall Page 13.02 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd OUTLET STRUCTURE INPUT DATA Structure ID = C Structure Type = Culvert-Circular ------------------------------------ No. Barrels = 1 Barrel Diameter = 1.2500 ft Upstream Invert = 617.25 ft Dnstream Invert = 616.00 ft Horiz. Length = 70.00 ft Barrel Length = 70.01 ft Barrel Slope = .01786 ft/ft OUTLET CONTROL DATA... Mannings n = .0130 Ke = .2000 (forward entrance loss) Kb = .023225 (per ft of full flow) Kr = .2000 (reverse entrance loss) HW Convergence = .001 +/- ft INLET CONTROL DATA... Equation form = 1 Inlet Control K = .0045 Inlet Control M = 2.0000 Inlet Control c = .03170 Inlet Control Y = .6900 T1 ratio (HW/D) = 1.086 T2 ratio (HW/D) = 1.188 Slope Factor = -.500 Use unsubmerged inlet control Form 1 equ. below T1 elev. Use submerged inlet control Form 1 equ. above T2 elev. In transition zone between unsubmerged and submerged inlet control, interpolate between flows at T1 & T2... At T1 Elev = 618.61 ft ---> Flow = 4.80 cfs At T2 Elev = 618.74 ft ---> Flow = 5.49 cfs S/N: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:31 AM 9/24/2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... South Outfall Page 13.07 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd REQUESTED POND WS ELEVATIONS: Min. Elev.= 621.00 ft Increment = .25 ft Max. Elev.= 623.00 ft OUTLET CONNECTIVITY ---> Forward Flow Only (UpStream to DnStream) <--- Reverse Flow Only (DnStream to UpStream) <---> Forward and Reverse Both Allowed Structure No. Outfall E1, ft E2, ft ----------------- ---- ------- --------- --------- Inlet Box R ---> C 621.830 623.000 Culvert-Circular C ---> TW 616.250 623.000 TW SETUP, DS Channel SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:32 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... South Outfall Page 13.07 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd OUTLET STRUCTURE INPUT DATA Structure ID = R Structure Type ------------------ = Inlet Box ------------------ # of Openings = 1 Invert Elev. = 621.83 ft Orifice Area = 4.0000 sq.ft Orifice Coeff. _ .600 Weir Length = 8.00 ft Weir Coeff. = 3.000 K, Reverse = 1.000 Mannings n = .0000 Kev,Charged Riser = .000 Weir Submergence = No SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:32 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 11 1 1 1 Type.... Outlet Input Data Name.... South Outfall Page 13.08 File.... S:\1517\0178-Madison\20-Tech\24b-Civil,Site,Hydraulic\Stormwater Management\Postd OUTLET STRUCTURE INPUT DATA Structure ID = C Structure Type = Culvert-Circular ------------------------------------ No. Barrels = 1 Barrel Diameter = 1.2500 ft Upstream Invert = 616.25 ft Dnstream Invert = 616.00 ft Horiz. Length = 92.00 ft Barrel Length = 92.00 ft Barrel Slope = .00272 ft/ft OUTLET CONTROL DATA... Mannings n = .0130 Ke = .2000 (forward entrance loss) Kb = .023225 (per ft of full flow) Kr = .2000 (reverse entrance loss) HW Convergence = .001 +/- ft INLET CONTROL DATA... Equation form = 1 Inlet Control K = .0045 Inlet Control M = 2.0000 Inlet Control c = .03170 Inlet Control Y = .6900 T1 ratio (HW/D) = 1.094 T2 ratio (HW/D) = 1.196 Slope Factor = -.500 Use unsubmerged inlet control Form 1 equ. below T1 elev. Use submerged inlet control Form 1 equ. above T2 elev. In transition zone between unsubmerged and submerged inlet control, interpolate between flows at T1 & T2... At T1 Elev = 617.62 ft ---> Flow = 4.80 cfs At T2 Elev = 617.74 ft ---> Flow = 5.49 cfs SIN: 2BYXYWHCPK58 Bentley PondPack (10.00.023.00) 10:32 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. 9/24/2008 H 1 STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 1 cl- ?? %h Q?. P-2 ?,Jl CI-17 <R YI-15 ILj L--LL- Title: State Employees' Credit Union Project Engineer: Don Bataille s:\...\stormcad\secu-madison.stm StormCAD v5.6 [05.06.012.00] ' 09/22/08 10:39:58OVkntley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 11 1 O N?O. IL d ?o y 0 m Z O ? O U IiI-1 I LJ .O O O W to W M W LO O N M W O M N O O O n M M M 7 7 O r ro M CO CO CO O c 0 ° Nn v C O U C 0 0 . L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L U ,N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U to N c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c (n t0 CO O u) 0 0 w M to M M 0 O 00 O n O M N O V N L O O m M N O CO N CO N M V M n M J v T O 0 N m M V M W V O n O M V V O N M O O M 0 v n M LO v co CO fD co CD v ri CO 00 aG 0 o co M ( v U 3 CD M 0 00 M n M V V O M M V M n O n M m o m 0o V OR 00 o M a oMM0oo MMMMMv(Dv LL co mmn w.. 0 1- co O N 00 N O Q v O Q Q 0 0 N 3 c o n ('7 M '7 M O Z V O Z Z O O O N O N O O O N M O O O - LL_ E f4 w N c U co a? to O o M to In M M Q o 0 Q a o 0 (D - C M O M n N M OR W Z cq O Z z z z 0 0 00000000 00 00 - N O E c 'L) m o ? _ ?? o N CL U D N n M v n o n v Q m o a 0 0 0 E 't co LQ c 0 c n v M Z LO Z Z m mar m ? L6 Ci o V .S U N CL D O O V O 0 M 0 0 0 0 O O O O O E Cl) V ?- M n 1h O V M N (O O CO 0 0 (0 C O Op 06 m y r-: h n CD 6 O W 6 6 M M N N N N N N N N N M N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 C O > 0 w 0 E c O O O v CO 0 0 0 0 0 m O O M M V (1 [f `- O V (,? OU? CO N M O W O (C c ) O M M 0 M M n N 0 0 0 0 0 N M N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N p > 0 (D (D (D CO (D (D CD CO CD O (D (D (D CD O CL (D D W N 0 O O O O O O O n W O O O o E (o u) o o q N O O o 0o m a OU? c i' CO V N N V V M 0 0 0 M M M 0 N y N N N N N N N N N N N 0 (D O CD 0 O CD CD O CD (D co O CD CD C > > S CD O W E C O N 0 0 0 O O n 0 0 (D co M M V UO W M (D O (D N N O aD V Cl co V-2 N N ? 0 v v N 0 (n M O 0 M t- M n 0 > _ N N N N N N N N N N N (D CO O O (D CD CO CO CO (D CD (D (D O CD > - a- w :5 W E m 2 0) a 0 m 00 M e- N 3 Z o ? N m m n 2 2 S S y 2 2 O _ 0 U >- U u. U U U LL 0 0 w 0 LL w w E Co a) _0 C14 ?Z rn ; U U UU? U5->-UUU>-U(1) 00 a? o p 0 N N ? m O N M O o o u o. N ? C ui p' > C ? W E 0 0 IL -? U S (I E N T T N 0 m c O E N p c o N U v mEQ OT U Cl) y a a Ev(M) W 8o CD E B o co 0 60 N u?. N I- ii o 1 1 1.? 1 1 1 1 1 1 II CD (1) C[1 O c O L U 0- U) 40 8 409 y4c 409'9 w I I 80S'£l9: nS d U OS'9l9 H 4 OS'E l9 : I ^ ul BEI + :e1S A 9'El9:dwnS S S33 00'SZ9 :w!b 48 'E 19 7n0 eul o N ' l l 9E9:uw1 a n V Aul 9 Ll 9 u! b LL+E :elS V-HVIS ? I U I 4 h @i Q 890'Ll9:dw S H o6 9z9 : !a 89010PO ul U 00'OZ9 :ul ul N SE+Z : IS E•H , S I U I H L9 0Z9 :dwnS M II i ; 11 OS'SZ9 :w!a @) N L9'OZ9 :ISO nul 8 LS'OZ9 :ul nul 8 99+1 As Z-HWS c7 0 U J $ a Z II I EZ9 :dwnS I Z'OE9 :w!8 Z9 1n0 nu! 9Z9 :u! nut 6Z+0 :EIS I-HWS I`Z9:dwnS N I OE9:w!b ? a s :9 :Ino wl .I 00+0 , l 0 .R 0 0 O N co O1 N 00 0 ua c an m> W ?E 00 a?5 co LO r Ih 0 N Q U LO W I- 0 p F- U c 0 N tC a? c d U c 0 .j 0 U V1 a O L N a m N O m 2 ii c E °2 N T U) T N C 4) co O c 0 E N C N W aka o 0) L to E -i vi, W 8 iV 0 0 O O OD 4 N u?'. N H N O N d m Q? L co U co O r?n ' V / l 1 O O U) co co 0 O 0 M co C O .> a? w u 00' [Z9 :dwnS 4 0£'VZ9 :wla 400'LZ9 :UI AUI 4 09+Z :els £L-s3j 4 Zl'ZZ9 :dwnS 4 ZL'ZZ9 :l 0 AUI 4 Z£'ZZ9 :UI AUI u £Z Z :els ZHO ? I U ZV'tZ9 :dwnS 4 0ti'8Z9 :wla u Zt'VZ9 :}n0 AUI u Z9'tiZ9 :Ul AUI u st.+? :e}s G L-Il? ? l8'tZ9 :dwnS 4 0£'8Z9 :wld u L8,tZ9 :jn0 AUI 4 l0'SZ9 :Ul AUI u 66+0 :elS u 00' Z9 :dwnS U 0 '0£9 :wla u 00'9 9 :}n0 AUI p0+0 :els n a ° ° o o, ui o co co o _ O T M c d 0\0 rn d o CO I ? i i 0 - - N j V I U a .c N h n co 0 n to n s4 - U C O U 0 ? o C O T T ,^ Ua a) 0 O O O Rom ,? N O m O of m . R 00 ooa iu ?L m > LLI A) E 60 a6 L6 O N O n O U 3 0 a? U c 0 o N O U) -q N N N U s C E c m 0 c 0 D E c N W U? m ? If N oi, w N 0 O m o °° N N N N I- N 0 1 1 1 Id ?°s 4 00'OZ9 :dwnS u oV'9Z9 :wla 4 00'OZ9 :UI nUI 4 98+ 1 AS 81-S33 0 O 0 M Co 4 0£' 1Z9 :dw S 4 00'LZ9 :wla 4 0£' 1Z9 :3n0 UI 4 OZ'£Z9 :UI UI 8 69+1 :U S L1- 0 4 08'£Z9 :dwnS N 4 5L'LZ9 Ad r U) 4 08'£Z9 :ln0 nUI _ f0 4 00'VZ9 :UI nUI m 4 00'VZ9 :UI nUI :8 4 80+1 1S .. O 91-10 'i - co y- O v 4 05'SZ9 :dwnS 4 oV'6Z9 :wla 4 05'9Z9 :ln0 nUI 4 00+0:81S VHA C O cu LU o O 0 0 LO o ? ? o O + N t? ?O . c o0 O r? 00 to T ti? U 0 0 C?o a-3 cn d If U O 1 *? i O O + O 0 ? f0 CO O m 0I 0 O ooa C o .5 > r O wa U E 0 (L ?5 (D O O Ln U) r 0 0 N a D LO 0) N O U 0 r a? 3 U N o ci U) a) m U C N UJ N T T N m 0 c 0 C E ? N U ? m E a T N U Oe N ay E -0 M LU N y o ;d 0 0 0 F- N O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I.a 1^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 00'OZ9 4 OV9Z' LO 4 OO,OZ9 T U) 4 C04 1 co 8 m ¦ O Q K- 40£'1Z9 co 4 00'LZ! O 4 0£' LZ9 :lr ' L U 4 OZ £Z9 n u) LL+ 4 08'£Z9 :dwn 4 5L'LZ9 :wl 4 08'£Z9 .lno n 4 00'VZ9 :UI n 4 00'VZ9 :UI n' 4 9Z+O .ea 91-1 4 0V'9Z9 ;dwnS 4 58'8Z9 :wla 4 0V'SZ9 :jnO nUl 4 00+0 •U}S 91-IA --- 0 O 0 M C.fl Z C O a? w 0 0 U7 N co ql- C?l IQ- 0 0 0 N O O O + N V o fa + Vo cn T O? / C) O 0 ° 0 m O a) O) O O al 0 ') N (D ?L6 > w< Q to a E '90 a?5 ui N n M O N Q 7 LO W r () O U C O c c 0 0 U) N 0 N Q) O x U C W E T v m 0 c 0 E ?r ? N C 0 U 'v m 0 U a O O co E30 M Lu N N O O Q co O _ N ? N O