20170938 Ver 1_Appendix H - Flood Study and No-Rise Cert_20170731

Appendix H
CSX CCX Intermodal Rail Terminal & Second Mainline
Edgecombe and Nash Counties, North Carolina
Project No. 643009004
APPENDIX H
FLOOD STUDY AND NO -RISE CERTIFICATION

Appendix H
CSX CCX Intermodal Rail Terminal & Second Mainline
Edgecombe and Nash Counties, North Carolina
Project No. 643009004
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal
Flood Study
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc
July 25, 2017
�FESSipN`��9
9�
' 040473 —
/V J. \N
INTERMODAL
TERMINALS

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal
Flood Study
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc
July 25, 2017

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Tar River Backwater at published cross-sections in
the Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA
Map Numbers 3720386100K, 3720385100K, 3720386000K, and 3720385000K
dated June 18, 2013 and will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway
elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished cross-sections in the
area of the proposed development.
���►ti�rr�iii
-CARoZ/f� J
40473 —
i �FjV 'IN�CEQ`�
Seal and Signature
Nathan Ortega
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Hornbeam Branch at published cross-sections in
the Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA
Map No. 3720386100K dated June 18, 2013 and will not increase the base flood
elevations or floodway elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished
cross-sections in the area of the proposed development.
\�� J I I I I///
� C �
SEAL
040473 _-
4NJ.WiD`�ti
111
Seal and Signature
Nathan Ortega
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Compass Creek at published cross-sections in the
Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA Map
No. 3720386100J dated June 18, 2013 and will not increase the base flood
elevations or floodway elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished
cross-sections in the area of the proposed development.
�� H=CAR041��,.
� 'ta•` ,, 5l,� ` �,9 i
r.EAL - -
'� 040473
/V J �W,
Seal and Signature
Nathan Orteqa
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Beech Branch at published cross-sections in the
Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA Map
No. 3720386300) dated November 3, 2004 and will not increase the base flood
elevations or floodway elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished
cross-sections in the area of the proposed development.
H-CARO���'r
-, EAL -
040473 -
'4 '"zNGINES\
J.W•��`
/f/J1111��r
Seal and Signature
Nathan Ortega
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
Contents
1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Tar River........................................................................................................................................................
2
1.2 Hornbeam Branch..........................................................................................................................................
3
1.3 Compass Creek............................................................................................................................................
4
1.4 Beech Branch................................................................................................................................................
5
2. Hydrologic Analysis.......................................................................................................................................
6
3. Hydraulic Analysis — Tar River......................................................................................................................
7
3.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models......................................................................................................
7
3.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model..............................................................................................
7
3.3 Proposed Conditions.....................................................................................................................................
8
3.4 Floodway......................................................................................................................................................
10
4. Hydraulic Analysis — Hornbeam Branch....................................................................................................
11
4.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models....................................................................................................
11
4.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model............................................................................................
11
4.3 Proposed Conditions...................................................................................................................................
12
4.4 Floodway......................................................................................................................................................
13
5. Hydraulic Analysis — Compass Creek........................................................................................................
14
5.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models....................................................................................................
14
5.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model............................................................................................
14
5.3 Proposed Condition Model..........................................................................................................................
15
5.4 Floodway......................................................................................................................................................
16
6. Hydraulic Analysis — Beech Branch...........................................................................................................
17
6.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models....................................................................................................
17
6.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model............................................................................................
17
6.3 Proposed Condition Model..........................................................................................................................
18
6.4 Floodway......................................................................................................................................................
19
7. Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................
20

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS'
Appendix 1 Intermodal Project Exhibits
Appendix 1A — Tar River
Appendix 1A(1) Exhibits
Appendix 1A(2) Hydrologic Data
Appendix 1A(3) Hydraulic Model
Appendix 1A(4) Supplemental/Additional Data
Appendix 1 B - Hornbeam Branch
Appendix 1B(1) Exhibits
Appendix 1 B(2) Hydrologic Data
Appendix 1 B(3) Hydraulic Model
Appendix 1 B(4) Supplemental/Additional Data
Appendix 1 C - Compass Creek
Appendix 1C(1) Exhibits
Appendix 1C(2) Hydrologic Data
Appendix 1C(3) Hydraulic Model
Appendix 1C(4) Supplemental/Additional Data
Appendix 1 D - Beech Branch
Appendix 1D(1) Exhibits
Appendix 1 D(2) Hydrologic Data
Appendix 1 D(3) Hydraulic Model
Appendix 1D(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
1. Introduction
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX) is a gateway connecting eastern North Carolina to CSX's
expansive railway system. It is located north of Rocky Mount along CSX's north -south main line near Highway
301, Highway 97 and Battleboro Leggett (Appendix 1). The project extends from Airport Road north to
Battleboro Avenue. Table 1 summarizes the affected crossings, flows, existing structure sizes and proposed
structure sizes.
A portion of the project is located in FEMA designated Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Therefore, this
analysis has been prepared per federal and state requirements to assist in the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) and to understand the impact of the project on effective floodplain and floodways. This
document meets standards contained in the NCDOT Guideline for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design and
CSX Transportation Drainage Criteria.
Any work within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated Flood Hazard Area must be in
compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The analyses have been conducted in
accordance with the following NFIP key regulations and orders: Title 44 CFR parts 59, 60, 65 and 70, Federal
Executive Order 11988, and NC Executive Order 123.
The State of North Carolina is designated as a Cooperating Technical State (CTS) meaning that the State, as
managed by NC Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP), assumes primary ownership and responsibility of the
NFIP. Therefore, proposed improvements (including adding, changing, replacing, or removing any structure) on
a FEMA regulated stream must be documented and receive approval from NCFMP. Therefore, the hydraulic
model and this report will be submitted to NCFMP for approval.
Table 1. Drainage Area, Flow and Structure Size and Type for Streams Crossing CCX Intermodal
Crossings DA Flow, Q (CFS) Upstream Existing Proposed
(acres) for 100 yr Structure Type & Structures Type
Storm Event Size & Size
Tar River
NA (Back-
293002
9' Span Bridge
9' Span Bridge
water)
12'x 9' Pipe Arch
Hornbeam 3878.4'
20802 12'x 9' Pipe Arch
Branch
Compass
4697.6'
27302
32' Span Bridge
32' Span Bridge
Creek
Box Culvert
Beech12'x4.7'
35008'
12702
&
Four- 9' x 8' Box
Branch
.
Culverts
11.5' CMP
Note:
1. Drainage area calculated using Streamstat.
2. The flow values are from FIS Study 37127CV000D, Revised July 7, 2014

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOB
1.1 Tar River
Tar River crosses t he existing CSX Railroad rail lines on the northeast side of the City of Rocky Mount,
North Carolina. The proposed crossing alignment at Rail Station 6172 is parallel to the existing tracks and
not on Tar River. The impacted area is located just south of Airport Road between the City of Rocky Mount,
Nash County to the west and Edgecombe County to the east (see Figure 1A(1)).
A more detailed map of the vicinity is located in Appendix 1A. An aerial map showing the crossing is
also located in Appendix 1A.
FIRM Map Numbers 3720386100K, 3720385100K, 3720386000K, and 3720385000K, dated June 18,
2013 contain the immediate upstream vicinity, the crossing, and downstream portions of Tar River. The
proposed crossing is shown on this panel to be in Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is included in
Appendix 1A, Effective FIRM.
JACOBS CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fe
0 1,525 3.250 6.5W 3,750 13,030
Figure 1A(1). Location Reference Map
2
VA
Hornbeam
-t
Branch`
_
Compass
_..
Beech Branch
Tar River
beef LM
y,
Lund
—$W1R LN -
Swion Em. H€RE aemeMPcoy_ GE9�
5.t1. kvn Rip �'� lk+n0�, mM4� MPrlhEm. i
Cen'>rc ?um.. Es.. HL0.F. Dr:amr
JACOBS CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fe
0 1,525 3.250 6.5W 3,750 13,030
Figure 1A(1). Location Reference Map
2

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
1.2 Hornbeam Branch
Hornbeam Branch crosses two existing CSX Railroad rail lines on the northeast side of the City of Rocky Mount,
North Carolina. The proposed crossing alignment is parallel to the existing tracks. This crossing of Hornbeam
Branch is unique in that three jurisdictions contain a portion of the crossing. The City of Rocky Mount and Nash
County lie to the west side, upstream of the crossing, while Edgecombe County is on the east, downstream side
of the crossing. Downstream of this crossing Hornbeam Branch flows into Compass Creek which empties into
the Tar River. A general reference map for this location is provided below in Figure 1 13(1)).
A more detailed map of the vicinity is located in Appendix 1 B. An aerial map showing the crossing is
located in Appendix 113.
FIRM Numbers 3720386100K, 3720385100K, 3720386000K, and 3720385000K, dated June 18, 2013
contain the immediate upstream vicinity, the crossing, and downstream portions of Tar River. The proposed
crossing is shown on this panel to be in Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is included in Appendix 113,
Effective FIRM.
4
Hornbeam
Branchis
Beech Branch
Compass
Creek
Droy—LIM
w Tar River
e�
Legend
5 WTR LN
4aruf [�ui.MERE men—_—ewsN'N Cup.. Cd'x _
yy fI�V �9t +Msdapo sfy...rm� ": f
M.onMna.. bardFrMAy wxnwcn. Fsa HEaC W.mr
JACOBS CCx Intermodal Project LimitFeel
9 1,625 3.250 6,500 9750 13.000
Figure 113(1). Location Reference Map
3

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study
1.3 Compass Creek
JACOBSL
Compass Creek is located in the Coastal Plain region of Tar -Pamlico River basin (8 -digiti HUC 03020101) and
surrounded by Nash County to the west and Edgecombe County to the east (Appendix A). It crosses the existing
railroad via a bridge, constructed in the early 1900's. Flow is from west to east and ultimately flows to Tar River.
A general reference map for this location is provided below in Figure 1C(1)).
This crossing is within the City of Rocky Mount. The proposed crossing as shown on FIRM Number
3720386100J is in a FEMA designated SFHA Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is shown in Appendix
1C, the Effective FIRM.
Hornbeam ranch_ Beech Branch
Compass �.. .�
_ — 'Creek
i5o�l Lirtxl
Tar River
LeWd
-5 WTR LN
c.mM r. can ur
am.[ tot m.a�
JACOBS CCx Intermodal Project Limit
Figure 2C(1). Location Reference Map
I

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
1.4 Beech Branch
Beech Branch is located in the Coastal Plain region of Tar -Pamlico River basin (8 -digiti HUC 03020101) and
surrounded by Nash County to the west and Edgecombe County to the east (Appendix A). It crosses the existing
railroad via two structures, a 12'x4.7' Box Culvert and an 11.5' CMP. Flow is from west to east and ultimately
flows to Tar River. A general reference map for this location is provided below in Figure 1A(1)).
This crossing is within the City of Rocky Mount. The proposed crossing as shown on FIRM Map Number
3720386300J is in a FEMA designated SFHA Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is shown in Appendix
11)(1), the Effective FIRM Map.
JACOBS CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fee
0 1,625 3,250 65W 9.750 13.0W
Figure 11)(1). Location Reference Map
5
F{63
- ..
_da
..
Hornbea
Branch
Beech
a i
Branch
Grc)w umrr
Compass Creek
Tar River
'
� 5 IMfR LN
Paree. E�.HCaE �aNa(:ap..GE6r
ye+d.uE'n [Yn:iry SVS c -r
.fin ..faaau W.*ewr
rnrm�nw.'b mn�nevun. [ +.HE;tE. dram
-nm.
JACOBS CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fee
0 1,625 3,250 65W 9.750 13.0W
Figure 11)(1). Location Reference Map
5

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS'
2. Hydrologic Analysis
A hydrologic analysis was not performed as part of this flood study. Flows from the published effective Flood
Insurance Study (FIS) (Study No. 37127CV000D revised July 7, 2014) were compared to the flows in models
obtained from the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. The flows in the FIS and effective models were
identical for the 100 -year event.

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
3. Hydraulic Analysis - Tar River
3.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
The effective models were downloaded from North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) website
(www.ncfloodmaps. com). The downloaded effective model was run using HEC -RAS (version 5.0.3) to duplicate
the output from the effective FIS report.
The models use 29,300 cfs for the 100 -year flow.
According to the FIS, during the 100 -year event, backwater from the Tar River impacts the downstream face of
the existing railroad crossing.
3.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model
The cross section Stations 445378 and 444102 in the vicinity of CSX rail road crossing in the existing conditions
model matches to the effective model. For this study the limits of model are from cross section Station 447983
on upstream end to Station 441773 on downstream. The boundary condition is a known water surface elevation
which is the same as in the effective models.
The existing conditions model and all models developed from the existing conditions model contain the same
flow data used in the effective models.
The existing conditions model was checked to ensure it accurately represented the existing conditions based on
the data currently available. No updates or corrections to the duplicate effective model were necessary.
Table 3.2.1. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
(ft)
(ft/s)
River
Sta
(cfs)
Effective
(EF)
Duplicate
Effective
(DEF)
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(EX -EF)
Effective
(EF)
Duplicate
Effective
(DEF)
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(EX -EF)
447983
29300
80.4
80.4
80.4
0.00
4.05
4.05
4.05
0.00
446626
29300
78.74
78.74
78.74
1 0.00
1 7.62
7.62
7.62
0.00
446531
Highway 64
Bypass (Rocky Mount)
446436
29300
78.36 78.37
78.37
0.00 7.7
7.69
7.69
0.00
445378
29300
78.28 78.28
78.28
0.00 5.35
5.35
5.35
0.00
444102
29300
78.14 78.14
78.14
0.00 4.56
4.56
4.56
0.00
441773
29300
77.95 77.95
77.95
0.00 3.53
3.53
3.53
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
3.3 Proposed Conditions
A proposed conditions hydraulic model was prepared using the existing conditions model as a base. The rail
road bridge crossing at Station 6172 is not included in the effective Tar River model. Also this crossing is
influence by backwater through Tar River flooding. There are BFE cross sections River Stations 445378 and
444102 in the vicinity of this bridge crossing. Hence for this analysis the proposed conditions model was
prepared to represent additional fill due to proposed embankment in the floodplain.
Figure 3.3.1 below shows fill placed at typical cross section at Station 6173 to accommodate the intermodal
facility lead tracks. Cross section geometry for HEC -RAS Stations 445378 and 444102 was modified to the
additional fill. All other inputs (i.e. other cross sections geometry, flow, boundary conditions, Manning's "n", etc.)
are identical to those used in the existing conditions model.
N
h;i
43 t
Lr
d t
a LU
�
S[16CRA0
f
TOP
2D to 0 -10 -2D -30 -40
-50 -60 -70
5173+00
Figure 3.3.1 Station 6173 Rail Cross Section
8

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
-.W- .,CUs. T ,; � x, a� ZFF
Figure 3.3.2 Proposed Cross Section 445378 Representing Fill
There is no rise in water surface elevations when compared to existing conditions model.
Table 3.3.1 Proposed 100 -year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
NO
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
447983
29300
80.4
80.4
0.00
4.05
4.05
0.00
446626
29300
78.74
78.74
0.00
7.62
7.62
0.00
446531
CSX Railroad Bridge
446436
Figure 3.3.2 Proposed Cross Section 445378 Representing Fill
There is no rise in water surface elevations when compared to existing conditions model.
Table 3.3.1 Proposed 100 -year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
NO
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
447983
29300
80.4
80.4
0.00
4.05
4.05
0.00
446626
29300
78.74
78.74
0.00
7.62
7.62
0.00
446531
CSX Railroad Bridge
446436
29300
78.37
78.37
0.00
7.69
7.69
0.00
445378
29300
78.28
78.28
0.00
5.35
5.35
0.00
444102
29300
78.14
78.14
0.00
4.56
4.56
0.00
441773
29300
77.95
77.95
0.00
3.53
3.53
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
3.4 Floodway
The floodway encroachments from the effective floodway model were incorporated into the proposed model; see
Table 3.4.1 below for the results. The proposed fill does not increase floodway water surface elevations or
floodway top widths when compared to existing conditions.
Table 3.4.1 Effective vs. Existing vs. Proposed Floodway Water Surface Elevations and Top Widths
Q
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Top Width
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Effective
(EF)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
447983
29300
81.12
81.12
0.00
515
515
515
0.00
446626
29300
79.65
79.65
0.00
296
296
296
0.00
446531
US -64 Bypass Bridge
446436
29300
79.32
79.32
0.00
295
295
295
0.00
445378
29300
79.27
79.27
0.00
1063
1063
1063
0.00
444102
29300
79.08
79.08
0.00
650
650
650
0.00
441773
29300
78.86
78.86
0.00
650
650
650
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study
4. Hydraulic Analysis — Hornbeam Branch
4.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
JACOBSL
The effective models were downloaded from North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) website
(www.ncfloodmaps. com). The downloaded effective model was run using HEC -RAS (version 5.0.3) to duplicate
the output from the effective FIS report.
The models use 2,080 cfs for the 100 -year flow.
According to the FIS, during the 100 -year event, backwater effects from the Tar River are felt up to the
downstream face of the existing railroad crossing of Hornbeam Branch. During this event the water surface
elevation rises to 78 feet.
4.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model
The duplicate effective model was checked against available geometry information. Adjustments were made to
the geometry of the railroad bridge culvert opening at HEC -RAS Station 6914 based on information provided by
the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company for the existing masonry arch culvert at this location (See Appendix
1 B(4)). A culvert geometry with an equivalent area (approximately 93 square feet) and approximate shape was
selected for the existing condition HEC -RAS model. Also, changes were made to the deck elevations based on
the detailed 1 -foot topographic data acquired for the project. Ineffective flow elevations were adjusted in order to
allow the right overbank weir flow indicated by the existing topography. The effective and existing models
indicate weir overtopping during the 100 -year event. The topography suggests that this overtopping impacts
hundreds of feet of existing track.
The existing model water surface elevations are at or below the effective model upstream of the existing railroad
crossing.
Table 4.2.3. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
NO
Effective
(EF)
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(EX -EF)
Effective
(EF)
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(EX -EF)
6939.5
2080
85.42
84.67
-0.75
0.56
0.64
0.08
6907
Existing Arch Culvert
6874.5
2080
75.53
75.56
0.03
9.01
7.33
-1.68
6447
890
74.71
74.71
0.00
3.03
2.97
-0.06

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
4.3 Proposed Conditions
A proposed conditions hydraulic model was prepared using the existing conditions model as a base. The
proposed rail alignments for the intermodal facility lead tracks and a proposed extension of the existing culvert
were inserted into the model for evaluation.
The proposed condition floodplain model uses the same flows and downstream boundary conditions that are
used in the existing conditions model.
In the proposed condition, the existing culvert is extended downstream approximately 45 feet to a point beyond
the proposed track improvements. In order to model the culvert extension, HEC -RAS Station 6874.5 in the
existing condition model had to be removed and a replacement section added downstream of the proposed
condition model, Station 6825. .
The proposed culvert extension results in no increase in water surface elevations over the effective water
surface elevations upstream and downstream of the improvements. Please see Table 4.3.2 below for a
comparison of the results.
Table 4.3.2. Proposed 100 -year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
River
Q
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft/s)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
6939.5
2080
84.67
84.67
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
6907
Existing Arch Culvert
6874.5
2080
75.56
-
-
7.33
-
-
6825
2080
-
75.46
-
-
7.55
-
6447
890
74.71
74.71
0.00
2.97
2.97
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
4.4 Floodway
The floodway encroachments from the effective floodway model were incorporated into the proposed model; see
Table 4.4.1 for the proposed condition results.
Table 4.4.1. Existing vs. Proposed Extended Floodway Water Surface Elevations
QTotal
Water Surface Elevation
Top Width
(ft)
(ft)
River
Sta
(cfs)
Existing
Floodway
(EX)
Proposed
Floodway
(PR)
Floodway
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
Top Width
(EX)
Proposed
Top Width
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
6939.5
2080
85.35
85.34
-0.01
299.00
299.00
0.00
6907
Arch Culvert
6874.5
2080
76.38
-
-
299.00
-
-
6825
2080
-
76.24
-
-
299.00
-
6447
890
75.69
75.69
0.00
164.00
164.00
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study
5. Hydraulic Analysis - Compass Creek
5.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
JACOBSL
The Effective Model for Compass Creek is a detailed study starting from its confluence with Tar River in
Edgecombe County to approximately 370 feet upstream of Red Oak Battleboro Road in Nash County. The flood
Insurance Rate Map with effective date of June 18, 2013 for the crossing is presented in Appendix 1C(2).
The models use 2,730 and 2,780 cfs for the 100 -year flow.
The Duplicate Effective Model for Compass Creek was created using cross-sections from the Effective Model
approximately 1,500 feet upstream and 800 feet downstream of the proposed work. The model starts at River
Station 12820 and ends at Station 15207.5.
5.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model
To create the existing conditions model, cross sections were added downstream of proposed work. Those cross-
sections were generated based on 1 -foot contours. The model results (Table 5.2.1) were used to compare the
proposed 100 -year and floodway water surface elevations with the existing condition.
Table 5.2.1. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River
(ft)
(ft/s)
Sta
(cfs)
Effective
(EF)
Duplicate
Effective
(DEF)
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(DEF -EF)
Delta
(EX -DEF)
Effective
(EF)
Duplicate
(DEF) Effective
Existing
(EX)
Delta
(DEF -EF)
Delta
(EX -DEF)
15207.5
2730
86.34
88.34
88.30
2.00
-0.04
3.28
2.68
2.71
-0.60
0.03
15117.5
Culvert
15027.5
2730
85.77
86.34
86.14
0.57
-0.20
5.24
4.14
4.34
-1.10
0.20
14936.0
2730
85.67
86.33
86.13
0.66
-0.20
3.42
3.28
3.47
-0.14
0.19
14476.0
2730
84.47
85.77
85.46
1.30
-0.31
6.16
5.24
5.64
-0.90
0.40
14172.0
2730
85.67
85.67
85.33
0.00
-0.34
3.42
3.42
3.69
0.00
0.27
13665.4
2730
84.47
84.47
83.96
0.00
-0.51
6.16
6.16
6.47
0.00
0.31
13641.8
Bridge
13618.2
2730
82.24
82.24
81.79
0.00
-0.45
7.63
7.63
8.05
0.00
0.42
13454.4
2730
-
-
81.97
-
-
-
-
3.33
-
-
13089
2730
-
-
81.53
-
-
-
-
4.33
-
-
12820.0
2780
81.28
81.28
81.28
0.00
0.00
3.37
3.37
3.37
0.00
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
5.3 Proposed Condition Model
A new bridge to carry the north -south rail is proposed parallel to the existing tracks, along the east side of the
existing bridge across Compass Creek. Because of the proximity of the existing and proposed bridges, they
have been modeled as a single bridge as recommended in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC -RAS
Hydraulic Reference Manual Version 5.0 (February 2016) See Table 5.3.1/Appendix 1C(3) for model results.
The proposed bridge is the same span as the existing bridge, with 11 feet between the two (modeled together
as a single 65 -foot width).
Table 5.3.1. Proposed 100 -year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
River
Sta
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
(cfs)
(ft)
NO
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
15207.5
2730.00
88.30
88.29
-0.01
2.71
2.71
0.00
15117.5
Culvert
15027.5
2730.00
86.14
86.13
-0.01
4.34
4.36
0.02
14936.0
2730.00
86.13
86.12
-0.01
3.47
3.48
0.01
14476.0
2730.00
85.46
85.44
-0.02
5.64
5.67
0.03
14172.0
2730.00
85.33
85.31
-0.02
3.69
3.71
0.02
13665.4
2730.00
83.96
83.93
-0.03
6.47
6.50
0.03
13641.8
Bridge
13580.4
2730.00
81.79
81.76
-0.03
8.05
7.97
-0.08
13454.4
2730.00
81.97
81.97
0.00
3.33
3.33
0.00
13089
2730.00
81.53
81.53
0.00
4.33
4.33
0.00
12820
2780.00
81.26
81.28
0.02
3.37
3.37
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
5.4 Floodway
The floodway encroachments from the effective floodway model were incorporated into the proposed model.
The proposed structure and fill does not increase the floodway water surface elevations or floodway top widths
when compared to existing conditions. See Table 5.4.1/Appendix 1C(3) for model results.
Table 5.4.1 Effective vs. Existing vs. Proposed Floodway Water Surface Elevations and Top Widths
Q
Water Surface Elevation
Top Width
Total
ft
ft
M
m
M
River
m
m C
m
-V
m
m p
m
Sta
_ '
p
-M
m
x o
Acv
n
c
n r
a
x
X
-0-°a
M
m
X o�
cfs
M n
��
x
-3'0
ON
M
Om
CD
T.
C.
(D
v Oq
^�
m
X
N
f D
3
v Go
.. L4
M I
y
m w
X
ro
m
m
a
n
m
T
p �*
m
Q
v
M
m
15207.5
2730
1 87.16
1 88.53
88.45
88.44
1.37
1 -0.08
1 -0.01
540.0
400.00
400.00
400.0
-140.0
0.00
0.00
15117.5
Culvert
15027.5
2730
86.71
87.16
86.77
86.75
0.45
-0.39
-0.02
311.00
337.81
337.81
337.8
26.81
0.00
0.00
14936.0
2730
86.64
87.16
86.77
86.75
0.52
-0.39
-0.02
280.00
540.00
540.00
540.0
260.0
0.00
0.00
14476.0
2730
85.39
86.72
86.22
86.20
1.33
-0.50
-0.02
36.60
311.00
311.0
311.0
274.4
0.00
0.00
14172.0
2730
86.64
86.14
86.11
-0.50
-0.03
280.00
280.0
280.0
0.00
0.00
13665.4
2730
85.39
84.69
84.64
-0.70
-0.03
36.60
36.60
36.60
0.00
0.00
13641.8
Bridge
13618.2
2730
83.22
83.22
82.59
-
0.00
-0.63
36.60
36.60
36.60
-
0.00
0.00
-
13580.4
2730
-
-
-
82.55
-
-
-
-
-
36.60
-
-
-
13454.4
2730
-
82.72
82.72
0.00
-
585.00
585.00
0.00
13089
2730
-
82.17
82.17
0.00
-
302.00
302.00
0.00
12820
2780
81.86
81.86
81.86
81.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
350.0
350.00
350.00
350.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study
6. Hydraulic Analysis - Beech Branch
6.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
JACOBS'
The effective model for Beech Branch is a detailed study starting from its confluence with Tar River in
Edgecombe County to approximately 250 feet downstream of Red Oak/ Battleboro Road in Nash County. The
Flood Insurance Rate Map with effective date of June 18, 2013 for the crossing is presented in Appendix 1 D(2).
A duplicate effective model for Beech Branch was created starting at River Station 45783 and ending at Station
47266 for Beech Branch. The models use 1,270 cfs for the 100 -year flow.
6.2 Corrected Effective/Existing Conditions Model
To create the existing conditions model, a cross section was added downstream of proposed work. This cross
section was generated based on 1 -foot contours. Also, invert elevations for the existing stream at Section 46730
was adjusted slightly to match survey information gathered for the project. The model results were used to
compare the proposed 100 -year and floodway water surface elevations with the existing condition.
Table 6.2.1. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
Total
River
(ft)
(ft/s)
Sta
Duplicate
Delta
Duplicate
Existing
Delta
(cfs)
Effective
Existing
Delta
Effective
Delta
Effective
(EX-
Effective
(EX)
(EX -
(EF)
(EX)
(DEF EF)
(EF)
(DEF- EF)
(DEF)
DEF)
(DEF)
DEF)
47266
1270
98.93
98.93
98.93
0.00
0.0
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.00
0.00
46890
1270
98.86
98.86
98.86
0.00
0.00
1.83
1.83
1.83
0.00
0.00
46810
Culvert
46730
1270
91.99
91.98
93.36
-0.01
1.48
5.95
5.97
4.38
0.02
-1.59
46080
1270
-
-
91.38
-
-
-
-
5.82
-
-
45783
1270
91.09
91.09
91.09
0.00
0.00
2.28
2.28
2.28
0.00
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
6.3 Proposed Condition Model
Four 9 -foot wide by 8 -foot high box culverts were used for the Beech Branch proposed condition model. The
inverts for the proposed culverts were set to match the existing stream flowline. The bottom of one of the barrels
has been modeled as native soil, with n= 0.03. This culvert will serve as a low -flow channel and will be installed
as a 9 -foot wide by 9 -foot high box culvert including a 1 -foot layer of substrate fill for environmental purposes.
Cross Sections 46660, and 4080 have been modified to show the proposed grading upstream and downstream
of the proposed box culverts.. See Table 6.3.1 for model results.
Table 6.3.1 Proposed 100 -year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
Q
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft/s)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
47266
1270
98.93
98.93
0.00
0.98
0.98
0.00
46890
1270
98.86
98.86
0.00
1.83
1.83
0.00
46810
Culvert
46730
1270
93.36
92.61
-0.75
4.38
5.26
0.88
46660
1270
-
92.46
-
-
5.07
-
46474
Culvert
46080
1270
91.38
91.23
-0.15
5.82
4.76
-1.06
45783
1270
91.09
91.09
0.00
1 2.28
2.28
0.00

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
6.4 Floodway
The floodway encroachments from the effective floodway model were incorporated into the proposed model.
The existing condition model exhibits a slight negative surcharge (approximately -0.0047 feet) at Section 46890
that is manifest to a lesser degree in both the duplicate and proposed models. Unsuccessful attempts were
made to eliminate or mitigate this discrepancy. This results in a reported 0.01 increase in the proposed
conditions model floodway elevations over the existing conditions model floodway elevations despite the 0.00
surcharge in the proposed conditions model. However, the proposed conditions model result at this location
does not exceed the effective model calculation. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the difference does
not represent an actual adverse impact in the proposed condition. At all other cross sections, the proposed
structure and fill does not increase the reported floodway water surface elevations or floodway top widths when
compared to existing conditions. See Appendix 1 D(3) for model results
Table 6.4.1 Effective vs. Existing vs. Prop Floodway W. S. Elev. & Top Widths
*Note: Increase is due to a negative surcharge in the existing condition.
Q
Water Surface Elevation
Top Width
Total
(ft)
(ft)
River
My
My
My
My
p
Sta
M
C
X
c
°'
°'
M
d
°
C
* c
X
c
m
�'
R;
9 O
m
"�
�' a
m v+
C
m
`
`
71
m m
d0
a
m
m
m
X
m
v
O m
m
a0
a
m
m
m
X
T
-M
v
v
47266
1270
98.93
98.93
98.93
98.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
350
350
350
350
0
0
0
46890
1270
98.86
98.86
98.85
98.86
0.00
-0.01
0.01*
83.00
83.10
83.10
83.10
0.10
0
0
46810
Culvert
46730
1270
92.93
92.93
94.02
93.16
0.00
1.09
-0.86
63
62.8
63.1
62.97
-0.20
0.3
--0.13
46660
1270
-
-
-
93.06
-
-
-
-
-
-
52.00
-
-
-
46474
Culvert
46080
1270
-
-
92.29
92.23
-
-
0.94
-
-
180.68
180.27
-
-
-0.41
45783
1270
92.07
92.07
92.07
92.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
117
116.92
116.92
116.92
-0.08
0
0
*Note: Increase is due to a negative surcharge in the existing condition.

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS=
7. Conclusion
Tar River
The addition of fill to construct the lead tracks for the intermodal facility will not increase 100 -year floodplain or
floodway water surface elevations or floodway top widths for the Tar River.
Recommendation: Widen existing bridge matching existing span and low chord.
Hornbeam Branch
The proposed culvert extension results in no increase to floodplain or floodway water surface elevations or
floodway top widths.
Recommendation: Extend the existing culvert downstream under the proposed improvements matching
geometry. Provide riprap channel protection downstream of the culvert outlet.
Compass Creek
The addition of fill and widening of the existing bridge at Compass Creek will not increase the 100 -year
floodplain or floodway water surface elevations for the Compass Creek floodplain or floodway during the 100 -
year event. Changes in cross section geometry can be seen in the HEC -RAS cross section comparisons
available in Appendix 1C(3).
Recommendation: 32 -foot Span Bridge with low chord at 80.84 feet elevation to match existing.
Beech Branch
The addition of fill and of four 9 -foot wide by 8 -foot high box culverts will not cause an increase in the Beech
Branch floodplain or floodway water surface elevations or floodway top widths during the modeled 100 -year
event. Changes in cross section geometry can be seen in the HEC -RAS cross section comparisons available in
Appendix 1 D(3).
Recommendation: Four 9 -foot wide by 8 -foot high box culverts. The channel bottom upstream and downstream
of the culvert will need to be widened and riprap outlet protection will be required.

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1 — Intermodal Project Exhibits

J CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fe(
0 1,625 3,250 6,500 9,750 13,000
Niblick Dr _.
•c
�
a " e�a0
r ca
v •.J
cru
o d 6
yj,
OL
CL17
caa _
ro
6
l
ro
%'
,a
`Y.
Q� a
o
Hornbeam Branch o
�ro�,�
Tar River
'�-
�
� ��r
µ �
Beech Branch
t10�(9c
Backwater
H—
°gle`yBlvd���
H�w+a,e�an=�tivd
,,; i;
►�
— — — z.
A?3rriott St �o
Centura HWY
V'C
ICA
Compass Creek
a Old BattleboroIRA
© i
�'s•
Tar River
_
`` Ave:
-
5
,
�o
Q ,
Project Limit
-
_
Old i9attleboro Rd
•-f
�.
SCP
r
�eyi
�, a1 aNI "
,V.,-
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Geo Base, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri ChinaHong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia,
© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme,
Ma m India, @ Open4treetMap contributors
J CCX Intermodal Project Limit Fe(
0 1,625 3,250 6,500 9,750 13,000

c Ave
Iry
ilk
At I
A
NkVVas aln,
a s gn.
7
adgeco,
0 -
lie
-d
k
0 0 a
:
0
NkVVas aln,
a s gn.
7
adgeco,
0 -
lie
-d
k
0 0 a

2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
820000 FEET 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W 820000 FEET
School Rd r in- f - ' f . A
C wl ,moi► �y'4 ' � I41Y
nA
Fou,tain;School Rd
'moi � � ` ! �� � �♦ r �,rD� .,
I
' '•' �'- CI Y OO F ROICKY
.11011NT F;TJ
Conip iss Creek ZONE"'AE
370092 35°59'30"N CITY OI F °`�
35'59'30"N
= OCO
CO
M
^° j�� ���� )��_ ICompass earrett\Rd
�• ee6;� :- - seer Hunt
CITY OF Vik ROCKY MOUN��c0ineVe
4h4 p
ZZ, 6 ti'0 *' -
w ,• q r p ,�
00
p
C
115
• � ZONE AE �
,_ CITY OI F ROCKY
MOO T ETJ
w a` r
LL 092
EY1376 3701
f EY1376,V'� wr
�•" 1
0
/ ­XZZ663`1. i ' a �' �Af:
s s 35°59'0"N
35°59'0"N - :�„, .~r
-
,
i
Gelo Rtl
. + -
- � I� CITY OF ROCKY �.: � � s - -
:7
a 7E
MOUNT ETT Q
1 370092 CITY OF
Compass Creek ROCKY MOUNT
" CITY OF 370092
Boddie Ct-L� o o `
ROCKY MOUNT
370092
H" ornbeam - ass 78.0
O
Branch ,y '''
0
oss n
�.• E=Y11�37
78:0 os� 78.0, I ,
� Z�Z6'048.
171
-+`_'',..f1 •...„ f 049
',8:0 =oaa EY1138� r. i
EY1139 -
«, N ZZ6047�, _- -
EY1140n
EY1140 ZONE AE Tar _ - 35°58'30°N
35°58'30"N } A�
EY 1139 otic — River
.` \H"ornbeam
1141 � CITY OF ROO C'KY
6W
0-
FY1®ZZ6046 8 97 - EY1136:
E-1Y01r1�42�'EY1._142 MOUNT EZ�J
ZONE AE ;
i.
EY0910 b'. I '
4.97 Compass
EY0910 f
f o Creek . . }
wo• •�" - _ , - is
4312
a
41
ro
u
810000 FEET '`� u�, 810000 FEET
77°47'0"W 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W
2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
FEMA'3 COIDPEAA I[IG 1W
TECHr,ICALPAFffl4U1
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmap
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
[I�.Ti�l=i�1I1]
0 75 150
PANEL LOCATOR
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood ,t\\ra
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
Zone A,V, A99
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
0 t. Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
NASH COUNTY
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
OTHER AREAS OF
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
severe than those in the VE Zone.
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES
I I I I I I I I I I I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
I
BM5510 X North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510® National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510� Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
0�2 1s-2— Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
s - - - - - - Coastal Transect
— - - - - - Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmap
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
[I�.Ti�l=i�1I1]
0 75 150
PANEL LOCATOR
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood ,t\\ra
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
3873
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
3893
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
4813
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
463
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
NASH COUNTY
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
4862 ;
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
3851
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
3850
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
37159
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
,
severe than those in the VE Zone.
3758
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
3747 3757
4822
4832
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1 -800 -344 -WILD.
CBRS Area Otherwise Protected Area
VA1101►«11111,
1,000
Feet
Meters
300
18197 c3897
3886 3896 4806 4816
HALIFAX COUNTY
3885 3895
r
4804 4824,,
3884 3894 �� r
3863
3873
3883
3893
4803
4813
4823
463
- --,
4842
4862 ;
3862
3872
3882
3892
4802
4812
4822
4832
I
C
MARTIN COUNTY
Fr
r�
cc
rrW
0
cc
loom
Cn
a
0
0
U.
cc
a
0
cc
Z
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAS`'
NORTH CAROLINAS �
PANEL 3861 0
Ivo s�G�a
FE I` 422
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF 370092 3861 1
MAP NUMBER
3720386100J
MAP REVISED
6/18/2013

2360000 FEET
840000 FEET 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W
36°3'0"N
36°2'30"N
iI:3%ral�➢I►1
36°1'30"N
k�� x:,71 ,� ,C,+'° ,-, y ► `��..
I
�^' a /'
f r J
C'If OF ROCKY
M®UNT ETJ`
A. � r - 370092
. :Lwr Amu. At& -
�o
0
°rdsG+
Fords Colcny Dr
r
1502
1 �
z
_ `so7 ,
ZONE E �"
i r
i'
r 1r, 7 i
52- + �f
•549
535 {
552 - - 543 Bcech -- _
r
Branch
i ZONE AE ;
e�(t,
I �
a
C7
C
va =
�1
r
-. C'IMTY O?F
';ROCKY MOT '
,, 370092.
yea
�` •'�r�-w ,'mar � 1 � r'L .
FX2�165
5eeen 1
3Y'�nCl7 1478
`483
*7
W
: Red Ir On ~+
Rd
�a
2370000 FEET
77°45'0"W 840000 FEET
r +'F.17r r dl
o w&I
F 1 t r ries
'�
r-
FX1362 m°
" FX1361_, _
FX2172^
FX2170 FX2169
F �FX2171
Pfjri
x
FX2173
:ti'
y ,yea yd^
ALI
84o
It44
s
WWZJ 1N' IE AE
1453
`447
Beech
Branch
{
' `aaz ° l
0
429
CD
a
O
473 - - -
0 /�� M - `aza
CITY OF ROCKY
MOUNT ETJ
r .
•
36°3'0"N
36°2'30"N
36°2'0"N
36°1'30"N
830000 FEET
830000 FEET 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W
2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
#1111SOPERATINGTECHNICAL PARTNER
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS REPORT
FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION
DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
2886
Zone A, V, A99
2884
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
3802
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
2880
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
3811
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
3810
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile Zone x
Nash
Future Conditions 1% Annual
3719
Chance Flood Hazard Zone x
OTHER AREAS OF
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes Zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Zone x
2785
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
3705
r
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES
I I I I I I I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
BM5510 D North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510 ? National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM551OZ Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
-(H2 —1,8-2— Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
{s - - - - - - Coastal Transect
\\--
- -- - Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
NOTES TO USERS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1 -800 -344 -WILD.
CBRS Area Otherwise Protected Area
SCALE
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150 300
PANEL LO CATO R
1:6,000
Halifax
3828
3827 3837 84
37 385_7 3867 3877, 3887
3826 3836 3846 3856 3866 3876 3886
I
3825 3835 3845 3855 3865 3875 3885
3824 3834 3844 3854 3864 3874
3823 3833 3843 3853 3863 3873
3822 3832 3842 3852 3862
1
3821 3831 3841 3851 13861
3820 3830 3840 38501 38603870
3729 3739 3749 3759 3769
3728 3738 3748 x3758 3768 3778
3727 3737 374713757
Edgecombe
Wilson
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
cc FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MA!
NORTH CAROLINA R
CL � PANEL 3061 5 v �
oND StiGJ�
CD FEMA
a
°, AfC, cc Panel Contains:
.. COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
` rr EDGECOMBE COUNTY 370087 3863 J
NASH COUNTY 370278 3863 J
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF 370092 3863 J
0
0
cc
a
0
CZ
MAP NUMBER
3720386300J
EFFECTIVE DATE
11/3/2004
2888 L,r
13
J
2886
3806
2884
3804
2882
3803
3813
3802
3812
2880
3801
3811
3800
3810
Nash
3709
3719
3708
3718
2788
3707
3717
2786
3706
3716
2785
2795
3705
r
3715
1:6,000
Halifax
3828
3827 3837 84
37 385_7 3867 3877, 3887
3826 3836 3846 3856 3866 3876 3886
I
3825 3835 3845 3855 3865 3875 3885
3824 3834 3844 3854 3864 3874
3823 3833 3843 3853 3863 3873
3822 3832 3842 3852 3862
1
3821 3831 3841 3851 13861
3820 3830 3840 38501 38603870
3729 3739 3749 3759 3769
3728 3738 3748 x3758 3768 3778
3727 3737 374713757
Edgecombe
Wilson
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
cc FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MA!
NORTH CAROLINA R
CL � PANEL 3061 5 v �
oND StiGJ�
CD FEMA
a
°, AfC, cc Panel Contains:
.. COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
` rr EDGECOMBE COUNTY 370087 3863 J
NASH COUNTY 370278 3863 J
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF 370092 3863 J
0
0
cc
a
0
CZ
MAP NUMBER
3720386300J
EFFECTIVE DATE
11/3/2004

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOIBS
Appendix 1A - Tar River
• 1A(1) Exhibits
• 1A(2) Hydrologic Data
• 1A(3) Hydraulic Model/Output
• 1A(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1A(1) Exhibits

C-)
0
D
b
j C
f �d
Thomas A Bells pkwy ��—
N
a" 4,4'
S
U) d �3 r
nes�yP 7 Gr"°n Rd
CD � Q1?
CD
n �b Rf. +� Fottnt4in School Rd
CunKINIIIO�C' q7
oc� 1V-r&green tir
0 Golf Club !I" `
Z �
BEAVER POND Freer DrE Cliff Ln
- P
P +
ry4P � II
.c a
4b
aPer Dr +
Benvenue Country Club 'B i
EV Llbb Rd
�• o¢ a ax,
rA
Golden East " , 7-16
Crossing Byp I
R $
� .qyC
% sa' �3
a �
a�
468A _ Qb R x*y Mount U
Je SP"ts
ALBA- - �y9S^ Complex.
468B
Gaal a Park21� .,
4g 43
� -` HISTORIC MILL
VI`LLLAyGE +
''I
C h¢ syer �� r
64 R HILLSDALE Chi St
54
FALLS ROAD v
P� E•i NATIONAL rh
r p HISTORIC 1. _
X L DISTRICT f vogInia St
W Northemtern
w Ce-ewy
r
"r it
Rocky Mount °
9a" unity WEEKS ARMSTRONG
Cemetery !rands
O HAPPY HILL BrMdt i"
3 + 43 1 L
nHOLLY STREET
WEST HAVEN f CENTRAL CITY
l0 NATIONAL �! NATIONAL
HISTORIC aye•Wand!
D) DISTRICT r'ca VILLA PLACE HISTORIC
DISTRICT tai
N `9y NATIONAL--%
wawa '
W
LPy9e� Rd � =3
W
Shore St
D
43
`9
�
HIStORIC R {
DISTRICT
+
x
Rineuiew
�e0'n cn Rd
CEDARBROC11(
f
Cernetery
o
J w
r4
tuSi.
EDGEMONIT
-
Fo•
NATIONAL
LITTLE ' ,1 HISTORIC
o
C7 Y� 'lt-
I'll,
RALEIGH DISTRICT
MEADOWBROOK
ht
�• �OWLfF
x�
W+gh �M
Rosewood AVe
_
Z
� r,
St o
Legend
sr
Project Boundary
Rocky Mount
Cn
Vicinity Map N
P JACOBS
Station 6172 Crossing -CSX Intermodal 0 2,000 4,000
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. City of Rocky Mount, Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina
REG No. 2966 Feet
xo Project No: JLXCX102

Alf%-
�e�

L
n
C-
0
vo
C—
r
X
C)
X
0
N
i�
0
X
O
O
0
n_
r_
Z
m
rn
0
rn
O
rn
0
rn
X
0

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1A(2) Hydrologic Data

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9 -Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Area
Location miles)
Approximately 1.6
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
miles downstream
of the 211.53
8,410
14,540
17,612
26,195
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 100
feet upstream of
the
211.0
5,860
9,832
11,777
16,650
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 750
feet downstream of
203.7
5,671
9,633
11,590
16,559
U.S. Highway 301
Approximately 2.4
miles downstream
196.9
5,498
9,452
11,419
16,474
of NC Highway 48
Approximately 500
feet downstream of
194.8
5,444
9,396
11,365
16,447
NC Highway 48
Swift Creek
Approximately 1.1
miles downstream
183.1
5,156
9,094
11,078
16,299
of Red Oak Road
(SR 1003)
Approximately 0.9
mile downstream of
182.3
5,138
9,074
11,059
16,289
Red Oak Road (SR
1003
Approximately 1.9
miles downstream
167.74
*
*
12,4002
of Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately 75
feet upstream of
165.38
*
*
12,300
Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately
1,300 feet
164.64
*
*
12,300
downstream of NC
Highway 43
N.C. 97 at Rocky
932.0
16,700
24,400
27,700
40,000
Mount
Tar River
Confluence of
Goose Branch
927.0
16,620
24,310
27,620
40,000
Confluence of Stony
809.0
14,820
22,270
25,770
38,700
Creek
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1A(3) Hydraulic Model

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Backwater Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY DUP EFF River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.57
0.000898
4.05
21853.07
1848.63
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.63
2208.70
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.66
2145.56
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15723.16
3590.70
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000124
4.56
33808.48
5420.91
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------
WS 100 -YEAR
-- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-------------- -
------- ------------ ------ -------
Crit 100........... A .................. ..
-YEAR FW
80-
----------- - ----------- ---
------- A -- -- ------------- -- -- ------- -- -- -- --------- ---------- ---
-----------------_- ------ ----------- -------- - -- ---------- ------------------ ------------- -------- - ----- - ------ - ---- --------- -----------
---- ----------- ------------ - ---- --------------------------- -- ---- ----- ----------- ----- ------ ------ ------------------- ----- ------ ----- ----- -------------- ---- ---------
-----------
------------ -
-------------- ------
- ------------------------------------------
Ground
70-
. ........ ..
Lu
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
6000 7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

0
I
c
0
m
Lu
50
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
.................A................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
WS 100 -YEAR FW
5500
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...................................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
50 1 1-
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100 -YEAR
.............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

EG 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank St,
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 1
c
0
m
LU
50
3500

4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W111:
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 --f .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
61/10111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Backwater Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY EX River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.57
0.000898
4.05
21853.07
1848.63
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.63
2208.70
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.66
2145.56
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15723.16
3590.70
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000124
4.56
33808.48
5420.91
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
<--
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ...........
WS 100 -YEAR
-- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-------------- ------- -------------
-------------- - - --- -----
........... A .................. ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
80-
-
----------- - ----------- ---
------ -- -- ------------- -- -- ------- -- ------------------- ---
----------------------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- -------- ----- - ------ - ---- ------- ......... ............... .
---- ----------- ------------ - ---- --------------------------- -- ---- ----- ----------- ----- ------ ------ ------------------- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------------ - --------
-----------
------------ - ----------------------------
--------------- - ------------------ - - --------------
Ground
70-
. ........ ..
Lu
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

ff
I
70
50
3500
................. A ................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
ws 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5500
Legend
.................. L .................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100 -YEAR
......................1......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Iteff
Bank
Sta
Encroachment

EG 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank St,
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 1
c
0
m
LU
50
3500

4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W111:
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 —�. .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
61/10111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Backwater Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY PROP River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.58
0.000898
4.05
21854.45
1848.65
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.93
2208.92
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.97
2145.87
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15539.02
3499.67
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000125
4.56
33147.14
5393.63
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Proposed 3/20/2017
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------
WS 100 -YEAR
-- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-------------- -
------- ------------ ------ -------
Crit 100........... A .................. ..
-YEAR FW
80-
----------- - ----------- ---
------ A -- -- ------------- -- -- ------- -- -- -- --------- ---------- ---
-----------------­- ------------------ -------- - -- ---------- ------------------ ------------- -------- - ----- - ------ - ---- ------- --------- ---- ---- -
---- ----------- ------------ - ---- --------------------------- -- ---- ----- ----------- ----- ------ ------ ------------------- ----- ------ ----- ----- ---- ------- - ---------
-----------
------------ -
------------- ------
- ------------------------------------------
Ground
70-
. ........ ..
Lu
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
6000 7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

0
I
c
0
m
Lu
50
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
.................A................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
WS 100 -YEAR FW
5500
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...................................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
50 1 11-
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100 -YEAR
.............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

BG1O0��ARRN
------------------------------------
Crit 1nn-YeARRm
Ground
�
LU
--------------------------
..............................
------
......
----
------------------------ - -----------------------------
........................................................
Bank Sta
70
Encroachment
60
3500
4000
4500
5000 5�00 60100 6500 7000 7500

M
0
m
w
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
6500
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W-111:
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Station (ft)

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 —�. .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
61/10111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1A(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

100 - - - -
AREA FILL: 85.8 SF
AREA CUT: 42.4 SF
- -
-
_
95
85
--
-
80
-
90
85
75
70
65
60
120
— — -
- -
CONTRACT
90
-
EXISTING
SEE_ INT'
80
A
YARD LEADS
110
-
rm
-
80
75
70
65
60120
w_ z
_
_
EXISTING
GRIND
_
i
-
100
110
r
-
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
100
95
90
_
AREA FILL:
AREA CUT
-- -
136.1 SF
1.4 SF
_
85
--
-
80
75
70
65
60
120
— — -
- -
CONTRACT
90
-
EXISTING
SEE_ INT'
80
— —
-NOT IN
100
YARD LEADS
110
Y
Q �
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
6v
60
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 _mU -14U -1DU -IOU _I/U -lao
618100
N N
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -1ZU -1Su -14U -13u -IOU -I/V ,II
6180.1.00
N N
100
AREA FILL' 69.9 SF
100
95
AREA CUT: 15.2 SF
w_ z
_
_
x
;
,
i
r
95
90
90
w
W�
W
W
cd
*L
I
85
85
-
I
- - -
-
f
I
80
60
-
f -
I
-
TOP 0 SUBGRAO
1
`-
-
i
-
-
75
_-
-
75
70
70
E%ISTING GROUND-�
65
-
65
YARD LEADS
NOT IN
CONTRACT !- SEE INT:RMODAL PIAN FOR DETAIL_
60120
110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40
30 20
10 0
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90
-100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-1800
6179+00
10, 0 10,
20'
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
SEE
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR R/W LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" -
10'
DESIGNED BY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
--
In�"l-" `m1 g, I
• it ..me. 1-1 g, e.ec-
anO/Of"rm-
D.MONTAGUE
CSATAil111SP0ITAi'z0111 INC. DESIGN &CONSTRUCTION
'
CROSS SECTIONS
DRAWN 87
DRAWING NO.
�1oat1on••
tim r.r"imetl nre.itn
• nai re�mi. the .r..ertr
D MONTAGUE
JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA
Rx -07
EMT1 6181+00 TO EMT1 6179+00
ionatMa�INDerMltl emir
CHECKED BY
N, ORTEGA
REVISION
SHEET NO,.
/ltlentw, mtl ow ".t..
�,.tl fm f y ..r.... ".r
I';,,�M'bs„„�a�,�,eY1p,
APPROVED BY
V00090
59 OF 188
SUB NORTH END DIVA FLORENCE
I NOT FOR 1) NMUC 11014 1DATE
M.GANAS
SCALE AS
SHOWN
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DATE
DESCRIPTION �'�%g APP
JANUARY 19, 2017
■ ^'

C
O�
x
N
LEI
N
N
Q'
C
.3
0
0
u
0
F—
c
U
U
a
0
/
_T
U
CL
0
U
O
N
LQ
Q
N
N
O
W
100
95
AREA FILL' ;165.3 SF
AREA CUTS 0.3 SF
SF
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
90
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
95 AREA
CUT_12 SF
85
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
—
80
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P
}
��
—
75
a
r
x
1U
70
TING GRO
65 - -
EXI
N(�
60YARD LEAQS NOT IN
(CONTRACT
- SEE INTERMODAL
P
AN FOR D
TAIL
-
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
100
AREA
—
FILL: ,1139.9
SF
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
-
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
95 AREA
CUT_12 SF
_
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
SHEET N0.
60 OF 188
-
.
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P
90
85y
80
-
-
75--
L
70
EXI
TING
CR
JND J
65
-
—
-
!TAIL
-
YARD
LEAl
S NOT
IN
(CONTRACT(-
SEE
INT�:RMODAL
P_AN FOR
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40 30
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR R/W LIMITS
DE 1
^ N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -''W
6178+00
N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
CA
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -180
6177+00
N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
E�
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1840
6176+00 10' 0 1a' 20'
GRAPHIC SCALE- 1" = l0'
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
-
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
V00090
DRAWING N0,
RX -08
_
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
SHEET N0.
60 OF 188
-
.
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P

100
95
90
85
BO
75
70
65
r
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
z Y
AREA FILL:
167.1 SF
AREA CUT:
1.3 SF
—
_fl
'21
z o
100
lY
IS
s
--
iC3
wQ
m�
22
Ww.
UBGRAO
W
cd
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
T
—
e J
I�
w
_+'
,r
-
95
`°
95
SI•NAL
PAD
T
EXIST
NG GROUNQ
YARD LEADS
NOT IN
PLAN FOR DETAIL
,CONTRACT
r- SEE INTERMODAL
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
100
i;
100
lY
IS
s
--
iC3
UBGRAO
�
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
T
—
e J
w
_+'
-
95
`°
95
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
100
i;
100
—
s
E
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
w
_+'
-
95
`°
95
90
90
W
tIJ
iJ
Ir
1
W.
1 r
x
,�
85
85
� �
�a.^
80—
o
BO
o v
/
TOP SUBGRA \
N
s
—
—
—
—
—
75
75
—
-
—
70
70
X - NG
-
- — --
65
- -
- -
65
YARD LEAS
NOT IN
CONTRACT -SEE INTERMODAL
PLAN
FOR DETAIL
F
60
120 110 100 90 80
70 60 50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180p
aw
617,3+00
10° 0 10'
zo'
�
1
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
GRAPHIC SCALE: ill- 10'
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
FOR R/W LIMITS
DESIGNED By
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
uim,rtns. wyry tMa'-
D MONTAcuE
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
CROSS SECTIONS
PRAWN BY
r}Raw1Nc Na.
g
°°I°'�^�°�°^
D. MONTAGUE
JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA
RX -09
EMT16175+00 TO EMT16173+00
anti .rain ,Nr waw+w
Iinasoi5`w+rlu�9'w,•°p
CHECREO BY
N.ORTEGA
REVISION
SHEET NO.
Feet- M Yell rot M
wa,�«Y�.w.,ro,
APPR04£U D r
V00090
61 OF 1B8
SUBS NORTH END DIVA FLORENCE
�
NOT FOR CONTmucnoDATE
°IMIMCSM T�eM
CAMAS
� �
SCALE AS SHOWN
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
a
a
- -
REV DATE DESCit�PTigN
APP
JANUARY 19.2017

C100 ti 100
x
T? — _ _ , .� _
AREA FILL 0.0 SF
AREA CUT 24.2 SF
N 95 95
i 90 - ep x
rn-' T.
Q 85 d Z w W o, 90
85
80 80
TOP OF SUBGRAD ,
~ 75 _ _ — -
.5 75
70
x 70
EXIS'ING GROU D�
� 65 , - - — - 65
0 60 YARD LEAS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE INT:RMODAL P AN FOR D TAIL
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 T
-30 -40 -50 -60 -70 80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -T80
a 6172-1-00
0
U
O Q R
N Q
LO
O 100
0 95
v 90
0
U
X BS
U)
U
c3
rn 80
w 75
C
c
Li 70
u,
v 65
E
0 60
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
c
14 110
100 90
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180
H
Z
�
?
AREA FILL'
129.9 SF4TOP01-
6171-00
0
J
Q
AREA CUT:
14.1 SF
o
0
100 AREA FILL V24.9
SF -
- — - 1 — -
c�11/'�BGRAD
-
100
E
AREA CUT: 'i.3
SF�a
i
°u
95' -- —
-
-- -
95
0
90
�_
90
a3
�'-
o
B5
Q
-
85
j
�a�
80
!�
80
TOP OF SUBGRADE
pl) rn
75
75
° -
— —
70
EXIS INC
GROLI)
70
65
YARD LEA SNOT
IN CONTRACT F- SEE
PLAN FOR DETAIL
60120 110
100 90
_INT
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
_
0 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140-150 -160 -170
fi0
-180
6170.00
WHERE R/W
LIMITS NOT
SHOWN
10 0 10'
20
aw
O
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS
FOR R/W
LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 10'
ww
J
nro m'rim our o-nri'i
npe, ww-
�� n�
DESTGREO BY
D. MONTACUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSx TRANSPORTATION, INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
-
DRAWN 9Y D. MONTAGUE
DRAWING
W
y~i W
imri rurni-nw rw-vi to
.Mi rmx,m rM or'wny
o/ iM CSN frmwwrarlon
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
No.
RX -10
EMT1 6172+00 TO EMT1 6170+00
-
CHECKED 9Y
C
w
W 0.11 w Mia cm-
lfm 1eiioM.Miinoree
—1' 4eny'er'w-nor
irn rM csx rronwo<renm
"III r...*,H
N,ORT
�/OOOQO
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
1
REVISION SNEE7 NO,
62 OF �s8
" w
-
APPROVED Y
M. CANAS
a
J
EXISTNG
GROUT D
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DAZE JANUARY 19.2017
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV DATE I DESCRIPTION B. APP
YARD LEA -S
NOT IN
CONTRACT
SEE INT RMODAL q,AN
FORD
TAIL
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
c
14 110
100 90
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180
6171-00
0
J
Q
o
0
100 AREA FILL V24.9
SF -
- — - 1 — -
-
100
E
AREA CUT: 'i.3
SF�a
i
°u
95' -- —
-
-- -
95
0
90
�_
90
a3
�'-
o
B5
Q
-
85
j
�a�
80
!�
80
TOP OF SUBGRADE
pl) rn
75
75
° -
— —
70
EXIS INC
GROLI)
70
65
YARD LEA SNOT
IN CONTRACT F- SEE
PLAN FOR DETAIL
60120 110
100 90
_INT
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
_
0 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140-150 -160 -170
fi0
-180
6170.00
WHERE R/W
LIMITS NOT
SHOWN
10 0 10'
20
aw
O
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS
FOR R/W
LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 10'
ww
J
nro m'rim our o-nri'i
npe, ww-
�� n�
DESTGREO BY
D. MONTACUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSx TRANSPORTATION, INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
-
DRAWN 9Y D. MONTAGUE
DRAWING
W
y~i W
imri rurni-nw rw-vi to
.Mi rmx,m rM or'wny
o/ iM CSN frmwwrarlon
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
No.
RX -10
EMT1 6172+00 TO EMT1 6170+00
-
CHECKED 9Y
C
w
W 0.11 w Mia cm-
lfm 1eiioM.Miinoree
—1' 4eny'er'w-nor
irn rM csx rronwo<renm
"III r...*,H
N,ORT
�/OOOQO
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
1
REVISION SNEE7 NO,
62 OF �s8
" w
-
APPROVED Y
M. CANAS
a
J
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DAZE JANUARY 19.2017
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV DATE I DESCRIPTION B. APP

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 B - Hornbeam Branch
• 1 B(1) Exhibits
• 1 B(2) Hydrologic Data
• 1 B(3) Hydraulic Model/Output
• 1 B(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1B(l) Exhibits

0IIIIIIIIIIIII
0
c
B
r�
48
a '
forth
fo Carolina
Wesleyan
College
to
C
Ar
tL �
I
BEAVER POND Brernrit
a
Zr
r
-Z a
w r
m i
97
Brench 43 `r t,t1 U (FALLS
64 Toe HISTCWdC fain
Rive/ V1l LAGEc>,`' �'
S BYP
Reservoir 't of ML.ISDALE 64
I.
s -P
o'
Roc s
k7+' Mount43fa WEF9CSAWASn��taG x
Gi
DOWN EAST
CEDARMOOK i Pineview
Cemetery
EUGEM 'ONT NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
r
Seven Vidge5 Ad
x
U
RC/ g''`
Byps'i#LLJLC)KC7 44 i. �ti` Rocky Mount
301 AROUND THE WEbing Legend
- + O Project Area
Vicinity Map N
J/�Cpg� Hornbeam Branch Crossing - CSX Intermodal 0 2,000 4,000
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.City of Rocky Mount, Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina
REG No. 2966 Project No: JLXCX102 Feet
al4

f` sir, of Rb,ih-
rt I i Jf'jr` r _ �I
1
�j
7 .1�079d �q hr
X
pNL'X ZONE - LO Q T.,. - l �Q
301
N1 OSLEY DR
y
'• 1 i.
tin
COLON CR-
I osa
..> MOLL
A
z �
� I
n
53 OZONE X .. d
r'• r
7
• Exhibit
Mck� lin . • . , .�<.
^�'� �` • ' . Effective FIRM
;r 4 fi
1" Hornbeam Crossing - CSX Intermodal
,, • ' , • • + . City of Rocky Mount
. Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina
$"1 4,11 �'' �'f?. ��,�^_,�� ' , ��• ' GRID NORTH
IIQ# h'' }: i • . MAP SCALE 1" = 500'(1 : 6,000)
'►. x asv o awSro 760 1.000
q `-r s . . FEEi
— — METERS
- f' '.? aa! e • f5a 0 760 500
FJ
• •�. • � , PANEL 3851K
..••
'ZONE X, FIRM
rZ{)NE X . ' . , • • . " ... , • ° FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
. • ... • " • • er�'� r©^��ri.' NORTH CAROLINA
.'....+.'. ` a PANEL 3851
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL
. • ' • • LAYOUT)
COAJTAINs;
COQ CIO No. PANEL SUFFIX
• • • • " III ,� FDGFCOMBE COUNTY 370W7 36$1 K
HASH COUNTY 370276 36$1 K
ROCKY MOL NT, CITY Oaf' 37W92 3651 K
s
I
-:J
No9ee to User The Map Humber shown below sMuM be used
• • , • When placing map -d--:on dre Communrry Numbar shown eb-w
sh-Id be —d nsur h- appaearlons fox the wbj-d
-a nft
• MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
JUNE 18, 2013 3720385100K
sem
F"`H'v f\ �✓� - rhe
.i t EY 1138 - sr Q r
_ •� � •.« �a0 sem'
State ©f North Carolina
Fcdcral Emergency Management Agency
Source:
Federal Emergency
Management Agency(FEMA)
Panel No. 3720386100K
Panel No. 3720385100K
F //x, 11111111ACOBS
EW xx Reg No. 2966

W
n
C-
0
vo
C—
r
X
C7
X
O
N
Z
O
1
n
O
C7
C/)
X
O
O
Cl)
C7
r_
Z
m
rn
O
rn
O
rn
O
rn
X

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1 B(2) Hydrologic Data

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9—Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Page 26 Revised: July 7, 2014
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Area
Location miles)
Approximately 0.44
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
mile downstream of 3.1
915 1,560 1,770 2,380
Highway 301 By -
ass
Approximately 0.21
mile upstream of
2.6
826
1,420
1,620
2,180
Highway 301 By -
Goose
pass
Branch
Approximately 0.56
mile upstream of
2.4
778
1,340
1,530
2,070
Highway 301 By -
ass
Approximately 0.88
mile upstream of
2.0
690
1,200
1,370
1,860
Highway 301 By -
ass
Approximately 100
feet upstream of
3.8
394
685
836
1,191
the confluence with
Tar River
Approximately
1,500 feet
3.5
374
652
796
1,135
upstream of West
Mount Drive
Approximately
1,978 feet
2.40
*
*
768
Grape
downstream of
South Halifax Road
Branch
Approximately 500
feet upstream of
2.01
*
*
965
South Halifax Road
Approximately
1,735 feet
1.75
*
*
643
downstream of
Redman Road
Approximately
2,441 feet
1.49
*
*
587
upstream of
Redman Road
Nash/Edgecombe
6.7
1,000
1,780
2,080
2,990
County Boundary
Hornbeam
Approximately 0.23
Branch
mile upstream of
6.0
1,000
1,780
2,080
2,990
Nash/Edgecombe
County Boundary
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Page 26 Revised: July 7, 2014

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1 B(3) Hydraulic Model

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Hornbeam Branch Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: EFF FWAY River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
6939.5
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.68
85.42
74.05
85.42
0.000009
0.56
16772.82
2593.26
0.02
Reach - 1
6939.5
FWAY
2080.00
67.68
86.36
74.05
86.37
0.000068
1.31
3856.54
299.00
0.05
Reach - 1
6907.0
Culvert
Reach - 1
6874.5
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.78
75.53
74.15
76.57
0.006793
9.01
676.62
830.97
0.59
Reach - 1
6874.5
FWAY
2080.00
67.78
76.37
74.15
76.89
0.003448
6.90
832.04
299.00
0.43
Reach - 1
6447.0
100 -YEAR
890.00
67.32
74.71
72.89
74.78
0.000971
2.97
970.74
386.56
0.23
Reach - 1
6447.0
FWAY
890.00
67.32
75.69
72.80
75.78
0.000907
3.03
678.46
164.00
0.21

Hornbeam Branch Plan: Effective _Floodway 7/25/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
15 .15 1
4
VA
5 ----- ..-------------
- _..... _.. - EG FWAY
85
c
0
m
LU
4500
15
65
4000 4500
5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
Hornbeam Branch Plan: Effective_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
�0�.15 T .1
4 -
5 —ONE
5000
i
5500
Station (ft)
6500
.2
7000
Legend
............. A.............
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
................. A .................
Crit FWAY
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000 6500 7000

90
85
80
0
0
LU
0
m
w
65
4000
4000
Hornbeam Branch Plan: Effective_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
15 P O .15 1 .2
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
Crit FWAY
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Ineff
Bank Sta
Encroachment
VIIIIII1
Legend
EG FWAY
............................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS FWAY
WS 100 -YEAR
................. ,.................
Crit FWAY
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
7000

F
85
80
0
0
w
75
70-
65
4400
4600
Hornbeam Branch Plan: Effective_Floodway 7/25/2017
Cross Section Hornbeam Branch 13.0
.15 .04 .15-
4800 .15
4800
5000
Station (ft)
1
.2
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
.................. I ............... I..
Crit 100 -YEAR
Crit FWAY
Groundp
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Hornbeam Branch Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: EX FWAY River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
6939.5
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.68
84.67
74.05
84.67
0.000012
0.64
14829.48
2563.04
0.03
Reach - 1
6939.5
FWAY
2080.00
67.68
85.35
74.05
85.36
0.000086
1.44
3555.62
299.00
0.06
Reach - 1
6907.0
Culvert
Reach - 1
6874.5
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.78
75.56
74.22
76.15
0.004910
7.33
715.72
833.71
0.49
Reach - 1
6874.5
FWAY
2080.00
67.78
76.38
74.15
77.73
0.007592
9.38
232.24
299.00
0.59
Reach - 1
6447.0
100 -YEAR
890.00
67.32
74.71
72.89
74.78
0.000971
2.97
970.74
386.56
0.23
Reach - 1
6447.0
FWAY
890.00
67.32
75.69
72.80
75.78
0.000907
3.03
678.46
164.00
0.21

Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Main Stem Reach - 1
90
Legend
__ _
...
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
--------------------------------
EG 100-YEAR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.................................................................. ...................
..........
-
;.. _,.. _,.
--- . .......... _ ..............
WS 100 YEAR
---------------------------•
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_
.........................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Crit FWAY
85
--------------------------------------
Ground
80
o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I--------------------
---------------------------------------_.
..... -------------
-------------- --------------
-
1
LU
----- ------- ----- ..--------------- .--------- ------ - ..
... --------
75
..-... - --------- -- --
----- --- -- --
70
65
0
100 200 300
400 500
Main Channel Distance (ft)

IN
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
.15 J, .1 J,
.0 Legend
4
-----------------------
5
--------------- ...... ...... --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- ----------------
---------- --------- ------------ I ------------- -EG AY
65
4000 4500
-0
Lij
75
--------------------------------------------
................. ............... i . * ..........
65 i I
4000 4500
15
WS FWAY
5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
.15 311, .1 ;J,
d 1� I - � 1 .2til
-
5000
5500
Station (ft)
6000
6500
Legend
A
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
............................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
.................. A .................
Crit FWAY
----
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
7000

15
c
0
m
LU
70-
65
4000
4500
4
-------- 5 ----------'
---------------------------------C-------------- --
5000
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
--------------------------
85
. --------------------- ..
T ----------------------------------------------
---------------
-------------------------------------------------
80
.2
............. ................. .................. ................
................ ................ ................ ................. ................
................ ................ ................. ................ ...........
........... ...........
........... ........
Legend
-------------i--------------- ------------------------------
--- ----------------------------------------------=------
---- ---------------- ----------------:-----........_i..............................................:
------------------------------ '---------------- ;---------------- .
........... ...........
...........
EG F AY
:.................................................. ..... ........................................
LU
EG 100 -YEAR
75
--------------
WS 100 -YEAR
..........
c
0
m
LU
70-
65
4000
4500
4
-------- 5 ----------'
---------------------------------C-------------- --
5000
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
.15�.1
LE
.2
............. ................. .................. ................
................ ................ ................ ................. ................
................ ................ ................. ................ ...........
........... ...........
........... ........
Legend
-------------i--------------- ------------------------------
--- ----------------------------------------------=------
---- ---------------- ----------------:-----........_i..............................................:
.... ....................
........... ...........
...........
EG F AY
a
WS FWAY
—_—_ —_ -------- -------
EG 100 -YEAR
--------------
WS 100 -YEAR
_........:..............
-------'----------------
....................................
Crit FWAY
................ :............... .:............... .:..............
Crit 100 -YEAR
- - -.. ....
.. .... ................ ................
'................ ;................
..
_
Ground
................ ................
..................
................ ................ ................
...........
Ineff
Bank Sta
--
----
Encroachment
.... .... ...... .... .... ........... ........... ........... .......
5500 6000 6500
...........
7000
Station (ft)
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)

F
85
80
0
0
w
75
70-
65
4400
4600
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Existing_Floodway 7/25/2017
Cross Section Hornbeam Branch 13.0
.15 .04 .15-
4800 .15
4800
5000
Station (ft)
1
.2
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
.................. I ............... I..
Crit 100 -YEAR
Crit FWAY
Groundp
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Hornbeam Branch Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: PROP FWAY River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
6939.5
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.68
84.67
74.05
84.67
0.000012
0.64
14829.48
2563.04
0.03
Reach - 1
6939.5
FWAY
2080.00
67.68
85.34
74.05
85.35
0.000086
1.44
3553.36
299.00
0.06
Reach - 1
6907.0
Culvert
Reach - 1
6825
100 -YEAR
2080.00
67.78
75.46
74.16
76.09
0.005305
7.55
683.94
804.25
0.51
Reach - 1
6825
FWAY
2080.00
67.78
76.24
74.16
77.64
0.008036
9.56
227.71
299.00
0.61
Reach - 1
6447.0
100 -YEAR
890.00
67.32
74.71
72.89
74.78
0.000971
2.97
970.74
386.56
0.23
Reach - 1
6447.0
FWAY
890.00
67.32
75.69
72.80
75.78
0.000907
3.03
678.46
164.00
0.21

Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Proposed_Floodway 7/25/2017
Main Stem Reach - 1
90
Legend
-
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ---------------------------------
----------------- ------------------- ------ ..
..................................... -------------------
................... -
............... A...............
EG FWAY
•
WS FWAY
---------------------
------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------
-------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- -------------------
--------------------------------
EG 100 YEAR
-
------------------- -----------------I-----------------
-----------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
--------------I.............
--.
--
WS 100
-
------------------- ------------------- -----------
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------- ------------------
-------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- -------------------
.................... . ....................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Crit FWAY
85
-
-
-------- -----------
---- - ------------------ ------------------- ------------------- ---------------- -
---- ----------
------------------- L ------------------ -------------------- -------------------- I --------------- --------- ------------------- i -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------
Ground
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ----------------------------------------
------------------- ----------------------------------
I -------------------- I -------------------
---------------------
-
80-
-------------------- I --------------------
--------------------------------------- -------------------
I -------------------- I ------------------
-------------------- I -----------------
------------------- -------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
-------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
.......
-
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
I
------------------- ------------------
I I
------------------- -------------------- ------------------- I -------------------- I --------------------
------------------ I -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
-
------------------- ------------------- --------------------
-------------------- -------------------
--------------------------------------- -------------------- -----------------------------------------
--------------------------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------
-------------- - -------- L
,Z6
----------- --- - ......... ...........
-------------------......... -----------------
-
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------- I --------------------
.................
------------------- -------------------
LU......
----------- -------- ---------------
----------------- ------------ ---------- ---------------- ----------------------------- ........ -----------
....... ------------------- .
............ ...........
...........................................
....... .................
.
75
---- — - __ ------------------------- ........... ---------------- ............................. ........... ...... .....
....................
................. ..................
........... .................
. ,
70
.OIL
. ................... ................... ........................................
. ................... ...........................................................
65
...............................................................................
......................................
....................................... ................... ............. ......... ..
............................................................. ................... ................... .................. .............. ................... ......................... ...... .
0
100 200 300 400
500
Main Channel Distance (ft)

rd6i
70
!9
LU
75
15
Ground
A___
|noff
oanxntu
—l�~~~~~~~~~~~�|
4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)
Hornbeam—Branch
P|an:Propooed_F|oodway 7/25/2017
Upstream Section orermooxCuxmmvvor
.z
4
Legend
EG FWAY
---------------
EG 100 -YEAR
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Bank Sta
Encroachment
nsno snun Vnoo
7000
0000
Station (ft)
Hornbeam—Branch
P|un:Propooad_F|oodway 7/25/2017
Ranmuu
1
�1s
.1
.2
4
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 1 00 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
A___
|noff
oanxntu
—l�~~~~~~~~~~~�|
4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)

�7
c
0
m
LU
70-
65
4000
4500
0
4
5
5000
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Proposed_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
15 t .1 i}
VA
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)
----------- -----------------
85
T --------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
80
---------------------------------------------
------------------------------ '----------------;---------------'
u
75
c
0
m
LU
70-
65
4000
4500
0
4
5
5000
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Proposed_Floodway 7/25/2017
Railroad
15 t .1 i}
VA
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Station (ft)

F
85
80
0
0
w
75
70-
65
4400
4600
Hornbeam—Branch Plan: Proposed_Floodway 7/25/2017
Cross Section Hornbeam Branch 13.0
.15 "�'.045�� .15
4800
5000
Station (ft)
1
.2
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
.................. I ............... I..
Crit 100 -YEAR
Crit FWAY
Groundp
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1 B(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

���purHGRay� -
` `0Asr
�N° r� "IC, (oAsrLnE PAILRoAn COMA:
<y E a -
— -- 1$ lelwec _bcc,"ols
vno�o�ry I masor)�
I A�en OS oper7,r-)(3 �
— I
\e4\-4 )77 'n eo r 13o ccr NC
MY 35 \,,t �%w SzQ
wA�r) �roPosed 12 Arc]
7-�5-21
A��GG-I
cfl re-�1C1� 8�%�t I Ola #5vy 5 �5

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1C - Compass Creek
• 1C(l) Exhibits
• 1C(2) Hydrologic Data
• 1C(3) Hydraulic Model/Output
• 1C(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1C(1) Exhibits

2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
820000 FEET 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W 820000 FEET
School Rd r in- f - ' f . A
C wl ,moi► �y'4 ' � I41Y
nA
Fou,tain;School Rd
'moi � � ` ! �� � �♦ r �,rD� .,
I
' '•' �'- CI Y OO F ROICKY
.11011NT F;TJ
Conip iss Creek ZONE"'AE
370092 35°59'30"N CITY OI F °`�
35'59'30"N
= OCO
CO
M
^° j�� ���� )��_ ICompass earrett\Rd
�• ee6;� :- - seer Hunt
CITY OF Vik ROCKY MOUN��c0ineVe
4h4 p
ZZ, 6 ti'0 *' -
w ,• q r p ,�
00
p
C
115
• � ZONE AE �
,_ CITY OI F ROCKY
MOO T ETJ
w a` r
LL 092
EY1376 3701
f EY1376,V'� wr
�•" 1
0
/ ­XZZ663`1. i ' a �' �Af:
s s 35°59'0"N
35°59'0"N - :�„, .~r
-
,
i
Gelo Rtl
. + -
- � I� CITY OF ROCKY �.: � � s - -
:7
a 7E
MOUNT ETT Q
1 370092 CITY OF
Compass Creek ROCKY MOUNT
" CITY OF 370092
Boddie Ct-L� o o `
ROCKY MOUNT
370092
H" ornbeam - ass 78.0
O
Branch ,y '''
0
oss n
�.• E=Y11�37
78:0 os� 78.0, I ,
� Z�Z6'048.
171
-+`_'',..f1 •...„ f 049
',8:0 =oaa EY1138� r. i
EY1139 -
«, N ZZ6047�, _- -
EY1140n
EY1140 ZONE AE Tar _ - 35°58'30°N
35°58'30"N } A�
EY 1139 otic — River
.` \H"ornbeam
1141 � CITY OF ROO C'KY
6W
0-
FY1®ZZ6046 8 97 - EY1136:
E-1Y01r1�42�'EY1._142 MOUNT EZ�J
ZONE AE ;
i.
EY0910 b'. I '
4.97 Compass
EY0910 f
f o Creek . . }
wo• •�" - _ , - is
4312
a
41
ro
u
810000 FEET '`� u�, 810000 FEET
77°47'0"W 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W
2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
FEMA'3 COIDPEAA I[IG 1W
TECHr,ICALPAFffl4U1
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmap
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
[I�.Ti�l=i�1I1]
0 75 150
PANEL LOCATOR
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood ,t\\ra
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
Zone A,V, A99
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
0 t. Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
NASH COUNTY
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
OTHER AREAS OF
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
severe than those in the VE Zone.
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES
I I I I I I I I I I I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
I
BM5510 X North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510® National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510� Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
0�2 1s-2— Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
s - - - - - - Coastal Transect
— - - - - - Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmap
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
[I�.Ti�l=i�1I1]
0 75 150
PANEL LOCATOR
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood ,t\\ra
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
3873
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
3893
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
4813
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
463
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
NASH COUNTY
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
4862 ;
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
3851
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
3850
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
37159
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
,
severe than those in the VE Zone.
3758
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
3747 3757
4822
4832
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1 -800 -344 -WILD.
CBRS Area Otherwise Protected Area
VA1101►«11111,
1,000
Feet
Meters
300
18197 c3897
3886 3896 4806 4816
HALIFAX COUNTY
3885 3895
r
4804 4824,,
3884 3894 �� r
3863
3873
3883
3893
4803
4813
4823
463
- --,
4842
4862 ;
3862
3872
3882
3892
4802
4812
4822
4832
I
C
MARTIN COUNTY
Fr
r�
cc
rrW
0
cc
loom
Cn
a
0
0
U.
cc
a
0
cc
Z
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAS`'
NORTH CAROLINAS �
PANEL 3861 0
Ivo s�G�a
FE I` 422
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF 370092 3861 1
MAP NUMBER
3720386100J
MAP REVISED
6/18/2013

jACOBS- Compass Creek Proposed Floodplain & Floodway Feet
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
CSX Intermodal, Rocky Mount, NC

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Appendix 1C(2) Hydrologic Data

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9 -Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Page 24 Revised: July 7, 2014
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Area
Location miles)
Approximately 0.16
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
Big
Peachtree
mile upstream of 9.65
* * 3,070
Creek
Nash/Franklin
County boundary
Approximately 0.7
mile downstream of
4.4
467
864
1,080
1,715
Bulluck School Road
Cokey
SR 1006
Swamp
Approximately 0.7
mile upstream of
3.1
377
707
888
1,422
Old Wilson Road
(SR 1002)
Nash/Edgecombe
8.8
1,390
2,350
2,730
3,820
County Boundary
Approximately 1.0
mile upstream of
6.3
1,120
1,950
2,260
3,200
Highway 301
Approximately 0.17
mile downstream of
4.8
941
1,660
1,940
2,770
Highway 48
Approximately 1.0
Compass
mile upstream of
3.5
774
1,400
1,630
2,350
Creek
Highway 48
Approximately 0.87
mile downstream of
2.6
651
1,200
1,400
2,030
Interstate 95
Approximately 0.33
mile downstream of
1.0
358
702
833
1,230
Interstate 95
Approximately 445
feet upstream of
0.6
264
534
637
955
Interstate 95
At mouth
4.9
1,335
2,173
2,476
3,342
At the confluence of
2.7
662
1,212
1,424
2,066
Cowlick
Parkers Canal
Creek
Approximately 129
feet upstream of
1.5
354
715
862
1,325
North Raleigh
Street
Cypress
At the confluence
31.5
*
*
6,436
Creek
with Tar River
Fishing
At the
Creek
Nash/Edgecombe
530.2
12,041
18,143
20,832
30,326
County boundary
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Page 24 Revised: July 7, 2014

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1C(3) Hydraulic Model

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Compass Creek Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: DupEFF River: Compass Creek Reach: Main
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Main
15207.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.51
88.34
78.89
88.40
0.000272
2.68
2930.96
827.70
0.12
Main
15207.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.51
88.53
78.89
88.59
0.000285
2.77
2346.60
400.00
0.12
Main
15117.5
Culvert
Main
15027.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.37
86.34
78.75
86.52
0.000765
4.14
1662.09
566.14
0.20
Main
15027.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.37
87.16
78.75
87.29
0.000545
3.63
1685.82
337.81
0.17
Main
14936.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.32
86.33
86.42
0.000419
3.28
2588.55
837.37
0.16
Main
14936.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.32
87.16
87.22
0.000296
2.87
2607.22
540.00
0.14
Main
14476.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.10
85.77
86.10
0.001108
5.24
1359.38
719.27
0.26
Main
14476.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.10
86.72
86.98
0.000832
4.76
1253.46
311.00
0.23
Main
14172.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.98
85.67
85.76
0.000718
3.42
2504.46
695.39
0.18
Main
14172.0
FWAY
2730.00
71.98
86.64
86.73
0.000548
3.16
2105.17
280.00
0.16
Main
13665.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.89
84.47
78.93
85.01
0.002494
6.16
535.85
1109.00
0.33
Main
13665.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.89
85.39
78.96
85.99
0.003719
6.21
439.40
36.60
0.32
Main
13641.8
Bridge
Main
13618.2
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.68
82.24
78.72
83.08
0.004994
7.63
428.83
918.49
0.45
Main
13618.2
FWAY
2730.00
71.68
83.22
78.75
84.08
0.006149
7.43
367.51
36.60
0.41
Main
12820.0
100 -YEAR
2780.00
71.27
81.28
77.88
81.34
0.000851
3.37
3075.42
685.34
0.19
Main
12820.0
FWAY
2780.00
71.27
81.86
78.13
81.96
0.001113
4.01
2108.07
350.00
0.22

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC—DupEFF 7/25/2017
Compass Creek Main
90-
Legend
.
................... .......................................
.................... ............................................................
-------------------- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------
............... A ...............
EG FWAY
I
--------------- --------------
WS FWAY
--------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
88-
WS 100 -YEAR
................. ................... .......
......................... .........................
................ ..............
............... ................... ................... ................... .......... ............ -------------- — ---- -------- -------
............
.................... A ....................
Crit FWAY
--------------
-------------- ------ ------------------
------ --------------------
.................... . ....................
Crit 100 -YEAR
I -------------------- I ---------------------------------------
------------ .............. ...... -----------
A -A --------------------- -------- .... -------------
.............
- - --------........ -------- ------
------------- - -------- ...
Groun
86-
------------------- ----------------------------------------
84
----
-------------------- I ----------------------------------------
......... ......
-------------
82�
----
::,i -
--
......... ...
80 -
LU
78
............
76
74-
72
70
0
5 0 1000 1500 2000
2500
Main Channel Distance (ft)

95
CSX_COMPASS_CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
WESLEYAN BLVD
.2 .09 O
5
c
0
m
LU
3500
4000
E
.09
EG FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-------------------
WS 100-YEAR
.....................................................................................................................
..................... ..................... ............... ......................._i................... i................... Crit 100 -YEAR
...........!...................
Crit FWAY
4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK P|an:CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 23.0
3500
4000 4500 5000 5500
6000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC—DupEFF 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 22.0
7
105
EG FWAY
100
95-
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
90-
Bank Sta
...
Encroachment
FU
85-
75
70
3500
4000 4500 5000 5500
6�00
Station (ft)

95
90
0
m
w
75-
70
4200
22�
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
-
WS FWAY
.........
WS 100 -YEAR
EG 100 -YEAR
--------
.....:...........................
WS 100 -YEAR
..................
Ground
M
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Encroachment
5800
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
///.
EG 100 -YEAR
.........
WS 100 -YEAR
...........................
...........................
.................,.................
Crit FWAY
.....:...........................
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
...............................
Encroachment
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000
Station (ft)
....
5800

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Railroad
c
0
m
LU
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Railroad
5600
Legend
............. A.............
EG FWAY
----------------------------
Gr, lnn_vGoo
b'1;:III1]
.........................
Crit FWAY
Ground
i
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...........................
EG FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS FWAY
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
70 1 1 1 1
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
224 3�k .168 ":056 .168
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 26.0
.168 "� .0 .168
Crit 100 -YEAR
61.10101
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
..........................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
................. ,.................
Crit FWAY
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Compass Creek Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: CC EX Cond River: Compass Creek Reach: Main
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Main
15207.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.51
88.30
78.89
88.35
0.000278
2.71
2893.35
820.10
0.12
Main
15207.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.51
88.45
78.89
88.52
0.000295
2.81
2314.98
400.00
0.12
Main
15117.5
Culvert
Main
15027.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.37
86.14
78.75
86.34
0.000858
4.34
1551.02
546.96
0.21
Main
15027.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.37
86.77
78.75
86.93
0.000653
3.90
1555.01
337.81
0.18
Main
14936.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.32
86.13
86.23
0.000479
3.47
2422.16
817.68
0.17
Main
14936.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.32
86.77
86.84
0.000365
3.13
2396.87
540.00
0.15
Main
14476.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.10
85.46
85.86
0.001328
5.64
1143.37
620.32
0.28
Main
14476.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.10
86.22
86.55
0.001036
5.19
1099.66
311.00
0.25
Main
14172.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.98
85.33
85.45
0.000872
3.69
2277.15
671.15
0.20
Main
14172.0
FWAY
2730.00
71.98
86.14
86.24
0.000666
3.38
1963.46
280.00
0.17
Main
13665.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.89
83.96
78.93
84.57
0.002928
6.47
509.16
1077.76
0.35
Main
13665.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.89
84.69
78.96
85.36
0.004408
6.60
413.50
36.60
0.35
Main
13641.8
Bridge
Main
13618.2
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.68
81.79
78.72
82.73
0.005947
8.05
405.19
860.53
0.48
Main
13618.2
FWAY
2730.00
71.68
82.59
78.75
83.56
0.007397
7.93
344.45
36.60
0.46
Main
13454.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.60
81.97
82.01
0.000769
3.33
3815.21
957.52
0.19
Main
13454.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.60
82.72
82.78
0.000922
3.82
2925.82
585.00
0.21
Main
13089
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.50
81.53
81.64
0.001354
4.33
2380.43
544.63
0.25
Main
13089
FWAY
2730.00
71.50
82.17
82.33
0.001581
4.89
1760.17
302.00
0.27
Main
12820.0
100 -YEAR
2780.00
71.27
81.28
77.88
81.34
0.000851
3.37
3075.42
685.34
0.19
Main
12820.0
FWAY
2780.00
71.27
81.86
78.13
81.96
0.001113
4.01
2108.07
350.00
0.22

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC—EX—Cond 7/25/2017
Compass Creek Main
90 -
Legend
.
................... ....................................... ................... ..............................................
...............................
............... A ...............
EG FWAY
.
A-------------------------
WS FWAY
------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
88 -
WS 100 -YEAR
-
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------------
------------- -------------------------
--------------------------------------- ------------
------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------- ---- ---- ------------------- -----
- --------------- -------------- - ------
.. .... ---- ----
............
..................... & ....................
Crit FWAY
---------------------- ------------------------ ---- ....
--- --------------
.................... . ....................
Crit 100 -YEAR
86-
-
------------------- -------------------- -------------------- I ---------------
........ - - ----- --- - -----------
........ ---- ---- ----------------------------- - --- ------
--------------
------
Ground
84
82
------------------- ------------------- ---------
---------- ------- ------------- ------- - ----------------- --------------
...... ----- -------
-----------------------
......
80
LU
78
76
74-
72
70
0 500
1000 1500 2000
2500
Main Channel Distance (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC—EX—Cond 7/25/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
—.2 .09 .1 JK �K
95 0 .1 —.09
- - - - - ---------------- -- --------
------5 ...............
............... ------ ....................................................
Leend
------------------- ------------------- ------ ----
------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ----------- ............ ....
EG FWAY
....................... ..................
IN
------------------- i ------------ WSFWAY
............................
EG 100-YEAR
------------------- ------------------- -
------------------
----------------- ------------------- -------------------
WS 100-YEAR
...................
.. .................. ..................
............................. .................... .................... ................... ................... ................... Crit 100-YEAR
Crit FWAY
............ ................... ....................................... ................... ...................
.......... ................... ........................................ .................. Ground
.......... .......................... ........................................ ................... ...................
Ineff
........... ................... ................... ................... ........................................ ............................................................. -------------------
•
Bank Sta
................... ................... .........................................................................................................
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- Encroachment
0610111
.2
HIM
3500
4000
4500
Station (ft)
5000
5500
6000

95
CSX_COMPASS_CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
WESLEYAN BLVD
.2 .09 O
5
c
0
m
LU
3500
4000
E
.09
EG FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
_.......... ...............................------------------------------- - - - - --
WS 100 -YEAR
..
7:T7.7................... ..................... ......................................_i................... i................... Crit 100 -YEAR
......:.......................................!..........................................................!...................
Crit FWAY
4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC EX Cond 7/25/2017
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK P|an:CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 23.0
L �
on 1e �o
3500
4000 4500 5000 5500
6000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC—EX—Cond 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 22.0
105j
T :
100
WS FWAY
95-
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
go -
Bank Sta
FU
85-
75
70
3500
4000 4500 5000 5500
6�00
Station (ft)

95
90
0
m
w
75-
70
4200
95
4000

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
Railroad
c
0
m
LU
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
Railroad
61:31I11
Legend
............. A.............
EG FWAY
----------------------------
Gr, lnn_vGoo
b'1;:III11
.........................
Crit FWAY
Ground
i
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...........................
EG FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS FWAY
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
70 1 1 1 1
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
224 3�k .168 ":056 .168 JL
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
4000 4200 4400
4600 4800 5000 5200
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
CC XS 2 New"
—.168 "�
0
5
6
5400
–.168
611-10111
Crit 100 -YEAR
61.10101
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400
Station (ft)
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
.........................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
T�
5600
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

86
84-
82
80
0
� 78
w
76
74
72
70
4200
0
m
w
.224
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
CC XS 1 New'
.224 .168 — — —
0
5
6
4400 4600 4800 5000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_EX_Cond 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 26.0
.168
5200
MCI-]
168
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
............................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5600
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
..........................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
................. ,.................
Crit FWAY
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
70
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study J,, COBS
Compass Creek Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: CC Prop River: Compass Creek Reach: Main
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Main
15207.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.51
88.29
78.89
88.35
0.000279
2.71
2890.18
819.46
0.12
Main
15207.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.51
88.44
78.89
88.51
0.000296
2.81
2312.60
400.00
0.12
Main
15117.5
Culvert
Main
15027.5
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.37
86.13
78.75
86.33
0.000865
4.36
1543.91
545.71
0.21
Main
15027.5
FWAY
2730.00
72.37
86.75
78.75
86.91
0.000659
3.92
1548.06
337.81
0.18
Main
14936.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.32
86.12
86.22
0.000483
3.48
2411.44
816.39
0.17
Main
14936.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.32
86.75
86.83
0.000369
3.14
2385.67
540.00
0.15
Main
14476.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
72.10
85.44
85.84
0.001345
5.67
1130.00
614.00
0.28
Main
14476.0
FWAY
2730.00
72.10
86.20
86.53
0.001049
5.21
1091.20
311.00
0.25
Main
14172.0
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.98
85.31
85.43
0.000884
3.71
2261.51
669.45
0.20
Main
14172.0
FWAY
2730.00
71.98
86.11
86.21
0.000674
3.40
1955.63
280.00
0.18
Main
13665.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.89
83.93
78.93
84.53
0.002963
6.50
507.23
1075.50
0.35
Main
13665.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.89
84.64
78.96
85.33
0.004453
6.63
411.99
36.60
0.35
Main
13641.8
Bridge
Main
13580.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.68
81.76
78.72
82.67
0.008293
7.97
403.50
859.49
0.48
Main
13580.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.68
82.55
78.74
83.54
0.014773
7.96
343.13
36.60
0.46
Main
13454.4
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.60
81.97
82.01
0.000769
3.33
3815.21
957.52
0.19
Main
13454.4
FWAY
2730.00
71.60
82.72
82.78
0.000922
3.82
2925.82
585.00
0.21
Main
13089
100 -YEAR
2730.00
71.50
81.53
81.64
0.001354
4.33
2380.42
544.63
0.25
Main
13089
FWAY
2730.00
71.50
82.17
82.33
0.001581
4.89
1760.17
302.00
0.27
Main
12820.0
100 -YEAR
2780.00
71.27
81.28
77.88
81.34
0.000851
3.37
3075.42
685.34
0.19
Main
12820.0
FWAY
2780.00
71.27
81.86
78.13
81.96
0.001113
4.01
2108.07
350.00
0.22

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Compass Creek Main
90
f...............
Legend
.........................................................
..............................................................................
-------
-------
-
A ...............
EG FWAY
.
---------------
WS FWAY
88
EG 100-YEAR
E
WS 100 -YEAR
------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------- ----- .................... ',.
.............. ;.. ;...
;.
................ ................
Crit FWAY
.......-------------------- -----------------
---- .....Crit
-_-------------- ----
. ....................
100 -YEAR
86
................
f A-------------------------- ........ ---......
---
Ground
84
82
'....._.-------- -....
+ - - --------
c
80
LU
......... .
78
76
74-
4-72
72
70
—
0
500 1000 1500
2000 2500
Main Channel Distance (ft)

95.2�
------------------- ----------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
WESLEYAN BLVD
.09
5
0
LU
3500
4000
I
.09
.............. L .............
EG FWAY
- --------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
--------------------- ------------- -------- -------------------- I ------------------- -------------------
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- -------------------
WS 100 -YEAR
........................................ ................... ................... ....... .. ................. . .................
.......... ................... ........... ................... Crit 100 -YEAR
A.................
Crit FWAY
................... ................... ............
4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Legend
....... ..... A .............
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
...................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................................
Crit FWAY
0
Ground
•
Ir7eff
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Phan:CC_pmp 7/25/2017
------------
�85. iiiiiiii�; --*- :7: : :. ................... ......... ............... ................... ............................... .............. ................... ................... ................... ................ ........ .................... ..................E7- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------ ------ ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ................ .......................................................... ................... ................... ...................--------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
807570

95
90
0
m
w
75-
70
4200
9
-1:11Il7
224
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
-
WS FWAY
.........
WS 100 -YEAR
EG 100 -YEAR
--------
WS 100 -YEAR
..................
M
Ground
Ineff
•
•
Bank Sta
...............................
Encroachment
Encroachment
5800
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
.
WS FWAY
EG 100 -YEAR
.........
WS 100 -YEAR
...........................
...........................
.................,.................
Crit FWAY
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
.....:...........................
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
...............................
Encroachment
........................... ........................... ................ ...........{........................... :....................
.......{...........................:...........................�
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800
Station (ft)

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Railroad
224 3�k .168 ":056 .168 JL
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
70
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Railroad
.224 168 1<05+--
4000
:056
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000
Station (ft)
5400
168
1.141I11
Crit FWAY
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5800
.224
Legend
EG FWAY
%-------------
EG
.......... EG 100 -YEAR
WS FWAY
WS 100 -YEAR
..................:..................
Crit 100-YEAR
..................A.......... ......
Crit FWAY
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
............................... Encroachment
T
5600
1
800

70
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
CC XS 2 New"
86 .168 0 .168
............................................................... ........ ......... ......... ........ ......... ..... .... ......... .........
Legend
.\...........:.............:. ;... 5
84
4800
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
224.168
.05
.168
.224
95
'I
Legend
......................:.....................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................
..................
...
....... ......•.............
EG FWAY
-------------------------->---------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
..........................................................!..........................................................................................................................
_...
YEAR
100 YEAR
100 -
90
WS FWAY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
......................................................
i.........................
......................
......................
------
100 YEAR
00 - YEAR
........................... ...................................................
................................................................................................
_................................................
.................................................................................................................................................:....................................................:.......................................................:......................................................:.....................
............................
.......................
Crit FWAY
..............................
Crit 100 -YEAR
85
......................... ......................................................................................................................................
.......................... ..............................
........................................ .
o..............................................................................................................
...........................
........ ;...........................
........................... ............................
Ground
--------------------------- .....................................................;............................
_..............
A
Ineff
LU
—
Bank Sta
80
-
- -- --
-------------------------------------------------------
*-.., ..
.........................
...........................
Encroachment
.............. ....................................................................
...................................................
.........................................................:..............................
-----------------------
------------------------ -----
.................... ................................................................................... ......................... ..;......................................................
_ _-
L
,...........................
75
--------------
------- ----
--
70
4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600 5800
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
CC XS 2 New"
86 .168 0 .168
............................................................... ........ ......... ......... ........ ......... ..... .... ......... .........
Legend
.\...........:.............:. ;... 5
84
4800

CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
CC XS 1 New'
.224 .168 — — —
86 �� 0
5
6
84 -
-....................................
82
80
0
� 78
w
76
74
72
70
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000
Station (ft)
CSX—COMPASS—CREEK Plan: CC_prop 7/25/2017
Cross Section Compass Creek 26.0
.224 .168
5200
168
168
991108]
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
............................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5600
Legend
EG FWAY
WS FWAY
..........................
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
................. ,.................
Crit FWAY
................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 C(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

No Supplemental/Additional Data Provided

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 D - Beech Branch
• 1C(l) Exhibits
• 1C(2) Hydrologic Data
• 1C(3) Hydraulic Model/Output
• 1C(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1D(1) Exhibits

2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
840000 FEET 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W 840000 FEET
6 1
z, Soco�j tr "' q +' o
P ,
.ped' r + rYe�ra9Ps
- �e'� '��`-•'y:�a .r ;` �.• �i kr ''� - Ire i 1 _ ,���ti � '�
=b
FFFF r`y 1. S_wse
' Bra w , d attfP c
Al' . v f
FX�2167 , � ay
.. - r,
a
�I ` i• 51• _ x�-]jJ;`, r �.Yit,.. �f • r' s f"''q` .',t IJ.
` Ir ' •'� � � �', '` - - -_ '-. ._ .,c. _ice *- .-� _ P _ i, 1 J� I`a
_ _ ,•
01111b;
36°3'0"N
36°3'0"N
.�F-X1361
f a /'44
"� FX2172
me H-1
1�TAS+H COO UNTY � ,J" � ' • 4 ` • ,a, - h�iy "* '` Y.
UN.INCO'RPOO RATEtD AREAS r F , `io+'
y a
370278 5� d' m
L47 y air ! "• a d,� �m
r r"►
,
CITY OF ROCKY F
•r s
NN
M®UNT ETJ •"� •
.z 94 r• p. ',aQe
r <4T <_ ,4 r, FXr2174
10
C1
�o6ry - � I
I
- SII 4 36°2'30"N
A .
36°2'30"N
r=�
FX�2�166
. -
7< f C.
, Y °
,.
r -q
Q iaa7
Becch
C'ITk OF -
w B��,nca,
y :
.;"ROCKY MOUNT ' -
_ • y y — �Fcrdscoo 370092. r _ . AE
" Fords Colcn Dr ZONE.
MAI
CiZ 1453
� 2 N
k
- • `sot r 90,E
a5a y'k 3
36°2'0"N
do
I AV AV
yy o t
°
4 �
`So7 .. FX2�165 ,' 442 c
ZONE E ,} f C
--- 3--' �_ 1429
CD
i
a Beech C
k' a
1 m Branch 1 8
483 /
1473 '
1424
7 A
r, i�f, z - CITY OF ROCKY
r
MOUNT TJ
- ; - 370092 - ,
MR
•
52•
549
• 535 v +
1552 1543 BPech
r �Ir
Bi ACIZ 7� &'. .
I I
Redlro
�t
'
rA
Aja ZONAE AE'}dal m• a -- x'49 36°1'30"N
36°1'30"N
.
i 830000 FEET
830000 FEET J' 77°46'30"W 77°46'0"W 77°45'30"W 77°45'0"W
AWL
2360000 FEET 2370000 FEET
#1111SOPERATING TECHNICAL PARTNER
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1 -800 -344 -WILD.
CBRS Area Otherwise Protected Area
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150 300
PANEL LO CATO R
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
SUFFIX
Zone A, V, A99
2888 L,r
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
/
2886
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
2884
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
2882
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
3813
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile Zone x
3812
Future Conditions 1% Annual
2880
Chance Flood Hazard Zone x
OTHER AREAS OF
N Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes Zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Zone x
3718
------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES
I I I I I I I I I I I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
2785
BM5510 D North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
3705
i
BM5510 ? National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM551OZ Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
-(H2 —1,8-2— Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
{s - - - - - - Coastal Transect
\\--
- -- - Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1 -877 -FEMA -MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1 -percent -annual -chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1 -800 -344 -WILD.
CBRS Area Otherwise Protected Area
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150 300
PANEL LO CATO R
Halifax
3828
3826 13836 13846 13856 13866 13876
3825 13835 13845 13855 13865 13875 13885
3824 13834 13844 13854 13864 11874
3823 13833 13843 13853 081631 3873
3822 3832 3842 3852 3862
1
3821 3831 3841 3851 13861
3820 3830 3840 3850 38603870
3729 3739 3749 3759 3769
3728 3738 3748 13758 3768 3778
3727 3737 3747/3757
Edgecombe
3726 -3736 3,746
Wilson
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA A. AR �
PANEL 3863 h
��igND StiGJ�'
FEMA
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF
CID
PANEL
SUFFIX
370087
2888 L,r
1-3
370278
3863
J
/
2886
3806
2884
3804
2882
3803
3813
3802
3812
2880
3801
3811
3800
3810
Nash
3709
3719
3708
3718
2788
3707
3717
2786
3706
3716
2785
2795
3705
i
3715
Halifax
3828
3826 13836 13846 13856 13866 13876
3825 13835 13845 13855 13865 13875 13885
3824 13834 13844 13854 13864 11874
3823 13833 13843 13853 081631 3873
3822 3832 3842 3852 3862
1
3821 3831 3841 3851 13861
3820 3830 3840 3850 38603870
3729 3739 3749 3759 3769
3728 3738 3748 13758 3768 3778
3727 3737 3747/3757
Edgecombe
3726 -3736 3,746
Wilson
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA A. AR �
PANEL 3863 h
��igND StiGJ�'
FEMA
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF
CID
PANEL
SUFFIX
370087
3863
J
370278
3863
J
370092
3863
J
MAP NUMBER
3720386300J
EFFECTIVE DATE
11/3/2004

F`
L m..j
iz
-------sem ---
----------------------
------
----- ------ --_�
-------------- .�---
T-
Beech Branch Proposed Floodplain & Floodway
Z _
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX) t
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. (CSXIT)
City of Rocky Mount, NC
[ X ] JACOBS
ry
I
Legend
{`� w
—
���, New Cross Sections
z Q
100 200 400 Cross—Section
�- Feet Stream Centerline
100yr
♦ �a
1- - Floodway
w � 1 _
1
1
r I — ! •I
-
-- ---- -- - -- —SOG _ 115
�°•kF
:...
'� =�
.y �i�e yg,471a6
.fit �P 9. .9 i,. .I '. .po. nt S - �. �..' �� •�4 t~
t.

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 D(2) Hydrologic Data

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9—Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 23
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Location
Area
miles)
5.8
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
555 1,020 1,270 2,000
Nash/Edgecombe
County Boundary
Approximately 0.15
mile upstream of
5.0
507
934
1,170
1,840
Highway 301
Approximately 0.37
mile upstream of
3.9
435
809
1,010
1,610
Highway 301
Beech
Branch
Approximately 1.0
mile upstream of
3.5
406
758
951
1,520
Highway 301
Approximately 0.65
mile downstream of
2.4
322
610
769
1,240
Red Oak-Battleboro
Road
Red Oak-Battleboro
1.6
254
487
617
1,010
Road
Approximately 1.5
miles upstream of
32.31
*
*
6,540
Boddie Mill Pond
Road
Approximately 1.16
miles downstream
20.92
*
*
4,980
of Edwards Road
Approximately
1,368 feet
19.63
*
*
4,790
downstream of
Edwards Road
Big
Peachtree
Approximately
Creek
2,530 feet
16.80
*
*
4,340
upstream of
Edwards Road
Approximately
2,426 feet
downstream of
15.25
*
*
4,090
Lancaster Store
Road
Approximately 500
feet upstream of
11.19
*
*
3,370
Lancaster Store
Road
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 23

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 D(3) Hydraulic Model

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Beech Branch Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: DupEff River: BEECH BRANCH Reach: MAIN
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
MAIN
47266.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000025
0.98
4137.17
608.88
0.05
MAIN
47266.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000027
1.01
3312.21
350.00
0.05
MAIN
46890.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.61
98.86
90.69
98.91
0.000123
1.83
809.45
533.15
0.10
MAIN
46890.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.61
98.86
90.69
98.91
0.000127
1.86
809.25
83.10
0.10
MAIN
46810.0
Culvert
MAIN
46730.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.85
91.98
90.93
92.52
0.005843
5.97
225.04
168.28
0.57
MAIN
46730.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.85
92.93
90.95
93.28
0.002866
4.73
268.57
62.80
0.40
MAIN
45783.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.16
91.09
88.31
91.15
0.000499
2.28
1241.88
379.18
0.19
MAIN
45783.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.16
92.07
88.45
92.17
0.000531
2.57
590.09
116.92
0.19

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF
7/25/2017
BEECH—BRANCH MAIN
115
Legend
-
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
------------- I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.................. L .................
EG FLOODWAY
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------
----------- ------------------------------
---------
------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------------------------- -------------
WS FLOODWAY
.
.............................. ..............................
.............................
.............................
............................................................
............................. ..............................
..............................
..............................
.............................. ..............................
............................................................................................
..............................
....................................
EG 100 -YEAR
--------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
------------------ .......... -------
............... --------------------------------------
---------------------------- -
WS 1 00 -YEAR
....................... A ......................
Crit FLOODWAY
....................... . ......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
110
-
.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------
.............................. ..............................
----------------------------- ------------------------------
------------------------------
..............................
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
.............................
- -----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
.............................................................
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------
............................. ..............................
------------------------------
..............................
......
---------------
..............................................................
-------
------------------------------ -----------------------------
............................... :1 .............................
------------------------------- : ------------------------------
Ground
--------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
....................... ..............................
------------------------------
----- ...... .......................
............................. ..............................
-----
..... ..............................
---------------------------------------
------------------------------- I ------------------------------
105
.
-
.............................. ....................................................................................................
------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
--------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------ I -------------------------------
----
............................. ...................... ..............................
---
----
------ -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------- I ------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
100-
LU
.
.............................. ............................................................
............................................................................................
...............................
--------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
I -------------------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------
------------------------------
A, A, A-
------------------------------
--------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
............................................................
..............................
....... ..................... ..............................
... ...
....
------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------ --------------------
5-
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ----------- ---------------
--------- --------- ---------- ----- --------- ---------------------- ------------ -----------------------
----------------- ---------------
------------------------------ ----------------------------- .............................. .............................. .............................. ..........................
------------------------------ ---- ..... ----------- -- ----------- ........ --------
---------------------------------------- ........ ------------- -------- ------------ .........
------------ ------- --------- ------- ------------ ----..... ........ ---- -------------------- -----
...
-------------
9067
............
85
0 260
400 600 800
1000
1200 14'00 1600
Main Channel Distance (ft)

11
IM
10
0
0
w
9
9
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Cross Section Beech Branch 66.0
4400
5400
Legend
............... A ...............
EG FLOODWAY
--------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS FLOODWAY
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5600
.............................
:...................:. EG FLOODWAY
.....:...................:.........
-----------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
WS FLOODWAY
.......................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
................... A ...................
Crit FLOODWAY
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Railroad
.15 "x'.04+ .15}' .2
90
,
85
4000
4500
..........:........................................
I1 1
5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Railroad
2 .15 .04� .15 .2
120
....................................... ...............
...................:......................................................................................... ......................................
115 \ --
.................................... ................
110
-----------------------------------------------
105-.............. ..............
c
............ :..........
......... ................... :...................:................... :................... :................... ................... :................... :................... :................... :...................
------ ------ -- - -
w 100
--------------
95
- ....... ........................ _ -.... ...........:...................
6000
6500
90
85
4000
4500
5000
Station (ft)
5500
6000
Legend
............
EG FLOODWAY
....... + ..............
Crit 100 -YEAR
..................... ...............
Crit FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
6500
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

120
115
110
_ 105
0
w 100-
95
90-
85
4000
1101
105
100
0
m
w
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
2.15 "1' .04 1 .15 � .2
4500 5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB_DupEFF 7/25/2017
Cross Section Beech Branch 73.0
15 .04
15
1:11I1111
6500
4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500
Station (ft)
Legend
EG FLOODWAY
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
A
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
EG FLOODWAY
I.."..".." ... ,.................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Beech Branch Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: BB EX River: BEECH BRANCH Reach: MAIN
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
MAIN
47266.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000025
0.98
4136.54
608.85
0.05
MAIN
47266.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000027
1.01
3309.86
350.00
0.05
MAIN
46890.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.61
98.86
90.69
98.91
0.000123
1.83
809.36
533.10
0.10
MAIN
46890.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.61
98.85
90.69
98.90
0.000128
1.86
808.69
83.10
0.10
MAIN
46810.0
Culvert
MAIN
46730.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
86.81
93.36
91.12
93.65
0.002088
4.38
308.91
265.44
0.36
MAIN
46730.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
86.81
94.02
91.14
94.26
0.001518
3.90
325.85
63.10
0.30
MAIN
46080
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.27
91.38
91.60
0.005947
5.82
710.22
334.02
0.58
MAIN
46080
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.27
92.29
92.66
0.005180
6.43
520.15
180.68
0.56
MAIN
45783.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.16
91.09
88.31
91.15
0.000499
2.28
1241.88
379.18
0.19
MAIN
45783.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.16
92.07
88.45
92.17
0.000531
2.57
590.09
116.92
0.19

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—EX 7/25/2017
BEECH—BRANCH MAIN
J
115
Legend
-
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
-------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
................. A .................
EG FLOODWAY
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------ ------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------
WS FLOODWAY
....................................
EG 1 00 -YEAR
--------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
------------------
-------
....................... --------------------------------------
--------------------------
WS 100 -YEAR
.. ........... A ......................
Crit FLOODWAY
....................... . ......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
110
-
.
-
------------------------------ I ------------------------------
.............................. ..............................
----------------------------- ------------------------------
------------------------------ -----------------------------
.............................. ............................................................
----------------------------- - -----------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
I -------------------------------
I ..............................
----------------------------- ------------------------------
............................. ..............................
------------------------------
..............................
......
---------------
..............................................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ---------------------------
............................... :1 .............................
Ground
--------------------------------
------------------------------
----------------------------- - -----------------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------
..............................
------------------------------
-----
............................. ..............................
-----
..... ..............................
---------------------------------------
------------------------------- I ------------------------------
105
.
-
.............................. ...................................
------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.................................................................
.......................
..............................
-----------------------------
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
----
.............................. ...................... ..............................
---
----
------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
100--,
LU.
.............................. ............................................................
............................................................................................
..............................
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------
I -------------------------------
----------------------------- ------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
-
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
............................................................
---------------------- --- --------
--------
..............................
------------------------------
------- --------------------- ------------------------------
------------------
--- ... ....
.... ------------------------------
..............................
......
------
------
.............................. .......... ---------------------
................ ---------- ---------
.............. ----------------
. ................. --------------------------
-----------------------------------
. .....
5-
-
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
.............................................................
------------------------------
---------- --------- ------- -----------
------ --------
90
--------------- ------- ---- -- --------------------
.............. ................... ------
........... ------
...... --------
85
T i
0 200 400
600 800 1000
1200 1400 1600
Main Channel Distance (ft)

105
100
0
o -
LU
95
90-
85
4400
120
115
110
105
c
0
m
LU 100
4600 4800 5000 5200 5400
5600
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR
T
WS FLOODWAY
.........................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
.................... y ....................
Crit FLOODWAY
t
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
------------------
Encroachment
85
4000
4500
5000
Station (ft)
5500
6000
6500

90�
.............. ................... .................... I ................... ...................
..................... I ................... ....................................... .................... .........
85
4000 4500
120
115
110
105
LU 100
90
85
4000
4500
1i
5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—EX 7/25/2017
Railroad
M 31( .15
I
5000
Station (ft)
1
5500
6000
.2 )1
6000
---i
6500
Legend
................................
EG 100 -YEAR
---------------•---------------
EG
--------------A---------------
EG FLOODWAY
.........................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
VVb t-LUUUVVAY
Ground
A
Ineff
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6500

120
115
110
105
0
E -j 100-
95-
90-
85
4000
94
0
.
-
90-
..............
-------------------
>
W
.
-
...................
-------------------
-
88-
-
.
-------------------
---------------------
...................
-
.
86
-------------------
...................
.............
84
4900
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—EX 7/25/2017
Downstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
.2J-
.15 >�<.04 Jk .15- -1-
4500
1, .15 Jlk--.04
5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BBEX7/25/2017
.15
M
1:1111111
5000 5100 5200 5300
Station (ft)
Legend
A
EG FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
uni r-LUUUVVAY
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
A
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6500
Legend
A
EG FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
--------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5400

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH
Plan: BB—EX 7/25/2017
Cross Section Beech Branch 73.0
.15 .04
.15
110-
Legend
-
-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
:
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------
EG FLOODWAY
-
-------------------------- ------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
---WS
FLOODWAY
--------------------------------
EG 100-YEAR
105
------------------------------ ------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------
I ---------------------------------------------
---------------
WS 100 YEAR
----------------------------
-------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------- ------
..............................
------------------------------ ------------------------------
....................
--------------------------------
: --------------------------------
............ ....
----------------------------- ----
.................... . ....................
Crit FLOODWAY
100
Crit 100-YEAR
-------------------------
-----------------------
: ---------------------------------------------------------------
I ------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------- ----------------------- ------
----------------------------- -----------------------------
------------------------------
I ------------------- -------------------------------------------
I
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------- ..............................
.............................. ..............................
..............................
........... .................................................
............................
Ground
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
--- I ------------------------------
.............................. ..............................
.......................
..............................................................
•----------------
.......
.............................. ..............................
......................
......................
..............................
Bank Sta
95
. ......................... ........................
- ----------------------------- -------------------------
--- ----
----
...............................
-------------------------------
Encroachment
..............................
------------------------------
-
-
90-
------------------------------ ------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
......
.......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.............................. ..............................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
------------------------------ --------------------------
.............................. ..............................
---------------------------
..............................................................
---f...............................----
...
.........................................
.........................................
....... ................................................................................................................................
........................
--------- ---------
..............................
.....................
--------- -
85
1
11
4700 4800
4900 5000
5100 5200 5300
5400 5500
Station (ft)

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Beech Branch Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: BB Prop River: BEECH BRANCH Reach: MAIN
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
MAIN
47266.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000025
0.98
4137.17
608.88
0.05
MAIN
47266.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.68
98.93
98.94
0.000027
1.01
3311.83
350.00
0.05
MAIN
46890.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.61
98.86
90.69
98.91
0.000123
1.83
809.45
533.15
0.10
MAIN
46890.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.61
98.86
90.69
98.91
0.000128
1.86
809.16
83.10
0.10
MAIN
46810.0
Culvert
MAIN
46730.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
86.81
92.61
91.12
93.03
0.003783
5.26
256.66
211.35
0.48
MAIN
46730.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
86.81
93.16
91.13
93.50
0.002708
4.68
271.41
62.97
0.40
MAIN
46660
100 -YEAR
1270.00
86.63
92.46
89.71
92.85
0.002024
5.07
270.50
301.95
0.37
MAIN
46660
FLOODWAY
1270.00
86.63
93.06
89.71
93.38
0.001453
4.58
300.83
52.00
0.32
MAIN
46474
Culvert
MAIN
46080
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.74
91.23
88.61
91.58
0.001804
4.76
266.74
329.84
0.36
MAIN
46080
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.74
92.23
88.61
92.48
0.001015
4.01
316.96
180.27
0.28
MAIN
45783.0
100 -YEAR
1270.00
85.16
91.09
88.31
91.15
0.000499
2.28
1241.88
379.18
0.19
MAIN
45783.0
FLOODWAY
1270.00
85.16
92.07
88.45
92.17
0.000531
2.57
590.09
116.92
0.19

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
BEECH—BRANCH MAIN
120
Legend
.................. .................
EG FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
EG 100 -YEAR
115
WS 100-YEAR
.......................4......................
Crit FLOODWAY
-----------------------
--------------------- ... .....................
.......................... 4...........................
........................-
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
110
......................................................................................._.._
_....-...............................
.............................
.............. ........................""""""""""'
105
F1
-
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
------------------------------
----------------------
------------------------------
100
LU
----------------------------
------------------------------
----------- _ _ .----
95
---'---'-�-'-----�--'------
90
-...---------------
........................................ -
85
80
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
1400 1600
Main Channel Distance (ft)

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Cross Section Beech Branch 66.0
90
85
4000
4800
5000 5200
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Upstream Section of Bridge/Culvert/Weir
.04 � .15
...... .. . . .... - ----
5400
--1
5600
Legend
................................
WS FLOODWAY
.........................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
.................... A ....................
Crit FLOODWAY
Ground
Ir7eff
•
Bank Sta
.................. —
------------------
Encroachment
.......... ................... ................... ................... t ................... ...................
---------- ----------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------
4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Railroad
.15 J- .04 1, .15 :J,
T 3� 1 - .2
1207 .1------------------- i ------------------- f ................... Legend
.................. .............................. . ................................ ....... ----- ----- .................------------------- -------------------------------- -------------------------------------
.............................
-----
------ EG 100 -YEAR
115 -- -
WS
WS
..
100 -YEAR
---------------A---------------
r------------ ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- --------------------
------------------- ................................... ......... EG FLOODWAY
............... ................... pr
110
-------------- ------------------- ----------------
.............. ................... ...............
-------------- -------------------- I -------------------- I
-------------- --------------------------------------------
105
--------------- ------------------- ------------------- : -------
0 ................... ................... .............................
---------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------
> -------------- --------------------------------------- -----------------
LU 100
---------------- ------------------- ------------------- ................... ................... ...........................
................. ................... ....... ................... ................... : ........
................... .......... ....................................... : ......... -
------------------- ------------------- -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
951
-------------- ------------------- --------------------------------------- I ---------------------------------------- I --------------------
---------------- :
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------------
90J
.............. ................... ....................
..............
I ................... .........................
.............. ..........
................... .................... ....................
.............. ................... ....................
................... ........................................
I ...... ..........................
I ................... .......................................
85
4000
4500
120
115
110
105
LU 100
90
85
4000
4500
................... : ...................
4 :
................. ................... ...................
5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Railroad
.04 � .15
1
5000
Station (ft)
1
5500
6000
.2 )1
6000
---i
6500
Legend
............... r...............
EG FLOODWAY
.........................................
Crit 100 -YEAR
.........................................
Crit FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
6500
Ground
A
Ineff
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment

120
115
110
105
c
0
w 100
5000 5500
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Upstream of the proposed culverts (New`)
.2
6000
......'....................:................... Legend
............. ......:...................
EG FLOODWAY
•
WS FLOODWAY
urn r-LVVUVVAY
................ _.....................
Crit 100 -YEAR
6500
85 —
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
Station (ft)
5100
5200
5300
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...............•...............
EG FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
Cant "IUU-YLAK
................... • ...................
Crit FLOODWAY
5400
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Proposed Culvert
.15 .04 .015
............................. ............................... !............................ ........................... i...............
_.' ............................... Legend
......................!...............................
...............•...............
EG FLOODWAY
•
WS FLOODWAY
EDIIIU7
90
85
80
4900
4700
�.15
urn r-LVVUVVAY
................ _....................
.
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4800 4900 5000 51100 5200 5300 5400
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Proposed Culvert
.04 15
Legend
L...... t.. :....... !....... t... ...............•...............
EG FLOODWAY
WS FLOODWAY
5000 5100 5200 5300
Station (ft)
Unt rwvuvVHY
Crit 100 -YEAR
t
Ground
Ineff
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5400

15
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
IDS of Proposed Culvert (New*)
.15
Legend
----------------------------------------------
-------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------
............... ..........
........... ................... ...................
...................
...................
....................................... .................
................... ................... ...................
EG FLOODWAY
..........................
................... ................... ................... ...................
................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ...................
................... ------------------- -------------------
WS FLOODWAY
..........................
......... ...... ................... ...................
................... ................... ................... ...................
.....
................... ................... .......... ........
................... ...................
................... ................... ...................
EG 100 -YEAR
---------------------------------------------------------- ......
-------------------------------- --------------------------
WS 100 -YEAR
.............................................................. ............... ................. ................................................... ...................
................... ................... ...................
..................... .....................
Crit 100 -YEAR
....
..........
...................
...................
................... ................... ...................
................... ................... ...................
Crit FLOODWAY
............
...................
..........
Ground
-------------------
-------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
•
Ineff
............. ...................
F
...................
................... ................... ...................
.......... ......... ------------------- -------------------
---- ------ ----- ......... ................... -------------------
-------------------
-------------------
------------------ --------- ----------------------------- -
................... ................... ...................
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4900 5000 5100 5200 5300
Station (ft)
CSX—BEECH—BRANCH Plan: BB—Prop 7/25/2017
Cross Section Beech Branch 73.0
5400
Legend
A
EG FLOODWAY
XAIC CI nnMAAIAV
4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 5200 5300 5400 5500
Station (ft)
... . ................
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment

Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal Flood Study JACOBS
Appendix 1 D(4) Supplemental/Additional Data

No Supplemental/Additional Data Provided

CSX
CSX Transportation
CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2"d Main Track Flood Study
July 25, 2017
�IA-CARO
FESS/0N
i
' 040473 -
�yT `"/VGINEE�,
tiN-- 9
[ CSX1
HOW tomorrow moves
..rtie

JACOBS
CSX
CSX Transportation
CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2"d Main Track Flood Study
July 25, 2017
cial
Naw tomorrow moves

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Tar River Backwater at published cross-sections in
the Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA
Map Numbers 3720386100K, 3720385100K, 3720386000K, and 3720385000K
dated June 18, 2013 and will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway
elevations, or impact the floodway widths at unpublished cross-sections in the
area of the proposed development.
���►ti�rr�iii
-CARoZ/f� J
40473 —
i �FjV 'IN�CEQ`�
Seal and Signature
Nathan Ortega
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

NO -RISE CERTIFICATION
This document is to certify that I am duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in
the State of North Carolina. It is to further certify that the attached technical data
supports the fact that the proposed Carolina Connect Intermodal Rail Terminal
Project will not increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or
impact the floodway widths, on Swift Creek at published cross-sections in the
Flood Insurance Study for Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina, FEMA Map
Numbers 3720387500K and 3720387400K dated June 18, 2013 and will not
increase the base flood elevations or floodway elevations, or impact the floodway
widths at unpublished cross-sections in the area of the proposed development.
tpRJH-CAR0(�*',, X
ES5/Of
AL
040473
rf y�N J. W
Seal and Signature
Nathan Orteqa
Name
Project Manager
Title
725 West Town and Country Road, Suite 300
Orange, CA, 92868
Address
7/17/2017
Date
FOR COMMUNITY USE ONLY
❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved
Name and Title Signature Date

Document history and status
Distribution of copies

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
CSX
Project No:
JLX26141
Document Title:
CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study
Document No.:
1
Date:
July 25, 2017
Client Name:
CSX Transportation
Project Manager:
Nathan Ortega, PE
Author:
Hrushikesh Sandhe, PE LEED AP
File Name: pw:\\DC1CLUS01.jacobs.com:Jacobs_JLPatterson\Documents\
Engineering\CSX\Contract 02_2015_2018\Intermodal\JLXCX102_CCX_Terminal\
700_Working_Docs\720_Models\720.02_Civil\H&H\PDF\Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main
Track Report 20170717.pdf
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
© Copyright 2017 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or
copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright.
Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs' Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the
provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance
upon, this report by any third party.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Contents
1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Swift Creek.................................................................................................................................................
1
1.2 Tar River....................................................................................................................................................
2
2. Hydrologic Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 3
3. Hydraulic Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Swift Creek.................................................................................................................................................
4
3.1.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models.........................................................................................
4
3.1.2 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................................................
4
3.1.3 Proposed Conditions........................................................................................................................
6
3.1.4 Floodways........................................................................................................................................
9
3.2 Tar River..................................................................................................................................................
11
3.2.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models.......................................................................................
11
3.2.2 Existing Conditions Model..............................................................................................................
11
3.2.3 Proposed Conditions......................................................................................................................
12
3.2.4 Floodway........................................................................................................................................
14
4. Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................
15
4.1 Swift Creek...............................................................................................................................................
15
4.2 Tar River..................................................................................................................................................
15
Appendix A. Swift Creek Exhibits
Appendix B. Swift Creek Hydrologic Data
Appendix C. Swift Creek Hydraulic Model
Appendix D. Swift Creek Additional Data
Appendix E. Tar River Exhibits
Appendix F. Tar River Hydrologic Model
Appendix G. Tar River Hydraulic Model
Appendix H. Tar River Additional Data

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
1. Introduction
1.1 Swift Creek
Swift Creek crosses an existing CSX Railroad rail line between the communities of Battleboro and Whitakers,
North Carolina parallel to US Highway 301. The proposed changes to the crossing include the widening and
strengthening of bridge piers to accommodate a new walkway. This crossing of Swift Creek is unique in that two
jurisdictions contain a portion of the crossing. Nash County lies to the west side, upstream of the crossing, while
Edgecombe County is on the east, downstream side of the crossing. Downstream of this crossing Swift Creek
flows into the Tar River near the community of Tarboro. A general reference map for this location is provided
below in Figure 1.
A more detailed map of the vicinity is located on Exhibit 1, Appendix A. An aerial map showing the crossing is
located on Exhibit 2, Appendix A.
The Nash County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Map No. 3720387400K, Panel No. 3874, dated June 18,
2013 contains the portions of the watershed on the southern portion of the crossing, containing area in both
Nash County and Edgecombe County. Panel 3874 shows the immediate upstream area of the crossing to be
located in Zone AE. FIRM Map No. 3720387500K, Panel No. 3875, dated June 18, 2013 contains the immediate
upstream vicinity, the crossing, and downstream portions of Swift Creek. The proposed crossing is shown on
this panel to be in Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is shown in Exhibit 3, Appendix A, the Effective
FIRM Map.
St Tcftlk
Figure 1. Location Reference Map

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOjBS
1.2 Tar River
Tar River crosses existing CSX Railroad rail lines on the northeast side of the City of Rocky Mount, North
Carolina. The proposed crossing alignment at Rail Station 6172 is parallel to the existing tracks and not on Tar
River. The impacted area is located just south of Airport Road between the City of Rocky mount, Nash County to
the west and Edgecombe County to the east (see Figure 2).
A more detailed map of the vicinity is located in Appendix E. An aerial map showing the crossing is also located
in Appendix E.
FIRM Numbers 3720386100K, 3720385100K, 3720386000K, and 3720385000K, dated June 18, 2013 contain
the immediate upstream vicinity, the crossing, and downstream portions of Tar River. The proposed crossing is
shown on this panel to be in Zone AE. A copy of the FIRM panels used is included in Appendix E, Effective
FIRM Map.
Figure 2. Location Reference Map
z
Y_s� r F..�,,.t.r
P��enr—a
.
Legend
i
S WIR_LH
-
JA .N.Ffl. tv . taYnitl. McYiYtRPCaA. CfBf
JY!YI, l.EfI,FYI 0Ml19.{fadmYK' ,Yf
YyrgY.Y i � 1!R m�
6
9nVi GnAb An
JACOBS
CCX Intermodal Project Limit
LL'I F.625 3,250
6.500 9,750
13,000
Figure 2. Location Reference Map
z

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
2. Hydrologic Analysis
A hydrologic analysis was not performed as part of this flood study. Flows from the published effective Flood
Insurance Study (FIS) (Study No. 37127CV000D revised July 7, 2014) were compared to the flows in models
obtained from the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. The flows in the FIS and effective models were
identical for the 100 -year event.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
3. Hydraulic Analysis
3.1 Swift Creek
3.1.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
The effective models were downloaded from North Carolina flood map website (www.ncfloodmaps.com). The
downloaded effective model was run using HEC RAS (version 5.0.3) to duplicate the output from flood insurance
study (FIS) report.
The boundary conditions for the effective and duplicate effective floodplain and floodway models are known
water surface elevation. A known water surface elevation of 88.74 feet is used for the floodplain models while
89.72 feet is used for the floodway models.
3.1.2 Existing Conditions
The duplicate effective model was used as a base to prepare existing conditions model. This model contained
bridges labeled as MP 109.1, MP 109.6, MP 109.7, MP 109.8, and MP 109.9 modeled as a single bridge with
multiple openings. Comparing with the plans provided by CSX Engineering Department, the number and
location of piers for the bridge in the model may not be accurately representative of existing conditions. An
existing condition model was developed from the effective geometry with changes made to the number, location,
and size of bridge piers on all five bridges.
In the existing conditions model the five bridges have a width of 25 feet with opening centerline stations at
Station 1895 for bridge MP 109.1, Station 5002.5 for bridge MP 109.6, Station 5577.5 for bridge MP 109.7,
Station 5775 for bridge MP 109.8, and station 7305 for bridge MP 109.9. The modified bridge piers in the
existing conditions model were sized to represent the area blocked by bridge piers on the plans. As per the
design drawing provided by CSX Engineering Department, the existing upstream bridge piers are rectangular in
shape approximately 6 feet wide and 9.5 feet tall. The downstream bridge piers are trapezoidal in shape
approximately 3 feet wide at the top, 5 feet 6 inches wide at the base and 9.5 feet tall. Piers in the model were
set to have an equal area of blockage with the pier face being 4.25 feet wide and 9.5 feet tall for the downstream
piers and 6 feet wide and 9.5 feet tall for the upstream piers.
The flow and boundary conditions is same as the effective hydraulic model. The Table 1 below has water
surface elevations comparison.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Table 1. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
Effective
(EF)
Duplicate
Effective
(DEF)
Existing (EX)
Delta
(DEF -EF)
Delta
(EX -DEF)
144217
11777
94.82
94.82
94.83
0.00
0.01
142845
11777
94.59
94.59
94.59
0.00
0.00
142805
US -301 Bridge
142768
11777
93.02
93.02
93.04
0.00
0.02
139290
11777
91.97
91.97
92.01
0.00
0.04
134189
11777
91.58
91.58
91.64
0.00
0.06
130590
17612
91.08
91.08
91.15
0.00
0.07
130521
CSX Railway Bridge
130385
17612
90.87
90.86
90.86-0.01
0.00
126426
17612
88.74
88.74
88.74
0.00
0.00

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
3.1.3 Proposed Conditions
The proposed condition for the Swift Creek crossing is the widening of the existing bridge piers. A proposed
conditions hydraulic model was prepared using the existing conditions model as a base. The proposed changes
based on plans provided by CSX Engineering Department (Drawing No A109.1-04) are an extension in the
width of the bridge deck and addition of 1 -foot diameter round columns downstream of the existing piers at River
Station 130521. The added columns were conservatively modeled as a 2 -foot extension of the bridge width,
which is the distance between the downstream end of the existing piers and the downstream end of the
proposed columns. A 0.01 -foot rise is reported in the HEC -RAS summary tables at Section 17612; however
examination of the model results reveals the calculated difference to be 0.0041 feet which equates to a 0.00 foot
rise within the precision required.
The floodplain is mapped with cross sections on Exhibit 4, Appendix A. The water surface elevations were
evaluated for the 100 -year event. Additional summary data and the HEC -RAS output can be found in Appendix
C. The results show that there is a 0.00 foot rise in water surface elevation for the 100 -year event. The channel
velocity decreases or does not change within the limits of this study, therefore not increasing any existing
erosion potential. The freeboard for the bridge is 1.1 feet.
Table 2 below summarizes the results of the analysis for this condition

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
LT -H
PLAN
BRIDGE AT MP A109.9
Figure 3. Proposed Bridge Widening, Plan View
Figure 4. Proposed Bridge Widening, Section View
MR
M)

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Table 2. Existing vs. Proposed (Bridge Widening) Water Surface Elevations
*The 0.01 -foot increase is due to a rounding anomaly. Examination of the HEC -RAS model indicates a calculated difference
of approximately 0.0041 feet or 0.00 feet.
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
NO
Existing Proposed
(EX) (PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing Proposed
(EX) (PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
144217
11777
94.83
94.83
0.00
1.59
1.59
0.00
142845
11777
94.59
94.59
0.00
1.44
1.44
0.00
142805
Bridge
142768
11777
93.04
93.04
0.00
2.45
2.45
0.00
139290
11777
92.01
92.01
0.00
1.60
1.60
0.00
134189
11777
91.64
91.64
0.00
0.95
0.95
0.00
130590
17612
91.15
91.16
0.01*
3.47
3.46
-0.01
130521
CSX Railroad Bridge
130385
17612
90.86
90.86
0.00
3.61
3.61
0
126426
17612
88.74
88.74
0.00
2.25
2.25
0
*The 0.01 -foot increase is due to a rounding anomaly. Examination of the HEC -RAS model indicates a calculated difference
of approximately 0.0041 feet or 0.00 feet.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
3.1.4 Floodways
The floodway encroachment stations from effective model were incorporated for the proposed bridge widening
scenario. Results for these simulations can be found in Table 3.
There was surcharge in the effective floodway of less than or equal to one foot for proposed bridge widening
scenario.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS'
Table 3. Existing vs. Proposed (Bridge Widening) Floodway Water Surface Elevation
*The 0.01 -foot increase is due to a rounding anomaly. Examination of the HEC -RAS model indicates a calculated difference of approximately 0.0037 feet or 0.00 feet.
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
Top Width
(ft)
(ft/s)
(ft)
River
Sta
(cfs)
Existing
Floodway
(EX)
Proposed
Floodway
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
144217
11777
95.26
95.26
0.00
2.09
2.09
0.00
2750
2750
0
142845
11777
94.86
94.86
0.00
1.91
1.91
0.00
2880
2880
0
142805
US -301 Bridge
142768
11777
94.03
94.03
0.00
2.72
2.72
0.00
2865
2865
0
139290
11777
92.86
92.86
0.00
1.93
1.93
0.00
3722
3722
0
134189
11777
92.33
92.33
0.00
1.23
1.23
0.00
4397
4397
0
130590
17612
91.74
91.75
0.01*
3.35
3.35
0.00
6000
6000
0
130521
CSX Railway Bridge
130385
17612
91.50
1 91.50
1 0.00
1 3.44
3.44
0.00
1 6000
6000
0
126426
17612
89.72
1 89.72
0.00
2.26
2.26
0.00
3400
3400
0
*The 0.01 -foot increase is due to a rounding anomaly. Examination of the HEC -RAS model indicates a calculated difference of approximately 0.0037 feet or 0.00 feet.

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
3.2 Tar River
3.2.1 Effective and Duplicate Effective Models
The effective models were downloaded from North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP) website
(www.ncfloodmaps. com). The downloaded effective model was run using HEC -RAS (version 5.0.3) to duplicate
the output from the effective FIS report.
The models use 29,300 cfs for the 100 -year flow.
According to the FIS, during the 100 -year event, backwater from the Tar River impacts the downstream face of
the existing railroad crossing.
3.2.2 Existing Conditions Model
The cross section Stations 445378 and 444102 in the vicinity of CSX rail road crossing in the existing conditions
model matches to the effective model. For this study the limits of model are from cross section Station 447983
on upstream end to Station 441773 on downstream. The boundary condition is a known water surface elevation
which is the same as in the effective models.
The existing conditions model and all models developed from the existing conditions model contain the same
flow data used in the effective models.
The existing conditions model was checked to ensure it accurately represented the existing conditions based on
the data currently available.
Table 4. Summary of Effective vs. Existing Conditions Water Surface Elevations
Q
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
Total
(ft)
(ft/s)
River Sta
(cfs)
Effective
Duplicate
Existing
Delta
Effective
Duplicate
Existing
Delta
Effective
Effective
(EF)
(EX)
(EX -EF)
(EF)
(EX)
(EX -EF)
(DEF)
(DEF)
447983
29300
80.40
80.40
80.40
0.00
4.05
4.05
4.05
0.00
446626
29300
78.74
78.74
78.74
0.00
7.62
7.62
7.62
0.00
446531
US -64 Bypass Bridge
(Rocky Mount)
446436
29300
78.36
78.37
78.37
0.01
7.70
7.69
7.69
-0.01
445378
29300
78.28
78.28
78.28
0.00
5.35
5.35
5.35
0.00
444102
29300
78.14
78.14
78.14
0.00
4.56
4.56
4.56
0.00
441773
29300
77.95
77.95
77.95
0.00
3.53
3.53
3.53
0.00

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
3.2.3 Proposed Conditions
A proposed conditions hydraulic model was prepared using the existing conditions model as a base. The rail
road bridge crossing at Station 6172 is not included in the effective Tar River model. Also this crossing is
influence by backwater through Tar River flooding. There are BFE cross sections River Stations 445378 and
444102 in the vicinity of this bridge crossing. Hence for this analysis the proposed conditions model was
prepared to represent additional fill due to proposed embankment in the floodplain.
Figure 5 below shows fill placed at typical cross section at Station 6173 to accommodate the intermodal facility
lead tracks. Cross section geometry for HEC -RAS Stations 445378 and 444102 was modified to reflect the
additional fill. All other inputs (i.e. other cross sections geometry, flow, boundary conditions, Manning's "n", etc.)
are identical to those used in the existing conditions model.
V U U 4]
s�
LD
rr Oti h { �t
�+l ❑ Ln
Ln 'r,
Vi t
Q LL1 - -
4.1
rag ; SUBGRADE _"' 1
20 t0 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50
6173+00
Figure 5. Station 6173 Rail Cross Section

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Tal River - AUGUST 24,2010 5856PROP 2) DUP_ur
lErwa = 1.1wn. lnin Ftsxn = kaaen - s a5= oni32 0 [reaa s.�lien rr nnwr en 5
Figure 6. Proposed Cross Section 445378 Representing Fill
There is no rise in water surface elevations when compared to existing conditions model.
Table 5. Proposed 100 -Year Water Surface Elevation and Velocity Summary
I wPnn�
WI imvrIk.GT.[w
l51PPw4 -PIFmn
-Du9 E"
GnwE - Wi' EK:
axx A'a'plR SCI
P0.f]P
[:mei
Hwk .4� . rnern
13
Q Total
Water Surface Elevation
Velocity Channel
River
Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft/s)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
Existing
(EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
447983
29300
80.40
80.40
0.00
4.05
4.05
0.00
446626
29300
78.74
78.74
0.00
7.62
7.62
0.00
446531
US -64
Bypass Bridge (Rocky Mount)
446436
29300
78.37
78.37
0.00
7.69
7.69
0.00
445378
29300
78.28
78.28
0.00
5.35
5.35
0.00
444102
29300
78.14
78.14
0.00
4.56
4.56
0.00
441773
29300
77.95
77.95
0.00
3.53
3.53
0.00
13

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOIBS
3.2.4 Floodway
The floodway encroachments from the effective floodway model were incorporated into the proposed model; see
Table 6 below for the results. The proposed fill does not increase floodway water surface elevations or floodway
widths when compared to existing conditions.
Table 6. Effective vs. Existing vs. Proposed Floodway Water Surface Elevations and Top Widths
14
Total
Water Surface Elevation
Top Width
River Sta
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
Existing Proposed Delta
(EX) (PR) (PR -EX)
Effective Existing
(EF) (EX)
Proposed
(PR)
Delta
(PR -EX)
447983
29300
81.12
81.12
0.00
515
515
515
0.00
446626
29300
79.65
79.65
0.00
296
296
296
0.00
446531
US -64 Bypass Bridge (Rocky Mount)
446436
29300
79.32
79.32
0.00
295
295
295
0.00
445378
29300
79.27
79.27
0.00
1063
1063
1063
0.00
444102
29300
79.08
79.08
0.00
650
650
650
0.00
441773
29300
78.86
78.86
0.00
650
650
650
0.00
14

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
4. Conclusion
4.1 Swift Creek
The proposed widening of the railroad bridge on Swift Creek will not increase floodplain or floodway water
surface elevations or floodway top widths within the limits of the study. Changes in cross section geometry in the
bridge Section 130521 can be seen in the HEC -RAS cross section comparisons available in Appendix C.
Recommendation: Widen existing bridge matching existing span and low chord.
4.2 Tar River
The addition of fill to construct the tracks will not increase 100 -year floodplain or floodway water surface
elevations or the floodway top widths for the Tar River. Changes in cross section geometry can be seen in the
HEC -RAS cross section comparison available in Appendix G.
Recommendation: Widen existing bridge matching existing span and low chord.

Appendix A. Swift Creek Exhibits

QI m
Johnston Rd
I4
4adley-Cutr�
Ln
301,
59
Battleboro
<p c�
�cY r
r
Whitakers 33 M
Welds Rd
Battleboro
Rd
qb
97
¢v
Legend
Op b I n g Project Area
JACOBVicinity Map N
IS Swift Creek Crossing -CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study 0 2,000 4,000
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina
REG No. 2966 Project No. JLX26141 Feet

- "-``�,'! _ �I •'�I ' � I ' �' 'E3. �" �:l�Yi+.4i{,1$.L�111,Y�r`�•!?T31`5 t'
IF
`M
rMs-,
r)", r j.,/r f'f"/f �� ,! •', f.:r. � rf.,r.�F y":� ,"' `/j/'jr/r/. `'"�,:.ii •-� i/�r j,'-f./r.- ♦/; f,?-�,,/ %�/''i/rr r,',•p.�py!/ !J,//'/rt/'//,�jr r`J 'r�/r /r:
y!�
Is
f i J/ ". / � ✓'t r r'" - ✓ / r f / � f r/ f/'F.'! `{ / r"� ` `% �' r/,;'�. � ,, /,r�
<jr rrr`r/ jr �. r '`r/i,.�'/. �,t'!� '�/f � !rif /r' i!f�// r''•..r / � r; �'x`' itr'j%
'/t' / f ✓ i/ ,r, , r jj � ' f,l�,.// • / , � r fr . i . f, ' , ,' {' r,; r �; // ' ,%'. '
r
t � /
j t f
ff�lr.l✓/r% ,. ,' � ' jl j r � � / j j�% �,�/% � ' TS,:73 i3
f
swim
k
y
44. ,ate p
r
ri
ri
!lm
x

n
C-
0
vo
C—
r
X
C)
X
0
N
II
n
X
O
O
0
n_
r_
Z
m
rn
0
rn
G�
rn
0
rn
X

Appendix B. Swift Creek Hydrologic Data

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9 -Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Area
Location miles)
Approximately 1.6
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
miles downstream
of the 211.53
8,410
14,540
17,612
26,195
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 100
feet upstream of
the
211.0
5,860
9,832
11,777
16,650
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 750
feet downstream of
203.7
5,671
9,633
11,590
16,559
U.S. Highway 301
Approximately 2.4
miles downstream
196.9
5,498
9,452
11,419
16,474
of NC Highway 48
Approximately 500
feet downstream of
194.8
5,444
9,396
11,365
16,447
NC Highway 48
Swift Creek
Approximately 1.1
miles downstream
183.1
5,156
9,094
11,078
16,299
of Red Oak Road
(SR 1003)
Approximately 0.9
mile downstream of
182.3
5,138
9,074
11,059
16,289
Red Oak Road (SR
1003
Approximately 1.9
miles downstream
167.74
*
*
12,4002
of Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately 75
feet upstream of
165.38
*
*
12,300
Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately
1,300 feet
164.64
*
*
12,300
downstream of NC
Highway 43
N.C. 97 at Rocky
932.0
16,700
24,400
27,700
40,000
Mount
Tar River
Confluence of
Goose Branch
927.0
16,620
24,310
27,620
40,000
Confluence of Stony
809.0
14,820
22,270
25,770
38,700
Creek
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35

Appendix C. Swift Creek Hydraulic Model

CSX Swift Creek/Tar River Backwater Flood Study JACOBS
Swift Creek Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY DUP EFF River: Swift Creek Reach: Reach -1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(fus)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach -1
144217
100 -year
11777.00
83.86
94.82
90.36
94.83
0.000259
1.59
22466.26
4028.10
0.10
Reach -1
144217
100 -FW
11777.00
83.86
95.25
90.77
95.27
0.000418
2.09
16565.68
2750.00
0.13
Reach -1
142845
100 -year
11777.00
83.83
94.59
93.47
94.60
0.000282
1.44
22002.71
4327.61
0.10
Reach -1
142845
100 -FW
11777.00
83.83
94.86
93.47
94.87
0.000471
1.91
16033.98
2880.00
0.13
Reach -1
142805
Bridge
Reach -1
142768
100 -year
11777.00
86.19
93.02
90.73
93.04
0.001084
2.47
14693.16
4311.21
0.19
Reach -1
142768
100 -FW
11777.00
86.19
94.01
90.73
94.04
0.001059
2.73
12649.90
2865.00
0.19
Reach -1
139290
100 -year
11777.00
83.68
91.97
88.70
91.97
0.000491
1.62
21145.20
6019.62
0.12
Reach -1
139290
100 -FW
11777.00
83.68
92.82
89.11
92.83
0.000585
1.95
17153.51
3722.00
0.13
Reach -1
134189
100 -year
11777.00
82.12
91.58
86.69
91.59
0.000102
0.96
36642.23
7503.82
0.06
Reach -1
134189
100 -FW
11777.00
82.12
92.27
87.07
92.28
0.000154
1.25
27502.57
4397.00
0.08
Reach -1
130590
100 -year
17612.00
81.63
91.08
86.71
91.14
0.001129
3.51
13496.82
8152.87
0.21
Reach -1
130590
100 -FW
17612.00
81.63
91.67
86.89
91.72
0.000967
3.39
13846.65
6000.00
0.20
Reach -1
130521
Mult Open
Reach -1
130385
100 -year
17612.00
81.35
90.86
86.81
90.92
0.001181
3.61
13386.75
7904.04
0.21
Reach -1
130385
100 -FW
17612.00
81.35
91.50
86.93
91.55
0.000980
3.44
13857.60
6000.00
0.20
Reach -1
126426
100 -year
17612.00
79.39
88.74
84.67
88.75
0.000594
2.25
23903.21
4694.68
0.15
Reach -1
126426
100 -FW
17612.00
79.39
89.72
84.72
89.73
0.000510
2.26
22012.33
3400.00
0.14

115 �•05 .15 .0
6
110-
105-
100-
0
101051000
m
w 95-
E, [0
5
1
1
1
0
m
LU
E,[0 ]
�—.05-� .
1
5
80
4000
...................................................................
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Swift Creek DET 13.0
.15
6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
HWY 301 (SWC) us
.15
iIIIIIII1
M
�......
- --------
.......................................................................................................................
-------- --------- ----
-----------------------
......................... .............................. :...............................
----------........................................................................................................................I
.............................. :
...............................................................................................................
...........................................................................................,..............................................................;...............
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -FW
Crit 100 -year
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
M1111I1,
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
....................................
Crit 100 -year
..................................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000

Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
HWY 301 (SWC) TORStructure ID: N_SWC_02Detailed Survey Structu
110
�—.05 .15
—
..................5.. .......................... ........................ .......................... .......................... ......................
.- ---- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- ---- ..........■
4000 5000
.. ............&................
Crit 100 -FW
------------- A
100 -FW
•
WS 100 -FW
................. . ................
Crit 100 -year
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
a
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000
Station (ft)

110
105
Swift Creek Plan: F|oodway_Dup| 4/20/2017
HWY 301 (SWC) ds
90
_____
EG1OOfW
----�-----�|
WS 100 -FW
Crit 100 -year
__-�---'
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
A___
mon
eanxSto
Encroachment
ao. -----------�
4000 s000 snoo rono 0000 y000 10000 11000 12OoO
Station (ft)
Swift Creek P|an:F|oodwuy_Dup|ioote_Effective 4/20/2017
Swift Creek DET u.0
I
WS 100 -FW
Crit 1 00 -FW
Crit 1 00 -year
Ground
I
Encroachment

0
KII1II]
4000 6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Railroad SWC us
^ .15 = .05
Crit 100 -FW
.............
Crit 100 -year
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
i[IAIIN
Legend
............ ..............
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
..........................
Crit 100 -year
i
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Station (ft)

Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
15 .15 =' 05
0
6
KIIIIIII
UIIIIII
6000 T 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
10000
EG 100 -FW
•
WS 100 -FW
Grit 1UU-year
...............................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
..........................
Crit 100 -year
i
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
80
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Station (ft)
.05 1
1'20
...............................
115-
—
—
110
--------------------------------
105
100
w
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
15 .15 =' 05
0
6
KIIIIIII
UIIIIII
6000 T 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective 4/20/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
10000
EG 100 -FW
•
WS 100 -FW
Grit 1UU-year
...............................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
..........................
Crit 100 -year
i
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
80
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Station (ft)

Swift Creek
Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective
4/20/2017
Railroad SWC ds
.05
.15
Id
1,
.15
.05
120
161- :
6
Legend
....
............. A ............
EG 100 -FW
115�
I
I
WS 100 -FW
-------------------
------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- -------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
-------
---------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------- --------------------
------------------- ------------------- --------------------
-------------------- .......
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
110
-------------------
------------------- ................... ------------------- I -------------------------------------------------------------
...................
...........
................... .................... .................... .................... ..............
-------------------
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
105
. ...............
-------------------- ----------
I ---------------------
Crit 1 00 -year
Ground
loo -
A
-------------- -------------------
---------
------------
----
-------------- -------------------
Inelf
LLI
AL
L A
Bank Sta
95 -
Encroachment
90-
85-
...................
80
0 2000
4000
6000 8000
10000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek
Plan: Floodway_Duplicate_Effective
4/20/2017
Swift Creek DET 1.0
.15
.05
05:��
.15
120
------------------------------
:
----------------------------
............. ...............................
.............................. ................
40
.......
Legend
------------------------------
..............................
-------------------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
-----------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------
...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............
......
EG 100 -FW
......................... ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............................
.............................
...............................
..............................
...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ......... .....................
..............................
...............................
WS 100 -FW
...............................
...........................
EG 100 -year
110
. ..............................
..........................................................
...... ...............................
......................
..........
...............................
..................
............... ............. ..............................................................
. ..............................
..............................................................
..............................................................
...............................
..............................
..............................................................
..............................
.............................. ..............................
............ ................ ..............................
..............................
..............................
WS 100 -year
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
...............................
------------------------------
..............................
-------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------
...............................................
..............................................................
...............................
.................... ......................................................
... ......................... .................................................
Crit 1 00 -FW
100--
. ................
Crit 1 00 -year
................... ...............................
..
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
.......
4 ...............
.................... 4
...................... ...............................
......... .....................
s
........... ...............................
...
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
..............................
...............................
.............................. ...................... ........
.............................. ...............................
..............................
.........................
Ground
------------------- -------------------------------
L
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------
...............................
.............................. --------------------- ---------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................
------------------------------
..............................
------------------------
.......................
A
Ineff
W
90 -.—
p
Bank Sta
--------------------------------
-------------------------------
--- -
IV
....
...........................................
.............................. 4 ...............................
..............................................................
..............................
4 ...............................
...............................
Encroachment
--------------------------------
80-
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
...............................
-----------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ............ ! .....
... .................. ... ...............
------------------------------ i --------------------------------
............
.... . . ......
------------------------------
............. .
i ---------------------------------
.....................
------------------------------
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
.... .....
---------------------- -------- J ---- - -- -------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.... ....
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
....
------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
4 ...............................
—------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
70
---
.... ....
.... .... .... .... .... ....
... -------------------------------
. ......................
2000 3000 4000
5000
6000
7000 8000 9000
10000
Station (ft)

CSX Swift Creek/Tar River Backwater Flood Study JACOBS
Swift Creek Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: Floodwav Existinq Conditions River: Swift Creek Reach: Reach -1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(fus)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach -1
144217
100 -year
11777.00
83.86
94.83
90.36
94.83
0.000259
1.59
22472.10
4028.15
0.10
Reach -1
144217
100 -FW
11777.00
83.86
95.26
90.77
95.27
0.000418
2.09
16568.49
2750.00
0.13
Reach -1
142845
100 -year
11777.00
83.83
94.59
93.47
94.60
0.000282
1.44
22009.74
4327.61
0.10
Reach -1
142845
100 -FW
11777.00
83.83
94.86
93.47
94.87
0.000470
1.91
16037.65
2880.00
0.13
Reach -1
142805
Bridge
Reach -1
142768
100 -year
11777.00
86.19
93.04
90.73
93.06
0.001070
2.45
14754.28
4311.86
0.19
Reach -1
142768
100 -FW
11777.00
86.19
94.03
90.73
94.05
0.001048
2.72
12693.67
2865.00
0.19
Reach -1
139290
100 -year
11777.00
83.68
92.01
88.70
92.02
0.000474
1.60
21380.24
6035.88
0.12
Reach -1
139290
100 -FW
11777.00
83.68
92.86
89.11
92.87
0.000568
1.93
17304.30
3722.00
0.13
Reach -1
134189
100 -year
11777.00
82.12
91.64
86.69
91.64
0.000099
0.95
37009.64
7505.17
0.06
Reach -1
134189
100 -FW
11777.00
82.12
92.33
87.07
92.33
0.000149
1.23
27751.39
4397.00
0.08
Reach -1
130590
100 -year
17612.00
81.63
91.15
86.71
91.21
0.001089
3.47
13653.03
8156.45
0.21
Reach -1
130590
100 -FW
17612.00
81.63
91.74
86.89
91.79
0.000934
3.35
14000.10
6000.00
0.19
Reach -1
130521
Mult Open
Reach -1
130385
100 -year
17612.00
81.35
90.86
86.81
90.92
0.001181
3.61
13386.75
7904.04
0.21
Reach -1
130385
100 -FW
17612.00
81.35
91.50
86.93
91.55
0.000980
3.44
13857.60
6000.00
0.20
Reach -1
126426
100 -year
17612.00
79.39
88.74
84.67
88.75
0.000594
2.25
23903.21
4694.68
0.15
Reach -1
126426
100 -FW
17612.00
79.39
89.72
84.72
89.73
0.000510
2.26
22012.33
3400.00
0.14

115 �•05 .15 .0
6
110-
105-
100-
0
101051000
m
w 95-
E, Lillie]
5
1
1
1
0
m
LU
CLiIII1]
�—.05-� .
1
5
80
4000
...................................................................
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
Swift Creek DET 13.0
.15
6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
HWY 301 (SWC) us
.15
itsiollI1
M
I I i I i I i 1 1
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -FW
Crit 100 -year
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
iv�l/IsIC
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
....................................
Crit 100 -year
..................................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000
V
-----------------------------------------------------
I'
I I i I i I i 1 1
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -FW
Crit 100 -year
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
iv�l/IsIC
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
....................................
Crit 100 -year
..................................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
12000

Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
HWY 301 (SWC) TORStructure ID: N_SWC_02Detailed Survey Structu
110
�—.05 > <0& .15
—
5
------------------------------
----- - ----------------- --- rion
k k k -k
Legend
Crit 100 -FW
------------- A
100 -FW
•
WS 100 -FW
................. . ................
Crit 100 -year
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
a
Ground
Ineff
.................. •
-------- Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 5000
12000
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000
Station (ft)

0
KII1II]
EG 100-FW
•
WS 100-FW
Crit 100 -FW
. ...............
Crit 100 -year
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank St,
Encroachment
i[iAIlIC
Legend
............ ..............
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
..........................
Crit 100 -year
i
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Station (ft)

1'20 .05 j .15.06
115-
110-
105-
100-
LU
15110105100w
0
0
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
15 ":06.1501 0.15 J, .06 T 15
.05 —�
Legend
EG 100 -FW
ws � nn_F�ni
-, 1
2000
05 .15 =� -," - .06
4000 6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
15 "x'06 .15– 0 1 0 .15 ",.06
G C G
MIIIIII
15
05
..............4.............
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W1111II
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
...................................
Crit 100-year
................4................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Station (ft)

Swift Creek
Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC ds
.05
.15
Id
1, .15
.05
120
161- :
6
Legend
..
............. A ............
EG 100 -FW
115�
I
I
WS 100 -FW
-------------------
------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- -------------------
------------------------------------------------------------ -------
---------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------- --------------------
------------------- ------------------- --------------------
-------------------- .......
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
110
-------------------
------------------- ................... ------------------- I -------------------------------------------------------------
................... ...........
................... .................... .................... .................... ..............
-------------------
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
105
. ...............
-------------------- ----------
I ---------------------
Crit 1 00 -year
Ground
loo -
A
-------------- ------------
------------------- ---------
----
-------------- -------------------
Inelf
LLI
AL
L A
Bank Sta
95 -
Encroachment
90-
85-
...................
80
0 2000
4000
6000 8000
10000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek
Plan: Floodway_Existing Conditions 7/25/2017
Swift Creek DET 1.0
dJ
.15
.05
E 05:��
.15
120
------------------------------
:
----------------------------
............. ...............................
.............................. ................
40
.......
Legend
------------------------------
..............................
-------------------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
-----------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------ ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............
......
1
EG 100 -FW
......................... ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............................
.............................
...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ......... .....................
..............................
...............................
WS 100 -FW
...............................
...........................
EG 100 -year
110
. ..............................
..........................................................
.......... ...............................
..................
............... ............. ..............................................................
. ..............................
..............................................................
..............................................................
...............................
..............................
..............................................................
..............................
.............................. ..............................
............ ................ ..............................
..............................
..............................
WS 100 -year
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
...............................
------------------------------
..............................
-------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ ...............................................
..............................................................
...............................
.................... ......................................................
... ......................... .................................................
Crit 1 00 -FW
100--
. ................
Crit 1 00 -year
................... ...............................
..
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
....... 4 ...............
.................... 4
...................... ...............................
......... .....................
........... ...............................
...
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ...................... ........
.............................. ...............................
..............................
.........................
Ground
------------------- -------------------------------
L
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------ ...............................
.............................. --------------------- ---------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................
------------------------------
..............................
------------------------
.......................
A
Ineff
W
90 -.—
p
Bank Sta
--------------------------------
-------------------------------
--- -
IV
....
...........................................
.............................. 4 ...............................
..............................................................
..............................
4 ...............................
...............................
Encroachment
--------------------------------
80-
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
...............................
-----------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ............ ! .....
... .................. ... ...............
------------------------------ i --------------------------------
............
.... . . ......
------------------------------
............. .
i ---------------------------------
..................... --------------------------------
------------------------------ --------------------------------
.... .....
---------------------- -------- ---- - -- -------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.... ....
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
....
------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
4 ...............................
-------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
70
---
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
... -------------------------------
. ......................
2000 3000 4000
5000
6000 7000 8000 9000
10000
Station (ft)

CSX Swift Creek/Tar River Backwater Flood Study JACOBS
Swift Creek Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: Floodwav PROP River: Swift Creek Reach: Reach -1
Reach
River Ste
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chi
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(fuft)
(fus)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach -1
144217
100 -year
11777.00
83.86
94.83
90.36
94.83
0.000258
1.59
22475.10
4028.17
0.10
Reach -1
144217
100 -FW
11777.00
83.86
95.26
90.77
95.27
0.000418
2.09
16566.90
2750.00
0.13
Reach -1
142845
100 -year
11777.00
83.83
94.59
93.47
94.60
0.000282
1.44
22013.38
4327.62
0.10
Reach -1
142845
100 -FW
11777.00
83.83
94.86
93.47
94.87
0.000471
1.91
16035.58
2880.00
0.13
Reach -1
142805
Bridge
Reach -1
142768
100 -year
11777.00
86.19
93.04
90.73
93.06
0.001069
2.45
14757.88
4311.89
0.19
Reach -1
142768
100 -FW
11777.00
86.19
94.03
90.73
94.05
0.001047
2.72
12695.90
2865.00
0.19
Reach -1
139290
100 -year
11777.00
83.68
92.01
88.70
92.02
0.000473
1.60
21393.74
6036.82
0.12
Reach -1
139290
100 -FW
11777.00
83.68
92.86
89.11
92.87
0.000567
1.93
17311.80
3722.00
0.13
Reach -1
134189
100 -year
11777.00
82.12
91.64
86.69
91.64
0.000099
0.95
37030.53
7505.25
0.06
Reach -1
134189
100 -FW
11777.00
82.12
92.33
87.07
92.34
0.000149
1.23
27763.70
4397.00
0.08
Reach -1
130590
100 -year
17612.00
81.63
91.16
86.71
91.21
0.001087
3.46
13661.89
8156.65
0.21
Reach -1
130590
100 -FW
17612.00
81.63
91.75
86.89
91.80
0.000932
3.35
14007.62
6000.00
0.19
Reach -1
130521
Mult Open
Reach -1
130385
100 -year
17612.00
81.35
90.86
86.81
90.92
0.001181
3.61
13386.75
7904.04
0.21
Reach -1
130385
100 -FW
17612.00
81.35
91.50
86.93
91.55
0.000980
3.44
13857.60
6000.00
0.20
Reach -1
126426
100 -year
17612.00
79.39
88.74
84.67
88.75
0.000594
2.25
23903.21
4694.68
0.15
Reach -1
126426
100 -FW
17612.00
79.39
89.72
84.72
89.73
0.000510
2.26
22012.33
3400.00
0.14

Swift Creek P|an:F|oodvvay_Prupoaed 7/25/2017
Swift Creek DET 1o.O
.15
6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek P|an:F|oodvvay_Propoeed 7/25/2017
Hvvv3o1 (SWC) us
.15
M
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -FW
___^---
Crit 1 00 -year
Gmund
|non
eanxSta
snomaommont�/
-----------------------------------------------------
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -FW
___^---
Crit 1 00 -year
Gmund
|non
eanxSta
snomaommont�/

4000 5000
....... ......... ................
Crit 1OO-FVY
__- A -------------
EG 100-FW
__sG100-Fw
WS 100'FVV
...... .......... ~................
Crit 100 -year
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
wS1oo'yoo,
Ground
A___
moff
w
eanxSto
Encroachment
12000
|non
Banksm
Encroachment�/
4000 nnoo 6000 rnoo onuo 0000 10000 11000 1e000
Station (ft)
------------------------ ----------------------------
........................... .................. ............
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ....
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ....
------------------------------ -------------------------------
............................. .....
------------------------------ -------------------------------
............................ .....
-----
-----
.....
....................... ...............................
....................... ............
..........................
100
-
------------------------------ ------------------- .......................... ...............................
..............................�
�
LLJ
4000 5000
....... ......... ................
Crit 1OO-FVY
__- A -------------
EG 100-FW
__sG100-Fw
WS 100'FVV
...... .......... ~................
Crit 100 -year
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
wS1oo'yoo,
Ground
A___
moff
w
eanxSto
Encroachment
12000
|non
Banksm
Encroachment�/
4000 nnoo 6000 rnoo onuo 0000 10000 11000 1e000
Station (ft)

� I j
0 2000 4000 6000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Proposed 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC us
8000 10000
Legend
............ ..............
EG 100 -FW
•
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
..........................
Crit 100 -year
i
Ground
l
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
80
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Station (ft)

05 j 1200 .15 .06
115-
110-
105-
100-
LU
15110105100w
0
0
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Proposed 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
15 ":06.1501 0.15 J, .06 T 15
.05 —�
Legend
EG 100 -FW
ws � nn_F�ni
►41I1P7
E, 1111111
05�.15.06-1, .15
6000 8000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Proposed 7/25/2017
Railroad SWC TORStructure ID: RRApproximate Survey Structure
P'06.15 0 1 0.15 ", .06
G C G
MINOIC
15
............................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W11I1I1,
.05
Legend
EG 100 -FW
WS 100 -FW
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
WS 100 -year
....................................
Crit 100 -year
..................................
Crit 100 -FW
Ground
•
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Station (ft)

Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Proposed
7/25/2017
Railroad SWC ds
.05
.15
>
.15
t�--.05
120
-6JE
6
Legend
..
............. A ............
EG 100 -FW
115�
I
I
WS 100 -FW
-------------------
------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
------------------- ------------------- -------------------
------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------
---------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------- --------------------
------------------- ------------------- --------------------
-------------------- .......
---------------------------
EG 100 -year
110
-------------------
------------------- ................... ------------------- I -------------------------------------------------------------
................... ...........
................... .................... .................... .................... ..............
-------------------
WS 100 -year
................. A ................
Crit 100 -FW
105
. ...............
................... ................... ...................
................... .................... .................... .........
-------------------- ----------
................... ................... .....
----- I ---------------------
Crit 1 00 -year
Ground
loo -
A
------------------- ---------
-------------- ------------
----
-------------- -------------------
Inelf
LLI
AL
L A
Bank Sta
95 -
Encroachment
90-
85-
...................
80
0 2000
4000
6000 8000
10000
Station (ft)
Swift Creek Plan: Floodway_Proposed
7/25/2017
Swift Creek DET 1.0
dJ
.15
.05
E 05:��
.15
120
------------------------------
:
----------------------------
............. ...............................
.............................. ................
40
.......
Legend
------------------------------
..............................
-------------------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
----------------------------- -------------------------------
------------------------------ ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............
......
1
EG 100 -FW
......................... ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ..............................
............................. ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ......... .....................
..............................
...............................
WS 100 -FW
...........................
EG 100 -year
110
. ..............................
..........................................................
........... ...............................
.................
. ............. ............................................................
. ..............................
..............................................................
..............................................................
...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
..............................
.............................. ..............................
............ ................ ..............................
..............................
..............................
WS 100 -year
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................................................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
...............................
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ..............................................................
------------------------------ ...............................................
..............................................................
...............................
.................... ......................................................
... ......................... .................................................
Crit 1 00 -FW
100--
. ................
Crit 1 00 -year
................... ...............................
..
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
....... 4
...............
.................... 4
...................... ...............................
......... .....................
s
........... ...............................
...
......................... ...............................
.............................. ..............................................................
...............................
.............................. ...............................
.............................. ...................... ........
.............................. ...............................
..............................
.........................
Ground
------------------- -------------------------------
L
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
------------------------------ ...............................
.............................. --------------------- ---------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
..............................
------------------------------
..............................
------------------------
.......................
A
Ineff
W
90 -.—
Bank Sta
--------------------------------
-------------------------------
--- -
IV
....
...........................................
.............................. 4 ...............................
..............................................................
..............................
4 ...............................
...............................
Encroachment
--------------------------------
80-
- ------------------------------
. ..............................
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
...............................
-----------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.............................. ............ ! .....
... .................. ... ...............
------------------------------ i --------------------------------
............
.... . . ...... ............. .
------------------------------ i ---------------------------------
..................... --------------------------------
------------------------------ --------------------------------
....
.....
---------------------- -------- ---- - -- -------------------
------------------------------ -------------------------------
.... ....
------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------
....
------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
4 ...............................
—------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
70
--- .... .... ....
.... .... .... .... ....
... -------------------------------
. ......................
2000 3000 4000
5000 6000
7000 8000 9000
10000
Station (ft)

Appendix D. Swift Creek Additional Data

54'1ZX 13 '"boVAll ACAT.Islllz o9.i A/09.1-10
ISO/B' 9••� 273-9"
/8'-qf"
I+6 Ah "'D
Base er RN/
'I I� •I
U U ij u y L U
" 'I II �I �� ' �I II
Ali L
�� II
�� I' IIT 1��
U L
jl II
U
.0 la u U jj U U
U li (� U
U U u Uu UIU W'
u
9 -3•
/6 ®/B =3" • 292 •-O'
9 =3'•
L. A«c
EEL VATION
Bos•
\ ,r
7,14-7DM DWI•/4 -9•'O"
LIST OF MATERIALS-Wa.
ea N
193
\n�
W2
•�/Z+/1'S-0"
/2 x/ =/ •-O••
/2,1/2 5:0 /1°x!2'=5-0'
/I s12 H=0"
FALSEWORN
104 R/es- 3S -0'
2 /r•/2 -/O.O"
/01 /2'+/Z -S -O
-B/oc/nilg
^+
BP
32 9", 14"
- /r 42t 4Z /i
2 .� 1
1 -3' 2-6" /'3/1 1'6 2'3
3'0" 2 3" 1'6"/ /13 2=6' 1'3
/1 7',/f'- 9•-O" •
34 9+B -/6:-O"
- Sfi Viers.
-Bracing.a.
ECTI ON A -A
ECTIS ON B -B
Sca/ �•/=0"
Srn/ems/-O"
. PI
384 �.d -//'O'/on9 -B.'
W, 1 p/.r. 9x�- 9} /ang -PI. WBea/robe we/ded e.. torte f%/lett
9hxek.
inegn arfso.
NotSPeor•/eesePn/}a
s //so ebw=or✓k.
beM/aasidon}P
/92 60-19',r •
4B 13 -0 // -Away R¢%
" s b
1pP/}b lurnig fi% o!
rf/ya�¢n }e/sa
*esdtr
}Teisa
aJnnd /sa worth be }s.
/ 2 I NMe 4� /ong.
q/o cu. yas-eonoroie.
DETAILS OF ROLLERS
5 Ti¢cF •Pais eY
MB h
Bose or Ro,/-//B Troch
w'SL¢/e
HO"
12 AS SWANTED AS SHOWN
D 3's
(-
•N "/�0'/�O'/�O" •N
3=0" 3 �
9• 4®/=6=6=0" /=0" 4®/=6=6=0"
�IE
JI ',
C'
K�
� �}-IT
n
� F
J
m
3
NEW SECTION p4 OLD SECTION
b I _
_
b �� .%
IL i_
'li i YII
ti
JI
•
I II
g �
0,
�
-
I a
ill' dl of
P IS
-6"
/4=0••
/�3'/=fi /�6 /3
/3-0"
Il.i y
•/6
0-�II
E /f
END VIEW OF PIERS
SECTION C -C ' L '
SECTION E -E
SECTION D -D
/=3' /=6 /3
3 /C /77 1/&- ///
LIST OF MATERIALS W.W. 190 LIST OF MATERIALS W.'N. 191LIST
OF MATERIALS WN, 199
60P/es 9S-
/20 P%es-3.t=e'roxrg. A.
C. L. R. R.
/Ix/1'-/4-O" -Caps.
2/i•/z'-/o'-o" ••-B.�c•n�y. DETAILS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF PIERS
DETAILS OF •B• BARS
30 /z'•/2' - S-1- - - 3p/1+/2" - 5- d
/z 7 r/4' -/0'-0" - /z 7x/4'
60 2 +';/2
22 >•/4' -/p' -o' - •-
WATERWAY 193
Sca/e=/=o
B 6//4'-/0'-0' - B -/0•-0"
sx/•r - s' -0'
-sl; ger:.
/B 6+/4 -/O•-O" - •'
/z > /! s' -o' - sr
BATTLEBORO, N. C.
/o s'•e"-J6=o"-Braeing/p sx B'•/6'-0' ••
-Brae g.
11
�
/1 .71 B" - B' -o' -
96 Wo 96 •'/.' 96 i'a"e.//=0'/¢�-Barr q"
B+
'xo� �R¢//B -O' /—C R
20 3, B' 0'- a' -• n (USE THIS
2/6 %9,/-//-o"/ g -Ba rs �.'
B 1 G(a SCALE
2=8
0es9�C
DRAWING FOR WWS. 190, 191,9 192)
AS SHOWN DECEMBER 1946
b
enLg,¢,Pe/®
TT cu y j2 j net i
./
cv y octet . `�
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER6,
.
WTLMINGTON, N. C.
S.
54'1ZX 13 '"boVAll ACAT.Islllz o9.i A/09.1-10

8'
IDS I,6Ls'vis -
�i s3iYn
Lf'ON 1Nn ONNStM3
I
amut trzk.06tS"Y is
fif'ON LN39 3MISIX3
WON 1N3B ONFSS 31j
¢
0
ti
eye y..
W
1
LI'60.S6LS'YtS _. +
� c
SCION 11438 OMISlx3
• urt
9fi'ON 11438 ONt151x3
R;
W
I
Ww
LS'SI•.S6LS'V15
� �i
I
a -M t.N38 OMIISI f3
LBT9.96Lx'Y15
-
ih_
..-
8f`ON 11438 ONI151%3 7y
uv..r
L6LS'Y1S
_ pppx
69-ONM393e OM�%isa%3
N
O
O
i
6PODM6i5�'V 15
_
01 WON 1N38 OMISI%3 it
a
94
n
_
f L'81a46a9'Y 1 S
12.
Ib'ON 11436 ONtLSIX3 ?,
VVVVV
w
� z
gT
dY'ON 4t138 ONt1Sl%3
4 r
E d
•- -
I
SCSx•9615'Y15
fr`ON IN38 0M1.SI%37
:C
SY'i(•96LS'Y'1
N
cz�00
^' �
S
WON 11438 ONIISIX3
91i6-96iS'Y15
c, So -ON 1N38 OtN151%3 f -
,,r
w
Z
x6.6v.L6Ls-YLs
�
°'
go -ON INN ONILSIx3it
a
s
�'ry Pc
I
I
S
LYON 4N36 OMPStx3
rt
0
O fi5'910•i6tS'Y15
J WON LN38 OINIISIX3
#
as

SS«16LS'Vls
-
3NIl H71aP
WON INA WISIx3 3
m
• a
� �
�
i4 � � �
-
}[ �
Ln" LN3S OMiSix3 'i
d
�
6
!q 64y4y
O
+
BrON 1N3B 9w1SIx3 j
V)
j
d
M
>t
60'il.Z61TV1S
y6
61 -ON 1N38 OMisIx3
Z1
P
,,pp
irg-ZBi"is
N'
WON IPM !Nwlsix3 3
F
N
_
K
STES-UtTVls
-
Ito
li"ON LN30 Nusin
SL'IL*26451VLS _
ZZ'ON 1N38 SMISIx3 j
-
-
-
Iy
SZ'ON INA sals1x3 j.
-
...
4
O
L+
WON 1N39 SWSIx3 1
d
i
6i'9z.E6LS'Vls
WON INN 9M1SB13 j
G
„
SZ'ON 1NN SMISIx3 j.
a�
iZ'C9�C64S'V 15.
_
LZ -ON INA 741slx3 -
..
v✓ 4
WON iN39 OMLSU3
o
`t' 6s•66«�fils•vd5
s WON INA "ASU3 A
r
- -
Y'
Y7
tt
_
.14
Y
sB'1I•Ybls'VlS-
0£'ON dM33B 7N11SW3 j
�b'BSrb6LS'VAs
� +�
ICON IN38 WISIx3 j
©
-
-
OSw61S'ad5
3N11 117dV14

s1'f5.06A5'YYS
WON IN39 ONIaSI%3
� Sf71.OfilS'7:S
u, 11.04 INN 5MMX3 3j
.O- -Y x -.i
1r`fi9•acls`Txs s
ZrON INN ONNlstx3 3 .
0
a
s _
Z
WON AN30 OWSIX3 } ...... -....
60`92•16ds'Tx5 --- _ - , .._
Vi -ON 1N-OMISI%3 j
w
�1
tl'7R+WLS'T LS - -
O. 57'04 1N39 OM1SIXI 3 .
V7
_J
99+0515'Tls 3M, N71TN
IN'09 •b9i5'u 15
m
9'ON LN30 OM1SI%3
a
cl
cl
a'
�e
'r
Q
1. ON IN39 ON1ISINN3 1
ti
a
n
e1roL.991s`Tls ;
U
_
"0N 1N39 ?r1115F17.
fY
1
IY'91+o61s'Ti5 a
-.
_. 9'0N
LN39 OMISUN3 j
m
99.90+991i'IN1S _
_
<
k
3'OND IN39 5MASM3
0
fi9'4C•0615Y L5
4
6 -ON IN39 7NUSf%3 3
m
+
mT
3• i
tl,
In
19'90*6915'1r1S
u✓v`+
roN 1N3B 9NN1stm %
..
a+
m
N
CFIz
�
u
��
=J to
VON IWA 7M1SIX3
I
lYfy+6815"715
Y -ON 1N39 OW1S7%3{
W
so
W =
L9`19+69x5'715
-
VON 1439 OMISIIN3 i
s1'f5.06A5'YYS
WON IN39 ONIaSI%3
� Sf71.OfilS'7:S
u, 11.04 INN 5MMX3 3j
.O- -Y x -.i
1r`fi9•acls`Txs s
ZrON INN ONNlstx3 3 .
0
a
s _
Z
WON AN30 OWSIX3 } ...... -....
60`92•16ds'Tx5 --- _ - , .._
Vi -ON 1N-OMISI%3 j
w
�1
tl'7R+WLS'T LS - -
O. 57'04 1N39 OM1SIXI 3 .
V7
_J
99+0515'Tls 3M, N71TN
IN'09 •b9i5'u 15
9'ON LN30 OM1SI%3
a
ofil'96•b9l5'Tis
a'
�e
'r
—
1. ON IN39 ON1ISINN3 1
ti
a
n
f
1
IY'91+o61s'Ti5 a
-.
_. 9'0N
LN39 OMISUN3 j
m
k
fi9'4C•0615Y L5
6 -ON IN39 7NUSf%3 3
m
s1'f5.06A5'YYS
WON IN39 ONIaSI%3
� Sf71.OfilS'7:S
u, 11.04 INN 5MMX3 3j
.O- -Y x -.i
1r`fi9•acls`Txs s
ZrON INN ONNlstx3 3 .
0
a
s _
Z
WON AN30 OWSIX3 } ...... -....
60`92•16ds'Tx5 --- _ - , .._
Vi -ON 1N-OMISI%3 j
w
�1
tl'7R+WLS'T LS - -
O. 57'04 1N39 OM1SIXI 3 .
V7
_J
99+0515'Tls 3M, N71TN
2 a 9 2
2
O
r
a'
�e
'r
9'
of
a.
i
w0
m
mT
3• i
u✓v`+
CFIz
�
u
��
I
a:
2 a 9 2
2
O
r

k
wti q a �
GG``ee z 7777
m N W
- Lr CS SL! `Y1511
_ 8 1
.�
="H lr 3b N651x^
C.
a
r'!S•5cl S'Y1S
Z
MN 1N38 Wu1SM3 3j
f}
;9*K+SLLS'YL5
LN39 N38N11L
XX
9
i
3
�
m�
S.1
4 y
+A S
cr
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
S
zZ'5R+5LRL'Y1S
VON LN36 WLSrX3 iJ
wti q a �
GG``ee z 7777
m N W
- Lr CS SL! `Y1511
_ 8 1
VAA
x
C.
a
d
1N38 !13801 i
a
cs
+
a
;9*K+SLLS'YL5
LN39 N38N11L
XX
9
i
4
�
m�
r
'�
4 y
+A S
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
S
q j
r`ON LN38 WdLSIX3
9!'L 5'e1S
r'ON LN38 Mi gX3
��►_
S2'S9.1lt5'YLS
i13WN1
_ a
Lfl
�
r \
w J
P
_ r3
W
z •m �
1.1139 LLLS'Y1S wr
I
Ir'oc•SRCS`YLS
�'� j111
---_ �
� _ �
J
`
Rl
�'Ixt
g'ni Nvy
r5°O9.5RL5'YLS #
"'
In
r1•LB+StL5'YLS �
�. "�'�+. o
_-'
.�.
i
1 N39 M39MIL j 4
� w
- _
-
i
0 or96«sLivvls
�} VON A39 SMISIX3 3,
_ 8 1
95'OS•LLLS'YLS
x
C.
VON LN38 Wls*3 �.
a
d
s
a
a
cs
+
a
;9*K+SLLS'YL5
LN39 N38N11L
XX
9
i
4
�
m�
r
'�
v
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
9911.9LL5'Y1S
_ ._
r`ON LN38 WdLSIX3
_J
r'ON LN38 Mi gX3
��►_
S2'S9.1lt5'YLS
i13WN1
_ a
Lfl
�
r \
w J
P
_ r3
W
z •m �
1.1139 LLLS'Y1S wr
I
d p ►1'62-9Ll5'M 15
-'-
- z m � �.
a� S'ON AM WIIL SIX3
`
Rl
�'Ixt
g'ni Nvy
-96"CS-ILLS'Y:S
,.ON
LN38 WISIX3 i
orzt.RlLS'Yis
ZION IN39 9NILS4 i
-
Ym
"fiPliLLS'Y LS A
1N38 lL39Y111 j � - �M1
oeS'■15 $ 94
1N38 839N11 j I
95'OS•LLLS'YLS
fo
C.
VON LN38 Wls*3 �.
d
s
a
a
cs
XX
9
i
4
�
m�
r
'�
v
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
eL"9o•eLLSrts
_ ._
r`ON LN38 WdLSIX3
_J
� N
��►_
S2'S9.1lt5'YLS
i13WN1
Lfl
�
r \
w J
P
6'OH RN3B WML51X3 �_.__. .
W
AM
last,
1.1139 LLLS'Y1S wr
I
'�` -may wl
3
LN38 emlsl
z-co-OLLRLS
`
Rl
�'Ixt
-
Ym
"fiPliLLS'Y LS A
1N38 lL39Y111 j � - �M1
oeS'■15 $ 94
1N38 839N11 j I
95'OS•LLLS'YLS
fo
C.
VON LN38 Wls*3 �.
d
s
1�� e
co —
z
r
'�
3a
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
eL"9o•eLLSrts
_ ._
r`ON LN38 WdLSIX3
_J
��►_
S2'S9.1lt5'YLS
i13WN1
9t"91.9LLS'YlS
6'OH RN3B WML51X3 �_.__. .
AM
last,
-
Ym
"fiPliLLS'Y LS A
1N38 lL39Y111 j � - �M1
oeS'■15 $ 94
1N38 839N11 j I
Wzn�w
fo
� lz
LN38 N380Q1
s
1�� e
3a
sr9t•!L!5•Yls �. �
_ ._
.INN
��►_
S2'S9.1lt5'YLS
i13WN1
1.1139 LLLS'Y1S wr
I
'�` -may wl
3
LN38 emlsl
z-co-OLLRLS
`
Rl
.... 1N38 N38A11 ..
g'ni Nvy
�w
Wzn�w
m
� lz
s
1�� e

a� rs
u
a
w–
L4'9i •6915'7 ; 1 _
ON 11436 9M.LSM3: 1, pp
K 2 W
1Y'YS
p'ON 11439 7N1_Sdx.
9Y21.6915`als -"
�-ON IN39 0N1151X3
ti,.j� w
O iON LN39 9NI'1SIX3
11436 lagiUl
*,ON 11439 OMISIX;
'-4.ul O
a mw� w
5'014 11438 '.1NI1SVX3
i£'ir-01157x5 - _ _
TON 1N39 OMLSIX3
a m
:.1436 SMnll j u.
L'ON 11436 OM159X3 j
a6'69.a1Ly 715 "—�- � Z
Nae 14391111
+t
WON LN39 91449%
vspo
Co
.+138 e3ml
8'014 �IN38 9M1SIX3 ',- ++
R f �. 91'90.1146'71s
1N3e e3e1111
Z OI'ON 1N36 ONUSiX3
L
p
i
a
�4w
s
OCW
�S d
V
tn
Iw1E ;LL

VON A39 ONIYSMN j
£5'bf+8£1S'tr 15
►ION I" ')NUSIX3 �
S82S«BiLS'tr LS_- _
TON 1N3B WISIX3 3
i
a'oN 1439 �r11151x3 �
3
Oi`-WLS`YLS
CON 1438 9NIlAX3
0
0
cn
b9'L0+4i1S'r15
B'ON 1N30 omisrf3 j
06'SZ+4CiS'vi5. ..:
WON LN39 ONIMY3 3
Sb'bb+4C15'ViS I —
VON 1N38 9NI1AX3 3 j
i
F 1919 OMI YI _
II'ON 1439 `.iebE Slx3
L
I
BO'�+fi£15'v15
ZYOM 1438 %ftsf t3 3
0
0
+ Z6'86.6C1s'vls
O — VON AN39 OMISIX3 , -
a
li'LI+OlrLVTL5
WGM 1N30 'MiSIX3 j
�a
0* 1N3B ONIISIX3
�c
22'5£+OelS'trls
s
VON 0438 WiAX3
i
Z
C7
'gg
.. lot;wF
ri'ae«L1Ls`vL5
3K
"ON 1N38 UMSIX3 i
5� 04 INS. 7411 Si>' ? -•
z
z
LrON 1N38 WISIX3 j
O
:r
Co
4
}_..-
®
OD —
Z`ON LN39 OM1SIX3
LO--
VON A39 ONIYSMN j
£5'bf+8£1S'tr 15
►ION I" ')NUSIX3 �
S82S«BiLS'tr LS_- _
TON 1N3B WISIX3 3
i
a'oN 1439 �r11151x3 �
3
Oi`-WLS`YLS
CON 1438 9NIlAX3
0
0
cn
b9'L0+4i1S'r15
B'ON 1N30 omisrf3 j
06'SZ+4CiS'vi5. ..:
WON LN39 ONIMY3 3
Sb'bb+4C15'ViS I —
VON 1N38 9NI1AX3 3 j
i
F 1919 OMI YI _
II'ON 1439 `.iebE Slx3
L
I
BO'�+fi£15'v15
ZYOM 1438 %ftsf t3 3
0
0
+ Z6'86.6C1s'vls
O — VON AN39 OMISIX3 , -
a
1:00
a�
EN39 939NIL
LlTO+BCLS`VYS
:439 83RAIl
SZ'II*B£LS'trls t
N30 UN M1 3
�692+Bi15'vY5 "
IN39 43"1 }
Sr
til'oi•BCLS"rY5 'y'M
LN38 H39411 }
I
..I
vN
z®
�M
w {
i4
cs r
uk �'
j}
N
'M M
B
a o
�Fl b PV
J �P
14'BC
1N38 M3®qli aj '�
1N39 H3ml j
1439 timm1
br9B«6i4S'v4s
INN Ai"i 3
i I
li'LI+OlrLVTL5
WGM 1N30 'MiSIX3 j
�a
�c
22'5£+OelS'trls
s
VON 0438 WiAX3
Z
C7
'gg
.. lot;wF
iii K"p
3K
5� 04 INS. 7411 Si>' ? -•
CL'IL+OeLS'vYi
LrON 1N38 WISIX3 j
1:00
a�
EN39 939NIL
LlTO+BCLS`VYS
:439 83RAIl
SZ'II*B£LS'trls t
N30 UN M1 3
�692+Bi15'vY5 "
IN39 43"1 }
Sr
til'oi•BCLS"rY5 'y'M
LN38 H39411 }
I
..I
vN
z®
�M
w {
i4
cs r
uk �'
j}
N
'M M
B
a o
�Fl b PV
J �P
14'BC
1N38 M3®qli aj '�
1N39 H3ml j
1439 timm1
br9B«6i4S'v4s
INN Ai"i 3
i I
1
q
4
�a
s
'gg
.. lot;wF
iii K"p
4

z
z
IL
?/
LLJ
�a
----
rdAYs t
F
ry
�
•
W I � LL
+
LL
w
a
J
� J
.o
ry
IIICCC---
d S
� � g
W .•
JJ
yl.
K
1N3B
1y411��
W
V
T-
4
iyll{
�o
a-
I_a
cn
o
'Vpf.aQ��
©
a
ID'
ZZI
J.0
LU
�'
3 ❑'CC
w
m
�
(.n
C7
�
� � C i -yd'-` •-da�in
z
crP
LL
z
[ r
z
z
IL
?/
LLJ
�a
----
rdAYs t
F
ry
•
W I � LL
+
LL
w
J
J
� J
.o
ry
IIICCC---
d S
� � g
W .•
JJ
yl.
K
1N3B
1y411��
W
V
T-
4
iyll{
�o
a-
_W
o
All
z
z
IL
?/
a
-"ji �`duo.t r
----
rdAYs t
F
ry
•
W I � LL
+
LL
w
J
J
� J
.o
d S
� � g
W .•
JJ
yl.
K
1N3B
¢6RIK
MHV38 j 2 q
3NfkV 3R j
T-
4
W
�o
a-
o
All
m�
�I rc
m
`k' a
R
I
1N36 d
a
.4-.9
w
J
d S
� � g
W .•
JJ
yl.
K
I
1N36 d
.4-.9
3
J
d S
� � g
W .•
JJ
yl.
K
¢6RIK
=
W
o

Appendix E. Tar River Exhibits

C-)
0
D
b
j C
f �d
Thomas A Bells pkwy ��—
N
a" 4,4'
S
U) d �3 r
nes�yP 7 Gr"°n Rd
CD � Q1?
CD
n �b Rf. +� Fottnt4in School Rd
CunKINIItO�C' q7 5�
oc� 1Vor&g—n ti119.
0 Golf Club !I" `
Z �
BEAVER POND Freor DrE Cliff Ln
- P
3117 �
P +
ry4P � II
.c a
$ I+ 4b
aPer Dr �' +
Benvenue Country Club 'B i
EV Llbb Rd
�• o¢ a ax,
J
Golden East " 5716
Crossing '�I
R $ .�,C
.Id' �-
rer�y� ` a �lr�rl,tRti
a �
a�
468A _ Qb R x*y Mount U
Je SP"ts
4GRA- - �y9S^ Complex.
468B
Gaal a Park21� .,
4g 43
� -` HISTORIC MILL
VI`LLLAyGE +
''I
C h¢ Syer �� r
64 R HILLSDALE Chi St
54
FALLS ROAD v
P� E•i NATIONAL rn
r p HISTORIC 1. _
X L DISTRICT f vog9nla St
W Northemtern
r
Cemetery
"r it
Rocky Mount °
9a" unity WEEKS ARMSTRONG
Cemetery !rands
O HAPPY HILL r arwmh i"
3 + 43 1 L
nHOLLY STREET
WEST HAVEN f CENTRAL CItY
l0 NATIONAL �! NATIONAL
HISTORIC aye•Wand!
D) DISTRICT r'ca VILLA ATIPLACE HISTORIC
DISTRICT tai
N `9y NATIONAL --%
wawa '
W
LPy9e� Rd � =3
W
Shore St
D
43
`9
�
HIStOR1C R {
DISTRICT
+
x
Rineuiew
�e0'n cn Rd
CEDARBROC11(
/
Cernetery
o
J w
r4
tuSi.
EDGEMONIT
-
Fo•
NATIONAL
LITTLE ' ,1 HISTORIC
o
C7 Y� 'lt-
I'll,
RALEIGH DISTRICT
MEADOWSROOK
ht
�• �OWLfF
x�
W,gh �M
r,
Rosewood AVe
_
Z
�
St o
Legend
Sr
Project Boundary
Rocky Mount
....--
Cn
o JACOB Vicinity Map N
rn Station 6172 Crossing -CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study Q 2,000 4,000
IS
Jacobs Engineering croup, Inc. City of Rocky Mount, Edgecombe/Nash Counties, North Carolina
X REG No. 2966 Project No: JLX26141 Feet
0

L
n
C-
0
vo
C—
r
X
C)
X
0
N
i�
0
X
O
O
0
n_
r_
Z
m
rn
0
rn
O
rn
0
rn
X
0

Appendix F. Tar River Hydrologic Model

Section 5.0 - Engineering Methods
Table 9 -Summary of Discharges
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35
Drainage
Discharges (cts)
Flooding
Source
Area
Location miles)
Approximately 1.6
0%
Chance Chance Chance Chance
miles downstream
of the 211.53
8,410
14,540
17,612
26,195
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 100
feet upstream of
the
211.0
5,860
9,832
11,777
16,650
Nash/Edgecombe
County boundary
Approximately 750
feet downstream of
203.7
5,671
9,633
11,590
16,559
U.S. Highway 301
Approximately 2.4
miles downstream
196.9
5,498
9,452
11,419
16,474
of NC Highway 48
Approximately 500
feet downstream of
194.8
5,444
9,396
11,365
16,447
NC Highway 48
Swift Creek
Approximately 1.1
miles downstream
183.1
5,156
9,094
11,078
16,299
of Red Oak Road
(SR 1003)
Approximately 0.9
mile downstream of
182.3
5,138
9,074
11,059
16,289
Red Oak Road (SR
1003
Approximately 1.9
miles downstream
167.74
*
*
12,4002
of Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately 75
feet upstream of
165.38
*
*
12,300
Hillardston Road
SR 1310
Approximately
1,300 feet
164.64
*
*
12,300
downstream of NC
Highway 43
N.C. 97 at Rocky
932.0
16,700
24,400
27,700
40,000
Mount
Tar River
Confluence of
Goose Branch
927.0
16,620
24,310
27,620
40,000
Confluence of Stony
809.0
14,820
22,270
25,770
38,700
Creek
Flood Insurance Study Report: Nash County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas
Revised: July 7, 2014 Page 35

Appendix G. Tar River Hydraulic Model

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Duplicate Effective

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY DUP EFF River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
Q Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.57
0.000898
4.05
21853.07
1848.63
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.63
2208.70
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.66
2145.56
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15723.16
3590.70
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000124
4.56
33808.48
5420.91
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
<__
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------
WS 1 00 -YEAR
-
------------- ---------------------------
------------- -------------
--------------------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-------------- -
------- ------------ -------------
........... A .................. ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
80-
-------- --------
--------- ......... ---------------------------------------------
------- A -- -- ------------- -- -- ------- -- -- -- --------- ---------- ---
------------------_--------- _ -------- ­ -------------------------------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- -------- ----- - ------ -- ---- ------- -- ------------- --- - ......... ...............
------------------------------------ ------------ --------------------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------------------- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------------
-----------
------------ -
-------------- ------
- ------------------------------------------
Ground
70-
Lu
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5�00
6000 7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

.................A................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
WS 100 -YEAR FW
5500
0
I
c
0
m
LU
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...................................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
50 1 1-
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100-YEAR
......................1......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

EG 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank St,
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 1
c
0
m
LU
50
3500

4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W111:
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Duplicate_Effective 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 --f .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
61/10111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Existing

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY EX River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
4 Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.57
0.000898
4.05
21853.07
1848.63
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.63
2208.70
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.66
2145.56
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15723.16
3590.70
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000124
4.56
33808.48
5420.91
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
<--
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ...........
WS 1 00 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------- ------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-------------- ------- -------------
-------------- - - --- -----
........... A .................. ..
Crit 1 00 -YEAR FW
80-
-------- --------
--------- ......... ---------------------------------------------
------ -- -- ------------- -- -- ---------- -- -- ----------- ---
------------------------------ — -------- — -------------------------------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- -------- ----- - ------ -- ---- ------- ......... ............
------------------------------------ ------------ ----- --------------------------- -- ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------------------- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------------ ----------
-----------
------------ -
--------------- - - ------------ --------------- ----------
Ground
70-
Lu
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5�00 6000
7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

11
ic
0
80
LU
70
50
3500
................. A ................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
ws 100 -YEAR FW
Uround
0
Bank Sta
Encroachment
5500
Legend
.................. L .................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100 -YEAR
....................... k ......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Iteff
Bank
Sta
Encroachment

EG 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank St,
Encroachment
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 1
c
0
m
LU
50
3500

4500 5000 5500 6000 6500
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W111:
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Station (ft)
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Existing_Conditions 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 —�. .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
61/10111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

CSX Battleboro to Bricks 2nd Main Track Flood Study JACOBS
Tar River Proposed

HEC -RAS Plan: FWAY PROP River: Main Stem Reach: Reach - 1
Reach
River Sta
Profile
4 Total
Min Ch EI
W.S. Elev
Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev
E.G. Slope
Vel Chnl
Flow Area
Top Width
Froude # Chl
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(ft/s)
(sq ft)
(ft)
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
52.39
80.40
80.58
0.000898
4.05
21854.45
1848.65
0.15
Reach - 1
447983.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
52.39
81.12
81.40
0.001196
4.56
7876.73
515.00
0.17
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.85
78.74
65.56
79.61
0.000377
7.62
5066.93
2208.92
0.28
Reach - 1
446626.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.85
79.65
65.56
80.46
0.000333
7.34
5198.82
296.00
0.27
Reach - 1
446531.0
Bridge
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.69
78.37
65.40
79.26
0.000390
7.69
4998.97
2145.87
0.28
Reach - 1
446436.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.69
79.32
65.40
80.14
0.000341
7.40
5145.79
295.00
0.27
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
51.08
78.28
78.65
0.000278
5.35
15539.02
3499.67
0.23
Reach - 1
445378.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
51.08
79.27
79.60
0.000228
5.03
9393.27
1063.00
0.21
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
50.34
78.14
78.38
0.000125
4.56
33147.14
5393.63
0.16
Reach - 1
444102.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
50.34
79.08
79.38
0.000130
4.77
10084.61
650.00
0.17
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR
29300.00
48.99
77.95
60.90
78.10
0.000095
3.53
31186.44
4693.90
0.14
Reach - 1
441773.0
100 -YEAR FW
29300.00
48.99
78.86
60.90
79.08
0.000109
3.90
9809.66
650.00
0.15

Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY—Proposed 3/20/2017
Main Stem Reach - 1
90-
Legend
-------------
------------- -------------
-
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-
------------- ------------- ------------
------------- -------------
--
----------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- -------------
------------
WS 100 -YEAR
-
------------- ---------------------------
------------- -------------
--------------------------
.......................... 1 ..........................
Crit 100 -YEAR
-----------.-.-.- -
------- ------------ ------ -------
........... A .................. ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
80
-------- --------
--------- ......... -----------
-------­--------­---------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------- ----- ------ - --- ------- A .....
------------------_--------------
---------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------ --------------------------------- ------ ----- ----------- ----- ------ --------------- ----- ..................
----70Lu
---------
--------- - -
..
--------------------
Ground
70
0
w
60
50-
40
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
6000 7000
Main Channel Distance (ft)

.................A................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
•
WS 100 -YEAR FW
5500
0
I
c
0
m
LU
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
Legend
...................................
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
50 1 1-
3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500
Station (ft)
Crit 100-YEAR
......................1......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment

EG 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
..............................................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
c
0
m
LU
50
3500

4500 5000 5500 6000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.5
6500
M1181n
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... A......................
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Crit 100 -YEAR
Ground
Ineff
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
W111:
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
50
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Station (ft)

M
I
1
0
m
w
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 69.0
1. .13
70
60
50
-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Station (ft)
Tar River - AUGUST 20,2010 4650 Plan: FWAY_Proposed 3/20/2017
Cross Section Tar River 68.0 XS98
08 —�. .03 +08 +11 �� 1. --�
6/1/0111
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
------------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
■
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
6000
Legend
EG 100 -YEAR FW
WS 100 -YEAR FW
-----------------------------------
EG 100 -YEAR
WS 100 -YEAR
....................... 4.......................
Crit 100 -YEAR
...................... A .................... ..
Crit 100 -YEAR FW
Ground
•
Bank Sta
Encroachment
40
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Station (ft)

Appendix H. Tar River Additional Data

100 - - - -
AREA FILL: 85.8 SF
AREA CUT: 42.4 SF
- -
-
_
95
85
--
-
80
-
90
85
75
70
65
60
120
— — -
- -
CONTRACT
90
-
EXISTING
SEE_ INT'
80
A
YARD LEADS
110
-
rm
-
80
75
70
65
60120
w_ z
_
_
EXISTING
GRIND
_
i
-
100
110
r
-
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
100
95
90
_
AREA FILL:
AREA CUT
-- -
136.1 SF
1.4 SF
_
85
--
-
80
75
70
65
60
120
— — -
- -
CONTRACT
90
-
EXISTING
SEE_ INT'
80
— —
-NOT IN
100
YARD LEADS
110
Y
Q �
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
6v
60
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 _mU -14U -1DU -IOU _I/U -lao
618100
N N
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -1ZU -1Su -14U -13u -IOU -I/V ,II
6180.1.00
N N
100
AREA FILL' 69.9 SF
100
95
AREA CUT: 15.2 SF
w_ z
_
_
x
;
,
i
r
95
90
90
w
W�
W
W
cd
*L
I
85
85
-
I
- - -
-
f
I
80
60
-
f -
I
-
TOP 0 SUBGRAO
1
`-
-
i
-
-
75
_-
-
75
70
70
E%ISTING GROUND-�
65
-
65
YARD LEADS
NOT IN
CONTRACT !- SEE INT:RMODAL PIAN FOR DETAIL_
60120
110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40
30 20
10 0
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90
-100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-1800
6179+00
10, 0 10,
20'
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
SEE
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR R/W LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" -
10'
DESIGNED BY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
--
In�"l-" `m1 g, I
• it ..me. 1-1 g, e.ec-
anO/Of"rm-
D.MONTAGUE
CSATAil111SP0ITAi'z0111 INC. DESIGN &CONSTRUCTION
'
CROSS SECTIONS
DRAWN 87
DRAWING NO.
�1oat1on••
tim r.r"imetl nre.itn
• nai re�mi. the .r..ertr
D MONTAGUE
JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA
Rx -07
EMT1 6181+00 TO EMT1 6179+00
ionatMa�INDerMltl emir
CHECKED BY
N, ORTEGA
REVISION
SHEET NO,.
/ltlentw, mtl ow ".t..
�,.tl fm f y ..r.... ".r
I';,,�M'bs„„�a�,�,eY1p,
APPROVED BY
V00090
59 OF 188
SUB NORTH END DIVA FLORENCE
I NOT FOR 1) NMUC 11014 1DATE
M.GANAS
SCALE AS
SHOWN
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DATE
DESCRIPTION �'�%g APP
JANUARY 19, 2017
■ ^'

C
O�
x
N
LEI
N
N
Q'
C
.3
0
0
u
0
F—
c
U
U
a
0
/
_T
U
CL
0
U
O
N
LQ
Q
N
N
O
W
100
95
AREA FILL' ;165.3 SF
AREA CUTS 0.3 SF
SF
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
90
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
95 AREA
CUT_12 SF
85
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
—
80
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P
}
��
—
75
a
r
x
1U
70
TING GRO
65 - -
EXI
N(�
60YARD LEAQS NOT IN
(CONTRACT
- SEE INTERMODAL
P
AN FOR D
TAIL
-
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
100
AREA
—
FILL: ,1139.9
SF
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
-
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
95 AREA
CUT_12 SF
_
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
SHEET N0.
60 OF 188
-
.
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P
90
85y
80
-
-
75--
L
70
EXI
TING
CR
JND J
65
-
—
-
!TAIL
-
YARD
LEAl
S NOT
IN
(CONTRACT(-
SEE
INT�:RMODAL
P_AN FOR
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40 30
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR R/W LIMITS
DE 1
^ N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -''W
6178+00
N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
CA
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -180
6177+00
N N
20 10 0
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
E�
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1840
6176+00 10' 0 1a' 20'
GRAPHIC SCALE- 1" = l0'
,n,a�,dndmrid•mi°
n •ion•. ardwinaew•°-
wrion rurni m•d n•r•wim
"atlI =I � imQ-
noon r•n°inm••ro°•r�r
r m• c1, rrm.°arrmion
and •toil e• e•m cm-
Fd•nfm dna .n° n°""
•s.d M. a,r w+rdnu nor
dw ,a in nw.en.n+.
M. cs• rron•°nrr°ri.n
D.MONTAGUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
+ +
EMT1 6178 00 TO EM T1 6176 00
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
-
DRAWN 9Y
D. MONTACUE
w
V00090
DRAWING N0,
RX -08
_
CHECKED BY
N. ORTECA
REVISION
SHEET N0.
60 OF 188
-
.
NOT ��--Pf'k+*n
j'� IDDE,ISj,CJRIPTION
APPROVED BY
M. CANAS
DATE
JANUARY 19, 2017
SCALE
AS SHOWN
REV DATE -P

100
95
90
85
BO
75
70
65
r
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
z Y
AREA FILL:
167.1 SF
AREA CUT:
1.3 SF
—
_fl
'21
z o
100
lY
IS
s
--
iC3
wQ
m�
22
Ww.
UBGRAO
W
cd
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
T
—
e J
I�
w
_+'
,r
-
95
`°
95
SI•NAL
PAD
T
EXIST
NG GROUNQ
YARD LEADS
NOT IN
PLAN FOR DETAIL
,CONTRACT
r- SEE INTERMODAL
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
100
i;
100
lY
IS
s
--
iC3
UBGRAO
�
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
T
—
e J
w
_+'
-
95
`°
95
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
6020 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -1�p
6175+00
-. _� 100
100 'AREA FILL' i0.0 SIF o
AREA CUT: 7.0 SF l �_ z_ z 95
95
N �
tri -
v -�
w;
m x m
90
W w •E� w W '�I I>
4
85
85to
o — — _ 80
.�. __ _ - '----
Bo TOP SUBCRAD1i - _I` _�-- P - — 75
75 — s RA TO ALL 0 ACCESS �1 TURNOU PAD
_ - 70
70 EXIST[.JG GROUND -J PROPOSE 36" CMP
- 65
65
60ivARQ LEADS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE 1NT.RMODAL P AN FOR TAIL _
120 110 100 90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 170 -6D
6174+00
w, ti N N
- --
100
i;
100
—
s
E
AREA FILL
AREA CUT
142.7 SF
4,1 SF
w
_+'
-
95
`°
95
90
90
W
tIJ
iJ
Ir
1
W.
1 r
x
,�
85
85
� �
�a.^
80—
o
BO
o v
/
TOP SUBGRA \
N
s
—
—
—
—
—
75
75
—
-
—
70
70
X - NG
-
- — --
65
- -
- -
65
YARD LEAS
NOT IN
CONTRACT -SEE INTERMODAL
PLAN
FOR DETAIL
F
60
120 110 100 90 80
70 60 50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180p
aw
617,3+00
10° 0 10'
zo'
�
1
WHERE R/W LIMITS NOT SHOWN
GRAPHIC SCALE: ill- 10'
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
FOR R/W LIMITS
DESIGNED By
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
uim,rtns. wyry tMa'-
D MONTAcuE
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
CROSS SECTIONS
PRAWN BY
r}Raw1Nc Na.
g
°°I°'�^�°�°^
D. MONTAGUE
JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA
RX -09
EMT16175+00 TO EMT16173+00
anti .rain ,Nr waw+w
Iinasoi5`w+rlu�9'w,•°p
CHECREO BY
N.ORTEGA
REVISION
SHEET NO.
Feet- M Yell rot M
wa,�«Y�.w.,ro,
APPR04£U D r
V00090
61 OF 1B8
SUBS NORTH END DIVA FLORENCE
�
NOT FOR CONTmucnoDATE
°IMIMCSM T�eM
CAMAS
� �
SCALE AS SHOWN
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
a
a
- -
REV DATE DESCit�PTigN
APP
JANUARY 19.2017

C100 ti 100
x
T? — _ _ , .� _
AREA FILL 0.0 SF
AREA CUT 24.2 SF
N 95 95
i 90 - ep x
rn-' T.
Q 85 d Z w W o, 90
85
80 80
TOP OF SUBGRAD ,
~ 75 _ _ — -
.5 75
70
x 70
EXIS'ING GROU D�
� 65 , - - — - 65
0 60 YARD LEAS NOT IN ICONTRACT - SEE INT:RMODAL P AN FOR D TAIL
120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 T
-30 -40 -50 -60 -70 80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170 -T80
a 6172-1-00
0
U
O Q R
N Q
LO
O 100
0 95
v 90
0
U
X BS
U)
U
c3
rn 80
w 75
C
c
Li 70
u,
v 65
E
0 60
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
c
14 110
100 90
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180
H
Z
�
?
AREA FILL'
129.9 SF4TOP01-
6171-00
0
J
Q
AREA CUT:
14.1 SF
o
0
100 AREA FILL V24.9
SF -
- — - 1 — -
c�11/'�BGRAD
-
100
E
AREA CUT: 'i.3
SF�a
i
°u
95' -- —
-
-- -
95
0
90
�_
90
a3
�'-
o
B5
Q
-
85
j
�a�
80
!�
80
TOP OF SUBGRADE
pl) rn
75
75
° -
— —
70
EXIS INC
GROLI)
70
65
YARD LEA SNOT
IN CONTRACT F- SEE
PLAN FOR DETAIL
60120 110
100 90
_INT
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
_
0 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140-150 -160 -170
fi0
-180
6170.00
WHERE R/W
LIMITS NOT
SHOWN
10 0 10'
20
aw
O
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS
FOR R/W
LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 10'
ww
J
nro m'rim our o-nri'i
npe, ww-
�� n�
DESTGREO BY
D. MONTACUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSx TRANSPORTATION, INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
-
DRAWN 9Y D. MONTAGUE
DRAWING
W
y~i W
imri rurni-nw rw-vi to
.Mi rmx,m rM or'wny
o/ iM CSN frmwwrarlon
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
No.
RX -10
EMT1 6172+00 TO EMT1 6170+00
-
CHECKED 9Y
C
w
W 0.11 w Mia cm-
lfm 1eiioM.Miinoree
—1' 4eny'er'w-nor
irn rM csx rronwo<renm
"III r...*,H
N,ORT
�/OOOQO
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
1
REVISION SNEE7 NO,
62 OF �s8
" w
-
APPROVED Y
M. CANAS
a
J
EXISTNG
GROUT D
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DAZE JANUARY 19.2017
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV DATE I DESCRIPTION B. APP
YARD LEA -S
NOT IN
CONTRACT
SEE INT RMODAL q,AN
FORD
TAIL
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
c
14 110
100 90
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140 -150 -160 -170
-180
6171-00
0
J
Q
o
0
100 AREA FILL V24.9
SF -
- — - 1 — -
-
100
E
AREA CUT: 'i.3
SF�a
i
°u
95' -- —
-
-- -
95
0
90
�_
90
a3
�'-
o
B5
Q
-
85
j
�a�
80
!�
80
TOP OF SUBGRADE
pl) rn
75
75
° -
— —
70
EXIS INC
GROLI)
70
65
YARD LEA SNOT
IN CONTRACT F- SEE
PLAN FOR DETAIL
60120 110
100 90
_INT
80
70 60
50 40
30 20
_
0 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-70 -80 -90 -100 -110
-120 -130 -140-150 -160 -170
fi0
-180
6170.00
WHERE R/W
LIMITS NOT
SHOWN
10 0 10'
20
aw
O
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS
FOR R/W
LIMITS
GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 10'
ww
J
nro m'rim our o-nri'i
npe, ww-
�� n�
DESTGREO BY
D. MONTACUE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CSx TRANSPORTATION, INC. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
VAL. SEC.
CONTRACT NO.
CCX TERMINAL ROCKY MOUNT MAIN TRACK
CROSS SECTIONS
-
DRAWN 9Y D. MONTAGUE
DRAWING
W
y~i W
imri rurni-nw rw-vi to
.Mi rmx,m rM or'wny
o/ iM CSN frmwwrarlon
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
No.
RX -10
EMT1 6172+00 TO EMT1 6170+00
-
CHECKED 9Y
C
w
W 0.11 w Mia cm-
lfm 1eiioM.Miinoree
—1' 4eny'er'w-nor
irn rM csx rronwo<renm
"III r...*,H
N,ORT
�/OOOQO
SUB: NORTH END DIV: FLORENCE
1
REVISION SNEE7 NO,
62 OF �s8
" w
-
APPROVED Y
M. CANAS
a
J
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DAZE JANUARY 19.2017
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV DATE I DESCRIPTION B. APP