20170938 Ver 1_Mitigation Plan_Appendix H_20170731

Appendix G
Swift Creek - Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
APPENDIX H
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL REQUEST

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Norton Webster, Palustrine Group, LLC
PO Box 603; Pittsboro, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Swift Creek - Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan, Edgecombe County, NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Edgecombe City: Leggett
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.997119 ON; Long. -77.606735 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Swift creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area -
Non -wetland waters:
22054 linear feet: Varies width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine lower perennial
Stream Flow: Intermittent and/or Perennial
Wetlands: 183.6 acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: N/A
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
a pplicant/consultant: Amec Foster Wheeler (consultant)
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Draughn and Tarboro, NC
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Edgecombe County, North Carolina
National wetlands Inventory map(s). Cite name: Draughn and Tarboro, NC
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑✓ FEMA/FIRM maps: 3720480100K, 3720480200K, 3720481100K, 3720481200K
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): USDA NADP 2017
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
Ml

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there maybe"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

aaaac
c c c c c
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
e 3 3 3 3 3 3 c c 3 3 c 3 3 3
m cc cc cc 0 C 0 C C 0 C C C C
O C C C C C C C C C C C 00
C0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R
O_ O O _O O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oj UTJ U U U U U U
mm m m m m m m m m m m m d m
m,N C9 N 0. N N w w m N w N N N
() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
'Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
[1
m 75 75 m m m m 7a ca m ca m m m
m.0 c c C C c c C C C C C
`
qtm d d m m C1 m m d d`` N N
o.no.v mm vvvvvvv
�..` QaQnnnnnnn
D 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
c c c c c c c c m m m v v v
S O N (V O O Or+ b n� th p i0 cNJ
J '.N rwi rw'� n cmi M �+wi c> M nl M t+I M M
n
_ 3 x
EQ1 FLFL
[OUO W LL(�2FL FL FL F�Y Yx
£ ZIJ J J J J J J J J Q x
m « n
m s
N
4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
�000000 aao
q
p O O O O O O O O
mtt.
13 t._
N N N N N N N
ON N 4J Vl U)U) N N
m
mC C
VZ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
v
W
m
`u
N
D
c�M�<mvm`r
m P O O l+l p
y N N O O O (O M O
i�
X
O
Q
a
N N N N N m N m
m v m m m v v v ami
V'000 00000
°i,.m v v vmmmm
�Oj m m m m m m m m
aaaaQn. n.a
m rnwma�n w
mm �.o fo �omm�
O nl�rrr��r
J i i
m w O N r r ryry
M M M M M M m
L
•' � r O Q w N N 0) 0 M V
X
O
16
Q
R
3..N V N M C� O W 10 V vOi
'q'o 0 0 0 o a o o rn m rn
J.Mn MMM�`F°�mnmM
m,
O-
m Z
L+
I

0o a
c c c c s
d d d d
udddcc �c 0@��dd
d d d 3 3 3 3 m m m m
r O O C O d d odd o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0C d oOc co 0co 0
u c c--
W
c c c
A C
CC C C 0
O O O 7 >>((]]
O_ OO OC O
t�t C C C C
o O o O o 0 o o o
ddd Z C
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N d N N
d C G C C C C w w w o w o
O O O O O .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ZZZ m 1616
d ZZZZZZ
c d
O O O O
Z Z Z Z
L
m
C
d
L
'p � N O) N (O M f� M [O N V n D✓ F N N N V N
O
a
n
j p O C 0 0 b h of O« N N N
rn o o w rn m aaao rn rn m o
'- rn rn m o 0 0 0 0 0 o m o o rn m m m d, w rn m o
d
E N' a
d N N N N N N N N N N M M M M
Z

USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, NC
ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Study Area Map
Figure 3 NRCS Soils Map
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5 USFWS NWI Map
Figure 6 Jurisdictional Waters Map
Figure 7 100 -Year Floodplain Map
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (wetland
side and upland side)

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Warren Northampton
Hertford
Halifax
Franklin Bertie
Nash •
Edgecombe
t Martin
Wake
Wilson
Pitt
Johnston
�rr
ene
Beaufort
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
Approximate Project
arnec
foster
IlPalustrine
Gaup I' wheeler
Reviewed Bv: RS
Date: 5/23/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
Oak Fo€est Ln
0 a@ 9
I
i' 'te
�d4 _
dry
U
�i
i
ettteb
G�B`O#f G 011
ry
�e
II gyp.
lrr'�
WW Lagsbaro Rd
Ebenezer Rd
Approximate Mitigation
Project Boundary
L ". y+—tt
rnufc'n Rd
�ein�e�etn
t1.
Es n, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intennap, INCREMENT R NRCan, Esn Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong
Kong), Esri Korea, Esn (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStmetMap contributors, and the GIS User

44
33
V2
V7 Tarboro
0 3.5 7 V V
Miles MM 1
Figure 2. Study Area Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
©Approximate Project
Boundary
Roads
USGS Named Stream
USGS Flow Path
amee
foster
Palustrnewheeler
Reviewed BV: WAR
Date: 5/23/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
A
---
co .
O
L
0.25 "z Or51—_ : ,,.. .. z,�, — s,,._ E
Miles
a-... -:}� z, �x. o- -� v •11-.-,.-� �-•.r - _-_��'�;--y. --. ti sem: '".... ,.. :' -
met

44
V
V
V2
V7 Tarboro
±� 0 3.5 7 V Miles 98
MN 1 V
Figure 3. NRCS Soils Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
Approximate Project Boundary
Roads
USGS Named Stream
USGS Flow Path
Soil Hydric Rating
Nonhydric
0 Predominantly Nonhydric
0 Predominantly Hydric
Hydric
arneC
foster
r
Palustnne Group wheeler
Date: 5/23/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
AAA
.. 'Un
WaB R
HSG HydricRate Aaeage
C 9 64.7
Very poorly drai ned
B/ D
r
"i {'
Somewhat poorly drai ned
B/ D
5
31.8
V
A
0
38.0
Moderatelywell drained
t
dt
5
33.5
Moderate) well drained
B
0
5
r .
AI tavi sta f i ne sandy I oam, Oto 3 perc
5
Bad Iahadcfine sandy loam
Well drained
ChewadasiIt loam
0
Cbnetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 peroen
Poorlydrained
Dogue f ne sandy I clam, 0 to 3 perce
92
Goldsboro fine sandy loam, Oto 2 per
Pborl drai ned
Norfol k loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent
�
Norfol k loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent
Well drained
r
0
13.4
Somewhat excessively drained
A
0
156.4
Well drained
A
0
5
6.0
26.1
Somewhat oorl drained
C9D
7
5.8
Poorlydrained
r: ,;%
90
12.0
Well drained
B
5
13.3
t.
,
.,
1
%
- Symbol
'5yAaA
Be
0013
r I k s " D9A
ITA GoA
-
_ ---.
fla NoB
/
-
FbA
k
-
Fb
4k StB
�•r
r
TaB
»s.L
W
WaB
a
1,aoa
2,00o f
We
Feet:'
.f Wh
WaB R
S1
sl of
it sl
R iinsfine sandy loam, Oto 2percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain
Fdoanoke loam
State loamy sand, Oto 4 percent slopes
Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Water
Wagram loamy sand, Oto 6 percent slopes
Wahee fine sandy loam
Wehadkee silt loam
Wickham sandv loam. 0 to 4 percent slopes
Drainage
Moderately well drained
HSG HydricRate Aaeage
C 9 64.7
Very poorly drai ned
B/ D
r
"i {'
Somewhat poorly drai ned
B/ D
5
31.8
V
A
0
38.0
Moderatelywell drained
t
dt
5
33.5
Moderate) well drained
B
0
Name
Well drained
AI tavi sta f i ne sandy I oam, Oto 3 perc
5
Bad Iahadcfine sandy loam
Well drained
ChewadasiIt loam
0
Cbnetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 peroen
Poorlydrained
Dogue f ne sandy I clam, 0 to 3 perce
92
Goldsboro fine sandy loam, Oto 2 per
Pborl drai ned
Norfol k loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent
100
Norfol k loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent
S1
sl of
it sl
R iinsfine sandy loam, Oto 2percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain
Fdoanoke loam
State loamy sand, Oto 4 percent slopes
Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Water
Wagram loamy sand, Oto 6 percent slopes
Wahee fine sandy loam
Wehadkee silt loam
Wickham sandv loam. 0 to 4 percent slopes
Drainage
Moderately well drained
HSG HydricRate Aaeage
C 9 64.7
Very poorly drai ned
B/ D
90
7.4
Somewhat poorly drai ned
B/ D
5
31.8
Well drained
A
0
38.0
Moderatelywell drained
C
5
33.5
Moderate) well drained
B
0
1.3
Well drained
A
5
12.3
Well drained
A
0
12.4
Poorlydrained
B/D
92
9.2
Pborl drai ned
Cf D
100
158.1
Well drained
B
0
13.4
Somewhat excessively drained
A
0
156.4
Well drained
A
0
5
6.0
26.1
Somewhat oorl drained
C9D
7
5.8
Poorlydrained
B/D
90
12.0
Well drained
B
5
13.3

M
110 3.5 7 I
Miles
Figure 4. USGS Topographic
Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
®Approximate Project Boundary
References:
USGS Topographic Map,
7.5 -minute series,
Whitakers, dated 1961
USGS Topographic Map,
7.5 -minute series,
Draughn, dated 1960
USGS Topographic Map,
7.5 -minute series,
Hartsease, dated 1981
USGS Topographic Map,
7.5 -minute series,
Tarboro, dated 1981
A vtv.
arnec
foster
4 Palustrne Gaup I' Wheeler
neve ov. -
Date: 5/23/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler ass umes no
liability, direct or Indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
cem
r�
t
I 'IF
ti `�`\ r^° , — 4- ,ig„\', f1 ate` `%'` • ' f '.� Ri; j
15,
_ - � I'.-�•-` J � �� ate: ..-s�aF
y 7
C49M 3 def
r y.i
i
-`•
)OV
f f
e# •a f
97
`sc
',% p { -r%�� U`rt/,�� t `'"_—. �f�`�� .- 4•L�ra_�'g / %'r'.� + �-----''�� �--. yam' sA � '' r � /
cx t
20
a t1�
"Aff
Leggeft
17
i
/ I a osa l
-��, �---' ` , �- � -►� '� , tip`% , - •.� r�
FIS-- - \,-�
907 — -- ` f501 : �� /
2
Miles j — _ at Es6, QBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributormnqq'+� r, �'".r ��.' ` 2013��ational Geographic Society,+i-cubed
`h `
bra- I

Warren Northampton
Hertford
Halifax
Franklin Berne
Nash
Edgecombe
Martin
Wake
Wilson
Pitt
Johnston
ene
� Beaufort
Figure 5. USFWS National
Wetland Inventory Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
Approximate Project Boundary
USGS Flow Paths
National Wetland Inventory
L J Freshwater Emergent Wetland
0 Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Wetland
Freshwater Pond
41
Pall ustr ne Grou I'
p
Date: 5/23/2017
arnec
foster
wheeler
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.

Figure 6. Jurisdictional Waters
Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
APPROXIMATE PROJECT
BOUNDARY
EVALUATED WETLANDS (5-11-2017)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
(--183.6 Acres)
EVALUATED STREAMS (5-11-2017)
r JURISDICTIONAL STREAMS
(-22,054 Feet)
— EXISTING DITCHES (--25,056 Feet)
Waters of the U.S. Disclaimer: This
drawing represents the jurisdictional
waters boundary identified in the field by
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment &
Infrastructure. All jurisdictional boundaries
are subject to verification by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This
map should be used for preliminary
planning purposes only.
1
amee foster wheeler
Job No. 6250170127
FEATURE TYPE
Drawn BV:
WAR
Jurisdictional Wetland
Reviewed
BV: RH
Jurisdictional Wetland
Date:
05/15/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250170127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
AREA
FEATURE TYPE
ACREAGE/ UN EAR FEET
Wetland No. 1
Jurisdictional Wetland
12.65 Acres
Wetland No. 2
Jurisdictional Wetland
2.43 Acres
Wetland No. 3
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.01 Acres
Wetland No. 4
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.06 Acres
Wetland No. 5
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.34 Acres
Wetland No. 6
Jurisdictional Wetland
164.81 Acres
Wetland No. 7
Jurisdictional Wetland
3.17 Acres
Wetland No. 8
Jurisdictional Wetland
0.17 Acres
UT -A
Intermittent/ Perennial FPVV
6,761 Feet
UT- B
Perennial RPW
1,662 Feet
UT -C
Intermittent/ Perennial RAW
473 Feet
UT- D
Intermittent/ Perennial F;P/V
2,619 Feet
UT- E
Intermittent/ Perennial F;P/V
582 Feet
UT- F
Perennial FAN
787 Feet
UT -G
Perennial FFW
1,075 Feet
UT- H
Perennial FFW
642 Feet
UT- I
Intermittent/ Perennial RPW
477 Feet
UT -J
Perennial F;PVV
635 Feet
UT- K-1
Perennial 1`43UV
598 Feet
UT- K-2
Perennial RPW
151 Feet
White Oak Swamp
Perennial FPVV
2,294 Feet
Shift Creek
Perennial FFW
3,298 Feet
Total .irisdictional Wetland
—183.6 ac/ -22,054 LF
Ditch 1
830 Feet
Ditch 2
673 Feet
Ditch 3
700 Feet
Ditch 4
344 Feet
Ditch 5
1,186 Feet
Ditch 6
1,453 Feet
Ditch 7
512 Feet
Ditch 8
1,496 Feet
Ditch 9
300 Feet
Ditch 10
1,137 Feet
Ditch 11
94 Feet
Ditch 12
158 Feet
Ditch 13
261 Feet
Ditch 14
952 Feet
Ditch 15
2,379 Feet
Ditch 16
694 Feet
Ditch 17
598 Feet
Ditch 18
1,437 Feet
Ditch 19
742 Feet
Ditch 20
86 Feet
Ditch 21
870 Feet
Ditch 22
867 Feet
Ditch 23
511 Feet
Ditch 24
481 Feet
Ditch 25
789 Feet
Ditch 26
934 Feet
Ditch 27
768 Feet
Ditch 28
2,161 Feet
Ditch 29
247 Feet
Ditch 30
212 Feet
Ditch 31
454 Feet
Ditch 32
570 Feet
Ditch 33
160 Feet
Total Ditche
25,056 LF
Uplands
—409.4 Acres
Total Easement Acreage
—593 Acres
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N

v
v
z
V7 Tarboro
0 3.5 7
Miles 138 V
Figure 7. 100 -Year Floodplain
Map
Swift Creek - Permittee
Responsible Mitigation Plan
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
Approximate Project
Boundary
Roads
USGS Named Stream
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
- ZONE AE
FLOODWAY
0.2 PERCENT ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
AREA
amec
foster
Palustrne Group wheeler
ov.
Date: 5/23/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6250160127.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.

Sum MAKY OF HNUINbb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No LJ within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WA- Upland
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WA -36 Up
Investigator(s):
J. Witherspoon
Section, Township, Fbnge:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Flalief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-2
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Sail Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Sum MAKY OF HNUINbb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No LJ within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B13)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sadiment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WA -36 Up
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Rnus taeda
30 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 2
(A)
2.
Quercus rubra
20 Y
FACLJ
Total Number of Dominant
3.
EpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 6
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 33%
(Al B)
6.
50 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 25
20%of total cover:
10
OBI -species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGW species 0 x2= 0
1.
Quercus rubra
20 Y
FACU
FACspedes 45 x3= 135
2.
Sassafras albidum
15 Y
FACU
FACU sped es 60 x4= 240
3.
UPI -species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 375
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 3.6
35 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 17.5
20%of total cover:
7
9vub3ratum (Rot size: 15)
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Sassafras albidum
5 Y
FACU
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
5 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 2.5
20%of total cover:
1
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and Iessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
=Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
vitisrotundifolia
15 Y
FAC
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes ❑ No 0
5.
Present?
15 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 7.5
20%of total cover:
3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

ante -�ampung mint: vvH an
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Ffrmarks
0-4 10183/ 1 100 LS
4-10 10YR3/3 100
10-18 10YR4/4 100
LS
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils were not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WA -Wet
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WA -36 Wet
Investigator(s):
J. Witherspoon
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Flalief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-2
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Sail Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B13)
0 Surface Water (A1)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
0 Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
0 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): >4
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WA-36 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant pedes
1.
Acer rubrum
10 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
EpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100% (Al B)
6.
10 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
OBI-species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGW species 40 x2= 80
1.
Acer rubrum
30 Y
FAC
FACspedes 60 x3= 180
2.
FACUsped es 0 x4= 0
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 260 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.6
30 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 15
20%of total cover:
6
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Morella oerifera
20 Y
FAC
0 Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
20 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 10
20%of total cover:
4
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Arundinana gigantea
25 Y
FACW
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
Viburnum nudum
15 Y
FAON
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
40 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 20
20%of total cover:
8
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Texture
g
C�
Fg.
mini: vvH an vvet
Remarks
'Type C= Concentration, D=depletion, F3vl=Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fbduced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Fedox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
0
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fbd Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Fedox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
IeducedVertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
lestrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF HNUINbb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No LJ within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6 South
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WC - Upland
Project/9te:
Swift Creek -PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/27/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
Sate: NC
Sampling Point: WG18 Up
Investigator(s):
J. Witherspoon
Section, Township, Fbnge:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Fblief (concave, convex, none): concave
9ope (°/o): 0-2
Sibregion(L.WorMuzA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee silt loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFbmarks.)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Femarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Sum MAKY OF HNUINbb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No LJ within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sirface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave S dace (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Foots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sadiment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Foduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Pecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Fomarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water-Sained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Focorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Fomarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WC-18 Up
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover Species?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Fagusgrandifolia
15 Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FAGW, or FAG 3
(A)
2.
Quercusmichauxii
15 Y
FAON
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Caryaovata
10 Y
FACU
EpeciesAcrossAllarata: 7
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAGW, or FAG 43%
(Al B)
6.
40 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 20
20%of total cover:
8
OBI-species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGW species 15 x2= 30
1.
Fagusgrandifolia
15 Y
FACU
FACspedes 12 x3= 36
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Y
FAC
FACU sped es 45 x4= 180
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 72 (A) 246
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =RSA= 3.4
25 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 12.5
20%of total cover:
5
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Ligustrum sinense
2 Y
FAC
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
2 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 1
20% of total cover:
0.4
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Sassafras albidum
5 Y
FACU
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
5 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 2.5
20%of total cover:
1
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes ❑ No 0
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

. F;,.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture
0-4 10183/2 100 FS_
F1
F1.
4-14 10184/4 100
14-18 10185/4 100
r-omt: vvtr-its
Fbmarks
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils were not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Flegion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6 South
S;condarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WC - Wet
Project/9te:
Swift Creek -PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/27/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
Sate: NC
Sampling Point: WG18 Wet
Investigator(s):
J. Witherspoon
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Fblief (concave, convex, none): concave
9ope (°/o): 0-2
Sibregion(L.WorMuzA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee silt loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFbmarks.)
Presence of Foduced Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Femarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn ste map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
S;condarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B13)
0 Sirface Water (A1)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave S dace (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
0 Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Foots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Foduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Pecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Fomarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
0 Water-Sained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): >6
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Focorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Fomarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WG18 Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant pedes
1.
Acer rubrum
30 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 4 (A)
2.
Betula nigra
25 Y
FAGUV
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100% (Al B)
6.
55 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 27.5
20%of total cover:
11
OBI -species 0 x 1 = 0
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 25 x2= 50
1.
Garpinus caroliniana
25 Y
FAC
FACspedes 65 x3= 195
2.
Ilex opaca
10 Y
FAC
FACU sped es 0 x4= 0
3.
UPI -species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 245 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.7
35 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 17.5
20%of total cover:
7
9vub3ratum (Rot size: 15)
D Dominance Test is> 50%
1.
D Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
=Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture
0-3 10182/ 1 100 F3
3-9 10YR3/ 1 100 Fg
mint: vvtr-its vvet
Fbmarks
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Redmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
0
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches) I Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks
Hydric soils present. Unable to retrieve beyond 9 inches due to saturated conditions.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINAMON DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6 West
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMA- upland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek- PFURan
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/25/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMA Up
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) sideslope
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): none
Sope (°/o): 0-3
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
SDil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Feduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VhUhIAI IUN (Five Urata) -use saentltic namesot plants
10 =Total Cover
Absolute Dominant
50%of total cover: 5
Tree3ratum (Rot size: 30)
%Cover SIDecies?
1.
briodendron tulipifera
60 Y
2.
Fbbinia pseudoacacia
10
3.
5
3.
4.
10 Y
4.
5.
5
5.
6.
5
6.
70 =Total Cover
OBI -species; 0
50%of total cover:
35 20% of total cover: _
Sapling Sratum (Rot size: 30 )
9.
1.
Ibbinia pseudoacacia
25 Y
2.
75
11.
3.
x4=
500
4.
40 =Total Cover
x5=
5.
20% of total cover:
Column Totals: 165 (A)
6.
_
1.
Lonicerajaponica
20 Y
25 =Total Cover
50%of total cover:
12.5 20% of total cover:
9vub Sratum (Rot size: 15 )
_
Satus
FACU
UPI -
FACU
1. fbsa multiflora 10 Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
FAC
FACU
FAC
FAON
FACU
FACU
Point: WMA
Number of Dominant c�pecies
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG
10 =Total Cover
(A)
50%of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: _
Herb Sratum (Rot size: 5 )
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata:
1.
Microstegium vimineum
15 Y
2.
Parthenodssusquinquefolia
5
3.
Athyrium asplenioides
10 Y
4.
Boehmena cylindrica
5
5.
Fblystichum acrostichoides
5
6.
7.
OBI -species; 0
xl =
8.
FAGW species 5
9.
10
10.
x3=
75
11.
FACU sped es 125
x4=
500
40 =Total Cover
x5=
50%of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
Column Totals: 165 (A)
Woody Vine Sratur (Rot size: 30 )
_
1.
Lonicerajaponica
20 Y
2.
3.
4.
5.
20 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 10
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation isnot present.
FAC
FACU
FAC
FAON
FACU
FACU
Point: WMA
Number of Dominant c�pecies
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG
0
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata:
5
(B)
Percent of Dominant Spedes
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG
0%
(Al B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
OBI -species; 0
xl =
0
FAGW species 5
x2=
10
FACspecies 25
x3=
75
FACU sped es 125
x4=
500
UPI -species 10
x5=
50
Column Totals: 165 (A)
635
(B)
Prevalence Index =B/A=
3.8
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
❑ Dominance Test is>50%
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, exduding woody vines, approximately
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, inducing
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
Woodyvine - All woodyvines, regardlessof height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes ❑ No 0
Present?
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture
0-16 10184/ 2 100 L
16-18+ 10YR6/2 100 S
r-omt: vvnnH
Fbmarks
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Redmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(55)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils are not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Flegion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINAMON DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 6 West
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMAwetland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek- PFURan
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/25/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMA Wet
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Presence of Feduced Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Feduced Iron (CA)
D
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Flamarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMA Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 7
(A)
2.
Acer rubrum
30 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Liriodendrontulipifera
15
FACU
ElpeciesAcrossAll4rata: 7
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100%
(Al B)
6.
65 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 32.5
20%of total cover:
13
OBI -species 45 x 1 = 45
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
Acer rubrum
10 Y
FAC
FACspedes 130 x3= 390
2.
FACU sped es 20 x4= 80
3.
UPI -species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 195 (A) 515
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.6
10 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Ligustrum japonicum
5 Y
FAC
0 Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
5 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Microstegium vimineum
50 Y
FAC
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
Woodwardia virginica
40 Y
OBL
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Fbltandra virginica
5
OBL
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Fbrthenocissusquinquefolia
5
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and Iessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
100 =Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 50
20%of total cover:
20
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
Vtisrotundifolia
10 Y
FAC
2.
Snilax bona-nox
5
FAC
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
15 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 7.5
20%of total cover:
3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Texture
Muck
sit
Sand
Sand
rami: vvnnH vvet
Remarks
'Type C= Concentration, D=depletion, F3vl=Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fbduced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
0
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fed Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Fedox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
IeducedVertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fedox (56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Festrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 3
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMC- upland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMCUp
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) sideslope
Local Flalief (concave, convex, none): none
Sope (°/o): 0-3
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
SDil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (03)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
SecondarV
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sadiment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (03)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMCUp
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Acer rubrum
10
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 4
(A)
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
70 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 6
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 67%
(Al B)
6.
80 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 40
20%of total cover:
16
OBI-species 0 x 1 = 0
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
FACLJ
FACspedes 150 x3= 450
2.
FACU sped es 70 x4= 280
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 220 (A) 730
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 3.3
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Ligustrum japonicum
10 Y
FAC
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
10 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40 Y
FAC
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
Parthenodssusquinquefolia
40 Y
FACU
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Wlystichum acrostichoides
10
FAC1J
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
90 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 45
20%of total cover:
18
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20 Y
FACU
2.
91nilax bona-nox
5
FAC
3.
Vtisrotundifolia
15 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes El No ❑
5.
Present?
40 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20
20%of total cover:
8
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture
0-3 10183/3 100 91ty loam
3-18+ 10yr 3/6 100 Loam
r-nmt: vvnnu
Remarks
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Redmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fed Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fedox (56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Festrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils are not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Flegion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 3
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMGwetland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgecombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMCWet
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Fladucion in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Femarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMCWet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Qirya cordiformis
10 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 7
(A)
2.
Acer rubrum
10 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 7
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100%
(Al B)
6.
20 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 10
20%of total cover:
4
OBI-species 15 x 1 = 15
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
Liquidambarstyradflua
5 Y
FAC
FACspedes 45 x3= 135
2.
Acer rubrum
5 Y
FAC
FACU sped es 0 x4= 0
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 150
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.5
10 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Ligustrum japonicum
5 Y
FAC
0 Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
5 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Y
FAC
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
dincuseffusus
15 Y
OBL
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
25 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 12.5
20%of total cover:
5
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

ante
`Location: FL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
-�ampung mint: vwwuvvet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
❑
Depth
Matrix
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
Fbdox Features
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist)
% Type' Loe
Texture Ffrmarks
0-4
10183/ 1
100
❑
Slit
4-10
10YR4/1
60 10YR512
40 C M
Loam
10-18+
10YR5/2
80 10YP4/2
20 C M
Loam
'Type C = Concent rat ion, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: FL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
LoamyGleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
0
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
P--dox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GeyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 2
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMD- upland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgeoombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
PalustrineGroup, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMDUp
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) terrace
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): none
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
SDil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of (educed Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMD Up
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
%Cover Species?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Acer rubrum
20
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 3
(A)
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
70 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 3
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100%
(Al B)
6.
90 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 45
20%of total cover:
18
OBI-species 0 x 1 = 0
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
FACspedes 150 x3= 450
2.
FACU sped es 25 x4= 100
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 175 (A) 550
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 3.1
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Fbrthenocissusquinquefolia
5
FACU
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
Folyshchum acrostichoides
20
FACU
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Microstegium vimineum
40 Y
FAC
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
65 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 32.5
20%of total cover:
13
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: 30 )
1.
3rrilax bona-nox
5
FAC
2.
Utisrotundifolia
15 Y
FAC
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes El No ❑
5.
Present?
20 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 10
20%of total cover:
4
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture
0-3 10183/ 3 100 Loam
3-18+ 10YR3/6 100 Loam
r-nmt: vvnnu
Fbmarks
'Type C=Concentration, D=depletion, FM =Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: R_= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fid Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Iedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
❑
Sandy Fbdox(56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F1 9) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Fbstrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils are not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Flegion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 2
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMDwetland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgeoombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
Palustrine Group, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Pbint: WMD Wet
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe slope
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Presence of (educed Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of (educed Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Flamarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMD Wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Plot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
C3rya cordiformis
10 Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 7
(A)
2.
Acer rubrum
15 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 7
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 100%
(Al B)
6.
25 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 12.5
20%of total cover:
5
OBI-species 10 x 1 = 10
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
Liquidambarstyradflua
3 Y
FAC
FACspedes 53 x3= 159
2.
Acer rubrum
5 Y
FAC
FACU sped es 0 x4= 0
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 63 (A) 169
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.7
8 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 4
20%of total cover:
1.6
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Ligustrum japonicum
5 Y
FAC
0 Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
5 =Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Microstegium vimineum
15 Y
FAC
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
dincuseffusus
10 Y
OBL
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
25 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 12.5
20%of total cover:
5
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

. F;,.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Fbdox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe
0-4 10183/2 100 _
4-12 10184/2 50 10185/2 30 C M
10183/6
20
C
M
12-18+ 10185/2 50 10YR4/2
30
C
M
10YR3/6
20
C
M
r-nmt: vvnnuvvei
Texture Remarks
sit
Loam Trace Sand
Loam Trace Sand
'Type C = Con cent rat i on, D=depletion, FM = Fled uced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: FL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Pblyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 crn Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fled uced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
LoamyGleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
0
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Shils(F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fed Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GeyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fedox (56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Festrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Flegion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 1
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMF- upland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgeoombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
PalustrineGroup, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMFUp
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Range:
❑
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) terrace
Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke loam
NWI Classification:
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
❑
Are Vegetation ❑
SDil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sadiment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Feduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
D
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology criteria was not present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMFUp
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Acer rubrum
5
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 4
(A)
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Ilex opaca
10
FAC
EpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 7
(B)
4.
Ffnustaeda
15
FAC
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
IYunus serotina
30 Y
FACU
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 57%
(Al B)
6.
80 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 40
20%of total cover:
16
OBI-species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGW species 0 x2= 0
1.
Runus serotina
5 Y
FACU
FACspedes 90 x3= 270
2.
Quercus alba
5 Y
FACU
FACU sped es 60 x4= 240
3.
Acer rubrum
5 Y
FAC
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 150 (A) 510
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 3.4
15 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover: 7.5
20%of total cover:
3
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
❑ Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Fbrthenocissusquinquefolia
20
FACU
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
30 Y
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
50 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 25
20%of total cover:
10
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: 30 )
1.
9nilaxbona-nox
5 Y
FAC
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes El No ❑
5.
Present?
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2.5
20%of total cover:
1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Texture
Loam
Loam
Loam
rami: vvnnr
Remarks
'Type C= Concentration, D=depletion, F3vl=Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Sarfaoe (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fbduced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fed Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Fedox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
IeducedVertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fedox (56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Festrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils are not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
WERMID DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atianticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region Wetland 1
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Wetland WMFwetland side
Project/Ste:
&viftCreek - PRA Ran
Cty/County: Leggett/Edgeoombe
Sampling Date: 4/26/2017
Applicant/ Owner:
PalustrineGroup, LLC
State: NC
Sampling Point: WMFWet
Investigator(s):
L Meyer/M. Martin
Section, Township, Fbnge:
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) bottomland
Local Felief (concave, convex, none): concave
Sope (°/o): 0-1
Subregion (L.WorMuRA)
P
Lat: Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
Fbanoke Loam
NWI Classification:
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
Are climatict hydrologic conditions on thesitetypical for thistimeof year?1E Yes ❑ No (If no, explain inFemarks.)
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
Are Vegetation ❑
93il ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Orcumstances" present? 0 Yes
❑ No
Are Vegetation ❑
Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
Sum MAKY OF FiNUINUb- Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations; transects, important teatureA etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
■ a �.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
q3arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRRU)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Fbots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of reduced Iron (CA)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Fladucion in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
❑ Algal Mat or Gust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Femarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
FAGNeutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Ephangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Saturation Present?Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): <1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No E-1
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Fecorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Flamarks: Wetland hydrology criteria present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain Region -Version 2.0

VtbtlAI IUN (Five Urata) -use suentltic namesot plants
Sampling Point: WMFWet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree 3ratum (Rot size: 30)
%Cover qDecies?
3atus
Number of Dominant c�pecies
1.
Carya cordiformis
5
FAC
That Are OBL, FAON, or FAG 4
(A)
2.
Acer rubrum
85 Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
ElpeciesAcrossAll Grata: 5
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spedes
5.
That Are OBI, FAON, or FAG 80%
(Al B)
6.
90 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 45
20%of total cover:
18
OBI-species 40 x 1 = 40
3apling3ratum (Rot size: 30)
FAGWspecies 0 x2= 0
1.
FACspedes 90 x3= 270
2.
FACUsped es 1 x4= 4
3.
UPI-species 0 x5= 0
4.
Column Totals: 131 (A) 314
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =6/A= 2.4
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
9vub3ratum (Rotsze: 15)
D Dominance Test is>50%
1.
Y
0 Prevalence Index is - Ja'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicatorsof hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Herb 3ratum (Rot size: 5)
Tree- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately
1.
Fbrthenocissusquinquefolia
1
FACU
20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
2.
dincuseffusus
10 Y
OBL
diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Qrexlurida
10 Y
OBL
Sapling - Woody plant s,exdudingwoody vines,
4.
Woodwardia areolata
20 Y
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and lessthan 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardlessof size. Indudeswoody
10.
plants, except woody vines, lessthan approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
41 =Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
50%of total cover: 20.5
20%of total cover:
8.2
Woody Vine 3ratur (Rot size: )
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
5.
Present?
=Total Cover
50%of total cover:
20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present.
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Rain (tion - Version 2.0

Texture
Loam
Loam
Loam
rami: vvnnrvvei
Remarks
'Type C= Concentration, D=depletion, F3vl=Fbduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
`Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydric SNO:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR$T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRO)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRRSj U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRRS)
❑
Black Histic(A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LW O)
❑
Fbduced Vert ic(F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain Soils(F19) (LRRP,Sj)
❑
a ratified Layers (A5)
0
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRRP,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Fed Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRRU)
❑
Fedox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRRP,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRRU)
❑
Other (Explain in Fbmarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F1 1) (M LRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRRO,P,T)
31ndicatorsof hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Fedox (A16) (M URA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRRP,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRRO,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy GleyedMatrix (Sl)
❑
IeducedVertic(F18)(MLRA150A,1508)
❑
Sandy Fedox (56)
❑
Piedmont Roodplain SDils (F19) (M LRA 149A)
❑
Sripped Matrix (95)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRRP,Sj U)
Festrictive Layer (if observed)
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric soils present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑
USArmy Corps of Engineers Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Rain (tion -Version 2.0

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 3, 2017
ROY COOPER
Gl"In<
MICHAEL S. REGAN
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Uir"101.
Palustrine Group, LLC DWR Project #16-1271
Attn: Mr. Norton Webster Edgecombe County
P 0 Box 603
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules and
Water Quality Standards (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Wilson Farm Mitigation Site (aka Swift Creek)
Address/Location: 9117 NC 33, Leggett
Stream(s) Evaluated: UTs to Swift Creek
Determination Date: February 6, 2017 Staff: Jennifer Burdette/Mac Haupt
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 026 .0233)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination
® Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 026 .0259)
(where local buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 0213 .0250)
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Palustrine Group, LLC
Tar -Pamlico Buffer/Stream Determination
DWR Project #16-1271
Page 2 of 4
Feature ID'
Feature Type
Not
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
Subject
Survey
Topo
Feature 1
Ditch
Not
Property
Confluence
Depicted
Boundary
w/UT 2
UT 2
Intermittent
X
Flag 2 Start
Confluence
X
Stream
with UT 17
UT 3
Intermittent
X
Flag 3 Start
Confluence
X
X
Stream
with UT 17
Feature 4
Ditch
Not
Farm Road
Confluence
Depicted
with UT 3
Feature 5
Ditch
Not
Property
Confluence
Depicted
Boundary/NC
with UT 2
33
Feature 6
Ditch
Not
Farm Road
Confluence
Depicted
with UT 2
Feature 7
Ditch
Not
See Map
Confluence
Depicted
with Feature
21
Feature 11
Ditch
Not
See Map
Start Feature
Depicted
12
Feature 12
Ditch
Not
Stop Feature
Confluence
Depicted
11
with UT 14
UT 14
Intermittent
X
Throughout
X
X
Stream
UT 15
Intermittent
X
Flag 15 Start
Wetland
X
Stream
UT 17
Wetland
X
Throughout Evaluated Area
X
X
UT 19
Intermittent
Not
Culvert under
Flag 19 Stop
Stream
Depicted
NC 33
Feature 20
Ditch
Not
Property
Confluence
Depicted
Boundary/NC
with 22
33
Feature 21
Ditch
Not
Farm Road
Confluence
Depicted
with UT 15
Feature 22
Ditch
Not
See Map
Confluence
Depicted
with Feature
21
Feature 23
Ditch
Not
Property
Confluence
Depicted
Boundary
with UT 2
Feature 24
Ditch
Not
See Map
Confluence
Depicted
with Feature
1
UT 25
Wetland
Not
See Map
Confluence
Depicted
with 17
Numbers 8, 9, 10, 13, 16 and 18 were not used.
Stream type applies only to the section of stream below start point. Streams were not evaluated to
determine whether the stream type changes prior to their confluence with another stream channel.
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the feature(s) listed above and included on
the attached site maps initialed by Jennifer Burdette on May 3, 2017 are located on the most

Palustrine Group, LLC
Tar -Pamlico Buffer/Stream Determination
DWR Project #16-1271
Page 3 of 4
recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, North Carolina and/or the most recent
copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for applicability to the Tar -
Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rule. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to
not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams that are checked "Subject"
have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least
intermittent streams. There may be other streams or features located on the property that do
not appear on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the
US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter
to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 61 7
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.):
clo Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not
approve any activity within the buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401
Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the Clean Water
Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jennifer Burdette
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: USGS Topographic Map, Edgecombe County Soil Survey Map and Wilson
Farm Stream, Buffer and Nutrient Calls Aerial

Palustrine Group, LLC
Tar -Pamlico Buffer/Stream Determination
DWR Project #16-1271
Page 4 of 4
cc: Franklin Wilson, P 0 Box 1359, Wilkesboro, NC 28697
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
RRO DWR file
Filename: 161271WilsonFarmMitigationSite(Edgecombe)_TAR _StreamDet.docx

_.
fes'meow
CCX Mitigation >i
USGS Quad
-� Cem 8
#
,..�" 40 n
Aw�t
f. t
1�
Ak
e� ys
lo—
/r-
Notes:
Tar -Pam
Edgecombe County, North Carolina e Wilson Parcel
0 570 1,140 Feet
WP��Iustnne

- _ No
CCX Mitigation
Edgecombe County Soil Survey fi
GoA=�
;3
a
,, R
N
F
° -.
�Y.
-
5�.::. R° AaA
y_
A Q^
VV rl� 4� %� ... � �
} ;3 CeB� r y
.Y y-..., ` f4a R.1 TE
aA _ w TaB -'
•� `
TaB PaP . St
..,
-W AaA
> Ce
A
c TaB
_.aka .a }p
A a
� T aaaaTa
Et
T.
TaB
�
g D A
.. _ TaB
ti.— ►.. W kB%
s'
v
- TaB 5th_`
c
i
A
H
� CeB
TaB
r� F.-
„'
M :
Y4 .a
— —
Tar -Pam Notes: J
6
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
0 580 1,160 Feet Pa strine Group

Wilson Farm Stream, Buffer, and Nutrient Calls
x
Proposed Channel
Connection
2-Y
x
Al
14
Ali
j
Swift Creek
It Mitigation Site =Wlson Parcel
Edgecombe County, North Carolina Channels
0 600 1,200 Feet
Notes:
,c; AA� 2/4, /,7
fustrine Group -7
- 6-#6 5/S//