20170938 Ver 1_CSX_DWR_Buffer Auth Form_07-28-17_Package_20170731

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project: Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal and Second Mainline
Improvements
1 b. County: Edgecombe and Nash
1c. Nearest municipality: Rocky Mount
1 d. Subdivision name: N/A
1 e. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?
If yes, answer 1f below.
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed:
2b. Deed Book and Page No.
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the
recorded map that indicates
when the lot was created):
2d. Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc., and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Attn: Matthew L. Adkins
2e. Street address:
351 Thornton Road, Suite 125
2f. City, state, zip:
Lithia Springs, GA 30122
2g. Telephone no.:
770-819-2849
2h. Fax no.:
2i. Email address:
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b. Name:
3c. Business name CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc., and CSX Transportation, Inc.
if applicable):
3d. Street address: 351 Thornton Road, Suite 125
3e. City, state, zip: Lithia Springs, GA 30122
3f. Telephone no.: 770-819-2849
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Richard Harmon
4b. Business name
if applicable):
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
4c. Street address:
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
4d. City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27703
4e. Telephone no.:
919-381-1366
4f. Fax no.:
919-381-9901
4g. Email address:
[e-mail]
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 7

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
386371624400
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.018182 Longitude: -77.761737
1c. Property size:
829 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Compass Creek, Hornbeam Branch, Beech
Branch, Swift Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C; NSW, Class C; NSW, Class B; NSW,
Class C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar -Pamlico
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 7

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The Rocky Mount site is approximately 829 acres and is located along the boundary line between Edgecombe
and Nash Counties and wholly within Edgecombe County north of the city of Rocky Mount, northeast of the
intersection of US -64 and 1-95. The site primarily consists of agricultural land with residential and commercial
buildings and woodlands dispersed throughout. College Road, a NCDOT secondary road, bisects the site in the
southern portion of the site. Beech Branch, unnamed tributaries and associated wetlands,
agricultural/recreational ponds, and agricultural ditches are also present within the site. Two cemeteries and a
telecommunications tower are present on the site.
3b. Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location
of the site.
The CCX Intermodal Site On -Site Determination Letter (dated December 7, 2016) and the CSX On -Site
Determination Letter (Dated May 31, 2017) include the USGS topographic maps indicating the location of the
project site.
3c. Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site.
The CCX Intermodal Site On -Site Determination Letter (dated December 7, 2016) and the CSX On -Site
Determination Letter (Dated May 31, 2017) include the published County NRCS Soil Survey Maps indicating
the location of the project site.
3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
10,417.5
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Proposed Action is comprised of two components representing two different types of railroad
infrastructure: the Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal; and the Rocky Mount to Bricks Second
Mainline reconstruction.
3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Proposed Action is comprised of two components representing two different types of railroad
infrastructure: the Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal; and the Second Mainline Improvements. The
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal component is subdivided into two elements; the intermodal
terminal facility and the associated lead tracks that will connect the terminal to the Second Mainline
Improvements. The Second Mainline Improvements consists of the reconstruction of former second mainline
track from Milepost A117.5 (southern Milepost) to A104.9 (northern Milepost). Initially, the phase 1 facility
infrastructure will consist of operational facilities, chassis parking, seven yard (storage) tracks, and eight
processing (loading/unloading) tracks with gantry cranes, with a phase 2 potential to expand to 13 total yard
tracks and possible processing track length extensions. The Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal will
consist of two lead tracks north and south of the facility diverging off the mainline service route into the
intermodal rail terminal. The lead tracks will extend 1.2 miles to the north and 2.3 miles to the south. CSXT
plans to restore double track to the mainline service route between Milepost A117.5 to A104.9, within an
approximately 158 acre corridor. Two phases of construction will occur in this phase of the project. Typical
construction equipment that may be used includes bulldozers, wheeled and tracked excavators, and
dump trucks.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 7

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
Comments: A request for Verification of
property/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) was
submitted, on behalf of CSX, to the USACE
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office for the
delineated wetland areas within the CCX
section of the site. The USACE Action ID is
SAW -2016-02338. The USACE JD review
was conducted on October 19 and December
8, 2016, by the USACE and on October 19,
2016 and 27, 2016. The Preliminary JD and
Approved JD have not been issued for the
project site to date.
4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/ Consultant Company: Amec Foster
Name (if known): Amec Foster Wheeler
Wheeler
Other:
4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach
documentation.
The USACE JD review was conducted on October 19 and December 8, 2016, by the USACE and on October
19, 2016 and 27, 2016. The Preliminary JD and Approved JD have not been issued for the project site to date.
USACE Action ID SAW -2016-02338.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
for this project(including all prior phases in the past?
5b. If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
The USACE Action ID SAW -2016-02338 was issued for the project. The Preliminary JD and Approved
JD have not been issued for the project site to date. No permits or certifications have been requested or
obtained for the project.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The phase 1 facility infrastructure will consist of operational facilities, chassis parking, seven yard
(storage) tracks, and eight processing (loading/unloading) tracks with gantry cranes, with a phase 2
potential to expand to 13 total yard tracks and possible processing track length extensions.
The Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal will consist of two lead tracks north and south of the
facility diverging off the mainline service route into the intermodal rail terminal. The lead tracks will
extend 1.2 miles to the north and 2.3 miles to the south. The Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail
Terminal will consist of two lead tracks north and south of the facility diverging off the mainline service
route into the intermodal rail terminal. The lead tracks will extend 1.2 miles to the north and 2.3 miles to
the south. CSXT plans to restore double track to the mainline service route between Milepost A117.5 to
A104.9, within an approximately 158 acre corridor.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 7

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
1a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ® Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact
Reason for
Type of impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
impact
(exempt, allowable,
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P)
allowable w/
required?
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
or Temporary
mitigation)
T
B1A ®P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable
S4
❑ Yes ® No
8,712
3,920
B1 B ®P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable with
S6
® Yes ❑ No
34,412
14,375
Mitigation
131C ® P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable
S6
❑ Yes ® No
6,098
3,920
B2 ® P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
SC/S8
® Yes ❑ No
9,583
7,405
Mitigation
B3 ® P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
SB
® Yes ❑ No
16,989
10,891
Mitigation
B4 ® P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
SD
® Yes ❑ No
69,260
47,480
Mitigation
B5 ® P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
SE
® Yes ❑ No
127,195
83,635
Mitigation
B6 ®P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
POND2
® Yes ❑ No
45,302
33,106
Mitigation
B7 ®P ❑ T
Rail terminal
Allowable with
SG
® Yes ❑ No
66,647
44,867
Mitigation
B8 ®P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable with
S12/SI
® Yes ❑ No
46,174
31,799
Mitigation
B9 ®P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable
S13
❑ Yes ® No
7,405
4,356
B10 ® P ❑ T
crossing
Allowable with
S14
® Yes ❑ No
35,284
18,295
Mitigation
B11 ®P ❑ T
crossing
Exempt
S17
❑ Yes ® No
1,743
1,743
Total buffer impacts
474,803
305,791
1c. Comments: Riparian Buffer Impact Sheets 1 through 6 (attached herein) show the proposed buffer impact
areas (Zones 1 and 2) within the project site.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 5 of 7

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance
and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
Impacts to waters of the US will be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. An extensive Alternative
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
Analysis study was conducted on twelve potential sites for the intermodal facility to determine the least
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
environmentall damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA). Five design altermatives were evaluated for the
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
preferred altermative. The final design avoids impacts to environmentally sensitive areas inlcuding minimizing
impacts to wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers for the intermodal terminal facility and the maximum
extents possible.
The second mainline restoration will occur on existing road bed for the previous double track within the
existing right of way. Current CSX standards for rail infrastructure constructs adjacent 15 -ft track centers.
Fourteen -foot track centers will be used in wetland, stream, and buffer areas to minimize impacts to these
resources.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques. Impacts will be minimized by following best management practices, erosion/sedimentation
control plan requirements, NPDES permit compliance, etc. Areas used for temporary construction will be
returned to re -construction conditions.
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
® Yes ❑ No
requires buffer mitigation?
2b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet
(square feet
Zone 1
Rail terminal and/or railroad crossing
450,846
3 (2 for Catawba)
1,352,538
impacts
Zone 2
Rail terminal and/or railroad crossing
291,853
1.5
437,780
impacts
Total buffer mitigation required:
1,790,318
2c.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC DMS
❑ Yes ® No
proposed?
2d.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC DMS.
2e.
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
The proposed Swift Creek — Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Project) located near
Leggett in Ed ecombe County will provide the required buffer mitigation credits.
2f.
Comments: See Appendix G of the Carolina Connector Rail and Second Mainline Improvements
Environmental Report for details on the PRMP project.
E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 6 of 7

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public federal/state land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
® Yes ❑ No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ® No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent by
First Class Mail via the US Postal Service:
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail via
the US Postal Service
For government transportation projects sent by
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by delivery service
(UPS, FedEx, etc.):
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch OR NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 7 of 7

Diffuse Flow Plan
Where ponds abut and discharge to riparian buffers, ponds are equipped with level spreaders
that release water from the first flush (1 inch rainfall event) from the pond in a period of two to
five days. Wet Detention Ponds level spreaders include Ponds 1, 4, 5 and 6. The level
spreaders are sized to go above and beyond the minimum requirement of 10 feet of width for
every cfs. High flow bypasses are included to safely control and direct high flows from the
ponds and release them in ways that are not harmful to the adjacent land and minimize
buffer/wetland disturbance. In most cases, this means that high flows are release from the
pond's riser either directly to the new stormwater piping for the project or to riprap protected
areas at the ends of site culverts. This helps to minimize overall impacts to wetlands, streams,
and provides a stabile point of discharge.

a�
i.L
a�
O �
SwF_
�12Q
(1)F_o
Z
w
Y �
a_W
O J
3 LSI
J
a
r
N
>_F_
=Z
IL w
F O
<) a
Q Z
Ow
U p
W
zw
J
LdZ
cn w
O J
U W
U W
w m
7
o=
o_
Z
o \1\
1
7"�
LEV. ='! 0'8.3
0.9888 Acre
5.2297 Acre
PW 2" �
.=`I Z4.
'POND 6
6
-TOP OF DAM 121.0
-NORMAL POOL = 117.0
100 -YR W.S.E. = 120.5±
o
-LEVEL SPREADER ELEV. = 116.0
e _o
co
° o o-
11
1.2672 Acre
0.1951 Acre
LEV. =123.
ELEV. =126.
LEV. = 124.2
'kin
��i\ ��
LEV.=126.2' '
4 � ELEV. =126.1
j
----------------------------------------------------------- ---- DESIGNED BY
__________ CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS
J. GOLLINGS ' INC.
-- ------ -- -- — ---- Information confidential
TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
all plans. drawings. spec- DRAWN BY
— — — — ifications. and/or infor- R. ARNER
rtan furnished herewith JACKSONVILLE, F L O R D A
— — ---- -- — --
shall remain the property
-- ------ ------ — — — ------ ---- of the CSX Intermodal CHECKED BY
and shall be held con- G. MONTOYA
-- ------ ------ — — -- — ----- — — — — f i dent i a l ; and sha l I not be
used for any purpose not APPROVED BY
-- ------ ---- — -- — — provided for in agreements .�=AFWM
-- — — ---- M. CANAS
— — — — with the CSX Intermodal.
-- ----------------------------------------------------- DATE IN
WA
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY clla APP APRIL 6, 2017 00 00
OND 5
. = "I Zj.
ELEV. 122.
POND 5
-TOP OF DAM = 119.0
G
-NORMAL POOL = 113.0
-100-YR W.S.E. = 117.5±
-LEVEL SPREADER ELEV. = 112
CP
POND 4
D
POND 4
-TOP OF DAM =100.0
-NORMAL POOL = 93.0
-100-YR W.S.E. = 96.5±
-LEVEL SPREADER ELEV. = 91.0
Rin1w!119
500' 0 500' 1000'
LEGEND 22"x34" SHEET
DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY GRAPHIC SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 500' 2
1000' 0 1000' 2000'
11"x17" SHEET
GRAPHIC SCALE: HORIZ. 1" = 1000'
CAROLINA CONNECTOR INTERMODAL CONTRACT NO.
J L X C X 10 2
RAL TERMINAL (CCX) DRAWING NO.
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
POST DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW REVISION SHEET N0.
F
CALE
_AS_SHOWN_

LEVEL SPREADER - FILTER STRIP (LS -FS)
THE DRAINAGE AREA
Drainage area number
Total coastal wetlands area (sq ft)
Total surface water area (sq ft) I
Total drainage area (sq ft)
BUA associated with existing development (sq ft)
Proposed new BUA (sq ft)
Percent BUA of drainage area
COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STORMWATER PROGRAM
Stormwater program(s) that apply (please specify):
Tar -Pamlico Rules, City of Rocky Mount
From Pond 1
sf
sf
1563804 sf
sf —
580768 sf
37
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX)
1
Break down of BUA in the drainage area (both new and existing):
-Parking/ driveway (sq ft)
Sidewalk (sq ft)
Roof(sq ft)
Roadway (sq ft)
- Other, please spi
otal BUA (sq ft)
In the comment box below (sq ft)
Design rainfall depth (in)
Minimum volume required (cu ft)
Design volume of SCM (cu ft)
#1 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build -out?
_ - ----_.—_.
Yes
#7 If applicable, with the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
#2 Is the SCM located on or near contaminated soils?
No
#8 Does the mainetenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
#3 What are the side slopes of the SCM (H:V)?
3:1
#9 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
#3 Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered side slopes?
No
#10 If the SCM is on a single family lot, does the plat comply with General MDC (10)?
#4 Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion (10 -year storm)?
Yes
_
#11 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
#5 Is there a a bypass for flows in excess of the design flow?
Yes
#12 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
#6 What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
Pump (preferred)
#13 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensed professional?
LS -FS MDC FROM 02H .1059
#1 Length of level spreader (feet)
20 ft
#7 Height of the drop from the level spreader to the transition zone (inches)
#2 LS -FS receives flow from
Another SCM
#7 Width of the transition zone (inches)
#2_ Flow rate to LS -FS during design storm (cfs)
_ _ 1 cis#7
Protection for the transition zone
#2 Is a bypass device provided?
Yes
#8 Width of the filter strip (feet)
#2 If yes, describe the bypass device:
#9 Is the filter strip free of draws and channels?
Pond Riser
#9 Has this been verified in the field?
3 Is this LS -FS designed to receive flow from the drainage area during the 10-y
Has a blind swale been provided?
Does the blind swale provide for uniform overtopping of the level spreader?
5 What material will be used for the level spreader?
5 Will the construction tolerance be < 0.25 inch along the level spreader length'
6 Will the level spreader be straight or convex in plan view?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about this LS -FS that
This is for Pond 1
storm?
Yes #10 Slope of the filter strip (%)
Yes #10 Is this slope uniform across the entire filler strip?
Yes #10 Will the first 12" of soil be adjusted if needed to promote plant growth?
concrete #10 Will the filter strip and side slopes be planted with non -clumping, deep-rooted sod?
Yes #10 Species of sod that will be used
Yes #10 Will soil be temporarily stabilized until permanent vegetation is established?
think is relevant to the review:
234283 sf
3411 of
343074 at
580768 sf
1.0 in
3161 cf
398021 cf
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1.0 in
12.0 in
Aggregate
30 It
Yes
Yes
2%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Fescue
Yes
LS -FS 8 1:40 PM 7/20/2017

LEVEL SPREADER - FILTER STRIP (LS -FS)
;THE DRAINAGE AREA
Drainage area number
Notal coastal wetlands area (sq ft)
(Total surface water area (sq ft)
Total drainage area (sq ft) -- - _
BUA associated with existing development (sq ft)
Proposed new BUA (sq ft)
Percent BOA of drainage area - --"—
COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STORMWATER PROGRAM
lStormwater program(s) that apply (please specify):
1 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces al buildout?
2 Is the SCM located on or near contaminated soils?
3 What are the side slopes of the SCM (H:V)?
3 Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered side slopes?
Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion (10 -year storm)?
5 Is there a a bypass for flows in excess of the design flow?
What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
LS -FS receives flow from
Flow rate to LS -FS during design storm
Is a bypass device provided?
If yes, describe the bypass device:
Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX)
2
From Pond 4 Break down of BUA in the drainage area (both new and existing):
---- _._—�_.
sf -Parking /driveway (sq ft) - -- - � 772234 sf -
sf - Sidewalk (sq ft) 16050 sf
2999106 sf - Roof (sq ft) - 37787 sf
sf -Roadway (sq ft) - -
2324018 sf - Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft) 1497947 sf
78% Total BUA (sq ft) -- ------------ _ 2324018 sf
7.Design rainfall depth 'n) -- 1.0 in
Minimum volume required (cu ft) I 1105 cf
Design volume of SCM (cu ft) - 396698 cf
Yes -e -
97 If applicable, with the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
`. No
#8 Does the mainelenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
3:1
#9 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
No
#10 If the SCM is on a single family lot, does the plat comply with General MDC (10)?
Yes
#11 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
Yes
#12 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
Pump (preferred)
#13 Was the -SCM by an NC licensed professional?
20 ft
Another SCM
1 cfs
Yes
3 Is this LS -FS designed toreceive flow from the drainage area during the 10 -year storm?
Has a blind swale been provided?
#4 Does the blind swale provide for uniform overtopping of the level spreader?
Yes _
Yes
Yes
#5 What material will be used for the level spreader?
F5 Will the construction tolerance be <0.25 inch along the level spreader length?
_ concrete
Yes
#6 Will the level spreader be straight or convex in plan view?
Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about this LS -FS that you think is relevant to the review:
This is for Pond 4
#7 Height of the drop from the level spreader to the transition zone (inches)
47 Width of the transition zone (inches_) _
#7 Protection for the transition zone
#8 Width of the filter strip (feet)
#9 Is the filter strip free of draws and channels?
#9 Has this been verified in the field?
#10 Slope of the filter strip (°/) -
#10 Is this slope uniform across the entire filter strip?
#10 Will the first 12" of soil be adjusted if needed to promote plant growth?
#10 Will the filter strip and side slopes be planted with non -clumping, deep-rooted sod?
#10 Species of sod that will be used
410 Will soil be temporarily stabilized until permanent vegetation is established?
-
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
12.0 in
Aggregate
30 ft
Yes
Yes
2%
Yes
Yes
Yes
fescue
Yes
LS -FS 9 1:40 PM 7/20/2017

LEVEL SPREADER - FILTER STRIP (LS -FS) Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX
rHE DRAINAGE AREA
)rainage area number
From Pond 5
3
Break down of BUA in the drainage area (both new and existing):
Fatal coastal wetlands area (sq ft)
'' sf
-Parking /driveway (sq ft) 1366702 sf -
otal so face water area (sq ft)
-- --
sf
Sidewalk (sq ft) 4776 sf
Total drainage area (sq ft)
2200651 sf
---
-Roof (sq ft)
3UA associated with existing development (sq ft)
sf
- Roadway (sq ft) -- -
5roposed new BUA (sq ft)
1371479 sf
- Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft)
ercent BUA of drainage area
62%
Tota B A sq 1371479Si—
:OMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STORMWATER PROGRAM
...�
that apply (please specify):
of Rocky Mount
Design rainfall depth (in)
Minimum volume required (cu ft)
Design vo ume of SCM (cu ft)
Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from :dl surfocns at huild-out? Yes #7 If applicable, with the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
Is the SCM located on or near contaminated soils? No #8 Does the mainelenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
---- —. _
What are the side slopes of the SCM (H:V)7 3:1 #9 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered side slopes? No #10 If the SCM is on a single family lot, does the plat comply with General MDC (10)?
Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion (10 -year storm)? Yes #11 Is there an 08M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
Is there a a bypass for flows in excess of the design flow? Yes— -
#12 Is there an 08M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
What is the method for dewaterin the SCM for maintenance? - Pum
9 p preferred) #13 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensed professional?
Length of level spreader (feet) 20 It
LS -FS receives flow from Another SCM
Flow rate to LS -FS during design storm (cfs) 1 cfs
Is a bypass device provided? Yes
If yes, describe the bypass device:
3 Is this LS -FS designed to receive flow from the drainage area during the 10 -year storm_ ? Yes
Has a blind swale been provided? Yes
Does the blind swale provide for uniform overtopping of the level spreader? Yes
5 What material will be used for the level spreader? concrete
p,#5 Will the construction tolerance be < 0.25 inch along the level spreader length? Yes
#6 Will the level spreader be straight or convex in plan view? - Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
;Please use this space to provide any additional information about this LS -FS that you think is relevant to the review:
This is for Pond 5
-._,_— .e..._ —...
#7 Height_— of the drop from the level spreader to the transition zone —(inch --es)
#7 Width of the transition zone (inches)
#7 Protection for the transition zone
#8 W idth of the Iter strip (feet) -
#9 Is the fllter strip free of draws and channels? -
#9 Has this been verified in the field?
#10 Slope of the filter strip I%)
#10 Is this slope uniform across the entire filter strip?
#10 Will the first 12" of soil be adjusted If needed to promote plant growth?
#10 W ill the filter strip and side slopes be planted with non -clumping, deep-rooted sod?
#10 Species of sod that will be used
#10 Will soil be temporarily stabilized untifpermanent vegetation is established?
1.0 in
76111 of
182121 of
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
12.0 in
Aggregate
30 It
Yes
Yes
2%
Yes
Yes
Yes
fescue
Yes
LS -FS 10 1:40 PM 7/20/2017

LEVEL SPREADER - FILTER STRIP (LS -FS) Carolina Connector Intermodal Rail Terminal (CCX)
THE DRAINAGE AREA
4
Drainage area number From Pond 6 Break down of BUA in the drainage area (both new and existing):-
- - T---- ----
otal coastal wetlands area (sq ft)
sf - Parking / driveway (sq ft) 1593899 sf
Total surface water area (sq ft) sf -Sidewalk (sq ft) - -- -
Total drainage area (sq ft) 2052112 sf Roof (sq ft) 7274 sf
BUA associated with existing development (sq ft) at Roadway (sq ft) -
Proposed new BUA (sq ft) ---- --
1601173 sf Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft)
Percent BUA o�inage area 78%-BUAs q—ft -- — ----
(�-- 1601173 sf
COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STORMWATER PROGRAM'
MStermwater Pro rams that aPPIY (Pleasespecify):---- Design rainfall depth (in)
1.0 in
Minimum volume required (cu ft) 56488 cf
Design volume -of SCM (cu ft) _- _"---- -- --
- - 232520 cf
GENERAL MDC FROM 02H .1050
_.....-----_..._._.._..-,.__.... - --.......
#7 Height of the drop from the level spreader to the transition zone (inches)
- Another SCM
#7 Width of the transition zone (inches)
#1 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build -out?
#2 Is the SCM located on or near contaminated soils?
Yes
----"- __----
#7 If applicable, with the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
Yes
-- --- —
#3 What are the side slopes of the SCM (H:V)7
No--
3:1
---- --
#8 Does the mainetenance access comply with General MDC (8)?
._--. --
Yes
#3 Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered side slopes?
No
#9 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)?
410 If the SCM is on a single family lot, does the plat comply with General MDC (10)?
Yes
#4 Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion (10 -year storm)?
- -
_
Yes
-
-
#11 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
Yes
#5 Is there a a bypass for flows in excess of the design flow?
Yes
#12 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)?
- Yes
#6 What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
�.,. 9
Pum p (preferred)
-
#13 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensed professional?
- Yes
LS -FS MDC FROM n7w into
,
Length of level spreader i
LS -FS receives flow from
Flow rate to LS -FS durinc
Is a bypass device provid
If Yes, describe the bvoas
Is this LS -FS designed to receive
Has a blind swale been provided i
-
- 20 ft
_.....-----_..._._.._..-,.__.... - --.......
#7 Height of the drop from the level spreader to the transition zone (inches)
- Another SCM
#7 Width of the transition zone (inches)
storm (cfs) 1 cfs
#7 Protection for the transition zone
Yes
#8 Width of the filter strip (feet)
#9 Is the filter strip free of draws and channels? _
#9 Has this been verified In the fleld?
flow from the drainage area during the 10 -year storm? Yes
#10 Slope of the filter strip (%)
Yes
#10 Is this slope uniform across the entire filter strip?
94 Does the blind swa a provide or uniform overtopping -- -
p ppin of the s readers - - —
_ 9P Yes #10 WIII the first 12" of soil be adjusted if needed to promote plant growth?
#5 What material will be used for the level spreader? concrete #10 Will the filter strip and side slopes be planted with non -clumping, deep-rooted sod?
#5 Will the construction tolerance be < 0.25 inch along the level spreader length? Yes #10 Species of sod that will be used
#6 Will the level spreader be straight or convex in plan view? Yes #10 Will soil be temporarily stabilized until permanent vegetation is established?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
_....>._
Please use this space to provide any additional information about this LS -FS that you think Is relevant to the review. -
This is for Pond 6
1.0 in
12.0 in
Aggregate
30 ft
Yes
Yes
2%
Yes
Yes
Yes
fescue
Yes
LS -FS 11 1:40 PM 7/20/2017

e 0 2 4
Miles
kc -4 meb�o
ak
aatchaa
Y
� F a eV6 F+.w
am*,
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 1 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
® Project Area
Project Limits of Disturbance
Stream
Wetland
'. .
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
�zone 1
- Zone 2
Roads
amen
foster
wheeler
Job No. 64300-9004
Drawn By: BW -1;
Reviewed By: RH
I Date: 7/21/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.

e 0 2 4
Miles
c�•°�` Jhit r.. i
kc -4 meb�o
ak
adchaa
Y
�Fae� �,.w
arm*- � t
zs
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 2 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
Project Area
Project Limits of Disturbance
Stream
Wetland
Pond
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
Zone 1
- Zone 2
Roads
amen
foster
wheeler
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
® 0 '875
E❑
P
l
S23
• i�
BLVp NpSH
N 4ESLE`(A►`� ..
Am
r N i
- L
l�
W -
Sources: Esd, HE
Job No.
64300-9004
Drawn By:
BWS
Reviewed BV:
RH
Date:
7/21/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
® 0 '875
E❑
P
l
S23
• i�
BLVp NpSH
N 4ESLE`(A►`� ..
Am
r N i
- L
l�
W -
Sources: Esd, HE

e 0 2 4
Miles
kc -4 tvebaro
ak
aatchaa
Y
� F a e� F+.w
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 3 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
® Project Area
Project Limits of Disturbance
Stream
Wetland
Pond
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
Zone 1
- Zone 2
Roads
amec
foster
wheeler
Job No. 64300-9004
Drawn By:
BWS
Reviewed BV:
RH
Date:
L/21/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
0 �
Z 1 • 1 9 11 �o��
�,t s
i i !►�
h�1
9
I.:.LFU
0
dam`
i < 1
Source:
Kc
• r r.
Source: Es
SED
SEES
S10
4i
(n, Esri Japan, VE -11, E- China (Hong
treetlVap conMbutors, and the GIS User
Community
USDA, USGS,� GRID, IGN, and

Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 4 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
® Project Area
Project Limits of Disturbance
Stream
F Wetland
= Pond
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Roads
amec
foster
wheeler
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
® 0
'N' .g. / .
_4
j
N -A
7
13
�a
� harm i t
�t
Ar All
Esn, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA N
6
t Sources: Esn, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT R NRCan, Esn Ja
Kong), Esri Korea, Esn (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, ©OpenStreetMap cc
CJ�J
E
Job No.
64300-9004
Drawn By:
BWS
Reviewed By:
RH
Date:
7/20/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
® 0
'N' .g. / .
_4
j
N -A
7
13
�a
� harm i t
�t
Ar All
Esn, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA N
6
t Sources: Esn, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT R NRCan, Esn Ja
Kong), Esri Korea, Esn (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, ©OpenStreetMap cc
CJ�J
E

e 0 2 4
s� Miles
Maker
'NC -a- 4$�IDfo
I �
CAckaa
Y
� P,
'W.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 5 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
" Project Area
LProject Limits of Disturbance
FStream
Wetland
= Pond
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Roads
amen 14 4V
foster
wheeler
Job No. 64300-9004
Drawn By: BWS
Reviewed BY: RH
Date: 7/21/2017 I
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.
E

e ° 2 4
EEEEEEKzzz= Miles
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Sheet 6 of 6
CSX Carolina Connector
Intermodal Rail Terminal
and Second Mainline Improvements
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Legend
® Project Area
Project Limits of Disturbance
Stream
Wetland
Pond
Riparian Buffer Zones
(Requiring Mitigation)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Roads
amen
foster
wheeler
Job No. 64300-9004
Drawn By: BWS
Reviewed BY: RH
Date: 7/21/2017
The map shown here has been
created with all due and
reasonable care and is strictly for
use with Amec Foster Wheeler
project number 6430090004.
Amec Foster Wheeler assumes no
liability, direct or indirect,
whatsoever for any such third
party or unintended use.

an
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CSX Transportation
Attn: Richard K. Nath
500 Water Street, J275
Jacksonville, FL 32202
17IMUT
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
December 7, 2016
RO STREAM /BUFFER TRACKING NUMBER #16-402
Edgecombe County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Basin Riparian Buffer Rules (15A BCAC 02B .0259)
Subject Property/ Project Name: CCX Intermodal Site
Address/Location: College Road, Rocky Mount
Stream(s) Evaluated: UTs to Beech Branch and Compass Creek
Determination Date: 10/20/16 & 10/27/16 Staff: Jennifer Burdette
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination
M Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
Soil
Survey
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
SK
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
Flows onto
site
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0250)
X
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
SI - Beech Branch
Stream
E/I/Pl
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
SK
P
X
Flows onto
site
Confluence
with SI
X
X
SI - Beech Branch
P
X
Throughout
X
X
SG(B)2
1
X
Pond I DWR flag
X
X
Pond 2
Pond
X
Connected to subject channel
downstream
X
X
C2
E
X
X
SGA
I
SGA -1A
Confluence
with SG
X
Pond 4
Pond
X
No channel or pond depicted
Ditch 2
E
X
I
X
Pond 3
Pond
X
Not connected to subject
channel upstream or
downstream
X
Ditch 3
E
X
I
X
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

CCX Intermodal Site
Edgecombe County
December 7, 2016
Page 2 of 3
Stream
E/I/Pl
Not Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
SE (A)z
P
X
Throughout
X
X
SD
I/P
X
SD -45.5 I Flows off-site
X
X
Pond 1
Pond
X
Not connected to subject
channel upstream or
downstream
Ditch 1
E
X
X
Ditch 4
E
X
X
SF
I
SF -8 Flows off-site
X
SB
I
X
SB -1 SB -24
X
X
SC
I
SC -1 Flows off-site
X
X
1E/11P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
2 By Division of Water Resources determination letter (RRO #16-309) dated September 26, 2016
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed above and included on the attached maps
signed by JAB and dated 12/7/16 have been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe
County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and
evaluated for applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Basin Riparian Buffer Rule. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject"
has been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent
streams. There may be other streams or features located on the property that do not appear on the maps
referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to
the Clean Water Act.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be
made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 61 7
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
clo Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding
applicability to the Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field
Office at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jennifer Burdette at [phone].
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch

CCX Intermodal Site
Edgecombe County
December 7, 2016
Page 3 of 3
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Richard Harmon, Amec Foster -Wheeler, 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Ste 100, Durham, NC 27703

CONFIDENTIAL
The map shown here has been created with all due and
reasonable care. Locations of all features on this
.s C4f map were collected from field reconnaissance and desktop
analysis. This map has not been certified by a licensed
land surveyor and any third party use of this map comes
without warranties of any kind. AMEC Foster Wheeler
assumes no liability, direct or indirect, whatsoever for any
such third party or unintented use.
This map is preliminary and subject to ,
Y change following USACE & NCDEQ verification.
V
P 00
1/1©Q
Cern
-911'
130
Ja 99 17 Zo
131
• �� �V ` SE
`'
2 ✓1r-�--
3fl • �r1
/ �' • _ i
�---- \4--
00LINA
�- _`t`a'i►
LLEG
SD
ASD
—120
.� SB
I. 0 : JJJ � 1 r✓ �'•
olk 44b�
o •
'0 1,000 2,000 Feet
y Sep, S, ; f /ala, F vre 6 s��•e i '�' = _
A
•` N Project Boundary CCX Intermodal Site
Stream USGS Topo Map
amec Wetland
foster Wetland / Stream Breakpoint Edgecombe County, NC l"L,
wheeler Note: This figure is for reference only. PROJECT NO: DATE:
643009004.0001 11/22/2016
r:u ransportatiomF rojectsxRau\GSX\Gentrai Carolina Intermodal facnity\GI5XGI5%UbX.mxd, User: Jason.hightower; Date: 11/16/2016 10:18:36 AM, Ghecke by: RGH Date: 10/20/16

CONFIDENTIAL
The map shown here has been created with all due and
reasonable care. Locations of all features on this
map were collected from field reconnaissance and desktop
analysis. This map has not been certified by a licensed
land surveyor and any third party use of this map comes
without warranties of any kind. AMEC Foster Wheeler
assumes no liability, direct or indirect, whatsoever for any
h th' d rt ' t t d
ON cV
suc lr pa y or unln en a use.
This map is preliminary and subject to
change following USACE & NCDEQ verification. g
SI
N t
SG-.'
SGA fir, x. A
+ SU6 G
Di t h 2 jk t
I sty�%j1,Y.
Pond 3 R
subJcc-
Ditch 3 ; r } I
AVA< _ A Y 4
rski r.� x se`*.
Y.7�-
s6A NOASEIIIiI t'
LYS
NeA —
�/ EAI► P
R49
Avg
WOO
LA
�. Ditch 1 �. .�"" oA. Nn,�
, ell
0 4
AVA
\ ,
f �
IN's 4 � A
�Ditch4A
+ .s
W #�
AjH
Hoe
SF -A
43-1 A
16 an � `h y 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
' � ' + •cam
•' N Project Boundary CCX Intermodal Site
NRCS Soils Map
amec A.�' Stream
foster wetland Edgecombe County, NC
wheeler Wetland / Stream Breakpoint
Note: This figure is for reference only. PROJECT NO: 643009004.0001 DATE: 11/22/2016
P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Central Carolina Intermodal Facility\GIS\GIS\CSX.mxd, User: jason.hightower; Date: 11/16/2016 10:18:36 AM, Checke by: RGH Date: 10/20/16

P:\Transportation\Projects\Rail\CSX\Central Carolina Intermodal Facility\GIS\GIS\CSX.mxd, User: jason.hightower; Date: 11/1/2016 2:21:02 PM, Checks by: RGH Date: 10/20/16

CSXI, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Matt Adkins
500 Water Street, J-25 South
Jacksonville, FL 32216
IZOY C0OPFR
MICHA 1_ S. RFGA
S. JAY ZIMMLIZMAN
May 31, 2017
RO STREAM /BUFFER TRACKING NUMBER
#17-163
EDGECOME County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules and
Water Quality Standards (15A BCAC 02B .0259)
Subject Property/ Project Name: CSX Line of Road
Address/Location: Adjacent to CSX Railroad between North of Whitakers and North of
Battleboro
Stream(s) Evaluated: UT to Fishing Creek & UTs to Swift Creek
Determination Date: April 28, 2017 Staff: Jennifer Burdette
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination
® Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
(where local buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
❑ Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0250)
❑ Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B.0605-.0608)
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300
k

CSXI, Inc.
Buffer Determination
Tracking # 17-163
Page 2 of 3
Stream
E/I/Pl
Not
Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
CC
Wetland
X
X
X
DD
Not
present
X
X
X
Stream
Segment within
Swift Creek
Swamp
Swamp
X
X
Swift Creek
P
X
throughout
X
X
HH1
P
X
throughout
X
X
GG
Swamp
X
I
X
X
S-19
P
X
throughout
X
X
WL -MM3
P
X
throughout
X
X
WL -MM Ditch
Ditch
X
I
X
1E/1/P = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
2 Intercepted by and re-routed into western railroad ditch to Swift Creek
3 Impounded by beaver; buffer begins at elevation of the top of the beaver dam
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the feature(s) listed above and included on
the attached map signed by Jennifer Burdette on May 31, 2017 are located on the most recent
published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, North Carolina (1979) and/or the most recent
copy of the Enfield & Whitakers, NC (2016) USGS Topographic maps at a 1:24,000 scale and
evaluated for applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rule. Each stream that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the
property. Streams that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. There may be other
streams or features located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above
but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to
the Clean Water Act.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter
to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 61 7
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx,
etc.):
clo Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

CSXI, Inc.
Buffer Determination
Tracking # 17-163
Page 3 of 3
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not
approve any activity within the buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401
Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the Clean Water
Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jennifer Burdette
at [phone].
cc
Sincerely,
wilm
6
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Josh Witherspoon, AMSC Foster -Wheeler, 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Ste 100,
Durham, NC 27703
RRO DWR File
Filename: CSX Line of Road(Edgecombe)_TAR_StreamDet.docx

csx L IWE or tqoAll 4-17 -14:)3 u,s'CS MRP I
- 01
�Fishrng Cree
—
©�r .100—
1
ter•— P ��'�_ �� —�
p
--Old—;
/ y` �•� _ _ 3' �Bricks
r 1-` 1l' BRIG �u� Cem LL'
AP
115
.- va.
301
kA -A M -
goo- , - —
- o w SLb
1 Y
cn
tL
0
/ .
iic� soec4
g�� vER
�n1Pot/A/0MCAIT
@ Cour= L v E A/C -C
OUTSIDE-£
PRd� �T 5 3tI
A K C A vP ST/ZEA M I

CSX LIVEoCk6AP U,565 AMP2-
1127\
Battle
i Cem
p Tempt(
Cem
❑ i
1
\\
r
4�r
(;
1127\
Battle
i Cem
p Tempt(
Cem
❑ i
1
\\
r

CSX LLL oFROAP --/:f 1-7-)63 USG 9 AIA P 3

CSX L11VE OF,DA D -�07 -1 L 3 U S6 5 MAS' �
L.�u_ -
-`
/--Pope Cem \' _
VD
ij
QS"LL St
SLG
Nq
ittleboro
EV LV herry
5 Crossroads
(1TI V T �� Morning'
ROCK 1 MO V 1�1 1 Star Cem
J !\ (j25�EN
deboro
n 125 \'
- 11
z
O Q

EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUM
0
s o0o
4000 a o00 ;000 1000 u
�' Scale 1:20000

NoB
NOA
Ra
.: NoB
INr
' J
C �S,Ly
y
-
zR
r
GoA
z
w i
Nc
.n
a oGoA
v
a
ti
Ra
N A o F
A
wl-
GoA
l 3
2 G ;w -
r NoA'
Ra GoA Ra "
NoB y NoA:
NoB Go�q�NO
�IJ Rin _'T
ax�� b
GI
WaB
w
�OIN Mol. NA
NoB
GI1�/= w
o ty RoAaA
WaB
Fto
Aa4 t \
14.
Me aP s R/aA
73 oOoorEEr AaA M�� ` )
I.1 (J GI �.
��500C
�5)3
I

� StB �
WaB NoB BB Ram �9\ R4�
2 369 000 FEET '�We j
w AaaA ` Cea AaA 3
_ w0 1 tl� ` � e ;� Oma✓ '�'�a,`e
. �. mrl
e s
2368000 FEET V AaA:�-�1
(Joins inset,sheet 21) / t
1000 AND 2000 -FOOT GRID TICKS
c Wie
WkB
Rq Tatem{ Me
wl
Ro- WkB I�B
l° VJ
c, y6 AaA
n Nob WaB /W� B
GoA NoB NoA ✓ DpB
j WaB
NoA
UO JS- WaB NoA GoA Ra
GoA LY /
LY
� Ro GoA ,
NnB 1
4"/ - oA 4 !'
Ra WaB DPA <i
NoA GoA
NoB WaB Gc
a i,4l9 - Ra _ NoA
' GoA Go � Ra
dY r I 1 + NoA
o NoB Jl
vNoB v,
' f
Pw f N B Ra GoA NoA ! WaB
� GoA NoA
GOP f .
w ExA NoA NoA / NoB Ra/ Ra
o Ra _
a
m Ra GoA LY NoA Wal
� G oA �
AYB °�
Gr AYA AYA NoA GoA
WaB LY
�a ExA \ 1Q 1
GGoA WaB NoA
v Gy
NoB t BATTLEBORO NoA Ra Ra / NOB w:
GoA
a NoA a. Gr AyA Ra' AYA Ra
lAy�`..--- ExA NoA Ra
NOB AYA ExA AuB <9y� Gd
Na ExA NoA
2 370 000 FEET (Joins sheet 6) NoA No
h esu _'171�
I