20170940 Ver 1_B-4544 Nationwide Harnett July 27 2017_20170728

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
July 27, 2017
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
ATTN: Ms. Sarah Hair
NCDOT Coordinator
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 and Section 401 Water Quality
Certification for the Proposed Replacement of Bridges Nos. 133 and 134 over Black
River and Black River Overflow on SR 1722 (Three Bridge Road) in Harnett County,
North Carolina; TIP No. B-4544; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1722 (7); Debit $275
from WBS No. 38406.1.2
Dear Sirs,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 54-foot,
three-span bridges Nos. 133 and 134 with 80-foot and 90-foot single-span bridges on existing
alignment. Traffic will be maintained using an off-site detour. Permanent impacts to riparian wetlands
tota10.2 acre. An additiona121 linear feet of permanent stream impact will occur to the Black River due
to bank stabilization. There will be no jurisdictional impacts due to utility relocations.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Division of Mitigation Services
Acceptance Letter, pernut drawings, stormwater management plan, and roadway plans for the above
referenced project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in August 2016, and
distributed shortly after. Additional copies are available at the NCDOT website:
http://207.4.62.65/PDEA/EnvironmentalDocs/
This project was let on July 18, 2017 has an availability date of August 28, 2017.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: We anticipate that the bridge replacement, including all approach work will be
authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 4085 will apply to this project.
NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Water Resources.
MailingAddress: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] I O2O BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS UNTT CuStOrit¢Y SErviC¢: 1-H%%-36H-496H RALEIGH NC Z.%61O
IS9g MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website.• www.ncdot.gov
RALEIGH NC 2%699-1S9g

A copy of this pernut application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit
Applications. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Jason Dilday at
(919) 707-61 ll ar [e-mail].
Sincerely,
.+�
�o� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., G.P.M., Unit Head
Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List

��Y ,� � T��� Office Use Only:
i � � F Corps action ID no.
� DWQ project no.
i�i�i � �
� '` Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2Q08
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridges Nos. 133 and 134 on SR 1722 over Black River and Black
River Overflow
2b. County: Harnett
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Dunn
2d. Subdivision name: nof applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g�544
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.347735 Longitude: -78.624827
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 2.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to g�ack River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Sw
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land use is mostly agriculture interspersed with rural residences along roadways and forestland along stream
corridors.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetiands on the property:
3.2
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
500 feet perennial
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace structurally deficient bridges.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing the existing 54-foot, three span bridges 133 and 134 with an 80-foot and 90-foot single
span structures. The bridges will be replaced on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building
equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
� Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
Fill/Mechaniz- � Yes � Corps
Site 1� P❑ T ed Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.02
Site 1� P❑ T Excavation Riparian � Yes � Corps <0.01
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Fill/Mechaniz- � Yes � Corps
Site 2� P❑ T ed Clearing Riparian � No � pWQ 0.17
Fill/Mechaniz- � Yes � Corps
Site 3� P❑ T ed Clearing Riparian � No ❑ DWQ <0.01
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
0.20
2g. Total wetland impacts Permanent
2h. Comments: See Wetland Permit Impact Summary sheet for details. Hand clearing in riparian wetlands totals 0.04 ac.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream length (linear
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width feet)
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 2� P❑ T Fill Black River � PER � Corps 40 21 ft
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P� T Fill Black River � PER � Corps 40 <0.01 ac
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P� T Fill Black River � PER � Corps 40 0.02 ac.
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 21 ft P
0.02 ac.T

3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) (if applicable)
or Temporary
T
02 � P❑ T Fill slope Borrow pit 0.05
02 � P❑ T Fill slope Swamp/Open <0.01
water
03 ❑ P� T Fill slope Borrow piUswamp 0.02
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.05 Permanent
0.02 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridges will be longer than the existing bridges; the replacement bridges will be a single spans, so no bents
in the water; the proposed bridges will be at approximately the same grade and alignment as the existing structures; the
new bridges will have no deck drains or direct discharge to Black River. An off-site detour will be used during
construction. 3:1 slopes will be used in wetlands. See Stormwater Management Plan for additional measures.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.20 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS website; biological surveys for protected species
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Digitally signed by Colin Mellor
C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES,
email=[e-mail],c=US 07-27-2�17
Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Date: 2017.07.27 13:20:23 -04�00�
`j°� ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
1�

E'nvironmental
Quality
RO`i' COOPER
Gcruerrror
Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., CPM
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Hanis:
Jwie 1, 2017
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4544, Replace Bridge Numbers 133 and 134 over the Black River and the Black River
Overilow on SR 1722 (Three Bridge Road), Harnett County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the infortnation supplied by you on May 31,
2017, the impacts are located in CU 03030004 of the Cape Pear River basin in the Southern Inner Coastal Plain (SICP)
Eco-egion, and are as follows:
Cape Fear Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03030004 Non- Coastal
SICP Cold Cool Warm Riparian Zone 1 Zone 2
Riparian Marsh
Impacts (feedacres) 0 0 0 0.20 0 0 0 0
*Some of the wetland impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determuied by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated
July 28, 2010. If the above refereiiced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter wi11 no longer be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
Jame tanfill
Credit Managernent Supervisor
cc: Ms. Liz Hair, USACE - Wihnington Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
File: B-4544
!'�'Nothing Compares�.
State of North Carolina � Environmental Quality
`l17 West Jones Street I 1601 Mail Service Center � Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-I(i01
919 707 8600

t �j�B�,,����,w. North Carolina Department of Transportation
St[)i't714YdtP�' Highway Stormwater Program
_�'%
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ��''�-��---��
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 38406.1.2 TIP No.: B-4544 County�ies): Harnett Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 38406.12 TIP Number: B-4544 Project Type: Brid e Replacement Date: 3/15/2017
NCDOT Contact: Paul Atkinson Contractor I Designer: Rajender Gaddam, PE, CFM Will Weathersbee, PE
Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Rd. Address: 1520 South Blvd, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27610 Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: atkinson ncdot. ov Email: ra'ender. addam rsandh.com [e-mail]
CitylTown: Dunn Count ies : Harnett
River Basin s: Ca e Fear CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 1070 ft. Surrounding Land Use: �Noods, Residential, Agricultural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.6 ac. 0.5 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 11' lanes with 2' shoulders on the approach, and two 11' lanes with 4'-5" shoulders Two 10' lanes with variable shoulders on the approach, and two 10' lanes with 2'
on the bridge shoulders on the bridge.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 1782 Year: 2038 Existi� : 1236 Year: 2018
General Project Narrative: This is a bridge replacement project. Existing bridge 133 is 3 span and 53' long; existing bridge 134 is 3 span and 53'-6" long. Proposed bridge 133 is a 80' long 33" box beam
(Description of Minimization of Water bridge; proposed bridge 134 is a 90' long 33" box beam bridge.
Quality Impacts) No deck drains were used on either bridge replacement. Both bridges will have 2 drop inlets at the downgrade end of the approach slab to collect deck drainage with a single
outlet to the downstream side of the bridge. 3:1 fill slopes are used where practicable to minimize impacts.
NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest extent practicable during project design.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Black River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 18-68-12-1
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw)
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Black River Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justifcation in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
�
L
C1
T
U
L
4
�
�
m
�
�
.z
�
S.
�
�
�
�
0
.
=
w
�
�
�
�
i
�
C
r. oi
oL
N��
�
�_�
���
r� �
�
�
• �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 9B For Conventlonol Symbols
See Sheets 9C- 1 Through 9C-? For Su�vey Control Sheets
SlT E l
�_ -
_----T� SR�1703.__�_____.�---
� ~\
RFI:/Al RR/M,F � �
�� �`��11."e �U�� \`��� J.l Jl J� �:� 1 � �lJ/�.,�.\� �
�� ���y1������' �]� �I ����� I �����
HARI�ETT COUI�TY
LOCATI011L• REPLACE BRIDGES l33 A11tD 134 OVER
BLACK RIVER A111D BLACK RIVER OVERFLOW
ON SR 1722 (THREE BRIDGE ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG, DRAINAGE, PAVI11lG, AND STRUCTURES
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
�1 � �
�— � BEG/N BRIDGE
� � -L � PoT ,5/0.19+23B8
E D BRiDGf � /'��
-L- POT S�o.W+72J6 --hr _ \. �
� � � �* \ \
� � �
��s
� �
� � � �
��.
-- —av------------e'M------ -------ew------
-L- SR 1722 THREE BRIDGE RD
��.
� ��`°- - - - -
�
1 �
I ^ � � x �
s� – �
I �� "\ �°�
��� �1 � �'� � � �,,
\
BEGIN TlP PROJECT B 4544
-L - POC Sfo. 11f30.00
_ — _ � � �h�� I � / � 4�
/__
/
� � �
, � � � �
/
/ �
THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II "MODIFIED" W/HAND CLEARING DONE BEYOND THE SIOPE STAKES
��
�
TlP
-L -
/T
/ �
% �
� , x , � I� Y j �
lS IE D BR/DGE � � �
' L- 510. O+A6J3
� � � � � �/��� �
is
.__�is� -� �s
F F
� � :
...�is___. �is � ...—� � :
�15 r ew--"---� -- �----ew----�- ----�u ---------
�I—. . _ __- _ _ _. -- — ---. . . . . .
TO SR 1715
�
--_� _� ���,
�\---h�e------- �""' i
_ --_—_ _�e
� \\ /'� �
� � � 1� �sm //�
t + � � I � t�
\ \ �� , �
� � ,�,
} i �
� � r
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 10
I�TG'O�IPLETE FLA�TSI
DO NO'1' USC I�DIi itlw ACQUI51'1'ION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLE55 ALL SIGNqTURES COMP�ETEG
rt s PREPMeo er: HYDRAULICS EIYGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
8601 S/X FORICS RD, SUITE 260
ADT 2018 = 1,236 RALElGH, NC 276I5
50 25 0 $0 10� � � 919-926-4100 �7mWi
ADT 2038 = 1,782 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4544 = 0.176 MILES FOR THE NQRTH CAROLINA DEPART,�IENT OF 7RbySPOR7ATI0N �� �� ��+,�
PLANS K = �O % _ 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �� �!_
D= 60 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4544 — 0.027 MILES p,g. � �
JENNIFER FARINO, PE srcNarur�: � .
50 25 0 50 loo T= 6 %* TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4544 = 0.203 MILES �GHT OF WAY DATE: rnoJEcr sNc�xEEn � �
V= 60 MPH FEBRUARY 17. 2017 ROADWAY DESIGN
PROFILE /HORIZONTAL JARED BOND, PE ENGINEER
l � *�TTST=�% + DUAL=5%) PROJECTDESIGNENGlNEER ��y� @����
l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTING DATE: �� p����
SUB—REGIONAL TIER FEBRUARY 20, 2018 GARY LOVERING, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
PROFILE (VERTICAL) PE
SIGNATURE:

�' .. . ... . .. .. . .. .. . ... ... .. ... . .. . . . . ... .. . ... .. ... ... . . O 2.5 5 PROI.REPERENCE N O. SHEET NO.
� B4544 X-1
�
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 10
. .
� O O �
� � _
� �
�
� �
�_
_ __ � ,� + - ----- ---- ----
,� _- ----
_-
0 0.
-- - -- _
. --
. �
3. / � .
�
�
�
- _ + , ---
- � _ - - - - - - - - - - -
- _ - _ _
L
�
�
� _
�
2
J
�
x
�,
�:
�,
�
N
J , ,
G� ❑ � �
�
� i
,� / - - �
/ � � - - - -
% - - - - - - - - - �
0
�
�� � 13 + 5. 00
� ,
w -- -
�
,
s
�
w
�
��
o� —
� �� —
�_�
,,�,�
�,��

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
an xisting xisting
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure FillIn FillIn in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
Site 1/2 -L- 13+60 to 14+86 Bridge 134 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 97
Site 2 -L- 14+86 to 19+14 Roadway Fill Slope 0.11 0.03 0.05 0.02
Site 2/3 -L- 19+14 to 20+16 Bridge 133 < 0.01 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 21 81
Site 3 -L- 20+16 to 20+75 Roadway Fill Slope < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
TOTALS*: 0.13 < 0.01 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.04 21 178 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2013 10 24

• �
See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets
See Sheet 1 B For Conventi onal Symbols
See Sheets �C- � For Survey Control Sheets
�`
��
�
�\_ T� S 17 3__--
��
��
----
THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT.
�
�
�
.
.
�
�
>�
\ �o
J
� �
.,,� � �
W
go
�
BEGIN BRIDGE \
-L - POT Sto.13+79.84
�� �� � � ��� � � ���
�� ��� � � ���� ��
LOCA TI011 t: REPLA CE BRIDGES 133 A1�D 134 O T�ER
BLA CK RI T�ER A1�D BLA CK RIT�ER O VERFL O W
01� SR 1722 (THREE BRIDGE ROAD)
TYPE OF WORI�: GRADII�G, DRAII�AGE, PA T�I1�lG, A1�D STR UCTURES
BEGIN T lP PROJECT B-4544
—L — POC Stotl ll f30�00
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L - POT Sto. l9 +23.88
�
END BRIDGE ��.��� \
-L - POT Sto. /4+72./6 `
� \
1 \
,�/-``�1----�------�._. _.� �
-L- SR 1722 THREE BRIDGE RD
�� -
NO. 133 � ,
z
�
I
� END BRIDGE
J -L- POT Sta.20+06J3
------- -- -----� "��/
�
---�--- ;.
.. �..
---�� -- .
` -- --.�
'END T /PI PROJECl B —4544
—L — POT Stoe 22 -�OOv00
TO SR 1715 �
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PLANS PREPARED BY: HYDRAULICS E11tGI11tEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LE11tGTH RSF�H Architects—Engineers—Planners, Inc.
8601 SIX FORKS RD, S UITE 260
ADT 2018 = 1,236 R � RALEIGH, NC 27615
50 25 0 50 100 qDT 2038 = 1 782 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4544 = 0.170 MILES 919-926-4100 � o� �oap�
� FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENr OF TRANSPORTATION � �q�
P LAN S K = � O % _ 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �p �Q�
a LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4544 — 0.033 MILES P.E.
D= 60 /o JENNIFER FARINO, PE SIGNATURE: � �
50 25 0 50 100 T= 6 %* TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4544 = 0.203 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: `°' �
V= 60 M P H F E B RUARY 17 2 Ol 7 PROJECT ENGINEER � o
ROADWAY DESIG11l �, �
PROFILE HORIZONTAL ' JARED BOND, PE E111GI11lEER �� �Q
� ) * (TTST =1 % + D UAL = 5%) �� o�
F U N C C LASS = LO CAL LETTIIIIG DATE: I'ROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER �� �� p��Q
10 5 0 10 20 GARY LOVERING, PE
SUB—REGIONAL TIER FEBRUARY 20, 2018 NCDOT CONTACT
PROFILE (VERTICAL) P.E.
SIGNATURE:

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Li ne ----- -----
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin �
Property Corner �
Property Monument 0
Parcel/Sequence Number �23
Existing Fence Line -X X X-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence �
Proposed Chain Link Fence �
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence '�
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -��8- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary ��B
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil - �• �•
Potential Contamination Area: Soil - � �
Known Contamination Area: Water - �' �'
Potential Contamination Area: Water � �
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential '� �
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O
Sign �
We I I w°
Small Mine �
Foundation 0
Area Outline
Cemetery fi
Building
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � �
Jurisdictional Stream �S —
Buffer Zone 1 Bz �
Buffer Zone 2 Bz z
F I ow Arrow � --- ---
Disappearing Stream �--- ---
Spring o� �����_---�
Wetland �
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
� FLOyy
False Sump �
��I�.'1,�I�I"� C�)%II�°�� C�);I'��I�I I ( .,�.I'� �) ,I � ,'\, II)� ��I�IC�) �'I'�" I I I' ��I I �`' ,'�.���
� � ' � � : �
�� � � �� � �� .„ ,
_
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF WAY.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R1W Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
CSX TRANSPORTATION
0
MILEPOST 35
0
SWITCH
����
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
�
0
�'
.
W
.
��
� W
in� 0
.�. ��
,� c ��
T
�A,
c
E
E
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
�
Orchard
Vi neya rd
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJ O R:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
— TELEPHONE:
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F---
Proposed Curb Ramp cR
Existing Metal Guardrail T T T
Proposed Guardrail T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n
Eq�al�ty symbol �
Pavement Removal
T�EGETATION.•
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge '�'
Woods Line �
�
�
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
� � � �
Vineyard
CONC
� �oN� WW �
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Wate r Va Ive
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
TV:
�oN� Hw TV Pedestal
TV Towe r
�--------� U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
��B U/G TV Cable LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
� U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
s
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
�
�
O
❑T
�
HH
- - - - T - - - -
- - T - -
T
- - - -TC- - - -
- -TC- -
TC
- - - -T FO- - -
- -T FO- -
T FO
GAS :
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. -
A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records -
End of Information
-w- -
�
A/G Water
- -TV- - -
TV
- - - -TV FO- - -
- -TV FO-
TV FO
�-
A/G Gas
�
O
SS
A/G Sanitary Sewer
- - - -FSS- - - -
- - FSS - -
FSS
•
�
�
a
- ?UTL
0
UST
0
�
4
AATU R
E.O.I.

�
o�
��
0
N
i
m
W
�[
I\'�'
O[