20140949 Ver 2_401 Application_20170717

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2014 - 1686 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Saddlebrook Development
2. Work Type: Private ❑� Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial 11
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family residential development in
Midland, North Carolina.
4. Property Owner /Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Dependable Development, Inc.; POC: Mr. Michael Foess
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2014-01686
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
East of the end of Pine Hill Road, south of Pelham Lane, and west of U.S. 601 in Midland, NC
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.2439741, -80.5090930
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: Please see the cover letter and PCN
v
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Midland
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Muddy Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑✓
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑� Section 10 & 404
PA
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
June 29, 2017
Mr. Jason Randolph
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Charlotte Satellite Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to After -the -Fact Nationwide
Permit No. 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 4092
Saddlebrook Development (SAW -2014-01686)
Midland, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Dear Mr. Randolph and Ms. Higgins,
The Saddlebrook site is approximately 35 acres in extent and is located east of the end of Pine
Hill Road, south of Pelham Lane, and west of U.S. 601 in Midland, North Carolina (Figures 1-3,
attached). The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family subdivision
located in Midland, North Carolina. Dependable Development, Inc. has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 After -the -Fact Permitting Services for
this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment A).
CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification (PNC) pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No.
29 (Attachment B) as an amendment to the previously authorized 0.487 acre of wetland impacts
(SAW -2014-01686). This amended PCN submittal includes After -the -Fact impacts for an
additional 0.011 acre of permanent unauthorized fill and 0.063 acres of temporary impacts
due to flooding.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Applicant Name: Dependable Development, Inc.; POC: Mr. Michael Foess
Mailing Address: 2649 Brekonridge Centre, Monroe, NC 28110
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-238-1229
Street Address of Project: east of the end of Pine Hill Road, south of Pelham Lane, and west
of U.S. 601 in Midland, North Carolina
Waterway: UT to Muddy Creek
Basin: Yadkin (HUC' 03040105)
City: Midland
County: Cabarrus
Tax Parcel No(s): 55449723600000, 55449770750000, 55540710680000, and
55540783550000
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.243974°, -80.509093°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Midland, NC (1996)
Project History
On January 28, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a 404 General Permit
Verification for the Saddlebrook Development, authorizing 0.487 acres of wetland fill impact
associated with development (SAW -2014-01686, Attachment C). Compensatory mitigation was
provided via North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for 0.487 acres of
Riparian wetlands. On February 12, 2014, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources issued the 401 Water Quality Certification (DWR # 14-0949, Attachment D).
However, on March 30, 2017, Mr. Gregg Antemann, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS), and
Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT), from CWS met on site with Alan
Johnson from NCDEQ and Jason Randolph from USACE for a compliance site visit as the
developer had filled approximately 0.011 acre of unpermitted wetland areas and flooded 0.063
acres of wetland. Dependable Development, Inc. has contracted CWS to determine the next
course of action to rectify the violation and to determine permitting requirements for
development.
Dependable Development, Inc. drained the flooded wetland with pumps on April 10, May
10 and May 11 of 2017, and Dependable Development, Inc. is planning to install a bypass
system to move ponding stormwater runoff from the wetland to the downstream
connection area as soon as possible to prevent a permanent conversion to an open
water feature. All construction activities within the unpermitted portions of the jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. have ceased until the applicant receives the 404 General
Verification/After-the-Fact Permit. Photographs 1-4, dated March 23, 2017, are representative
of current site conditions (Attachment E). Photographs 4-8, dated January 28, 2014, are
representative of Wetland AA during the wetland delineation (Attachment E).
Current Land Use
The project area currently consists of cleared and graded areas for future residential
subdivision. Photographs 1-4 are representative of site conditions prior to corrective
procedures, Photographs 5-8 are representative of the site conditions prior to wetland impacts,
"HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
Page 2 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
and Photographs 9-10 are representative of the current conditions after draining the flooded
wetland (Attachment E).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On January 28, 2014, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, PWS, Gregg Antemann, PWS, Kelly
Thames, PWS, and Logan Hardin delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the project
area. Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), and classified using the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is
defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual,2 and the 2007 USACE
Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,3 with further technical guidance from the 2012
Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.'
The on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were verified by the USACE on October 7, 2014
(SAW -2014-01686). The on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. totals approximately 0.55 acre.
The on-site jurisdictional water of the U.S. is depicted on Figure 4 (attached) and is summarized
in Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Jurisdiction
Photo #
Linear
Acreage
Wetland
USACE/EPA Rapanos Classification
Feet I
� �
ac.
� )
1-4 (current conditions)
Wetland AA
Abutting RPW
5-8 (prior wetland impacts)
_
0.55
9-10 (after draining the
flooded portion)
Wetland Total:
N/A
0.55 ac.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family subdivision located in
Midland, North Carolina (Figure 5, attached). This area is experiencing rapid population growth
due to its proximity NC Highways 601 and 27 that provides easy access to this region of
Cabarrus County and connects to other rapidly growing cities such as Concord and Charlotte.
There is a need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand within this
highly -desirable area and economic market.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are unavoidable to meet the project goals.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certificate No.
3890. All work will be constructed in the dry.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating
Procedures for conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD.
USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC.
US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Page 3 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Permanent impacts to the on-site jurisdictional water of the U.S., including both the previously
authorized and After -the -Fact, are limited to a total of 0.498 acre of low quality wetland (Wetland
AA).
Removing fill from the wetlands (for example dividing the BMP pond in two) to show avoidance
and minimization and bring the project into compliance was also discussed. However, this is not
a practicable alternative and any changes to the existing work would be cost -prohibitive.
Additionally, the impacted wetland was low quality (estimated NC WAM score LOW, Attachment
F). It is CWS's opinion that mitigating these impacts through the purchase of wetland
mitigation credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) would create a
greater overall uplift for waters of the U.S. and be more beneficial for the environment by
enhancing and creating habitats than restoring the original low quality wetlands abutting
the new development.
No Build Alternative
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the
project, a "No Build" alternative was considered. The property is being purchased for the
purpose of providing residential housing to meet the growth and demand of an area in Midland
experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project goals
of providing necessary housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative
was eliminated from further consideration.
Alternative Design for the BMP
In an attempt to avoid permanent additional impacts to the Wetland AA, three alternative BMP
designs were considered (Attachment F). The alternatives and the reasons why they were
rejected are listed below:
Alternative #1 - Relocating the BMB to North
The first alternative that was considered was to relocate the BMP to north. However, relocating
the BMP to north is not possible since it would not capture the drainage from the lots southeast
of the relocated BMP without extensive re -grading of the entire site. Additionally, this option
would result in a loss of three lots. Even without the re -grading, the cost estimate for this option
would be approximately $260,000 ($50,000 for each each lot, $65,000 in pipe work, and
$45,000 in basin work).
Alternative #2 - Dividing BMP to two smaller BMPs
The second alternative that was considered was to divide the BMP into two separate facilities
and relocate a portion of the BMP to north. This option would result in a loss of two lots and
additional basin construction work. The cost estimate for this option would be approximately
$200,000. ($50,000 for each lot and $100,000 for the construction of the basins). Furthermore,
this option would lead to an increase in maintenance and inspection costs associated with the
long term maintenance of these facilities (two instead of one) that is ultimately the responsibility
of the homeowners and not the developer.
Alternative #3 - Dividing BMP to three smaller BMPs
The third alternative that was considered was to divide the BMP in three smaller BMPs. This
Page 4 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
option would result in a loss of two lots and require significant costs due re -grading and
additional stormwater structures. The cost estimate for this option would be $280,000
($50,000 for each lot, $45,000 in pipe, and $135,000 in basin work). Furthermore, this option
would lead to an increase in maintenance and inspection costs associated with the long term
maintenance of these facilities that is ultimately the responsibility of the homeowners and not
the developer.
Moving the basins would result in unreasonable additional costs, as well as the loss of lots and
the additional long term costs for maintenance of more than one facility. The additional time and
resources spent on the solution for the BMP redesign alternative and bypass design has
delayed any income of revenue to this point. This project needs to furnish lots to prospective
homeowners to recover the lost income due to the unfortunate history of this development.
Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29. the authorized permanent impacts to jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. totaled 0.487 acre of wetland (SAW -2014-01686; Figure 5, attached). These
impacts to Wetland AA were the result of the fill associated with construction of residential
subdivision.
Unauthorized impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total 0.011 acre of permanent wetland
impacts due to fill for stormwater control measure and 0.063 acre of temporary impact to a
wetland due to flooding (Figure 6, attached). The extent of these impacts were determined
based on the site visit conducted by CWS, Inc. scientists on March 23, 2017. The wetlands that
were not previously authorized to be filled were re -flagged. A sub -foot Trimble GPS was used
to locate the former wetland boundaries, as the current conditions made delineation based on
the hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation impractical. Authorized and
unauthorized impacts are summarized in Table 2 (next page).
Page 5 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Table 2. Imnacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Impact
NWP
Temporary or
Loss of
feature
No:
No.
Impact Type
permanent
Waters
Authorized
Impact Area
(acre)
Wetland AA
W1
29
Fill
Permanent
Yes
Yes
0.487
Wetland AA
W2
29
Fill
Permanent
Yes
No
0.011
Wetland AA
W3
29
Temporary
Temporary
No
No
0.063
Flooding*
Total Permanent Wetland Impacts:
0.498 ac.
Total Temporary Wetland—Impacts:1
0.063 ac.
Total Wetland Impacts:1
0.561 ac.
* Temporary flooding due to failure to install a drainage system to maintain the hydrologic connection between the flooded wetland
area and the downstream connection. This area was drained with pumps and a bypass system is proposed to be installed to
move the stormwater from the wetland to the downstream connection to prevent a permanent conversion to an open water
feature.
2015: Authorized Impacts
Wetland Impact 1 (W1) - Fill for Residential Subdivision
Authorized impacts consisted of 0.487 acre fill to a low quality wetland (Figure 5, attached; NC
WAM 1, Attachment F). Wetland AA divides the property in western and eastern halves.
Therefore, alternatives to avoid Wetland AA were not practical while meeting the project goals.
The 404 General Permit Verification is attached as Attachment C (SAW -2014-01686) and the
401 Water Quality Certification is attached as Attachment D (DWR # 14-0949) for this wetland
fill.
2017: Unauthorized Impacts - After -the -Fact Permit
Wetland Impact 2 (W2) - Fill
Unauthorized grading and fill for a stormwater BMP impacted 0.011 acre of jurisdictional wetland
area (Figure 6, attached). Photographs 3 and 4 are representative of the conditions at this
location prior to pumping out the waters and Photographs 9 and 10 are representative of the
current conditions (Attachment E). Dependable Development, Inc. proposes mitigating these
impacts through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits from the NC Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) as this would create a greater uplift for waters of the U.S. than restoring the
originally low quality wetlands.
Wetland Impact 3 (W3) - Flooded Wetland and Proposed Bypass Pipe
Flooding due to failure to install a drainage system to maintain the hydrologic connection
between the flooded wetland area and the downstream connection temporarily impacted 0.063
acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 6, attached). Photographs 1 and 2 are representative
of the conditions after the flooding at this location (Attachment E). Dependable Development,
Inc. drained the flooded wetland with pumps on April 10, 2017 and May 10 and 11, 2017 and
plans to install a bypass system to move the stormwater from the wetland to the downstream
connection area as soon as possible to prevent a permanent conversion to an open water
feature. The inlet of the bypass system, at the wetland, will be set an elevation that allows the
wetland maintain a hydrologic connection. The inlet will be four to six inches above existing
ground elevations to mimic the natural hydrologic conditions. Figure 7 (attached) illustrates the
Page 6 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
bypass alignment and the full design is included as Attachment I. Photographs 9-10 illustrate
the wetland after the draining (Attachment E).
Compensatory Mitigation
As the 0.011 acre unauthorized permanent impacts to jurisdictional Wetland AA are cumulative
to the 0.487 acre already authorized impacts, the mitigation threshold is exceeded and
additional compensatory mitigation is required. Proposed impacts requiring mitigation total
0.011 of low quality wetland. Dependable Development, Inc. proposes to mitigate for the
permanent unauthorized wetland impacts through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits
from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). The credit acceptance letter is attached
(Attachment H).
CWS would like to propose mitigation ratios for the proposed impacts. As the wetland has beer
degraded by site development activities and could not be evaluated properly, the North Carolina
Wetland Assessment Methodology (NC WAM) form was completed based on the pictures taken
during the wetland delineation on January 28, 2014 to obtain an estimate of the quality of the
Wetland AA prior to the grading and fill (NC WAM 1, Attachment G). The wetland area was
clear cut between April 2010 and April 2013. Both ground surface condition and vegetation
structure had already been severely altered due the clearing and the Wetland AA scored LOW
based on the pictures taken January 28, 2014. This wetland represented a significantly
degraded condition and departure from its reference conditions (Headwater Forest) prior to
unauthorized impacts. Therefore, CWS proposes a 1:1 ratio for the impacted wetland.
On behalf of Dependable Development, Inc., CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification
Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31,
and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29/After-the-Fact Permit.
Page 7 of 8

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
Tom,,®,, I �,i„
k go..Omf
Aliisa Harjuniemi, WPIT
Project Manager
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Site Location
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 5: Authorized Impacts (2015)
Figure 6: After -the -Fact Impacts. (2017)
Figure 7: Bypass Alignment Sketch for USACE Permit Violation Resolution
Attachment A - Agent Authorization Form
Attachment B - Pre -Construction Notification for After -the -Fact permit
Attachment C - 404 General Permit Verification
Attachment D - 401 Water Quality Certification
Attachment E - Photopage (Photographs 1-10)
Attachment F - Alternative Designs
Attachment G - NC WAM Form
Attachment H - DMS Credit Acceptance Letter
Attachment I - Bypass Design
Page 8 of 8

C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Saddle Brook ATF\ArcGIS 2017\Figurel Vicinity.mxd

r � � I `I'r �� r` ' f . =kms= % ! �,, • `P, i-�_ �r / }
�• 1F"_ _- ' •� .ter f/�! "- �,. lff "•' i (�'
'��_� .' r�'�.J^�' �� 1 '� y�� • � f , Y � k Y '� •/ �J }' tir� ��.�! � Jam• f
N.
I s�
NC Hwy 27
A _ } fly` t- r J `a f I
i f i� • -;� f rl\ /
��'\ �� .� �� � •t,.�,• i ! - � i .h��f I '-vim -" _' ���y �° � SPaI� �,, � 5 4 +� �r�
;t � }.• y ; '.,v} ,':-. \_� �, r`j
.
F. Us -601
� .� r' •� � /p 4 ' S (11�•���-, � �� �r � �.• �/J�.� n� l�, l`, _' �f.,r� /: - \ '- i � N /r'�. \`_
� ` J ; � ._ _ � � •� � off`'. � �� r f �,,�ill �Ov \ + � � ' � � I �' Sart
X51 Tl
a
Legend
I•
r
4 , f . , _ '4.�
�1
4'' 'f) ' _, `i1► Project Limits (35 ac.)
r n . - f --CAME 2. rte` �` i' 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet a
REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC USGS QUADRANGLE MIDLAND, NC (1996).
7Y \
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 4/3/2017 USGS Site Location
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2013-3232:2 AVH Saddlebrook Development
APPLICANTNO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Midland, North Carolina 2
GCA WETLAND 5ERVIGE5 CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
C:\Users\AliisaHujmiemi\Desktop\SaddleBrookATF\AreGIS2017\Figu e2_USGS.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Saddle Brook ATF\ArcGIS 2017\Figure3_Aerial.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Saddle Brook ATF\ArcGIS 2017\Figure4_JD.mxd

C:\Users\AliisaHarjmiemi\Desktop\Saddle Brook ATF\ArcGIS 2017\Figure5_Authorized Impacts.=d

C:\Users\AliisaHarjuniemi\Desktop\Saddle Brook ATF\ArcGIS 2017\Figure6_Impacts.=d

Exlsiwc wE LANOs PER
cARouNAwETLANOSERwcES N/F
BYPASS ALIGNMENT SKETCH FOR
USACE PERMIT VIOLATION RESOLUTION
/f\
Bypass System:
N
DARRELL EUGENE AND
CATHERINE S HOOKS
- Moves the $tormWater toIGN
�DID
M 10-016-003870
DB 4632 PG 47
N/F
the downstream connection
41VIL Cra 6{NLCRIFVO
BYPASS SYSTEM
DOUGLAS D MCCOY AND
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
FRANCES C MCCOY
N/F
IVETA E SHEPHERD
6120
C,00 AlW-1 26
PIS M 10-016-0082
NO DEED OF RECORD
PIP M 10-016-0038,23
DD 7677 PG 75
F:v 9.0406
WWW.DNAWOEVEORINE.COM
Ib 215 --
z12
— — —
BYPASS SYSTEM
30' COMMON OPEN SPACE
P 1223
211
210 209
— —
20a 20J 206 205
203 202
— — — —
201 200 199
19
—
SEAL.
........
..... .. ... -. -'
19 19
................
,......
93 9z 91 90
1 1 188
_
—
W3 - Temporarily Flooded Wetland:
- 0.063 ac.
_
Drained with pump on April 10, 2017
TERSK DRIVE
and May 10 and 11, 2017 (Photographs 9
312
and 10, Attachment E
313
� DEVLGPME N
'ELO
ass 339
310 264 zea 2a2 2a1
280 2J9 1 18a les 186 IB) PID 0809EP
1
334
350
340
314
\
353 •/ 333
309
las
278 \82 .� `, BYPASS SYSTEM
\\
52 / 341 332
315
308
N
PHILIP JWEEKS AND
/DONNA WEEKS
�% ,�
q
316 3 07
2e6 277
161 PIDM 10-016-0033.00
DH 4985 PG 23E
3 31
2O
343
2a] 276
180
\j/ 2P 330
317 306
q .•�
/
Q�
288 275
1]9
LLA
344
329
2q 318 305
U
O~
345 U
q 289 274
IJ8 /
�
y) Z
=
/ 32a
319 304
�O
Rer
y
W
0
2
QQ� 290 2]3
1]J �
►4
Z �
� �
346 327
320 303
/
V
F—
W
LL
O
291 2J2 qQ-
1J6 N/F
PHILIP J WEEKS AND
Q
Q'
=
o N
PIDkDONNA0 16EEKS
11 5.10
/'S
d W N
~
326 /
322
301
292 271 rq
oq�
IJS Rer DD 9566 PG 130
>
F-
[) (�
] Ur Z
Y Z
H O
CSS 325
293 2J0
IJ4 /
1.
OU
OU f) WO
Z
WW Q
323 300
/
O
Q Z
C J
294 269 IJ3
m
Q 1 L O
Z O
324
/
C
<
299
295
268 t72
/
m
W
F
J
46
248 P/Nf ROA
c S 298
26J 171
N
H W
249
LL
\ 250
266 170
r/^,
d
29
m
\ 252
\ 253
265
N/F
TERRY W EFIRD
PIDM 10-021-0012.00
254
NO DEED OF RECORD
255
W 2 - Unauthorized Wetland Impact:
BMP
0.011 ac.
Mitigation
p
I /
/ 41
LEGEND
� � � 6V-Fa53Sr�RMFiFE
proposed through
� //
�
LF:1
DMS at 1:1 ratio
(!
\\\.`
NOTES;
1. BY-PASS SYSTEM SUBJECT TO FINAL DESIGN TO ACCOMMODATE
ROJFCr a:
172012 cxECK�er.
SMC
CMF
BYPASS SYSTEM
OFFSITE FLOWS AND AVOID CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE AND AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND.
are: .FFao�Fn a.:
004/27/2017
CMF
2. ESTIMATED /- 25 ACRES OFFSITE DRAINAGE OF LARGE
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND WOODED LAND.
Flgure 7
3. BYPASS PIPE WILL BE±42"RCP

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT A:
Agent Authorization Form
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdictional under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, AlovE LV_&_ /Yi representing Dependable Development, Inc., hereby certify that I
have authorized Gregg An emann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take
all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands
determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Applicant's signature
Qcb�/ e fyl v
Date
Agent's signature
Date
4-3-2017
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT B:
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Pre -Construction Notification for After -the -Fact permit

\NA
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
N Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes N No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
N Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
N Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes N
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Saddlebrook Development
2b.
County:
Cabarrus
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Midland
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
121180-314
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
2627 Brekonridge Centre
3e. City, state, zip:
Monroe, NC 28110
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Other, specify: Client
4b. Name:
Mr. Michael Foess
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Dependable Development, Inc
4d. Street address:
2649 Brekonridge Centre
4e. City, state, zip:
Monroe, NC 28110
4f. Telephone no.:
704-238-1229
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable).-
pplicable):5c.
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c.Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f. Fax no.:
704-527-1133
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
55449723600000, 55449770750000, 55540710680000,
and 55540783550000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.243974° Longitude: -80.509093°
1 c. Property size:
35 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Muddy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area currently consists of cleared and graded areas for future residential subdivision. Photographs 1-4 are
representative of site conditions prior to corrective procedures, Photographs 5-8 are representative of the site conditions prior to
wetland impacts, and Photographs 9-10 are representative of the current conditions after draining the flooded wetland
(Attachment E).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.55 acre of jurisdictional wetland area
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to develop the property into a single-family subdivision located in Midland, North Carolina (Figure
5, attached). This area is experiencing rapid population growth due to its proximity NC Highways 601 and 27 that provides
easy access to this region of Cabarrus County and connects to other rapidly growing cities such as Concord and Charlotte.
There is a need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand within this highly -desirable area and economic
market.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: (see next page)
Page 3 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29. the authorized permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. totaled 0.487
acre of wetland (SAW -2014-01686; Figure 5, attached). These impacts to Wetland AA were the result of the fill associated
construction of residential subdivision.
Unauthorized impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total 0.011 acre of permanent wetland impacts due to fill for
stormwater control measure and 0.063 acre of temporary impact to a wetland due to flooding (Figure 6, attached). The extent
of these impacts were determined based on the site visit conducted by CWS, Inc. scientists on March 23, 2017. The wetlands
that were not previously authorized to be filled were re -flagged. A sub -foot Trimble GPS was used to locate the former wetland
boundaries, as the current conditions made delineation based on the hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation
impractical. attached). Photographs 1 and 2 are representative of the current conditions at this location (Attachment E).
2015: Authorized Impacts
Wetland Impact 1 (W1) — Fill for Residential Subdivision
Authorized impacts consisted of 0.487 acre fill to a low quality wetland (Figure 5, attached; NC WAM 1, Attachment F).
Wetland AA divides the property in western and eastern halves. Therefore, alternatives to avoid Wetland AA were not practical
while meeting the project goals. The 404 General Permit Verification is attached as Attachment C (SAW -2014-01686) and the
401 Water Quality Certification is attached as Attachment D (DWR # 14-0949) for this wetland fill.
2017: Unauthorized Impacts - After -the -Fact Permit
Wetland Impact 2 (W2) — Fill
Unauthorized grading and fill for a stormwater BMP impacted 0.011 acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 6, attached).
Photographs 3 and 4 are representative of the conditions at this location prior to pumping out the waters and Photographs 9
and 10 are representative of the current conditions (Attachment E). Dependable Development, Inc. proposes mitigating these
impacts through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) as this would
create a greater uplift for waters of the U.S. than restoring the originally low quality wetlands.
Wetland Impact 3 (W3) — Flooded Wetland and Proposed Bypass Pipe
Flooding due to failure to install a drainage system to maintain the hydrologic connection between the flooded wetland area an(
the downstream connection temporarily impacted 0.063 acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 6, attached). Photographs 1
and 2 are representative of the conditions after the flooding at this location (Attachment E). Dependable Development, Inc.
drained the flooded wetland with pumps on April 10, 2017 and May 10 and 11, 2017 and plans to install a bypass system to
move the stormwater from the wetland to the downstream connection area as soon as possible to prevent a permanent
conversion to an open water feature. The inlet of the bypass system, at the wetland, will be set an elevation that allows the
wetland maintain a hydrologic connection. The inlet will be four to six inches above existing ground elevations to mimic the
natural hydrologic conditions. Figure 7 (attached) illustrates the bypass alignment and the full design is included as Attachmen
I. Photographs 9-10 illustrate the wetland after the draining (Attachment E).
Typical construction equipment such as tract hoe will be used.
Page 4 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project including all prior phases in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ PreliminaryEl Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): CWS
Other: CWS
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
On January 28, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a 404 General Permit Verification for the Saddlebrook
Development, authorizing 0.487 acres of wetland fill impact associated with development (SAW -2014-01686, Attachment C).
Compensatory mitigation was provided via North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for 0.487 acres of
Riparian wetlands. On February 12, 2014, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources issued the 401
Water Quality Certification (DWR # 14-0949, Attachment D). No notification of jurisdictional determination was provided by the
USACE.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
On January 28, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a 404 General Permit Verification for the Saddlebrook
Development, authorizing 0.487 acres of wetland fill impact associated with development (SAW -2014-01686, Attachment C).
Compensatory mitigation was provided via North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for 0.487 acres of
Riparian wetlands. On February 12, 2014, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources issued the 401
Water Quality Certification (DWR # 14-0949, Attachment D).
However, on March 30, 2017, Mr. Gregg Antemann, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS), and Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland
Professional in Training (WPIT), from CWS met on site with Alan Johnson from NCDEQ and Jason Randolph from USACE for
a compliance site visit as the developer had filled approximately 0.011 acre of unpermitted wetland areas and flooded 0.063
acres of wetland. Dependable Development, Inc. has contracted CWS to determine the next course of action to rectify the
violation and to determine permitting requirements for development.
Dependable Development, Inc. drained the flooded wetland with pumps on April 10, May 10 and May 11 of 2017, and
Dependable Development, Inc. is planning to install a bypass system to move ponding stormwater runoff from the wetland to
the downstream connection area as soon as possible to prevent a permanent conversion to an open water feature. All
construction activities within the unpermitted portions of the jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have ceased until the applicant
receives the 404 General Verification/After the Fact Permit. Photographs 1-4, dated March 23, 2017, are representative of
current site conditions (Attachment E). Photographs 4-8, dated January 28, 2014, are representative of Wetland AA during the
wetland delineation (Attachment E).
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f. Area
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Tempora T
W1
P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.487*
W2
P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.011
W3
p
Temporary flooding
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.063
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.561 ac.
2h. Comments:
*Filling 0.487 acre of wetlands (W1) was authorized in 2015 (SAW -2014-01686). Compensatory mitigation was provided via
NCEEP for 0.487 acre of Riparian wetland for these impacts.
The new permanent After -the -Fact impacts total 0.011 acre (W2).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
Page 6 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3i. Comments: No permanent impacts to streams are proposed.
Page 7 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tempora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
_
Choose One
Choose
02
_
Choose One
Choose
03
_
Choose One
Choose
04
_
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Tempora T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
_
Yes/No
B2
_
Yes/No
B3
_
Yes/No
B4
_
Yes/No
B5
_
Yes/No
B6
_
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 16
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are unavoidable to meet the project goals. Proper sediment and erosion
control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certificate No. 3890.
All work will be constructed in the dry.
Permanent impacts to the on-site jurisdictional water of the U.S., including both the previously authorized and After -the -Fact, are
limited to a total of 0.498 acre of low quality wetland (Wetland AA).
Removing fill from the wetlands (for example dividing the BMP pond in two) to show avoidance and minimization and bring the
project into compliance was also discussed. However, this is not a practicable alternative and any changes to the existing work
would be cost -prohibitive. Additionally, the impacted wetland was low quality (estimated NC WAM score LOW, Attachment F). It
is CWS's opinion that mitigating these impacts through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits from the NC Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) would create a greater overall uplift for waters of the U.S. and be more beneficial for the environment
by enhancing and creating habitats than restoring the original low quality wetlands abutting the new development.
No Build Alternative
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build" alternative was
considered. The property is being purchased for the purpose of providing residential housing to meet the growth and demand of
an area in Midland experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project goals of providing
necessary housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
Alternative Design for the BMP
In an attempt to avoid permanent additional impacts to the Wetland AA, three alternative BMP designs were considered
(Attachment F). The alternatives and the reasons why they were rejected are listed below:
Alternative #1 - Relocating the BMB to North
The first alternative that was considered was to relocate the BMP to north. However, relocating the BMP to north is not possible
since it would not capture the drainage from the lots southeast of the relocated BMP without extensive re -grading of the entire
site. Additionally, this option would result in a loss of three lots. Even without the re -grading, the cost estimate for this option
would be approximately $260,000 ($50,000 for each each lot, $65,000 in pipe work, and $45,000 in basin work).
Alternative #2 - Dividing BMP to two smaller BMPs
The second alternative that was considered was to divide the BMP into two separate facilities and relocate a portion of the BMP
to north. This option would result in a loss of two lots and additional basin construction work. The cost estimate for this option
would be approximately $200,000. ($50,000 for each lot and $100,000 for the construction of the basins). Furthermore, this
option would lead to an increase in maintenance and inspection costs associated with the long term maintenance of these
Facilities (two instead of one) that is ultimately the responsibility of the homeowners and not the developer.
Alternative #3 - Dividing BMP to three smaller BMPs
The third alternative that was considered was to divide the BMP in three smaller BMPs. This option would result in a loss of two
lots and require significant costs due re -grading and additional stormwater structures. The cost estimate for this option would be
$280,000 ($50,000 for each lot, $45,000 in pipe, and $135,000 in basin work). Furthermore, this option would lead to an
increase in maintenance and inspection costs associated with the long term maintenance of these facilities that is ultimately the
responsibility of the homeowners and not the developer.
Moving the basins would result in unreasonable additional costs, as well as the loss of lots and the additional long term costs for
maintenance of more than one facility. The additional time and resources spent on the solution for the BMP redesign alternative
and bypass design has delayed any income of revenue to this point. This project needs to furnish lots to prospective
homeowners to recover the lost income due to the unfortunate history of this development.
Page 9 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment and
erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to
on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permits 29 and Water Quality Certificate
No. 3890. All work will be constructed in the dry.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
N Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
N DWQ N Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
N Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
N Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.011 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 10 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 11 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
This project is associated with a stormwater infrastructure maintenance project and
❑ Yes ❑ No
does not require a SMP.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
N Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Stormwater Permit No, SW3150205 was issued on April 29, 2015.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DWQ Stormwater Program (2015)
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes N No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
El HOWEl
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
N Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes N No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
p' Yes N No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑' Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑' No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes IN No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Wetland Impact 2 (W2) — Fill
Unauthorized grading and fill for a stormwater BMP impacted 0.011 acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 6, attached).
Photographs 3 and 4 are representative of the conditions at this location prior to pumping out the waters and Photographs 9
and 10 are representative of the current conditions (Attachment E). Dependable Development, Inc. proposes mitigating these
impacts through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) as this would
create a greater uplift for waters of the U.S. than restoring the originally low quality wetlands.
Wetland Impact 3 (W3) — Flooded Wetland and Proposed Bypass Pipe
Flooding due to failure to install a drainage system to maintain the hydrologic connection between the flooded wetland area an
the downstream connection temporarily impacted 0.063 acre of jurisdictional wetland area (Figure 6, attached). Photographs 1
and 2 are representative of the conditions after the flooding at this location (Attachment E). Dependable Development, Inc.
drained the flooded wetland with pumps on April 10, 2017 and May 10 and 11, 2017 and plans to install a bypass system to
move the stormwater from the wetland to the downstream connection area as soon as possible to prevent a permanent
conversion to an open water feature. The inlet of the bypass system, at the wetland, will be set an elevation that allows the
wetland maintain a hydrologic connection. The inlet will be four to six inches above existing ground elevations to mimic the
natural hydrologic conditions. Figure 7 (attached) illustrates the bypass alignment and the full design is included as Attachment
I. Photographs 9-10 illustrate the wetland after the draining (Attachment E).
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development.
Page 13 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed sewers will tie into the exiting sewer infrastructure.
Page 14 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The project area currently consists of cleared and graded areas for future residential subdivision. There are no potential
habitats for the federally protected species within the project area. Photographs 1-4 and 9-10 are representative of current
site conditions (Attachment E).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes © No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on August 19, 2014 to determine the presence of
any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. The response letter
dated September 2, 2014 stating that the SHPO was aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project
was forwarded to the USACE.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710555400J and 3710554400J
Page 15 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

ZT—�-
Mr. Gregg Antemann 6.29.17
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name signature is valid only if an authorization letter Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 16 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT C:
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
404 General Permit Verification

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRSCT
Action ID. SAW -201401686 County: Cabarrus USGS Quad: NC -MIDLAND
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner /Authorized Agent: Carolina Develovment Services, LLC Scott Twiddv
Address: 2649 Breckonridge C¢nter Driv¢
Monro¢_ North Carolina 28110
Telephone No.: 803 389 338'1
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The oroi¢ct is located east of
th¢ Pin¢ Hi11 Road. south of Pelham Lane and west of U.S_ 601 n¢ar Midland. in Cabarrus county.
NC. Coordinates: 35_243994N_ -80_509093
Description of projects azea and activity: Thies oermit authorizes ¢xcavation and olacement of till
material associated with OA89 acres of wetland fill imoact aasociatea with r¢sidentisl develovment
As-comvensatory miHgaHon. the avvlicant will vrovide vavment to the North Carolina Ecosvatem
Enhanc¢mevt Pro ram EP for 0_489 acre of Ri ariav W¢tlavds. Pa ment must be made rior
to conducting the authorized work_
Applicable Law: � Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Q Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional Genaal P¢rmit Number.
Nationwide Permit Number: NW 29
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions
Based on th¢ u of NWP and th¢ i Deets that occurred_ s additional immacta WoUS would exc¢¢d
existloa NWP thresholds. Therefore an iP would be revuiredV
Areas of Forested wetland that will be t¢mporar0y impacted during covstruMion must b¢ replant¢d
with vatiy¢ woody vegetation, monitor¢d for success and repiant¢d where necessary. Any impact
deviation to the approved plan must b¢ approved by prior notification from the Corps before th¢se
impacts can occur.
PERMIT CONDITION TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL PERMITS USING THIS PROCESS: "In
order to compensate for impacts associated with chis permit mitigation she/! be provided in
accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form
including any special conditions listed on this form are hereby incorporated as species!
conditions of this permit authorization."
Your work is authorized by the above r¢f¢renccd permit provided it is accomplished in spier accordance witb the
attached conditions and your plans submitted on September sad revised on January 14, 2015. Any violation of the
attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plays may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order avd/or appropriate legal action.
This veriflcatioa will remain valid until the expiration date iden0fied below unless the nationwide auUrorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the �iionwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verifica0on wi0 remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided ii complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (ic., are under construction) or
are under contract to cotttmence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity

is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or re cation,
unless discretionary authority has been exermsed on a cast -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Wamr Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requvements. You may also visit their website at h :// orta ncdenr.or w b/w s /ws/ eb ca e
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to begirmivg work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Deparhnent of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
requved Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the unit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at 82g-2 -99
Cotes Regulatory Official William Elliott Date: January 28. 2015
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18. 201'1
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
ontin a to do so, please c mplete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
httu://oer2 n usace.armv mil/survey html to complete the survey online.

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. � Based on preliminary information, mere appear to be waxers of the US including wet]ands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appea3able action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFA Part 33 ]).
S. � There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section l0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
U�ess there is a change th the law or our published regulations, this deternination may be relied upon for a
period not [o exceed five years from the date of this notification_
C ® There are waters o{the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 o{the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). UNess there is a change is the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon £or a peraod not m exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
D. Q The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please ref en a jurisdictional determination issued Action ID
Basis of Juriatlictional Det¢rminatiov:
The site contains wetlands as deterrnined by the 198 Corpr 1 Engineers Wetland Delineation Mar�uat and the
Interim Regianot Supplement to the Corpr gjEngtneerr Weitands Delineation Manual: Eortern Mountain and
Piedmont Region. These wedands arc adjacent to stream charmels located oa the property that exhibit indicators of
ordinary high water marks. The stream charmel on the property is an umnatned tributary [o Muddy Crcek wfiich
flows into the Aocky River.
This jurisdictional determination is valid for the impact areas only.
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delimaflor✓determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for
the particWar site identified th this request The delineafion/determination may no[ be valid for the wetland
conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 3985. If you or your tenant are USDA Progam participants, or
anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a wrtified wetland determination Som the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Appeals Iaformationc (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B and C about).
This rrespoaden constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described sire. If you object
[o this determination, you may request an adxtrinistrative appeal under Corps regu]atiovs at 33 CFR Part 33 t.
Enclosed you will fmd a request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request m appeal this determination you must
submit a completed RFA fora m the fallowing address:
US Army Corps of Eagincers
South Atlantic Division
Atm: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
AUaata, Georgia 303 03-880 1
Phone: <404)562-5139
m order For an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days o£
the date of the NAP_ Should you decide m submit an RFA form, ii must be received at the above address within 60
days from the issue Date below.
"•It is not necessary to submit as RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
corespondence.�

Corps Regulatory Of£�ial: William Elliott ��� i�
Issue Date: January 28. 2015
Expiration Date: Five years from Irsue Dote
Copy Furnished:
Andrew McCoy, John Wi¢land Homes, 8325-D Atrowridge Slvd, Charlotte, NC 28273, Greg Antemann,
Carolina Wetland Services, Tnc., 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd_, Charlotte, NC 28273

Permit Number: SAW -201 4-0 1 6 86
Permit Type: NW 29
Name of County: Cabarn,a
Name of Permittee: Carolina Development Services, LLC Scott Twiddy
Date of Issuance: January 28, 2015
Project Manager: William Elliott
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any miflgation required by the
permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
' Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to
pemut suspension, modiF cation, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Pemuttee

NO"I7 FICATION OP ADMINIS'TKA'11VE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
KEQUES'f FOR APPEAL
A hcant Carolina Devel
pp - opment Services, LLC
_
File Number- SAW -2014- Date January 28,
Scott Twidd
01686 2015
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of txnission A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PREL IMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I -The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision: Additional information may be found at
.h ://www.usace.anny mtl/CECW/Pages/reg materiala.aspx or Carps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL, PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT : Ifyou received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer £or £nal
authorization. Ifyou received a Letter of Permission (LOPj, you may a rcpt the LOP and yow work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of ttre LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the penrri; including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associaxed with the permit.
OBJECT: 1£ you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions [herein, you may request that
the permit be modified accoMingly. You must complete Section II o£this { and retain the form to the district ergineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer witlda 60 days of the date o£this notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the permit m the future. Upon receipt o£yovr letter, the district engin will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some o£you objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. Ager evaluating your objections, the
districe engineer will send you a proffered permit £or your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Perini; you may sign the permit document and reiw-n it to the district engineer for £nal
authorrzatioa. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is auxhorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance o£the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
APPEAL: IFyou choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer- This Form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You say appeal the denial o£a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the divrston engineer This form must. be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this. nonce.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information -
ACCEPT: You do not need to noti[y the Corps to accept an approved TD. Failure to notify the Corps within fi0 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive aLL rights m appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: Ifyou disagee with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the nate oEihis notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for furtkter consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - RE UEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or yourobjcctions to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
r abjectiovs are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record oEthe appeal conference or meetin8. and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is weeded to
clarify the administrative record. Neither tha appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
vide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POIIJT OF CONTACT FOR UESTIONS OR INFORMATION_
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact:
also contact:
William Elliott, Pcoject Manager
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
USACE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Ave
V.S. Army Corps o£Engineers, South Atlantic Division
RM 208
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Asheville, NC 28801
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
828-2']3-']980
phone: [phone]']
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signator¢ below gravts the right of ¢Wray to Corps of Engin rs persormel, and any govammcnt
consultants, m conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will b¢ provided a 15 day
notice o{an sit¢ roves ' tion, amd will have the o orn,nity to artici aro in all site in esti atiovs.
Date:
Telephone number:
Si attue of a ellant ora ent.
For appeals on Initial Protl¢r¢d Permits send this Eorm to:
District Engineeq Wilmington Regulatory Division, AHnt William Elliotq 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional D¢terminationa send this form toe
Division Evgin¢er, Commandey U.S. Army Engineer Diyisiov, South Atlantis Atta: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Oifleer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-
8501_ Phov¢: (404) 562-513']

���
NC�ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resoumes
Pat McCrory Michael -Ellison, Director John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary
November 3, 2014
Scott Twiddy
Carpline Development Smites, LLC
2649 BtecKinridga Center Drive
Momoq NC 25110 � Eipfration o£Acccptance: May 3, 2015
ProJact: Saddlebroolc Sit¢
County: Cabanva
Tha putposa of tiv. letter is Yo notify you the[ the North Carolina Ewsystem P.�tancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment £or compensaffiry mitigation for ssnpact associated with the above tai ranted projett as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decisi n dons not asstae that participation in the NCEEP wilt be approved by the peradt issuing agencies as mirigetion
for pr ject impacts.o It is xha responsibility of the applicant to contact tl;ase agencies to datennine if payment to the NCEEP will ba
approved.. You moat also tom 1 with all or local cnt 'tar - authorization 'ted
x osed activi mala L 2009 33 tt to a the Use of Com a sato Mit: axi enks as amended by
S.L. 2011-343.
This acceptance is valid far six onths from the date o£this lea¢r and is not transterable. If we have not received a copy of th¢
lasv¢d 404 P¢rmit/40] C¢rtlRcatlon/CAlKA permit within dais time frame, this ceptaoca wilt expire It is the applicant's
xnspoasibility to send copies of the perm:rs m NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the petmit(sj an invoice will bo issued based
n the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authori:sd work. Tha amount oftbe in -
Lieu Fw to ba paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fae Schedule and policies listed at wwwmceep.net.
Based on rhe information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigatiov
are arirxd in ebe following table. Tlea amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is dexetminad by
River CU Stream (Peat) Wetlands (acres]
Basin Location
Upon receipt o£payment, EP.P wall telco respoasibiliry for providing the compensatory m:tigatloa Tha mitigation will be parfgxmed
- ordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem E�ancement Program ha -Lieu Fea
Instruateot daffid July 28, 2010.
ThatiY you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any quartioas or need additlonal information, please contact Kelly Williams at
[phone]_ -
Sincere � , n n
�-� �- c__ ifl�/.{ V
James. E �"dl V —
Asstt Management Supevisor
u: William Elliott, USACE-Asheville
Alen Johnson, NCDWR-Mooresville
Gregg Antetnann, agent
'1652 Mail Servlet Center, Ralelgb, NortM1 Carolina 2]699-0652
Phone: 91940]-8996\ IMemeT, wvnv.ncdenr.gov
An Equel Op3101itmiiy \ Atfmntive Acllan Employer -Mace in part Ey rxyGetl paper

U.5_ ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Compensatory Miti¢ation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permitt¢¢o Stott Twitldy, Carolina Dev¢lopment SerJices, LLC Action ID: SAW -2014-01686
Proj¢¢ Name: sadtllebroak County: Cabarrus
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either a approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Erosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed This form, it is [he Permittee's responsibll Ry to
e that to the U.s. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Project Manager itlentified on page Iwo is receipt of a signed
copyrof this form before wntlucNng authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation
Sponsor will be used to provide the mitigation associated with Me permit, or if the impacts and/or ffie mitigation will o
in m e than o ¢ 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Cotle (HUG), multipl¢ forms will be attached [o the permit, and the separate fo ms
for each Sponsor antl/or HUC muse be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below a vailable at
the identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigationr�¢gardless mf
whertrer o not they haver vetl payment from the Permittee. Once the form is sign¢d, the Sponsor must update the
bank ledger and provide a copy of the sign etl form and the updated bank letlg¢r to the Permittee, the USAGE Project
Manager, and the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (s¢e wntact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply
with all reporting requtrements established in their authorizing instrument
P¢rmitt¢tl Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements=
Permitt¢d Impacts R¢ airing MIH atlon� 8 -digit HUC antl Basin: 03040105, Yadkin Riv¢r Basin
Stream impacts (linear feet) wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm Cool Cold Riparian River Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
O O O 0.487 O O O
�If more Lhan one mitigation sponsor. will be us¢d for the permit, only include impacts m be mitigated by this sponsor.
8-tli¢it HIIC and Basins 03040105. Vad kin River Basin
Stream Miti ation cr¢dlts)
W¢Tland Mitigation (credits)
Warn Cool
Cold
Ri a n Riverine
rlo.ag>
Riparian Non-Riverine Non-Ripartan
Coastal
0 0
o
D o
0
Mhigation site Debited: NCEEP
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the speci£c site. For NCEEP, list NCEEP_ If the
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list [he specific site to be debited).
s¢crion m b¢ comp/¢red by the
Statem¢nt of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I a authorized to approve mitigatlon
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I rertify that the sponsor agrees to a cept full responsibility for
providing tM1e mitigation Itlentified in [his doament (see the fable above), associated'wiih the USAGE Permittee and Action_
ID n mbar shown. 1 also verify that r¢leas¢d credits (antl/or advance cretllTs for NCEEP), a approved by the USAGE, a
urrently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the sponsor fails To provide ttre
required c mpensatory mitigation, the USAGE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
M{tlgation sponsor
Nam¢ of sponsors Authodzed
Page 3 of 2 Form Updated 23 October, 2013

USAGE Wilmington District
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transf¢r Form, Page 2
Contlifions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
. Once this documenC has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USAGE is in r eip[ of the signed form, [he
permittee is no longer responsible for proyitling the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
esponsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in [he permiT conditions.
Construction within Jurisdictional a authorized by The permit IdentiFled on page o of this form can begin only
atter the USAGE is in r eipt of a copy of this tlocument signed by the Sponsoq confirming that the Sponsor has
cepted responsibility for proyitling the mitigation requirements listed herein. Far authorized impacts conducted by
[he North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), c nstruc[lon within jurisdictional a may proceed upon
permit Issuance; however, a copy of thus form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USAGE within 30 days of
permit Issuance., NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USAGE has re ved this form, confirming
that the Sponsor has a cepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USAGE
administrative records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instmment. I[ is the Perm ittee's responsibility [o ensure
that the USAGE Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposetl to Me type, a unt, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USAGE, [fie Sponsor must obtain c e -by -case approval from the USAGE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). if approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current Disiritt
guidance and a of this form must be compleTed and included In the USAGE administrative records for both
the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/AddiLinnal Condi inns:
This form is not valitl unless signed below by the USAGE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed the Sponsor shou/d provide copies of this Jorm o/ong wifh on updoted bonK /edger [o: 3j the Permi[fee, 2j the
USAGE P Jec[ Monoger of fh¢ oddress be/ow, Ond 3f [he W1/ming[on 01s[Ac[ Mitigo[ton OJy-ice• AKnv Todd Tugwe!/
32405 FORS of Neuse Rood Woke Fbresq Nc 275g7(emoi/: mdd. tugwef/�usoce.ormy.mil). Questions regarding this form
or any of the permit conditions may ba directed to the USAGE Protect Manager below.
USAGE ProJecc Manager: William Elliott
USAGE Fieltl Offic¢: Asheville RegulaTo Field Office
rY
'
ELLIOTT.WILLI P,gaauy Agnea by
ELLIOrt.WILLIAM.AMNONY.I OOB
US Army Corps of Engineers
c� os,mus.
tsi Patton AyenPe, Room zoa
DGgi+ cowmmmc
AM.A/INGT(-H�OGN�1
�=DOD, o�=PRh on=DSA,
Ash¢Yille, North [: rolina 28801-SD06
Y.1 O'Y'HV J"t[V O`Y m—ELLIOTr.WILLIAM.ANTNONY.
tWe69960.1
y.mi
Email: William-a_ellintt�lYsace.arm 1
- patc 2015.012819=4639-OS'OD'
USAGE Project Manager Signature Date of Slgnafure
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, tndutling information o mitigation ratios, functional a enTs, and
mitigation bank location and a ailability, and credit dassiflcaCions (induding stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at htto://r bits.usace ar v mil.
Page 2 of 2
Tb¢ Wilmington DlRnct Is commit[etl to proyitling tM1e M1lgryes[ level of support tv [M1¢ pubOc To help us ¢nsure we continue to tlo so. please compleR tM1e
Customer5a[Isfa�an Survey loca[etl at our website at M1ttve/he¢ula[erv.ue m/[o mmple[e tb¢survey online.

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT D:
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
401 Water Quality Certification

a
►`
AM
KU
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Scott Twiddy
2649 Breckonridge Center Dr.
Monroe, NC 28110
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
February 12, 2014
DWR# 14-0949
Cabarrus County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Saddlebrook Development
Dear Mr. Twiddy:
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions
listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated Aigust 21, 2014 and received by
the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on September 5, 2014 and subsequent information
submitted on April 30, 2015. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this
project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3890 which can be viewed on our
web site at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding
with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the Certification
are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the Certification,
you must also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 02H
.0507(c)
2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the
approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)]
3. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact Amount Approved Amount Approved
Temporary Impact Permanent Impact
Stream 0 linear ft. 0 linear ft.
Wetland 0 acre. 0.487 acre
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28155
Phone: [phone]W Internet: www,ncdenr,gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

DWR# 14-0949
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion
control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This
includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be
matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. The SMP approved by the Division of Energy, Mining and Land Resources under the state
stormwater program meets the requirements of the 401 Certification Program. [15A NCAC
02H .0506(b)(5)].
7. Mitigation [15A NCAC 02H .0500(h)] must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified
in the table below. The Division has received notification/acceptance from the City of
Charlotte Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank to meet this mitigation requirement.
Until the City of Charlotte receives and clears your payment, and proof of payment has been
provided to this Office, no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. For
accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes payment to meet the following
compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub -basin Number
Required
Stream 0 (feet)
Wetlands (corns) 0.487 (acres) Yadkin. 03040105
8. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the
potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment
accumulations, scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
9. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in
waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
10. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the
permit drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)
11. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and
maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids,
or other toxic materials. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
12. The permittee shall report any violations of this Certification to the Division of Water
Resources within 24 hours of discovery.. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute
150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http://www,�icoah,com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].

DWR# 14-0949
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable
OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am
to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one (1)
copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office
at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DENR
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality
Greg Antemann, CWS, email

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant: _
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
DWR# 14-0949
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401
Transportation Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's
authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, _, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the
project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date

DWR# 14-0949

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT E:
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Photopage (Photographs 1-10)

Saddlebrook Development
Attachment E - Photopage
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Photograph 1. View of flooded wetland, facing northwest. Dated March 23, 2017.
Photograph 2. View of the site, facing southwest. Dated March 23, 2017.
Photopage 1 of 5

Saddlebrook Development
Attachment E - Photopage
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
Photograph 3. View of the impacted wetland, facing southeast. Dated March 23, 2017.
Photograph 4. View of the BMP located on the impacted wetland, facing northeast. Dated March 23,
2017.
Photopage 2 of 5

la,
Y d ►.
�s
v ---W
p!77
f^
'
'�' 1 ` � �c � J •? - V
''��
•+,
•rte;
.�/.
� [. ,+ y � * rte.
�
f
4
s
Q`
' P" 4t;. yY"
la,
Y d ►.
�s

Saddlebrook Development
Attachment E - Photopage
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
I
Photograph 9. View of drained portion of flooded Wetland AA, facing north. Dated May 12, 2017.
Photograph 10. View of drained portion of flooded Wetland AA, facing east. Dated May 12, 2017.
Photopage 5 of 5

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
Attachment F:
Alternative Designs
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2

1 \
N &
BMP ALTERNATIVE #1
N/F WOLV ERINE-�
HIL DA ANN BERRY PEND
PID4 10-016-003815
CIVIL ENGINEERING
DB 3606 PG 290
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
980.309.0 6
7 � \ TING LANDS PER
_ — WWW.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
\ \ C I D SERVICES N/E \ NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
I— —- PAAR kEfrINE-S--x AND
\ SEAL:
PID# lq--G 03870---
�_i 4632 PG Ft7 — — — —_--_-
-� l --- N/F
NOT FOR
nouGLAs n MCcov AND
` ---- ---- FRANCES C MCCOY N/` CONSTRUCTION
222 221 '� - --- -----------
����� L -10-016-0082.00 IVETA E SHEPHERD
13 I �� 220 1 219 _ - - - - - - - - - - - M - -- RECORD PID# 10-016-0038,23
218 217 2t6 215 J DB 7677 PG 75
! 1214 213 I y _ \ i BYPASS SYSTEM 30' COMMON OPEN SPACE
z12 cos.
21
� 210 �zos ' zos-----
� zoi zo9 "� los zoo �203 1 I �
® - 202~201
200 ' I X199 P[PE
f 198 .
I � 197 i
' 196 � "•
®-
3POT C_O.S.
2
CARQLINA,
WETLAND SERVICES
362 381 360
I 358
-
�-
J
PivE I
PID
282 _ 281 280 279 1 ll 185 188 // I DB 10809
r \ 339
b"
I
8
354
-
�
N/
PHILIA
352 332 316 \ �\ / AND
_,DONNA WEEKS
2 /
/PID# 1985 TOB 40-0 PG 23033 00
/ 351 D 8
372_ zR7 / z76 A 190 ty,
343 \
1 i
374
{ \ 329 V 318
375 178 Z O w yy
349 � 8 / � i 289 \ � �/ 274 � i 178 �r �
32'H-
�_
3oa Z
349 / �: 290 A 273 O
348 327320 > 303 • .. / �_ Z w [)
0'OS. / 272 776 N/F /
1 �/
PHILIP J WEEKS AND w - Q
i C
L
DONNA WEEKS Z � -J
�\ 347 326 ® PIDit 10-016-00 5.10 co CL
IL
U N
/ 23s i /� ® A 301 v� 1 n5 RB DB 9566 Py' 130 Q
as
Z
zao - -•
w w
- � V �� � m
Lu
27 /
w
\
W
\ _
_
244 O v m Z I—
• / Q
\ ` \
299 `\� p
268 hA � � - \ � � � w CO
246 _ �\ \ - ` � L Z
247 \ ' / i _ � � \ \ ` Z m Lu
- c'0. \\ \ r Lu Lu
24a s./yI/ z9s 267 / FUTURE BYPASS SYSTEM _ Z W d' ~
-......,..,� � W J
EXISTING POWER LINE EASEMENT
9
257
\ALTERNATIVE \ `�
�-
\\
zsz
L_ �/� 263 V 60�2�
/ V `,
-
SYSTEM � � A ao so
SCALE: 1--60'
*- F EXISTING WETLANDS AS
BY I REVISION
FLAGGED BY CWS AND NOTES: : :
LOCATED BY PROVIDENCE 1. CONCEPT LAYOUTS FOR ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ONLY NOT FOR PRoIECT # DRAWN erSMC
REMOVE AND REPLACE `
I GROUP SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION 172012 CHECKED BY: CMF
31 1 LF STORM SYSTEM �� LAND �
\ \ .\ 2. ACTUAL SIZE AND DIMENSION SUBJECT TO DETAILED DESIGN FOR DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
ROAD CONNECTION EXISTING A \ �� BMP 06/20/2017 SHEET:
BMP �\ \ 3. EXISTING BMP SIZE AND TOPOGRAPHY AS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS SCALE:

r \
N
M°' BMP ALTERNATIVE #2 &
N/F RVOLVERI 1011
HIL DA ANN BERRY PEND
PID# 10-016-003815
CIVIL ENGINEERING
DB 3606 PG 290
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
980.309.0 6
7 � \ �� TING LANDS PER
WWW.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
\ \ C I D SERVICES NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
-AR-THEfrI NE-s-rE AND \ SEAL:
1\ ��
PID# 1-Glt-OnB70---
4�32HU117----__ NOTFOR
BYPASSISYSTEM r - - - - - _ noLIGLAS D MCCOY AND
222 221 '� - -� --- - --__ _ --- _ FRANCES C MCCNY N/F
CONSTRUCTION
� L _ -----_ PID# 10 -016 -RECO 0 IVETA E SHEPHERD
r3 220 1 219 218 217 n � 1 I \ \ r - M RECORD PIT # 7677 -0038235
! � 216 215 214 213 1 BYPASS SYSTEM Ds 7677 PG 75
z12 cos30' COMMON OPEN SPACE
207 206 -' 205 204 203 202
f 198 .
I � 197 i
' 196 � "•
192 .. c. o.S.
191 '190 189 88
/
®. -�_ CAROLINA
WETLAiVd SERVICES
� 364 363 381 I j I 357 _
359 358 C.O.S. C. S. �-
J `
I
I�
�- �j 338 )
_ � - _
PIPE
313 �- 284 283 � I 187 / PID
/ 355 / / 310 - 282 _ 281 339 4 280 279 t ll 185 188 // I DB 10$09
/ \
b"
I
8
\ z
\
353 340
333 28s 27a - I - BYP2,S5 SYSTEM -
��
341
N/
�/ './2B6�\ \ 277 \ / 181 \ /P IDDONNA10-016-003300
AND
/ 332 \ ,DONNA WEEKS
316 307\ �� �u \\, / DB 4985 PG 238
287 1276 780
372
373 � I \ 344 � 1 � 288
3D5 i \ Z
Lu
375 349 / / 328289 / 274 178 - \
304 REF O Z �
\ 348Q
346 327 320 > 303 / \ \ • / Z LuN/F [)
272 776 / W O
PHILIP J WEEKS AND C
347 HIU-016-0035.10 Z
322 292 271 t75 PID DB 9566 P)3' 130 m O U J
\
IJw U Q_ as uLC-
I_I
(n Z
270 774 ;' / i
Eu
323 300 0 w O m
\
294 b" 269 �\ % 173 LL! Z ce LU
J _� � O C� O Z >
_ % ' �� \ ��
` - Q w p
29s � �; 26s 1 � � , 172 �
'•� - 247 _ W m Z
248 _ os \ 29B I. z9s 267 / 171 � ��/ FUTURE BYPASS SYSTEM Z CL d• Lu W Lu
A.
,EXISTING POWER LINE EASEMENT
96
-' _ / �•�
J9S I
267
ALTERNATIVE
BMP #2 \ ��
1220
0 /
263 60
v A
YPASS SYSTEM \ so so
n
SCALE: 1"=60'
EXISTINGWETLANDS AS DATE BY REVISION
\ 1 1FLAGGED BY CWS AND NOTES:
LOCATED BY PROVIDENCE 1. CONCEPT LAYOUTS FOR ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ONLY NOT FOR PR01ECTa: DRAWN BY sMc
/ I LAND GROUP SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION 172012 CHECKED By: CMF
2. ACTUAL SIZE AND DIMENSION SUBJECT TO DETAILED DESIGN FOR DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
ROAD CONNECTION �i / \ ,/ EXISTING \ \ \ `� BMP 06/20/2017 SHEET.
//I BMP -,3. EXISTING BMP SIZE AND TOPOGRAPHY AS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS
SCALE:

BMP ALTERNATIVE #3
N Da—
N/F
WOLVERINE_J
0406
HILDA ANN BERRY PEIND
PID# 10-0id
16-003815
CIVIL ENGINEERING
DB 3606 PG 290
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
' f - CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
- -
-_
TING LANDS PER '
'ER WWW.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
_ \ NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
----DAR NE AND SEAL:
----. f _-_ _ z� �� �� �A-THERI N€TH
--- PID# 1 fi11t X03870--- - ----
— --
DB 4632 PC, p-7 -
---_ WASS{SYSTEM r - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ DUUGLAs D MCCOY AND NOT FO R
_ \- �� ___ FRANCES C MCCOY N/F
3 222 22t li PID# 10 016-0082.00 IVETA E SHEPHERD
1 220 219 1 _ - --_ ' 1 -- -M RECORD PID # 10-016-0038,23 CONSTRUCTION
218 217 216 215 � 1 J - - DB 7677 PO 75 -
z1a z13 � ..?�- " __ -- —__— — BYPASS SYSTEM
_, 212 c s 30' COMMON OPEN SPACE
„ 209. x. - -• _ _
208
206 205 202'..... ..... .. �
r ¢rs I
201 200 199198 _ _ PIPE
197
--� _ _ __-. 6F9 ® - .• ...195 ^ T 193 + I • - .. -
��C.0.5.
190 -
®------ --------------
CAROLINA
364 3633sz 361
� 57 —--- -
-WETLANu SERVICES
360 359 358 I =--337
IL I
_ 358 -r1 3 2
_ _ 1
- _- 338 --� �__ 311 -�
l
- __335 __--_
_ J I
__ \ -- �313�/PIPE
_ _- 284 J F'
no / 365 �.. / —_- ® 282 27 184 185 186 DB 9
310 281 j .'
/ I PLD
1 .. .... � 1080
283
-- 280 g
i
I
339 ® 18
J
354 334 ® ' ^ I
.. ^
CX.S
/
340 hG 314 309
® 353 e/ i
® 333 zas 278 i ®� .^ BYP2,S5 SYSTEM /
az ^ ,
®- ® 341 332 315 308 ® ® / PHILIPjN EEKS AND
' ® 3a2 /DONNA WEEKS
2a6 277 tat �^, /PID# 10-016-003300
351 331 316 307
/ DB 4985 PG 238
28r � 276 / 180 14 �
372 350 / 343 330 ® ® / ® 317 306 \
//
373 / 1 288 275 179
® /
T 374 344 329 318
375 0 349 (
® 289 274 / 178 ^ _ 1 L1..1
RHE
�'� 345 328 �. 319 304 ® O U
\ 348 ® ® 290 273 - 177 ... •/� Z
\a ® 346 ® 327 320 303 / .. �/� Z Lu O
272 / 176 N/F / / � LCLJ � O
� 321 302 291 PHILIP DONNAWWEEK$ EEKS ➢ < Z � J
347 N1 326 ® ® PID# 10-016-0035.10 L1.J r-
3zz � 292 z71 ns �4 DB 9566 Pf' 130 m � (� � �
Rer J
LIJ LU Z
' 240
241 ®- C 325 293 270 ` / 774 / / W V
S
\coW
\� 242 0 w O /_
® 243 ® �_ ® 294 b" 269 173 " L/ O ELJ J Z w
244 / / ��. 324 299 . ® -_. ' \ ` - - O m O O
\\\ [�
\ 245 / \�� 295 268 E 172 qt .. _ - Q W CC Z
246 i. ® / _ 3 0� L
247 Z m
248 OS Lu
298 0 267 171 _ _ r CL O`
za9 296 - \ FUTURE BYPASS SYSTEM — W W d' J
c,
. \ 1 25D \ 260 170 -
�` ® 251 �. ^ \�- -_ '-_ Lu
`�� - • ��� 252 / ® 265 TERRY W EFIRD --
\' /J 2531 \ \ - \PID# 10-021-091200 -
J \,\` `�,\�� /�•`�,� _ - cpN i I�O"DEl`DE RECORD -_-\ - \--
r 25a _
-O
/X1.0 Y / / 255 \ 264
_ OWER
�" / ----/ / / ®® 2 \
56 \\
\ ` ��a �r �\ �•>� �( / 257 / 2�
���` `--` \�. \,\� •/``\'��� ��`��/ � � / 258 - \\ \\ \ � � \ \ ��```\ \\\ \\
71�.� / / 259
_ --__ _ ��� �� `�\� / j f�•�% / � REMOVE AND REPLACE
140 LF STORM SYSTEM
/
L� /263 / \ \-�\ \\ \0 60\ 120
EXISTING POWER LINE EASEMENT / �— \ YPASSSYSTEM �\ \ \\ \ 30 so
SCALE: 1"=60'
LAGGED BY CWS AND
EXISTING WETLANDS AS \ ` DATE BY REVISION
FNOTES:
_ _ - - _ / I •;� �� �� �° �--- \ DRAWN er:
PROJECT # SMC
:
LOCATED BY PROVIDENCE 1. CONCEPT LAYOUTS FOR ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ONLY NOT FOR
1 :
LAND GROUP SURVEYING � \ CONSTRUCTION 172012 CHECKED BY
CMF
//9s \\ 2. ACTUAL SIZE AND DIMENSION SUBJECT TO DETAILED DESIGN FOR DATE. APPROVEDBY: CMF
CONNECTION i \� �1 / \ /� - EXISTING A \ vv BMP 06/20/2017 SHEET.
BMP �\ \ 3. EXISTING BMP SIZE AND TOPOGRAPHY AS SUPPLIED BY OTHERS SCALE:
1..=60'

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT G:
NC WAM Form
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch s 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
Accompanies user manual version 5.0
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Saddlebrook Development
Date of Evaluation
Pictures taken prior ATF,
10.7.14
Applicant/Owner Name
Dependable Development, Inc.
Wetland Site Name
Wetland AA
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
CWS
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Muddy Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03040105
County
Cabarrus
NCDWR Region
Asheville
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
-80.507319 35.242743
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch s 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
❑A
❑A
❑A
> 10% impervious surfaces
❑B
❑B
❑B
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C
❑C
❑C
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑D
❑D
❑D
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E
❑E
❑E
>- 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
OF
OF
OF
>- 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G
❑G
❑G
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑s 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
EJ Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B 7 From 80 to < 100 feet
®C ®C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >- 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F ❑F R From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
®H ®H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑1 From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ®J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>: 500 acres
®B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >: 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
T
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
v. ❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_�E ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
(n ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-a ®A ®A Dense herb layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
n Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
171 Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area has been clear cut between April 2013 and April 2010. The wetland was delineted on October 7, 2014.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland AA
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Pictures taken
prior ATF,
Date of Assessment 10.7.14
Assessor Name/Organization CWS
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
LOW
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT H:
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2
DMS Credit Acceptance Letter

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 9, 2017
Michael Foess
Dependable Development, Inc.
2649 Brekonridge Centre
Monroe, NC 28110
Project: Saddlebrook Development
ROY COOPER
MICHAEI, S. REGAN
.SC(TC1,7rr,
Expiration of Acceptance: November 9, 2017
County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
Impact
River
CU Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
Buffer II
Basin
(8 -digit HUC)
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool Warm
Riparian Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Yadkin
03040105
0
0 0
0.011 0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Gregg Antemann, agent
Sincerely,
James Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Saddlebrook Development
Nationwide Permit No. 29 (After -the -Fact)
ATTACHMENT I:
Bypass Design
June 29, 2017
CWS Project No. 2013-3232:2

PROPOSED BYPASS STORM DRAINAGE FOR USACE/DEQ N.O.V. RESOLUTION
BRENTWOOD (AKA:SADDLEB ROOK)
TOWN OF MIDLAND, CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
us 601
NC 24
NC 2d �_ NC 24 _- - NC 24 -;r 27
NC 27 NC 27 NC 27
-C 24' - ---
27,.
ussoi
W51
4i Yr
1405
VICINITY MAP
�-[bttle�IC�
. �
.4
"C24
NC 27'
NC24���-
NC 27
1
u$sal ,
I
n '
byrr 1%w�` t+
9
o
a u_
IL --
/
,
H� G
i
OVERALL SITE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
A I f1TCC
1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS TO PROPOSE A STORMWATER BYPASS TO
RESOLVE A USACE/DEQ NOTICE OF VIOLATION.
2. DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS, GRADING,
AND OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE
PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT #3550
SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16 REVISED
6/6/16 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND ON
6/24/16.
RNCD&�
WCL
CIVIL ENGINE€RIND
0
Rnnw wta below,
Call Wfine you dig.
SHEET INDEX
SHEET NO.
SHEET NAME
Cl
COVER SHEET
C2
GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS
C3
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND OVERALL SITE PLAN
C4-C7
STORMWATER BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
C8
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER:
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC.
2649 BREKONRIDGE CENTRE DRIVE
MONROE, NC 28110
CONTACT: MR. MICHAEL FOESS, PE
PHONE: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
www.truehomesuso.com
CIVIL ENGINEER:
D&A WOLVERINE PLLC
550 E. WESTINGHOUSE BLVD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER FLECK, PE
PHONE: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
www.dnowolverine.com
Q�NsARa��2%;
MIN 'RY
Otto y-
C_ ON
,, ,e %;23/2017
M

GENERAL NOTES
1. D&A WOLVERINE PLLC WAS CONTRACTED TO PROVIDE BY-PASS STORM DESIGN TO RESOLVE A USACE NCDEQ NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ADD A MINOR SANITARY
SEWER EXTENSION. D&A SCOPE OF WORK AND LIABILITY IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO THOSE ITEMS AND DeJ, SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM ALL ISSUES
RESULTING FROM WORK BY OTHERS INCLUDING WORK THAT MAY HAVE OR WILL IMPACT OUR SCOPE, DESIGN OR EFFORTS.
2. BASIS OF BY-PASS DESIGN: IOYR 6HR STORM EVENT. SEE ATTACHED CALCULATIONS DATED 6/23/2017 BY D&A.
3. PER CONVERSATION WITH TOWN OF MIDLAND ENGINEER A SLOPE OF 0,47. FOR THE 42 RCP PIPE WAS ACCEPTABLE GIVEN THE SITE CONSTRAINTS. SITE CONSTRAINTS
INCLUDE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNED & CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS, ETC.
4. PER CONVERSATION WITH TOWN OF MIDLAND ENGINEER THE 0.2 FT CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE EXISUNG 8" SANITARY SEWER AND THE PROPOSED 42"
RCP WAS ACCEPTABLE IF PROTECTED WITH A MAT OR OTHER MATERIAL TO AVOID A DIRECT POINT LOAD. 20 LF OF 8" SANITARY SEWER IN THE AREA OF THE
CROSSING WILL BE REPLACED WITH 8" DIP.
5. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO THE BY-PASS SYSTEM AN ONSITE MEETING SHALL BE CONDUCTED. THE OWNER, TOWN ENGINEER, USACE, NCDEQ
AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM D&A WOLVERINE PLLC & CAROLINA WETLANDS SERVICES SHALL ATTEND.
6. PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY MATERIALS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED PIPE AND ALL
STRUCTURES. THE BYPASS DESIGN HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON SURVEY AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS AS WELL AS THE
PROPOSED/PLANNED/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS ALSO DESIGNED & PREPARED BY OTHERS. D&A SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFLICTS RESULTING
FROM CHANGED OR ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DBA IN THE EVENT OF ANY CHANGES THAT WILL AFFECT THE BYPASS.
7, HEADWALL 16 AND THE PIPE INVERT AT THE WETLANDS HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO ALLOW 6-9 INCHES OF PONDING IN THE EXISTING WETLANDS TO MAINTAIN WETLAND
HYDROLOGY IN THE AREA, THE HEADWALL ELEVATION INVERT MAYBE ADJUSTED BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE REGULATORY
AGENCIES.
8. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLASS III REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. ALL DISTANCES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. ALL PIPE
SHALL HAVE MIN SET OF COVER AND SHALL BE LOCATED IN A BEEF EASEMENT. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF DEBRIS OR ROCKS.
9. ALL RIM/TOP ELEVATIONS SHALL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE AS DESIGNED AND SUPPLIED BY OTHERS.
/TO
10. THE SITE IS ASSUMED TO BE AN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH APPROVED SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS, MEASURES AND PERMITS APPROVED AND
IN PLACE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL REQUIRED SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE AND
11, THESE PLANS SHALL NOT SUPERCEDE ANY PREVIOUS APPROVALS OR PLANS BY OTHERS. THESE PLANS ARE IN ADDITION TO ALL OTHER PLANS AND OR PROJECT
PERMITS AND REQUIREMENTS.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INVESTIGATE THE SITE FOR CONFLICTS THAT MAY NOT BE SHOWN AND CONTACT NC811 AS APPLICABLE.
13. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF MIDLAND, CABARRUS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CONCORD AS APPLICABLE.
14. THE ONSITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER IN THE EVENT THAT ANY CHANGE TO THE GRADES. ROADS, DRIVE, UTILITIES OR ANY OTHER ITEM THAT
MAY AFFECT THESE PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND OR DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT THE ENGINEER MAY PROVIDE ANALYSIS . ASSES THE IMPACTS AND RESPOND. THE
DESIGN ENGINEER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY.
15. ON-SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING AND/OR REPAIRING ALL DAMAGES TO ADJACENT SITE PAVING. CURB OR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS DAMAGED AS A
RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS ACTIONS. THIS WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AS PART OF ME CONTRACT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. THIS WORK SHALL BE ALL INCLUSIVE i0
ANY REM DAMAGED ON THE SITE OR ADJACENT AREAS, AS PART OF STORAGE OR STOCKPILE AND OR AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION, DELIVERY OR OTHER ACTIONS. REPAIRS SHALL BE
MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER ARER DISCOVERY AND AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER.
SANITARY SEWER NOTES
I. ITT ASSUMED THAT THIS PROJECT IS AN ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS IN PLACE. THE SOLE INTENT OF THIS SANITARY SEWER
EXTENSION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE A BULLETIN DRAWING AND PLAN SHEET TO INCORPORATE +.- 124 LF OF B" SANITARY EXTENSION TO SERVICE POTENTIAL FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH AS REQUESTED. BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER CITY OF CONCORD STANDARDS AND ASPER THE APPROVED PLAN/PERMITAS DESIGNED AND PREPARED BY OTHERS
REFERENCE DATA:
1. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THIS PROJECT IS AN ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS IN PLACE AS DESIGNED AND PREPARED BY OTHERS. D&A
WOLVERINE PLLC SHALL NOT ASSUME ANY LIABILITY FOR WORK DONE BY OTHERS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WORK THAT WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF THIS
PLAN THAT WAS SUPPLIED BY OTHER PROFESSIONALS.
2. CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT#3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/2016 REVISED
6/06/2016 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND ON 6/24/16 WERE UTILIZED AS THE BASIS OF DESIGN. INCLUDING ASSOCIATED CALCULATION OBTAINED AS
PUBLIC RECORD FROM THE TOWN OF MIDLAND.
3. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY PROVIDENCE LAND GROUP IN JUNE OF 2017.
4. ALL PLANIMETRICS. SITE LAYOUT. GRADING AND OTHER UTILITIES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY OTHERS AND ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SUBJECT TO
CHANGE. THIS INFO 15 FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND AS SHOWN SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR RECORDING OR SALES. SCHEMATIC REFERENCES TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN
BY OTHERS FOR PURPOSES OF PREPARING THE BYPASS PLAN.
5f F7
ITIF
ILI
IN I.
bi
Li
i.
"�L.nww.,,.4,e,IE, SECTION 0-G�w � �H '
PLAN OF FRAME
car LBAH
+wwu°w
m �. PLAN OF GRATING o
4 b EIEYATION SIpE -`�,...m".: -F y.s vsr IRON
� EWaEALL pIRE�xONs L � -E � � h• yx, yE- h. .. �#
3 n. I 3 � ,}IF•�i � 6
Jt rLnKP F 1•t- h• 19, }.N• uL
w
..
b pa U0
2
�#�W � (Fq • o � SECTION H -H
'pLllH ,a e . r +.eole.ea r.sen .ar+.m ' S
es n . r +.,an.m r nlrs m
SECTION F -F
@3@.80 838-@0 @4@.l@ 840.78
�y
T MEA➢EO
y�
ANpe3q
AFA�FteR
""�.y�s aIA.TE A!u F,u,ea< recxoA muTE ANo rReaR aAArc AID' EkEIE ,• M1tA. $g�,rx
E t� - AEnPW'/€e �ti��ewt5
AA ��
_ BA Il.8C1/lY N4L E
n11: MLL fANLP€TE p
%ILL Gm
a BRICK RWIN CONCRETE PRECAST CONCRETE ci
CONSTRUCTION WOM1TI IM, CONSTROC3�41I
DETAIL SNORING ANCHORAGE OF
m FRAME FOR ORATED DROP INLETpRO�I�L�
_ EA
W
i_
i D COngTIaFr E,RTo OeDP $KEY i0 W,MGLOE ,RTH xBrwt PaEfJeLE4i
= w GB &RRLIAYkTB' ENpUL0F8 9R PAYEYapr FLGRE. LMSTBtltFlb, IL H
444 IIT adarlaice isa a �.
RIA. Bltlt 1W.9dLPY a
�� pglBTBBCTEOX i `�'
V
$ 1
'^ FRAME AND ORATE I LLATION
r ■RSOMRY ANCHOR CONCRETE ANCHOR PRECAST NSTA w m
h- OIA. 91]LT RIM PLATE xy" OLA- OEet &AR CONCRERE ANCHOR � T� CkORN ANp
7g• DIA, "NT w WFURELEVATEp. SECTIPNG
@40.25 890.25
Y
x _ L a
goo
Pill
- L• _:`1 'er' ..,.,emer.wn :°"'" ��
,�..
El
SECTION X_x m
ONE
m� rte.. mI>o+nl ..,,.In.... a.�.•'-u,`� m ,m..���,�,
SECTION x -x RgCTION Y Y a;
- @�eTIGN Y -Y
@40.79. @4 L1® 84@.31 R416.31
pm ��
_ E74-
IN:TAIL BlOr]H] -ES OF ORATE
Y ttle•
m E T TAF
YBC I�SIXIA-0[NB 0 IM C L4M.
��`�'�^ S2rlE "9' `TTrE "E TWE 'R• .L� 1 �Odt" ��`���d
$ � moral rLd � ■Aa � MPB rww � � T 1 r.5%• r�>
-------' �II Eo
3 �ICT¢OIT FR
$ Y x
MTB rLER � L10 a MTB rLw -
Eli
BLTIYI, A -A G
� • x °r rrre ^E' rYr[ -o• TrrE . [ €
-11
$c
W l]LVERINE -
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
. CAgOY
SH ,-
�
F?� �f�k "'R�'
C=- ON
".OPHER
Z H
�
W
O
W
� ,Zwwo D
m L LZ obi
� ODU v1
H >�z �
0 w p w 0
O �Z° z
z
O
o�� Q
Z °°
CLu W
W w 11' Z
1210
Ix N
m ''W^^
V
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#:DRAWN BY SMC
172012
~ o'i
xaEe Etu,
>ti- �3 f
ABrtwr
sj
$ S
srA:.J
�,'
- r..ssa4• Ia-
r•
I
t
E�dll A'A -
eao.aa
@4G.oa
CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE: APPROVED BY: CMF
06/22/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: Cf�
N/A (�

WOLVERINE a -
laid
D&
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
�tHk �'
OBO <-
,Z U;
C ON
".OPHER �
Z
Z O CL
W
U > H Lu
h ~
i w�oZ
mIL w 'oO
U
°UUU'
vs > �
0�o? O
00 m0Z `�' o
< S203 C) W
Lu Z
Luw a
Z CL
W W
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE: APPROVEDBY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C3
111=60'

BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
7 =_
SADDLEBROOK DR.
EXISTING FOREBAY
I
�
- - - PROPERTY LINE
- _
MH -2- - - - - -
� - -
I
HW---
—
/ -
—
--
42"RCP -- -- -
I \
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE SLOPE AS NEEDED TO
\
I \
ACCOMMODATE HEADWALL. ADJUST HEADWALL
11
DIMENSIONS AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. HW DETAIL FOR BASE
J \\
BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
7 =_
SADDLEBROOK DR.
EXISTING FOREBAY
5`0_
535-
em
35-
em
m
-
4
- - - PROPERTY LINE
- _
MH -2- - - - - -
� - -
--
-
HW---
/ -
42" RCP
--
42"RCP -- -- -
! /
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE SLOPE AS NEEDED TO
ACCOMMODATE HEADWALL. ADJUST HEADWALL
11
DIMENSIONS AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. HW DETAIL FOR BASE
J \\
BID ONLY, CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST AS NEEDED.
\ 1
�
PROPOSED 332 SF OF CLASS B RIPRAP I
I
/ L
J
24LONG APRON
HW -I MH -2 -
CONTRACTOR TO PLACE RIP RAP OVER KEYED IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.
MAY REQUIRE GROUTED IN RIP RAP AS NEEDED TO SUIT ACTUAL FIELD
CONDITIONS.
'
I
0
5`0_
535-
em
35-
em
m
�l \7-
-
- PROPERTY LINE ----_
- � - - - � � / NOTE: DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS,
GRADINGANDOTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
\ \ \ \ ONLY. SEE PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
1 \ \ #3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16
11 \\ \ \\ \ REVISED 6/6/16
_ AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
\ \ _ _ MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
\ 0 20 40
A, , SCALE:1' 20'
! /
/ EXISTING SS MH I
HW -I MH -2 -
MH -3
EXISTING STORM
0
PROPOSED SS LATERAL
/
z
nZ
�"-- raa,-
f�Ovv
NN
�iNO
(TYPICAL)
26
n
+ Rw
Wiz
PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
EXISTING GRADE
- _ --�
PER SUPPLIED
--'
d
..
�I
PROPOSED BUILDING PAD
(
(TYPICAL(
1
-
l
/
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
PROPOSED 132 LF OF
47'RCP @ 0.4%
I
PROPOSED 292 LF OF
_ 42" RCP @ 0.47.
/
PROPOSED GRADE -
--
/:21 1
PROPOSED
42' RCP @
6 LF OF
0.4%
Lcy
— — _
PROPOSED 30'STORM
_ _ — — —
—
— —
-------
— — —
----
— — — — — — — — — —
----- PROPOSED GRADING �
-
gDE - -SDE- - - -
--------
----- PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
_ - SD
SD
E- - SDE
MH -3
--------
—
—-------------
`SL --
��--
— — —5 =----------
-,—,,�--42"
RCP ---�
--
SIDE SD711
S
�gDE SIDE SDE SDE
SDE _
�l \7-
-
- PROPERTY LINE ----_
- � - - - � � / NOTE: DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS,
GRADINGANDOTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
\ \ \ \ ONLY. SEE PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
1 \ \ #3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16
11 \\ \ \\ \ REVISED 6/6/16
_ AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
\ \ _ _ MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
\ 0 20 40
A, , SCALE:1' 20'
ml
530
510 510
O+OD 0+25 0+50 0+ 5 1 I+ 5 1+50 I+ 5 2+00 2+25 2+50 2+75 3+00 3+25 3+50 3+J5 4+00 4+25 4+50 4+ 5 5+00 5+25 5+50
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
L0
W
W
_
W
O
Lo
N
z
J
H
a
WOLVERINE AIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
tH/yam
aO <=
U;
C ,Z ON
".OPHER
W
m
Z 0
ix
O J > CL
H Z Q 0
Lu
> w 0 Q
m w w �
ODZ
U
H >�z Q
wLLI CL
O y
O LLJZ Z H
oLu� CL
H wZ CL
m
W w
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY:7r.l
172012 CHECKED BY:
DATE. APPROVED BY:
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C4
1 "=20,
HW -I MH -2 -
MH -3
0
z
nZ
�"-- raa,-
f�Ovv
NN
�iNO
s�OnN
n
+ Rw
Wiz
PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
EXISTING GRADE
- _ --�
--'
d
u
..
-
l
/
PROPOSED 132 LF OF
47'RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSED 292 LF OF
_ 42" RCP @ 0.47.
/
PROPOSED GRADE -
--
PROPOSED
42' RCP @
6 LF OF
0.4%
ml
530
510 510
O+OD 0+25 0+50 0+ 5 1 I+ 5 1+50 I+ 5 2+00 2+25 2+50 2+75 3+00 3+25 3+50 3+J5 4+00 4+25 4+50 4+ 5 5+00 5+25 5+50
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
L0
W
W
_
W
O
Lo
N
z
J
H
a
WOLVERINE AIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
tH/yam
aO <=
U;
C ,Z ON
".OPHER
W
m
Z 0
ix
O J > CL
H Z Q 0
Lu
> w 0 Q
m w w �
ODZ
U
H >�z Q
wLLI CL
O y
O LLJZ Z H
oLu� CL
H wZ CL
m
W w
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY:7r.l
172012 CHECKED BY:
DATE. APPROVED BY:
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C4
1 "=20,

BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
M
s3o -
525 -
EEO
Bm
00
v
SADDLEBROOK DR.
M
/
\ \
\
PROPOSED SS LATERAL
DI -6
\
\
\
(TYPICAL)
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
\
/
/
\
`\ REMOVELF OF EX B" PV CS SEWER
DI -4 \ �
-DI
�
GRADE
BYOTHERS
REPLACE WITH 18 LF OF 8" DIP SEWER.
INSTALL RUBBER MAT BETWEEN 8" DIP AND 42' RCP
-+..zNQ
Q
WN�
zpa
ZZ�
O U
vaz
N m �Zz"
7Qo zu,G
ZNQ O n �vv2
�Q .NNU - -
o �' _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _
- _ _
- - - _ _
\ \
\
GD'
O
vZ..
L
-aZ
- - - -
_-
\
AFwO
vz
EXISTING GRADE
PERSUPPLIEDPLAN
SDE-
S DE SDE
PROPOSED BUILDING PAD
/>�'
I
.�
/
DE
MH -9
SDE
h
!(E
\\
\ �\
(TYPICAL)
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
DII
/ /
MH$
-
1
/
42 LF OF - - - PROPOSED 86 LF OF
@ 0.47. 11, RCP @ 0.4%
EXISTING
I
41 F
@ 0:4%
PROPOSED
42"
95 LF OF
RCP @ 0.4%
SDE SDE SDE
SSMH-A8 SE
SD
PROPOSED
249 LF OF
RCP @ 0.4%
--
C
_ 42'
\ lS�
I�� \
\ \
\53
O
PROPOSED STORM CROSSES
UNDER PROPOSED 8" DIP SEWER.
F OF
0.4%
PROPOSED �.
SSMH-Bl
\\
\
\ \ \
APPROXIMATELY 0.2' CLEARANCE
ssE�-
��
\
�\
PROPOSED GRADING
/
/
BOTTOM OF 8"SEWER=523.84
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
/
/ \
\
TOP OF 42" STORM = 523.64
( to
/
�\
PROPOSED SEWER
SEE SHEET C8 FOR DETAILS
\
\
\ \ so, --5
alp
\
530
PROPOSED 30' STORMWATER EASEMENT \ \ \ `
j
/
NOTE: DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS,
/
GRADING AND OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
\
ONLY. SEE PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
------
\
#3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16
v A
AV
0II
REVISED 6/6/16 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
v
o 20 40
\ \
\
SCALE: 1"=20'
M
s3o -
525 -
EEO
Bm
545
540
MR
530
m
520
m
510 - ..
5+50 5-75 6 6+25 6+50 6,75 7+00 7+25 7+50 7+75 8+00 8+25 8+50 B+ 5 A. 0 9+ 9+50 9+ 5 10+00 10+25 10+50 10+75 i..,
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
WOLVERINE ala
d
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
Z aO
C ©N
W
LL
Z O
LLJ ix
O J> CL
0
W Q
m TWIN Z
ODU
H >LLJz Q
W LLI CL
OO y
I Z Z H
oL� CL
H Luz CL
m
W LLI
Mme/ CV
W
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C JC
1 "=20'
DI -4
DI -6
DI-]
y
ago
N?m
zo-
PROPOSED
GRADE
BYOTHERS
-+..zNQ
Q
WN�
zpa
ZZ�
O U
vaz
N m �Zz"
7Qo zu,G
ZNQ O n �vv2
�Q .NNU - -
o �' _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _
- _ _
- - - _ _
_ - _ _ -
-
,',o
r
o h
ti O
O
vZ..
-aZ
- - - -
_-
AFwO
vz
EXISTING GRADE
PERSUPPLIEDPLAN
EXISTING 8"S
PIPE BOTTOM
NITARY SEWER
=523.84
\
/>�'
42 LF OF - - - PROPOSED 86 LF OF
@ 0.47. 11, RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSE
42 RCP
41 F
@ 0:4%
PROPOSED
42"
95 LF OF
RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSED
42" RCP
PROPOSED
249 LF OF
RCP @ 0.4%
_ 42'
PROPOSED 95
42" RCP@
F OF
0.4%
--
545
540
MR
530
m
520
m
510 - ..
5+50 5-75 6 6+25 6+50 6,75 7+00 7+25 7+50 7+75 8+00 8+25 8+50 B+ 5 A. 0 9+ 9+50 9+ 5 10+00 10+25 10+50 10+75 i..,
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
WOLVERINE ala
d
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
Z aO
C ©N
W
LL
Z O
LLJ ix
O J> CL
0
W Q
m TWIN Z
ODU
H >LLJz Q
W LLI CL
OO y
I Z Z H
oL� CL
H Luz CL
m
W LLI
Mme/ CV
W
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C JC
1 "=20'

BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
um
50 -
me
520 -
\ TERSK DR
1
D,10DI-11
ro-
PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
Z
DI -12
-
-
NN__
+qZo
<
EXISTING RADE -
G
Z z
3 zw 0
zo
w
H
_ _
PROPOSED 25 LF OF
42" RCP @.(.4% -
PROPOSED 197 LF OF
- -
PROPOSED 95 LF OF
42'RCP@0.4%
-
PROPOSED 142 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4% -
-- --
42" RC P
_
@ 0.4%
\
PROPOSED
SS LATERAL
1
41
40
All/
\
\
\I
PER SUPPLIED
(TYPICAL)
PLANS BY OTHERS
MATCH LINE STA. 11+00 SEE SHEET CS
\
il
PROPOSED BUILDING PAD
(TYPICAL)
a
_
)
PROPOSED
SEWER
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
m
-)
SEE SHEET C8 FOR DETAILS
,��m
n
n
\
I\\
/66
\
06�
\\
L6�
Z6�
\\
Z6(
\
)I ��
MCr)
�� �-/
I
L6 "
Q I'
`-'�
�
- o
m --
--PROPOSED 20'SANITARY
1
//
/
m
SEWER EASEMENT
-
- ---_-
_\
)
PROPOSED GRADING
_-\
�_ !
'--�
/
I
-------
-
-------1
/
- --
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
`
/
PROPOSED 30' STORMWATER EASEMENT - /
-------3tlS
L
-
_—__ _
34S _ _
---
• •'
3
i0
-Vj
A�
-_ -
A
�
/
_+ DI -11
��`
42"RCPT
m
0
4+
i
SSMH-
�42'RCP
�5.
'6
-�-_-------
-------------
- --
)
l�S
5
-10
BEG
aes
I
30S as
FG9
1
as
LZS
\
gas 3GS
\ \
W -11A
V
A
_______
V- �--_------ ---
N
J
I
� // \
\
_ -
_--- J _
NOTE: DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS,
_ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ - - -
_ _ - - -
GRADING AND OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
_
- -
- -
_ _
ONLY. SEE PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
_-----
--
_
43550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION DATED 4/26/16
___ ____----
-_-______
_
REVISED 6/6/16 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
___-----
--------------
MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
0 20 40
10 30
SCALE: 1 "=20'
um
50 -
me
520 -
545
540
520
515 515
11+W 11+25 I1+50 11 75 12+W 12+25 12+50 12+75 13+W 13+25 13+50 13+75 14+W 14+25 14+50 14+75 15+W 15+25 15+50. 15+75 16+W 16+25 16+50
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
W DLYE R INE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
,�tH/yam
) O
C ©N
".OPHER
W
Z O
ix
O J > Io -
H
wW� a
m w Z
0u
H >�z Q
0 wow a
O0 O y
'o Z Z H
C) CL
H Lu
W w 11'
04
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C L
Q
1 "=20'
D,10DI-11
ro-
PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS
Z
DI -12
-
-
NN__
+qZo
<
EXISTING RADE -
G
Z z
3 zw 0
zo
w
H
_ _
PROPOSED 25 LF OF
42" RCP @.(.4% -
PROPOSED 197 LF OF
- -
PROPOSED 95 LF OF
42'RCP@0.4%
-
PROPOSED 142 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4% -
-- --
42" RC P
_
@ 0.4%
545
540
520
515 515
11+W 11+25 I1+50 11 75 12+W 12+25 12+50 12+75 13+W 13+25 13+50 13+75 14+W 14+25 14+50 14+75 15+W 15+25 15+50. 15+75 16+W 16+25 16+50
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
W DLYE R INE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
,�tH/yam
) O
C ©N
".OPHER
W
Z O
ix
O J > Io -
H
wW� a
m w Z
0u
H >�z Q
0 wow a
O0 O y
'o Z Z H
C) CL
H Lu
W w 11'
04
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C L
Q
1 "=20'

535 -
t.¢
Yb=
515
16+50
BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILE
N
532 // /' TERSK DR ' 5,3,3
16.75 17+00 17+25 117+5017-75 18+0018,25 18+50 111— 19+0019-125 19-50 19-175 m,00 20-25 20-50 W-75 24W 21+25; 21+50 21+75
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
=W
— 525
—520
15
22+00
WOLVERINE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
,�tH/yam
Z aO
C DN
HER
W
Z O
ix
O v > CL
H Z Q 0
�
Eu a
m �wN Z
0 U
H >�z Q
Q LLJ Q LL CL
O y
O LLJ
Z Z H
ooh CL
Lu m
W LL 11'
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C 7
1 "=20,
DI -15
HW -16
oo_
PROPOSED
SS LATERAL
.NNS
EXISTING GRADE
7
mzD�.
NZZo
2 o
N zo
CIN
/
/PER
(TYPICALI
SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
-O❑
,zSF
z
a- = U
V
\\ \\ �\ CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST PROPOSED GRADING TO
\\ \ROVIDE
- / - - - - - - - -
i
--PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS ovv --
PROPOSED 6" THICK CONCRETE WEIR WALL
CONNECTED TO BOTTOM SLAB AND WINGWALLS
OF PRECAST CONCRETE ENDWALL (NCDOT STD#838.80)
_ _ WEIR ELEVATION = 532.00
-- _
^¢
MINIMUM]'COVER OVER PROPOSED 42"
/ Arl
RCPAND
TO DRAIN RUNOFF TO DI -15
PROPOSED 123 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSED 204 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4%
--
------ -
PROPOSE 10 LF OF
42" RCP @ 5.0%
PROPOSED BUILDING PAD
(TYPICAL(
-
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
/
CACP
ON
7
zo7
o
�07/
Jr7
/ C
L
Q0�
(P
/
�
THICK CONCRETE WEIR W
A "
ALL�o7
CONNECTED TO BOTTOM SLAB AND WINGWALLS
1-
OF PRECAST CONCRETE ENDWALL INCDOT STD 4838.80)
/
/
I
\
PROPOSED GRADING
PER SUPPLIED PLANS BY OTHERS
/
/
TOP WEIR ELEVATION= 532.00
I I
3051
I r
I
4
r
3'dS
Dl -1
42 "RCP
7 �
� i
-_�
� — — 42"RCP.---
-__--_----------
-----
/ � _-_
- 12 RC
SDI -1
- - —'
- - -
-I
\ 42'RCP
-
Res
—
ING WIETLANDS
ASFFEX LAGGED YCWS AND
\
`
PROPOSED 30' STORMWATER EASEMENT
\ \ \ ; \
PROPOSED DI -15
LANDE'ROBPPROVIDENCE
CONTROL STRUCTURE
-
-
SEE DETAIL
--------__
NOTE: DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS,
GRADING AND OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
ONLY. SEE PLAN BYSUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
1\
#3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16
----
_�
���
\
REVISED 6/6/16 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
-------------
—__--
--
�_ ���_ ��
MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
—
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
--------------------
---1
--
I
a
--------------
---
----------
SCALE: 1"=20'
16.75 17+00 17+25 117+5017-75 18+0018,25 18+50 111— 19+0019-125 19-50 19-175 m,00 20-25 20-50 W-75 24W 21+25; 21+50 21+75
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
=W
— 525
—520
15
22+00
WOLVERINE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
,�tH/yam
Z aO
C DN
HER
W
Z O
ix
O v > CL
H Z Q 0
�
Eu a
m �wN Z
0 U
H >�z Q
Q LLJ Q LL CL
O y
O LLJ
Z Z H
ooh CL
Lu m
W LL 11'
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C 7
1 "=20,
DI -15
HW -16
oo_
.NNS
EXISTING GRADE
7
mzD�.
NZZo
2 o
N zo
CIN
-O❑
,zSF
z
a- = U
- / - - - - - - - -
i
--PROPOSED GRADE
PER SUPPLIED PLAN BY OTHERS ovv --
PROPOSED 6" THICK CONCRETE WEIR WALL
CONNECTED TO BOTTOM SLAB AND WINGWALLS
OF PRECAST CONCRETE ENDWALL (NCDOT STD#838.80)
_ _ WEIR ELEVATION = 532.00
-- _
^¢
PROPOSED 123 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSED 204 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.4%
PROPOSE 10 LF OF
42" RCP @ 5.0%
PROPOSED 197 LF OF
42" RCP @ 0.47.
16.75 17+00 17+25 117+5017-75 18+0018,25 18+50 111— 19+0019-125 19-50 19-175 m,00 20-25 20-50 W-75 24W 21+25; 21+50 21+75
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1 "=4' V
=W
— 525
—520
15
22+00
WOLVERINE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
W W W.DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
,�tH/yam
Z aO
C DN
HER
W
Z O
ix
O v > CL
H Z Q 0
�
Eu a
m �wN Z
0 U
H >�z Q
Q LLJ Q LL CL
O y
O LLJ
Z Z H
ooh CL
Lu m
W LL 11'
CV
m
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE. APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C 7
1 "=20,

SANITARY SEWER NOTES
I. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THIS PROJECT IS AN ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS IN PLACE. THE SOLE INTENT OF THIS SANITARY SEWER
EXTENSION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE A BULLETIN DRAWING AND PLAN SHEET TO INCORPORATE +,- 124 LF OF W SANITARY EXTENSION TO SERVICE POTENTIAL FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH AS REQUESTED BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER CITY OF CONCORD STANDARDS AND AS PER THE APPROVED PLAN/PERMIT AS DESIGNED AND PREPARED BY OTHERS
3. DESIGN AND LAYOUT FOR ALL PLANIMETRICS, GRADING, AND OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE PLAN BY SUMMIT LAND SERVICES PROJECT
#3550 SADDLEBROOK SUBDIVISION 2 DATED 4/26/16 REVISED 6/6/16 AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF MIDLAND ON 6/24/16.
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE
BOLTS) ON MH FRAME -
Lo IN
PROVIDE BOLTDOWN COVER(S),
ONLY WHERE SPECIFIED
VARIES
h �ZI�h
(D" MIN- - PLACE MASTIC :FA 'ES
13" MAX) BETWEEN GRADEMIN-
RINGS MAX)
:
GRADE RINGS
I—
oN ..
AS REOVI RED
kCD
Wh
CONE SECTION y
ep
I MH STEPS
15" D.C. (TYP)
'�—WRj}
FLAT SLAB UPPER SECTION
�}... 1 N101i'iD OM.Y WHERE XF`KHS WILL
Iq'li PFShcli ff SFi1WN5
MH STEPS
g
15" O.C. (iYP)
�
3/4" PIPE {
` DIAM€TER ttlOTES:
�
t. MANHOLE RISERS AND CONE SECTIONS
�
SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-478,
•.
J \ �
- •- LATEST R€VISION.
PROPERTY LINE
2. TRANSITION RINGS SHALL HAVE A
MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 2'-O" ABOVE
530
THE EFFLUENT OVERT ELEVATION.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
3. SEE FIGURE S4-0 FOR DROP MANHOLE.
4. FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT, SYNTHETIC
SEWER RUBBER SLEEVES WITH STAINLESS STEEL
SEE NOTE 4 CLAMP; DRAW BOLT AND NUT; OR
CAST -IN SLEEVE: OR 'A" LOCI(
I 3/4" PIPE
r DIAMETE� CONNECTION SHALL BE FURNISHED FOR
EACH PIPE TO MANHOLE CONNECTION.
5 SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE
• i
_
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF GRADE ADJUSTMENT
RINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 12'
8" PVC Ca 0.60%
STANDARD PRECAST
WSACC CONCRETE MANHOLE
EV151D
NO. DATE BY CHKO
WATER MTD SEWER AUTHORITY
OF CABARRUS COUNTY
TILE NAMEF._tll=I:
PROP INV IN = 524.16
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1I.=2' V
WOLVERINE ala
d
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
anoR , �tHk '
a UO <=
,Z U;
C ON
Z Q�
O J > CL Lu
HZ 1k: GC -A
0 W LL.
LLJ O
Lu w
m ILLZLIN to a
0 u u p
to; Z IM Z
Q LL Q W Q Q
0 wO
Co0z Z
w H
Z m
Lu
LJJ LL 11'
CV
W
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE: APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C O
v
1 "=20'
II
00
Lo IN
Wdl+.�
h �ZI�h
:
I—
oN ..
kCD
Wh
��ti�
h WUD(1) ric __
'�—WRj}
g
�
�
J \ �
PROPERTY LINE
530
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
L
_ PROPOSED 102 LF
02
PROP INV OUT = 525.10
PROP INV IN = 524.49
_
PROP INV OUT = 524.29
PROPOSED 22 LF
8" PVC Ca 0.60%
EX INV IN = 524.14
PROP INV IN = 524.16
EX INV OUT 523.96
SCALE: 1 "=20' H
1I.=2' V
WOLVERINE ala
d
CIVIL ENGINEERING
D&A WOLVERINE, PLLC
6120 BROOKSHIRE BLVD, UNIT R
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
P: 980.309.0406
WWW '
WW. DNAWOLVERINE.COM
NCBELS LICENSE NO: P-1223
SEAL:
anoR , �tHk '
a UO <=
,Z U;
C ON
Z Q�
O J > CL Lu
HZ 1k: GC -A
0 W LL.
LLJ O
Lu w
m ILLZLIN to a
0 u u p
to; Z IM Z
Q LL Q W Q Q
0 wO
Co0z Z
w H
Z m
Lu
LJJ LL 11'
CV
W
DATE BY REVISION
PROJECT#: DRAWN BY: SMC
1 7201 2 CHECKED BY: CMF
DATE: APPROVED BY: CMF
06/26/2017 SHEET:
SCALE: C O
v
1 "=20'