20170908 Ver 1_B-5370 Union July 24 2017_20170724

"�, StAT�,,,.,, .
=a' .w=' 4ho'�.
: �,� � Qs •.
:� ��-'
�•;�+y�.i � r:-
�. �r, .,,.� �.. .�':
, �..,u.,,.,.M':
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
July 24, 2017
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Ms. Crystal Amschler
NCDOT Coordinator
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23, 33, and 401 Water Quality
Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 444 over East Fork
Stewarts Creek on SR 1506 (Price Dairy Road) in Union County, Federal Aid
Project No. BRZ-1506(3), Division 10, TIP No. B-5370.
Debit $240 from WBS 46085.1.1.
Dear Madam:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.
444 over East Fork Stewarts Creek on SR 1506, Price Dairy Road. Bridge No 444 is a 31 foot-
long single-span bridge. The replacement structure will be a 43.6 foot-long, triple-barrel box
culvert with 10' (width) x 8' (height) barrels. Traffic will be maintained off site during
construction.
Impacts include:
96 linear feet of permanent impact to East Fork Stewarts Creek which includes 26' of stream
modification on each side of the culvert (52' total) to properly align the stream to the new structure,
25 feet of temporary stream impacts for the temparary dewatering (for the installation of
impervious dikes) to construct the culvert in dry conditions, and
<0.01 acre of permanent wetland fill (the total wetland size is 258 square feet), and <0.01 acre of
temporary wetland fill to accommodate for the wider shoulders (11' lanes with 4' shoulders
replacing 8' lanes with 6-inch shoulders).
MailingAddress: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF 1i2ANSPORTATION F[iC: (919� 212-57H5 1 OZO BIRCH RIDGE DRNE
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 RALEIGH NC 27610
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website: www.ncdot.gov
Rnt,EiGx NC 27699-1598

Due to the size of the wetland impacted (<0.01 ac, 258 square feet), NCDOT does not propose
mitigation for this impact.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notifcation (PCN), stormwater management
plan, permit drawings, design plans, and DMS mitigation acceptance for the above-referenced
project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was cornpleted in September 2015 and
distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
This project calls for a letting date of February 20, 2018 and a review date of January 2, 2018.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website
at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Michael Turchy at [e-mail] or [phone].
Sincerely,
/��% � '-
'
,�� Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M.
Natural Environment Section Head
cc: NCDOT Standard Permit Application Distribution List

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
-Construction Notification PCN Form
A licant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23, 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu � Yes ❑ No
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: B-5370 Replacement of Bridge 444 over East Fork Stewarts Creek on SR 1506
(Price Dairy Raod)
2b. County: Union
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Monroe
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5370
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: 919-707-6157
3g. Fax no.: 919-212-5785
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): n/a
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.043466 Longitude: - 80.557916
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: Approximately 1 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to East Fork Stewarts Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III
2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land use is farmland with maintained disturbed dispersed throughout.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are two wetlands on the property totaling 0.016 acre.
(The avoided wetland is <0.01 acre (421 sq ft), the impacted wetland is <0.01 (258 sq ft).
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 354 linear feet of stream exist within project study area.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge, built in 1958 that
is approaching the end of its useful life. The bridge is currently posted for 15 tons for single vehicles and 19
tons for tractor-trailer semi-trucks.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 31-foot long, single span bridge with a 43.6-foot, triple barrel box culvert
structure at the same location. Traffic will be maintained on an off-site detour during construction.
Standard culvert and road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
Bottomland <0.01
❑ Yes � Corps
Site 1� P❑ T Fill Hardwood � No ❑ DWQ (wetland size is 258
Forest sq ft')
Bottomland � Yes � Corps
Site 1❑ P� T Temporary access Hardwood <0.01
Forest � No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts <0.01
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length (linear
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, width
Temporary (T) (INT)? 10 (feet)
DWQ — non-
404, other)
Site 1� P❑ T Culvert (structure) East Fork � PER � Corps 10 44
Stewarts Creek ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 1� p❑ T Channelization to East Fork � PER � Corps 10 52
Structure Stewarts Creek ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Temporary
Site 1❑ P� T Dewatering for East Fork � PER � Corps 10 <0.01 acre
Culvert Stewarts Creek ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Installation
Permanent = 96'
Temp = <0.01 ac
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts NW 23 = 96'
NW33=<0.01 ac
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 11

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (acres)
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland (acres)
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of
number pond Floo Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Floode
ded d
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit
required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area
(acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed
(acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 11

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Traffic will be maintained off-site during construction, thus minimizing the project footprint.
A culvert was selected as the replacement structure due to the small size of the watershed (3.6 square miles),
and long term maintenance cost.
The stream is unnaturally widened at bridge, as the current bridge behaves like an over-widened culvert. The
new culvert will maintain East Fork Stewarts Creek natural steam width (10') through the crossing by way of
sills in the outer two barrels.
Two, 2-foot sills will be located in the outside barrels and a 1-foot sill will be located in the center barrel.
Native material will be backfilled to sill heights. Floodplain benches adjacent to the outside barrels are
proposed above and below the culvert.
An old/ abandoned structure located upstream of the current bridge (also unnaturally over-widened) will also
be removed.
The new structure has been minimized as much as practicable to avoid impacts to the adjacent confluence
with an unnamed tributary.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized during construction to attempt to reduce the stormwater
impacts to the receiving streams due to erosion and runoff.
Page 6 of 11

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 44 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acre
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer ❑ Yes � No
that requires buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
3 (2 for
Zone 1 Catawba
)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? n/a %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
see attached permit drawings
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? n/a
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other: N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a
Page 9 of 11

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments: - PCE completed September 28, 2015.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetiand Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable.
Page 10 of 11

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS website:
Schweinitz's sunflower- No Effect, habitat present, last survey: 10/20/2015
Michaux's sumac — No Effect, habitat present, last survey: 10/20/2015
Carolina heelsplitter — No Effect due to "preferred habitat absent from East Fork Stewarts Creek." and "Lake
Twitty (Lake Stewart) would act as a barrier for mussels, this isolating any mussels in East Fork Stewarts Creek,
which eliminates long term viability for mussels."
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No •
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? approved NEPA documents
� Philip S. Harris C.P.M., P.E. D?—�,�-2o f7
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 11 of 11

En viranmentaf
Quality
ROY i�O��PER
. .. �-�;;��
Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., CPM
Project Develapment and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Caroliva 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
July 6, 2017
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-5370, Replace Bridge Number 444 over East Fork Stewards Creek on SR 1506, Union County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based an the information supplied by you on July 6, 2017, the
impacts are located in CU 03040105 of the Yadkin River basin in the Southern Piedxnont (SP) Eco-Region, and are as
follaws:
Yadkin
03040105
sp Cold
Impacts (feet/acres) 0
Stream
Cool Warm
0 44.0
Wetlands
Riparian Non- Coastal
Riparian , Marsh
0 0 � 0
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Zone 1 I Zone 2
0
*Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on June 1, 2017. The
impacts and associated mirigation needs were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2017 impact data. DMS will cornmit
to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as
determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no
longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
Jame�,�; Stanfill
Credit Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Crystal Amschler, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
File: B-5370
. '`Nothing Compares � ._
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street I 1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-t601
919 707 8600

� ���,��k����. North Carolina Department of Transportation
41tDC11lt�':�Rt'f Highway Stormwater Progrem
��
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 46085.1.1 TIP No.: B-5370 County(ies : Union Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: 46085.1.1 TIP Number: B-5370 Project Type: Brid e Replacement Date: 3/30/2017
NCDOT Contact: William (Bill H. Elam Jr., PE Contractorl Desi ner: Reid B. Robol, PE
Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Rd. Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Raleigh, 27610 Cary NC, 27518
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Email: belam ncdot. ov Email: rrobol ecolo icaleng.com
CitylTown: Town of Unionville County ies): Union
River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro ect Description
Project Length lin. miles or feet : 0.06 Surrounding Land Use: Rural residental, agricultural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.1 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 11' lanes with 4' shoulders 8' lanes with with 0.5' shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day�: Design/Future: 527 Year: 2038 Existing: 345 Year: 2018
General Project Narrative: State project B-5370 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #890444 on SR 1719 over East Fork Stewarts Creek. Bridge #890444 consists of 1@30'-6" timber
(Description of Minimization of Water deck on I-beams with timber caps and piles. The proposed crossing will be a 3@10'X8' RCBC with 2.0' sills in the outside barrels and 1.0' sill in the center barrel. Native
Quality Impacts) material will utilized as backfill to sill heights. The proposed culvert will elminate direct roadway runoff to the surface water. No deck drains are proposed.
Waterbod Information
Surface Water Body (1 : East Fork Stewarts Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 13-17-36-9-2
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply III (WS-III)
Supplemental Classification: None
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T8E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: East Fork Stewarts Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Brid e Spannin Water Body? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

� �������•;�ti� North Carolina Department of Transportation
:��Ul'l]l��'i�Qf T
Highway Stormwater Progrem . �
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN --
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 46085.1.1 TIP No.: B-5370 County ies : Union Page 2 of 2
Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed Structure Summary
Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 Station: 18+16 -L- Number of Barrels: 3
Drainage Area (ac or sq mi): 3.6 Sq. Miles Barrel WidthlDiameter (ft): 10
Surface Water Body: (1)East Fork Stewarts Creek Barrel Height (ft : 8
Culvert T e: Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert Culvert Len th ft 43.6
Avoidance and Minimization Efforts: Culvert Burial Minimization - Native material will utilized as backfill to a Sill height of 1.0' in the center barrel and 2.0' in the outer barrels. Erosion
(Bridge to Culvert) control - Bank stabilization with class II rip rap will be utilized up and downstream to avoid bank erosion. Impervious dikes and silt fence will be
used during the construction of the culvert. Minimize clearing - There shall be minimal clearing of vegetation on the existing shoulders/side slopes
during the construction of the proposed culvert and roadway.
Stream Slope Fish and/or Aquatic Life Passage
Existing Average Stream Slope (%): 0.44 % Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions 10'-20' Base, 2:1 side slopes, 1.0' depth of
Proposed Culvert Slope (%): 0.44 % in the Stream: water
Culvert Burial
Proposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft): 1.0' in center barrel, 2.0' in outside barrels
Existing Streambed Material: cobbels, course sand Proposed Low Flow Dimensions Center barrel is the low flow barrel - 1' burried
Through the Culvert: 10'x8'.
Proposed Sills/Baffles: 2.0' Sills will be located in the outside barrels of the
3@10'x8' RCBC. A 1.0' sill will be located in the Existing Low Flow Velocities in the
center barrel. Native material will be backfilled to Sill Stream (ft/s): z
heights. Native material consist of material that is ropose ow ow e ocities roug
being excavated from the stream bed at the project the Culvert (ftls): 2
site during culvert construction. Native material is qlternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles: Alternating sills/baffles are not needed due to
subject to approval by the engineer and may be the low flow barrel matching the width of the
subject to permit conditions. existing low flow channel.
Culvert/Stream Alignment
Stream Patterns Upstream and The existing bridge and proposed culvert are located within a slight bend of the channel. Amored bank work has been proposed to minimize
Downstream of the Culvert that Could potential bank erosion at the inlet and outlet.
Affect Fish Passage and Bank Stability:
Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, NA
pools, glides, etc.):
Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? Yes In order to match the existing channel dimensions, floodplain benches adjacent to the outside barrels are proposed above and
(provide justification) below the culvert.
Sharp Bends at Inlet/Outlet? No
(describe culvert alignment with stream)
Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide No
justification)
Bank Stabilization: Class II Rip Rap is proposed as bank stabilization approximately 22' upstream and 33' downstream.
Outlet Velocities
Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s): 4.3 Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s): 5.5
Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity ft/s : 4.3 Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocit (ft/s : 5.4
Roadwa Geometric Considerations
Evaluate/Describe Roadwa Geometric Constraints:
There is an abandonded bridge immediately downstream of the existing bridge that contracts the channel. The proposed culvert design recommends removing the abandoned bridge and
creating benches to better match existing channel dimensions and to aid in conveyance. Excavated banks will be stabilized with rip rap.

�
See Sheet 9 A for I ndex of Sheets � � � � � � � � � �IID � � � � 1� � � � � �
See Sheet 98 for Conventlonal Symbols 1�l l llp
See Sheet 9C- 9 for Survey Control Sheet � � � � � � � � �� � �, �� � � ,� ��� � � �
�
�
• �
�
V
�
�
0
V
2. CLEARING� ONVTHIS PROJECT SHALL.BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
3. DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVE K-VAWE AND VERTICAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE.
DRAWING
OF
�
�o
N
ia
ZZ
MENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
S ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Pre red in fhe Offlce of: Plans Pre red For: gyDRAULICS ENGLNEER
KCL Assoc�ares' of N.C.. P A.
asusrHusosN��s<aoda DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
s„ta aoo
ADT 2018 = 345 a,i�,;�i,,Nc _�ho�-a,�� I000 sirch Ridge Dr.
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2038 = 527 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5370 = 0.051 MILES KCI P����,e,9��,�a=_9��4 nare�gh xc, z�sia ����p
,�. „_� .., Fa. (�mn �ss-e^_aa .�� � � �°4
K= 12 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5370 = 0.006 MILES z°iz srnxnAnn srsc.FrcarroNs �e� ��g
PLANS D= 55 % RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DEWAYNE L. SYKES P.E. sfcharcns: P� � �
50 25 0 50 l00 T- 21 %* TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5370 = 0.057 MILES �xo�Ecr sNcixEsx � �
V= 50 MPH FEBRUARY 21, 2017 ROADWAY DESIGN ��, 0.
* � a LETTING DATE: BARRY C. SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER �� ��
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) (1TST =6/o DUAL =15/0) rno�EcrDssrcxsxcrx�a �'� ��'
10 5 0 10 20 FEBRUARY 20, 2018 �� v�a���
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB-REGIONAL TIER 1VCDOT CONTACT: THAD DUNCAN, P.E. p.E.
PROFILE (VERTICAL) PROJECT DESlGN E,\'GINEER — ROADWAY DESIGN S7GNATURE:

�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
$0' 0' SO' 100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
25' 0' 25' S0'
INSET SCALE
.: �hi�n�nYvCY 24 itvu� . �
Cpp WSN BU5INE55 UNn �.
ADDRESITf NAPoEEPD�AIR" � . ..
�
BEGI11l STATE TIP PR
� � —L— POT STA 16 + 65.00
�'�-- � �
Q I �_.
1 a� KCIJNEL
� Q �j-��
. d `2 `
o� Wo, � a�, �, O
HTR
�� —L— PC Sta.12+q625 �
B�. P/z S BK D TRINAVF. M�ARTIN
�
� � \ o��R.tiWELL �\�\� /� �.\
I
' I ti5 Q i P� � I
_,.__ _ _ _.... c GF �.�.
� �
S °09' � •
0. EIP \� 0401
/ GU�Y TURNAROUND
C4 aP _ — — LOCATION
Mii �E�
_,, .�-J _ — _ — _ — 20'R w w 20'R
� RETAIN 10'R
r„ � �10'R
78' DR
1 —/ — .
RETAIN
V,V^, ��� ,I_ �w,__ - - —
'�, . _ _ r 1 BL-3
\ � �
JIMMY WILLIAM THOMAS and wffe, \ I I
�', I LEASA ROBINSON THOMAS �
—L— STA /5+35A0
SITE 1
E
B-5370
����� 7 ����_
CLASS II RIP .
SEE INLET DET�I
EST 90 TONS
FST 115 SY
GEOTEkTILE '�
n
r '�
���� \ �\
50' EOT 8 PS � �
�APER LT & R� ��
SITE 1��\'. \\
GRPU 350 ;
F n-z
d F
�E
0
d
BEGIN CULVERT
-L- STA 18+0/.00
t REMOVE ALL COMPONENTS � r
� OF THE ABANDONED BRIDGE
�.'
O
�
�
COIR FIBER
EST 100 SY
COIR FIB
MATfINC
EST 110 '
C
!J
I ,��I � END CULVERT
—L— 57A /8+,j
CL4S5 II RIP RAP
� SEE OUTLET DETAII
EST 135 TONS
` EST 160 SY GEOTEXTILE
�
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF
— _ �F _
r
�
N
Q
� S
�
0
Z
N
END STATE TIP PROJECT B-5370
—L— POT STA 19 + 65.00
rGRAU 350
TL-3
—L— PC SYa. 20+242/
BEARIN =
S 77' 38' 085' E
`Ln�
.'�
S
B537m-1
���.
r'
� 0402
m �� TEMPORARY
' /�157� TURNAROUND
GRAU 350
TL-3
��.
�_
END CONSTRUCTlOI
—L— STA 20+86A0
"" � �:
• � ' ��v.� ��,�I
��/ � � ��
�,��. � ��
�.. �� I ���� � ��
1►1� =:•=' `1,�� � ���,
��:� ����
�� �� �
i �
� ��+ � ��
s�
e
/ I � II
I �
. .. . ?�ICE I I II
� � � '
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-5370 4
ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INC�NiI'LE E FLAN3
DO NOT USE FOR B W ACVl�15[TION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I PI�� � �. M�n
KCI ���.a.� � � : ��
PI i.��141 �R�9_� I.af 91�x v�fifi
f NC I'IRM LICENSE No. f�]148
IIA� 115t Sh Cery Pn�lcwuy
� ECOLOGICAL �� v"N�?�s�o
= ENG[NEERING (n97sa�o9z9
E
�;���� - �3
� ' O Q��� I �
�
� IS BK 0 W�i
• �
�3 �4: -� " °Y ,�
Q �
�
—L—
Pl Sta 13+g8.43 Pl Sta 18t87.92 Pl Sta 23+05.56
0= 6 20' 04.7' (LT) �= P l9' 00.7' (LT) 0= 3% 39' 40.0' (LTl
D= 2' 05' 005' D= l' 08' 45.3" D= 6' 56' 4/.8"
L= 304A4' L= 11492' L= 54228'
T= 152J8' T= 57.96' T= 28/.34'
R= 2,750A1Y R= 5.00OAO' R= 825A(Y
SE _ .03
RO = 66'
DS = 50 MPH
FOR —L— PROFILE,SEE SHEET 5
FOR CULVERT PLANS.SEE SNEETS C—ITHRU C—?

�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
$0' 0' SO' 100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
25' 0' 25' S0'
INSET SCALE
.: �hi�ndnYvCY 24 itJu� . �
Cpp WSN BU5INE55 UNn �.
ADDRESITf NAMIFEPD�AIR" � . ..
�
BEGI11l STATE TIP PR
� % � _ —L— POT STA 16 + 65.00
�'� �
� � '� -_. � 1.;:. a , KLIJNEL . . �
� a �,�
. \ 4
B-5370
c�
. o� Wo,— � _ O
HTR
�� -L- PC Sta.12+q625 �
B�. � lyz S BK D TRINAuF. MAR'IiN �
. -^�a � � �\ \
- - _ � o �+WELL �. � � � � � / r �� i
��.SQ,P—. �� . ..��
.. . . - I GF '. ��' � ... . .
� �
S °09' �
� 0. IP - `'� 0401
// GU�Y . TURNAROUND
LOCATION
_ �
i � �E�
- -�L __ - - _ . . . 20'R w w 20'R
� RETAIN � 10'R
r„ �10'R
78' DR
1 -/ - .
RETAIN
} . � . -- ____-
.'I� � =g�� I - ,
BL-3 �
_ � � �
; JIM Y� ISA ROBINSON THOMAS �fe� � I I
Y Y
� E I
; � BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
; -L- STA /5+35.00
� I tw� � SURFACE WATE
1 IMPACTS
� _ � �J'
4I
SITE 1
E
�.
,
'� � ��
�
r
CLA55 II RIP
SEE INLET DET L � �
EST 90 TONS
es1 ns sv `�'
GEOTE%TILE
n
r '�
/��� \ \
50' EOT 8 PS � �
'APER LT & R� �� � ''•\ `�
�� `\ \'�.�
SITE 1
BEGIN CULVERT
—L— STA 18+0/.00
'��/ �` �
f�
: REMOVE ALL COMPONENTS -�Y �
OF THE ABANDONED BRIDGE S r
' ���ji,�
►
COIR FIBER —
MATTING (TYP)
THICKNE55 = 2' -
INLET DETAIL
Nrs
O �
/l :
-L- PT Sta.19+4538
-L- PC Sto.18+30.46
�COIR FIBER Mfff���1TMG
EST 100 SY /
22' /
INC
_�� / E�
��-__ F �=--
COIR FIB
MATfINC
EST iio
�
!J
��
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF
— _ �F _
r
�
N
Q
� S
�
0
Z '\
N
END STATE TIP P.
�
s�, �.
cuv'' �
� �) � ( � � �
� �ud� , � ► �
�% / �
� ��
T B-5370 � � F.
—L— POT STA 19 + 65.00 '"
O
/
�. --
-L- PC Sta. 20t242/ � S
BEARIN = - ` ' _� , ,
S 77' 38' 08.5' E --
....__'_. ,,.
� 8537�-1
9F,
• 9ti
GRAU 350 ��"n
TL-3 0-
u +�
GRAU 350
TL-3
�j
�
END CONSTI
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-5370 4
ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INC�NiI'LE E FLAN3
DO NOT USE FOR B W ACVl�15[TION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I PI�� � �. M�n
KCI ���.a.� � � : ��
PI i.��141�C9_� I.af 91"x�vfifi
f NC I'IRM LICENSE No� f�]148
I� 115t Sh Cery Pn�lcwuy
ECOLOGICAL c �°"e1p1
�' ENGINEERING (n9] s�i o9ie
E
1- DONNA F- �
� 0402 '
m �� TEMPORARY
'/��SJ'� TURNAROUND
�END CULVERT -L- STA 20t86A0
-L- STA 18+3/AO
CL4S5 II RIP RA°
SEE OUTLET DETAII .
EST 135 TONS , �'
EST 160 SY GEOTEXTILE � �/
� ,�j �
� / ,
"J ; �/ / %'!% ��lll/ � i
- ..� . /. / � � ,
/ ��'� �.� . . . . ,
"��:
, �;��� ��i�I
�./,� � ���
��1,�� � �
I ��� � �
' `1�, �:�,
���� .
�'� �
PRICE
�
O ;
�
POLES
� �
�J �NnN� 1
I � I •99 a•
� _ 1�
� �I I �
�
��J � �
J WEL\
• �-
�
� c°�ur /� f' �.
�
-L-
Pl Sta 13+g8.43 Pl Sta 18t87.92 Pl Sta 23+05.56
0= 6 20' 04.7' (LT) �= P l9' 00.7' (LT) 0= 3% 39' 40.0' (LTl
D= 2' 05' 005' D= l' 08' 45.3" D= 6' 56' 4/.8"
L= 304A4' L= 11492' L= 54228'
T= 152J8' T= 57.96' T= 28/.34'
R= 2,750A1Y R= 5.00OAO' R= 825A(Y
SE _ .03
RO = 66'
DS = 50 MPH
FOR -L- PROFILE,SEE SHEET 5
FOR CULVERT PLANS.SEE SNEETS C-ITHRU C-?

. . . �, . .. . l .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., .. . L. __ 4 . . . . .. .
.. :.. �... :. .. .. .... . :..:.. :... .:. . :,,.. �.. ... � :.. .. . ..
. . . �. . � .. . .. . . .. .. . : . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . : . . .. . . . : .. . .. . : r ...: .. . �. .. . . . �� . : .. . . .. . ��: .. . . �: . . . .
; '
... . .. .... �. .. ....�.
630
620
610
600
590
580 —'---
��``\
�� ��
570 -: .
-- -- —�
_ -- t
560 ,
550
540
530 �
D
D
6
B
520 B
a
a
a
510
_ i
500
� � � � � � �
490
12
BM #2 - RR SPIKE IN BASE OF POWER POLE
- -L- STA. 16+76.96, 36' LT
EL = 561.65'
I�'� PERMIT DRAWING
�_ --- --- --- - ----, SHEET _ OF _
,,I-�,[
_... . . . . . . . . . . .
� �
L
� - _ ��
0
0 0
� o
� u�
+ �
m +
m
Q --
u~i LOW POINT
-L- STA. 18+02.
J BEGIN CULVERT
�
N
. _., - ' J O
. �
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
8-5370 5
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INC�NiFLE E PLAN3
DO NOT USE FOR B W qCUU15[TION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
�KCI Rfi��,�k ,, � � ��s �
� �� ��4;,�� 9 ; a v�9„ . _,
NC FIRM LICC�'SL M1o: F-l]AJ
115 � SE Cary i'aii<way
�'.� r�...�r i.�.r.. n � Suice101
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
............................................................................................................ . �
::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
ii�'iiiiiiiii'iiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiii ,iiiiiiii iiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii,iii ,iiiiiiii iiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiii
... ......... ..........C........�.........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
"""""":�:::' :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::':::::::'::: . �
�u�uu�u�
i�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�ii
�ouoo�oo �0000u0000� oo�oouoo�oo 00000 00�00� oo�oouoo�oo �0000uo�
o� 0000� o0000 0000 0000� 0000� o0000 0000 0000� 0000� o0000 0�
...i..u.....iu......oi.....u.i.........i..o.....iu......oi.....u.i.........i..u..... u......oi...
.............�.......................................�....................................... ..............
::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::
:::�:::::::::�:'::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::: . �
: :'::: :.: :' :: : :: :' ::::�.�:: : :':.: :: :� :: :::: :���.�:: : :'::��.�.� : :: :' ::
... ......... ..........C........�.........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
:::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::
,ii�i��iiiii,i���iiii,iii ii,i��iii�i,i,ii,ii�i��iii��iii�,i,ii,iii �iiiii��ii�iiiiiii�iiiiii,i���iiii,iii iii
...�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
��o ���o�o�� �o������� �������o� o���o��� �oo�o�� �o������� oo���o� o���o�o ���o�o�� �o������� ����
�u�umum������uumu������m�����������um������uumu������m������umum����������m • � 1
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��������������
������������� ��������������������������������������� �����������������������������
������������� ��������������������������������������� �����������������������������
:::::::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::C:::::::::::::::::
��o ���o�o�� �o������� �������o� o���o��� ���o�
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�::::' .
.............................................. �
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::
��n ���n�n�� �n������� ���
���'������
����������
..........
uum� :1
iiiiii�ii
��������o
��������'���������'��������� ����������C���
iiiii�i�iiiiiiiii�ii�iiiii �iiiiiiiii�iii
��������� �����������iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiii
:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::: �
. . .. ::: :: :� :: :::: : : :.7�.�:: : :'::��.�.� : :: :' ::
....... .........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::
�������������,ii��ii'i'i'ii'ii�i��iii��iii�'i'ii'iii �iiiii��ii�iiiiiii�iiiiii,i���iiii'iii iii
.......... ........ .........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
�i�iiiiiii�i�i�iui�i�i�iii�iii�i���u�iii�i�ii��i iiiu�u�i�i�i�i�ii�i�iuiu�u�iii�i�iiiiiii�W . I
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
iiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii
:::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::
���� ���o����� �o������� �������o� o�������� ���o����� ���������� ��u���o� �����o��� ���o����� �o������� ����
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
............................................................................................................ �
::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
��o ���o�o�� �o������� �������m o���o��� �oo�o�� �o������� oo���o� o���o�o ���o�o�� �o������� ����
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
"""""":�::':::::::' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::'::::::':::::::::::::::'::::::::::::�::':::::::'::: - �
�u�uu�u�
i�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�iiiiiii�ii
���� ���o����� �o������� �������o� o���o��� ���o�o�� �o������� ��o���o� o���o��� ���o����� �o������� ��o
iiiiiiuiiiii uiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiii uiiiiiiuiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiii uiiiiiiuiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::: �
'■■�..�::: :■: :'.� :: : :: :' : ::■:: :::: : :':■: :: :� :: : :: :■������■�:: ::: ::��.�■� � ��.�
... ......... ..........C........�.........�.........�..........C........�.........�.........�..........C...
:::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::
,ii'i��iiiii,i'��iiii,ii iii,ii��ii�ii,ii,ii�i��iii��iii�,i,ii,ii iii,ii��ii�iiiiiii�iiiiii,i���iiii,iii iii
iio iiioioi� ioiiiiiii iiiiii�io�i oiiioi�ii iooio�ii ioiiiiiii Cooiii�o�i oiiioi�ii iiioio�ii ioiiiiiii iio
........................................................................................................... �
............................................................................................................
:::::::::::::�.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�.::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::C:::
��o ���o�o�� �o������� �������o� o���o��� ���o�o�� �o������� oo���o� o���o��� ���o�o�� �o������� ��o
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
............................................................................................................ �
::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
............................................................................................................
:::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C::::::::�:::::::::�:::::::::�::::::::::C:::
"""""":�::':::::::' :::::::::::::::'::::::::::::�::':::::::':::::::::::::::'::::::::::::�::':::::::'::: � �
�u�uu�u�
9�>>�??e99����=e9����:?a��:?:€?e9����?=;9?:����e99�����e9����e?a �a�e ?e9����eee9����e?e99��� �e9������a �e?
:::�::::�::::� E:::ieeeee �eeee�eee� eeeeeeeee� eeee�eee'
�:: ::=C�::Z: C�:�Z::=C :::: ::: :Z::=::::.:�=C��:Z - • �
�-
•- �
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

6 - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
° O 2.S S PRO1. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
`� � �7 � B-5370 X-1
x
565 �5 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 565
W ET LAN D P E RM I T D RAW I N G INC�MflDL]ETE II�LANS
DO NOT LiSE FOR A%W ACQUISiTION
56O BO U N DARY i S H E ET O F UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED cCO
; ; , � — —
- - r �. : : �.�2� �.�2� � i � :.. ✓v
. . : , ..I ..I ..
I
„i i �
. . �--------------� . . . . .
, { .. . . .. . . . ... �'% �.. .. . . . . . . .. .
555 _,___ _____ 555
� i �i
�Ia� ! i i - -
_ --�, _���_ i, � I I M i l�
-- ---�
� : : `L�'� ,�� 556.82 �
L _.
�.. ..., ..
_. . i. _ . . . . . . . `—��_
+.-. .. ; i i... i i� __ I I I iTi-� � � i-i-I I -----------------------------------
550 ��------- _�i , , 550
_i� SITE 1 � _ .. . . _ .. . . �_ ..
--------------------- 17 + 85.00
; ; � ; i
_
_ __
.. __ ---.— _ _ __--,_ , ,
-- --- -- _ _-___ _ - - � ---- ---
---- -- -- � � ; ; ; ; ,
- -- ----- ____ , � __ __ _
- r - r� r. - � r . . : :-�T.. .... _� �.. .. _�i � � �.-� �: : : . �. : : : ' �, ._._� ? ._ � : : �. 4 r, i . : -- -� � �--� � ? i
. -
.. i i i . . .. .. . .
-�i i �i i --�i i-.
:�.. .. .. ..... . . i..: i
. I .., . .. : .. .:., :.'_ . ..: : ;..1_ ... . . . .; . . . : : : . . : �
:.... ._ �. .. � . . ...
.. . . .... . . . . ... . . � . :�.1.. � �I.: ... .:. . .
i...
560 �; �; - �. ',.. .. � 560
,.
- r - r� �rl-:_i.. 7 ... I .,�. �. i . . . : . I �.�2� 0.�2� � %
'_ �� , . . ' , � ,L.� --
---
- — --
_ �
555 557.26 555
_ __
_ . _..
,
:. I
550 � 7+�J 0. 0 0 I ' � 550
, i � i �
I
- + ;- � � I I I , '� �'
_:
_ �
�.. . 1 �i n .
565 r; : : ; ; : : , , , __ , : : , : : I : : : . : : : i 565
_,_.
,_. ..,_ .. � _. .._. .... .... ... .__ _ . _.. _
_:, �__.� _,
_ ;_ _;_ , ; . _
_
� ---� --- - , _ , ,
;. �
560 ,�,� > 0.020 0.020 ?�I
-� 560
559.96
, _.�
5 _; � �, _ . _ . � + �� ; : : : : : : : : : : 555
i_
'
� _ . ....._ _ .. .�.. . �.� .. �.. .. ... �... .�� .. �l�i Li .;�. ��.� ..
17 + �0.�0
, _
�. _ .
_ �
�� �I. � : � � ���� .. : : � � : : ' �i . � � � � : : � : : : � � - -�. �-
. : �. . . . -i,.. L ��.. . .
.. . . . . . .. -.. . . �. .. ; .
.. . . . . .. . . . . .
. . �. i . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. � . ' ' .. �. 7 .
�
: .. I._.i I : . �:.. ..li- . . .. �. ��. .. �� �� : ��. �. �. - �. �� �. �. . . . . . . . �
. . .... L ..... L. i . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . ., . . . . . �. �. . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .
� �.. . il.....1 l ._ .. .. .. .... I . .�.... ..l-.1......' .... ..... _ .'..._�.' :�..... ... ... ....... __Ll- 1 . ..'..'�. ..... . ' . !
-f- i- - f ;--� � -� -I 't- '. ! I . : , ,
,_, . r .. .... .... .:..:
�
565 � � ---- - -- - -- - -- -- -- -- - ---- -- - - --- - --- 565
� _ . ' , � 0.010 0.005 S ?�I
`L'� _ � _ _ - _
560 562.03 560
� „ ���� ��, -- � ��--,� ���� � ��-��� --,� ,�� ���� ���� ��--���� ---
_ _ _ _ � 16 + 65.00 °ea-e e�a . ,
� � � � �
a - - -- - -- - - -- ; . , ;
�
- �� I �� , - � �
555 � � �,� _ _ . _ _._ � � _:e_: _ 555
�� ,.. — � _
X s � � �, BEGIN PROJECT _ __ _ —� � � � �-
°� � - � —
� -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - -
�, _ _ _ _ —L— STA. 16 + 65.00 _
� 565 � �
565
�
�
�
m
�, 560 562.91 560
� , , _ _
3 ��� , �� ,� �, � � � �,,, ��,�, �-', ��' �,-� � �-� ;��,� ��;
� -- ___�_. _� . � . , � ;,- , _ - - 16 + 50.00 � � � � � �
�
L
� _ -�— -
- - - - - -- -- - --- -- - - - ---
_ ,,
� 570 - - - - - - - - - - - _ _� - - -- _ - -- _ - - -- -- _ -- - , , 570
N
E � , i . i --- . .--__. �.— _ ._'_I_ -I ,.,__'_I.___� ...,-�-. ___I • I ,.._, -I._..�I ..,., . _I._..�r, -,-. __�I , . -I._.._I ...,_ _I.__fl -,-, I .,., ._., __I.__�r...__. _.., . T _�. �..rl , .-,-.-I._.._I .,_, ,..., .
� .Tr . ._ ... . .. ....... .... .... .... ......... .... ......... ......... .... ......... .... ......... .... .... .. .... .... ..... .. .... ......
0
C I
w 565 565
�
�
� 565.58
�
,
w _;_ � _;_ __ _
� 5so t�l-�tj+,�H+N+�++�,+�+��+�+��+���+�++�,+�+��++++++�+��+�+H+H+�+i 16 + 00.00 �+��++�+�+��-�++tt+�+��+��+�++I : � ' - —T: __ __ -T— __ . T�- � _ � 5so
�
��� _�_
��
�o
�_�
�%�, 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Q��

SI�� DETAI� FOR
INLET AND OUT�ET
NOT TO SCALE
I� 30" �1
, � �
rE �—Ij—E �—j—E �1
10' 10' 10'
i� cn i �� c�� �
�
�
�
�
�
4�
C
21
E
C
0
C
W
�
�
T
W
0.
l00' S0' 0 50' l00'
1 CL STA 18+16000
� � 3@10'x8' RCBC
GP = 557081,
PROPOSED 100 YR SKEW = 90� -
WS EL = 558033' I i
560
PROPOSED 25 YR L
��r WS EL = 555e8' ° �— � �
T � 1 >i
= TB LT
550 i ---! -- \ _
� TB RT
�1�
----- -- — � �—
T- `
i� cii i �
__--_-_—_--�—
_�-----
�`" ���—
I' SILL � EXISTING BED
„� �� ,-.� � �� -,,.,
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-5370
WJJ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDR4ULIC5
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMFLE E PLANS
DO NOT QS6 FOR ! W AC4l�ISITiON
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 17+66/18+29 3@10'X8' RCBC < 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 96 25
TOTALS*: < 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 96 25 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
�

•�
See Sheet � A for I ndex of Sheets
See Sheet �B for Conventional Symbols
See Sheet � C- � f or Survey Control Sheet
NOTE:
l. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
2. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS
3. DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVE K—VALUE
����� � � � ���\��I I�I � ������� �
��������� �� ���� ���
LOCA TI01�: BRIDGE 1�0. 444 01� SR 1506 (PRICE DAIR Y RD)
O T�ER EA S T FORK S TE WAR T'S CREEI�
TYPE OF WORI�: GRADII�G, DRAI1�lAGE, PA T�I1�G A1�D STR UCTURE
ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
AND VERTICAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Pre ared in the Offlce of: P/ons Pre o�ed For: HyDRAULICS E1VGII�EER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH KCI ASS°�iates °fN.C., P.A.
� 4sos Falis ofNeuse xoaa DIVIS70111 OF HIGHWAYS
ADT 2018 = 345 sU�te400 1000 Birch Ridge Dr.
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 6-5370 = 0.051 MILES RPh ne°�9 9��;g°9z 4° xaiezgh Nc, a�6io
50 25 0 50 l0o ADT 2038 = 527 KCI FaX�9�9>,g3-9266 � o� �o��a �
h[tpd/www.kci.coin
O
K= 12 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 6-5370 = 0.006 MILES 20I2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �Q� �°'oQQ
PLANS D= 55 % RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DEWAYNE L. SYKES, P.E. SIGNATURE: P.E. � �
50 25 0 50 l0o T— 21 %* TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5370 = 0.057 MILES PROJECT ENGINEER � o
FEBRUARY 21, 2017 ROADWAY DESIGI�
� O
* V o= 50 MPH o BARRY C. SMITH, P. E. E11tGI11tEER �� �Q
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) (TTST — 6/o DUAL =15 /o) LETTIIIIG DATE:
F E B RUARY 2 0 2 Ol 8 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER ��/' �� p� p��QO�
10 5 0 10 20 �
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB—REGIONAL TIER 11tCDOT C01�lTACT: THAD DUNCAN, P.E. P.E.
P RO F I L E(V E RT I CAL) PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER - ROADWAY DESIGN SIGNATURE:

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line ----- -----
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin �
Property Corner �
Property Monument �
Parcel/Sequence Number �23
Existing Fence Line -X X X-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence �
Proposed Chain Link Fence �
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence '�
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -W�B- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary W�B
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil ` �• `�'�
,
Potential Contamination Area: Soil - � �?�
Known Contamination Area: Water - '� '�
Potential Contamination Area: Water � ,� �
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential �' ?
BUILDI11lGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O
Sign �
Well °
w
Small Mine �
Foundation 0
Area Outline
Cemetery i
Building
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water -- ---
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � �
Jurisdictional Stream �S —
Buffer Zone 1 Bz �
Buffer Zone 2 sz 2
F I ow Arrow � --- ---
Disappearing Stream �--- ---
Spring �-�-��_ -�
Wetland �
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
� FLOW
False Sump �
��� �� J�' ������I ��� l� �����:�9 �'� ���� � �� 1.��������°� ��_��
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF WAY.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R1W Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete C�A Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
CSX TRANSPORTATION
0
MILEPOST 35
0
SWITCH
-+ -+-- �- �-
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement —
Existing Curb —
�
0
.
W
.
W
.
�\
� W
in� �
.". �I
� c �,
� A��
c
E
E
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
�
Orchard
Vi neya rd
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJ O R:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
— TELEPHONE:
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F---
Proposed Curb Ramp cR
Existing Metal Guardrail T T T
Proposed Guardrail T T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
Proposed Cable Guiderail � � n n
Equality Symbol �
Pavement Removal
I�EGETATION.•
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
�3
�
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
� � � �
Vineyard
CONC
J ��N� WW �
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
TV:
�oN� HW TV Pedestal
TV Towe r
}----------< U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
��B U/G TV Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
� U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*)
s
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*)
- - - - T - - - -
- - T - -
T
- - - -TC- - - -
- -TC- -
TC
- - - -T FO- - -
- -T FO- -
T FO
GAS :
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS 6(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*)
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. -
A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records -
End of Information
-W- -
W
A/G Water
- -TV- - -
TV
- - - -TV FO- - -
- -TV FO-
TV FO
�-
A/G Gas
�
O
55
A/G Sanitary Sewer
- - - -FSS- - - -
- - FSS - -
FSS
•
0
0
❑s
- 7UTL
0
UST
0
�
m
AATU R
E.O.I.

GRAU 350
TL-3 �, �
� N
� �
PROP. EOT �
PROP. EOT �
� � GRAU 350 � �
TL-3
50' EOT & PS
TAPE R LT & RT
NOT TO SCALE
PAVED SHOULDER TAPER DETAIL
(BEGIN AND END OF PROJECT)
CROWN CASTLE
www.crowncastle.com
FOR LEASE 877 486-9377
FOR EMERGENCY 24 HOUR SERVICE 800 788-7011
CROWN BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER 876281
SITE ADDRESS 811 PRICE DAIRY ROAD, MONROE NC 28110
SITE NAME: PRICE'S DAIRY ROAD
• �
S BEGI1�l STATE TIP PROJECT 8—�370
-��--�� —L— P�T STA 16+6 00
,
� � -- � �
,
- - �
� � � � DOG
, , � KENNE�
s `
� � ❑ � �� � ���,�
• ' ' � +2
� — ' � �
i i �
� W�� WD � i � ���� � CLASS II RIP fb
i SEE INLET DET
HTR i'i � � EST 90 TONS
� � � JOHNNY FRANKLIN EST 115 SY
�-- '�—L— PC t. 12+46.25 MARTIN GEOTEXTILE
' � and wife,
,
, • ;' ��, i�, Ei� e�� i�/z s BK � TRINA F. MARTIN
� ,'� ,_, � � \ � DB 4603 PG 099
� �A I � � GUY �
� � �� � �--- �' � � � � �
� �I �
i WELL ' � � ��
� i i� ' o � � a �`-�WELL � � � � � �� �
S
' THOMAS E. MURPHY I ;� I� � � � °� � � �� ���, �,' , A\ f � �
' and wife � � z �, � � � �L�'` 80
' MAUREEN F. MU�PHY � s' ' � � �� `-� � i X. R�W '�o
��I EiP 7 °09� ��� � _ � ,
� DB 1603 PG 118 I i = �60�op�� � E!P �' - � ' _ � � -L- +2 � 50' EOT & PS � �40', & �� , `so_
i iI , � � �' `� � � � L- + 80 � � p EX. WW TAPER LT & R� � �50' LT � �r
� '� `� �/ i GUY � � � EX•� � 45' LT �L- +20 � � �
� "' � � �& 4' LT
�� ExrsriNe Ri i i� -���� i MTL � � �� � EX. RiW
� T _ _ _ TEMPORAR�I� E �g 0401 � � �
�
- � � � � C EIP _ BST � � — — --rv- - TURNA�I�MD w �'� w gM� � � 48" 5SBW _��
� � I �s" RCP � � 5'R ��5� F
G\BE� E`2 �� � ETAII� � RE�AI�\_ T M 15" 15�R F TL-3 �� --5��54,82'-�
-���" 03./" E �o � - - — � �S���cMP o_ -
� — -- � �
, _ -- _ - -
�'-� � __ �R 1506 -L - M v�i p � �� -L-
— — - -' _- — ��ricE oA�Rr Ro a� S 7 ° l9' 07e8" E r W o � � �� _ _ _
- ------ _ - RTAI�
ExisriNc' � �S" CMP ��
� � i w -��E+� � - - -
GUY —_ GRAU 350 F ' N s -
- - �t=3—
�
� -rv- _ �,��- _� EII' -� X X48" 4SBWX X � -��
— — — � � B�-3 ���� � �AT-�� 6�
_
- W
� � � - oo� 22' �
JIMMY WILLIAM THOMAS and wife, � ��� � F�Ac Po�E N�, + �NC. �
� LEASA ROBINSON THOMAS � �I -�- -+-40
DB 4557 PG 420 � � � � WE�� r�< EX. R�W �_L- +85
i � � 1 � ��
� / �� �`
� � � � � � � � � , � � "' BEGIN CULV ERT
�
—L — ST A l8 +0/,C
I BST 2 S F D
� � � BEG/N CONST RUCT lON �
—L — PT Stao l9 +45e38
� —L — PC Stae l8 +30e46
.z�
S 76°53'25" E
189096'
CHRISTOPHER MOSER HEIRS
W 14 E 323
EIP
PT Stoo l5 +50029
BEARING AH =
S 76° l9' 07.8" E
JIMMY W. THOMAS and wi-Fe,
LEASA R. THOMAS
DB 3658 PG 754
EIP
S 78°I2'05" E
209097'
—L — ST A l5 +75000_„
REMOVE ALL COMPONENTS -
OF THE ABANDONED BRIDGE
40', &
65' RT
COIR FIBER MATTING
+14031 EST 100 SY -L- +40
�� 31004'
� 22, -L- +60 EX. R�W
INC. EX. fLW,
4Q'
� � � LT
� -4 --- F �� --
T T T ������
�
� M
� O
�/ r °' �o
�
�' A� ��OI��FIB
y A A N � MATf I N
1 B �IDG � EST 110 �
c, � �
�� TDE
65' &
85' RT
�
O
1N
N
Op
�
Z
/
\
�
\
�
s
��o
� , ,�
s -�
� �° p �j
cu� �
GUY • �
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B —5370 4
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K� � Engineers . Planners . Scientists • Construction Managers
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609-6270
http://www.kci.com phone [phone] • Fax (9]9) 783-9266
�� NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-1148
1151 SE Cary Parkway
ECOLOGICAL Su'te 1°1
Cary, NC 27518
� ENGINEERING [phone]
NEAL KEMP PRICE and yvife
�, WILMA R. PRICE � �
� DB 679 PG 270 ' ��
�
�,
�,
��
-L - pT St � 5 +66049 ', �� ; �
D STATE TIP PROJECT 8-5370 BEAR � aH = �-�;
N 64° 4 ' lle6" ��- ,/' � �
- I'OT STA 19 + 65.00 �� � �,;
' i�; /
� �o
2 �'
� � ��
��, ➢ ��� � /
ki-� � p �'� ��'`� � �
� � /
�
�r�^ NEAL KEMP PRICE �
� �r'� DB 4099 PG 386 ��� �� �
� / i ii
`i�r� � �� ''i �i
i i ����
-L - PC Stao 20 24d2/ � � � � � ; �K �;�' , � �,���
� � � BM��3 / /ii
BEAR/N� BK � � �� <
S 77° 38' 08 E � � � � '� �`� � Q � - � '
� � //
w
i -
FGRAU 350 15'R-�
TL-3
�_:,�. �-
2 2'
INC.
50' EOT & PS
TAPER LT & RT
-L- +95 x
35' RT i
-L- + 90
90' RT �
�X
m
�
�
�
�
x
I �
��
350
i �
X GUY
�-L- + 65
40', &
65' RT
END CULVERT
-L - ST A l8 +3/,00
CLASS II RIP RAP
SEE OUTLET DETAIL
EST 135 TONS
EST 160 SY GEOTEXTILE
3
DARLENE H. PRICE
DB 5422 PG 308
COIR FIBER —
COIR FIBER EXCAVATE MATTING (TYP)
MATTING (TYP) EST DDE = 160 CY �`
NG�
�
�
CLASS II RIP RAP
W/GEOTEXTILE (TYP) VARIES �--�
THICKNESS = 2' 0-10' (TYP)
INLET DETAIL
NTS
� � / / �
B�"?7�-1 � ��� %� /� %
� � ��F � /// /.
� +4u -L- +80 � � '� �
�
� EX. ILW � / / / / \\
' / �
45 LT & /� �/ /EiP DONNA PRICE HAIGLER
` � � ��"W� DB 4099 PG 396
$ E 0 02 /� / 60 BK ° � POLLS
r" � � � � i / co�uMN , � .
n� i � �� �15' R � ' � � �'
T NAROUND � � � � �-
%
- �� � �� � � � � � �
��� / � O �
/ � �
� � �� � �'�,� o�
__ — / ' ' �
� — / I � I
�
� —� DARLENE H. PRICE �, ��
� ��
� DB 5422 PG 308 � � �
�3 � ' I �
� � � i
� � i
3 � �3 , - ' ', �
� _�
/ � �
�o I S BK D WEI_L
� �
_� � � �
o,
� ��
�3 � � °Y � �'
END CONST RUCT lON �� k �� ��3
��
i p
-L - STA 20+86.00 ��� �
EXCAVATE
EST DDE = 165 CY / �
/
�
��� �
i, 2' (TYP) ` �, 2' (TYP)
� CLASS II RIP RAP �j'
W/GEOTEXTILE (TYP) VARIES i '�
THICKNESS = 2' 0-10' (TYP)
OUTLET DETAIL
NTS
Pl Sta l3 +98043
0 = 6° 20' 0407" (LT )
D = 2° 05' 00.5"
L = 304a04'
T = 152.18'
R = 2,750v00'
—L —
P/ Sta l8 f87e92
p = l° l9' 00.7" (LT )
D = l° 08' 45.3"
L = 114a92'
T = 57e46'
R = S,OOOv00'
SE _ °03
RO = 66'
DS = 50 MPH
Pl Sta 23 +05e56
� = 37° 39' 4000" �LT )
D = 6° 56' 4/.8"
L = 542.28'
T = 28/,34'
R = 825°00'
FOR —L — PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
FOR CULV ERT PLANS, SEE SHEET S C—1 T HRU C—?

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Jessica Tisdale, HDR Engineering of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207
Raleigh, NC 27612-4845
for
Michael Turchy
NCDOT — NCDOT Natural Environment Section
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Union City: Monroe
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35 2.604° Long. -80 33.124°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: East Fork Stewarts Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
SA (210` L, 15-20' W), SB (144` L, 2-6' W)
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.02 acres
Cowardin Class: PFO
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
1

❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who
requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain
an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit
applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the
option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has
the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the
permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special
conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all
the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the
Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon
the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a
proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands
and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional
waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an
approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable.
Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions
contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant
to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be
raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site,
or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Figure 3: Water Features (delineation map).
2

� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Bakers:
1:24,000.
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
.❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
of 1929)
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
3
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

',a
{�7-. � . �•1�� ..,�
� �y . . _ _ � � �7 L��
.J�`-.. ` �.I' ` � � � 4
' "y�,�� q ; 1 �� II � � ��
[.�3' ~— _�z��..{"'�.,� � I � � %
�' f I fd
4^. � '�i'.��- I � ...
I I._a�� -. 3��r
�i �i � -_..� - �� R _ . �-�' r
\ �� r 1�,{, — _aL}�
- �i;:j - � �.yfJ,�� o:t�zh'' �.� 4�.= �
.�=-Y, ��_,
� '_��-�-y ;'
V
���„ � - � `k, %v
,�'�,� �,�`5,7 - ' �f - u. +/
',1 � �� 1s,J� �r -
I� �� ' ��
� �� L�-{1 � F � r�dofY �� '�„ � �
�. r.�.,�Y' �
�f ,��+Y '�� �,r'" -_' ��'�.�. ��� �� '� is ��� �.
�r , � � �e
� � ���r
h• d ��, f � _�—
� �� �S � fl � � . ,���4 � � �_�
�_- �
.. � �- � � -
-ti 'p�,,r � - i s,a - A -a ��` ..o- �, �,_, a
�, - � - �,f r�
� �; .���� �.:.�+� r_ �;' i�
—� - - � i `l�' ` . - � `� � �`�} /' � .� �r
��� I , � �`'Y � i 25/�' � � - .
� � 1s I r�e�U''F t _ _
� v �`
�_ � . ., ��_.Y,�� ,;.__,-;.�.--
r` � r�'G� 1�,� � � _ - - �J'
/ '_aUc' � �i
J---.�lF J tr � �41�}�� '�
{
��, � . :
� � 1.i
�i '� i � ��
s-�
�,J'� �I ��` S a :' ^ � ' - `� "�
f,�
rF �"� tx f ' � 'uo10 G_ _
.�r /'� +� ,r= ���.,, �� �,
!'n�'`��'l.�"1,rtf•� r � _�''{ ��5k� � _"_'
_ J J� y � . �
I / � " �,
� � I i i T A. I�E
/�,�-,I 4 � �'Y i �`, � I` I
� �� � � � _ �� � " �� � ��� ,, ,.
ry� ', � Iy � � , --�' � '' ��} r' �� . � �,}
� ----
„ ,,'�;.,. T _
���--� �'° � � =�' -
- .' f
Qr �O.y"* c,�� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
G TRANSPORTATION
� V y DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
�`� �� PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL
n9�-t_'�: ��.q^.
-^sF �-�`4 ANALYSIS UNIT
... hTOc iFip�"��.
UNION COUNTY
Replace Bridge No. 444 on SR 1506
OVER EAST FORK STEWARTS CREEK
B-5370
Figure 1

r � � ` p5:�? /,
r � .� . . � � ` �,o �4 . +:ts• ' • + . HJ, t;� .
�� ,,., � �`� :r_���. . . . . �- .� � - �_�{� -
- . __ �C ��� �� �-����.; _ - . �� . � � �� _ __
�,:: r. _ '� �L`�:e _ •, . , .� . � - _
� ' 4?0 '� ,�n ,��1 : �;
, ' ' � � _ . � ; �5 �
- " `� ` - —
�` - - ;\ -
f�a � ,� �
. •,. , , y? `:. _". _ . - ` _' \ �_-. ., .
. - .� ��`� , i:
� �l/4SlNl,O?'n 6.)�i'L � � . � �. . �I _ . � `� f \ :s -_
57� \ � - `' _�. _ J �: ,- �� . y- ��.� _ -.
- . �`
�_
, . -.�
I �,
' � ` - - '` �
--- i �I ` �� ,.�, ,� . . . `��1 y _J � _ - � �t'- . .
505 - ' 1 � - � _ : �,
_ _ _ , � ' ,., I �� � � �\� . . � � . - . . ' '�
. - '—,,, �\- � �� � ���� ,�1 �� , � . ' - � — ,
.. yR i `� � �� �� .ii4, ' r, ^ � ' i ' ' -
- � ��� ,� � i ,�� t� `= : _ � ,_ • , �
�t/—�-`�'`��'' �`.� �'-�'//- � � _.
�'� -� �� 1 � _ �, ��: / ! � � ��os
�� '�' `-+� � � + �i _`� ! i r
� _ ,.` � i, r � � • ` _
{ �- 6�1 . Roa'rrc�ka �h
'•;ioCr.ar,� Ctar �1 _ / '' �. .. � l� _ _�` - I - -_� �� . � �� , .
• ' - .I^� E� � , � � � J� ��+ `�t> ' _
. � ,�y ` �_ 1 - {�}fr, � _ � �i � � -
Af8 -.-ry- :�• I �l'. ` i � � ��
� . O' � � !�� ' • . r - r �
• .S: ' • . ' �f . �� - ' �„
r�1 � � � • /f ` S I{r, . � ' x � �� e
� i�' e - . R'4 .•,� . ��.�" _;
I ...' � � \�``—{_�)�e � • e � � � JL _ � '
I ����� `\ \ S4l ' � \ /: \_' . , i �`` . _.. .
jl.�1 , � • � _ \. � � - = cY,!d '• . < ` t� '
. '' �r�.. ��' _��';� .•� - - - � f .
/ ' +� /� - - � - � �
. I �- 4. . /'\ � `�.,�
� ��-�' �� ' q \� �'- -~�� �. . tf .ti
�/ -- � �. . �`-� 1v' /- `.�-•. � • y�" � 4! ��a.��, �y U •
' , � � � • ` . 1����� . l �� . q \ �. �,./ '
� .. � _y�Sp �� ��. r� ' _� .c}1\ ��
1 _;,. -� _ _ . ' � _ _ � ' __ . - , � ,. _ .
��' -Cem ; t� M,
--.�l�D� '� �.�? � - . - •.rGrzc f'h ,,f. '�� . 57� ' • ' • • :'i ,
- � ��_J _ `' � . '� ' � '
� „ <_, � '_�' - j �.
. � � - S.�_' � _ � • • �'..�>�1`- • • - _��v :` . .
' � � - -. -��c `� 1,. --`;� /?,� .. � � -� � t _
• � �G :=-1�� r�- �� �^�L� � � ` `� / ``=�`'`:k$ J �`OSV�!'C
�a151i. - `?�f � � ,�� � '� �-J1� �y�. � . •��i()S'Si�$
. •T'-' rl �^.i - - � . � . �7r . -
' � _- ����• ��.+� • � � , , � 1 •� ` f . • '� .
-.. � r�` A �_ ��; �?� ,�� / , ,� _ ��� _ ( . ,
�,� , ', ' ' '� /J ��/ r��., ' ' -J�? `���'�''� _ ,. .
_ � "f ` . � � ,1! � � ' , .. . . £ 4"` - - _- '
l! ,i- t.
- �--� 1 • . � � � :i __ n7 � , • . ' •
�i �! I !I
� �` • � � \ - _ _ �
Y ' .
• � � � � . �� ; �� ' tic �. �.�� ��. . -, l
�� _ i; ; . . ; _ � , ,. ,r�% - � � ; �� �� � -._�.
��. � �,,� ; . ��r-� � j t:�� ��,�;�-��
`,; , , , �J�� , c-' , r ,
� ��j . �` � . �Q � , .
`L� _ U � :� � � �: r-.
i� �`�� _ . ' `I ! �� ��, : - _ t'� i - l ' 1&'"i' ,
` ¢ . �'-'' " �i �.._n �"` � , i � J'' = _:` � � � � �'�J
� Miles • ' \� � �� 'S� -
�s� .
0 0.25 0.5 1 � , � �� '
, n ar�K ' -_ '�.' _ - t��� � � � . ��: � 54 h�r1'
USGS Topographic Quad: Bakers
�� Figure 2
(�NE cI�MC'nN`� �tL1ra,,,� sn�'irtin,�;
NCDOT � Bridge Replacement #444 � Preliminary JD

�T� Water Resource Features
1 L� Figure 3
ONE COMPANY � M�tny Solutions�^
NCDOT � Bridge Replacement #444(B-5370)� Preliminary JD

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: B-5370 WA City/County: Union Sampling Date: 2/27/2013
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA (B-5370)
Investigator(s): S. Easterly J. Tisdale Section, Township, Range S T Monro R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%) 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 474454.72 Long: 1533700.002 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla (Cha) fine loamy NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil . , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (Bs)
Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Water Marks (Bi) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imag.(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
� Iron Deposits (65) d❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑�/ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ A uatic Fauna B13 d FAC-Neutral Test D5
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X NO
includes ca illar frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers �� Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: wa �B-5s�o)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Saecies Status Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 Ft ) Number of Dominant Species 3 A
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � �
Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
20 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B)
=Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (plot size: 30 Ft ) Percent of Dominant Species 60.0% (A/B)
Juniperus virginiana 5 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 =Totai Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 Ft ) Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Rubus argutus 40 Y FACU OBL species X 1-
Lonicera japonica 15 Y FAC FACW SpeCies X 2-
55 =Total Cover FAC species x 3=
Vine Stratum x 4 =
FACU species
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) (B)
Preva/ence Index = 8/.4=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test > 50%
3- Prevalence Index s 3.0
Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
X Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Steata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present? yes X No
iemarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Ligustrum sinense (shrub, 10%) was dropped from the vegetative list as the problematic hydrophytic vegetative 5a. section describes this as a used method
when certain FACU species commonly dominate wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers �� Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

S�IL Sampling Point: WA (B-5370)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type � Loc 2 Texture Remarks
0 to 6 10YR 4/ 3 100 SILTY CLAY
6 to 12 10YR 4/ 2 90 10 YR 3/6 10 C M SILTY CLAY
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Martix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surtace (SS) ( MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) ( MLRA 147, 148)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
d❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Ai 0) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surtace (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ai i) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
❑ Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hvdric Soils: 3
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers � Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: B-5370 WB City/County: Union Sampling Date: 2/27/2013
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB (B-5370)
Investigator(s): S. Easterly J. Tisdale Section, Township, Range S T Monro R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toe of Slope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%) 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 474454.72 Long: 1533700.002 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla (Cha) fine loam NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil . , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Wetland is located adjacent to the stream on the NW quadrant.
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (Bs)
� Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) 0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Water Marks (Bi) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑d Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imag.(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
� Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑�/ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑d Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ A uatic Fauna B13 FAC-Neutral Test D5
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X NO
includes ca illar frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers �� Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: wa �B-5s�o)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Saecies Status Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 Ft ) Number of Dominant Species 4 A
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��
Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
20 =Total Cover Total Number of Dominant
Shrub Stratum Species Across all Strata: 7 (B)
(Plot size: 30 Ft )
�igustrum sinense ao v FACU Percent of Dominant Species 5� 1% �A/B�
Juniperus virginiana 15 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet:
65 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 Ft ) OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Lonicera japonica 20 Y FAC FACW species 15 x 2= 30
Rubus argutus 2o v FACu FAC species 50 x 3= 150
Juncus effusus 15 Y FACW
FACU species �5 x 4= 300
55 =Total Cover
Vine Stratum
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 140 (A) 480 (B)
Preva/ence Index = 8/.4= 3.43
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test > 50%
3- Prevalence Index s 3.0
Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Steata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present? yes X No
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers �'] Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
��.

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB (B-5370)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type � Loc 2 Texture Remarks
0 to 12 10YR 5/ 2 80 2.5Y 3/6 20 C M Silt Clay
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Martix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soff Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (Ai i)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si ) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) ( MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) ( MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
� Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
� Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 3
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers � Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: B-5370WAWBUp City/County: Union Sampling Date: 2/27/2013
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAWBUp(B-537
Investigator(s): S. Easterly J. Tisdale Section, Township, Range S T Monro R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Top of Slope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope(%) 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 529339.9 Long: 1543144.55 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla (Cha) fine loam NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology , significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil . , or Hydrology , naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
No X
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (Bs)
Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Water Marks (Bi) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imag.(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
� Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
� Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ A uatic Fauna B13 FAC-Neutral Test D5
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca illar frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers �� Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: wawBup(B-5s�o)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Saecies Status Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (plot size: 30 Ft ) Number of Dominant Species O A
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��
Carya glabra 10 FACU
�� =Total Cover Total Number of Dominant
Shrub Stratum Species Across all Strata: 0 (B)
Herb Stratum (plot size: 6 Ft ) Percent of Dominant Species 0.0% (A/B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Festuca pratensis 10 FACU
Geranium maculatum io FACU Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Lonicerajaponica 10 FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
30 =Totai Cover OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Vine Stratum FACW species 0 x 2= 0
FAC species 10 x 3= 30
FACU species 30 x 4= 120
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 40 (A) 150 (B)
Preva/ence Index = 8/.4= 3.75
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test > 50%
3- Prevalence Index s 3.0
Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Steata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present? yes No X
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers � Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

S�IL Sampling Point: WAWBUp(B-5370)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type � Loc 2 Texture Remarks
0 to 12 5YR 4/ 4 100 CLAY LOAM some gravel
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Martix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) ( MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) ( MLRA 147, 148)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (Ai i) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si )(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
❑ Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 3
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers � Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name �-�j 3�-D 1/�l� Nearest Road Pr �c.� f�A�Y�, �c�
County �}�; Un Wetland area D-D,� acres Wetland width feet
Name of evaluatar J. Ti �,dU �•r J���lt�� Y� Date �2 �� 13
Wetland location
_ on pond or lake
_ on perennial stream
�C on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series: Ghew�c.l a F,�� �a�
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
� predominantly mineral - non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
�c ditched or channelized
_ total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
� Bottomland hardwood forest
_ Headwater forest
Swamp forest
� Wet flat
Pocosin
_ Bog forest
Adjacent land use
(within'/Z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
_ forested/natural vegetation %
� agriculture, urban/suburban �%
�C impervious surface S %
Dominant vegetation
(1� (a[.��r r�,br�rh
(2) �.u��t�, a►'�1 �+.�"u5
(3) Lon;Ge�ru �Q�on�f�-
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
� seasonally flooded or inundated
_ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
_ Freshwater marsh
_ Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
_ Carolina bay
_ Other:
` The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
: R Water storage 2 x 4.00 = �.bb
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization � x 4.00 =�-.u0 �'�'etland
raNng
T Pollutant removal 1 ** x 5.00 = S,uU
I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00 = 2�00
'� � ,
N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 8 r3'�
G Recreation/Education ��
I x 1.00 = ( .aU - - -
=** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name g•� 3�'b W� Nearest Road �Y�L,� �A ►YL! �d
County U h � c� �
Name of evaluator �. '� � sdu
Wetland location
_ on pond or lake
� on perennial stream
_ on intermittent stream
_ within interstream divide
other:
�
Wetland area � �n I acres
Soil series: Gh�we��lr� F►�� (.,�am
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
� predominantly mineral - non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
� ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
� Bottomland hardwood forest
_ Headwater forest
_ Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
_ Bog forest
Wetland width feet
Date �/2�-I i3
Adjacent land use
(within '/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
_ forested/natural vegetation %
� agriculture, urban/suburban �!S %
� impervious surface 5 %
Dominant vegetation
(1) T�,n��S eF�usus
(2) �.I Gf u5�"r u m S� n� n5 G
(3) �cev �/�brKw�
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
X seasonally flooded or inundated
_ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
_ Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
_ Bog/fen
_ Ephemeral wetland
_ Carolina bay
_ Other:
` The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage 1 x 4.00 = ,ab
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization I x 4.00 = 4,Up �'etland
rat�ng
T Pollutant removal � "* x 5.00 = 5,�b -
I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00 = 2��b '� r'� .
/l /
N Aquatic life value � x 4.00 = q'-l� �
G Recreation/Education x 1.00 = i, �U �
** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within'h mile upstream, upslope, or radius