The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170902 Ver 1_B-5704 Nationwide Harnett July 24 2017_20170724STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR July 24, 2017 N.C. Division of Water Resources Wilmington Regional Office 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Attention: Joanne Steenhuis NCDOT Coordinator JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY Subject: Application for 401 Water Quality Certi�cation and Notice of Use of Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 for the replacement of Bridge No. 246 on SR 1718 over Black River in Harnett County. TIP No. B-5704. Debit $240 from WBS 45658.1.1. Dear Madam: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Harnett County Bridge No. 246 on SR 1718 (Erwin Road) over Black River. The purpose of this letter is to request approval of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. In addition to this cover letter, this application package includes: Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) form, stormwater management plan, pernut drawings, and roadway plans. This project calls for a let date of January 16, 2016 and a review date of November 28, 2017. Impacts to Jurisdictional Resources The project will have no permanent surface water impacts. Proposed permanent wetland impacts are 0.08 acre. Section 401: We are requesting a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from NCDWR and are providing this application far their approval. Authorization to debit the $240 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 45658.1.1 is hereby given. Section 404: As currently designed, this activity does not require written approval under USACE Nationwide 3 Permit. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at hrips://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project in March 2017. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. MailingAddress: Telephone: (919) 707-6000 Location: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: (919) 212-5785 I O2O BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS UNTT CuStOrit¢Y SErviC¢: 1-H%%-36H-496H RALEIGH NC Z.%61O IS9g MAIL SERVICE CENTER Website.• www.ncdot.gov RALEIGH NC 2%699-1S9g Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Gordon Cashin at or (919) 707-6107. Sincerely, fv .r - �o�t Philip S. Harris III, P.E., CPM, Unit Head Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Pertnit Application Standard Distribution List �� w A 7,�,�� r � � } � � � � � ' � T Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 246 on SR 1718 over Black River 2b. County: Harnett 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Dunn 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5704 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6107 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: gcashin@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.315216 Longitude: -78.643246 1 c. Property size: 7 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Black River proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, Sw 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The study area includes residential and forestland. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.02 acres (from Table 6 of the 2013 NRTR) 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 250 feet (from Table 5 of the 2013 NRTR) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing an existing bridge. Standard roadbuilding equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT Name (if known): Chris Manley Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for yaur project (check all that apply): � Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or impact (if known) (acres) Tem ora T Site 1� P❑ T Fill Bottomland Hardwood � YNo � pWQ Perm. 0.08 Site 2� P❑ T Fill Bottomland Hardwood � YNo � pWQ Perm. <0.01 Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts Perm 0.08 2h. Comments: There will be 0.03 ac of hand clearing in wetlands. Additionally, there will be 0.01 acre of temporary fill in wetlands in the hand clearing areas for erosion control measures, including temporary silt fence and/or Special Sediment Control Fence. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - impact (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 01 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled ed Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B7 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No U1* ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No U2* ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: . D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The existing bridge 246 is a 3-span, 114' long bridge. The proposed bridge is a 3-span 130' long cored slab bridge. The proposed bridge will remove bents from the water. No deck drains were used. The bridge will have 2 drop inlets at the downgrade end of the approach slab to collect deck drainage with a single outlet to the downstream side of the bridge. 3:1 slopes are used where practicable to minimize impacts. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be adhered to during construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Due to minimal permanent impacts, com ensato miti ation is not ro osed 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes � No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS website, NHP GIS data, and field surveys. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Digitally signed by Colin Mellor C o I i n M e I I o r DN: cn=Colin Mellor, o=NCDOT, ou=NES, �� Plllll S. Harris III, P.E' . email=cmellor@ncdot.gov, c=US � Date: 2017.07.24 11:15:42 -04�00� 07-24-2017 ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 11 t �j�B�,,��.w� North Carolina Department of Transportation !� St[ )i't714YdtP�' Highway Stormwater Program _ ` J'-�'% STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ��''�-��---�� (Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 45658.1.1 TIP No.: B-5704 County�ies): Harnett Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 45658.1.1 TIP Number: B-5704 Project Type: Brid e Replacement Date: 5/16/2017 NCDOT Contact: Paul Atkinson Contractor I Designer: Richard Bollinger, PE Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Rd. Address: g601 Six Forks Road, Suite 260 Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919-707-6707 Phone: 919-926-4105 Email: atkinson ncdot. ov Email: Richard.Bollin er rsandh.com Cit ITown: Erwin / Dunn Count ies): Harnett River Basin s: Ca e Fear CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 702 ft. Surrounding Land Use: �Noods, Residential, Towns Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Project Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.4 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 11' lanes with 6' (9' with guardrail) shoulders on the approach, and two 11' lanes Two 11' lanes with variable shoulders on the approach, and two 11' lanes with 2' with a 4'-11" shoulder and a 5'-6" sidewalk (LT) and a 4'-2.5" shoulder (RT) on the shoulders on the bridge. bridge. Annual Avg Daily Tra�c (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 10063 Year: 2038 Existi� : 6973 Year: 2018 General Project Narrative: This is a bridge replacement project. Existing bridge 246 is a 3 span, 114' long bridge. Proposed bridge 246 is a 3 span, 130' long cored slab bridge. The proposed bridge will (Description of Minimization of Water remove bents from the water. Quality Impacts) No deck drains were used on the bridge replacement. The bridge will have 2 drop inlets at the downgrade end of the approach slab to collect deck drainage with a single outlet to the downstream side of the bridge. 3:1 fill slopes are used where practicable to minimize impacts. NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest extent practicable during project design. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Black River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 18-68-12-1 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Black River Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � • � � V � � O V See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 18 For Conventlonal Symbols See Sheet iC- 9 For Survey Cont�ol Sheet �' 1�� C�l�� ':��.,�.`� � 1[��[ `�yJ�S�I�� 1F I�II �[,��`�[I �"�11Y'S HARI�ETT CO U1�TY LOCATI011L• REPLACE BRIDGE 246 OVER BLACK RIVER O1V SR 1718 (ERWIIV ROAD) TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11tG, DRAIIVAGE, PAVI11tG, A1VD STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 8 ti ��a � 0�� THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCES: THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF ERWIN. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. JI I C L DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED rt s PREPMeo er: HYDRAULICS EIYGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH 8601 SIX FORKS RD, SUITE 260 ADT 2018 = 6973 naLErcx, xc z�6is 50 25 � 50 100 � � 919-926-4100 ��Wi — ADT 2038 = 10063 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5704 = 0.108 MILE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPART�IENT OF 7RbySPOR7ATI0N �� e,� PLANS K = % % _ 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �� _ a LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5704 - 0.025 MILE p,g. 50 25 0 50 loo D= 55 /o JENNIFER FARINO, PE srcNaru�: � '. T 3 %* - RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � a TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5704 - 0.133 MILE Pnofecr sNcixsEn s� � V= 50 MPH JUNE 20, 2017 ROADWAY DESIGN PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) *(T1"ST=1% + DUAL=2%) JARED BOND, PE ENGINEER ��y� e��,�� PROJECT DESIGN ENGlNEER l0 5 0 l0 2p FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: �� p�� COLLECTOR JANUARY 16, 2018 TATIA L. WHITE, PE, PLS NCDOT CONTACT PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNATURE: 6 � � m Z O > � I' PIPE 0 � DETAIL A SPECIAI LATERAL 'V' DITCH INo�eo s�oiel Grral � iill ound �?.� Slope D Min. D= I.0 F. FROM -L- STA. 13+75 TO STA. 14+69 LT FROM -L- STA.16+15 TO STA. 16+89 LT � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5704 4 � RNJ SHEET NO. Q ROADwAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER �� y I�T�'O�IPLE E PLA�T� DO NOT USE FOR 0 W ACpU15[TION ao f o � N DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL � a> UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �a W I ELI�ON ��ILLIA�IS� JR. /� Ol)SE PUlAP 1 I �`...�...'�� `, , o �0�5E = RS�1 I �ILLIA�15 ONEYCUTT � u 5 � I I = o' I� r=— � �� IRIS DELL ILLIA S HONEYCUTT �a m u� _ I � � � 2 uNKNo�N � � � � . . . I I � ISBKD p � � � � i=I �1 � l PERMIT DRAWING �� ml \ I I I � ;� \ ESTATE OF SHEET 2 OF 8 I �. � �-- �� BRENT S. CRANE o ' � . � � - r I / - � �, � � I I � � �� p�' � � � � I I SITE � �000s � � � �� SIT� � FILL IN WETLANDS i � � r� � � � II I - �. � � � i I / � � � � �\� � , I I� � i I i �� I / E ^ I I � a \ I I I i � � R � � � R � � . I�I 000s '�� 0005 � � � ISFD -• 1 �\ IHo ett County y�000s �a� ; �` F F � ' P - C F \ -_ + ��y�000s - "/ o � ' � ExiSiiNL R/�' " 30'I p F F I�...L Z� �� .ili;' �� " — ' � -�� ___ iY�' _' _ _ _ _ — _ — } — — / - - 60 . . . . . . : . e . . L . ' \ - - - .. " - � F 600 PAIR, COPPER, Cent - ink — ,-� . i - -r_ --r-- --r_- _- - - .. .. � --------- -- - - --- --- ___ -- — ---- -- -- ro �wNN -�- �— ro eaWiN sR ma er+WiN Ro zr esr CONC G° sR OB ERW�N RD 22'657 PiecJmont NaturolGaS ComDan nC. �� — —�----- =ro,� _ � '` ' ,r - - - - - - a t — — — — — — — — ��.�,.�-- -------�—� _______ -�_- io•PVC ss I'PIPE N i�Piedmont NaturolGas Company Inc. � F 4 STEE zi Ex4nNc Ai�y a — — — ��— Q �• — � — _ — — l— — — -- . � — — — — — _ — \4AEBA��_.— _ �_ IB' RCP 'DIP / 14 °. DIP, City f Dunn —__ __--- __ � 14 . Cit of Dunn -- —�(- 4 RE� —� �� w � PVC. � � — -�_ j;.�, __- __ C7, �— \ Y � vG 14 '. I : Y of Ounn _ _ .__ — — � a� + +y� �`' F " R i � ` � L� �. o � ' X E E E / � \. THE LHURCH OF GOD • I z� �. I � r aiPe -� �- � ea�eonao� W000s p � 1; ., iN CHRiST OF DELryERANCE � N ; 4 RLBAR o I [�AB HARNETT CouNTr V�000s �4000s _ _ _ - _ " � a �yoo s � I = zsaKo I I- � o I .Itl��l . �� I� : / .y, � � ISF CH I z I \ \ ISF CH � � � � - i� 7 ��(V ( I I U 1�. 'r ANNETTE A. BARFiELD �� aaF4 e� _ _ t � � � — ' � MiNN�E F, �EBB �� \ - - � i � � I 5� 36' ViNvL I -x � � m / �Y q a��bOf3G70 �� x ar� ,/ � �- � �� . __� � �• - r �B�M _ � l � .. 4 REBAR "' I . > `� ' CASPER TART, JR, p I �� - isvo � o � l a ..�Z �croNC > � � -�� _.._ . ANDRE� GRAHAM �jEST, JR. /� N ,/� �. � 4 REBAR L 5 � \ < . �. � U / / �� : � � l I.. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. / � � I SEE SHEET 4 OF 8 FOR ENLARGEMENT �1 d=1 � au / / ¢a Wy J� I � � 6u 1 � =1 �_ ...� �; 1 � �.: V � DE OTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN D � DENOTES HAND CLEARING 100' 0' 100' 200' 300' �� I Z O N i K I' PIPE O �: � PVC; � ANNETTE A. BdRFIELD � �� - / I � — � � / ss� --- _ _ ` �', � DETAIL A SPECIAI LATERAL 'V' DITCH INo�eo s�oiel Grral � iill ound �?.� Slope D Min. D= I.0 F. FROM -L- STA. 13+75 TO STA. 14+69 LT FROM -L- STA.16+15 TO STA. 16+89 LT � SEE SHEET 5 OF 8 FOR ENLARGEMENT N PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5704 4 RNJ SHEET NO. ROADwAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER I�T�'O�IPLE E PLA�T� DO NOT USE FOR 0 W ACpU15[TION DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED RS�1 a � N ' � � � ¢ 0 —� y-� 4f 5 lnn � J � � � I � EBB J O I � � � �1 J � DE OTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN D � DENOTES HAND CLEARING 100' 0' 100' 200' 300' �� I 's PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. ` ��-'�%l�Y � �� ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS � I ENGINEER ENGINEER � ��.�� ,�� DO NOT USE �OR It/W ACQUISITIO.�* I � STRUCTURE HYDRAULIC DATA BRID�E STA.= 17+5/.00 -L- l@�{O� ZP� CORED SLAB, l@.SO� ZP� CORED SLAB, DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL ORAINAGE AREA =�lZ.S SO. ML /@�/O� 2P� CORED SLAB UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED DESIGN DISCHARGE = 2400 CFS yylTH 4' END BENT CAPS DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS SKEW = 90° DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 164.4 FT RS� BASE DISCHARGE = 3500 CFS � ELEV. _ 172.08' BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS BASE Hw ELEVATION = 165.8 FT OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 8/90 CFS — OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY = 500+ rRs P E RM I T D RAW I N G OVERTOPPING ELEVATION - 169.1 FT SHEET 6 OF O Pl = 16+00.00 Pl = 20+00.00 EL = 172.53' EL = l7/33' VC = l50' VC = 200' i K=98 K= 333 — BEGIN PROPOSED GRADE - BEGIN BRIDGE _ END BRIDGE END PROPOSED GRADE -L- STA.I4+00.00 -L- STA.16+8475 sTeuctuae -L- STA.lB+17.25 -L- STA2/+00.00 excnvqnoN ELEV.= l7/.63' ELEV.= 170.06' I o e�eu. isi.r (STRUCRURE I PAY I EM) I . , . _ . _ — I _�`L 5�. '' , . , . , I , (+1.235 % �-J0.30 0% _ � _ _ - - - - - - - �- - - -- �- -- -- - - - I - - - -�-- -i- r- --- -'�- -��.-- - -. �, . �, - - - - - - -- � � -JO.I, 64% _ f_l2 378• N i � ,� _ �_ o � W W -` � � J a � ti � i � � ' Z y U' ��f7 Q J STRU TURE U�'�l � Z i� Q EXCAV TION I O ELE .1628" ' � O � � � N ~ Q N � � (STRU TURE �(/� � Q � �� CO =� Q. PAY I EM) _ II -�� = Q O CLA55 'll" AN � � O I I ~� �O „g„ R P RAP � �l J W 2 J W I �I �� \ STR CTURE O I PAY ITEM) Z J J W I w � I BM °� � I RAILROAD SPIKE lN l3" PINE -L- STA 10+38.00 8/' RIGNT ELEV. _ 168.04' � � � e � �, m � � � � +� C N E C 0 C W � � LEFT DITCH � w � � � �iD i i I i i i I i i � LC Nan � �V �� 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 �� ' O 2.5 5 PROI.REPERENCE NO. SHEET NO. N � B5704 X-1 ` 5 5 0 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 RS�1 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 7 OF 8 :� .� � � � � � � -- � + � � J a t 2 � 0.0 5 0. 25 � � m— � — — — m � .� � � � 3; 0 � � � � � � E � � � � 0 w 3� � � � � � � w � � �� a �� s �N — N�� =�� 5 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 �� o�_ WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (fit) (ft) (fit) 1 -L- 13+70 to 16+75 LT Roadway Embankment 0.06 0.02 0.03 2 -L- 18+61 to 19+20 LT Roadway Embankment < 0.01 < 0.01 TOTALS*: 0.06 0.02 0.03 0 0 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 2016 09 09 • � See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets See Sheet �B For Conventional Symbols See Sheet � C- � For Survey Control Sheet THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT. � � � � O � �� LOCA TI01�: REPLA CE BRIDGE 246 O T�ER BLA Cl� RI T�ER 01� SR 1718 (ER WI1� R OAD) T YPE OF WORK: GRADII�G, DRAII�A GE, PA T�I1�G, A1�D S TR UCT URE BEGIN PROJECT —L — POC Stoo l4 f00o00 THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF ERWIN. � TO ERWIN BEGIN CONST RUCT lON -L - POC Sto.13+75.00 BEGIN BRIDGE -L - POT Sto. l6 +84.75 � � .�,, f_. , W ;,� � � � � Nm -�i ._�_.. � i � EN� BRIDGE � -L - POT Sto. l8 +17.25 Z � ;� ; i/ W' I � I O � � � � i _-- WLB------- / - --F I � _--------___�v�e-- -- ---- (Z —W�a-- — —�LB— — — — — _ _ _ — - - No. 246 -L- SR 1718 ERWIN RD. �� --- / � /� ' �� \ / \� �i \ / � �0 m � l � �m �'� � / \ _ _ � � � <•., \� � _ _ — � � _, � � � � � � � f 1 _ � � �n.l CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II "MODIFIED" W/ HAND CLEARING ONLY. N � � END PROJECT —L — POT Sta� 2/ f00°00 TO DUNN � -- —� ,— Z z � � � O � V DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED PLANS PREPARED BY: HYDRAULICS E11tGI11tEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LE11tGTH 8601 SIX FORKS RD, SUITE 260 ADT 2018 = 6973 RS� RALEIGH, NC 27615 5� 25 � 50 100 919-926-4100 0� �O�p� ADT 2038 = 10063 LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17.BP.6.R.89 = 0.108 MILE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENr OF TRANSPORTATION p�� q�o P�N S K C% o/p _ 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS � Q� D= 55 % LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 17.BP.6.R.89 — 0.025 MILE P.E. JENNIFER FARINO, PE SIGNATURE: � � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 3 %* TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17.BP.6.R.89 = 0.133 MILE RIGHT OF WAY DATE: `°' � V = 5 O M P H J U N E 2 0 2 O l 7 PROJECT ENGINEER � � ROADWAY DESIG11l �, � PROFILE HORIZONTAL ' JARED BOND, PE E111GI11lEER �� Q � ) * (TTST =1 % + D UAL = 2 %) �� o� F U N C C LASS = LETTIIIIG DATE: I'ROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER �� p��Q 10 5 0 10 20 CHRISTY W. HUFF, PE COLLECTOR JANUARY 16, 2018 NCDOT CONTACT PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER P.E. SIGNATURE: BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Li ne ----- ----- County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Computed Property Corner � Property Monument 0 Parcel/Sequence Number �23 Existing Fence Line -X X X- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence '� Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -��8- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary ��B Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB Known Contamination Area: Soil -�' — S— �' - Potential Contamination Area: Soil -�— S—�- Known Contamination Area: Water - �' —W— �' - Potential Contamination Area: Water -� W �- Contaminated Site: Known or Potential '� � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE: Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° Small Mine � Foundation 0 Area Outline Cemetery fi Building School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � � Jurisdictional Stream �S — Buffer Zone 1 Bz � Buffer Zone 2 Bz z F I ow Arrow � --- --- Disappearing Stream �--- --- Spring o� ��_---� Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � FLOyy False Sump � �� 9 �� RAILROADS: Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering Standard Gauge - RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned — RR Dismantled — CSX TRANSPORTATION O MILEPOST 35 0 SWITCH � � � � RIGHT OF WAY � PROJECT CONTROL: Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point ♦ Primary Horiz Control Point 0 Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point � Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap 0 New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap O Vertical Benchmark � Existing Right of Way Marker 0 Existing Right of Way Line - New Right of Way Line R New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap New Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite R1W Marker New Control of Access Line with Concrete C�A Marker Existing Control of Access New Control of Access Existing Easement Line New Temporary Construction Easement - New Temporary Drainage Easement New Permanent Drainage Easement New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement New Permanent Utility Easement New Temporary Utility Easement New Aerial Utility Easement ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES: Existing Edge of Pavement — Existing Curb — Proposed Slope Stakes Cut - Proposed Slope Stakes Fill - Proposed Curb Ramp Existing Metal Guardrail — Proposed Guardrail = Existing Cable Guiderail — Proposed Cable Guiderail — Equality symbol Pavement Removal T�EGETATION.• Single Tree Single Shrub � W �� 0 � W in� 0 .�. �— �c� �A, c E E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE c F CR ti �♦�♦�♦�♦�♦� � � Hedge Woods Line Orchard Vi neya rd EXISTING STRUCTURES: MAJ O R: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES: POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) - U/G Telephone Conduit LOS 6(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) � � � � Vineyard coNc � �oN� WW � / coNc Hw \ �--------� � CB O -s � � O ❑T � HH WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Wate r Va Ive Water Hydrant U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*) Above Ground Water Line TV: TV Pedestal TV Towe r U/G TV Cable Hand Hole U/G TV Cable LOS 6(S.U.E.*) U/G TV Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) GAS : Gas Valve Gas Meter U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout U/G Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information -w— — � A/G Water - -TV- - - TV - - - -TV FO- - - - -TV FO- TV FO �— A/G Gas � O SS A/G Sanitary Sewer - - - -FSS- - - - - - FSS - - FSS • � 0 a - ?UTL 0 UST 0 � 4 AATU R E.O.I. rn N �[ � O N i Z �[ � i� �� I" PIPE N 67°30'S0" W 149,56' O � AXLE -�- CURVE DATA Pl Sta 13+98.07 �= 0° 08' l8.1" l RT ) D = 0° 0/' 43.1" L = 482.94' T = 24/047' R = 200,000.00' SE = 025 RO = SEE PLANS � � � �� ELMON �I. �►ILLIAMS, JR. � � �� HousE PUMP �� IRIS DELL N '' �� HousE N "' �ILLIAMS HONEYCUTT � ' ' `� DB 934 PG 162 � �� _ � � � � ,� �`�'-�'� i i ISBKD i i i � � � � � � M � � � �,s II � I �-' z � � � � I� i i il�?, � � � � � � i i L - PC Sto. ll +56.60 � � � I i i i i i i I i i � I �'� � � ' i i i i i i i� i 2 Ilq ��q O� � � Q I I Ha nett County WOODS m� �_� + "' I I s DETAIL A SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH ( Not to Scale) Natural � `�'1 Fill Ground 3•� Slope D Min. D= 1.0 Ft. FROM -L- STA. 13 + 75 TO STA. 14 + 69 LT FROM -L- STA. 16 + 15 TO STA. 16 + 89 LT � � _ �I � SPECIAL LATERA V' DITCH - SE ETAIL A � + 75.00 EX. RiW� � 65.00' LT. � � WOODS O Z � N a r 'r' Z � "� °' a 1 � �o ' 1 ��- �- �--�_°�, � w a � Z_ O � � J O ELMON IH. INILLIAMS. JR, a Y s � N °G` IRIS DELL �ILLIAMS HONEYCUTT � a a' = Z v� DB 934 PG 162 "' o- �'� � z � a � N � �NKNOyyN SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH rn � � COULD NOT LOCATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. l7BPe6eRe89 RrW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED � � SEE DETAIL A Z= `� Q E N D P ROJ E CT z � BEGIN BRIDGE � �� m � N -L- POT Sta . 21 � 00. 00 � � -L- POT Sta.16+84.7J� v ^ STRUCT E XCAVATION � o BRENTQSECRANE �r�-,�� BEGI N 2'-6" C&G � � (STRUCT E�Y I�EM) 0 06-E-577 � �, � � F BEGIN 5' CONC.S/W � �� CLAS� I B RIP RAP � � �� i +6/.38 � + 35 00 � � (ST UCTU PAY ITEM) � � '�-, � � WOODS � � ' � N; m � + 39.54 65.0 ' LT. "' + 50.00 ��O 65.00 � T. I 80.00 LT. z EN� BR DGE EX � I � � '1' PO SfO. I �"�7.2J� �65.00' LT. � � � � �j ' \ � � ' � o � 25' � � +00.00 � � � w � � \ ' � - � o TyP � 65.00' LT. 0404 �_ N � END '- "C&G � , � • , � O = � -, / , � � � � � � 80.0o LT. E � o END ONC.S/W �'�'� 25 � N � � � R � � C 2�" S I D E I N z� R I f 2.5 'y ��'"��, TYP, o � ` I BILLB RD w F —_ � I W ` o � �l . � ISFD N �I \ C �_ R V � WOODS O I �, i ` � � J �y �l � _ — — _ _ _ � P ; RETAIN— C F _ — ��s - — — — _ +aa.zz � �`��IV oODS �r�-` , � � � � � � +53.80 I 24° C�/IP C, � _ _ 30.96' + / � o � � "�' �� — — —W�e— — 1 �'f ExisriNc RiW 30"�CMP �— — — — — — -� — - N — — — ` � Z ---- 60 g e u Li r� —� �- � � � � ---T— — — R�T IN _ _ --r-- --r—: , � —1— o � � > a S 67° l0' 40.2" E -L - '` o o� � � w � � � TO ERWIN SR l7/S ERWIN RD 22' BST x o o � � �♦ _ — — — — — — — — �Ufit-= _ _ _ $ _ , _ _ _ — �iJT� �_— — — — — — _ — — G — =-9tJT . io" vc SS - r PIPE NAi� Piedmont Natural Gas Company Inc, F� � 8:lTAPER T<: �, 1a31' 2081' �__ q", STFFI _ _ �_ EXISTIN R/W � � \ y � \ o � 14 " DIP, City of Dunn � — — — _ _ _ _ _� _ _ _ _ _ _ vc9 - � -�, -gL-1 R - - Har t °� �y �` �� , �� X � ° 6' o o / . �w� N . � N �� . . + � � �o��v� �'��I:L'�� Ie�" �� ,) I � W � � X I" PIPE � �� r�- 1, BILL ARD � WOODS E �, E + 00.00 + 00.0 � N 6 7° 0 4' 1 6" W a ` r�' WOODS 55.00' RT. � o RETAIN ��l 50000� HARNET T COUNTY � � W000s �� EX. Rrw , � � _ ��00' RT. � - g � - 2 S L A B D B 2 2 4 9 P G 9 2 2 0�; 55.00' RT. /� � � -- � B M� N� � -L -�T Sto. l6 +39.54 -L - POT Sta. l0 f00.00 � , � � � � � � � i \ / �� N BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �0 � � �� `e � N � ANNETTE A. BARFIELD ''� � / , � qr�Fq +39.54 � _ , �� N N DB 531 PG 257 -L- POC Sta. 13 + 75.00 � � �--�� 55.00' RT. �--- � � �' � \ � ,,, / �� i N 67°09'36" W 362,16' 0401 — — — — _ / , 8:lTAPE,q�_ d' _ F 600 PAIRq COPPERg Centu ,� ink _,�� __T_ ��- . �� — - CB — - - �5�� RCP-IV �; o w S 67° 02' 22.P' E -L- To o�NN � TB 2G1 040 �� N � SR l7/8 ERWIN RD 22' BST �— 8:lTAPER -— Piedmont Natural Gas Company nc, —� � F 4", STEE� �,gq' I8" RCP I"DIP Io40� q F �� 4 R EH A� +-� - F 0403 +00.00 +79.23 ,,,� Wlq "— City of Dunn� —W� 4 REIB"1sRi T��g � ity o� � � EX. fLW 3o.a6� �� SIGN i i . i � � � �� / 55.0� RT. � `� �\ � ,� � �� / 70.04;,R� THE CHURCH OF GOD i z o ' �i / s� Z IN CHRIST OF DELI�ERANCE N ; E N D B G 4 R�BAR i �� i D B 3 1 7 0 P G 6 8 4 0� � �L- STA.�8+38 �y WOODS � � � �c i � / =� �, ' � �i o j i 2SBKD � ELBOW ��e �SF CH i �� i �� 15" 'y o�' ISF CH i �- � � EST 1 TON � �i � � � CL B RIP RAP � � �� I EST 5 SY � �,� _ �� M�N�I�E F, y�EB6 � I � � � DB IC�94 PG 656 � GEOTEXTILE � �i '� -�'s, N � � - " � � �} � �3 {� `� \� � CLASS II �ND B RIP RAP � �� -L- POT Sto. 23+00.00 a �� Q ��'} r � � °� � o � w t.,j ,I � (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) y �, ,,, cc o _ � N 67°I4'05" W X N I X � � 202,07' � � I � - �a� M �Z 4 REBAR � � � S B E G I N P ROJ E CT STRUCTURE EXCAVATION � � �� N i� � � (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) �/ �� CASPER TART, JR. � ' ISFD QQ -L- POC Stq. �4 � ��.�� 3 o Q a DB 367 PG 144 �°� �coNc �� ; � ~ I.C) � � � � N � � I a \ �krr -- - � v W N � -� � � N 67�08'02� W �n - �. ANDRE GRAHAM �EST, JR. , n� DB 3295 PG 162 w N Q �� 4 REBAR 83�,08' � S 4 RE2 �, \ —� cD � ��-- ---� BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE -L - POT Stae l6 +84e75 -L - POT Staa l8 +17,25 BE�IN APPROACH SLAB END APPPROACH SLAB -L - POT Stao l6 f73o88 -L - POT Stae l8 +28a13 � � � � i � ,� i GREU TL-3 o TyPE III � � o GREU TL-3 � � TYPE III � � N ; o � —�— o �; � o ; � � o �♦ o � o � � GREU TL-3 � TYPE III � TYPE III � GREU TL-3 � N N cu � � � SKETCH SHOW lNG BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELAT IONSHIP NoT eSo a � � c..> �— _ _ �� W m � �o p i �I � � � i i M o-' � W �� Z \ � a Q O \(,�, � �� o n- °' � 'o a � Z_ = m �J � a �. U ., � � Q o� a �, Wa Q � a� a Z= O �J � a 0 � FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 5 � FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S1-1 THRU S1-?