20170859 Ver 1_401 Application_20170711

Smith
5400 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 400
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
tel: [phone]
July 10, 2017
Ms. Karen Higgins
Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Fayetteville PWC Water System Improvements - Contract 2: Water Main Improvements
Preconstruction Notification
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Fayetteville PWC proposes to construct a new water transmission main to improve its water system
in the North Fayetteville area in Cumberland County. The project will require a 401 Water Quality
Certification for impacts to waters of the US and State from construction of the water transmission
main across McPherson Creek and adjacent jurisdictional wetlands.
Enclosed please find five copies of the Preconstruction Notification application form with supporting
documentation and plan sheets. Also enclosed is a check for the permit fee and a CD with a PDF
version of the application and attachments. We are submitting this application under separate cover
to the US Army Corps of Engineers for a 404 permit.
Please call or email me (919-325-3508 or [e-mail]) if you have any questions. Thank
you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
Kelly R. Boone, P.E.
CDM Smith Inc.
Enclosures: Five copies of Preconstruction Notification form with attachments
Check for permit fee
CD with the PCN package
cc (email): Vance McGougan, Fayetteville PWC
Michael Sloop, CDM Smith
ii
WATER + ENVIRONMENT + TRANSPORTATION + ENERGY + FACILITIES

0
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
North Fayetteville Water Improvements
2b.
County:
Cumberland
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Fayetteville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A (Fayetteville PWC has an easement for the water main)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Fayetteville PWC
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 1089
3e.
City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28302
3f.
Telephone no.:
910-223-4740 (Joe Glass)
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kelly Boone
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
CDM Smith
5c. Street address:
5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27612
5e. Telephone no.:
919-325-3508
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0521-20-90-4705 and 0521-20-90-9749
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.152839 Longitude: -78,901507
1 c.
Property size:
8 acres (acreage of PWC easement on
2.
Surface Waters
these parcels)
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McPherson Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Stream/wetland crossing portion of project is located in an area that is bottomland hardwood forest between Interstate 295 (under construction) and
an apartment complex (Ultris Patriot's Park).
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.15 acres on PWC easement
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 47 LF in PWC easerr
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct water system improvements in Fayetteville PWC's North pressure zone.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes approximately 10,000 feet of 16-inch water transmission main. The water transmission main will cross McPherson Creek
and the surrounding wetland via open-cut construction. The water main will be buried and preconstruction contours re-established. Equipment
to be used includes trackhoes, dump trucks, loaders, and similar construction equipment.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project includin all prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: on site meeting with Emily Greer on 12/17/2014
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Kelly Boone/Rob Hopper
Agency/Consultant Company: CDM Smith
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
ent

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.15
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.15
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Excavation
McPherson Creek
PER
Corps
8
47
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
47
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Water main was designed to be installed below bottom of stream bed. Crossing is near perpendicular to the stream. Crossing is necessary to connect
pump station to existing water system. Trenchless construction was considered but is not recommended by geotechnical engineers at this site due to
slopes on sides of creek and wetland area.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used during construction. All wetland areas that are impacted will be reseeded using a native wetland
seed mix. Stream crossing will be constructed in the dry using a pump -around system. Stream banks will be restored to original contours, and banks
will be replanted with live plantings.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Fayetteville
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
0 Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate any wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
El Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
County species lists, USFWS Fact Sheets, site visit
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat mapper (http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office's HPOWEB tool
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
—7—
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Jer�F l P"• 61a06,m
U1 r.S'--toy
7
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
f Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Attachment A
Project Summary

Fayetteville PWC
North Fayetteville Water System Improvements
Project Description
Fayetteville Public Works Commission (PWC) proposes to construct a water transmission main to
reinforce pressures in the North Fayetteville service area. The North Fayetteville Water System
Improvements - Contract 2: Water Main Improvements project includes approximately 9,260 feet
of 16 -inch water transmission main to be constructed along Jossie Street and future Interstate 295,
connecting to PWC's existing water main system on Andrews Road.
The project includes one stream crossing of McPherson Creek and approximately 0.15 acre of
wetlands adjacent to McPherson Creek. McPherson Creek and the adjacent wetlands will be
impacted during construction of the buried water transmission main. The water main will be
installed below ground, and contours will be restored after construction.
The project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin.
A site visit was conducted by Ms. Emily Greer of USACE on December 17, 2014 to discuss this
project and verify the wetland flagging.

Attachment B
Maps, Photos, and Plan Sheets

Fayetteville PWC
North Fayetteville Water System Improvements
Project Photos
Photo 1. McPherson Creek and adjacent wetlands
(Stream Impact 1/Wetland Impact 1).
Photo 2. McPherson Creek and adjacent wetlands
(Stream Impact 1/Wetland Impact 1).

f,-. aTl `•"�` . - _ i' i'l "rte•, • ,rt
r °
r ,
�u y
,�
• ., �"'' �" �.+'*` _ �� !!I ter' * ,. - � ^•�
t
z AL
17
VA IL
Transmission MainI�,'`'
��-� a _" - re',-_. .. � .• ,
t _
E .
*14
>fa °► a„("/pry" ' e •'� i •t � .
l
* .s
`Y xv� : 5.
s,
Legend
Limit of Disturbance
Figure 1
Feet
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Limits of Disturbance
CDM1 inch = 750 feet Contract 2 - Transmission Main
Smith Improvements

.F
C3PC1�CQ40. �ra �^'
� Q
a� t - +� Andr�wfo Ri
3 � Antt'�em L�
z
o
zz
•
��. Reflex Qr Iwo
T
E
— X31 r
3 it
G
a
Data So rce: LIPted States Geological Survey,,
Ci
• - . • •'e -
, Ir
N - D
`-r Kd•
i I,�dtCN'
- Ransld Regan C!�
— rr
Harry Tnxnar7 Rd 4
urs
�j
J
�► Legend
— Limit of Disturbance
Figure 2
Feet
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Limits of Disturbance - USGS
CDM1 inch - 750 feet Contract 2 - Transmission Main
Smith Improvements

AuAi , _ D BaB
�' f'7
a aD
Cab C+'�n-=� CaB
o-
s „
aD
LbBMIA
WaB
aA,tr . 5
JO
GdB a1'
t WaB'
�.
Transmission Main
VaQ
WaB
Ud
,v
1Ng B
aD
CUR
4LbB,
BaD W � Y
WgB CaB
BaB Legend
Lab Bap Limit of Disturbance
Soil Class
Figure 3
Feet
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Limits of Disturbance - Soils
CDM1 inch = 750 feet Contract 2 - Transmission Main
Smith Improvements

�r+. i- ; . i..
--Owe
ARTEMIS
# PIE FLEX STj`
:mss• it
S1_
V
m
G
T4
Ot
t ANDREWS RD
+ NWI Wetland -
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Wetland Flags .
Approximate Proposed
Water Line Location
30SS1E
-/AM
McPherson Creek
(College Lake)
L,.Y S
Location data should not be relied upon for accuracy and
is only for Preliminary Planning Purposes. Wetland boundary
locations are approximate and were obtained using a
Trimble GPS unit with position tolerance of sub meter
accuracy on July 24, 2014. This does not constitute a
surveyed plat.
CDM Feet North Fayetteville Water Line
smith 0 100200 400 600 800 Figure 4. Wetland Delineation

O
W O
O OU N o
0 o a o iwnEo
QN- Q J�w
Zzu ozza
Qa �wlnzw J Fw
JG � U
Z I U�Wi(wn =YfWC
O I
Q= -OH KNV~IZ
Z �
N 3ZI� Qw OUZ
U
� O U H~ U K Z>� Z
HZZZZ � W VlQ
a
z�
1,730 UHdUw
� UwacnQ �3�W�
O
Z � N
N011bn OI+N00 210 S_0
993NIlHOlbW S 33S
aam 1
z /
1 /
o n
ZI:
O_ NOj
CE
H ....
O +NM �4
Z N N O
Q
A O ANN
Na QON /// ZOONN
2Z>II �mmm Zlal/ m�mo
Rr O//N
Zzoi I tO lno
/ / 7 - J
i� D..'
OT .0Y o \
40 L
<-aCC //
16nN?/////SOP
o
3
/ o
yy /
oco'
Y />rno
ro
zi
1 �
� I
O
In �
actinw> 't
+
za >-M�
MNN Na n
JOIn ^�ti
mdy Q\ON
C OQInN
`r rzl;i '
�O
\ \ M
\ O N
m + n N
d N
LoO�
S� N JAN
I QnN
F ..
VIZ W
zz
�allo I / 'l1\ z3
zm /
0
p _~^ 54+00
MAICH�IN� FMR
SEE CON11NVA,
SHED C
W
M O
o d
d „19
In
o
O
rr a
m"
\ C
W +03"
m 0, N
W
w w
o• o
N3�0
¢ IQQn
I QInN
.2 Iii
_
O
/
z
f '
w
QNQ
W
\
QO
K �
a�
w N
04
\ \ M
\ O N
m + n N
d N
LoO�
S� N JAN
I QnN
F ..
VIZ W
zz
�allo I / 'l1\ z3
zm /
0
p _~^ 54+00
MAICH�IN� FMR
SEE CON11NVA,
SHED C
M O
o d
w
!L
7
� O
O
Z
\ C
\
W
w w
o• o
m
¢ IQQn
O
\
2
� U
l P
\ \ M
\ O N
m + n N
d N
LoO�
S� N JAN
I QnN
F ..
VIZ W
zz
�allo I / 'l1\ z3
zm /
0
p _~^ 54+00
MAICH�IN� FMR
SEE CON11NVA,
SHED C
ELEVATION (FEET)
0 0
0 0,
�
M O
o d
w
!L
7
� O
O
Z
'r
L
W -,
o
T
JLL
O
\
2
� U
l P
ELEVATION (FEET)
0 0
0 0,
�
w
\
2
-
-
1,9'll £9 1S
ON38 .94 „9l
\ Y�
la
\
ll'90+Z9 H1S
ON38 .9b „9l
vi
1
z
1)
NI
t,
\
96+09 V1S
-00
3/ d,m 31V9 9T
1
a
dTi
r
NIW ,b
3 I
-40 00'00+69IV1S
y 3AIVA 330 MOIL
9b+8S V1S
-00
3A-lVA 31V9 .91
0
/
I
�
W �
a
N7
C
w
/
WI �
- -
90'99+99 V1S
ON38 .9'ZZ „9l
/
I
££Zq+49
V1S
/
ON38
.9Z'LL „91,
0
o
(133L) NOUVAILA
mm
O
W O+
z J (D
of
LL
a 2
LU0
Q Q o
C)
+
+ z
Q LD
J Q
U)
U)
r
z
W
2U)
W
r
> z
+ Z
N J ca
R G >
L O
OP W
c�c
D Z } G
Z
W (n
o;O
o An W W
_ H
o o } Q w
" ILL w�
co J
D OJ N
H >
Lu H U
Q
ILL w
Q z
0
+ LL. O
= U
O
z
'H11WS W00 30 NOIIVZIHOHiAV N311I21M 3H1 1f10H11M IO3f021d 2J H10 ,INV 2103 'iNVd a0 310HM NI '03Sf1 39 01 LON RdV ONV HAWS W00 E0 kL2E]d02Jd 3H1 ]bV 'Nl3H1 H O31VHOddOON1 101AHIS 7VNOISS33Oidd A9 0301AOidd SNOIS30 (INV SIN3WN000 3S-IH1 :Sil\ WVMQ00 30 3SN321
.03Ad3S3?J S1HOId TIV WINS WO39I0Z©
6Mpdd1S4000\}3oJau00 sjW—oidwl WM\OOVO OI\I!AIO ZO\pawao; 00 WN s A -s u61sa0 b0\L69£0 l\48£9\IWX Md: Iddomdoop\\:Md
WV Bb:bS'lI ZLOZ/6Z/9 —11 OCdV3lN001 :Rq P-.. }soT
[] _6_1 [1SIOOdMO 'SSIOOd3O 'g2tZ SWOO] :s33?JX

n o Z
0 o O
7
zo2.P�....
oz ¢ N
!-
w o O
H
O
s 00 O U - LL
xo
w ° OO 000 x
o < 0
¢ ID �Q
� 04� oo`b"
T w zx ro o `p0°Oopj o z 0
v~oa �ooo O OZ Z_ Q
d w d ,Vr4� OO� Z �' a 2-8
¢ z O
�w bc�NNg q 0a = ww z a 2 Z Cl)
LJ OO"b00 J w ww O ZO Q -I �- o
c» IDS) o w v, r z Cl)
D 04ED0 J w U w Z F- Q
Z ob �Oa U U' z vwi
a ¢ o a w �� W
° O°O q0 w mo �o o z wz U c
a Yw Y 30 O c�oQ z N w �z xa Z G
/1 z F-
'0
o :2 O W in Q
w Q U O O Q Z W
3 Q a z W w z W (�
W J w z wo a p F z S¢
W Q U W Z O FF Q
O x d W W Z N
I U Y W W J N 7
c5 w :o o a a o H Q
m z 3 �o < z w O
d
0 a O
zs o o
O
a n 1 a Xb'W .Z Z
I // w U p z J v w J �-
J
v =za a J
NN- hoz w N� o M W
Dol TOo woo W 00 z zo�o3�a zo a
LL azo a J
oY� °�00 tj 0 0z=w�oz �>�Fz z O
000
z o oQ40 m N
pO 00° O w c� O¢w 3�Y �O aLLw LL
z O O (n
° 7 0�0o w cn w �owQoam m� wv o
a
,ria °per O w �w�ao �o wQom
w ?W 000 U1 U �� p
Z~ O> X�,00 oaa=
OT N Zp dOOO Oa Sao < cn W
a�� m Xbyyo lb O�a? Nooo
llllIl III TIIIoo-wz��>o 0oY ozzmoa = owzL
C/)OE
Ow HU \Yw W
�Qov
Iwi Z
a00
0UM
CoII�Illl- I Uoallom`��"ze aJw\> ow Z Q
wJ,o¢LL >¢zo J W
Qwj86TG
C) CL o� g �o allllllll �o� �wz n <woa z U
w 0�a<zoQ "z c���� o �� Z=
�� - mooa<3a Jw a= w as O W d
z o w a ao r
wo a< J w ozooaz��m wo 0000 Q oT HOZ
oW O fN >HUQOW3 tYU OU tL Z
woxa'�>o ¢z inw�w wl� � W �
UU - - ww UtnOK U_ ZO]v1K K KO O J Q
2� �0 3 in (-) J r�
cV n aLL C
Y CLJ W G
UQI W J Z LJ. z _� m Q Z I,F_I O } j
Q go z a wm z d a w m >W
�mO U� w C�Uw LL
50 �C� QQ Ua 3 O U
w J ll
aT v= o oom cnT oZ^ Z. �o w CO 0
azWp v iz w w �/ �'d`^Jow'o �'� �c�w �� d T� 0 1 I-- > N
z Mi
�a zo w a >�iwNxw z� Won zo o wJ a I o U W
W U KF~wa Ow OJT HWQ w= U ZU �j U w = V
oY==dN wo O Z ZUOUO~ W� zON NW Kd QZ U li Z �' Q
�wr NZ U O a �ozz m J W L�
O="(nmOG in za ¢ d N oQlwi�o�S wL,i DIT Ui laid KH w m
ED
O
moaavroo _I I w 3� w �� oJ_�w3 w w I .coo-qoo oY7o®� a U Q L
a a z T o oa it N rn z oa°� 0 O LL Q
I N a T woo � N o w� '�' ", � �o (L = ()
�XM Sol
.�w Y U� alai C(/I
Q w o1 oL Q
0 0I I H y ® _J - w oo z� Via. wtoo az o¢ e Z ' N Z iO Q
o 1 I D z
m b31N3J 1 Q O w 1> z S:
� 8
„0- �J Jim o w a 6
w CM l o a� a o � w
``� owe a s No,w
oa < w=a z CUJ
2� _ Y 3o ww woo a azm w
N� —I U oa Yew Awa w x�� U
Qo~��w� = Q o�a w w
M�I
J ww z �nwo to z a0�S 0 L�
Q <w
z �w �>� � o ~ _
v2 Q L �o awm Xm< �M� rr o J Q
,orf' LLIN� NVQ <�� III �I� II aav a m (n
w o 1� 3 o F
0= o' a
z z_ W _
Fw JJ3
a
ro
U
QQ O
0 0
i � 5
c
.,8
XVW „bZ NIW „bZ 4
CD
t m
II � 300
� U 111�111�1��.1
ww _
.i
O
z a r N
'o.�
J a oo� a N 'i irk I W
AVM 30 1HOla 0170rid 3 3 - U rn > Q
o Y LLJ
17 z
m z r 3 Z .—
�w w Wax < o Q A W
w w I
3 LLJCM
'.i �• Q
��w a Z - J
tp
0 00 U r -I Q
sz 3�o ao Q _I W rn
cy = N orz F a o� o N d 0
z
zw aio ,n � cwi� W O
d ? 3 aw a Q L)
d zao m Od WCL
� II
N / z w w o
I/ z SIN z oQ a 0 0 E LLiL
z
moz a �� o� a _
N
za
w m w
a�
�z H
a
3 cn a rn I w N 3
zz zz wa Iwo � a� a� �
z N n a N ro
R w
0
�z
'H11WS WOO 30 NOIIVZIHOHiAV N3llAM 3H1 1f10H11M 1O3p021d 2J H10 ),NV 2103 'iNVd aO 3IOHM NI 'o3Sf1 39 01 lON RdV ONV HAWS Woo d0 AL2J d02Jd 3H1 3bV 'NI3H1 H O31VHOddOON1 101AHIS 7VNOISS33Oild A9 0301AOild SNOIS3o (INV S1N31NN000 3S3H1 ;S1N3WNJOo 30 3SMd
03Ad3S32i S1HOId 11V SAW MZ OO
6mp•1oS3L000\3OOj3uoo Sd9>d1S3\OOVO oL\IiniO aw
Z0\p,lO;uOO-ab
WN s A -S u61sa0 0\L6S£OL\48£X M
9\LAd:lddomdaop\\:md
Wd LC:b6R 9LOZ/9Z/OL :-L V3H11WS :Xq panne }sod
[] :sa6owl [9£bZ SWOO] :sA321X

O
W O
O OU N o
0 o a o iwnEo
QN- Q J�w
Zzu ozza
Qa �wlnzw J Fw
JG � U
Z I U�Wi(wn =YfWC
O I
Q= -OH KNV~IZ
Z �
N3ZI� QwOUZ
U
� O U H~ U K Z>� Z
HZZZZ � W VlQ
a
z�
1,730 UHdUw
� c�wacnQ �3�W�
O
Z � N
N011bn OI+N00 210 S_0
993NIlHOlbW S 33S
dam 1
z /
1 /
o n
ZI:
O_ NOj
n N
H ....
O + D M 4
Z N N O
Q
A O ANN
Na Q�N /// ZCONN
2Z>II Wim, Zlal/%�� m�mo
Rr O//N
Zzoi I tO lno
/ / 7 — J
i� D..'
Y o \
40 L
<-aCC //
16nN?�////SOP
H
as ' / I' 0
mA �/ C',^�
/Z
a rl Q
co cu
lan o >
CL
nw
�a'
mA~ilzw �' c I`
z 0) 3
O
Nm y
a w _0
O t0
darn � N1-0
i Z Q
aoN> 7 rn
0 c ^���.�� � � U N
N
N
N z� a
5a �
U W
a m
_ w
W
4VI 0 I
N O J � O O U
+ p z
a d
d „19
CD U Z
InO O
O i n
o°Dro '2'&
9
W" off,
it) J
40
(V \p
a
o ~
n `O
In
-
z
w
f � 1
w
y \ w¢ z
\ -3W
K0 W W
a� o•0
\ \ M
m + In N
N
�k \ in 'oO,�:
S) N JAN
I <
VIZ W
Arno `
z
z�allo I / 'l1\ z3
zm /
i / O
54+p0
MAICH�IN� FOR CON11NVAT101
SEE SHED C
ELEVATION (FEET)
0 0
0 0,
�
M O
o d
w
!L
7
� O
O
Z
'r
L
W -,
o
T
JLL
O
\
2
� U
l P
ELEVATION (FEET)
0 0
0 0,
�
w
\
2
—
-
1,9'll £9 1S
ON38 .94 „9l
\ Y�
la
\
ll'90+Z9 V1S
ON38 .9b „9l
vi
1
z
1)
NI
t,
\
96+09 V1S
-00
3A,m 31V9 9T
1
a
dTi
r
NIW ,b
� I
I
-40 VJ.S
_00'00+69
V 3A1VA 330 M018
9b+8S V1S
-00
3A1VA 31V9 .9I
7;
I
�
W �
w
/
I
w o
90'99+99 V1S
ON38 .97Z „9l
/
I
££Zq+49
V1S
/
ON38
.9Z'LL „91,
0
o
N
(133L) NOUVAILA
mm
O
W O+
z J (D
of
LL
a 2
LU0
Q Q o
C)
+
+ z
Q Ln
J Q
U)
U)
r
Z
W
2U)
W
r
>Z
+ Z
N J ca
R G >
L O
OP W
c�c
D Z } G
Z
W (n
o;O
o An W W
_ H
o o } Q w
" ILL w�
co J
D OJ N
H >
w H U
LL w
O Q Z
0
+ LL. O
= U
N�
LL
O
Z
'H11WS W00 30 NOIIVZIHOHiAV N311I21M 3H1 1f10H11M IO3f021d 2J H10 ,INV 2103 'iNVd a0 310HM NI '03Sf1 39 01 LON RdV ONV HAWS WOO E0 ),L2E]d02Jd 3H1 ]bV 'Nl3H1 H O31VHOddOON1 101AHIS 7VNOISS3d0?Jd A9 0301AOidd SNOIS30 (INV SIN3NA000 3S-IH1 :Sil\ WVMQ00 30 3SN321
.03Ad3S3?J S1HOId llV WINS WO391,0Z©
6Mpdd1S4000\}3oJau00 sjW—oidwl WM\OOVO Ol\I!AIO ZO\pawao; 00 WN s A -s u61sa0 b0\L6920l\48£9\IWX Md:Lddomdoop\\:Md
WV Bb:bS'll ZLOZ/6Z/9 —11 OCdV3lN001 :Rq panos J-1
[] _6_1 [1Sl0odM0 'SS[00d]o 'g2tZ SWOO] :s33?JX

Attachment C
Federally Protected Species

Fayetteville PWC
North Fayetteville Water System Improvements
Protected Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) records for Cumberland County indicate the presence of
the protected species in Table 1.
Group
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
American alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
Threatened (S/A)
Vertebrates
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Endangered
Invertebrates
Saint Francis' satyr
Neonympha mitchellii francisci
Endangered
American chaffseed
Schwalbea americana
Endangered
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
Endangered
Vascular Plants
Pondberry
Lindera melissifolia
Endangered
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Endangered
Source: USFWS, Species by County Report for Cumberland County, NC (July 6, 2017)
Protected Species Habitat and Impacts
The Water System Improvements project is not anticipated to adversely affect any federally
protected species.
Vertebrates
American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's American Alligator Fact Sheet (February 2008),
alligators live in wetlands throughout the Southeast and eat turtles, fish, and snails. This animal was
classified as Endangered in 1967 but has recovered and been removed from the Endangered list. It
is still classified as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance, allowing regulation of harvesting
and trading.
The project area is adjacent to McPherson Creek and is separated from the nearest downstream
pond (College Lake) by Interstate 295. The stream in the project area is relatively small and not
expected to provide suitable habitat for the American alligator.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Red -cockaded Woodpecker species profile (updated
August 6, 2015), the red -cockaded woodpecker's habitat is open stands of old pine trees. Red -
cockaded woodpeckers excavate cavities in living pine trees.

The water transmission main project area is dense vegetation around McPherson Creek. There are
no open stands of pines. Therefore, the project area is not expected to provide suitable habitat for
the red -cockaded woodpecker.
Invertebrates
Saint Francis' Satyr
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's species profile on the Saint Francis' Satyr (updated
June 27, 2016), the Saint Francis' satyr is a butterfly whose habitat is wide, wet meadows with
sedges and wetland grasses.
The water transmission main project area is dense, forested vegetation around McPherson Creek.
The project area is not expected to provide suitable habitat for the Saint Francis' Satyr.
Vascular Plants
American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's American Chaffseed species profile (updated August
6, 2015), American chaffseed is an erect perennial herb with unbranched stems and large, purple -
yellow flowers. Its habitat is sandy, acidic, seasonally -moist to dry soils. It depends on disturbance
such as fire, mowing, or fluctuating water tables to maintain its open habitat.
The water transmission main project area is dense, forested vegetation around McPherson Creek.
Because the project area is not open and disturbed, it is not expected to provide suitable habitat for
American chaffseed.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Michaux's Sumac species profile (updated August 6,
2015), Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub that occurs in sandy or rocky open woods. It
depends on disturbance such as highway right-of-way maintenance, plowed field edges, or fires to
maintain its open habitat.
The water transmission main project area is dense, forested vegetation around McPherson Creek.
The project area is not expected to provide suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac.
Pondberry (Lindera melissifolia)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Pondberry species profile (updated August 6, 2015),
pondberry is a deciduous shrub that grows to 6 feet tall and displays pale yellow flowers in the
spring.
The water transmission main project area is dense, forested vegetation around McPherson Creek.
While pondberry is associated with wetlands habitats, pondberry has not been observed in the
project area and is not expected to be found in this area adjacent to Interstate 295.
Rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Rough -leaved Loosestrife species profile (updated
August 6, 2015), rough -leaved loosestrife is a perennial herb that grows to 11.8 to 23.6 inches tall

and has triangular shaped leaves often opposite and in groups of three or four. It displays yellow
flowers in summer. Its habitat is the edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins,
often in fire -maintained or otherwise open, disturbed areas.
The water transmission main project area is dense, forested vegetation around McPherson Creek.
The project area is not expected to provide suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife.
References
US Fish and Wildlife Service. American Alligator Fact Sheet. February 2008.
(https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/alligator.pdo
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Red -cockaded Woodpecker
species profile. Updated August 6, 2015. (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_red-
cockaded_woodpeckenhtml)
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Saint Francis' Satyr species
profile. Updated June 27, 2016. (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_st_francis_satyr.html)
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. American Chaffseed species
profile (updated August 6, 2015).
(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_american_chaffseed.html)
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Michaux's Sumac species
profile (updated August 6, 2015).
(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_michauxs_sumac.html)
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Pondberry species profile
(updated August 6, 2015). (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_pondberry.html)
US Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. Rough -leaved Loosestrife
species profile (updated August 6, 2015). Chttps://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_rough-
leaf loosestrife.html)

Attachment D
Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectrsite: North Fayetteville Waterline Expansion City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 7-24-2014
Applicant/Owner: PWC State: NC Sampling Point: U1
Investigator(s): R.Hopper and P. Stout section, Township, Range: North Fayetteville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 2029761.99 Long: 510334.87 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse Series NWl classification: None
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil I l or Hydrology= significantly disturbed=kre "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No �✓
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0
�
� Is the Sampled Area
F Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No V I within a Wetland? Yes= No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguiired cheek all that apply)
= Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (1313)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (816)
=Water Marks (81)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
= Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=S h a I I ow Aqu itard (D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC -Ne utraV Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes = No 0
(includes ca ills fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of e=ngineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: U1
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes= No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
area recently cleared next to DOT construction
IM
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
) % Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Quercus alba
70
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2. Carya glabra
10
FACU
1. Quercus alba
10
FACU
FACW species x 2 =
Total Number of Dominant
6
3.
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
FACU species x 4 =
4
5.
UPL species x 5 =
Percent of Dominant Species
33%
Column Totals: (A) (B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (%VB)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes= No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
area recently cleared next to DOT construction
IM
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
80 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
16
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Quercus alba
10
FACU
FACW species x 2 =
z. Sassafras albidum
10
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
4
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
- Dominance Test is >50%
1. Morella cerifera
30
FAC
e2
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2. Vaccinium angustifolium
10
FA
problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
40 = Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
8
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
S.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes= No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
area recently cleared next to DOT construction
IM
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: U1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 90 10% peppered white sand
3-10 10YR 4/2 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
=Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,13)
(Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Ped Parent Material (TF2)
(Redox Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= NoFv7
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectrsite: North Fayetteville Waterline Expansion City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland sampling Date: 7-24-2014
Applicant/Owner: PWC State: NC Sampling Point: W1
Investigator(s): R.Hopper and P. Stout section, Township, Range: North Fayetteville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 2029761.99 Long: 510334.87 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston Loam NWl classification: FW Forested/Shrub
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil Q or Hydrology= significantly disturbed=kre "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No _
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology_ naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesO No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesO No _
within a Wetland? Yes �/ �, No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguiired cheek all that apply)
= Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (1313)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (816)
=water Marks (81)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_✓ Drift Deposits (B3)
= Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
=S h a I I ow Aqu itard (D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC -Ne utraV Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes 0 No= Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes ca ills fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water associated with stream
US Army Corps of e=ngineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1
5.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 m )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendren tulipifera
50
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
FACW
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1. Liriodendren tulipifera
50 FACW
Total Number of Dominant
9
3.
2. Magnolia virginiana
10 FACW
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
FACU species
x 4 =
3
Elproblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Percent of Dominant Species
100
5.
4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Column Totals:
5.
100 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover: 20
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
An = Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
20% of total cover: 12
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1. Liriodendren tulipifera
50 FACW
FACW species
x 2 =
2. Magnolia virginiana
10 FACW
FAC species
x 3 =
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
FACU species
x 4 =
3
Elproblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4
UPL species
x 5 =
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
An = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Ilex coriacea
50 FACW
e✓
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2.
Diospyros virginiana L
10 FAC
Elproblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
60 = Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: i2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
Woodwardia areolata
20 OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
Athyrium filix-femina
10
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
S.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Smilax L.
10
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No=
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-1" 10 YR 6/6 100
1-12" 10 YR 2/1 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Q Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
�✓ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,13)
(Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Ped Parent Material (TF2)
(Redox Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0