20170856 Ver 1_401 Application_20170710

Montalvo, Sheri A
From:
Montalvo, Sheri A
Sent:
Wednesday, July 12, 2017 11:15 AM
To:
[e-mail]
Cc:
[e-mail]
Subject:
Chestnut Park Stream Restoration
Attachments:
Agent Authorization Form.pdf
Importance: High
Good morning,
We have received the PCN for the above. However, the signature page 15 of 15 was
left unsigned. Could you please email me at sheri.montalvo(a).ncdenr.gov the signed
page so that I can take this project off hold and forward through the review process?
Also, if the app is signed by someone other than the Town of Waynesville you will need
to complete and send the agent authorization for that I have attached.
Thanks
Sheri Montalvo
Administrative Assistant
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6303 (office)
919 807-6494 (fax)
sheri.montalvoCaa ncdenr.gov
Physical: 512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-D, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
h
'-�"Nothinq Compares
3,
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

O�0 WA TF9OG
1 >_r -i
Ii.'I o r
J
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
0 1
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number: n/a
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chestnut Park Stream Restoration
2b.
County:
Haywood
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Waynesville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
D
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Town of Waynesville JUL
I 0 201
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 892 / Page 2147 p
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Robert Hites 1 & BUFFER
pEM SING
3d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 100
3e.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
3f.
Telephone no.:
828-452-2491
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Town of Waynesville — Development Services
4b.
Name:
Elizabeth Teague
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Waynesville
4d.
Street address:
P.O. 100
4e. City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
4
Telephone no.:
828-456-8647
4g3
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Eric Romaniszyn
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Haywood Waterways Association
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 389
5d.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
5e. Telephone no.:
828-476-4667
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 15

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8615-09-2533
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): - if you can't get
these, just include a very good vicinity map
Latitude: 35.496421 Longitude: -82.998108
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c.
Property size:
4.1047 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Shingle Cove Branch
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B
FC.
River basin: map is available at
http://h2o. en r. state. nc. us/ad min/maps/
[Pigeon (06010106) sub -basin of the French Broad
Page 3 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site usage is a community park. The general land use in the vicinity of the property is single family low and
medium density.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
970
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Restore eroding stream banks, improve stream channel, and improve/enhance the overall aquatic habitat.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Shingle Cove Branch drains to the 303(d) listed Richland Creek, and the stream restoration is part of a larger
initiative to delist Richland Creek. It flows through Chestnut Park, and exhibits streambank erosion, channel
incision, and poor streamside vegetation. Richland Creek and Lake Junaluska are on the impaired waterways
list, in part, due to sedimentation, which the project would address.
The current stream banks are eroding. The restoration of the channel would modify the slope and include a
bankfull bench to provide relief above the bankfull stage. The pattern of the stream channel would be improved
by integrating appropriate pool and riffle sequences and restoring meanders.
Multiple log and rock vanes (single, cross and double j -hook) would be used to direct stream flow toward the
channel center. Both types of vanes would be placed throughout the project reach (please see attached design
and construction plan). Standard construction techniques would be used (boulders, length 1/3 of the stream
channel's bankfull width, 200- 300 angle out from the streambank toward upstream, top elevation one-third
of bankfull depth, decrease toward the center of the channel at a slope of 10 percent, cover upstream side
with Type 2 filter fabric and river rock, voids filled with river rock, keyed into the bank at the downstream
end).
All work would be completed by the Town of Waynesville. The same skilled and experienced operators that
completed the Shelton Branch stream relocation in Waynesville would be used for this project. The town would
contract with a professional engineer/surveyor to match the beginning and end elevations, install the rock veins,
and make sure slopes and benches were accurate.
A backhoe would be used for installation and placement. Fine excavation and grading would be conducted by
hand digging. Standard controls (i.e., silt fence, native grass seeding, coir matting) would be used to prevent
erosion and sedimentation. A mix of native trees and shrubs would be planted along the entire reach for long-
term protection of the stream bank and filtering stormwater. The Town Horticulturalist and Haywood Soil & Water
Conservation District would be consulted for species and spacing.
Page 4 of 15

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 15

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 SPOT
Stream
Shingle Cove
® PER
® Corps
3
360
Restoration
Branch
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 []POT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
360
3i. Comments:
Page 6 of 15

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 [:1 POT
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P[IT
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P[IT
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 15

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The designs were created to minimize in -stream and riparian buffer impacts to the extent feasible.
Considerations were made for stream gradient, bank slope, erosion prevention, and sediment control.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction would temporarily increase turbidity and sedimentation downstream of the site. These impacts
would be reduced by working in the dry as much as possible. Work is expected to be completed within two
weeks.
Fine excavation and grading would be conducted by hand digging.
Standard erosion and sedimentation controls (i.e., silt fence, minimizing disturbance, maintenance inspections
and corrections) would be used to prevent erosion during construction. Impacted riparian buffer area would be
seeded in native grasses and covered in coir matting at project completion. Additional protection would be made
through planting of riparian shrubs and trees in select locations.
A skilled engineer would be on-site during construction to make sure the designs and proper construction
techniques are followed. A skilled heavy equipment operator would also be used to minimize disturbance.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
Page 8 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4h. Comments.-
omments:5.
5.Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 15

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No impervious surfaces that could
elevate stream discharge.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Waynesville
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been❑
Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?❑
Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Latest on-line FIRM/FEMA North Carolina, Panel
8615, Map No. 3700861500J, April 3, 2012
6/19/2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 15

Shingle Cove Branch Stream Restoration
Chestnut Park Vicinity Map- `
Shingle Cove Brand
„
s
J0.05 0,11,
I'diles..
..� .. �:' r� �.. _ J,J,��`%3i�4��f?�r..C.t�-'�:;L•a�i1�Ja�.��""e�f;..��dau'u�f�/

Pre -Construction Notification
Shingle Cove Branch, Chestnut Park, Waynesville, NC
Photos of Existing Conditions
Photo 1: Facing upstream to upstream culvert Photo 2: Facing downstream from upstream
and project starting point. starting point.
Page 14 of 15

9. � L � ,>' .•{ � i.. �. A.
to AR,
�f �•
n f9 -_-f
29 i
Photo 3: Facing downstream to downstream twin culverts and project endpoint.
oil
_`•
Alk. j. I I �&"'
Photo 4: Eroding and incised stream banks visible in winter.
Page 15 of 15

DESIGN 8e CONSTRUCTION
PLANS 8c SPECIFICATIONS
CHESTNUT PARK STREAM
RESTORATION PROJECT
Project No. ME -16-011
Prepared For; Prepared By:
Southwestern North Carolina & Development Council
In Cooperation with Haywood County Soil & Water District
Vicinity Map
Marks Enterprises of NC, PITC
1 Palatka Street Arden, NC 28704
B. Dan Marks, PH.D. ,P.E. Principal NC Registration No. 9631
Contents [e-mail]
V+.an
I [phone]
1
p
1
Stream Profile
2
Upstream Profile Plan
3
Downstream Profile Plan
4&5
Profile Detail Plans
ti a�N �ARp���i
fsti
February 2017
Location Map

4W'OCMPC Culvert
Upstream Invert 95.09'
Downstream 94.19'
Slope of Culvert = 4.5%
Tmb 01
TBM p2 ELEV.105.177
ELEV. 84.15 NallIn Oak
X MARKED®ROAD White
@4_BETWEEN TWIN 36"f�
CMP CULVERTS Invert Rt Culvert
r ELEV. 80.44'
Top ELEV. 83.45' 98�\\
Invert Lt Culvert
ELEV. 80.54' 92\ \� CLOSED GRAVEL ROAD ♦ �a.o
Top EVEV. 83.55' \\ 96--, \\` TREE
Slop of Both Culverts "��,� 90., \\ ���` \�� I
TREE \ \\ 94•.\ ��\ \�\ L
0.050=5.0% 68` \\ \` �\ \\ ���.►�98,194 ,fj /
I 4 S6 /
84 �.. \ ��_ ��TREE _�
98
TREE .84- A:._� 86�..��.� - .90
...�..��88-77— ....� ....���►�����9� a�,I�, /
�\ ��.`io `\, �.� r;`�� �86��88�..��.�.��.��}V�_..-°Y.. .A. ��,�y.94/'EIEV. 100.00'
\� ��\ ems .84�/ TREt ice'—SREE�
�—_ �r9���.�_��.���_�.. ` � ,96/ Abandoned
\ .•-82' /�.
Creek I�►92� � Water Fountain
/� /� /�.00
Comer of
Elevation/94i �� Concrete Slab
86/ 88-"' /92�/
ol 100,
90/ _/ i/ i.0 .ice
1-1 /' 98'
94/1
I�
96--, 980
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE PLAN 100
CHESTNUT PARD CREEK 94 a8"� ^, at;
SCALE 111= 20'
86'
CREEK PROFILE
SCALES:
1"= 20' HORT
1"=5' VERT
7110'j/
Sheet 1 of 5

r
Double Log cross Vane
Structure
See D<t<Il L
4
Upstream Profile Plan
Abandoned
Gravel Road
Toe Stones Two (2) Rows
5"fly to 18"0 50 =12"
Rounded Boulders 981
i 9
slope mex. 1:1 / 5
/ 1
\ 0.,Fbw e/endl /
Cross Vane Structure _ Exca-te Benr�hat /
5 9e.0'
See Datall 4 ELEV. 95.0'
/
Stones 30" to 36" 0'� � / Back F1 11
0 St am 94' /
{ Over Flow Beech
Overflow Bench
ELEV. 94.0'_94.0
Natural Overflow 5111 Stones < �i �,. ._ /
Exgvate Band at
1` Top ELEV. 93.0 1� / ELEV. 95.0'
.•�, ��1.'r'' �\' / / Fxlstln Slope
•..•.-^:� .. � / %96.0' /
/9" to 12"O White Oak Logs t as 5b e6% c, s[ u+ 5 / / 098.0'
Top ELEV. = 91.0' 2' I' 0',94.0'
SIn61a Vane Structure
Stream Slope 4% 16" to 24" 0 SO =18" �10,
"94 6" to 24" 0 50 =18" \STA 0+74 "'n Slope
/
Overflow Bench /
STA 1+05 ELEV. 94.0'
Sill Stones /
Natural Overflow Top of Vane = ELVE. of Overflow
Bench (ELEV.95.0') at End of Vane
STA 1+50
96' -
Stones 30" to 36" far Begin of project Control Structures
SCALE: 1" = 10' /
98'
0 CMP Culvert
Slope - 4.5%
STA 0+00
No Work
Begin Single Vane
see Detail z
o' 4
STA 0+20
Begin Bench
at STA 0+25
ELEV. 95.0'
NOTE: Remove ALL
Wood Chips Prior to
Excavation of Overflow
Bench
Sheet 2 of 5

STA 3+90
No Work
36" 0 CMP Culverts
STA 3+70
End of Work
Protection
Systems
12" to 18"0
50 =15"
FLOW
STA
Downstream Profile Plan
Large Log Vane Structure Single Vane Tree Protection System
See Detall 3
4 12" to 18" id So= 16"
See Detail 2
4
24"0 Anchor 12"gr Maple Tree
Boulders lz" to 2z" a Rounded Bou
50=18"
1g" to 22" 0 Solid Log
T
0 Protection Boulders
e<. Q Stream _ _
Be'
Single 36"0 Boulder
Single Vane
24"0 Anchor Structure
Boulders 16" to 24"0 So=16"
see Detail 1
STA 3+25 STA 3+00 ° STA 2+75
END OF PROJECT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURES
SCALE: 1" = 10'
Structure
iders See Deta6 3
5
Single 36" O Boulder
New Stream Bank
FLOW
84'
1S'
_Q Sir-
New
tream ,I
� I W
New Stream Bank
12" to 22" 0 Rounded Boulders
so =1B"
STA 2+50
Sheet 3 of 5

1 Plan Detail
4 NTS
Bankfull Stags
)(�
4-15%
--Inner Sean
�Ctt nel aar�
SutrPav --
PROFILE
FLOW
Note: Use of geotextile
material on upstream
side of logs Is strongly
recommended
Slope and
Vegetate
Banks
Bankfult
\\ 1Z Bench
Legend—
E�
coda. Rock Meader t.cg
,V/v"gatetwn � Log
CROSS-SECTION
t..
NC Log Vane Detail
Stream
Restoration Institute
Data: 6/12/03 (Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
2 Plan Detail
4 NTS
Structure spans 1/2 to 2/3 of stream width.
:3
71VY
Notes:
-Rocks in vane are not
spaced.
-Rocks In "J" section are
spaced 1/2 rock width.
PLAN 1
Bankfull Stage
nn
Flow —� Inner Be
eour rn _
�Channel1 = Hole
PROFILE
Slope and
Vegetals Banti
BankfuO
\\ IC Bann, — -
- —
NO
Legend.� .
Heador Rock )S�,J) MS
Tma E /� '�.� �.
®Fester RoCk %�Wvegftmlon
_ CROSS-SECTION
:t•.
NC
Stream Jw
Restoration Institute
Date: 6/12/03
J -Hook Vane Detail
(Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)

4 Plan Detail 3 Plan Detail
5 NTS 5 NTS
Note:
-There should be no gaps
between the rocks in the cross
vane.
Structure spans 1/2 to 2/3 of stream width.
FLOW
PROFILE
Slope and
Vag—tote Banks
BankfuN
—
Legend
Baa •- ,,! j
CMCJ( .«rkao. CROSS-SECTION
NC � Cross Vane Detail
Stream
Restoration Institute
Date: 6/1203 (Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
J
y
PLAN
Bankfull Stage
-tsx
Flow —� --' , Inner Berm
1l
I ///— =i' /Her
Channel =
PROFILE
Slope end
Vegetate Ssnke
8anktull
Z Hand+ —
y L4v
Legend / , —_
�(a �A=�= �a.6Y
�Heedor Roalt )�J�) nas E�/! ��_�/�=/� CROSS-SECTION
NC 1 J -Hook Vane Detail
Stream Jw
Restoration Institute
(Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
Date: 6/12/03
Sheet 5 of 5
G�z7191'1
Notes:
-Rocks in vane are not
i
spaced.
-Rocks In "J" section are
spaced 1/2 rock width.
Bankfull Stage
-tsx
Flow —� --' , Inner Berm
1l
I ///— =i' /Her
Channel =
PROFILE
Slope end
Vegetate Ssnke
8anktull
Z Hand+ —
y L4v
Legend / , —_
�(a �A=�= �a.6Y
�Heedor Roalt )�J�) nas E�/! ��_�/�=/� CROSS-SECTION
NC 1 J -Hook Vane Detail
Stream Jw
Restoration Institute
(Adapted from Rosgen, 1998)
Date: 6/12/03
Sheet 5 of 5

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Town of Waynesville — Development Services
4b.
Name:
Byron Hickox
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Waynesville
4d.
Street address:
P.O. 100
4e.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
4f.
Telephone no.:
828-452-0401
4g.
Fax no.:
828-452-1492
4h.
Email address:
bhickox(&waynesvillenc.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Eric Romaniszyn
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Haywood Waterways Association
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 389
5d.
City, state, zip:
Waynesville, NC 28786
5e.
Telephone no.:
828-476-4667
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
[] Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Latest Corps updated Heritage database.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Latest on-line FIRM/FEMA North Carolina, Panel
8615, Map No. 3700861500J, April 3, 2012
Byron �. H i ci�ox
Applicant/Agent's�S' nature
6119/2017
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 12 of 12