20170881 Ver 1_401 Application_20170718

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20005
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0005
5090.12
BEMD
JUN 282017
From: Commander, Marine Corps Installations East -Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune
To: Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Brad Shaver
Subj: APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE
REPLACEMENT OF A VEHICULAR BRIDGE (UN970) ON HWY 172 OVER
FREEMANS CREEK ON MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS
BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE
Encl: (1) Pre -Construction Notification Form (NWP 3) for the
replacement of a vehicular bridge (UN970) on Hwy 172 over
Freemans Creek on Marine Corps Installations East -Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ)
1. The enclosed application to discharge fill into Section 404
wetlands to replace an existing bridge on MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ is
submitted for your review and approval.
2. Camp Lejeune proposes to permanently fill 0.0073 acres of Section
404 wetlands to create the appropriate fill slope for the new
replacement bridge located at Freemans Creek on NC Highway 172. A
site visit was conducted with the US Army Corps of Engineers and NC
Division Water Resources on 13 Dec 2016.
3. The point of contact for this project is Ms. Jessi Baker,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
G -F at telephone [phone] or email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
f
OHN R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental Management
By direction
Copy to:
NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section, Attn: J. Burdette
NCDENR, DWQ, WRO, Attn: R. Mairs D 12
(9 LQ
'JUL 18 2017

PROJECT WETLAND PERMIT SUBMITTAL
REPAIR VEHICULAR BRIDGE, UN970
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. N40085 -16-B-0011
G7
PREPARED BY:
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, PA
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
[phone]
MAY 31, 2017

APPENDICES
REPAIR VEHICULAR BRIDGE, UN970
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. N40085-16-8-0011
Appendix A Project Narrative
Appendix B Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Appendix C Wetland Determination Data Form
Appendix D USMC CATEX 8 Decision Memorandum LE17057
Appendix E Site Location Map
Appendix F Soils Map
Appendix G Primary Nursery Area Map
Appendix H USGS Topographic Map
Appendix I Project Maps - Existing Conditions, Demolition, New Work, Wetland Impacts (2 Sheets)

APPENDIX A

PROJECT NARRATIVE
Repair Vehicular Bridge UN970
MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
Construction Contract No. N40085-16-8-0011
I. Project Description
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune is proposing to replace the existing bridge (UN970)
spanning Freeman's Creek on NC Highway 172 within the limits of MCB Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina. The existing bridge has deteriorated beyond the point of repair and is in
need of replacement. It is proposed that a new two-lane bridge be constructed across
Freeman's Creek. The enclosed project plans document the location and the extent of the
proposed construction.
II. Purpose and Need
NC Highway 172 is an existing traffic corridor located in the south and eastern quadrants of
MCB, Camp Lejeune. This roadway provides a direct connection between NC Highway 24
to the north and Sneads Ferry Road and US Route 17 to the southwest. Within the limits of
MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC Highway 172 runs primarily through training areas. NC Highway
172 crosses Freeman's Creek approximately 3/4 of a mile east of the intersection of NC
Highway 172 and Sneads Ferry Road.
Although there are no alternate paved routes that will allow normal vehicle traffic access
over or around Freeman's Creek, tank trails and remote gravel and earthen paths do exist in
the nearby training areas that allow access for military vehicles around or over Freeman's
Creek. Public access and normal vehicle traffic must cross Freeman's Creek at the UN970
Bridge.
The existing bridge consists of a concrete cored slab structure supported on steel H -piles.
Several repairs have been completed on the bridge to keep it in an operable state in the
recent years. However, the bridge as it presently exists, is beyond the state of repair and in
need of replacement.

III. Existing Site Conditions
The existing bridge is constructed from concrete cored slabs supported on concrete bridge
bents supported by steel H -piles embedded in the bottom of Freeman's Creek. The bridge
at this location spans approximately 30 feet and is retained on each side by creosote
treated wood retaining walls. Freeman's Creek flows in a southerly direction beneath the
bridge. The property immediately surrounding the Freeman's Creek crossing consists of
wooded remote training areas. NC Highway 172 consists of a paved asphalt surface with a
total width of approximately 24'. Earthen embankment fill is present on the shoulder area
of NC Highway 172. Existing utilities within the area include overhead electric, underground
communication and a water distribution main.
Section 404 Wetland areas exist within the area of the Freeman's Creek bridge. A wetland
delineation was completed on the site by Avolis Engineering, P.A. The extent of wetlands
are documented on the project plans. A request for approval of the delineated wetland
lines has been submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for confirmation concurrent
with the submission of the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form.
Freeman Creek is located within Primary Nursery Area according to mapping information
available from the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries.
The Freeman's Creek Bridge crossing is located in an area identified as Red Cockaded
Woodpecker Foraging Habitat. The proposed construction will occur within the limits of the
existing cleared right-of-way of NC Highway 172; therefore, this habitat area will not be
disturbed as part of the proposed construction. No clearing or grubbing of woody
vegetation will occur as a result of the proposed construction.
No construction is proposed to occur below the water line of Freeman's Creek with the
exception of the removal of support piles and the wood timber retaining wall as a part of
the proposed demolition. No dredging, excavation or fill of the surface waters or bottom
are proposed by this project.
IV. Proposed Construction
It is proposed that the existing Freeman's Creek Bridge be removed in its entirety including
the creosote constructed retaining walls. The vertical retaining walls will be retained during
the initial phases of construction in order to serve as a retaining wall for the new
embankment areas. A new cored slab, single span bridge will be constructed over
Freeman's Creek. The bridge deck will span a total distance of 65 feet and will include the
installation of rip rap embankment cones. Pre -cast concrete piles will be driven to support
the bridge bents at each end and a core slab will be installed on the bridge bents. The rip
rap embankment cones will be constructed to NCDOT Standards and will be embedded.

The asphalt surface of NC Highway 172 will be elevated approximately 8.5 inches above the
existing roadway elevation to meet the newly established grades at the bridge crossing.
It is proposed that 320 SF, 0.0073 acres of wetlands be impacted in order to establish side
slope areas. The Nationwide Permit No. 3 being secured for this project allows for impacts
to wetlands associated with minor structure reconfigurations.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control devices will be utilized during construction in order to
prevent erosion and prevent any sediment from impacting to the surface waters or adjacent
wetland areas.
NC Highway 172 will be closed to vehicular traffic during construction allowing all
construction to be completed from upland areas. No temporary bridge structures or
bypasses are proposed as a part of this construction. Anticipated construction period to
replace the bridge is 120 days.
The existing bridge structure will be removed in its entirety as a part of the proposed
construction. Steel H -piles and timber wing wall piles that exist within the limits of
Freeman's Creek will be removed as a part of the proposed demolition.

APPENDIX B

Ct�O� W A TF9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑X Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
NX Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Repair Vehicular Bridge UN970
2b.
County:
Onslow
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
--
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
--
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
United States of America
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
--
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
3e.
City, state, zip:
Camp Lejeune, INC 28547
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: Federal Government
4b.
Name:
Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
Building 1005, Michael Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0005
4f.
Telephone no.:
910-451-3238 extension 3285
4g. Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
J. Kevin Avolis, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Avolis Engineering, PA
5c.
Street address:
5405 Morton Road (PO Box 15564)
5d. City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562 (28561)
5e.
Telephone no.:
252-633-0068
5f.
Fax no.:
--
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 34.60389 Longitude: 77.26694
1 c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Freeman's Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA, HQW
2c. River basin:
White Oak
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Highway 172 crosses Freeman Creek with existing core slab bridge structures. Site is in remote training area of MCB Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina - See Project Narrative.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace deteriorated bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall riot phases)in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:Re uest submitted with application.
4 pp
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Avolis Engineering, PA
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
F1 Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Unknown
No
Corps
0.0073
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.0073
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Bridge Replacement
Freemans Creek
PER
Corps
30
60
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
60
3i. Comments:
Temporary impacts needed to demolish existing bridge structure.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: N/,4
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
0
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Bridge embankments placed at or landward of existing bridge retaining walls. Bridge span increased to allow installation of embankments in
upland areas.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Bridge side slopes maintained to maximum slopes to ensure stability and to minimize wetland impacts. Erosion Control devices to be employed during
and after construction to control sediment and protect adjacent surface waters and wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ED No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
5
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Surface areas above the permitting threshold will not be created by this project. Project is not within an existing stormwater permit boundary.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
US Government
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑X Other: None
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑X Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑X No
letter.) The project qualified for USMC CATEX 8 (Routine Repair of Facilities) which has
Comments: been documented in Decision Memorandum LE17057, attached.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
X❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage generated by this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ X Yes No
❑
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
MCB Camp Lejeune Environmental Department staff referred to the NCDMF PNA maps to identify EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Flood Maps
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's,Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only f an authorization
letter from the applianti rovided.)
Page 10 of 10

PCN Form - Additional Information
Repair Vehicular Bridge UN970
Section B - Project Information and Prior Project History
Item 3e. Project includes existing bridge demolition, installation of new embankments, bridge
bents, and bridge surface. Equipment includes dump trucks, excavators, and pile
drivers.
Section F - Supplementary Information
Item 5d. MCB Camp Lejeune Environmental Department staff refer to and comply with the Camp
Lejeune Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), which is required by
DoD and approved by USFWS and NCAA. The plan identifies protected species habitats
and how to proceed with the necessary development on Camp Lejeune.
Item 7b. MCB Camp Lejeune Environmental Department staff refer to and comply with the Camp
Lejeune Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP), which is required by
DoD and approved by SHPO. The plan identifies historic buildings and archaeological
sites and details the permitting procedures to continue with the necessary development
on Camp Lejeune.

APPENDIX C

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
projecvsft: Repair Vehicular Bridge UN970 CnylCou ty: Onslow Sampling Dom: 1/19/2017
Applicant owner: Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina State: NC Sampling Point: Typ Upland
investigator(s): Joseph C. Avolis, PE Ste, Township, )ate: N/A
Landform (thiNalope, terrew. etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Atlantic Coast Flatwoo Let: 34.60389 fig: 77.26694 gym: NAVD 88
Soil Map Unit Name: Marvyn Nyyl classification: Uplands
Are climatic / is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes= No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationSal or Hydrology =significantly disturbed?[ A 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yea No=
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0 within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r-- 1 No V/1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum
of one is required: check all that aoolvl
=Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
[::]Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1)
=OxkNzed Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (Ce)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
^
Yes No Lj Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes Q✓ No = Depth (inches): 30
Saturation Present?
Yes No 0 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No Q
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1. Pinus Taeda 75 0 FAC
2. Quercus Falcata 40 Q_ FAC+
3.
4.
5.
6.
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Y 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Myrica Cerifera 20 Y FAC+
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
MUItiDIV bV:
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 = Total Cover Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50°16 of total cover: 20% of total cover: Y approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 • Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
annroximately 3 to 20 ft M to 6 m1 in helaht.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax Rotundifolia 20 FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, MU woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Y I Present? Yes No=
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast)
Color (mast) Twe Loc2
Texture Remarks
8" 10 YR/3/4 100 --
— -- —
Loam
8 - 12" 10 YR / 5 / 6 100 --
-- -- __
Loam
12-16" 10YR/6/8 100 --
— — —
Loam
'Type: C=Concentration D=De etion RM=Reduced Matrix MS --Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Metrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls :
Q Histosol (Al)
Payvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 3)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
aryShallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Ped
1 amMuck {A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
ther (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy RedoK (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? YesEl Noa
Remarks:
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region
Projec/Site: Repair Vehicular Bridge UN970 city/county: Onslow Sampling Dme: 1/19/2017
AppiicenyDw,er: Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina stsia: NC Sampling point: Typ Wetlan.
Investigator(s): Joseph C. AyoliS, PE Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Atlantic Coast Flatwoo Let: 34.60389 Long: 77.26694 Datum: NAVD 88
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee NWI cam on: Freshwater Foreste(
Are climatic / k conditions on the eke typical for this lime of year? Yea EZ:1 No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Salor Hydrology =significantly disturbed[= 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes F71No
Are AVegetation Soil P or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyticc Vegetation Present? Yes= NoIs the Sampled Area
Hydric Sal Present? Yes= NoH within a Welland? Yes Q No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators irrinimum
of one is reeuired: check all that aoolvl
=Surface Sal Cracks (136)
[::]Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
[Ddari Deposits (815) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_✓ Water Marks (81)
=Oxldized Rhizospheres Wong Living Roots (C3) =Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C6)
=Drift Deposita (63)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils
(C6) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundatkm Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=FAC-Neutrat Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (SO)
Sphagnum moss (De) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes = No iFI Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present?
Yes 0 No = Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regan — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Persea Barbonia 50 Y FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Y 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Myrica Cerifera 50 Y FAC+
2.
3.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (AM)
Total % Cover of:
MUItiDIV bV:
x 1 =
OBL species
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
rophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50 = Total Cover
500/6 of total cover: Y 20% of total cover:
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Cladium Jamaicense 20 Y OBL
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
2,
3
4.
U.
6.
7. _
8.
9.
10.
11.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
500A of total cover:
20 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: Y
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size,nLd woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 n (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: I Present? Yesm No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Pant: Typ Wetlpj
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) OA
Color (mast) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-81' 10 YR / 2 / 1 100
-- -- -- --
Texture - Silty Loam
9 - 16" 10 YR / 5 / 1 100 --
-- -- _
Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D --Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocatien: PL=Pore Linin M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
Histosa (A1)
Payvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 3, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedcn (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 3)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
ed Parent Material (TF2)
Presence 08) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
H010ther
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
(Explain in Remarks)
EMuck
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface IF 13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? YesE] No[Zl
(inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

APPENDIX D

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20004
CAMP LEJEUNE, NC 28542-0004
5090
26 Apr 17
From: Director, Environmental Management Division
To: Director, Installation Development Division
Subj: NATIONAL ENVIROMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA)DOCUMENTATION FOR PROJECTS
COVERED UNDER A PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Subj: DECISION MEMORANDUM, CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION; FREEMAN'S
CREEK VEHICULAR BRIDGE REPAIRS UN970, LE1766M, (NEPA
LE17057)
Ref: (a) MCB Lejeune, Public Works REIR of 22 Mar 17
(b) MCO P5090
(c) Draft BO 5090.12
Encl: (1) REIR
(2) Site Maps
(3) Applicable Conditions
1. In response to reference (a), this document satisfies the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review requirement under reference (b) and
qualifies as a categorical exclusion in compliance with 32 CFR 775.6(f)
(8), reference (c), which states:
(8) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, facilities, vessels,
aircraft, and equipment associated with existing operations and activities
(e.g., localized pest management activities, minor erosion control
measures, painting, refitting).
RATIONALE
This project will not result in extraordinary circumstances.
2. The project proposes the following scope as provided by the Action
Sponsor:
This project will repair or replace the following on bridge UN970, top
deck surfacing, underside deck, all steel curbs, all barriers, all piles
and flanges, all end bents, retaining walls, and signs. The road way
transitions will be repaired as needed to insure a smooth transition
approaching the bridge. All embankment erosion will be repaired in this
project. All areas of the bridge will be re -striped to base standards. The
bridge will also have a certified load rate posted.
3. If the project changes, coordinate with the NEPA Program Manager
(451-4542) to determine if this DM continues to cover your proposed
action.

Subj: DECISION MEMORANDUM, CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION; FREEMAN'S
CREEK VEHICULAR BRIDGE REPAIRS UN970, LE1766M, (NEPA
LE17057)
Note 1: This decision memorandum (DM) report documents the proper level of
environmental review (CAT EX) for this project and does not constitute
authority to proceed with implementation of the project.
Accepted
r/s J. Baker
Receipt Acknowledged Winberry, John F.
26 Apr 17

Enclosure 1: REIR
REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW
SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION
Project Title: Freeman's Creek vehicular Bridge Repairs UN970
Short Plain English Description of Action: This project will repair or
replace the following on bridge UN970, top deck surfacing, underside
deck, all steel curbs, all barriers, all piles and flanges, all end
bents, retaining walls, and signs.
Project ID: LE1766M
Start By Date: 14 -Aug -17
End By Date: 20 -Nov -17
Activity Sponsor (Unit/Command): MCB Lejeune, Public Works
Activity Sponsor POC: Frankie Winberry
Phone/Fax: [phone]
Activity Sponsor POC (Alternate):
Phone/Fax:
Base Location: Mainside
Project Required To: Conduct Regular / Recurring Maintenance
Action Will Be Performed By: Contract
Project will result in permanent site improvement?: No
New or Modified Real Estate License Will Be Issued By Base?: N/A
Descriptive Information
Purpose and Need of Action: Bridge UN970 is in substandard condition.
The bridge has rotted piles. The deck is starting to show signs of
failure. The embankments and underlayment on the banks have started to
eroded, thus causing stress to the bridge. The bridge is rusted and old
and is in need of repairs to become safe. This bridge has never had a
large repair project.
Scope of Project: This project will repair or replace the following on
bridge UN970, top deck surfacing, underside deck, all steel curbs, all
barriers, all piles and flanges, all end bents, retaining walls, and
signs. The road way transitions will be repaired as needed to insure a
smooth transition approaching the bridge. All embankment erosion will be
repaired in this project. All areas of the bridge will be re -striped to
base standards. The bridge will also have a certified load rate posted.
Identify Other Alternatives Considered:
Information concering avoidance, specific best management practices,or
mitigation necessary to complete the project:
Preferred and Alternative Sites

Preferred Site Description:
RDD or IDD Comments, Site Approval: Not Applicable
Clarify Pending status::
Towers working group coordination (if applicable): Not Applicable
Action Sponsor: Frankie Winberry
Rank: GS11
Title: Engineer Technician
SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY
a. AIR QUALITY
1. Will your project involve any of the following?: No
(Indicate all that apply, indicate "new" or "modified" as appropriate):
Abrasive Blasting:
Landfill:
Lime Storage:
Open Burning:
Painting:
Paint Booth:
Paint Gun Cleaners:
Paint Strippers:
Refrigerant Storage Recovery, and/or Recycling:
Tanks (ASTs, USTs):
Surface Coating:
Welding:
Woodworking:
Boilers:
Generators:
Engine Test Stands:
Fiberglass Repair:
Bulk Chemical Storage (liquid or solid):
Remediation:
Rock Climbing:
Grinding:
Jet Engine Testing:
Fuel Dispensing:
Parts Oven:
Parts Cleaner:

Fire Training Pit:
Provide proposed construction dates, equipment size, specification, and
estimated types.:
2. Will pollution control equipment be involved (e.g.filter or
incinerators)?: No
3. Will the project involve the use of disposal of asbestos?: No
4. Will project cause dust problems either temporarily during
construction or over the long term?: No
b. LAND QUALITY
1. Number of acres involved? Indicate total project area and total
disturbed area.: Less than one
2. Will the action require use of earthen fill material? Where will it
come from (onsite borrow pit or purchased)?: Yes
3. Will vegetation be cleared? If yes, indicate whether roots will be
removed also, or whether vegetation will be cut only to the soil surface
without root disturbance.: Yes
4. Will the project increase impervious area by 10,000ft squared or
more?: No
5.- Will wetlands be involved? How many acres? What work will be done in
wetlands?': Yes
c. GROUNDWATER QUALITY
1. Does the project involve use of herbicides, insecticides, or other
pesticides?: No
2. Does the project involve installation/use of septic tanks, leach
beds, or other on-site disposal of sanitary waste?: No
3. Will there be any wells dug or any excavation deeper than 20 feet?:
No
4. Will the project generate or use any toxic or hazardous
material/waste materials?: No
5. Are there any known Installation Restoration Program (Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act - CERCLA or
Resource Conservation Recovery Act - RCRA) sites or hazardous waste
treatment, storage, and disposal (RCRA) facilities within the proposed
project area?: No
6. Will there be an increase of solid waste (temporarily or permanently)
caused by implementing the project/action?: No
7. Will the project or action be carried out within 100 to 500 feet of a
drinking water supply well? If yes, provide distance to nearest drinking
water well.: No
S. Does the project require the installation or removal of any petroleum
or non -petroleum underground storage tank (UST)?: No
d. SURFACE WATER QUALITY
1. Is the project located on or in a water body or adjacent to or in the
100 -year flood plain?: Yes

2. Will the project involve construction of drainage ditchs/underground
drains for purposes of lowering water table?: No
3. After construction is complete, will petroleum products including
fuel, oil and lubricants be routinely stored or used (temporarily or
permanently) at the site? : No
4. Does the project require the installation of any petroleum or non -
petroleum above ground storage tank (AST)?: No
e. NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Will trees be cut? Provide an estimate of the number of trees to be
cut if a small number, or estimate the acreage if appropriate: Yes
2. Will shrubs, or other low -growing vegetation be cut?:
3. Will completion of the project result in a change in land use from
what is presently shown in the Base Master Plan? : No
4. Will public access for hunting, boating, fishing, ect., be
restricted?: No
S. Are there potential effects on any threatened or endangered species?:
No
6. Does the project involve the transfer (purchase, sale, lease,
easement or otherwise) of any real estate interest?: No
f. CULTURAL RESOURCES
1. Are there any known archaeological sites in the area of your
project /action?: No
2. Are there any known historic buildings or districts affected by the
project/action?: No
3. If known, please contact the Base Archaeologist/Cultural Resources
Program Manager for assistance at [phone].:
g. UTILITIES AND SERVICES
1. Will utilities be required? : No
If yes, please list below.:
2. will modifications to existing utilities be required? : No
If yes, please list below.: b2. There may have the potential to use fill
material in the said bridge repairs.
b3. Vegetation surrounding the bridge will be disturbed in the repair of
the said bridge.
b5. The bridge is located across wetlands, so the potential to disturb
wetlands is a high possibility.
di. The project will take place in a flood plain.
el. Small trees may have to be removed during the repair to the repair
to the said bridge.
h. SOCIAL ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
1. Will the project cause an increase/decrease in on -base or off -base
military population? : No

2. Will there be any increased demand on a local or state government to
provide services? : No
3. Will there be any changes to traffic flow and patterns on or off
base?: Yes
4. Will the project cause noise or safety issues that could potentially
impact off -base persons or property either during construction or from
the project itself?: No
J. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Are alternative procedures, practices, or technologies available to
minimize environmental impact or utility use? No
2. Are there likely effects on the human environment that:: a. are
highly uncertain?
Explain YES answers here::
End of Form

Enclosure 2: Site Map
Image: Bridge Location

Enclosure 3: Appplicable Conditions
AST/UST/IR (Soil):
1. If contaminants are suspected through odors or visual observation
during construction activities, immediately stop work, call 911, and
contact EQB at 451-9017 for further instructions.
2. There are no known monitoring wells in the project areas but if an
unmarked well is discovered and inadvertently damaged, immediately contact
EQB at 451-9017 for further instructions.
3. There are no known Installation Restoration issues associated with the
subject project. However, these projects are within historic and/or known
operational range areas and it is recommended (although not regulatorily
required) that the area be assessed for possible surface or buried UXO
before construction begins. Recommend coordinating with Range Control on
appropriate safety requirements for construction.
Water Quality Program:
1. Ensure sediment does not leave a construction site of any size as a
result of land -disturbing activities. Coordinate with Water Quality
Manager, EQB at 451-9522 and the Storm Water Manager, ECB at 451-9657.
Wetlands:
1. There are delineated, jurisdictional wetland features within the
project area. In accordance with MCO P5090.2A, all facilities and
operational actions avoid, to the maximum degree feasible, wetlands
destruction or degradation regardless of wetland size or legal necessity
for a permit. In order to achieve this goal and avoid significant project
delays, the action proponent must coordinate with NEPA Section, ECON at
451-4542 during project design to ensure Clean Water Act permitting issues
are addressed at the earliest opportunity. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands
or waters of the U.S. will require coordination and written approval from
the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a Section 404 Clean Water Act
Permit (Individual or applicable Nationwide Permit), the NC Division of
Water Resources for a Section 401 Clean Water Act, Water Quality
certification, and the NC Division of Coastal Management for a Federal

Consistency Determination. If wetlands cannot be avoided during the
planning process and an individual permit is required, then an
Environmental Assessment must be prepared for this project.
Note 1: This decision memorandum (DM) report documents the proper level
of environmental review (CAT EX) for this project and does not constitute
authority to proceed with implementation of the project. In accordance
with BO 11013.4E, projects that propose modification, alteration, or
addition to Class I (land) or Class II (buildings, structures) real
property require prior approval from the Installations and Environment.
Note 2: The following EMD Sections reviewed the REIR, replied to it and
have no concerns: ESO, RTAM, Air Quality, IR, Cultural Resources
Permits
The following permits are required:
1. USACE 404 permit
2. Water Quality Certification
3. Coastal Consistency Determination

APPENDIX E

d' K, If I'k.
O Hif,.
oon d�
JACKSONVILLE
Je Sm ,& Ferry
-
= SNEADS FERRY
�411
Wirth ,.CoUh" Club
P�
, °0 ".
Rona,<"
iops)tl
.' Bzxh..
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A. SITE LOCATION MAP
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM Civil and Environmental Engineering REPAIR VEHICULAR BRIDGE, UN970
P.O. BOX 15564 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA 28561 MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LE)EUNE, NC
PHONE: [phone] [e-mail] CONTRACT #N40085 -B-16-6-0011
LICENSE NO. C-0706

APPENDIX F

APPENDIX G

:c...:. AreasFishery Nursery
maps. luau Primary
SecondaryPermanent
Special SecondaryA!Z WMiliftm DangerZones andRestncted Areas
Inland waters (WRC judWiction) • 20
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
Civil and Environmental Engineering
P.O. BOX 15564 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA 28561
PHONE: [phone] avolisengineer [e-mail]
LICENSE NO. C-0706
PRIMARY NURSERY AREA MAP
REPAIR VEHICULAR BRIDGE, UN970
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
CONTRACT #N40085 -B -16-B-0011

APPENDIX H

I
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Civil and Environmental Engineering REPAIR VEHICULAR BRIDGE, UN970
P.O. BOX 15564 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA 28561 MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
PHONE: (252)633-M avolisengineering@embargmail.00m CONTRACT #N40085 -&16-B-0011
LICENSE NO. C-0706

APPENDIX

is
nie
------------
I �4w 4 <i`�.-, Sc,��G t.. �c.,�T� ,1,'�'�i,.,�'�:��'..�5; , �71.,+x,\,r ��,rr,"?t •.
I \�'/ I - C' '—_ -- �``� � �� .'gym' � �`�r"m.er?"1"..•��'..'� I.. �'l'}. a # � 2
� .. 3z iaa7.>~- �., zl#��'�^a �...1•bv-.. Fa?�..,,..�a2`"a`�4:. __ ,�..'�s,..-..a4. ,�,.tl.�
lK
A SITE PLAN -NEW CONSTRUCTION
,RD`
-2 R-2 SCALE: 1' = 20'
•�' iW " y y W W WI /�//G/./ �\�\IIT .Y
( // VIEW\BRI�I�E
/ PROP, WERANO $PACTS TVS
y 1 y W
SILT FPWCI
,,,`.\ W NG 11-1 OF SCOPE \ I
I I
ET�W W *ROPOSEO`W'ETLANDWIMPACT9 IH IS AREA 35
IAIITS OF WETLAND
`\ I`,`. . . R-.�= � `�. .`���_~,.•. . %�.-o `:�-A •: •.'. `,`, .`.rte• • • � i
--4---- -
-
-s- - �.b.�
_ - - - ----- ----
48
-- A -
'A`
82.
-___,
-"- ------ - - - - - -
W _
�C'�`,' LANDYy
ROPOSED WEILND IMPACTS TMS AREA=585F y\ y y y W W W W
LIMNS OF WLITIAND ON]NFATIONW
SILT FENEM639-TOE OF SLOPE
¢ J
MEW
'NC HWY 172
1
1
WP.RGP%-!,:)
LTfELS��J4 \EEILTMPACjAS THIS AIj�A=1625Fy
W TWETUWIDSW W y y N
\ W y W y W W \\ y W W
W \
B ENLARGED SfTE PLAN -NEW CONSTRUCTION TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS = 320 SF, 0.0073 ACRES
R-2 R-2 SCALE: 1- = 10' 8 '
10' 0 5' 10' 20'
O w"c SCALE 1' - 10'
W M SGOE' 1' - 2W I AE PRMCI 1160241 1 NNE: MOT® I M. OS160011 I SHEET 70( OF 25 1

A
,°r ��--- ,2 __ 'lam/ ///'/ /'/'///' /' % � `y`;`• `, `. .`. .
__-- ---__"-'- �� ;rte 1 / � I I / i '. -. `. `. ,' . - • . \.
= -_= - -_ =------------------- ------_ - '
,
_MIN
i' _
--------------
--___' r Zt.-�—___-___- \ 111 � 1
sj
-13---_.--- � � '�` • ` ` V' III t \\ � j
-- - i �`\ \1 i II I' ' `/. ` . �.. • ..TIAA1051 ` .. '� 'A ' I , fir/.
\ - - - - -�'-= ri qty
_41 ilk
A SITE PIAN -EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DENOUT011 1!�
Il -I 3L -I SCALE: V = 20' !C
W�
W y W W W cWETADS
ll.
---__ -- ---------------------
1 ♦ —1 \— — — — — — — — — — — _ — _ _ _ _ — _
/ PROPOJI WETLAND IAPACTS T.OS AREA =§55F
- ' W
` W SILT FTWCING AWDE DF SLOPE \ I /
W y I W .a' VLANQ� N' AWE
1115 AREA=359F ��:SL,
r \ .1• W y UmfTSNbF W."IT`Q€LIAF NN,
1: y �•
B ENLARGED SITE PLAN -EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION
\!L-Iv
L-I l-1 SCALE: I- = 10'
--__- 7-__--__-_
P A 11 A A P
NC WY 172
-7' _- `1_'________- __-' _-..{___'_- /--------- -/--- ---- -
--- __ - — — — — -. -_ _5_ — — — J — — — — — — —
��_•
-aiT•.- SII �: ��� _--��-i_ . . •--- ---- -=---- . ^ 1 ,1,
( ``- :�,. • „ +Ir + Vii. . - ,. - . .. .• . •
_tom. •`.`.` •.\L�• . . . . . `_ ' `` /�,• ````��s'
________
\ \ `ISTINC _ _
\ \ \T( BEA�EIAB O
\ \ \ 2 SLT=_-�-
�l�\\��_ W_ --W-- �•,-z -___
1 1 I I I I I\ 1 i I 1 I ` \ \I y N. �✓ N' `I' W \&1 {ENCING AT TOE OF SLOPE -
/ I�I11I 1 ; cam., i I 1 I SL _;\; W y -�•`MRB OF/WE"ND DEL OTION
/ �III11 11 ` of \ , W PROPOyED WETLNV� MPACTI THIS AEP=162SF,
�WETLANOS
��I I�� I ` /// /� r �, \\ .\L y W W y �Y .L W W \\ y J• W W W J
TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS = 320 SF, 0.0073 ACRES
10' 0 5' 10' 20'
OlAgt 3011E I' - IC
20' 0 10' 20' 10'
3RAa6 SOME 1• - 21r
..OP 1 1 1
OF WLAND 1 1 -
;yS+lLT ,
1 1•..:_S4
L 2t
�/
V.07091HHip
1►Vlp►ppi►�d PURI
AH�s ,�i►�i•���i•�%•�i•�•�ii�
NC MY 172
MR
�pH ��•••�•••••�•••••••••••�
All
W�H�,7p�Hur
N�`Ldp.:����'�A�.♦a�►��►�i�•i�i�i•�:��i�:i�:�i�
________
\ \ `ISTINC _ _
\ \ \T( BEA�EIAB O
\ \ \ 2 SLT=_-�-
�l�\\��_ W_ --W-- �•,-z -___
1 1 I I I I I\ 1 i I 1 I ` \ \I y N. �✓ N' `I' W \&1 {ENCING AT TOE OF SLOPE -
/ I�I11I 1 ; cam., i I 1 I SL _;\; W y -�•`MRB OF/WE"ND DEL OTION
/ �III11 11 ` of \ , W PROPOyED WETLNV� MPACTI THIS AEP=162SF,
�WETLANOS
��I I�� I ` /// /� r �, \\ .\L y W W y �Y .L W W \\ y J• W W W J
TOTAL PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS = 320 SF, 0.0073 ACRES
10' 0 5' 10' 20'
OlAgt 3011E I' - IC
20' 0 10' 20' 10'
3RAa6 SOME 1• - 21r