20170820 Ver 1_401 Application_20170630

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
PO Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]
25 June 2017
NC DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: PCN for Moore County Advanced Career Center
Southern Pines, Moore County, North Carolina
Dear NC DWR,
G PID
aO17082O
Enclosed please find four copies of the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) that has
been prepared for the above referenced property, located west of NC22, in Southern Pines,
Moore County, North Carolina. The proposed institutional development plan will permanently
impact 0.25 acre and temporarily impact 0.15 acre of riparian wetland (0.4 acre total wetland
impacts) for construction of a road, removal of a pedestrian footbridge, and improvement of an
existing road. It appears the project meets the. conditions of and can be authorized by
Nationwide Permit 39. (WQC# 4092).
Also enclosed is a check made payable to the NC Division of Water Resources in the
amount of $240 for the application fee.
We trust that this provides all the information that you require to authorize the proposed
impacts. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact us at
your convenience.
Enclosures
CC: USACE, Wilmington Office
Sincerely,
/ . IV7�..
Krissina B. Newcomb
RECEIVED
JUN 3.0 2017
DENR-LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING

O 0 WArE9OG
y r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
V � cut/
DENR-LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply).-
pply):® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Moore County Advanced Career Center
2b.
County:
Moore
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Pinehurst
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Sandhills Community College
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book 270 and Page 375
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Brenda Jackson
3d. Street address:
3395 Airport Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Pinehurst, NC 28374
3f.
Telephone no.:
910-695-3731
3g.
Fax no.:
'
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail] JUN
V � cut/
DENR-LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify.-
pecify:4b.
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Mike Eaker
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Southeastern Soil & Environmental
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 9321
5d.
City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28311
5e.
Telephone no.:
910-822-4540
5f.
Fax no.:
-
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Portion of 857312859168
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.218541 Longitude: -79.39804
1 c.
Property size:
60 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mill Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-III,B;HQW
2c.
River basin:
Upper Cape Fear (HUC8 03030004)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Subject site is currently undeveloped (wooded, with existing soil paths and sewer/water utilities). Adjacent site is
institutional. Land use in the vicinity is undeveloped (wooded) and residential.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.31 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construct an institutional building and parking. The proposed wetland impacts are associated with construction of the
access road.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A road will be constructed across the wetland (Impacts W1 and W2), from the site entrance on Hwy 22 to the new
building and parking areas. Retaining walls (up to 16ft tall) will be used instead of fill slopes along the road. Three 5'X 5'
RCP Box culverts will be placed under the roadway, with a 22'X 40' riprap dissipater at the downstream end of the pipes.
Temporary sediment and erosion control devices will be installed adjacent to the road (Impacts W3 and W4). An existing
pedestrian bridge will be removed (Impact W5). An existing asphalt road will be improved (Impact W6). Typical
construction equipment such as excavators, bull dozers, and pans will be used.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Mike Eaker, Southeastern
Soil & Environmental
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Action ID SAW 2016-01436, AJD approved by Brennan Dooley on 23 Aug 2016
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number —
impact
Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.25
W2 T
Land
Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.04
W3 T
Land
Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.01
W4 T
Land
Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.02
W5 T
Type in
(Other)
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.08
W6 T
Land
Clearing
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.002
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.40
2h. Comments:
W5, an existing footbridge will be removed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of
Stream name
Perennial (PER)
Type of
Average
Impact
number
impact
or intermittent
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
(INT)?
width
(linear feet)
Temporary (T)
(feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
3i. Comments
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary T
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water
impacts:
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
use or
(acres)
purpose of
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1 -
Choose one
P2 -
Choose one
5f.
Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit
required?
El Yes ElNo If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e.
6f. 6g.
Buffer impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer
Zone 1 impact Zone 2
number - mitigation
(square feet) impact
Permanent (P) or required?
(square
Temporary T
feet
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimization:
The road was sited perpendicular to the drainageway and retaining walls will be used instead of fill slopes to minimize wetland
impacts.
Justification: The road is necessary to access the new building and parking lots.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be used, such as silt fencing, to protect water quality.
Construction limits will be clearly marked through wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.25 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
43.7% %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater runoff from the site discharges to the North and South of the site. The site is within the Cape Fear River
basin and peak stormwater discharges shall meet pre -development rates for the 10 -year 24-hour design storm as well as
providing 85% removal of total suspended solids for any impervious area. One (1) Bio -Retention Cell and two (2) Stormwater
Wetlands were designed to control the runoff from the site to meet the predevelopment peak flow of the 10 -year 24-hour
design storm.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Local
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Southern Pines
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
® HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This
institution is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
public sanitary sewer
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. I Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS iPaC The FWS was consulted to prepare a list of federally protected species that may occur in the proposed project
area and/or may be affected by the proposed project (attached). The list identified four species that may occur within the
boundary of the proposed project: the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis
mekistocholas), American Chaffseed (Schwalbea Americana), and Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii). No Critical Habitats
were identified.
NC Natural Heritage Program. The NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer indicates element occurrences for the Red -cockaded
Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) only within one mile of the project area.
Species Conclusion Table
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle
Notes / Documentation
Act Determination
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
may effect, but not likely
NCNHP indicates element
(Picoides borealis)
to adversely affect
occurrences within 1 mi.
See attached letter from FWS
dated 31 Jan 2017
Cape Fear Shiner
no suitable habitat
no effect
NCNHP
Notro is mekistocholas
no stream
American Chaffseed
unlikely to disturb
no effect
NCNHP
Schwalbea Americana
Michaux's Sumac
unlikely to disturb
no effect
NCNHP
Rhus michauxii
Critical Habitat - none
Northern Long -Eared Bat (NLEB) coordination: (a) Tree removal estimate = (impact area + 50 feet of uplands around impact
area to be cleared multiplied by 800 trees/acre) = 0.045ac. X 800 trees/ac. =360 trees (b) Blasting WILL NOT occur at
proposed impact location (c) Other percussive activities WILL NOT be conducted (d) Bridge removal or maintenance WILL
NOT occur
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service, EFH Mapper
(http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efhmapper/index.html)
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
❑ Yes ® No
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Flood Risk Information System (http://fris.nc.gov/fris/)
Mike Eaker
3. `Y ° for Mike Eaker
26 June 2017
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter
Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Southeastern if & Environmental Associates,
P.O. Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 25403
To whom it may concern:
WC Division of Water Quality
Central Office
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, NC 27699
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Southeastern Soil & Environmental
Associates, Incorporated permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation and permitting for the subject project_ This authorization
includes permission to enter the site to conduct site meetings with US Army Corps of Engineers and NC
Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Mame: S N _ t-
SSEA Project # 2,o l L o t �
Current Property Owner or Easement Holder
Name:{)
(include contact person of a corporation paring -ship
Mailing Address:
`relephone: '3k\b
�''�--.
ignature
Date
Fax: (Wo `
Print Name
SOILISITE EVALUATION ® SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS m LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING a WETLANDS
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING c SURFACEISUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION $ DESIGN

Vicinity Map
Moore County Advanced Career Center (proposed)
Located off Central Drive (NC 22) in Moore County, NC.
Center Coordinates for the site are 35.218541, -79.39804.
Cardo€
Sa tz�arracvd
CII 1
IL Whispering
Vass
West End
Lakevienr....
Jackson
Springs
Ta}c rt wn
Y ninf)"fatmnFoxfire x
NgPnan
Wind Blow '
Sc� t �t� Pines
1
`t�
Aberdeen
W
r
Hilrf('a 1E'Ei:S7
w
:
a,
v
iyFi4
61
a
Sa�nciiasft
ok
nt
-
vle°
3
7-
Rezerv�nf Park
f

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-01436 County: Moore U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -SOUTHERN PINES
NOTIFICATION OF JLiRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Brenda Jackson Agent: Mike Laker
Sandhills Community College Southeastern Soil chic Environmental Associates
3395 Airport Road PO Bos 9321
Pinehurst, NC 28374 Favetteville NC 28311
Size (acres) 60 Nearest Town Pinehurst
Nearest Waterwav Mill Creek River Basin Upper Cape Fear
USGS I IUC. 03030004 Coordinates Latitude: 35.2184146918063
Longitude: -79.4023897544628
Location description: The proiect area is located on the southeast side of Sandhills Community College at the end of
Lindbergh Place Pinehurst Moore County North Carolina (Parcel Index Number: 857312859168).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U -S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. t Tpon completion, this survev should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or out- published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U -S_ including wetlands have been delineated and sun=eyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _ Unless there is a change in the law or our published
reOulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
2-.6. 1 ul

_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water .Act (33 USC § 13 11 ). Ifyou have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brennan Doolev at 910-2.51-4694 or
Brenvia n.J.Dooley(a).usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The proiect area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland
Delineation Manual: and appropriate regional supplement. The wetlands are abutting Mill Creek, which flows to
the Little River, which flows to the Cape Fear River, which is a TNW.
D. Remarks:
C. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The del ineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. if you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 33 1.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by October 21, 2016.
*`it is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** DOOLEY.BRENNAN JOHN. 1 O'g"llysigned by DOOLEY.BRENNANJOHN.1512992613
ON: -US, ­U.S, Govemn t ou=DoD, ou.=VK1, —USA,
M-000LEY BRENNANJOHN.1512992613
512992613
Corps Regulatory Official: Dace:zol6.oaz3lzstza ocoo
Date: August 23, 2016 Expiration Date: August 23, 2021
'The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. 'fo help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at hip:%regulator .issaces�Jrvev.ciJni�.

SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at latt�4_ti���y.usace�armv.mil Missions C:ivill'� r�rhs'Regulator�Pro�ramandl'ern;its is'I7; or
Cors regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: if you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the I.OP and your work is authorized_ Your
signature or) the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL_ If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section lI of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMiT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section lI of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
in fonnation.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 1I of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Brenda Jackson
File Number: SAW -2016-01436
Date: Au_-ust 23, 2016
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Pen -nit or Letter of permission_)
A .....
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Pern-tit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION _
D
❑
PRELIMINARY .IURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at latt�4_ti���y.usace�armv.mil Missions C:ivill'� r�rhs'Regulator�Pro�ramandl'ern;its is'I7; or
Cors regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: if you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the I.OP and your work is authorized_ Your
signature or) the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL_ If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section lI of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMiT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section lI of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
in fonnation.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 1I of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRFLIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarifv where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify- the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional Information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Brennan Dooley
CESAD-PDQ
69 Darlington Avenue
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28403
60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below= grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You. will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Brennan Dooley,
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room l OMI 5, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

�WII . C 11 .
A
A, 1, . - -
W. 71 - "14 P -W Ilk" S --W,
ILIM-T IK 7 iWKI . .....
"- 4-11- -11�,.,� Orr - x c+.-, - —.1- .. :-.. — ,
10
...........
Ivir
LINE TABLE WEnAAVS "a' r 31
LQ YJ
Q
015
0
v�
V
... ;5 5 is
. dIl.1 I Mll
0
m
0iE r LL WAKeR
7
-4-
-W %w*ml
KXW,
W—,
f2'
;4r . � - - -,-
i'z
nt , l ` ! - 4tYr aR[�',;jf -Ai' a^ >xK m ir#e«Au S*F_. ifii6t,.� tW-
*7v*
41
.?"p W
Nl
NorEs,
SVBJjCI ID My 4-C, A" EA,�EVENT$, j?or or
WAYS.
M MW c.T. pMtN
11M.k. 01 14,00"D Wt*R To I.( WE o't TK :7f cuRe --------- AIIIIm
1. AEA �Kfthiy L�U 94D CUV-4M L5TMV5%Ek LNX� EX1571INr ULM "T uNt
WNr,RS FOUND. EVVING BDUIDARY (ICE. AN DEM AM ppoAwb FRopt- tc
M�� T C' �� . .... . .. ow Ilksvk (tyK -y W )
S. r3 Of "=�Ml IN IK 40ORE CoM" RECIMAY tCY Z -MC CONCfiM VOM,4041 WNL Ftl=
&L )nT&XES AR; NQR.?(MT�41 . ....
Awn OdslK IRQ14 foly"t .......... *RE frWC ("PE NAY VART)
I -W; By mcRowc ccWITA"' &I, • MITI" Ron Rm ....... . ,,, vw FWE S YARIILS�
.qd oCqei.IE? E_
"'D.15Hto Ac�
us" rm ,Ri..rur cvwtcmn 3wiAny I
xv ,,,= co-o� -w oA5 Wr EWER M (WE 'ARIES)
UK, -Rol m scr —4— (wr VARIES}
,'CD r okH
'CO (SIZE w Es)
�:ftft QPIIC PCMTAL
m 1A RIPW
lujlmn
P Walff pas
.I#, WNHOLE Pelt IwA
P*ff nrY ME
ual at mc"T!J� -WAY wAvw-w LIFT
,tL No . TGyp1.ONE ptrwa
Arlt w"
VAI WATER 0EFE4
HATER WyYC
-j
;il'j
PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
22 6 c
W M2;
GREEN LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
planning I SUrveving
Bly C.k Ch-ull RoOd Ecyle t-mh Caro ino 212.12
PhOftol 010.075.2.306
Llw,se Kumoei: P-06—
E
006,
LL
UNE TAM WETLANDS "k
<
cl
CF
0
0
SAM 4-1
0
D -C
iri, owl . ,p
6—
INC,
�WII . C 11 .
A
A, 1, . - -
W. 71 - "14 P -W Ilk" S --W,
ILIM-T IK 7 iWKI . .....
"- 4-11- -11�,.,� Orr - x c+.-, - —.1- .. :-.. — ,
10
...........
Ivir
LINE TABLE WEnAAVS "a' r 31
LQ YJ
Q
015
0
v�
V
... ;5 5 is
. dIl.1 I Mll
0
m
0iE r LL WAKeR
7
-4-
-W %w*ml
KXW,
W—,
f2'
;4r . � - - -,-
i'z
nt , l ` ! - 4tYr aR[�',;jf -Ai' a^ >xK m ir#e«Au S*F_. ifii6t,.� tW-
*7v*
41
.?"p W
Nl
NorEs,
SVBJjCI ID My 4-C, A" EA,�EVENT$, j?or or
WAYS.
M MW c.T. pMtN
11M.k. 01 14,00"D Wt*R To I.( WE o't TK :7f cuRe --------- AIIIIm
1. AEA �Kfthiy L�U 94D CUV-4M L5TMV5%Ek LNX� EX1571INr ULM "T uNt
WNr,RS FOUND. EVVING BDUIDARY (ICE. AN DEM AM ppoAwb FRopt- tc
M�� T C' �� . .... . .. ow Ilksvk (tyK -y W )
S. r3 Of "=�Ml IN IK 40ORE CoM" RECIMAY tCY Z -MC CONCfiM VOM,4041 WNL Ftl=
&L )nT&XES AR; NQR.?(MT�41 . ....
Awn OdslK IRQ14 foly"t .......... *RE frWC ("PE NAY VART)
I -W; By mcRowc ccWITA"' &I, • MITI" Ron Rm ....... . ,,, vw FWE S YARIILS�
.qd oCqei.IE? E_
"'D.15Hto Ac�
us" rm ,Ri..rur cvwtcmn 3wiAny I
xv ,,,= co-o� -w oA5 Wr EWER M (WE 'ARIES)
UK, -Rol m scr —4— (wr VARIES}
,'CD r okH
'CO (SIZE w Es)
�:ftft QPIIC PCMTAL
m 1A RIPW
lujlmn
P Walff pas
.I#, WNHOLE Pelt IwA
P*ff nrY ME
ual at mc"T!J� -WAY wAvw-w LIFT
,tL No . TGyp1.ONE ptrwa
Arlt w"
VAI WATER 0EFE4
HATER WyYC
-j
;il'j
PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
22 6 c
W M2;
GREEN LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
planning I SUrveving
Bly C.k Ch-ull RoOd Ecyle t-mh Caro ino 212.12
PhOftol 010.075.2.306
Llw,se Kumoei: P-06—

Moore County Advanced Career Center
Overall Site Plan
N UND5 'A'
u11/VATER VVETLAND �•
-
-
13211
E'.9189211

Moore Countv Advanced Career Center
Wetland Impact Exhibit
lllll�llllll�l IIII�.I II W I y) �iil I� �� �\
1 SF PERM, \
ROADWAY. WALL, AND +� +
/ RIPRAP
1 `// MBOX aXVER
11 // l //l l A3) 5'X5'�(R/ Ty
POND / . 0. 4 Ac.
1.840 SF TEMP.
ROADWAY AND WALL
' (CONSTRUCTION
Imoact•W3 =0-01 Ac- I
OSIONF STEMP.
/CONTROL
ew
_P
���-.►t. _ oaot W4
7►�
'. '
i
)8 SF TEMP. I mp art W5
0 BRIDGE REMOVAL, WALL AND = O Oc$ Ac.
ADWAY CONSTRUCTION a
106 SF TEMP. I 16
C.
FOR PATH�C�j
CONSTRUCTION ^c•
/i
-� r4pw-
��
W
Q
\

ENO,
swf L & 5UKrACE STABILIZATION ,A
W W ONl1p STAMAbIWI SWLL L Ni01DID d Au pSMABD ANFA$
I� � AROpNO ro fouorp SMAOIAL
pcm
ST ANG
SIAMgANPIsrAa2,W.'
LLLL
OES09 m
W FALE
IME MAW CAOFyRMS
PCI lm OWEI
t
S,NOIE1/I-5 COYYLNM NlftF
SOLM 00CIE5
Alp SO -ES
I mn
MODE
x OAMM
N[SEMVI PAHA
W W (1101)
zows
/ UM
Nw
IRARE WMLESSN
SLOFES SAFPO:
I W R
uwm A AAE Wl SEf➢Of
MIM 11
\�
W. 11. 11 MYS ARE
ALLONCD.
AORS 11 OR
11 un
I-pAYS Fp( SLOPE OEAMF
MTWEP
MW SO ICET N LppM
ALL OMIP AMAS
A"
A"(CAIYPI fQ1 FFRAEMFS
YM 9
!1 DAM
K. 201 E5}
MrIFR M1AN ti
C / / i / / / l I IXS60[YAYF Agym YYME WrpA VMg9M MASfDdMGMEktl OMRM 9E-SPEIlC 1MlO$
REMOV" .EAA Mr.NE (5 WC AY(2) n»
ME AM01E NEYL"O AR_ ME A m A[QSSNY ro erot EMWO!1 Alp Marl L10YRn rtIAAAIluS M[ LTMIRIC!
l� q OOnA1M1S MUOE ALpWIAI SII.p Alp SrAiYAWI MENIIIpIR AID 50@ALS NM01 WI EMmO M10rY AdT£
NMWALL EYF y SLOE EF090N mMIMa EACRAF MA/ M SWAAgAMN1 MW ME ESG919 T W WF AW
1y'',�I \ EO1W OM Au SiFm 91PCf (0:1 a sImE uwff IDIOGNY C cma W r N A ppM m F41 NEWG ro
_ `"( / 9EOMEAMOM YCM01 FOSW fU) W rwN SPfOIG)M)6 16rALL W WIIp PA YMIEACRIW" I6NMCMp6
r \»������ \� \\ �\1 \ / / LEGEND
Q
U
2
c
ffe
o
LLLL
U
>&w
oG
���m
___
t
S,NOIE1/I-5 COYYLNM NlftF
Q
� P
r Z
p
W
N[SEMVI PAHA
z
C / / i / / / l I IXS60[YAYF Agym YYME WrpA VMg9M MASfDdMGMEktl OMRM 9E-SPEIlC 1MlO$
REMOV" .EAA Mr.NE (5 WC AY(2) n»
ME AM01E NEYL"O AR_ ME A m A[QSSNY ro erot EMWO!1 Alp Marl L10YRn rtIAAAIluS M[ LTMIRIC!
l� q OOnA1M1S MUOE ALpWIAI SII.p Alp SrAiYAWI MENIIIpIR AID 50@ALS NM01 WI EMmO M10rY AdT£
NMWALL EYF y SLOE EF090N mMIMa EACRAF MA/ M SWAAgAMN1 MW ME ESG919 T W WF AW
1y'',�I \ EO1W OM Au SiFm 91PCf (0:1 a sImE uwff IDIOGNY C cma W r N A ppM m F41 NEWG ro
_ `"( / 9EOMEAMOM YCM01 FOSW fU) W rwN SPfOIG)M)6 16rALL W WIIp PA YMIEACRIW" I6NMCMp6
r \»������ \� \\ �\1 \ / / LEGEND
Q
U
2
c
ffe
o
LLLL
U
>&w
oG
���m
d
t
us
Q
� P
r Z
W
MAINTENANCE PLAN
o.) rcuok aroIAYa01u a L>pOSm 40PES 9lALL H FNOIpm ACCOM'1MC ro aGIAo
srAuuAnw rAat 9aa!f1 rcuaw� wM�nw a Axr Nusc Lr/-C/(�
/// � y 1A PQNAENT WdNON £F fW ALL dSM C ANFAS T M[ PNOM W ALL CSMA RO pFAS ACOO.WC O CLH DESIGN, PA
_ \ J / / Oi0'NO ST.16117AMPl /A9F (MLLMMJ iCLLOM10 CCWPIFIKN R CMVSIIPUCMpi OM OLHIONOIT. 100 Pwat 0n.e
\ 1 /IEOLFfIImm ANE m YAWM AELESSINY ro Y ow. Alp sm w LYN IEQMAMLNS ME .RM�wu c..ol
vljl /` \\ \ '^ / \= / '. =W •a — — pq'g CTS R M]!pC .1MP1pVAl 4i0NG Yp sIAMUlAMUI MEgN!OE/IR Afp SLEd.IfS MKKM YAY Gm0 sal 130 �l
,/- �/ ,': '�;, . , � 1. aroE fl1051g1 wlma W rnrc suu Mr NSrAIUD roM E11gtIMr sIAlwFZApLN pANp nM EsrAMusuur v u c-LaaNM w1-wle
///l `\ \ + y �—� IEORAMIF COLS.' OY N! SIRP IlLRS I81OR SlmOfi MCiEN p W1WN 9Rfi%AMMK I6ULL Wr1NC PfR K c-ISu
\ $;. ':.µi � �� WMFACMA'RNS NSMACMONS
/ / siaMYWrcN MrMArp � _
_ J
pazQ
■z■.
zea~~c
1 cl-
VLJ
oG
���m
~
O
W
W
c3e
z
I BAN
\�
/ / siaMYWrcN MrMArp � _
gI�ED
GENERAL NOTES Q
.�.. 2017
WQUALITY
RERMITTING
Q zoo
> () W Q
W _
Q CoQ
MATE NE OESCPoPTgN
(4/)�(��i/ ifIOMLPY SfDYYE11i MASH I' /ISM -AI
OISMM� NEA 11133 AC
R24115O
SLWAaAREA
REa:
X324
/�v/ i i PoYR Rli. r0° EILY
4- WNtor3
� ) �{(` (�"/ / � EYaAr aAv .pmwaav
/.'� / // / j/ �pf� / 90WEY aQWKE mw1m 1.Or
BRAWDO nW-' 26 N's
� EROSION CONTROL
0/- / j R PLAN -AREA 3
/ ss/ GRAPHIC SCALE o
1 i h = 40 K
_ J
pazQ
■z■.
zea~~c
1 cl-
VLJ
oG
���m
~
O
W
W
c3e
z
gI�ED
GENERAL NOTES Q
.�.. 2017
WQUALITY
RERMITTING
Q zoo
> () W Q
W _
Q CoQ
MATE NE OESCPoPTgN
(4/)�(��i/ ifIOMLPY SfDYYE11i MASH I' /ISM -AI
OISMM� NEA 11133 AC
R24115O
SLWAaAREA
REa:
X324
/�v/ i i PoYR Rli. r0° EILY
4- WNtor3
� ) �{(` (�"/ / � EYaAr aAv .pmwaav
/.'� / // / j/ �pf� / 90WEY aQWKE mw1m 1.Or
BRAWDO nW-' 26 N's
� EROSION CONTROL
0/- / j R PLAN -AREA 3
/ ss/ GRAPHIC SCALE o
1 i h = 40 K

,,�yw4 ,57. ,�
pquEd 5&,a 411t.
United States Department of the Interior
AEB
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ralei--h Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0635
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01619
Project Name: MCACC
June 21, 2017
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat. that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to _jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the

species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdl ssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
httD://www.fws. gov/mi2ratorvbirds/CurrentBirdI ssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at john _ellis a fws.gov.

Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06121/2017
Project Summary
Consultation Code:
Event Code:
Project Name:
Project Type:
Project Description:
Project Location:
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01619
04EN2000-2017-SLI-063 5
04EN2000-2017-E-01619
MCACC
DEVELOPMENT
Moore County Advanced Career Center
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
https://www.google. com/mapss/place/3 5.21852215966419N79.40313408413 797W
Counties:
Moore, NC
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species on
this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.
...... �..........
8
�rA
F
i'
'.. % a:..
Moore, NC
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species on
this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.

NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
STATUS
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is outside the designated
critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ec_p/species/6063
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
American Chaffseed (&hn,albea americana) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: fittps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/si2ecies/1286
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
There are no critical habitats within your project area.

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
January 31, 2017
Ms. Jeanette M. Sabo
Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
515-F Midland Road
Southern Pines, NC 28388
Dear Ms. Sabo:
The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your January 6, 2017, email and associated
document titled "Red -cockaded Woodpecker Biological Assessment for the Advanced Career Center,
Southern Pines, Moore County, North Carolina." Sandhills Community College (SCC) proposes a land
transaction with Moore County Schools to create a location for the future Advanced Career Center
(ACC). The proposed project is within the 0.5 -mile radius foraging partition for one abandoned cluster
(SOPI 87) of the federally endangered red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW). Our
comments are provided in accordance with sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.).
SCC proposes to donate about 22 acres east of, and adjacent to the current Moore County Schools
campus for the project. The project would include construction of a new building, two future attached
buildings, four storm water retention ponds, four parking lots (441 total parking spaces), an enclosed
yard, an access road connecting with NC Highway 22 and an access road connecting with the SCC
campus. The ACC campus would be accessed from Highway 22, through an easement with SCC.
According to the biological assessment, the project would result in the loss of some potential foraging
habitat associated with RCW cluster SOPI 87, an abandoned Safe Harbor recruitment cluster. The
affected cluster is comprised of 12 cavity and cavity start trees, none of which are currently active. The
biological assessment states that SOPI 87 was last active in 2004 when a solitary male occupied the
territory.
The proposed project falls within the 0.5 and 0.25 -mile radius foraging partitions for SOPI 87 and
within 200 feet of two relic cavity trees, tag #s 1480 and 1481. Since SOPI 87 is currently unoccupied
and has not been active in over five years, a full foraging habitat assessment was not conducted.
However, the 0.5 -mile radius partition contains approximately 369.43 acres, of which 231.57 acres are
pine forested, 8.75 acres are lowland hardwood, 24.35 acres are open water and 104.76 acres are non -
foraging habitat (e.g., roads, buildings, open land, etc.). The proposed ACC would remove about 20.13
acres of pine forest, leaving approximately 21 l .44 acres of suitable and potentially suitable habitat.
Sufficient acreage would remain in the 0.5 -mile radius foraging partition to support a RCW group if the
cluster is reactivated.
Annual cluster monitoring has shown that at least one cavity tree in SOPI 87 has been identified as
being possibly active prior to each breeding season; however, no RCWs have been detected in the
cluster during the breeding season. Based on the distribution of pine forest on the SCC and neighboring
properties, the remaining habitat is important to RCW conservation in Moore County, as foraging,

dispersal and nesting habitat. For a variety of reasons, SOPI 87 has remained inactive for several years.
In its current configuration, the cluster may be too close to occupied RCW territories to the west (SOPI
34 and 35) and/or the distance between SOPI 87 and active territories to the northeast and southeast
have a negative effect on SOPI 87's ability to recruit resident RCWs.
While not a required condition of the Service's concurrence, we believe it is important to recommend
appropriate measures that may be carried out on SCC property that are likely to further benefit RCW
conservation. Rather than focusing cluster management within the current cavity tree aggregation at
cluster SOPI 87, it may be more productive to shift the cluster center about 1,100 feet due east, and
provision new cavities (a minimum of four) in trees on SCC land between the ACC project access road
on NC 22 and the Tyler's Ridge at Sandhills Apartment Homes. Moving the cluster east may reduce
territorial conflict with woodpecker groups to the west and improve the potential for a new breeding
group to form. These cluster management activities, in combination with prescribed burning or
chemical/mechanical midstory control, would be likely to promote RCW group resilience in Moore
County and support the overall health of the RCW recovery populations in the North Carolina Sandhills.
Based on the information contained in your January 6, 2017 email and biological assessment, the
Service concurs with your determination that the proposed tree removal may effect but is not likely to
adversely affect the red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW). We believe that the
requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under
section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified
action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. John Hammond at 919-856-4520
(Ext. 28). Thank you for your continued cooperation with our agency.
Sincerely,
F
e Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Literature Cited:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery plan for the red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis): second revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 296 pp.
Cc: Susan Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Mr. Will McDearman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2

DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Moore County Advanced Career Center
Central Drive
Southern Pines, North Carolina
April 2017
CLH design, p.a.
400 Regency Forest Drive, Suite 120
Cary, North Carolina 2751127518
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

CONTENTS
Stormwater Impact Analysis
Maps
Supporting Calculations
BMP Design
Storm Routing
Storm Drainage System

Stormwater Impact Analysis
Proiect Descrilltion
The site is located approximately 0.75 miles South of the intersection of Central Drive and Airport Road
along the Western side of Central Drive in Southern Pines, NC. The 17.51 -acre site is currently within
the Town of Southern Pines municipal limits. The project will impact approximately 16 acres of the site
and approximately 6.5 acres of the surrounding property for road connectivity.
The stormwater runoff from the site discharges to the North and South of the site. The site is within the
Cape Fear River basin and peak stormwater discharges shall meet pre -development rates for the l0 -year
24-hour design storm as well as providing 85% removal of total suspended solids for any impervious
area. One (1) Bio -Retention Cell and two (2) Stormwater Wetlands were designed to control the runoff
from the site to meet the predevelopment peak flow of the 10 -year 24-hour design storm.
FEMA FIRM # 3710857300J and # 3710858300J dated October 17, 2006 indicate that the site is outside
the limits the 100 -year flood plain.
Soils on the site consist predominately of Candor Sand (90.5%), and Ailey Loamy Sand (9.5%). These
soils represent Hydrologic Soil Groups (HSG) A and B respectively. An HSG of A was used to perform
stormwater calculations.

Stormwater Management Methodology
Stormwater Quantity
The site stormwater quantity analysis was performed at Analysis Points 1, 2, and 3. Analysis point 1 is
on the Northern side of the property, analysis point 2 is on the South -East side of the property and
analysis point 3 is on the South-West side of the property. One (1) Bio -Retention Cell and two (2)
Stormwater Wetlands were designed to control the runoff from the site to meet the predevelopment peak
flow of the 10 -year 24-hour design storm.
The time of concentration (Tc) calculations utilize the TR -55 method by the United States Soil
Conservation Service (SCS) while maintaining a minimum Tc of 5 minutes (user input) for smaller
drainage areas. The stormwater and BMP managed flow calculations were performed with Hydraf7ow
Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D software which utilizes the TR -55 method.
Summary tables of the design calculations are provided below:
Pre -Development / Post -Development Peak Runoff Comparison Summary:
Analysis
Design
Pre -Development
Post -Development
Post -Development
Detention
Point
Event
Qpre (cfs)
Qpost (ces)
With Dete) tion
Provided
1
10 -yr
10.95
8.31
1.53
Yes
2
10 -yr
8.22
55.54
6.58
Yes
3
10 -yr
7.55
23.42
3.66
Yes
Stormwater Quality
Stormwater treatment at this site will be achieved by providing treatment for the first one (1) inch of
stormwater runoff for any impervious. Stormwater Wetland #2 has been sized to accommodate (offset)
any impervious that cannot be practicably be captured and treated.

jd_q ation Senices
ENVtPONMENTAt. O VAUTY
June 26, 2017
Brenda Jackson
Sandhills Community College
3395 Airport Road
Pinehurst, NC 28374
Project: Moore County Advanced Career Center
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL. S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: December 26, 2017
County: Moore
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. ff we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 CertificationlCAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicants responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
Impact
River
Basin
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm Riparian on -Riparian Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear
03030004
0
0
1 0 0.25 1 0 0 0
0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Mike Eaker, agent
Sincerely,
r
James,. Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T