NC0079057_Site Visit_20170707

i to State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NCO079057
Attn: Julie Grzyb Facility name: Manteo WWTP
From: Robert Tankard
Washington Regional Office
Note. This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals Please complete all sections as they are applicable
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No RECEIVEMCDENWR
a. Date of site visit: 06/23/2017 JUL 0 7 2017
b Site visit conducted by: Robert Tankard
Water Duality
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No Permitting Section
d. Person contacted: Josh Obrien and their contact information• (252) 216 - 5314 ext
e Driving directions: From Hwy 64, turn north on Hwy. 64 Business. Travel north one mile, turn west on
Bowser -town Rd. In 0 3 miles turn into road leading to the wwtp
2. Discharge Point(s)-
Latitude: +3554.24 Longitude -75.39.28
Latitude- Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Shallowbag Bay
Classification. SC
River Basin and Subbasin No. Pasquotank River Basin; Index No. 30-21-3
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Waters are used for recreational
purposes Swimming, fishing, etc
H. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1 Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Josh O'Brian Certificate #: 994932 Backup ORC: Victor Quick Certificate #.16878
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Existing description is correct.
Proposed flow -
Current permitted flow: 0 6 MGD
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5

Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be impoistant
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate9 ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain -
6 Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit corrects ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain -
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

' AI 1 Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no. please complete the following (expand table if necessarv):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O I II O f It
O 1 It O 1 II
O / // O I If
O I I/ O 1 It
O / // O I If
12 Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review. See 12 month BIMs report
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13 Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations9 ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14 Check all that apply-
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i e, NOV, NOD, etc )
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain
15 Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If yes, please explain -
16 Possible toxic impacts to surface waters- N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only). N/A
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

M. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS '
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit9 ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPEES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3 List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4 List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5 Recommendation.
❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
6 Signature of report preparer
Signature of regional super
Date- July 3, 2017
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5

•
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
The facility has requested a reduction of monitoring from 3 times per week to 2 times per week for BOD TSS NH3
and enterococci. The facility has been compliant with all parameters and the plant appears to be functioning as
desiy,ned. This office recommends the reduction of sampling be gyanted Also the facilfty requests that instream
sampling be reduced from 3 times per week to once per week in the summer months. This office also recommends
the reduction of sampling to once per week for the summer months.
FORM WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved
EPA Washington, D C 20460
OMB No 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A National Data System Coding (i e , PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I NC0079057 I11 121 16/06/21 117 18 � C � 19 LG j 201 I
211111 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----- —Reserved ---------
I 71 I I 72 I N I 73 I I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
67 70 LJ il LJ I I I
Section B Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10 35AM 16/06/21
13/04/01
Manteo WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
710 Bowsertown Rd
12 OOPM 16/06/21
17/12/31
Manteo NC 27954
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
///
Nathaniel David Pharr/ORC/252-473-3513/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Nathan Pharr,PO Box 246 Manteo NC 279540246//252-305-3491/
No
Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit E Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program N Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Compliance Schedules
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Justin K Davis Non Discharge Compliance Unit//910-79
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 N00079057 111 121 16/06/21 117 18 ICI
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Justin Davis with DWR, Washington Region, Inspected the Manteo WWTP facility on June 21, 2016
Facility is under permit number NCO079057 The facility was found to be in compliance with permit
number NCO079057 See questions and comments for Inspection details
Page# 2

Permit NCO079057 Owner -Facility Manteo WWfP
Inspection Date 06/21/2016 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires In 6 months or less) Has the permittee submitted a new
0
❑
❑
❑
application?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility as described In the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for Inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment Current permit for the Manteo WWTP NC0079057, became effective on April 1,
2013 and
expires at midnight on December 31 2017 Permit was available at the time of the
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
inspection
Dates of analysis
❑
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is all required Information readily available, complete and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab reg required 5 years)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DM Rs?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
0
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of Individual performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
❑
Name of person performing analyses
❑
Transported CDCs
❑
Are DMRs complete do they Include all permit parameters?
M
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted Its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility Is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
❑
0
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment ORC sign -In log for 2016 was checked Nathaniel David Pharr was the ORC at the time of
the Inspection Josh O'Brian was the Back -Up ORC at the time of the inspection
Nathanial David Pharr 2016 license's CS 2-991835, SS -988268, SI -987932, WW -991372
Paper Trail performed June 2014 and June 2015 -weekly samples verified
Page# 3

Permit NCO079057 Owner -Facility Manteo VWVTP
Inspection Date 06/21/2016 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Compliance Schedules Yes No NA NE
Is there a compliance schedule for this facility? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is the facility compliant with the permit and conditions for the review period? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment -NA-
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters for ex MLSS, MCRT, Settleable E ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment Grass had been cut within days of _he Inspection visit The plant appeared
to be well
Type of bar screen
maintained Sludge Judge used to get sludge blanket levels of clarifier land 2 Clarifier 1 -
8" blanket depth Clarifier 2 - 14" blanket depth
❑
Influent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑ E
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
E ❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑ 0
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees
E ❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Comment Tubing on the Influent sampler was black and purple In color According to backup CIRC,
Josh O'Brian, the tubing Is changed monthly on the samplers Temperature
of the Influent
sampler was 0 degrees
Bar Screens
Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a Manual
❑
b Mechanical
E
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit In good condition?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment The bar screen unit had been replaced recently, within a month of the Inspection Micro
Strainer to Grit Chamber The unit appeared to work properly
Grit Removal
Yes No NA NE
Page# 4

Comment Grit removal appeared to function properly
Oxidation Ditches
Yes No NA NE
Are the aerators operational?
N
❑
Permit NCO079057
Owner -Facility Manteo WWTP
Are the aerators free of excessive solids build up?
0
❑
Inspection Date 06/21/2016
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
# Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
E
❑
Grit Removal
Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
0
❑
❑
❑
a Manual
❑
❑
❑
0
b Mechanical
❑
❑
❑
0
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
E
❑
❑
❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
N
❑
❑
❑
Comment Grit removal appeared to function properly
Oxidation Ditches
Yes No NA NE
Are the aerators operational?
N
❑
❑
❑
Are the aerators free of excessive solids build up?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
E
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
0
Are settleometer results acceptable (> 30 minutes)?
❑
❑
❑
0
Is the DO level acceptable?(1 0 to 3 0 mg/I)
❑
❑
❑
0
Are settelometer results acceptable?(400 to 800 ml/I in 30 minutes)
❑
❑
❑
N
Comment Rotating Aeration Basin with pH and DO probes linked to SCADA System All rotating
assemblies apperaed to be operating properly
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
S
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs levels
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
E
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational9
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)9
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment Sludge Judge used to get sludge blanket levels of clarifier 1 and 2 Clarifier 1 - 8" blanket
depth Clarifier 2 - 14" blanket depth
Page# 5

Comment RAS and WAS hardware appeared to be well maintained
Sand Filters (Low rate)
Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used) Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational?
M
❑
Permit NCO079057
Owner -Facility Manteo VW TP
Is the distribution box level and watertight?
0
❑
Inspection Date 06/21/2016
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Is sand filter free of ponding?
❑
M
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Pumps -RAS -WAS
Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are pumps operational?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site"
❑
❑
❑
M
Comment RAS and WAS hardware appeared to be well maintained
Sand Filters (Low rate)
Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used) Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the distribution box level and watertight?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is sand filter free of ponding?
❑
M
❑
❑
Is the sand filter effluent re -circulated at a valid ratio?
❑
M
❑
❑
# Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the sand filter effluent re -circulated at a valid rat o? (Approximately 3 to 1)
❑
0
❑
❑
Comment High Rate Sand Filter System appeared to function properly
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
M
❑
❑
❑
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlonne residual acceptable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge bul dup?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment Chlorine contact chamber equiped with DO, pH, ORP probes and linked to SCADA System
Flow Measurement - Influent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder mach the flow meter?
Yes -No NA NE
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment Influent station equipped with Gorman Pumps Audio and Visual alarms present but not
tested, due to SCADA System lin< If the influent station goes down an alarm is sent out to
the SCADA System and the Operators are informed through electronic devices
Page# 6

Permit NCO079057
Inspection Date 06/21/2016
Owner -Facility ManteoWWTP
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
N
❑
Comment Calibration for the Ciptisound Ultra -Sonic Effluent Flow Meter is due November 2016
Battery Back-up system for effluent electronics is a battery powered Surge
protector
Type of system ?
Liquid
System will reboot within a few minutes of a power failure when the generator system turns
on but with the Battery Back -Up the effluent reading Is not missed at all when the system
0
❑
works properly Total gallons reading during Inspection 109683 gallons/day
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑
❑
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑ ❑
E
❑
Comment The outfall is approximatlev 400 Yards off the shore Take a right out of the facility, go to the
light go straight across Drive 1 5 tenths of a mile and take a right on a skinny asphault
roadway It bends slightly to the right so you will basically be -going straight Drive past 5 or
6 houses to the end of the pavement There is a spigot to get a sample from for the effluent,
but due to the low flow pressure of the effluent, no water will come out of the spigot The
outfall is out towards a marker in the eastern direction about 400 yards out from the
shoreline
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?
Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑
❑
E
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
E
❑
Comment Liquid de -chlorination used
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment Liquid de -chlorination used
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 7

Permit NCO079057 Owner - Facility Manteo VWVrP
Inspection Date 06/21/2016 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the tubing clean? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees M ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the oermlt (frequency, sampling type M ❑ ❑ ❑
representative)?
Comment Effluent Sampling is time proportional
Aerobic Digester
Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the mixing adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming In the tank?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
N
❑
❑
❑
Comment Appeared to function properly at the time of the Inspection
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by Interrupting primary power source?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested under load?
❑
❑
❑
0
Was generator tested & operational during the Inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment The generator was started up, it appeared to function properlV
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameter) performed by a certified lab?
N
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees
❑
❑
❑
M
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44 5 degrees Celsius+/- 0 2 degrees?
❑
❑
❑
N
Incubator (BOD) set to 20 0 degrees Celsius +/- 1 0 degrees?
❑
❑
❑
0
Page# 8

Permit NCO079057
Inspection Date 06/21/2016
Owner -Facility Manteo WWTP
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Comment Environmental Chemist does all the lab work for the Manteo WWTP, NCO079057 An
Environmental Chemist, satelite office is located on location at the Manteo WWTP
Lagoons
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons In operation at time of visit?
Are lagoons operated In?
# Is a re -circulation line present?
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
Are dikes free of seepage?
Are dikes free of erosion?
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically In multiple
locations?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
Yes No NA NE
Facultative
1
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment Sludge holding area/Lagoon was about 10% full during the Inspection The sludge is
removed by hauler service Cost around $50,000 according to CIRC
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1 0 to 3 0 mg/1)
Yes No NA NE
Surface
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
N
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment Rotating Aeration Basin with pH and DO probes linked to SCADA System All rotating
assemblies apperaed to be operating properly
Page# 9

Permit NC0079057 Owner-Facility Manteo WWfP
Inspection Date 06/21/2016 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
Page# 10

PERMIT NUMBER NC0079057 OUTFALL
FACILITY NAME Town of Manteo - Manteo WWiP
CITY Manteo
001 EFFLUENT
COUNTY Dare
PERIOD ENDING MONTH 5- 2017
REGION Washington
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE # 1 - 2
CO310
CO530
CO600
C061
CO665
COMER
TGE6C
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
ug/I
pass/fail
BOD, 5 -Day (20
Solids, Total
Nitrogen, Total -
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Phosphorus, Total
Mercury, Total (as
Pass/Fail Static 24hr
Deg C) -
Suspended-
Concentration
Total (as N) -
(as P) -
Hg) - Concentration
Acute Pimephales
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
5-17
5
30
2
05714286
04285714
0
4-17
5
30
2
05
0
0
3-17
10
30
4
04285714
0
72
0
176
2-17
10
30
4
1
0
0
1-17
10
30
4
01538462
0
00307692
12-16
10
30
4
21538462
0
77
00846154
25
11-16
10
30
4
08571429
0
0
10-16
5
30
2
0416667
0
0
9-16
5
30
2
0
0
96
0
434
B-16
5
30
2
0285714
0
0
1
7-16
5
30
2
1
0
0
6-16
F785714
30
2
0
101
0
295

PE4,IT NUMBER
FP*LITY NAME
CITY
NC0079057 OUTFALL 001
Town of Manteo - Manteo WWTP
Manteo
EFFLUENT
COUNTY Dare
PERIOD ENDING MONTH 5- 2017 DMR 12 Month Calculated
REGION Washington
PAGE# 1- 1
00010
00300
00400
00625
01092
50050
50060
61211
deg c
mg/I
su
mg/I
ug/I
mgd
ug/I
cfu/100ml
Temperature, Water
Oxygen, Dissolved
pH
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl,
Zinc, Total (as Zn)
Flow, in conduit or
Chlorine, Total
Enterococci
Deg Centigrade
(DO)
Total (as N)
thru treatment plant
Residual
5-17
06
23 3318182
73357143
73- 78
064
02362
0
4-17
06
20 9210526
7 675
72- 78
1 075
02176207
0
3-17
06
16 426087
86928571
76- 78
085
0 048
02052903
0
2-17
06
15 885
8 925
75- 78
0 825
02037143
0
1-17
06
15 3619048
9 1153846
75- 78
098
02576333
0
12-16
06
15 4761905
88230769
76- 78
0 875
0 043
02164
0
--
—
----0-6
—
11-16
--
02031379
0
18 5761905
82714286
76- 79
048
10-16
06
23 280952
7 5
75- 79
0 425
0317839
0
9-16
0 6
26 557143
7069231
76- 79
0 325
0289367
0
8-16
06
28 347826
6807143
77- 78
018
0200097
0
7-16
06
2836
6291667
76- 78
0 525
0 258
0
6-16
06
25 231818
6 957143
74- 78
045
03206
0