The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170801 Ver 1_B-4738_20170629STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPART'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR June 14, 2017 Ms. Sarah E. Hair U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Subject: Dear Ms. Hair: Nationwide Permits #3 and #13 Replace Bridge No. 250189 over Buckhead Creek on SR 1137 Cumberland County, North Carolina NCDOT TIP B-4738 JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 250189 over Buckhead Creek on SR 1137 (Crystal Springs Road) in Cumberland County. The structure is to be replaced by a bridge at its existing location. The existing structure is a 36' long, two-span reinforced concrete floor bridge on I-beam. The proposed structure is a 50' long, one- span cored slab bridge. An off-site detour is proposed. Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Cape Fear River Basin. The existing bridge crosses Buckhead Creek, a Class C water. Please find attached a Pre-construction Notification (PCN) form, permit drawings, and associated stormwater management plan. Temporary impacts of 51 linear feet to Buckhead Creek for bank stabilization are proposed. Proposed impacts to wetlands include 0.02 acre of permanent fill for bridge and roadway fill, <0.01 acre of excavation for bridge construction, and 0.01 acre of hand clearing for bridge and roadway construction. This project was reviewed for the presence of federally threatened and endangered species (see Table 1 on page 2). No habitat was found for the listed species except American alligator. Mailing Address: Telephone: (910) 486-1493 Location: NC DEPAR7'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION F[lX: (J1O� 4H6-19S9 SSH GILLESPIE STREET H�GxwAY Drv�s�oN 6 Customer Service: 1-8'77-368-4968 FA�1"rEv[[,[,E, NC 28301 PO Box 1150 FA�TTEviLLE, NC 28302 Website: www.ncdot.gov Replace Bridge No. 250189 over Buckhead Creek on SR 1137 (Crystal Springs Road) Page 2 June 14, 2017 Table 1. Federall � ientific Name lligator mississippie� eonympha mitchelli ancisci icoides borealis indera melissifolia ysimachia asperulae� hus micha�ii chwalbea americana Note: E - Endaneered: T(S for Common Name American alligator Saint Francis' satyr Red-cockaded Yes I Not E No E No E No �ugh-leaved loosestrife E No Michaux's sumac E No American chaffseed E No itened Due to Similarity of Appeazance. No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect No Effect The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federa] Highway Administration (FHWA), the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) in eastern North Cazolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides incidenta] take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for iive years for al] NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Cumberland County, where this project is located. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a 6na1 listing determination through Apri130, 2020. Cultural resource compliance work has been completed. No archaeological resources or historic properties fall with the Area of Potential Effect of this project. This letter, PCN, and permit drawings are being submitted for USACE and NCDWR 404/401 approval. If further information is required, please let me know. Your review and consideration is greatly appreciated. incerely, c�-�, , /�w 5 James J. erko Division 6 Environmental Officer Cc: Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Resources Travis Wilson, NCWRC Gary Jordan, USFWS Greg Burns, PE, Division Engineer Ken Murphy, Jr, PE, Division Maintenance Engineer Keith Beverley, Division Roadside Environmental Engineer PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Jim Rerko, NCDOT, PO Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-L D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: TIP: B-4738 Description: BRIDGE NO. 189 OVER BUCKHEAD CREEK ON SR 1137 (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: CUMBERLAND City: Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.0020°N, Long. -78.9606° W Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Buckhead Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: See table below Non-wetland waters: 423 linear feet: 20 width (ft) and/or 0.19 acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 0.40 acres. Cowardin Class: Forested Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: N/A Non-Tidal: N/A E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date: ❑ Field Determination Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: � SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant � Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant ❑ Office concurs with data sheetsldelineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation repor[. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:600; Fayetteville & Hope Mills ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Seroice Soil Survey Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): Signature and date of ignature�a�d`�1ate of� Regulatory Project Manager erson re�questing preliminary JD (REQUIRED) (REQUI�iED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Estimated Site Name Latitude Longitude Cowardin amount of Class of aquatic resource Class aquatic resource in review area Buckhead 35.00168°N -78.9599°W RUB 2001inear feet non-section 10 — non-wetland Creek SB 35.0022°N -78.9628°W RUB 2231inear feet non-section 10 — non-wetland WA 35.0015°N -78.9601°W PFO 0.21 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland WB 35.0021°N -78.9609°W PFO 0.19 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland NORTH CAROLINA DEPART'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH CUMBERLAND GOUNTY REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 189 ON SR 1137 OVER BUCKHEAD CREEK B-4738 Figure 1 �. �� ✓ � r � � Mi � I � �`\�� ..PpY, ^ L ''�. �.. _:;s �,��';� j; � Study Area TI P B-4738 4 ��`��vx FIGURE 2 ��- � � , " ` � . , ;,� , :_ ' "� ' ! us�s Quaas: Cumberland Coun 4 � * Prepared by the NCDOT < < �- p � `h Project Development & �"V �` �� q : d�+� . �� '� `�� "'M o R � e'� a. Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 189 on �,, ��" . Environmental Analysis Branch � � Fayetteville & Hope Mills �F � Natural Environment Unit Scale 1: 600 --,��,� ��--�-::- ti �� SR 1137 Over Buckhead Creek '�'''�F�� I.�.. �- : i ti� � � ; ` �:.-'3. - - �- -'re ��. � � � .. � — . --� `-- - � - - � . � - �� - - . - �- � :`r �1 . .� , :• T � �,� . - _ - ' - _ �y� � , ', � � + . ' ��, ' � -- �. . #� '� �s . ��4� . r . , , '..yF ��1'"� ' , � �� _ _ . rr : . �i � . - - . ,. y ,�$' y_� r� � ` 7�T� l 5��- 4� �I_� "� �' �''. .� ��. �. _._� yW i.� - . :- - `•� , �,�, � `�„ `� y� '�,�� . � . . . _ �.' �-�a �{• �,'. � � '` Y � . � - _:. • .. � . �: . JiF � '; i 5 ' ; . � �. �� -(��_ - ' � rl, � . _ � - p'�a� �" - 6 � _ � , - '• _�- ' . �y, . � _ -{�� r I� � #� L , r I , � . .1' � ■ . j � 'rl E : � � . . - . 1� i - q�• i � ' .i ^ �� , � , , k ..1 � ' I ..... ' �- 7�. • ' e :. � u� �i'', y �h. ... � � - � � � ' _ . �a � � . �- - i _� „3b . � � .� Y � _� � L �. , f, ' . � ��' _ � R ' � .� .�� I� a' � �;� � ' i � . � �.. a ��' � 'r � - . - . II i . y.� . '�- .� � � �. a , y . i` � L� : . � � • �. � � �'.�� r � � �i � � � °y.� '� k: 1 . _, '� �� ir �' V� -� � , hj� - � � �j ti-.. , :�' 1�� i�-�� . ��I, '. � �L .. r h�y � + ' - � _ s _ � y�.'�� , -� .:l � r �' �.� •-3 ; r� :+- ��.�{ . �..- - ,.r�+,� _ e� �' _ . i� �� .a. �- q �- u � -'� �� ° i�� , . � . � , �� _ � . ` g� ' �L - . � �� . ._ ,� � �� : , .� s,` 'C � � �- •.t . . .� �� _ �! � - . . � < t 1 � �c - - � i � + - .'.��. . c� . �y '� ,� m .a. �1 ; � _ '!r �l 1' � � . � � L . . 0. . � �' � _ �. � � � � �" - �._ t _ ' . - � - � _ �. . + ,j4',F? �- � -n k� r _ �'w-- _ T�� . -',�'{r'� �.I�.�, - Y' ' _ -- �� d �i ' � o� , �L � � � � � � _ tl � y _ � •� ��' � J. � 4� � � � t: ` - ' aio '�' . .+,,, �r7� . . . . �'. a - i ' . �` -i _ . ti + J, � r e � �� - `�'� �' ft. '°,. f y� a ` -. i' �i � _� � �. �-�4 i�� .Q � � , e m lf �, d _ � � . � �- �.1, - . . - - _ - io ' - � - - � k ..- - � �a�� _ .� 4 . . �r '' �: .�. � �� .{� g' , t; � �, � �� F �� , �� , u� � t� - ��_ �i� _ � � � " �� _ �� ' � _ _ � � �,'+�'i � +h [ '� � � i I ��V• L � � ^ � �r p . � � _ ��i .. ' 3.. , � .� . W � � J � � � �, � F 1 . ' ' 4}L�•1 � ��' 1�� I 1 � � .' _ _ '�' F �� . -'� . k.l. � � - " . .1� � - � + � . � ' � � � � }I � r � f �,�.� � � �raF -��. , .�- ., - � _- � �� . . � . , - . , � �� , � , 4 � - , � � � �* ' �� _ r _ , ,� . , � _ - i � �� . - � 4' �r,:� ��+'� _ � - -r =' ��'` _ ��'. q ��i _ � ,� �� - �, R # � . � . ' " �~� � - 4 - :�a � , . � , a � '`,e �, � _ . .� ' i � � � �� f .. r� d � ' : y� . - - - d- ' �'� � � . _ . � d�' rr - � . ^. - . �� I I` � -,-rt� �'. . . � _,� - '�°� Iy�' _ � � �- . �� ' i� '�C . . '� +" � r , _ . � _ � _ - . .1't� ��.a _ - .. ' _- , . �� ! p y - 11 ��+� '� — - ' - r. �' � - , � ' -1 `,�. � '�-� �' , , . � ,: ,� _ _ . � ^ , � ` -- � �r. � e �, r� i 5 q c � �� -'�y � ' � � _ � � A � _ !� � _ ��'- � rF ;*��, 3YE,;�y_ , L � c '� F � �� , . e � �£ _ ' . � , �l - , ,� . - �.�_ .- , � '�" '� � , � 'P. '� �� p1��1 ��_�.� 1 ..�=. ..� }�,� ��,��, `�_ ` �} .. .. { �� I � � � . �'. . �' ' � , i j� +�' y � �F� � � . � �� _�,� �H-�" � _ � : � . � 1 i � � �." �� ., � . _ � . ,. ' w � __ . � . � _ ,1. ^ �'` � • �J'P � � i 7 � . _ I � �: _ _•.,,�� . �5 �� I�� ` P� .. w � y - _ �.T ^ , _`= ' . , � .•,� �.. _ �. . .� �.' �_ _�. -. � �, `��- ' . � � Mi �' �� '7' r2 � ' � � �� r � � � '�-1� 4� � 'r - ��,� � _ . � T. � .p _ • . � ' , _ .� -N _ 3 . � � � . � . � .- ' .� . !? --. - I � i . � . ._� . � :� _ . �, � , �- . � � �3 .1 11yy�� . .. � . _ �� _'! r ' r =. .. . ' r . � . . ' � . . J,. � , r � '�-� . i � _ . %� u. . f's` . .. � '� ; ' x . - �' � y F F j � • � � �� _ � �� _ _ � ,�J _ � _ . � m �r � ;: � �� s4 - -y:s1 � . � , � - ,, � y , , � - _ _ �` _ � .� s � , -g . 'R � � . . �� . '�. � , u . g� s . ; ',J�� . � . ' � � . _ '�s � ]R„4 . . �'�� . . . , i� - _ '� rT� _ .# .. - - '" 3-. � - . . - . .� , „ i � �' �..t � ' - �� -�, � . _i 1.-- . ' . _.. � ,Z � � � .._ • - `� � �� ' /� �}t . � � . i ' ,�1`f_ �,'� _ t ..� , c �` �y k � � �_� � 1{ 1 � � � � ��y�" �� ',��.F,.� _ i �i �� "J� ._p ',."� .�,r.�� P� r4ri �, r - , . _. _ _ � - � � , . .F ,� . , : . 'i t _ � � � _ - - � ` :a.��'T .,� � i. r o,l��,� . �yG `l �.� . .. .. � . ' f t , � ,. , �. �' � .'' � � ,'" F . -� � , .�i � �. ��.�. � .y � � �� .. � a,I. � t,. � �,i.: - .-�� - . s . r - . �..� ,, '�� y � , � g . - _ t � - _ � r ._ • � � _ �L a n� � 1� � i A , � ' , . � _ - . . � . ._ _ . , � r _ � � ' n �' r � �� t i'��`' � � �1 `. , �1 _ _ - �. � ^ �y -. , � a q.� . �, ; .y'�'� ' �w 1 - �;, - , � : � ` .� 't� � �7 : ;:Y� ,�- � ` � �''_yu � �� ,h. '!� _ r� o_ � .i�� r��,� , si4� �� _ .v��F$ _h� � ..�yr� yp �y. � ' '�ii ''.� - > ��.�_ 5 �'I � I ' $: _� � �f. � � . - � � ` . '� � _ . :� .. , Y� E ` �' �� . z.�.,� �'- -�Y� . . . � - �� _ � -�� - .� � i-!Y i� 1,< �Y�' _ �� , � ',, . � . - . - , � . "Y' , . �' - - . . : . . � . , .. �` ��,� � � � `�� - '1 �. � .s . �41 � �` '!� �� _ �' -�a �t � � ��il�. i � ` .� -.�� L` _r._� -�� 9`� . �4 a�� -. i4 �-�"� .y L'I`i�'''�t T.�� a►`�� $� �-- ��__ _ � ��: . � - I � . _ , ,2r . � �' - .� I - JY a�' A,� � ��` �Tq. F� `I� - . � '. - - . � - � - - . '��i — � DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project ! Site: !� - y�i 38 Date: 2- Zy -C?" Applicant / Owner: NCDOT County: �'�„�r��P_c/}rvr� Investigator: �,�. i-+-a►� i-� vY'. r_-e�� "r"" State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves ✓ No Community ID: ET !s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No� Transect ID: ls the area a potential problem area? Yes No ✓� Plot ID: W A (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator pominant Plant Snecies Stratum Indicator 1. j��Sa l��-Flo�a 1 C�6L 9. 2.� �riocicnclmn -lvhn�+;i� T �� 10. 3.��c.e.i- ��.��-ru m � i=1�C 11. 4. l-i m S e^ S1r,. ___E1� 12. 5. i e-41nrG ��n�F�l�e SY,• FI�CtN 13. 6. v5 Sh, FY�rL 14. 7, per�: mu4. i ria- 51� � I,IPL 15. 8. I.r� i rera ,� hon �ca �� C�}� — 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). � Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other inundated ✓Saturated in Upper 12" � No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: �_(in.) Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: > I(v (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and• Phase): �o�rr,STprl L OATM Drainage Class: VEt2�� P��2� �l 'D�r�r lr� Taxonomy (Subgroup): ('umuUc l-fuV�t�aC�U6p3 Con�rm Mapped Type? Yes_ No X Profile Descriotion: Depth Matrix Colors MottYe Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, finchesl Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrest Structure, etc. � - u ��Y� Z / ! � SA-NDY 6Yh?� `"�" �(� �ov�' 1�E S�4Nny ��r�,�� Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _. Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List _ 13educing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List ✓Gleyed or Low-Chroma Cofors _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: vNt I LANU Ut I tKMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes t� No Hydric Soils Present? Yes �/ No Remarks: Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes� No WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version w� Project Name �3- 1�73g Nearest Road S� � 13% County ('�nw� BE2�,prvp Wetland area 0, 21 acres Wetland width 33o feet Name of evaluator S-rw�� m c�i d Yvt��t� ► f` Date z-� �b9 Wetland locaHon K on pond or lake X on perennial stream _ on internuttent stream within interstream divide other: Soil series: Jo�r•�-ttrJ E�orn.n _ predominandy organic - humus, muck, or peat _ predominantly mineral - non-sandy � predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors _ steep topography ditched or channelized (� total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest � Swamp forest Wet flat Pocosin _ Bog forest Adjacent land use (within lh mile upstream, upslope, or radius) X forested/natural vegetation I S% X agriculture, urban/suburban �% � impervious surface S % Dominant vegetation (1) iJvssa b��b�a �2� l.�r� odPX1L�tOn { �(�t f�l �c7� (3) (�Ge.� Pabru�n Flooding and wetness semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated � seasonally flooded or inundated _ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water _ no evidence of flooding or surface water Pine savanna � Freshwater marsh Bog/fen _ Ephemeral wetland _ Carolina bay _ Other: M The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels R Water storage � x 4.00 =� A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3 x 4.00 = ��Z., �'etland rating T Pollutant removal 4 "* x 5.00 = Zo �.,�.� � ��k� , I Wildlife habitat 2 x 2.00 = � �� e� N Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 0 ' �� 1 �, .. ,-. G Recreation/Education Z x 1.00 = �2 ** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project / Site: F.'�- �1738 Date: 2- Zu -04 Applicant / Owner: NCDOT County: CG��:tE�,.�.'.�/t1'w27 Investigator: Srr�rmN ,�,� r-�2N i� State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ✓ No Community ID: ET Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ✓ Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No�/ Plot ID: W�. (exptain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator pominant Plant Species Stratum fndicator � 1. �,h�ts a.e�a !T r�C _ 9. 2. �C��e � ru I-Y�� m % �-A C 10. 3. il�1lAa�n��^ i �rath �� F C + 11. 4. �u <ii� �.�� S �'I�L 12. 5. � Ii '✓ �K� 13. 6. Sm � la� �o�u,r,l �'rr, /«- �_� 14. 7. i��ce.+�a �ar�orr« � 1=G�C- 15. 8, y � 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC exciuding FAC-). �%%5 Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: _ Other Inundated �/Saturated in Upper 12" � No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks — Drift Lines Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: N!� (in.) Secondary Indicators: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: 2- (in.) 7 Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: � (in.) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and• Phase): Jo�►rvs mn/ LO FW1 Drainage Class: �lra2y Pc�F�' �2�,•�,t;) Taxonomy (Subgroup): (' a n,� tc l-�i,r��lC�rrr= �-� Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No X Profiie Descrintion: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure, etc. D- 5 ►DY� Z�� S�Dy n�; 5- I G� 1 b�l�? Z% r ,.�,��x�y .5�, n Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol _ Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List t/ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Exptain in Remarks) Remarks: vvt 1 WIVu Ut 1 CKMINA �ION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soiis Present? Yes � No Remarks: Is the Sampiing Point Within a Wetland? Yes� No_ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version W 8 Project Name B- y � 38 Nearest Road S �? I I 3 7 County C�,�,,n� �3E�e�.�tV �� Wetland area O, I q acres Wetland width I(9v feet Name of evaluator S�w,r•,tDN �F M��2�� rr Date 7- y� - pq Wetland location _ on pond or lake �( on perennial stream _ on intermittent stream _ within interstream divide other: Soil series: Jor►�SfD� l�o�°tw� _ predominantly organic - humus, muck, or peat _ predominantly mineral - non-sandy �t predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors _ steep topography ditched or channelized � total wetland width > 100 feet Wetland type (select one)* Bottomland hardwood forest Headwater forest �c Swamp forest Wet flat Pocosin _ Bog forest Adjacent land use (within 'h mile upstream, upslope, or radius) � forested/natural vegetation �% X agriculture, urban/suburban �_% � impervious surface s % Dominant vegetation �1� t��nu5 +c1cG� �2) l�lte� Pu �aVur►n (3) �laar�ol�a ura�n�ana � Flooding and wetness semipermanently to permanently flooded or inundated �! seasonally flooded or inundated _ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water _ no evidence of flooding or surface water Pinesavanna Freshwater marsh Bog/fen _ Ephemeral wetland Carolina bay _ Other: � The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels = R Water storage � x 4.00 =� IA Bank/Shoreline stabil�zation 3 x 4.00 = �2 Wetland T Pollutant removal rating � ** x 5.00 = 2 0 .� I Wildlife habitat � ' � *' ` 2 x 2.00 = 0 �, ��'� :. N Aquatic life value _� x 4.00 = 0$ �g �"��-� � �,�<; G Recreation/Education �_ x 1.00 = 0 _** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10 % nonpoint source disturbance within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project / Site: �- �( 738 Date: � - �' �'`' Applicant / Owner: NCDOT County: r'��n?�1"�6�;^�"� Investigator: �'r�N?DN, M�2r� r'"'" State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ✓ No Community ID: U, PLf�IV�� fs the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No �/ Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No r/ Plot ID: l�t! F/1�1/ (explain on reverse if needed) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator pominant Plant Species Stretum Indicator 1. 4�i n �,5 i-�ec� � � � A L 9. 2. �y�rrlerClfon fi,�i� ��*_1& �I I'-AC 10. 3. I'�-r v r ru hrreW� �_ F AC- 11. 4. (�ueYC�+S hiar8 �_ �F- C- 12. 5. S� hlrYaS 1tnc�'6r�,^x � F� 13. 6�n,a '�,�� - �'r � 14. 7. ��'vr , +� - F�.r Uj 15. 8. ��s ro-I,�r�� l,� V hL 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). � I�D'rfl Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe fn Remarks): Wet{and Hydrology Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: Other Inundated Saturated in Upper 12" �No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks Drift Lines Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Sur�ace Water: ��(in.) Secondary Indicators: � Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: .' �� (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: % � g (in.) �FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOI LS Map Unit Name (Series and•Phase): RL/-NV�Y Ln►�1�cY �l-�-ivr> Drainage Class: �tl� Dr2p-rn/Er� Taxonomy (Subgroup): �}rtF�►�1�� 1'��i u C�-+�� Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No X Profife Descriation: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, Ifnches) Horizon IMunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrest Structure, etc. �- z loY� 2 i r Lo►4,�;� -�,v�% Z'[ S t lNt? ��3 l:: `/2 .� i�F' �,.f,�►u'� ...;t�� `�i �.4 �' i.O� � Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soils _ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List , Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes Remarks: No � Is the Sampling Point No ✓ Within a Wetland? Yes No [/ No � O�O� W A r�9QG � � > � o � Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3, 13 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No if. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 250189 on SR 1137 (Crystal Springs Road) over Buckhead Creek 2b. County: Cumberland 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hope Mills 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4738 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: PO Box 1150 3e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302 3f. Telephone no.: 910-437-0207 3g. Fax no.: 910-486-1959 3h. Email address: jjrerko@ncdot.gov Pagelofl0 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Phil May 5b. Business name Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 3040 NC Hwy 42 West 5d. City, state, zip: Clayton, NC 27520 5e. Telephone no.: 919-606-1065 5f. Fax no.: 919-585-5570 5g. Email address: phil.may@carolinaeco.com Page 2 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Attached Plans 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.00183 Longitude: - 78.96000 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 3.0 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Buckhead Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Substandard bridge to be replaced in rural/low density residential area. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.40 acre 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Approximately 150 feet within the project area 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient bridge and ensure the safety of the traveling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 36-foot 2-span bridge with a 50-foot 1-span bridge on/near the existing bridge location with an offsite detour. Standard road building equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: PJD request submitted March 11, 2010. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Tyler Stanton, John Merritt of NCDOT Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. A preliminary jurisdictional determination has not been received. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T W1 � P❑ T Bridge and Riverine Swamp � Yes ❑ Corps 0.02 Roadway Fill Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Riverine Swamp � Yes ❑ Corps W2 � P ❑ T Excavation <0.01 Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Riverine Swamp � Yes ❑ Corps W3 ❑ P� T Hand clearing 0.01 Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.03 2h, Comments: Excavation is 41.2 sq.feet. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P� T Bank stabilization Buckhead Creek � PER � Corps 25 51 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DW(� S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 51 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 5 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T im act re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B4 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is located in approximately the same location and alignment as the existing bridge. An off site detour will be used during project construction to avoid impacts associated with an onsite detour. The design has only minimal wetland and stream impacts. Stormwater from the project will be released at non-erosive velocity through two dissipator pads west of the bridge, or flow over roadside vegetated slopes prior to entering surface waters. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT BMP's for bridge demolition and construction as well as North Carolina standard erosion control measures will be strictly enforced throughout project construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project involves replacement of existing infrastructure, and negligible increase in impervious surface will result from this project. The stormwater design has been reviewed by NCDOT. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: Categorical Exclusion signed on April 6, 2017. 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is a replacement of existing infrastructure; therefore, additional development is not likely to occur as a result of the project. The replacement will neither influence nearby land use or stimulate growth as no new travel lanes are proposed. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater will be generated by this project. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. WiII this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? ❑ Yes � No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? � Yes ❑ No � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS Website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisUcumberland.html for Cumberland Counry; North Carolina Natural Heritage Program GIS data updated January 2017. No habitat present for the Iisted species based upon July 2009 Natural Resource Technical Report prepared by NCDOT, except American alligator which is threatened due to similarity of appearance. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essentlal fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What daia sources did you use to determine whe[her your site would impact Essentlal Fish Habitat? EFH Mapper Website:http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protectioNefh/efhmapper/index.html 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What daia sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Categorical Exclusion signed April 6, 2017. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Memorandum of Agreement 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Ca olina Floodplain Mapping Program http://www. ncfloodmaps.com/ James J. Rerko �/' � /Z� / An � 7 ApplicanVAgenYs Printed Name �� Applicani�AgenYs Signature Date (AgenTs sig�/ ture is valid� nly if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version t �i�;vri1�E1�� North Carolina Department of Transportation St01'[714Yr1 t�`�' �+ , ., ., Highway Stormwater Program =,..T'. � STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ' — (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 35811.3.1 TIP No.: B-4738 County(ies): Cumberland Pa e 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 35811.3.1 TIP Number: B-4738 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 6/22/2017 NCDOT Contact: James J. Rerko Contractor I Designer: Wetherill Engineering, Inc. / Harminder Singh, PE Address: Highway Division 6 Address: 1223 Jones Franklin Rd. 500 Transportation Dr. (PO Box 1150, 28302) Fayetteville, NC 28301 Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: (910)437-0207 Phone: 919-851-8077 Email: lirerko(a�ncdot.qov Email: hsinqh(c�wetherillenq.com CitylTown: N/A County(ies): Cumberland River Basin(s): Cape Fear CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Project Description Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 0.08 Surrounding Land Use: Urban, Wooded, Residential Proposed Project Existing Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: (2) 12' lanes with grassed shoulders and up to 4.92' shoulders with guardrail. 4' (2) 12' lanes with grassed shoulders shoulders are variable width paved. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 5520 Year: 2016 Existing: Year: General Project Narrative: Replace bridge no. 189 over Buckhead Creek on SR 1137 Crystal Springs Rd. Use 1@50' 21" Cored Slab with Vertical Sheet Pile Abutments. At begin bridge, a modified (Description of Minimization af Water concrete flume used on both sides for drainage. No deck drains will discharge directly into channel. Quality Impacts) Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Buckhead Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 18-31-24-6 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C None Supplemental Classification: None None Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None ThreatenedlEndangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) N 0 d' � V •� � V � � O V .,= CI?,"'% /-;� ,�,_ii j�;r-�.� ;lt '1_;=`f° �I(��7 S� ✓� I a3 (7^r. �E �� I�7 �� (� �� iIjIjI� /�,j I( �� A� ... ST.fTE STwTE VI10JEc`T RP,PP.RCNC`C I:O. 1 a f .1 � (. I I A iL �1 �� B-4738 I �I��I��1'� ��1�-� 1�I��1�I��s��,�� GLI ST��Paa�no — 38517.31 BRZ-1137(bj 38511.37 BRZ-7137 6 38511.31 BRZ-1137(� C UMBERLAI�D CO U1�t T�' LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE 1V0.250189 OVER BUCKHEAD CREEK ON SR 1137 (CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAI11lAGE, PAVING £� STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT STA. 20 + 0 BEGIN PROJECT B-4738 STA. 17 + 73.13 i BUCKHEAD �'i - CREEK � � � - "_ � ' ' = END BRIDGE ( �ti� � / STA. 20+57.00 .\ �. I -L- SR 1137 CRYSTAL SPRINGS RD4 ,!- E � i SR 1135 (JOHN SMITH RD) �� Ir I ��i: ' � 0 ; MO � N ZZ THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II MODIFIED. GRAAHIC SCALES 30 15 0 30 60 PLANS 30 15 0 30 60 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) DESIGN DATA ADT 2017 = 5520 ADT FY = h1iA DHV = WA � = wa T = 4 % * V = 50 MPH (TTST =1% + DUAL =: FUNC CLASS = LOCAL SUBREGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH GTH ROADWAY PROJECT B-4738 = 0.073 MILES GTH STRUCTURE PROJECT B-4738 = 0.009 MILES AL LENGTH PROJECT B-4738 = 0.082 MILES SR 1003 CAMDEN RD I � Nl�_ P B4l� �_T_8-47_3 8 STA. 22 + 07.00 Prepored for: DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS ]000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 ,r:,.�u.�u:,� tira,u�-,c:i,ru.c� r�,.,:«�.��, r��,� rHn�rr��r 1ir��r,� � � � �� EF6C GON6Tii1JCT101N, LLG 3600 5. COLLEGE RD. STE. E-375 SHCP,T TOTAI. . O. SHF.F:TS 1 IPTION PE CONST. �_, -,__ TRANSPoRTATION PLANNING/OESIGN - BRIOGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN CNIL/S?E OESIGN - Gl5/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION BRIDGE #250189 EMERGENCY EXPRESS DESIGN BUILD: DIVISI0IV 6 PRELIM. RDWY PLAIVS BRIDGE #: 250189 SUBMITTAL #: S-OOI SUBMITTAL DATE: 5 /11 /17 OOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES GOMPLETEO HYDRAULICS ENGINEER P E. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.fi. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 6 :t1VC'S9,�il1[DLlli'I'� II']L.�:VS DO hOT USG �OR RfW ACpU15ITiON I�1[31� II.�A'ilIINAIE�'�" 1[�LAI`�� DO NOT L�SE F02 CO.�'STRVCTIOV WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 -L- 19+75 to 21+18 1@50' 21" Cored Slab 0.02 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 51 TOTALS*: 0.02 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0 51 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Fil1=912.9 sqft Excavation=41.2 sqft Hand Clearing=642.9 sqft 2013 10 24