20070245 Ver 6_401 Application_20170617

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
a ,, LP
MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20005
1� CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0005
�'� 5090.12
BEMD
%.l JUN 0 6 2011
From: Commander, Marine Corps Installations East -Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune
To: Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Brad Shaver
Subj: APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESS ROAD TO THE MARINE CORPS SPECIAL
OPERATIONS COMMAND BATTALION COMPANY/TEAM FACILITIES P1219 AND
COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT FACILITY P1288 ON MARINE CORPS
INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE
Encl: (1) Pre -Construction Notification Form for the Construction of
SOF Marine Battalion Company/Team Facilities, P1219 and
Combat Service Support Facility, P1288 on Marine Corps
Installations East -Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCIEAST-
MCB CAMLEJ)
The enclosed application to discharge fill into Section 404 wetlands
to construct an access road for the Marine Corps Special Operations
Command (MARSOC) Battalion Company/Team Facilities, P1219 and Combat
Service Support Facility, P1288 on MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ is submitted for
your review and approval. The application is a request to modify the
existing MARSOC Department of the Army Permit, Action ID No. 2007 286
067 that was issued 27 Nov 2007.
2. Camp Lejeune proposes to permanently fill 0.057 acres of Section
404 wetlands to construct a new access road as described in the
application.
3. The point of contact for this project is Ms. Jessi Baker,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
G -F at telephone [phone] or email [e-mail].
Sincer%e�ly,
HN R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of the
Commander
Copy to:
NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section, Attn: J. Burdette
NCDENR, DWQ, WRO, Attn: R. Mairs

�o� va a rFRpG
1 1 i o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: IP#2007286067, 11/27/2007.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
MARSOC P1219 individual Permit Modification Project
2b. County:
Onslow
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
Not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
F R P R I t
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: The United States Marine Corps Camp Lejeune
4b. Name:
Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
Public Works Design Civil Branch
4e. City, state, zip:
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
4f. Telephone no.:
910-451-3238 extension 3285
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Richard Harmon, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
AMEC Foster Wheeler
5c. Street address:
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27703
5e. Telephone no.:
919 381-1366
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
436000377695
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.57651138 Longitude: 77.43356323
1c. Property size:
1224 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Everett Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA; HQW
2c. River basin:
White Oak (New River)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of an existing gravel road and associated drainage items, overhead utilities and undeveloped forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 254
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 35456
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is the construction of a new access road to the new P-1219 facilities. See the attached project description.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project construction may utilize a bulldozer, backhoe, motor grader, and roller. See the attached project description.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Action ID 2007 286
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑X Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Tetra Tech
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A jurisdictional determination was completed for the Camp Lejeune Stone Bay 1224 project. This jurisdictional determination was approved on May
14, 2013, Action ID: 2007 286.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes ❑ No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A Department of the Army Provisional Permit 2007 286 067 was issued for the site on November 27, 2007.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.057
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.057
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b. 5c.
Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres)
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number–
Permanent (P) or
—Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
No
B2
No
B3
No
B4
No
B5
No
Corps
B6
No
Fill
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Realignment of the pipe with the roadway prism will allow the pipe to hydrate the downstream wetlands. The pipe replacment construction activities
will completed from the existing gravel path and surrounding disturbed area in order to avoid and minimize equipment wokring in wetlands to the
maximum practicable.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Although wetlands will be avoided as much as possible, any equipment use in wetlands will utilize mats. Trees may need to be cleared for mat
installation but no grubbing will take place. See attached permit drawing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
The proposed replacement of the undersized 15-inch RCP with a new 30-inch RCP will restore the historic wetland hydrologic connection between
the two sides of the wetland separated by the existing gravel road. The existing undersized 15-RCP was installed at such an elevation that is too
high to allow for normal flows within the wetland. According to the USACE project manager, the restoration of the historic wetland hydrologic
connection between the portions of the wetland separated by the existing gravel road will provide necessary compensatory mitigation for project.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project will not generate stormwater.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Onslow County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: US Fish and Wildlife Re
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes 0 No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached.
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.
Yes X No
The project qualified for USMC CATER 34 (New Construction) which has been
Comments: documented in the 2009 Grow the Force EIS ROD and in a 2017 Decision Memo.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
MCB Camp Lejeune environmental staff refer to and compy with the Camp Lejeune Intergrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP),
which is required by Dol) and approved by USFWS and NOAH.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper. htm.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The Camp Lejeune Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP). The ICRMP is required by the Dol) and approved by SHPO.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project is located in FEMA Flood Zone X, the area at a higher elevation than the one percent annual flood hazard.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Maps. FEMA FIRM number 3720436000J, Panel 4360, revised 11/3/05.
N A4 I
A."A
M
5.2517
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent Signature
(Agent's signature is valid U if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Project Description
SOF Marine Battalion Company/Team Facilities (P-1219) has been sited on a portion of the
MARSOC base property that required a new access road to serve the new buildings. The new
road will impact a small area of existing wetlands on each side as a result of the new road
section and shoulders width and cross drainage pipe required from the current gravel single
lane path there now. There is an existing 15 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) under the
existing gravel path that is undersized. The existing RCP will be replaced with a new 73 feet of
new 30 -inch RCP to accommodate flows form the approximately 13 -acre drainage area above
the existing pipe. A new fence will also be erected. The proposed culvert replacement project
will result in wetland fill impacts of approximately 2,484 ft' (0.057 acre). Equipment to be used
includes a bulldozer, backhoe, motor grader, and roller. Work is estimated to require thirty days
to complete.
The proposed replacement of the undersized 15 -inch RCP with a new 30 -inch RCP will restore
the historic wetland hydrologic connection between the two sides of the wetland separated by
the existing gravel road. The existing undersized 15 -RCP was installed at such an elevation
that is too high to allow for normal flows within the wetland. Based on personal communication
with Brad Shaver of the USACE on May 3, 2017, the restoration of the historic wetland
hydrologic connection between the portions of the wetland separated by the existing gravel road
will provide necessary compensatory mitigation for the proposed project. Additional
compensatory mitigation will not be required.

r
Ag
J UNCLASSIHED//FOP OfICIAL USL ONLY
LEGEND
• //�� EXISTING CONTOUR SURFACE
POPOSED CONTOUR SURFACE
EXISTING EDGE ROAD GRAVEL g
EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
LIMITS OF E NBUFFER ZONE
( 1� EXISTING TREE
LI
EE LINEE
EXISTING CENTER UNE OF DITCH
• / sIp EXISTING ERUIUNDERGROUND
FI OPTIC
LI
EXISTING FIBER MAIN LINE
. �� / /� , /• /. i��� '• E. EXISTING FORCE MAIN E
i
I_, WE7Lyq EXISTING STORY SEWER PIPE
AREA EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE
/ +
' EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
FES G-1 / /a + ./ EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
EXISTING TOE OF DITCH MY t+• a• fw'• JLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
/ / �!/ j �'� / ~ •+ +j E [ IMPACTED
WEILAND AREA TO BE CLEARED
WETLAN AREA TO BE
WEILAN
+/
✓� i/ j .
1277 FT' OF WETLAND / + Y
AREA XIPACiEO / lit•llj� ��
UNCLASSIFIED//FOP, OFFICIAL USE
O
•FES G-2 a
a
�s` � � � •� My ouTa/.00'
30•/ RCP
i�
(/
,.
$ i1 W
WETLAND
5 AREA IMPACTED� \
I
]�
i it _
N'1X(('iB •
i/ /,
��
I & `
•/ "/ / yam/ 1721 FF' WETLAND AREA TO BE
`/ 1` 1
��
/• IAm
•� CLEARED TO 6' IN HEIGHT. DO
%WETLUIO• a I NOT GRUB DR MSTUBS SOILS
/ AREA WRING DING AND FENCE
/i I ` ` % INSTALLATGRARIN.
i Ia
J�
la `1
\\v /
/ a 1
uu oryrx
it
!+/
A TO BE . . . .. .
2550 FT' WETLAND AREA TO BE
CLEARED TO 6' IN HEIGHT. DO NOT
ONLL
7W~F
k7¢O
/�/"
i y GRUB DR DISTURB SOILS WRING
\• \ a OVERHEAD POWER LINE INsrALunox
+
\\
ii
aU d
WLL]
g
3
�
a ♦
a
R\ a
W
Z W
t�!
LL
OXWiJ
NdeQ-
� ` ••8a
OU
a
al �
+
•
N
GRAPN� scALE: r 10
W
6
LL
\"\ !/ �e�
any` I
10 D 10 60' �
Q�
Z�
p Vl
As aT.
ll
AREA T A:;:?. 2 AREA ?
WETLAND
BGALE. ,'•IO
- AREA 1 AREA , A
r,.•b.
BDE
-FIG 1
UNCLASSIFIED//FOP, OFFICIAL USE
O