20170669 Ver 1_401 Application_20170526

May 26, 2017
Mr. Kyle Dahl
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
65 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Ms. Jennifer Burdette
N.0 Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Nationwide No. 121 Section 10
Water Quality Certification 4086 Notification Only
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement Project
New Hanover County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
CO
COTES y
Py
HDR, Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), on behalf of the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA), is
submitting a preliminary jurisdictional determination and Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) application for
Section 404 approval through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit (NWP)12 and
Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act for construction activities associated with the proposed Pump Station 10
Force Main Replacement Project in New Hanover County (Figures 1 and 2).
Project Purpose
CPFUA operates and maintains a large wastewater collection system. To maintain the integrity of the
collection system, CFPUA has implemented a robust Asset Management Plan that influences all activities and
decisions of the Authority. The Pump Station 10 force main, which is one of the key assets for CFPUA,
conveys wastewater from much of the downtown area of the City of Wilmington via a 30 -inch force main to the
James A. Loughlin (Northside) Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), The Asset Management Plan stated the
probability of failure for this force main was high based on the condition and age of the force main.
Additionally, due to size, location adjacent to surface waters, and a lack of redundancy for event management,
the consequence of failure is also high. Therefore the primary purpose of the proposed project is to implement
the results of the CFPUA's Asset Management Plan to prevent a serious failure of key assets and to protect
the environment by improving collection system reliability. This will be accomplished by replacing the 49 year
old Pump Station 10 Force Main. It is important to mention, in the event of a break on the new force main, the
existing force main could be put back into service as a redundant route to prevent a multi-million gallon spill to
surface waters. This option is not part of this project but will be looked at as an option for future projects.
hdrinc.com
555 Fayetteville St., Suite 900, Raleigh NC 27601
T 919.232.6654 F 919.785.1187

Project Description
The alignment of the proposed force main starts near Pump Station 10 and follows the existing gravity sewer
line (progressing east and then northeast) for approximately 975 feet. At that point, open cut trenching ends
and horizontal directional drilling begins (Plan Sheet OOC-02). The directional drilled segment crosses
underneath Smith Creek and the Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway (MLK Jr. Parkway), passing between the
bents of the MILK Jr. Parkway, and underneath the entrance/exit ramp. Directional drilling will terminate inside
the fence of the WWTP (Plan Sheet OOC-003). From this point the open cut trenching will resume and follow
the WWTP plant road until connecting to an existing force main. The total length of this force main route is
approximately 4,000 linear feet, including 1,900 linear feet of pipe installed by horizontal directional drill
methods.
Project Purpose
The primary purpose of the proposed project, as detailed in the Engineering Report/Environmental Information
Document, is to replace the existing force main connecting Pump Station 10 to the James A. Loughlin
(Northside) Wastewater Treatment Plant. The asset management plan predicted a high probability of failure for
this force main based on existing condition and age.
Ownership
The project alignment is owned by 3 landowners; Cameron Company Limited, NCDOT, and CFPUA.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
HDR reviewed the proposed alignment for jurisdictional waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. The alignment was examined according to the methodology described in the USACE 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual, USACE Post-Rapanos guidance, the recent USACE Regional Supplement, and
the NCDWQ Guidance. On-site reconnaissance, conducted in August 2014, determined one jurisdictional
stream and three jurisdictional wetlands located within orjust outside of the proposed Study Area (Figure 3).
USACE Wetland Determination forms are attached. Table 1 provides a summary of the delineated features.
Table 1. Summary of Waters of the U.S. within the Study Area
Estimated
Amount of
Sheet No,
Aquatic
(from
Stream Impact # 8
Stream
Cowardti
Resource in
Class of
Project
Stream[Wetland
Latitude
Longitude
Classification
on
Classification
Study Area
Aquatic
Planset)
Name
(If for
Resource
streams or
ac for
wetlands)
OOC-02
W1
34.2583
-77.9214
PEM2R/
< 0.2
non
section 10
PEMSR
— non -tidal

Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
This project has been reviewed on the SHPO website (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) and the National Register
of Historic Places (NRNP) and no known structures or historic districts were located within the Study Area.
Federally Protected Species
HDR obtained and reviewed a list of federally protected species for New Hanover County from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new hanover.html), which
was last updated on April 2, 2015. HDR conducted on-site visits in August 2014 and determined the Study
Area only exhibits habitat for the northern long-eared bat and no other federally -listed species. The northern
long-eared bat roosts singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or in crevices of both live and dead
trees (typically >_ 3" dbh) and the Study Area has areas of forest that meet these criteria. A USFWS IPAC self
certification letter was submitted on May 2, 2017 (see attached).
Estimated
Amount of
Aquatic
Sheet No.
(from
Stream Impact # &
stream
C
Resource in
Class of
Project
StreamlWetland
Latitude
Longitude
Classification
Classification
Classification
Study Area
Aquatic
Planset)
Name
(If for
Resource
streams or
ac for
wetlands)
non
OOC-02
W2
34.2573
-77.9218
PEM1 R
< 0.01
section 10
— non -tidal
OOC-02
S1 (Smith Creek)
34.2573
-77.9232
Perennial
R1UB2/3
175
Section 10
— tidal
OOC-02,
W3
34.2568,-
-77.9225
PSS1/PFO1
0.75
non
section 10
OOC-03
— non -tidal
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
This project has been reviewed on the SHPO website (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) and the National Register
of Historic Places (NRNP) and no known structures or historic districts were located within the Study Area.
Federally Protected Species
HDR obtained and reviewed a list of federally protected species for New Hanover County from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new hanover.html), which
was last updated on April 2, 2015. HDR conducted on-site visits in August 2014 and determined the Study
Area only exhibits habitat for the northern long-eared bat and no other federally -listed species. The northern
long-eared bat roosts singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or in crevices of both live and dead
trees (typically >_ 3" dbh) and the Study Area has areas of forest that meet these criteria. A USFWS IPAC self
certification letter was submitted on May 2, 2017 (see attached).

We are hereby requesting a preliminary jurisdictional determination for delineated waters of the U.S. and
authorization to construct the proposed Project under a Section 404 NWP 12 and Section 10 Permit. If you
have any questions or require additional information after your review of the enclosed information, please
contact me at Jessica.tisdale()hdrinc.com or 919-232-6654.
Respectfully,
HDR
Jessica Tisdale
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Topographic Quad: Castle Hayne
Figure 2. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Environmental Features
Pre -Construction Notification
Regulatory Review Plans
Request for Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination Form
USACE Wetland Data Forms
DWI Engineering Report Funding Approval Letter
USFWS I PAC Self Certification Letter
Cc: Craig Wilson — CFPUA Project Manager
Eric Williams - HDR

Figure 1
Cape Fear Pubhc Utillly Authority i Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement 404/Section 10 Permit Application

Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority I Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement 1404/Section 10 Permit Application

i911
f
01
.A
N 23rd St
James A` Loughlin VVWTP
Environmental Features
FIGURE 3
Legend
�.
Y
Study Area
I _ #%
Proposed FM Replacement Project Alignment
Q Pump Station
Delineated Wetlands (within con. easement)
r"
Q NRCS Soils
FEMA Zones
500 year Floodplain
h i
4`.
Q Floodwayl100-year floodplain
. . . . . . .
NWI Wetlands
�N
. . .
1 inch = 250 feet
0 250
500
..
n
..P.°ar.... . -
Feet
N 23rd St
James A` Loughlin VVWTP
Environmental Features
FIGURE 3

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
FN
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verged by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement
2b.
County:
New Hanover
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wilmington
2d.
Subdivision name:
not applicable
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
not applicable
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See attached landowner table in regulatory review plans
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
not applicable
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address:
not applicable
3e.
City, state, zip:
not applicable
3f.
Telephone no.:
not applicable
3g.
Fax no.:
not applicable
3h.
Email address:
not applicable

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: CFPUA
4b. Name:
Craig Wilson, Project Engineer
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
4d. Street address:
235 Government Center Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
4f. Telephone no.:
910-332-6474
4g. Fax no.:
910-332-6535
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jessica Tisdale
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
HDR Engineering
5c. Street address:
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
5e. Telephone no.:
919-232-6654
5f. Fax no.:
919-232-6642
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
PIDs: R04807-001-010-000 (CFPUA), R04807 -001-006-
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
000 (Cameron Company Limited), D.B. 3118 PG 12
(NCDOT), R04100-005-001-000 (CFPUA)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.2585 Longitude: - 77.9201
1c. Property size:
3.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Smith Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C, Swamp Waters (Sw)
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Land use within the project vicinity is a mix of developed lands (commerce and employment center areas),
conservation areas along Smith Creek, and other forested areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are three wetlands that the project will cross beneath with the horizontal directional drill. The total acreage of
wetlands within the study area is approximately 1 acre.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Smith Creek will be crossed diagonally approximately 190 feet by using horizontal directional drilling methods.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the proposed project as detailed in the Engineering Report/Environmental Information Document,
is to replace the existing force main connecting Pump Station 10 to the James A. Loughlin (Northside) Wastewater
Treatment Plant. The Asset Management Plan predicted a high probability of failure for this force main based on existing
condition and age.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The alignment of the proposed force main starts near Pump Station 10 and follows the existing gravity sewer line
(progressing east and then northeast) for approximately 975 feet. At that point, open cut trenching ends and horizontal
directional drilling begins (Plan Sheet OOC-02). The directional drilled segment crosses underneath Smith Creek and the
Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway (MLK Jr. Parkway). Directional drilling will terminate inside the fence of the WWTP (Plan
Sheet OOC-03). From there, open cut trenching will resume and follow the WWTP plant road until connecting to an existing
force main. The total length of this force main route is approximately 4,000 linear feet, including 1,900 linear feet of force
main installed by horizontal directional drill methods.
Standard construction equipment will be used, such as excavators, backhoes, hauling trucks, and horizontal directional
drilling equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
(acres)
Temporary
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts due to horizontal directional drill methods
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact length
number -
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
(linear feet)
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(Corps - 404,
width
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
10
(feet)
DWQ — non -
404, other)
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No stream impacts due to horizontal directional drill methods

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flo
ode
d
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No pond impacts
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then
you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
,
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
required?
B1 ❑PEI
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
EI Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: There are no regulated buffers within the project area.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Smith Creek and wetlands within the construction footprint will be avoided by utilizing a horizontal directional drill (HDD).
The HDD has been placed in the Peedee Formation which has dense sands, limestones, and cemented sands therefore
placement will guard against a potential frac-out event.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be employed prior to construction and maintained throughout the duration of
the project. HDD drilling slurries will be captured onsite and will be appropriately disposed of by the contractor. The
contractor is required to have a response and clean-up plan in the event of a frac-out.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: See attached DMS letter.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: There are no state regulated buffers for the project area.

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project does not increase impervious
surfaces or stormwater flows.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
10

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
See attached Engineering Report Funding Approval letter from the Division of
® Yes ❑ No
Water Infrastructure dated March 10, 2017. The project is below the minor
construction activities outlined in 15A NCAC 01 C.0408 and was deemed exempted
from inter -agency review and preparation of additional environment documents is
not required.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is a wastewater force main replacement project with the intent to prevent a serious failure of the existing 30"
force main and to protect the environment by improving collections stem reliability.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable
11

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
Impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
An IPAC self certification review letter was submitted to the USFWS Raleigh field office on May 2, 2017. A "No Effect"
biological conclusion was determined for all threatened and endangered species within New Hanover County except for
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) which was determined as a "not likely to adversely affect". Approximately 0.7 acres of
forested area will be Geared due to this project, these areas are considered NLEB habitat. This project will rely upon the
findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the NLEB and activities excepted from
take prohibitions to fulfill the project-specific Section 7 responsibilities. Also, it has been determined that this project would
not affect bald eagles. The attached IPAC self certification review letter is attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
EFH Mapper (http://www.habitat.nosa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapperrindex.html)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The HPO website (hftp://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb) was reviewed on May 2, 2017 for historic properties in and nearby the
project. It is not anticipated any National Register listed or eligible properties will be impacted.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
__F8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project is simply a force main replacement project that would
not alter the floodplain dynamics in the area since it will be a horizontal directional drill within the FEMA-designated
floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Zone AE (100-year floodway)
/1 c-.S
D. '
�xf}R�' � "�',� . ` ljr
�e
/ � G I<' M9 �yy •'N Eta JK y ' Atc
Carel Vandermepden. CFPUA
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is av(ded,
12

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Carel Vandermayden, Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, 235 Govemment Center Drive, Wilmington, NC 28403
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
See cover letter
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: New Hanover
City: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.2573 ON; Long. -77.9232 °W_
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Smith Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
175 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Rlverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 1.0 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested/Emergent/Scrub-shrub
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
r-] Field Determination. Date(s):
THAT
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
wh re checker[ and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
7 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appicant1consultant.
'H Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
R USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K Castle Hayne
© USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: NRCS GIS layer
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI GIS layer
L_ 1 State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
aFEMA/FIRM maps: NC Floodplain Mapping Program digital Flood maps
E❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is;
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date); or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary J D finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later lurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjProject/Site:
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement City/County,n/lds3d'p i Sampling Date: ✓) I
ApplicantfOwner: Cape Fear Public Utility A 11 uthority State: Nc- Sampling Point:,Vi
Investigator(s):'' '' Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope terrace, etc.): < ( Local relief (concave, convex, none) Slope
�. : IZ.. i >,` ! ° i '� �!. _Datum.—
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): flLat: � Long: � - j{`- •
Soil Map Unit Name: VQ ``> r )V'�` NWI classification: P ��
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation lA Soil _ A or Hydrology _j()_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y No
Are Vegetation 4_, Soil JA or Hydrology to naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Yes -No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Yes 5° No
Primaro Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
— Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Iron Deposits (135) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_, Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
rro�u vuam •wuvna.
Surface Water Present?
r
Yes No Depth (inches): 2�t,011'A
Water Table Present?
Yes)No Depth (inches): � r a, c.L
Saturation Present?
Yes �O_ No Depth (inches): � tA'(�
incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspe
Remarks:
�!F' - y' Lirab.S
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: V`f I �J
Tree Stratum (Plot size:. )
° Cover .Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2..
Y-,�~ �
Total Number of Dominant
3,
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
__�„-,_,
plino Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
,,,,.
2.
�� G—
FAC species x3=
��
species x4=
�'�
UPL species x5=
UPL s
.'
4' -
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
6. ..............
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Vn..#. inn 1.411—Mrs-
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Piot size:
2.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
tHertt Stratum (Plot size:4P A -4,1W
�d )
2. D t[yif3�7idh+t�'t'r(AYiW is
3,
JA10 IP16L
8.
10._
Total Cove
50% of total cover: 2_r) 20% of total cover: -
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.^`
3. ..
4.
5.
Total Cover
50°x6 of total cover: 20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is X50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes 4__ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: „j `, D j2
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features
Color (!DoW) % Type' Loc Texture Remark§
AA
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes �L_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement City/County: /ZN 1 t Y' +l r' --*'- Sampling Date: 2�5 /-7 I V
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority State: Sampling -fie
ApplicApplicant/Owner:_ �� P 9 Point:
Investigator(s): S t 7,a . s� 1 ;_, ' Sda 1 � Section, Township, Range: i Yktt { h
Landform (hillslope, terrace, e1c..7):,r ( W ' Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Laltt:' ' Long: 7) �� �' I Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Do t-4� /
sn
n I!
✓L 't'f - Da ` jf6rZ NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ' : No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil j:` or Hydrology_l}significamtly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation i" , Soil, or Hydrology t^ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
inditors (mjntmum bf twa r it
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313) —
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _Marl
Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _Drainage
Patterns (1310)
Y- Saturation (A3) —
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) —
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) —Other
(Explain in Remarks) _
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
_._.....-
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X- No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes �_ No
Yes No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Saturation Present?
includes capilla Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
CyPGt�r'�
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2,
3
4,
5.
6,
Sampling Point: n �'
Absolute Dominant Indicator T—DomnanceTest worksheet:
% cover SRecies7 Status Number of Dominant Species
_ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
a lino Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
4. .............. ....... ; ,
5.
d
of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Shrub (Plot size:
4yel
OBL species
2. Ad 1t1t4�!� fit✓
Areg-
3,
FAC species
4.
FACU species
5.
UPL species
6.
=Total Cover t
(A) (B)
50% of total cover:
I��J 20% of total cover:
Herb SICAturn( lot size: f� )
3. r p& aameri lank.
_ANr
4. 81A1, € f' { ! :° dV+
6.
a--
8.
9. u' . ....... ... _._..._
10.
11.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species �+
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: f (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
a0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _ to
Woogy Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5, Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present?
Yes _X?_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
document the indicator or
Sampling Point:' !
Depth Matrix ..., Redox Features
(inch j _ of(moist) ., °h Color (M ' _ % Type'LciTg�Q Remarks
Ty�eW CmConcentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR9, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Si
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _,,,,
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 8, T. U) ,,,,,,_
2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
— Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (LRR P, 8, T)
_
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1530)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
` Redox Depressions (F8)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:.
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes )II _ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement City/County: �l �� AiYtrti:%� -�` 1 J
Sampling Date:
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority I � -�
Applicant/Owner. _ State �` ; Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): > iw .r _"Y Fi I.F Section, Township, Range: (�/i i ,. "[')t
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): + Local relief (concave, convex, none) tr Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ( v, te= Lat: ,3 f `���' ' Long: �. �U";' Y� Oa m:
Soil Map Unit Name: �%Y' �i/�9i�_ NWI classification: �^� -� =,,ry
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation h Soil " , or Hydrology it significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes )e No
Are Vegetation '^ Soil V_, or Hydrology °� _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Y No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes }' No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reggjfed)
Primary Indica14rs (minimum of qne is required: check
all that app)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes –�— No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): i r
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth ([Aches):., r r t ft .
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
............................ _
......_.._....._._......._..._
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:.
Remarks:
try IA ve !y
t
4;
121d
f--�,'j
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
�F
3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Treetr (Plots' e: )
1. 1i� U rt{YYtr�tjc` IE fI
° Cover Status
3a fi
—_ -W
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
3 ; �'R� Mt t{ l<" I , : f } i �2 G •i dG{
1d, �1! ;r�AG
T
4.
3.
4.
5.
6. ^�
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
20% total
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: U� )
of cover:
4,
5,
—
6 .W. ....... ...._
Total Cover
50% of total cover: ,�� 20% of total cover. -�
(Plot size: $D )
/m1 cif !!i
AU F4 (-_I
i.
2. Af, 1`4056,4A-,
4.-
5..c�-
r
6.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: t
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: /0 )
2.
3.
4.
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: W
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: rf (A)
Total Number of Dominant r
Species Across All Strata: / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t) (AB)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
_
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: _ (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes I_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: W
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: rf (A)
Total Number of Dominant r
Species Across All Strata: / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t) (AB)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
_
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: _ (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes I_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
FO
or
Sampling Point: M-0
Depth Maus± co I I Red4.E�-, •7.
T r Remarks
(inches) _olor L 1131_ --ffi
'Type: C=Concentratlon, D"Ip eiion. RM=Reduced Matrix, , MS=Masked Sand Grains, 'Location PL Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric S<
Histosol (Al)
! Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) T
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LIAR P, S, T)
J Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (FB)
(MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MCRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_,_,. Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Sandy Redox (S5)
! Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MCRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
— Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type;.
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes N No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement +t# L
ProjecUSite: CitylCounty: 1) r �A, (f'e ' Sampling Date: /J
Applicant/Owner: Cape Fear Public Utility Authority State. i '' Sampling Point: t� I � qfy-
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: V I hr
�, U V)• r Local relief concave, convex, none): /IMV Slope
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): � t� ` 1 ( ) y
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): LILfZ--F Lat: 1`10 �-?3,4,i"tJ Long: :�-}b S5 � �� Datum:
S,
Soil Map Unit Name:...!)O - (d t Al �. r t �� � � � rN"'z (- " NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —�— No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _h}_, Soil , or Hydrology _� significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Yes No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indi n�tgm tmini urn_mof two recuiredl
Primgryr .Indcators (minimum of one
is required: h all h
_Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
�.
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
-Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No k
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
—
3U
Absolute
"
Dominant Indicator
'
Dominance Test worksneet:
Tr
ratu (Plotsize; )
S
Cove r
e ? Status
Number of Dominant Species TDA
That Are OBL, FACW, FAC: (A)
1
t/1 U
or
2
Yr.`s �.'. l r ice"—
1 ✓1k.
Total Number of Dominant
/
3.
ft1 I /t> .`f r" P1 of
A%l/ AI�Species
Across All Strata: (B)
-
Percent of Dominant Species 00
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
L!
=Total Cover
.... ...._................... ..... .... ....
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30
'?/
Total % Cover of I Multiply by:
species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
SaipOBL
li r Plot s�}e: --)
�'-r^
t s.
C �L,1'lt.
FACW species x2=
lt � 1'�G�t�rdt
2,
x� f,.r �� rt`�,. �� VrY ik'l /.a�
t FLr�I
FAC species x 3 =
3
/ Gd f7 (r9 t YC7 i!1!r
FACU species x4=
_
UPL species x5=
4.
"""'""— ....
_.... -"
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
_. _
Prevalence Index = B/A =
-Total Cover /
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
,�
20% of
total cover: '/'
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: °y )
le f #�
r-46-
) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
"`
1..1L1A1..11L^
'. Y _,� _.
3 Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.
M t1A 11 A_ V i k� r n' Q h A.
6&4V
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
..._.
/
4
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
3 0
= Total Cover /.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(p /
H r StraIM (Plot size: _ )
i-
/0
1 1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
!"Iw y'Y1, l f/?/ ' r? 'w
L-1�
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
V filer/ kyr ,��
/D
-k-Ya, SAG
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
Yi1/JY�'1 o'f Ge r� d"liC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5
_._.........,.._.
. —
6.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
7
-
----- ---
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
B.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
z'
f
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4,
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
!;-the depth needed to
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _ °� _ Color (moist] % ?Y�� hoc
a
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
T Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Sampling Point:
Texture _ Remarks .___�....._.
z
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=MaV(x..,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1150B)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726 -
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: May 01, 2017
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0508
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Project Name: CFPUA Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http: //www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentB irdls sues/Hazards/towers/towers. htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
httn://www.fws. eov/mieratorvbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.mnfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0508
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Project Name: CFPUA Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement
Project Type: WASTEWATER FACILITY
Project Description: Project Purpose
The Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CPFUA) operates and maintains
a large wastewater collection system. To maintain the integrity of the
collection system, CFPUA has implemented a robust Asset Management
Plan that influences all activities of the Authority. Pump Station 10 force
main, which is one of the key assets for CFPUA, conveys much of the
downtown area of the City of Wilmington via a 30 -inch force main to the
James A. Loughlin (Northside) Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).
The Asset Management Plan showed that the probability of failure for this
force main was high based on the condition and age of the force main.
Additionally, due to size, location adjacent to surface waters, and a lack
of redundancy for event management, the consequence of failure is also
high. Therefore the primary purpose of the proposed project is to
implement the results of the City's Asset Management Plan to prevent a
serious failure of key assets and to protect the environment by improving
collection system reliability. This will be accomplished by replacing the
49 year old Pump Station 10 Force Main. In the event of a break on the
new force main, the existing force main could be put back into service as
a redundant route to prevent a multi-million gallon spill to surface waters.
Project Description
The alignment of the new (replacement in-kind) force main starts near
Pump Station 10 and follows the existing gravity sewer line (progressing
east and then northeast) for approximately the first 975 feet. At that point,
open cut trenching ends and directional drilling begins (Figure 1). The
directional drilled segment crosses underneath Smith Creek and the
Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway (MLK Jr. Parkway), passing between the
bents of the MLK Jr. Parkway and underneath the entrance/exit ramp.
Directional drilling terminates inside the fence of the WWTP. From there,
open cut trenching resumes, following the WWTP plant road until
connecting to an existing force main. The total length of this pipe route is
approximately 4,000 linear feet, including 1,900 linear feet of pipe
installed by Horizontal Directional Drill.
Environmental Impacts

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262 3
The proposed alternative will require a 50 -foot wide temporary
construction corridor and will disturb approximately 3.7 acres of land. An
additional approximate 30 -foot wide permanent maintenance easement at
the beginning of each force main will be required and mowed periodically
to allow access for maintenance vehicles. The new maintenance easement
will total approximately 0. 19 acres. Erosion control devices will be
installed to comply with Clean Water Act Section 401 Stormwater
Requirements to account for impervious surfaces from the construction
access roads. There will be no permanent impervious surfaces after the
construction of this project. There will be no disturbance to wetlands or
streams within the footprint of the project (See attached plans).
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
htWs://www.google.com/maps/place/34.25850290703711N77.9201878351452W
Counties: New Hanover, NC
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 17 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species
on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area. Please contact the
designated FWS office if you have questions.

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.f\vs.goy/ecp/species/9045
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) Threatened
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/snecies/4469
Birds
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) Threatened
Population: except Great Lakes watershed
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.goy/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa) Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/­snecies/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/`species/7614

05/01/2017
Reptiles
NAME
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
STATUS
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Similarity of Appearance
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. (Threatened)
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Hawksbill Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1 1 10
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) Endangered
Population: Carolina DPS
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3252
Shortnose Sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: httR:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/,species/6635
Snails
NAME STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn (Planorbella magnifica) Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: ht2s:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216

05/01/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-01262
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecl/species/3281
Golden Sedge (Carex lutea) Endangered
There is a final critical habitat designated for this species. Your location is
outside the designated critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos,fws.gov/ecp/species/6025
Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth (4maranthus pumilus) Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
There are no critical habitats within your project area.

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: CFPUA Pump Station Force Main Replacement
Date: 4/28/2017
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Piping Plover
No suitable habitat; no
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Charadrius melodus
critical habitat
Red Knot
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Calidris canutus rufa
Red -cockaded
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Atlantic Sturgeon
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Acipenser oxyrinchus
ox rinchus
Shortnose Sturgeon
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Acipenser
brevirostrum
Cooley's Meadowrue
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Thalictrum cooleyi
Golden Sedge
No suitable habitat; no
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Carex lutea
critical habitat
Rough -leaved
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Loosestrife
Lysimachia
as erulaefolia
Seabeach Amaranth
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation, 08/07/2014
Amaranthus pumilus
Northern Long-eared
Forested suitable habitat
Not likely to adversely affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Bat
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
Myotis septentrionalis
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities.

American Alligator
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation
Alligator
mississippiensis
Hawksbill Sea Turtle
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation
Eretmochelys
imbricata
Kemp's Ridley Sea
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation
Turtle
Le idochel s kem ii
Leatherback Sea
No suitable habitat
No effect
Field visit confirmation
Turtle
Dermochel s coriacea
Loggerhead Sea
No suitable habitat; no
No effect
Field visit confirmation
Turtle
critical habitat
Caretta caretta
Bald eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No effect
No eagle permit required
Haliaeetus
bald eagles
leucocephalus
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Digitally signed by [e-mail]
[e-mail] DN:cn=[e-mail]
Date: 2017.05.01 14:25:40-04'00'
Signature /Title
4/28/2017
Date

Xk°ofg ral and
C"U orad RCSOUrCTS
ROI COOPER
SUSI H. H XIILTOiti
N C N H D E-3404
May 1, 2017
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) will replace an existing 30" gravity force main; the route is
approximately 4,000 linear feet, including 1,900 linear feet of pipe installed by Horizontal Directional Drill. ; 10
Dear Jessica Tisdale:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerCcDncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
,,,...Nothin Compares",.,
s",..,..
;'ate f..rtr. Cer�inajLie�,artr'r'.et2 �'�aturat anc CuEtrrat Ra c7;c�3(l�iafufai HerrCagE ;,.�,r�ra^
121 w J*fwn Rreet I Raleigh, rte' 27603
1651 Adan! ser Oce canter J Raleip, MG 27699., 6551,
www.ncnhaurz ; 919-7417.91(}7

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) will replace an existing 30" gravity force main; the route is approximately 4,000 linear feet, including 1,900 linear feet of pipe
installed by Horizontal Directional Drill.
Project No. 10
May 1, 2017
N C N H D E-3404
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
a—xonomiic- f,
D °-, dent fclame ~ 7 }< :°
mmori fi+Iame
Last
Group
State
Occurrence
Observation
Status
Rank
Rank
Rank
Date
Freshwater Fish
32417
Acipenser oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
2012-04-04
Mammal
24390
Corynorhinus rafinesquii
Eastern Big -eared Bat
2006 -Pre
E
5 -Very
macrotis
Special
G3G4T
Mammal
32126
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern Long-eared Bat
1994 -Post
Mammal 17664 Trichechus manatus West Indian Manatee
Reptile 34706 Farancia erytrogramma Rainbow Snake
Reptile 12976
Vascular Plant 30852
Ophisaurus mimicus Mimic Glass Lizard
Baccharis glomeruliflora Silverling
Vascular Plant 22454 Dichanthelium Hidden -flowered
cryptanthum Witchgrass
2012-08-18
2002-05-02
1967-06
1904 -Pre
1906-05-04
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Rank
E
4 -Low
Endangered
Endangered
G3
S2
E
5 -Very
Species of
Special
G3G4T
S3
Low
Concern
Concern
3
E
5 -Very
T -4(d)
Significantly
G1 G2
S2
Low
Rare
E
5 -Very
Endangered
Endangered
G2
S1 N
Low
E
3 -Medium
—
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
H
5 -Very
Species of
Special
G3
S1
Low
Concern
Concern
H
5 -Very
---
Special
G4
S1
Low
Concern
Historical
H
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4Q
S2
Low
Rare
Throughout
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
e
Northeast Cape Fear River Floodplain R1 (Exceptional) C1 (Exceptional)
Mana ed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation State
New Hanover County Open Space New Hanover County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at htt[)S7//ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on May 1, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2017. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

May 1, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E)
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
I -j
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:26,309
0 0.225 0.45 0.9 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Sources: Esd, HERE, DeLorme. InW nW. increment P Corp., GESCO, USGS.
FAO, NPS, NRCAN. G—Base, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan,
METI, Esri Ch.. (Hong Kang(,—sstopo. Mapmylndia, O Op—Su..".p
contributors, and the GIS User Community

United States Department of the
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 4/28/2017
Self -Certification Letter
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement Project
Dear Applicant:
f1Nf1LL R.OIJF7i
Interior tC
r
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
7" may
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect' determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
F1"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleigh(a_),fws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Lister Infrastructure
ENVIRONMENTAL Oi1ALITY
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
KIM H. COLSON
Director
March 10, 2017
Mr. Jim Flechtner, Executive Director
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
235 Government Center Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Engineering Report Funding Approval
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
Pump Station 10 Force Main Replacement
Project No. CS370923-10
Dear Mr. Flechtner:
The Division of Water Infrastructure (Division) has completed its review of the subject
engineering report. Based upon this review, the Division has determined that the referenced
project is eligible for funding as follows:
El�ible
Installation of approximately 4,000 LF of 30 -inch force main and appurtenances.
Based upon detailed review of the bid documents, the Division may determine that
portions of the project are not eligible for funding and the total loan amount may be reduced.
In accordance with G.S. 120-157.1 through 157.9, local government units with projects
that require debt to be issued greater than $1,000,000 must submit a letter to Committee Chairs,
Committee Assistant, and the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly at least 45 days
prior to presentation before the Local Government Commission. You are responsible for
submitting this letter and providing a copy to the Division.
Projects funded through the CWSRF program must comply with the federal Brooks Act
for the selection of architectural, surveying and engineering services. CWSRF projects cannot be
exempted from qualification -based selection of these services under N.C.G.S. 143-64.32. Submit
the Professional Engineering Services Procurement form (from our website) to document
compliance for any services to be reimbursed. Any services provided that are not selected in.
compliance with federal requirements are ineligible for reimbursement.
Please note that funding is contingent on meeting the schedule provided in your Letter of
Intent to Fund, or approved extension, as tabulated below:
-- `>'Nothing Compares':--,-...
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water infrastructure
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 1 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
919 707 9160

Mr. Jim Flechtner, Executive Director
March 10, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Milestone
Date
Submit Bid and Design Package
November 1, 2017
Obtain approval of Bid and Design Package:
March 1, 2018
Advertise Project, Receive Bids, Submit Bid Information, and
Receive Authority To Award
July 2, 2018
Execute Construction Contract(s)
August 1, 2018
If you have any questions, please contact Anita E. Reed, PE at anita.reed @ncdenr.gov or
[phone].
Sincerely,
Seth Robertson, PE, Chief
State Revolving Fund Section
Attachment — Categorical Exclusion.
cc: Eric Williams, HDR, Sunset Beach NC.
Mark Hubbard, PE, via email
Anita E. Reed, PE
Susan Kubacki, via email
James E. Baltzer, PE, via email
SRF File (EREID/ERAL)

Categorical Exclusion
North Carolina Division of Water Infrastructure
Project Applicant
Date:
Project Number:
Estimated Project Cost:
Estimated Funding Amount.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
March 10, 2017
CS370923-10
$4,00.1,970
$3,923,500
Project Description: The proposed project will replace the existing Pump Station 10 forcemain
with approximately 4,000 LF of 30 -inch force main and appurtenances.
The above named applicant will receive funding assistance from the State Revolving Fund
program to construct the wastewater facilities described above. The North Carolina Division of
Water Infrastructure (Division) has conducted a review of the project in accordance with the
NCGS §159G-38. The Division has determined that this project is below the minor construction
activities threshold outlined in 15A NCAC 01C .0408; therefore, the project is exempt from
inter -agency review, and the preparation of additional environmental documents is not required.
This determination shall become effective upon its distribution by the Division and will be
available on the Division's website (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wi/environmental-documents).
This determination can be revoked at any time adverse information is made available. The
documentation to support this decision will be on file with the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Infrastructure, and is available for public scrutiny
upon request.
Comments concerning this decision may be addressed to Ms. Jennifer Haynie, Environment and
Special Projects Unit, Division of Water Infrastructure, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699, or she can be reached by phone at [phone].
Sincerely,
/ZA;`___.
Seth Robertson, P.E., Chief
State Revolving Fund Section
Division of Water Infrastructure

�J
!"I
VICINITY MAP
a
Project No.
000000000221668
PWP STATgN 0
w PLAN
Wilmington, NC
REGULATORY
APRIL 2017
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
GENERAL
moot f.�v se..tvr+�Maora mnvawmwq.
mom a.iaa i.we.Pa ur..rr...e a.�.a Piq.aram
CML
mca Arm wwor ar iowomer iaoo
mcm PaeArr PMM�M Br ie.mrer naso
mcm PreAYm MPmis arn.mrsr v.is
Data Prsrin PrM.aY er n.rsrar.ew�m
mcm Pm. sam �wa.Pr�
mwe cr..ei.�arr
mcm s.weoar.
mca wnmrnv.a.ro+ar
mc�� Fm.a.c.�rao.mr
OPEN CIPO��
F+�C Nll���+
IMN

1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 5 1 8 1 7 1 8
SiTE PLAN SYMBOLOGY
,._. PUMP STATION 10
FORCE MAJ REPLACEMENT
MATERIALS IN PLAN/SECTION
GENERAL SYMBOLOGY
PROJECT NOTES
wain
acNLLa: s .IIAI11
p AAJC HILL
Cape Feer PIJWIG Utility AutherRy
Pt9e'9e9G U IL (3HI @Zliy WYml gto . NC
•�'��'"""'
Iw1.1E
®
DDG-az.B.9 I
""�T
nnr nn
�OGnON
1
E4RMNKYEM POPE
M1T ME SUSPENDED ABOK G,—E ME
MOUSIIGL CE(1NG nLE (SEC1KlN)
OF ERSBNG UTILITIES SHOYM ON TNESE PLMS RETE COMPILED BASED ON THE BEST MFTNM — AVNUBLE TNESE
LOGnONS ME NOT NRNOED 0 RE EXACT OR COMHFTE, THE CONT CII Si— COORDMAO WITH ALL UTILITY COLIPUNES
DESIGNATED W 1HE PRET-( W.
ASPHIIT (PW! OB 5MN.1 SG1E SE—)
:E 1NDIGlES
MD F1F1D YEFYY 111E u0cAlVN OF ALL N UIRES PRMR TO Cq3 RUCTON.
��
—T— IEIFPEKXIE WE
—N�
PLAN
2. ALL TIE -MS Si— BE SCNEWl1D AND COGmINAiED MIX T11E AUTHORM AT IEAST AB NWRS PR01t TO wKNG CONNECRW
O
VEGETAT (SIZE)
—E— DECOLC WE
ASPHALT (LVmE SLNE SECnW)
1/A' 1'-0"
3. THE CONTRACTOR 5 SOLELY RfSPONSIBUF MR SITE SARTY 550CNTED WRX THE WORK WDER iN5 PROJECT MO fOR
CONPUMCE MTH HL FEDBtN. STATE AND LOCAL HEALTH MO SAFETY UWS. CODES. REIWRATKIN^. MD MONMCES
O
TREE
INLLIxNNG BUT NOT LINKED TO —ISE WBREMLY MMGTD BY TIIE ccCUPAT SAFETY MD 11E11M —NIS --N
�0— F R
IJ
BATT MWUIXM! (SECTION)
SECIIW JEJ=
(OSHA).
O CO
CLEW OIIT
�— CAS %�
)U(,
FV.0 NGCATES GBECTI(N
- THE CONIRICTOR SHALL BE PFSPOI151&F FOX PRONOMG TXE ENGINEER WITH A SET OF RECORD (AS-0IALT) 02AVM1C5.
O W
4MNIIOLE
®
BRILK LIASCNRY (PLM/SECTION)
% OF SECTION Ct/T
RTNESE EQ UkiRN SHALL AT A MNIMUY SHOW THE TMAL LOGTION OF 111 INVfACUTIES. SEE SPECIFRAMNI 01720 FOR
—VCT— CI)Nm CJ�110N
QMW
MGIRGMJG WIIL
POTMLE TER
CNECIORED PUIE (PLw)
SE i Vld 15 IDGiED
S FEAR PUBLIC URLRT AUi11d8Ty. AOR ANp PROPEXIY OWNERS SIW1 BE MIOE N WRITING MD COPIED 0 THE CAPE
on
REZOMETE
-- -- MWS
SECTION Gln MARKER
B. ALL PN+E LtE/SUIPEYENTS SHOMM ME PUN lfiILTX 41FASUIEFD M HORIZONTAL Plus ONLY.
"'E1P
c'-11 NW PIPE
pIPEVIE
�
CONCRETE (PUN/SECTN)N)
). iORCE MYN 51M11 BE CONSTRUCTED ND MORE 1WN E' FROM EDGE aF NCIXJT R. DF RAv MD HAVE A OF J'
,p
L'J
4W x
Q LMCE fNPE11NE
CONLREIE MASONRY (PWT/SE- N)
YC110TI 1)FB
SECTION X
T mli
AL1GN MM IX5T%IG PROPERtt CGENEM. COWRICTORTEN IS TOFUSE E%I— RIGH - WAVY MONWENTSPoAND EXISTBK�Y
PROPEIM CORNERS TO PROPERLY INSTALL THE PIPE UNE AS MGGTED MOVE.
SRW 41CW
R(RlT 6 WAY YONUMERR
URIInY GIH STRUCTURE
BEN
®
DUJOl1ilON (—A—)�EET
}/8" - T'-0" XXX
ERE
B. NO OPEN CUTS ACROSS NCDOT ROMMAYS ME ALLOWED.
CB
ED
STOW DRNN GTCX BASIN
.Tyyyyy�.rM
vIETA5
-W
U181TY —TFIRTH
�JJ-Ll1�-Il RAIURON
(SECTION)
n
PST ClR
9. CONIM4TOR 5 RESPONSNIE FOR C00(BAli%t MM OVERHEAD URItt OWNER WHEN WORMNC NEW POLES MD 5
RESPONSIBLE MR WORK ASSOCNTD WIIN BRACNIC Mp SUPP0IDING 1HE POLES WRNC COHSTNUCIWN. CONTACT IXII(E
�O->PP
u<II'm POUF
- ~ E
—ER PANT MAT (PITH)
� �
ENERGY PROGRESS FOR COOROWnON MTH OVER18lD VTIUtt 55UES.
10. OTHER lITl1TY CGITACTS:
X �
P
TELEPEmNE OLE
+ E1AlIlPIw WATEAYMY
%%% SNEEF WHERE
GPE fFJR HIBl1C MIM AIRHORIIY (910)_}}2-8330
P0.E
—x—X— —EUNE
iMLSf1FD iR=, (SECTION)
DETML 5 —TM
DUNE ENERGY PROGRESS (840) -A52 -V77
NCDOT SNWlS (888}-01}_55p8
©
TELFPIKINE PEDESTAL
—__—��� PROPEIRY UNE
CW -LAM LUMBER (SECTY)N)
DETAL MARK D3
t MIEWE PIPES INSTALL- N NC OOT RSM OF II— TREES SNALL W CLEARED AND GRUBBED KONG THE TRENCH MDTN.
®
ELECTRICAL BOX
- CENTERLNE
DETAIL mmm
EXCEPT WHERE HPE 5 MSTAUED BY HORIZONTAL GR-TIONAL DR— WHERE HPE IS NSTAJJFD N PUBLIC UTEnY EASEMENTS.
cI1M AND GRUB EIITIRE MOTH Of EASEMENT. EXCEPT WHERE PIPE CROSSES IRI MEAS MD W HINT PROPERTY.
Y FX
FNEE HYMANf
--- -- - ROCK BERM
GIUNULM ERI. (s—)
DETAIL
12 PEMO.£ MD REPINE WITH EOU.LL OR BETTER LATERAL ALL IXbTNG PAYEYEMS, ORNEWATS, GMVEL ROARVIAYS, PIPE
Es—
WATER METER
—SF— SILT FENCE
GMTNG (SECTgN)
}• 1'-0'
REPRESEMATNE
CULVERTS. CULVERT HEIDW/J15, FENCES. BRIBOMDS. MWBOX6 MD MISCELLANEOUS REAS MNERE REWMtED TO COMPLETE
THE CONSiRUCMN.
IN
MLVE
------_ EASELEM
g2mGRATMC
(PUN)
DMWNG WHERE DETA6
WAS GLLED OUT
t}. PIPE INSTAW110N SHAl1 BE BY TRENp1 IXGVATON AND BK FlLL UNL65 OIHEPwISE NDRII ON THE DRAMNGS.
e
AM RELEASE VALVE
— — — — W� OE
+�
CRGIT (SECTION)
F1EVAl10N
DENTfIC TION
A SIWN£Y NFGiNATgN PROAOED BY ROBERT N. GOSIFE a ASSOCMTES. HORZONTAL GTW 5 BASED ON TMD 8}: YEIETICX
OAl W 15 BASED ON EILYO 1988.
gYH-x
YARD NYDRMT
---- Row
ELEVATION
t5. All MMdYME TO BE 318 STAMlE55 5TEEl.
T
rsGD SIGH
._ _.. wEruNo eaXID.Jrr
GYPsw Boum (SE—)
3. _ zxz
X75.5
FJOSRNG SPOT EIF.YATYN
...'.... TREE UNE
NEIN. (SEcmN)
POINT LiF WRKEIt
Cµ BE FO ND
=5.8
MISND SPOT EI—I
L
ORIENTED STRAND EMwtO (SEC1X]N)
SECTION, OR 0.TAR CALL -OUT MD
. M P, -AN MD—zm.
A
cp
CONTROL PGNT K
N— MRCE YUN
ME
NUMBER 5 REP ACED Eu MEE ,)SHEE
ABBREVIATIONS
FORcE M.W
®
BENCHMARK
—PS— FRESWRE SEWER
PLYWOOD (INCE SGIE 5ECR014)
SINGLE ELPNATION OR PHOTO HANKER
ABA10.......... ......ABMDOND ............._...1M1R¢aNTe1 rrr_..................... ..reGHT
(DENTe APPRO%WTE
—BWL— RECINUED Y/AIER UNE
LAD .... ......... ORTERENCE MT....... _..._....._..NIERSECIION RCP.... ........ ........RENFGiCD CONC HPE
ASPN...................ASPHALT INv ........................BNFRT RJP...._......... .......AESiRNNEO JGM HPE
.G IX
lDCN10N d SOY TEST HOLE
rumPLYWGIO
(SMALL SOME SECTIGI)
FIFMRON IERFR
APPROY...._... MPROIOWIELY IP.................... _....IRON HN SET .........................RIIW aF WAY
B/C...................... .B•CN aF CURB E..........................LFIWM 5................._..._..SGnH
�
OOWNGUY
WHIP ROM RWAM
PRECAST CONLIETE (PtuY/SECTON)
ARROW INDIGIES
% PGM Q NEW
BR...._........_._.....JBENcH NNR Ui._.......... _.........UNEAR FOOT10E 50...........__..........STORY CIRRIN
BRO...................... MARK SF..............._..._...SP W FOOT, SILT
m
EXTEROR PAOMOUNID TPINSFOAYER
BENCH
. ........
BBC .......................BEARING ro.......__...._.........PoIINO S/P FETICE...........SRN T RJL FENCE
CB...... GTCH BASIN lPPOLE SS........................SMRARY SEWER
—(0)— PROPOSED CONTOUR
RIGID (SEcmim) INSUNION
•SHEET WXEAE
......... ........ .........................l1CM
. ......................CURB AND GUilElt W.%..._......_..........MA%Xklll STA......._............_STATION
.
PoIE YOIINiD TRMSFOPTJER
ELFVAl10N 5 LOGTD
tlP..... _................fASF M PVEE YIN....... ..............YINMW 50................. ...STMOMO
CL_YONOSLA
Y
E3ECIRKJL WNDHGE OR AI.VIIIGE
®
MPRAP (PLM/mcwN)
......................CUEARMCE ... .......... .....MONWRHH: ...... ............ .....SIOEYMI.N
CMP ...CORRUGTW ML HPE ITTE............. ......... "ETN.TLE _.....
..T MMRY
CONS`— ..._...CONSTRUCTION NIS.. 0 SCALE TP.. .i ,TERSE PgNT
SEWEIME NUMBER
5A110 (SECTION)
...NOT
CIS........................DOD BOOK OH ..............,........OVER HEAD ELECTRIC T)1W ................. . 1W RIPE
INLET PROTECTX)N
ALW y
BOD
ELEVAININ LETTER
q.............._..._.....DROP INLET M.........................GT CENTER 1W...._..........._._..IYPMAL
dA........_.............IXVIETFR V/G....._...............UNOD GCI
PAVI. _..................PAYEYENT
iI r
(SECTION)
ARROW INgG1E5 PGNT OF
NEW E11YAnON
OP.._ .................... ORNEWAY PCB- ..................PREGST BOX CULVERT VE_............. _... ... NAIMK CLINE
GM .................._....pMEN5KK1 Pm... Oi WRVARIRE VERT................._Vmc5r L
TETIPOWNI' SEDIMENT TMP
WEEP JGNT
% x
...... ...........PGM
E_......................._FAST/EASING PFRY.....................PERMMQIT W_.........................WEST
PROlEC110N SYSTEM (SELTKN)
SmE.
% NDKAlES SNFET WHDE
G ................ ........EI1N W/.................._.....Wml
PC....._..__............PAGE WM..................._.WAIER
IEMPORMY DNFRSION
A-11 F1EVAilON IS IOGTEO
EIEV......_..............ELEIMTION METER
EM.............._.._..EITGE OF PAVEMEM PI......._..............._PoIM a NIEBSECTON W VHILi........._.....WATER VALIT
PK........_NAE SET
(GPADE TO DBNN)
®
M]OD - COxTM0005 (SECIpN)
...............PN
ES ............._FASEMEM WV......_........ _.
PP...... _. ................POWER PIXF .. ._.WATER VALVE
LHECK MW
1. TH5 IS A STANDARD SNER SNOW1NC COMMON
W000 BLOticING (SECTION)
KEY NOTE DESIGNATION
..._
E%5i................... 1IXS PROP.. .._.._.........PROPOSE- ?OP ............_.......51X11' PENN NAR SFT
F/C.......................F/.2 OF CURB PSE..._....__.... SW —T ......int
SYMBOLOGY. ALL SYMBOLS ME NOT NECESSMEY 15ED
THS
...PERM .:-...
FES ._ ........ .....EURO END SECl10N PT PONT OF TANGEHLI' _.........................NCH
MS
ROCK HPE INLET PROTECTION
ON PROJECT.
NOTE NWBER
.........................FIRE IIIDRWT PN ..................._...PONT aFV IM
FO........._..............HBEn OPTIC GMLE Pl1E.......... V11UTY ESIAT
2. SCRE TEE OR STMDNG OF MARK 5 USED TO
OR TO OE-EMPHAAiE
INpC TE EA911NG COMPONTo
�NEY
y
_..........PERM
GI.........................G15 vILVE.........................._.PADXIS
T
WATTLE
PROPOS- HAPRbAlO115 TO HSHJGIIT SELECTED
H
�-®-SF- SILT FENCE GfflFl
TRADE WORK. REFTR 0 CONIEM OF EACH SHEET
FOR 115ACE.
/—TARGET ELEVAIIUN
DESIGN- BY R. PILIN It, PE
CNE
"M CK- BY S. MCKELNE. P
.... _. ...... LW.E
P-_
Guw--B, c. HUNETcIrtr
SUWn EEoo NGaR.ee
xcacLauw N.rrm. W/20TTRE—T—
MlE ONTMEpM PM.IECTMII�ETI A21MS
,.•`M Dne9t�
f'+'0 %Csfr� "• *
,._. PUMP STATION 10
FORCE MAJ REPLACEMENT
GENERAL LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
AND GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
Cape Fear
wain
acNLLa: s .IIAI11
p AAJC HILL
Cape Feer PIJWIG Utility AutherRy
Pt9e'9e9G U IL (3HI @Zliy WYml gto . NC
•�'��'"""'
Iw1.1E
®
DDG-az.B.9 I
""�T
nnr nn
O
C
B
A

208-�20
It B
\ 8 r t
A10
�g
0 0
'' b -M FORCE NAM
lu A
a
-10 ._.__.. .. ___... I -10
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 13150 13!00 13+50 14+00 1_50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00
SF' n' 0 SD' V 25 r PRonLE PIPE CONPNlNN25LY UPGRADE
® ® OMZOMK �. OOwNG-1 TO AVOID MON POIHf$
HOPoZOMK SCAIF M FEE! \fRI1CIC.Y1 SCKE IN ill! VERTICK SCALE: 1'�5'
SIGNED BY R. PLUNMEFG PE -' PUMP STATION 10
CHECKED BY S. MCKELVR:. PE +�\N GAROV� r. FORCE MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
oRAYm w C. N1N1 _ Yss. , "�'"^� FORCE MA)N REPLACEMENT STA 10+00 TO STA 18+00
Cape Fear
i � I Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
ras s.Foo aM' }MPIeEF: SISI 11 €<€3€3-f€ pR.tEt[ ¢€;i€€ t7! wilmie¢roa� NC N.Ne ooc
oaten REcuutolm�cuutora PfAre wi�V�Vw ,I�..... w�..P�...,..,...
ala oFauslnN Paos6Yrr Nuru znee. s<:ALE As NOTED OOC-01
I
trNPf101ER IXISfNFG GRMItt SEAETY MIItRIIi
IXSTIFIC PWP STATION
1
MS 'WAi1011.
n
PROPERiy UNE
1
2. cooaaNATE NRN Au 1mlm6s PRRM ro
3 45' SENDS
CONSTRUCTgN TO VEPIFf IXSTNG UTADY
DUTKKK.
cft)ncNMCAL aDRE B-1
li
3. RECp2— ALL Rb.D SNWLDFTb. DiWNIDE
.
/
\'�
)>
ORCHES. AND SLAKES MSTURBED 9Y CONSTRUCTION E
ACTM1TIES TO TNEp ONIGpdK GRADE ENSIXRE
K
IXSTING W
FORCE MAIN /
- s. 12—
END FU PIPE
1�
POSI BE DRAT E IN ALL DITCHES AND SLYKES.
$ET FENCE OLRLET (SFO)(l )
m_ CFM NOTFS
FCIFAR
Em'.l.G s0' muEASEUEM
YT iF7RI
S
SG 15+70 _ �. —. I
1. fHlatE PEIaPMEM EASFNEM. cI
EASE As NECEssurr TO
BEGa2 W RPE /
11 23' %21D f = IDs
_
-
/� ��10'IEYPORMY
cora�Ruc:1ON
• :.
� 6o •^'SEs
�, ��� EASEMEM
`$��\ IX51N0 IXRANIY.SFN£R i•
i0D
/
�
` £
NEY NOTES:
—INPIPEPER2MNEM
•
UIIUIY EASE2aM �� n- 1z
\
OI OF91H TO TOP OF FORGE MAIN s SE A NIN4W OF
_
_
SEE CONMCfpN w.1,
_ ----
�\ ENi IF
3 FEET AND A W uM a 3 FEET WLE55 OTNE!WwaE
sNONN.
j- SHEET 30C-/
'
V
STA 13+70
BEGN RJ PCE
\ \„�
JO -IN FORCE
STA
END RJ PIPE
to
BEND
22.5' RENO
TENPOP.VrY
CONSTRUCIgN FASEMflIf
i
E
SEE SPECIFIC NDIE 1
1
1
I
PLAN
scNE: I •-w'
se n sv
208-�20
It B
\ 8 r t
A10
�g
0 0
'' b -M FORCE NAM
lu A
a
-10 ._.__.. .. ___... I -10
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 13150 13!00 13+50 14+00 1_50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00
SF' n' 0 SD' V 25 r PRonLE PIPE CONPNlNN25LY UPGRADE
® ® OMZOMK �. OOwNG-1 TO AVOID MON POIHf$
HOPoZOMK SCAIF M FEE! \fRI1CIC.Y1 SCKE IN ill! VERTICK SCALE: 1'�5'
SIGNED BY R. PLUNMEFG PE -' PUMP STATION 10
CHECKED BY S. MCKELVR:. PE +�\N GAROV� r. FORCE MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
oRAYm w C. N1N1 _ Yss. , "�'"^� FORCE MA)N REPLACEMENT STA 10+00 TO STA 18+00
Cape Fear
i � I Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
ras s.Foo aM' }MPIeEF: SISI 11 €<€3€3-f€ pR.tEt[ ¢€;i€€ t7! wilmie¢roa� NC N.Ne ooc
oaten REcuutolm�cuutora PfAre wi�V�Vw ,I�..... w�..P�...,..,...
ala oFauslnN Paos6Yrr Nuru znee. s<:ALE As NOTED OOC-01

`•` STA 1S+2s
BEEEr1 NOD o
S T fFNCE DEOiEtNNC BORE 9-F
g� i sEE srEanc ralE i
d 1
j�' L(! NOR¢aNTM cu6vE
2o+OD .20D R IUMUS �PFJiWNENf ulwtt STS 23+1622'
�f \_// / Eµ�T EtO NOPo2oNiId
E GEKc sGL BdtE D-1
�;\Rm - �/ 2,a0p a vFRiRK CUR'vE SEE PECi1C'NOTE 1 1$�
y s8 22+Do — .— -7 Ip
\`1i 9EOw MaDZapTy. - r —, '. WN�
'e KRTIfi4 CURVE 1++00' ,$ ,.. EMEWEWfoo 26+00 27+00 �A
PE7eYNFNf UDLITYFASEYFHi - -
1IX5TING 50 - EOUS
/ Um�ITr. E/SDFJiT. ' FASEIIENT
b D PLAN
®N
,. PROTECT EzSTNK GMnM1 YSER DURING
Nsaw,,fon.
2. COORD-m S1i11 711 N6/11E3 P11RNt TO
CONSIRUCibN TO 1£R61' EIOS,YG lI,LL11Y
LOGTgNS.
30
3. RECONSfiluCf ALL ROTO SHOULDERS.
20
ORARYOE DOCNES. AND SSIL ASIVRSFD
BY CON5IRUCTRIH ACTMTIES TO i0 MEIR
1 EDN NOD
3mPE. ra6ce
ORIANM OPIDE. ENSINtE POSRIVE ORNNAGE C
Nl AfCN6 IND SWNES.
« x
1. 1aNTNN A NIN SEPIJUTION SE,MEEN
OEOIECNNf/1 wIRE .WD Na6ZONFM
A� Owll OF 10 FEET.
O1 SEE DETAES ON SHEET OOC-09 Fat CONNECTpN I
'RNISRION ASSflLBLI E — ANAE M BE ,6NNw OF
Q IND ro — K l r.
30
30
20
n
F-.�
1 EDN NOD
3mPE. ra6ce
6 38-w, OR 9
lwM
« x
20
n
I -
r
r
MIIIANM
i �
m C
I
m
to
i
l'o
e NERntri cuR1E
� �
/
m
i
�
-20
1
.30.......
JB -N• MCE
'I
I
3VERfDIC
.. _... _.._._
+
��ee+I _3p
EwN
L W�T'E(TDR aF PfE)
k'
40 _
__. _
-40
�
s
IBB
1
-50
rtRir..i currvE (TDP aF wPE)
Il4
.60 I
7223,16.2.2
_. 1 cnnoE __
60
'70 1 ......ST
....STA
-70
D FIaiIZOM11
2++89.11 SIA 26+3996
a VERIIUL CURVE
SEAN VERfICH CINiVE END YSRLICM a1RLE
-80
- :.....
_80
,S+OD 15+50
10+00 19+50 20+00 2D+50 21+00
21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 2.+00 —50
25+00
25+50 26+00 26+50 2—
27+50
0
PROFILE
µALL PnE GDN NlpUSET UPGRADE
59' ri' b'
®
IO' S'
®
HORIZONTM SCALE: 1'.50'
AS SDOWNCRADE N AvaD NIGH POINfS
MOw201rtM SCM£ w fEEf
vERMI1 SCALE w FEET
3•FNi 1'.10'
E N611A11d. PE
°Estc"ED er R. xuu6cR, rE �6' PUMP STATION 10
»�_ k clxclaD ar s. NCREINE, rE eon 1 y�4 FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT FORCE MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
IMP
N6s>s.m 2.a. oaA.N er c. NUNEvcun 4 STA 18+00 TO STA 27+50
�CapeFPL�ar CapeFprPuWlcUl9ttyAW1o111y
.F.A �N...� F'FFINF j+ S'S,t9 Public Witty Autheii:y Wg1Rlngmn, NC na>,Fol6l aac-oz.e.9 r�r
u A 0./20,7 RE6UlATOR1' p�TD"Mi��3' d�N`1Oe.
— — o69clvrlall — w I OOC-02
11111115.
or

�N 1. EN. ND E5.
CODRpNMIE W1R1 ALL UIIIITIES HHOR TO
LTNUCTIDH ro i£RfY ENISTNlO UTLLl1Y
LMM1gN5.
]. RECONSTRUCT ALL ROV) SNOLLOFAS,
DNNNIQ gf.csS AND -ALES OISRMBEO
er earmaueraN ,u.TmnEs ro rHENe
oMALL C GRADE ENSURE PDSTTNE DRNHY.E
DRCHES AND srALEs. [
SPCCWIO NOTES_
i. HDR20MN. WECT10W1 OREL HOLE SW11
BEA YRRNUN OF 10 FEET BELOW 1r1E
PANEWEM SUT6AM.
2. WINTbN A NINMLM SEPMATNW BETWEEN
6EOLEC— L BONE AN0 NONRONTIE
NRECNdLLL OPEL OF o FEET.
NET IplES
OI SEE pETAI$ ON SNFFr OOC-01 r'OR CONNECINWI ANO
NtAN511pN ASSEYBIT. F%R AIIGIF TO BE uMMIN Of
e AND uAxluw a lv.
02 MONDE HTIINGS AS NLTfSSMT AT END ()<
HONROMAL DIRECTKK4L DNX
OJ L W NW) PROTECT EN6TM0 ELECINMJL LWES.
�9 SEE SUBSURFACE MN11T MTA TABLE. SHEET =-W.
1H0 SEE SUBSL *M UMRT DATA TABLE SHEET 000-03,
C
SUBSLWIFICE UTRPT MTA
\,v
rgy9Jl,
WIERIAI
-
BAN-
�[y^2
15'NJ'
E%6fMD 6RDfiE BEM (M)
NgNONf4 CUA'vE -
,`k
i
Y'
'3,0.00
NOPE FOACE YNN
410
+ t, 57�bO �1j^
'��'•�
26'00
i
19100
31.00 32+OD
SJ+00 3..00
95+00 ^�
� y
..
35,_N61
cEOIECNNICX.HIMiE-B-+
SEE SPEC6lC-NOTE 2
Siff 35+0303.25 25
BEGIu NDN2GNTAL
'-O Tu ]>+60 END H.0 'J
\`J BER+U
66' 2r o w PLAN
....'
30
„....
37+. O S
I
20 1
6'EIlNiDS.
m o
_�
.�. pp55
m
mm iA Fn Y
^ m
ry., N� ...._.. _.__ _
r�i1m
trim _
_.._ _ -
nm
EID ND0 aF OR -1
_ _ __ _-HBPEMPoREE uAM ....1
g3 a
d i EN6IM0 OIICf SINN
20
J
�
1
10
�FRIT TI
ITITIT
'
I II III I
1 1 1 1
II II
I1 I1 I1
-10
I I... I I
II I � I atnrf %uxcs (tel -i.
1
-2011(
I I I I
'F f
1 1 1 1 1 1
_.. _
.... _..__�-20
—301
iaiaaia111ii
i
11111 II
111111 I-
—30
-40
1
((I I I
111111 11
I I I I I I I
111111 I
_
___....
_
-40
I
-50
oRCE
-50
on
(TopOi
SA 33+66.66
: ENO N MAL EMT
M 32+37.19
BE- NERIINE W—
–70 I
ENSURE HpE a MstAum WITH A
cg1E11ru01rs R>?P[
1 70
–80
27+50
I
26+00
28+50 21+00
_ _.
21+50 30+00 30+50 31+OD 31+50 32+00
_..... .. .......
32+50 33+00 33.50 31+00 31+50
35.00 35+50 36.00 36+50 37+00 37+SOS2+75
J –90
b
6
10 5 6 6
PROFILE
�N 1. EN. ND E5.
CODRpNMIE W1R1 ALL UIIIITIES HHOR TO
LTNUCTIDH ro i£RfY ENISTNlO UTLLl1Y
LMM1gN5.
]. RECONSTRUCT ALL ROV) SNOLLOFAS,
DNNNIQ gf.csS AND -ALES OISRMBEO
er earmaueraN ,u.TmnEs ro rHENe
oMALL C GRADE ENSURE PDSTTNE DRNHY.E
DRCHES AND srALEs. [
SPCCWIO NOTES_
i. HDR20MN. WECT10W1 OREL HOLE SW11
BEA YRRNUN OF 10 FEET BELOW 1r1E
PANEWEM SUT6AM.
2. WINTbN A NINMLM SEPMATNW BETWEEN
6EOLEC— L BONE AN0 NONRONTIE
NRECNdLLL OPEL OF o FEET.
NET IplES
OI SEE pETAI$ ON SNFFr OOC-01 r'OR CONNECINWI ANO
NtAN511pN ASSEYBIT. F%R AIIGIF TO BE uMMIN Of
e AND uAxluw a lv.
02 MONDE HTIINGS AS NLTfSSMT AT END ()<
HONROMAL DIRECTKK4L DNX
OJ L W NW) PROTECT EN6TM0 ELECINMJL LWES.
�9 SEE SUBSURFACE MN11T MTA TABLE. SHEET =-W.
1H0 SEE SUBSL *M UMRT DATA TABLE SHEET 000-03,
C
SUBSLWIFICE UTRPT MTA
LDMTION SERNfE
WIERIAI
512E
BAN-
CONC
15'NJ'
�.'
MSTI11 HPE CONTNVOUSLTUPCRALIE
M!D DOWNGRADE LO ANMD NIGH PDMS
AS $MOWN. -
muse WNWWSW 4Wru1ANa. re
ceslcNm BT N. pLUuuEN. PE PUMP STATION 70
--�-BY 5 -PE
036 cAao� FORCE MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
N �w�Na..IW k FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT
DRAWN
BG. uNETCDrr +°�u i'• STA 27+50 TO STA 37+75
NEs�,11� �CaDe Fear
.."�'.Ww�i Ncs�i. _...— F&OIr°SiIIIS9YI@&izY?J m6 Faar Publk UEOiry AuthaMyT
HnanWe6 WF W1661ngton. NC NL91.! DOC -03.6.9
r11m wlE BaclslloN rRo]BerNuuRar n e. WJaR As NDIm OOC-03

STA {5+00
BECM R DIP
GEOTECHNICAL BORE S-17
JO -IN pP FORCE
�-
,µ+O0
l2+DO
N
a
'4
LOG1gN5.
3. RELONSTRIICT ALL ROAD SHOULDERS. ORNNAGE
I
b2
SEIMCE
GRADE. ENSURE POSITNE DFwMAGE M ALL
pi[XE$ AND SWAlES.
JAMES A. LOUGwJN MV1P
t. PRESERr£ E]OSTI11c ASRNLT RCAO MIFAE Nm
SEE CONNECTION OEINL 1/DOC-OR
SNOMI ibR RERAF.
2. Rtt DOES Nm 1DG1E IRLIRES d! MRP
PROPERIV CONRM w IS PESPW4BlE FOR
Lp:ATNG UT 1. 011 — 511E MID
Js
sOO
UT E Z NG TEST — TO VERiV NEW PIPE
PLACEMENT PI—I TO YpRK.
1 LMDSGPING AIDNG WHIP ROAD SMALL BE
/tiJ Yv
X
StA SB�)S
END RJ aIP
\\\
J]y,Po. fl�lI�
/ GEOTECMNIGL BORE S-3
�
SOUTH Di ME FORCE WJn CpmECT10N5 AT A
LOUTON TO BE PRONDEp BY
i/
SOUTH OF iNE CONNECTKKS AEN GREATER
THAN FNE FEET {ROH A JgHT.
SEWER FM
DIP
2{•
I
/
(fS i WWTP ROAD
IT,
DfT
5EF
PVC
1
I
INLEI PRmEGTIOH (,1F)
STA {5+00
BECM R DIP
GEOTECHNICAL BORE S-17
JO -IN pP FORCE
�-
,µ+O0
l2+DO
N
MRP ROAD
—rte
PROPOSED In STRwG Nom 73rd SIR�T
VXX REOURE CMTS -� FOR X/. IARICs
PLAN
SOME: ,• I•
6
1
PROTECT E1f61NC 111UIIL5 AND RRNG ON
MlN SRE
N
2 COOIIp11Ai MIN A1E lRlf11E5 PRIDR TD
CONSmUCIION TO VflafV p(4T111G UIILPY
LOG1gN5.
3. RELONSTRIICT ALL ROAD SHOULDERS. ORNNAGE
ORCHES, ANO SXWES DLSTURRED RT E
—TRK—ACTMRES TO THEIR ORIGINAL
SEIMCE
GRADE. ENSURE POSITNE DFwMAGE M ALL
pi[XE$ AND SWAlES.
JAMES A. LOUGwJN MV1P
t. PRESERr£ E]OSTI11c ASRNLT RCAO MIFAE Nm
SEE CONNECTION OEINL 1/DOC-OR
SNOMI ibR RERAF.
2. Rtt DOES Nm 1DG1E IRLIRES d! MRP
PROPERIV CONRM w IS PESPW4BlE FOR
Lp:ATNG UT 1. 011 — 511E MID
UT E Z NG TEST — TO VERiV NEW PIPE
PLACEMENT PI—I TO YpRK.
1 LMDSGPING AIDNG WHIP ROAD SMALL BE
.- --
R+FPUCED UPON COWNEIpN OF PIPE
STN UTION
\\\
♦. A P NEW LelE R IN SPROVOE SOtiEI
A X -I
E STOP AND MSTALL A JOIN PLUG VALVE
` GTED AC'CE$$ LO MMTP
SOUTH Di ME FORCE WJn CpmECT10N5 AT A
LOUTON TO BE PRONDEp BY
E IEIR
To EORATOR) O T"IE SHALL BE PERFORMED E
l0 ENSURE LHAT THE VA1VE 5 INSTALLED
SOUTH OF iNE CONNECTKKS AEN GREATER
THAN FNE FEET {ROH A JgHT.
—CE UIIIIIY DATA
LOGT1011
SEIMCE
WTEAPL
4g
O(MIN
TO TDP
r a
.30
❑7
SWDGE
pP
10'
{.Oa'
_
]❑
SEWER FM
DIP
2{•
$S
4 r o
©
SEWER F1J
PVC
w
673'
�
❑5
pP
N•
7.I3•
�n
I-LUENL
©
sENER FM
pP
SD•
e.a•
20
❑i
SEWER Fw
Dr aNc
]0•
6.M'
�9
oua ti—
DDNC
1.5)w
3A0•
-
',.
DUCT 8♦Ja
CONC
11713•
3.04'
�I
10
O3)+38+00 35.50. AI+00 )9+50 40+00 w+50 11+00 4—{2+00 {2+50 {3+00 63+50 —00 _{{+50 {3+00 {5+50... a6+00 b+50 47.00 ♦)+500
]5
b' a' SV S E5 s PROFILE IIWZ RPE—I,MWUSLr UPGRADE
® ® Hpe w. SGEE: 1•.50• AND OOYIIIGRAOE TO A= HIGH PorcrtS
NOPoZOMAL SCAIE NI FEET VE1C11GL SGVE MI iEET VERIIGL SGL£ •.5• m s—
_.. __ DESIGNED By R. —IDFt. PE �A:y
_ _ _ cxEcxm W s M�KU aE •ol] PUMP STATION 10
��� ------ o'A••••� - - FORCE MAIN PLAN AND EES
�������� ������ � DRAM+ _e_. c. HUNE>cLm + 'Af}°' •'• 33
Cage
y FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT STA 37+75 TO STA 46+94.01
+ : � fTzai{ J E.iIA'17 E!ageFea Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
a10 n5JMo O {E•IXfEp; 5 SN
�••....... !k� ,.,.;< Wilmington. NC o I• r wenllae DDc-a..e.q
W/201] RECUGTORV JYC WILLIE.
•c•`y'I,�•••••w,,• .a11e uw mcrtnlox rwaeaxuret alum ,.,.� ,. _.:.^.. ® awe As ROTED OOC-04

i 2 3 4 5 6 7 6
LStlE6AL�i:
I. PPOTFCf E%rslMO UlIUI1ES N1WG PIPE STPWG.
2. RPE STRNO SMALL BE MTINM 5' OE IbWf-Oi-Yur,
MMENE MLV1ID M NC DGf RIOrt-Of-wr.Y.
J. PRDJOE APPROPRNTE NOPI20FE TPAFTIC COIIIP0. PEP
12wpD NCDOT KOUROEMb.
_ N ♦ PEwME NO PFP—E M1iN EOWL OR 6ETiFF wTEPNL
UAND MOR%NMISNP M E=nW PANJIEMS. NNEWAYS, U
M+00 4Se00 f 00 %BCW O, AWES ANO MNLBO%ESS^MIFAEEP WINEAOMI , TES. SIDNS.
WNSIRUCIIDN. RPE STRRIO MORI( SNALL K PAPE OE
ME PRICE FOP THE NORZOHVL DBECFXMM OINLL
�p YMiO 5. PECONS1TNCf AMY DPCNES OR SHALES MNEPf
... :,.. ..:. ENTRAIA; pSNMBED BY CM5IRUCTON.
o NEM NMrO`Fit_
ElMW FDCE(D MIMVE SOCIEIYO} - E PEIaFOPMFD. Mb NCWDES RE-SEEMn6 n05101®EO
�-------
IGY NOTES:
ACCESS CM! SE TflWOPM CLOSED EOR RPE STPNC.
. � - uNWDE TWE THAT AxF55 b CLOSED. ODORp1MTE MON
rsPw Ae Hoops PRwrt To unsP+c Access.
GATED ACCESS ro wwm Qi 2O PIPE STPoNO w K MRFMED 1KtdKN OPEMNG IN
FENCE PRONGED BY CONTPACroR. OPENWG — K
PROPOSED PPE SIRPiG ACMFR pHA SECURED AT ALL TMES. FENCE ro K PEPAnED DN
�"' REPIMFD TO TME NEM COND— uPON OWIRZnON Di
PRDEa.
O0 pMEMAY Of THE NEM WNOVER MWME SOCRIY
_ SNALL BEN- OPEN AT ALL iNES UNLESS DINER
NNIMN%IEWs AAE uADE W 11NRING. P B0M C
EMMNCES APE CLOSED, PRDNK AFSEENEnT
OONNEMFATpN M CFPW AFQ ENGIEER PPIOR ro
aosWc.
O Mrs ENIMM•E ANtA ROHM OPEN Ma011fA10Uf TIIE
ENURE PROECf. PANNE OETNIID PUW IM PPE
STRWGINO ACROSS Mb ENIWWCE EOR APA,VIAL BY
CFR1A ND FH4INOR PRgR TO E%ECUDNO CROSSWG
PLAN
SR b'
®N
B
END RPE STRWG
PPOPp RPE STPoND - r�
`O
>A A
IZ i
v
PLAN
s ,•-so•
Su zz
PIIDi[T YANAYaN EW%1Mr, PE
-ED PLwNER, PE PUMP STATION 10
uEc%Eo erc s. utlfELNE. PE -. `�•'k�'v PIPE STRING LAYOUT PLAN
��� ti � r. oRM.n m c IAnExurr `+:'�svo`•"' ��y FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT
_ Cane FWf Caps Fa PubOc UWW AuUwft
pubite KUM AOti10'62y VAlrnlnpmn, NC raeNMe ooc-0s.e-o EF�r
PEDGUTD acAaa As NOTEo OOC-05
wTE asscRncN RroJKf nurse a,eeE

1 I 2 13 4 1 1
CONNECTION DETAIL n
NOT To scut -0I
D
PMMDE'.30-M LAE
$TOP FOR CpMECTKM
N
I9ff5:
1. RCIKh£ O15TMG MM4101E Q)R
BQ BEND.
2. RRF1110) W SMD.
FOB COMBHWiKIN, SEE
3. CON a NEM 24 MCH PPE TO
fUNRE PS 10 SNEfl OOC-0t
IPE.4
UI W 24 IMCH 1-
P wn
1110 RJ ILWi SEE NOTE 3.
w
EY.ISfMG PS t0
4.NSTALL 30 INCH 01' 24 INCH
�• FY
REDutEn.
�, w
8. ALL PPMC IN THIS DETAIL ro fE
30'.30' lEE
PCSTUMED JOMf Oo.
w 30'.24' Rro.
OHE
CONNECTION DETAIL n
NOT To scut -0I
D
PMMDE'.30-M LAE
$TOP FOR CpMECTKM
TIE ro F}KBNO 30�
30-M PLL10 141)
(IYPKYiL DF 2)
SRIBM 24' VALT6
P wn
1110 RJ ILWi SEE NOTE 3.
w
EY.ISfMG PS t0
iOR COHONUATION. SFF
FORCE MNN ' -
RESIIWMD CM. ITrv)
SHFFT OOC-D,},
ExISBNO 3 89
FONCE WM
C
ptN2M ACCESS
ro zsta smEEr
tlOhS:
t. Pltp•SOE 141N(EI6 Al ENO R fACT1 SNB OUP.
SEE OETAI 6. SHEET OOC-08.
2. All PPMO M THS OETK TO BE PESIWtINm mw W.
3. 21-IHCH SNB WIS SW31 E%IEND 1D FEEf EAOM CFN1ERlINE
OF ]ll-NCN ORCE — SEE D AL 4. SHEEP OOC-OB FOR BLACKIHO DEf/Y.
CONNECTION DETAIL %=1
HOT 10 SCALE OOC-a
■r
oESKMED W R.PLu.4ER. vE _ PUMP STATION 10
CHECKED BY McKELNE, PE F };;"'�:� FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT
HH,A, m �D•• CONNECTION DETAILS
Cane Fear
P 4 eg w { IJI AI P6F�9I� vilitty lummd[i1 vwlminywn,N F4a ooc os.e.o n�
.a o4�zot> REDuuToar fgic wlW��s,� ® rxalws HrnED I OOC-06
c..�41..�H... us1E uTe DanlrltoN NIMea ..

STD. 24'OFFSET
RING AND COVER
t OCURSE OF BRICK OR
PRECAST LEVELING RNGS
IS.
MAXIMUM) �D
2'AIiNACUUM
VALVE
2' S.S. NIPPLE
P S.S. HALL VALVE
2' S.S. NIPPLE
2' TAP SEE NOTFt 4 —
6' MIN.
GASKET(TVP)
IL" MAM40lE
4 -MN
\ �NCRET=_:=OOTING
COMPACTED SUSGRADE — NOTES:
T. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL VALVE 8 A44NHOLE AT SUFTTCIENT DEPTH
TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS.
2. FORCE MAIN TO BE OFFSET IN MANHOLE
7. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.
4. SEE SECTION O273Z FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
AIR/VACUUM RELEASE VALVE DETAIL n
NOT TO SCALE
4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 B
�uAYCX�pxsTnG sPHALT OR
-95A OR F tv rLFS
EXiSTixO PA`EYEXT / N Av SgInAF.
W! (TiX
TL -u n B r
II R 11 IL : rll f.11=11
SDIB.�I rR�l �LS�o�III'
OON
Leo cKnu nuu c{ vnTRC WTIERITL nu- s rrxc rrKlR x_Aw nA. ,u c0,. —I. ai .. A.
-
: TO NO E%CfS9VE RE.
]. YiECT BACAFlLL YA" BE f. StM$UBSInnFD CA REOJPED BY QTY TO AJHEtE CdlPACBRL. P.E. AY. IBC, CRUS£0
0. FLOWTF.Lf FII1, ETC).
STPCETS.
ON Q
(X' ABCNBASE NAF_PIM SHALL B LSEG TY
�. pAnm.1 Aho BAY MAIEPIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED 12 MUM SFS
i __ )BALL BL COMPAC" by A M.LNPNILEII IAMHEv (Lt AI4WNG JACR). XUBL'Nf. NNRAI(.vHY HULLENS > Ib'
A 4TMACPROtCOUCASTMOMGS GEP E 4lAFL,U T01' PLq u.10NP METHOD SHALL NOT BE USED.
ww:rer_o I- AwLr..DL
ABC B/SE ANL A63AY EpIPti TED TO 95A ANO BACxn' AVD Eu9EWENT OluP.— TO 90A A5
T
.TE
-1—
a. H -r00- ;IJTBACKS P SPN-11. T-
BcD ON M.
AVHALT KISm' HsAPALTyllO
ASPHALT 90A
REPAIR DETAIL n
HOT TO SGLE
I
Y�
REPUCE PAVEMENT STRUCTUREPRfSDW Exl$TNG PAVEIAENT SIRUC —
II
I.
=M TO 0IMW
STK•
BRUNMWB CONCRETE
.. a. RADIUSSF95A
3/4' PAgUS
µ TE QIP
D GUTTER
1/n PER
MN.L AND WERw TOP 1.5' WITH TYPE
WTCH R-0PAVEYDIT
A'
• n
STUNE UNDFJt
CUR9NG (MN. B') B" ABC —EIIOIFS:
,
n
w
�
�
COMPACTED
FORCE SUBGFADE
O
THIS DETML I, BE USED ALONG WWII RRB.. WERE
FORCE MNN E PULED UNOEP THE CU
2. WERE THE FORCE MNN CROSSES THE RWO. REPLACE
E
M1RE RMD CRO55 _.8
�
a(I
I�
3. WIDTHS.RADE CM PIQII.
—2-0"
PNI
a. IS' UPA WTCN AT CRE— NO RE IN
4" uEE SHNL
IIF
AT
AT EXISTING PAVEMENT ILN,m ANSROMLL
TPN.
EXISTNG ASP1iLLT AT TEE INN LDCATONS AS PEWIRED.
CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL/B
\
WWTP ROAD REPAIR
�l
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
DESIGNED BY 1. Pw4MER' PEY, ca'Pov PUMP STATION 10
�� In ns eeoo x9�M CHECKED B! YCKELVIE PE -0. I <£ii
DRAW BY . HUNETIuTT '* u FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT
IMCape Fear Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
Wilmington. NC
r..c.e.�s..�.. r...d sa.� M/ZOI] PECIAATMY fq�•'�P Hw...rr-s..n
IZATB BmnMPHION nrosTur�a ar
STANDARD DETAILS
Tv er..c DOC -97.0.9 IPHr
® IIrwIr As NOTES BOC -07

2
13
22f 11t FlR EIIG K�OP
Fl11MG fIRNK
JO" W b
12 G M b
FlN5MED GRADE
sLOK wru ro MCLE a
REPOSE OF SOIL OR AS
TYPE 1 OR ]
APPRD.m ar rHE D141NFEP
FADE BMS(F1lE
6'
CV55 I, X OR In
PIPE 4ZE AS MOKATEO
PUNS 6" MN �
CA55IMX
9O
PER REDOING
SKUF1GTIgXS
PIPE 0.0,
R" MN 0• YIN
STABLE FOlE11WilOXI
WTERML
NOES: SEE SK—A— SECT" 02220.
PIPE BEDDING DETAIL
NOT ro scNE
%1
CONNECT -- MRE
w FLANGE am. (Tw.)
TRACER MARE W BE X AL
d IE VALVE BO% BTN YIN. 2,
E%MA LENGTH A90K VALVE BO% —
TRACER YA t
LOCATOR 80%
(1.000' MAX.
MTEItvAL1 GIE vA
WRC
�wavE eo%
Wc11tE NON TEF P—
(ATTACH INACER WAXE)
WRAP WAGER MRE
ARWND
FLANGE BOL1S
MAN PIPE
—1 — PIPE -L \ J\
1. TR
1. nAIsI TIN SHALL BE /10 COPPER 50.10 GOES COPPER WRE M1N GAS ANO 0.
BIBS TNR N E STFIA
2 MME 91ALL BE SWAPPED M ALL PVC FORCE MAIN %PNC WM DUCT TAPE AT 12-17.
NIERVALS
1
ALL AU " WIRE ro ALL TEE AND CRO55 FlTRNGS
a, RE SRKTS SHALL NAK. WATER PROOF MRE CONNECROJS.
TRACER WIRE DETAIL %�1
NOT To SCALE
0
E
Tyrs �L
LEGEN
0 Po ISR So_u srT�..�
ytlmSIVB�D-Edlmf
Jfnns
1. W6E OETAAS AIS FIX- ROTN
2WERfNEB AIID NOIIQpYALLY WD PPE
. POURED IN PE C
IACONCRETE SHALL I 3000 P51.
3. LEAVE JOIN15 CIFM D< CONCRETE FOR EASY ACCESS.
1. PWYETNYLENE SHNLwRNFCD AROUND FIRINGS.
TI$F ASSULHS A W%., WATER PRESSURE OF 150 P9 Alq 2.00D PSF Sqt BEARING CMIOLT.
' A. USE YEGALUG uOR EOWLJ M lAV K BIDGKNG AND ROODNG UEAE55 APPROaID
BEAMNG MEA OF TNRUSr BLOCK N SOLIAK FEET
r1iTING 90 a5
SIZE FIRNG FlTIMG
22f 11t FlR EIIG K�OP
Fl11MG fIRNK
JO" W b
12 G M b
CONCRETE BLOCKING DETAIL n
NOT TO SCALE
3 IV BRONZE YMK6IR
CpJCREIE PNOTEOTOit PMC
FLUSH MDI ..Na,
t. PLACE MARKER ,THIN ONE FOOT OF
ENO Qi STtIBW,
2. BRONZE MNMER TO NWATE DEPTH
PPE TO TOP l PIPE AND PIK SIZE.
SRIBQIT
PIPE MARKERS n
Nm ro scALE
r
-
T
E
GRADE
3 ANCHOR BOLiS
�- ,LONG W/3• HOOK
COIILRETE 3000 PS W Rl1O. WLVE OR AFDUCDt
�I. +
r-1
PIPE
PN'E L w N
OMNETER
5' A'
ROES
PL Z
EYBEO PE 8005 OVER FlfiING
! A• INCONCRETE t COEP:RETE M HUR LO K USED
DNLT WHERE CONCRETE
BLOCwNc Ofl RE6LRANT JOWL
PIPE CM NOT RE USED AND
M�Et1 APPROVEp RY '"M2. TABLES —NE A WAX WATER
PRESSURE OF 150 M.
CONCRETE 3000 P51
FlnNG NJLUTAE GF ANC110P BLOCK N WBIC TARO
AZE 90 BEND a5' BEND 22-I BEND It -1/a' KENO
b" 20 10 6
CONCRETE ANCHOR DETAIL n
NOT m WEE
LFNCM OF PIK ON EACH SIDE 6 FITTING OR V W THAT MUSE BE RL3TRNNED
fR1MG 9P a5' 22j' ltf TEE PLUG OP VNVE �—RFITnIGNCiTl11NGNTEE20' b' 2C" 10' 100' 120
NOBS:
1. COMPACTOR 5 REWIRED TO XSTALL RESiWJNm -HT NK IN
—AT SHOWN ON iHE DMwNCS. BLOCKING 5 DXA.Y TO M
USED MERE APPRO.FU By OWNER.
2. TABI£ —IJUCS A MAK. RDD PRESSURE OT IM) P51.
RESTRAINED JOINT
RESTRAINT HARNE SES DETAIL n
NOT M SENE
DE—HIEEI WR. —101t, PE PUMP STATION 10
Hort Gtr. xc CNECYXED BY S. IkNF141L K '� Ear :�,
Fn
X �� ssXW _ �� �, NIR+EYc�rr rA FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT zR STANDARD DETAILS F
``A: y�r�� _CBQe Fear Cape Fear Public UIiINy Autho ty
rPNa°,., PObSFC#911tYA€t10:1 wilmiNgton,NC DDG-oBn.R ANE
A Oa/201J pEpAAIORY `�C•wll �W w..ReA.u�u�
.�.X..,w......a N.— OOC-08
N XLW aa.OAM:IIIAIIUN A1wIARXAIXYII 2XHi
C
M
A

M XOE,
�XXR,oA,1 rRYE
�EMrI ERD) '71-
7
YIIR
.�
1-- - 12
-----L
lo
EMc1naYLr CRLIm � lO'E w]q sEE OEfM. O,
PPE (Y]Pf oXc w RusaE P.c Er EOa PusaE we
NR„1: EEE IWPE alRlc,w xoo
NrwX]m01 rR9[.)
HDD TRANSITION ASSEMBLY �1
bMtiIXC
nuc YaY
far r alAXr. aa� w AYo -
Rmm1�EP art nc art m
MYD Ml! PIPE WE � y
�wM Ir
7,�
E� J_
OPEN CUT PIPE TO FUSIBLE PVC
HDD TRANSITION ASSEMBLY
Rm m wRc -
M OtM T6 96I'IESSUIF liC
� M,IQ� � roll u RPPa.Tr
ro�i.&E v.,Ex�wlx SLY�F55 sl ceAERVE
MpGm EOU.I RNFlP PI F.NINL
RmROIm EV WI: ,uW1u5
OPEN CUT PIPE TO HDPE HDDm ERA:
TRANSITION ASSEMBLY
for ro Eco
qP
�siRY105) M PING
ROROOrmE ORLmWLr Pe1,ED vsE
DIRECTIONAL DRILL UNDER
WETIANDS/WATER BODY / 1
lWf ro YIIE -
PI,O.Etl..RM.061 EYIIL.Y3. PE
DESWRED 6v nlWYER. PE ...^ �`�
~� � CRECKFD BY R1cKF1NE, PE ? p'�SSiD
oar,Re, er . Y,,aEvourt a
— - - A
` I^�
OYN P f961XEE : .� h
IMP
novsm � o./xo,� AFcuu*oar Tit mE�r��
•"•.•.•�'••`•'�• XmuE wrE oPscv,lAR — --- PaA.lEcr xlRnal a,w -
E0 UIREM EM
�;;��Er r ri:-.. r+.^.r err-.r;r•.�
�)♦���iXSY'•1•w'cat[.'.n-aMl��s0t'--:++w EII➢SIII3
�y ��!'GK•.•Z•��1¢-:•il,-i�l�Ql� it['i�.>wsl[5i1fa61
�r��'r�,a �ieEwen Erne:�awl.X
i t
�.ti•�yiCy
COLLAR•PRESSURE
e
;� 0: -Ya, Nx MA P.Y.E YPu E .RR1Wo, „YY AORr W [M Poll W
.ol�R Md MF M�Raf�ia MMO � O.l ®16�M 9�ML I�FFi�O®
W.R"RMO.:"0
x la nl aE al®c 1Pww .E .sEEXnynmXnnoX ePnRraR RRew z
11p0a1s"`,la� � e°YanuR"�"�'.RR A o�RurEnaX �"" R.l
a ARam� loroRs. a.1....E M a.R�P.ea aRXreW W M
n, acnx
Y.oWn s ePno.. ai¢r cmnMmol uE R YR.E Mo a a.wn
vxKixwX la' lu�ilu :E lui.:..eiwa�lz "�imi:io n',ic
Y�Eq Rm E ammm Ol00pWir Y01[D RP[ to S a�Pu E
lK Ym �j� NTIY �!O WRAF YMI�Y �c
a XananR. uaeRA.a Yu a Rmm swE ROWa w t rlmm r Xmw
W mmwc rr[ woYE xo Mwm wr.11r.
1. M NXWILIOR 4lw I,IOP 9U11,LM,O10116 O PK W QIE10lwf M
PoR Ca11M[Ml PYYD 100 PPE 5w1 E RlOXW W RAM
K (FORS yl �,ypj 0 pE O[ l �p T M WwP,L'R,B Ilpl W
P 9WRR M PIM6) a. SEF nAM iM 160URm PI4 IEOIRD WSIIIF NG
11o1@RIfK ^MSYLv 001ID P!E ua� m1191wbE
UMP ZZ
STATION 10
FORCEPMAIN REPLACEMENT HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL DETAILS
WMCay'peFear C,.,-,Pb,,,UOMYAY11,oAty _
PIITla$11110tY Au tl6rM w1iminyron, NC ® arawe oac-As.e.9
•••••+•��• r I� RorEo I OOC-09

SEgM FENCE
'MOTE SEE NOTE 1
N47E5: I�)
E FA , PER NCOENR 6.62. TO
BC AHGgRED IN THE 1RFl1CH
6' WNN ANO V" HORIZO "
AND THEN —Pi TE NRH
EARTH ANO COYPKTEO. LJ
3. POSTS TO BE YIN. OF
3'-0" N cRWND.
O. BRACE POSTS "ERE
NECESSAm.
ATTKH FABRIC WIRE Ae.
a. POSTS MM METAL RUNGS I
M�1N. Tt:e amu) nE5 (50 LB 1 —II — I
5. POST SHALL BE 5' (MM) uETa Posr -��= III
K—NNG A 10L 1.35 LR PER LF,
YANUFKTMEO MTH CLIPS. (1
6. NARF 51M11 NOT BE .—UNDED TO A
DEPTH GRGRR THAN 1.5 FT AT ANY PO6(T
ALONG iLNCE CONTRACTOR SHA1L MS — A
FENCE ILY'OUNOMENT 011RET. SEE DCT .
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SEE SCNEWLE
oc •ID
PEfWM1ENT SEEgt1G
IEMPoRART SFEgNG ALL
AREAS
e
AIdA hPE
I -
SEAmN
"PE
cALVA1azED Mr•EN
1 �
I
CENTIPEDE 5
UTE MNTCR-SPRNG
WR
MRE FlELD FENCE,
1a GAUGE. Mn1 6•
- _.
iFSOIE 50
1 RRT SPK
SEgM FENCE
'MOTE SEE NOTE 1
N47E5: I�)
E FA , PER NCOENR 6.62. TO
BC AHGgRED IN THE 1RFl1CH
6' WNN ANO V" HORIZO "
AND THEN —Pi TE NRH
EARTH ANO COYPKTEO. LJ
3. POSTS TO BE YIN. OF
3'-0" N cRWND.
O. BRACE POSTS "ERE
NECESSAm.
ATTKH FABRIC WIRE Ae.
a. POSTS MM METAL RUNGS I
M�1N. Tt:e amu) nE5 (50 LB 1 —II — I
5. POST SHALL BE 5' (MM) uETa Posr -��= III
K—NNG A 10L 1.35 LR PER LF,
YANUFKTMEO MTH CLIPS. (1
6. NARF 51M11 NOT BE .—UNDED TO A
DEPTH GRGRR THAN 1.5 FT AT ANY PO6(T
ALONG iLNCE CONTRACTOR SHA1L MS — A
FENCE ILY'OUNOMENT 011RET. SEE DCT .
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SEE SCNEWLE
FIIOIERIEA11A0ER EVALLVA6, PE
0F51gtm B`' R. PLUMMEH, PE
PEfWM1ENT SEEgt1G
IEMPoRART SFEgNG ALL
AREAS
GIECI® BT S. ucKEL`AE, R
_ _.
ORARN BT MUNETCUTT
AIdA hPE
"PE -TE (1115/K)
SEAmN
"PE
RATE
NON-RESIOENTML
CENTIPEDE 5
UTE MNTCR-SPRNG
WR
9
- _.
iFSOIE 50
ec •.: ss1N�`z�i��1-1Ii9
pubo EKY€fity s�CEthuf:'
C,m Fear Public Utility AUthortty
WimtNC
_
0— wwRER RiE (GIWN)
n EKN
RESIDENML
CENTIPEDE 5
—.ERSWAN
GRASS
05-10
��..�.« a
FESCUE TYPE 1 50
FESCUE ME E 50
tNEat.cru..w 23166
9ROwN TOP M,
KEPING -O GRASS
00-40
-6
UTE sWMER/
EARLT MNIER
MITER m (GR,uN)
O 6
50
50
eME
MILT
JO -a0
]0-b
SEEgNC NO1F5:
i. APPLT L11f5TONE AT A RATE OF 5 SnUWS Na•O01H5 PER K ANO FERTILIZER, 5-10-5, AT A RATE a 500 L05 PER
3 N MULCN . ATA RATE OF a i0 S OEPIH OR 1.5 TORS PER K.
1. SEESFE 6PECRiUTON SECTgN 03900 FOR ADOTIOYL REWNREYEHTS.
K.
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
61D1A616 DDI-tD.a.9 �`
�� IICIdP Az NDTm 00C-10
FIIOIERIEA11A0ER EVALLVA6, PE
0F51gtm B`' R. PLUMMEH, PE
6�0 CPRO��
O ........ M
a lssrP ••;•
PUMP STATION 10
FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT
_
GIECI® BT S. ucKEL`AE, R
_ _.
ORARN BT MUNETCUTT
IMN
a6wc.aNa
.
Ezt34
� Cape fear
xw6
- _.
-
ec •.: ss1N�`z�i��1-1Ii9
pubo EKY€fity s�CEthuf:'
C,m Fear Public Utility AUthortty
WimtNC
_
06/201)
A...a•�N
5in on
��..�.« a
6mR uTe 000�110R
tNEat.cru..w 23166
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
61D1A616 DDI-tD.a.9 �`
�� IICIdP Az NDTm 00C-10

INLET GMIE
NTARIN PG
I INSTALL ALL EROSON AND SFDNEMAION CONTRO..—RIES
AD pE ES NECESSARY TO CO— WIDI TRE STANOWOS
PNCE TWO STA E.S UP51REµ
W MARE AND, FOUR
21QII5:
RECESSED CURB N,17E oust
CATCH B SIN SUSPENSION LYIRD/ROUST
BE BLOCKED WHEN 'SING
FILLER ABRD SACH.
AEAFLOW
2. SIZE 6 SACK TO BE
DETERMINED B
MIER
..FRONT
WWUFICRWEq
To BUR WILE..
NEW
3. INSTAL a— I RNw GAPS
OF pY -__ :- _-
T WILT m1E.
4. RLTER FABRC SACK SHAL
BE'SILTSACK- NAMIFAC1UgED
CATCH BASIN
1' REBAt N HEM
BYACF ENVNORAEMAL WC..
OR APPROVED EQUAL
FOR BAG REMOVAL
4 DISTURBANCE ACIS NIH vROGRESS.
E LAID sEdMEM CONTROL MEASURES BE
S'ORL1 PPE RUBBER RESTRAINT
01 DA
CECED DALY AND ANY DEFlCIfERS NOTED WILL BE
BE
CORRECTED BY THE END OF —I GY. ADq I— EROSON
AND SEU4EMT CONTROL MEA51NE5 MU BE NSTA.LED P
BLOCKS
NECESSARY BY ON -SE INSPECTION.
5. ILCINUTATED SEDIMENT IS TO BE CLEANED FORA THE
F%PMSON RESTRAINT
uPsinFAM SIDE OF N STREW CHECK DWS AT THE END OF
EACH WORK Y.
TE
FlL1FR FMRC SACK
SDE NEW
6. NWTAIN ALL END— CONTROL 1NEAA1RE5 INSTI11E0 FOR THE
FULL OURATHN OF THIS CONTRACt.
INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION
NOT M sG E
MMLOLCT WAAOQ L9MLII S. PF
OESICNED BY
NTARIN PG
I INSTALL ALL EROSON AND SFDNEMAION CONTRO..—RIES
AD pE ES NECESSARY TO CO— WIDI TRE STANOWOS
PNCE TWO STA E.S UP51REµ
W MARE AND, FOUR
ND SPECRIGTXNS OF THEULU NORTH CARODEPARTMENT OF
ENV[iONIIENI AND NATURALRESOURCES AND APPLICABLE STATE
ANO LOLL UWS AND ORgNANCES, AND PREVENT STANONG
WATER M1MIN PRN UNI -ESS OiHERMSE ONECtEp.
DOATLSTRUA OF WATTLE
NSTN1 10 LP OF
2. GROUND STANLIZATDNT SHAAL E ACHIEVED LOIEISTENT MM
ID DENT GENERA. PERMIT NCG010000 E FECTRE AS of
S' M 4'
NIGUST 2. 2011, WHERE LAPD DSTURBNG ACTM11E5 FLAK
1dPORAR Y OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, ALL O5IUINBED AREAS
WTTH TEUPORAM
PRIOR ro HlSTAl1TNG
.EAnLL
SHA' BE P—DED OR PETNWNEMLY
SUBILIUTION MTH GROUND CMA MRNIN 14 CALENOW MYS
TROTH THE LIST LAND OSTURRING AUNT- EXCEPT FOR ALL
OWE"OH W -- _---_-
PERNETER WES, S ALES. DnENES, ERWETER SLOPES, AND
OF pY -__ :- _-
ALL SLOPES STEEPER THEN 1:1 (M. WHICH ANLL BE
PRONDED TEMPORARY OR PEgLWI[NT STIgtIUTgN MTH
GROND COVEP WTIFIN T CALEHbR DAYS FROM THE Vu1D
D6TURRING AC'TMTY. REGIA TO GENERAL PERMT NCGOlOW)
OR SPECNC C—TIONS, EXEMPTIONS AND DEFNITONS itYV
4EETWG THE STABWZATgN REWRtE4ENTS.
_
—II
S. A COPY OF THE APPROVED — DISTURBANCE PIAN AND
PERMIT SHNL BE PRESENT ON THE STE WHENEVER VRD
I
4 DISTURBANCE ACIS NIH vROGRESS.
E LAID sEdMEM CONTROL MEASURES BE
SECURE WAVE ON
PLM VIEW REINFORCED SECTION 'VIEW EACH SDE MPH 12-01
STAPLES EW RIOT
01 DA
CECED DALY AND ANY DEFlCIfERS NOTED WILL BE
BE
CORRECTED BY THE END OF —I GY. ADq I— EROSON
AND SEU4EMT CONTROL MEA51NE5 MU BE NSTA.LED P
ERDSroN CONTROL AND ON EACH ENDTIPPLED
�y PROpuCi
NECESSARY BY ON -SE INSPECTION.
5. ILCINUTATED SEDIMENT IS TO BE CLEANED FORA THE
1. NSTALL ROVED EROSION CONTROL MODEa (RECP) 10-M LONG X
uPsinFAM SIDE OF N STREW CHECK DWS AT THE END OF
EACH WORK Y.
lOiT MDE (SEE RECP DELL 5, SHEET OOC-18 FOR Rfou E EMS OF
t6TN1ApOM)
6. NWTAIN ALL END— CONTROL 1NEAA1RE5 INSTI11E0 FOR THE
FULL OURATHN OF THIS CONTRACt.
2. NST— 18-114 WMETER % 10-1 LONG EXCELSIOR WATRE NFIGIIT
T. WNTNN RE .' OF ALL —E, SSOCMTED MM
SHALE BE 50 LRS.IL' WATTLE SHALL CONSIST OF BOS OR MARE FIBERS
MTH A LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 6-N. NETTING ANLL BE CLOSED ON—
SEDNEHT AND F—IN CONTROL NIENAEE AND
nONS HCL-11MLI. DAILY AND AFTER RAIN
NNSPECTIOH REPOMS.
BOTH SSS
6 EXISTING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WITHN INE
S. NSTML WATTLE 2 -FE 001,04STRFAN OF RECP (t -FT OF RECP MLL BE
DOYNSIRFAM OFWAiII.E).
C
DURATION OF i E"'SS s— w —IN. THROUIRDIR INE
4. WIEILE WATll6 ARE NACEO ALONG A ARCH, lE TOP EIEWn10N OF TE
OOYNSIREAM WATTLE SHOULD -TEE THE ADM ELEVATNIN OF THE
9. A)OTOHA ESC MEASURES MLL BE IMPLEMENTEt) P THE
E%SRNG MEASURES ARE I. PERFORMNG ADEOwTELY TO
WATTLE JPITRtEAN,
S SEE EROSION AND SFDIINEMAnON COMR0. NOTES ON 1N5 SMFET FOR
MEET STATE AND FFD REGULATIONS AS )MTATED BY FIETD
CONOIIONS. CHMGES TO THE ESC PUN MLL BE OOCUETNT6
LIMIIETIMICE REWNEMENR.
AND SHOm ON THE I—TON ORAMNGS. A SET OF
EXCELSIOR WATTLE DETAIL
CONSTRICHON Dw,MNGs — BE ON SITE AT .LL 1NEs AND
MADE AVARARLE TO THE ENGNE. UPoFN REOIEST.
NOT To SCAE
MMLOLCT WAAOQ L9MLII S. PF
OESICNED BY
}EIiDRAARM CHMxEL NOTES:
coNsrqucrDx
1. FINE GRADE AREAS SO THE TUP OF GRAND 5 SUOOTH
AND I—E.
2. PTAH' SEED BY FDLLUNWNG SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS.
S. TER4WL ANCHOR TRENCHES ARE REWIRED AT EROS
MND ACROSS CNANELS Ai 25 FOOT NT
1FAMNAL ANCIDR TREINCHES 51MLL BE A
12 LACES DEEP AND. NTERNmENT
iRENLES SHALL BE A XRN OF 5 WLES DEEP
MCI 8 INCHES MDE OR BY IxST-- TWO ROWS OF
ANCHORS CLOSELY SPACED.
NCDOT /5 OR
° BEGINNING AT E DOWHNSIREAM EE OF ITHE CIWNEL
/5) WASHED STOP
ENMTFEENT TRE Is
REAL ED. FO RACKP UNTX S THE REFIRST CP BACK MR IISELT.
AND PIN THE WD ERS D THEN COx UP
HMNE OMHG A
FOLLHESE 5 EP5 AT EA
EACH
ENT TRENCIN,
IAT
IIIIIIIIIIIII
5' STEEL POST
TH
S STAPLE5, BACKFILL ANO COMP THEA FOLD RTHE AAT
(1.25 LBI STEEL)
BAD( — RSfIF AND OVERLAP THE RECP A MINIMuu
OF 2 FEET.
6. WHEN STARTING NSTA EON OF A NEW ROLL. BEM
111 WIRE
NNOWARE CIDTH
1W OF CHANNEL
NSTA1 8'
u11
A TENCH OR SNRRE-UP ENDS OF ROLLS Aelm ui Nlu u
OF ONE FOOT MM UPSiRFIY RECP DN TOP.
1
i
(1/l" 16H OPFHNCS)
AFOF1aR ^'E L'AT ygy'S TxORTh 1ASfRu�� WIRIELR� y
WOW
NANTEx1I1L£
_ I (
I
NCOOT /5 OR
/5] WASHED STOP
� � STABERATRN ELMaDIDN S2 OR
y
1. ASPECT ROLLED EROSION CONINOL PROOlCTS AT I—T
T'
?I
WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNfKINT (1/2 NCH OR
_
GREATER) RAN FAL EV EM. REPAIR NNEDMTELY.
Nug BE
1
AND EROSION MUST NOT � NEATH THE RE�.
1 I I
EDSDNG
s. ANY MEAS OF THE RECP THAT HE OR NOT
LJ I U
I I I
1 I I I
GROlNO
DENEDED
IN LLCSE 0 SEACT YIIIN THE GOIITD SHALE BE
REPARm ANO STAPIID.
4 P EROSION OCCURS DUE TO POORLY CONTROLLEDANDTH
L
DROOED THE PROBLEM SNAIL BE FIXED AND THE
I I I I sEcnoN
ERODED AtEA PROTECRU
TEMPORARYFABRICDROP INLET PROTECTION
DETAILS
5. NONROR AND REPAIR THE RECP AS NETISSAR LNnL
cRouND co ER rs ESAaa Ep. coMgAcroR rs
CHANNEL — GRASS LINED WITH RECP %1
RESPOR4BLf FDR AL ERDSIDn
NOF ro SGNE
Mm m SLAP
MEASURES NSTALIID FDR THE ML OUPATI0IN OF TINS
FOI1RTHE OFT1
CONTRACL
R. PU WI PE 0. W CA40[A
HDRBN..M.Mk ._ CHECKED IR MaOlYP• PE ,� .: •.•� ® BY
DRAWN WM. raaW� HUNEYg1R ' F Iq/EWHj .
• Cape ear
A w/xon
xueie�s..,rrFa, 16Ma MR OEYIIImOx _-_. -_. -- PMJBCTMIIL mN
PUMP STATION 10
FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
Cape Fear PubI1D Utility AuthNNity
Wilmington, NC R1MALe ➢pD-11.B«s I —T
® tint AS NOTED 00C -'I1