Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170590 Ver 1_More Info Received_20170606ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 4901 TRADEMARK DRIVE RALEIGH, NC 27610 (919) 212-1760 • FAX (919) 212-1707 environmentalservicesinc. com May 31, 2017 NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Attn: Karen Higgins 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Re: Bridgeport DWR No. 20170590 Supplemental Information Ms. Higgins, E ,iUN 0 6 201' Attached please find updated information for the above referenced 401 WCQ application Proposed wetland impacts account for 0.33 acre of headwater forest resulting from the entrance road, a Town of Wake Forest required roadside buffer, sewer crossing, and a storm water pond. Impacts have been reduced by 0.01 acre since the original submittal. I have included additional drawings along with four copies of the updated PCN. Also, I have included an updated Statement of Availability from a mitigation bank for 0.66 riparian mitigation credits that is being requested by the Army Corps of Engineers. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information during your review. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Environmental Services, Inc. �w Njou�" Jeff Harbour, PWS Enclosures fires EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks Statement of Availability May 26, 2017 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers James Lastinger Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Re Project: Bridgeport This document confirms that Dos Bros. LLC (Applicant) for the Bridgeport (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.66 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the EBX-Neuse sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically from the Arrington Bridge 111 Site in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time. These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits/units. The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the proper documentation. If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1052. Best Regards, Cara S. Conder Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, NC 27605 Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no. Form Version 1 4 January I A. Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form D WqT F Applicant Information 1. Processing la Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 and 18 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — ExpressX❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes Q No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes Q No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑x Yes ❑ No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes X❑ No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes Q No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridgeport Permit 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Wake Forest 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Multiple, see attached list 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (If different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: 4b. Name: Andrew Sandman 4c. Business name (if applicable): Dos Bros, LLC 4d. Street address: 7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 122 4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27613 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: andy@ccdattomeys.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Jeff Harbour 5b. Business name (if applicable): Environmental Services, Inc. 5c. Street address: 4901 Trademark Drive Raleigh, NC 5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27610 5e. Telephone no.: 919-212-1760 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: jharbour@esinc.cc Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See attached list 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.94003 Longitude: -78.50344 1c. Property size: 38 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Sanford Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project study area Is mostly undeveloped, excluding 2 residential homes. The rest of the study area is mostly forested, with a floodplain that is located adjacent to Sanford Creek 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 600 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to develop a portion of the study area into a single family subdivision. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves construction of a road crossing and storm water pond for a subdivision. Typical construction equipment will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? © Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ® Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): K. Murphrey, J. Harbour Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services, Inc. Other. 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. USACE: SAW:2016-02300 Site review held on November 7, 2016 with James Lastinger NCDWR: NBRRO#16-289 Buffer review held on September 7, 2016 with Stephanie Goss 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) In the past? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to `help file' instructions. 6. Future Project Pians 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes © No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ® Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 2b. 2c. Type of impact Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P Fill for Road Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.21 W2 P Fill for SW Pond Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.09 W3 T Sewer Line Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.03 W4 - Choose one Choose one YestNo - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - Wg - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.33 2h. Comments: 0.21 acre results from the entrance road construction and a required 20' Type D Buffer off Forestville Road ROW. 0.09 acre results from the storm water pond. 0.03 acre of temporary Impact is from a sewer line connection 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. 3f. Type of Average jurisdiction stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 - Choose one - - S2 - Choose one - - S3 - Choose one - - S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one _ - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4, Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indivi ualIV list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 - Choose one Choose 02 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose O4 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated 5e. Upland (acres) Pi Stormwater 0.09 0.28 P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 1 0.09 0.28 5g. Comments: Storm water pond located in low spot on property. Portion of a disturbed headwater wetland proposed to be impacted. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes Q No If yes, permit ID no: 51. Expected pond surface area (acres): 0.37 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 15.6 5k. Method of construction: Excavation and grading 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO) If project will Impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico 0 Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. Buffer Impact Reason for impact number- Permanent (P) or Temporary 6d. 6e. 6f. Stream name Buffer Zone 1 mitigation impact required? (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 - Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No 84 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The applicant is having to construct the entrance road across from the high school entrance per DOT requirements. The wetland that is proposed for impact cannot be avoided at this location. Wake Forest is also requiring a 20 ft buffer along Forestville Rd that begins at the ROW. This buffer has to be graded and planted. The storm water pond is proposed in a naturally low area that contains a portion of the disturbed headwater wetland. No other wetlands or WOTUS will be impacted as a result of the project. No impacts to the floodplain of Sanford Creek are proposed. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All necessary sediment and erosion control BMPs will be installed and maintained through construction. Disturbed ground will be restored and stabilized with permanent vegetative cover. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Q Yes ❑ No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? 59 Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete N Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Riparian wetland Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: 0.6 Quantity: Quantity: Mitigation proposed at 21 for the 0.30 acre of permanent impacts. 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In4leu Fee Pro ram 4a. Approval letter from in4ieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. if yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Discharge from the stormwater wet pond is to existing wetlands that will diffuse flow before entering the Neuse River Buffer ❑ Yes © No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 30.9% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Two (2) stormwater wet ponds are being used to meet the Town of Wake Forest stormwater requirements to treat and control the difference In stormwater runoff volume leaving the project site between the pre- and post -development condition for the 1 -year, 24 hour storm. The runoff volume drawdown time meets the requirement to drain between between 2 and 5 days. Also the two (2) stormwater wet ponds are designed to treat the runoff for 85% TSS. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Town of Wake Forest 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmerifs jurisdiction is thisproject? © Phase 11 ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally4mpiemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes 1Z No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties DHOW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs applyORW (check all that apply): HSession Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Pian meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the 0 Yes ® No use of public (federallstate) land? 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State [--]Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)? 1c. If you answered yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑Yes No ❑ Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ®No 2c. If you answered yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result In OYes ® No additional development, which could Impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The Town of Wake Forest is forting the developer to install the stub roads that you see on the site plan. The applicant, the engineer, and myself are aware that time stub roads are looked upon unfavorably by USACE and DWR. The engineer argued against these stub roads_ but the Town of Wake Forest would not reconsider their position. Any additional Information regarding the potential fidufe impact of these stub roads should be the responsibility of the Town of Wake Forest. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Munidpal sewer will be available for the project. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 a. tnaangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 5b. Have youchecked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act pa px Yes ❑ No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NCNHP data (updated January 201 7) and on site evaluations. Online FWS project review and submittal. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? EFH online mapper 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will thio project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in Yes � Q No North Carolina historyand archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your.site would impact historic or archeological resources? NCSHPO ti. Flood Zone Designation (Corp; Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 400-year floodplain? Q Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No developrnent win occur inside the 100-yearfloodplain 8c. What sources) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.nCnoodmaps.com �j.Nt32�w Cyd-a,�3n-v4-rJ f � g—/�- Applicant/Agent's Printed Name AppGcan.,. ent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter Boni the a ii cant is routed. Page 10 of 10 31V�S �ludv219 — — ouz Will _ •/ \ ✓ / ` _ _ \ \ \ �- '� / / 0102 � � / / �,��,( �� \ \ / i / /i " �`�\� ) f \` � ` — — � ��arvlla+anlara '� `, . �•': .+ � �.,L`• � I �r � � � i/i — - - �et+slMluw7e�aeivRnw \e�ol�\ / 7`.l ?',r \ � ` � \\ \ / �/,�K� � •�`'. �� +[' 1 ,�1 i` ape 60'0 Ic .� i i -- _ ,J� • ,�. I I I .antes wu4 pedu. / / L 10?'91QJJV -`\ -/, r7 \\ -� f r� uc�' .r•' . <^ P"nW 5"�- v OCId 401 �. I ��- \ y \ r / � 7:'Z: + oa 60"0 8l dMN. i' • * „ � , ,� M � / / // / / / 1 _ TI loadw, PuOd-Z n17, z -UL�.a/ ]7YxriVJd7n01IJv1I- »vx wm mnoadwwn . \ \ \ � I / �\ / r ` ' ,f •'rJ'�� r' , ' �! ' �: �• / /c ~ i "y C G' 1, ^'1 -_.i'. Taw.! is°°.` 1'w°°" \ \\ I / / � 1 1 I / // '�. �. .. •.. •.J� I IIS \ I I rn OI Maa025a0 N M aNra m0Y Ml2a ,ING clNJvm avm MuvJ awa CI I I I I I l / `� '� ' /' �C L1 1 iv_ L = �. =i rte~' _ \ J.'uJr mus a l HOIeIOC l 1 ( ` -r pedes IP�kYt nouaauam of Naw clNavanoww aroN Name n2ooN acv aaa anwrna � � ' J •' — „ ' - r ac .,. "l � -- .1 � \ r`. %�j � � I _ f_ T �anuviao 2a lmle suaw�er uur«vaaolo aNr stenaJ arMwaa ,oax�-II ! l'Y / is _ = L°A` 11-Q'� _,} >•!.� 'w. _ Av ` ".JI I \ \J•J rziu000u rvuaol mn mJns rnn xJw au wcun auwrn m rnuc Glm rn of ( 1 I /r� I _ 1 1``fo 1 a� t t "e'}a� _ - , _ �' _ " -la t i�• �. — _ T wunJosav mnno2rnu 1 / / 1 r /tJ nu.w ozxnNmr aN. gra avx Info 2e muc cun.iawJ m+IG xu anlslno rn.m e I I \ ` / z �••�•I II �- -u NJocn uwr,n> alueJ mace wc.vo 1 L 1 ILS IK 1 ry •,, C'_• = 11Jn(,�� 1< \ s I <l J 11 ti § \ \ a. �glwrJMwl r (CC20NOf620 act NOOapIW xTIMK aNr bMI1?LL Nlla wINw GIfHM]MA aNL _ `✓ , ➢ ax arJli rc a vm cp<�aoaJ Naunc cvwrJa au lova rmrw.m au mvul O utmlo \ ♦ <. '! _ �) (� "1 `-'w r 1 { I I l; _ S t" 1t 1 -TM t t' \ - 1 .� -1 1 I 1 \ `' — - n lraruxorr.M Nwln uarao anaa,rM x; eultrNS 1waNv MOTH tuN •rnJ+nGcnowa.nl I I � \ , °1 r n /" -_ rT a �., \ i k ._. _. \ / — � — � �- . -. ➢ aJ1rM JO coIGVaa ialO NOLLri1NOLUM N2uwa NUUv<SviaJ WL'ILOYJ NJIK NO.Q1 I H ! I _-,-� G• 1' d .'" .• ~1— ^ ^�.. l � 1 ` y / / J _ y*moumvunraarNo�c<uxlwcJmnmiaaaowx couvnaanJrnva N V un 'TI2naw x�N �auwt�+ollaweo-orm nun un vaomaao 7ivnrxa•rnao �nu rn JJeIe NO NOGYY CN 'NWtltaOOilrOLLaY aO TNIIN Nn w.WllllMJd MOB�FLmW Q�' h - ➢ � 2NI No xalr/Si2 zln mro al avpr,w rol �uou or« aura Irzl anonuw•u+o \ i / ^ (t�1)ao(, "c � 1 U '� i 1 I� �> � {$ r _ \ ' � \ � \ In / / / / / �- 3 O a,oln nu wawa a won a2awJ No •snavnc •awroJ •xOK'pNL TnM acuamuoo ` ` 1` �! ! \ ' 1 I r ➢ 1wnJ.rauvclalm NMpaG ccnr<a2m�wJ aNJamJuxnnKn Jo-waa 22 xu ! \ t ``\ I 11.1 �I �.- K��1a / J \�\ / \ \ J ��« I I / / / i v �vno,aJ✓olarlvaa colon of S aonov auwmww wo No O wvam<w. au vMa ywmx raw oawv,eo>a muc sLLrm,<a•caw m s - _ _ j 1 l4 K -� oci % / / / // smz•z<vn auva nwcruozcs wJJaJuc cauNa nlaaaa JVW war su . \ \ I 1 / / � � }� , •rte_ I __I yip_ I I ," 1 t _ ,� ��, L 1 ..�I / /�// / /// .+ _ w�unwwenioavoc.e aJ<w2ua alai aauvJwnaNauno rJwz ox winLNvuaw s - -� ,nom wnNGnJn m�n>�J�n a�n..Ir�Nna <w� 1 1 / anw Nua. aaaaa svM OJoi aauwnc alu caoun2v+c acylLox �'a.w axvJau __ sc mwu�S i_. _ I, 1 I II / -� aIW TIa'A,IVY Nan<MOLLYIaOIn OgLL9Nm OMLLNn nW ]INJVNOntlI'Allrfwi110p a 1 I I I Y/ f f aaav�IJn2x McaNrmric I , , _ _ -•-e < ..a, "` ti i_ /' ,, 1< , _ ,res_ �J. 1 I lW / /ar0�3-_ / _ z /�: ! / I I ,, , _ �'' ;<b•Ia - - -,- „ f w , . I , , �jm ,, � _ _ "�' \ \ I i I� II /////// I r'� � �.�.. ; ///„�iW / "- I -- I \ \\ (< LIQ < � - __ �_ �_' b, , 1,I � '%i�%����”" /� \ Il 1^il-i'^�.\ �///!/!//•- \ I I / �� F'ae 1`.<®' a �•1, , r'a`° // (�/ Lwa I\ \ \ 'III ��/% \ \\ j l 11 / / \ / III I// .c�.•. , I J J,6 7 ,r}Y �' c�iNors• \\\\\ / i J w(a \ - Q I+.4K• I , ' , Al $• � \\\ \ /!!l1 r+d1/ I /= \� \\ / ,! / i_ II111/( _-,� 1^ \'_ t u x • ;�'( \�\I f,l \�����_�f_ j/'/.ifl� Il/Iqj�/ it p L 1 III// / , 4G _ am � .6 ,', 1; � l•''J i r ara. T� / � I � — / / / ,. .r b�«,.•�' /// 1 ! / /! l // ,, \ ' (7" _ , , � � , t , R , �nusva / �/ �1 .I' J l l' .. `\ _ / / / MIN�/< ama ON )i!I/ \ / / / •c. - '- - ' ` rJ "I ,1 l / cs t - / �/ LI / I / _ " / / MIN IV rensrla / !!! �/ ' 4� u \ \\ �L th \ ", I//////�// 1�111tll;ll////!�/ r�1j17 % j \ \ Inn I/ / / / / / / / 1 9LBrt,J�'w! I l � / ,.\ , JN]cv,. ' dw vuiNIDIn 11 //� /i/'1 I I /�/ 1 !I .,.1 a.' i ,'/ 1 1 /if m Z 1 v / +� ^p /// // / / nhavlaarN�51 1 1 q<aLl � / / '/ ,.� � , :,• I - __ JM � \\ \ GS m _ S% All Ill �� I�I�.I,,r��,(�(l�\��\��� f 1 \ l 30 LONE I X 1 1 �NfSrING ;SWAY I �' SIN•\ �\ \ I 2 � 4Cp \ ~ 4 f \ Nw oV �i ' •moi-'+r{ Y ST �WATER I — Nw?i cL 136 134 — J `,,,ptgtttr nr►prr�,�i SII � � I .,23 D ,,••• Q�'t N �q'qp �� � a t � ZZ e � �� / or ItI 1 r , 1 y �Oi � � � � x � X •< X X y '` X k X k } k X E` x r x x X k X x X X X X FR4vQ/N x X y x % �X k X X k x ? C�l qX O S X X ",X- )e X :< XX XX XX�%CX `y�I��xxX } f / X XX X� x Xx xX kk r X X k X x x k ti. X x X X k X X x X k x X X h X X Y• x X X X X XXX xx� X XX } Xk k �